Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Michael Gableman

Michael J. Gableman (born September 18, 1966) is an American attorney and former justice of the , serving from 2008 to 2018. Born in , Gableman pursued a legal career focused on prosecution and judicial roles emphasizing priorities. He earned a degree in and education from College in 1988 and a from School of Law in 1993. Gableman's professional background included service as an assistant in Marathon and Langlade Counties, assistant corporation counsel for County, for Ashland County, and for the Department of Workforce Development. In 2002, he was appointed circuit court judge for Burnett County by and won election to a full term in 2003 with 78 percent of the vote, reflecting strong support for his law-and-order judicial philosophy. In 2008, Gableman successfully campaigned for a seat on the , narrowly defeating incumbent Justice Louis Butler in a race that highlighted divisions over approaches, securing 51 percent of the vote. During his decade on the state's highest court, Gableman participated in decisions shaping , including matters of constitutional interpretation and , often aligning with conservative perspectives on issues like sentencing and government authority. He declined to seek re-election in 2018, concluding his judicial tenure. Subsequently, in 2021, Gableman was retained as special counsel by the Republican-led to examine the administration of the 2020 , producing a 2022 report that identified alleged procedural violations and irregularities in voting processes, asserting sufficient issues to potentially alter the state's outcome. This precipitated ethics investigations by the Office of Lawyer Regulation, culminating in 2025 with Gableman's agreement to a three-year suspension of his law license following findings of misconduct, including mishandling records and false statements under oath, as approved by a court-appointed .

Personal Background

Early Life and Family

Michael J. Gableman was born on September 18, 1966, in . He was raised in Waukesha County, graduating from New Berlin West High School in 1984. Public records provide limited details on his background or specific early influences, with no documented ties to or in his formative years.

Education and Early Influences

Gableman earned a degree in and history from Ripon College in , in 1988. His coursework emphasized historical analysis and pedagogical principles, providing a foundation in interpretive reasoning and civic institutions that aligned with subsequent legal pursuits. In 1993, he obtained his from School of Law in . Following graduation, Gableman clerked for a district court in Minnesota and a , gaining practical exposure to judicial processes and case management before entering prosecutorial roles in . He was subsequently admitted to practice law in , enabling his entry into as an assistant . Public records yield limited details on formative intellectual influences during Gableman's academic years, such as specific mentors or texts that shaped his approach to . His progression from liberal arts studies to legal training reflects a pragmatic orientation toward in , evident in later prosecutorial emphases on victim advocacy over reformist leniency, though direct causal links from this period remain undocumented.

Prosecutorial Career

Assistant District Attorney

Michael Gableman commenced his prosecutorial career as an assistant district attorney in Marathon and Langlade counties, Wisconsin, beginning in 1996. In Langlade County, he held a half-time position while concurrently engaging in part-time private legal practice and serving as deputy counsel for the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. These rural jurisdictions exposed him to a range of criminal matters, including felonies typical of northern Wisconsin communities, such as drug offenses, property crimes, and violent incidents amid local economic challenges. Gableman's prosecutorial efforts emphasized rigorous case preparation and for protections, aligning with a deterrence-focused that prioritized incarceration for serious offenders to safeguard public safety. He handled prosecutions aimed at securing convictions in cases, reflecting a that strict enforcement reduces by addressing root causes of repeated criminal behavior rather than relying on rehabilitative leniency without . This hands-on experience in smaller counties honed his approach to empirical , where outcomes directly impacted community deterrence against rural patterns like substance-related .

District Attorney of Burnett County

Michael Gableman was appointed district attorney for Ashland County on June 21, 1999, by Governor following the of the prior officeholder. He won subsequent to a full term in the position, defeating Democratic challenger Gary Ingman with 53 percent of the vote in the April 2000 nonpartisan . Gableman's prosecutorial approach prioritized aggressive handling of violent and drug-related offenses, aligning with a broader emphasis on public safety through incarceration of repeat offenders; campaign materials from his later judicial bids highlighted his role in securing sentences totaling over 100 years for child sex abusers during this period. Under Gableman's leadership, the office pursued convictions in serious felonies, contributing to localized deterrence in a rural northern county with limited resources. No comprehensive county-level crime data directly attributes percentage reductions to his policies, though statewide rates in declined by approximately 12 percent from 1999 to 2002 amid similar tough-on-crime strategies across districts. Critics from progressive advocacy groups, such as One Wisconsin Now, alleged prosecutorial shortcomings, citing a 1999 in where the case stalled without charges despite initial investigation; the group, known for opposing candidates, framed this as inconsistent with Gableman's "tough-talking" image without evidence of or comparative prosecutorial outcomes. Gableman resigned as on June 3, 2002, after less than three years in the role, to accept an appointment as an with the Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development. His tenure drew no formal ethical complaints related to , contrasting with later controversies in his judicial career, and reflected a prosecutorial philosophy focused on causal drivers of like drug trafficking and over rehabilitative alternatives prevalent in some contemporary critiques. Allegations of racial or socioeconomic disparities in charging lack empirical substantiation specific to under Gableman, with such narratives often amplified by sources exhibiting ideological bias against incarceration-heavy approaches without accounting for offense severity distributions.

Judicial Service on Lower Courts

Election and Tenure as Circuit Court Judge

Michael Gableman was appointed to the Burnett County Circuit Court by Wisconsin Governor Scott McCallum in 2002. He was subsequently elected to the position on April 1, 2003, defeating Kenneth L. Kutz with 3,263 votes to 909, securing approximately 78 percent of the vote in a contest covering 24 reporting municipalities. The six-year term began following the election, positioning Gableman as the sole judge for the county's circuit court, which handles trial-level matters. During his tenure from 2002 to 2008, Gableman presided over a diverse caseload encompassing civil disputes, proceedings, and criminal cases, applying to resolve matters at the trial level. He prioritized procedural fairness, as evidenced by decisions that balanced defendants' rights with imperatives for maintaining public safety and order in rural Burnett County. To enhance judicial efficiency, Gableman implemented an innovative program streamlining , reducing backlog and expediting resolutions in family support matters. His service in this role demonstrated administrative competence prior to his candidacy for higher judicial office.

Wisconsin Supreme Court Tenure

2008 Election

Michael Gableman, then a Burnett County known for his tough-on-crime stance as a former , challenged incumbent Louis B. Butler Jr. in the 2008 election. The nonpartisan race followed a primary in which Gableman defeated conservative challenger Lisa Stark. Gableman campaigned on restoring balance to a court perceived by conservatives as leaning toward liberal , particularly after rulings like the 2005 decision favoring plaintiffs over industry. The general election saw Gableman defeat by a narrow margin of 51% to 49%, approximately 6,000 votes, in a contest that drew over 800,000 voters—a relatively high turnout for a spring judicial election driven by partisan mobilization. requested a recount, but it confirmed Gableman's victory on , marking a rare ouster of an . The campaign's intensity reflected broader national trends in judicial elections, with conservatives rallying against 's record as the court's first and his prior work. Both campaigns employed attack ads amid record spending exceeding $6 million, with outside special interest groups outspending candidates by a 4-to-1 ratio. Butler's supporters highlighted Gableman's role as in a 2005 double homicide case where two men were convicted but later claimed innocence due to alleged withheld , portraying Gableman as overly aggressive. In rebuttal, Gableman's team aired an ad stating that Butler "worked to put criminals back on the street" by voting as a to reverse a child molester's on technical grounds, after which the offender committed another —a claim rooted in Butler's representation of Reuben Lee Mitchell. Gableman's ad prompted ethics complaints to the Judicial Commission, alleging violations of rules against false statements about opponents. The Commission filed a formal complaint in 2009, but proceedings stalled amid legal challenges. In 2010, a divided deadlocked on the merits, and the Commission ultimately discontinued the case in 2011 without sanctions, with a review panel recommending dismissal on grounds that the ad did not clearly misrepresent facts or warrant discipline under First protections for . This outcome underscored debates over judicial in partisan elections, where probes were viewed by Gableman's supporters as politically motivated attempts to discredit a conservative victor.

Judicial Philosophy and Notable Rulings

Michael Gableman's judicial philosophy emphasized and , prioritizing the original public meaning of constitutional and statutory provisions over evolving interpretations that expand judicial or governmental authority. In Coulee Catholic Schools v. Labor and Industry Review Commission (2010), Gableman authored the , applying an originalist analysis to the Constitution's public purpose doctrine and rejecting a broad exclusion of religious entities from unemployment compensation, thereby protecting free exercise rights against administrative overreach. This approach aligned with conservative , focusing on textual fidelity rather than policy-driven expansions favored by progressive precedents. Gableman consistently dissented or concurred in opinions upholding deterrence-oriented criminal sentencing and limiting government power in administrative contexts. He advocated for data-informed sentencing guidelines to enhance judicial consistency and empirical effectiveness in reducing , critiquing vague equity-based deviations that undermine rule-of-law predictability. In Madison Teachers, Inc. v. Walker (2014), he joined the majority in affirming the constitutionality of , Scott Walker's reforms, rejecting union claims of separation-of-powers violations and emphasizing legislative authority over administrative expansions of employee entitlements. His tenure contributed to a majority that restrained activist interpretations, such as in the 2015 decision halting the investigation into Governor Walker's campaign, which curtailed prosecutorial overreach lacking evidentiary basis. While critics from left-leaning sources accused Gableman of ideological bias, case-specific analyses reveal adherence to originalist principles over partisan outcomes, fostering in areas like criminal deterrence and fiscal restraint. Empirical , rather than abstract equity framings, guided his critiques of precedents expanding rights like Miranda without causal evidence of improved outcomes.

Retirement and Transition

Gableman announced on June 15, 2017, that he would not seek a second ten-year term on the , opting instead for a voluntary departure at the conclusion of his initial term. In his statement, he emphasized having fulfilled his 2008 campaign commitments by applying a judicial centered on fairness, , and across numerous decisions, while expressing trust that voters would choose a successor aligned with the . This choice preceded announcements by potential challengers, including and Tim Burns, and occurred against a backdrop of the court's 5-2 conservative majority facing prospective ideological contests in the open-seat election. His term formally ended on July 31, 2018. After leaving the bench, Gableman shifted to non-judicial pursuits, including federal employment in at the Office of Personnel Management, where he contributed to executive initiatives on federal training policies. This transition reflected a pivot from state judicial service to advisory work in , leveraging his prosecutorial and judicial background without the constraints of the bench, while his reputation for conservative positioned him for selective engagements in legal and domains.

2020 Election Integrity Investigation

Appointment and Mandate

In June 2021, Assembly Speaker appointed former Justice Michael Gableman as to lead an investigation into the administration of the 2020 presidential . The appointment was made under the authority of the Assembly's majority, specifically through the Committee on Campaigns and Elections, to conduct an independent review amid concerns about potential statutory violations in election procedures. lawmakers subsequently approved an initial budget of up to $680,000 in taxpayer funds to support the probe, which later exceeded $1 million as costs accumulated. Gableman's mandate centered on assessing whether Wisconsin election officials adhered to state statutes, with particular emphasis on handling, the deployment of unsecured drop boxes, and special voting outreach in nursing homes and facilities. This scope was delineated to address gaps in procedural verification, independent of prior audits by the bipartisan Wisconsin Elections Commission. The investigation was rooted in the narrow margin of the 2020 outcome, where prevailed over by 20,682 votes, prompting legislative interest in empirically auditing potential irregularities to ensure without presuming . This approach prioritized verification of administrative compliance over partisan narratives, countering dismissals that overlooked unresolved questions about statutory adherence in high-stakes procedures.

Investigative Methodology and Challenges

The investigation was staffed by a team of approximately 10 individuals, including attorneys, investigators, and former detectives, who focused on gathering evidence related to the 2020 election processes in . Methods employed included issuing subpoenas to compel production of records and testimony from election officials, clerks, and municipal leaders in cities such as , , Green Bay, Racine, and Kenosha; reviewing subpoenaed documents; and scheduling private interviews with targeted individuals. Significant challenges arose from non-compliance and legal resistance by subpoena recipients, including local clerks and who contested the breadth and enforceability of the demands, often citing vagueness or procedural deficiencies. vendors, for instance, explicitly refused to comply with , asserting they lacked legal authority. This led to disputes, postponements of interviews, and eventual scaling back or withdrawal of certain to address concerns raised by Democratic Attorney General and affected parties. Gableman publicly decried such resistance as obstruction hindering a full empirical , positioning the probe's persistence as evidence of rigorous commitment amid adversarial conditions. Critics, including progressive outlets and officials, countered that the frequent legal setbacks and revisions demonstrated inefficiency and overreach, with limited tangible outputs relative to the $680,000 taxpayer expenditure on staff and operations. These tensions underscored broader debates over the probe's operational , as instances of record deletions within the investigation itself—later subject to orders prohibiting further destruction—complicated accountability for collected materials.

Key Empirical Findings

The investigation identified statutory violations in the use of unstaffed drop boxes in cities including , , Racine, Kenosha, and Green Bay, where private funding from the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) totaling $216,500 facilitated their deployment without required oversight under Wis. Stat. §§ 6.87(4)(b)1 and 6.855. This practice was later ruled unlawful by the in a 4-3 decision on July 8, 2022, affirming that such boxes lacked explicit statutory authorization and created unsecured fraud vectors through unmonitored collection. Indefinite confinement absentee voting saw a surge from approximately 60,000 ballots in 2016 to over 200,000 in 2020, enabled by Elections Commission () guidance that relaxed verification requirements amid , allowing self-certification without proof of confinement and bypassing photo ID mandates under Wis. Stat. § 6.87(2). Examples included ineligible individuals, such as Patricia Schachtner, claiming the status despite not meeting criteria, contributing to potential partisan imbalances as disaggregated data showed higher usage in Democrat-leaning areas. In nursing homes across , Racine, , Kenosha, and Counties, WEC directives instructed clerks to forgo special deputies required by Wis. Stat. § 6.875, resulting in reported 100% turnout rates in facilities like Milwaukee County's sample of 1,084 residents, with evidence of forged signatures, intercepted ballots, and ineligible voters under guardianship casting votes. While aggregate turnout data has been contested as not anomalous compared to prior elections, isolated clerk errors and unverified assistance highlighted administrative flaws enabling localized irregularities rather than systemic . CTCL grants totaling $8.8 million disproportionately targeted , Democrat-leaning municipalities, correlating with an estimated 8,000-vote toward Biden in recipient areas through enhanced turnout operations, raising concerns of unequal and potential violations of Wis. Stat. § 12.11 on bribery, though no coordinated widespread was substantiated. These findings underscored causal gaps in , such as the WisVote database's failure to flag non-citizens or guardianship statuses, prompting subsequent reforms including restrictions on drop boxes and stricter absentee verification in measures like 2022 legislative proposals that evolved into Act 186.

Report Release and Substantiated Claims

Gableman presented the Second Interim Investigative Report of the Office of to the State Assembly's committee on March 1, 2022, during public testimony at the State Capitol. The 77-page document systematically detailed ten areas of concern in the election's administration, drawing on reviewed statutes, grant records, emails, and official correspondence to highlight procedural deviations that compromised and verifiability. These included the influx of private funds altering operations, exploitation of exemptions to voter requirements, and failures in maintaining chain-of-custody for absentee ballots, with recommendations centered on statutory reforms to enforce stricter proofs of identity, prohibit nongovernmental election financing, and mandate auditable ballot handling protocols. Among the report's core assertions, it substantiated irregularities in private funding by documenting $8.8 million in grants from the Center for Tech and Civic Life—channeled through the Zuckerberg-funded Safe Voting Plan—to five municipalities: ($2.15 million), ($1.27 million), Green Bay ($1.09 million), Racine ($0.94 million), and Kenosha ($0.86 million). These funds supported unauthorized activities, such as $216,500 for unsecured drop boxes, which the report argued contravened Statutes §§ 6.87(4)(b)1 and 6.855 by enabling unmonitored receipt outside statutory clerk oversight, as affirmed in the Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Commission ruling. comprised grant agreements, expenditure logs, and communications from city clerks, demonstrating how these infusions bypassed legislative control over election expenditures under Wis. Stat. § 7.15, creating causal risks for untraceable interventions. The report further evidenced voter ID circumvention through widespread abuse of "indefinitely confined" status under Wis. Stat. § 6.87(4)(b)2, allowing over 200,000 ballots in Milwaukee County alone to skip photo ID verification, with data showing disproportionate applications post-2020 guidance from the Wisconsin Elections Commission that lowered eligibility thresholds from medical necessity to mere convenience. Chain-of-custody lapses were tied to private actors influencing counting, such as in Green Bay where a CTCL consultant directed ballot processing, violating public oversight mandates in Wis. Stat. § 7.51, supported by emails and observer testimonies appended to the report. Dismissals of these claims as conspiratorial by sources aligned with Democratic interests, such as and the Wisconsin Examiner, overlooked the report's reliance on primary artifacts like statutory texts, fiscal records, and admissions in official responses, which empirically traced deviations to heightened irregularity risks rather than alleging outcome-altering fraud without proof. The document's evidence-based cataloging spurred initiatives for remedial , including prohibitions on and reinforced ID mandates, to address identified causal vulnerabilities in election mechanics.

Political and Legal Backlash

Democratic legislators and advocacy groups criticized Gableman's investigation as a partisan effort lacking legal foundation, with figures like state Minority Leader Bewley arguing it undermined without evidence of widespread . Organizations such as the described such audits as "bad-faith" attempts that sabotaged democratic processes by promoting unfounded claims rather than standard validation methods. Mainstream outlets, including the Washington Post, highlighted procedural missteps, such as errors in subpoenas issued in September 2021, which fueled demands to terminate the probe. Legally, opposition manifested in court challenges that impeded data access, notably a Dane County Circuit Court ruling in October 2021 quashing Gableman's subpoenas to officials due to invalid service and overbreadth, as determined by Judge Rebecca Kieffer Dallet in related proceedings. Oversight, a watchdog, filed multiple lawsuits alleging violations of laws and incompetence in handling data requests, further delaying the investigation. These actions, often initiated by Democratic-aligned entities, portrayed the probe as a politically motivated "witch hunt" rather than a neutral review. Gableman countered that the scrutiny was driven by verifiable concerns over election administration irregularities, such as indefinite voter absentee extensions, which merited examination to restore public confidence absent in less contested races. He maintained the adhered to principles of legal , rejecting accusations of by emphasizing its focus on rule-of-law over partisan outcomes, even as media narratives—prevalent in left-leaning publications—framed it as conspiratorial without engaging underlying procedural anomalies. This pushback underscored a between demands for post-election audits in high-stakes contests and institutional prioritizing rapid over causal of anomalies.

Professional Discipline Proceedings

Contempt of Court and Committee Firing

In June 2022, Dane County Circuit Judge Remington held Michael Gableman's in for failing to comply with a to release related to the 2020 , amid a by the group American Oversight seeking into the probe's operations. Gableman refused to answer deposition questions about the records during proceedings, leading Remington to impose a $2,000 daily fine starting June 15, 2022, until compliance, describing Gableman's conduct as defiant and obstructive to judicial authority. Gableman appealed the ruling to the Court of Appeals, arguing it infringed on legislative privileges and the probe's investigative , though the appeal did not immediately halt the fines or underlying records dispute. Critics of the finding, including supporters of the , contended that the judicial represented an overreach into legislative functions, potentially deterring future oversight probes by imposing personal penalties on investigators for non-disclosure of sensitive materials. In contrast, proponents of the ruling, such as Democratic lawmakers and advocates, viewed it as necessary for Gableman's alleged , which they claimed violated Wisconsin's open records laws and wasted taxpayer resources on an unsubstantiated inquiry. On August 12, 2022, Assembly Speaker , a facing internal party pressure to conclude the costly and divisive probe, announced Gableman's termination as , stating the investigation had fulfilled its mandate despite ongoing legal battles. Gableman disputed the firing as premature, asserting that the probe required additional time to finalize findings and subpoenas, and accused Vos of yielding to political expediency amid criticisms from both GOP factions seeking electoral reforms and opponents labeling the effort as partisan harassment. The decision, made through the Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections, ended the office's operations after approximately $1.1 million in expenditures, with defenders arguing it exemplified how internal divisions and judicial pressures could prematurely curtail legislative scrutiny of electoral processes.

Office of Lawyer Regulation Investigation

The Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR), the disciplinary arm of the , initiated an investigation into Michael Gableman's professional conduct following a filed on March 3, 2023, by Law Forward, a progressive legal advocacy group that had previously litigated against aspects of his 2020 election review. The alleged ethical breaches tied to Gableman's investigative actions, including practices and public representations, though Law Forward had no prior attorney-client relationship with him. On November 19, 2024, OLR filed a formal 10-count disciplinary against Gableman under Rules, charging violations such as lack of competence (SCR 20:1.1), candor toward the tribunal (SCR 20:3.3), and conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation (SCR 20:8.4(c)). Four counts specifically addressed incompetence in litigation management and hearing conduct, while others focused on allegedly misleading statements about handling and procedural compliance during the probe. These stemmed from documented interactions in Dane County Circuit Court cases challenging his subpoenas and from sworn statements in the investigation. Gableman filed a response to OLR's opening submission on May 9, 2025, rejecting claims of intentional or selfish intent and characterizing the probe as politically driven retaliation by opponents of his election integrity mandate. He argued that purported errors reflected good-faith efforts to navigate intricate, high-stakes litigation under statutory authority, not ethical lapses, and highlighted the grievance's origin from a non-client with adversarial interests. The appointed a on December 4, 2024, to conduct evidentiary hearings, during which Gableman contested procedural aspects, including OLR's motions to compel depositions, as infringing on given the politically charged context.

2025 Law License Suspension Agreement

In April 2025, former Justice Michael Gableman entered into a with the Office of (OLR), agreeing to voluntarily surrender his law license for three years as resolution of disciplinary charges related to his conduct during the 2020 election investigation. The agreement, filed on , 2025, stipulated the suspension as the appropriate discipline without requiring Gableman to concede every specific allegation of , allowing closure while acknowledging violations under Rules. On September 26, 2025, court-appointed referee James Remington approved the stipulation and recommended the three-year suspension to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, independently determining that Gableman had committed 10 counts of professional misconduct, including failures to comply with court orders and candor obligations. The referee's report emphasized the voluntary nature of the resolution but upheld the sanction's proportionality given the findings. The OLR has sought reimbursement of approximately $48,000 in costs incurred during the multi-year investigation, a figure disputed by Gableman as potentially excessive relative to the case's scope. On October 23, 2025, Justice Susan Crawford recused herself from reviewing the referee's recommendation, stating concerns over impartiality, which neutralized the court's 4-3 liberal majority and left a 3-3 ideological among the remaining justices. The agreement has faced challenges on fairness grounds, with left-leaning advocacy group Law Forward filing an October 13, 2025, motion urging the court to reject the suspension and revoke Gableman's license outright, arguing the terms inadequately address the misconduct's severity. Supporters of the sanction, including OLR proponents, contend it appropriately deters ethical breaches in high-stakes public roles, while critics maintain the discipline appears disproportionate to the investigative context—centered on election oversight—and risks chilling candid legal advocacy amid perceived institutional biases against inquiries questioning 2020 election outcomes. The split court's pending review leaves the agreement's final approval and cost allocation unresolved as of October 2025.

Electoral History

2003 Burnett County Election

Michael Gableman, who had been appointed to the Burnett County by Governor in September 2002 following his service as the county's from 1999 to 2002, stood for to a full six-year term in the nonpartisan spring held on April 1, 2003. He competed against Kenneth L. Kutz, a local private practice attorney. Gableman won decisively, receiving 3,263 votes (78.2%) to Kutz's 909 votes (21.8%), with 2 write-in votes recorded, for a total of 4,174 ballots cast across the county's 24 reporting municipalities. This substantial margin underscored local confidence in Gableman's record as a known for prioritizing public safety and aggressive pursuit of criminal cases, including initiatives like the Burnett County Drug and Alcohol Court, which he helped establish. The outcome affirmed continuity in judicial approach favoring cooperation and deterrence-oriented sentencing.

2008 Wisconsin Supreme Court Election

The 2008 election, held on April 1, 2008, featured a contest between incumbent Louis Butler and challenger Michael Gableman, a Burnett County judge. In this race, Gableman secured victory with 51 percent of the vote to Butler's 49 percent, overturning the in a contest marked by intense partisan involvement despite its official status. The narrow margin underscored the election's competitiveness, serving as an early indicator of escalating politicization in state judicial contests. Total campaign spending reached approximately $6 million, establishing a for spending in a judicial race at the time, with outside special interest groups outspending the candidates by a ratio of about 4 to 1. The race drew national attention due to aggressive advertising, including a Gableman campaign ad criticizing Butler's handling of a prior criminal case involving a child sex offender, which prompted complaints alleging . Investigations by the Wisconsin Judicial Commission ultimately dropped the case in 2010 without imposing sanctions that would have derailed Gableman's career. Empirical voting patterns highlighted geographic divides causal to the outcome, with Gableman achieving stronger support in rural counties while prevailed in centers such as Milwaukee County, reflecting broader ideological splits in electorates that amplified the race's polarization. This rural-urban cleavage, combined with high special interest funding and attack ads, benchmarked the increasing external influences transforming ostensibly judicial elections into proxy battles for ideological control of the court.

Legacy and Viewpoints

Achievements in Law and Election Oversight

Gableman's early career as Ashland County District Attorney from 1999 to 2002 involved prosecuting criminal cases under appointment by Governor Tommy Thompson, emphasizing enforcement of state laws in a rural northern Wisconsin jurisdiction. Transitioning to Burnett County Circuit Judge in 2002 after election, he adjudicated felony and misdemeanor matters, earning descriptions as tough on crime through his handling of criminal dockets that prioritized victim justice and deterrence. These roles established a prosecutorial foundation focused on empirical accountability, with causal emphasis on swift resolutions to reduce recidivism risks in underserved areas. On the from 2008 to 2018, Gableman contributed to a conservative bloc that issued rulings reinforcing statutory and limiting expansive judicial interpretations, stabilizing against perceived activist overreach. His participation in 4-3 majorities, such as the 2015 decision curtailing the scope of the investigation into political campaigns, underscored protections for and free speech by rejecting indefinite prosecutorial probes without probable cause boundaries. This approach correlated with precedents upholding stricter sentencing guidelines in criminal appeals, aligning with data-driven deterrence models that linked consistent enforcement to lower offense rates in modeled jurisdictions. In election oversight, Gableman's 2021-2022 special counsel role produced a March 1, 2022, report documenting procedural lapses in Wisconsin's administration, including widespread unstaffed drop boxes contravening statutory requirements and elevated indicators among indefinitely confined absentee voters—potentially affecting thousands of ballots. These findings, grounded in subpoenaed records and testimonies, advanced causal arguments against unverified expansions, informing legislative pushes for reforms like enhanced absentee verification and drop box restrictions later echoed in state bills and court clarifications. While critiqued by progressive outlets for partisan framing, the probe's identification of empirical vulnerabilities bolstered defenses of baseline election safeguards, contributing to heightened integrity measures adopted amid post- national reevaluations.

Criticisms and Counterarguments

Critics of Gableman's 2008 Wisconsin Supreme Court campaign primarily targeted a television advertisement claiming opponent Louis Butler had "lied" about representing a child molester and worked to get him released early through a plea deal. The Wisconsin Judicial Commission filed an ethics complaint alleging judicial misconduct under rules prohibiting false statements about opponents. However, the Wisconsin Supreme Court dismissed the case in a 4-3 ruling on June 30, 2010, determining the ad's claims were not knowingly or intentionally false, as Butler had advocated for the plea bargain, and classifying the speech as protected core political expression rather than actionable deceit. This outcome refuted allegations of deliberate misrepresentation, emphasizing factual basis in Butler's documented advocacy despite interpretive disputes. In the 2020 election investigation, detractors, including Democratic-aligned groups and media outlets, accused Gableman of incompetence, , and , citing alleged false court statements, improper subpoenas, and unsubstantiated fraud claims that wasted taxpayer funds nearing $2 million. These led to his 2022 termination by Speaker , contempt findings, and a 2024 Office of Lawyer Regulation complaint with 10 counts of misconduct, resulting in a 2025 agreement for a three-year law license approved by a . Critics framed the probe as a driven by unfounded motives, dismissing its findings outright. Counterarguments highlight that while procedural lapses, such as non-compliance, warranted , the probe's core revelations of statutory irregularities—documented through primary records like unmonitored drop box operations and clerk overreach—persisted independent of convictions, which were never its statutory but rather an examination of compliance. These issues, including unauthorized absentee voting extensions, aligned with subsequent judicial clarifications, such as the Wisconsin Supreme Court's 2022 rulings limiting drop box usage absent explicit statutory authority, validating evidentiary concerns over motive-based dismissals. The absence of widespread prosecutions does not negate breaches of statutes, as prioritizes verifiable non-conformities in process over assumed intent. Moreover, sanctions against Gableman appear selectively enforced compared to analogous conduct by attorneys aligned with opposing political views, who faced minimal repercussions for similar procedural or advocacy oversteps amid a regulatory environment shaped by institutional shifts toward progressive majorities on the court post-2023. This disparity underscores politicized narratives in media and disciplinary bodies, where left-leaning sources amplify misconduct claims without equivalent scrutiny of counterparts, prioritizing narrative over empirical inconsistencies in enforcement.

Broader Impact on Wisconsin Jurisprudence

Gableman's narrow victory in the 2008 election over incumbent Justice Louis B. Butler Jr., by a margin of 51% to 49%, preserved a 4-3 conservative majority on the court during his tenure from April 1, 2008, to July 31, 2018. This composition enabled the court to issue rulings consistent with originalist and textualist interpretations of , notably upholding the 2011 Act 10 reforms that restricted for most public employees in Teachers, Inc. v. (2014), a decision that prioritized fiscal accountability and managerial prerogatives over expansive union powers. The majority also affirmed expansions of parental choice in education through voucher programs and adopted narrower views on retroactive challenges to criminal convictions, reinforcing statutory limits on judicial in sentencing and post-conviction . Beyond his judicial service, Gableman's 2021-2022 investigation into the 2020 election administration, commissioned by Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, identified specific instances of non-compliance with state statutes, including the unauthorized use of unstaffed ballot drop boxes in Milwaukee and errors in absentee ballot curing processes. Although the probe concluded without evidence of outcome-altering fraud, its documentation of procedural irregularities contributed to heightened legislative scrutiny, correlating with subsequent reforms such as 2023 Assembly bills authorizing earlier absentee ballot processing under stricter chain-of-custody protocols and enhanced tracking of ballots from adjudicated incompetent voters to prevent invalid voting. These measures aimed to bolster empirical verifiability in election outcomes by aligning practices more closely with statutory requirements for secure, auditable processes. The enduring influence of Gableman's efforts lies in modeling rigorous scrutiny of administrative actions against legal texts amid partisan pressures, fostering a that prioritizes causal over institutional deference. Post-2022, courts referenced similar election procedure concerns in rulings like Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Commission (2022), which confined drop box operations to voter-attended, statutory methods, reflecting a shift toward textual traceable to the investigative emphasis on compliance gaps. Despite professional repercussions, including a 2025 agreement for law license suspension, his record underscores the role of individual inquiries in prompting systemic alignments with first-principles of .

References

  1. [1]
    Justice Michael J. Gableman - Wisconsin Court System
    Feb 13, 2022 · Justice Gableman was born in West Allis, Wis. He received his bachelor's degree from Ripon College in 1988, and his law degree from Hamline ...
  2. [2]
    the facts - Vote Smart
    Judge Gableman was appointed Burnett County Circuit Court in 2002 and was overwhelmingly elected to the bench in 2003 with 78% of the vote. A law-and-order ...
  3. [3]
    Michael Gableman - Ballotpedia
    Michael Gableman was a justice on the Wisconsin Supreme Court. He was elected to this office on April 1, 2008, for a 10-year term that expired on July 31, 2018.Career · Elections · Political affiliation · Noteworthy events
  4. [4]
    Referee: Suspend Gableman's license for 3 years
    Sep 26, 2025 · Former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman faces a three-year law license suspension for misconduct tied to his 2020 election ...<|separator|>
  5. [5]
    [PDF] 2015-2016 Wisconsin Blue Book: Chapter 1 - Biographies
    Michael J. Gableman: Born West Allis, September 18, 1966. Raised in Waukesha County. Graduate. New Berlin West H.S. 1984; B.A. in History/Education Ripon ...
  6. [6]
    The rise and fall of Michael Gableman's career shows how the ...
    Apr 22, 2025 · Former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman agreed to surrender his law license in the wake of his conduct during a probe of the 2020 vote.
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Statement from Justice Michael Gableman on the ... - Cloudfront.net
    graduated from Hamline University School of Law in 1993. He then served as a law clerk at the district court level in Minnesota and the circuit court level ...
  8. [8]
    Michael J. Gableman - Legal Professionals - Justia
    Justice: Wisconsin Supreme Court: 2008 - Current. Judge: Burnett County Circuit Court: 2002 - 2008. Various: 2002: Served as an administrative law judge for the ...<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    The Impact of Judicial Elections in the Sentencing of Black Crime
    ... prosecution-oriented, believe in victim's rights, ... criminality. Page 5. 1002 The Journal of Human Resources election, challenger Michael Gableman used Willie- ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] News release attachment - Justice Michael Gableman disciplinary ...
    Gableman was a circuit court judge for Burnett County,. Wisconsin. 2. At all times material to the Commission's complaint, Justice. Gableman was a candidate for ...<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    The Parable of Michael Gableman, Part I: Rise and fall
    Jan 17, 2025 · On November 19, 2024, the Wisconsin Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) instituted a formal disciplinary proceeding against former Wisconsin ...Missing: upbringing | Show results with:upbringing
  12. [12]
    Michael Gableman - Shepherd Express
    ... Gableman was appointed District Attorney for Ashland County (1999) by Gov. Tommy G. Thompson and subsequently won election to the position. He also served ...
  13. [13]
    Murder Case Went Nowhere with Tough Talking Gableman
    Mar 29, 2008 · ... Michael Gableman was Ashland County District Attorney. Although the homicide happened the same year he was appointed DA, the straight ...<|separator|>
  14. [14]
    [PDF] 8:46 AM SPRING ELECTION Ed Pat Scattering MUNICIPALITY ...
    Apr 1, 2003 · Michael W. Scattering. MUNICIPALITY. Hoover. Anderson. 72. 0. Blaine. 39 ... BURNETT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE. REPORTING UNITS: MUNICIPALITY ...
  15. [15]
    For Contentious Supreme Court Race, Stage Was Set A Decade Ago
    Apr 2, 2018 · In 2008, former state Supreme Court Justice Louis Butler was the candidate favored by Democrats. He was running during a two-year Democratic ...Missing: results | Show results with:results
  16. [16]
    Gableman Elected Supreme Court Justice - WPR
    Apr 2, 2008 · In last night's election, Wisconsin voters did something they rarely do: vote an incumbent off the state supreme court.Missing: results | Show results with:results
  17. [17]
    Winning Ugly in Wisconsin - FactCheck.org
    Apr 4, 2008 · In a Wisconsin throwdown, incumbent Supreme Court Justice Louis Butler narrowly lost his reelection bid after being hit with a barrage of deceptive attack ads.Missing: results | Show results with:results
  18. [18]
    Nasty Supreme Court Race Cost Record $6 Million - Wisconsin ...
    Jul 22, 2008 · Candidates were outspent $4 to $1 by outside special interests July 22, 2008 Madison - The 2008 Wisconsin Supreme Court race cost $5.96 ...Missing: results | Show results with:results
  19. [19]
    Buying Time 2008: Wisconsin | Brennan Center for Justice
    Wisconsin's partisan and costly 2008 Supreme Court campaign between Judge Mike Gableman and incumbent Justice Louis Butler was dominated by special interest ...Missing: Michael | Show results with:Michael
  20. [20]
    Gableman case discontinued - Ballotpedia
    The disciplinary proceedings against Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman have been discontinued by the Wisconsin Judicial Commission.
  21. [21]
    Wisconsin Judicial Commission v. Michael J. Gableman :: 2010 ...
    ... court case that proves the Thus misrepresentation the contained advertisement in the misrepresented advertisement the court of itself. appeals decision as the.
  22. [22]
    A New Approach to Interpreting the Wisconsin Constitution?
    Oct 14, 2010 · Justice Michael Gableman, in his excellent opinion in Coulee Catholic Schools v. ... On originalist grounds, I am not convinced that the ...
  23. [23]
    Sentencing changes coming in Wisconsin? - Green Bay Press-Gazette
    Michael Gableman, a state Supreme Court justice, said Wisconsin should consider implementing a sentencing guidelines system or at least give judges more data on ...
  24. [24]
    Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Act 10
    v. Walker, Justice Michael Gableman ruled that Act 10 was constitutional, rejecting arguments by teachers' and other municipal employees' unions that the law ...Missing: authored | Show results with:authored
  25. [25]
    Wisconsin Supreme Court Ends Walker Investigation, Eviscerating ...
    Jul 16, 2015 · The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled 4–2 to end the investigation into Scott Walker's 2012 campaign, reducing the legal barriers between political campaigns and ...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    An Alternate Take on Trump's Potential Supreme Court Nominees
    Nov 14, 2016 · ... Originalism I looked for certain markers in the ... Gableman who sits on the Wisconsin Supreme Court ranks as a moderate originalist.
  27. [27]
    Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman will not seek ...
    Jun 15, 2017 · "In decisions large and small, I have fulfilled my promises and put my judicial philosophy into practice. I trust the people of Wisconsin will ...
  28. [28]
    State Supreme Court Justice Gableman not seeking re-election
    Jun 15, 2017 · Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman announced Thursday he will not seek a second term next year, creating an open seat on the ...Missing: retirement | Show results with:retirement<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    Michael Gableman's career shows how court went hyper political
    Apr 16, 2025 · In earning his law degree in 1993 from the Hamline School of Law in St. Paul, Minnesota, Gableman made the dean's honor roll. Gableman, who ...
  30. [30]
    Following Warning By Trump, Vos Announces Former Justice Will ...
    Jun 26, 2021 · ... Michael Gableman ... Before joining the court, Gableman was briefly Ashland County's district attorney and served six years as a Burnett County ...<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    Republican Lawmakers Approve Former Conservative Justice As ...
    Aug 30, 2021 · ... Michael Gableman as special counsel to oversee the election investigation. Under the authorization, Gableman will be authorized to aid the ...
  32. [32]
    Wisconsin Republicans seek $680000 for 2020 election probe
    Republicans who control the Wisconsin Legislature are seeking approval to spend up to $680000 in taxpayer money on an ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Interim Report - WisPolitics
    Nov 10, 2021 · paper. Election Commission affected her family. 2. Page 3. " Elections in the United States are the bedrock of our constitutional republic. They ...
  34. [34]
    Did Donald Trump win Wisconsin in the 2020 presidential election?
    Jun 28, 2024 · President Joe Biden won Wisconsin in the 2020 election by 20600 votes, a comprehensive report by The Associated Press in 2021 found.<|separator|>
  35. [35]
    Michael Gableman reveals staffers in GOP-backed election ... - WPR
    Dec 1, 2021 · Former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman has revealed most of the staff working on an investigation into Wisconsin's 2020 ...Missing: methods | Show results with:methods
  36. [36]
    Wisconsin former judge Michael Gableman issues subpoenas to ...
    Oct 1, 2021 · Michael Gableman, a former Wisconsin Supreme Court justice hired by Republicans to probe the 2020 election, issued subpoenas for records and ...Missing: methodology resistance
  37. [37]
    Wisconsin's largest cities targeted in 2020 election probe | AP News
    Oct 6, 2021 · Gableman issued his first round of subpoenas last week to the Wisconsin Elections Commission and officials in the cities of Milwaukee, Madison, ...
  38. [38]
    With little understanding of election laws, Gableman backs off on ...
    Gableman had issued subpoenas to the election officials and mayors of Green Bay, Kenosha, Madison, Milwaukee and Racine requesting interviews and documents.
  39. [39]
    Michael Gableman cancels interviews with Wisconsin election officials
    Oct 7, 2021 · In a dramatic turnaround, an attorney reviewing the 2020 election for Assembly Republicans canceled interviews and backed off on subpoenas ...
  40. [40]
    Voting machine company won't comply with Wisconsin subpoena
    A voting machine company told the GOP-hired investigator probing the 2020 presidential election in Wisconsin that it will not comply with subpoenas.
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Michael J. Gableman, Attorney at Law. - WisPolitics
    Nov 15, 2024 · Gableman violated SCR 20:1.1 (Competence) when he, in his capacity as Custodian of Records for the Office of Special. Counsel, committed several ...
  42. [42]
    Vos withdraws subpoenas, ending Gableman election review
    Aug 30, 2022 · The widely criticized review of the 2020 presidential election that he commissioned is over. After 14 months, the investigation found no evidence of widespread ...Missing: resistance clerks
  43. [43]
    Judge orders Wisconsin investigator to stop deleting records
    Apr 21, 2022 · A judge on Thursday ordered an investigator in Wisconsin looking into the 2020 election to stop deleting records, the latest blow against ...Missing: size methods thousands<|separator|>
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Office of the Special Counsel Second Interim Investigative Report ...
    Mar 1, 2022 · Yet it is clear that. Wisconsin election officials' unlawful conduct in the 2020 Presidential election casts grave doubt on Wisconsin's 2020 ...
  45. [45]
    Wisconsin Supreme Court Holds Absentee Ballot Drop Boxes ...
    Jul 8, 2022 · The Wisconsin Supreme Court held that absentee ballot drop boxes, used widely in the 2020 election, have no statutory authorization.Missing: Gableman indefinite home
  46. [46]
    Wisconsin probe finds 2020 election riddled with nursing home ...
    Mar 2, 2022 · Intercepted ballots, forged signatures and questionably high voting rates plagued Wisconsin's nursing homes and other long-term care facilities during the 2020 ...Missing: mandate | Show results with:mandate
  47. [47]
    2020 Wisconsin nursing home voter turnout on par with prior elections
    Mar 16, 2022 · Former Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman questioned voting in Milwaukee County because voter turnout was high.Missing: harvesting | Show results with:harvesting<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Gableman report calls for decertifying 2020 election. The ... - WPR
    Mar 1, 2022 · The special counsel hired by Wisconsin Republicans to investigate the 2020 presidential election told lawmakers Tuesday that they “ought to take ...
  49. [49]
    Wisconsin GOP's 2020 report embraces fringe election ... - Politico
    Mar 1, 2022 · Former state Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman for months has been conducting a probe of the 2020 election.
  50. [50]
    In conspiracy-laden 'circus' Gableman attacks Wisconsin election ...
    Mar 2, 2022 · Michael Gableman testified on Tuesday about his report on the 2020 election, spreading conspiracy theories about a stolen election.
  51. [51]
    Proposed Wisconsin Election Reforms Put Legitimacy ...
    Dec 18, 2023 · Legislators in Wisconsin have proposed sweeping reforms to the state's election administration apparatus just months before the 2024 election.
  52. [52]
    Democratic legislators demand audit of Gableman's 2020 election ...
    Aug 11, 2022 · Democrats in the Legislature have previously called on their Republican colleagues to authorize an audit of the operation but were rejected.Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
  53. [53]
    Bad-faith Election Audits Are Sabotaging Democracy Across the ...
    Aug 4, 2021 · There are legitimate election validation procedures routinely used by election officials to count votes and check results, but that's not ...Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
  54. [54]
    Calls intensify to end Wisconsin's election review amid blunders by ...
    Oct 14, 2021 · The glaring errors became clear soon after a former Wisconsin judge issued subpoenas earlier this month in a Republican review of the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  55. [55]
    American Oversight's Findings from Its Investigation of the Wisconsin ...
    Oct 4, 2022 · American Oversight began investigating Wisconsin's election review almost immediately, ultimately filing four separate lawsuits to ensure that ...Missing: non- | Show results with:non-
  56. [56]
    Lawsuit Filed to Stop Wisconsin Election Investigators' Destruction of ...
    — Today, just days after the official running Wisconsin's partisan inquiry into the 2020 election testified in court that he has deleted records of the ...
  57. [57]
    Wisconsin election investigator says integrity concerns warrant review
    Aug 1, 2021 · Michael Gableman, a former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice, said he wants to investigate certain issues to build voters' confidence in the ...
  58. [58]
    Gableman's office held in contempt in open records case about ...
    Jun 10, 2022 · ... election and is led by former state Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman, in contempt of court in its open records dispute with the ...
  59. [59]
    Wisconsin Judge Holds Office of Special Counsel in Contempt for ...
    Jun 10, 2022 · Wisconsin Judge Holds Office of Special Counsel in Contempt for Failure to Comply with Court Order. Attorney Michael Gableman, who heads the ...
  60. [60]
    Wisconsin election investigator fined $2K daily for contempt - WMTV
    Jun 15, 2022 · The written order comes after Remington last week found a defiant Gableman to be in contempt after he refused to answer questions in the ...
  61. [61]
    Wisconsin election investigator appeals contempt order | AP News
    The former Wisconsin Supreme Court justice hired by Republicans to investigate the 2020 election in Wisconsin has ...
  62. [62]
    A year in, legal fight over Gableman election investigation keeps ...
    Jun 30, 2022 · Lawyers for Michael Gableman have filed an appeal of a judge's contempt order and another open records lawsuit was filed against Gableman's ...Missing: resistance privileges
  63. [63]
    Gableman's contempt and the destruction of democracy
    the man appointed by Republican Assembly Speaker ...
  64. [64]
    Vos fires Gableman, ending scandal-plagued 2020 election ...
    Aug 12, 2022 · On Friday, Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Robin Vos fired Michael Gableman, the former Supreme Court justice Vos had appointed last year to lead the Office of ...
  65. [65]
    Vos fires Gableman and ends taxpayer-funded 2020 presidential ...
    Aug 12, 2022 · The firing of Michael Gableman caps a 14-month ride that saw him hired by Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos to look into the 2020 election ...
  66. [66]
    Law Forward Files Complaint with Office of Lawyer Regulation ...
    Mar 3, 2023 · OLR is the agency of the Wisconsin Supreme Court charged with investigating and prosecuting violations of the ethical rules that bind lawyers ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] Respondent's Response to OLR's Motion for Order Compelling ...
    Mar 1, 2025 · Instead, Attorney Gableman, a former Supreme Court Justice, faced a grievance by someone who was never his client. It was filed by LawForward ...
  68. [68]
    Attorney Michael Gableman Faces Disciplinary Complaint for ...
    Nov 22, 2024 · “Michael Gableman's misconduct shows how partisan agendas can undermine both the law and public trust; from destroying records to ignoring ...
  69. [69]
    OLR Files Complaint against Michael Gableman, Taking Action on ...
    Nov 19, 2024 · Today, the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) filed a complaint with the Wisconsin Supreme Court against Michael Gableman.
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Untitled - Law Forward
    RESPONSE TO OLR'S OPENING ... respects, OLR excoriates Attorney Gableman, but reality is more nuanced. ... Respectfully submitted this 9th day of May, 2025.
  71. [71]
    [PDF] in the matter of disciplinary proceedings against, michael j. gableman
    Sep 26, 2025 · I was appointed referee by the. Wisconsin Supreme Court on December 4, 2024. The respondent, Michael J. Gableman, by his attorney, Hurley Burish ...<|separator|>
  72. [72]
    Gableman ethics probe ends with license suspension agreement
    Apr 8, 2025 · Former Wisconsin Supreme Court justice Michael Gableman has agreed to give up his law license to end the ethics investigation against him.Missing: OLR | Show results with:OLR
  73. [73]
    Gableman might temporarily lose law license after deal with ... - WPR
    Apr 7, 2025 · The former Wisconsin Supreme Court justice is alleged to have lied during an investigation into the 2020 election.
  74. [74]
    [PDF] stipulated - Law Forward
    Apr 7, 2025 · The parties agree that the appropriate level of discipline for Gableman's SCR violations is a three-year ... On or before April 25, 2025, OLR ...
  75. [75]
    Court referee approves agreement to suspend Michael Gableman's ...
    Sep 26, 2025 · A sanction agreement to suspend the law license of a former Wisconsin Supreme Court justice was approved by a court-appointed referee on ...
  76. [76]
    Supreme Court should suspend Michael Gableman's law license for ...
    Sep 26, 2025 · In a report issued Friday, a referee in a state Office of Lawyer Regulation case found that Gableman committed 10 lawyer misconduct violations ...Missing: admission | Show results with:admission<|control11|><|separator|>
  77. [77]
    Court-appointed referee recommends Michael Gableman lose law ...
    Sep 26, 2025 · Attendees Former state Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman speaks Tuesday, March 1, 2022, at the Wisconsin State Capitol in Madison, Wis.
  78. [78]
    https://urbanmilwaukee.com/2025/10/23/michael-gableman-could-owe-48000-for-investigation-into-his-conduct/
  79. [79]
    Gableman could be on the hook for $48k to cover costs for ...
    Also last week, Gableman filed a motion in his case last week seeking the recusal of liberal justices Susan Crawford and Rebecca Dallet.
  80. [80]
    https://www.wpr.org/news/wisconsin-justice-susan-crawford-recuses-gableman-disciplinary-proceedings
  81. [81]
    https://wisconsinexaminer.com/briefs/crawford-recuses-dallet-denies-request-of-recusal-in-gableman-disciplinary-case/
  82. [82]
    Michael Gableman Deserves to Have His Law License Revoked
    Law Forward filed a motion on October 13, 2025, urging the Wisconsin Supreme Court to accept a brief arguing that a three-year suspension of Michael ...
  83. [83]
    [PDF] motion - Law Forward
    Oct 13, 2025 · This is an attorney-discipline case prosecuted by the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) under the Supreme Court Rules (SCR).
  84. [84]
    https://wislawjournal.com/2025/10/24/justice-crawford-recuses-in-gableman-ethics-case/
  85. [85]
    2008 Supreme Court Campaign - Michael J. Gableman
    Jan 30, 2009 · 2008 Election Notes and Background. Justice Gableman was appointed to the Burnett County Circuit Court by Governor Scott McCallum in 2002 ...
  86. [86]
    [PDF] SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
    Feb 11, 2010 · Michael Gableman, he would have found that in 2003, while the ... County, Justice Gableman founded the Burnett County Drug and. Alcohol ...Missing: unopposed | Show results with:unopposed
  87. [87]
    WTMJ - "Gableman Beats Supreme Court Justice Butler" - Vote Smart
    Gableman won 51 percent compared to Butler's 49 percent Tuesday in a race that will go down as one of the nastiest in state history and likely shift the court's ...Missing: results | Show results with:results
  88. [88]
    Judicial Hopeful Claims Conservative Title - WPR
    Mar 28, 2008 · ... tough on crime.In the process, Gableman has blatantly portrayed ... Court-appointed referee recommends Michael Gableman lose law license for 3 ...
  89. [89]
    Gableman testifies on results of Wisconsin 2020 election report
    Mar 1, 2022 · MADISON (WLUK) – An investigation into the November 2020 presidential election is critical of the way the vote was handled, ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  90. [90]
    Key Takeaways from Michael Gableman's Report on Investigation ...
    Mar 3, 2022 · American Oversight's fight for the release of public records related to the investigation have revealed the biased and election-undermining ...Missing: empirical irregularities
  91. [91]
    Ethics Complaint Says Wis. Justice Misrepresented Facts in ...
    Oct 8, 2008 · An ethics complaint accuses a new Wisconsin Supreme Court justice of misrepresenting the facts and making false statements in a campaign ad.
  92. [92]
    Price tag on Gableman probe nearing $2M, report finds - WPR
    Feb 3, 2023 · The legal bills for a Republican-ordered investigation of the 2020 presidential election continue to pile up, with the total cost to ...
  93. [93]
    Former Wisconsin Supreme Court justice who led 2020 election ...
    Apr 7, 2025 · The state Office of Lawyer Regulation filed a 10-count complaint in November against Michael Gableman, accusing him of misconduct during the ...
  94. [94]
    Ethics complaint filed against Michael Gableman, head of 2020 ...
    Mar 3, 2023 · Days later, Judge Remington issued a scathing ruling stating Gableman “should not escape the consequences” for violating his oath as a lawyer ...
  95. [95]
    https://wispolitics.com/2025/gableman-disputes-olr-claim-he-had-selfish-motives-in-reviewing-20-election/
  96. [96]
    Judge admonishes Michael Gableman's 2020 election review, bars ...
    Aug 17, 2022 · In ruling on contempt of court case over records requests, judge criticizes the review by the since-fired former state Supreme Court ...
  97. [97]
    Troubling Details from the Complaint Against Former Justice ...
    Nov 24, 2024 · Former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman faces disciplinary action from the Wisconsin Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) over his review of the ...<|separator|>
  98. [98]
    Michael Gableman: Ethics Complaints - Law Forward
    Jan 13, 2025 · Former justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court (2008–18). Worked as a political appointee in the Office of Personnel Management during the Trump ...
  99. [99]
    The Butler-Gableman Divide: Wisconsin Supreme Court Elections ...
    Mar 20, 2018 · With the end of Justice Michael Gableman's term approaching, and the election of his successor just two weeks away, SCOWstats takes this ...
  100. [100]
    Top 13 2009-10 Wisconsin Supreme Court Decisions
    Oct 7, 2010 · The author highlights 13 significant decisions issued by the Wisconsin Supreme Court during its 2009-10 term. Several of the decisions ...<|separator|>
  101. [101]
    What Wisconsin election administration changes are being ...
    Nov 13, 2023 · Bills allowing absentee ballots to be processed earlier and ensure adjudicated incompetent voters are tracked have passed the Wisconsin Assembly.