Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Network function virtualization

Network Functions Virtualization (NFV) is a approach that leverages IT technologies to consolidate diverse classes of node functions onto industry-standard high-volume servers, switches, and devices, which can be deployed in data centers, nodes, or end-user premises. This enables the implementation of functions—such as , firewalls, load balancing, and mobile gateways—in software that can be dynamically instantiated, scaled, or migrated across locations without requiring dedicated hardware appliances. Originating from a collaborative effort by seven leading operators in 2012, NFV was formalized under the European Standards Institute (ETSI) Industry Specification Group (ISG) to address the need for greater flexibility, reduced operational costs, and accelerated in response to the growing demands of and . The NFV framework has evolved through multiple releases, starting with Release 1 in 2013, which focused on foundational specifications, and progressing to Release 6 initiated in 2023, incorporating advancements in , security, and integration with . At its core, NFV architecture decouples software-based Virtual Network Functions (VNFs) from proprietary , relying on a NFV and (MANO) system that includes elements like the NFV Orchestrator (NFVO), VNF Managers (VNFM), and Virtualized Infrastructure Managers (VIM) to automate deployment and lifecycle management. Key benefits include significant reductions in and operational expenditures (CAPEX/OPEX) by minimizing dependencies, faster time-to-market for new services through automated provisioning, and enhanced and resilience via resource pooling and software portability across multi-vendor environments. NFV often integrates with Software-Defined Networking (SDN) to optimize control and data planes, enabling dynamic service chaining and supporting use cases such as virtualized mobile cores, content delivery networks (CDNs), and enterprise security functions. Challenges addressed in its development include ensuring high performance for latency-sensitive applications, maintaining security in virtualized environments, and facilitating smooth migration from legacy systems, with ETSI producing over 100 specifications and hosting interoperability events like Plugtests to promote adoption. As of 2025, NFV continues to underpin and beyond networks, driving the transition toward cloud-native telecommunications infrastructures.

Fundamentals

Definition and Core Concepts

Network Function Virtualization (NFV) is a concept that leverages standard IT technologies to virtualize entire classes of network node functions—such as firewalls, routers, load balancers, and intrusion detection systems—into building blocks that can run as software on (COTS) hardware, including high-volume servers, switches, and storage devices. This enables the consolidation of multiple network functions onto shared infrastructure, typically deployed in data centers, network nodes, or end-user premises, without requiring dedicated proprietary appliances for each function. At its core, NFV operates on the principle of decoupling software implementations of network functions from the underlying , which fosters through elastic resource provisioning, in service deployment and updates, and reduced reliance on vendor-specific to lower operational . Key concepts include Virtual Network Functions (VNFs), which are software-based realizations of traditional network functions that can be instantiated, scaled, or migrated across virtual machines as needed, and the Network Functions Virtualization Infrastructure (NFVI), comprising the resources, virtualization layer (e.g., hypervisors), and virtualized components that collectively form the runtime environment for VNFs, often spanning multiple locations with integrated connectivity. The primary motivations driving NFV adoption stem from the need to address limitations in traditional hardware-centric telecom networks, including substantial cost savings via hardware consolidation and leveraging IT industry —for instance, the high-volume shipment of servers compared to specialized network gear—and enhanced flexibility to accelerate service innovation and deployment times from months to days. By enabling multi-tenancy and dynamic reconfiguration, NFV supports efficient resource utilization and adaptability to varying traffic demands in environments.

Historical Development

Network function virtualization (NFV) originated from collaborative efforts among major telecommunications operators to address the limitations of hardware-centric network architectures. In October 2012, a seminal white paper titled "Network Functions Virtualisation: An Introduction, Benefits, Enablers, Challenges and Call for Action" was published, outlining the vision for decoupling network functions from proprietary hardware and running them as software on standard servers. This document was authored by representatives from AT&T, BT, Deutsche Telekom, Orange, Telecom Italia, Telefónica, and Verizon, highlighting the potential for cost reduction, faster service deployment, and greater flexibility in network operations. Following the white paper's release, the (ETSI) formally established the NFV Industry Specification Group (ISG) in November 2012, with the same seven operators as founding members. The ISG aimed to foster industry consensus on NFV requirements, architecture, and implementation without producing full standards, instead focusing on specifications to guide global adoption. Early milestones included the completion of Phase 1 specifications between 2013 and 2014, which emphasized use cases, architectural frameworks, and infrastructural overviews through initial publications such as GS NFV 001 on use cases (October 2013) and subsequent documents on management and . This phase laid the groundwork for NFV Release 1, finalized in early 2015, establishing core , high-level , and interfaces. NFV Releases 1 through 3, spanning approximately 2014 to 2018, built on this foundation by developing normative specifications for , information models, and technologies, with Release 2 (starting 2015) focusing on management and details and Release 3 (starting 2017) advancing network slicing and reliability features. Key events during this period included the publication of over 100 NFV specifications and reports by the ISG, covering aspects from security to testing methodologies. The first NFV Plugtests event was held in January-February 2017 at the 5TONIC lab in , involving multiple vendors to validate conformance and integration, achieving high success rates in test sessions. Around 2017-2020, the NFV ecosystem shifted from (VM)-based to container-based , driven by needs for lighter-weight deployment and scalability, as incorporated in later Release 3 features and Release 4 planning. Post-2020 developments marked accelerated evolution to support . NFV Release 4, initiated in 2019 and concluding its core specifications in the first quarter of 2025 with version 4.6.1, emphasized automation enhancements, cloud-native integrations, and support for networks through updates to the NFV infrastructure (NFVI) and management frameworks. Release 5, started in , introduced explicit support for containerized network functions and virtualized radio access networks (vRAN), enabling multi-vendor orchestration and efficiency gains in edge environments. NFV Release 6, launched in 2023 and ongoing, focuses on low-latency techniques, architectural evolutions for AI-driven operations, and extensions to handle diverse communication paradigms.

Architecture

NFV Framework Components

The NFV architectural framework, as standardized by the (), defines a structured set of components to enable the virtualization of network functions. At its core, the framework comprises three main components: the Network Functions Virtualization Infrastructure (NFVI), Virtualized Network Functions (VNFs), and NFV Management and Orchestration (NFV-MANO). The NFVI serves as the foundational component, encompassing hardware resources such as computing, storage, and networking equipment, along with a virtualization layer that abstracts these resources to provide virtualized compute, storage, and network capabilities. VNFs represent the software implementations of traditional network functions, such as routers, firewalls, or load balancers, which are deployed and executed on the virtualized resources provided by the NFVI. Collectively, NFV-MANO integrates VNFs, NFVI, and supporting management elements to form a cohesive environment for virtualized network services. Key components within this framework facilitate the operation and coordination of virtualized elements without delving into dynamic processes. The component handles the lifecycle aspects of individual VNF instances, including configuration and monitoring at the VNF level. The NFV Orchestrator (NFVO) oversees end-to-end service orchestration across multiple VNFs and domains, ensuring alignment with service requirements. Complementing these, the Virtualized Infrastructure Manager (VIM) is responsible for managing and allocating NFVI resources, such as virtual machines or containers, to support VNF deployments. Additionally, the interacts with EM and VIM to handle VNF-specific resource lifecycle operations. ETSI specifications provide the foundational reference for these components, with ETSI GS NFV 002 outlining the high-level functional and design principles for NFV. To enable , the framework incorporates standardized descriptors and protocols; for instance, NFV-SOL001 defines descriptors for VNFs and network services using (Topology and Orchestration Specification for Cloud Applications) and data modeling languages, allowing precise representation of VNF requirements and service topologies. Furthermore, REST-based APIs specified in NFV-SOL005 support interfaces for package management and lifecycle operations, promoting modular and scalable implementations. Interactions between components are governed by defined reference points to ensure standardized communication. Notable interfaces include the Ve-Vnfm reference point, which connects the VNFM to the for VNF instance lifecycle management, and the Or-Vnfm reference point, linking the NFVO to the VNFM for coordinating resource requests and service deployments. These reference points, along with others like Os-Vnfm and Vi-Vnfm, form the interconnection fabric of the NFV framework, enabling seamless integration across components.

Management and Orchestration (MANO)

Management and Orchestration (MANO) is the architectural framework defined by the to automate the operational aspects of Network Function Virtualization (NFV), enabling the lifecycle management of virtualized network functions (VNFs) and network services (NSs). It comprises three primary functional blocks: the NFV Orchestrator (NFVO), VNF Managers (VNFM), and Virtualized Infrastructure Manager (VIM). The NFVO oversees end-to-end service orchestration, including resource allocation across domains and policy enforcement for NS lifecycle events. The VNFM handles individual VNF operations such as configuration and performance monitoring, while the VIM abstracts and controls the underlying NFVI resources like compute, storage, and networking to support fault management and scaling. The MANO framework facilitates key lifecycle processes for VNFs, including , , , , and termination, often driven by policy-based automation to optimize . involves validating and storing VNF packages in the NFVO's , preparing them for deployment. deploys VNF instances by coordinating resource reservation through the VIM and via the VNFM. adjusts VNF —either horizontally (adding instances) or vertically (modifying resources)—in response to triggers, while detects and mitigates faults through restarts or migrations. Termination gracefully shuts down instances and releases resources, ensuring minimal disruption. These processes integrate with the NFVI components for seamless execution. MANO emphasizes multi-vendor through standardized interfaces, allowing components from different providers to coexist, and supports closed-loop for proactive fault resolution and optimization via and execution. It also integrates with Operations Support Systems (OSS) and (BSS) through the Os-Ma-nfvo reference point, enabling end-to-end service assurance, billing, and fulfillment aligned with industry models like TM Forum's Shared Information/Data model. The foundational standard, ETSI GS NFV-MAN 001, outlines the MANO and functional requirements, including information models for descriptors and repositories. ETSI NFV Release 5 (initiated in 2021) extends MANO to support container orchestration for cloud-native VNFs (CNFs), incorporating intent-based principles, data analytics, and features like Container Infrastructure Service for Kubernetes-based deployments. As of November 2025, Release 6 (started in 2023) advances MANO , including declarative intent-driven , AI-driven for cloud-native orchestration, and support for AI-based applications to enhance closed-loop and predictive capabilities. As of 2025, Release 6 includes reports on new resources and for NFV, supporting latency-sensitive applications and ecosystem integration.

Integration and Relationships

Relationship to Software-Defined Networking (SDN)

Network Function Virtualization (NFV) and (SDN) address distinct yet complementary aspects of modern networking architectures. NFV focuses on virtualizing data plane functions, such as , , and load balancing, by implementing them as software-based Virtual Network Functions (VNFs) running on (COTS) hardware. In contrast, SDN emphasizes the separation of the from the data plane, enabling centralized programming and dynamic management of network forwarding behaviors through abstracted interfaces. This distinction allows NFV to prioritize service function decoupling from proprietary hardware, while SDN targets enhanced network agility via programmable control, avoiding the silos of traditional distributed routing protocols. The integration of NFV and SDN enables end-to-end virtualization by leveraging their mutual strengths, where SDN provides the underlying programmable fabric for connecting and steering traffic among VNFs. SDN controllers can orchestrate NFV traffic flows, utilizing southbound protocols such as for fine-grained packet forwarding instructions to switches and for configuration and state management of network elements hosting VNFs. This synergy facilitates dynamic service chaining, as SDN's centralized intelligence automates the provisioning of virtual networks that support NFV's scalable function deployment, reducing manual intervention and improving resource efficiency. In ETSI-aligned architectures, the combined use of NFV and SDN delivers enhanced programmability, with SDN handling core forwarding and connectivity tasks while NFV manages higher-level service functions like firewalls or gateways. This division optimizes overall network performance by allowing SDN to focus on real-time traffic engineering and NFV to ensure modular service composition. For instance, the NFV Management and Orchestration (MANO) framework can interface with SDN controllers to provision virtual overlays, enabling rapid scaling of services without hardware dependencies. Post-2020 developments have driven further convergence between NFV and SDN, particularly through NFV standards that address integration gaps for advanced virtual networking. NFV Release 5 (initiated in 2021) introduces features for NFV-SDN overlay virtual networking, supporting dynamic, multi-site service provisioning and high-performance connectivity exposure to VNFs. These evolutions build on earlier gap analyses, such as those in reports from 2018, to harmonize interfaces and operational models, fostering unified ecosystems for programmable networks.

Integration with Cloud and Edge Computing

Network function virtualization (NFV) integrates seamlessly with environments by leveraging (IaaS) and (PaaS) models to deploy virtual network functions (VNFs) on public and private clouds. This approach allows operators to utilize elastic compute, storage, and networking resources from cloud providers, decoupling NFV infrastructure (NFVI) from proprietary hardware and enabling scalable deployment of network services. In telco clouds, NFV and orchestration (MANO) provides a unified for lifecycle management of VNFs, supporting both virtual machine-based and containerized deployments to align with cloud-native principles. A key evolution in this integration is the shift toward for , which complements MANO by mapping its components—such as the virtualized infrastructure manager (VIM), VNF manager (VNFM), and NFV orchestrator (NFVO)—to Kubernetes constructs like pods, deployments, and clusters. This enables declarative, intent-based management of containerized network functions (CNFs), reducing the need for imperative procedures and enhancing automation in cloud environments, particularly through platforms like AWS Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS). Kubernetes handles horizontal and vertical scaling of CNFs, while MANO oversees higher-level network service , facilitating hybrid VM-container ecosystems. At the network edge, NFV supports low-latency services by deploying VNFs closer to end-users through (MEC), where virtualization infrastructure enables localized processing to minimize delays in applications like real-time analytics and content delivery. MEC frameworks treat MEC applications as software entities running on NFVI, with the MEC orchestrator (MEO) and platform manager coordinating via VIM for rapid provisioning at edge hosts. This integration allows VNFs to access real-time information, reducing core network traffic and enabling bandwidth-intensive edge services. Hybrid models combine central cloud NFVI with distributed edge nodes, supporting seamless application relocation between cloud data centers and MEC hosts to balance load and optimize performance. ETSI standards, such as those in MEC Phase 3 (completed 2024) and Phase 4 (ongoing, with the first specifications released in November 2025 further integrating open-source technologies for heterogeneous edge cloud ecosystems), define interfaces for NFV-MANO integration with MEC, including federation mechanisms for multi-operator edge sharing and multi-domain orchestration. These post-2020 developments extend NFV to hybrid deployments, incorporating ETSI NFV Release 3 for edge compatibility. Such integrations address key challenges like and in distributed by enabling policy-driven resource management and ecosystems that comply with regional regulations while supporting elastic scaling across and central resources. In MEC-NFV hybrids, data usage policies are enforced through MANO extensions, ensuring localized processing for without compromising . Phase 4 enhancements further tackle these issues via multi-tenancy slicing and secure protocols.

Implementation Aspects

Practical Deployment Challenges

Deploying Network Function Virtualization (NFV) in production environments encounters significant technical challenges, particularly in hardware compatibility, where standard (COTS) servers must support high-throughput network workloads such as 100 Gbps or higher while maintaining reliability under diverse traffic patterns. overhead introduces bottlenecks through layers and software abstractions, which can degrade packet processing efficiency unless mitigated by optimizations such as (NUMA) awareness and specialized input/output virtualization techniques like Single Root I/O Virtualization (SR-IOV). Multi-vendor remains a core hurdle, as integrating hardware, hypervisors, and virtual network functions (VNFs) from diverse suppliers requires standardized interfaces, such as those between the Orchestrator and Virtualized Infrastructure Manager (VIM), to avoid and enable ecosystem growth. Operational issues further complicate NFV rollout, including the migration from hardware-centric systems to virtualized architectures, which demands gradual to ensure coexistence and compliance with existing regulatory frameworks while minimizing service disruptions. A notable skills gap exists in organizations, where traditional network engineering expertise must evolve to encompass practices for automating VNF deployment, monitoring, and scaling, often requiring extensive retraining to bridge the divide between IT operations and telecom-specific demands. Testing interoperability through initiatives like the NFV Plugtests program addresses these gaps by facilitating multi-vendor validation in controlled environments, achieving success rates of 95% to 100% in NFV and related scenarios. Security considerations in NFV deployments emphasize robust VNF isolation to prevent side-channel attacks on shared resources, employing mechanisms like (IOMMU) and resource quotas to enforce performance and confidentiality boundaries across multi-tenant environments. Secure bootstrapping poses challenges in maintaining boot integrity and authenticating VNF instances at scale, addressed through hardware-rooted trust anchors such as Trusted Platform Modules (TPMs) and digital signatures managed by certification authorities, while disabling insecure debug interfaces reduces the . Compliance with standards like GS NFV-SEC 001 ensures these practices mitigate virtualization-induced vulnerabilities, including multi-layer complexities, by promoting hardware-secured topologies and ongoing monitoring. Early deployments illustrate these challenges; for instance, Verizon's 2016 virtualization of (VoLTE) services encountered integration hurdles with legacy infrastructure and scalability bottlenecks during high-demand periods, highlighting the need for phased rollouts and enhanced automation via Management and Orchestration (MANO) frameworks. Common pitfalls, such as unanticipated failures in multi-vendor setups, have been observed in proof-of-concept trials, underscoring the importance of pre-deployment testing to avoid production-scale disruptions.

Distributed NFV Approaches

Distributed NFV approaches enable the deployment of virtual network functions (VNFs) across geographically dispersed locations, contrasting with centralized NFV infrastructure (NFVI) that consolidates resources in a single for and simplified management. In distributed NFVI, VNFs are hosted at the network edge, such as customer premises or intermediate nodes, to address limitations of centralized models like high and costs. This distribution supports phased deployments, starting with edge placements for low-risk pilots before scaling to hybrid setups integrating central and peripheral resources. Edge NFV particularly benefits IoT and enterprise scenarios by minimizing through proximity to data sources and end-users, enabling processing without reliance on distant central facilities. For instance, in IoT applications, edge-hosted VNFs reduce transmission delays for time-sensitive tasks like , improving overall (QoE) while adhering to agreements (SLAs). Enterprises leverage this for secure, on-premises functions such as , ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements and enhancing performance in bandwidth-constrained environments. Key approaches in distributed NFV include hierarchical and federated and (MANO) frameworks, which coordinate resources across multiple domains without a single point of control. Hierarchical structures decouple from , allowing scalable management of transport, , and infrastructures in multidomain setups. Service function chaining (SFC) further facilitates distributed VNF placement by sequencing functions across nodes while optimizing for constraints like delay and resource utilization, though it remains an NP-hard problem addressed through heuristics for traffic efficiency in heterogeneous networks. ETSI NFV Release 6, ongoing as of 2025 with specifications published throughout the year (e.g., GR NFV-IFA 054 V6.1.1 in February 2025), emphasizes latency aspects in VNF deployment to support end-to-end QoS, aligning with multi-access edge computing (MEC) for use cases like vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communications. It incorporates deterministic communication technologies, such as IEEE Time-Sensitive Networking (TSN), to bound jitter and latency for time-sensitive VNFs. Integration with distributed cloud frameworks evolves NFV toward telco cloud architectures, enabling hyper-distributed orchestration across edge and central regions with modular platform services for portability and automation. Prior releases, like Release 5, already provide MANO enhancements for ultra-low latency through time synchronization and acceleration abstractions. In edge deployments, NFV supports content delivery networks (CDNs) by placing VNFs closer to users, reducing buffering delays and improving streaming efficiency in distributed environments. These setups emphasize through self-healing mechanisms and , ensuring service continuity during WAN outages via automatic VNF recovery managed by the Virtual Infrastructure Manager (VIM). is enhanced by container orchestration and , allowing proactive failure recovery in scenarios without central dependency. For example, deployments like TPG Telecom's virtualized core utilize multi-vendor NFVI for robust edge operations, demonstrating fault-tolerant scaling in real-world networks.

Performance and Optimization Studies

Performance studies in Network Function Virtualization (NFV) primarily evaluate key metrics such as throughput, , and resource utilization to assess the viability of virtualized network functions (VNFs) on commodity hardware. Throughput measures the packet processing rate, often limited by I/O bottlenecks in virtual environments, while captures end-to-end delays critical for real-time applications. Resource utilization tracks CPU, memory, and network efficiency, highlighting overheads in layers. Comparisons between virtual machines () and containers reveal that traditional VMs introduce significant overhead; for instance, containers achieve 20-25% higher in write workloads compared to VMs under NFV conditions. Bottlenecks in NFV performance frequently stem from layer inefficiencies, where mediation increases context-switching overhead and reduces efficiency. Additionally, —data flows between VNFs within data centers—exacerbates these issues by overloading virtual switches and network interface cards (NICs), creating I/O bottlenecks that degrade overall throughput. Optimization techniques address these challenges through hardware acceleration methods like Single Root I/O Virtualization (SR-IOV) and (DPDK). SR-IOV enables direct device access for , achieving near 100% native line-rate performance by bypassing involvement. DPDK accelerates user-space packet processing, yielding 2-5 times higher throughput than standard networking in NFV workloads. Studies from and academic research on 5G core networks demonstrate significant reductions in end-to-end paths enabled by these optimizations in virtualized environments, such as up to 90% in packet processing with DPDK. Recent 2024 studies incorporate and for predictive scaling of VNFs, using models like and to forecast and automate . These approaches achieve up to 50% resource savings in horizontal auto-scaling compared to fixed allocations, enhancing efficiency in edge-5G-IoT ecosystems.

Advanced Topics

Cloud-Native Network Functions (CNFs)

Cloud-Native Network Functions (CNFs) represent a of Virtual Network Functions (VNFs) within the Network Functions Virtualization (NFV) framework, where network functions are implemented as cloud-native applications leveraging technologies such as , orchestration platforms like , and / (CI/CD) pipelines for automated lifecycle management. These functions adhere to cloud-native principles, including , to enable modular, scalable, and resilient network services deployed on commodity hardware. Compared to traditional VNFs, which typically run on virtual machines () with higher resource overhead, CNFs offer advantages such as improved portability across diverse infrastructures, enhanced elasticity for dynamic scaling, and faster updates through automated practices. They support greater density of function instances on the same hardware due to the lightweight nature of containers, reducing startup times and operational costs while improving fault isolation and service continuity. specifications in Release 3, such as GS NFV-EVE 011, standardize CNF descriptors, including the Virtual Network Function Product Characteristics Descriptor (VNFPCD), to define non-functional attributes like resiliency, , and resource requirements for seamless integration. In implementation, CNFs are packaged using tools like charts, which encapsulate manifests and configuration details into deployable artifacts compliant with NFV-SOL004 for VNF packaging in Cloud Service Archive (CSAR) format. These packages integrate with NFV Management and Orchestration (MANO) frameworks through -based Virtualized Infrastructure Managers (VIMs), allowing the NFV Orchestrator (NFVO) and VNF Manager (VNFM) to handle lifecycle operations such as instantiation, scaling, and healing via standardized APIs defined in ETSI GS NFV-SOL002 and SOL003. This approach facilitates a shift from VM-based deployments to bare-metal containers, optimizing efficiency by eliminating overhead and enabling direct where needed. Since 2020, CNF adoption has accelerated among operators, driven by the maturation of standards and open-source implementations like Open Source MANO (OSM), with NFV-SOL004 enabling standardized CNF onboarding processes for multi-vendor environments. This evolution supports telco cloud infrastructures, promoting and agility in network operations as evidenced by industry initiatives from bodies like the NGMN Alliance.

NFV in 5G and Beyond

Network Function Virtualization (NFV) is integral to , particularly through the virtualization of the core network, known as the virtualized Core (vCore) or evolved from the virtualized Evolved Packet Core (vEPC). This virtualization decouples network functions from proprietary hardware, enabling scalable deployment on servers and supporting the diverse performance requirements of , such as enhanced and massive machine-type communications. A key application of NFV in is network slicing, which leverages NFV to create isolated virtual networks on shared infrastructure for dynamic tailored to specific services. This allows operators to provision slices with varying levels of , bandwidth, and reliability on demand, optimizing resource utilization across the network. ETSI's NFV Release 5 further advances this by providing support for virtualized (vRAN), including container-based deployments that enhance flexibility and integration with cloud-native environments for radio functions. In practical use cases, NFV enables ultra-reliable low-latency communication (URLLC) through NFV deployments, where virtualized functions are placed closer to the for minimal delay in mission-critical applications like industrial automation and autonomous vehicles. For instance, in 2022, in migrated its entire and customer base to a virtualized core platform, utilizing NFV to achieve nationwide coverage and support low-latency services without hardware dependencies. Looking beyond 5G, NFV is being prepared for networks with enhancements incorporating () for automated and optimization, addressing the demands of massive connectivity and immersive services such as holographic communications. In 2025, ETSI introduced a new NFV evolving the MANO framework into a Telco Cloud approach to support requirements, including AI-driven . -enhanced NFV will facilitate predictive resource scaling and self-healing capabilities to handle the terabit-per-second speeds and ultra-high reliability required for scenarios. Standards efforts, including the alignment of SA5 with NFV, emphasize a service-based that integrates NFV interfaces for seamless 5G-to- evolution, ensuring and exposure of network capabilities via APIs.

Benefits and Impact

Modularity and Operational Benefits

Network Function Virtualization (NFV) introduces a modular architecture that decouples virtual network functions (VNFs) from proprietary hardware, enabling independent scaling based on demand. This modularity allows operators to instantiate, scale, or terminate individual VNFs without affecting the entire network, facilitating elastic resource allocation across commodity off-the-shelf (COTS) servers. Service chaining further enhances this composability by orchestrating VNFs into flexible forwarding paths, creating tailored network services that can be dynamically assembled and reconfigured. By leveraging COTS hardware, NFV significantly reduces capital expenditures (CAPEX) by up to 40% and operational expenditures (OPEX) by up to 30% compared to traditional appliance-based deployments, as it minimizes the need for specialized equipment and streamlines maintenance. Operationally, NFV accelerates time-to-market for new services from months to weeks through automated provisioning via the Management and Orchestration (MANO) framework, which handles VNF deployment, configuration, and lifecycle management. This automation also boosts reliability by incorporating redundancy mechanisms, such as and load balancing across virtual instances, ensuring without physical interventions. Specific benefits include enhanced energy efficiency, addressed in ETSI NFV Release 5 under the "Green NFV" initiative, which optimizes power consumption in virtualized environments through efficient resource utilization and metering standards. Additionally, upgrades become simpler, as software updates to VNFs can be applied without hardware replacements, reducing and enabling rapid feature enhancements. Studies, such as Vodafone's deployment, demonstrate up to 40% faster service deployment times, underscoring NFV's role in operational agility.

Industry Adoption and Economic Impact

Network function virtualization (NFV) has achieved widespread adoption among major operators, particularly in the telco sector, where it supports scalable and flexible network architectures. Leading providers such as have integrated NFV into their operations since 2016, deploying it for global network services and enterprise solutions to reduce hardware dependencies and enhance efficiency. Similarly, has rolled out NFV infrastructure across 21 European markets in partnership with vendors like , enabling virtualized network functions for millions of customers. The global NFV market reflects this momentum, valued at USD 39.0 billion in 2025 and projected to reach USD 360.0 billion by 2035, driven by a (CAGR) of approximately 25%. Key case studies illustrate NFV's practical implementation in 5G environments. Ericsson's multi-vendor NFV infrastructure (NFVI) platform facilitates the deployment of virtual and cloud-native network functions from diverse vendors, supporting core and edge workloads for over 140 service providers worldwide. In the UK, BT announced a partnership in with Ericsson to deploy a cloud-native dual-mode core and launched its cloud-native Evolved Packet Core (EPC) in 2022 as part of its transition to a cloud-based architecture, with millions of subscribers migrated by December 2022; BT utilizes via Canonical for resource optimization and multi-service hosting in its deployments. These deployments highlight NFV's role in enabling rapid scaling and vendor in production networks. Economically, NFV drives a shift toward as-a-service models, allowing operators to monetize services through virtualized delivery, which reduces by up to 39% over three years compared to traditional approaches. This transition fosters new revenue streams, such as managed services for enterprises, with 20-30% of current potentially migrating to NFV-based offerings. Global standards from ETSI's NFV group ensure interoperability across multi-vendor ecosystems, promoting efficient resource sharing and reducing deployment barriers. Looking ahead, NFV's integration with (AI) is poised to enable zero-touch operations, automating service management in and emerging networks to meet 2025+ demands for ultra-low and self-healing capabilities. Initiatives like Zero-touch Service Management (ZSM) framework combine NFV with AI for intent-based , enhancing network and efficiency in clouds.

References

  1. [1]
    None
    ### Summary of ETSI NFV White Paper (2012)
  2. [2]
    Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV) - ETSI
    Founded in November 2012 by seven of the world's leading telecoms network operators, ETSI ISG NFV became the home of Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV).Introduction · Started 2021: NFV Release 5 · Started 2019: NFV Release 4
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Network Functions Virtualization - ETSI
    ETSI has created the NFV ISG to define the requirements and architecture for the virtualization of network functions and to address their technical challenges.
  4. [4]
    [PDF] ETSI GS NFV 003 V1.1.1 (2013-10)
    Oct 10, 2013 · The present document provides terms and definitions for conceptual entities within the scope of the ISG NFV, in order to achieve a "common ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Network Functions Virtualisation - ETSI Portal
    This is a non-proprietary white paper authored by network operators. The key objective for this white paper is to outline the benefits ...
  6. [6]
    Leading operators create ETSI standards group for network ...
    Jan 22, 2013 · AT&T, BT, Deutsche Telekom, Orange, Telecom Italia, Telefonica and Verizon have been joined by 52 other network operators, telecoms equipment ...Missing: formation 2012 founding
  7. [7]
    NFV - ETSI
    ISG NFV has developed over 100 different specifications and reports for the virtualization of network functions, with focus on the management and orchestration ...
  8. [8]
    ETSI drives NFV interoperability with first Plugtests event
    ETSI will organize the first Network Functions Virtualization (NFV) interoperability Plugtests event from 23 January to 3 February 2017.Missing: date | Show results with:date
  9. [9]
    [PDF] ETSI GS NFV 002 V1.2.1 (2014-12)
    The NFV architectural framework focuses on the changes likely to occur in an operator's network due to the network function virtualisation process. That is, the ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] ETSI GS NFV-SOL 005 V3.5.1 (2021-10)
    The present document has been produced and approved by the Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV) ETSI Industry. Specification Group (ISG) and represents the ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] ETSI GR NFV-MAN 001 V1.2.1 (2021-12)
    NFV-MANO architectural framework overview ... functional blocks in the NFV-MANO Architectural Framework: OSS/BSS, VNFM, and VIM.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] ETSI GS NFV-SOL 016 V2.8.1 (2020-08)
    Aug 1, 2020 · The NFV-MANO procedure of VNF package on-boarding comprises the following steps: ... Clause 5.4 specifies the NFV-MANO procedure for VNF scaling ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] ETSI GS NFV-MAN 001 v1.1.1 (2014-12)
    This document has been produced and approved by the Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV) ETSI Industry Specification. Group (ISG) and represents the views of ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] ETSI GS NFV 006 V5.2.1 (2024-12)
    ETSI GS NFV 006 V5.2.1 is a Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV) Release 5 architectural framework specification for management and orchestration.Missing: AI- | Show results with:AI-
  15. [15]
    [PDF] TR-518 Relationship of SDN and NFV - Open Networking Foundation
    This paper compares and contrasts SDN, whose architecture is defined in [SDN], and NFV, as described in the set of phase 1 deliverables of the ETSI NFV ISG, as ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] An Architectural Framework for Integrating SDN and NFV for Service ...
    Evolution of both SDN and NFV has shown strong synergy between these two paradigms. Recent research efforts have been made toward combining SDN and NFV to ...Missing: differences | Show results with:differences
  17. [17]
    https://www.etsi.org/newsroom/blogs/entry/nfv-51-plenary-meeting-in-review
  18. [18]
    [PDF] ETSI GR NFV-IFA 037 V4.1.1 (2021-12)
    deployments using techniques such as Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV) and Software Defined Networking. (SDN). ... ETSI TS 123 501 [i.2]). 5.3.4 Gap analysis.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] The Role of NFV-MANO and Its Added Value - ETSI
    This white paper emphasizes the role and added value of NFV-MANO in relation to other Standards. Development Organizations (SDOs) and open-source projects that ...
  20. [20]
    Mapping ETSI MANO to Kubernetes - AWS Documentation
    ETSI MANO specifies direct procedures between NFVO and VNFM and VIM, whereas Kubernetes performs all communication among its components as well as on north and ...Mapping VIM and VNFM to... · NFVO: functions and mapping
  21. [21]
    Multi-access Edge Computing - Standards for MEC - ETSI
    MEC offers cloud capabilities at the network edge with low latency, high bandwidth, and real-time access to network info, not just mobile networks.
  22. [22]
    [PDF] ETSI GS MEC 003 V3.2.1 (2024-04)
    Multi-access Edge Computing enables the implementation of MEC applications as software-only entities that run on top of a Virtualisation infrastructure, which ...<|separator|>
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV) - ETSI Portal
    Oct 14, 2014 · The key challenge for growth of an open ecosystem is to achieve interoperability for the key interfaces identified in the NFV Architectural ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] ETSI GS NFV-PER 001 V1.1.1 (2014-06)
    Single Root I/O Virtualisation (SR-IOV) is a PCI-SIG specification that defines a method to split a device into multiple. PCI Express Requester IDs (virtual ...Missing: compatibility | Show results with:compatibility
  25. [25]
    [PDF] NFV evolution: Towards the Telco Cloud - ETSI
    To ensure a sustainable transition from legacy NFV to an evolved NFV, and address the challenges faced by network operators in procuring, deploying and ...
  26. [26]
    The Challenges of Operationalizing NFV - Light Reading
    Nov 29, 2017 · DevOps skills shortage (15%) was the least significant barrier, according to the survey. Familiarity with DevOps tools such as GIT, Chef and ...Missing: gap | Show results with:gap
  27. [27]
    Telecom industry must address its talent shortage — here's how
    Aug 29, 2023 · ... NFV in areas such as 5G and IoT requires a different set of skills. These include knowledge of cloud, virtualization, Open RAN, network ...
  28. [28]
    NFV Plugtests Programme - ETSI
    The NFV Plugtests Programme provides a continuous and ubiquitous environment for collaborative testing and validation activities among different organizations.Missing: migration legacy systems skills gap DevOps telcos
  29. [29]
    ETSI NFV and MEC IOP Plugtests Report 2021 published - ETSI
    NFV and MEC overall interoperability reached a 95% to 100% success rate. The NFV&MEC Plugtests offered NFV and MEC solution providers and open-source projects ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] ETSI GS NFV-SEC 001 V1.1.1 (2014-10)
    Oct 1, 2014 · Given the relevance of hardware-rooted security to NFV, it is useful to understand the challenges in deploying secure boot technology. UEFI ...
  31. [31]
    7 NFV Hurdles: How DTAG, NTT, Verizon, Vodafone, Swisscom and ...
    Our latest analysis identifies seven key barriers that have slowed NFV roll out across six operators (Deutsche Telekom, NTT, Verizon, Vodafone, Swisscom and ...
  32. [32]
    What is Distributed NFV and why do you need it? - Ciena
    Nov 8, 2016 · Distributed hosts VNFs at the network edge, typically within a customer premise. Centralized hosts VNFs in one location, such as a data center, ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Distributed Network Functions Virtualization - CREZER
    This paper reviews the distributed approach to NFV, discusses phased NFV deployment and introduces critical decision factors for placing such functionalities at ...
  34. [34]
    None
    Nothing is retrieved...<|separator|>
  35. [35]
    Hierarchical Distributed Overarching Architecture of Decoupled ...
    Jun 6, 2022 · For scalable and flexible management across transport, cloud, and edge infrastructures, the NFV MANO has been extended into multidomain ...
  36. [36]
    Service Function Chain Placement in Distributed Scenarios
    SFC placement is a complex task, already proved to be NP-hard. Moreover, in highly distributed scenarios, the network performance can also be impacted by other ...
  37. [37]
    None
    ### Summary of Proposals for Latency Aspects in ETSI NFV Release 6
  38. [38]
    [PDF] ETSI GR NFV-IFA 046 V5.2.1 (2024-12)
    Relevance to NFV: ETSI GR NFV-EVE 017 [i.16] reports about real time/ultra-low latency aspects in. NFV-MANO. ETSI GR NFV-EVE 017 [i.16] investigates ...
  39. [39]
    Network Functions Virtualization (NFV) explained - Ericsson
    Network functions virtualization (NFV) is a modern network architecture approach that decouples the network's various applications from its hardware ...
  40. [40]
    Performance evaluation of containers and virtual machines when ...
    Feb 13, 2020 · As shown in Figure 1, the maximum number of tps for the write workload is 20% to 25% higher for containers compared with VMs. Figure 5 shows ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] White Paper: Using Hardware to Improve NFV Performance
    The latter sce- nario results in much more East/West traffic, putting additional load on the vSwitches and NICs, making I/O a bottleneck to performance.Missing: inefficiencies | Show results with:inefficiencies
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Reducing Latency and Improving Throughput for NFV Workloads ...
    Studies have shown that DPDK can improve NFV throughput by 2-5× compared to standard Linux networking [5]. Vector Packet Processing (VPP) provides additional.
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Ultra-low Latency NFV Services Using DPDK
    An experimental evaluation of the obtained software stack is performed on a real test-bed, where we measured a 69 % reduction of the end-to-end latency compared.Missing: ETSI | Show results with:ETSI
  44. [44]
    AI-Driven Resource Allocation and Auto-Scaling of VNFs in Edge ...
    This paper presents an AI-based predictive auto-scaling framework designed to optimize resource allocation for VNFs in edge/5G-enabled IoT environments.Missing: gains | Show results with:gains
  45. [45]
    NFV FAQ - NFVwiki - ETSI
    Apr 8, 2020 · Instantiate VNF (create a VNF using the VNF on-boarding artefacts). Scale VNF (increase or reduce the capacity of the VNF). Heal VNF ...
  46. [46]
    None
    ### Summary of ETSI GS NFV-EVE 011 V3.1.1 (2018-10) - Cloud Native VNFs (CNFs)
  47. [47]
    [PDF] ETSI GS NFV-SOL 004 V3.5.1 (2021-05)
    May 1, 2021 · The present document specifies the structure and format of a VNF package file and its constituents, fulfilling the requirements specified in ...Missing: CNF | Show results with:CNF
  48. [48]
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/cpe.5693
  49. [49]
    https://network.nvidia.com/pdf/whitepapers/WP_heavyreading-NFV-performance.pdf
  50. [50]
    Welcome to Open Source MANO's documentation! - ETSI OSM
    Welcome to Open Source MANO's documentation! · 1.1. OSM in practice · 1.2. Assumptions about interaction with VIMs and VNFs · 1.3. Installing OSM · 1.4. Adding VIM ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Cloud Native Enabling Future Telco Platforms - NGMN
    May 17, 2021 · ETSI NFV has defined an architectural framework for Network Function Virtualization (NFV) management and orchestration [NFV1]. The SDO has then ...
  52. [52]
    Feature Tracking Release 5 - NFVwiki - ETSI
    The scenarios, requirements and solutions applicable to the container networking for NFV system are proposed for the maximum reuse of open source technologies ...
  53. [53]
    Enabling Successful Edge Services Deployment - Wind River Systems
    In concert with edge computing, 5G can fulfill ultra-reliable low-latency communication (URLLC) service needs.Edge, More Than A New Cloud · The Need For Edge-Native... · Maximizing Success With The...
  54. [54]
    TPG Telecom's ground-breaking cloud transformation - Ericsson
    TPG Telecom became Australia's first service provider to have its entire 4G and 5G customer base migrated to a virtualized core platform, and then go on to ...
  55. [55]
    Towards 6G Internet of Things: Recent advances, use cases, and ...
    This paper highlights the recent activities and trends toward 6G technology, network requirement, essential enabling technologies for 6G networks, and a ...Missing: NFV preparations
  56. [56]
    Management, Orchestration and Charging for 5G networks - 3GPP
    Mar 22, 2018 · This article will focus on the new 5G Rel-15 architecture and the main functionalities, including charging.
  57. [57]
    ETSI tightens 3GPP 5G compatibility with NFV Release 3 - TelecomTV
    Jul 2, 2019 · ETSI announces new features to its architecture to support 5G · Closer collaboration with the 3GPP SA5 Working Group · Support for network slicing ...
  58. [58]
    Optimal Network Function Virtualization and Service ... - ResearchGate
    Aug 7, 2025 · Network Function Virtualization (NFV) is an emerging technology, which enables service agility, flexibility and cost reduction by replacing ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  59. [59]
    Network Function Virtualization (NFV) Market Size 2032 - SNS Insider
    It is also predicted that NFV deployments can reduce OpEx by up to 30% and CapEx by up to 40%. And even more than 60% of core network functions have become ...
  60. [60]
    NFV Makes Networks Lighter - ZTE
    Mar 13, 2017 · NFV shortens the hardware and software purchasing periods by six weeks, the software deployment time by one week, and the network commissioning ...
  61. [61]
    ETSI NFV Release 5 (Version 5.1.1) is now available!
    Sep 5, 2024 · PIM and Container Infrastructure Service (CIS) Cluster Management (CCM) can support the management of CIS clusters which serve as the underlay ...
  62. [62]
    Vodafone slashes costs of core network functions across Europe ...
    Apr 8, 2020 · The telco cloud infrastructure enables Vodafone to design, build, test and deploy next generation functions more securely and around 40% faster, ...
  63. [63]
    AT&T Case Study | HPE Juniper Networking US
    In 2016, AT&T introduced a global network service that leveraged software-defined networking (SDN) and Network Functions Virtualization (NFV) to simplify ...
  64. [64]
    Network Functions Virtualization (NFV) Explained - Dgtl Infra
    Jan 2, 2023 · As a case study, Vodafone, one of the largest wireless carriers in the world, completed the roll-out of NFV infrastructure (NFVI) from ...
  65. [65]
    Network Function Virtualization (NFV) Market - MarketsandMarkets
    The global Network Function Virtualization market was valued at USD 39.0 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 360.0 billion by 2035, ...
  66. [66]
    NFVI - Ericsson
    Ericsson NFVI enables operators to deploy virtual network functions (VNFs) or cloud native functions (CNFs) from multiple vendors, as well as OSS and BSS ...
  67. [67]
    Case study: BT's journey toward 5G Core - Ericsson
    This is the story about how BT in UK leaped directly from physical to cloud-native architecture on the journey toward a 5G Core.Missing: virtualization 2020
  68. [68]
    [PDF] The Economic Benefits of Virtual Edge Services - ACG Research
    The virtual edge results in a three-year cumulative TCO savings of 39% and a 412% increase in cumulative cash flow over the same period. Network function ...
  69. [69]
    Can Service Providers Actually Make Money with NFV-based ...
    Apr 26, 2016 · 20% to 30% of managed services delivered over physical appliances today are ripe to be picked by NFV-based managed enterprise services.
  70. [70]
    Zero touch network & Service Management - ETSI Blog
    During the ETSI NFV#51 plenary meeting, on Monday 8 September 2025, a dedicated Telco-Cloud and AI-native Open Session was kindly hosted by Huawei in the ...
  71. [71]
    The Rise of Autonomous Networks with AI Advantage - waisl
    Jul 18, 2025 · These networks enable zero-touch operations, enhanced agility, self-healing capabilities, and significantly improved efficiency. As telecom ...