Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Norrmalmstorg robbery

The Norrmalmstorg robbery was an attempted heist on 23 August 1973 at the Kreditbanken branch located in Norrmalmstorg Square, central , , perpetrated by armed convict , who wounded a responding and seized four bank employees as hostages. Olsson, having escaped earlier that day, demanded the release of fellow inmate and a getaway car, leading authorities to transfer Olofsson to the scene where he joined the standoff, which extended over six days amid negotiations and media coverage. The crisis concluded on 28 August when deployed into the vault, prompting the robbers' surrender without further violence; Olsson received a 10-year sentence for the robbery and related charges, while Olofsson faced no additional penalty for his involvement. The incident gained lasting notoriety due to the hostages' post-release behavior, including refusal to testify against the captors, financial support for their defense, and public criticism of police tactics, prompting criminologist —who advised authorities during the siege—to label the dynamic "" as a form of . Despite widespread popularization, empirical scrutiny has revealed scant diagnostic criteria or rigorous studies validating as a distinct psychological disorder, with some analyses deeming it more a vernacular construct amplified by media than a scientifically robust phenomenon, though the robbery's causal sequence—prolonged isolation, perceived captor benevolence amid external threats—illustrates adaptive survival responses under duress. The event underscored vulnerabilities in strategies and influenced subsequent law enforcement protocols, while Olofsson's celebrity status post-incident highlighted media's role in shaping public perceptions of criminals.

Background

The Perpetrators

Jan-Erik Olsson, born on April 16, 1941, was a 32-year-old Swedish career criminal on parole at the time of the robbery on August 23, 1973. He had accumulated prior convictions for robbery, assault, and attempted murder, reflecting a pattern of violent offenses. Olsson, who had previously been cellmates with Clark Olofsson during imprisonment for robbery-related sentences, expressed admiration for Olofsson's exploits as a bank robber and sought to carry out a swift heist at the Kreditbanken to secure funds for personal use. Clark Olofsson, born in 1947 and aged 26 during the incident, was a repeat offender serving a prison term for crimes including armed robbery, attempted murder, assault, and accessory to the 1966 killing of a police officer. His criminal record also encompassed drug dealing and multiple high-profile prison escapes, establishing him as a notorious figure in Swedish underworld circles. Though not involved in the robbery's planning, Olofsson was transferred from prison to the at Olsson's explicit demand, where he participated in holding the captives. The four hostages seized by Olsson were Kreditbanken employees Kristin Enmark (a 23-year-old teller), Birgitta Lundblad, Elisabeth Oldgren, and Sven Safvean.

Societal and Criminal Context in

experienced economic prosperity in the early , with near-full and a comprehensive system supporting social stability, yet official records indicate a marked increase in violent crimes during this period. Reported offenses of violence by persons aged over 15 rose by 40 percent in the years leading to 1979, encompassing assaults, threats, and robberies amid broader trends of escalating criminality despite the absence of acute economic distress. This uptick in armed robberies reflected growing boldness among offenders, enabled in part by penal policies emphasizing over extended incarceration. The parole and conditional release system in the prioritized reintegration, frequently granting temporary furloughs or supervised liberty to inmates showing compliance, even repeat violent offenders. , convicted in 1969 for a prior and sentenced to three years, exemplified this approach; he received temporary leave in August 1973, allowing his attempt on the Kreditbanken despite his history. Such policies stemmed from a penal viewing prisons as reformative rather than purely punitive, contributing to risks in a context of rising . Banking security at institutions like Kreditbanken remained minimal by modern standards, featuring silent alarms and access protocols but lacking routine guards or rapid-response deterrents, as violent heists were uncommon before the decade's crime surge. The Norrmalmstorg branch's central position heightened visibility yet did not prompt fortified measures, with response relying on tactics over immediate confrontation, aligning with prevailing non-escalatory norms. This reflected broader societal trust in institutions and low expectations of firearm use in crimes, per pre-1973 statistics showing contained violent offense rates relative to population.

The Robbery and Hostage Taking

Initial Break-In and Confrontation

On August 23, 1973, , a 32-year-old , entered the Kreditbanken branch at square in central armed with a . He fired shots into the air to assert control and demanded money from the tellers, but a was triggered, alerting . As responding officers arrived at the scene, Olsson engaged them in a confrontation, shooting one in the leg and wounding him. With the situation escalating, he forced four female bank employees into the vault, barricading the doors to secure his position and taking them as hostages. Olsson then telephoned the police to communicate his initial demands, which included the release of imprisoned criminal , a payment, and provision of a getaway car. This marked the beginning of a prolonged standoff, with immediate police involvement focused on containing the threat and initiating contact.

Securing the Vault and Demands

quickly moved the four hostages—bank employees Kristin Enmark, Birgitta Lundblad, and Elisabeth Oldgren, along with customer Sven Safström—into the safe-deposit vault to secure the premises against potential intervention following the initial . He directed Safström to bind the female hostages loosely with rope around their wrists, permitting some mobility while preventing escape attempts. To maintain calm in the , Olsson supplied the hostages with cigarettes and facilitated the delivery of sandwiches and from a nearby shortly after securing the vault. Around 10 p.m., arrived at the bank under heavy police escort in response to Olsson's primary demand for his release from , effectively positioning Olofsson as a second robber; Olofsson promptly unbound the hostages and assumed a more reassuring role in managing the group. The robbers' demands escalated to include 3 million Swedish kronor (approximately $710,000) in a mix of Swedish and foreign currency, two unloaded pistols, bulletproof vests, helmets, and a fast getaway car enabling departure with the hostages and no pursuit. authorities rejected provisions allowing the robbers to flee with , viewing threats of devices or vests as unsubstantiated bluffs per subsequent hostage and investigator accounts. In parallel, cordoned off Norrmalmstorg square, surrounded the building with armed units, and severed electricity and water utilities to the bank, aiming to isolate and pressure the perpetrators without immediate assault. Swedish media outlets began live coverage almost immediately, with journalists and cameras assembling outside, thereby elevating public awareness of the unfolding crisis.

The Standoff

Police Negotiations and Tactics

The Swedish police, advised by psychiatrist , adopted a hardline during the six-day standoff following the August 23, 1973, at Kreditbanken, emphasizing refusal of core demands to avoid setting precedents that could encourage future crimes. Bejerot, monitoring communications, argued that prolonging the siege would erode the robbers' resolve and foster dependency, predicting the hostages would bond with captors over time rather than aiding escape. Jan-Erik Olsson's demands for 3 million kronor in unmarked bills, additional weapons, release of from prison, a getaway car, and permission to depart with hostages were met with partial concessions—such as delivering Olofsson to the scene as a potential and preparing a —but firm rejections of allowing hostages to accompany the robbers and full payment without traceability measures. These refusals escalated tensions, leading Olsson to issue threats, including firing warning shots near hostages and staging a by threatening to shoot vault guard Säfström in the leg, an act witnessed and vocally accepted by hostage Kristin Enmark to de-escalate. Negotiations unfolded primarily through daily telephone exchanges between the vault and headquarters, with hostages frequently intervening to plead for compliance with Olsson's terms, citing fears of assault over robber violence; a pivotal instance occurred on when Enmark engaged in a 42-minute call with Olof , imploring authorities to permit her exit with the captors under their perceived protection. countered with psychological tactics, including supply cutoffs to induce fatigue and deceptive assurances of safe passage via a rigged equipped for remote disablement, aiming to exploit internal divisions without immediate force. Technical efforts to gather intelligence faltered when attempted to insert listening devices through ventilation ducts, only for Olsson to detect and obstruct them with wadded , severely hampering real-time and forcing reliance on verbal reports. This over-dependence on passive and —eschewing an early dynamic entry in favor of —prolonged the crisis until August 28, when exhaustion tactics culminated in a incursion after final negotiation breakdowns.

Daily Events and Hostage Dynamics

On August 24, 1973, after was transported to the bank and entered the with the , interactions between the captives and robbers shifted toward more personal exchanges. comforted Kristin Enmark, one of the female , by providing her with a as a protective token and reassuring her amid her distress. He permitted another , Elisabeth Oldgren, to briefly exit the tethered by a 30-foot , though she did not attempt to flee. received basic provisions including sandwiches and from negotiators, which were passed into the , and the robbers allowed access to a radio for news updates. No physical harm was inflicted on the beyond their initial binding with . By August 25, Olsson's early threats had diminished, evolving into casual conversations with the four hostages—two women and two men—who began addressing him and Olofsson by their first names. On one occasion, Olsson threatened to shoot male hostage Sven Safström in the leg to demonstrate resolve to police, but Enmark interjected, "But Sven, it's only in the leg," reflecting the group's adapted dynamic; Safström later recounted perceiving Olsson's restraint as an act of kindness. Hostages expressed verbal defenses of the robbers, with growing apprehension toward potential police intervention rather than their captors. Police microphones captured discussions revealing the hostages' fear of a gas attack or raid exceeding any concerns about Olsson or Olofsson. Throughout August 26 and 27, the hostages rebuffed opportunities to separate from the robbers, including declining offers to evacuate without them. Enmark publicly conveyed this stance in a phone call to , broadcast via media, stating, "I fully trust and the robber... I am not desperate. They haven't done a thing to us. On the contrary, they have been very nice to us... They have given us food, beer, and sandwiches." She pleaded for the group—herself, another , and the robbers—to be allowed to leave together, citing terror of actions over any threat from Olsson and Olofsson. The hostages displayed hostility toward arriving officials, refusing handshakes and prioritizing rapport with their captors during relayed communications.

Resolution

Escalation and Tear Gas Assault

Following the breakdown of negotiations on August 28, 1973, police initiated a coordinated on the Kreditbanken vault where the robbers and hostages were barricaded. The operation involved drilling seven holes through the vault's ceiling to facilitate the deployment of via aerosol canisters, aiming to incapacitate the occupants without direct confrontation. Preparatory drilling commenced late on August 27 at approximately 10:45 PM, allowing police to position the canisters effectively by the following evening. At around 9:00 PM on August 28, tear gas was released into the vault, filling the enclosed space and causing immediate disorientation among those inside. The robbers, Jan-Erik Olsson and Clark Olofsson, responded by firing warning shots, but the overwhelming effects of the gas—described by hostage accounts as inducing choking, vomiting, and severe eye irritation—prompted a rapid surrender within minutes. Olsson reportedly shouted terms of capitulation amid the chaos, eventually dismantling a barricade and handing over weapons and explosives to police. None of the four hostages sustained injuries directly from the assault, though they experienced physical distress from the gas and initially resisted evacuation until the robbers exited first. Chief Inspector Thorander confirmed the operation's success, noting that "it's all over and no one's hurt." The tactical use of gas through ceiling penetrations minimized risks of armed resistance, marking the end of the six-day standoff without casualties.

Surrender and Arrests

On August 28, 1973, after more than 130 hours of standoff, Swedish drilled holes into the Kreditbanken vault and pumped in , prompting and to surrender. The perpetrators exited the vault without major resistance, where they were immediately arrested by officers wearing gas masks; Olsson fired a single shot before discarding his weapon and declaring his surrender. The four hostages, exposed to the irritant gas, were extracted shortly after but refused to exit ahead of their captors, with Kristin Enmark demanding that Olsson and Olofsson leave first to shield them from potential gunfire. Treated for minor effects of the gas exposure, including being wheeled out on stretchers, the hostages displayed immediate relief at their release mingled with protective concern for the robbers, embracing them and imploring authorities, “Don’t hurt them—they didn’t harm us.” Enmark specifically called to Olofsson, “Clark, I will see you again.” In the ensuing frenzy, captured by national and press photographers positioned nearby, initial interviews revealed ongoing defiance toward the police, whom they blamed for prolonging the crisis and endangering the captors. Olofsson, who had been released from to aid negotiations, maintained in his that he served primarily as a mediator and did not actively participate in .

Immediate Aftermath

Legal Proceedings and Sentencing

The trials for the Norrmalmstorg robbery perpetrators began in 1974 at the District Court, relying on evidence such as audio recordings captured inside the , witness testimonies from released s and police officers, and forensic analysis of the scene. faced charges of aggravated robbery and for firing his weapon at responding officer Gunnar Norgren, wounding him in the foot during the initial entry on August 23, 1973. He was convicted on both counts and sentenced to a ten-year term, reflecting the severity of the armed takeover and hostage endangerment. Clark Olofsson, transported to the bank under Olsson's demands and held inside with the hostages, was charged with complicity in the robbery due to his presence and interactions during the standoff. The court acquitted him of direct involvement, determining that his role was involuntary and lacked intent to aid the escape or crime execution, as supported by vault recordings showing his reluctance to escalate violence. Olofsson was nonetheless remanded to custody to complete his preexisting six-year sentence for prior grand and escape convictions, extended indirectly by the incident's complications. No legal actions were pursued against the four hostages, despite their sympathetic statements toward the perpetrators post-release, as prosecutors found no basis for charges like aiding or abetting under Swedish law at the time. Olsson's sentence withstood appeals, leading to his in 1980 after serving roughly seven years, during which he maintained a low profile in prison without further incidents. Olofsson, after resolution of Norrmalmstorg-related proceedings, continued his pattern of incarcerations for subsequent offenses unrelated to the 1973 event.

Hostage Releases and Initial Reactions

Following the police assault on August 28, 1973, which involved the use of tear gas to force surrender, the four remaining hostages—Kristin Enmark, Birgitta Lundblad, Elisabeth Oldgren, and Sven Safvean—were released unharmed alongside the robbers Jan-Erik Olsson and Clark Olofsson. The hostages had barricaded themselves with the captors shortly before the raid, reportedly out of fear that police actions would endanger them more than the robbers would. Upon release, Enmark publicly stated that she trusted Olofsson and Olsson, asserting, "I fully trust Clark and the robber. I am not desperate. They haven't done a thing to us," and emphasized their protective behavior toward the captives. In the days immediately after, the hostages rejected the typical victim narrative, expressing greater apprehension toward than their former captors and declining initial offers for psychiatric evaluation, insisting they required no such intervention. Enmark, in particular, refused to testify against Olsson and Olofsson in preliminary proceedings, visited Olsson in shortly thereafter, and reportedly considered a romantic involvement with him before it ended. Some hostages also contributed to a public defense fund for the robbers' legal costs, signaling rather than trauma-driven resentment. Swedish media outlets sensationalized these reactions, highlighting interviews and behaviors that portrayed an inexplicable affinity between captives and criminals, which fueled early public and expert speculation about psychological bonding without yet formalizing it as a . Coverage emphasized Enmark's advocacy for the robbers' fair treatment, contrasting sharply with expectations of relief or condemnation from the ordeal.

Psychological Interpretations

Emergence of Stockholm Syndrome Concept

Swedish criminologist and psychiatrist , serving as a to during the Norrmalmstorg robbery on , 1973, observed the hostages' interactions with captors via monitors installed in the bank. He noted a recurring pattern where captives developed sympathetic bonds with their kidnappers, interpreting this as a primitive survival mechanism rooted in dependency and perceived protection from external threats like intervention. Bejerot initially termed the phenomenon Norrmalmstorg syndrome (or Norrmalmstorgssyndromet in Swedish), emphasizing its origin at the specific site of the standoff, with core features including hostages expressing positive emotions toward robbers—such as fear for their safety—and antagonism toward rescuers attempting liberation. This label captured behaviors like hostage Kristin Enmark's telephone plea to Prime Minister Olof Palme on August 26, 1973, urging against a police assault and defending robber Jan-Erik Olsson's character. Post-release actions by the four bank employees provided immediate illustrations: they drafted letters to authorities and media protesting the robbers' treatment, with one , Elisabeth Oldgren, publicly collecting funds for Olsson's legal defense shortly after the September 5, 1973, . Bejerot's formulation, disseminated through his advisory role and subsequent commentary, framed these responses as an adaptive emotional strategy rather than mere coercion, distinguishing it from prior captivity dynamics in criminological literature. The term gained broader recognition as in international discourse by late 1973, retaining Bejerot's descriptive emphasis on captor-victim alignment for .

Evidence from Hostage Accounts and Behaviors

During the six-day hostage crisis beginning August 23, 1973, Kristin Enmark, a bank employee held captive, broadcast a radio message to on August 24, expressing full trust in robbers and , stating she was unafraid of them despite their possession of , and warning that police intervention would endanger the hostages' lives. Enmark's plea highlighted a perceived alignment with the captors, as she urged authorities to meet demands rather than risk a . In the bank vault where the four hostages were confined, accounts describe the robbers refraining from physical harm, sharing limited supplies like and , and permitting hostages some interaction and movement within the enclosed space, which contrasted with the external pressure of negotiations and threats of forcible entry. Hostages later reported feeling protected by the robbers from potential aggression, with one noting the captors' behavior as surprisingly considerate under stress, contributing to a dynamic of amid . Post-release on August 28, 1973, following the assault, Enmark and at least one other visited Olofsson in shortly thereafter, donated to the robbers' legal defense funds, and initially declined to provide testimony against them in court. Enmark maintained contact with Olofsson, describing a friendship that persisted into 2016. Another , upon debriefing, confided to a her bewilderment at lacking fear or resentment toward the captors, questioning whether this indicated a personal abnormality. These self-reported behaviors—prioritizing captor welfare during the siege and sustaining positive ties afterward—have been linked in hostage accounts to causal elements including prolonged in the vault, the robbers' restraint from violence despite armed threats, and amplified dread of authority intervention as relayed through media and negotiations. While invoked to explain dynamics in cases like Patty Hearst's 1974 kidnapping, such evidence relies on retrospective testimonies without formal psychiatric validation as a distinct , as remains unlisted in the DSM-5.

Criticisms and Debates

Skepticism Toward

has not been recognized as a formal psychiatric diagnosis in major classification systems such as the or , with critics arguing it lacks empirical validation and rigorous scientific backing beyond anecdotal media narratives. Scholars have described it as an urban myth perpetuated by sensationalized reporting rather than reproducible psychological phenomena, noting the scarcity of controlled studies and the term's origins in Bejerot's remote analysis of the Norrmalmstorg events via television and phone consultations, which drew immediate pushback for overinterpreting limited data. This skepticism intensified in retrospective analyses, which highlight Bejerot's formulation as a hasty generalization from hostage Kristin Enmark's public criticism of police tactics, framing her rational concerns as irrational attachment without direct clinical assessment. Alternative interpretations emphasize pragmatic survival strategies over pathological bonding, positing that hostages' expressed fears toward rescuers stemmed from observable threats like the police's planned assault, which heightened risks of or captor retaliation, rather than emotional dependency. Such responses align with evolutionary heuristics for threat avoidance in high-stakes , where aligning with captors minimizes immediate harm, a infrequently replicated in other prolonged sieges despite similar conditions. Critics further contend that the syndrome concept pathologizes these adaptive behaviors, shifting blame onto victims for employing agency in dire circumstances and overlooking contextual factors like perceived rescuer incompetence. Recent re-evaluations underscore hostages' post-release testimonies of deliberate , rejecting the narrative of victim irrationality in favor of situational realism.

Police Handling and Strategic Failures

The Swedish police adopted a rigid stance during the six-day from August 23 to 28, 1973, refusing key demands such as allowing the robbers to escape with , under the influence of psychiatrist , who advised that prolonged captivity would erode the robbers' control and facilitate surrender without concessions. This approach, prioritizing societal order over immediate release, extended the standoff despite internal robber tensions—such as Olsson's frustration with Olofsson's arrival and the ' occasional pleas for compromise—opportunities that went unexploited to divide the group. Superintendent Sven Thorander later acknowledged operational lapses, including poor record-keeping of and inept press management, which compounded logistical delays in assault planning, such as sourcing vault blueprints. The eventual resolution via on involved drilling ceiling holes and deploying aerosol canisters into the sealed , a high-risk that caused and among occupants but avoided fatalities; however, critics highlighted its recklessness, as initial entry attempts had already faltered due to misidentification of Olsson as another criminal, escalating early tensions without clear gains. Bejerot's uninterviewed public dismissal of hostages as "emotionally irrational" further rigidified police rejection of captive communications, including Kristin Enmark's direct appeal to Olof warning that a would endanger lives more than the robbers. Defenders of the strategy emphasized its success in preventing bloodshed, with Commissioner Gunnar Lindroth awarding commendations to officers for the non-lethal outcome amid national media scrutiny. Critics, however, pointed to hostages' post-release accounts expressing greater fear of intervention than captors, alongside public frustration over the paralysis of central , as evidence of mishandling that eroded trust in authorities' crisis response.

Long-Term Legacy

Impact on Criminology and Negotiation Practices

The Norrmalmstorg robbery of August 1973, through its illustration of hostage-captor bonding, underscored the risks of aggressive police tactics that could alienate captives and escalate violence, contributing to a doctrinal shift in toward time-proven, non-confrontational strategies. Criminologists and analysts subsequently emphasized allowing sieges to extend, as prolonged isolation fostered dependency bonds that often deterred captors from harming hostages, a dynamic observed in the event where victims defended their keepers after release. This insight informed post-1973 protocols prioritizing over , with empirical reviews of subsequent incidents showing higher peaceful rates when negotiators avoided portraying authorities as threats. In the United States, the integrated these psychological observations into its evolving hostage negotiation framework, adopting the Police Department's model in 1974 and refining it by the 1990s to focus on rapport-building via and , as outlined in the Behavioral Change Stairway Model. Training materials highlighted how phenomena akin to —such as hostages developing negative views of —necessitated techniques that preserved subject trust, reducing impulsive tactical entries and correlating with fewer casualties in resolved crises. Peer-reviewed analyses of FBI operations post-1973 attribute this evolution partly to Norrmalmstorg's exposure of trauma-induced loyalty, enabling negotiators to exploit it for influence rather than counteract it forcibly. Swedish law enforcement responded with targeted reforms to address tactical deficiencies exposed during the six-day standoff, including upgraded training in psychological assessment and coordinated armed responses to prevent media-fueled chaos and command indecision. By the , national guidelines incorporated lessons on victim-perpetrator dynamics, mandating interdisciplinary teams for sieges and elevating standards for preparation, which empirical data from later domestic incidents linked to shorter effective resolutions without gas assaults or breaches. These changes reflected a causal recognition that empirical hostage behaviors, not abstract , should guide interventions, prioritizing causal factors like over politically driven haste.

Cultural Representations and Media Influence

The 2022 Netflix miniseries , directed by Félag Hrafninn and based on Clark Olofsson's , dramatizes Olofsson's criminal career, including his telephone involvement in the Norrmalmstorg robbery during episode four, portraying him as a charismatic figure whose actions helped spawn the term "." The series, starring as Olofsson, emphasizes his celebrity status in media and public fascination, contributing to renewed global interest in the event's psychological legacy without delving into hostage testimonies that downplayed romanticized bonding. Earlier Swedish productions include the 2003 TV movie Norrmalmstorg, which recounts the robbery and standoff as a centered on Jan-Erik Olsson's failed , highlighting the live coverage that turned the crisis into a national spectacle. A companion documentary, Norrmalmstorgsdramat inifrån (), features Olsson's rare post-event reflections, framing the narrative around his perspective on the chaos and police response, though it amplifies dramatic elements like the robbers' interactions with captives over verified survivor accounts of primarily fear-driven compliance. Documentaries such as The Day Became a (2021) reconstruct the six-day siege with archival footage and interviews, underscoring how real-time broadcasting sensationalized the hostages' reported sympathy toward captors, fostering a public narrative that outpaced from the victims, who later described their reactions as survival instincts rather than genuine affinity. Around the 50th anniversary in 2023, media retrospectives, including articles and podcasts, revisited these depictions to question the syndrome's validity, noting how initial press amplification created a template for interpreting victim-perpetrator dynamics beyond the specific facts of coerced gratitude amid isolation and threats. Books like David King's Six Days in August: The Story of (2020) compile press reports and trial records into a chronological account, popularizing the event's lore by focusing on media-hyped elements of , yet acknowledging that primary sources reveal minimal long-term attachment, with victims attributing post-release support to anti-police resentment rather than captor endearment. Such narratives have influenced public perception, embedding the robbery as a shorthand for paradoxical allegiance in high-profile retellings, often diverging from declassified police logs and statements that prioritize over inherent psychological bonding. The syndrome's cultural footprint extends to its invocation in political and domestic discussions, where it serves as a vernacular explanation for complicity—such as in analyses of authoritarian or battering relationships—despite critiques that its application lacks diagnostic rigor and oversimplifies under duress, as evidenced by its contested in psychiatric literature. In these domains, media-derived portrayals of Norrmalmstorg have perpetuated a that prioritizes anecdotal drama over replicable studies, prompting debates on whether the term pathologizes rational adaptations to power imbalances rather than capturing a .

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] 49367NCJRS.pdf - Office of Justice Programs
    August 23rd,1973, a bank robbery took place on the premises of Kreditbanl<en at Norrrne.lms torg in Stockholm. The robber, whose identity remained unknown ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] RISK FACTORS FOR TRAUMATIC BONDING AND ASSOCIATIONS ...
    The term was coined after a failed bank robbery that took place on Norrmalmstorg square in Stockholm, Sweden in 1973, when it was revealed that the hostages ...
  3. [3]
    (PDF) 'Stockholm syndrome': Psychiatric diagnosis or urban myth?
    Aug 10, 2025 · ... Norrmalmstorg robbery. (it can be argued that the ... However, there is limited empirical research on the features of Stockholm syndrome ...
  4. [4]
    (PDF) Stockholm Syndrome as Vernacular Resource - Academia.edu
    First used in 1973 in connection with the response of a group of employees held hostage in a robbery at a Stockholm bank, the use of the term “Stockholm ...
  5. [5]
    Forty Years Ago, A Swedish Bank Robber Gave Us "Stockholm ...
    Aug 28, 2013 · On Aug. 23, 1973 at 10:15 a.m., 32-year-old Olsson stormed into the Kreditbanken on the central Norrmalmstorg square, pulled out a sub- ...Missing: age | Show results with:age
  6. [6]
    Jan-Erik Olsson Age, Birthday, Zodiac Sign and Birth Chart
    Born on April 16, 1941, Jan-Erik Olsson is 84 years old. Zodiac sign is Aries. Life path number is 8. Analyze Jan-Erik Olsson birth chart and kundli.
  7. [7]
    10 Facts about the Norrmalmstorg Robbery: The Stockholm ...
    Sep 21, 2023 · ... robbery, assault, and attempted murder. Olsson was fascinated by Olofsson's criminal past as a bank robber. On January 7, 1973, after Olsson ...
  8. [8]
    Is Stockholm syndrome a myth? The terrifying crime ... - ABC News
    Aug 22, 2023 · A 23-year-old bank teller caught up in a siege inspired the psychological ... Jan-Erik Olsson was ready for the greatest heist of his life.
  9. [9]
    Is Stockholm Syndrome even real? The bizarre story behind a ...
    Aug 25, 2023 · “Jan-Erik suddenly found himself in a hostage-taking [situation.] He intended a quick getaway bank robbery, and now he was in a situation ...
  10. [10]
    Stockholm Syndrome: The True Story of Hostages Loyal to Their ...
    Aug 23, 2013 · After wounding a policeman who had responded to a silent alarm, the robber took four bank employees hostage. ... Within hours, the police ...
  11. [11]
    'Stockholm Syndrome' bank robber Clark Olofsson dies - CTV News
    Jun 26, 2025 · Olofsson had a slew of convictions including robbery, attempted murder, drug dealing and assault, and spent more than half of his life in ...Missing: prior armed
  12. [12]
    'Stockholm syndrome' bank robber Clark Olofsson dies aged 78
    Jun 26, 2025 · ... armed robbery and acting as an accessory in the 1966 murder of a police officer. Within hours, the police delivered Olsson's fellow convict ...Missing: prior | Show results with:prior
  13. [13]
    Swedish criminal Clark Olofsson who inspired 'Stockholm syndrome ...
    Jun 28, 2025 · Clark Olofsson, the notorious Swedish criminal who inspired the popular psychological term, died after a long illness, his family announced.
  14. [14]
    How the myth of Stockholm syndrome came from a media ... - NZZ
    Aug 24, 2023 · When police arrived, the robber opened fire, wounding a police officer in the hand and taking 23-year-old Enmark and two of her female ...Missing: names Safvean
  15. [15]
    Crime Trends and Measures Against Crime in Sweden
    During this period, the number of reported crimes of violence committed by persons above the age of 15 rose by 40 percent. In 1979, the violent crime rate ...Missing: 1970-1975 | Show results with:1970-1975
  16. [16]
    The Real Bank Robbery That Gave the World Stockholm Syndrome
    Aug 4, 2020 · ... Norrmalmstorg square in Stockholm on Aug. 24, 1973. A misfired robbery turned into a six-day standoff that gave birth to the phrase ...
  17. [17]
    The Swedish Prison System in Historical Perspective: a Story of ...
    Contrary to what happened in most other nations, the Swedish prison system became organized around a penal policy built on solitary confinement. My argument ...Missing: lax | Show results with:lax
  18. [18]
    50 years on, the enduring myth of Stockholm Syndrome - France 24
    Aug 21, 2023 · Police and media quickly swarmed the square outside Kreditbanken, with snipers perched in surrounding buildings, their weapons pointed at the ...<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    Statistics from the judicial system | Brå - Brottsförebyggande rådet
    Oct 10, 2025 · In 2024 there were 2 bank robberies which were 0 reported crimes in 2023 and 2022. ... Brå is responsible for the official criminal justice ...
  20. [20]
    On this day in history, August 23, 1973, a bank robbery in Sweden ...
    Aug 23, 2024 · The bank robbery and hostage situation that led to the coining of the term "Stockholm syndrome" began on this day in history, Aug. 23, 1973.
  21. [21]
    Norrmalmstorg – Discover Stockholm Syndrome Origins
    – Site of the 1973 Heist and Birthplace of Stockholm Syndrome. Image from the robbery at Norrmalmstorg, 1973. Source: TV broadcast from Sveriges Television.<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    The Six-Day Hostage Standoff That Gave Rise to 'Stockholm ...
    Aug 23, 2017 · But they wouldn't allow the robber to leave with the hostages, sparking a standoff. The police got a phone in so the hostages and their ...
  23. [23]
    The Bank Drama | The New Yorker
    Nov 18, 1974 · Before Olsson took aim, the policeman had shouted his own name and had begun pleading with the invisible robber to mend his ways, and the ...
  24. [24]
    Stockholm Syndrome and the art of hostage negotiation - BBC
    Aug 19, 2024 · It was day two of the siege, and robber Jan-Erik Olsson wanted to show the police he meant business by shooting her terrified bank colleague ...<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    https://www.history.com/news/stockholm-syndrome
  26. [26]
    The Stockholm Syndrome - Radio Sweden
    Nov 25, 2009 · ... robbery, the so-called Norrmalmstorg Drama. She was one of four ... Enmark: Can you just not let me and Elisabeth, Clark and the robber ...
  27. [27]
    Stockholm Police Seize 2 in Vault, Free 4 Hostages - The New York ...
    Aug 29, 1973 · Stockholm bank robber J‐E Olsson and convict C Olofsson surrender on Aug 29, freeing 4 hostages held for 6 days in Kreditbanken vault; ...
  28. [28]
    Norrmalmstorgsdramat | Året runt | Historia - SO-rummet
    Den 23 augusti 1973 startade Norrmalmstorgsdramat. Detta omtalade bankdrama skulle gastkrama Sverige i nära sex dygn. Klockan 10 den 23 augusti kom en ...
  29. [29]
    Clark Olofsson var ingen charmknutte - Sydnärkenytt
    May 21, 2022 · Olofsson är utbildad journalist. Jan-Erik “Janne” Olsson, född 1941, dömdes efter Norrmalmstorgsdramat till tio års fängelse, och frigavs 1980.<|control11|><|separator|>
  30. [30]
    50 år sedan dramat vid Norrmalmstorg – bankrån numera ovanligt
    Aug 23, 2023 · I dag är det 50 år sedan Norrmalmstorgsdramat började, ett av de mest uppmärksammade bankrånen genom tiderna ... Janne Olsson döms senare till tio ...
  31. [31]
    50 år efter dramat återvände flyktbilen till Norrmalmstorg
    Aug 25, 2023 · Olofsson anklagades för att ha begått brott under Norrmalmstorgsdramat, men friades. Den i dag 82-årige Janne Olsson, som bland annat ...Missing: dom | Show results with:dom
  32. [32]
    https://www.popularhistoria.se/samhalle/brott-straff/norrmalmstorgsdramat
  33. [33]
    What is Stockholm syndrome? It all started with a bank robbery 50 ...
    Aug 25, 2023 · At one point, a hostage, Kristin Enmark, told Palme over the ... 28 when police, using tear gas, stormed the bank, arrested Olsson and Olofsson ...
  34. [34]
    Is the Stockholm syndrome a real thing? This is the story of the 1973 ...
    Dec 8, 2021 · A bank robbery in Swedens capital Stockholm turns into a six day hostage situation. During that time the hostages act in a way not previously observed.Missing: tactics | Show results with:tactics
  35. [35]
    Six Days In August: The Story Of The Stockholm Syndrome
    May 31, 2021 · Out of the four captives, Kristin Enmark and Elisabeth Oldgren were ... Such events as this would-be robbery and hostage-taking are ...Missing: Norrmalmstorg Safvean
  36. [36]
    Birthplace of the Stockholm Syndrome - Atlas Obscura
    Sep 3, 2015 · During and after the attempted robbery, the hostages showed sympathy for the robbers and criticized the police for their actions. The Swedish ...
  37. [37]
    What Is the Origin of Stockholm Syndrome - Business Insider
    Oct 23, 2013 · Swedish psychiatrist Nils Bejerot later coined the term "Stockholm Syndrome" to describe so-called captor bonding.
  38. [38]
    Stockholm Syndrome In Relationships: Impact On Mental Health
    Apr 16, 2025 · Stockholm syndrome is not an official diagnosis in the DSM-5 or other psychiatric manuals​. However, many experts question whether it is a ...
  39. [39]
    'Stockholm syndrome': psychiatric diagnosis or urban myth? - PubMed
    'Stockholm syndrome' is a term used to describe the positive bond some kidnap victims develop with their captor.
  40. [40]
    Hostage Dynamics: Stockholm Syndrome - Blue Line Magazine
    Jul 26, 2022 · The anti-police sentiment is, in part, a fear that they could be harmed by either the hostage takers in an attempt to prove a point to the ...
  41. [41]
    Appeasement: replacing Stockholm syndrome as a definition of a ...
    Jan 19, 2023 · We propose replacing Stockholm syndrome with 'appeasement,' a term that can be explained through a biopsychological model (ie Polyvagal Theory)
  42. [42]
    Is Stockholm Syndrome a Psychiatric Reality or a Convenient Myth?
    Jul 14, 2025 · Stockholm Syndrome is not an official psychiatric diagnosis, not listed in DSM/ICD, and is not recognized as a recognized psychiatric diagnosis.
  43. [43]
    The Myth of “Stockholm Syndrome” and other labels which are used ...
    Jan 8, 2016 · “Stockholm Syndrome” is one thread in a dense fabric of similar notions used to pathologize, blame, and discredit victims. Here is the list of ...Missing: adaptive | Show results with:adaptive
  44. [44]
    Stockholm Syndrome: How Systems Blamed Survivors to Protect ...
    Apr 26, 2025 · The Stockholm Syndrome story isn't just about a bank robbery · Swedish bank Robber Clark Olofsson barricaded a vault with hostages. · Press ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] ENFORCEMENT - Office of Justice Programs
    The Stockholm Syndrome is con- sidered to be a positive and useful element in a hostage situation because it may reduce the chance for the un- precipitated ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] APRIL 1979.pdf - LEB - FBI
    Apr 7, 1979 · As such, the Stockholm Syndrome should be kept in mind by police when they face such a situation, plan an attack, debrief former hostages, and ...
  47. [47]
    Fifty Years of FBI Crisis (Hostage) Negotiation - LEB
    Aug 6, 2024 · Later in 1990, based on this realization, we implemented a major change in the FBI Hostage Negotiation Program to focus on active listening ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Crisis (hostage) negotiation: current strategies and issues in high ...
    The Behavioral Change Stairway Model (BCSM), developed by the FBI's Crisis. Negotiation Unit, outlines the relationship-building process involving the ...
  49. [49]
    Organizational Changes and Remodelling of the Swedish Police
    In 1984, the Swedish Government enacted police reforms designed to result in a more flexible organization and an extended decentralization.Missing: Norrmalmstorg robbery 1973
  50. [50]
    Watch Clark | Netflix Official Site
    This is the unbelievable story of Clark Olofsson, the controversial criminal who inspired the term "Stockholm syndrome. ... The Norrmalmstorg robbery is underway.
  51. [51]
    Clark Olofsson, 78, Dies; Bank Robber Helped Inspire 'Stockholm ...
    Oct 10, 2025 · Sentenced to nine years for that robbery, Mr. Olofsson studied journalism behind bars and was released in 1983. The next year, he was convicted ...
  52. [52]
    Clark true story: Bill Skarsgård crime series explained - Radio Times
    May 5, 2022 · The six-part series, which was released today, charts the life of Clark Olofsson, a Swedish criminal who gained celebrity status across the 1960s, '70s and '80 ...
  53. [53]
    Norrmalmstorg (TV Movie 2003) - IMDb
    Rating 5.9/10 (588) This is the true story of the failed bank robbery-cum-hostage taking in a bank at the square Norrmalmstorg in Stockholm, in September 1973.<|separator|>
  54. [54]
    Norrmalmstorgsdramat inifrån (2003) - IMDb
    Rating 6/10 (33) For more than 30 years, the bank-robber Janne Olsson refused to talk about the noted bank-robbery at Norrmalmstorg, Stockholm, in 1973.
  55. [55]
    The Day Stockholm Became a Syndrome - Top Documentary Films
    Rating 7.2/10 (5) August 23rd, 1973, wasn't just another day in Stockholm. A botched bank robbery at the Kreditbank turned into a six-day hostage crisis.
  56. [56]
    STOCKHOLM SYNDROME AS VERNACULAR RESOURCE - 2012
    Jun 12, 2012 · First coined in 1973 to describe a pathological response on the part of individuals involved in kidnapping or hostage-taking situations, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Stockholm Syndrome A Psychiatric Diagnosis or Just A Myth - IJTSRD
    ➢ Stockholm syndrome is a form of psychological trauma that occurs when hostages develop feelings of trust or affection for their captors. ➢ The hostage may ...