Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

OMA Device Management

OMA Device Management (OMA-DM) is a suite and set of specifications developed by the (OMA) to enable the remote, over-the-air management of mobile devices, consumer electronics, and other connected endpoints. It supports key functions such as initial device provisioning, software and updates, of settings, fault , and , allowing service providers, device manufacturers, and operators to maintain and optimize devices throughout their lifecycle using a standardized, interoperable framework. The core architecture of OMA-DM revolves around the DM Client, a embedded in the managed device, and the DM Server, a remote entity that controls management sessions. Communication occurs via a secure over bearers like HTTP/, utilizing XML-based SyncML messages. Originating from the OMA's formation in 2002 to standardize mobile services, OMA-DM specifications first emerged around 2005 to address the growing need for scalable device in emerging mobile ecosystems. The standard has evolved through multiple versions, with Version 1.3 approved in May 2016 incorporating enhancements such as improved notification mechanisms, for clients and servers, and support for additional objects like DMAcc (account settings) and DevDetail (device details). , initially proposed in 2013 for broader applicability, was approved in February 2016. For constrained devices, OMA has developed Lightweight M2M (LwM2M) as a successor . These specifications influence modern (MDM) solutions in platforms like Windows Intune and embedded systems.

Background and History

Origins in OMA

The Open Mobile Alliance (OMA) was established in June 2002 as a consolidation of several industry forums, including the Wireless Application Protocol (WAP) Forum, the Open Mobile Architecture Initiative, and the Location Interoperability Forum, aimed at developing interoperable standards for mobile services across diverse devices and networks. This formation addressed the fragmentation in mobile technology specifications by uniting over 200 companies from the mobile ecosystem to create unified protocols that would enable seamless service delivery. In its early years, OMA prioritized for emerging mobile applications, particularly as global adoption surged from approximately 12 subscriptions per 100 people in 2000 to over 36 by 2005, necessitating standardized approaches to device configuration and service provisioning. This growth in user base and device diversity highlighted the need for efficient over-the-air provisioning to configure applications, networks, and settings without physical intervention, fostering reliable deployment of services like messaging and browsing. A key precursor to OMA's device management efforts was the SyncML Data Synchronization standard, developed by the SyncML Initiative and first released in 2000 to enable platform-independent of data such as contacts and calendars across devices. By 2001, SyncML had achieved for initial implementations, providing a foundational XML-based protocol that OMA later adapted to extend capabilities into broader device management functions.

Evolution of Specifications

The (OMA) Device Management (DM) specifications originated from the SyncML Initiative's efforts in the early , with OMA DM v1.0 released in 2002 to establish a foundational SyncML-based protocol for remote device configuration, provisioning, and synchronization over various transport bindings like HTTP and . This initial version introduced core commands such as Get, Replace, Add, Delete, and Exec, enabling basic management of a device's hierarchical represented as a management tree. Subsequent iterations built on this foundation, with OMA DM v1.1 approved in 2003, enhancing the tree representation through improved serialization mechanisms in XML or WBXML formats to better describe management objects and nodes for more efficient . The progression continued to v1.2 in 2008, which incorporated support for firmware updates via the Firmware Update Object (FUMO) enabler and diagnostics through the Diagnostics and Monitoring (DiagMon) framework, allowing remote software upgrades and device health assessments. A minor update to v1.2.1 in 2008 further refined these capabilities by introducing atomic operations, enabling grouped commands to execute as a single unit for reliability in complex tasks. The specifications reached v1.3 in May 2016, extending applicability to (IoT) devices with optimizations for constrained environments, such as sessionless operations and large object handling to reduce overhead on low-power networks. This version also strengthened security through enhanced authentication options, including and SHA-256 digests, and refined access controls to address evolving threats in diverse device ecosystems. Central to these evolutions are key documents like OMA-TS-DM_Protocol, which defines the core session and command mechanics across versions, and OMA-TS-DM_Tree_and_Description (also known as Tree and Node Description or ), which standardizes the structure and node descriptions, with change histories documenting additions such as atomic operations in v1.2.1. Parallel efforts included collaboration with the (IETF), formalized in RFC 3975 (March 2005), to align OMA DM with broader internet standards for interoperability.

Core Concepts and Features

Definition and Purpose

OMA Device Management (OMA DM) is a protocol suite standardized by the (OMA) for the remote management of mobile and () devices, encompassing phones, personal digital assistants (PDAs), tablets, and sensors. While OMA DM supports management, OMA has developed the Lightweight M2M (LWM2M) protocol as a successor optimized for constrained devices using CoAP over . This suite facilitates the interaction between management servers and client devices over various transport protocols, enabling efficient oversight of device configurations and managed objects. The primary purposes of OMA DM center on comprehensive device lifecycle , including initial provisioning to set up devices out-of-the-box, configuration updates to adapt settings dynamically, software and for upgrades and , fault diagnostics to identify and resolve issues remotely, and compliance enforcement to ensure adherence to operational standards. These capabilities address challenges in low-bandwidth, high-latency environments typical of mobile networks, promoting seamless service delivery without physical intervention. OMA DM primarily targets network operators, device manufacturers, and enterprises, allowing them to streamline operations by reducing support costs associated with on-site servicing and enabling over-the-air (OTA) updates for large-scale device fleets. Originating from the Alliance's initiatives in the early to harmonize mobile data services, it has evolved as a foundational for interoperable device management.

Key Capabilities

OMA Device Management (OMA DM) enables of configurations and capabilities through a set of specialized functionalities designed for efficiency and flexibility in and environments. A fundamental capability is the and of the , a hierarchical representation of the hardware, software, and settings organized by unique paths. Servers access and explore this tree using commands like GET to retrieve details, while ADD, REPLACE, DELETE, and EXEC allow precise modifications to both permanent and dynamic , facilitating targeted updates to parameters without full data transfers. Software inventory reporting is supported via the Software Component Management Object (SCOMO), enabling servers to query and receive detailed lists of installed components. This includes mandatory tracking of SCOMO-delivered software under the /Deployed node—covering identifiers, package references, names, versions, and states (e.g., Inactive or Active)—as well as optional inclusion of externally installed applications, all retrievable through standard GET operations for comprehensive asset monitoring. To enhance update efficiency, OMA DM incorporates delta updates through the Delta Record Management Object, which logs incremental changes (adds, deletes, or modifications) to the management tree with timestamps, authority identifiers, and sequence numbers. Servers query these s asynchronously via EXEC commands or Generic Alerts, receiving only the differences since the last sync in XML format, thereby minimizing and demands while adhering to configurable thresholds for record retention and purging. The protocol's extensibility allows for vendor-specific nodes and custom Management Objects, defined using the Device Description Framework (DDF) in XML format, which describe node structures, access controls, and formats for proprietary extensions without altering core specifications. This design also supports seamless integration with other OMA enablers, such as Client Provisioning, where the Bootstrap Configuration Management Object populates the initial tree with provisioning parameters during setup, ensuring compatibility across service ecosystems.

Architecture and Components

Client-Server Model

The (OMA) Device (DM) operates on a client-server designed to enable remote of devices in a secure and efficient manner. In this model, the DM Client and DM Server communicate through structured sessions to facilitate configuration, software updates, and diagnostics, with the protocol ensuring bidirectional interaction over secure channels. This supports scalability for large-scale deployments, such as in mobile operator networks, by centralizing control at the server while distributing tasks to the client on individual devices. The DM Client is residing on the managed device, responsible for initiating sessions, accessing the device's management tree—a hierarchical representation of configurable parameters—and executing commands received from the . It handles session requests by sending initial device information, such as manufacturer details and protocol version, in the first package of a session, and subsequently processes server instructions while reporting status and results back. The client ensures local enforcement of management operations, maintaining device compliance without constant connectivity. The Server functions as a centralized entity, typically hosted in operator or networks, that initiates sessions and pushes configurations or commands to enrolled devices. It authenticates clients, orchestrates session flows by sending operational packages, and terminates sessions upon completion, enabling proactive oversight of device fleets. Servers support multiple clients simultaneously, leveraging the protocol's package-based exchange to apply policies, retrieve diagnostics, and update firmware across diverse device types. Interactions between the DM Client and Server follow a session-based model, supporting both pull and push mechanisms to accommodate varying connectivity scenarios. In pull sessions, the client proactively initiates communication, often triggered by user actions, scheduled timers, or internal events, allowing the device to request management updates when connected. Push sessions, conversely, are server-initiated, where the server sends notifications—via mechanisms like SMS, WAP Push, or in later versions Google Cloud Messaging (GCM; deprecated in 2019 and replaced by Firebase Cloud Messaging (FCM))—to alert the client and prompt it to establish a session. These sessions utilize HTTPS as the primary transport protocol for secure data exchange, ensuring encryption and integrity during transmission. In OMA DM 1.x (up to version 1.3), the protocol employs SyncML as the foundational data format for message encoding, providing a standardized XML-based structure for client-server exchanges. In OMA DM 2.0 (approved 2016), the model evolves to a RESTful HTTP-based protocol using JSON for data serialization, simplifying interactions while maintaining core client-server roles for enhanced efficiency in modern networks.

Data Synchronization Framework

The Data Synchronization Framework in OMA Device Management (OMA DM) versions 1.x (up to 1.3) is built upon (Synchronization Markup Language), an XML-based representation designed to encode management objects, commands, and operations across client-server interactions. enables the structured exchange of data by defining a common that supports both and device management tasks, allowing commands such as Add, Replace, Delete, and Get to be serialized into XML messages. This format ensures interoperability between diverse devices and servers, with messages wrapped in transport bindings like HTTP or for reliable delivery. Central to this framework is the Device Management Tree (DM Tree), a hierarchical that represents the managed state of the device as a collection of nodes organized in a tree-like format. Each node is addressed using a unique, case-sensitive path compliant with 2396, starting from the ("/") and branching into interior nodes (which can contain child nodes) and leaf nodes (which hold actual values). For instance, the "/DeviceInfo" node captures essential device attributes, including subnodes like Man (manufacturer), DevId (unique device identifier), Mod (model), and Lang (language), while the "/Software" node under "/DevDetail" details with elements such as SwV (software version) and FwV ( version). Nodes may also include for type (e.g., text/plain or application-specific formats) and scope (permanent or dynamic), facilitating targeted management operations on device resources without affecting unrelated areas. The DM Tree structure is reused in OMA DM 2.0. Synchronization in OMA DM 1.x operates through defined modes to update the DM Tree efficiently between the client and the management . In one-way , the pushes changes to the client in a single exchange—typically via a -initiated package followed by a client acknowledgment—ideal for straightforward updates like configuration deployment without requiring client feedback beyond . Two-way , in contrast, involves iterative message packages that allow bidirectional updates, where the client reports changes or back to the , enabling ongoing reconciliation of the DM Tree for complex scenarios like software inventory or diagnostic reporting. These modes leverage SyncML's command structure to detect and resolve conflicts, ensuring the 's represented state remains consistent with expectations. In OMA DM 2.0, data synchronization evolves to a RESTful model using HTTP methods such as HGET, HPUT, and HPOST over HTTPS, with management objects serialized in JSON format (e.g., application/vnd.oma.dm.request+json). This supports similar one-way and two-way synchronization through package exchanges (Package#1 to #3), enabling efficient updates to the DM Tree while providing backward compatibility for management objects from 1.x versions. Synchronous and asynchronous reporting modes are also included for flexible operation in modern IoT and mobile environments.

Protocol Mechanics

Session Initiation and Management

In OMA Device Management (DM), sessions are initiated primarily through server-triggered notifications or client polling mechanisms, enabling remote management of device configurations. The setup phase begins when the DM server sends a Package #0, known as the Management Initiation Alert, via supported bearers such as WAP Push, OBEX, SIP Push, or HTTP Push, which includes the server identifier, a unique session ID (a 16-bit value), and the transport binding (e.g., HTTP as "01" or HTTPS as "10"). Upon receipt, the DM client verifies the notification's authenticity using a digest to mitigate denial-of-service risks and initiates the session by responding with Package #1 over the specified HTTP or HTTPS connection. During the setup phase, is exchanged using the Cred element within SyncML messages, supporting Basic authentication (base64-encoded userid:password) or digest challenges to establish secure identity verification. The client reports its device capabilities through the DevInfo structure, transmitted via a Replace command in Package #1, detailing elements such as DevId (device identifier), (manufacturer), Mod (model), DmV (DM version), and (language). The , initially provided in the notification or generated by the client, is assigned and included in the SyncHdr of subsequent messages to uniquely identify the session throughout its lifecycle. This phase ensures both parties confirm compatibility and security before proceeding to management operations. The management phase involves multi-message exchanges structured as atomic units over HTTP or , utilizing Packages #2 (initial server commands), #3 (client responses), and #4 (additional server commands or closure) to handle ongoing interactions efficiently. For extended sessions, pause and resume functionality is supported through Alert 1222, which signals the need for additional messages, allowing the session to continue with sequential MsgID increments without full reinitialization. The Final element in the last message of each package demarcates the end of that exchange, maintaining session continuity across multiple HTTP requests if necessary. Session termination occurs via status alerts and cleanup procedures to ensure orderly closure. The server or client may issue a Session Abort Alert (1223) with the Final flag set to indicate completion or interruption, prompting the release of resources. Cleanup involves sending an empty message or explicit abort to finalize the session, while error handling maps HTTP status codes to DM-specific faults—for instance, 401 Unauthorized triggers authentication retry, and 4xx/5xx codes (e.g., 404 Not Found or 500 Internal Server Error) correspond to protocol-level errors like invalid commands or server faults, ensuring diagnostic feedback.

Core Management Operations

The core management operations in OMA Device Management (OMA DM) encompass a set of standardized commands that enable a to manipulate the hierarchical on a client device, facilitating remote , , and of mobile devices. These operations are executed within an established management session and target specific nodes in the tree using URI-based addressing, where URIs denote paths such as ./Vendor/Setting to uniquely identify nodes like leaves or interior nodes. Each command elicits a synchronous status response from the client, typically using HTTP-like codes such as () for success or (Not Found) for non-existent targets, ensuring reliable feedback on execution outcomes. The primary commands include Add, which creates a new node—either a leaf with data or an interior node with children—at a specified non-existent URI, requiring appropriate access rights and failing with status 405 (Method Not Allowed) if the target is permanent. Delete removes a dynamic node and its entire sub-tree from the specified URI, succeeding only on non-permanent nodes and returning 200 OK upon completion or 404 if the URI is invalid. Get retrieves the value of a leaf node or lists the children of an interior node at the given URI, with results encapsulated in a <Results> element and meta-information like format or type if requested. Replace updates the value or properties of an existing node at the URI, such as modifying a setting's data, and can also rename nodes while failing on immutable permanent node attributes with status 405. Exec invokes a predefined action or script associated with a node, often used for tasks like initiating a download, and returns results via status or a subsequent Generic Alert. These commands support atomic wrappers: Atomic ensures a group of operations either all succeed or all fail as a unit, ideal for complex updates like large object handling, while Sequence executes a series of commands in strict order, reporting individual statuses within the group. Special operations extend these core capabilities for specific use cases. Firmware Notification leverages the Exec command or Generic Alert to signal firmware update availability or progress, notifying the server of completion via a ResultCode in OMA DM's Firmware Update Management Object (FUMO), which integrates with the for over-the-air updates. VendorSpecific commands allow proprietary extensions, typically under nodes like ./Ext, where vendors define custom parameters and actions accessible via standard commands like Get or Replace, enabling tailored without altering the core . All operations adhere to node access types (e.g., AddOnly, Get) defined in the Device Description Framework (DDF), ensuring across compliant devices.

Security and Compliance

Authentication Protocols

Authentication in OMA Device Management (OMA DM) ensures secure verification of identities between the device client and management server during session establishment, primarily through challenge-response mechanisms integrated with the SyncML-based protocol. These protocols support both transport-layer and application-layer authentication to prevent unauthorized access to device management operations. The core authentication method employs challenge-response using HTTP Basic or Digest authentication, alongside SyncML-specific extensions. In HTTP Basic authentication, the client encodes the userid and password in format within a <Cred> element tagged as syncml:auth-basic, sent during the session setup phase. Digest authentication, mandatory for clients lacking transport-layer security, utilizes or SHA-256 hashing; for instance, the client computes a digest as H(B64(H(username:password)):nonce), where the server-issued prevents replay attacks, and responds via the <Cred> element with syncml:auth-md5 or syncml:auth-sha256. These credentials are exchanged in the initial packages of the OMA DM session to authenticate the client to the server. Device authentication relies on shared secrets, such as pre-provisioned username-password pairs stored in the device's DM Account object, or (PKI) using certificates for stronger security. In PKI-based authentication, certificates enable mutual verification without shared secrets, leveraging underlying TLS for transport security while application-layer checks confirm identities via the SyncML . Server authentication is mandatory to establish trust, achieved either at the using TLS with certificates or at the through the server's provision of credentials in the <Cred> element during session initiation; this ensures the device only accepts commands from verified servers. Role-based access control is enforced through Access Control Lists (ACLs) applied hierarchically to nodes in the OMA DM Tree, restricting management operations based on the authenticated 's identity. Each DM Tree node can define ACLs using server identifiers (e.g., ServerID), specifying permissions such as Get, Add, Replace, or Delete for authorized entities, thereby preventing unauthorized modifications to sensitive device configurations. These ACLs are evaluated during command execution, with the required to possess the appropriate credentials matching the node's access rules.

Encryption and Integrity Measures

In OMA Device Management (OMA DM), transport-layer encryption is implemented primarily through Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) or Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols over HTTPS bindings, ensuring confidentiality of SyncML messages during transmission between the DM client and server. The OMA DM Security specification requires the use of transport-layer security whenever it is available on the underlying transport, such as HTTP, with implementations supporting TLS for certificate-based authentication and data protection. Certain implementations and deployments, such as Verizon's LTE OTADM requirements (as of February 2022), specify TLS 1.2 or higher to address vulnerabilities in prior versions, aligning with secure communication standards for mobile ecosystems. Integrity protection in OMA DM focuses on detecting tampering of SyncML representation messages, using HMAC-SHA256 as a transport-neutral mechanism. HMAC-SHA256, per RFC 6234, generates a using the AAuthSecret (derived from credentials) as the key over a concatenated with the message body, which is then inserted into the SyncML header (e.g., via the element) to verify unaltered delivery. For enhanced confidentiality of sensitive data nodes, OMA DM supports optional through XML Encryption as specified in the W3C standard, allowing individual management tree elements to be encrypted independently of the . This mechanism uses implementation-specific algorithms, such as AES-128 in mode for symmetric encryption with for key transport, applied to specific SyncML nodes during bootstrap or management operations to protect proprietary or critical device configurations. Key management in OMA DM adheres to secure and processes outlined in the OMA DM Security specification, integrating with standards such as the Generic Bootstrapping Architecture (GBA) for generating long-term credentials like the Device Management Bootstrap Key (DMBIK) and Key (DMBEK). These keys, derived from network access keys (Ks_ext/int_NAF), facilitate secure session establishment and credential storage on the device, ensuring compliance with OMA's secure device management requirements for authentication and encryption key handling post-bootstrap.

Implementations and Impact

Adoption in Mobile Ecosystems

OMA Device Management (OMA DM) gained widespread adoption in mobile ecosystems during the mid-2000s, coinciding with the rollout of networks such as / and CDMA. This protocol enabled over-the-air () configuration and management of handset settings, allowing carriers to remotely manage device configurations without physical intervention. Initial implementations aligned with OMA DM version 1.2 releases from 2005 onward, facilitating seamless integration into early infrastructures for tasks like APN setup and updates. In consumer mobile devices, OMA DM found significant uptake in Android platforms through dedicated carrier configuration APIs, which supported carrier-driven provisioning of network parameters and software updates. For instance, Android's CarrierConfigManager and related telephony APIs leveraged OMA DM to enable remote provisioning of carrier-specific features, enhancing compatibility across diverse hardware. Feature phones from manufacturers like Nokia and Sony Ericsson also incorporated OMA DM support, particularly in models from the mid-2000s such as Nokia's Eseries and Sony Ericsson's multimedia devices, where it handled OTA updates and service activations over GSM/UMTS networks. iOS devices, however, exhibited limited native support for OMA DM, relying instead on Apple's proprietary Mobile Device Management (MDM) framework for similar functionalities, with minimal interoperability for standard OMA operations. The integration of OMA DM profoundly impacted mobile ecosystems by empowering carriers to customize devices remotely, such as adjusting connectivity settings and deploying updates en masse. This capability streamlined operations for networks like and others, reducing reliance on brick-and-mortar stores for and configuration assistance, thereby lowering operational costs and improving service efficiency. Certifications of OMA DM clients by major U.S. carriers in the late and beyond underscored its role in scaling consumer device management across global deployments.

Role in Enterprise Management

OMA Device Management (OMA DM) plays a pivotal role in enterprise management by enabling centralized control over mobile and Windows devices through integration with leading (MDM) platforms. has utilized OMA DM since the Windows Phone 8.1 era to deliver Configuration Service Provider (CSP) policies, allowing administrators to configure device settings remotely via the SyncML protocol over . Similarly, Workspace ONE incorporates OMA DM for secure communication with Windows devices, leveraging it alongside the Windows Notification Service (WNS) to push policies and ensure compliance in environments. This integration supports enterprise IT teams in managing diverse device fleets, from corporate-issued laptops to hybrid work setups, by providing a standardized protocol for over-the-air updates and configurations. A core aspect of OMA DM's utility in settings is its mechanism, which follows the GET-SET-GET model to apply and verify configurations reliably. In this process, the MDM server first issues a GET command to retrieve the current state of a CSP node, such as querying profiles under ./Vendor/MSFT/WiFi/Profile; it then uses a SET or REPLACE command to deploy the desired , like installing a specific app via the ./Vendor/MSFT/EnterpriseAppManagement CSP; finally, another GET confirms the change took effect. This iterative approach ensures idempotent application of settings, making it particularly effective in (BYOD) scenarios where personal devices require selective corporate policies without full ownership takeover, such as enforcing connections to secure networks or restricting app installations to approved sources. In the evolution of enterprise management tools post-2020, OMA DM has seen extensions toward declarative models, such as Microsoft's via the Microsoft Management Platform Cloud (MMPC), which shifts from periodic syncs to continuous state enforcement for more efficient policy handling. Despite this transition, OMA DM persists for legacy compatibility in 2025, serving as the foundational for and older CSPs in platforms like Intune and Workspace ONE, ensuring seamless support for pre-WinDC devices while bridging to modern declarative frameworks.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] OMA Device Management Protocol - Open Mobile Alliance
    May 24, 2016 · OMA-DM is a secure management protocol that runs between a DM Server and a DM Client. The following sub-sections present a high-level overview ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Device Management Architecture - Open Mobile Alliance
    Sep 22, 2009 · The architecture of the Device Management enabler anticipates the needs of the market actors to differentiate their products through vendor- ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  3. [3]
    [PDF] OMA Device Management Protocol - Open Mobile Alliance
    Dec 10, 2013 · Description Framework specification used to represent the OMA DM description. Mandatory. Man. Specifies the manufacturer of the device.
  4. [4]
    [MS-MDM]: Overview - Microsoft Learn
    Apr 27, 2022 · Where OMA DM is the management system built on the OMA-DM protocol. MDM supports the following capabilities: Client and resource configurations.
  5. [5]
    Microsoft Joins Open Mobile Alliance as Sponsor Board Member To ...
    Jun 12, 2002 · The Open Mobile Alliance includes the previous WAP Forum membership, the supporters of the Open Mobile Architecture initiative (OMA) and ...
  6. [6]
    Business | Technology firms sign mobile alliance - BBC NEWS
    The alliance aims to replace the WAP Forum's "wireless application protocol" which has failed to excite mobile internet users. "For some of us that have been ...
  7. [7]
    Mobile cellular subscriptions (per 100 people) | Data
    Mobile cellular subscriptions (per 100 people) World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database, International Telecommunication Union ( ITU )Missing: early | Show results with:early
  8. [8]
    WAP Forum to be replaced by OMA - EDN
    WAP will consequently be absorbed through a merger with the Open Mobile Architecture Initiative and others. Advertisement. OMA will define ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] A Primer to SyncML/OMA DS - Open Mobile Alliance
    Mar 31, 2008 · SyncML is an open synchronization protocol that was first released by SyncML Initiative ltd. in 2000, to solve this situation. As SyncML ...
  10. [10]
    SyncML Data Synchronization
    By April 2001, the first SyncML-conformant solutions were certified and SyncML had become the de-facto standard for data synchronization. (Competing proprietary ...
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Enabler Release Definition for OMA Device Management
    Dec 9, 2003 · OMA Device Management (based on SyncML DM) Enabler Release, version 1.1.2. Fully conformant DM client implementations can only be achieved ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] OMA Device Management Protocol - Open Mobile Alliance
    Jun 17, 2008 · The declared Essential IPR is publicly available to members and non-members of the Open Mobile Alliance and may be found on the “OMA IPR ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] OMA Device Management Tree and Description
    Oct 9, 2012 · This document defines the management tree and the Nodes on which the OMA DM protocol acts. A standardized way to describe these Nodes is also ...
  15. [15]
    RFC 3975 - OMA-IETF Standardization Collaboration
    This document describes the standardization collaboration between the Open Mobile Alliance (OMA) and the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).
  16. [16]
    [PDF] OMA-AD-DM-V2_0-20160209-A - Open Mobile Alliance
    Feb 9, 2016 · The declared Essential IPR is publicly available to members and non-members of the Open Mobile Alliance and may be found on the “OMA IPR ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Enabler Release Definition for OMA Device Management
    Jun 17, 2008 · The OMA DM v1.2 specifications are based on the OMA Device Management (DM) v1.1.2 specifications and make use of the OMA. SyncML Common v1.2 ...Missing: 0 | Show results with:0
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Software Component Management Object - Open Mobile Alliance
    Dec 6, 2011 · The inventory includes software components delivered via SCOMO and can also include those that are installed outside of SCOMO e.g. at the ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Delta Record Management Object - Open Mobile Alliance
    May 21, 2013 · Device Management includes - but is not restricted to - setting initial configuration information in Devices, subsequent updates of persistent ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] 09 Feb 2016 Open Mobile Alliance OMA-TS-DM_Protocol-V2_0 ...
    Feb 9, 2016 · OMA DM 2.0 is the next generation of the OMA DM 1.x Protocol, and provides the interface between the DM Server and the DM Client to manage the ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] SyncML Representation Protocol - Open Mobile Alliance
    Jul 11, 2004 · The SyncML Messages are represented in a mark-up language defined by [XML]. The SyncML representation protocol is an. XML application. The ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] OMA-SyncML-DMProtocol-V1_1_2 ... - Open Mobile Alliance
    The SyncML Initiative, Ltd. was a not-for-profit corporation formed by a group of companies who co-operated to produce an open specification for data ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] SyncML Device Management Standardized Objects
    Dec 3, 2003 · Unless this document is clearly designated as an approved specification, this document is a work in process, is not an approved Open Mobile ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] OMA Device Management Notification Initiated Session
    Dec 7, 2010 · This document specifies the OMA Device Management Notification Initiation package from the DM Server to the DM Client. A DM Server can use this ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Firmware Update Management Object - Open Mobile Alliance
    A ResultCode is provided to the DM server via a Generic Alert [DMPRO] notification. The Generic Alert [DMPRO] command provided by the OMA-DM protocols is to be ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] 09 Feb 2007 Open Mobile Alliance OMA-TS-DM_StdObj-V1_2 ...
    Feb 9, 2007 · This document defines a set of management objects. Some of these are mandatory for all OMA DM compliant devices and others are optional. The ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] 24 May 2016 Open Mobile Alliance OMA-TS-DM_Security-V1_3 ...
    May 24, 2016 · OMA DM offers the ability for a DM Server to make a request to a DM Client to establish a Management Session. The security of this message ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] OMA Device Management Security - Open Mobile Alliance
    May 25, 2010 · OMA DM is a protocol based upon DM representation [DMREPPRO]. Its purpose is to allow remote management of any device supporting the OMA DM ...Missing: capabilities | Show results with:capabilities<|control11|><|separator|>
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Software Requirement Specification - Verizon Open Development
    Enabler Release Definition for OMA Device Management (based on SyncML DM),. Version 1.1.2, December 9, 2003. 2. IP Based Over-the-Air Device Management (IOTA ...<|separator|>
  30. [30]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  31. [31]
    History and Evolution of Mobile Device Management (MDM) - 42Gears
    Feb 3, 2025 · The roots of MDM can be traced back to the early days of mobile technology in the 1990s. The launch of the first commercial mobile phones marked the beginning ...
  32. [32]
    DevicePolicyManager | API reference - Android Developers
    android.net.wifi.hotspot2. Overview. Classes. ConfigParser · PasspointConfiguration. android.net.wifi.hotspot2.omadm. Overview. Classes. PpsMoParser. android.
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Sony Ericsson
    Jun 2, 2009 · Provisioning (OMA CP, OMA DM) ... According to OMA Multimedia Messaging Service v1.2 + SMIL. Java™ Platform, Micro Edition. JSR-75 PDA ...Missing: phones | Show results with:phones
  34. [34]
    Top US Mobile Carriers Certify Friendly OMA-DM Client
    The Friendly OMA-DM Embedded Client provides a rich feature set to support the device's manageability, including full support of the OMA-DM and OMA-CP protocol; ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  35. [35]
    Carriers' remote control software continues to put some mobile ...
    Aug 7, 2014 · The OMA-DM functionality itself can be abused to modify APN and proxy settings, change routing and preferred gateway settings, install ...
  36. [36]
    The History of Intune: From OMA DM to Modern Management
    Oct 19, 2025 · Explore how Windows device management began with OMA DM and the original GET–SET–GET model that laid the foundation for Intune.
  37. [37]
    Deep dive: OMA-DM protocol and CSP policies - Unisys
    The OMA-DM protocol is a client-initiated remote HTTPS DM session over SSL. To illustrate the DM session generated for our policy example, we can use several ...
  38. [38]
    Troubleshooting Workspace ONE Windows Devices | Omnissa
    Oct 18, 2024 · OMA-DM/WNS inherently communicates between Workspace ONE UEM and Windows devices securely via HTTPS. The WNS status of a Windows device can be ...
  39. [39]
    OMA-DM and Intune Policy Enforcement a Deep Dive get-set-get
    Feb 7, 2025 · In this blog, we'll break down how Intune uses OMA-DM, how it sets policies, and the mechanisms to validate if those policies are properly enforced.What Is Oma-Dm? · How Intune Sets Policies... · How Intune Checks Policy...
  40. [40]
    From OMA-DM to Declared Configuration: The Next Step in ...
    Feb 28, 2025 · The model is built around a cycle of request, response, and validation (get -set -get), meaning that a device: Requests policies from the Intune ...Missing: BYOD | Show results with:BYOD
  41. [41]