Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Ocean surface topography

Ocean surface topography denotes the deviations in sea surface height from the geoid, an idealized equipotential surface representing mean sea level under gravitational equilibrium without currents or tides.^[1] These variations, typically spanning about 2 meters globally, arise primarily from ocean circulation driven by wind, density gradients due to temperature and salinity differences, and to lesser extents from tides, waves, and atmospheric pressure.^[2] Unlike the static geoid undulations tied to Earth's mass distribution, dynamic components of surface topography directly encode the slope of pressure gradients that geostrophically balance Coriolis forces, enabling inference of current speeds and directions.^[1] Satellite altimetry has revolutionized measurement of ocean surface topography since the TOPEX/Poseidon mission launched in 1992, providing continuous global observations with centimeter-level precision through radar ranging from orbit, combined with precise orbit determination via GPS and Doppler tracking.^[3] Successor missions like Jason-1, -2, -3, and the ongoing Sentinel-6 series have extended this record, revealing mesoscale eddies, western intensified boundary currents such as the Gulf Stream, and basin-scale gyres that transport heat and influence climate variability.^[1] The upcoming Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission, launched in 2022, enhances resolution to sub-mesoscale features by employing wide-swath interferometric altimetry, promising finer details on fronts, filaments, and internal waves previously undetectable.^[4] Empirical data from these observations underscore causal links between surface topography slopes and circulation strength, with steeper gradients in western boundaries reflecting momentum conservation in rotating fluids, unmediated by unsubstantiated narratives on transient forcings.^[5] Such measurements are pivotal for validating general circulation models, quantifying meridional overturning circulation, and assessing steric sea level contributions from thermal expansion amid ongoing debates over anthropogenic versus natural variability in global mean levels.^[6]

Fundamentals

Definition and Components

Ocean surface topography refers to the variations in sea surface height (SSH) relative to the geoid, defined as the equipotential surface coinciding with mean sea level in the absence of currents, tides, and atmospheric effects.^[1] These height anomalies, typically on the order of ±1 meter globally, encode information about ocean circulation, as slopes in the surface correspond to geostrophic balances between pressure gradients and the Coriolis force.^[5] The geoid itself undulates by up to ±100 meters due to uneven mass distribution in Earth's interior, but ocean surface topography focuses on deviations from this reference driven by oceanic processes.^[6] The primary components of ocean surface topography are the mean dynamic topography (MDT) and the time-variable dynamic topography. MDT represents the time-averaged height deviations resulting from long-term density distributions and basin-scale circulation patterns, such as the subtropical gyres, with amplitudes reaching 1-2 meters in western boundary currents like the Gulf Stream.^[7] Time-variable dynamic topography captures transient features, including mesoscale eddies (10-100 km scale) and seasonal fluctuations, which contribute variability of 10-50 cm in mid-latitudes.^[8] Together, these components overlie the geoid to form the absolute SSH, observable via satellite altimetry after correcting for instrumental and environmental effects.^[9] Additional minor components include tidal signals and atmospheric pressure loading, but these are often separated in analyses of mean topography to isolate ocean dynamic signals. For instance, the M2 tidal constituent alone can produce SSH variations up to 1 meter in amplitude, yet dynamic topography studies filter these to focus on aperiodic circulation.^[10] This decomposition enables derivation of absolute geostrophic currents via finite-difference approximations of SSH gradients, with velocities scaling as v \approx \frac{g}{f} \frac{\Delta h}{\Delta x}, where g is gravity, f the Coriolis parameter, and \Delta h the height difference over distance \Delta x.^[11]

Physical Principles and Causes

Ocean surface topography refers to deviations in sea surface height (SSH) from the geoid, the irregular equipotential surface where Earth's gravitational potential is constant, shaped by uneven mass distribution in the planet's interior such as crustal thickness variations and mantle density heterogeneities.^[12] These geoid undulations cause baseline SSH variations of up to approximately 100 meters globally, though oceanic portions typically span tens of meters peak-to-peak.^[12]^[13] The dynamic component of ocean surface topography arises from ocean circulation, where geostrophic balance governs the relationship between sea surface slopes and current velocities: the Coriolis effect deflects moving water, requiring a compensating pressure gradient via elevated or depressed sea levels, with sea height higher on the right side of currents in the Northern Hemisphere.^[13] Large-scale currents are primarily driven by wind stress at the surface and density gradients from spatial variations in temperature and salinity (thermohaline forcing), redistributing water mass and producing mean dynamic topography (MDT) amplitudes exceeding 2 meters in regions like the Antarctic Circumpolar Current.^[6]^[13] Transient variations stem from mesoscale eddies, planetary waves, and steric effects, where thermal expansion of seawater due to heating increases height by up to 0.5 meters locally, while salinity changes inversely affect density and thus elevation.^[6] Tides, induced by lunar and solar gravitational pulls, superimpose periodic undulations of 1 to 2 meters in mid-oceans, rising to over 10 meters in coastal amplifications.^[13] Atmospheric pressure loading contributes via the inverse barometer response, where low pressure elevates the sea surface by about 1 cm per hectopascal deficit, modulating short-term topography.^[1] Waves and direct wind forcing add higher-frequency perturbations, though these are typically smaller in altimetric observations after averaging.^[1] Overall, these processes ensure the ocean surface deviates from a static geoid to reflect ongoing mass and momentum fluxes in the coupled ocean-atmosphere system.^[6]

Historical Development

Pre-Satellite Observations

Prior to satellite altimetry, ocean surface topography was inferred indirectly through shipboard hydrographic surveys that measured temperature, salinity, and pressure at discrete depths along transects to compute density profiles and derive dynamic height anomalies.^[14] These dynamic heights represented relative deviations in sea surface elevation from a deep reference level, typically assumed to be a "level of no motion" at 1000–2000 meters where horizontal pressure gradients were presumed negligible, allowing geostrophic balance to relate height slopes to currents via the thermal wind relation.^[15] Specific volume anomalies, calculated from density via the equation of state, were integrated upward from the reference level using the hydrostatic equation to yield height differences accurate to about 5–10 cm over distances of 100–500 km along survey lines.^[16] The dynamic method originated in the early 20th century, pioneered by Bjørn Helland-Hansen and Fridtjof Nansen, who applied it to data from Norwegian research vessels between 1900 and 1904 in the Norwegian Sea.^[17] Their 1909 publication The Norwegian Sea provided the first systematic quantitative estimates of dynamic topography, revealing surface height variations of up to 0.5–1 meter associated with the Norwegian Current and coastal upwelling, thereby establishing geostrophy as a core tool for inferring circulation from hydrographic sections.^[17] This approach relied on Nansen bottles for water sampling and reversing thermometers for temperature, with salinity determined via chlorinity titration, enabling density computations despite measurement uncertainties of ~0.02°C in temperature and ~0.02 in salinity.^[18] Subsequent expeditions expanded coverage: the HMS Discovery surveys (1925–1927, 1930s) in the Southern Ocean mapped Antarctic Circumpolar Current fronts with dynamic height slopes exceeding 1 meter over 200 km; the German Meteor expedition (1925–1927) across the tropical Atlantic documented equatorial undercurrents via relative topography; and mid-century U.S. and international efforts, such as the International Gulf Stream Expedition (1950s), quantified the Gulf Stream's intense front with height drops of ~1.2 meters across its axis.^[17] These ship-based methods, constrained by sampling intervals of 50–100 km horizontally and 100–200 m vertically, yielded basin-scale patterns but missed mesoscale eddies due to aliasing and temporal variability during multi-day occupations.^[14] Absolute dynamic topography, requiring subtraction of the geoid undulation, remained elusive owing to sparse surface gravity measurements (e.g., from pendulums or early gravimeters accurate to ~5–10 mGal) and incomplete global models, resulting in mean dynamic topography uncertainties of 0.5–1 meter basin-wide.^[19] Efforts to mitigate level-of-no-motion biases included inverse methods fitting observed hydrography to dynamical models, as in Sverdrup's analyses of Pacific sections during the 1950s Snodgrass floats era, but pre-1970s data density precluded robust global means.^[19] Tide gauges provided coastal absolute references since the 1800s (e.g., Amsterdam gauge from 1700), yet open-ocean integration relied on assumptions of geoid stationarity, limiting causal inference of circulation drivers like wind stress to qualitative correlations with atmospheric data.^[17]

Emergence of Satellite Altimetry

The development of satellite altimetry for ocean surface topography began in the mid-1970s with experimental radar systems aimed at measuring sea surface height from orbit, building on prior radar ranging concepts to address limitations of ship-based and airborne surveys.^[20] Early efforts focused on proving feasibility amid challenges like imprecise orbital determination and atmospheric corrections, which initially limited accuracy to tens of centimeters.^[21] NASA's Geos-3 mission, launched on April 29, 1975, introduced the first spaceborne radar altimeter dedicated to marine geodesy, yielding initial profiles of sea surface topography and demonstrating the potential to detect dynamic ocean features over marine geodesy benchmarks.^[21] Although limited by sparse coverage and data noise, Geos-3 established baseline techniques for range measurement via pulse-delay timing between satellite and ocean surface returns.^[22] The pivotal advancement came with Seasat, launched on June 27, 1978, as the first satellite designed specifically for ocean monitoring, incorporating a Ku-band altimeter that mapped global sea surface heights with approximately 10 cm radial accuracy over its 105-day operational period before a power system failure.^[23] Seasat's data revealed mesoscale eddies and internal waves, validating altimetry's utility for topography despite ionospheric and tropospheric interference, and it collected over 10 million radar echoes across diverse ocean basins.^[23]^[21] Subsequent missions refined these foundations: the U.S. Navy's Geosat, operational from October 12, 1985, to January 1990, provided denser Exact Repeat Mission tracks for improved mean sea surface modeling, achieving sub-10 cm precision after post-mission reprocessing.^[22] These early systems, hampered by short durations and military restrictions on data access, nonetheless transitioned altimetry from proof-of-concept to operational tool, enabling the joint NASA-CNES Topex/Poseidon mission launched on August 10, 1992, which attained 2-3 cm accuracy through dual-frequency altimetry and GPS/DORIS orbit control, marking the onset of precision ocean topography monitoring.^[24]^[25]

Measurement Techniques

In-Situ Methods

In-situ methods for measuring ocean surface topography involve direct observations within the marine environment, typically providing high local accuracy but limited spatial and temporal coverage compared to remote sensing techniques. These approaches infer sea surface height (SSH) relative to a reference, often the geoid or ellipsoid, through pressure, density, or positioning data, and are crucial for validating global models and estimating mean dynamic topography (MDT) in coastal and undersampled regions.^[26]^[27] Tide gauges, deployed at coastal sites, record relative sea level variations by measuring water pressure or acoustic distance from a benchmark on land, yielding SSH data after tidal filtering. Modern stilling-well or acoustic gauges achieve precisions of approximately 1 mm for hourly measurements, enabling detection of dynamic signals when combined with GPS for absolute referencing to the ellipsoid. Networks such as NOAA's National Water Level Observation Network (NWLON) and the Global Sea Level Observing System (GLOSS) operate hundreds of stations worldwide, facilitating MDT estimates via synergy with geoid models; for instance, collocated GPS-tide gauge pairs determine coastal MDT with uncertainties around 5-10 cm. These measurements reveal alongshore tilts in MDT, such as increases from south to north in certain coastal zones, but are inherently biased toward nearshore areas and require corrections for land motion via GPS.^[28]^[27]^[29] Ship-based hydrographic surveys compute dynamic height anomalies—approximating the steric component of SSH—by integrating temperature and salinity profiles from conductivity-temperature-depth (CTD) casts or expendable bathythermographs (XBTs), assuming geostrophic balance. This yields baroclinic topography with accuracies of 5-10 cm over survey lines, as validated against altimetry in regions like the East Auckland Current, where mean dynamic heights align within dynamic height differences of similar magnitude. Surveys provide snapshots of mesoscale features but demand extensive sampling to resolve basin-scale patterns, historically forming the basis for pre-satellite MDT maps.^[30]^[31] Moorings and drifting buoys offer complementary in-situ data: bottom pressure recorders on seafloor moorings quantify barotropic SSH variability by differencing ocean and atmospheric pressures, separating contributions with resolutions of a few cm, as demonstrated in eastern boundary current studies. Surface drifters from programs like NOAA's Global Drifter Program track velocities to reference absolute topography via geostrophic relations, enhancing MDT resolution when integrated with altimetry; datasets combining drifter velocities yield global SSH maps with improved mean circulation features. Emerging platforms, such as GNSS-equipped wave gliders, directly measure instantaneous SSH via satellite positioning or reflectometry, achieving centimetric precision even in high winds up to 20 m/s.^[32]^[33]^[34]

Satellite Altimetry Principles

Satellite altimetry utilizes active microwave radar instruments to measure the distance from a low Earth orbit satellite to the ocean surface at nadir. The altimeter transmits short pulses, typically in the Ku-band at 13.6 GHz, which reflect off the sea surface and return as an echo. The round-trip travel time \Delta t of the pulse is precisely measured, yielding the radar range r = \frac{c \Delta t}{2}, where c is the speed of light, adjusted for propagation delays.^[35]^[36] The shape of the returned echo, known as the ocean waveform, provides critical data for range determination. Over a calm, homogeneous ocean surface, the waveform exhibits a characteristic form: an initial rise from the leading edge corresponding to specular reflections from the closest wave crests, followed by a plateau and exponential decay from diffuse scattering. Range is extracted from the waveform's leading edge using tracking algorithms, such as the constant false alarm rate (CFAR) or offset center of gravity methods, achieving sub-meter precision before corrections. This waveform analysis also informs on sea state parameters like significant wave height, estimated from the waveform's trailing slope.^[36]^[37] Absolute sea surface height (SSH) is derived by subtracting the radar range from the satellite's geocentric altitude h above a reference ellipsoid: \mathrm{SSH} = h - r. The satellite's position is determined via precise orbit determination (POD) integrating multiple techniques, including Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers, Doppler Orbitography and Radiopositioning Integrated by Satellite (DORIS), and Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR), attaining radial orbit errors of 2-3 cm for modern missions. This enables SSH measurements with overall accuracy of 2-4 cm over open ocean after instrumental and environmental corrections, revealing dynamic topography variations driven by geostrophic currents.^[35]^[38]^[39]

Key Satellite Missions

Early and Nadir-Beam Missions

The development of nadir-beam radar altimetry began with experimental efforts in the 1970s, but dedicated missions emerged in the late 1970s, utilizing pulse-limited radar systems pointed directly downward to measure the two-way travel time of Ku-band signals reflected from the ocean surface, yielding sea surface height (SSH) with initial accuracies on the order of several decimeters after corrections for atmospheric delays and instrument noise. These early missions operated in sun-synchronous or non-sun-synchronous orbits, providing along-track profiles spaced by beam footprints of 1-2 km in width but with spatial resolutions limited to tens of kilometers due to signal averaging.^[20] Seasat, launched by NASA on July 27, 1978, marked the first satellite mission focused on global ocean observations, carrying a single-frequency Ku-band altimeter that operated until October 10, 1978, when a power failure ended the mission after 105 days. It demonstrated the potential for detecting mesoscale ocean features, such as eddies, with SSH precision around 10-15 cm after post-processing, though data were affected by higher orbit errors and limited ionospheric corrections compared to later systems. Seasat's altimeter provided measurements every 1.7 km along-track, enabling initial maps of dynamic topography influenced by geostrophic currents.^[23] Geosat (GEOdetic SATellite), launched by the U.S. Navy on March 12, 1985, into an 800 km altitude, 108° inclination orbit, delivered altimetry data until January 1990, initially under operational constraints before transitioning to an exact repeat mission (ERM) on November 8, 1986, with a 17.05-day repeat cycle for unclassified geodetic and oceanographic use. Its Ku-band altimeter achieved SSH accuracies of about 5-10 cm in ERM mode, contributing to improved mean sea surface models and gravity field estimates through denser coverage than Seasat, though wet tropospheric corrections relied on external models due to the absence of an onboard radiometer.^[40]^[41] The European Remote-Sensing Satellite ERS-1, launched by ESA on July 17, 1991, into a 785 km, 98.5° sun-synchronous orbit, featured a Ku-band altimeter that functioned across multiple phases—including a 3-day calibration orbit, 35-day repeat ERM, and geodetic phases—until mission end in March 2000. It provided SSH data with precision around 6-8 cm, supported by an onboard microwave radiometer for tropospheric corrections, and extended coverage to higher latitudes for ice and wave studies, though its single-frequency design limited ionospheric error mitigation compared to dual-band successors.^[42] TOPEX/Poseidon, a joint NASA-CNES mission launched on August 10, 1992, into a 1336 km non-sun-synchronous orbit with a 10-day repeat cycle, introduced dual-frequency (Ku- and C-band) altimetry for enhanced ionospheric correction, achieving SSH measurement precision of 2-3 cm after precise orbit determination using DORIS and GPS-like tracking. Operational until October 2006 (with tandem operations extending the record), it enabled the first global observations of absolute dynamic topography, revealing basin-scale circulations and interannual variability tied to phenomena like El Niño, with data calibrated against tide gauges for absolute sea level trends.^[43]^[44]

Wide-Swath and High-Resolution Missions

The Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission represents the primary operational wide-swath altimetry system for high-resolution ocean surface topography measurements, launched on December 16, 2022, as a collaboration between NASA, the French space agency CNES, the Canadian Space Agency, and the UK Space Agency.^[45] Unlike traditional nadir-beam altimeters, which provide one-dimensional profiles along the satellite ground track with cross-track resolution limited by orbital spacing (typically 100-150 km), SWOT employs a Ka-band Radar Interferometer (KaRIn) to acquire two-dimensional elevation data over a 120 km wide swath.^[4] This instrument operates at 35.75 GHz with dual 10 m antennas separated by a 10 m baseline, enabling interferometric synthetic aperture radar processing that achieves along-track and across-track resolutions of approximately 5-10 km and 15-25 km, respectively, for ocean wavelengths down to 15 km.^[46] The mission's noise floor is calibrated to about 1 cm RMS for ocean surfaces after processing, allowing detection of submesoscale features such as eddies, fronts, and internal waves that were previously undersampled by conventional altimetry.^[47] SWOT's high-resolution capabilities have enabled the first global observations of ocean surface topography at scales resolving mesoscale variability (50-100 km) and submesoscale structures (10-50 km), revealing dynamic processes like vortex filaments and filamentary fronts that contribute to vertical exchanges of heat, momentum, and nutrients in the ocean.^[48] Initial data products, including Level-2 swath sea surface height anomalies, became available in 2023 following a commissioning phase, with full operational datasets integrated into multi-mission analyses by 2024 to map absolute dynamic topography with improved accuracy over prior gravity-based models.^[49] For instance, SWOT observations have quantified submesoscale contributions to kinetic energy dissipation, estimating that these features account for up to 20-30% of upper-ocean variability in energetic regions like the Gulf Stream and Antarctic Circumpolar Current, based on comparisons with in-situ glider and mooring data.^[47] The mission's 21-day repeat cycle covers 97% of Earth's ice-free ocean surface, though data gaps persist near the equator and poles due to orbital geometry.^[45] Ongoing challenges in wide-swath altimetry include corrections for ionospheric delays, wet tropospheric path, and roll-induced errors, which are mitigated through ancillary data from microwave radiometers and Doppler Orbitography and Radiopositioning Integrated by Satellite (DORIS) receivers onboard.^[4] High-resolution SWOT data has been assimilated into ocean general circulation models, enhancing forecasts of mesoscale-driven transports and reducing uncertainties in mean dynamic topography by factors of 2-3 compared to pre-SWOT gridded products derived solely from nadir altimeters.^[49] Future extensions may involve constellations of wide-swath satellites to achieve near-real-time global coverage at similar resolutions, as conceptual studies suggest that dual wide-swath platforms could halve error variances in eddy kinetic energy estimates relative to single-mission sampling.^[50]

Temporal and Spatial Variations

Short-Term and Mesoscale Variations

Short-term variations in ocean surface topography, spanning hours to days, primarily stem from tidal forcing, surface gravity waves, and atmospheric pressure fluctuations. Tidal effects, driven by gravitational attractions from the Moon and Sun, produce periodic sea surface height (SSH) oscillations with principal semidiurnal (M2) amplitudes averaging approximately 0.5 meters globally, though regional extremes reach several meters in coastal amphidromic systems.^[1] Surface waves contribute smaller-scale undulations, typically on the order of centimeters to decimeters in significant wave height, while inverse barometer effects from atmospheric pressure induce SSH changes of 1 cm per hectopascal variation.^[1] These signals are routinely corrected in satellite altimetry data to isolate longer-period dynamics, as uncorrected tides can mask subtler circulation signals.^[1] Mesoscale variations, characteristic of ocean "weather," occur on spatial scales of 10 to 100 kilometers and temporal scales of weeks to months, dominated by geostrophically balanced eddies, fronts, and meanders. These features arise from instabilities in large-scale currents, such as baroclinic instability, leading to coherent vortices that transport heat, salt, and momentum.^[51] Globally, mesoscale eddies exhibit mean SSH anomalies of about 8 centimeters, with radii around 90 kilometers and lifetimes of several weeks, though amplitudes escalate to 20-50 centimeters in energetic regions like the Gulf Stream or Antarctic Circumpolar Current.^[52] Satellite altimetry, particularly multi-mission datasets, resolves these variations, revealing their nonlinear nature and role in rectifying mean flows, with root-mean-square SSH variability often exceeding 10 centimeters in mid-latitudes.^[52] Such dynamics contribute substantially to meridional heat transport and nutrient upwelling, influencing broader climate patterns.^[51]

Long-Term Trends and Global Patterns

The mean dynamic topography (MDT) of the ocean surface displays persistent global patterns primarily dictated by wind-driven gyres and thermohaline circulation, with elevations varying by up to 1-2 meters across ocean basins. In subtropical regions, anticyclonic gyres feature central highs, such as approximately 0.7-1.0 m in the North Atlantic's Sargasso Sea relative to surrounding lows, maintained by geostrophic balance where pressure gradients oppose Coriolis forces. ^[53] These patterns are evident in MDT models like CNES-CLS18, which integrate altimetry, gravimetry, and in-situ data to resolve features at 1/15° resolution, revealing basin-scale undulations tied to permanent currents like the Kuroshio and Gulf Stream. ^[53] Equatorial and polar zones exhibit contrasting topography, with a broad low in the equatorial Pacific due to upwelling and trade wind forcing, contrasted by a rotational equatorial bulge contributing to higher mean heights near the equator overall. High-latitude subpolar gyres show depressions, such as in the Nordic Seas, where cold dense water formation drives convergence and lower surface heights. These global structures, derived from combining satellite gravimetry (e.g., GOCE) with altimetric mean sea surfaces, underscore causal links between density gradients, currents, and surface slopes, with western boundary currents displaying steep gradients of 0.5-1 m over 500 km widths. ^[7] Long-term trends in ocean surface topography, observed via multi-decadal satellite altimetry from 1993 onward, reflect accelerating global mean sea level rise superimposed on dynamic changes, totaling about 10 cm over 1993-2023 at an average rate of 3.4 mm/yr, escalating to 4.4 ± 0.5 mm/yr in 2013-2023 due to steric expansion and mass addition from melting ice. ^[54] Regional variations in dynamic topography trends include rates up to 8 mm/yr in parts of the western Pacific and Indian Ocean, linked to intensified circulation and heat uptake, while some eastern boundary areas show subdued rises or localized declines from subduction and wind shifts. ^[56] These trends, parsed from missions like TOPEX/Poseidon and Jason series, indicate subtle evolutions in MDT, such as strengthening subtropical gyre intensities by 1-5% per decade in some basins, driven by anthropogenic warming altering density fields and wind patterns. ^[25] Decadal modes like the Pacific Decadal Oscillation modulate these long-term patterns, imprinting multi-year anomalies on MDT, with altimetry revealing connections between Arctic freshening and Southern Ocean freshening influencing global topography gradients. Validation against in-situ drifters and hydrography confirms MDT trend uncertainties below 5 cm in low-variability regions, though higher in energetic western boundaries. ^[57] Overall, these observations highlight causal realism in topography evolution, where empirical steric and barotropic adjustments dominate over transient mesoscale noise.

Data Processing and Modeling

Signal Correction and Error Sources

Satellite altimetry measurements of ocean surface topography rely on deriving sea surface height (SSH) from the difference between the satellite's orbit height and the radar range to the sea surface, necessitating extensive signal corrections to account for instrumental, propagation, and geophysical effects.^[37] These corrections transform raw altimeter data into accurate SSH anomalies, which form the basis for dynamic ocean topography by subtracting mean dynamic topography or geoid models.^[58] Instrumental corrections address platform-specific biases, such as radial motion of the satellite and the offset between the spacecraft center of gravity and altimeter antenna, which are typically pre-applied during data processing.^[58] Propagation corrections mitigate delays in the radar signal caused by the atmosphere. The ionospheric correction, ranging from 2 to 20 cm with an uncertainty of ±3 cm, utilizes dual-frequency altimeter measurements or global ionospheric maps (GIM).^[58] Dry tropospheric correction accounts for hydrostatic delays of approximately 2.3 m (±1-2 cm), derived from surface pressure models like those from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF).^[58] Wet tropospheric correction, varying from 5 to 35 cm (±3-6 cm), is obtained via onboard microwave radiometers or model-based approaches such as ECMWF or GNSS-derived path delay plus (GPD+) models.^[58] Geophysical corrections remove ocean-specific signals unrelated to dynamic topography. These include sea state bias (SSB), an empirical adjustment for waveform skewness dependent on significant wave height (SWH); ocean, load, solid Earth, and pole tides, modeled globally; dynamic atmospheric correction via inverse barometer and non-inverted barometer models like MOG2D for high-frequency pressure and wind effects; and geoid removal using models such as those from the Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE) mission, which undulates by up to ±100 m.^[58] Additional processing, such as waveform retracking (e.g., ALES or X-TRACK methods), corrects for land contamination near coasts.^[59] Error sources in corrected SSH measurements arise from residual uncertainties across categories, impacting topography precision. Orbital errors, historically dominant, have improved from meters in early missions to 1-2 cm radially due to advanced gravity models and tracking, though long-correlated components persist with standard deviations of 0.5-1.12 mm over decadal scales.^[58]^[60] Instrumental errors include altimeter noise (<4 cm precision in modern systems) and biases (e.g., 2 mm between TOPEX/Poseidon phases), mitigated by cross-calibration.^[37]^[60] Geophysical residuals, such as wet troposphere path delays (σ=1.1 mm, correlated over 5 years) and tide model errors (1.0-1.7 mm), contribute to global trend uncertainties of ±0.4 mm/yr over 1993-2017, reducing with mission advancements like Jason-2/3.^[60] Sea-state-related errors, including EM and skewness biases (1-4 cm), and atmospheric effects further propagate if incompletely modeled.^[37] Overall, these yield SSH uncertainties suitable for mesoscale topography studies after scale-dependent filtering.^[37]

Computation of Mean Dynamic Topography

Mean dynamic topography (MDT) is computed as the difference between the mean sea surface (MSS) height, derived from multi-year satellite altimetry observations, and the geoid height, obtained from satellite gravimetry missions such as GRACE and GOCE.^[61]^[53] This subtraction yields the absolute mean ocean surface referenced to the geoid, enabling geostrophic current estimation via spatial gradients, as MDT reflects the integrated effect of density-driven ocean circulation over long timescales.^[19] Computation requires addressing discrepancies in spatial resolution and error characteristics between MSS (typically accurate to 1-2 cm at scales >100 km) and geoid models (with short-wavelength errors beyond 100-150 km requiring filtering).^[61] Pure satellite-based approaches involve direct MSS-geoid differencing after applying low-pass filters or band-pass corrections to mitigate gravimetry's high-frequency limitations, often using least-squares collocation or empirical orthogonal functions for signal separation.^[61] For instance, early methods truncated the sea surface height spectrum in the frequency domain to match geoid resolution, while space-domain techniques perform point-wise subtraction post-interpolation.^[62] More advanced models, such as CNES-CLS18, start with a satellite-only MDT estimate from altimetry (e.g., SARAL/AltiKa, CryoSat-2) and gravimetry, then refine it via optimal interpolation incorporating in-situ data like ARGO floats, drifter velocities, and hydrographic profiles to resolve mesoscale features and reduce biases up to 20-30 cm in regions of strong currents.^[53] This hybrid method assumes geostrophic balance and uses covariance functions to weight observations, achieving global resolutions of 1/4° with formal errors below 10 cm in open ocean areas.^[53]^[63] Validation against independent datasets, such as shipboard expendable bathythermographs or glider sections, confirms MDT accuracy, with discrepancies typically under 5-10 cm after corrections for tidal aliases and atmospheric loading.^[19] Recent iterations like CNES-CLS22 integrate high-frequency radar and additional drifter data for coastal enhancements, emphasizing spectral consistency to avoid artificial signals from mismatched resolutions.^[64] Uncertainties persist in polar and marginal seas due to sparse in-situ coverage and ice contamination in altimetry, necessitating regional adjustments or model ensembles.^[53]

Applications

Ocean Circulation and Dynamics

Ocean surface topography, particularly mean dynamic topography (MDT), derived from satellite altimetry measurements of sea surface height minus the geoid, provides a direct indicator of large-scale ocean circulation patterns by revealing the slopes associated with geostrophic currents.^[1]^[65] In geostrophic balance, the horizontal pressure gradient force from these slopes is balanced by the Coriolis effect, allowing currents to flow parallel to contours of constant MDT, with velocity magnitudes proportional to the gradient of the topography.^[66] This approach enables the estimation of absolute geostrophic velocities without reliance on dynamic height references from in-situ data, improving global coverage especially in remote regions.^[7] MDT maps distinctly outline major circulation features, including subtropical and subpolar gyres in each ocean basin, characterized by closed contours of dynamic height with intensified western boundary currents such as the Gulf Stream in the North Atlantic and the Kuroshio in the North Pacific.^[65] These gyres, driven primarily by wind stress curl, exhibit anticyclonic circulation in subtropical regions and cyclonic flow in subpolar areas, with MDT gradients highlighting the narrow, swift western intensification due to conservation of potential vorticity.^[67] Satellite-derived MDT has refined estimates of gyre transports, revealing inter-basin variations influenced by bottom topography and buoyancy forcing.^[68] In the Southern Ocean, MDT delineates the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC), the world's strongest current, flowing eastward around Antarctica without continental barriers, with peak velocities exceeding 0.5 m/s in frontal zones.^[69] Combining MDT with hydrographic density profiles allows quantification of ACC volume transport, typically estimated at 130–150 Sverdrups (1 Sv = 10^6 m³/s), underscoring its role in global meridional overturning by facilitating inter-ocean exchange of water masses.^[70] Topographic steering by submarine ridges modulates ACC pathways and spin up adjacent gyres, as seen in MDT-derived flow fields.^[67] Beyond steady circulation, temporal variations in dynamic topography from altimetry track mesoscale eddies and frontal instabilities, which redistribute heat, salt, and nutrients, influencing eddy kinetic energy and mixing rates essential to ocean dynamics.^[71] These data support validation of general circulation models, revealing discrepancies in simulated gyre strengths and boundary current positions when compared to observed MDT.^[53] Overall, MDT enhances understanding of wind- and buoyancy-driven dynamics, causal links in the global overturning circulation, and responses to climatic forcing through empirical mapping of potential energy anomalies.^[72]

Marine Geodesy and Gravity Mapping

Satellite altimetry provides critical data for marine geodesy by measuring ocean surface topography, enabling the computation of the mean sea surface (MSS) which approximates the marine geoid after accounting for mean dynamic topography (MDT). The MSS is derived from multi-year averages of sea surface heights to filter out short-term oceanic variations such as tides, waves, and currents, revealing undulations primarily due to Earth's gravity field and seafloor topography.^[73] This approach has revolutionized marine geodesy since the 1970s, offering global coverage over approximately 70% of Earth's surface where traditional shipborne gravimetry is sparse and costly.^[74] In gravity mapping, altimetry-derived vertical deflections—obtained from the along-track slopes of sea surface heights—are inverted to estimate marine gravity anomalies using techniques such as the inverse Vening Meinesz formula or least squares collocation. These deflections represent the angle between the local vertical (plumb line) and the geoid normal, directly linking to gravitational perturbations. Early efforts began with the Seasat mission in 1978, followed by Geosat and ERS-1 in the 1980s and 1990s, achieving initial resolutions of several arcminutes with root-mean-square (RMS) errors around 10-15 mGal compared to shipborne data.^[74] Modern multi-satellite combinations, including TOPEX/Poseidon (launched 1992), Jason-1/2, CryoSat-2, SARAL/AltiKa, and HY-2A, enhance track density and accuracy through data fusion weighted by instrument precision, yielding models like SIO V31.1 at 1 arcmin resolution with RMS differences below 5 mGal in mid-latitudes.^[74]^[75] Processing involves remove-restore techniques, where a high-degree background gravity model (e.g., EGM2008) is subtracted from altimeter-derived deflections, inverted for residuals, and restored to produce anomaly grids. Accuracy depends on factors like altimeter range precision (centimeter-level in recent missions), sea state bias corrections, and coastal proximity, with degradation near shores due to land contamination and poor waveform retracking.^[74]^[75] Recent models such as DTU17 and SDUST2021GRA extend coverage to high latitudes (up to 88°N/S) and achieve global RMS fits of 4.50 mGal against independent ship gravity measurements, supporting applications in seafloor mapping and geoid unification.^[74] These advancements facilitate precise marine geoid models essential for height systems and understanding mass redistributions in Earth's interior.^[73]

Climate Monitoring and Sea Level Analysis

Satellite altimetry missions measure ocean surface topography by determining the height of the sea surface relative to a reference ellipsoid using radar pulses, enabling global monitoring of sea level variations as a key climate indicator.^[76] These measurements provide continuous coverage of dynamic sea surface height anomalies, which reveal short-term fluctuations and long-term trends linked to climate processes such as thermal expansion and mass addition from land ice melt.^[77] The record began with the TOPEX/Poseidon mission launched in 1992, followed by the Jason series (Jason-1 in 2001, Jason-2 in 2008, Jason-3 in 2016) and Sentinel-6 in 2020, achieving millimeter-level precision after corrections for atmospheric effects, tides, and instrument biases.^[78] From 1993 to 2023, global mean sea level rose by approximately 101 mm, with the rate accelerating from about 2.1 mm per year in the early 1990s to 4.5 mm per year by 2023, as derived from altimetry time series.^[79] ^[77] This acceleration, exceeding 3.3 mm per year on average over the period, reflects combined contributions from ocean warming (steric rise via thermal expansion) and barystatic rise from glacier and ice sheet melting, with altimetry capturing the total dynamic topography change.^[80] To partition these components, altimetry data is integrated with gravity missions like GRACE for mass changes and in situ profiles from Argo floats for density variations, confirming that ice melt contributions increased significantly after 2005.^[77] In sea level analysis, ocean surface topography data facilitates detection of regional deviations from the global mean, such as higher rises in the Western Pacific due to dynamic ocean circulation adjustments under climate forcing.^[81] These measurements support climate model validation by quantifying steric and circulation-driven signals, with uncertainties estimated at 3-4 mm for decadal trends after processing.^[78] Ongoing wide-swath missions like SWOT, launched in 2022, enhance resolution for finer-scale topography variations, improving projections of future sea level impacts on coastal systems.^[82]

Limitations and Challenges

Measurement Uncertainties and Biases

Satellite altimetry provides precise measurements of ocean surface height, but these are affected by multiple sources of uncertainty and bias that propagate into estimates of ocean surface topography. Random uncertainties primarily stem from instrument noise in the radar echo, with along-track noise levels typically around 2-3 cm for pulse-limited altimeters like those on the Jason series, though synthetic aperture radar (SAR) modes in Sentinel-3 and Sentinel-6 reduce this to below 2 cm in low-resolution processing. ^[83] ^[84] Systematic biases arise from imperfect geophysical corrections, including atmospheric path delays and sea state effects, with sea state bias (SSB) remaining the dominant error source, contributing up to 2-5 cm regionally due to the electromagnetic bias where the radar preferentially samples wave troughs over crests. ^[85] ^[86] Sea state bias correction relies on empirical models parameterized by significant wave height and wind speed, but these models introduce residual errors of 1-2 cm standard deviation, with larger discrepancies in coastal zones where wave statistics deviate from open-ocean assumptions, leading to underestimation of SSB by up to 20% near shorelines. ^[87] ^[88] Orbit determination errors, including radial components from force model inaccuracies and tracking data limitations, contribute biases of 1-2 cm in mean sea surface models, though precise orbit solutions from missions like Jason-3 limit this to under 1 cm after post-processing. ^[89] Inter-satellite calibration mitigates systematic offsets, with relative biases between Jason-2 and Sentinel-3 estimated at less than 1 mm through crossover analysis and tide gauge comparisons, ensuring continuity in multi-mission records. ^[90] Atmospheric corrections introduce further uncertainties: dry tropospheric effects are modeled with millimeter precision using pressure data, but wet troposphere delays from radiometers carry 1-2 cm errors due to spatial variability and calibration issues, exacerbated in rainy conditions. ^[60] Ionospheric delays, corrected via dual-frequency measurements, exhibit residual biases of 1 cm or less for Ku-band altimeters. ^[37] Tidal modeling, encompassing ocean, solid Earth, and load tides, accounts for most variance but leaves high-frequency internal tides with uncorrected amplitudes up to 5 cm in deep ocean regions, contributing to noise in dynamic topography estimates. ^[91] In coastal areas, land interference and unmodeled shallow-water dynamics amplify total uncertainties to 5-10 cm, as validated by round-robin comparisons showing spread in sea level estimates exceeding open-ocean values by factors of 2-3. ^[88] Overall, while early missions like TOPEX/Poseidon had total sea level uncertainties around 3-4 cm, recent altimeters achieve 1-2 cm precision globally after corrections, though biases in mean dynamic topography persist at the 1 cm level due to cumulative effects in gridded products. ^[92] Validation against independent data, such as tide gauges and Argo floats, confirms that uncorrected SSB and coastal biases systematically low-bias sea surface heights by 1-3 cm in high-variability regimes, underscoring the need for ongoing model refinements. ^[86] ^[93]

Interpretive Debates and Validation Issues

Interpretive debates in ocean surface topography center on the reliability of mean dynamic topography (MDT) estimates derived from satellite altimetry combined with gravimetric geoid models, where short-wavelength errors exceeding 16 cm at scales of 80–133 km—primarily from geoid uncertainties—limit resolution of fine-scale circulation features, contrasting with sub-2 cm accuracy at wavelengths over 250 km.^[94] These discrepancies fuel arguments over whether gravity missions like GOCE provide sufficient geoid precision for absolute dynamic topography without excessive filtering that smooths genuine ocean signals, as formal error models often underestimate medium-scale variances influenced by seafloor topography.^[94] Validation efforts reveal persistent challenges, including signal attenuation in reference MDTs from in-situ hydrographic data, which biases long-wavelength comparisons and inflates root-mean-square differences against satellite products by up to several centimeters.^[94] Independent cross-checks using drifter velocities, ARGO floats, and high-frequency radar demonstrate qualitative alignment in major gyres for models like CNES-CLS22 but quantify residuals of 1–2 cm RMS in geostrophic current estimates, highlighting data inhomogeneities that require smoothness priors potentially misrepresenting barotropic flows.^[64] ^[95] Such issues extend to interpretive tensions in absolute referencing, where geodetic MDT (altimetry minus gravimetric geoid) diverges from oceanic MDT inferred from in-situ dynamics, complicating causal inferences about steric versus barystatic sea level contributions and leading to varied impacts on numerical model assimilation, with some MDT variants reducing forecast errors by 10–20% in eddy-resolving simulations while others introduce spurious transports.^[96] ^[97] Ongoing refinements, such as incorporating radial surface currents from Sentinel-1 Doppler data, promise tighter constraints but remain provisional due to sparse temporal coverage and synthetic validation dependencies.^[95]

References

[1]
Ocean Surface Topography - PO.DAAC - NASA
Ocean surface topography is the height of the ocean surface relative to a level of no motion defined by the geoid, a surface of constant geopotential.
[2]
[PDF] The Surface Water and Ocean Topography Mission - NASA SWOT
Apr 16, 2008 · Defined as the departure from the geoid, the ocean surface topography varies by a range of about 3 m, and contains information about ocean ...<|separator|>
[3]
Ocean Surface Topography Science Team (OSTST) - noaa/nesdis/star
Oct 7, 2021 · Since 1992, measurements of ocean surface topography have been provided by a series of U.S.-European satellite missions, which began with the ...
[4]
Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) - PO.DAAC - NASA
The Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission aims to provide valuable data and information about the world's oceans and its terrestrial surface ...
[5]
Just 5 questions: Sea surface topography - NASA Science
Aug 4, 2015 · Those variations in sea surface topography are caused by ocean currents that tilt the sea surface. TOPEX/Poseidon measurement system. 3. How do ...
[6]
Ocean Surface Topography - eoPortal
Ocean Surface Topography (OST) represents variations in sea surface height (SSH) ... OST is caused primarily by tides and currents; if they didn't exist ...
[7]
Mean Dynamic Topography of the Ocean Derived from Satellite and ...
This work was supported by the NASA Ocean Surface Topography Science Team and NASA GRACE Science Team. N.M. and O.M. were also supported by NSF Grant OCE05 ...
[8]
[PDF] Global Observations of Fine-Scale Ocean Surface Topography With ...
May 15, 2019 · The primary oceanographic objectives of the SWOT mission are “to characterize the ocean mesoscale and submesoscale circulation determined from ...
[9]
Sea Surface Heights | Satellite Altimetry & Ocean Dynamics
Explore sea surface heights derived from satellite altimetry, revealing ocean dynamics, currents, and sea level variations.
[10]
Sea level: measuring the bounding surfaces of the ocean - PMC
Levelling combined with mean sea-level observations from tide gauges suggested that mean dynamic ... ocean surface topography. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 31, 560– ...
[11]
ocean surface topography: Topics by Science.gov
The sea surface slopes relative to the geoid (an equipotential surface) basically carry the in-formation on the absolute velocity field of the surface ...
[12]
Sea Level 101: What Determines the Level of the Sea?
Jun 3, 2020 · Changes in the solid Earth affect Earth's gravitational field, causing the height of Earth's geoid to vary by up to 100 meters (328 feet) ...
[13]
Sea Surface Topography - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Sea surface topography associated with spatial variations in the Earth's gravity field has vertical amplitudes 100 times larger than sea level changes ...
[14]
[PDF] Dynamic Height
This latter method has historically been the most common and that depth is known as the “level of no motion.” Of course, an error occurs where there is ...
[15]
SIO 210: Introduction to Physical Oceanography Lecture 8
Oct 19, 2004 · 3.2 Dynamic height. To calculate pressure at a point relative to a deeper or shallower point at the same horizontal location, from the measured ...
[16]
Dynamic Height from Temperature Profiles in - AMS Journals
A method is developed for the computation of dynamic height from temperature data alone by using a mean TS relationship to provide salinity values.Missing: calculations | Show results with:calculations
[17]
100 Years of the Ocean General Circulation in - AMS Journals
Jan 1, 2018 · These equations constitute the “dynamic method” and were in practical oceanographic use as early as Helland-Hansen and Nansen (1909, p. 155).
[18]
[PDF] Brief History of Physical Oceanography
Nansen and Helland-Hansen's careful study of the Norwegian Sea made it the most thoroughly studied and best-known body of water in the world. The new method of.
[19]
A mean dynamic topography computed over the world ocean from ...
Dec 28, 2004 · A derived technique consists in using inverse modeling to estimate a full dynamic topography from hydrographic and/or Lagrangian data. Its ...
[20]
Satellite Radar Altimetry: past and future - ESA Earth Online
Sep 27, 2018 · In 1969, at the Williamstown congress, the feasibility of a new discipline as space oceanography by radar instrumentation was discussed.
[21]
Three Decades of Satellite Oceanography: The View From on High
Geos-3, the first altimetric satellite, designed for marine geodesy. It established the feasibility of space-based measurements of oceanic topography and wave ...
[22]
History - AVISO.altimetry.fr
The first country to fly a satellite-borne altimeter was the United States, with the Skylab and Geos3 missions, Seasat in 1978 (the first satellite to provide ...
[23]
Altimetric Data Information: Missions | PO.DAAC / JPL / NASA
Seasat (July - October 1978) – NASA's, Seasat, was the first satellite mission dedicated to measuring the oceans. It carried a synthetic aperture radar (SAR), ...
[24]
TOPEX/Poseidon (Topography Experiment/Poseidon) - eoPortal
The T/P satellite is regarded the successor mission of the following US altimetry missions: GEOS-3 (Geodynamics Experimental Ocean Satellite-3, launch 1975), ...
[25]
The Emerging Golden Age of Satellite Altimetry to Prepare Humanity ...
Nov 20, 2023 · Beginning in 1992, the continuous record of high accuracy and near-global measurements of sea level from what are known as conventional ...
[26]
Realistic dynamic topography through coupling geoid and ...
Jun 1, 2021 · The geoid represents the vertical datum, the natural “zero”, so to speak, for physically meaningful heights and depths, and also to the tide ...
[27]
Determining Coastal Mean Dynamic Topography by Geodetic ...
Oct 18, 2017 · A GPS station collocated with a tide gauge allows the direct determination of mean sea surface height with respect to a reference ellipsoid at ...
[28]
What is a tide gauge? - NOAA's National Ocean Service
Jun 16, 2024 · A tide gauge measures changes in sea level relative to a datum (a height reference). The NOAA San Francisco Tide Station, in operation for more than 150 years.
[29]
Dynamic ocean topography at the coast: Using satellite geodesy to ...
Here we show that a combination of tide gauge measurements located using GPS and the latest gravity models including GOCE data demonstrate consistency with ...
[30]
Estimation of Mean Dynamic Height from Altimeter Profiles and ...
The mean dynamic height of the ocean surface is estimated along a subsatellite track of TOPEX/Poseidon crossing the East Auckland Current system northeast of ...
[31]
Research paper Comparison of the altimetric signal with in situ ...
Abstract. An intensive survey of XBT and surface salinity sampling was carried out during September/October 1988 to compare surface dynamic height anomalies ...
[32]
Measurements of Sea Surface Height Variability in the Eastern ...
The main goals of this paper are 1) to show in detail how the baroclinic and barotropic contributions to sea surface height (SSH) can be measured by a pressure ...
[33]
Improved global sea surface height and current maps from remote ...
Jan 17, 2023 · We present a new gridded sea surface height and current dataset produced by combining observations from nadir altimeters and drifting buoys.
[34]
Sea Surface Height Measurement Using a GNSS Wave Glider
May 29, 2018 · GNSS Wave Glider measures instantaneous sea surface heights with centimetric precision in the North Sea, in winds gusting up to 20 m/s ...
[35]
Principle - AVISO.altimetry.fr
The sea surface height (SSH), is the range from the sea surface to a reference ellipsoid. Altimetry satellites basically determine the distance from the ...
[36]
Pulses and waveforms - AVISO.altimetry.fr
The radar altimeter emits a pulse towards the Earth's surface. The time which elapses from the transmission of a pulse to the reception of its echo reflected ...
[37]
[PDF] SATELLITE ALTIMETRY: OBSERVING OCEAN VARIABILITY FROM ...
achievement over the 15 year history of satellite altimetry. This increase in accuracy results mainly from improvements in knowledge of the earth's gravity ...
[38]
How do satellites measure sea-level change?
Satellite altimetry is all about timing. Sea-surface height can be measured by the time it takes for radar pulses to hit the ocean surface and bounce back ...Missing: principles | Show results with:principles
[39]
Summary | TOPEX/Poseidon - Ocean Surface Topography from Space
Launched in 1992, TOPEX/Poseidon was a joint venture between CNES and NASA that measured ocean surface topography to an accuracy of 4.2 cm.
[40]
GEOSAT (Geodetic/Geophysical Satellite) - eoPortal
May 29, 2012 · The launch of the GEOSAT spacecraft took place on March 12, 1985, on an Atlas-E vehicle from VAFB (Vandenberg Air Force Base), Vandenberg, CA.
[41]
Geosat - AVISO.altimetry.fr
Geosat (GEOdetic SATellite) was launched in March 1985, and ended its mission in January 1990. ... Once this 18-month mission was over, the satellite was put on a ...
[42]
ERS-1 - AVISO.altimetry.fr
ERS-1 flew on three different orbits: a 3-day period for calibration and sea ice observation (from 12/28/1991 to 03/30/1992 and from 12/ ...Missing: Seasat details
[43]
Topex-Poseidon - AVISO.altimetry.fr
The Topex/Poseidon satellite was launched on 10 August 1992 with the objective of "observing and understanding the ocean circulation".Missing: Seasat details
[44]
TOPEX/POSEIDON mission overview - Fu - 1994 - AGU Publications
Dec 15, 1994 · TOPEX/POSEIDON is the first space mission specifically designed and conducted for studying the circulation of the world's oceans.Missing: Seasat details<|separator|>
[45]
Overview | Mission - NASA SWOT
SWOT will make the first global survey of Earth's surface water, observe fine details of ocean surface topography, and measure how water bodies change over ...
[46]
SWOT (Surface Water Ocean Topography) - eoPortal
This new SWOT measurement will extend the two-dimensional resolution of ocean surface topography down to between 15 and 45 km in wavelength, detecting small ...
[47]
The Surface Water and Ocean Topography Mission: A Breakthrough ...
Feb 21, 2024 · The Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) Mission is a new satellite using advanced radar technology to make headway in observing the variability of the ...
[48]
Wide-swath satellite altimetry unveils global submesoscale ... - Nature
Apr 16, 2025 · The Surface Water and Ocean Topography mission: a breakthrough in radar remote sensing of the ocean and land surface water. Geophys. Res ...
[49]
Integrating wide-swath altimetry data into Level-4 multi-mission maps
Jan 15, 2025 · This study proposes a global analysis of the integration of wide-swath altimetry data into an ocean surface topography mapping system. More ...
[50]
Impact of two high resolution altimetry mission concepts on ocean ...
Dec 11, 2024 · The two mission concepts are a constellation of two wide-swath altimeters and a constellation of 12 nadir altimeters. These two configurations greatly improve ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[51]
Ocean Mesoscale Eddies - Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory
Ocean mesoscale eddies are the “weather” of the ocean, with typical horizontal scales of less than 100 km and timescales on the order of a month.
[52]
Global observations of nonlinear mesoscale eddies - ScienceDirect
Their mean amplitude and a speed-based radius scale as defined by the automated procedure are 8 cm and 90 km, respectively. The tracked eddies are found to ...
[53]
The new CNES-CLS18 global mean dynamic topography - OS
Jun 17, 2021 · The mean dynamic topography (MDT) is a key reference surface for altimetry. It is needed for the calculation of the ocean absolute dynamic ...
[54]
Mean Sea Level - AVISO.altimetry.fr
Practically this means that rate of sea level rise has doubled from the 1993-2003 decade (2.1 +/- 1 mm/yr, 90%CI) to the 2013-2023 decade (4.4 +/- 0.5 mm/yr, 90 ...
[55]
Global Mean Sea Level | Vital Signs
The plot shows global change in sea level since 1993, as observed by satellite altimeters. The black line tracks the measurements, while the blue line shows how ...
[56]
Sea Surface Height Linear Trend: 1993-2017 - NASA ECCO
Sea level has been rising over much of the ocean, with some regions rising nearly 8 mm per year for decades, according to the 1993-2017 data.<|separator|>
[57]
25 Years of Global Sea Level Data, and Counting
Aug 10, 2017 · On smaller space and time scales, satellite altimetry measurements provide information directly useful for marine storm prediction.
[58]
[PDF] Overview of Altimetry corrections
Once all the corrections seen above we are applied, we are left with a Sea Surface Height (SSH) w.r.t. a reference ellipsoid. • The SSH is the results of ...
[59]
NASA and NOAA Altimetric and Ocean Surface Topography Data ...
It was the predecessor to many ocean observing satellites. It measured sea surface height with 10 cm accuracy, after various orbit and model corrections were ...
[60]
[PDF] Characterisation of altimetry errors and uncertainties
Altimetry errors and sea level uncertainties at global scale. Satellite altimetry now provides more then 25 years of measurement of the sea surface topography.
[61]
Calculating the Ocean's Mean Dynamic Topography from a Mean ...
Two algorithms for combining MSS and satellite-derived geoid data to determine the ocean's mean dynamic topography (MDT) are considered in this paper: a ...
[62]
Determination of the mean dynamic ocean topography model ...
Jan 1, 2019 · MDT calculating can be divided into frequency domain method and direct method in space domain. In the frequency domain method, SSH spatial ...
[63]
Mean Dynamic Topography Modeling Based on Optimal ... - MDPI
Jun 7, 2021 · Mean dynamic topography (MDT) is crucial for research in oceanography and climatology. The optimal interpolation method (OIM) is applied to MDT modeling.
[64]
New Global Mean Dynamic Topography CNES-CLS-22 Combining ...
Jul 28, 2025 · The mean dynamic topography (MDT) is a key reference surface for altimetry. It is needed for the calculation of the ocean absolute dynamic ...
[65]
Mean Dynamic Topography - AVISO.altimetry.fr
The strong variations in these zones are caused by intense eddying generated by instabilities in these powerful ocean currents. Sea level variations in the ...
[66]
Dynamic Ocean Topography and Geostrophic Surface Currents
Dynamic Ocean Topography (DOT) is the deviation of the sea surface from the geoid, caused by winds and currents, and is used to calculate geostrophic currents.
[67]
Topographic Control of Southern Ocean Gyres and the Antarctic ...
Dec 1, 2019 · Not only is ridge topography important in determining the ACC volume transport but it is also crucial to Southern Ocean gyre formation. With the ...
[68]
Ocean Gyres Driven by Surface Buoyancy Forcing - AGU Journals
Aug 4, 2020 · We explore this phenomenon through a combination of modeling and linear theory to highlight that the transport of ocean gyres depends upon surface buoyancy ...
[69]
Antarctic Circumpolar Current - AVISO.altimetry.fr
Antarctic Circumpolar Current Mean Dynamic Topography and mean geostrophic velocities in the Southern Ocean. (Credits CLS).
[70]
Mean dynamic topography in the Southern Ocean: Evaluating ...
Jan 28, 2012 · The mean mass transport of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) system can be determined by combining the MDT products with climatological ...Abstract · Introduction · Comparison of Mean Dynamic... · Fit to SOSE
[71]
Eddy Dynamics from Satellite Altimetry - The Oceanography Society
Oct 2, 2015 · The Surface Water and Ocean Topography ... Improved description of the ocean mesoscale variability by combining four satellite altimeters.
[72]
Dynamic Ocean Topography | Data Portal - GRACE Tellus - NASA
The mean dynamic ocean topography (DOT) is the difference between the time-averaged sea surface and the geoid (the equipotential surface of the Earth's ...
[73]
Geodesy - AVISO.altimetry.fr
Altimetry contributes to this discipline by calculating the Mean Sea Surface, which includes the geoid, i.e. sea level in the absence of disturbing forces ( ...
[74]
A Review of Marine Gravity Field Recovery from Satellite Altimetry
We provide an overview of advances in satellite altimetry for marine gravity field recovery, focusing on the impact factors and available models.
[75]
Global marine gravity anomalies from multi-satellite altimeter data
Nov 8, 2022 · The accuracy of the marine gravity anomaly inversion from satellite altimetry observations mainly depends on the density of the observation ...
[76]
NASA Sea Level Change Portal
View regional relative sea level trends and understand the processes that contribute to the measurements from satellite altimeters and tide gauges. All ...Global Sea Level · Understanding Sea Level · Sea Level News · Vital Signs
[77]
Climate Change: Global Sea Level
Graph showing the different things contributing to sea level rise since 1995. Observed sea level since the start of the satellite altimeter record in 1993 ...
[78]
Sea Level Rise - noaa/nesdis/star
Feb 26, 2024 · Satellite altimeter radar measurements can be combined with precisely known spacecraft orbits to measure sea level on a global basis with unprecedented ...
[79]
The rate of global sea level rise doubled during the past three decades
Oct 17, 2024 · With total sea level rise measured by satellite altimetry surpassing 100 mm in 2023, global observations from satellites will continue to ...
[80]
Data in Action: The rate of global sea level rise doubled ... - PO.DAAC
Feb 5, 2025 · The total sea level rise from 1993 to 2023 was 11.1 cm (bottom figure). Overall, the rate of global mean sea level is about 3.3 mm/year +/- 0.3 ...
[81]
Ocean Surface Topography from Space: Home
Data collected from a series of satellite altimeters have measured a rise in global mean sea level (GMSL). The rate more than has doubled with more than 10 cm ...Data · Along-Track Near Real-Time... · TOPEX/Poseidon · Jason-3
[82]
[PDF] Accuracy of the mean sea level continuous record with future ... - OS
Jan 15, 2016 · The method to estimate the relative bias uncertainty also relies on GLORYS-based simulated Jason-2 and Sentinel-3a. MSL time series as described ...
[83]
Assessment of Sentinel-6 SAR mode and reprocessed Jason-3 sea ...
Sep 1, 2024 · In this study, we present a new 20-Hz along-track sea level anomaly (SLA) dataset of Jason-3 within 100 km to the global coastlines using the modified SCMR.
[84]
Assessing the effects of sea-state related errors on the precision of ...
Jul 15, 2021 · This paper focuses on improved characterization and reduction of these high-rate correlated errors that arise from this altimeter measurement process.
[85]
Sea State Bias Variability in Satellite Altimetry Data - MDPI
On zonal average, SSB correction causes about 1% uncertainty in mean sea level trend. At high SWH regions, the uncertainties grow to 2–4% near the 50°N and 60°S ...
[86]
Coastal sea level anomalies and associated trends from Jason ...
Oct 20, 2020 · The sea state bias (SSB) correction is usually estimated from models optimized for open-ocean altimetry measurements and becomes inaccurate ...
[87]
Understanding uncertainties in the satellite altimeter measurement ...
Jan 24, 2025 · Understanding uncertainties in the satellite altimeter measurement of coastal sea level: insights from a round-robin analysis.
[88]
Mitigation of Spatial and Temporal Orbit Errors in Satellite Altimeter ...
Minimizing both the spatial and temporal radial orbit errors therefore benefits almost all applications of the satellite altimeter observations of ocean surface ...
[89]
[PDF] Techniques for determining bias and stability in satellite altimeters
An extension to this work develops a method for inter-altimeter calibration, allowing the systematic di erences between unconnected altimeters to be measured.
[90]
[PDF] Understanding uncertainties in the satellite altimeter measurement ...
Jan 24, 2025 · Uncertainties associated with each of the components used to calculate the altimeter sea surface heights are estimated by measuring the spread ...
[91]
[PDF] Uncertainty characterisation of sea level measurement by satellite ...
Although the uncertainty of sea level estimates from recent missions is far lower than those of early radar altimetry missions, more reliable measurements are ...<|separator|>
[92]
Exploring Siamese network to estimate sea state bias of synthetic ...
Sep 2, 2024 · As a result, the mean scattering surface tends to be shifted towards the wave troughs, causing the sea level measured by the radar altimeter to ...
[93]
How well can we measure the ocean's mean dynamic topography ...
May 21, 2014 · Recent gravity missions have produced a dramatic improvement in our ability to measure the ocean's mean dynamic topography (MDT) from space.
[94]
An opportunity for mean dynamic topography estimation?
Aug 15, 2024 · Broadly defined as subtracting the geoid from the mean sea surface, this separation problem suffers from data inhomogeneities and usually ...Radial Surface Currents From... · 2. Parametric Least-Squares... · 4. Results
[95]
Technical note: Two types of absolute dynamic ocean topography - OS
Sep 4, 2018 · The first type of DOT is determined by a physical principle that the geostrophic balance takes the minimum energy state. Based on that, a new ...Missing: causes | Show results with:causes
[96]
(PDF) Impact of Ocean Mean Dynamic Topography on Satellite Data ...
Aug 7, 2025 · PDF | The response of an eddy-permitting ocean model to changes imposed by the use of different mean dynamic topographies (MDT) is analyzed ...