Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Polohy

Polohy is a city in , , founded in 1887 as a around a railway station and serving as the administrative center of and Polohy urban . The city functions as a key railway junction connecting major lines in the region, with an estimated population of 18,111 as of 2022. Since March 2022, Polohy has been under Russian following the of , leading to disruptions in infrastructure, local governance, and daily life for residents. Historically tied to and , the area developed rapidly in the late with the expansion of the Russian Empire's railway network, later experiencing industrial growth in , including sunflower oil production.

Geography

Location and physical features

Polohy is located in in southeastern , at coordinates 47°29′N 36°15′E. The city sits at an elevation of approximately 98 meters above . It occupies a position in the northern portion of the oblast, southeast of and north of , within the broader steppe zone of . The local terrain features flat steppe landscapes typical of the Pontic-Caspian steppe, with gently rolling plains and fertile soils formed under long-term grassland cover, enabling intensive agricultural use. These black earth soils, rich in , predominate in the and support crop production such as grains and sunflowers. Water features include the nearby Konka River and, further south in the , the Molochna River, which contributes to the area's hydrological context. Polohy serves as an administrative center for , which borders other raions within , including those to the north toward and south toward . The city functions as a node, anchored by its railway station that connects regional lines facilitating movement across .

Climate and environment

Polohy lies within the Pontic-Caspian zone, featuring a temperate marked by distinct seasonal variations. Average annual temperatures hover around 10–11°C, with July means reaching 22–24°C and daytime highs often exceeding 28–30°C during peak summer heat. Winters are cold, with averages of -2 to -3°C and lows frequently dipping to -5 to -10°C, accompanied by occasional frost and snow cover lasting 60–80 days. Precipitation totals approximately 450–550 mm annually, concentrated in the warmer months from May to , when convective showers support agricultural cycles in the region's fertile soils. and autumn see transitional rains, while winters contribute lighter snowfall equivalent to 100–150 mm of liquid water. Aridity increases toward summer's end due to higher evaporation rates in the open landscape, influencing needs for crops like and sunflowers that dominate local farming. The centers on the flat, grassy , historically adapted to and dryland , with dominated by feather grasses and herbs resilient to periodic droughts. Pre-2022 studies highlighted as a key concern, driven by and action on tilled fields; Ukraine-wide, erosion affected up to 40% of , with annual soil loss rates of 10–20 tons per in areas like , exacerbating fertility decline without conservation tillage. posed challenges in drier years, as reliance on Dnieper-derived and local rivers limited reserves amid variable rainfall, prompting empirical assessments of depletion rates averaging 1–2 meters per decade in southern basins.

History

Founding and early development

Polohy was officially founded in 1887 as a point, known as Grebarskyi, for station during the building of the Chaplyne–Berdyansk line within the Katerynoslav under the . This development connected inland agricultural regions to ports, facilitating the transport of grain and other commodities from the zones. The settlement's name originated from the adjacent Novi Polohy , established earlier by migrants from central villages in the , including Polohy-Verhuny and Polohy-Yanenky. Early growth stemmed directly from activities, drawing laborers for track laying, station operations, and maintenance, which formed the core of the initial alongside local farming and . The positioned Polohy as an emerging , boosting in the surrounding chernozem-rich areas dedicated to and other crop production for . Predominantly in composition, the populace reflected patterns of 19th-century to the southern frontiers, with roles introducing specialized workers to support . By the late , foundational rail facilities like repair workshops had taken shape, underscoring the causal link between imperial railway expansion and the town's inception as a service-oriented amid agrarian expanses. This period established basic economic pillars in transportation-linked commerce and , prior to further lines enhancing its nodal status.

Russian Civil War and early Soviet integration

During the , Polohy served as a key railway junction in , facilitating insurgent movements and drawing contesting forces due to its logistical value on lines connecting to the Sea region. In December 1918, Nestor Makhno's anarchist insurgents established a defensive front at Polohy amid clashes with advancing Bolshevik and Ukrainian Directory troops. On 3 January 1919, Makhno convened a conference of delegates from 40 insurgent detachments at Polohy station to coordinate supplies, unification under his command, and resistance against Bolshevik encroachment, reflecting the fragmented partisan dynamics in the area. Early 1919 saw intensified fighting as White forces under pushed southward; Makhno's detachments failed to retain control of Polohy alongside nearby and amid the Volunteer Army's offensive. Skirmishes continued, with reports of at Polohy on 4 1919, followed by its capture announced in Bolshevik outlets, likely by White troops exploiting the rail network for advances toward . Makhno reorganized fronts extending to Polohy- to counter Petliura's nationalists and residual Bolshevik units, but shifting alliances and White momentum fragmented anarchist holdings. By mid-1919, Denikin's forces dominated the steppe, incorporating Polohy into their temporary occupation zone until counteroffensives in late 1919–1920, aided briefly by Makhno against , reversed gains and led to Bolshevik consolidation by 1921. Post-1921, Polohy integrated into the following the Bolshevik victory and the 1922 USSR formation treaty, with local soviets enforcing central decrees amid residual partisan resistance. The 1917 Land Decree's redistribution of estates to peasants persisted under the (NEP) until 1928, allowing limited private cultivation in the raion's agrarian economy, though state procurement quotas strained rural holdings. Initial collectivization efforts emerged in the mid-1920s, organizing farms into cooperatives amid class warfare rhetoric targeting kulaks, precursors to full-scale formation. The 1921–1923 Volga famine extended to southern Ukraine's drought-hit steppes, prompting migrations from Polohy-area villages and reducing rural populations by an estimated 10–20% regionally through starvation and exodus, as grain exports continued under Soviet policy. Local integration emphasized , promoting Ukrainian-language administration and education to consolidate loyalty, though Russian remained dominant in rail operations.

Soviet period (1920s–1991)

In the 1920s, following the consolidation of Soviet control over , Polohy became part of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic's administrative framework within , emphasizing agricultural collectivization to support central planning goals. Forced implementation of kolkhozes began around 1928–1929, consolidating private peasant holdings into state-controlled collective farms, which disrupted local farming practices in the fertile region surrounding the town. This process involved campaigns targeting wealthier farmers, leading to deportations and resistance; by 1932, collectivization rates in reached over 70%, though output initially declined due to , confiscations, and motivational failures under rigid quotas. The ensuing famine of 1932–1933 severely impacted rural areas like Polohy, as grain procurements exceeded harvests to fund industrialization elsewhere, resulting in widespread starvation across —a region with mortality rates estimated at 20–30% in some due to demands and border closures preventing aid. Soviet records underreported deaths, but demographic analyses indicate lost 3.9 million to famine-related causes, with agricultural towns like Polohy experiencing depopulation and social upheaval from family separations and coerced labor. intensified post-famine, shifting from early policies to prioritizing Russian in schools and administration, eroding local linguistic practices despite nominal cultural autonomy. Central planning inefficiencies persisted, as yields in grain-heavy oblasts like Zaporizhzhia often fell 20–40% below targets by the late , attributable to poor incentives, shortfalls, and bureaucratic mismanagement rather than climatic factors alone. Railway expansions under the first Five-Year Plans (1928–1932) bolstered Polohy's role as a junction connecting to ports, with track doublings and electrification initiatives enhancing freight for grain and coal, though construction relied on labor and fell short of electrifying key lines until the 1950s. During , German forces occupied Polohy from 5 October 1941 to 17 , destroying rail infrastructure and establishing a camp for Soviet prisoners of war, where executions and forced labor claimed local lives; civilian casualties included residents killed in December 1941 reprisals. Postwar reconstruction from 1944 prioritized rail repairs and mechanization, attracting labor influxes that grew Polohy's population amid Ukraine's overall recovery, with restoring 80% of prewar agricultural capacity by 1950 through tractor distributions and irrigation. Industrial adjuncts like repair depots emerged, tying the town's economy to Soviet transport networks, yet chronic shortages in inputs and overemphasis on quotas perpetuated inefficiencies, as evidenced by repeated shortfalls in the despite Lysenkoist agricultural . By the , stagnation under Brezhnev-era planning manifested in underinvestment, with local output metrics lagging behind claims due to hidden deficits and black-market reliance.

Independence era (1991–2022)

Following Ukraine's declaration of independence on August 24, 1991, Polohy, as a rural raion center in Zaporizhzhia Oblast, faced severe economic contraction amid national hyperinflation peaking at over 10,000% in 1993 and a GDP decline of approximately 60% by the end of the decade. Agricultural collectives, the backbone of local production, underwent de-collectivization starting in 1992, with land redistributed to individual households—transferring nearly 70% of arable land to about 6.6 million rural residents nationwide by the mid-1990s. In Polohy Raion, this process yielded fragmented smallholdings averaging under 5 hectares, hindering efficiency and mechanization while exacerbating rural poverty; hyperinflation further eroded agricultural terms of trade, as fixed state prices lagged behind soaring costs. The local railway junction, however, maintained its role as a key transport node for grain and kaolin clay exports, providing continuity amid broader industrial stagnation. Privatization efforts in the late and early transitioned some collective farms into private entities, but challenges persisted, including incomplete legal frameworks and resistance from entrenched managers who retained control over large tracts. By the mid-, Ukraine's economy rebounded with annual GDP growth of 5-10%, driven by export booms in and metals; in , this supported modest upgrades, including road and rail maintenance in Polohy, though rural areas lagged behind urban centers. Local focused on grains and industrial crops like sunflowers, with trade ties split between (for and markets) and emerging orientations via preferential agreements, reflecting Polohy's position in a balancing industrial output with farming. Pre-2014 political dynamics in revealed preferences for closer Russian economic integration, as seen in strong regional backing for Viktor Yanukovych's 2010 presidential victory, which promised balanced ties with and the West. Following the 2014 Revolution, Polohy experienced no major unrest, unlike eastern oblasts; local stability prevailed under Kyiv's administration, with agriculture adapting to disrupted Russian markets by pivoting toward EU exports under the nascent Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area. Population outflows from rural Polohy continued, but rail-dependent logistics sustained economic viability through the period.

Russian invasion, occupation, and administration (2022–present)

Russian forces captured Polohy in March 2022 as part of their southern offensive launched from , advancing rapidly through toward and beyond, with defenders withdrawing from the city to consolidate lines and prevent encirclement. Local reports indicated instances of by pro-Russian elements facilitating the takeover, alongside sporadic , though the city's strategic rail hub contributed to its swift fall without prolonged urban fighting. In late September 2022, Russian-installed authorities conducted a referendum in occupied portions of , including Polohy, claiming turnout of around 85% and over 90% approval for joining , results cited as justification for . The process drew international condemnation as illegitimate, with observers noting coercion, armed oversight at polling stations, and exclusion of dissenting voices, rendering the outcomes unverifiable and non-representative of pre-war sentiments where polls showed limited separatist support in Zaporizhzhia compared to regions. On September 30, 2022, formally annexed , asserting administrative control over Polohy despite controlling only partial territory. Under Russian administration, Polohy has seen efforts to integrate economically and demographically, including the phased introduction of the as by late 2022, displacing the hryvnia in local transactions, and systematic passportization campaigns pressuring residents to obtain Russian citizenship for access to services, , and aid. These measures, decried by and Western analysts as forced , have coincided with reports of uneven local compliance, where pre-invasion linguistic Russification and cultural ties fostered some acquiescence amid fears of reprisal, though empirical data from 2022 surveys indicated a sharp postwar decline in pro-Russian attitudes even in southern oblasts. As of October 2025, forces maintain control of Polohy and much of its , with no confirmed Ukrainian advances recapturing the city despite 2023 counteroffensive attempts in western that stalled short of occupied centers. Humanitarian consequences include massive evacuations, reducing the local population by over half from pre-war levels through flight to government-held areas or , exacerbating infrastructure decay and restricting movement under protocols. upholds Polohy as sovereign territory under temporary illegal , rejecting claims while documenting war crimes and activity in the district. sources portray the area as stably integrated, though independent verification remains limited due to restricted access.

Government and administration

Ukrainian administration pre-2022

Polohy operated as an and the administrative center of within from Ukraine's independence until the 2020 raion reform. The local governance structure followed Ukraine's dual system of elected self-government bodies and appointed state administrations, with the Polohy City Council (міська рада) handling municipal affairs such as budgeting, public services, and infrastructure maintenance. This council, comprising a and deputies elected every five years, managed functions including local education oversight, utility provision (e.g., and heating), , and collection of property and land taxes. Prior to the 2014–2020 decentralization reforms, Polohy Raion maintained a separate elected raion council and state administration, appointed by the oblast governor, which coordinated regional state policies, social services distribution, and interactions with the Zaporizhzhia Oblast State Administration. The raion encompassed Polohy as its urban center, one additional urban-type settlement, 36 villages, and 12 rural councils, with the city council interfacing with raion bodies for shared responsibilities like healthcare facilities and road repairs beyond settlement limits. In response to , Polohy formed an urban (territorial ) on March 30, 2018, amalgamating the city council with three village councils to enhance fiscal autonomy and service delivery. This entity, centered in Polohy, assumed broader powers over local development, including budget allocation from increased property taxes and state transfers, while subordinating to oblast-level oversight for national programs. Yuriy Konovalenko served as , leading the and representing it in regional associations. The 2020 administrative reform abolished legacy raions, incorporating Polohy Raion's territory into the expanded Zaporizhzhia Raion, but the Polohy urban hromada retained its elected council structure for local . Following the October 2020 local elections, the city council consisted of 26 deputies from various parties, focusing on operational continuity amid fiscal reliance on central funding, which constituted a significant portion of the budget due to the area's agrarian economy. Local administration emphasized practical coordination with oblast authorities for subsidies in and utilities, without notable publicized corruption investigations specific to Polohy in this period.

Russian occupation governance and claims

Following Russia's declaration of annexation of Zaporizhzhia Oblast on September 30, 2022, Polohy and its were incorporated into the Russian Federation's administrative structure as part of the newly claimed , with designated as the regional administrative center for occupied territories. Local governance shifted from Ukrainian control to Russian-installed officials, who oversee raion-level administration under the oversight of Russian-appointed regional governor , appointed in June 2022 to replace earlier military-civilian structures. This transition followed referendums held September 23–27, 2022, in occupied areas, where Russian authorities reported 93.11% approval for joining in based on 541,093 votes cast, framing the process as an exercise of . Russian policies in occupied Polohy emphasize integration, including the mandatory introduction of the as alongside the hryvnia, with efforts to phase out Ukrainian currency through state salaries and pensions paid in rubles. systems have been reoriented to the Russian curriculum, suppressing Ukrainian-language instruction and incorporating portraying Ukraine negatively, as documented in occupied schools where attendance at Russified programs is enforced and non-compliance risks family repercussions. drives target local males, with reports of at least 200 residents from Zaporizhzhia occupied areas forcibly mobilized into Russian forces in fall 2024, including summary executions for . Russian authorities claim these measures enhance stability and infrastructure repair, such as restoring utilities damaged in prior fighting, though independent verification is limited. The annexation and governance lack international recognition, with the condemning the referendums as invalid and the territorial changes as violations of Ukraine's in resolutions adopted October 12, 2022. Ukrainian and Western reports document repression, including arbitrary detentions, , and forced relocations for —such as plans in August 2025 to move 60 children from Polohy district to for military-patriotic camps—contrasting Russian assertions of voluntary integration and improved security. The referendums occurred under duress, with armed personnel overseeing and pre-filled ballots reported, undermining claims of genuine local consent despite official turnout figures exceeding 80% in the .

Economy

Key industries and agriculture

Polohy's economy prior to the 2022 was predominantly agricultural, with the surrounding specializing in the cultivation of grains such as and corn, alongside sunflower as a major oilseed crop, reflecting the broader patterns of where supported extensive field operations. Local processing infrastructure, including the Polohy Oil Extraction Plant (PJSC Pology OEP), established during the Soviet era, handled sunflower seed crushing and produced and phosphatide concentrates, positioning it as one of Europe's larger facilities for oilseed processing with capacities for modern extraction technologies. This plant contributed to value-added activities, exporting products and supporting ancillary light industries like seed cleaning and dehulling equipment manufacturing in the region. Limited complemented , focusing on derivatives and service-oriented operations tied to local resource extraction, though specific GDP breakdowns for Polohy remain sparse; oblast-level data indicated 's outsized role, accounting for significant portions of output in before disruptions. Following occupation in March 2022, in Polohy and surrounding areas plummeted due to field abandonments exceeding 7-8% of in occupied zones, widespread rendering thousands of hectares unusable, and forced asset seizures targeting enterprises like and facilities. Harvest yields in -occupied , including , reached their lowest levels since 2003 in 2025, with occurring at undervalued prices under coercive rather than market-driven resumption. authorities have claimed normalization of farming operations in annexed territories, but empirical indicators such as reduced sown areas and export diversions to contradict assertions of restored pre-war efficiency, highlighting instead and infrastructural .

Transportation and infrastructure

Polohy functions as a major railway junction in , with tracks linking the region and Berdyansk to city, facilitating freight and passenger movement across prior to the 2022 invasion. The city's rail infrastructure supports connectivity to the Sea of Azov ports and broader regional logistics networks. routes passing through or near Polohy, including segments of the and local roads, provide overland access toward , though specific pre-war upgrades to these roads in Polohy remain undocumented in available reports. During the beginning February 24, 2022, infrastructure nationwide suffered extensive damage, with approximately 30% of transport networks affected, including tracks, bridges, and stations targeted to disrupt . In occupied areas like Polohy, seized by forces in March 2022, initial disruptions to operations occurred amid fighting, though precise damage assessments for the local junction are limited due to restricted access and conflicting reports from and sources. Under Russian occupation, authorities have prioritized repairs and enhancements to Polohy's rail lines for , integrating them into a proposed corridor from through Polohy toward , Kamysh-Zoria, and to bolster supply lines to and Azov Sea fronts. allocated 12.5 billion rubles (about 130 million euros) in 2025 for railway maintenance in occupied territories, including track repairs and equipment upgrades, reflecting the junction's strategic role in sustaining southern operations despite partisan sabotage risks. Nearby fortifications, such as 30 km of anti-tank ditches northwest of Polohy, underscore its defensive and logistical significance in defending supply routes.

Demographics

According to the 2001 All-Ukrainian , Polohy had a population of 22,209 residents. This figure reflected modest post-Soviet stabilization after earlier growth tied to railway development and industrialization in the region, though Ukraine's broader demographic patterns—negative natural from rates persistently below replacement level (approximately 1.2 children per woman by the 2010s) and rural out-migration—began exerting downward pressure. By early 2022, prior to the full-scale , the population had declined to an estimated 18,111, continuing a trend of annual losses averaging 0.5-1% amid and urban pull factors in nearby city. These dynamics were exacerbated by limited local employment opportunities outside agriculture and transport, contributing to and aging demographics, with projections indicating further erosion absent policy interventions. The , culminating in of Polohy by early March 2022, triggered acute contraction through evacuations and . government-organized evacuations from advancing frontlines displaced thousands from the area before capture, while post- conditions—including shelling risks, administrative disruptions, and reported —prompted additional outflows to Kyiv-controlled territories or . In occupied settlements like Polohy, remaining residents faced restricted mobility and humanitarian access, with UN estimates for similar frontline towns indicating 40-70% reductions by mid-2023 due to registration data and of reduced activity. Current levels remain unenumerated amid the , but tracking suggests a sharp drop below pre-war estimates, compounded by halted natural growth and from hostilities.

Ethnic, linguistic, and religious composition

According to the , Polohy's population was composed of 91.25% ethnic and 7.23% ethnic , with smaller groups including 0.28% , 0.23% , 0.20% , 0.14% , and 0.09% . These figures reflect a historically Ukrainian-majority settlement in the region, augmented by Russian influx during Soviet industrialization and agricultural collectivization, though ethnic intermixing and assimilation reduced distinct Russian enclaves by independence. Linguistically, Polohy exhibited bilingualism shaped by Soviet Russification policies, which promoted as the in , , and media, leading many ethnic to adopt it as a primary or daily despite Ukrainian ethnic identification. While city-specific native breakdowns from the 2001 are aggregated within broader data, Zaporizhzhia Oblast overall recorded approximately 51.8% and 46.7% as native languages, suggesting a near in Polohy akin to other southern urban centers with mixed heritage. Post-1991 Ukrainianization initiatives, including laws mandating in public spheres, gradually shifted usage toward , though persistent bilingual practices remained common in daily commerce and family life. Religiously, the population has been overwhelmingly Eastern , with adherence centered on parishes affiliated with the under the Moscow Patriarchate prior to the 2018 autocephaly schism, reflecting the oblast's historical ties to Russian imperial and Soviet ecclesiastical structures. Minority faiths, such as Protestant denominations or , existed in trace numbers consistent with urban Ukraine's secular trends, but no comprehensive local surveys quantify deviations from Orthodox dominance. The military occupation of Polohy since March 2022 has induced significant demographic flux through wartime , with thousands fleeing to government-controlled territories or abroad, disproportionately affecting Ukrainian-identifying families amid reported and collapse. This , estimated at over 50% depopulation in some occupied locales, likely skewed remaining compositions toward Russophone holdouts or incoming administrators and settlers from , though verifiable post-invasion censuses are absent due to territorial disputes and restricted access. Such shifts parallel broader patterns in annexed areas, where forced passportization and relocation incentives aim to consolidate ethnic presence, per analyses of occupation .

Society and culture

Local traditions and landmarks

The Polohy Local History , founded in 1968, serves as a primary repository of the region's , with a collection exceeding 12,000 artifacts displayed across six halls covering topics such as local , , 19th-century settlement, revolutionary periods, and the Second World War. Notable exhibits include Polovtsian stone statues dating to the 11th-12th centuries and items from kurgan excavations, such as the Polohivskyi Posokh, a ceremonial symbolizing elite status in ancient societies. During the occupation beginning in 2022, the museum suffered , including the theft of key archaeological pieces between September 15-16, 2022, though some pre-war exhibits like household items and ceramics persist under restricted access. Local traditions revolve around steppe and craftsmanship, particularly production, for which Polohy earned recognition as a hub of ceramics in , with techniques rooted in 19th-century artisan practices tied to local clay deposits and rural economies. These customs, including hand-thrown earthenware for household and decorative use, reflect continuity from Cossack-era influences in the broader region, though specific festivals in Polohy emphasize harvest-related gatherings rather than large-scale events. Soviet-era architecture, such as administrative buildings from the 1930s-1950s, remains a visible landmark, exemplifying functionalist design adapted to agricultural collectives. Key monuments include the Bratska Mogyla, a communal honoring local residents killed in during Nazi , erected post-war as a Soviet with inscriptions commemorating nine buried individuals. The Polohy railway , operational since 1905 as a junction on the Zaporizhzhia-Mariupol line, functions as an infrastructural landmark intertwined with local identity, though shelling in caused partial damage to surrounding areas without halting rail use under . Pre-war customs, such as communal bread-baking from wheat harvests, persist informally amid wartime disruptions, underscoring resilience in agricultural routines.

Education and social services

Prior to 2022, education in Polohy operated under Ukraine's national framework administered by the Ministry of Education and Science, mandating compulsory schooling from ages 6 to 17 with a curriculum emphasizing and history as primary subjects of instruction. Reforms initiated in the late introduced the New Ukrainian School (NUS) model, shifting toward and reducing reliance on rote memorization inherited from Soviet standards, with lower secondary implementation beginning in September 2022—disrupted by the in Polohy. Local schools served the raion's pre-war population of around 58,000, though precise enrollment data for Polohy in 2021 remains limited in public records; oblast-wide, had 679 daytime schools enrolling 271,400 pupils. Social services included municipal hospitals providing primary and secondary care, alongside welfare programs for vulnerable groups managed through Ukraine's social protection system. Following Russian forces' occupation of Polohy in March 2022, authorities mandated a transition to educational standards, requiring schools to adopt Moscow-approved textbooks and that prioritize instruction—often exceeding 80% of class time—and incorporate narratives justifying the as a "special military operation." Teachers faced to sign contracts affirming compliance, with non-adherence resulting in dismissal, salary withholding, threats, or abduction; documented cases of violence and psychological pressure to enforce participation. -language materials were systematically removed or banned, suppressing prior elements and prompting an of educators to government-controlled areas, which created acute staff shortages estimated at up to 50% in some occupied facilities. Enrollment dropped as parents resisted or children attended underground or online classes where feasible, though exact figures for Polohy are unavailable due to restricted access; internationally, around one million school-age children remain in occupied territories, many facing disrupted access. Social services under occupation shifted to Russian administrative models, with healthcare facilities nominally operational but reoriented toward integration into Russia's system, including requirements for full access to payments and treatment. and U.S. State Department reports highlight coerced relocations of minors from institutions for purported medical care, often without parental consent, amid broader aid dependencies exacerbated by conflict-related shortages. Hospitals in occupied areas, including Polohy, experienced staff flight and supply disruptions, contrasting pre-war provisions; while occupation authorities claim expanded services via Russian funding, independent verifications are absent, and NGOs report declines in quality due to politicized oversight and of personnel. Challenges persist from intermittent shelling damaging , forcing partial closures or reliance on makeshift facilities, though attribution of attacks varies by source.

Notable people

Viktor Poltavets (1925–2003), a Soviet-era and painter and graphic artist, was born in Polohy on January 11, 1925, and graduated from the Art Institute in 1950, later becoming known for his participation in Great Patriotic War exhibitions and works held in museum collections. Oleksii Chubashev (1991–2022), a and correspondent with the call sign "," was born in Polohy on November 16, 1991; he graduated from the Ivan Bohun High School in 2010 and died on June 10, 2022, while defending during the . Volodymyr Kozak (born 1959), a and former People's Deputy who served in the during multiple terms including the 5th convocation starting May 25, 2006, hails from Polohy, where he began his career before advancing to national roles in infrastructure and transport policy.