Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Proselyte

A proselyte is a new convert to a or system, originally denoting a who fully adopts by accepting its laws and practices, thereby changing religious and ethnic affiliation. The term derives from the Greek prosēlytos, meaning "stranger" or "newcomer," reflecting the status of an outsider joining a . In Jewish tradition, a proselyte is termed ger tzedek ("righteous stranger"), distinguishing them from a (resident alien who follows basic ethical laws but does not fully convert). The formal conversion process, as codified in from the early , requires three key steps supervised by a (religious court): instruction on the and the burdens of Jewish observance, circumcision for males (with immersion in a ritual bath following healing), and immersion for all candidates along with explicit acceptance of the Torah's obligations. This ritualized procedure evolved from biblical precedents, such as the allowance for circumcised foreigners to participate in (Exodus 12:48), but was not fully formalized until the rabbinic period after the Second Temple's destruction in 70 . Converts were fully integrated as Jews, with the equating their status to that of a newborn soul, free from prior lineage ties (Yevamot 22a; 48b). Historically, to occurred primarily during the Hellenistic and Roman periods (c. 300 BCE–400 CE), attracting voluntary converts drawn to its and ethical framework, though did not engage in organized efforts. Evidence includes literary references in and , who praised proselytes for renouncing , and epigraphic inscriptions from sites like and Asia Minor documenting converts from the 1st century BCE onward. Roman authors like and , however, viewed such conversions with hostility, associating them with cultural betrayal and contributing to anti-Jewish measures, such as the expulsion of and proselytes from in 19 CE under . Despite sporadic persecution, conversions persisted into , with figures like the royal court of in the 1st century CE converting en masse, as recorded by . Beyond , the concept of a proselyte influenced , where converts from were similarly integrated, though the term retained its Jewish connotations in contexts (e.g., Matthew 23:15). In broader usage today, "proselyte" denotes any recent adherent to a or cause, often in discussions of dynamics.

Etymology and Definition

Linguistic Origins

The word proselyte derives from the prosḗlytos (προσήλυτος), a term rooted in the verb prosérchomai ("to come to" or "to approach"), signifying a "newcomer," "stranger," or "one who has arrived from elsewhere." Originally, in secular contexts, prosḗlytos referred to a resident alien, , or political newcomer who had recently settled in a , without inherent religious connotations. This usage reflects the linguistic environment of the (circa 323–31 BCE), when served as the common dialect across the Mediterranean, facilitating cultural and migratory exchanges. In Jewish Hellenistic literature, prosḗlytos became the standard Septuagint translation for the Hebrew gēr (גֵּר), a biblical term meaning "stranger" or "sojourner," often denoting a foreigner residing among the . This linkage transformed the word's application, bridging secular residency with religious affiliation, as gēr increasingly implied integration into the covenant community through adherence to Jewish laws. During the Hellenistic era, amid widespread and interactions with Greek culture, the term evolved to emphasize over mere physical relocation, particularly for Gentiles adopting . Early literary attestations of prosḗlytos in this religious sense appear in the works of of Alexandria (circa 20 BCE–50 CE), who described proselytes as individuals who had "come over" to a God-pleasing life, abandoning for monotheistic worship of the one . highlighted their voluntary choice as superior to birthright adherence, using the term to denote full converts who embraced Jewish ethics and rituals. Flavius Josephus (37–100 CE), while rarely employing prosḗlytos directly, frequently referenced Jewish converts in analogous terms, portraying them as those who renounced prior customs to follow Jewish laws and worship. These usages mark the term's solidification as a key descriptor for religious newcomers in .

Core Meaning and Usage

A proselyte is fundamentally a who voluntarily converts to , adopting its religious laws, customs, and full integration into the Jewish community. This primary religious sense emphasizes the proselyte's transition from or another faith to monotheistic observance, often involving formal rites such as and . As described by the ancient philosopher , proselytes are those who "have come over to a new and God-loving community," highlighting the communal and transformative aspect of the . The term proselyte differs from the broader "convert," which can apply to any change in religious affiliation without implying complete societal integration, whereas proselyte specifically denotes a full adherent who assumes the obligations and privileges of the new faith. In contrast to an apostate, who abandons their original religion, a proselyte actively joins and embraces a new one, marking a positive ingress rather than egress. The word derives from the Greek prosēlytos, meaning "newcomer" or "stranger," underscoring the outsider's entry into the community. In , "proselyte" generally refers to an individual who undergoes formal rites of to join a new , extending beyond to the , where it refers to full converts to (e.g., Acts 2:10), and more broadly to any new convert to a . This usage prioritizes the ritual and social embedding over mere belief change. While rooted in religious origins, the term has modern secular extensions in , where it describes individuals who fully adopt new ideologies, political movements, or social causes, akin to converts who integrate into alternative communities. For instance, in studies of social movements, proselytes may represent those who abandon prior worldviews for radical commitments, such as or , though retaining the connotation of deliberate transformation.

Historical Development

In Ancient Israel and Biblical Period

In ancient society, the concept of the —often translated as "," "," or "resident alien"—referred to a non- living among the , who was afforded certain legal protections and opportunities for integration under law. This status emphasized communal responsibility toward vulnerable outsiders, distinguishing the from full citizens (ezrach) while mandating equitable treatment. A key provision in 12:48-49 allowed a circumcised to participate in the alongside , underscoring that ritual inclusion was possible through adherence to covenantal markers like , thereby treating the as equal under the law in this observance. Such laws reflected an early framework for foreigners to align with Israelite practices without formal rituals. The further reinforced protections for the ger, commanding to love and not oppress them, drawing on the collective memory of Israel's own sojourning in (Deuteronomy 10:19). Additional statutes prohibited exploitation, such as withholding from the ger or widow, and required leaving gleanings in fields for their sustenance (Deuteronomy 24:17-18, 19-21). These provisions aimed to foster , positioning the ger within the triad of vulnerable groups—alongside orphans and widows—that particularly defended, thereby embedding humanitarian ethics into Israel's legal tradition. Biblical narratives illustrate the acceptance of individuals who effectively became proselytes by adopting Israelite faith and customs. Ruth the Moabite, after declaring her loyalty to and ("Your people shall be my people, and your God my God," Ruth 1:16), integrated into Israelite society through marriage to and became an ancestor of King David, exemplifying voluntary alignment with the covenant community. Similarly, the Syrian commander, healed of by , professed faith in and requested soil from to worship exclusively there, marking a shift from to monotheistic devotion (2 Kings 5:15-17). These stories highlight informal pathways to acceptance, where personal commitment rather than institutional processes enabled foreigners to join Israel's religious life. During the pre-exilic and exilic periods, formal conversion mechanisms were limited, with the ger primarily denoting resident aliens under protection rather than full converts, as evidenced by the absence of structured proselytism in monarchic-era texts. However, interactions in the Babylonian exile and subsequent return fostered greater exposure to non-Israelites, leading to an increase in proselytism post-exile as diaspora communities encountered diverse populations and emphasized covenantal inclusion to rebuild identity. This shift laid groundwork for broader gentile engagement, though still rooted in biblical precedents of hospitality and faith adoption.

In the Hellenistic and Roman Eras

The conquests of in the 4th century BCE marked a pivotal shift in Jewish , as Hellenistic culture facilitated the spread of Jewish ideas across the Mediterranean world. This era saw the emergence of "God-fearers," Gentiles who adopted Jewish and ethical practices without undergoing full or , often participating in . These semi-proselytes bridged pagan and Jewish communities, with archaeological from inscriptions in synagogues, such as those in and , indicating their presence and contributions to Jewish institutions. Second Temple literature provides key insights into the voluntary and sometimes coerced nature of conversions during this period. , in writings like On the Special Laws, describes enthusiastic pagan conversions to , attributing them to the appeal of its philosophical depth and moral rigor, with examples of entire households embracing the faith. Similarly, in recounts mass conversions under Hasmonean rulers, notably John Hyrcanus's forced circumcision of the Idumeans in the late 2nd century BCE, integrating them into Judean society while expanding territorial influence. These accounts highlight through cultural appeal and as a tool for political consolidation. In the era, Judaism's allure grew among pagan elites, drawn by its emphasis on and one , leading to notable despite imperial scrutiny. By the , a significant number of proselytes and sympathizers existed across the empire, as inferred from historians like and , who noted Jewish influence on imperial circles, including conversions among women of high status. This expansion contributed to tensions with nascent , as shared proselytizing efforts in diaspora cities like and created competition for adherents. Proselytism faced severe challenges, including persecution under Seleucid ruler Antiochus IV in the 2nd century BCE, which sparked the and temporarily suppressed Jewish outreach amid forced . Later Roman edicts, such as those under after the in 135 CE, banned circumcision and conversions, yet Jewish communities in the diaspora persisted, sustaining proselytism through tolerant urban centers like and . This resilience underscored the adaptive nature of Jewish missionizing in a polytheistic .

Role in Judaism

Conversion Process and Requirements

In , the conversion process, known as giyur, became formalized as a structured ritual to ensure the sincerity and commitment of the prospective proselyte. This procedure, outlined in the , emphasizes voluntary acceptance and integration into the Jewish covenant, distinguishing full proselytes (ger tzedek) from partial adherents. The three core requirements for conversion, as codified in the Babylonian (Yevamot 47a-b), are circumcision for males, in a (ritual bath), and formal acceptance of the mitzvot (Jewish commandments). Males must undergo (circumcision) or, if already circumcised, hatafat dam brit (extraction of a drop of blood); both men and women then immerse fully in natural water to symbolize spiritual rebirth. The acceptance of the mitzvot involves a verbal commitment to observe Jewish law, often tested through prior instruction. These steps must occur in sequence after initial evaluation, marking the completion of the transformation into a full Jew. A beit din, or rabbinic court consisting of at least three observant male qualified as judges, oversees the entire to verify the candidate's motivations and preparedness. The court begins by instructing the proselyte in key aspects of observance, including both lenient and stringent mitzvot, and issues stern warnings about the potential hardships of Jewish life, such as and communal responsibilities. This deterrence serves to discourage insincere applicants; only if the candidate persists willingly does the court proceed with the rituals. The mandates this oversight to uphold the integrity of conversion, ensuring it aligns with the covenant at Sinai. Historically, pre-rabbinic conversions in ancient were often informal, relying on assimilation through residence, intermarriage, or adoption of practices without a standardized , as the was closely tied to . Following the destruction of the Second in 70 , rabbinic authorities formalized the process to safeguard the community amid and to deter opportunistic conversions influenced by political or social pressures, shifting focus toward internal survival and sincere commitment. This standardization, developed in the Talmudic era, reflected Judaism's adaptation to life without a central temple. Special cases include conversions for entire families, which are permissible in rabbinic tradition provided each member—adult or child—undergoes the required steps individually under beit din supervision, often motivated by or communal . Conversions under , however, are deemed invalid, as sincere voluntary of the mitzvot is essential; for example, rabbinic authorities ruled that forced conversions, such as those during the anti-Jewish pogroms in in 1391 and under the (established 1478), did not nullify the Jewish status of the (forced converts), as duress invalidates the religious transformation.

Status, Rights, and Integration

In Jewish law, a proselyte who completes the process is regarded as equivalent to a native-born Jew, with all prior familial and legal ties to their non-Jewish origins severed. The articulates this principle in the statement that "a proselyte is like a newborn ," as found in Yevamot 22a, meaning enters the Jewish as if reborn, with Abraham as their spiritual ancestor. This status erases previous lineage, allowing the proselyte to fully integrate without the burdens of heritage, though they retain a biblical to honor their non-Jewish parents. Upon achieving this status, proselytes enjoy full rights identical to those of born , including participation in religious rituals, inheritance, and within the community. They are obligated to observe the entire , encompassing commandments such as , festival observance, Sabbath-keeping, and dietary s, with no distinctions made in civil or religious matters (Numbers 15:14). Jewish protects proselytes from derogatory references to their origins, emphasizing their equality, though certain restrictions applied historically to of specific nations like Ammonites or Moabites for up to three generations. Integration has faced challenges due to historical distinctions and modern denominational variances. In ancient and rabbinic periods, the term "" referred to a resident non-convert who adopted and the seven laws but remained a without full circumcision or immersion, often facing social limitations compared to the fully converted "ger tzedek," which contributed to a around partial affiliation. Today, recognizes only conversions performed under strict halakhic standards by an Orthodox beit din, rejecting most Reform and ones, while accepts a broader range of conversions focused on personal commitment and community involvement, leading to uneven integration across denominations. Notable proselytes like , a first-century convert possibly related to , exemplify successful integration and contributions to Jewish thought. , who adhered rigorously to purity laws and converted soldiers through scriptural arguments, is traditionally credited with the authoritative translation of the Pentateuch known as , which provided a literal interpretation of the Torah's plain meaning () and became a cornerstone of Jewish study. His work facilitated deeper understanding and observance among -speaking Jews, highlighting the proselyte's potential to enrich the tradition.

Role in Early Christianity

References in the New Testament

In the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus criticizes the Pharisees and scribes for their zealous proselytism, stating, "Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you travel across sea and land to make a single proselyte, and when he becomes a proselyte, you make him twice as much a child of hell as yourselves" (Matthew 23:15). This passage highlights the active efforts of Jewish religious leaders in the first century to convert Gentiles to Judaism, portraying such conversions as leading to spiritual ruin under Pharisaic influence rather than true righteousness. The Book of Acts records proselytes as part of the diverse audience at Pentecost, where the Holy Spirit descends on the apostles, and the crowd includes "visitors from Rome, both Jews and proselytes" (Acts 2:10) from various regions such as Phrygia, Pamphylia, Egypt, and Libya. These proselytes, full converts to Judaism, represent the international scope of Jewish communities and their openness to Gentile adherents, facilitating the rapid spread of the Christian message as some likely joined the early believers following Peter's sermon. Further evidence of proselyte involvement appears in the selection of church leaders, as seen with Nicolas, "a proselyte from ," chosen among the seven deacons to serve the Hellenistic Jewish widows in (Acts 6:5). As a former convert to , Nicolas's appointment underscores the integration of proselytes into early Christian leadership, bridging cultural divides within the nascent church community. A significant theological shift in the diminishes the emphasis on formal to , prioritizing faith in Christ over ritual observance of the law. articulates this in , declaring, "There is neither Jew nor , there is neither slave nor free, there is no , for you are all one in Christ " ( 3:28), which eliminates ethnic and ritual distinctions, including the need for Gentiles to become Jewish proselytes through or adherence to achieve salvation. This unity in Christ reframes inclusion as based on belief rather than conversion to Jewish practices, marking a departure from traditional Jewish . Proselytes and similar figures played a crucial role in the early church's expansion by serving as intermediaries between Jewish and worlds. For instance, the centurion Cornelius, a God-fearing who had not undergone full proselyte conversion via , receives the and is baptized without such requirements (Acts 10:44-48), exemplifying direct inclusion and challenging Jewish-Christian boundaries. This event propelled church growth by demonstrating that extended to uncircumcised outsiders, with proselytes like those at acting as initial bridges for broader evangelism. Amid the emerging divide between and in the first century, proselytes occupied a precarious position, often navigating loyalties between traditions and the new faith. As Jewish converts drawn to 's message of universal access through faith, they embodied the tensions of this , contributing to formation while facing potential exclusion from both Jewish and emerging Christian groups.

Practices and Theological Views in the Patristic Period

In the patristic period, early church fathers adapted the concept of the proselyte to underscore Christianity's fulfillment of Jewish covenantal promises, positioning believers as the authentic heirs to God's law. Justin Martyr, in his second-century Dialogue with Trypho, explicitly described Christians as the "true proselytes" illumined by Jesus Christ, arguing that they, rather than Jewish converts, properly enter God's covenant through faith rather than physical circumcision. He contended that Gentiles who accept Christ become the spiritual descendants of Abraham, supplanting those who adhere solely to Mosaic observances. Similarly, Tertullian, writing around 200 CE in Adversus Judaeos, critiqued Jewish proselytism by noting that the admission of Gentile proselytes to the law demonstrated its universal intent, yet he insisted this universality pointed to Christ as the true mediator, rendering Jewish conversion practices obsolete for salvation. Tertullian highlighted a debate between a Christian and a Jewish proselyte to illustrate how such conversions failed to recognize the messianic fulfillment. The patristic era marked a shift toward active Christian , with emerging as the rite equivalent to the Jewish required for proselytes, symbolizing purification and entry into the community. The Didache, a late first- or early second-century manual, instructed that for converts should preferably occur by in running water, followed by , mirroring the ritual (tevilah) in a for Jewish converts while invoking the to distinguish it as Christian . This practice emphasized and spiritual rebirth for pagans and Jews alike, facilitating widespread without the need for or dietary laws. Theologically, interpreted Gentiles as spiritual proselytes who fulfilled prophecies, particularly 56, which promised inclusion for foreigners who keep God's . (c. 185–254 ), in his , viewed converted Gentiles as the "spiritual " entering the through Christ, opposing any requirement for Judaizing practices like that would hinder their full participation. Augustine (354–430 ) echoed this in works like , portraying Christian Gentiles as the proselytes of 56:6–7, whose acceptable sacrifices in the house of prayer for all nations superseded literal Jewish rituals, while firmly rejecting who imposed Mosaic law on converts as contrary to . This opposition reinforced and as sufficient for integration, drawing from apostolic precedents against . Christian proselytism expanded across the during the patristic period, attracting pagan conversions through efforts and theological persuasion, culminating in imperial support. By the fourth century, edicts in the Theodosian Code (438 CE) privileged , prohibiting pagan sacrifices and granting privileges to converts, which accelerated mass transitions from to the faith among diverse populations. These measures, building on Constantine's earlier , transformed proselytism from a marginalized activity into a state-endorsed movement, integrating former pagans as full members of the church.

References

  1. [1]
    PROSELYTE Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
    The meaning of PROSELYTE is a new convert (as to a faith or cause) ... Word History. Etymology. Noun. Middle English proselite, from Anglo-French prosilite ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Conversion to Judaism and Hostility toward Jews in the Roman ...
    Jul 30, 2024 · One must also clarify from the outset that the phenomenon of conversion to Judaism does not mean that Jews searched for proselytes. Even though ...
  3. [3]
    Proselyte - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    Originating from late 14th-century Old French and Greek, proselyte means "one who changes sects or creeds," especially a convert to Judaism.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
  6. [6]
    PROSELYTE - JewishEncyclopedia.com
    A proselyte is one who abandons polytheism and adopts the worship of the One God ("De Pœnitentia," § 2; "De Caritate," § 12).Missing: etymology | Show results with:etymology
  7. [7]
  8. [8]
    Proselyte - Encyclopedia of The Bible - Bible Gateway
    גֵּר, H1731, one who lives in a foreign community. A general meaning is a convert from one religion to another; the specific meaning is a convert to Judaism, so ...
  9. [9]
    Jewish Proselytism At the Time of Christian Origins: Chimera or ...
    Proselytes to Judaism certainly existed but there is no evidence for the view that these people were actively sought out.
  10. [10]
    (PDF) Proselytes and proselytism, Jewish - Academia.edu
    The fact that there was now more than one religion who adhered to an exclusive god, gave a new meaning to the proselyte: 'a convert', i.e. a person who accepts ...
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
    [PDF] The Strangers in the Land - BYU ScholarsArchive
    The word that is commonly translated in the King James Version as “stranger” (rg ger) comes from the Hebrew root rwg which means. “to sojourn”3 and can equally ...Missing: Torah | Show results with:Torah
  13. [13]
    Revisiting the προσήλυτος in "the LXX" - Project MUSE
    Although Exod 12:45 stipulates that the πάροικος (Hebrew: תושב) cannot partake of the Passover, 12:48-49 provides an exception: a circumcised προσήλυτος can.
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Deuteronomy's Theological and Social Vision for the רג
    The aim of this dissertation is to present a more nuanced and comprehensive understanding of the noun רג “immigrant” in the book of Deuteronomy (D), which.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Reimagining the Gēr Through Deuteronomic Law
    Chapter 1: History of Scholarship of the Gēr. The Hebrew word gēr – “stranger, sojourner, alien”11 – occurs frequently in the Hebrew Bible. (ninety-two times) ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Rahab and Ruth as Foreign Converts to the People of God
    Nov 23, 2020 · Rahab is a prostitute, while Ruth is an unfortunately childless widow. First and foremost, they are women who do not have husbands who will ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] OLD TESTAMENT TEACHING ABOUT CONVERSION
    Individuals who were converted from an idolatrous Gentile background include such major figures as Abram (Genesis 12), Naaman (2 Kings 5), Rahab. (Joshua 2), ...
  18. [18]
    (PDF) Double Rainbow: Theology of Conversion - Academia.edu
    This work, originally a thesis, explores theologies of conversion to Judaism as seen in three major areas of the Jewish textual tradition: Hebrew bible, ...
  19. [19]
    How to Convert to Judaism - What to Expect at a Conversion
    You'll often be required to live immersed within the Jewish community ... Deuteronomy 1:16; Talmud, Yevamot 47a. By Menachem Posner and Yehuda Shurpin.
  20. [20]
    The Beit Din Le-Giyur (1) | Yeshivat Har Etzion - תורת הר עציון
    Jan 2, 2020 · The Talmud teaches that a conversion must be performed in from of a beit din of three dayanim. This week, we will discuss whether the dayanim of ...
  21. [21]
    History of Conversion | My Jewish Learning
    The history of conversion reflects the ebb and flow in the relationship between the Jewish people and the cultures in which they have lived.Missing: process pre- informality post-
  22. [22]
    The Conversion Controversy - Jewish Theological Seminary
    ... Talmud (Yevamot 47a-b), which first formulates the four stages of the process that culminates in conversion to Judaism (see Shaye J.D. Cohen, The Beginnings ...
  23. [23]
    Conversion to Judaism - Jewish Virtual Library
    The Talmud calls them, "newborn babies" (Yevamot 22a). Nevertheless, proselytes are still obligated to fulfill the biblical comandment of "Honor thy father and ...
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
  26. [26]
    In the Torah, Is the Ger Ever a Convert? - TheTorah.com
    Apr 15, 2019 · The biblical ger, who lives among the Israelites and thus may eat the paschal lamb with them, was transformed by the rabbis into a full convert.
  27. [27]
    Denominational Differences On Conversion - My Jewish Learning
    A convert who has undergone a Reform conversion will be welcome as a member in any Reform or Reconstructionist congregation, but perhaps not in an Orthodox or ...
  28. [28]
    ONḲELOS - JewishEncyclopedia.com
    Onḳelos (commonly called the Proselyte Onḳelos): By: Wilhelm Bacher, Louis Ginzberg Tanna of the end of the first century CE.
  29. [29]
  30. [30]
    What does Matthew 23:15 mean? - BibleRef.com
    Some scholars and historians understand this to be a literal form of missionary work in which the Pharisees attempted to convert non-Jews to religious Judaism.
  31. [31]
    Matthew 23:15 - Verse-by-Verse Bible Commentary - StudyLight.org
    He is speaking of the conversion to the Pharisees' man-made, self-righteous traditions. Robertson points out that there are two classes of proselytes (182).
  32. [32]
    What does Acts 2:10 mean? - BibleRef.com
    Acts 2 describes the beginning of the church in three episodes. First, the Holy Spirit comes upon the Jesus-followers in Jerusalem, equipping them with the ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  33. [33]
    Acts 2 - Pentecost in the Book of Acts - Reading Acts
    Jan 25, 2019 · In Acts 10 the Holy Spirit falls on Cornelius, a God-Fearing Gentile and he speaks in tongues just as the Jewish believers do in Acts 2.
  34. [34]
    What does Acts 6:5 mean? - BibleRef.com
    It makes sense that, judging by their names, six of the new deacons are Hellenist Jews, while the seventh is a Gentile proselyte. Two of the deacons have a ...
  35. [35]
    Acts 6:5 - Verse-by-Verse Bible Commentary - StudyLight.org
    A heathen Greek, who had not only believed in the God of Israel, but had also received circumcision, and consequently was a ...
  36. [36]
    Galatians 3:28: Neither Jew nor Gentile - Reading Acts
    Sep 25, 2019 · Paul claims here that when one has “put on Christ” ethnic distinctions no longer matter. There is no longer an advantage to being Jewish, or a disadvantage to ...Missing: proselytes | Show results with:proselytes
  37. [37]
    Galatians 3:28—Neither Jew nor Greek, Slave nor Free, Male and ...
    “There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer slave or free, there is no longer male and female; for all of you are one in Christ Jesus.”Missing: proselytes | Show results with:proselytes
  38. [38]
    Gentiles, Proselytes, and the Gospel - Apologetics Press
    May 15, 2005 · The Ethiopian eunuch was a worshiper of Jehovah God, like the Jews and proselytes who were in Jerusalem on the day of Pentecost “from every ...
  39. [39]
    Acts 10 - What is a “God-Fearing Gentile”? - Reading Acts
    Feb 17, 2019 · The description of Cornelius as a God-Fearer (φοβούμενος τὸν θεὸν) may mean he was a Gentile who was nearly a convert to Judaism.
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Reflections on Conversion and Proselytizing in Judaism and ...
    Martin Goodman, Mission and Conversion: Proselytizing in the Religious History of the Roman Empire (Oxford, 1994). Berger, Reflections on Conversion and ...
  41. [41]
    Saint Justin Martyr: Dialogue with Trypho (Roberts-Donaldson)
    CHRISTIANS ARE THE TRUE ISRAEL. "As, therefore, all these latter prophecies ... For the proselytes have no need of a covenant, if, since there is one ...
  42. [42]
    CHURCH FATHERS: An Answer to the Jews (Tertullian) - New Advent
    The man who set up to vindicate God's Law as his own was of the Gentiles, and not a Jew of the stock of the Israelites.Missing: text English
  43. [43]