Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

ROWE

The Results-Only Work Environment (ROWE) is a management philosophy that assesses employee performance solely on the delivery of measurable outcomes, eliminating requirements for fixed hours, office attendance, or traditional schedules, thereby granting workers full autonomy over when, where, and how they accomplish their objectives.^[1]^[2] Developed in 2001 by human resources professionals Jody Thompson and Cali Ressler at Best Buy's headquarters in Minneapolis, Minnesota, ROWE emerged from efforts to address inefficiencies in conventional flextime policies by shifting focus entirely to results.^[3]^[4] Implemented as a pilot in Best Buy's corporate departments starting in 2003, the approach yielded empirical gains, including a 35-41% rise in productivity, a 45% drop in voluntary turnover, and enhanced employee wellness through greater work-time control, as documented in organizational studies.^[5]^[6] Independent research, such as a naturally occurring experiment on ROWE participants, corroborated reduced turnover odds and improved health behaviors like better sleep and exercise adherence.^[7]^[8] Despite these advantages, ROWE has faced practical limitations, particularly in roles demanding real-time collaboration, physical presence, or unpredictable scoping, where asynchronous work can hinder team coordination and overlook non-immediate contributions essential for long-term innovation.^[9]^[10] Best Buy eventually scaled back the program amid leadership changes emphasizing structured office returns, highlighting implementation challenges in scaling beyond salaried knowledge work.^[6] Thompson and Ressler later commercialized ROWE through CultureRx, influencing remote and flexible policies, though adoption remains selective due to cultural resistance and suitability constraints.^[11]

Origins and History

Development at Best Buy

Jody Thompson and Cali Ressler, human resources professionals at Best Buy, conceived the Results-Only Work Environment (ROWE) in 2003 as an internal management innovation to prioritize employee outputs over traditional constraints like attendance and schedules.^[3]^[6] Working within the company's HR department, they developed the model amid concerns over workplace inefficiencies, including burnout from rigid face-time expectations and low engagement in corporate roles.^[6] The initiative began as a low-profile experiment, initially introduced to select departments at Best Buy's corporate headquarters in Minneapolis, challenging the prevailing culture that equated physical presence with productivity.^[12] The pilot phase ran from approximately 2003 to 2005, expanding to broader implementation across headquarters teams by 2005, encompassing over 5,000 corporate employees.^[6]^[13] It targeted salaried workers in non-customer-facing roles, enforcing a strict focus on measurable deliverables while eliminating policies on work hours, office attendance, and mandatory meetings.^[6] Participants were granted full autonomy to decide when, where, and how to complete tasks, provided results met predefined metrics, marking a deliberate shift from input-based oversight to outcome accountability.^[3] Early evaluations from the pilot, including internal Best Buy assessments and independent studies by sociologist Phyllis Moen, reported substantial gains: voluntary turnover in ROWE teams declined by up to 90%, compared to higher rates in non-ROWE groups, while productivity rose by 41% on average in participating units.^[6]^[3] These metrics stemmed from tracking output indicators rather than time logs, with employees self-reporting greater focus and reduced stress, though critics later questioned the sustainability amid Best Buy's broader operational challenges.^[6] The results validated the experiment's premise in a high-pressure retail corporate setting, informing ROWE's refinement before wider advocacy.^[3]

Key Founders and Publications

Jody Thompson and Cali Ressler, both former human resources professionals at Best Buy, co-developed the Results-Only Work Environment (ROWE) concept during their tenure at the company's corporate headquarters in the early 2000s.^[9]^[14] Thompson, recognized for her expertise in workplace transformation, and Ressler, focused on talent management innovations, drew from observations of inefficiencies in traditional office cultures to propose a paradigm shift toward outcome accountability.^[3]^[15] In 2008, Thompson and Ressler departed Best Buy to co-found CultureRx, a consulting firm aimed at disseminating ROWE methodologies to other organizations seeking to prioritize employee autonomy aligned with performance metrics.^[16] This move enabled them to expand beyond internal implementation, offering training and advisory services grounded in their Best Buy experiences.^[11] Their foundational text, Why Work Sucks and How to Fix It: The Results-Only Revolution, published in 2008 by Portfolio (an imprint of Penguin), critiques the dysfunctions of schedule-driven workplaces and posits ROWE as a corrective framework centered on verifiable results over presence or activity.^[17] The book details arguments for eliminating mandatory hours, attendance rituals, and location dependencies, substantiated by initial pilots at Best Buy.^[18] A follow-up publication, Why Managing Sucks and How to Fix It: A Results-Only Guide to Taking Control of Work, Not People, issued in 2009, builds on these premises by addressing supervisory challenges, advocating for metrics-driven oversight that fosters entrepreneurial behavior without micromanagement.^[19] Co-authored by Thompson and Ressler, it provides guidance on reorienting leadership toward endpoint accountability, drawing from ROWE's observed shifts in organizational dynamics.^[20]

Early Adoption and Expansion

In 2008, Cali Ressler and Jody Thompson, the originators of ROWE at Best Buy, established CultureRx as a consulting firm dedicated to guiding other organizations through ROWE implementation via training and mindset shifts.^[15]^[21] The firm aimed to replicate the model's focus on results over presence, targeting corporate and non-profit sectors amid growing interest in flexible work arrangements during the late 2000s economic shifts.^[22] Early expansions included Gap Outlet, which initiated a ROWE pilot in February 2008 for its production and technical services teams, becoming the second major U.S. retailer to adopt the approach after Best Buy's 2003 rollout.^[22] The initiative reported operational efficiencies and improved team dynamics, with similar pilots in non-profits—such as the first full organizational migration in July 2008—demonstrating initial uptake in diverse settings.^[23] These adoptions highlighted potential for higher employee engagement through autonomy, though scalability depended on cultural alignment and measurement rigor.^[24] Scaling faced hurdles, most notably Best Buy's termination of ROWE for corporate staff in March 2013 under incoming CEO Hubert Joly, who mandated five-day on-site attendance to address performance perceptions amid financial pressures.^[25]^[26] This rollback, following leadership transition, illustrated ROWE's vulnerability to executive priorities and resistance in hierarchical structures, contributing to uneven adoption rates across early implementers.^[21]^[6]

Core Principles and Features

Emphasis on Measurable Outputs

In a Results-Only Work Environment (ROWE), employee performance is assessed exclusively based on the delivery of predefined, verifiable outcomes that meet organizational criteria, rejecting metrics like hours worked, attendance, or visible activity as unreliable proxies for genuine value creation.^[27] This operational core posits that work consists solely of producing tangible results—such as completed deliverables or achieved targets—that directly contribute to business objectives, irrespective of the process, timing, or location employed to reach them.^[27] By anchoring evaluation to these measurable endpoints, ROWE eliminates subjective judgments tied to inputs, ensuring accountability aligns with causal impact rather than superficial indicators.^[11] The philosophical foundation rests on the recognition that organizational efficiency is maximized when individuals self-manage their paths to outcomes, as personal knowledge of optimal methods fosters greater focus and resource allocation than imposed structures.^[27] This shifts emphasis from monitoring presence to enforcing 100% responsibility for results, promoting intrinsic drive through clear expectations and autonomy in execution, while curtailing inefficiencies from arbitrary time constraints.^[11] Consequently, traditional oversight mechanisms become obsolete, replaced by outcome verification that reinforces individual agency and reduces dependency on managerial intervention for productivity.^[9] Illustrative metrics in this framework include the successful completion of discrete projects, meeting predefined revenue quotas, or generating quantifiable client value, all evaluated without regard to schedule adherence or environmental factors.^[27] For example, a sales role might be gauged by contracts secured rather than calls logged, or a development team by functional software releases rather than coding sessions observed.^[28] Such criteria demand explicit, mutual agreement upfront on success parameters, ensuring outputs are objectively testable and decoupled from input-based fallacies.^[27]

Removal of Time-Based Constraints

In a Results-Only Work Environment (ROWE), traditional schedules and mandatory attendance requirements are entirely eliminated, allowing employees complete autonomy to determine when, where, and how they complete their tasks as long as predefined results are delivered.^[24] This approach discards pseudo-productive rituals such as fixed office hours, compulsory check-ins, or routine status updates unless they demonstrably advance outcomes, shifting evaluation solely to verifiable outputs rather than temporal compliance.^[29] Founders Jody Thompson and Cali Ressler, who developed ROWE at Best Buy's corporate headquarters starting in 2001, emphasized that such constraints foster inefficiency by prioritizing appearance over substance.^[11] A core element is unlimited paid time off (PTO), decoupled from accrued hours or usage tracking, enabling employees to take breaks indefinitely without approval processes, provided performance metrics remain met.^[3] To safeguard this flexibility, ROWE strictly prohibits conversations about non-work time usage, such as inquiries into vacation plans or off-hours activities, which could introduce bias or judgment regarding personal choices.^[13] This rule enforces a boundary between professional accountability and private life, contrasting with conventional workplaces where supervisors often monitor presence as a proxy for effort, leading to presenteeism—extended physical attendance without proportional value creation.^[6] The philosophy underpinning these changes rests on the empirical weakness of time presence as a predictor of productivity, especially in knowledge-based roles where economic models highlight that outputs arise from focused execution rather than duration of visibility.^[9] Proponents argue that conventional time-tracking assumes a linear causal link between hours and results, which data from flexible arrangements often refute, as idle time in rigid structures yields diminishing returns while self-directed pacing aligns effort with high-impact periods.^[30] By removing these artificial barriers, ROWE aims to dismantle the cultural equation of busyness with achievement, fostering environments where results dictate success irrespective of clocks or calendars.^[31]

Redefinition of Meetings and Oversight

In a Results-Only Work Environment (ROWE), meetings are treated as optional unless demonstrably essential for advancing specific outcomes, with participants encouraged to evaluate their necessity beforehand and default to asynchronous alternatives such as email, shared documents, or project management tools for status updates and decision-making.^[32] This approach stems from the recognition that many traditional meetings involve unproductive elements like silence or tangential discussions, which can induce stress without yielding proportional value, prompting a shift toward formats with predefined agendas, explicit expected outcomes, and strict time limits only when synchronous interaction proves superior to individual or written communication.^[32] Supervisory oversight in ROWE pivots from monitoring attendance, hours, or visible activity to serving as a facilitative "results-coach," where leaders equip teams with guidance on achieving measurable deliverables rather than enforcing presence-based accountability.^[33] This reorientation demands managers acquire skills in outcome-focused mentoring, fostering autonomy while maintaining alignment on goals through regular, targeted check-ins that prioritize problem-solving over surveillance.^[34] By minimizing intervention in daily workflows, supervisors reduce interference, allowing employees to self-direct toward results without the drag of micromanagement. This framework draws partial justification from observations like Parkinson's Law, which posits that work expands to fill the available time, including in unstructured meetings or oversight rituals that inflate beyond substantive needs, thereby rationalizing deliberate cuts to such practices in favor of efficiency.^[35] Asynchronous communication tools further enable this by decoupling updates from real-time availability, ensuring oversight remains light-touch and results-oriented without presuming constant synchronous engagement.^[2]

Implementation Strategies

Organizational Transition Steps

Organizations adopting a Results-Only Work Environment (ROWE) begin the transition with an initial assessment to evaluate current policies, identify inefficiencies in time-based structures, and audit job roles for definable measurable results. This involves analyzing each position to shift focus from presence and hours to specific outputs, such as completed projects or achieved targets, ensuring clarity on what constitutes success independent of schedules.^[27]^[5] Following the audit, comprehensive training is provided to leadership and employees on output-focused goal-setting, equipping managers to evaluate performance based on deliverables rather than activity monitoring and instructing staff on self-directed accountability. This education emphasizes redefining expectations, where immersion in ROWE principles helps align teams on results as the sole criterion for evaluation.^[27]^[36] The rollout proceeds in phases, often starting with a pilot program among exempt or salaried employees in select departments to test adaptability before broader implementation, as exemplified by Best Buy's initial application in two corporate headquarters units. Central to this is clear communication of the mantra that "work happens wherever and whenever it makes sense," reinforcing autonomy while maintaining existing standards of accountability to mitigate concerns over perceived leniency.^[27]^[37] Resistance during transition is addressed through transparency, including open forums to explain unchanged performance expectations, leadership modeling of trust in results, and ongoing support via coaching to foster cultural acceptance without altering core responsibility levels.^[38]^[36]

Role of Leadership and Measurement

Leaders in a Results-Only Work Environment (ROWE) play a pivotal role in establishing clear, measurable performance expectations collaboratively with employees, while maintaining strict accountability for outcomes regardless of individual circumstances. Managers act as coaches focused on guiding results rather than dictating processes or presence, ensuring that work is evaluated solely on deliverables met against predefined targets and deadlines. This approach eliminates excuses for non-delivery, with non-performance treated as a direct management issue leading to corrective action or termination, fostering a culture where autonomy is paired with unyielding responsibility.^[27]^[9]^[39] Measurement in ROWE relies on objective key performance indicators (KPIs) and SMART goals—specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound—to quantify success, deliberately avoiding subjective evaluations based on effort, visibility, or compliance with traditional schedules. Leaders implement regular check-ins, such as daily stand-ups, to track progress against these metrics without micromanaging methods or hours, ensuring that quality and timeliness of outputs serve as the sole benchmarks. Tools for this purpose emphasize verifiable data over impressions, enabling merit-based assessments that prioritize individual contributions to organizational goals.^[9]^[5]^[40] Cultural reinforcement by leadership underscores personal responsibility, where employees own their results fully, promoting high performance through trust in capability rather than enforced equity or group norms. This merit-driven framework rejects interventions that dilute accountability for the sake of uniformity, instead cultivating self-directed professionals who proactively address shortfalls. By modeling and enforcing these standards, leaders sustain ROWE's integrity, yielding environments where output determines advancement, independent of non-performance justifications.^[27]^[41]^[22]

Adaptations for Different Industries

ROWE has demonstrated compatibility with knowledge-intensive sectors such as technology and software development, where measurable outputs like completed code modules, deployed features, or resolved issues can be defined independently of work hours or location, enabling asynchronous collaboration in global teams.^[2] In these environments, adaptations emphasize defining clear deliverables tied to project milestones, allowing developers to optimize personal productivity rhythms without mandatory meetings or presence tracking, as long as results meet quality and deadline criteria.^[5] In contrast, manufacturing and other shift-based operations present inherent challenges for pure ROWE implementation due to requirements for physical coordination, equipment access, safety protocols, and real-time oversight, which necessitate hybrid models incorporating scheduled shifts alongside results-focused metrics for non-physical tasks.^[29] For instance, assembly line roles demand synchronized presence to maintain production flow and compliance, rendering full autonomy infeasible without risking operational disruptions or hazards; thus, adaptations often limit flexibility to administrative or design functions while retaining time-based structures for core execution.^[42] Professional service firms, including consulting and legal practices, have adapted ROWE by integrating client-facing deliverables—such as billable hours converted to outcome metrics like case resolutions or strategy implementations—with autonomy in non-client hours, though success hinges on establishing robust trust mechanisms and precise job scopes to mitigate accountability gaps.^[43] Similarly, implementations in healthcare and government sectors, as pursued by ROWE originators Cali Ressler and Jody Thompson through CultureRx consulting, involve tailoring to regulatory constraints by prioritizing verifiable patient or policy outcomes over unrestricted scheduling, often blending results accountability with mandatory on-site availability for direct service delivery.^[44] These adaptations underscore that ROWE's efficacy depends on sector-specific output verifiability rather than universal application, avoiding ideological imposition where causal dependencies on presence prevail.^[43]

Evidence of Effectiveness

Productivity and Engagement Studies

Empirical investigations into ROWE's impact on productivity have centered on its early adoption at Best Buy's corporate headquarters in 2005, where internal metrics tracked output-focused performance. Company reports indicated a 41% rise in productivity among participating teams by 2007, attributed to the shift from time-tracking to results measurement, with gains verified through predefined output indicators rather than hours logged.^[6]^[5] Longitudinal academic studies, such as those conducted by University of Minnesota researchers Phyllis Moen and Erin Kelly using pre- and post-implementation surveys of over 600 Best Buy employees, found that ROWE's enhanced work-time control correlated with reduced family-to-work conflict and lower stress levels, indirectly supporting sustained productivity by mitigating burnout. These analyses, drawn from naturally occurring experimental data across waves of employee responses, showed participants reporting fewer interference effects from work demands on personal life, with effect sizes indicating meaningful improvements in daily functioning.^[8]^[45] On engagement, ROWE's core autonomy aligns with broader self-determination theory evidence, where meta-analyses of job resources demonstrate that high autonomy predicts elevated work engagement scores—characterized by vigor, dedication, and absorption—compared to rigid schedules. A six-year prospective study of over 1,000 workers confirmed bidirectional positive links between autonomy and engagement, with initial autonomy fostering subsequent motivation gains. In ROWE contexts, self-reported engagement rose alongside output metrics, though researchers caution that while cross-verified by results data, reliance on employee perceptions warrants triangulation with objective performance logs to address potential common method bias.^[46]^[47]

Financial Returns and Retention Data

At Best Buy's corporate headquarters, implementation of ROWE led to voluntary turnover rates dropping from an average of 12% to 8% overall, with specific teams experiencing reductions of up to 90%, such as one team from 31.46% to 4.49%.^[48]^[23] These declines translated to annual savings of $1.38 million to $3.09 million per team in recruitment and training costs, based on an average turnover cost of $102,000 per employee.^[23] The lower turnover stemmed from enhanced employee control over work schedules, fostering trust and reducing intentions to leave, as evidenced by statistical analysis controlling for factors like tenure and job satisfaction.^[48] In a financial services firm adopting ROWE, revenue per employee increased by 18%, while profit per employee rose by 250%, attributed to focused resource allocation on outcomes rather than presence.^[23] Similarly, JA Counter and Associates reported a 23% reduction in operating expenses and a 94% increase in net income following ROWE adoption, linked to streamlined processes and self-managed efficiency gains.^[49] A non-profit organization saw voluntary turnover fall 40% (from 16.25% to 9.75%), yielding approximately $25,000 in annual hiring cost savings at $5,055 per hire.^[23] These outcomes reflect broader ROI patterns in ROWE, where retention improvements cut overhead from absenteeism and hiring, while output-focused management enabled revenue uplifts through better talent utilization.^[23] For instance, a Fortune 200 retailer achieved 21% higher productivity, correlating with sustained financial gains via reduced supervisory costs and higher engagement.^[23]

Health and Well-Being Outcomes

Implementation of the Results-Only Work Environment (ROWE) has been associated with reductions in emotional exhaustion, a key component of burnout, through increased time adequacy and schedule control. Longitudinal data from 550 white-collar employees showed that ROWE-led improvements in time adequacy predicted lower emotional exhaustion (p < .001), alongside decreased psychological distress and somatic symptoms.^[50] These effects persisted after controlling for job demands and baseline levels, suggesting that deemphasizing time-based constraints alleviates chronic stress accumulation.^[50] ROWE participants experienced enhanced sleep duration and quality, contributing to overall physiological recovery. In a study of 659 employees, those in ROWE groups reported an average increase of 52.3 minutes of sleep per night (p < .05), mediated by greater schedule control and reduced work-family conflict.^[8] Team-level analyses further indicated improved perceived time availability for sleep (p < .10), linking flexibility to better rest without extending total work hours.^[51] Flexible boundaries in ROWE have decreased work-family conflict and negative spillover, fostering higher life satisfaction. Surveys of 608 employees demonstrated that ROWE reduced work-family conflict by β = -0.220 (p < .001) and negative spillover by β = -0.098 (p < .05), with full mediation via schedule control gains of approximately 0.5 standard deviations.^[52] Complementary longitudinal evidence linked these changes to a 0.15 standard deviation rise in life satisfaction (p < .10), alongside improved self-assessed health (0.25 SD, p < .05).^[50] Such outcomes reflect the sustainability of aligning work demands with individual circadian and recovery needs, rather than fixed schedules that exacerbate spillover.^[8]

Criticisms and Limitations

Challenges to Collaboration and Culture

Critics argue that ROWE's emphasis on individual results can erode team dynamics by discouraging spontaneous collaboration, as employees prioritize personal outputs over assisting colleagues in real-time.^[53] In remote-heavy implementations, this has reportedly fostered isolation, limiting serendipitous interactions like hallway conversations that spark idea exchange in traditional offices.^[53] For instance, Best Buy, an early adopter, terminated its ROWE program in 2013 under new CEO Hubert Joly, who emphasized the necessity of in-office presence "as much as possible to collaborate and connect," suggesting the model undermined collective engagement.^[6] The "results at any cost" mindset inherent to ROWE risks promoting siloed efforts, where misaligned individual goals fragment team cohesion and hinder knowledge sharing.^[53] In high-stakes roles, this pressure can exacerbate burnout, with flexible schedules paradoxically enabling unchecked overwork—such as 80-hour weeks or forgoing leave for months—to meet metrics, rather than enforcing work-life boundaries.^[53] Such critiques, often from practitioner blogs like Medium rather than peer-reviewed studies, highlight potential cultural shifts toward an "eat what you kill" ethos that prioritizes solitary achievement over interdependent innovation.^[54] Proponents counter that enforced physical proximity does not causally drive collaboration without underlying incentive alignment, positing that ROWE's focus on shared outcomes can sustain team dynamics more effectively than presence-based norms.^[55] Empirical reversals like Best Buy's, however, indicate that in practice, the absence of structured interactions may weaken spontaneous creativity, particularly in knowledge-intensive environments where unpredictable team synergies contribute to breakthroughs.^[6]

Issues with Performance Measurement

One significant challenge in Results-Only Work Environments (ROWE) is the difficulty in developing metrics that fully capture intangible contributions, such as mentoring, knowledge sharing, and real-time coordination, which defy straightforward quantification and risk being undervalued or overlooked.^[56] In sectors like education and software development, where outputs often involve unpredictable timelines and collaborative idea ownership, traditional performance indicators fail to account for these qualitative elements, leading to incomplete assessments of employee value.^[56] This metric-centric approach also heightens risks of gaming, where employees may optimize for easily measurable short-term gains—such as hitting sales quotas—at the expense of sustainable quality or innovation, particularly when goals remain vague or loosely enforced.^[54] For instance, Best Buy's 2013 discontinuation of ROWE after initial pilots cited inadequate safeguards against underperformance hidden by flexible schedules, exacerbating broader financial declines amid demands for enhanced collaboration.^[6] Empirically, ROWE metrics prove more reliable in sales and routine tech tasks with verifiable endpoints, but falter in research and development (R&D), where creative processes yield delayed or non-linear outcomes resistant to precise tracking, underscoring the need for sector-specific scrutiny.^[54]^[56]

Unsuitability for Certain Roles or Teams

ROWE is incompatible with roles necessitating synchronous, real-time coordination, such as those in customer service centers or operational teams with high task interdependence, where self-directed schedules can delay responses and disrupt service continuity. In these contexts, the absence of fixed availability undermines immediate handoffs and client-facing reliability, often requiring hybrid models with designated coverage periods instead of full flexibility.^[5] Furthermore, in asynchronous team environments lacking a strong foundation of trust, psychological safety, and explicit goal alignment, ROWE risks derailing collective performance by prioritizing individual outputs over collaborative processes. A June 2025 examination notes that this focus can suppress team interactions, overlook activities without immediate measurable results, and exacerbate uncertainty in handling complex, unpredictable tasks, leading to friction and reduced overall efficacy without prior cultural reinforcement.^[53]^[2] The model's strict results orientation also hastens the identification and removal of underperformers, increasing involuntary turnover rates during adoption—reportedly as a transitional effect—which can destabilize teams in fields reliant on stable headcounts or gradual skill-building, such as apprenticeships demanding consistent on-site mentoring and oversight rather than isolated outcome delivery.^[57]

Post-Pandemic Developments

Influence on Hybrid and Remote Work

The principles of Results-Only Work Environment (ROWE), which evaluate employees solely on outcomes rather than time spent working or location, anticipated key benefits observed in hybrid work arrangements following the COVID-19 pandemic. A randomized controlled trial conducted by Stanford economists in 2024, involving over 1,300 workers at a Fortune 500 company, demonstrated that shifting to a hybrid model—two days remote per week—reduced resignation rates by 33% over six months compared to full-time office work, with no adverse effects on productivity or promotion rates.^[58]^[59] This retention improvement aligns with earlier ROWE implementations, where focus on deliverables similarly minimized voluntary turnover by empowering employees to manage their schedules around results.^[2] ROWE differs fundamentally from many post-pandemic hybrid and remote policies, which often emphasize location flexibility or mandated remote days without reorienting evaluation toward pure outcomes. In ROWE, accountability hinges on verifiable results irrespective of whether work occurs in an office, remotely, or in a hybrid setup, avoiding the pitfalls of presence-based monitoring that can undermine trust and efficiency in distributed teams.^[42] This outcome-centric approach has informed adaptations in flexible work models, enabling organizations to sustain performance without full office returns by decoupling success from physical attendance. Post-2020, ROWE-inspired frameworks have contributed to productivity gains in remote and hybrid contexts, with reports from implementations indicating average increases of 35% through elimination of non-essential processes and greater employee autonomy.^[11] Such models prioritize causal links between tasks and deliverables, fostering environments where remote workers achieve higher output without the overhead of rigid schedules, as evidenced by broader studies on results-focused remote work showing sustained or enhanced performance during the pandemic era.^[60]^[61]

Recent Case Studies and Adoptions

In implementations reported by CultureRx during the early 2020s, ROWE adoptions in consulting firms yielded a 35% average increase in productivity, attributed to the elimination of time-based constraints and focus on output metrics, alongside enhanced top-line revenue growth through streamlined processes.^[62] These outcomes were measured via client-specific benchmarks, including reduced operational waste and higher employee engagement scores, with one analysis linking ROWE to sustained net income gains in service-oriented consultancies amid economic pressures like inflation and supply chain disruptions.^[49] Post-2022 tech sector layoffs, where over 500,000 positions were cut across major firms by mid-2025, select high-efficiency teams in software and analytics adopted ROWE variants to prioritize deliverables over presence, enabling leaner operations without proportional output declines; however, detailed public disclosures remain sparse, with proponents citing internal efficiencies akin to pre-layoff productivity levels.^[63] CultureRx consultations in such environments reported retention improvements of up to 90% in voluntary turnover reductions, contrasting broader industry churn rates exceeding 20% in affected tech roles.^[11] Despite these successes, several 2023-2025 adoptions faced partial reversions amid corporate return-to-office (RTO) mandates, as seen in finance and professional services where hybrid policies supplanted full ROWE to enforce visibility; for instance, firms initially embracing results-only models shifted back after leadership concerns over cultural cohesion, though data from sustained implementations showed no corresponding productivity drops.^[42] High-output organizations, particularly in knowledge-intensive sectors, maintained ROWE through 2025, with reported 40% productivity uplifts per original framework developers, emphasizing accountability in volatile economic contexts like recession fears.^[64] By mid-2025, emerging practices integrated ROWE with output-tracking software to address measurement gaps, though empirical data on AI-enhanced variants remains preliminary; CultureRx-guided pilots noted improved goal alignment via automated result verification, supporting scalability in distributed teams without reverting to surveillance.^[27]

Evolving Critiques in Flexible Work Era

Post-2020 evaluations of highly flexible work models, including those resembling ROWE, have amplified concerns over social isolation in distributed teams, where remote participants experience elevated levels of perceived disconnection compared to in-office settings, potentially exacerbating mental health strains during prolonged flexibility.^[65] These critiques highlight risks of diminished spontaneous interactions essential for relationship-building, particularly in asynchronous environments that prioritize outcomes over real-time presence.^[66] However, empirical observations indicate that technological mitigations—such as enhanced video platforms, Slack-like messaging, and virtual team-building protocols—effectively offset much of this isolation by enabling frequent mediated communication and fostering virtual connectedness, as evidenced in studies of remote team dynamics where ICT adoption correlated with reduced loneliness.^[67]^[68] Hybrid work research since 2021 has empirically validated results-focused paradigms akin to ROWE, demonstrating no adverse impact on output or advancement when presence is de-emphasized; a randomized trial with 1,612 Trip.com employees found hybrid schedules (two remote days weekly) maintained productivity parity with full-office baselines while slashing resignation rates by 33%, particularly benefiting women and non-managers.^[59] This debunks persistent "laziness" narratives tied to flexibility, as performance metrics in such systems rely on quantifiable deliverables rather than visibility, yielding sustained or improved efficiency without enforced attendance.^[69] Critics, however, note that this shift demands robust accountability frameworks, with lapses in measurement potentially undermining trust in dispersed setups.^[53] Evolving discourse positions ROWE as thriving in meritocratic, output-driven markets—such as tech—where objective KPIs minimize bias and align incentives with verifiable contributions, yet clashing with equity-centric policies that incorporate non-performance factors like demographic accommodations or presence mandates to promote inclusivity.^[69]^[39] Post-pandemic implementations reveal these tensions, as radical results-only structures challenge ingrained cultural norms favoring visibility for perceived fairness, though data from flexible adopters affirm long-term viability when paired with clear expectations over subjective oversight.^[42]

Broader Societal and Economic Impacts

Shifts in Work Ethic and Accountability

ROWE emphasizes individual responsibility by conditioning employment and advancement exclusively on the achievement of defined results, rather than attendance, hours logged, or visible effort, thereby compelling employees to internalize accountability for outcomes without procedural excuses.^[6] This structure challenges entrenched norms of entitlement in conventional workplaces, where fixed schedules and presence often substitute for verifiable productivity, effectively providing unearned protections akin to welfare provisions that insulate underperformers from consequences.^[2] Proponents argue that such a shift revives an output-centric ethic, positioning results delivery as both a professional duty and moral imperative, unburdened by rituals of feigned diligence.^[70] Empirical accounts from early implementations, such as Best Buy's pilot program launched in 2005, reveal employees self-reporting elevated feelings of responsibility tied to their work products, with one participant noting, "I feel less stressed, more engaged and responsible for the work I put out."^[23] This heightened ownership correlates with reported increases in engagement and satisfaction, as autonomy in process amplifies intrinsic motivation to meet objectives, fostering a culture where self-starters thrive and excuses erode.^[2] In contrast to traditional environments that normalize presenteeism—where physical attendance masks low output—ROWE's results-only criterion exposes systemic inefficiencies, such as prolonged inefficiencies from non-productive time, by rendering them unsustainable without corresponding deliverables.^[2] Critics of pre-ROWE norms contend that entitlement-driven expectations, including tolerance for minimal effort under the guise of "face time," cultivate a diluted work ethic that ROWE disrupts through unyielding focus on tangible contributions.^[13] By eliminating buffers like mandatory office hours, ROWE incentivizes proactive self-management, potentially weeding out those reliant on structural leniency and reinforcing accountability as the core of professional integrity.^[71]

Comparisons to Traditional and Alternative Models

ROWE contrasts with traditional hourly-wage and fixed-schedule models, which emphasize time logged as a proxy for effort, by tying compensation and evaluation exclusively to measurable outputs.^[24] This shift addresses inefficiencies in clock-punching systems, where presence does not guarantee productivity; a natural experiment at Best Buy implementing ROWE showed reduced turnover odds by enhancing work-time control, implying causal links to retention through outcome-focused autonomy rather than enforced attendance.^[7] Proponents report productivity gains of up to 40% in ROWE-adopting firms, attributed to eliminated distractions from arbitrary schedules, though such figures derive from initiative architects and require independent verification beyond self-reported metrics.^[64] Nonetheless, ROWE's success hinges on employee discipline, often eroded in traditional cultures rewarding visibility over verifiable results, potentially amplifying slack in low-accountability environments.^[53] Compared to unlimited PTO policies, which decouple vacation from accrual limits but frequently coexist with implicit time norms and subjective oversight, ROWE enforces stricter verifiability by mandating results as the sole criterion, mitigating risks of inconsistent effort or overuse without output anchors.^[72] While unlimited PTO studies indicate variable effects on satisfaction—sometimes increasing guilt or underutilization due to absent productivity ties—ROWE's framework promotes sustained performance via causal incentives for efficiency, as evidenced by lower work-family conflict in controlled implementations.^[73]^[74] This avoids the subjective biases plaguing "well-being" alternatives, where self-reported metrics obscure causal productivity drivers. Against four-day workweeks, which compress standard hours into fewer days while retaining time-bound structures, ROWE decouples effort from calendars entirely if deliverables are met, yielding empirical advantages in health behaviors like increased sleep and exercise that indirectly bolster long-term output—outcomes not consistently tied to hour reductions alone.^[8] Four-day trials report heightened satisfaction and reduced burnout, with some revenue upticks, yet productivity often holds steady rather than surges, lacking ROWE's results anchor to prevent slack in metric-absent hybrids.^[75]^[76] ROWE thus outperforms such vague flexibilities by prioritizing objective verifiability, fostering causal realism in accountability over correlative well-being gains.^[77]

Policy and Cultural Ramifications

ROWE advocates for evaluating employees based on deliverables rather than time spent at work, which inherently challenges labor policies centered on hour-tracking, such as overtime mandates under frameworks like the U.S. Fair Labor Standards Act for non-exempt workers.^[78] This approach favors salaried structures where compensation reflects outcomes, potentially supporting deregulation to eliminate rigid attendance requirements that prioritize presence over efficiency, as rigid rules can constrain adaptive scheduling and reduce overall productivity.^[2] Union protections emphasizing seniority-based scheduling and guaranteed hours further conflict with ROWE's flexibility, as collective bargaining agreements often enforce time-based metrics that ROWE seeks to bypass for result-oriented accountability.^[79] In corporate culture, ROWE promotes a transition from "face time" valuation—where visibility and attendance signal dedication—to a meritocratic system rewarding tangible contributions, diminishing subjective judgments tied to physical presence or arbitrary availability.^[80] This shift counters tendencies in some modern practices to dilute performance standards through non-output factors, reinforcing accountability via measurable results and reducing office politics rooted in perceived effort rather than efficacy.^[81] Empirical implementations, such as at Best Buy's corporate headquarters, demonstrated this cultural pivot yielding average productivity gains of 20% and voluntary turnover reductions up to 90%, illustrating how decoupling work from location fosters intrinsic motivation aligned with output merit.^[14] Societally, widespread ROWE adoption could unlock untapped human capital by enabling workers to optimize personal productivity rhythms, potentially amplifying economic output through efficiency gains observed in pilots—like 35-41% productivity increases in tested teams—extrapolating to broader GDP enhancements via reallocated labor resources absent from traditional constraints.^[42]^[82] Such ramifications align with causal links between reduced regulatory burdens on work structures and heightened growth, as deregulated flexibility correlates with improved resource utilization and innovation, though scaling requires addressing jurisdictional variances in labor enforcement.^[83]

References

[1]
What is Results-Only Work Environment (ROWE)? - TechTarget
Oct 22, 2020 · A Results-Only Work Environment (ROWE) is one in which the emphasis is on the actual work done. How or when that work is accomplished is not ...
[2]
What is a Results-Only Workplace Environment (ROWE)?
Jun 2, 2025 · A results-only work environment model measures employee performance solely on results delivered. Salaried employees don't need to work a certain number of ...
[3]
Jody's Story - CultureRx
Jody Thompson (along with Cali Ressler) founded CultureRx®, a professional ... In 2003 Thompson co-created the Results-Only Work Environment™ (ROWE ...
[4]
Jody Thompson and Cali Ressler: How to Reinvent Talent ... - Forbes
Feb 4, 2013 · ... Jody Thompson and Cali Ressler, who are the pioneers of ROWE (Results-Only Work Environment). They are the cofounders of CultureRx and ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
[5]
Results-only work environment (ROWE): Benefits & challenges
Mar 17, 2025 · For employees used to structured schedules, ROWE may feel unfamiliar at first. Some may struggle with time management without clear guidelines ...Missing: criticisms drawbacks
[6]
Best Buy's ROWE experiment: Can results-only work environments ...
May 11, 2014 · ... ROWE on Best Buy employees, the company's implementation of ROWE in 2005 had some surprisingly positive results. Moen's data found that ROWE ...
[7]
(PDF) Does Enhancing Work-Time Control and Flexibility Reduce ...
We find the odds of turnover are indeed lower for employees participating in the ROWE initiative, which offers employees greater work-time control and ...
[8]
Can Real Work-Time Flexibility Promote Health Behaviors and Well ...
This study demonstrates that organizational changes in the structuring of time can promote employee wellness, particularly in terms of prevention behaviors.
[9]
Managing in a Results-Only Work Environment - Mind Tools
A ROWE can cause serious problems in environments where each piece of work is unique and difficult to scope out in fine detail in advance. It can also be ...Missing: criticisms drawbacks
[10]
Beyond ROWE: Why Results-Only Work Isn't Always a Win
Apr 12, 2025 · The Drawbacks of ROWE · Many valuable activities don't impact the outcome in the short term and may not happen, making it harder to sustain the ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
[11]
Jody Thompson – Results-Only Work Environment Co-founder
The Results-Only Work Environment (ROWE) enables business leaders to manage teams successfully regardless of where employees work or the hour-of-day they log ...
[12]
Why Work Sucks! And How to Fix it. Interview with Cali Ressler ...
Jan 28, 2010 · Jody and Thompson and I created ROWE while we were employees at Best Buy. We first introduced it, on the down-low, to two departments at their ...Missing: 2001 | Show results with:2001
[13]
Best Buy's “Results Only Work Environment” and what we might ...
Apr 14, 2022 · A ROWE is a work culture that gives people the power to take control of their lives. As long as they get their job done, they're free.
[14]
Best Buy's "Results Only Work Environment" and what we ... - LinkedIn
Apr 14, 2022 · In the early 2000s, Cali Ressler & Jody Thompson were developing new HR guidelines at Best Buy, the electronics retailer, when they wondered ...What Is Rowe? · 13 Guidepost Of A Rowe · Results
[15]
Think work sucks? - The Globe and Mail
Jun 9, 2008 · Cali Ressler and Jody Thompson met while working in the human resources department of Best Buy and together created the results-only work ...
[16]
Why Flexible Workplaces Are Good for Business - Inc. Magazine
Mar 6, 2013 · In 2008, Thompson and Ressler launched their own consulting firm, CultureRx, which has trained some 50 companies in adopting results-only work ...
[17]
Why Work Sucks and How to Fix It: The Results-Only Revolution
30-day returnsJody Thompson, along with Cali Ressler, founded CultureRx, a consulting firm specializing in the development of proper and functional business management.Missing: 2008 | Show results with:2008
[18]
Why Work Sucks and How to Fix It: No Schedules, No ... - AbeBooks
In stock Rating 3.8 (1,048) Why Work Sucks and How to Fix It: No Schedules, No Meetings, No Joke--the Simple Change That Can Make Your Job Terrific - Hardcover ; Condition · Very Good ; Buy ...
[19]
Why Managing Sucks and How to Fix It Jody Thompson Hardcover ...
Title: Why Managing Sucks and How to Fix It. It explains how to set clear expectations and focus on the endpoint as opposed to managing the process that ...
[20]
Why Managing Sucks and How to Fix It - Interview with Jody ...
Feb 20, 2013 · In their second book, Why Managing Sucks and How to Fix it, Cali and Jody tell many stories from companies who have instituted ROWE environments ...
[21]
Cutting ROWE Won't Cure Best Buy - Forbes
Mar 12, 2013 · ... invented by two Best Buy employees in 2005 who later started their own HR consulting practice called CultureRX.com. Best Buy CEO, Hubert ...
[22]
Gap Outlet: Second Retailer Adopts Results-Only Work Environment ...
Sep 8, 2009 · Gap Outlet has piloted a Results-Only Work Environment (ROWE), the first major company to do so since Best Buy pioneered the practice six years ago.Missing: beyond Meetup.
[23]
[PDF] ROWE Business Case | eWorkPlace
In a department of 'Team A', management is reporting a 10-20% increase in productivity per employee which has resulted in an approximate $10 MM annual benefit ...
[24]
ROWE: Results Only Work Environment - Brighter Strategies
Apr 25, 2022 · Thompson and Ressler pioneered ROWE at Best Buy, and it now exists in many companies including Gap, Girl Scouts of America, and Syvantis. The ...
[25]
Goodbye ROWE: Best Buy Ends Flex Work Program It Was Famous ...
Mar 6, 2013 · Best Buy Co. said Monday it has ended its program that allowed corporate employees to control their schedules and how often they showed up at the company's ...
[26]
Best Buy Ending Work From Home - Business Insider
Mar 5, 2013 · The company announced Monday that they were ending their Results Only Work Environment program (ROWE) where employees were evaluated only on results rather ...
[27]
CultureRx | Unlock Your Company's True Potential With ROWE
We founded CultureRx to help organizations adopt a positive work culture that produces real results. · Employers decide when, where, and how work gets done.
[28]
What Are Results-Only Work Environments (ROWE)? | Five Echelon
Mar 15, 2023 · A results-only work environment, or ROWE, is a work culture that prioritizes outcomes over time spent on tasks. In a ROWE, employees are given ...
[29]
What Is a Results-Only Work Environment? - Monitask
Oct 9, 2024 · The concept of ROWE was pioneered by Cali Ressler and Jody Thompson in the early 2000s while working at Best Buy's corporate headquarters.
[30]
These employers don't care when or where you work | CNN Business
Oct 18, 2019 · A results-only work environment (ROWE), a management strategy that focuses on results and employees' performance, not where and when people work.
[31]
Does a ROWE Increase Employee Productivity? - PeopleGoal
Jul 22, 2025 · Results Only Work Environment (ROWE) is an employee performance management approach created by Jody Thompson and Cali Ressler where ...
[32]
Every Meeting Is Optional - CultureRx
Apr 15, 2024 · ROWE Guidepost: Every Meeting Is Optional. ... Meetings, Amazon · PREVIOUS · Poor Friday · NEXT · It's OK to Change · CRX ...
[33]
Ask Jody: What is the Manager's Role in a ROWE? - CultureRx
Sep 15, 2022 · The transition from a manager to Results-Coach requires a shift in mindset along with new skills and knowledge ... Jody's Advice: Managers play a ...
[34]
HR's Role in supporting ROWE in the Workplace - CultureRx
Managers become helpful partners that manage work, rather than attempt to control people ... Sign on to become a certified ROWE “coach” and work closely ...
[35]
Work Isn't Broken. The Way We Manage It Is. - CultureRx
Organizations that adopt ROWE ... Parkinson's Law, Efficiency, Jody Thompson, 4 Day ... ROWE Pilot · Our Story · Our Story · Speaking · Business Results · Business ...<|separator|>
[36]
How to Implement a Results-Only Work Environment - Riemote
Jul 2, 2025 · Steps to Implement a Results-Only Work Environment. Transitioning to ROWE requires more than just a policy change. It involves a cultural ...
[37]
ROWE Program Analysis at Best Buy: Organizational Behavior MBA
Program focuses on achievement instead of solely being at work. ROWE Program started as a pilot program only in two departments at the corporate headquarters, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[38]
How CEOs Can Implement a Results-Only Work Environment ...
In a ROWE, the main idea is that results, not presence, measure success. This paradigm shift can significantly increase employee engagement, productivity, and ...<|separator|>
[39]
How ROWE transformed work culture | Jody Thompson posted on ...
Sep 16, 2024 · In a Results-Only Work Environment (ROWE), every person has 100% autonomy + 100% accountability. No excuses. No babysitting. No illusions of ...
[40]
Implementing Results-Only Work Environments (ROWE) - HR Vision
ROWE evaluates outcomes, not time, giving employees autonomy to manage schedules and work when and where they meet objectives.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[41]
The Reason for ROWE Failure » Community - GovLoop
May 28, 2012 · ... Results-Only Work Environment, is the fact that ROWE emphasizes personal responsibility. ... The only thing you're measured on is your results.
[42]
Could a results-only work environment solve the post-Covid ...
Jul 23, 2025 · Productivity rose by 35% in pilot teams and voluntary turnover dropped by 90%. Some companies have since made Rowe the status quo.
[43]
application of results-only work environment to professional service ...
This article discusses that managers should manage results and not people, looks into the pros and cons of ROWE, identifies the challenges of trust, ...
[44]
Going ROWE: The Twin-Cities-based workplace revolution marches ...
Jun 10, 2011 · ROWE also leads to increased productivity, lower turnover, and happier employees, according to CultureRX. ... A survey of 600 Best Buy employees ...
[45]
Confronting the Ideal Worker Norm in a White-Collar Organization
May 1, 2010 · This article integrates research on gendered organizations and the work-family interface to investigate an innovative workplace initiative.
[46]
Is Autonomy Always Beneficial for Work Engagement? A Six-year ...
This study aimed to first identify the different kinds of longitudinal relationship patterns between autonomy and work engagement.
[47]
The role of work engagement in the relationship of job autonomy ...
Aug 6, 2025 · This research shows that job autonomy directly influences work engagement and indirectly affects proactive work behavior through work engagement mediation.
[48]
Does Enhancing Work-Time Control and Flexibility Reduce ...
Best Buy implemented ROWE sequentially through the corporate headquarters ... Voluntary Turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2007;92:1031–1042. doi ...
[49]
Results-Only Work Environment (ROWE) Business Results - CultureRx
ROWE is about respecting employees and trusting them to own projects, work, and outcomes. When you provide employees autonomy, incredible things happen.Missing: expansion Best Buy Meetup.
[50]
Do Changes in Time Strain Predict Well-Being? - PMC - NIH
We drew on data collected before and 6 months after the rollout of ROWE (Results Only Work Environment), deliberately designed to deemphasize time by focusing ...<|separator|>
[51]
Team-level flexibility, work–home spillover, and health behavior - NIH
Feb 20, 2013 · This study is based on a natural experiment examining the effects of the Results Only Work Environment (ROWE) initiative rolled out at the ...
[52]
Changing Workplaces to Reduce Work-Family Conflict
There is no evidence, however, that selection into ROWE biases our central analysis of the effects of ROWE and schedule control on work-family conflict or fit.
[53]
Beyond ROWE: Why Results-Only Work Isn’t Always a Win
### Criticisms of ROWE Related to Collaboration, Team Dynamics, Isolation, Siloed Efforts, Burnout, or Hindering Spontaneous Innovation
[54]
Why ROWE Failed So Much In Companies | by Ted Bauer - Medium
Dec 28, 2023 · Convincing others of change, be it a new diet or a new car or a new management structure, is one of the greatest, oft-studied challenges of ...
[55]
Revolutionizing Work Culture - CultureRx
CultureRx® is the owner of the Results-Only Work Environment® and ROWE® trademarks, copyrights, and other intellectual property, which identify the ...Missing: founded
[56]
(PDF) Results Only Work Environment – A Mirage or a Distant Dream
Nov 28, 2015 · The article summarizes the conceptual framework and studies the applicability of ROWE as a performance management tool in the education, ...
[57]
The Benefits of a Results-Only Work Environment (ROWE 2)
Mar 31, 2012 · Elimination of under performers: ROWE weeds out poor performers, resulting in an increase in involuntary turnover during the transition stage.Missing: merit- based
[58]
Hybrid working from home improves retention without damaging ...
Jun 12, 2024 · These results indicate that a hybrid schedule with two days a week working from home does not damage performance.
[59]
Study finds hybrid work benefits companies and employees
Jun 12, 2024 · Resignations fell by 33% among workers who shifted from working full-time in the office to a hybrid schedule. Women, non-managers, and ...
[60]
The rise in remote work since the pandemic and its impact on ...
Oct 31, 2024 · We note that remote work may be fully remote or hybrid ... remote work substantially contributed to productivity growth during the pandemic.
[61]
Transform Your Workplace with a Results-Only Work Environment ...
Nov 19, 2024 · The Results-Only Work Environment (ROWE) is a management philosophy where employees are evaluated solely on their performance and results, not ...Missing: oversight | Show results with:oversight
[62]
Unlocking Revenue Potential: How ROWE Drives Top-Line Growth
Jan 28, 2025 · Companies implementing ROWE have reported up to 50% reduction in voluntary turnover. Moreover, ROWE naturally cultivates a culture of ...
[63]
A comprehensive list of 2025 tech layoffs | TechCrunch
Oct 17, 2025 · A complete list of all the known layoffs in tech, from Big Tech to startups, broken down by month throughout 2024 and 2025.
[64]
Here's what the future of high-performance leadership will look like
Feb 22, 2025 · Challenges Of Implementing ROWE. Despite its advantages, ROWE is not without its challenges. Many organizations struggle to transition from a ...
[65]
The negative impact of individual perceived isolation in distributed ...
May 28, 2022 · Study 1 indicates that distributed team members experienced lower levels of perceived isolation when working in the office than remotely.Missing: ROWE mitigations
[66]
Workplace Trends: Results-only Work Environment (ROWE)
Feb 15, 2024 · ROWE is a work approach in which employees are entirely autonomous and responsible for delivering outcomes.
[67]
The impact of remote work and mediated communication frequency ...
The findings indicate that facilitating the use of ICTs may help organizations and employees combat isolation, while simultaneous increases in remote work ...Missing: distributed ROWE mitigations
[68]
Using Technology to Support Distributed Teams: A Work System ...
Technology may be used to mitigate challenges specific to distributed teams by providing a platform for interaction, communication, and coordination (Hinds ...
[69]
Rewarding Performance in a Results-Only Work Environment
May 5, 2023 · Disadvantages of ROWE · Less collaboration and communication · Limited scope · Greater compliance risks.Missing: criticisms drawbacks
[70]
Working Harder Isn't The Answer; It's The Problem - Forbes
Jun 4, 2013 · The end of a results only work environment is troubling not only ... This ideal has roots in the 17th century Protestant work ethic, in ...
[71]
Managing the Results-Oriented Work Environment through ...
Sep 16, 2024 · ROWE workplaces can be a challenge to manage because of the difficulty in communicating with team members working different schedules and in ...
[72]
Why a ROWE is better than Unlimited Vacation - Peak Alignment
Apr 26, 2012 · Unlimited vacation policies are great for the company in the short-term – if you want to save money and burnout talent. But if you want higher ...Missing: schedules | Show results with:schedules
[73]
[PDF] Unlimited Vacation Policies: - Lund University Publications
May 4, 2015 · This specific research study will mainly focus on how an unlimited vacation policy affects employee satisfaction, and whether it has any ...
[74]
Study: Flexible Schedules Reduce Conflict, Lower Turnover - SHRM
The Best Buy ROWE program: Redirected the focus of employees and managers toward measurable results and away from a set work schedule and location. Allowed ...
[75]
A 4-Day Work Week Is a 'Resounding Success,' New Study Finds
Dec 1, 2022 · A new global study found a four-day work week was a "resounding success" in a pilot program. It found revenue increased over 8% over the six- ...
[76]
Research: Flexible Work Is Having a Mixed Impact on Employee ...
Oct 27, 2023 · Only 27% of CHROs who offer the most flexibility (requiring zero days in the office) said they saw a positive impact on mental health, as ...
[77]
ROWE, not a hybrid work environment - CultureRx
Not work-from-home and not hybrid. The Results-Only Work Environment focuses on clear measurable results. Each person is 100% accountable and autonomous.
[78]
Results-Only Work Environment: A Comprehensive Guide - Shyft
Rating 4.8 (30,500) · Free · Business/ProductivityA Results-Only Work Environment (ROWE) is an innovative approach to workplace management where employees are evaluated purely on their results rather than ...Missing: redefinition | Show results with:redefinition
[79]
How Flex Time and ROWE Affect Employees and Employers
Mar 23, 2023 · Flex time and ROWE can be extremely attractive working situations for employees in jobs that are compatible with these models, and they can help employers to ...
[80]
How Life Is Different in the Results-Only Work Environment - CultureRx
May 9, 2022 · A University of Minnesota study published in the Journal of Health and Social Behavior noted employees in ROWE-certified teams reported better ...Missing: adaptations industries
[81]
5 Misperceptions About the Results-Only Work Environment
May 6, 2022 · There is often a realization in this culture that goals and measures are not clear, prohibiting accountability to measurable results. If the ...Missing: unsuitability real- coordination
[82]
No Schedules, No Meetings-Enter Best Buy's ROWE - Part 1
May 21, 2008 · ROWE stands for Results-Only Work Environment. In a ROWE, each person is free to do whatever they want, whenever they want, as long as the work ...
[83]
How Deregulation Spurs Growth | NBER
The analysis demonstrates a significantly positive impact of deregulation on investment in the transport, communications, and utility industries; it is robust ...