Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Rake receiver

A rake receiver is a specialized digital receiver in communication systems designed to combat multipath fading by resolving and coherently combining multiple delayed versions of a transmitted signal arriving via different paths. Introduced in by Robert Price and Paul E. Green as a for multipath channels, it employs a bank of correlators—termed "fingers"—each aligned to a specific path delay, enabling the capture of signal energy that would otherwise interfere destructively. The name "rake" derives from the receiver's structure resembling a garden rake, with fingers "raking" in dispersed signal components. In code-division multiple access (CDMA) systems, such as the IS-95 standard for second-generation cellular networks, the rake receiver leverages the wideband spread-spectrum signaling to separate multipath components that are resolvable if their delays exceed one chip duration (typically 1.2288 MHz chip rate in IS-95). Each finger performs despreading using the user's pseudonoise code, followed by channel estimation to correct for phase and amplitude variations due to fading. The combined output uses maximal ratio combining (MRC), weighting each finger's contribution by its instantaneous signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) to optimize overall detection performance. The rake receiver's effectiveness stems from its ability to convert —a common impairment in urban and indoor environments—into a gain, improving (BER) without requiring additional transmit power. It was integral to wideband CDMA (WCDMA) in third-generation () systems like , operating over 5 MHz bandwidths to support higher data rates while maintaining multipath resolution. Modern variants incorporate adaptive algorithms for finger assignment and interference suppression in DS-CDMA systems. The technology has also been adapted for (UWB) applications.

Fundamentals

Multipath Propagation and Fading

occurs when a transmitted radio signal reaches the receiver via multiple paths due to interactions with the environment, resulting in signals with varying delays, amplitudes, and phases. These multiple paths arise primarily from three mechanisms: , where bounce off large surfaces like buildings or the ground; , where bend around obstacles such as hills or edges; and , where interact with small objects like foliage or rough surfaces, dispersing the signal in multiple directions. In wireless channels, multipath propagation leads to fading, characterized by rapid fluctuations in signal amplitude and phase caused by constructive and destructive interference among the arriving paths. Fading types include flat fading, where the entire signal bandwidth experiences similar attenuation because the channel's coherence bandwidth exceeds the signal bandwidth, and frequency-selective fading, which predominates in wideband systems when the signal bandwidth surpasses the coherence bandwidth, leading to varying attenuation across frequencies. Frequency-selective fading is particularly relevant in systems with significant multipath delay spreads, where the time dispersion exceeds the symbol duration. The impacts of on signal quality are profound, including signal from destructive , inter-symbol (ISI) due to overlapping delayed paths, and increased bit error rate (BER) in digital communications as distorted symbols hinder accurate detection. Statistical models describe the envelope of multipath signals: the model applies to non-line-of-sight scenarios with no dominant path, where the envelope follows a p_R(r) = \frac{r}{\sigma^2} e^{-r^2 / (2\sigma^2)} for r \geq 0, assuming many independent paths with random phases. In contrast, the model accounts for a strong line-of-sight component plus multipath, with the envelope obeying a Rician distribution parameterized by the , the ratio of direct to scattered power. A representative example is environments, where buildings cause extensive reflections, resulting in multipath delay spreads of 1–5 µs, which can span several durations (approximately 0.8 µs) in CDMA systems and exacerbate and .

Role in Spread Spectrum Systems

In (DSSS) systems, the transmitted signal is modulated by multiplying the symbols with a pseudo-noise () spreading , which expands the signal far beyond the original . The consists of a sequence of transmitted at a much higher than the , typically by a factor known as the processing gain, allowing the system to occupy a wide while maintaining low . This spreading enables the receiver to resolve and exploit individual multipath components, as the fine time resolution provided by the short duration distinguishes paths that would otherwise overlap in narrower-band systems. Multipath propagation in DSSS environments introduces delays that can cause (ISI) if paths are closely spaced, but when paths are separated by more than one chip duration, they become resolvable and can be treated as distinct signals rather than destructive . This resolvability transforms multipath —a challenge in conventional schemes—into an opportunity for gain, where the receiver captures energy from multiple delayed replicas of the signal without significant self-. The rake receiver is ideally suited to this, functioning as a bank of matched filters each tuned to the PN code delayed by the estimated path arrival time, thereby collecting dispersed signal energy coherently. The orthogonality of the PN code's properties ensures minimal between these resolved paths during despreading. As an extension in (CDMA) systems, DSSS allows multiple users to share the same bandwidth by assigning unique PN codes to each, enabling simultaneous transmission without mutual interference under ideal conditions. In multipath channels, the rake receiver despreads the desired user's signal by correlating with its specific code, suppressing contributions from other users' signals while combining the multipath components for that user alone, thus improving and robustness. The chip duration T_c sets the resolution limit for distinguishing paths, with a typical value in UMTS CDMA systems of T_c \approx 260 ns corresponding to a chip rate of 3.84 Mcps.

Operating Principle

Structure of the Rake Receiver

The rake receiver consists of three primary components: multiple fingers, a searcher, and a combiner. Each finger functions as a correlator tuned to a specific multipath delay, enabling the parallel processing of distinct signal paths. The searcher identifies potential multipath components, while the combiner integrates the outputs from the active fingers to form the final received signal. Each despreads the incoming signal by correlating it with the code phase-shifted according to the detected path delay, thereby recovering the baseband data from that path. Fingers also track the phase and amplitude variations of their assigned paths using mechanisms such as delay-locked loops to maintain within a fraction of the chip duration. The outputs of the fingers are complex symbols, typically quantized to 12 bits or similar resolution for efficient . The searcher operates by scanning the received signal across a range of possible code offsets, computing correlations to detect strong multipath components based on thresholds. It then assigns the strongest paths—typically 3 to 6—to available fingers, prioritizing those that contribute most to signal recovery while avoiding weaker or interfering paths. This assignment process supports dynamic adaptation to changing channel conditions. Rake receivers can be implemented in different configurations to complexity and performance. Fixed rake receivers use pre-set delay values for fingers, suitable for stable environments with known path profiles. Adaptive rake receivers dynamically reassign fingers to the most prominent paths as detected by the searcher, enhancing robustness in varying multipath scenarios. Flexible rake receivers employ a single shared correlator with buffering mechanisms, such as shift registers to hold incoming , allowing sequential processing of multiple paths without dedicated per finger. In a typical , the input radiofrequency (RF) signal is first downconverted to an and then digitized using an to produce in-phase and samples. These digital samples are fed in parallel to the searcher for detection and to the s for despreading, with finger outputs routed to the combiner after alignment to account for differential delays.

Signal Combining Techniques

In the Rake receiver, signal combining techniques integrate the outputs from multiple fingers, each aligned to a distinct multipath component, to enhance overall signal quality by exploiting diversity gains. These methods vary in complexity and optimality, with the choice depending on computational constraints and channel conditions. The primary techniques include maximal ratio combining, equal gain combining, and selection combining, each addressing the challenge of fusing delayed signal replicas while mitigating and . Maximal ratio combining (MRC) weights the contribution of each finger by the complex conjugate of its channel amplitude estimate, thereby maximizing the (SNR) at the combiner output under the assumption of uncorrelated noise across paths. This optimal weighting scheme aligns the phases of the multipath signals and scales their amplitudes inversely to the noise variance, yielding the highest possible diversity gain in multipath environments. MRC is particularly effective in direct-sequence (DS-CDMA) systems where accurate channel estimates are available. Equal gain combining (EGC) assigns uniform weights to all active fingers, simplifying the combining process by eliminating the need for precise amplitude scaling. While less computationally intensive than , EGC still achieves coherent phase alignment but sacrifices some SNR optimality, making it a practical alternative in resource-limited receivers. Its performance approaches that of in scenarios with similar finger strengths but degrades more noticeably when path imbalances are significant. Selection combining (SC) further reduces complexity by selecting only the finger with the strongest instantaneous SNR for processing, discarding weaker paths entirely. This approach minimizes hardware demands in the Rake receiver but incurs a diversity loss, as it forgoes the benefits of integrating multiple paths, leading to inferior performance compared to MRC or EGC in dense multipath settings. SC is suitable for low-power applications where capturing the dominant path suffices. Among these techniques, MRC delivers the highest diversity gain in channels by fully utilizing all resolvable paths, outperforming EGC—which serves as a low-complexity compromise—and , which prioritizes simplicity at the expense of robustness. In practice, the weights in these combiners are adaptively updated using channel estimates derived from dedicated pilot signals in CDMA systems, ensuring alignment with time-varying multipath conditions. For instance, in the IS-95 CDMA standard, is employed in the Rake receiver, leveraging the forward-link pilot channel for both finger and weighting to achieve optimal coherent combining of multipath components.

Mathematical Model

Channel Model

The multipath channel model addressed by the Rake receiver represents the received signal as a superposition of delayed and attenuated versions of the transmitted signal due to over multiple . For a direct-sequence (DS-CDMA) system, the received signal r(t) for a single user can be expressed as r(t) = \sum_{k=1}^{L} \alpha_k \, d(t - \tau_k) \, c(t - \tau_k) + n(t), where L is the number of resolvable , \alpha_k is the gain of the k-th , d(t) is the transmitted , c(t) is the pseudonoise () spreading code, \tau_k is the delay of the k-th , and n(t) is (AWGN). This model assumes the transmitted signal is s(t) = d(t) \, c(t), and the channel introduces differential delays and phase shifts via reflections, diffractions, and . In discrete-time representation, suitable for digital processing in the Rake receiver, the multipath is modeled as a (FIR) filter or tapped delay line: h(z) = \sum_{k=0}^{L-1} h_k \, z^{-k}, where h_k are the complex tap coefficients corresponding to that are multiples of the duration T_c = 1/W (with W the rate ), and the received discrete signal is the of the transmitted sequence with this filter plus . The number of taps L is determined by the maximum excess T_m relative to T_c, typically L \approx T_m / T_c + 1. Key assumptions underlying this model include that multipath components are resolvable if their relative delays satisfy \tau_k - \tau_{k-1} > T_c, allowing distinct taps; the fading on different paths is uncorrelated; and the noise is AWGN with zero mean and variance \sigma^2. These ensure the channel can be treated as a sum of independent resolvable paths without significant inter-tap interference within the chip resolution. The tap coefficients h_k (or equivalently \alpha_k in continuous time) are statistically modeled as zero-mean complex Gaussian random variables, reflecting conditions where the are independent Gaussian with equal variance. The power delay profile (PDP), which describes the average power as a function of excess delay, often follows an form P(\tau) = P_0 e^{-\tau / \sigma_\tau} for \tau \geq 0, where \sigma_\tau is the decay constant related to the rms delay spread. In CDMA systems, the number of significant paths L is limited by the maximum excess delay; for urban s, this is typically 10-20 μs, yielding L on the order of 10-25 taps given chip durations around 0.8 μs. The multipath fading underlying this model arises from the physical propagation environment, providing the basis for the Rake receiver's path-combining approach.

Receiver Processing

The receiver processing in a Rake receiver begins with despreading the received signal in each finger to extract the multipath components. For the l-th finger, the despreading output y_l is obtained by correlating the received signal r(t) with the spreading code c(t - \tau_l) delayed by the path delay \tau_l over the symbol period, approximated as y_l = \int r(t) c(t - \tau_l) \, dt \approx d \sum_k h_k \delta(k - l) + n_l, where d is the transmitted data symbol (often normalized to 1 in derivations), h_k represents the channel coefficients, \delta(k - l) is the isolating the l-th path, and n_l is the noise term. These finger outputs are then combined to form the overall estimate \hat{y}. The combining step is given by \hat{y} = \sum_{l=1}^M w_l y_l, where M is the number of fingers and the weights w_l are based on the combining ; for maximum combining (MRC), w_l = h_l^* / \sigma^2, with h_l^* the of the channel gain for the l-th path and \sigma^2 the variance. Prior to finger allocation, path detection is performed using a searcher block that computes peaks to identify significant . The searcher correlates the received signal with shifted versions of the spreading code, yielding peaks at \left| \int r(t) c(t - m T_c) \, dt \right|^2 for delay index m, where T_c is the chip , allowing selection of the strongest paths for finger assignment. Under assumptions, the Rake output \hat{y} serves as the maximum likelihood estimate of the transmitted symbol, with achieving optimality by maximizing the output (SNR). The resulting SNR for is \text{SNR} = \sum_{l=1}^M |h_l|^2 / N_0, where N_0 is the noise power spectral density, demonstrating the diversity gain from combining independent multipath components. Quantization effects arise from analog-to-digital (A/D) in the fingers, where finite bit impacts processing accuracy. Typically, 4-6 bits per sample suffice for near-optimal in CDMA systems, as lower resolutions (e.g., 1-2 bits) cause significant SNR , while 4 bits incurs minimal loss (around 0.75 ) compared to infinite precision.

Historical Development

Invention and Early Concepts

The Rake receiver concept emerged in the mid-1950s as a solution to multipath fading in wireless communications, building on foundational work in . Robert Price and Paul E. Green Jr., researchers at , introduced the idea in their seminal paper, where they described a capable of resolving and combining multiple delayed signal paths to mitigate in multipath environments. This work formalized the as an adaptive tailored for wideband signals, extending principles from 1940s-1950s systems that used and to distinguish echoes in cluttered environments. The core innovation addressed the challenge of , where signals arrive via multiple routes, causing destructive interference—a problem briefly motivating the need for path-specific processing in systems. The inventors formalized their design in U.S. Patent No. 2,982,853, filed on July 2, 1956, and issued on May 2, 1961, under the title "Anti-Multipath Receiving System." Assigned to the , the patent outlined an analog system using wideband signals to separate multipath components, each delayed and correlated with a reference to reconstruct the original without . The name "Rake" derives from the analogy to a garden , with the receiver's "fingers"—sub-receivers tuned to individual paths—collecting scattered multipath energy like tines gathering leaves. Early development focused on theoretical advancements for military applications during the , particularly in jam-resistant communications at . Integrated into systems like NOMAC (noise modulation and correlation), the Rake receiver enabled coherent combining of multipath signals for high-frequency military links, emphasizing resilience in adversarial environments. However, pre-1970s computational constraints limited practicality, necessitating analog implementations reliant on surface-acoustic-wave devices or delay lines for path alignment, as digital processing was infeasible for real-time operation.

Commercial Adoption and Evolution

The practicality of rake receivers advanced significantly in the 1970s, as 16-bit microprocessors enabled digital correlation processing essential for simulations and prototypes in (DSSS) systems, transitioning the concept from theoretical designs to feasible hardware implementations. Building on foundational patents from the , these developments at organizations like Linkabit facilitated early testing of multipath-combining techniques in spread-spectrum environments. A major breakthrough occurred in the 1990s when integrated rake receivers into its CDMA technology, culminating in the IS-95 standard published in 1993, which became the foundation for the cdmaOne systems deployed commercially starting in 1995. This adoption addressed multipath challenges in cellular networks, enabling higher capacity and voice quality through and rake-based diversity, with initial deployments by carriers like Hutchison Telecom in . By the late 1990s, rake receivers were standard in 's MSM chipsets, supporting millions of devices and proving essential for urban mobile communications. The technology evolved into 3G standards, with rake receivers adopted in W-CDMA under UMTS in 1999 by 3GPP and in CDMA2000 by 3GPP2, incorporating adaptive rake structures to handle higher data rates up to 2 Mbps through dynamic spreading factors and enhanced power control. These adaptations improved multipath resolution in wider bandwidths (5 MHz for W-CDMA versus 1.25 MHz in earlier CDMA), supporting features like HSDPA for packet data. In the 2000s, base station implementations increased rake fingers to 8-16 to capture more multipath components, enhancing coverage in dense urban areas with severe fading. Post-2010 developments shifted toward (SDR) platforms, where rake receivers are implemented in flexible architectures for (UWB) systems, often hybridized with equalization to mitigate inter-symbol interference in short-range, high-data-rate applications. These SDR-based designs leverage general-purpose processors for rake finger allocation, enabling reconfigurability across standards while reducing hardware costs.

Applications

In Mobile Communications

The rake receiver plays a central role in (CDMA)-based mobile communication systems, including the second-generation () IS-95 standard, its evolution to third-generation () , and the Universal Mobile Telecommunications System () using CDMA (W-CDMA). In these systems, the rake receiver is essential for exploiting in both the downlink and uplink to mitigate effects and improve signal reliability. In the downlink, it combines multipath components from the transmission, while in the uplink, it processes signals from multiple mobile users, treating inter-user as while resolving path delays. This architecture enables efficient handling of the wideband signals required for higher data rates in cellular networks. Integration of the rake receiver with pilot signals is crucial for accurate channel estimation and finger synchronization in these 3G systems. In the downlink (forward link), the common pilot channel (CPICH) transmits known symbols at a spreading factor of 256, allowing the receiver to estimate channel amplitude and phase by correlating the received signal with the pilot sequence after despreading. For the uplink (reverse link), dedicated pilots multiplexed in the dedicated control channel (DPCCH) provide similar estimation, with the rake's path searcher identifying delay profiles to assign fingers to dominant multipaths, ensuring synchronization within one chip duration. This pilot-aided approach supports coherent detection and maximal ratio combining, enhancing overall receiver performance in multipath environments. The multipath diversity provided by the rake receiver significantly boosts system capacity in fading channels of 3G networks. By coherently combining resolved paths, it achieves diversity gains that can increase user capacity by 2 to 4 times compared to single-path reception, as interference-limited CDMA systems benefit from improved signal-to-interference ratios. In UMTS specifically, the rake receiver supports delay spreads up to 256 chips (approximately 67 μs at the 3.84 Mcps chip rate), enabling robust operation in urban environments and facilitating peak data rates of 2 Mbps through low spreading factors (e.g., SF=4 with multiple parallel codes). With the transition to fourth-generation (4G) and fifth-generation (5G) systems, the rake receiver has largely been supplanted by orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) in standards like Long-Term Evolution (LTE) and 5G New Radio (NR). OFDM's cyclic prefix effectively combats inter-symbol interference from multipath without needing explicit path resolution, performing better in wideband scenarios (e.g., 20 MHz channels) where rake complexity grows with the number of resolvable paths. However, remnants of rake-like processing persist in hybrid modes or low-mobility scenarios within some legacy 3G/4G interoperability features, though pure OFDM dominates for its simplicity and scalability.

In Radio Astronomy and Other Fields

In radio astronomy, the rake receiver has found application in planetary radar experiments to counter multipath effects arising from ionospheric propagation and planetary surface scattering. Developed initially for such purposes in the late 1950s, it enabled the processing of delayed echo returns to enhance signal detection. A notable early use occurred at MIT's Millstone Hill radar facility during Venus radar observations in February 1958, where 59 hours of radar reflections were collected and averaged using rake principles to improve the , yielding the first radar detection of the planet's and subsurface structure. Beyond traditional , rake receivers have been adapted for (UWB) positioning systems, where they resolve and combine multipath arrivals to boost localization accuracy in multipath-rich environments like indoors. By capturing energy from multiple delayed paths, these receivers mitigate ranging errors, enabling precise time-of-arrival measurements essential for positioning. Propagation studies confirm that selective finger placement in UWB rake structures can capture up to 80-90% of the signal energy in typical indoor channels. In satellite communications operating in the L-band, such as (GPS) receivers, rake architectures address multipath interference from ground reflections and atmospheric delays. Software-defined rake implementations dynamically track and combine multipath components, enhancing signal acquisition and tracking under weak-signal conditions. This approach has demonstrated robustness in urban canyons, where multipath can degrade carrier-to-noise ratios by 10 or more without mitigation. Underwater acoustics represents another domain where rake receivers excel against extreme multipath and Doppler distortions, with channel delay spreads often spanning tens to hundreds of milliseconds due to reverberations off surfaces and bottoms. Variants incorporating cancellation, such as successive cancellation followed by rake combining, have been experimentally validated to reduce bit error rates by orders of magnitude in shallow-water tests at ranges up to 10 km. These adaptations typically employ more fingers—often 4 to 8—and wider correlation windows compared to microsecond-scale channels, prioritizing sparse selection to handle the sparser but longer-lived arrivals.

Performance Characteristics

Advantages

The Rake receiver achieves substantial diversity gain through the coherent combination of multiple multipath signals using techniques such as , which enhances the effective (SNR) by approximately $10 \log_{10}(L) dB in channels, where L is the number of independent paths resolved by the receiver. This gain arises from the statistical independence of the multipath components, enabling the receiver to mitigate fading depth and improve overall link reliability without requiring additional transmit power. A key benefit is the rake gain, obtained by collecting and coherently summing energy from resolvable multipath components that would otherwise be treated as or lost, thereby reducing the required transmit by 3-6 in typical wideband CDMA environments with moderate delay spreads. This energy capture maximizes the utilization of the channel's total received , providing a processing advantage over single-path receivers in multipath-dominant scenarios. The Rake receiver's compatibility with CDMA systems stems from the use of orthogonal spreading codes, which largely prevent inter-path interference in synchronous scenarios by preserving code orthogonality across delayed paths, thus enabling efficient full-bandwidth utilization and high . For implementations involving a limited number of paths, the Rake receiver offers low complexity, as its digital structure can be efficiently realized using processors (DSPs) with modest computational demands, making it suitable for cost-effective deployment in devices. In terms of performance, the addition of multiple fingers yields notable (BER) improvements in channels compared to a single-path .

Limitations and Alternatives

Rake receivers exhibit increased hardware complexity due to the need for a searcher unit and multiple fingers, each requiring correlators and channel estimators, which can demand 20-50% more logic gates than a single-path correlator implementation in spread-spectrum systems. This added circuitry also elevates power consumption, particularly in mobile devices, where conventional rake designs for wideband CDMA may consume up to 30 mW under typical operating conditions, posing challenges for battery-limited applications. Path detection in rake receivers is susceptible to the near-far problem inherent in CDMA environments, where stronger interfering signals from nearby users overpower weaker desired signals, degrading performance even with modest power imbalances of 6 dB. Additionally, in fast-fading or high-mobility scenarios exceeding 100 km/h, the receiver's channel estimation lags behind rapid variations, leading to false path locks and reduced . Rake receivers are limited to combining resolvable multipath components separated by at least the chip duration T_c, rendering them ineffective for closely spaced paths with delays less than T_c that cause unresolvable clustering and energy loss. In channels with very long delay spreads, the need for numerous fingers to capture dispersed energy further exacerbates complexity, often capping practical implementations at 3-5 fingers despite greater potential paths. Modern alternatives to rake receivers include (OFDM) equalizers employed in and , which utilize cyclic prefixes to mitigate (ISI) from multipath without requiring multiple fingers, thereby simplifying receiver design and improving over CDMA-based rakes. (MMSE) receivers offer superior rejection in CDMA contexts by adaptively suppressing multiuser and multipath distortions, outperforming conventional rakes in near-far scenarios with lower bit error rates. In , the core downlink relies on OFDM, and while research proposes rake-like elements for enhanced resiliency in scenarios using , standard NB-IoT employs OFDM-based modulation without rake receivers.

References

  1. [1]
    A Communication Technique for Multipath Channels - IEEE Xplore
    A new communication system, called Rake, designed expressly to work against the combination of random multipath and additive noise disturbances.
  2. [2]
    [PDF] RAKE Receiver
    A RAKE receiver combines time-delayed signal versions to improve signal-to-noise ratio in CDMA systems, using multiple correlators to detect multipath ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] IS-95 CDMA - University of Pittsburgh
    – Rake receiver allows user to receive signal from multiple base stations or multiple sectors simultaneously. TELCOM 2720. 40. Pilot Channels and the Use of PN.
  4. [4]
    RAKE receiver CDMA performance | IEEE Conference Publication
    The bit-error-rate of a CDMA system using two types of RAKE receivers are calculated considering random codes, AWGN and a two ray multipath channel.
  5. [5]
    A generalized RAKE receiver for DS-CDMA systems - IEEE Xplore
    In this paper, a generalized RAKE receiver for interference suppression and multipath mitigation is proposed. The receiver exploits the fact that time ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Wireless Communications - Stanford University
    Feb 8, 2020 · 2.8.4 Multipath Model with Reflection, Diffraction, and Scattering. The received signal is determined from the superposition of all the ...<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    [PDF] 2 The wireless channel - Stanford University
    Note that flat or frequency-selective fading is not a property of the channel alone, but of the relationship between the bandwidth W and the coherence bandwidth ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Wireless Communication Technologies - WINLAB, Rutgers University
    Frequency selective fading is caused by multipath delays, which approach or exceed the symbol period of the transmitted symbol. Frequency selective fading ...<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Lecture Notes 10: Fading Channels Models
    In this lecture we examine models of fading channels and the performance of coding and modulation for fading channels. Fading occurs due to multiple paths ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Propagation measurements and models for wireless ...
    The authors describe the type of signals that occur in various environments and the modeling of the propagation parameters, which are divided into outdoor ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Direct-Sequence Spread-Spectrum
    Figure 13.3: Direct-Sequence Spread-Spectrum Receiver of ... Because the structure of the receiver looks like a garden rake it is called the rake receiver.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Spread Spectrum
    Offset in syncronization of ∆t reduces received signal power by ρ(∆t). 6. RAKE Receivers. • DSSS removes most of the energy from multipath and the received ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 125 102 V3.8.0 (2001-09)
    The occupied channel bandwidth shall be less than 5 MHz based on a chip rate of 3.84 Mcps. 6.6.2 Out of band emission. Out of band emissions are unwanted ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] MASTER Efficient implementation of a WCDMA RAKE receiver on a ...
    Jun 13, 2003 · The Rake receiver has a receiver finger for each different propagation path. In each finger, the received signal is correlated by a spreading ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] A Scalable Implementation of a Reconfigurable WCDMA Rake ...
    Traditionally a Rake receiver consists of a number of Rake fingers (see Figure 2), each assigned to a different multipath signal, and a maximum ratio combiner ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Efficient ASIC implementation of a WCDMA Rake Receiver
    Apr 15, 2002 · To be able to combine several fingers, the Rake Receiver needs to know the relative delay and amplitude for each finger. A Searcher is used ...
  17. [17]
    (PDF) A Simplified Single Correlator Rake Receiver for CDMA ...
    The main advantage of this receiver structure is that it requires only a single correlator and a code generator in contrary to the conventional RAKE receiver ...
  18. [18]
    A Bayesian Approach to Adaptive RAKE Receiver
    **Summary of Classical Combining Methods in RAKE Receivers (from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8169021):**
  19. [19]
    [PDF] A RAKE Receiver Employing Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC ...
    The purpose of the weighting parameters is to place more emphasis on those correlator fingers with the better SNR when making the symbol decision. Maximal Ratio ...
  20. [20]
    Performance analysis of equal gain combining 2D-RAKE receiver in ...
    The simulation results and the comparison with the maximal ratio combining (MRC) 2D-RAKE receiver are also presented. Published in: The 57th IEEE Semiannual ...
  21. [21]
    A selection combining scheme for RAKE receivers
    **Summary of Selection Combining in RAKE Receivers (IEEE Xplore Document 496935):**
  22. [22]
    [PDF] CDMA Mobile Communication & IS-95
    ○ Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC). ○ MRC is an optimal form of diversity. ○ RAKE receiver in IS-95 is a form of MRC ... (Mobile Station Rake Receiver). –Search ...
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
    [PDF] On channel estimation for RAKE receiver in a mobile multipath ...
    Feb 1, 2010 · Based on the tapped delay line model, a RAKE receiver. (as in Figure 3) [5] can be used to detect the signal from the multipath fading channel.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] 3 Point-to-point communication: detection, diversity, and channel ...
    This operation is the same as the first stage of the Rake receiver, and the channel estimator can in fact be combined with the Rake receiver if done in a ...
  26. [26]
    A Novel Rake Receiver Design for Wideband Wireless ...
    Jul 10, 2007 · Uniform and exponential power delay profiles (PDPs) are considered. Taps positions optimization is done according to the Maximum Power ...Missing: decay | Show results with:decay
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Computer simulation of a direct sequence spread spectrum cellular ...
    it is moving around is called the maximum delay spread, A. For example, in urban areas a typical A is 5-10 ,us (6). If the transmission bandwidth is much ...
  29. [29]
  30. [30]
    A Communication Technique for Multipath Channels
    **Summary of "A Communication Technique for Multipath Channels" by Price and Green, 1958:**
  31. [31]
    US2982853A - Anti-multipath receiving system - Google Patents
    -In the present system, wide band signals are used so that a number of individual multipath signals can be resolved. At the receiver the signal arriving over ...
  32. [32]
    US5237586A - Rake receiver with selective ray combining
    ... fixed range of data buffer locations. The I and Q ... Adaptive forward power control and adaptive reverse power control for spread-spectrum communications.
  33. [33]
    [PDF] The NOMACand - MIT Lincoln Laboratory
    tem," U.S. Patent No. 2,982,853 (ftled 2 July 1956, issued. 2 May 1961). 41. PA Bello, "Performance of Four RAKE Modems over the. •. Non-Disturbed Wideband HF ...
  34. [34]
    A Detailed History of Qualcomm - Read more on SemiWiki
    Mar 19, 2018 · The RAKE receiver, developed by Bob Price and Paul Green of MITLL ... PacTel continued with its CDMA plans, leading to the CAP I capacity trial in ...
  35. [35]
    Milestones:Development of CDMA for Cellular Communications, 1989
    Qualcomm's perseverance led to CDMA becoming the Telecommunications Industry Association standard TIA/EIA/IS-95 in 1995. More commonly known at the time as ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] W-CDMA/UMTS Wireless Networks - Tektronix
    W-CDMA specifications allow. 3.84 MHz for a signal bandwidth. In the example ... W-CDMA systems have a fixed chip rate of 3.84 Mcps (mega chips per second).Missing: Tc | Show results with:Tc<|control11|><|separator|>
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Signal Processing Advances for 3G WCDMA: From Rake Receivers ...
    For the first decoding, however, the traffic channel with large traffic-to-pilot power ratio results in interference to channel estimation based on the pilot ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] RAKE Receiver
    Jul 12, 2004 · RAKE Receiver in WCDMA System (6). • Maximal-Ratio Combining (MRC). – Is the optimal form of diversity combining because it yields the maximal ...<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    Performance Analysis of a Six‐Port Receiver in a WCDMA ...
    Jan 23, 2014 · An ideal software defined radio (SDR) will be the optimum solution to satisfy the listed requirements on the receiver FE. The SDR radio directly ...
  40. [40]
  41. [41]
    [PDF] A UMTS Baseband Receiver Chip for Infrastructure Applications
    ❖ 2 MBPS peak rate. ▫ Network backward compatible to GSM. Page 5. 5. 3G Base ... ❖ Mix of rates from 12.2Kbps (voice) up to 2Mbps (data). ▫ Flexible ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] AN2253, Channel Estimation for a WCDMA Rake Receiver
    There are 15 slots per WCDMA frame. Each frame is 10 ms long and has 38400 chips (3.84 Mcps). Channel estimates can be made using these pilot symbols. If these ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] RECEIVER IMPLEMENTATIONS FOR A CDMA CELLULAR SYSTEM
    These multiuser receivers are integrated into an IS-95 compatible receiver model which is simulated in software. This thesis develops simulation software that ...
  44. [44]
    Experiments on pilot symbol-assisted coherent multistage ...
    Feb 28, 2002 · ... RAKE receiver with (without) antenna diversity reception). This extends the cell coverage, battery life, and increases the system capacity ...
  45. [45]
    Capacity Improvement Of Cellular CDMA By The Subspace-tracking ...
    This new receiver has a very simple structure and outperforms [2] and [3] in capac- ity by almost a factor of 2. We consider a CDMA cellular system with base- ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Introduction to WCDMA (Chapter 3)
    Oct 23, 2000 · • High bit rates up to 2 Mbps. • Bandwidth-On-Demand = Flexible ... 4–256 chips (1.0–66.7 µs). Downlink also 512 chips. Different bit ...
  47. [47]
    Vector OFDM Single Transmit Antenna Systems - IEEE Web Hosting
    resist a few chip level time delays (RAKE receiver). ▫ 4G: 20 MHz, more multipath. ❑ Even CDMA RAKE receiver may not work well. ❑ OFDM is adopted (down link).
  48. [48]
    Wireless multi-carrier transmission techniques for commercial ...
    Sep 15, 2025 · The CP-OFDM was later introduced to cart away the problems encountered by OFDM, where it effectively advanced 4G transmission efficacy to LTE-A.Missing: rake remnants
  49. [49]
    ROBERT PRICE | Memorial Tributes: Volume 20
    The Rake receiver concept, first used for ionospheric communications, has been applied in a variety of areas such as underwater communications, analysis of ...<|separator|>
  50. [50]
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Software Rake Receiver Enhanced GPS System
    The L1 band is dedicated for commercial use while the L2 band is reserved for military applications. On the. L1 band each satellite transmits on the same ...
  52. [52]
    (PDF) Software rake receiver enhanced GPS system - ResearchGate
    Acceleration of semiconductor technologies has enabled incorporation of GPS receivers in small inexpensive hand held battery operated devices.
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Rake receiver with interference cancellation for an underwater ...
    With multipath interference cancellation, the proposed Rake-. IC algorithm can significantly improve the receiver performance. The Rake-IC algorithm is.
  54. [54]
  55. [55]
    [PDF] PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF RAKE RECEIVERS USING ...
    A way to utilize all the multipath components in UWB environment is to use the so called. Rake receiver. ... Price and P. E. Green in their paper “A communication ...
  56. [56]
    Orthogonal Multi-rate DS-CDMA for Multimedia Mobile/Personal Radio
    From Table 33.2, we find that the rake gain is 2.25 dB for L = 2 and 3.17 dB for L = 4 when D = 2; these small rake gains in terms of transmit power are ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] An Area and Power Efficient Rake Receiver Architecture for DSSS ...
    Our simulation results indicate that the proposed rake architecture for a WCDMA system reduces power dissipation by 37 % and the circuit complexity by 28 % ...
  58. [58]
  59. [59]
    [PDF] A Non-Coherent Tracking Scheme for the RAKE Receiver That Can ...
    Since the chip duration is. 244 ns, it is evident that the first two paths of the channel model are unresolvable. Simulations are carried out for both the ...Missing: limitations | Show results with:limitations
  60. [60]
    Intersymbol Interference - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    ... RAKE receiver is designed to operate in the presence of ISI. OFDM systems use a different method, called a “cyclic prefix.” Of the three methods mentioned ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] 5G Physical Layer Resiliency Enhancements with NB-IoT Use Case ...
    Power management would be needed for the DSSS-based signals. The receiver would need to be a RAKE receiver so that the DSSS signal on the radio interface can be ...