Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Ranger Assessment and Selection Program

The Ranger Assessment and Selection Program (RASP) is the United States Army's intensive selection and training course designed to qualify soldiers for service in the , an elite unit focused on missions, raids, and . Held at , , RASP evaluates candidates' physical endurance, mental toughness, and foundational combat skills through a demanding regimen of ruck marches, , marksmanship, and tactical exercises conducted under and environmental stressors. RASP 1, intended for junior enlisted soldiers from private to sergeant, spans eight weeks divided into two phases: the first five weeks emphasize physical and psychological assessments, including a 12-mile ruck march with a 35-pound load and medical response evaluations, while the subsequent three weeks focus on combat skills such as explosives handling and personnel recovery techniques. In contrast, RASP 2, for officers, warrant officers, and senior non-commissioned officers from to , is a condensed three-week assessing potential and operational readiness for regimental assignment. Established in 2010 to replace the Ranger Indoctrination Program, RASP serves as the mandatory gateway to the Regiment, with successful graduates earning the distinctive scroll and preparing for optional advanced training like to further hone small-unit under combat-like conditions. The 's unyielding standards ensure only those capable of sustaining the Regiment's operational tempo—characterized by rapid deployments and high-risk engagements—are selected, reflecting the causal link between rigorous vetting and mission effectiveness in .

History

Origins in Ranger Indoctrination Program

The Ranger Indoctrination Program (RIP) originated in 1978 within the 1st Battalion, 75th Infantry Regiment (Airborne), as a response to excessive attrition rates among personnel assigned directly to companies without prior vetting or following School. Prior to RIP's implementation, newly qualified Rangers experienced high failure and dropout rates in operational units due to insufficient preparation for the Regiment's demanding standards, prompting the development of a structured screening . Initially battalion-specific, RIP later expanded to regiment-wide application, serving as the gateway for enlisted soldiers seeking assignment to the . RIP spanned approximately three to four weeks and focused on physical conditioning, weapons proficiency, small-unit tactics, land navigation, and mental toughness assessments, including sleep deprivation and ruck marches exceeding 20 miles with heavy loads. Candidates underwent peer reviews and cadre evaluations to identify those embodying Ranger attributes such as initiative, self-discipline, and team orientation, with attrition often exceeding 50% per class. The program also instilled the Ranger Creed and Regiment history, functioning as both a selection filter and basic indoctrination to align recruits with elite light infantry ethos. Separate but analogous processes existed for officers, such as the Ranger Orientation Program (ROP), though primarily targeted junior enlisted personnel post-Airborne qualification. This foundational model of intense, peer-driven evaluation under operational stress directly informed the Ranger Assessment and Selection Program (RASP), which retained 's emphasis on verifiable combat readiness while addressing identified gaps in depth and standardization. By the late 2000s, evolving mission requirements and lessons from 's limitations—such as limited skill-building time—necessitated a more robust framework, leading to RASP's adoption as 's successor.

Transition to RASP in 2009

In 2009, the 75th Ranger Regiment initiated a transition from the Ranger Indoctrination Program (RIP) to the Ranger Assessment and Selection Program (RASP) to better align selection with the demands of prolonged combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. This shift responded to high operational tempos requiring Rangers deployable immediately into sensitive missions, where prior assessment methods proved insufficient for ensuring both suitability and baseline proficiency. RIP, a three-week course emphasizing physical and mental tests post-Airborne School, was restructured into RASP 1—an eight-week regimen for soldiers up to —divided into assessment and skills phases. The expanded format incorporated regiment-mandated training in marksmanship, lifesaving, breaching, small-unit tactics, , and vehicle operations, centralizing instruction previously handled at battalion level to enhance and reduce post-selection remediation. Concurrently, 2 supplanted the two-week Ranger Orientation Program for staff sergeants, warrant officers, and officers, extending it to three weeks with focused evaluations of , , and adherence to Ranger operating procedures. The full occurred in January 2010, with 1's inaugural class graduating in March after starting with 165 candidates and retaining approximately 37 percent. This reform prioritized verifiable over mere , reflecting causal insights from wartime feedback on gaps.

Post-2010 Developments and Adaptations

In response to the U.S. Department of Defense's 2013 decision to open combat roles to women and subsequent 2015 implementation across Army units, the adapted to accept candidates starting in early 2015. This marked a significant policy shift, with the first attempting RASP at in January 2015, though initial efforts focused on assessing eligibility without altering core standards. By December 2016, the first officer successfully completed RASP 2, earning assignment to the and demonstrating that qualified women could meet the program's physical, tactical, and leadership demands. A followed in 2016, completing RASP 2 in June. These adaptations aligned RASP with broader Army integration efforts, requiring no dilution of selection criteria such as the Physical Fitness Test (RPFT), peer evaluations, or small-unit tactics assessments, which remained gender-neutral. Success rates for female candidates mirrored overall attrition patterns, often exceeding 50%, underscoring the program's emphasis on empirical performance over demographic quotas. Post-integration, RASP incorporated minor procedural refinements, including updated medical screening protocols to ensure physical profiles met operational demands without expiration within four months of course start. Further evolutions included alignment with Army-wide fitness transitions, such as preparatory adoption of elements from the (ACFT) by the late 2010s, though retained bespoke assessments like the 12-mile ruck march under 3 hours and combat water survival tests to prioritize mission-specific readiness. These changes reflected causal adaptations to sustain high operational tempo amid shifting threats, with no verified reductions in baseline standards despite anecdotal debates in military forums. Ongoing data-driven reviews, including models, informed iterative improvements to phases like Cole Range, enhancing training without compromising selectivity.

Purpose and Eligibility

Core Objectives and Selection Criteria

The core objectives of the Ranger Assessment and Selection Program () are to identify and prepare soldiers who possess the physical stamina, mental resilience, leadership qualities, and operational aptitude required for integration into the , an elite unit focused on raids, airfield seizures, and missions. The program emphasizes assessing candidates' ability to perform under extreme physical and psychological stress, fostering attributes like adaptability, , and unyielding discipline essential for high-tempo combat environments. Selection criteria begin with stringent prerequisites to ensure only qualified active-duty U.S. Army personnel, including enlisted soldiers and officers in eligible military occupational specialties (such as infantryman), proceed to the course. Candidates must be U.S. citizens for assignment, hold a General Technical (GT) score of 100 or higher on the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (waivable in select cases), maintain a physical profile of PULHES 111221 or better with no limiting conditions, and be eligible for a . Moral and disciplinary standards require no Uniform Code of Military Justice convictions, drug use, or alcohol-related incidents within the prior 24 months. Physical entry standards mandate passing the Ranger Fitness Test, comprising 41 hand-release push-ups in two minutes, a two-minute-and-35-second plank hold, six pull-ups, and a five-mile run in 40 minutes or less. During the program, candidates face further benchmarks, including a 15-meter swim in full uniform, a 12-mile with a 35-pound load completed in three hours or less, and water confidence drills to verify endurance and composure. Beyond physical metrics, selection hinges on demonstrated character, peer evaluations, instructor assessments of tactical decision-making, and performance in stress-induced scenarios like and small-unit tasks, with attrition rates reflecting the program's intent to cull those unable to sustain standards. Successful graduates earn the and scroll, signifying validated readiness for airborne-qualified roles.

Differences Between RASP 1 and RASP 2

RASP 1 is intended for junior enlisted personnel in pay grades E-1 through E-5, ranging from to , who require foundational to integrate into the 75th Ranger 's operational roles. In contrast, RASP 2 targets more experienced senior non-commissioned officers (starting at , E-6), warrant officers, commissioned officers up to , and select senior enlisted leaders seeking advanced positions within the . The duration of RASP 1 is eight weeks, combining initial assessment with instruction in core competencies such as marksmanship, demolitions, and small-unit tactics to build proficiency from the ground up. 2, however, lasts three weeks and emphasizes validation of pre-existing skills rather than remedial training, with a heavier focus on evaluation under operational stress. While both courses assess , mental resilience, and tactical aptitude through shared standards like ruck marches and , RASP 1 incorporates extended phases for skill acquisition and confidence-building tailored to less seasoned soldiers. RASP 2 shifts toward scrutinizing command decision-making, peer leadership, and Regiment-specific knowledge, often drawing on candidates' prior service, including potential prior completion of RASP 1 during earlier career stages.
AspectRASP 1RASP 2
Target RanksE-1 to E-5 ( to )E-6 and above (, NCOs, Warrant Officers, Officers to )
Duration8 weeks, including training phases3 weeks, primarily evaluative
Core EmphasisSkill development (e.g., marksmanship, demolitions) and basic assessmentLeadership validation and stress testing of existing capabilities

Prerequisites and Preparation

Candidates for the Ranger Assessment and Selection Program () must meet stringent eligibility criteria established by the to ensure only qualified active-duty soldiers proceed to selection. All applicants must be U.S. citizens volunteering for assignment to the . They require a General Technical (GT) score of 100 or higher on the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB), though waivers are granted case-by-case based on operational needs and individual merit. Enlisted candidates for 1, targeting ranks E-1 through E-5, additionally need a (TECH) score of 105 or above. A physical profile under 40-501 (PULHES) of 111221 or better is mandatory, along with eligibility for a and a record free of UCMJ convictions, drug or alcohol incidents within the prior 24 months. Eligible military occupational specialties (MOS) include (), with others like signal or maintenance roles supporting regiment needs. Prior to arrival, candidates must qualify for and volunteer for the Basic Airborne Course, as airborne operations form a of the regiment. Physical prerequisites demand passing the Ranger Fitness Test, comprising 41 hand-release push-ups in 2 minutes, a 2-minute-and-35-second plank hold, 6 pull-ups, and a 5-mile run completed in 40 minutes or less. Additional gateways include the Water Survival Assessment and a 12-mile foot march in under 3 hours carrying a 35-pound rucksack plus weapon. For RASP 2 candidates—officers, warrant officers, and senior noncommissioned officers ( and above)—these standards apply, augmented by a commander's board evaluating leadership potential. Preparation begins with completion of Basic Combat Training and Advanced Individual Training to establish foundational soldiering skills. The publishes a 12-week pre-RASP training program, recommended to commence 13-14 weeks prior to the course start, focusing on in running, rucking, , and to exceed minimum standards. Emphasis falls on building aerobic capacity for timed runs (e.g., 5 miles under 40 minutes), ruck proficiency (12 miles with 35 pounds), upper-body strength via pull-ups and push-ups, and core stability through planks. Mental preparation involves cultivating discipline, adaptability, and peer , often through unit physical training and self-directed practice, as RASP tests resilience under and . Soldiers should maintain height and weight standards per AR 600-9 and seek cadre feedback during pre-RASP conditioning at to identify weaknesses.

Course Structure

RASP 1: Junior Enlisted Selection

The Ranger Assessment and Selection Program 1 (RASP 1) is an eight-week course designed to assess and select U.S. junior enlisted soldiers in pay grades E-1 through E-5 for assignment to the . Conducted at , , the program evaluates candidates' physical capabilities, mental resilience, leadership qualities, and basic tactical skills necessary for operations within the Regiment. Successful completion qualifies participants for integration into one of the Regiment's infantry battalions, emphasizing rigorous standards to ensure only those capable of meeting the unit's operational demands proceed. RASP 1 consists of two primary phases, with Phase 1 focusing on initial screening and foundational assessments. This phase includes physical fitness evaluations, such as extended ruck marches, obstacle courses, and combat water survival training, alongside and peer reviews to gauge character and teamwork under stress. Candidates must demonstrate proficiency in , both day and night, and maintain high performance in repetitive physical tests modeled after standards but tailored to enlisted selection criteria. Attrition during Phase 1 is substantial, often driven by voluntary withdrawals, injuries, or failure to meet performance benchmarks, with overall program attrition rates frequently exceeding 50%. In Phase 2, selected candidates from Phase 1 advance to advanced training in weapons handling, small unit tactics, and mission planning. Instruction covers marksmanship with individual and crew-served weapons, patrolling techniques, and squad-level leadership exercises, culminating in evaluated field training events that simulate Ranger Regiment operational scenarios. Emphasis is placed on , , and adaptability, with continuous assessments ensuring alignment with the Regiment's of rapid deployment and capabilities. Graduates earn the only after subsequent attendance, but RASP 1 assignment grants immediate entry into battalion roles. The program's structure prioritizes identifying soldiers who exhibit sustained motivation and technical competence amid and physical exhaustion, reflecting the causal demands of elite infantry service where directly impacts mission success. Peer evaluations and cadre observations play a , allowing for holistic judgments beyond quantifiable metrics.

RASP 2: Senior Leader Assessment

The Assessment and Selection Program 2 ( 2) evaluates mid-level and senior non-commissioned officers (, E-6, and above) and commissioned officers for assignment to the , emphasizing leadership aptitude, tactical proficiency, and alignment with the unit's operational standards. Unlike RASP 1, which provides foundational training for junior enlisted soldiers over eight weeks, RASP 2 is a condensed 21-day (three weeks) that assumes prior experience and Ranger qualification, focusing instead on Regiment-specific assessments of command potential and peer evaluations. Candidates must meet stringent prerequisites, including possession of the Ranger Tab (with exceptions requiring approval from the Regimental Commander or Command Sergeant Major), a current Airborne Ranger physical examination valid within 18 months, and at minimum a Secret security clearance. For officers at the captain or major level, an annual selection board convenes at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, over the Labor Day weekend, reviewing applications submitted via the Army's Integrated Personnel and Pay System-Army (IPPS-A) portal, which include a letter of intent, letters of recommendation, recent officer evaluation reports, Army Combat Fitness Test scores, and a DA Form 4187 endorsed by a colonel (O-6) or higher. The Regiment conducts 10 RASP 2 classes per year, each accommodating up to 34 participants, with successful graduates ordered to permanent change of station to a Ranger battalion within 60 days, often reporting 30 days early for integration. The course unfolds in three distinct weeks tailored to senior leader scrutiny. Week one involves critical event testing—intensive physical and mental evaluations—culminating in a at Camp Darby (Cole Range), replicating small-unit operations under stress to gauge decision-making and resilience. Week two emphasizes advanced marksmanship, including precision shooting with Regiment-issued weapons and specialized equipment familiarization, to assess technical expertise and adaptability to elite standards. Week three centers on a board , where candidates face scrutiny from senior Rangers on command philosophy and past performance, alongside peer evaluations that weigh interpersonal dynamics, , and team influence—key determinants for selection. Throughout, instruction covers unique Regiment missions, special tactics, operational techniques, and equipment not emphasized in standard Army training, ensuring candidates demonstrate the causal links between leadership decisions and mission success in high-risk environments. Attrition stems primarily from failure to exhibit requisite maturity, tactical judgment, or peer consensus, rather than purely physical shortcomings, reflecting the program's emphasis on selecting proven leaders capable of sustaining the 's 70+ year legacy of direct-action raids and . Graduates earn assignment to one of the 's battalions but do not automatically receive the Ranger Tab if not previously qualified, underscoring RASP 2's role as a gateway for experienced personnel rather than an entry-level qualification.

Training Phases and Assessments

Physical and Mental Conditioning

The Ranger Assessment and Selection Program () evaluates candidates' physical conditioning through standardized entry tests and ongoing challenges designed to measure strength, cardiovascular capacity, and load-bearing stamina under fatigue. Prior to arrival, soldiers must meet prerequisites including at least 49 push-ups, 59 sit-ups, 6 pull-ups, and a 5-mile run completed in 40 minutes or less, alongside a 12-mile ruck march with a 35-pound load in under 3 hours. During the 8-week course, physical demands escalate with repeated ruck marches up to 6-12 miles, high-repetition , obstacle courses, and water survival drills, often conducted with minimal recovery to simulate operational . These assessments, drawn from a 12-week pre-RASP preparation guide emphasizing in running, rucking, and upper-body strength, ensure candidates possess the baseline to withstand regiment-specific missions. Mental conditioning is assessed via Phase 1 psychological evaluations, peer reviews, and performance metrics under duress, targeting , , and aversion to voluntary . The program imposes , continuous training cycles, and high-stakes peer accountability, where lapses in focus or motivation lead to elimination, reflecting combat-like pressures that filter for intrinsic over external motivation. on RASP attrition highlights mental factors such as and emotional as predictors of success, with many failures stemming from self-initiated quits amid cumulative exhaustion rather than isolated physical benchmarks. This dual emphasis on physical output and mental fortitude aligns with the regiment's operational needs, prioritizing soldiers who maintain cognitive sharpness and during prolonged, high-intensity engagements.

Tactical Skills and Small Unit Tactics

During Phase 2 of RASP 1, which spans weeks 4 through 8, candidates undergo intensive training in small unit tactics to develop the proficiency required for operations within the . This phase focuses on advanced Ranger skills, including patrol techniques, ambush establishment, raid execution, and reactions to contact, conducted in and configurations to simulate combat environments. Training emphasizes doctrinal principles such as fire and maneuver, bounding overwatch, and fireteam sectoring, ensuring candidates can integrate individual actions into cohesive unit efforts under stress. Assessments in small unit tactics involve peer-evaluated exercises where candidates lead or participate in tactical movements, seizures, and , with cadre observing , communication, and adaptability. Failure to demonstrate tactical soundness, such as improper flank security or delayed enemy engagement, results in elimination, as these skills directly correlate with in the Regiment's high-tempo raids and airfield seizures. elements, including vehicle and foot-mounted operations, are integrated to test tactics at the small unit level. For RASP 2, senior leaders refine these tactics through scenario-based training tailored to and command roles, assessing strategic application in larger formations while maintaining emphasis on foundational small unit proficiency. This ensures selected officers and NCOs can direct Rangers in assaults and , with evaluations prioritizing causal links between tactical choices and operational outcomes. Overall, tactical training in RASP prioritizes empirical validation through repetitive, high-fidelity drills, weeding out those unable to execute under fatigue and ambiguity.

Land Navigation and Endurance Tests

The land navigation assessments in the Ranger Assessment and Selection Program (RASP) require candidates to demonstrate proficiency in map reading, compass utilization, pace counting, and terrain association, conducted both during daylight and limited visibility conditions to simulate operational environments. These exercises typically occur early in Phase 1 of RASP 1, following initial physical screenings, and involve locating multiple points across varied terrain at , , without reliance on electronic aids. Failure to locate all required points within allotted times—often several hours depending on distance and conditions—results in elimination, as the tests prioritize self-reliance and accuracy under fatigue, with candidates carrying standard gear including rucksacks. Endurance evaluations complement by incorporating prolonged loaded marches, such as a mandatory 12-mile ruck with a minimum 35-pound dry load in full uniform, completed within three hours to meet passing standards. Additional ruck assessments, including shorter 6-mile variants under similar loads, build cumulative stress to gauge sustained load-bearing capacity and recovery, with times tracked rigorously— performances under 53 minutes for 6 miles noted in recent classes. These marches often integrate into or follow navigation tasks, exacerbating physical demands through elevation changes and obstacles, testing lower-body resilience, , and cardiovascular efficiency essential for roles. Both test types emphasize mental fortitude alongside physical output, as and amplify errors; candidates receive preparatory instruction but must apply skills independently, with attrition high among those lacking prior practice in pace calibration (e.g., 100-meter counts) or adjustments. Standards remain consistent across RASP 1 and 2, though senior leaders in RASP 2 face adapted variants aligned with demands, ensuring selected Rangers possess foundational competencies for missions.

Graduation and Regiment Integration

Completion Requirements

To successfully complete the Ranger Assessment and Selection Program (RASP), candidates must pass comprehensive physical, peer, skill, and evaluations that assess their ability to operate within the 75th 's high-intensity environment. These requirements apply across 1 (8 weeks for enlisted ranks E-1 to E-5) and 2 (3 weeks for officers, warrant officers, and senior NCOs E-6 and above), with emphasis on sustained performance rather than isolated entry tests. Failure in any phase—due to voluntary withdrawal, injury, peer rejection, or instructor assessment—results in recycling or elimination, ensuring only those demonstrating resilience, proficiency, and Regimental fit graduate. Physical completion standards mandate passing the Ranger Fitness Test, which includes performing at least 41 push-ups in 2 minutes, holding a plank for 2 minutes and 35 seconds, completing 6 pull-ups, and finishing a 5-mile run in 40 minutes or less. Candidates must also complete a 12-mile footmarch carrying a 35-pound rucksack and weapon within 3 hours, alongside water survival assessments to verify operational readiness in diverse conditions. These tests are conducted periodically, with progressive demands building on initial entry fitness (e.g., 53 push-ups, 63 sit-ups, 4 pull-ups, and a 2-mile run under 14:30). Peer evaluations form a critical non-physical component, where squad members anonymously assess each candidate's teamwork, character, integrity, and commitment, often leading to drops for those perceived as unreliable or self-serving. Skill proficiency in marksmanship, small-unit tactics, land navigation, and Ranger-specific drills must be demonstrated without errors that compromise mission safety or effectiveness. For RASP 2, a final selection board reviews overall performance, including leadership judgment under stress, to classify candidates as "selects" or "non-selects," with selects requiring minimum Secret security clearance and Ranger qualification (or waiver). Graduates who meet all criteria are awarded the Ranger scroll—a distinctive unit insignia signifying Regimental membership—and assigned to a battalion, headquarters, or support element within 60 days, typically with 30 days early reporting. This completion does not confer the Ranger Tab, which requires separate attendance at the U.S. Army Ranger Course, but qualifies individuals for airborne operations and immediate integration into Ranger strike forces.

Assignment to Ranger Battalions

Upon successful completion of RASP 1 or RASP 2, selectees are awarded the Ranger scroll and , signifying membership in the , and are assigned to a unit within the regiment, typically within 60 days via (PCS) orders. Assignments are determined by a regimental selection board, battalion S1 personnel, and the Regimental Recruiting Detachment, prioritizing operational needs, the candidate's military occupational specialty (), and performance evaluations from RASP. Candidates have no input in selecting their battalion, as placements are made to balance manpower across the regiment's structure. Most new Rangers are assigned to one of the three infantry battalions: the 1st at , ; the 2nd at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington; or the 3rd at , . Less commonly, graduates may be slotted into regimental support elements, such as the Regimental Special Troops (RSTB) or Military Intelligence , depending on MOS requirements like signals, intelligence, or . These assignments ensure the regiment maintains readiness for raids, airfield seizures, and missions across its geographically dispersed units. High-performing RASP graduates, particularly those identified during the program's merit-based evaluations, may receive priority for immediate attendance at prior to battalion reporting, filling slots based on regimental quotas and training availability. Upon arrival at their assigned , new Rangers undergo further on-the-job orientation, including squad-level integration and specialized training, to prepare for operational deployment; this phase emphasizes rapid acclimation to the 's high-tempo environment and peer accountability standards. Attrition from post-assignment separations remains low, as the enforces strict standards to retain only those committed to its .

Attrition Rates and Challenges

Historical Pass Rates

The Ranger Assessment and Selection Program (RASP) exhibits significant variation in pass rates between its two phases, with RASP 1—targeted at junior enlisted soldiers (E-1 through E-5)—experiencing higher due to the influx of less experienced candidates directly from basic training or initial entry. Historical data indicate pass rates for RASP 1 ranging from approximately 33% to 59% across cohorts, with a peer-reviewed of eight 2019 classes (n=746) reporting a 46% overall success rate and a validation sample from five 2020 cohorts (n=575) yielding 54%. These figures reflect an 8-week course where over half of occurs in week 1, predominantly through voluntary withdrawals (77% of early dropouts), underscoring the psychological and initial physical demands as key filters. In contrast, RASP 2, designed for staff sergeants and above (E-6 through O-3) who often already serve in Ranger battalions, maintains higher pass rates of around 72%, with historical at 28%, as these participants bring operational experience that mitigates failure in tactical and assessments. Earlier reports from the program's inception around , succeeding the Ranger Indoctrination Program (), suggested lower overall graduation rates near 30% for entry-level selection, though such figures lack granular cohort data and may reflect smaller class sizes or stricter pre-screening.
PhaseTypical Pass RateKey Attrition FactorsSource Period
RASP 146-54% (range 33-59%)Week 1 voluntary quits; physical failures laterFY 2019-2020
RASP 2~72%Lower due to prior Regiment serviceHistorical average
Pass rates have shown modest fluctuations over time, potentially influenced by class volume increases and preparatory pipelines, but no verified long-term decline or surge is documented in primary analyses; claims of plummeting standards in the early 2010s, citing isolated classes with 80% graduation from 114 starters, remain un corroborated by broader datasets and may stem from expanded pre-RASP conditioning. Physical fitness emerges as the strongest predictor of success across phases, outperforming cognitive or personality metrics in regression models.

Common Failure Points and Injuries

Voluntary withdrawals represent the leading cause of in the Ranger Assessment and Selection Program (RASP), comprising 53.3% of total failures across analyzed classes, often occurring in the initial week when candidates confront the program's unrelenting physical and psychological demands. Physical standard failures account for 17.2% of , primarily during assessments such as the 2-mile run, push-ups, and ruck marches, where suboptimal —particularly slower run times and fewer repetitions—serves as a strong predictor of elimination. Medical disqualifications due to injuries contribute 12.2% overall, rising to 19.3% in Week 1, as candidates sustaining acute or overuse conditions fail to recover sufficiently to continue. In pre-RASP screening phases, medical drops elevate to 26.9% of , frequently linked to pre-existing or early-onset conditions exacerbated by preparatory physical demands, while psychological screening failures add 9.2%. Lower intrinsic at entry correlates with higher voluntary quit rates, as does reduced scoring, underscoring the role of self-selection and in mitigating these points of failure. factors, including diminished , further predict voluntary , particularly in early phases absent structured performance gates. Common injuries precipitating medical attrition mirror those in high-intensity military selection courses, dominated by overuse mechanisms from repetitive loading: foot blisters and abrasions from extended ruck marches, stress fractures in lower extremities due to prolonged weight-bearing, and soft tissue strains from combatives or tactical movements. In analogous programs like Assessment and Selection, blisters affect up to 20% of participants and lacerations 13%, patterns attributable to similar environmental stressors including heavy loads, minimal recovery, and terrain navigation. For RASP 1 specifically, lower enlisted ranks (e.g., to ) and prior recycling from the program heighten attrition risk, often intersecting with injury susceptibility from inadequate prior conditioning.

Controversies and Criticisms

Gender Integration and Standards Maintenance

Following the U.S. Department of Defense's 2015 decision to open all combat roles to women, the initiated gender integration into the (), with the first candidates attempting 2 in late 2016. In December 2016, one officer became the first woman to complete 2, earning assignment to the in spring 2017, marking the unit's transition from all-male composition. Subsequent graduates have included officers like Shaina Coss, the first officer in the by , and enlisted personnel, though exact numbers remain classified or low, with estimates suggesting fewer than a dozen women serving in combat roles within the as of 2025. U.S. Army leadership has consistently stated that standards for , ruck marches, , and tactical evaluations remain identical for male and female candidates, with no modifications to requirements such as the 12-mile ruck in under three hours or combat water survival tests. Pre- eligibility requires a minimum 60% Physical Fitness Test (APFT) score, which is - and age-normed—allowing women lower thresholds in push-ups (19 vs. 42 for men) and run times (18:54 vs. 15:54 for two miles)—but core selection phase benchmarks, including 69 sit-ups, 58 push-ups, six chin-ups, and a five-mile run in 40 minutes, apply uniformly regardless of sex. Post-selection, Regiment-wide fitness maintenance reverts to the 60% -normed APFT, a policy critics contend indirectly accommodates average physiological differences in upper-body strength and aerobic capacity between sexes, potentially affecting small-unit performance in high-intensity operations. Empirical outcomes reflect sustained rigor, as pass rates mirror or exceed overall of approximately 50%, with most failures attributed to physical demands rather than accommodations; for instance, early attempts in resulted in dropouts due to inability to meet ruck march and peer evaluations, without reported waivers. Independent analyses, drawing from leaked internal documents, question whether gender-normed entry dilutes the Regiment's merit-based ethos, arguing that uniform combat standards necessitate pre-selection physiological parity, which sex-based averages challenge without higher injury risks or . officials counter that has not compromised operational readiness, citing successful female contributions in deployments, though data on unit-level or injury disparities remains limited and not publicly disaggregated by sex.

Debates on Rigor Versus Accessibility

The transition from the to the in January 2010 extended the selection duration from four weeks to eight weeks for enlisted personnel, incorporating formalized instruction in , , and weapons proficiency alongside physical evaluations. This shift aimed to enhance candidate preparedness for operations, with supporters arguing it improved accessibility by bridging gaps in prior-service skills rather than relying solely on attrition-based culling, as emphasized. Critics, including veterans, have contended that the added training phases effectively transformed into a hybrid assessment-training pipeline, potentially lowering the barrier for entry by remediating deficiencies that would have exposed and eliminated outright. Graduation rate fluctuations have fueled ongoing scrutiny of this balance. Early RASP 1 classes post-2010 reportedly achieved pass rates of 20-30%, but by 2012, rates had climbed to 60-70%, coinciding with sustained deployment tempos in and that strained regimental manning. A SOFREP attributed this increase to relaxed physical and thresholds, positing that operational imperatives prioritized over selectivity, thereby compromising the program's rigor in favor of . Military underscores the value of high —often exceeding 50% in elite pipelines like RASP—for identifying candidates with innate and adaptability, suggesting that elevated pass rates risk admitting personnel less equipped for the Regiment's high-tempo missions. Proponents of maintained rigor emphasize causal links between stringent standards and operational outcomes, noting that RASP's dual-phase structure (selection followed by skill validation) still demands superior performance under stress, with post-selection peer evaluations in battalions serving as a de facto filter for underperformers. Debates persist in veteran forums and analyses, where some attribute higher graduation to improved pre-RASP preparation programs rather than dilution, though empirical pass rate data and anecdotal reports of evolving fitness benchmarks indicate pressures to adapt standards amid recruitment challenges. The Regiment has not publicly acknowledged standard reductions, but the program's evolution reflects broader Army tensions between preserving elite quality and ensuring sufficient force structure for contingency demands.

Impact and Achievements

Contributions to Regimental Effectiveness

The Ranger Assessment and Selection Program (RASP) contributes to the 75th Ranger Regiment's effectiveness by rigorously screening candidates to identify those capable of meeting the unit's demanding operational tempo and standards, thereby ensuring a force composed of highly motivated and physically resilient personnel. Established to replace the earlier in 2010, RASP processes approximately 550 to 600 soldiers annually through its Phase 1 for enlisted ranks to generate sufficient Skill Level I Rangers, directly supporting the Regiment's sustained deployment cycles in high-intensity conflicts. This selective mechanism, with attrition rates often exceeding 50%, filters out individuals lacking the requisite attributes, reducing downstream risks such as mission failures or casualties due to inadequate preparation. Beyond mere selection, imparts foundational skills, tactical knowledge, and the Regiment's ethos of discipline and adaptability, fostering essential for raids and airfield seizures that characterize Ranger operations. By integrating assessments, , and small-unit tactics with peer evaluations, the cultivates a mindset prioritizing team performance over individual endurance, which empirical analyses link to lower voluntary post-selection and higher overall readiness. Data-driven optimizations, including predictive modeling of success factors like prior experience and , have refined RASP's criteria since its , enabling the Regiment to allocate resources more efficiently toward mission-critical roles. This structured gateway enhances regimental effectiveness by aligning personnel quality with the Regiment's role in , as evidenced by its contributions to multi-domain operations where screened Rangers demonstrate superior execution under stress. For instance, RASP's emphasis on prepares soldiers for the Regiment's operational environment, where rapid adaptability correlates with successful outcomes in over 23,000 insertions and countless engagements since 2001. Ultimately, by prioritizing verifiable predictors of long-term performance—such as and physical benchmarks—RASP sustains a cadre capable of maintaining the Regiment's edge in lethality and reliability against peer adversaries.

Notable Graduates and Operational Successes

The , composed primarily of RASP graduates since the program's 2010 implementation, has sustained an intensive operational schedule focused on raids, high-value target captures, airfield seizures, and in support of U.S. Command missions. These efforts contributed to ongoing counterterrorism campaigns in under and , as well as Operations Iraqi Freedom and Inherent Resolve in and . RASP-selected personnel have demonstrated effectiveness in high-risk environments, with units like 1st Battalion, receiving collective awards for combat performance, including medals presented to approximately 800 Rangers for actions in around 2011. Individual valor decorations, such as Silver Stars, have been awarded to members for exceptional conduct in raids and engagements during this period. Among notable RASP completers, the first officer graduated 2 in December 2016, marking the initial integration of women into the Regiment's officer cadre and enabling her assignment to support roles. This was followed by subsequent graduates, including officers like Shaina Coss, who became the first woman to lead Rangers in combat operations. These achievements reflect the program's role in maintaining qualification standards amid evolving personnel policies, though public details on individual graduates remain limited due to operational security constraints.

References

  1. [1]
    Best Ranger | The United States Army
    ### Ranger Assessment and Selection Program (RASP) Summary
  2. [2]
    Army Rangers
    To become a Ranger, you'll first be tested in the Ranger Assessment and Selection Program (RASP)—a two-phase program to test your abilities and train you to ...
  3. [3]
    Ranger Indoctrination Program : r/army - Reddit
    Nov 24, 2022 · I was in 1/75 when RIP started in 1978. Before that new Rangers were sent directly to the company, but the attrition rate was off the charts. I ...
  4. [4]
    Selecting and Building a US Army Ranger | SOFREP
    With this in mind, 1st Ranger Battalion was stood up as was its selection program called the Ranger Indoctrination Program, or RIP. Soon after when 2nd Ranger ...
  5. [5]
    Why did the 75th Ranger Regiment selection changed from RIP to ...
    Jun 4, 2021 · Each Batt had their very own selection programs called RIP for everyone wearing rank on the sleeve and ROP for those wearing rank on their shoulder.<|control11|><|separator|>
  6. [6]
    On RIP - the great Ranger Indoctrination Program and that's why ...
    Aug 3, 2020 · The Ranger Indoctrination Program (RIP) was three weeks long and conducted after Airborne School which was down the road in much spiffier barracks.
  7. [7]
    75th Rangers - Living the legacy | Article | The United States Army
    Ranger candidates attend the four-week Ranger Indoctrination Program to hone weapons and combat skills. Ranger School itself lasts 61 days, with training ...
  8. [8]
    Ranger Assessment and Selection Program - Wikipedia
    Ranger Assessment and Selection Program (RASP) is an 8-week course held at Fort Benning, Georgia, for the U.S. Army's 75th Ranger Regiment. In 2009, RASP ...History · Course
  9. [9]
    75th Ranger Regiment streamlines selection process - Army.mil
    Sep 3, 2010 · RASP 1 replaced the regiment's Ranger Indoctrination Program in January, Crosby said. The instruction period for RASP 1 is eight weeks long ...
  10. [10]
    Inside the Team Room: US Army Rangers - Indoctrination Stories
    Feb 29, 2024 · These days, it is known as RASP, or the Ranger Assessment and Selection Program. This change was part of an effort to update and improve the ...
  11. [11]
    Interview with 75th Ranger Regiment Commander Col. Christopher ...
    Jun 30, 2014 · Our assessment and selection process changed in 2009 because of the lessons we learned from Afghanistan and Iraq as well as in response to the ...
  12. [12]
    Directive opens 4,100 special ops positions to women - Army.mil
    Mar 16, 2015 · Since 2013, the integration of women into USASOC has been so rapid ... Ranger Assessment and Selection Program, and with SOCOM's social ...<|separator|>
  13. [13]
    Sill female first to tackle Ranger course | Article - Army.mil
    Jan 28, 2015 · She is one of the first women allowed into Fort Benning's Ranger Assessment and Selection Program in hopes of ea... (Photo Credit: U.S. Army) ...
  14. [14]
    Female NCO tries out for Army's elite 75th Ranger Regiment
    Sep 1, 2016 · The staff sergeant attended the 75th Ranger Regiment's Ranger Assessment and Selection Program 2 in June, officials said. RASP 2 is designed ...
  15. [15]
    No Turning Back? First Woman Makes Army's Elite 75th Ranger ...
    Jan 19, 2017 · If women can meet the test of RASP and be admitted to the ranks of the 75th Ranger Regiment, it gets a lot harder to say they shouldn't be there ...
  16. [16]
    Predicting ranger attrition - PMC - NIH
    Elite military programs such as the 75th Ranger Regiment's Ranger Assessment and Selection Program (RASP) see rates of attrition often in excess of 50%, ...<|separator|>
  17. [17]
    Updated RASP Packing List - ArmyRanger.com
    Feb 25, 2018 · If you're going to airborne after RASP because you're coming from the big army obviously you won't need this because you're not jump qualified.
  18. [18]
    Changes Are Coming to Army Ranger Fitness Tests. Here's How to ...
    Mar 27, 2025 · One-mile run · 30 hand-release push-up repetitions · 100-meter sprint · 16 sandbag lift repetitions to a height of 5½ feet · 50-meter farmer's carry ...Missing: 2010 | Show results with:2010
  19. [19]
    Why Are Standards Plummeting in the Ranger Assessment and ...
    Jul 8, 2012 · These graduation rates signify is massive drop in the physical and/or academic standards that RASP students are being held too in order to move ...
  20. [20]
    Join the 75th Ranger Regiment - Fort Benning
    Mar 12, 2025 · Pass physical requirements which include the Ranger Fitness Test (41 T Push-Ups in 2 minutes, 2:35 plank, run 5 miles in 40 minutes or less, and ...Missing: objectives | Show results with:objectives
  21. [21]
    Ranger Assessment Selection Program 1 (RASP 1) - Fort Benning
    Mar 12, 2025 · This 8-week course trains soldiers in the rank of Private through Sergeant in the basic skills and tactics required to operate in the 75th ...Missing: prerequisites | Show results with:prerequisites
  22. [22]
    'Worth every bit of the struggle': How Fort Moore regiment turns ...
    Dec 24, 2023 · While RASP 1 focuses largely on training, RASP 2 is about proving the skills that soldiers already possess. On a recent day on Cole Range, ...
  23. [23]
    Joining the Army Rangers - Military.com
    Dec 4, 2012 · Officers, warrant officers and senior noncommissioned officers (staff sergeant through command sergeant major) must attend RASP 2, a three-week ...
  24. [24]
    Five things you didn't know about the 75th Ranger Regiment
    Feb 18, 2020 · In order to become a member of the 75th Ranger Regiment a Soldier must attend and pass Ranger Assessment and Selection Program 1 or 2. Soldiers ...
  25. [25]
    Join the 75th Ranger Regiment - Fort Benning
    Mar 12, 2025 · Battalion S1's and the Regimental Recruiting Detachment will slot approved candidates for Ranger Assessment and Selection Program 2 (10 ...
  26. [26]
    Video - Ranger Assessment and Selection Program 1 - DVIDS
    Jul 21, 2024 · RASP 1 is an eight week course designed to assess and select US Army soldiers for service within the 75th Ranger Regiment.
  27. [27]
    U.S. Army Rangers - Overview, History, Best Ranger Competition ...
    The Ranger Assessment and Selection Program (RASP) is an eight-week course that trains Soldiers to become members of the 75th Ranger Regiment. After ...75th Ranger Regiment · Learn more · Heritage · News & Media
  28. [28]
    Ranger Assessment Selection Program 2 (RASP 2) - Fort Benning
    Sep 17, 2018 · A 21-day course for soldiers in the rank of Staff Sergeant and above, and all officers volunteering for assignment to the 75th Ranger Regiment.
  29. [29]
  30. [30]
    Ranger Assessment and Selection Program - ARMY RANGERS
    Ranger Assessment and Selection, known as RASP, is an intense, eight-week course designed to test a Soldier's physical and mental strength under extreme ...
  31. [31]
    Predicting Ranger Attrition: Research About Passing RASP
    During this research, analysts examined a total of 1,321 candidates from the 75th Ranger Regiment who participated in the intensive 8-week RASP program over two ...
  32. [32]
    RASP land nav - ShadowSpear Special Operations
    Apr 28, 2017 · My son is in a current RASP class. He just survived Cole Range - but he only found 11 of the 12 nav points. He says he has the option of recycle to next class.<|control11|><|separator|>
  33. [33]
    RASP Volunteers Crush 6 Mile Ruck Assessment with Style
    Oct 7, 2025 · RASP volunteers recently completed a 6 mile ruck assessment, demonstrating their strength and endurance. With a fastest time of 52:55 ...Missing: endurance | Show results with:endurance<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    How to prepare for land navigation for the RASP 75th Rangers - Quora
    Nov 28, 2020 · Lensatic compass, map, and protractor. Learn your pace count for 100 meters. Know the 5 terrain features. Know the 5 colors on a military ...How to improve my land navigation skills to prepare for Rasp and ...What's it like undergoing the nighttime navigation test during Army ...More results from www.quora.com
  35. [35]
    MARSOC, Navy SEALs, and Army Rangers: SOF by the numbers
    Jan 17, 2024 · ... RASP 1, which has a historical attrition rate of 47%. RASP 2 has a 28% attrition rate, but it should be noted that most soldiers attending RASP ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] A Mixed Methods Study of Ranger Attrition - VTechWorks
    Apr 17, 2023 · Selection Program (RASP) are known for their difficulty and high attrition rates, despite substantial candidate screening just to get into ...
  37. [37]
    Military Activity Related Injuries - Defense Centers for Public Health
    Sep 10, 2025 · Foot blisters, stress fractures, foot pain and tingling, knee problems, and back problems are among the most common road marching related ...Missing: RASP | Show results with:RASP<|control11|><|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Types of Injuries on the US Army's Special Forces Assessment ...
    Feb 26, 2020 · The most common injuries were blisters and abrasions/lacerations with incidences of 20% (n = 158/800) and 13% (104/800), respectively.
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Predicting Ranger Assessment and Selection Program 1 success ...
    RANGr takes precise estimates of graduation rates using historical RASP1 data and provides optimal solutions to fill demand across the Ranger Regiment. We show ...
  40. [40]
    Army outlines gender integration implementation plan
    Mar 10, 2016 · The Army announced today details of its implementation plan for integrating women into all military occupational specialties (MOSs).
  41. [41]
    Captain Shaina Coss, the FIRST and ONLY female infantry officer in ...
    Oct 10, 2021 · Captain Shaina Coss, the FIRST and ONLY female infantry officer in the 75th Ranger Regiment. West Point grad 2016, powerlifting team, Ranger ...First Woman passes RASP, to be come first Woman in the elite 75th ...Ranger Regiment? : r/ArmyOCS - RedditMore results from www.reddit.com
  42. [42]
    Historic Achievement: US Army's Sidney Jaques is ... - Facebook
    Jul 7, 2025 · Historic Achievement: US Army's Sidney Jaques is recognized as the first woman to earn both the Ranger Tab by graduating from the U.S. Army ...
  43. [43]
    Soldiers prepare for gender-integrated Ranger Course - Army.mil
    Feb 10, 2015 · The standards are the same for men and women at RTAC just as they will be for the actual Ranger Course Assessment in April. "There is ...Missing: Selection RASP maintenance
  44. [44]
    Proof that standards will be dropped for females entering the 75th ...
    Mar 12, 2016 · Documents obtained by SOFREP regarding the 75th Ranger Regiment's Ranger Assessment and Selection Program (RASP) and physical training standards within the ...Missing: maintenance | Show results with:maintenance
  45. [45]
    How is RASP for Rangers different from RIP, and which prepares ...
    The biggest difference is that RASP trains the candidates on more of the skills they'll need in Ranger Batt. By my understanding, RIP was mostly just a ...
  46. [46]
    RIP vs rasp, difference in the 80s and 90s vs now - army - Reddit
    Jun 11, 2025 · RASP phase 1 was RIP. They added phase 2 to give some basic skills to new Rangers before they got to Battalion.Compared to RASP, how much more difficult was RIP? - RedditWhat exactly is an Army Ranger? What's the difference between ...More results from www.reddit.comMissing: debate | Show results with:debate
  47. [47]
    The 75th Ranger Regiment Military Intelligence Battalion
    The Ranger Assessment and Selection Program, or RASP, consists of two parallel courses. RASP 1 trains and assesses sergeants and below. RASP 2 trains and ...Modernizing For Multi-Domain... · ``rangers Lead The Way'' · Rangers Lead The Way!<|control11|><|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Demographic, psychosocial, and physical fitness predictors of ...
    In a study to determine candidate characteristics that led to successful completion of the Ranger Assessment and Selection Program (RASP) – Soldiers must pass ...
  49. [49]
    75th Ranger Regiment celebrates 30 years of service - Army.mil
    Oct 7, 2014 · In the 30 years since the regiment was activated, the Rangers have participated in every contingency operation from Operation Just Cause to the ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
  50. [50]
    75th Ranger Regiment: Rangers lead the way - Combat Operators
    Mar 25, 2025 · These include direct action, airfield seizure, airborne and air assaults, special reconnaissance, personnel recovery, and high-value target ...
  51. [51]
    1/75 Rangers awarded medals for combat actions | Article - Army.mil
    About 800 Rangers from the 1st Battalion, 75th Ranger Regiment stood quietly in formation as they were awarded medals for combat actions.
  52. [52]
    [PDF] January 2010 Tip of the Spear.pdf - SOCOM.mil
    U.S. Army Special Operations Command. Two 3rd Group Soldiers receive Silver Star ... 24. 75th Ranger Regiment Soldier earns Silver Star ... 26. Naval Special ...
  53. [53]
    This woman will be the first to join the Army's elite 75th Ranger ...
    Jan 18, 2017 · This woman will be the first to join the Army's elite 75th Ranger Regiment ... She is the first woman to complete RASP but not the first to try it ...Missing: standards | Show results with:standards