Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Sabarmati Express

The Sabarmati Express (train numbers 19167/19168) is a superfast express train operated by the of , providing daily service between Ahmedabad Junction in and Varanasi City in , spanning approximately 1,629 kilometers through , , and states. The train typically consists of 20-23 coaches, including air-conditioned, sleeper, and general classes, and is hauled by diesel or electric locomotives depending on route electrification. The service, named after the associated with Mahatma Gandhi's near , facilitates connectivity for pilgrims, traders, and passengers traveling to northern . It gained global notoriety due to the incident on 27 February 2002, when a mob attacked the stationary train at Junction in , pouring inflammable liquid into coach S-6 and setting it ablaze, killing 59 passengers—predominantly Hindu kar sevaks (pilgrims and volunteers) returning from . The , appointed by the government, concluded the attack was a pre-planned involving of 140 liters of petrol by local perpetrators, rejecting claims of spontaneous combustion or accident. Judicial proceedings substantiated the conspiracy finding: a special SIT court convicted 31 individuals of murder and in 2011, sentencing 11 to death (later commuted to by the ) and 20 to life terms, based on forensic evidence of external and witness testimonies. The has upheld core convictions while granting to some on merit review, dismissing alternative narratives like the U.C. Banerjee Committee's accidental fire theory, which was invalidated by the for procedural flaws and lack of forensic alignment. The incident triggered widespread communal violence in , highlighting tensions over the Ayodhya movement, though official inquiries emphasized the targeted nature of the train attack independent of prior altercations. More recently, in August 2024, the Sabarmati Express (19168) derailed near due to a suspected foreign object on tracks, prompting investigations into potential , though no conclusive link to organized was established.

Overview and Operations

Route and Major Halts

The Sabarmati Express operates on the route between in and in [Uttar Pradesh](/page/Uttar Pradesh), spanning approximately 1,594 kilometers across , , and [Uttar Pradesh](/page/Uttar Pradesh). The service, identified by train numbers 19167 ( to Varanasi City) and 19168 (return), includes 53 halts and typically requires 35 hours for the journey, departing daily at 23:10 and arriving in Varanasi City around 11:00 the following day. The path follows the Western Railway and Central Railway networks initially, transitioning to North Central and North Eastern Railways. From , the train moves southeast through central , entering near , then proceeds via and to . Beyond , it traverses eastern through Bina, Sagar, and , before entering at and continuing to and via the Allahabad division. Major halts, serving as key junctions for passenger exchange and operational significance, include:
  • Chhayapuri (serving , halt duration ~2-3 minutes, ~96 km from origin)
  • Godhra Junction (~163 km, site of historical operational note in 2002)
  • Ratlam Junction (major yard and depot, ~10-minute halt)
  • Ujjain Junction (religious and divisional hub, extended halt for crew change)
  • Bhopal Junction (state capital, significant stop for ~20 minutes with maintenance facilities)
  • Katni South (junction for branch lines, ~5-minute halt)
  • Satna Junction (entry to , operational halt)
  • Prayagraj Junction (major interchange point, ~10-15 minute halt)
These stops facilitate connectivity to regional networks, with halt times varying based on scheduling and freight priorities, as per timetables.

Schedule and Service Patterns

The Sabarmati Express operates as train numbers 19165 ( Junction to Junction) and 19166 ( Junction to Junction), providing a tri-weekly long-distance mail/express service spanning approximately 1,936 kilometers across , , , and . The 19165 departs Junction daily at 23:10, covering the route in 43 hours and 55 minutes with 63 scheduled halts, arriving at Junction at 19:05 on the third day. Key intermediate stops include Junction (00:58–01:08), Junction (04:15–04:25), Kota Junction (07:45–07:55), (20:45–20:55 on day 2), (23:40–23:50 on day 2), (04:20–04:25 on day 3), Jaunpur Junction (06:08–06:13 on day 3), and Junction (17:25–17:35 on day 3). The return service, 19166, departs Junction at 04:30, arriving Junction at 08:25 on the third day after 51 hours and 55 minutes with 65 halts, incorporating similar major stops in reverse order such as Hajipur Junction (07:50–08:00), Varanasi City (14:50–15:00 on day 1), Sultanpur (17:45–17:50 on day 1), Faizabad Junction (20:30–20:35 on day 1), and Junction (02:23–02:24 on day 3). This schedule maintains consistent timings year-round, subject to occasional diversions for maintenance or operational needs as notified by . Service operates on Sundays, Wednesdays, and Fridays from , aligning with the return leg's tri-weekly pattern to optimize rake utilization and track capacity on congested sections like the Delhi-Howrah and Lucknow-Varanasi corridors. The frequency reflects standard practices for non-daily expresses on high-density routes, balancing passenger demand—particularly from migrant workers, pilgrims to sites like , and general travelers—with infrastructure constraints, without seasonal extensions or special runs reported in standard operations. No rake-sharing arrangements with other Sabarmati-named services, such as the Ahmedabad-Varanasi variant (19167/19168), are indicated for this route, ensuring dedicated consists for the full -Darbhanga loop.

Passenger Demographics and Usage

The Sabarmati Express, encompassing multiple routes such as to City (train nos. 19167/19168), to (19165/19166), and Sabarmati to Tawi (19223/19224), primarily serves long-distance travelers connecting with northern and eastern . These services operate 3–7 days per week depending on the route, with journey durations ranging from 21 to 35 hours, accommodating , , and general classes to facilitate overnight and extended travel. Passenger usage reflects demand for affordable connectivity to familial, business, and religious destinations, with peaks during festivals and seasons. Historical and reported patterns indicate consistent utilization for inter-state migration and return travel, though specific occupancy rates for these trains are not publicly itemized by ; broader networks report varying load factors influenced by seasonal surges. Demographics skew toward middle- and lower-middle-class individuals, including families and group travelers, with a notable contingent of Hindu pilgrims (kar sevaks) en route to sites like , , and in . Accounts from operations, including pre-2002 runs, highlight this component, comprising volunteers and devotees alongside routine passengers from Gujarat's urban and rural populations. Detailed breakdowns by , , or remain unavailable in official records, underscoring the trains' role in regional cultural and devotional mobility.

Technical Specifications

Coach Composition and Capacity

The Sabarmati Express (train numbers 19167/19168) operates with a rake typically comprising 22 to 23 coaches, reflecting standard Indian Railways configurations for long-distance mail/express trains maintained by the Western Railway zone. The composition generally includes one luggage-cum-brake van (SLR) at each end, two to three unreserved general second-sitting (GS) coaches, one first-class air-conditioned (1A, designated H1), two second-class air-conditioned (2A, A1 and A2), three to six third-class air-conditioned (3A, B-series), eight sleeper class (SL, S-series), and a pantry car (often PWR for power and brake van with pantry facilities). This arrangement prioritizes non-air-conditioned sleeper and general coaches to accommodate higher volumes of economy-class passengers on the extended route. Sleeper class coaches, which form the bulk of the non-AC accommodation, utilize conventional ICF () design with 72 berths per coach—arranged as six bays with three tiers (lower, middle, upper) on each side of a central aisle, plus two transverse lower berths at each end. Third AC coaches seat 64 passengers in a similar three-tier but with air-conditioning, while second AC offers 46 berths in two tiers plus side lower/upper. The first AC coach provides 18-24 private coupe-style accommodations. Unreserved GS coaches hold approximately 100-120 passengers on bench seating without reservations. Total train capacity exceeds 1,500 passengers, though actual occupancy often surpasses nominal berths due to waitlisted travel and overcrowding in non-AC sections.
Coach TypeDesignationNominal Capacity (Passengers)Key Features
First ACH118-24Private coupes/rooms, full , attendant service
Second ACA1, A246 eachTwo-tier berths + side lowers, , curtains for privacy
Third ACB-series64 eachThree-tier berths, , shared aisles
Sleeper ClassS-series72 eachThree-tier berths, non-, fans/lights, basic bedding
General Second SittingGS100-120 eachUnreserved bench seating, non-, high turnover
In the context of the 2002 Godhra incident, the targeted S-6 coach was a standard class unit with a reserved berthing capacity of 72, though it was reported as overcrowded on that journey. Rake compositions are subject to periodic modifications for maintenance, demand, or policy changes, such as reductions in coaches to add variants, but the core emphasis remains on affordable non-AC travel for the train's primary demographic.

Traction and Locomotive Details

The Sabarmati Express (train numbers 19167/19168) operates on broad gauge tracks equipped with 25 kV 50 Hz AC overhead electrification, enabling electric traction for the majority of its 1,594 km route from to City. The train is typically hauled by a based at the Electric Loco Shed, which takes over for the western sections including the Godhra- leg. The WAP-7 features a , delivers 6,350 horsepower, and supports maximum speeds of 140 km/h, suitable for hauling the 's formation of up to 24 coaches including air-conditioned and variants. In northern sections originating from , such as around Junction, diesel locomotives like the WDM-3D class from Diesel Loco Shed may be employed where is incomplete or during transitions, providing 3,100-3,300 horsepower via a Co-Co configuration for mixed passenger-freight duties. Progressive efforts by have minimized usage, with full end-to-end electric haulage achieved in recent years through locomotives interchanged at major junctions like or . The western portion, including the route through where the 2002 incident occurred, has utilized electric traction since the 1990s, reflecting early electrification priorities on high-density Western Railway lines. changes occur at sheds like for maintenance and efficiency, ensuring reliable power delivery across varying gradients and load conditions.

Operational Features Including Reversals and Rake Sharing

The Sabarmati Express (train numbers 19167/68) requires an engine reversal at Bina Junction during its journey from to , necessitated by the track layout where the line diverges northward toward after arriving from the south via . This procedure involves detaching the locomotive, repositioning it to the opposite end of the rake, and reattaching it, typically during a scheduled halt of approximately 20-30 minutes to accommodate the maneuver without excessive delay. Such reversals are standard for express trains on this corridor to maintain directional efficiency amid junction constraints. The operates under a rake-sharing system with multiple companion services from , including the Ahmedabad-Darbhanga Sabarmati Express (19165/66), Ahmedabad-Gorakhpur Express (19489/90), and Swarna Jayanti Superfast Express (12917/18), enabling coordinated deployment of coaching stock across overlapping initial segments of their routes. This arrangement, managed by Railway, allows to be utilized sequentially—completing one service before immediately servicing another—thereby reducing idle periods, optimizing maintenance cycles at Sabarmati or depots, and enhancing overall fleet efficiency amid high demand on the Ahmedabad-Delhi main line. Rake composition may vary slightly between sharers, with verification recommended at boarding stations due to occasional adjustments for specific runs.

Historical Background

Inception and Early Operations (1990s–2001)

The , a long-distance operated by , was introduced in 1975 under Railway Minister to connect in with in , later extended to to serve growing demand for travel between and the Gangetic plains. The service initially ran with steam locomotives, such as class WG engines observed hauling it through in the late , reflecting the transitional phase of ' motive power before widespread diesel and electric adoption. By the 1990s, the train had stabilized as a key corridor for migrant workers, pilgrims, and families linking Gujarat's industrial hubs with and , operating on a route spanning approximately 1,600 kilometers with halts at major junctions like , , , , and . Diesel locomotives, primarily WDM-2 and WAP series classes, powered most sections, with the Ahmedabad-Vadodara segment electrified earlier and using electric traction from the train's early years, enabling average speeds of 40-50 km/h despite frequent stops and mixed freight-passenger priorities on single lines. The consist typically included 18-22 coaches, comprising second-class sleepers, general unreserved compartments, and limited air-conditioned options, accommodating up to 1,500-1,800 passengers per trip on bi- or tri-weekly frequencies. Operations through the late 1990s and into 2001 remained routine, with no major derailments or disruptions recorded on this service prior to , though the route's vulnerability to seasonal , track maintenance, and overcrowding—common to express trains—occasionally caused delays of 4-6 hours. Passenger demographics skewed toward lower-middle-class travelers, including visiting eastern kin or religious sites, underscoring the train's role in regional amid India's liberalization-era migration patterns.

Post-2002 Adjustments and Modernization

Following the Godhra incident on February 27, 2002, rail operations in , including the Sabarmati Express, faced temporary suspension amid widespread communal violence, with all traffic through halted except for the affected train to facilitate investigations and relief efforts. Services resumed in the ensuing weeks with reinforced security protocols enforced by , prioritizing trains carrying pilgrims or traversing sensitive routes like the Sabarmati Express. These measures included augmented deployments of (RPF) and (GRP) personnel, stricter verification of passenger manifests, and heightened vigilance at halts such as . Accountability for security lapses was emphasized post-incident, exemplified by the dismissal of GRP officers assigned to the Sabarmati Express who failed to board on February 27, 2002; the upheld these terminations in May 2025, affirming that their presence might have mitigated the tragedy and reinforcing mandatory on-board policing as a standard adjustment. Over the following two decades, technical modernization aligned the Sabarmati Express with ' fleet-wide upgrades, notably the replacement of conventional (ICF) coaches with safer Linke-Hofmann-Busch (LHB) designs, which feature bodies, anti-telescoping couplers, and improved fire-retardant materials to enhance and evacuation efficiency. These LHB conversions, initiated network-wide in the early and accelerated after safety audits, were completed for the Sabarmati Express by the late 2010s, as evidenced by its composition during the 2024 derailment where 20 LHB coaches derailed but remained structurally intact, minimizing casualties. traction also evolved with of key sections, shifting from to electric WAP-series engines for better efficiency and reduced emissions, though the train retains diesel compatibility for non-electrified stretches.

The 2002 Godhra Incident

Sequence of Events on February 27, 2002

The Sabarmati Express train No. 9175, en route from to with around 1,700 passengers including Hindu karsevaks returning from , arrived at railway station at approximately 7:43 AM, delayed by over four hours due to operational issues. Upon halting, an altercation broke out on the platform between some karsevaks in coach S-6 and Muslim tea vendors, stemming from disputes over unpaid tea bills and escalating to allegations of toward a vendor's sister, prompting calls for retaliation from nearby Muslim residents. The train departed the station around 8:00 AM but came to a stop about 700 meters away after the emergency chain was pulled multiple times, reportedly by members of or in response to the growing unrest. A of 1,000 to 2,000 individuals, largely from the adjacent Signal Falia Muslim neighborhood known for prior communal tensions, rapidly converged on the stationary train, pelting it with stones and bricks, shattering windows particularly on coach S-6, and attempting to uncouple coaches. Eyewitness accounts from passengers and railway staff described coordinated aggression, with armed with makeshift weapons and blocking escape routes. Conspirators within the mob poured an estimated 140 liters of petrol—purchased from nearby pumps earlier that morning and transported in containers via auto-rickshaws and a —through broken windows and into the between coaches S-5 and S-6, igniting the with burning rags or fireballs around 8:10-8:15 AM. The resulting quickly engulfed S-6, fueled by the highly inflammable and trapped by locked or obstructed doors, leading to intense smoke and fire that prevented most occupants from escaping despite attempts to break open exits. Forensic evidence, including burn patterns starting from the floor level and traces of petrol, supported external ignition rather than internal accident. Surviving passengers from adjacent coaches tried to douse the flames and rescue trapped individuals, but the mob's continued assault hampered efforts until railway police and fire services arrived around 8:30 AM, by which time the coach was fully ablaze. The incident claimed 59 lives—primarily women, children, and karsevaks—through burning and asphyxiation, with 48 bodies recovered from S-6. The and the special court, in its 2011 judgment convicting 31 individuals of conspiracy under POTA, characterized the attack as a deliberate plot hatched overnight by local Islamist elements targeting the karsevaks due to resentment over the Ram temple movement, dismissing alternative narratives of or passenger provocation as unsupported by evidence.

Immediate Aftermath and Casualties

The fire engulfing coaches S-5, S-6, and S-7 of the Sabarmati Express on February 27, 2002, resulted in 59 deaths, primarily from burns and asphyxiation, with victims consisting of 32 men, 27 women, and 10 children, the majority being Hindu pilgrims (kar sevaks) returning from . An additional 48 passengers suffered injuries, mostly severe burns requiring medical treatment. Local Government Railway Police (GRP) personnel at station, numbering around 15-20, initially attempted to control the mob of approximately 2,000 assailants and secure the site but were outnumbered and armed only with lathis. Firefighting units arrived within 20-30 minutes, deploying water tenders to combat the blaze, which forensic evidence later indicated was accelerated by roughly 60 liters of flammable liquid poured from outside. efforts extracted some survivors through windows and doors, though intense heat, smoke, and external stone-pelting impeded access to those trapped inside. By late morning, the fire was brought under control, and the unaffected coaches were detached under , proceeding to with the recovered bodies for postmortem examination and identification, a decision made by railway officials and local administration amid escalating tensions. This transport of charred remains contributed to immediate communal unrest in , though site-specific operations focused on body recovery and evidence preservation.

Forensic and Eyewitness Evidence

The Laboratory (FSL) analysis of coach S/6 determined that the was ignited using petrol as the , with approximately 60 liters of the poured onto the floor and seats from outside the coach. patterns indicated the entered primarily through broken doors and windows on the side, ruling out an internal accidental origin such as a cooking or , as no such residues or ignition sources were found inside. The FSL report, prepared under expert examination, supported the conclusion of deliberate external pouring, consistent with the rapid spread and intensity of the blaze that trapped passengers. Eyewitness accounts from survivors and platform observers described a of around 1,000 to 2,000 individuals, predominantly local , assembling near station after the train's scheduled halt, pulling the emergency chain to stop it approximately 100 meters beyond the platform. Multiple testimonies reported the pelting stones, breaking windows and the connection between coaches S/5 and S/6, and pouring a liquid—identified in corroborating statements as petrol—into the coach before igniting it with fireballs or lit rags around 7:50 a.m. on February 27, 2002. These observations, including from Muslim witnesses like Ilyas Husain Mulla who escaped the coach, aligned with physical evidence of external attack points and contradicted claims of spontaneous internal . Survivor recollections emphasized premeditated aggression triggered by altercations at the station, with the mob targeting Hindu pilgrims (karsevaks) returning from .

Investigations and Legal Outcomes of Godhra

Nanavati-Mehta Commission Findings

The concluded in its September 2008 report that the fire in coach S-6 of the Sabarmati Express on , , resulted from a deliberate, pre-planned aimed at harming the Hindu kar sevaks (pilgrims) aboard, rather than an accidental blaze originating inside the coach. The rejected theories of or internal causes, such as cooking stoves or passenger quarrels escalating to arson, determining instead that the attack was orchestrated by local elements in to target the train carrying returnees from . Forensic analysis and eyewitness accounts supported the finding that inflammable liquid—identified as approximately 140 liters of petrol purchased the night prior—was poured from outside into the coach via and broken windows after the train was forcibly stopped at Signal Falia, about 500 meters from station. Burn patterns showed the fire spread rapidly from the floor upward, consistent with external dousing rather than internal ignition, with residues indicating deliberate pouring rather than splashing from bottles alone. The commission noted that doors were pried open from outside, enabling attackers to access and lock inner doors, trapping passengers. Evidence pointed to a mobilized of 1,000 to 1,500 individuals, predominantly local armed with stones, petrol bombs, swords, and acid, who assembled swiftly after the train's halt, blocking tracks with boulders and cutting the pipe to hinder escape. The highlighted premeditation through prior procurement of from nearby pumps and coordination by figures including timber merchant Nanu Kalandar and cleric Maulvi Umarji, who allegedly incited the crowd via mosque announcements. While broader links to Pakistan's (ISI) were suspected based on statements about external and , the emphasized the primary role of Godhra's local Muslim community in executing the plot. The findings underscored failures in local intelligence and rapid response, attributing the incident's scale to inadequate railway and preparedness despite prior tensions over the train's kar sevaks, but cleared state-level officials of in the burning itself. This contrasted with alternative inquiries, such as the U.C. Banerjee Committee, which posited an accidental origin, though the commission critiqued such views for ignoring and testimonies from over 200 witnesses, including railway staff and survivors.

Court Verdicts and Convictions

In February 2011, a special in convicted 31 individuals in the case, sentencing 11 to death and 20 to under Sections 302 () and 120B () of the , for orchestrating a premeditated attack involving the procurement and pouring of 60 liters of petrol into the S-6 coach of the Sabarmati Express. The acquitted 63 others, citing insufficient of direct involvement, and determined the fire was not accidental but a deliberate act by a conspiracy-laden mob that surrounded the train and targeted the coach carrying Hindu pilgrims. This verdict relied on forensic of external fuel ignition, eyewitness testimonies, and confessions, rejecting claims of an internal short-circuit or . The , in its October 2017 judgment, upheld the convictions of all 31 accused, affirming the trial court's finding of a but commuting the 11 death sentences to without remission, based on the absence of the "rarest of rare" criteria for despite the premeditated nature of the attack that killed 59 people. The division bench emphasized unimpeachable evidence, including scientific analysis confirming petrol as the poured from outside the coach, and dismissed appeals challenging the charge. As of October 2025, the has not delivered a final verdict on pending appeals from the convicts seeking acquittal and from the government seeking restoration of death penalties for key conspirators; however, interim rulings have upheld the evidentiary basis of the convictions, with the court in May 2025 questioning claims of by one convict and noting the "unimpeached" nature of prosecution evidence. In 2023, the granted to eight life-term convicts after over two decades in custody, citing prolonged trial delays, while denying bail to others involved in the initial mob violence. Separately, in April 2025, a Juvenile Justice Board convicted three individuals, tried as juveniles at the time of the incident, to three years' imprisonment each for their roles in the , marking the resolution of ancillary proceedings 23 years later.

Dissenting Reports and Alternative Narratives

The Justice U.C. Banerjee Committee, constituted by the Union on September 4, 2004, under Minister , submitted an interim report in January 2005 and a final report on March 3, 2006, asserting that the fire in coach S/6 of the Sabarmati Express was accidental and not the result of a deliberate external or . The committee's analysis, based on forensic examination of burn patterns and witness statements, proposed that the blaze originated internally from a cooking stove used by passengers or an electrical , dismissing claims of petrol being poured from outside as unsupported by physical . It further criticized the railway authorities for inadequate preservation of , such as the rapid disposal of the gutted coach without proper . Supporters of the Banerjee findings, including the Communist Party of India (Marxist), hailed the report as debunking the "conspiracy theory" advanced by the state government, attributing the incident instead to a spontaneous escalation from a altercation involving kar sevaks and Muslim vendors rather than premeditated by a mob. Justice himself reaffirmed the report's conclusions in 2011, maintaining that scientific inquiry supported an internal origin for the fire despite conflicting narratives. The report faced immediate legal invalidation when the , in a ruling on October 13, 2006, declared the committee's formation unconstitutional and , citing interference with the ongoing probe and sub-judice criminal trials, thereby quashing its proceedings and recommendations. Critics contended that the inquiry was politically engineered to undermine the BJP's account amid the 2004-2009 government's efforts to challenge Gujarat's handling of the post-Godhra , eroding public trust in its evidentiary basis given contradictions with eyewitness testimonies of external attackers and forensic traces of inflammable liquids. Beyond the Banerjee Committee, fringe alternative narratives advanced by select activists and outlets have portrayed the fire as an unintended consequence of onboard quarrels spilling onto the , without organized of or coordination, though these views have not produced independent forensic corroboration and were rejected in judicial proceedings that convicted 31 individuals of and murder based on confessions, material , and burn pattern indicating deliberate external ignition.

Recent Incidents and Safety Concerns

2024 Kanpur Derailment

On August 17, 2024, at approximately 2:35 a.m., the of train number 19168, the Sabarmati Express traveling from to , struck a large object placed on the tracks between and Bhimsen stations in , causing 20 to 22 coaches to derail near station. No injuries or fatalities were reported among the passengers, despite the derailment's scale, which damaged the and disrupted rail services in the area. Railway authorities, including Minister , indicated that evidence suggested the object—a or chunk of rail track—was deliberately placed, prompting suspicions of rather than accidental failure. The reported a sharp from the , which led to the sequence. A investigation team, including the Special Accident Investigation (SAG) unit, examined the site and concluded that the placement appeared intentional, with track locks found nearby but no immediate evidence of mechanical issues in the . The incident led to the diversion and cancellation of several trains, with restoration efforts completing within hours, though it heightened concerns over track security amid a pattern of similar suspected interferences in Indian railways. Police registered a case to probe potential foul play, but as of late August 2024, no arrests or definitive perpetrators had been identified in public reports. This event echoed vulnerabilities exposed in prior rail disruptions, underscoring the need for enhanced surveillance on high-traffic corridors.

2025 Derailment Events

On August 1, 2025, the Muzaffarpur-Sabarmati Jan Sadharan Express (train number 15269), en route from Muzaffarpur in Bihar to Ahmedabad in Gujarat, derailed near Bhaupur station yard in Uttar Pradesh around 4:15 p.m. local time. The incident involved two coaches, including one trolley coach, derailing in the loop line as the train entered line number 4 from Panki station toward Bhaupur. The train was traveling at low speed at the time, which officials attributed to the controlled nature of the derailment within the station yard. Railway authorities confirmed no injuries among passengers or crew, with all individuals reported safe following immediate evacuation efforts. Rescue and technical teams were mobilized to the site, initiating track restoration and assessment of the derailed coaches. The event caused temporary disruptions to rail traffic in the area, though preliminary reports indicated no evidence of external interference or in this specific case. officials conducted an initial probe focusing on track conditions and operational factors within the yard.

Suspected Sabotage and Security Implications

In recent years, has faced a surge in suspected attempts aimed at causing derailments, with investigations revealing deliberate placement of obstacles on tracks or tampering with . For instance, on September 9, 2024, the Kalindi Express narrowly avoided derailment near , , after striking an LPG cylinder intentionally placed on the tracks, accompanied by a petrol bottle and matchboxes suggestive of an incendiary plot. Local detained over two dozen individuals and questioned more than 100, while the (NIA) examined potential terror linkages. Similar incidents proliferated in 2024, including the October Bagmati Express crash in , where a probe confirmed via the forcible removal of nuts, bolts, and fittings at a switch point, resulting in and collision with a stationary goods train. From June 2023 to September 2024, at least 24 such efforts were documented nationwide, involving items like bicycles, iron rods, and cement blocks, often in and other high-traffic corridors. State police registered 82 cases of tampering or in 2024 alone, prompting railway officials to attribute many to coordinated malice rather than accidents. Extending into 2025, attempts persisted, such as the May 20 incident in , , where wooden blocks and earthing wires were found on tracks targeting the Rajdhani and Express trains, and a event in involving detected track tampering by vigilant staff. These followed at least seven thwarted efforts in by mid-2025, including metal doors and other obstructions. The security implications are profound, exposing vulnerabilities in an extensive network spanning over 68,000 kilometers with limited real-time monitoring in remote sections. Such acts risk mass casualties, akin to the 2002 arson on the Sabarmati Express, where a court-verified led to 59 deaths and triggered widespread unrest. In response, authorities have intensified NIA inquiries into terror angles, deployed advanced surveillance like AI-driven track inspections, and bolstered patrolling, yet official assessments note that not all cases yield conclusive sabotage evidence, underscoring challenges in attribution amid potential lone-actor or low-tech threats. Persistent incidents signal a need for fortified perimeter security and rapid-response protocols to mitigate causal chains from tampering to catastrophe.

Cultural and Societal Impact

Role in Broader Communal Tensions

The incident involving the Sabarmati Express on February 27, 2002, served as the immediate catalyst for the , igniting widespread retaliatory violence that resulted in 1,044 deaths, predominantly (790) and (254), alongside 223 missing and 2,500 injured, according to official state figures. The attack, in which a mob poured petrol into coaches S-5 and S-6 and set them ablaze, killing 59 s—mostly Hindu kar sevaks (volunteers) returning from —exposed acute vulnerabilities in Hindu-Muslim relations, transforming a localized confrontation into a statewide that spread to cities like , , and within hours. The , appointed by the , determined through eyewitness accounts, forensic evidence of external inflammables, and confessions that the was a premeditated orchestrated by a 1,000-2,000 strong Muslim mob, rather than a spontaneous reaction to passenger provocations, thereby framing it as an unprovoked assault on Hindu pilgrims that fueled perceptions of existential threat among the majority community. This event amplified pre-existing communal fault lines rooted in the dispute, where the kar sevaks aboard the train had participated in rituals advocating the construction of a at the site of the demolished in 1992, a that had already strained interfaith dynamics nationwide. The timing—mere months after the state assembly elections and amid heightened Hindu nationalist mobilization—intensified narratives of demographic insecurity among , portraying the burning as emblematic of Islamist aggression against symbolic assertions of Hindu identity, a view substantiated by the commission's findings of local political instigation involving figures like Maulvi Husain Umarji. In contrast, reports from human rights organizations like attributed the subsequent riots primarily to state complicity and Hindu nationalist groups such as the , often minimizing the conspiracy while emphasizing disproportionate Muslim casualties, though such analyses have been critiqued for selective framing that overlooks the trigger's in eliciting mob fury. The incident thus underscored causal chains in , where an initial targeted attack provoked asymmetrical retaliation, deepening mutual distrust and reinforcing segregated living patterns in Gujarat's urban areas. Longer-term, the Sabarmati Express episode entrenched the Godhra narrative in Indian political discourse, bolstering Hindu-majority consolidation under parties like the Bharatiya Janata Party while alienating Muslim communities, who reported heightened marginalization and economic boycotts in riot-affected regions. Empirical data post-2002 indicates a relative decline in large-scale riots in Gujarat compared to prior decades, attributed by state officials to improved law enforcement and development initiatives, yet surveys reveal persistent perceptual divides: Hindus viewing Godhra as a jihadist plot, and Muslims perceiving the riots as a pogrom, hindering reconciliation efforts. Court verdicts upholding convictions for the train burning—31 guilty in the 2011 trial, later adjusted on appeal—provided judicial validation for the conspiracy thesis, countering alternative narratives of accident or fabrication propagated in some academic and media circles, though source credibility varies, with state-commissioned probes facing accusations of bias from left-leaning outlets. Overall, the incident exemplified how singular acts of violence can crystallize broader tensions, perpetuating cycles of grievance and vigilance in India's pluralistic society without resolution through impartial historical reckoning.

Media and Political Representations

The of the Sabarmati Express on February 27, 2002, which killed Hindu pilgrims, elicited polarized media coverage, with initial reports oscillating between accidental fire theories and evidence of by an external mob armed with petrol. Forensic analysis by the Forensic Science Laboratory in confirmed the fire was set deliberately from outside the coach using approximately 60 liters of flammable liquid, supporting premeditation, yet some English-language outlets emphasized intra-train conflicts or spontaneous escalation to contextualize it within broader communal friction. This framing, recurrent in international coverage from outlets like the , often subordinated the incident's to critiques of the subsequent , reflecting a pattern where empirical details of the attack were downplayed amid narratives prioritizing state complicity allegations against the BJP government. Controversial investigations further shaped representations; magazine's 2002 report, The Truth: Gujarat 2002, alleged through undercover stings that Hindu nationalists provoked the mob and fabricated evidence, but these claims unraveled under scrutiny, with key accusers recanting and the operation tainted by ethical lapses and unverified tapes, underscoring selective sourcing in activist journalism. In contrast, Gujarati-language dailies such as Sandesh and published vivid, unverified eyewitness accounts of the assault, which, while aligning with later court findings of , were criticized for inflammatory language that exacerbated tensions. Recent cinematic depictions, notably the 2024 film The Sabarmati Report, reassert the incident as a covered-up Islamist based on the Nanavati-Mehta Commission's conclusions of a planned , countering perceived historical omissions in mainstream narratives. Politically, the (BJP) has invoked the event as emblematic of targeted violence against Hindus, issuing a 2002 resolution condemning it as a "ghastly" disruption of social harmony by forces opposed to Ram Sevak pilgrims, and integrating it into discourses on national security and anti-appeasement. Prime Minister , then Chief Minister, endorsed The Sabarmati Report in November 2024, stating it illuminated suppressed truths about the burning. Opposition parties, including , have navigated the incident cautiously; a 2019 government educational reference book asserted the conspiracy involved local Congress-elected members from , citing their role in mobilizing the mob, though this claim stems from state-aligned inquiry and lacks independent corroboration beyond witness statements. Congress figures have periodically referenced Godhra-like risks in political rhetoric, as when leader warned of potential repeats in in January 2024, prompting BJP demands for accountability and highlighting partisan instrumentalization. Such representations often reflect underlying ideological divides, with BJP emphasizing causal Islamist agency per judicial verdicts—where 11 were convicted of conspiracy in 2011, upheld by the in 2017—against opposition tendencies to embed the event within riot-response indictments, despite courts exonerating state orchestration.

Lessons for Railway Security

The absence of (GRP) personnel assigned to the Sabarmati Express on February 27, 2002, contributed to the vulnerability of the train to mob attack, as nine constables skipped their duties by boarding another train instead, a lapse upheld by the in 2025 as potentially avertable had they been present. This underscores the necessity for strict enforcement of duties on trains traversing communally sensitive routes, with mandatory verification of personnel deployment to deter opportunistic assaults. Rapid response to unauthorized train halts is critical, as the Sabarmati Express was stopped approximately 100 meters from station via misuse of the emergency chain, enabling a to surround and ignite coach S-6 with inflammable liquids. protocols must prioritize immediate patrolling and dispersal upon such stops, including equipping guards with communication tools for swift coordination with station authorities and local police to prevent escalation from gatherings into violence. Intelligence failures exacerbated the incident, with inadequate monitoring of local tensions despite prior clashes involving kar sevaks at station; enhanced preemptive surveillance, including and CCTV at platforms, could mitigate risks in areas prone to communal friction. Post-event analyses highlight the value of integrated intelligence-sharing between GRP, (RPF), and state police to identify threats like premeditated conspiracies targeting specific passenger groups. Structural vulnerabilities in coach design amplified fatalities, as the fire spread rapidly in the wooden-floored S-6 coach; subsequent adoption of Linke-Hofmann-Busch (LHB) coaches with steel bodies and fire-retardant materials by addressed this, reducing burn risks in sabotage scenarios. Additionally, limiting emergency chain accessibility or integrating GPS-linked alerts has been proposed to curb misuse facilitating ambushes. The event revealed gaps in RPF capabilities during mob confrontations, though three constables' firing dispersed part of the 1,000-strong crowd; bolstering RPF training in crowd control and arming protocols, alongside amendments expanding RPF strength by over 6,000 posts, emphasizes proactive asset protection over reactive measures. Overall, prioritizing layered security—personnel vigilance, technological safeguards, and localized threat assessment—remains essential to counter sabotage amid persistent communal undercurrents.

References

  1. [1]
    Western Railway - Ministry of Railways
    19165/19166 and 19167/19168 Ahmedabad- Darbhanga - Ahamedabad and Ahmedabad- Varanasi-Ahmedabad, Sabarmati Express. Location, Ahmedabad division. Tender Fee ...
  2. [2]
    Sabarmati Express 19167 Time Table - RailYatri
    Rating 4.4 (1,293,173) 19167-Sabarmati Express , departs usually from AHMEDABAD JN at 23:10. It takes almost 35hr 5 min for the journey as per the train time-table.
  3. [3]
    [PDF] R E P O R T The Commission of Inquiry
    Sep 18, 2008 · A ghastly incident of fire in coach S/6 of Sabarmati Express train happened in the morning of 27-2-2002, near Godhra railway station, ...
  4. [4]
    India Godhra train blaze verdict: 31 convicted - BBC News
    Feb 22, 2011 · A special court in the western Indian state of Gujarat has found 31 people guilty of setting fire to a passenger train in the town of Godhra in 2002.
  5. [5]
    2002 Godhra train burning case: SC rejects plea for 3-judge bench ...
    May 6, 2025 · The Supreme Court has dismissed objections from convicts in the 2002 Godhra train burning case regarding the composition of the bench hearing their appeals.
  6. [6]
    Sabarmati Express accident: Deliberate rail placement suspected ...
    Aug 20, 2024 · A joint probe into the derailment of the Varanasi City-Ahmedabad Express in Kanpur suspected deliberate rail chunk placement on the track.
  7. [7]
    19167 train Sabarmati Exp - Coach position - Train Chart
    19167 starts from Ahmedabad ADI (AHMEDABAD JN) at 23:10 and reaches Varanasi BCY (VARANASI CITY) at 10:15 covering a distance of 1594 kms and 53 stations. 19167 ...
  8. [8]
    19167 SABARMATI EXP Train Route - eRail.in
    19167 SABARMATI EXP Route ; 1, Ahmedabad Jn, First ; 2, Maninagar, 23.18 ; 3, Mahemadavad Kheda Road, 23.40 ; 4, Nadiad Jn, 23.55 ; 5, Anand Jn, 00.10 ...
  9. [9]
    19167/Ahmedabad - Varanasi City Sabarmati Express (PT)
    Show ALL intermediate Stations ; ADI Ahmedabad Jn ; MAN Maninagar ; MHD Mahemdavad Kheda Road ; ND Nadiad Jn ; ANND Anand Jn.
  10. [10]
    Route Map of SABARMATI EXP (19167) - etrain.info
    1. AHMEDABAD JN0 · 2. MANINAGAR4 · 3. MHMDVD KHEDA RD29 · 4. NADIAD JN46 · 5. ANAND JN64 · 6. CHHAYAPURI96 · 7. GODHRA JN163 · 8. DAHOD237.
  11. [11]
    19166/65 Sabarmati Express Route, Schedule, Time Table, & More
    Jul 3, 2025 · The Sabarmati Express, operating with train numbers 19165 and 19166, runs between Ahmedabad Junction in Gujarat and Darbhanga Junction in Bihar.
  12. [12]
    19167 Train Route and Schedule - sabarmati exp - ConfirmTkt.com
    Rating 4.8 (1,104,530) SABARMATI EXP 19167 train passes through 53 major stations in 3 days to reach from Ahmedabad Junction to Varanasi City . It takes total of 35:5 hours ...
  13. [13]
    Ahmedabad - Darbhanga Sabarmati Express (PT)/19165 Time ...
    Ahmedabad - Darbhanga Sabarmati Express (PT)/19165 (offers Premium Tatkal tickets) Train Time Table Departs @ 23:10 Arrives @ 19:05 Journey Time:43h 55m 63 ...
  14. [14]
    Sabarmati Express 19165 Time Table - RailYatri
    Rating 4.4 (1,293,173) 19165-Sabarmati Express , departs usually from AHMEDABAD JN at 23:10. It takes almost 43hr 55 min for the journey as per the train time-table.
  15. [15]
    19165 Sabarmati Exp Train Route, Schedule, Time Table - Ixigo
    Rating 4.6 (3,531,595) · Free · TravelIt starts from Ahmedabad Jn station and ends at Darbhanga Jn. Due to its 65 stoppage stations, the total time taken by this train is around -4hr 5min. You can ...Missing: halts | Show results with:halts
  16. [16]
    19165 Train Time Table – Check Schedule, Route & Timings
    Sabarmati Exp 19165 Timings & Schedule ; AHMEDABAD JN · -- 23:10 ; MANINAGAR · 23:18 23:20 ; MHMDVD KHEDA RD · 23:40 23:42 ; NADIAD JN · 23:55 23:57 ; ANAND JN · 00:10 00 ...<|separator|>
  17. [17]
    19166 SABARMATI EXP Train Route - eRail.in
    19166 SABARMATI EXP Route ; 1, Darbhanga Jn, First ; 2, Laheria Sarai, 04.38 ; 3, Samastipur Jn, 05.30 ; 4, Muzaffarpur Jn, 06.55 ; 5, Hajipur Jn, 07.50 ...Missing: frequency | Show results with:frequency
  18. [18]
    19166 Sabarmati Exp Train Schedule & Route Details - RailYatri
    (19166) The Sabarmati Exp train runs between Darbhanga Jn (DBG) to Ahmedabad Jn (ADI). The 19166 Sabarmati Exp train leaves Darbhanga Jn at 04:30 hours and ...Missing: frequency | Show results with:frequency
  19. [19]
    19165 SABARMATI EXP Train Running Status - MakeMyTrip
    Rating 4.6 (1,960,035) Currently, 19165 Ahmedabad - Darbhanga Sabarmati Express operates on 3 days a week on Sun, Wed, Fri. It operates from AHMEDABAD JN (ADI) to DARBHANGA JN (DBG).
  20. [20]
    19165 Sabarmati Express Train Schedule & Route Details - RailYatri
    19165 - Sabarmati Express ; Malipur (MLPR). 05:18. 05:20 ; Shahganj Jn (SHG). 06:40. 06:50 ; Khorason Road (KRND). 07:28. 07:30 ; Sarai Mir (SMZ). 07:40. 07:42.
  21. [21]
    19165 Train Route and Schedule - sabarmati exp - ConfirmTkt.com
    Rating 4.8 (1,104,530) Train 19165 SABARMATI EXP runs from Ahmedabad Junction(ADI) to Darbhanga Junction(DBG) on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday. Train ...
  22. [22]
    19167 Sabarmati Express Train Schedule & Route Details - RailYatri
    The Sabarmati Express (19167) passes through 53 popular railway stations to reach Varanasi City (BCY). The entire train journey takes 35h 50m in total. The ...
  23. [23]
    Jammu Tawi - Sabarmati Express 19224 Time Table - RailYatri
    Rating 4.4 (1,293,173) 19224-Jammu Tawi - Sabarmati Express , departs usually from FIROZPUR CANT at 16:30. It takes almost 21hr 35 min for the journey as per the train time-table.<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    Most S-6 reserved passengers survived Godhra | India News
    Aug 19, 2002 · Eighty per cent of passengers with reserved berths in the S-6 coach of the Sabarmati Express, which was burnt at Godhra on February 27, survived the incident.Missing: demographics | Show results with:demographics
  25. [25]
    Genocide in Gujarat - Dissent Magazine
    On February 27, 2002, the Sabarmati express train arrived in the station of Godhra, in the state of Gujarat, bearing a large group of Hindu pilgrims.
  26. [26]
    Body of the Nation - Boston Review
    On February 27, 2002, the Sabarmati express train arrived in the station of Godhra, in the western Indian state of Gujarat, packed with Hindu pilgrims who were ...
  27. [27]
    19168/Varanasi City - Ahmedabad Sabarmati Express - India Rail Info
    Rake/Coach Position. 0. L. 1. SLR. 2. GS. 3. GS. 4. H1. 5. A1. 6. A2. 7. B1. 8. B2. 9. B3 ... Xing with 13238/Kota - Patna Express (via Ayodhya Cantt) | Fri. more ...
  28. [28]
    SL Sleeper Class - eRail.in
    These are regular sleeping coaches with three berths across the width and two longways, without air conditioning. It carries 72 passengers per coach. Sleeper ...
  29. [29]
    Classification On Coaches and Wagons in Indian Railways
    CC ,AC chair car: Coach has 3+2 seating arrangement with 73 seating capacity. SL, Sleeper class: The most common coach in IR with 72 passenger capacity in ICF ...
  30. [30]
    CC July 2002 -- Godse's Gujarat - Sabrang
    As far as coach S–6 of the Sabarmati Express is concerned, the reservation capacity is 72. However, it was jam–packed on that day. Only one coach (S–6) was ...
  31. [31]
    19168/Varanasi City - Ahmedabad Sabarmati Express - India Rail Info
    5, 7, 9, 10, 12, 14, 16, 17 एवं 19 जनवरी को अपने प्रारंभिक स्टेशन से चलने वाली गाड़ी संख्या 19167 अहमदाबाद-वाराणसी सिटी साबरमती एक्सप्रेस परिवर्तित मार्ग वाया मक्सी-संत हिरदाराम नगर-निशातपुरा-बीना होकर तथा 5, 6, 8 ...Missing: traction | Show results with:traction
  32. [32]
    Sabarmati Express - Facebook
    May 10, 2025 · Sabarmati Express Retrofitted with APU & GM style mounted DBR, Lucknow (LKO) WDM 3D # 11157 waiting for starter at Shahganj Jn with 19168 ...AC 3tier bogie B2. On informing the TC, our compartment was ...Sabarmati express route information - FacebookMore results from www.facebook.com
  33. [33]
    WP 7643 with the Sabarmati Express from Ahmedabad to Faizabad ...
    Aug 29, 2024 · The Ahmedabad - Vadodara portion of this train was on electric traction from the date of inauguration (I was at Ahmedabad then), but Vadodara ...Sabarmati express route information - FacebookSabarmati Express - FacebookMore results from www.facebook.com
  34. [34]
    Trains introduced by Railway Ministers - IRFCA.org
    1974, L N Mishra. Samastipur Jayanti Janata and other JJ trains. ; 1975-?, Kamalapati Tripathi. Sabarmati Express; Ganga-Kaveri Exp. Neelambari Exp. Varanasi Exp ...
  35. [35]
    Remembering Kamlapati Tripathi - Swapnil Sansar
    Following trains were introduced during his tenure Sabarmati Express-Ganga Kaveri Express Neelambari Express-Varanasi Express (Delhi-Lucknow Exp. extended)- ...
  36. [36]
    1970 - 1994 - [IRFCA] Indian Railways FAQ - IR History
    The first Shatabdi Express is introduced between New Delhi and Jhansi (later extended to Bhopal), and becomes the fastest train in the country. Feb. 1: Bombay- ...Missing: Sabarmati | Show results with:Sabarmati
  37. [37]
    Bullet trains better late than never - The Statesman
    Sep 14, 2017 · Just about the time fifty years ago that Japan pioneered the world's first 550 km high speed “bullet” train corridor between Tokyo and Osaka, ...
  38. [38]
    Rail traffic through Ahmedabad suspended | India News
    Feb 27, 2002 · AHMEDABAD: All rail traffic through Ahmedabad, except the ill-fated Sabarmati Express, was suspended on the orders of district collector K ...
  39. [39]
    Security heightened on 10th anniversary of Godhra carnage
    Feb 27, 2012 · Security has been stepped up in the city and Godhra town in wake of the 10th anniversary of the Sabarmati express train carnage, which ...
  40. [40]
    Their Sabarmati Express duty may have prevented 2002 tragedy
    May 2, 2025 · At least 59 passengers travelling in Sabarmati Express were killed when a mob set the S6 coach on fire near Godhra station at around 7:40 am on ...Missing: typical | Show results with:typical
  41. [41]
    2002: Godhra riots - Frontline - The Hindu
    Aug 15, 2022 · At 7.42 a.m. on February 27, 2002, the Sabarmati Express pulled into the station at Godhra. Among the passengers were karsevaks returning ...
  42. [42]
    Timeline of Godhra case - The New Indian Express
    May 16, 2012 · The timeline of events related to the 2002 Godhra train carnage case in Gujarat: Feb 27, 2002: 59 people killed as mob attacks S-6 coach of the Sabarmati ...
  43. [43]
    Chronology of Godhra train carnage case - Deccan Herald
    Feb 21, 2011 · 59 'karsevaks' die after S-6 coach of the Sabarmati Express torched by a mob near Godhra railway station. FIR filed against 1500 people.
  44. [44]
    No mastermind, but court upholds conspiracy theory - Times of India
    Feb 23, 2011 · The conspiracy charge almost collapsed when Umarji, who was accused of directing the attack, was declared innocent. The court convicted the 31 ...
  45. [45]
    godhra train burning - Times of India
    Oct 9, 2017 · MISCELLANEOUS News: The tragedy draws back with a fire in coach S6 of the Sabarmati Express on February 27, 2002, which ultimately killed 59 ...
  46. [46]
    Godhra bogie was burnt from inside: Report | India News
    Jul 3, 2002 · The mystery over the burning of the S-6 compartment of Sabarmati Express at Godhra has turned deeper with the forensic report discounting the possibility of ...
  47. [47]
    Nanavati report on Godhra: Four accounts on who decided to get ...
    Dec 13, 2019 · The Justice Nanavati-Mehta Commission report on 2002 Gujarat riots that was tabled in the Gujarat Assembly on Wednesday said that after the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  48. [48]
    India braces for religious violence - February 28, 2002 - CNN
    Feb 28, 2002 · Fearing sectarian riots, Indian authorities have stepped up security after more than 50 Hindus died in a train fire set by a suspected mob ...
  49. [49]
    Forensic lab gave 'clinching evidence' in Godhra case
    Feb 22, 2011 · The FSL, after detailed investigation, had concluded that the burning of the S-6 coach of the train was by using petrol. The FSL also stated ...
  50. [50]
    Godhra massacre: Forensic report come in handy for rival politicians
    Jul 22, 2002 · "The Forensic Science Laboratory report only indicates that there was deeper planning on the part of the attackers in the Godhra incident." - ...Missing: Dr. JH Shah
  51. [51]
    Godhra train burning: Eyewitnesses' version - Times of India
    Oct 22, 2005 · India News: Two eyewitnesses -- travelled on the ill-fated Sabarmati Express S-6 Coach -- say VHP men made the first move.
  52. [52]
    Godhra &ldquo;witness&rdquo; escapes to tell his story - The Hindu
    Feb 25, 2010 · Thirty-two-year-old Ilyas Husain Mulla is an eyewitness to the February 27, 2002 Godhra Sabarmati Express carnage.
  53. [53]
    Forgotten 59: Survivors Of Godhra Train Tragedy Break Their Silence
    Nov 16, 2024 · For the first time in 22 years, the survivors and families of victims of the tragic Sabarmati Express burning have broken their silence.
  54. [54]
    Godhra fire was a conspiracy: Nanavati panel - Times of India
    Sep 26, 2008 · India News: The Justice Nanavati commission report also absolved Gujarat CM Narendra Modi, his council of ministers and police officers of ...Missing: Mehta 1400
  55. [55]
    Nanavati Commission - 2002 Godhra Riots - Shankar IAS Parliament
    It concluded that the train burning was “pre-planned act” and done to “cause harm to the kar sevaks travelling in that coach”. The final report was submitted ...
  56. [56]
    One burning train, 3 judges, 3 versions | Ahmedabad News - Times ...
    The Nanavati-Mehta commission ... coach S-6 originated in the coach itself without any external input. ... from outside coach. "The 'inflammable liquid ...
  57. [57]
    How Siddharth Varadarajan lied about Godhra train burning incident
    Oct 20, 2022 · Siddharth Varadarajan added, “Two years on, the police cannot offer a credible account of how coach S-6 caught fire. ... from outside, for ...
  58. [58]
    India - State.gov
    Sep 13, 2011 · In September 2008 the Nanavati-Mehta Commission concluded that the Godhra incident was a conspiracy. At the end of the reporting period, the ...
  59. [59]
    Godhra verdict: 31 convicted, 63 acquitted - NDTV
    Mar 1, 2011 · A special court in Ahmedabad has given verdict in the 2002 Godhra train burning case, convicting 31 people under Section 302 and 120 B of the Indian Penal Code.
  60. [60]
    India hands down Godhra verdict | News - Al Jazeera
    Feb 22, 2011 · Court finds 31 people guilty of setting fire to a train in 2002, which sparked major religious violence in Gujarat.Missing: exact | Show results with:exact
  61. [61]
    Supreme Court to Hear Gujarat Govt, Convicts' Pleas in Godhra ...
    Apr 24, 2025 · The Gujarat High Court had in 2017 in its order had upheld a total of 31 convictions in the case and commuted the death penalties of the 11 ...
  62. [62]
    Supreme Court questions plea against conviction in Godhra case
    May 7, 2025 · The Supreme Court on Tuesday questioned Godhra train burning case convict Abdul Raheman Dhantiya's contention that he was not present at the scene of the ...Missing: verdict | Show results with:verdict
  63. [63]
    2002 Godhra train burning case: SC rejects convicts' plea against ...
    May 6, 2025 · Supreme Court rejects convicts' plea for three-judge Bench in Godhra train burning case, commences final hearing.
  64. [64]
    India Supreme Court grants bail to 8 life convicts in Godhra train ...
    Apr 21, 2023 · The Supreme Court of India Friday granted bail to eight life convicts in the 2002 Godhra train burning, which led to the death of at least 58 people.Missing: verdict | Show results with:verdict
  65. [65]
    3 juveniles in '02 Sabarmati Exp arson awarded 3 years' jail term
    Apr 9, 2025 · In 2002 Godhra train burning case, a Juvenile Justice Board sentenced three men to three years in jail, 14 years after 31 others were convicted.
  66. [66]
    Godhra train fire accidental: Banerjee report - Times of India
    Mar 4, 2006 · Submitting the final report of his findings, Justice Banerjee said the fire was not a result of a deliberate act.
  67. [67]
    what did bannerj committee's report say on Godhra - X
    The Justice U.C. Banerjee Committee, appointed by the Indian Ministry of Railways in 2004, investigated the Godhra train burning incident of February 27, ...
  68. [68]
    Godhra Interim Report - Communist Party Of India (Marxist)
    Aug 8, 2009 · Banerjee Committee probing the fire in the Sabarmati Express at Godhra in Gujarat on February 27, 2002 has nailed the lie of the Narendra Modi ...
  69. [69]
    Godhra carnage: Justice Banerjee stands by his findings | India News
    Feb 23, 2011 · Justice UC Banerjee,who had described the Godhra train carnage as “accidental”,on Wednesday said he will stand by his inquiry commission report “200 per cent” ...
  70. [70]
    Godhra: HC terms Banerjee panel illegal - Rediff.com
    Oct 13, 2006 · Following the verdict, the Bhartiya Janata Party has demanded the resignation of Railway Minister Lalu Prasad Yadav on moral grounds.
  71. [71]
    Panel probing Godhra riots illegal: HC | India News - Times of India
    AHMEDABAD: Gujarat High Court on Friday quashed ... Banerjee committee to probe the 2002 Godhra train burning incident and nullified its findings. ... Justice D N ...
  72. [72]
    The end of truth - The Banerjee report eroded the trust of people ...
    Jan 29, 2005 · Banerjee, disclosed the interim findings of his inquiry into the burning of the train at Godhra have done grave harm to the cause of truth.
  73. [73]
    Banerjee report is biased | Latest News India - Hindustan Times
    Mar 8, 2006 · Sanjay Uniyal from Delhi said, "The Banerjee Commission report is biased. Group of corrupt politicians of our country created this committee.
  74. [74]
    Godhra: An accident or a conspiracy? | IPCS
    Feb 8, 2005 · The Banerjee Railway Inquiry Committee claims that Godhra was an accident and there was no conspiracy, yet there is no consensus on accepting this result.<|separator|>
  75. [75]
    20 coaches of Sabarmati Express derail near Kanpur, no injuries ...
    Aug 17, 2024 · Evidence points to an object placed on the track that derailed the track, says Railways Minister. Updated - April 30, 2025 03:05 pm IST.
  76. [76]
    22 coaches of Sabarmati Express derail in UP after engine hits ...
    Aug 17, 2024 · According to Railways, Sabarmati Express 19168 derailed after hitting a boulder, causing significant damage to the engine's cattle guard. The ...Missing: reversals change
  77. [77]
    20 coaches of Sabarmati Express derail near Kanpur, Railways ...
    Aug 17, 2024 · Twenty coaches of the Ahmedabad-bound Sabarmati Express passenger train derailed near Govindpuri station in Kanpur early Saturday after the engine hit an “ ...
  78. [78]
    Sabarmati Express train derails | 'Foreign object' found on track ...
    Aug 16, 2024 · “The engine of Sabarmati Express (Varanasi to Amdavad) hit an object placed on the track and derailed near Kanpur at 02:35 am today," railway ...
  79. [79]
    Train Derailment: Railways' SAG team investigates Sabarmati ...
    Aug 21, 2024 · The Sabarmati Express derailed near Govindpuri station in Kanpur after its engine hit an object on the track, raising suspicions of sabotage. No ...
  80. [80]
    Sabarmati Express derailment: Check complete list of trains ... - Mint
    Aug 17, 2024 · As many as 20 coaches of the 19168 Sabarmati Express passenger train derailed near Govindpuri station in Kanpur during the wee hours of Saturday.
  81. [81]
    Muzaffarpur-Sabarmati Jan Sadharan express derails near Bhaupur ...
    Aug 1, 2025 · LUCKNOW: At around 4.15 pm, the Muzaffarpur-Sabarmati Jan Sadharan Express (15269), derailed at Bhaupur station yard.
  82. [82]
    Muzaffarpur-Sabarmati express derails near Kanpur, none hurt
    Aug 1, 2025 · Two coaches of the Muzaffarpur-Sabarmati JanSadharan Express derailed between Kanpur and Tundla in Uttar Pradesh on Friday (August 1, 2025), ...
  83. [83]
    Sabarmati Jansadharan Express train derails near Kanpur, railway ...
    Aug 1, 2025 · 15269) derailed while heading from Panki station towards Bhaulpur on Friday. The incident occurred while the train was entering line number 4.
  84. [84]
    Muzaffarpur-Sabarmati express derails near Kanpur in Uttar Pradesh
    Aug 1, 2025 · Two coaches, including one trolley coach, derailed in the loop line," the official said. PTI. Last Updated : 01 August 2025, 07:10 IST.
  85. [85]
    Gujarat-bound express train derails near Kanpur, track restoration ...
    Aug 1, 2025 · Two coaches of 15269 Sabarmati Janasadharan Express, travelling from Muzaffarpur in Bihar to Sabarmati in Gujarat, derailed while entering ...
  86. [86]
    Muzaffarpur-Sabarmati express derails near Kanpur in UP - ET Infra
    Aug 1, 2025 · Two coaches, including one trolley coach, derailed in the loop line," the official said. PTI. Published On Aug 1, 2025 at 07:03 PM IST.
  87. [87]
    Anti-terror agency joins Kanpur train derailment bid probe, over 100 ...
    Sep 10, 2024 · A total of 12 people have been detained and over 100 people have been questioned in connection with an attempt to derail the ...
  88. [88]
    Kalindi Express derailment bid: Kanpur cops detain over two dozen ...
    Sep 11, 2024 · A bottle of petrol and matchboxes were also found at the site hinting at a sabotage bid following which local police lodged an FIR.
  89. [89]
    Sabotage led to Bagmati Express crash: Probe report - Times of India
    Oct 18, 2024 · An inquiry concludes sabotage in the Bagmati Express accident due to removed nuts and bolts, leading to derailment and collision with a stationary goods train.
  90. [90]
    Investigation confirms sabotage in Bagmathi Express accident
    Jul 30, 2025 · Confirming the sabotage, the report said removal of fittings and connections at Point No. 51B by “miscreants” led to the collision of Train ...
  91. [91]
    Train Sabotage Attempts On The Rise: LPG Cylinder Found On ...
    Sep 22, 2024 · Since June 2023, a total of 24 such incidents have occurred, with objects like LPG cylinders, bicycles, iron rods, and cement blocks being found ...
  92. [92]
    [PDF] government of india
    Aug 1, 2025 · As per the data received from State Police, 82 cases of sabotage/tampering with railway tracks were registered during the year 2024 by various ...
  93. [93]
    Train Sabotage Foiled in Uttar Pradesh - Organiser
    May 20, 2025 · An alleged sabotage attempt on two major trains, the Rajdhani Express and the Kathgodam Express, in Uttar Pradesh's Hardoi district was narrowly averted.<|separator|>
  94. [94]
    Another train sabotage attempt foiled in UP; probe underway
    Jun 3, 2025 · A potential train accident was averted late Sunday night in Bareilly district, after a group of vigilant railway staff detected tampering with track ...
  95. [95]
    7th train sabotage attempt thwarted in Uttar Pradesh | Lucknow News
    Jun 3, 2025 · April 22, 2025: A nearly six feet long and three feet wide metal door was found on the rail track between Utraitai Junction and Bakkas railway ...
  96. [96]
    Railways grapples with 'sabotage' attempts - The New Indian Express
    Oct 14, 2024 · Probes by railway officials have revealed suspected sabotages to cause derailments. In most cases, objects have been placed on railway tracks.
  97. [97]
    NIA probes sabotage angle in recent train derailments - Rediff.com
    The National Investigation Agency has begun a preliminary enquiry to ascertain any sabotage angle in recent train derailments and accidents, ...
  98. [98]
    NIA has not found any sabotage in recent train derailments: Officials
    Oct 25, 2024 · The National Investigation Agency (NIA) has so far not found any angle of sabotage in the recent accidents on railway tracks, people familiar with the ...
  99. [99]
    "WE HAVE NO ORDERS TO SAVE YOU" - Human Rights Watch
    Thirty-eight-year-old Mehboob Mansoori lost eighteen family members in the massacre of Muslims in the neighborhood of Gulmarg Society, Ahmedabad.
  100. [100]
    '2002 Riots Not a Conspiracy': Key Findings of Nanavati-Mehta ...
    Dec 14, 2019 · Statements and evidence of 3 whistle-blower IPS officers dismissed. The Commission completely dismissed the evidence provided by former IPS ...Missing: forensic | Show results with:forensic
  101. [101]
    The Truth: Gujarat 2002 - Wikipedia
    The Truth: Gujarat 2002 (also called Operation Kalank) was an investigative report on the 2002 Gujarat riots published by India's Tehelka news magazine
  102. [102]
    Resolution on Godhra and its aftermath | Bharatiya Janata Party
    Apr 12, 2002 · The social harmony in the state was disrupted by the deplorable and ghastly burning of Ram Sevaks in the Sabarmati Express on the 27th February 2002.Missing: discourse | Show results with:discourse
  103. [103]
    'Truth coming out': PM Modi hails film on Godhra train burning
    Nov 18, 2024 · Prime Minister Narendra Modi praised the film 'The Sabarmati Report' for revealing the truth about the 2002 Godhra train burning.Missing: representations | Show results with:representations
  104. [104]
    Godhra train tragedy was a 'conspiracy' hatched by Congress, says ...
    Nov 22, 2019 · The February 2002 Sabarmati train fire, which killed 59 kar sevaks and triggered large- scale riots, was part of a “conspiracy” hatched by Congress's elected ...
  105. [105]
    B K Hariprasad warns of 'Godhra-like incident' in Karnataka; BJP ...
    Jan 3, 2024 · India News; B K Hariprasad warns of 'Godhra-like incident' in Karnataka; BJP demands arrest of Congress leader | India News - The Times of India.
  106. [106]
    '2002 Godhra incident could've been averted': Gujarat HC upholds ...
    May 2, 2025 · On that day, the S-6 coach of the Sabarmati Express was torched near Godhra railway station by a rioting mob, killing 59 passengers, including ...
  107. [107]
    GODHRA: THE TRUE STORY - francois gautier - WordPress.com
    Feb 27, 2022 · This train transported more than 2,000 people, mainly karsewaks on their way back to Ahmedabad after participating in the Poorna Ahuti Yagya at ...Missing: typical | Show results with:typical
  108. [108]
    LEADER ARTICLE Truth about Godhra - The Times of India
    Jun 19, 2004 · ... Sabarmati Express was attacked at Godhra. Mr Modi, who has ... lessons about the fire safety of railway coaches in general. Here ...<|separator|>
  109. [109]
    RPF saved the day in Godhra: Report - Times of India
    Apr 11, 2002 · RPF saved the day in Godhra: Report ... NEW DELHI: Three constables fired at and dispersed a thousand-strong mob that torched the S-6 coach of ...Missing: enhancements post
  110. [110]
    [PDF] enhancement in sanctioned strength of rpf - ANSWER
    (b) Since amendments in the RPF Act in the year 2003, the strength of RPF/RPSF has been enhanced by. 6107 posts. Further efforts are under process to enhance ...