Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Supreme deity

A supreme deity is conceptualized as the singular, ultimate divine entity embodying maximal power, knowledge, and moral perfection, serving as the foundational cause and governor of existence in monotheistic theologies and certain philosophical systems.^[1] This notion typically attributes to the supreme deity attributes such as omnipotence, omniscience, and eternality, distinguishing it from lesser spiritual beings or polytheistic figures.^[2] While prevalent in Abrahamic traditions—where it manifests as the personal God of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam—the concept also appears in Eastern frameworks like Advaita Vedanta's Brahman as impersonal absolute reality, though interpretations vary between personalistic and non-dualistic forms.^[3]^[1] Philosophical arguments for a supreme deity often invoke first-cause reasoning, positing that contingent reality requires an uncaused, necessary ground to avoid infinite regress, as articulated in cosmological proofs tracing back to Aristotelian unmoved movers adapted in medieval theology.^[4] Ontological arguments further contend that the very definition of maximal greatness entails necessary existence, rendering non-existence logically incoherent for such a being.^[5] These rationales aim to derive the deity's reality from conceptual necessities rather than sensory data, emphasizing causal chains in observable order as indirect pointers.^[4] However, empirical scrutiny reveals no direct verifiable evidence for such an entity's intervention or attributes, with naturalistic explanations attributing cosmic fine-tuning and moral intuitions to evolutionary and physical processes absent supernatural agency.^[6] Defining characteristics include transcendence beyond material constraints alongside potential immanence in creation, though tensions arise in reconciling omnipotence with observed suffering—the problem of evil—challenging claims of perfect benevolence without ad hoc resolutions like free will defenses. Anthropological data indicate that belief in supreme deities correlates with societal complexity in some cases but is not prerequisite for advanced civilizations, as evidenced by early state formations relying on animistic or ancestral spirits rather than moralistic high gods.^[6] This concept's endurance reflects human cognitive predispositions toward agency detection and existential causation, yet its truth remains contested, hinging on metaphysical commitments over falsifiable claims.^[4]^[1]

Conceptual Foundations

Definition and Terminology

A supreme deity is conceptualized in religious studies as a divine entity embodying the pinnacle of spiritual hierarchy within a given belief system, characterized by transcendent power that surpasses all other supernatural beings or forces. This notion underscores an unchallenged authority, often manifesting as the originator and sovereign ruler of the cosmos, distinct from subordinate deities or spirits that may influence specific domains but lack ultimate dominion.^[8]^[9] Terminologically, the English phrase "supreme deity" integrates "supreme," derived from Latin supremus meaning "highest" or "utmost," with "deity" from Latin deus, denoting a god or divine power. This reflects a hierarchical emphasis inherent in Indo-European linguistic roots, where supremacy implies elevation above peers in potency and scope. Analogous terms appear cross-culturally, such as Sanskrit paramadeva ("supreme god"), which conveys paramount divine status through qualifiers denoting transcendence and preeminence. These etymological foundations highlight a conceptual framework prioritizing vertical order in divine ontology, observable in theological lexicons across traditions.^[10]^[11]^[12] Core attributes ascribed to supreme deities, drawn from comparative religious analyses, typically include omnipotence (unlimited power), omniscience (complete knowledge), eternality (existence beyond temporal bounds), and a creator role initiating cosmic order. Anthropological examinations of diverse societies reveal recurrent patterns where such beings exert sovereignty over lesser entities, enforcing moral or natural laws without rivalry, thereby fulfilling criteria of supremacy as absolute governance rather than mere primacy among equals. These traits are not universally identical but converge on causal primacy—the deity as the uncaused cause underpinning reality—evident in ethnographic accounts of high gods across cultures.^[2]^[8]^[13]

Core Attributes of Supremacy

Omnipotence constitutes the supreme deity's absolute capacity to effect any logically coherent outcome, defined philosophically as maximal power over possible states of affairs, distinguishing it from limited deities subordinate to natural or logical constraints.^[14] This attribute underpins causal primacy, wherein the deity serves as the necessary first cause for the contingent universe, initiating existence without itself requiring prior causation, as chains of dependent causes cannot regress infinitely without a self-sufficient originator.^[15] Empirical observations of ordered complexity in reality, from cosmological constants to biological systems, align with such primacy only if traceable to an unbounded efficient cause rather than random emergence.^[15] Omniscience attributes to the supreme deity exhaustive knowledge of all true propositions, past, present, and future, rendering reality non-random as every contingency falls within a comprehensive cognitive framework devoid of epistemic gaps.^[16] This maximal awareness implies deterministic foresight, where apparent stochasticity in physical laws reflects incomplete human perception rather than inherent unpredictability, consistent with first-principles reasoning that truth is unitary and knowable in principle by an ultimate intellect.^[16] Transcendence positions the supreme deity as ontologically independent of the material cosmos, existing beyond spatial-temporal bounds and causal dependencies, while potential immanence involves active sustenance of universal order without compromising aseity.^[17] Causal realism necessitates this transcendent status, as a contingent universe demands an external, necessary ground to avoid explanatory regress, evidenced by the universe's finite age—approximately 13.8 billion years per cosmic microwave background data—precluding self-eternal cycles without an initiating agency.^[15] Omnibenevolence, positing inherent perfect goodness, features prominently in monotheistic supreme deity concepts as alignment with moral order, yet remains philosophically contested due to tensions with pervasive suffering, prompting critiques of its universality.^[18] In polytheistic frameworks, supreme figures often lack this trait, manifesting amoral forces or rivalrous wills rather than unified benevolence, highlighting how monotheistic supremacy integrates ethical perfection as causal telos absent in distributed divine hierarchies.^[17]

Distinctions from Lesser Deities

Supreme deities are conceptualized as the uncreated originator of all existence, possessing aseity or self-existence independent of any prior cause or dependency, in contrast to lesser deities, which are derivative entities either directly created by the supreme or delegated limited powers within a pre-established cosmic order.^[19] This ontological primacy ensures the supreme deity's lack of contingency, positioning it as the foundational cause rather than a product of emanation, evolution, or subordination from higher powers.^[20] The absence of peers or rivals further delineates the supreme from lesser deities, as the latter often engage in relational dynamics involving competition, alliances, or hierarchical submissions among themselves, whereas the supreme embodies unchallenged sovereignty without need for validation or conflict resolution.^[21] Anthropological analyses of high gods—functionally equivalent to supreme deities—document their characteristic remoteness from everyday human concerns, with invocations reserved primarily for existential crises such as droughts, plagues, or communal threats, unlike the more proximate lesser deities or spirits handling routine affairs like fertility or harvests.^[22]^[23] This pattern underscores a structural detachment, where the supreme's transcendence limits direct intervention, preserving its role as an ultimate arbiter rather than a participatory agent. Supreme figures also prioritize impersonal perfections—omniscience, omnipotence without caprice—over the anthropomorphic flaws like envy or localized biases evident in lesser deities.^[24]

Historical Development

Origins in Ancient Near Eastern Cultures

![Bronze figurine of El, the Canaanite creator deity, from Megiddo, Stratum VII, Late Bronze II, 1400-1200 BC][float-right] In early Mesopotamian religion, Anu (Sumerian An) emerged as the primordial sky god and head of the pantheon around 3000 BCE, as evidenced by cuneiform inscriptions from Sumerian city-states like Uruk and Nippur. These texts depict Anu as the father of the gods, embodying cosmic authority and order, with his supremacy invoked in temple hymns and administrative records that prioritize his role in maintaining heavenly stability over subordinate deities like Enlil. Archaeological finds, including cylinder seals and votive offerings from the Early Dynastic period (c. 2900-2350 BCE), further illustrate Anu's elevated status through iconography of a horned crown symbolizing divine kingship.^[25]^[26] Among the Canaanites of the Levant, El functioned as the supreme creator deity and patriarch of the divine assembly, with textual evidence from Ugaritic tablets (c. 1400-1200 BCE) describing him as the "father of the gods" who delegated authority while retaining ultimate sovereignty. Bull iconography and epithets like "El the Compassionate" in these Ras Shamra archives underscore his benevolent yet hierarchical rule, predating Baal's rise and reflecting a structured pantheon where El's primacy is unchallenged in cosmogonic myths. Bronze figurines from sites like Megiddo, dating to the Late Bronze Age (1400-1200 BCE), provide archaeological corroboration of El's worship as a bearded, enthroned figure, linking him to broader Semitic traditions of a high god.^[27] In Egypt, the syncretism forming Amun-Ra around 2000 BCE during the Middle Kingdom consolidated local Theban deity Amun with solar god Ra, driven by political unification under pharaohs like Senusret I, who expanded the Karnak temple complex. Hieroglyphic inscriptions from this era, including stelae and pyramid texts, portray Amun-Ra as the supreme hidden creator and solar sovereign, whose fusion symbolized national hierarchy amid dynastic consolidation, elevating him above earlier equals like Atum. This development is attested in temple reliefs and royal decrees emphasizing Amun-Ra's universal dominion.^[28] Zoroastrian texts in the Avesta affirm Ahura Mazda's supremacy as the uncreated wise lord in a dualistic framework opposing Angra Mainyu, with Gathic hymns (composed c. 1500-1000 BCE orally) positioning him as the origin of all good creation and moral order. Inscribed evidence from Achaemenid inscriptions (c. 500 BCE) echoes this, invoking Ahura Mazda's singular authority under kings like Darius I, influencing Near Eastern concepts of a transcendent high god through ritual purity and cosmic battle narratives preserved in Yasna liturgies.^[29]

Evolution Toward Monotheism

One early precursor to monotheistic supremacy occurred in ancient Egypt under Pharaoh Akhenaten (ruled c. 1353–1336 BCE), who elevated the sun disk Aten to exclusive worship through monolatry, suppressing traditional polytheistic cults including the powerful priesthood of Amun.^[30] This shift was politically motivated to centralize power and diminish entrenched religious elites, but it failed due to widespread opposition, economic disruptions, and Akhenaten's premature death, with reforms swiftly reversed under Tutankhamun.^[31] Despite its short duration, Atenism demonstrated that royal decree could impose a singular divine focus amid polytheism, though lacking enduring theological or cultural traction beyond Egypt.^[32] In the Levant, Yahweh emerged within a Canaanite polytheistic framework, initially as a southern warrior deity associated with storms and warfare, gradually merging attributes with the high god El by the late second millennium BCE. Early Israelite religion exhibited henotheism, acknowledging other gods' existence while prioritizing Yahweh, as evidenced in texts like Deuteronomy 32:8–9 and Psalm 82, where Yahweh is depicted as presiding over a divine council but subordinate to El Elyon initially.^[33] This intermediate stage persisted through the monarchic period (c. 1000–586 BCE), with archaeological finds of Yahweh alongside Asherah inscriptions indicating syncretistic practices.^[34] The Babylonian exile (586–538 BCE) catalyzed a decisive shift toward exclusive monotheism in Judahite thought, as displacement from the land and temple prompted theological reflection emphasizing Yahweh's sole sovereignty without territorial or cultic aids.^[35] Prophetic texts from the exilic and post-exilic eras, such as Second Isaiah (Isaiah 40–55, c. 550–539 BCE), explicitly deny other deities' reality, framing Yahweh as the universal creator against Babylonian idols.^[36] Persian conquest and Cyrus the Great's edict allowing return in 538 BCE exposed returning elites to Zoroastrian dualism and angelic hierarchies, potentially reinforcing eschatological elements, though direct causation for monotheism remains debated given pre-exilic Yahwistic primacy.^[37] By the 5th century BCE, texts like Zechariah reflect consolidated supremacy, attributing the transition to causal factors including crisis-induced purification and imperial tolerance favoring unified cultic identity over pluralistic fragmentation.^[38]

Theological Frameworks

Monotheistic Systems

Monotheistic systems conceive of the supreme deity as a singular, non-composite entity that constitutes the sole divine reality, fundamentally rejecting the existence of pantheons or lesser gods as illusory or subordinate to the point of non-divinity. This framework emphasizes empirical exclusivity, wherein the universe's coherent order and causal chain trace back to one ultimate source rather than diffused powers, aligning with parsimonious reasoning that avoids multiplying entities beyond necessity. Scriptural foundations in Abrahamic traditions, such as declarations of divine oneness in the Torah, Bible, and Quran, reinforce this by prohibiting acknowledgment of rivals and demanding undivided allegiance.^[39]^[40] From a causal perspective, monotheism posits the supreme deity as the uncaused cause—the primordial ground of being that initiates and sustains all contingent existence without itself requiring a prior explanation. This view resolves the regress of causes by invoking a single, self-sufficient originator, whose unity better accounts for the observed uniformity in natural laws and cosmic structure than would a plurality of independent first causes, which could engender conflict or redundancy. Philosophical arguments, such as those tracing efficient causation to a singular prime mover, underscore that positing more than one such entity introduces gratuitous complexity without enhancing explanatory power.^[41]^[42] Monotheism distinguishes itself from deism by affirming active divine providence, wherein the supreme deity not only creates but continuously upholds the world's operations through willful intervention, moral guidance, and responsive engagement with creation. Deism, by contrast, envisions a detached architect who sets initial conditions and withdraws, rendering ongoing sustenance impersonal and mechanistic; monotheistic systems, however, integrate revelation and covenantal relationship, viewing providence as evidence of the deity's personal sovereignty over history and contingency. This active involvement manifests in claims of miraculous events, ethical imperatives, and eschatological judgment, all contingent on the supreme deity's undivided authority.^[43]^[44]

Henotheistic and High God Concepts

In anthropological studies of nonliterate societies, high gods represent supreme entities conceptualized as remote creators or overseers, existing alongside lesser spirits, ancestors, or deities without demanding exclusive devotion. These figures often embody the origin of the cosmos and moral order but remain otiose—detached from routine human concerns and rarely propitiated through direct rituals. Cross-cultural datasets, including the Ethnographic Atlas and Standard Cross-Cultural Sample, document high gods in approximately 15-30% of sampled tribal groups, typically as intellectual constructs for explaining ultimate causality rather than objects of emotional cultic practice.^[45] Among African indigenous traditions, ethnographic accounts describe high gods like Nyame among the Akan or Mulungu among Bantu groups as transcendent sky deities who initiate creation but delegate intervention to intermediaries such as divinities or ancestors. These supreme beings are acknowledged in origin myths and proverbs, yet worship is infrequent, with sacrifices and prayers directed toward more proximate forces for practical needs like fertility or protection. This pattern holds across diverse regions, from West African Yoruba (Olodumare as distant ruler) to East African Zinza (Kaginga as otiose high god occasionally linked to blood offerings only in crisis), underscoring a causal hierarchy where the high god's supremacy is affirmed philosophically but not ritually dominant.^[46]^[47]^[48] In Native American indigenous contexts, similar high god concepts appear as overarching powers, such as Gitche Manitou in Algonquian ethnography or Tirawa among the Pawnee, portrayed as life-givers who establish natural laws but withdraw from ongoing affairs. Field studies note that while these entities feature in cosmological narratives—e.g., Pawnee star myths invoking Tirawa's directional sovereignty—daily ceremonies emphasize localized manitous or animal spirits for hunting success or healing, with high god invocation limited to communal rites like the Hako ceremony for renewal. This empirical scarcity of worship, evident in early 20th-century ethnographies of Northern Algonquian and Plains groups, aligns with broader patterns where high gods function as explanatory archetypes for unity amid polyspirited diversity, rather than focal points of supplication.^[49] Henotheism, as distinguished in analyses of intermediary theisms, elevates one deity to provisional supremacy within a pluralistic framework, without negating coexistent powers—a dynamic observed in early Vedic hymns where Varuna assumes sovereign oversight of cosmic order (ṛta) and ethical surveillance, yet shares ritual space with figures like Indra or Agni. Scholarly examinations of Rigvedic texts highlight this selective exaltation, with Varuna's attributes of omniscience and binding oaths positioning him as paramount in sovereignty hymns, though devotional emphasis shifts across compositions without doctrinal exclusion of others. Such configurations, rarer in purely animistic settings but bridging to structured pantheons, reflect pragmatic adaptations where a high god's conceptual primacy aids social cohesion without supplanting embedded polytheistic practices.^[50]^[51]

Polytheistic Supreme Figures

In polytheistic traditions, supreme figures such as Zeus in Greek mythology approximate ultimate authority through a hierarchical kingship over the pantheon, yet their dominion relies on delegated powers and remains susceptible to internal challenges. Zeus, as the sky and thunder god enthroned on Olympus, oversees fate, justice, and oaths, distributing domains like the sea to Poseidon and the underworld to Hades following the Titanomachy, as detailed in Hesiod's Theogony and Homeric epics.^[52] His supremacy manifests in enforcing order via thunderbolts and assemblies of gods, but limitations arise from the independent agencies of kin deities, evident in myths where Poseidon defies him during the Trojan War or Hera orchestrates deceptions against his paramours.^[53] These narratives, preserved in texts like the Iliad, portray Zeus's rule as paramount but not absolute, constrained by prophecies, Moirae (fates), and familial alliances that enable intrigue.^[54] The Roman counterpart, Jupiter, mirrors this structure as the chief deity of state religion, embodying sky sovereignty, oaths, and victory, with powers extended through consorts and offspring in Ovid's Metamorphoses. Ovid depicts Jupiter wielding lightning and arbitrating divine disputes, yet vulnerable to Juno's retaliatory schemes and subordinate rebellions, reflecting a kingship sustained by consent rather than omnipotence.^[55] In both systems, the supreme figure's authority is contested within the pantheon, fostering narratives of coups, bindings (e.g., Thetis and Briareus aiding Zeus against rebels), and exiles, which underscore causal instabilities inherent to divided sovereignty: multiple power loci create incentives for coalitions against the apex, eroding centralized control absent a singular, unchallengeable source.^[56] Such pantheon dynamics parallel empirical patterns in polytheistic societies, where hierarchical divine models correlated with political fragmentation, as in ancient Greece's myriad poleis lacking empire-scale unity despite cultural ties, contrasting monotheistic regimes' enhanced cohesion for expansion. Greco-Roman polytheism accommodated local cults and tolerated syncretism, yielding adaptive pluralism but impeding supranational integration, whereas monotheism's undivided divine archetype supported scalable authority, evident in the Umayyad Caliphate's unification of disparate tribes across 5.7 million square kilometers by 720 CE.^[57] Scholarly analyses attribute this to polytheism's fragmented sovereignty mirroring societal incentives for rivalry over collective enterprise, limiting conquest radii compared to monotheistic polities' returns-to-scale advantages in mobilization.

In Abrahamic Traditions

Yahweh in Judaism

In Judaism, Yahweh, denoted by the Tetragrammaton YHWH, serves as the personal and ineffable name of the singular supreme deity, embodying eternal existence and self-revelation.^[58] This name, derived from the Hebrew verb "to be," signifies God's unchanging essence, as interpreted in Exodus 3:14 where Yahweh declares "Ehyeh asher ehyeh" ("I am who I am").^[59] Observant Jews refrain from pronouncing YHWH aloud, substituting Adonai ("Lord") or HaShem ("the Name") in prayer and Torah reading to preserve its sanctity, a practice rooted in post-biblical traditions.^[60] Yahweh is depicted as the sole creator of the universe in the Torah's opening account, forming order from formless void through divine speech in Genesis 1, without reliance on pre-existing materials or lesser agents.^[61] This act establishes Yahweh's absolute sovereignty, distinct from surrounding ancient Near Eastern myths where creation involved conflict or procreation among gods. As lawgiver, Yahweh reveals the 613 commandments (mitzvot) at Sinai, following the covenant with Abraham (traditionally dated circa 1813 BCE) and the Exodus from Egypt (traditionally 1313 BCE), events framed as direct interventions demonstrating Yahweh's power over nature and nations.^[62] These narratives underscore covenantal causality, where obedience to Yahweh's ethical and ritual laws sustains Israel's relationship with the divine, with historical fulfillments like the plagues and Red Sea parting serving as evidentiary anchors for faith.^[63] Theological attributes of Yahweh include omnipotence, omniscience, transcendence, and a balance of mercy and justice, enumerated in the Thirteen Attributes (Exodus 34:6–7), recited in Jewish liturgy during repentance periods.^[64] Yahweh is incorporeal and beyond human comprehension, yet relational through covenants, responding to human actions with reward or correction, as in the prophetic warnings against covenant breach. Post-exilic texts, such as Second Isaiah, reinforce strict monotheism by declaring Yahweh the exclusive deity with no rivals (Isaiah 44:6), rejecting idols as futile representations of created matter that mislead from the uncreated creator (Deuteronomy 4:15–19).^[65] Idolatry's prohibition stems from its empirical failure to effect change, contrasting Yahweh's demonstrated causality in events like the Exodus. Rabbinic literature, including the Talmud, elaborates Yahweh's unity (echad) and incomparability, prohibiting anthropomorphic depictions to avoid diluting divine otherness. In Kabbalistic thought, Yahweh relates to the manifest, personal aspect of God, emanating from Ein Sof—the infinite, attributeless essence preceding creation—through the ten Sefirot, yet without compromising the Torah's emphasis on direct covenantal engagement.^[66] Ethical monotheism defines Jewish practice, positing Yahweh as the source of universal moral standards, where true worship integrates ritual observance with justice, compassion, and rejection of polytheistic influences, as codified in the Shema prayer (Deuteronomy 6:4).^[67] This framework prioritizes lived obedience over speculative metaphysics, grounding supremacy in Yahweh's role as both cosmic originator and historical redeemer.

The Triune God in Christianity

In Christian theology, the Triune God is understood as one divine essence eternally existing in three distinct persons: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, each fully and equally God, without division or subordination in essence.^[68] This doctrine maintains the unity of God while preserving real distinctions among the persons, rejecting both modalism, which conflates the persons into modes, and tritheism, which posits three separate gods.^[69] The formulation arose from scriptural exegesis, particularly passages attributing divine attributes and works to each person, such as the Father's role as creator, the Son's preexistence and redemptive agency in John 1:1-14, and the Spirit's sanctifying presence in Acts 5:3-4.^[70] The Nicene Creed, promulgated at the Council of Nicaea in 325 CE, formalized this understanding in response to Arianism, which subordinated the Son as a created being.^[71] It declares belief in "one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth," "one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds, God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father," and later expansions in 381 CE at Constantinople affirmed the Holy Spirit as "the Lord and Giver of Life, who proceeds from the Father, who with the Father and the Son is worshiped and glorified."^[72] These creeds emphasize co-equality and consubstantiality, ensuring the persons' eternal relations—generation of the Son and procession of the Spirit—do not imply hierarchy in divinity.^[70] Central to the Son's person is the incarnation, wherein the eternal Word assumed human nature without ceasing divinity, enabling direct divine intervention in human history for redemption.^[73] This hypostatic union, as defined at the Council of Chalcedon in 451 CE, posits two natures—divine and human—in one person, facilitating atonement by satisfying divine justice through substitutionary sacrifice.^[74] The resurrection of Christ, reported in the Gospels as occurring on the third day after crucifixion circa 30-33 CE, serves as empirical vindication of this intervention, with historical data including the empty tomb discovered by women witnesses, multiple post-mortem appearances to disciples, and the rapid transformation of fearful followers into bold proclaimers amid persecution.^[75] Scholarly minimal facts approaches, drawing from early sources like 1 Corinthians 15:3-8 (composed within 2-5 years of the events), affirm facts such as the crucifixion under Pontius Pilate, burial in Joseph of Arimathea's tomb, and experiences compelling belief in bodily resurrection among skeptics like Paul and James.^[76] Unitarian views, which reduce God to a singular person and deny the Son's full deity, dilute this framework by severing the causal link between divine initiative and human salvation, rendering Christ's work mere human exemplarity rather than efficacious atonement.^[77] Such positions, historically akin to Arianism condemned at Nicaea, fail to account for New Testament attributions of worship and creative agency to the Son and Spirit, presupposing a unipersonal God incompatible with triadic baptismal formulas in Matthew 28:19 and redemptive history's interpersonal dynamics.^[78] In salvation causality, the Triune God's eternal counsel—Father electing, Son accomplishing, Spirit applying—establishes supremacy through coordinated, intra-divine action, culminating in glorification where believers participate in divine life without ontological merger.^[79]

Allah in Islam

In Islamic theology, Allah is portrayed in the Quran as the embodiment of tawhid, the absolute and indivisible unity of God, which maintains logical coherence by positing a singular, uncaused cause for the universe's order, avoiding the contradictions inherent in attributing creative or sovereign powers to multiple entities. This doctrine rejects any division in divine essence, attributes, or acts of worship, as articulated in verses such as Quran 112:1-4, which declare Allah as eternal, self-sufficient, and incomparable. Tawhid thus underpins Islamic metaphysics, ensuring causal consistency wherein all existence derives from one transcendent source without partnership or delegation.^[80]^[81] Allah's attributes are comprehensively outlined through the 99 names, known as Asma ul-Husna, which encapsulate divine perfections such as Ar-Rahman (the Most Compassionate), Al-Malik (the Sovereign), and Al-Khaliq (the Creator), drawn from Quranic descriptions and authenticated prophetic traditions including a hadith in Sahih Muslim stating that memorizing and invoking these names yields spiritual reward. These names affirm Allah's supremacy in originating creation ex nihilo and exercising ultimate judgment, as in Quran 1:2, which identifies Him as "Lord of the worlds," responsible for sustaining existence and reckoning human actions on the Day of Judgment. The revelations to Muhammad from 610 to 632 CE, culminating in the Quran's compilation, position this scripture as the uncorrupted final corrective to earlier prophetic messages, restoring pure monotheism against perceived distortions in Judaism and Christianity.^[82]^[83]^[84] A key empirical claim for the Quran's authenticity—and thus Allah's supreme intervention—is its linguistic inimitability (i'jaz), wherein the text challenges doubters in verses like Quran 2:23 to produce a surah of comparable eloquence, rhetorical depth, and predictive accuracy, a feat unachieved despite Arab literary prowess at the time and subsequent attempts over 14 centuries. This miracle is evidenced by the Quran's unique fusion of prose, poetry, and predictive elements, such as embryological descriptions aligning with modern observations, which Islamic scholars argue defies human capability without divine origin. Complementing this, the Quran emphasizes Allah's abstract transcendence, explicitly rejecting anthropomorphism by stating "There is nothing like unto Him, and He is the Hearing, the Seeing" (Quran 42:11), thereby upholding divine incomparability to creation and averting corporeal interpretations that would imply limitation or resemblance to contingent beings.^[85]^[86]

In Indic and Eastern Traditions

Brahman and Personal Forms in Hinduism

In the principal Upanishads, such as the Brihadaranyaka and Chandogya, composed circa 800–500 BCE, Brahman is depicted as the nirguna (attributeless) absolute, an impersonal, eternal reality that constitutes the ground of being, beyond qualities, forms, or dualities, from which the universe emanates yet remains distinct in its illusory manifestation.^[87] This conception emphasizes Brahman's transcendence, where it is the singular, unchanging substrate (sat), consciousness (chit), and bliss (ananda), with individual souls (atman) ultimately identical to it in essence.^[88] Subsequent texts introduce saguna (with attributes) forms, reconciling the impersonal absolute with personal deity worship; in the Bhagavad Gita, dated to circa 400 BCE–200 CE, Ishvara is presented as the supreme personal controller (param isvara), an aspect of Brahman endowed with will, knowledge, and causality, who oversees the cosmic order while remaining rooted in the nirguna reality.^[89] Ishvara governs the cycles of samsara through maya—Brahman's projective power that veils its unity, creating the appearance of multiplicity and diversity—and karma, the causal law binding actions to consequences across rebirths, ensuring ethical continuity without direct intervention in every event.^[90] Philosophical schools highlight tensions in this unity: Advaita Vedanta, formalized by Adi Shankara (c. 788–820 CE), asserts strict non-dualism (advaita), where the perceived world is maya-induced illusion, and liberation (moksha) dissolves ego-bound distinctions to reveal atman-Brahman identity, critiquing personalist views as provisional for the unqualified.^[91] Dvaita Vedanta, propounded by Madhvacharya (c. 1238–1317 CE), counters with eternal dualism, positing irreducible differences between Ishvara (typically Vishnu as supreme), souls, and matter, where maya and karma operate under divine oversight without negating personal devotion as the path to grace-dependent salvation.^[92] Empirically, Hindu practice reflects this duality through widespread temple worship of Vishnu (as preserver and supreme in Vaishnavism) or Shiva (as destroyer-transformer and supreme in Shaivism), with over 2 million temples in India alone facilitating daily rituals, festivals like Diwali or Maha Shivaratri drawing millions, and bhakti traditions elevating these deities as accessible avatars or forms of the ultimate Brahman.^[93] These observances underscore causal realism in devotion: ritual actions accrue karmic merit, aimed at transcending maya toward either impersonal realization or personal union, varying by sect without universal consensus on supremacy.^[94]

Waheguru in Sikhism

In Sikhism, Waheguru denotes the singular, formless supreme reality, conceived as the eternal creator and sustainer of the universe, distinct from anthropomorphic deities in surrounding Indic traditions. This monotheistic framework, articulated in the Guru Granth Sahib—Sikhism's central scripture compiled between 1604 and 1708 CE—portrays Waheguru as nirankar (without form), akaal (timeless), and sat naam (eternal truth), emphasizing a transcendent essence beyond physical representation or ritual mediation.^[95] The Mool Mantar, the foundational verse composed by Guru Nanak (1469–1539 CE), declares: "One Universal Creator God, Truth is His Name, Fearless, Without Hatred, Timeless Form, Beyond Birth, Self-Existent," underscoring Waheguru's self-sustaining causality in originating and governing existence without reliance on intermediary forces.^[96] Guru Nanak, the founder of Sikhism amid 15th-century Punjab's polytheistic and caste-riven milieu, positioned Waheguru as a direct counter to idol worship and hierarchical rituals, advocating naam simran (meditative remembrance of the divine name) as the path to experiential union rather than ceremonial proxies. Sikh theology rejects murti puja (idol veneration) as illusory, with the Guru Granth Sahib instructing devotees to recognize Waheguru's immanence in creation while avoiding material symbols that foster division.^[97] This formless monotheism synthesizes ethical causality—where actions accrue karmic consequences under Waheguru's impartial oversight—into daily conduct, promoting kirat karna (honest labor), vand chakna (sharing), and rejection of varna (caste) distinctions as antithetical to divine unity. Institutional practices in Sikh gurdwaras (houses of worship) empirically instantiate this equality, as evidenced by the langar (communal kitchen) tradition, where adherents of all backgrounds partake in unsegregated meals, a custom initiated by Guru Nanak to dismantle social barriers and affirm Waheguru's egalitarian sovereignty. By 1708 CE, under Guru Gobind Singh's codification of the Khalsa, this ethos solidified into a community-oriented discipline, prioritizing moral agency and collective defense against oppression over esoteric rites. Scholarly analyses of Sikh texts highlight how Waheguru's attributes foster a realist ethic: human flourishing arises from aligning personal causality with the creator's timeless order, unmediated by priestly or hereditary elites.^[98]^[99]

Shangdi and Tian in Chinese Traditions

In the Shang dynasty (c. 1600–1046 BCE), Shangdi (上帝) was conceptualized as the supreme deity and high god, often invoked in oracle bone inscriptions from the late period around 1200 BCE as the ancestral progenitor of the royal line and overseer of divinations concerning warfare, harvests, and royal health.^[100]^[101] These inscriptions, primarily from the site of Anyang, reveal Shangdi receiving offerings and sacrifices, including human victims in some rituals, to secure favor, with empirical outcomes like military success or natural events interpreted as responses.^[102] Shangdi's role emphasized causal intervention in human affairs, distinct from subordinate ancestral spirits, though worship remained confined to royal elites without widespread personal devotion among the populace.^[103] Following the Zhou conquest of the Shang around 1046 BCE, the concept evolved into Tian (天), or Heaven, which supplanted Shangdi as the impersonal cosmic order granting the Mandate of Heaven (Tianming 天命) to justify dynastic legitimacy.^[104]^[105] Zhou rulers claimed Tian's approval through moral governance, with loss of the mandate evidenced by observable causal indicators such as famines, floods, or rebellions, enabling empirical challenges to tyrannical rule without invoking anthropomorphic divine will.^[106] In Confucian texts from the Eastern Zhou (770–256 BCE) onward, Tian represented an abstract ethical principle aligned with human virtue, diluting theistic elements into a naturalistic framework where supreme authority manifested through ritual propriety (li 禮) rather than personal supplication.^[107] Chinese emperors perpetuated state rituals to Shangdi or Tian, conducting annual sacrifices at the Temple of Heaven in Beijing—established by the Ming dynasty in 1420 CE but rooted in Zhou precedents—offering unblemished bulls and grains to affirm legitimacy and avert disasters.^[103] These ceremonies underscored a causal realism in governance, linking ritual observance to dynastic stability, yet lacked devotional piety, integrating with ancestor veneration where Tian/ Shangdi oversaw familial hierarchies without supplanting them.^[108] Over time, Confucian humanism further abstracted Tian into a moral cosmology, critiqued by some scholars for subordinating transcendent causality to immanent human ethics, evident in the Warring States period (475–221 BCE) texts prioritizing sage-kings over divine intervention.^[107]^[108]

In African and Indigenous Traditions

High Gods in Sub-Saharan Africa

In many Sub-Saharan African societies, oral traditions describe a remote supreme creator deity, often termed a "high god," who holds causal primacy as the originator of the universe and all life, yet receives little direct cultic attention. Anthropological surveys indicate this belief's prevalence across diverse ethnic groups, from West African Yoruba and Akan to Bantu-speaking peoples, where the high god is invoked in creation myths as the ultimate source of existence but is mediated through lesser spirits, ancestors, or nature deities in daily practice.^[109]^[110] Ethnographic records from the mid-20th century, such as those documenting Yoruba cosmology, portray Olodumare as the omnipotent owner of the heavens who delegates creation to subordinate orishas like Obatala, emphasizing a hierarchical ontology where the supreme being's remoteness stems from its transcendence rather than absence.^[111] Among the Akan of Ghana, Nyame functions similarly as the omniscient sky god and uncaused cause, responsible for forming the world and sustaining moral order indirectly through abosom (lesser gods) and human intermediaries, with proverbs and myths underscoring its role in primordial acts like separating earth from sky.^[112] Direct worship of such high gods is minimal, as evidenced by field studies showing rituals prioritize propitiation of accessible spirits for immediate needs like fertility or rain, while the supreme creator is acknowledged in oaths or crises but lacks temples or priesthoods; this pattern aligns with causal realism in traditional ontologies, where efficacy derives from proximate agents rather than the distant apex.^[109]^[110] For instance, Yoruba invocations to Olodumare occur sporadically in Ifa divination texts, but empirical observations confirm orisha cults dominate communal life.^[113] These concepts demonstrate resilience against colonial-era syncretism, persisting in oral corpora documented in 20th-century ethnographies despite missionary pressures to equate high gods with Abrahamic deities. Studies from the 1960s onward, including analyses of Akan proverbs and Yoruba myths, reveal undiluted pre-colonial attributes like Nyame's infinity and Olodumare's ase (vital force), unaltered in rural communities as late as the 1990s, though urban Islamization and Christianization have diluted overt expressions without eradicating underlying causal primacy.^[114]^[115] This endurance underscores the empirical robustness of high god beliefs in non-literate traditions, where they function as explanatory frameworks for origins rather than objects of fervent devotion.^[116]

Creator Spirits in Native American Beliefs

Native American spiritual traditions encompass a wide array of creator figures or high gods, conceptualized as supreme forces responsible for the origin and sustenance of the universe, though interpretations differ markedly across tribes due to linguistic, geographic, and cultural diversity. These entities are often described in oral traditions as omnipotent life forces or mysteries that precede and govern all existence, with lesser spirits or natural elements subordinate to them. Archaeological evidence, such as petroglyphs and pictographs from pre-Columbian sites dating back over 1,000 years, depicts anthropomorphic and symbolic figures that oral histories associate with creative or divine powers, though direct attributions remain interpretive and reliant on ethnographic records collected in the 19th and 20th centuries.^[117] Among Algonquian-speaking peoples, such as the Ojibwe and Cree, the Great Spirit—rendered as Gitche Manitou or Kitchi Manitou—serves as the primordial creator who infused life into the world and maintains cosmic order through sacred power (manitou). This entity is portrayed as an abstract, pervasive force rather than a anthropomorphic deity intervening in daily affairs, emphasizing a hierarchical cosmology where human actions align with natural laws to honor the creator's design.^[118] In Lakota Sioux tradition, Wakan Tanka, translating to "Great Mystery" or "Great Spirit," represents the supreme being who manifests through sixteen interconnected aspects yet transcends them as the ultimate source of all reality, including both benevolent and challenging forces.^[119]^[120] These creator concepts reflect empirical adaptations to environmental realities, such as seasonal cycles and resource hierarchies, rather than undifferentiated harmony romanticized in modern narratives; for instance, Lakota rites like the Sun Dance enforced strict protocols to propitiate Wakan Tanka, acknowledging predatory balances in nature over egalitarian ideals. Tribal variations highlight this: some, like the Iroquois with their Sky Woman and creator twins under a overarching divine order, lean toward monotheistic structures with a singular high authority, while others, such as Pacific Northwest groups, integrate creator figures into animistic frameworks with prominent trickster mediators.^[118] This diversity underscores no uniform "Native American" theology but localized supreme entities derived from observable causal patterns in creation and sustenance.^[121]

Philosophical and Critical Analysis

Arguments for Existence and Supremacy

The cosmological argument asserts that the observed chain of causes in the universe cannot extend infinitely backward, necessitating an uncaused first cause endowed with supreme causal primacy. Thomas Aquinas, in the 13th century, formulated this in his Summa Theologica, where the second way from efficient causes reasons that every effect requires a prior cause, precluding an infinite regress and culminating in a per se necessary first efficient cause that sustains all subsequent causation.^[122] This uncaused cause qualifies as supreme by originating all contingent existence without dependency, exercising ultimate explanatory power over the cosmos's ordered dependencies.^[15] The ontological argument derives the existence of a supreme being from the very definition of maximal greatness. In the 11th century, Anselm of Canterbury argued in his Proslogion that God, understood as that than which nothing greater can be conceived, must exist in reality; existence in the mind alone would permit a greater conception including actual existence, rendering the definition contradictory if God lacks it.^[123] Supremacy follows from this necessity, as the maximally perfect being encompasses all perfections, including aseity and independence from contingent realities.^[5] Contingency-based reasoning demands a necessary supreme reality to explain the existence of contingent entities. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, in the 18th century, invoked the principle of sufficient reason, stating that nothing occurs without a reason why it is so and not otherwise; applied to the totality of contingent facts, this requires a non-contingent necessary being as their ultimate ground.^[124] This necessary being achieves supremacy by possessing existence through its own nature, providing the self-sufficient foundation for all else without explanatory regress.^[124] The moral argument posits that objective moral values and duties imply a transcendent moral source with supreme authority. Objective morals, such as the universal intuition that torturing innocents for sport is intrinsically wrong, cannot be mere evolutionary byproducts or cultural constructs, as these lack binding normativity; instead, they necessitate grounding in a personal, morally perfect legislator.^[125] This ground is supreme as the eternal standard of goodness, authoring moral realism independent of human opinion or natural processes.^[125] Fine-tuning in physical constants empirically indicates calibration by a supreme intelligence. Parameters like the cosmological constant, tuned to within 1 part in 10^{120}, and the strong nuclear force, balanced to permit atomic stability, exhibit improbably precise values enabling carbon-based life; random variation would yield a barren universe devoid of stars, planets, or chemistry.^[126] Such specificity points to a transcendent agent with comprehensive knowledge and power to ordain these conditions, establishing supremacy through dominion over fundamental reality's architecture.^[126]

Logical and Empirical Critiques

Empirical critiques of the supreme deity concept emphasize the lack of verifiable evidence for direct divine interventions beyond ancient anecdotal claims. In the modern era, purported miracles have not demonstrated repeatability or falsifiability under controlled scientific conditions; for example, a 2009 Cochrane systematic review of 10 randomized trials involving 7,646 patients found no discernible effect from intercessory prayer on health outcomes, concluding that results were consistent with null hypotheses rather than supernatural causation.^[127] Similarly, cosmic fine-tuning arguments, which posit precise physical constants as evidence of purposeful design by a supreme intelligence, encounter naturalistic alternatives such as multiverse hypotheses. These propose an ensemble of universes with varying parameters, where our life-permitting conditions arise probabilistically without requiring a singular tuner, as explored in cosmological models by physicists including Andrei Linde and Leonard Susskind.^[128] Logical inconsistencies further challenge the coherence of supreme deity attributes. A core paradox arises between omniscience—complete foreknowledge of all events—and human free will, particularly in libertarian formulations where agents possess genuine alternative possibilities. If a deity infallibly knows future choices in advance, those choices become necessitated, rendering them unfree; this incompatibility has been formalized in philosophical arguments tracing to medieval thinkers like Boethius but persisting in contemporary analyses.^[129] David Hume's 1748 critique in "Of Miracles" from An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding underscores this by requiring testimonial evidence for violations of natural laws to surpass the accumulated weight of uniform experience, a criterion unmet by historical or contemporary miracle claims, which rely on subjective reports over empirical uniformity.^[130] Polytheistic frameworks critique monotheistic supremacy as a parochial construct emergent from cultural and historical contingencies rather than objective universality. Traditions such as ancient Greek or Norse pantheons feature hierarchical deities without a singular, omnipotent overlord transcending all contexts, implying that attributions of absolute supremacy reflect anthropocentric projections onto diverse divine ecologies rather than inherent metaphysical hierarchy.^[131] This perspective aligns with anthropological observations that complex societies can sustain moral and social orders without centralized "big gods," as evidenced in pre-Axial Age civilizations where polytheistic pluralism preceded monotheistic consolidation.^[6]

The Problem of Evil

The problem of evil constitutes a philosophical challenge to the attributes of a supreme deity, particularly omnipotence, omniscience, and perfect benevolence, given the observable reality of suffering and moral wrongdoing. Attributed to Epicurus (c. 341–270 BCE), the argument questions: whether such a deity lacks power to prevent evil (undermining omnipotence), lacks desire to do so (undermining benevolence), or faces some other logical barrier to its elimination.^[132] This tension intensifies when considering the empirical magnitude of evils, including moral atrocities like the Holocaust, where Nazi policies resulted in the systematic murder of approximately six million Jews through ghettos, forced labor, and extermination camps from 1941 to 1945,^[133] and natural calamities such as the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami, which caused over 230,000 deaths across 14 countries due to seismic displacement generating waves up to 30 meters high.^[134] These instances highlight not only the scale but the apparent gratuitousness of suffering, where causal chains—human agency in genocide or tectonic forces in disasters—produce outcomes seemingly incompatible with a supremely powerful and caring creator. Prominent theodicies attempt to reconcile this incompatibility. Alvin Plantinga's free will defense, outlined in his 1974 work God, Freedom, and Evil, maintains that genuine moral freedom requires the logical possibility of choosing evil, as a world of coerced goodness would lack the higher value of voluntary virtue; thus, an omnipotent God cannot create free creatures guaranteed to avoid moral evil without contradiction.^[132] Complementing this, John Hick's soul-making theodicy, elaborated in Evil and the God of Love (1966), reframes earthly existence as a developmental process akin to Irenaeus' (c. 130–202 CE) view of humanity as immature souls requiring adversity to cultivate virtues like compassion and resilience, positing suffering as epistemically necessary for moral growth in a post-creation world.^[135] Such responses face scrutiny for inadequately accounting for natural evils independent of human choice and for potentially attenuating the causal primacy of sin in traditional accounts, where human rebellion introduces disorder into creation, rendering suffering a consequence rather than a mere pedagogical tool.^[136] Empirical observation of evils' disproportionate intensity—unresolved by evident compensatory goods—supports moral realism, affirming suffering's objective disvalue against dilutions that prioritize abstract harmony over concrete causal harms, thereby questioning whether supreme benevolence aligns with a reality permitting unchecked devastation.^[18]

Cultural and Modern Implications

Influence on Morality and Governance

The principles embedded in monotheistic supreme deity concepts, such as prohibitions against homicide, theft, perjury, and adultery in the Ten Commandments, form axiomatic foundations for Western legal traditions, influencing ethical norms that prioritize objective moral absolutes over subjective relativism.^[137] In governance, the doctrine of divine right asserted that monarchs derived absolute authority directly from a supreme God, justifying centralized rule in European states from the medieval era through the early modern period and stabilizing hierarchies by framing rebellion as impious defiance.^[138] This causal linkage subordinated political legitimacy to transcendent divine sanction, enabling empires like those of Louis XIV in France to consolidate power without parliamentary checks until Enlightenment challenges eroded it.^[139] Historically, polities invoking supreme deity authority for ethical enforcement, such as Puritan New England colonies in the 17th century, leveraged religious covenants to foster social cohesion and deter deviance, yielding relative stability amid frontier conditions through doctrinal emphasis on communal moral accountability.^[140] Similarly, early Mormon settlements in 19th-century Utah employed theological mandates to regulate inheritance and governance, mitigating internal conflicts and promoting order in isolated theocratic structures.^[140] These cases illustrate how supreme deity-centric systems impose causal constraints on ethical relativism, contrasting with governance vacuums where absent transcendent anchors correlate with fragmented authority, as observed in pre-monotheistic tribal moralities prone to vendetta cycles.^[141] Critiques of such influences highlight excesses, including the Spanish Inquisition's coercive tribunals from 1478 to 1834, which weaponized divine orthodoxy for political suppression and deviated from scriptural mercy imperatives.^[142] Yet, the same monotheistic causality propelled abolitionist reforms; William Wilberforce, motivated by evangelical convictions of God's mandate for human dignity, spearheaded the 1807 British Slave Trade Act after decades of parliamentary advocacy rooted in supreme deity-derived ethics.^[143] This underscores a net historical pattern where supreme deity frameworks, despite aberrations, generated moral imperatives driving governance toward equity advancements over unchecked exploitation.

Contemporary Theological Debates

The 2025 State of Theology survey conducted by Ligonier Ministries and Lifeway Research revealed significant theological dilution among American evangelicals, with 49% agreeing that "God accepts the worship and service of all religions, including Christianity," indicating a marked embrace of religious pluralism that undermines claims of a singular supreme deity's exclusivity.^[144] This figure reflects a persistent trend, as similar surveys since 2020 have shown evangelicals increasingly conflating tolerance with doctrinal equivalence, despite biblical assertions of unique divine sovereignty. Complementing this, 64% of evangelicals affirmed that "everyone is born innocent in the eyes of God," and 53% endorsed the view that "everyone sins a little, but most people are good by nature," evidencing confusion over human depravity and the need for a transcendent supreme authority to address inherent moral failings.^[145] ^[146] These responses, drawn from a nationally representative sample of over 2,000 U.S. adults, highlight empirical erosion in adherence to core tenets positing a supreme deity as the ultimate arbiter of sin and redemption.^[147] Interfaith dialogues, proliferating since 2020 through initiatives like those promoted by academic and ecumenical bodies, have drawn critiques from orthodox theologians for diluting the exclusivity of worship directed to a singular supreme deity. Such engagements often prioritize relational harmony over doctrinal fidelity, fostering syncretic views that equate disparate deities or spiritual forces, as evidenced by survey data linking participation in interfaith activities to higher pluralism rates among younger believers.^[148] Conservative analysts argue this approach causally contributes to theological relativism, where empirical outcomes include weakened evangelistic commitments and blurred distinctions between a personal supreme creator and impersonal cosmic principles.^[149] Without rigorous first-principles scrutiny of incompatible claims—such as monotheistic supremacy versus polytheistic multiplicity—these dialogues risk substantiating a causal chain from apparent inclusivity to diminished recognition of any deity's absolute authority. Amid advancing scientism, which posits empirical methods as sufficient for all knowledge domains, there has been a conceptual shift toward deistic frameworks that envision a distant supreme deity uninvolved in moral causation, correlating with secularism's observable moral voids such as subjective ethical relativism and societal fragmentation. Surveys from 2020-2025 indicate that while overt atheism plateaus, vague "higher power" beliefs rise among the religiously unaffiliated, yet without anchoring to a supreme deity's prescriptive order, leading to inconsistencies in moral reasoning traceable to the absence of transcendent accountability.^[150] Philosophers critiquing secular ethics note that without a foundational supreme authority, moral imperatives devolve into preference-based constructs, empirically manifesting in policy debates over issues like objective human rights where causal links to divine neglect explain persistent voids in universal standards.^[151] This pattern underscores a realist assessment: neglect of a supreme deity's role as moral source precipitates voids not resolvable by humanistic substitutions, as evidenced by rising indicators of ethical confusion in pluralistic societies.^[152]

References

[1]
[PDF] Conceptions of Supreme Deity Abstract - PhilArchive
as supreme deity, supreme deity is intrinsically immaterial, and that, when considered as incarnation or avatar, supreme deity is intrinsically material.
[2]
The Attributes of God
Concerning the existence of a single supreme deity or god there are a variety of positions or beliefs: Forms of theistic beliefs: Monotheism- a belief that ...
[3]
Conceptions of Supreme Deity - ResearchGate
Download Citation | Conceptions of Supreme Deity | This paper attempts to provide a high-level comparison of Eastern and Western conceptions of deity.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[4]
The Existence of God: What proof is there?
Arguments are offered to support belief in the existence of a deity not based upon any evidence but on a consideration of the consequences of holding such a ...
[5]
Anselm: Ontological Argument for the God's Existence
Ontological arguments attempt to show that we can deduce God's existence from, so to speak, the very definition of God.<|separator|>
[6]
Complex societies evolved without belief in all-powerful deity | Nature
Mar 4, 2015 · Emergence of politically sophisticated societies may be assisted by faith in supernatural spirits, but does not need "big God" religion.Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
[7]
Supreme Beings | Encyclopedia.com
SUPREME BEINGS are divinities whose nature reveals a unique quality of being—generally, a transcendent spiritual power—in a culture's religious system ...<|separator|>
[8]
Supreme deity - god - The Free Dictionary
Noun, 1. God - the supernatural being conceived as the perfect and omnipotent and omniscient originator and ruler of the universe; the object of worship in ...
[9]
Supreme - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Originating from Latin supremus, meaning "highest," this word denotes the highest authority or place in power, derived from Old French suprême.
[10]
Deus - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
"God" originates from mid-13th century French and Latin, meaning a deity; phrases like "deus ex machina" derive from Greek, meaning "god from the device," ...
[11]
Adhideva: 10 definitions
Apr 13, 2025 · 2) [adhikṛto devo yena guṇātiśayāt] The supreme or highest god, Almighty. Derivable forms: adhidevaḥ (अधिदेवः). See also (synonyms): adhidevatā.
[12]
[PDF] Accounting for cross-cultural variation in the minds of gods - Pure
We propose that cultural models of gods' concerns point to particular kinds of challenges and problems—and behaviors that mitigate them—that people face or have ...
[13]
Omnipotence - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
May 21, 2002 · Omnipotence is maximal power, associated with maximal greatness, and is related to the power to bring about certain possible states of affairs.Omnipotence and Unrestricted... · Omnipotence and the Shared... · Bibliography
[14]
Cosmological Argument - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jul 13, 2004 · As Aquinas noted, the philosophical arguments for God's existence as first cause are compatible with the eternity of the universe (On the ...
[15]
Omniscience - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Feb 1, 2010 · Omniscience is the property of having complete or maximal knowledge, defined as knowing all true propositions.
[16]
Philosophy of Religion
Mar 12, 2007 · Traditionally, the divine attributes have been identified as omnipotence, omniscience, perfect goodness, worthiness of worship, necessary of non ...<|separator|>
[17]
The Problem of Evil - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Sep 16, 2002 · If God exists, then God is omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfect. If God is omnipotent, then God has the power to eliminate all evil. If ...
[18]
Causal Language and an Inquiry into Divine Procession of the ...
The term "generation" within the Triune God context does not denote a hierarchical causation, implying a lesser, eternally created status for the Son. Rather, ...<|separator|>
[19]
[PDF] Being is double - Research Bank - Australian Catholic University
Mar 1, 2014 · unlike the supreme being of Aristotle's cosmology, Aquinas construes God as “pure ... and transcends all difference and multiplicity; he has no ...
[20]
Exploring the Unique Philosophy of God in Islam
Dec 5, 2023 · Different religions paint unique portraits of the supreme being ... But tawhid suggests something far more radical—Allah has no peers, no equals, ...
[21]
[PDF] An Annotated Bibliography of Social Research on the Nuba Mountains
Stevenson perceived that the “high God” is only invoked during major crises; in daily life the spirits of the dead and nature play a more central role ...
[22]
Nature, Culture, and the Supernatural among the Susu - jstor
In African religious systems, while the high god is often distant and remote, the lesser deities-spirits or ancestral spirits-are intimately related to both the ...
[23]
[PDF] 8 Natural Nonbelief in God - PhilArchive
May 30, 2022 · The empirical literature also contrasts high gods with. “small gods,” highly limited supernatural agents who lack creator status. Belief in a ...
[24]
[PDF] THE BABYLON I AN GENESIS
They named him Anu, probably in allusion to the fact that he was the likeness of his father, Anshar. Anu was the sky-god. He, in turn, begot Nudimmud, his ...
[25]
[PDF] The Roots of Apocalypticism in Near Eastern Myth
The chief gods in the pantheon were Anu (Sumerian An), “sky,” the god of heaven and head of the older generation of gods, whose consort was Antu;. Ellil ( ...
[26]
The Gods and Goddesses of Canaan
Apr 1, 2009 · The god El was viewed as the elder, “gray beard” supreme deity. He was the creator god, the father of the gods and humankind, and the god of ...
[27]
Winter Solstice - Egypt Museum
Dec 21, 2024 · The syncretism of Amun and Ra occurred around the Middle Kingdom, when Amun's worship in Thebes rose in prominence.
[28]
https://egypt-museum.com/solstice/
[29]
13.2 Akhenaten's Religious Reforms and Their Impact
However, opposition from the priesthood and populace ultimately led to the failure of Akhenaten's religious revolution after his death. Akhenaten's Religious ...
[30]
The failed reforms of Akhenaten and Muwatalli | ETANA
The failed reforms of Akhenaten and Muwatalli ... "In his fifth regnal year Akhenaten founded his new capital Akhet-Aten in Middle Egypt, thereby crowning his ...
[31]
(PDF) Akhenaten and Nefertiti: The Controversy and the Evidence
It delves into questions regarding the failure of Akhenaten's monotheistic experiment, his influence on subsequent religions, and the dynamic interpretations by ...
[32]
[PDF] Monotheism, Polytheism, Monolatry, or Henotheism? Toward an ...
The dominant critical consensus since the late nineteenth century holds that Israel's faith evolved from polytheism or henotheism to monotheism.
[33]
[PDF] Stages of Ancient Israelite Religion: From Polytheism to Monotheism
Jul 2, 2024 · In the past scholars traced monotheism to the time of Moses, around 1200 BC. But in the last decades that date changed to 7th-6th century BC ...
[34]
[PDF] jewish monotheism: the exclusivity of yahweh in persian period
We also outlined the key factors that led to the transformation of Yehudite faith, from pre-exilic polytheism to post-exilic monotheism. The case for an.
[35]
[PDF] The Origins and Development of Israelite Monotheism from the ...
Apr 23, 2010 · But Yahwism was neither the original monotheism nor originally monotheistic; it represented neither the beginning nor the end of the evolution ...
[36]
[PDF] Views of Scholars Refuting Zoroastrian Influence
There are many historians who not only challenge any Zoroastrian “influence,” even when framed on the Hinnells model, but also there are some who insist on the ...
[37]
[PDF] The Rise of Monotheism in Israel and Its Implications in Human ...
The gradual evolvement of Israelites from Canaanites, as majority of scholars and archaeologists purport, could account for the polytheistic tendencies of ...
[38]
Monotheism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Nov 1, 2005 · Monotheism is the view that there is only one God, who is the ultimate principle of reality and the creative ground of everything else.Monotheism's Origins · Two Arguments from God's... · Are the “Monotheistic...
[39]
What defines monotheism? - Bible Hub
Monotheism is the belief in one, and only one, supreme God. The term comes from two Greek words: “monos,” meaning “single” or “alone,” and “theos,” meaning “god ...
[40]
The First Cause Argument by Peter Kreeft
He argues that if there were no first efficient cause, or cause of the universe's coming into being, then there could be no second causes because second causes ...
[41]
[PDF] The Nature of Monotheism: A Philosophical Explication - PhilArchive
Abstract: This article develops a philosophical explication of monotheism through fundamentality, using Rudolf Carnap's method of explication and Karen ...
[42]
Theisms: Monotheism, Polytheism, Deism and More - Learn Religions
Mar 18, 2019 · Deism is actually a form of monotheism, but it remains distinct enough in character and development to justify discussing separately.
[43]
Western Concepts of God - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Monotheism maintains that there is one God. To this Christianity adds that there is a threefold distinction within one God. Stated roughly, God is one substance ...
[44]
[PDF] moralizing gods - LSE Research Online
Here, MGs include both the traditional concept of “Moralizing High Gods” (MHGs) used in the Standard Cross-Cultural Survey and the. Ethnographic Atlas, and the ...
[45]
Religion, History and the Supreme Gods of Africa - jstor
The status of the Supreme Being in precolonial traditional African religious thought has been the subject of innumerable studies within.
[46]
The High God among the Zinza of Northwestern Tanzania - jstor
which, for some reason, coalesced with the otiose High God and thus made him into a more active God to whom blood sacrifices are made, as Kazoba as a ...Missing: worship data<|separator|>
[47]
Arts & Humanities Open Access Journal - MedCrave online
These names are Onyame, Onyankɔrpɔn and Ɔdomankoma. There are seventy-seven deities that are recognized and accepted in the Oguaa traditional area. These ...<|separator|>
[48]
High-Minded High Gods in North America - jstor
(Publications of the American Ethnological Society, 8/1 and 2.) 300 pp. Cooper, John M. 1934 The Northern Algonquian Supreme Being. (The Catholic U. of ...
[49]
[PDF] The Evolutionary Forms of the Religious Life: A Cross-Cultural ...
This is be- cause a high god will be a personified being that represents a sovereign group's desire to maintain order and diversity among subordinate sovereign ...<|separator|>
[50]
05 FOUNDATIONS OF VEDIC HENOTHEISM-THE CULT OF THE ...
They speak of Indra, Mitra, Varuna, Agni; and there are the divine Suparna and Garutmat. The One Being the wise call by many names (Ekam sad vipra bahudha ...
[51]
ZEUS - Greek God of the Sky, King of the Gods (Roman Jupiter)
Zeus was the king of the ancient Greek gods, and the god of the sky, weather, law and order, destiny and fate. He was depicted as a regal, mature man with a ...Zeus Family · Zeus Titles · Ancient Greek Vase Painting · Zeus Myths 4 LovesMissing: authority | Show results with:authority
[52]
Zeus: Myths, Power & Facts - World History Edu
Feb 28, 2019 · Zeus was the king of all Greek Olympian gods and goddesses – the gods that lived on Mount Olympus. Ancient Greeks worshiped him as the god of the sky, thunder, ...
[53]
Zeus - Mythopedia
Sep 20, 2023 · Zeus was the supreme god of the Greeks, a mighty deity who meted out justice from atop Mount Olympus. Hailed as the father of both mortals and immortals.
[54]
Jupiter - Mythopedia
Aug 31, 2023 · As the god of the sky, Jupiter commanded lightning, thunder, storms, and the weather at large. Like Zeus, his Greek counterpart, Jupiter ...
[55]
(PDF) The Sociological Lens on Polytheism and Monotheism: War ...
Aug 8, 2025 · By analyzing the social structures, pluralistic tendencies, and conflict dynamics of polytheistic versus monotheistic systems, this essay argues ...
[56]
the Indian Versus the Greco-Roman Religions - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · Monotheistic religions overtook polytheistic ones and the proselytizing religions expanded faster and farther. This lesson underscores the ...
[57]
The History of the Tetragrammaton - Biblical Archaeology Society
Feb 8, 2023 · The tetragrammaton, YHWH, is a four-letter Hebrew name of God. It was not spoken aloud, and became the basis for the name Jehovah.
[58]
YHWH: The God that Is vs. the God that Becomes - TheTorah.com
Jan 17, 2017 · The philosophical view of YHWH sees God as an immutable, abstract "being," while the kabbalistic view sees God as a dynamic, evolving "becoming ...
[59]
https://www.thetorah.com/article/yhwh-the-god-that-is-vs-the-god-that-becomes
[60]
The God of Creation and the Land of Israel | Bereishit
Sep 22, 2010 · Read Rabbi Jonathan Sacks' Torah reflections on Bereishit The God of Creation and the Land of Israel in Covenant and Conversation.Missing: Yahweh | Show results with:Yahweh
[61]
20 Exodus Facts Every Jew Should Know - Chabad.org
The Exodus Happened on the 15th day of Nissan in the Year 2448 of the Jewish Calendar (1313 BCE). Nissan falls out in the springtime. G‑d wanted the Exodus to ...<|separator|>
[62]
The Angel of YHWH - TheTorah.com
Mar 29, 2023 · It overlays the logic of divine images upon the figure of the messenger, resulting in the concept of “the messenger of YHWH,” an individualized ...
[63]
The 13 Attributes of YHVH - Assembly of Called-Out Believers
1) YHVH. This Name denotes mercy. God is merciful before a person sins, even though He knows the evil lies dormant in the person.
[64]
Understanding Idolatry - TheTorah.com
Jul 28, 2015 · Deuteronomy makes it clear that the Israelites should not worship human-made cult images or celestial bodies, unlike the people around them.
[65]
Ein Sof (Kabbalah) | Texts & Source Sheets from Torah, Talmud and ...
Ein Sof, or the Infinite One, has two meanings. One is the initial stage of creation, what is referred to as the Creator's intent for creation.
[66]
Judaism and Monotheism: Meaning, Origins, & Implications - Aish.com
Ethical Monotheism, the belief in one God who is the Creator of the Universe, the Father of all humanity, and the source for one absolute standard of morality, ...
[67]
Athanasian Creed | Christian Reformed Church
there is one Holy Spirit, not three holy spirits. Nothing in this trinity is before or after, nothing is greater or smaller; in their entirety the three persons
[68]
The Doctrine of the Trinity: No Christianity Without It | Clearly Reformed
Sep 28, 2011 · The three great ecumenical creeds—the Apostles' Creed, the Nicene Creed, and the Athanasian Creed—are all structured around our three in one God ...
[69]
The Nicene Creed - The Reformed Church in America
325. The creed emphasizes the doctrine of the Trinity in response to the teachings of Arius, a clergyman who denied the divinity of the Son, the second member ...<|separator|>
[70]
First Council of Nicaea – 325 AD - Papal Encyclicals
First Council of Nicaea – 325 AD · We believe in one God the Father all powerful, maker of all things both seen and unseen. · And those who say · First of all the ...
[71]
Creed of Nicaea 325 - Greek and Latin Text with English translation
We believe in one God, the Father almighty, maker of all things visible and invisible; And in one Lord, Jesus Christ, the Son of God, begotten from the Father.
[72]
Incarnation: The Central Miracle of the Christian Faith
Dec 8, 2020 · The Incarnation is the miracle of God becoming fully human, the central miracle of Christian faith, where the Word became flesh.
[73]
Jesus' Preexistence and Incarnation - St Andrews Encyclopaedia of ...
Jun 20, 2024 · The incarnation of Jesus Christ is the central teaching that defines Christian churches as a community, along with the identification of God as ...
[74]
Historical Evidence for the Resurrection | Desiring God
Sep 12, 2007 · Historical evidence includes the empty tomb, disciples' experiences with the risen Christ, and the origin of the Christian church, which are ...
[75]
[PDF] Jesus' Resurrection: A Historical Investigation - Scholars Crossing
May 7, 2010 · This thesis investigates Jesus' resurrection using a minimal facts approach, exploring twelve historical facts, early eyewitness accounts, and ...
[76]
What are some problems with unitarianism? | carm.org
Oct 4, 2024 · Unitarianism has many problems, such as expressing that god's love is dependent on something else, the problem of the one and the many.
[77]
The Incompatibility of Unitarianism with Biblical Christianity
Jul 9, 2024 · The Unitarian Church's emphasis on inclusivity and rationalism, while appealing, ultimately diverges from the core tenets of biblical Christianity.
[78]
The Trinity from Canon to Creed | Modern Reformation
The earliest Christian communities confessed a belief in the triune God before the term "Trinity" came into use. Indeed, they could hardly have done less.
[79]
Qur'an Verses About Oneness of Allah (سُبْحَٰنَهُۥ وَتَعَٰلَىٰ) - My Islam
Apr 19, 2024 · In this article, we've gathered the Qur'anic verses on oneness of Allah (سُبْحَٰنَهُۥ وَتَعَٰلَىٰ). The methodology was to compile all the Qur'an verses ...
[80]
Oneness Of God - Tawhid | Fundamentals of Islam
Unity means belief in the absolute Oneness of God, in the sense that He is not composite and divisible in any sense or composition and divisibility.
[81]
Learn The 99 Names of Allah (With Meaning and Benefits) - My Islam
A complete guide to learning all the 99 names of Allah سُبْحَٰنَهُۥ وَتَعَٰلَىٰ with translation and explanation of their meanings.
[82]
The Quran | World Civilization - Lumen Learning
Muhammad first received revelations in 609 CE in a cave on Mount Hira, near Mecca. · Muslims regard the Quran as the most important miracle of Muhammad, the ...
[83]
Oneness and Supremacy of Allah in the Quran
Jun 11, 2017 · Allah is the One and Only God and indeed the Most Supreme. The Oneness and Supremacy of Allah has been mentioned in abundant places in the Quran.
[84]
Introduction to I'jāz al-Qur'ān: The Miraculous Nature of the Qur'an
Jun 18, 2020 · The subsequent essay addresses the inimitability of the Qur'an, various plagiarism attempts throughout history, and the role of the Prophet ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[85]
What does Islam say about Anthromophic philosophy and ...
Feb 15, 2012 · In Islam the anthropomorphic concept of God is fully rejected and equals blasphemy. Many Ayat in the Quran clearly reject this notion.
[86]
[PDF] Brahman in the Upanishads
Aug 12, 2020 · Sankara has accepted this Nirguna Brahman as the ultimate reality. Actually Brahman is described in two ways – saguna and nirguna. However ...
[87]
The Upanishads: Wisdom for the Modern World - Himalayan Institute
Jan 18, 2018 · Saguna Brahman is the Absolute Reality with attributes; Nirguna Brahman is the Absolute Reality without attributes. If you think of the Divine ...
[88]
Ishvara: Personal-Creator God, Supreme Person (Gita)
“When he sees that the same Ishvara remains equally everywhere, he does not harm himself, and therefore attains the highest goal” Bhagavad Gita 13.29. Bhagavad ...Missing: date | Show results with:date<|separator|>
[89]
The Concept of Maya | Vedanta Society of Southern California
Brahman is the real truth of our existence: in Brahman we live, move, and have our being. “All this is indeed Brahman,” the Upanishads—the scriptures that form ...
[90]
Article: Dualism and Non Dualism - Kriya.ca
Shankara, a famous proponent of advaita, was a called a monist – believed in one reality, the external world as an illusion, underlying everything is Brahman.
[91]
Advaita Vedanta vs. Dvaita Vedanta: Key Differences
Explore the key differences between Advaita Vedanta (Non-Dualism) and Dvaita Vedanta (Dualism) in their views on Brahman, Atman, Maya, and liberation.
[92]
Hinduism's Four Denominations
Jun 30, 2022 · Contrary to prevailing misconceptions, Hindus all worship a one Supreme Being, though by different names. For Vaishnavites, Lord Vishnu is God.
[93]
ISHVARA: THE PERSONAL ASPECT OF GOD - The Indian Panorama
Ishvara thus refers to the personal aspect of Brahman in general; it is not specific to a particular deity. Ishvara transcends gender.
[94]
Waheguru - SikhiWiki, free Sikh encyclopedia.
Nov 10, 2023 · Waheguru (Punjabi: ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ) is the Gurmantra or primary Mantra; it is the reference to the Almighty God; the Creator; the Supreme Soul; ...Waheguru - Article by G. S. Talib · Vahiguru By Manvir Singh...
[95]
The Mool Mantra - Key beliefs in Sikhism - Eduqas - BBC Bitesize
The Mool Mantra was written by Guru Nanak and gives a short description of what God is like (also known as God's nature).
[96]
Sikhism on Idol Worship - SikhiWiki, free Sikh encyclopedia.
May 8, 2019 · Through their writings, the Sikh Gurus and Bhagats rejected such practices, stating them to be fruitless and delusional, and encouraged the ...
[97]
Sikhism - Singh Sabha Gurdwara
Sikhism preaches the devotion and remembrance of Waheguru at all times, truthful living, equality of all human beings, including men and women, social justice, ...
[98]
GURU NANAK & THE SIKH RELIGION -An Anthology of Critical ...
This book is intended to serve as seekers guide to Sikhism, the 5th largest religion of the world with its adherents, the Sikhs, spread over all the continents.
[99]
Magic and Rationalism in Ancient China
a. tortoise shell oracle bones main source of information; b. oracle bones from Hsia period have no inscriptions ... Shangdi, ancestor god of the dynasty, main ...
[100]
[PDF] Rethinking the Axial Age in Ancient China: The Role of Religion in ...
The Shang used oracle bones to divine about every aspect of their lives. Their spiritual pantheon included various ancestral and nature spirits as well as the ...
[101]
https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/f819fa05-eb3a-4975-8955-4de2f5426971/content
[102]
[PDF] Understanding Di and Tian: Deity and Heaven from Shang to Tang ...
Most scholars assume that di is the "God" of the Shang people, especially because this theory is perpetuated by the use of Shangdi in place of di throughout ...
[103]
tianming 天命, the Mandate of Heaven - Chinaknowledge
Mar 1, 2019 · The so-called "Mandate of Heaven" (tianming 天命) was a metaphysical concept to legitimize rule. It was invented by the Zhou dynasty 周(11th ...
[104]
The Mandate of Heaven | World Civilization - Lumen Learning
Under the Zhou Dynasty, China moved away from worship of Shangdi (“Celestial Lord”) in favor of worship of Tian (“heaven”), and they created the Mandate of ...
[105]
Zhou dynasty (ca. 1050–221 BCE)
To legitimize their overthrow of Shang, they introduced the concept of Heaven (Tian), and the Mandate of Heaven. They believed that a king could rule only if he ...
[106]
On the Identity of Shang Di and the Origin of the Concept of a ...
Mar 26, 2015 · This article reexamines the hypotheses of Guo Moruo and H.G. Creel that Shang Di was the high god of the Shang and Tian, that of the Zhou.
[107]
[PDF] confucian heaven (天 tian): moral economy and contingency
Thus, we might distinguish between a Shangdi of the Shang that was an amoral, anthropomorphic deity and a tian of the. Zhou that was a moral, naturalistic or ...
[108]
God: African Supreme Beings | Encyclopedia.com
Although there is universality of belief in a supreme being among most African peoples, it is correctly asserted that there is no formal worship accorded the ...
[109]
219. The High God: A Comment on Father O'Connell's Paper - jstor
people tend to replace their high gods with more clearly defined lesser gods. Pettazzoni, on the other hand, says that because men see the supreme being as ...Missing: deities | Show results with:deities
[110]
Olodumare, God in Yoruba Belief. By E. Bolaji Idowu. London ...
The Religion of the Yoruba - Olodumare, God in Yoruba Belief. By E. Bolaji Idowu. London: Longmans, 1962. Pp. 222. 27s. 6d. - Volume 4 Issue 1.Missing: ethnographic | Show results with:ethnographic
[111]
Nyame and the Message of Death - Oxford Reference
Nyame, the supreme being, is eternal, infinite, and the creator of the universe; he is remote from men and unconcerned with their daily life. He is one of the ...
[112]
[PDF] Olodumare: God in Yoruba Belief and the Theistic Problem of Evil
Staying strictly within Yoruba religion, these writers present Olodumare as Christian God, Muslim Allah, and Esu as Satan or Devil. That this interpretation is ...Missing: ethnographic records
[113]
[PDF] Olódumare and Esu in Yorubá Religious Thought
According to him, there is indeed an undiluted conception of Olódumare before the advent of Christianity and Islam. That belief in and conception of Olódumare ...
[114]
(PDF) The Akan Indigenous Concepts of Religion and Nyame (the ...
Feb 2, 2024 · This paper in revealing that the adoption of foreign religions has not eradicated the lingering influence of indigenous spiritual and religious values.
[115]
Hunter-Gatherers and the Origins of Religion - PMC - PubMed Central
May 6, 2016 · Belief in high gods appears to be a rather “stand-alone” phenomenon in the evolution of hunter-gatherer religion. Prior studies have shown that ...
[116]
3-D Scans Reveal Gigantic Native American Cave Art in Alabama
May 3, 2022 · By creating 3-D scans of the cave, they revealed previously unseen giant figures, including life-size drawings of humans in enigmatic regalia ...Missing: pre- Columbian
[117]
Native American Religion in Early America
Second, most native peoples worshiped an all-powerful, all-knowing Creator or “Master Spirit” (a being that assumed a variety of forms and both genders). They ...
[118]
Wakan Tanka | Encyclopedia.com
Wakan Tanka (great mystery) is the supreme being and creator of the Lakota Sioux. Sometimes called Great Spirit, he is similar to the supreme beings found in ...
[119]
Lakota Sioux Creation Story - World History Encyclopedia
Sep 19, 2023 · Who is the Creator God in Lakota Sioux religion? The Creator God is known as Wakan Tanka which means "Great Mystery" or "Great Spirit." How old ...
[120]
Sky Father/Sky Chief Mythology: Great spirit, Great Mystery, and ...
The Great Spirit is the English translation of the name of the creator god in many Native American traditions, particularly Algonquian and Siouan tribes.
[121]
SUMMA THEOLOGIAE: The existence of God (Prima Pars, Q. 2)
The existence of God can be proved in five ways. The first and more manifest way is the argument from motion.Missing: source | Show results with:source
[122]
Medieval Sourcebook: Anselm (1033-1109): Proslogium
In this brief work the author aims at proving in a single argument the existence of God, and whatsoever we believe of God. --The difficulty of the task. --The ...
[123]
Principle of Sufficient Reason - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Sep 14, 2010 · The Principle of Sufficient Reason is a powerful and controversial philosophical principle stipulating that everything must have a reason, cause, or ground.
[124]
Moral Arguments for the Existence of God
Jun 12, 2014 · Moral arguments for God's existence form a diverse family of arguments that reason from some feature of morality or the moral life to the existence of God.
[125]
Fine-Tuning - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Aug 22, 2017 · Many researchers believe that the fine-tuning of the universe's laws, constants, and boundary conditions for life calls for inferring the ...Fine-Tuning for Life: the... · Does Fine-Tuning for Life... · Fine-Tuning and Design
[126]
Divine intervention? A Cochrane review on intercessory prayer gone ...
A Cochrane review of ten randomised trials (7646 patients) of intercessory prayer concludes that the evidence justifies further trials.
[127]
Is the fine-tuning evidence for a multiverse? - PMC - PubMed Central
Jun 18, 2024 · A significant number of scientists and philosophers believe that the fine-tuning is evidence for the multiverse hypothesis.
[128]
Foreknowledge and Free Will | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
A human being's foreknowledge, exactly as would God's, of another's choices would seem to preclude the exercise of human free will.
[129]
Of Miracles - Hume Texts Online
A permanent online resource for Hume scholars and students, including reliable texts of almost everything written by David Hume, and links to secondary material
[130]
Polytheism | Definition, Examples, Religions, & Facts - Britannica
Polytheism, the belief in many gods. Polytheism characterizes virtually all religions other than Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.Forms of polytheistic powers... · Types of polytheism · Animal, Human, Forms
[131]
Logical Problem of Evil | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Logical Problem of Evil. The existence of evil and suffering in our world seems to pose a serious challenge to belief in the existence of a perfect God.Introducing the Problem · Logical Consistency and the... · Other Responses to the...
[132]
Evidence and Documentation of the Holocaust
Key denial assertions are that the murder of approximately six million Jews during World War II never occurred, that the Nazis had no official policy or ...Nazi Germany · Gassing Operations · "Final Solution": Overview
[133]
2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami: Facts and FAQs
Jul 25, 2025 · Approximately 230,000 people died in the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami. It is one of the deadliest disasters in modern history. The ...Fast facts: 2004 Indian Ocean... · How did World Vision help...
[134]
John Hick (1922—2012) - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
During this stage Hick also developed his Irenaean “soul-making” theodicy in which he argued that God allows evil and suffering in the world in order to develop ...Life · Religious Epistemology · Philosophical Theology · Religious Pluralism
[135]
[PDF] Theodicy: An Overview
The Judgment of God: Many theodicy discussions tend to focus on "innocent" suffering and experiences of profound evil while ignoring the profound sinfulness ...
[136]
The Fount of Everything Just and Right? The Ten Commandments ...
Oct 15, 2015 · It is axiomatic that many of the principles contained in the Ten Commandments are fundamental to the Western legal tradition. Prohibitions on ...
[137]
The Doctrine of the Divine Right of Kings
Mar 9, 2017 · This doctrine has been used to justify absolute monarchy, where a monarch holds absolute control over his or her subjects. In some cases, it was ...
[138]
Making Sense of the Divine Right of Kings - JSTOR Daily
Dec 18, 2020 · Divine right is the notion that royalty is given divine sanction to rule, with kings considered God's lieutenants, and answerable only to God.
[139]
religious doctrine as a factor of stability of political systems. a study ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Two empirical examples are offered of the use of religious doctrines to protect the stability thus conceived. The idea of covenant was used by ...
[140]
Divine Command Theory | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Divine Command Theory is the view that morality is somehow dependent upon God, and that moral obligation consists in obedience to God's commands.
[141]
The Ten Commandments a Source of American Law...REALLY???
Mar 4, 2012 · The Ten Commandments have profoundly influenced the formation of Western legal thought and the formation of our country. ... Commandment One does ...
[142]
Wilberforce and the Road to Abolition: A Model for Christian Cultural ...
Oct 8, 2015 · Wilberforce felt God had given him two great goals in life: the suppression of the slave trade and the improvement of public morality. Despite ...Missing: motivation | Show results with:motivation
[143]
https://tifwe.org/wilberforce-and-the-road-to-abolition/
[144]
https://www.ligonier.org/posts/does-god-accept-the-worship-of-all-religions-the-state-of-theology
[145]
https://www.ligonier.org/posts/64-of-evangelicals-think-were-born-innocent-the-state-of-theology
[146]
State of Theology - Lifeway Research
The latest State of Theology study from Lifeway Research and Ligonier Ministries finds significant stability across a wide range of theological beliefs.
[147]
When 'Evangelical' Means Everything but the Gospel
Sep 26, 2025 · Joe Carter explores results from the 2025 State of Theology survey and draws implications for our churches.
[148]
U.S. evangelicals confused on gospel truths, Ligonier finds - WNG.org
Sep 22, 2025 · Almost all of the evangelicals said that God loves all people the same way. However, 41% agreed that God chose the people He would save before ...<|separator|>
[149]
Religious identity in the United States | Pew Research Center
Feb 26, 2025 · The religious composition of the United States has been fairly stable in half a dozen Pew Research Center surveys conducted since 2020.Missing: deism | Show results with:deism
[150]
The Disturbing Contradiction at the Heart of Secular Morality
Feb 5, 2025 · This contradiction is corrosive: it upends the view of universal morality and human rights that nearly every secular person takes for granted.Missing: voids supreme neglect analysis
[151]
Secularism Can't Explain Morality-And Here's Why - The Rebelution
Jan 14, 2021 · The problem is that secularism does not have an ultimate standard to appeal to. Of course, secular people can still be ethical. ... It's true that ...Missing: voids supreme neglect analysis