Teach For America
Teach For America (TFA) is a nonprofit organization founded in 1990 by Wendy Kopp that recruits recent college graduates from top universities to commit two years of teaching in low-income public schools, providing them with accelerated training and alternative certification to address educational disparities.[1][2] The program's model emphasizes selecting high-achieving corps members, intensive summer training, ongoing support, and a focus on data-driven instruction to close achievement gaps, with alumni often advancing to leadership roles in education and policy.[3] Over three decades, TFA has placed more than 60,000 corps members in classrooms across the United States, primarily in urban and rural high-poverty districts, contributing to a network of alumni who influence systemic reforms.[4] Empirical evaluations, including a 2024 meta-analysis of 23 studies covering over 5 million students, indicate that TFA teachers produce statistically significant positive effects on student math achievement (0.05 standard deviations) and especially science (0.16 standard deviations) compared to other novice teachers, though impacts on reading and nontested outcomes like attendance are inconsistent or negligible.[5][6] Randomized and quasi-experimental studies from districts like Miami-Dade and Indianapolis corroborate higher effectiveness in math and science for TFA teachers, attributing gains to rigorous selection and instructional focus rather than extensive pedagogical training.[7][8] Despite these measurable student gains, TFA has drawn criticism for its short-term commitment, which results in high turnover rates—over 80% of corps members leave classrooms after two years—potentially undermining long-term school stability and exacerbating inequities by assigning inexperienced teachers disproportionately to disadvantaged students.[9][10] Critics, including educators and policy analysts, argue the model prioritizes elite recruitment over sustainable professional development, fostering a "churn and burn" dynamic that benefits alumni career trajectories more than persistent student needs, with program enrollment declining amid broader teacher shortages.[11][9] Longitudinal analyses suggest that while initial high performance occurs, the transient nature limits enduring impacts on student trajectories.[12][13]