These Truths
These Truths: A History of the United States is a 2018 book by Jill Lepore, an American historian and staff writer for The New Yorker, that offers a single-volume synthesis of U.S. history from the arrival of Europeans in 1492 to the early 21st century, centered on the three "truths" from the Declaration of Independence—political equality, natural rights, and the sovereignty of the people—and assessing whether the American experiment has affirmed or contradicted them.[1] Published by W. W. Norton & Company, the 932-page work traces conflicts over these principles through events like the founding era, slavery, the Civil War, industrialization, civil rights struggles, and technological disruptions, arguing that governance has often failed to extend rights equally while innovations in communication and media have repeatedly challenged popular sovereignty.[1] Lepore, the David Woods Kemper '41 Professor of American History at Harvard University, frames the narrative around empirical tensions between ideals and realities, emphasizing causal chains from constitutional debates to modern polarization, though her analysis prioritizes expansions of equality amid persistent hierarchies.[2] The book received widespread acclaim for its ambitious scope and readability, becoming an international bestseller and winning the 2019 Arthur Ross Book Award from the Council on Foreign Relations for distinguished writing on U.S. foreign policy and history.[2][3] Critics from conservative perspectives have faulted These Truths for a selective emphasis on systemic inequalities—particularly racial and gender-based—that aligns with prevailing academic orthodoxies, potentially underrepresenting the role of individual agency, cultural traditions, and economic liberties in driving progress, while downplaying evidence of press bias in historical accounts.[4][5] Others note its limited engagement with non-rational elements like faith and custom in shaping political outcomes, reflecting a rationalist bias common in elite historiography.[6] Despite such debates, the volume stands as a influential, if contested, reckoning with America's foundational claims against its empirical record.[4]