Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Virtue signaling

Virtue signaling refers to the conspicuous public expression of moral opinions, sympathies, or behaviors intended primarily to advertise one's alignment with socially approved values, often prioritizing reputational benefits over genuine commitment or costly action.^[1]^[2] The term was coined and popularized by British journalist James Bartholomew in a 2015 Spectator article, critiquing instances such as politicians reflexively praising refugees or celebrities posting emotive social media updates on distant tragedies to evoke approval without personal sacrifice.^[1]^[3] Rooted in signaling theory from evolutionary biology, virtue signaling functions as a low-cost mechanism for individuals to broadcast traits like altruism or righteousness, thereby securing status, alliances, or mating advantages in social groups, much like other honest or dishonest signals in animal communication.^[4]^[5] Empirical studies on related phenomena, such as moral grandstanding, reveal that people frequently amplify moral rhetoric in public forums to elevate their perceived status, with surveys indicating widespread recognition of this motive in online discourse and political statements.^[6] While proponents view it as an adaptive tool for coordinating group norms and driving gradual moral progress through collective pressure, detractors highlight its potential for hypocrisy and performative emptiness, where signaling substitutes for substantive behavioral change.^[7]^[8] This tension underscores virtue signaling's role in modern culture wars, particularly on platforms like social media, where it amplifies polarized displays but risks eroding trust in authentic ethical discourse.^[9]

Definition and Origins

Etymology and Popularization

The term "virtue signaling" (or "virtue signalling" in British English) combines "virtue," denoting moral excellence or goodness derived from the Latin virtus, with "signaling," referring to the communication of attributes or intentions to observers, often drawing from evolutionary biology's concept of honest or costly signals in social interactions. In its modern pejorative sense, it describes actions or statements intended primarily to advertise one's moral rectitude rather than to effect real change, without implying the etymological roots extend deeply into antiquity as a fixed phrase. Prior academic usages, such as in religious studies for ostentatious piety, existed but lacked the contemporary connotation of insincere social posturing.^[10] British journalist James Bartholomew coined the term in its current form in an April 18, 2015, article in The Spectator titled "The awful rise of 'virtue signalling'," where he critiqued public expressions of sympathy—such as tweets about disasters—that served more to elevate the speaker's image than to aid victims.^[1] Bartholomew later affirmed inventing the phrase to capture this phenomenon of "easy, empty boasting" amid rising social media displays of faux compassion.^[3] Though rare pre-2015 references appear in niche contexts, Bartholomew's usage marked the pivot to widespread pejorative application.^[11] The term's popularization accelerated in conservative and contrarian circles post-2015, entering broader lexicon by 2016 amid critiques of performative activism during events like the U.S. presidential election, where it targeted social media virtue displays without policy substance.^[12] By 2017, outlets like The New York Times referenced it in discussions of moral grandstanding, reflecting its adoption across ideological lines despite origins in skepticism toward elite moralizing.^[13] Usage surged with social media's growth, peaking in analyses of corporate statements and celebrity endorsements, as tracked by tools like Google Ngram and media databases showing exponential mentions from 2015 onward.^[14]

Core Characteristics and Distinctions from Genuine Advocacy

Virtue signaling entails the conspicuous public expression of moral sentiments or positions that align with socially approved norms, primarily to affirm one's alignment with those norms and secure approbation from observers, rather than to advance substantive ethical goals.^[1] This behavior often manifests as low-effort gestures, such as social media posts or verbal affirmations, which impose negligible personal cost while signaling loyalty to a group or ideology.^[1] Empirical studies link it to status-seeking motives, where individuals exaggerate moral stances to elevate their perceived standing, akin to moral grandstanding, characterized by grandiose public assertions aimed at eliciting praise rather than fostering dialogue or change.^[6] Such displays frequently prioritize symbolic conformity over consistency, with signalers sidestepping inconvenient facts or personal accountability to maintain the facade of virtue.^[1] A hallmark of virtue signaling is its detachment from genuine belief or behavioral alignment, involving overt moral posturing irrespective of internal conviction, which distinguishes it from authentic moral expression.^[15] Psychological research frames it within reputational dynamics, where the act serves self-aggrandizement through observer judgments of moral integrity, often without corresponding private actions or sacrifices.^[15] In contrast to costly signaling in evolutionary terms, where honest indicators require verifiable investment to deter deception, virtue signaling relies on cheap, unverifiable claims that erode credibility when scrutinized for hypocrisy or ineffectiveness.^[9] Genuine advocacy, by comparison, integrates public rhetoric with sustained, resource-intensive efforts toward measurable outcomes, reflecting intrinsic commitment rather than performative display.^[6] Advocates exhibit consistency across contexts, enduring tangible costs like financial outlay or reputational risk, which validate their signals as reliable under scrutiny, unlike the low-stakes optics of virtue signaling that falter under demands for follow-through.^[1] Where virtue signaling amplifies self-regard via audience validation, authentic advocacy prioritizes causal impact, such as policy reform or behavioral shifts, over ephemeral social capital, avoiding the motivational pitfalls of grandstanding that subordinate moral concern to egoistic gains.^[16] This demarcation underscores how virtue signaling, while socially pervasive, undermines collective discourse by incentivizing appearance over efficacy.^[6]

Theoretical Foundations

Psychological Mechanisms

Psychological mechanisms underlying virtue signaling primarily revolve around reputational enhancement and status-seeking motives, where individuals publicly express moral positions to elevate their perceived moral standing among observers. Moral grandstanding, a form of virtue signaling involving the use of moral talk for self-promotion, is driven by the desire for others to view the actor as morally superior, correlating with personality traits oriented toward prestige and dominance.^[17] ^[6] This behavior is associated with greater daily experiences of political and moral conflict, suggesting it amplifies interpersonal tensions as a byproduct of self-elevation strategies.^[17] Narcissistic tendencies and Dark Triad traits—narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy—further underpin these displays, particularly through signaling virtuous victimhood, where individuals emphasize personal moral suffering to garner sympathy and status.^[18] Empirical scales measuring virtue signaling confirm its link to self-favoring biases, distinguishing it from internalized moral commitments by prioritizing external validation over private virtue.^[19] Impression management processes, rooted in social psychology, explain how such signaling elicits judgments of moral integrity from audiences, often as a defensive response to perceived social exclusion risks.^[15] Attachment styles also mediate involvement, with anxious attachment prompting virtue signaling as a pathway to prosocial actions like ethical consumption, serving to alleviate insecurity through visible moral alignment.^[20] Unlike genuine moral reasoning, these mechanisms prioritize observable performance over substantive behavioral change, potentially leading to hypocrisy when private actions diverge from public postures.^[6] Observers' epistemic vigilance—psychological defenses against deception—often detects such insincerity, reducing the signaled actor's perceived authenticity.^[21]

Evolutionary and Signaling Theory Perspectives

From an evolutionary standpoint, human moral displays, including virtue signaling, can be understood as adaptations shaped by sexual and social selection pressures to advertise desirable traits such as altruism, reliability, and coalitional loyalty in ancestral environments.^[4] These signals likely evolved because they conferred fitness advantages by facilitating mate attraction, alliance formation, and group cohesion, where individuals who convincingly demonstrated moral commitments gained reputational benefits over those who did not.^[22] Evolutionary psychologist Geoffrey Miller, who popularized the term "virtue signaling" around 2019, argues that such behaviors stem from instincts to showcase moral personality traits, akin to how physical displays signal health or intelligence in other species.^[4]^[22] Signaling theory, rooted in Amotz Zahavi's handicap principle, emphasizes that reliable signals must impose verifiable costs to deter deception, as low-cost or "cheap talk" signals would evolve to be ignored or punished.^[7] In the context of virtue signaling, honest moral expressions—such as costly actions like resource sharing or risk-taking for group norms—credibly indicate underlying dispositions toward cooperation, which game-theoretic models predict would stabilize through repeated interactions in small-scale societies.^[7] Empirical support comes from studies on religious communes, where adherence to demanding rituals (e.g., fasting or celibacy) predicted group longevity by functioning as costly signals of commitment, reducing free-riding and enhancing collective survival rates; for instance, 19th-century U.S. communes with more such practices lasted over twice as long on average.^[23] Philosophical analyses informed by evolutionary biology further contend that widespread virtue signaling is predominantly honest rather than manipulative, as dishonest strategies would be selected against in environments where signals face scrutiny and retaliation.^[7] However, contemporary low-cost platforms like social media may amplify cheap virtue signals, potentially decoupling expression from action and eroding signal reliability, though residual costs—such as reputational damage from detected hypocrisy—still enforce partial honesty.^[8] This tension highlights how virtue signaling, while rooted in adaptive mechanisms for social coordination, can manifest as a double-edged tool: fostering norm adherence and cultural evolution when costly, but risking performative excess when barriers to entry are minimal.^[5] Belief signaling in evolutionary psychology extends this view, positing that moral stances function as learned or innate indicators of cognitive reliability, expanding signaling opportunities as agents detect others' agency more acutely through individual or phylogenetic development.^[24]

Historical Context

Pre-Modern Instances

In the Gospel accounts of the New Testament, composed in the first century CE, the Pharisees of ancient Judea exemplified early instances of performative moral displays. Jesus critiqued them for public acts of piety, such as extended prayers in synagogues and streets to attract admiration, and ostentatious tithing where they sounded trumpets to draw attention to their generosity, behaviors intended to signal religious superiority rather than foster genuine humility or devotion.^[25] These practices, as recorded, prioritized social validation over internal righteousness, leading to accusations of hypocrisy that undermined authentic faith.^[25] In the Roman Empire, the historian Tacitus (c. 56–120 CE) documented similar hypocritical posturing among elites during the treason trials of the early imperial period. Under Emperor Tiberius (r. 14–37 CE), prosecutors publicly professed zeal for the state's welfare while leveling baseless accusations against senators to secure personal favor and safety, exploiting "public hatred" for advancement amid a climate of fear that stifled open discourse.^[26] Figures like Thrasea Paetus further illustrated this by pursuing ostentatious gestures, such as ritualistic suicide, to cultivate a reputation for stoic virtue and glory, contrasting with quieter exemplars like Tacitus's father-in-law Agricola, whose moderation required no performative display because it was innate.^[26] These episodes, detailed in Tacitus's Annals, reveal how signaling moral rectitude served political self-preservation in a system rife with imperial surveillance and betrayal.^[26]

20th-Century Precursors

In the latter half of the 20th century, amid the civil rights movement and anti-establishment protests of the 1960s, early critiques of performative moral displays emerged in American public discourse, highlighting affluent individuals' public endorsements of progressive causes as mechanisms for social distinction rather than authentic commitment. The term "limousine liberal" originated in 1969 during the New York City mayoral campaign, when Democratic candidate Mario Procaccino used it to deride incumbent Republican John Lindsay and his supporters as wealthy elites who championed urban welfare policies and racial integration while residing in insulated luxury, unaffected by the socioeconomic disruptions they endorsed.^[27] This pejorative captured a perceived hypocrisy wherein symbolic advocacy—through speeches, donations, or policy rhetoric—served to signal moral superiority and maintain class alliances without incurring personal costs, such as integration into diverse neighborhoods or economic redistribution impacting one's own wealth.^[28] Tom Wolfe's 1970 essay "Radical Chic: That Party at Lenny's," published in New York magazine, provided a vivid satirical examination of such dynamics at a January 1969 fundraiser hosted by composer Leonard Bernstein at his Park Avenue apartment for the Black Panther Party. Wolfe portrayed the gathering of Hollywood celebrities, socialites, and intellectuals as a spectacle where guests donned revolutionary accoutrements—like discussing Panther militancy over caviar—and effusively praised the group's anti-capitalist stance, yet exhibited unease with the attendees' actual poverty and rhetoric, preferring controlled displays over substantive engagement.^[29] The essay argued that this "radical chic" represented a fusion of elite fashion and political extremism, wherein hosting militants enhanced hosts' cultural cachet and insulated their privilege under a veneer of solidarity, ultimately prioritizing self-congratulation over the Panthers' legal defense fund goals.^[30] These mid-century instances, rooted in reactions to the era's radical movements, illustrated precursors to virtue signaling by emphasizing how public moral gestures could function as status signals within stratified social circles, often diluting the causes they ostensibly supported. Contemporary observers noted that such behaviors fostered cynicism toward activism, as elite endorsements appeared detached from grassroots realities, paving the way for later scholarly scrutiny of insincere advocacy.^[30]

Contemporary Manifestations

In Politics and Ideology

In political discourse, virtue signaling frequently appears as the public endorsement of moral or ideological positions intended to convey moral superiority and secure approval from like-minded audiences, often detached from substantive policy commitments or personal sacrifice. Politicians and activists may amplify rhetoric on issues such as climate change, racial equity, or immigration to demonstrate alignment with partisan norms, thereby bolstering their status within ideological coalitions. This practice aligns with moral grandstanding, where individuals use moral language for self-promotion, as prestige-seeking grandstanders consistently report more extreme ideological views, with correlations ranging from r = 0.1 to 0.2 across U.S. samples.^[31] Such displays contribute to affective polarization, heightening negative sentiments toward out-groups and reinforcing in-group loyalty without advancing practical solutions.^[32] Ideological manifestations often involve symbolic gestures, such as issuing condemnations of perceived societal ills using vague collectivist terms like "we" or "society," which allow flexible moral posturing with minimal accountability. For example, vocal expressions of concern for marginalized groups or environmental causes can garner praise through low-cost actions like awareness campaigns or social media statements, yet frequently evade rigorous implementation, prioritizing reputational gains over efficacy.^[26] This pattern fosters a culture of performative outrage, where ideological purity tests—evident in phenomena like cancel culture—elevate accusers' standing by highlighting others' faults, eroding focus on individual responsibility and constructive dialogue. Research links these prestige-driven tactics to increased partisan antagonism, as grandstanders exhibit stronger emotional divides, with mean partisan affect gaps widening in representative adult samples (N = 2,519).^[31] Empirical data from multi-study analyses underscore how virtue signaling in politics sustains ideological echo chambers, where public moral testimony serves as evidence of allegiance rather than truth-seeking. In prestige-motivated cases, participants across undergraduate (N = 981) and national adult cohorts showed heightened endorsement of extreme positions, suggesting a causal link to polarization via status competition rather than genuine conviction.^[33] Critics note that while such signaling can normatively reinforce cooperation in theory, its political application often devolves into hypocrisy, as actors decry opponents' vices while exempting their own inconsistencies, thereby impeding cross-ideological compromise.^[26] This dynamic is bipartisan but amplified in environments rewarding symbolic over empirical virtue, as evidenced by correlations persisting across self-reported conservative and liberal identifiers.^[32] In corporations, virtue signaling often takes the form of public alignments with social justice causes to cultivate a progressive brand image, a practice critics label "woke capitalism" that prioritizes signaling over substantive action or customer alignment. Anheuser-Busch's Bud Light campaign featuring transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney in April 2023 exemplifies this, as the partnership aimed to appeal to younger, diverse demographics but triggered a consumer boycott, leading to a 26% U.S. sales drop in May 2023 and the brand's displacement from its top-selling position.^[34] Similarly, Disney's vocal opposition to Florida's 2022 Parental Rights in Education Act, including CEO Bob Chapek's public criticism and internal employee activism, positioned the company as a defender of LGBTQ+ interests but resulted in legislative backlash and stock value erosion amid perceptions of prioritizing ideological signaling over family-oriented entertainment core to its audience.^[35] Nike's 2018 "Dream Crazy" advertisement with Colin Kaepernick, endorsing his national anthem protests against police brutality, initially increased sales by 31% but later faced accusations of performative engagement, as the company's labor practices in supply chains continued to draw scrutiny for exploitation in developing countries.^[36] Media outlets engage in virtue signaling through selective framing and amplification of narratives that align with institutional leanings, often at the expense of balanced coverage to demonstrate moral alignment. For instance, during the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests, major networks like CNN invoked terms associated with systemic inequities over 7,000 times in peak coverage months, correlating with advertiser pressures and audience demographics skewed toward urban, liberal viewers, yet empirical analyses later highlighted disproportionate emphasis on unrest narratives while downplaying concurrent declines in certain crime categories post-2020 reforms.^[37] This pattern reflects broader incentives where editorial choices signal institutional virtue to elite networks, as evidenced by internal leaks from outlets like The New York Times revealing staff pushback against stories challenging dominant social justice orthodoxies.^[6] On social platforms, virtue signaling proliferates via low-effort performative activism, such as hashtag campaigns or symbolic posts that prioritize social approval over tangible impact. A 2023 analysis of Twitter (now X) data showed that moral grandstanding posts—expressive statements on issues like climate or inequality—receive higher engagement when framed for status elevation, with users 2.5 times more likely to amplify grandiose moral claims than substantive policy discussions, often without corresponding behavioral changes like donations or volunteering.^[37] Platforms' algorithms exacerbate this by prioritizing emotionally charged content, as seen in the 2020 #BlackLivesMatter trend where over 47 million posts occurred, but follow-up studies indicated minimal conversion to offline action, with performative "blackout" squares dominating feeds as symbolic gestures critiqued for diluting substantive discourse.^[38] This dynamic fosters echo chambers where signaling reinforces norms but hinders causal progress, as platforms like Instagram and TikTok reward viral virtue over evidence-based advocacy.^[39] In casual conversations, individuals frequently engage in moral grandstanding by publicly articulating strong ethical positions to enhance their social reputation, such as claiming longstanding support for the disadvantaged while emphasizing external scrutiny to impress friends.^[6] This behavior, driven by status-seeking traits like prestige strivings, correlates with increased interpersonal moral and political conflicts in daily life, accounting for 5.7% to 10.8% of variance in reported disputes across multiple studies involving over 2,500 participants.^[6] Visible, low-cost displays also serve as everyday signals, including wearing t-shirts or pins emblazoned with cause-related slogans, affixing bumper stickers to vehicles advocating social issues, or erecting yard signs expressing moral stances, which convey virtue to passersby or neighbors without requiring ongoing commitment.^[40] Such actions often prioritize reputational gains over behavioral change, as evidenced by their association with narcissistic antagonism and extraversion in self-reported motivations.^[6] Performative expressions of empathy in social interactions, like verbalizing compassion for disaster victims or mild disapproval of others' views on topics such as immigration during group discussions, further exemplify these patterns, functioning as evolved mechanisms for social coordination but frequently prioritizing self-presentation.^[5] Empirical associations indicate that higher grandstanding tendencies predict not only relational strain but also heightened cynicism toward moral discourse in routine encounters.^[6]

Empirical Evidence and Studies

Research on Moral Grandstanding and Hypocrisy

Philosophers Justin Tosi and Brandon Warmke introduced the concept of moral grandstanding in 2016, defining it as the act of contributing to public moral discourse primarily to enhance one's status or reputation, rather than to seek truth or promote genuine moral improvement.^[16] They distinguished it from hypocrisy, which involves a discrepancy between professed beliefs and private actions, arguing that grandstanding centers on impure motives in public expression, often leading to exaggerated claims, conflict escalation, and degraded discourse quality.^[41] Empirical research has since validated and quantified grandstanding as a measurable trait linked to self-promotion, with studies showing its prevalence across ideological lines in online and everyday interactions.^[42] Key empirical work includes the development of the Moral Grandstanding Motivation Scale (MGMS) by Grubbs and colleagues in 2019, comprising Prestige Strivings (seeking admiration) and Dominance Strivings (asserting superiority) subscales, which demonstrated high reliability (e.g., confirmatory factor analysis fit: CFI = .992, RMSEA = .034) across multiple U.S. samples totaling over 5,000 participants.^[17] The scale correlated with status-seeking personality traits, such as narcissistic extraversion (r = .326 for prestige) and antagonism (r = .484 for dominance), and independently predicted greater reported political and moral conflict in daily life, explaining an additional 5.7% of variance in conflict beyond other factors.^[17] Longitudinal data confirmed scale stability over one month (r = .701 for prestige, r = .663 for dominance), indicating grandstanding as a consistent individual difference rather than situational behavior.^[17] Further studies link grandstanding to polarization and behavioral inconsistencies suggestive of hypocrisy. In multi-study analyses, prestige-motivated grandstanding was associated with endorsing more extreme ideological positions and reduced willingness to engage opposing views, amplifying divisive rhetoric on social media.^[31] During the COVID-19 pandemic, a 2022 longitudinal study of 1,533 U.S. adults found dominance-oriented grandstanding predicted lower adherence to social distancing guidelines despite public expressions of moral concern for collective health, alongside increased interpersonal conflict and status-focused online activity.^[43] Prestige-oriented grandstanding, while not directly tied to noncompliance, correlated with heightened social media moralizing and discord, highlighting how self-promotional motives can undermine consistent moral action.^[44] Research on moral hypocrisy intersects with these findings, revealing mechanisms where individuals rationalize personal failings to maintain a superior self-image, often amplified in public signaling contexts. For instance, studies on moral hypocrisy demonstrate that people judge their own transgressions as less severe than identical acts by others, a bias strengthened by desires for moral superiority that align with grandstanding incentives.^[45] While direct causal links remain underexplored, the overlap suggests grandstanding fosters environments where hypocritical inconsistencies—professed virtue without corresponding sacrifice—thrive, as status gains from signaling outweigh costs of behavioral alignment.^[46] These patterns hold across samples, with no strong evidence of ideological asymmetry, countering claims of partisan exclusivity.^[42]

Quantifiable Impacts on Behavior and Policy

Empirical studies have quantified virtue signaling's influence on individual behaviors, often through its overlap with moral grandstanding, where public moral expressions aim to elevate one's status. In a longitudinal analysis of U.S. adults during the COVID-19 pandemic, dominance-oriented moral grandstanding correlated negatively with social distancing adherence (r = -0.26, p < 0.05) and positively with interpersonal conflict over pandemic measures (r = 0.35, p < 0.05), while prestige-oriented grandstanding predicted heightened social media engagement for status (r = 0.22, p < 0.05) and further conflict (r = 0.21, p < 0.05).^[43] These patterns suggest virtue signaling can undermine collective action by prioritizing reputational gains over practical compliance, with structural equation modeling confirming model fit (CFI = 0.974, RMSEA = 0.046).^[43] Conversely, virtue signaling has been linked to prosocial consumer actions in controlled experiments. Among Pakistani participants (n = 419), self-oriented virtue signaling mediated the effect of attachment anxiety on green purchase intentions (indirect effect 95% CI [0.05, 0.15]) and prosocial responses (95% CI [0.01, 0.06]), with direct correlations of r = 0.16 (p < 0.001) for purchases and r = 0.10 (p = 0.021) for prosociality.^[20] A follow-up manipulation (n = 260) showed induced anxious attachment boosted virtue signaling (d = 0.29, p = 0.012), further mediating purchase behavior (95% CI [0.04, 0.36]). Such findings indicate signaling can drive observable, albeit potentially performative, environmental and altruistic behaviors, though the studies' cultural context limits generalizability to Western samples.^[20] At the societal level, prestige-motivated moral grandstanding correlates with ideological extremism and affective polarization, exacerbating divisions that shape policy preferences. Across U.S. samples (N > 1,000 per study), these associations ranged from small to moderate (r = 0.1–0.2 for polarization; r > 0.2 for extremism, p < 0.05), independent of political affiliation.^[31] This dynamic fosters environments where signalers endorse extreme positions for prestige, potentially crowding out compromise-oriented discourse and leading to polarized policy outcomes, such as stalled bipartisan reforms. Theoretical models of legislative virtue signaling further posit it selects for "policy zealots" over pragmatists, though empirical quantification remains nascent.^[47] In corporate contexts, virtue signaling manifests in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) policies, with quantifiable financial trade-offs. ESG funds, often critiqued as signaling mechanisms, exhibited underperformance relative to broader markets over recent years, attributed to structural biases overweighting underperforming sectors like renewables amid energy transitions.^[48] For instance, specific sustainable portfolios lagged benchmarks by margins tied to virtue-aligned but low-return assets, prompting investor outflows and policy reevaluations in states restricting ESG mandates to prioritize fiduciary returns over signaling.^[49] These outcomes highlight how signaling-driven policies can impose measurable costs, diverting resources from substantive efficacy.^[50]

Criticisms

Inauthenticity and Hypocrisy

Critics of virtue signaling frequently highlight its association with hypocrisy, defined as a discrepancy between professed moral commitments and actual behavior or underlying attitudes. This inauthenticity manifests when individuals or organizations publicly display moral superiority to garner social approval, yet fail to enact corresponding actions, prioritizing performative gestures over substantive change.^[51]^[21] For instance, empirical analysis of corporate communications reveals that firms engaging in extensive virtue signaling—such as emphasizing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles in shareholder letters—face investor backlash when their operational practices contradict these claims, with stock penalties averaging up to 5% in hypocritical cases unless offset by high returns.^[52] Philosophical examinations further argue that virtue signaling incentivizes moral hypocrisy by encouraging exaggerated public outrage or concern without internal alignment, as the drive for status elevates signaling over genuine moral progress.^[2] Related research on moral grandstanding, a close analog, demonstrates through surveys and experiments that participants often amplify moral rhetoric to impress observers, leading to polarized discourse and diminished trust when insincerity is perceived, distinct from outright hypocrisy yet exacerbating perceptions of feigned virtue.^[53]^[54] Inauthenticity aversion studies corroborate this, showing that hypocritical actors provoke stronger moral reactance—such as outrage and distrust—compared to consistent but flawed ones, as observers detect the taint of self-serving pretense.^[55] Specific domains amplify these dynamics: in politics, leaders may decry inequality while maintaining personal lifestyles that embody privilege, eroding credibility; corporations adopt symbolic diversity initiatives amid internal data showing persistent disparities, as evidenced by longitudinal audits revealing implementation gaps in 70% of signaling-heavy firms.^[56] Such patterns underscore a causal link where signaling substitutes for action, fostering cynicism as publics recognize the gap between rhetoric and reality, with surveys indicating that 62% of respondents view high-profile virtue signalers as hypocritical when private behaviors surface.^[57] This hypocrisy extends to cultural critiques, where virtue signaling is likened to "acting good" without conviction, as satirized in performative social media campaigns that prioritize viral optics over sustained effort. Recent theoretical models explain heightened sensitivity to such inauthenticity as an evolved mechanism to enforce genuine cooperation, penalizing those whose signals decouple from costly commitments.^[58] While defenders argue signaling can bootstrap norms, the preponderance of evidence from behavioral economics and psychology supports the view that unchecked inauthenticity undermines moral discourse, as hypocritical displays erode collective trust more than overt vice.^[59]^[60]

Detrimental Effects on Discourse and Action

Virtue signaling undermines the quality of public discourse by shifting focus from collaborative truth-seeking to competitive self-promotion. Philosophers Justin Tosi and Brandon Warmke describe moral grandstanding—a key mechanism of virtue signaling—as the act of expressing moral opinions primarily to boost one's status, which fosters antagonism rather than reasoned exchange.^[16] In such environments, participants prioritize outshining others over evaluating evidence, leading to exaggerated rhetoric and suppressed dissent, as individuals avoid positions that might appear morally inferior.^[61] This dynamic has been linked to heightened group polarization, where exposure to grandstanding among like-minded peers intensifies extreme views without substantive justification.^[62] The practice also erodes trust in moral communication, as observers increasingly attribute arguments to signaling motives rather than sincerity, breeding widespread cynicism. Tosi and Warmke contend that this suspicion diminishes the perceived value of genuine moral discourse, discouraging participation and reducing the forum's utility for resolving ethical disputes.^[41] Empirical observations in online settings, such as social media threads on contentious issues, reveal how grandstanding escalates conflicts into status battles, sidelining empirical data in favor of performative outrage.^[42] Consequently, discourse becomes less conducive to persuasion or compromise, with participants retreating to echo chambers to avoid reputational risks. On the plane of action, virtue signaling promotes symbolic gestures over effective interventions, diverting resources toward visible but low-impact measures. A 2023 analysis of social media virtue signals regarding climate change found no correlation between public expressions of concern and subsequent prosocial behaviors, such as donations to environmental causes, indicating that signaling often substitutes for costly action.^[37] In policy contexts, this manifests as initiatives driven by reputational enhancement rather than outcomes; for instance, corporate diversity programs motivated by signaling pressures have yielded minimal improvements in workforce representation or performance metrics, as measured in longitudinal firm data from 2015 to 2020.^[63] Such patterns foster hypocrisy, where proclaimed commitments fail to translate into behavioral change, ultimately weakening collective efforts on pressing issues by prioritizing short-term approval over long-term efficacy.^[21]

Defenses and Counterarguments

Proponents argue that virtue signaling serves a functional role in social coordination by disseminating common knowledge of prevailing moral norms, thereby enabling collective adherence and action where individual commitment might falter. In scenarios involving coordination dilemmas, such as shifting societal attitudes toward issues like slavery abolition or same-sex marriage rights, public expressions of virtue create widespread awareness that others share the norm, reducing uncertainty and catalyzing group-level change even among those with moderate personal conviction.^[5] This mechanism aligns with signaling theory, where overt moral declarations function as low-cost coordinators, prompting reciprocal behaviors and averting suboptimal equilibria in group dynamics.^[5] Virtue signaling further reinforces norms by imposing reputational costs on non-conformers and incentivizing compliance, effectively weeding out free riders who might otherwise exploit cooperative systems. Philosopher Neil Levy contends that such signaling preserves social coordination by publicly affirming virtues, which deters defection and sustains group cohesion, particularly when tied to observable commitments like charitable pledges that normalize pro-social expectations.^[7] For instance, early adopters of costly signals—such as public vows to donate 10% of income—face potential backlash but gradually entrench norms, fostering self-enforcing environments where deviation invites social disapproval and peer influence amplifies adherence.^[64] Empirical support emerges from experimental psychology, where moral signaling enhances perceptions of trustworthiness and group binding, teaching normative standards through emphatic expressions that strengthen enforcement. In preregistered studies (N=1,224), participants exposed to extreme moral signals inferred deeper character traits and adjusted cooperative behaviors accordingly, demonstrating how signaling binds individuals to group responsibilities and facilitates norm internalization over time.^[65] These functions underscore virtue signaling's adaptive value in maintaining order, though they hinge on contextual credibility rather than inherent sincerity.^[65]

Challenges to the Concept's Validity

Critics of the concept contend that virtue signaling lacks clear empirical distinguishability from genuine moral expression, rendering it difficult to operationalize in psychological research. Studies on moral grandstanding, a related phenomenon, indicate that public moral discourse often involves status-seeking motives intertwined with authentic beliefs, but fail to isolate "signaling" as a uniquely insincere category without introspective evidence of hypocrisy, which is inherently unverifiable.^[6] ^[66] This unfalsifiability allows the term to dismiss any moral advocacy as performative, potentially stifling legitimate discourse without substantive critique. Philosophical analyses challenge the pejorative framing, arguing that virtue signaling does not inherently express vice or degrade moral talk when it aligns with the signaler's commitments. For instance, public expressions of virtue can reinforce communal norms and constrain behavior through reputational incentives, serving moral progress rather than undermining it, as long as they avoid deliberate deception.^[7] ^[21] Accusations of signaling, in turn, may themselves function as ad hominem attacks that prioritize motive attribution over argument evaluation, thus questioning the concept's utility as a diagnostic tool rather than a rhetorical weapon.^[67] From an evolutionary standpoint, signaling theory posits that overt displays of moral virtue are adaptive mechanisms for building trust and coordinating cooperation in social groups, not pathological vices. Empirical models in behavioral ecology suggest such signals evolve because they reliably indicate underlying traits or intentions, even if they confer reputational benefits, challenging the notion that motive dilution invalidates the behavior's social value.^[5] Experimental findings further indicate that perceived virtue signaling can influence attitudes positively, such as by creating common knowledge of norms that prompts behavioral change, implying the concept overlooks potential prosocial outcomes.^[40]

Cultural and Political Implications

Role in Polarization and Culture Wars

Virtue signaling contributes to political polarization by incentivizing individuals to adopt and publicly express more extreme moral and ideological positions to gain social status and admiration. Empirical research demonstrates that prestige-motivated moral grandstanding—a close analog to virtue signaling involving self-promotional moral talk—positively correlates with ideological extremism, with effect sizes ranging from moderate (r > 0.2) in undergraduate and adult samples to smaller but reliable associations (r = 0.1–0.2) in nationally representative U.S. surveys of over 4,000 participants.^[31] This occurs as individuals ramp up the intensity of their rhetoric to outdo peers, fostering affective polarization through heightened negative emotions toward outgroups, while dominance-motivated grandstanding shows no such consistent link.^[31] Such dynamics degrade discourse quality, replacing reasoned debate with competitive displays that prioritize appearing morally superior over seeking truth or consensus.^[68] In culture wars—intense societal conflicts over values, identity, and norms—virtue signaling amplifies divisions by reinforcing in-group cohesion and out-group vilification without necessitating behavioral change. Participants signal allegiance to causes like environmentalism, social justice, or traditionalism through public gestures, such as corporate statements during controversies (e.g., over 1,800 U.S. companies issued diversity pledges in 2020 amid racial unrest, often yielding minimal internal policy shifts), which entrench tribal loyalties and discourage cross-aisle engagement.^[69] This performative escalation, evident in social media outrage cycles, intensifies polarization on flashpoint issues including abortion, transgender rights, and immigration, where moral claims serve as loyalty tests rather than bases for negotiation; studies link such grandstanding to reduced willingness for dialogue and heightened group extremism.^[70]^[71] Although the phenomenon spans ideologies, its prevalence in elite institutions and media—where left-leaning biases may inflate certain forms—often results in asymmetric scrutiny, with mechanisms like status-seeking operating universally to hinder resolution.^[72]

Cross-Ideological Applications and Biases

Moral grandstanding, a status-seeking variant of virtue signaling through public moral expressions, shows no substantial ideological disparities in prevalence or motivation. Across six studies involving diverse U.S. samples totaling over 4,000 participants, self-identified Democrats and Republicans exhibited comparable levels of prestige and dominance strivings in moral discourse, with non-significant differences (e.g., F(4,340) = 1.74, p = .141 for prestige motives).^[6] Prestige-motivated grandstanding correlates with ideological extremism on both ends of the spectrum, as evidenced by consistent associations (r > 0.2) in samples of undergraduates (N=981), U.S. adults (N=1,063), and nationally representative adults (N=2,519), independent of left-right orientation.^[31] This pattern holds curvilinearly, with higher grandstanding at ideological extremes, suggesting applications in conservative signaling of patriotism or traditionalism for group affirmation, akin to progressive endorsements of equity causes for social capital. Perceptions of virtue signaling, however, reveal partisan biases, as individuals apply outgroup derogation to interpret opponents' moral displays as insincere more readily than ingroup equivalents.^[73] Empirical patterns indicate the term's usage skews toward conservative critiques of left-leaning activism, such as symbolic corporate progressivism, potentially underemphasizing parallel right-wing instances like performative anti-elitism without policy follow-through.^[74] Such selective application fosters reciprocal accusations, amplifying affective polarization (r = 0.1–0.2), where moral extremity serves prestige over substantive engagement across affiliations.^[31] Institutional analyses note this without ideological exclusivity, attributing biases to echo-chamber dynamics rather than inherent partisan hypocrisy.^[75]

References

[1]
The awful rise of 'virtue signalling' | The Spectator
James Bartholomew. The awful rise of 'virtue signalling'. Virtue signalling is one of many phrases invented by Spectator writers ('the Establishment' is another) ...
[2]
(PDF) Virtue Signaling and Moral Progress - ResearchGate
Jan 27, 2021 · Virtue signaling is the act of engaging in public moral discourse in order to enhance or preserve one's moral reputation.
[3]
I invented 'virtue signalling'. Now it's taking over the world
Oct 10, 2015 · The phrase 'virtue signalling' has become part of the English language. I coined the phrase in an article here in The Spectator (18 April)
[4]
Virtue Signaling (2019) — Geoffrey Miller, Ph.D.
This book collects seven essays written from 1996 through 2018. They're all focused around the evolutionary psychology of politics, ethics, and language. It ...
[5]
Why virtue signalling is not just a vice, but an evolved tool - Aeon
Apr 4, 2022 · In defence of virtue signallers, research on signalling theory shows that even cheap talk can be useful. Life is rife with coordination problems ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[6]
Moral grandstanding in public discourse: Status-seeking motives as ...
Oct 16, 2019 · That is, virtue signaling, as commonly understood, refers publicly signaling one's values or virtues in a grandiose way with a goal of garnering ...
[7]
Virtue signalling is virtuous | Synthese
Apr 16, 2020 · Virtue signalling is morally appropriate. It neither expresses vices, nor is hypocritical, nor does it degrade the quality of public moral discourse.Missing: studies | Show results with:studies<|separator|>
[8]
'Virtue Signalling' May Annoy Us. But Civilisation Would Be ...
Sep 2, 2019 · Virtue signalling includes the best of human instincts, and the worst of human instincts.
[9]
What's my motivation? Reputational motives, virtue signaling, and ...
Jan 20, 2025 · My aim here is to analyze the cognitive repercussions of virtue signaling behavior for moral agents with mixed motivations: coldhearted virtue ...
[10]
virtue signalling - Wiktionary, the free dictionary
virtue signaling, virtue-signalling, virtue-signaling. Etymology. Initially used in academic works about religion to refer to ostentatious public displays of ...
[11]
VIRTUE SIGNALING Definition & Meaning - Dictionary.com
the sharing of one's point of view on a social or political issue, often on social media, in order to garner praise or acknowledgment of one's righteousness.
[12]
Virtue Signaling Is A Terrible Foundation For Lawmaking - Forbes
Jun 23, 2017 · British author James Bartholomew first coined the phrase “virtue signaling.” He describes it as the phenomenon “in which many people say or ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[13]
'Virtue Signaling' Isn't the Problem. Not Believing One Another Is.
Aug 8, 2017 · The British conservative writer James Bartholomew may be the main popularizer of the term ''virtue signaling,'' which he first used in an April ...
[14]
'Virtue signalling', a slur meant to imply moral grandstanding that ...
or “woke washing” — for issuing empty statements ... The origins of the term “virtue signalling” are disputed.
[15]
The roles of narcissism, virtue signaling and social exclusion
Virtue signaling involves symbolic actions intended to elicit favorable judgments from the observers about an individual's moral integrity (Ok et al., 2021).
[16]
Moral Grandstanding - Tosi - 2016 - Philosophy & Public Affairs
Dec 27, 2016 · This article examines moral grandstanding, one prominent form of repugnant moral talk, and considers its moral implications.
[17]
Moral grandstanding in public discourse: Status-seeking motives as ...
Moral grandstanding motivation was associated with status-seeking personality traits, as well as greater political and moral conflict in daily life.
[18]
Signaling virtuous victimhood as indicators of Dark Triad personalities
Jul 2, 2020 · Next, we develop and validate a victim signaling scale that we combine with an established measure of virtue signaling to operationalize the ...
[19]
Signaling virtuous victimhood as indicators of Dark Triad personalities.
Jul 2, 2020 · Virtue signaling is defined as “the conspicuous expression of moral values, done primarily with the intent of enhancing one's standing within a ...<|separator|>
[20]
Anxious Altruism: Virtue Signaling Mediates the Impact of ...
May 31, 2024 · Our psychological mechanism of virtue signaling adds depth to our understanding of how attachment styles shape ethical consumption responses ...
[21]
[PDF] Virtue signaling and moral progress - PhilPapers
speech is a case of virtue signaling. This makes the empirical study of virtue signaling and its real-world effects challenging. It also means that the term ...
[22]
Signaling Virtue | Psychology Today
Apr 21, 2020 · The term ''virtue signaling'' has become much-maligned, after having been first introduced (I think) by evolutionary psychologist Geoffrey ...
[23]
(PDF) Virtue signalling is virtuous - ResearchGate
Aug 9, 2025 · 10120. Sosis, R., & Bressler, E. R. (2003). Cooperation and commune longevity: A test of the costly signaling ... virtue signaling. By ...
[24]
Evolutionary psychology, learning, and belief signaling: design for ...
Sep 18, 2021 · Recent work in the cognitive sciences has argued that beliefs sometimes acquire signaling functions in virtue of their ability to reveal
[25]
Live Your Virtues, Don't Just Signal Them - The Gospel Coalition
Aug 30, 2022 · The Pharisees could be considered the original virtue signalers. Acutely attuned to truth and being right, the Pharisees were known for overt ...
[26]
Virtue Signalling, Ancient and Modern – Scott B. Nelson
Apr 15, 2022 · Virtue signalling is a way of pointing at others' faults and flaunting our superiority. It is a political act: a way of stating not just that I am doing ...
[27]
Limousine Liberal: This Is How the Term Was Invented | TIME
May 10, 2016 · Procaccino coined the term limousine liberal to characterize what he and his largely white ethnic following from the “outer boroughs” considered the repellent ...
[28]
'Listen, Liberal' and 'The Limousine Liberal' - The New York Times
Apr 26, 2016 · ... limousine liberal” has a long and messy history all its own. The term originated during the 1969 New York mayoral campaign, when the ...
[29]
Radical Chic: That Party at Lenny's - New York Magazine
Sep 15, 2023 · “It's a tricky business, integrating new politics with tried and true social motifs.” By Tom Wolfe, a contributing editor at New York Magazine from 1968 to ...Missing: virtue | Show results with:virtue
[30]
Tom Wolfe, radical chic and that party at Lenny Bernstein's | TheArticle
Dec 19, 2020 · Wolfe coined the term “radical chic” to describe how wealthy liberals attempted to ingratiate themselves within the progressive politics of the ...
[31]
Moral grandstanding and political polarization: A multi-study ...
Moral grandstanding is related to endorsing more extreme ideological positions. Moral grandstanding motivated by a desire to seek prestige is related to ...<|separator|>
[32]
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104009
[33]
https://osf.io/3mpx2/
[34]
If US companies 'go woke', do they really go broke? - BBC
Jun 21, 2023 · Bud Light loses top spot in US after boycott · Why Bud Light and Disney are under attack · DeSantis warns 'buckle up' as he gets Disney power.
[35]
Why Bud Light and Disney are under attack from conservatives - BBC
May 16, 2023 · At the home of Sarah Fields, a conservative activist and mum-of-three from Texas, some of America's biggest brands are no longer welcome.
[36]
Definitive Guide To The Anti-'Woke' Protests: From Bud Light To ...
May 20, 2023 · New Zealand retailer The Warehouse faced similar online backlash, reportedly for selling items from Disney's Pride collection. Chief Critics.
[37]
The signal behind virtue signals - CEPR
Jul 4, 2023 · Social media enables individual users to show support for moral causes online, fostering a kind of 'virtue signalling' that has provoked both praise and ...
[38]
Stop the Show: A Call to End Performative Activism - Sage Journals
Sep 1, 2024 · Aagerup U. (2022) The ethics of conspicuous virtue signaling: When brand co-creation on social media turns negative.
[39]
Is performative activism always bad? A qualitative case study - Duncan
Jul 4, 2025 · Thimsen (2022) argued that performative activism is a critical label applied to actions that are seen as aiming to “self-promote and build one's ...Abstract · METHOD · RESULTS · DISCUSSION
[40]
Don't Be Afraid to Virtue Signal — It Can Be a Powerful Tool to ...
Jul 2, 2020 · Virtue signaling seems like selfishness covered in a thin shell of goodness, a way to score social points rather than by doing the work of real reform.
[41]
Justin Tosi & Brandon Warmke, Moral Grandstanding - PhilArchive
In this essay, we provide an account of moral grandstanding as the use of public discourse for moral self-promotion.
[42]
MORAL GRANDSTANDING AS A THREAT TO FREE EXPRESSION
May 4, 2021 · Moral grandstanding, or the use of moral talk for self-promotion, is a threat to free expression. When grandstanding is introduced in a public forum, popular ...
[43]
Moral grandstanding, narcissism, and self-reported responses to the ...
Jan 6, 2022 · Moral grandstanding motivations reflect a desire to seek status via publicly sharing one's beliefs or values. Such motivation can be ...
[44]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8756259
[45]
The duality of virtue: Deconstructing the moral hypocrite
The present study examined the processes giving rise to moral hypocrisy, a phenomenon in which individuals judge their own transgressions to be less morally ...
[46]
Self-enhancement in moral hypocrisy - PubMed Central - NIH
Jul 5, 2019 · We examined whether feelings of moral superiority—as a manifestation of self-enhancement motives—motivates people's hypocritical behavior ...Missing: historical pre-
[47]
[PDF] Virtue Signaling: A Theory of Message Legislation
May 25, 2020 · We discuss several potential empirical hypotheses that our results imply. 2 Model. 2.1 Players and Sequence. A legislator represents a voter in ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
[48]
ESG Investing: From Backlash to Rebranding - Wealth Management
Aug 20, 2025 · ESG is just virtue signaling that costs you money.” Related:Wealth ... While ESG underperformance was a function of sector and style ...
[49]
Why companies are ditching ESG - Reason Magazine
Jan 22, 2025 · ... virtue-signaling ... But over the past three years, his "sustainable" fund underperformed the stock market.<|separator|>
[50]
“Virtue Signaling is Expensive”: ESG Investing's Threats to ...
Nov 8, 2023 · Increasingly common and pervasive ESG mandates are forcing seniors and savers to pay more in management fees, while earning less.Missing: underperformance | Show results with:underperformance
[51]
Is virtue signalling a perversion of morality? | Aeon Ideas
Nov 29, 2019 · What about the hypocrisy claim? The accusation that virtue signalling is hypocritical might be cashed out in two different ways. We might ...
[52]
Hypocrisy penalty: Investors especially hate companies that say they ...
Jul 27, 2023 · Hypocrisy penalty: Investors ... To gauge virtue signaling, we conducted linguistic analysis of each company's letters to shareholders.
[53]
[PDF] Moral Grandstanding and the Norms of Moral Discourse - PhilArchive
... moral claim maker is (a) consistently hypocritical, ... But one might wonder how much it matters whether someone is grandstanding in a clear case of hypocrisy.
[54]
Grandstanding: The Use and Abuse of Moral Talk - ResearchGate
This research explores Moral Grandstanding ... Preregistered Replication and Extension of “Moral Hypocrisy: Social Groups and the Flexibility of Virtue”.
[55]
Inauthenticity aversion: Moral reactance toward tainted actors ...
Dec 5, 2020 · Hypocrisy tends to provoke negative reactions characteristic of inauthenticity aversion—outrage and distrust. For example, Wagner et al.
[56]
Hypocrisy and culture: Failing to practice what you preach receives ...
If failing to practice what you preach only counts as hypocrisy when attributed to an attempt to feign virtue, as we claim, then it should receive less negative ...Missing: inauthenticity | Show results with:inauthenticity
[57]
New theory explains moral reaction to hypocrisy - University at Buffalo
Apr 9, 2025 · New theory explains moral reaction to hypocrisy. A ... hypocrisy that helps distinguish genuine criticism from grandstanding opposition.
[58]
[PDF] Natural Born Jerks? Virtue Signaling and the Social Scaffolding of ...
Sep 23, 2024 · By its lights, exercising one's moral agency the right way requires protecting one's autonomy from the interference of outside social influence.
[59]
[PDF] The Non-Performativity of White Virtue-Signaling: Insights for Social ...
I refer to this as the Hypocrisy Feature—the words communicate virtue but lack further ac- tion. Both terms—grandstanding and virtue-signaling—have also been ...<|separator|>
[60]
[PDF] Preach! (Practice not Included): A Qualified Defense of Hypocrisy
Jun 25, 2024 · ... virtue signaling. Virtue signaling and Biblical hypocrisy are close relatives of hypocrisy in the sense I'm going to tackle, but they are ...
[61]
Grandstanding: The Use and Abuse of Moral Talk - Amazon.com
Philosophers Justin Tosi and Brandon Warmke explore the dangers of moral grandstanding--using moral ... moral responsibility, forgiveness, and public discourse.Missing: harms | Show results with:harms
[62]
Justin Tosi and Brandon Warmke: “Moral Grandstanding”. Précis by ...
Aug 1, 2017 · This purpose or point, according to the authors, is primarily to “improve people's moral beliefs” but grandstanding has three effects ...Missing: quantifiable | Show results with:quantifiable
[63]
What's wrong with virtue signaling? - ResearchGate
Mar 12, 2023 · A novel account of virtue signaling and what makes it bad has recently been offered by Justin Tosi and Brandon Warmke.
[64]
The virtues of virtue signalling - Giving What We Can
Nov 20, 2024 · The term “virtue signaling” is usually used in a pejorative sense, and is associated with people disingenuously engaging in pro-social behavior ...
[65]
How morality signals, benefits, binds, and teaches - ScienceDirect.com
The reason morality is effective at coercing people into fulfilling the responsibilities of group life is because it feels universal (Turiel, 1983), objective ( ...
[66]
Opinion | Are You 'Virtue Signaling'? - The New York Times
Mar 30, 2019 · Psychological studies reveal that a person's authentically experienced outrage is inherently interwoven with subconscious concerns about her reputation.
[67]
[PDF] What's Wrong With Virtue Signaling? - PhilArchive
It may be true that, as a mere empirical fact, virtue signaling has or would ensure that some moral progress was realized more quickly than it would otherwise ...
[68]
[PDF] Moral Grandstanding - Michael Hannon
We conclude by argu- ing that there are good reasons to think that moral grandstanding is typically morally bad and should be avoided. I. WHAT IS MORAL ...
[69]
[PDF] Moral Grandstanding in Public Discourse: Status-seeking Motives as ...
Oct 16, 2019 · Specifically, moral grandstanding motivation was associated with status-seeking personality traits, as well as greater political and moral.
[70]
[PDF] The Influence of Moral Grandstanding on Ideological Extremism ...
competition, and intensify polarization (Tosi & Warmke, 2016). Common manifestations of moral grandstanding include piling on, ramping up, trumping up ...
[71]
[PDF] Transcript: Moral Grandstanding with Brandon Warmke
Moral grandstanding is the use of public discourse for self-promotion. ... grandstanding is we argue that it's polarization. ... point those two points together, ...
[72]
[PDF] BRAND ACTIVISM, THE ROLE OF MORAL GRANDSTANDING
Jan 22, 2025 · Previous research shows that moral grandstanding can lead to polarization and prevent effective communication, especially regarding ingroup ...
[73]
Virtue Signaling and Moral Discourse - Justice Everywhere
Feb 28, 2022 · Others, like Neil Levy and Evan Westra, argue that virtue signaling is not only morally benign but also sometimes morally beneficial.
[74]
Virtue signalling and vice signalling - Crooked Timber
Dec 5, 2019 · So, they have to resort to terms like “virtue signalling”, in this case implying an ostentatious moral superiority, combined with hypocrisy.Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-
[75]
Virtue-signaling is not unique to the left - Institute of Economic Affairs
But virtue-signaling is not unique to the left. It takes place on the right almost as frequently. We're just not always so quick to recognise it. Donald Trump ...