Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Ad valorem tax

An ad valorem tax is a imposed on the of an asset, , or , with the tax amount calculated as a of that assessed rather than a fixed sum per unit. The phrase originates from Latin, translating to "according to ," reflecting its proportional structure designed to align tax burdens with economic capacity as measured by . Common applications include taxes, which are assessed annually on the estimated of and buildings to local services such as schools and ; sales taxes applied at the point of purchase on consumer ; value-added taxes () that accumulate through production stages; and import tariffs based on the customs value of entering a . For instance, a municipal rate of 1.5% on a home valued at $300,000 would yield $4,500 in annual tax liability, adjustable with reappraisals to reflect market changes. These taxes differ from specific or taxes, which impose flat rates per quantity or unit, by automatically scaling with or appreciation in underlying values, though they necessitate periodic valuations that can introduce administrative complexity and disputes over assessments. Historically rooted in ancient practices of taxing and values—as seen in records from around 3000 BCE for —the modern ad valorem framework evolved in Western systems from feudal land obligations to standardized value-based levies by the , becoming a of local in the United States where taxes alone often exceed 30% of state and local collections. Economically, these taxes promote tied to asset growth but can distort incentives if valuations lag market realities or if rates encourage underutilization of high-value properties; empirical analyses indicate taxes are largely capitalized into lower asset prices, shifting incidence to owners rather than pure users.

Definition and Fundamentals

Core Principles

An ad valorem tax, derived from Latin meaning "according to the ," is levied as a of the assessed of , goods, or services, distinguishing it from fixed-amount levies by tying the tax burden directly to economic worth. This proportionality ensures that the scales linearly with the underlying , such that a doubling of at a constant rate doubles the , promoting a direct link between taxable base and fiscal obligation. The core mechanism requires accurate valuation of the asset or transaction, typically using or appraised as the benchmark, to establish the taxable base before applying the statutory rate. The fundamental formula for computation is Tax = (Tax Rate) × (Assessed Value), where assessed value often represents a fraction—such as 60%—of the full market value in jurisdictions employing assessment ratios to standardize levies across properties of varying appraisal accuracy. Valuation methods prioritize empirical indicators like recent sales comparables, income capitalization for revenue-generating assets, or cost approaches deducting depreciation, ensuring the base reflects current economic reality rather than historical cost alone. This process demands periodic reassessments to capture value fluctuations, as stagnant valuations can distort equity by under- or over-taxing relative to true worth. At its essence, the principle of underpins ad valorem taxation's rationale for , positing that taxpayers with higher-value holdings bear a commensurately larger share, aligning with capacity-to-pay considerations since or values often correlate with or economic activity. Unlike unit-based taxes, this value orientation fosters horizontal —equal treatment for equal values—and vertical through scaled burdens, though critics note potential regressivity in applications where lower-income groups spend proportionally more of income on taxed items. Empirical administration reveals administrative challenges in valuation disputes, yet the system's adaptability to —via rising bases without rate hikes—supports stable without exogenous adjustments.

Distinction from Specific Taxes

Ad valorem taxes are imposed as a fixed of the assessed of an asset, good, or , thereby scaling the proportionally with economic . In economic terms, this structure ensures that higher- items bear a greater absolute burden relative to lower- equivalents, as the applies directly to the monetary worth at the time of or . For example, property taxes calculated at 1.5% of a home's appraised of $300,000 result in a $4,500 , which would rise to $6,000 if the increases to $400,000 due to appreciation. Specific taxes, by contrast, levy a predetermined flat amount per measurable unit of quantity, volume, or weight, independent of the item's price or value. Common in duties, such taxes apply uniformly regardless of fluctuations in market conditions; a tax of $0.184 per on , enacted under the and adjusted periodically for inflation, remains fixed per unit sold even if fuel prices vary from $3 to $5 per . This per-unit approach simplifies collection for standardized products like or , where a of $1.01 per pack of cigarettes (as set by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act of 2009) does not adjust for retail price differences. The core distinction lies in responsiveness to value changes: ad valorem taxes inherently incorporate inflationary or appreciation effects, potentially yielding higher revenue as nominal values rise without rate adjustments, whereas specific taxes require legislative updates to maintain real yield amid price shifts. Administratively, specific taxes demand less valuation effort for homogeneous , reducing disputes over assessments, but they can disproportionately burden lower-priced variants if quality differences exist. Economically, ad valorem structures may encourage efficiency by taxing rather than volume alone, though both forms distort markets by raising effective prices and curbing demand. Empirical analyses, such as those on systems, indicate specific taxes often prove more effective at curbing consumption of targeted harms like when paired with minimum pricing, as they avoid erosion from discounting high-value substitutes.

Historical Origins

Early Forms

One of the earliest documented forms of ad valorem taxation appeared in around 3000 BCE, where officials known as Shemsu Hor conducted periodic tours to assess the value of holdings, with taxes collected in grain proportional to that assessed value. Nilometers, structures dating back to at least 2686 BCE in , measured flood levels to predict harvest yields and adjust tax liabilities accordingly, effectively basing levies on anticipated crop value rather than fixed amounts. In , particularly Sumerian city-states like and between 3300 and 2000 BCE, clay tablets inscribed with recorded tax obligations on tangible assets such as grain stores and livestock, valued for temple tributes and including penalties for evasion based on asset quantities. Similar value-oriented property assessments extended to ancient , Persia, and , where taxes on land were calculated according to its expected production yield—such as crops or goods—rather than acreage alone, rendering them indirect levies on output value. By the classical period, ad valorem principles influenced transaction-based taxes, as seen in under Emperor (r. 27 BCE–14 CE), who instituted the centesima rerum venalium, a 1% on the declared of goods sold at auctions or markets, without exemptions for intermediate . These early mechanisms prioritized empirical valuation of assets or transactions to gauge fiscal capacity, laying groundwork for later formalized systems despite rudimentary assessment methods reliant on local officials.

Evolution in Modern Fiscal Systems

In the 19th century, ad valorem property taxes solidified as a of modern fiscal systems , transitioning from colonial-era assessments based on acreage and rudimentary valuations to more systematic evaluations tied to , facilitated by widespread land ownership and markets. This shift enabled local governments to fund infrastructure and services proportionally to economic productivity, with states like implementing uniform assessment laws by the mid-1800s to reduce arbitrary valuations. By the early , however, property tax reliance declined at the state level—from over 70% of state revenue in 1902 to under 20% by 1922—as and taxes emerged, prompting reforms like California's Proposition 13 in 1978, which capped assessment increases to curb fiscal expansion. The introduction of ad valorem sales and marked a pivotal in consumption-based revenue during the , addressing the limitations of specific duties that failed to adjust for or fluctuations. In the United States, the first state , an ad valorem levy, was enacted by in 1921, spreading to 30 states by 1935 amid fiscal pressures, with rates typically ranging from 1% to 3%. Globally, the modern (VAT)—an ad valorem tax applied at each production stage to avoid tax pyramiding—originated in on April 10, 1954, under Maurice Lauré's design, replacing a fragmented system and yielding initial revenues equivalent to 2-3% of GDP. Its adoption accelerated in during the 1960s, with and implementing it in 1967, and by the 1970s, it underpinned fiscal harmonization in the , expanding to over 170 countries by 2020 and generating an average 6.6% of GDP in nations. Ad valorem tariffs, prevalent in early modern trade policies, evolved toward specificity in the interwar period for protectionism but reverted to value-based equivalents post-World War II amid liberalization. The U.S. Tariff Act of 1789 imposed primarily ad valorem duties averaging 8-10% on imports to fund the federal government, but by the Smoot-Hawley Tariff of 1930, specific rates dominated, with effective ad valorem equivalents rising from 40% to 47% due to deflationary pressures. The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) in 1947 initiated rounds of reductions, lowering bound ad valorem rates from 40% in 1947 to under 5% by 2000 in developed economies, shifting reliance from tariffs to domestic ad valorem taxes like VAT for revenue stability. This transition reflected causal advantages of ad valorem structures—automatic adjustment to economic growth—over fixed specific duties, enhancing fiscal resilience in inflation-prone modern systems.

Types of Ad Valorem Taxes

Property Taxes

Property taxes represent a fundamental application of ad valorem taxation, levied on the assessed value of such as and structures, and in some jurisdictions, tangible like business equipment or vehicles. Unlike fixed-amount levies, the tax liability scales proportionally with the property's monetary value, typically determined through professional appraisals approximating under standard sales conditions. Assessment occurs periodically—annually in places like or every few years elsewhere—with values derived from comparable sales data, replacement cost minus , or capitalized income for income-producing assets. Local taxing authorities then apply a millage rate, where one mill equals $1 per $1,000 of assessed value, to compute the bill; for instance, a 20-mill rate on a $200,000 assessed property yields $4,000 in tax. Collection is enforced via liens on the property, with nonpayment potentially leading to , ensuring high compliance rates. In the United States, property taxes predominate as a local revenue source, funding over 70 percent of municipal and county general expenditures for schools, roads, and emergency services, while generating about 10.4 percent of aggregate tax collections—double the 5.4 percent OECD average. Effective rates average around 1 percent of market value nationwide, though they vary widely; Hawaii's median rate stands at 0.27 percent, contrasted with New Jersey's 2.23 percent, influencing residential and commercial location decisions. Internationally, implementation differs: Canada's provinces assess at full or fractional with rates often below 1 percent, while the imposes on banded property values, yielding effective rates up to 2.57 percent of capital stock—one of Europe's highest burdens. Many nations offer relief mechanisms, such as exemptions for primary residences or , to mitigate regressivity concerns, though undervaluation and infrequent reassessments can distort equity.

Sales and Excise Taxes

Sales taxes constitute a primary form of ad valorem taxation applied to the purchase of , computed as a fixed of the excluding the tax itself. This structure ensures the tax burden scales proportionally with the item's value, distinguishing it from fixed per-unit levies. In the United States, 45 states impose statewide taxes, with average combined state and local rates standing at approximately 7% as of , though rates vary widely—such as California's 7.25% base rate plus local additions up to 10.75% in some areas. Internationally, similar taxes exist, often integrated into broader value-added systems, but pure taxes remain ad valorem by design to capture value at the point of . Excise taxes, by contrast, target specific goods or activities deemed socially or economically sensitive, such as , , or fuels, and may incorporate ad valorem components alongside or instead of specific rates. Ad valorem taxes apply a to the product's , often at , importation, or wholesale stages, to and patterns. For instance, several countries, including , , , and , levy ad valorem excises on wine equivalent to percentages of value, ranging from 10% to 29% depending on content and jurisdiction. The notes ad valorem excises on beverages in various nations, where the equals a proportion of the retail or , aiming to deter excess intake while generating —such as up to 70% of beverage price in some high- implementations. Unlike broad sales taxes, ad valorem excises focus narrowly, enabling targeted policy effects but complicating administration due to value assessments. Both mechanisms differ in scope and application: sales taxes apply generally to promote revenue neutrality across transactions, whereas ad valorem excises serve regulatory ends, like reducing harmful consumption, with collection often upstream to embed costs in market prices. Empirical data indicate ad valorem structures in excises can amplify price sensitivity for higher- variants, potentially shifting demand toward cheaper alternatives, though specific excises mitigate this by maintaining uniform per-unit burdens. In practice, systems prevail, as seen in U.S. excises on items historically taxed at 10% of until phased down post-2000.

Value-Added Taxes

Value-added tax (VAT) is a imposed on the to at each stage of or , calculated as a of the transaction value, making it inherently ad valorem in nature. Under the predominant invoice-credit method, businesses charge VAT on their (output tax) and deduct VAT paid on purchases (input tax), remitting the difference to tax authorities, which ensures taxation only on net rather than gross . This multi-stage collection mechanism approximates a tax on final consumption while minimizing cascading effects seen in single-stage taxes, with the effective burden falling on end consumers through embedded prices. The modern VAT originated in France on April 10, 1954, when tax official Maurice Lauré introduced it as "taxe sur la valeur ajoutée" to replace a fragmented system, marking the first comprehensive implementation. By 2022, VAT systems operated in approximately 160 countries, including all members except the , generating an average of 20.8% of total across nations. Standard rates typically range from 15% to 25%, with exemptions or reduced rates applied to essentials like and to broaden political acceptability, though ideal designs favor a single rate on a comprehensive base to enhance efficiency. Economically, VAT promotes neutrality by avoiding distortions in intermediate production choices, as input credits prevent tax pyramiding, and its broad base supports revenue stability with lower rates than narrower taxes. However, static analyses often deem it regressive, as lower-income households allocate a larger share of expenditure to taxed consumption, though dynamic assessments incorporating lifetime income suggest proportionality or mild progressivity when accounting for savings patterns. Compliance relies on robust invoicing and registration thresholds, with digital tracking increasingly mitigating evasion, though administrative costs can burden small firms.

Import and Customs Duties

Import and customs duties represent a key application of ad valorem taxation in , levied primarily on imported as a of their assessed customs value to raise and impose trade barriers. These duties, also known as tariffs, adjust proportionally with the value of the merchandise, distinguishing them from specific duties that apply a fixed amount per unit regardless of price fluctuations. Under the World Trade Organization's (WTO) Agreement on Customs Valuation, effective since 1988 and implemented by over 140 members, the primary method for determining the customs value is the transaction value: the actual price paid or payable for the goods when sold for to the importing , adjusted for elements such as transportation costs to the , loading charges, and commissions, but excluding post-importation costs like domestic transport. If transaction value cannot be used—due to restricted sales or related-party transactions—alternative hierarchical methods apply, including transaction value of identical or similar goods, deductive value based on resale price, computed value from production costs, or fallback methods based on reasonable means consistent with principles. This framework ensures uniformity and minimizes disputes, with ad valorem rates then applied to the resulting value (e.g., a 5% on $100,000 goods yields $5,000). In major economies, ad valorem rates vary by product and trade partner, often codified in harmonized schedules. The employs the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS), with average applied most-favored-nation (MFN) rates around 3.4% as of 2023, though specific items face higher duties, such as 25% on certain steel and aluminum imports imposed in 2018 under Section 232 for reasons. The maintains a Common Customs Tariff with an unweighted average of approximately 5.1% for non-agricultural goods, while countries like apply rates up to 80% on items such as rice in the husk. These duties are collected at the point of entry by authorities, with importers declaring values under penalty of fines or seizure for undervaluation. WTO members bind most-favored-nation rates in schedules, capping applied tariffs to promote predictability, though exceptions exist for developing economies and preferential trade agreements that reduce or eliminate duties.

Implementation Mechanics

Valuation and Assessment

Valuation establishes the monetary base for ad valorem taxes by estimating the or transactional worth of the taxed item, such as , goods, or services, while converts this value into taxable amount by applying classification factors, exemptions, or assessment ratios as defined by law. In taxation, which constitutes a core application of ad valorem principles, assessors or appraisers conduct periodic valuations using standardized methodologies to ensure uniformity across jurisdictions. These processes often rely on mass appraisal techniques, enabling efficient evaluation of large inventories through statistical modeling rather than individualized appraisals. Three primary approaches guide property valuation: the sales comparison approach, which derives value from recent sales of comparable properties adjusted for differences in location, size, and condition; the cost approach, which calculates replacement cost of improvements minus plus land value; and the income approach, which capitalizes net operating income for revenue-generating assets like commercial buildings. Valuations typically reference an appraisal date, such as June 30 in even years for certain U.S. states, incorporating from the prior 18 to 60 months to reflect current conditions. Assessed value is then often a fraction of —e.g., 60% in —to determine the tax base before applying millage rates. For transactional ad valorem taxes like sales, value-added (), or duties, valuation centers on the or , with taxpayers or authorities verifying arm's-length dealings to prevent undervaluation. In VAT systems, is assessed at each stage by subtracting input taxes from output taxes on sales value, relying on self-reporting backed by audits. Customs ad valorem duties prioritize the transaction value method under international agreements, using the price paid or payable for imported goods, with fallback sequential methods like identical goods comparisons if primary data is unavailable. Discrepancies arise in non-market transactions, such as intra-company transfers, where arm's-length principles or computed values based on production costs are applied to approximate . Assessment processes incorporate legal safeguards, including taxpayer appeals to challenge valuations deemed inaccurate, often through local boards or courts, ensuring due process while balancing administrative efficiency. In practice, jurisdictions like New York employ hybrid models tailored by property class—market-based for residential, income-capitalization for multifamily rentals—to align assessments with economic reality. International bodies such as the OECD emphasize self-correcting mechanisms, like revaluation cycles every 3–5 years, to mitigate value drift from market fluctuations.

Rate Setting and Collection

Ad valorem tax rates are determined by taxing authorities through a process that balances budgetary requirements against the estimated taxable of the underlying base, typically using the where the rate equals required (after for non-tax income) divided by the total assessed . In property taxation, local governments or counties calculate millage rates—often in mills per of assessed —annually or biennially to fund services like schools and , with adjustments for exemptions, assessment ratios (e.g., 40% of in some U.S. jurisdictions), and voter-approved limits. For sales and value-added taxes, legislatures enact fixed percentage rates, such as state-level rates ranging from 2.9% to 7.25% in the U.S. as of 2023, applied uniformly to values while allowing local add-ons. Rate-setting processes incorporate statutory constraints and public input mechanisms; for instance, in , "truth-in-taxation" laws mandate public notices and potential elections if proposed rates exceed no-new-revenue benchmarks, calculated as the rate yielding the prior year's revenue adjusted for property value growth. These determinations rely on prior-year data, cost-of-living adjustments, and projections of economic activity, ensuring rates reflect fiscal rather than arbitrary , though disputes arise when assessments inflate without corresponding service expansions. Collection methods differ by tax type but emphasize periodic remittance to minimize evasion. Property ad valorem taxes are billed directly to owners based on assessed values, with payments due quarterly or annually—e.g., in many U.S. counties, bills are mailed in October for the fiscal year starting July 1, accruing penalties at 1-2% per month on delinquencies and enabling tax liens or foreclosure after 1-3 years of non-payment. Sales and excise ad valorem taxes, conversely, are gathered at the point of transaction by sellers, who add the rate to the purchase price and file returns (monthly for high-volume entities, quarterly otherwise) to remit net proceeds, with governments auditing records and imposing fines up to 25% of underpayments for compliance failures. Value-added taxes follow a similar intermediary collection via invoiced credits across supply chains, with businesses offsetting input taxes against outputs before periodic government filings. Enforcement integrates automated systems and penalties: property collectors use digital notices and liens recorded against titles, while transaction taxes employ point-of-sale software integration and withholding from business licenses for non-filers, yielding collection rates above 95% in efficient U.S. states as of data. Variations exist internationally, such as annual self-assessments in some VAT regimes, but core mechanics prioritize verifiable value tracking to sustain revenue flows without excessive administrative burden.

Compliance and Enforcement

Compliance with ad valorem taxes typically requires taxpayers to self-report the assessed value of taxable , , or services and remit payments based on applicable rates, often through periodic filings with tax authorities. For sales and value-added taxes (), businesses collect taxes at the point of sale or transaction and are responsible for remitting them, supported by mechanisms like third-party reporting and data matching to verify accuracy. compliance involves annual or periodic declarations or assessments by local authorities, with non-payment triggering liens on the property to secure the debt. Enforcement relies on audits and risk-based assessments to detect underreporting or evasion. Tax agencies employ systematic risk management, including segmentation of taxpayers by size or activity and targeted audits using criteria like discrepancies in reported values, yielding adjustments 2.5 to 4.4 times higher than random checks in some jurisdictions. For VAT and sales taxes, reverse charge mechanisms shift liability to the recipient in certain cross-border or business-to-business scenarios, while simplified registration regimes for non-residents reduce administrative burdens but include safeguards like electronic filing and good-faith evidence requirements. Property tax enforcement often escalates from notices to installment plans, garnishment, or foreclosure sales, with liens prioritizing tax claims over other creditors. Penalties deter non-compliance and recover shortfalls. Late filing or payment for sales taxes incurs 5-10% of the tax due plus 1% monthly interest, capped at 25-30%, with penalties up to 30% and doubling the plus potential criminal fines and . Inadequate during audits can add quarterly fines starting at $1,000, while false exemptions trigger document-specific penalties plus 100% of the evaded. Withholding systems, such as requiring for unregistered suppliers, enhance collection efficiency by embedding at the source. International cooperation and further bolster enforcement for duties and cross-border , addressing valuation disputes through consistent guidelines.

Economic Theory and Analysis

Efficiency Considerations

Ad valorem taxes, by imposing a levy proportional to the assessed value of goods, services, or assets, generally generate deadweight losses through distortions in economic decisions, as taxpayers alter behavior to minimize tax liability, such as reducing consumption or investment in taxed items. The magnitude of this inefficiency depends on the elasticity of supply and demand; higher elasticities amplify deadweight loss, as seen in standard public finance models where the loss approximates one-half the product of the tax wedge and the reduction in quantity transacted. Compared to lump-sum taxes, ad valorem taxes are inherently less efficient due to their impact on marginal incentives, though they outperform highly elastic bases like labor income when applied to relatively inelastic ones such as land or final consumption. In competitive markets, ad valorem taxes produce deadweight losses comparable to specific (unit) taxes when rates are calibrated to yield equivalent revenue, but diverge under imperfect competition: ad valorem taxation tends to be more efficient under monopoly by curbing markup distortions, while specific taxes may edge out in monopsony settings. For value-added taxes (VATs), empirical analyses highlight their relative efficiency as a broad-based consumption tax, enabling low rates that minimize substitution effects and evasion, with studies showing VAT introductions correlating with sustained revenue without disproportionate growth slowdowns in adopting economies. Property taxes, a quintessential ad valorem levy on immobile assets, exhibit low efficiency costs due to the inelastic supply of , imposing minimal distortions on output decisions and often funding localized public goods efficiently, as evidenced by cross-state U.S. data linking them to higher growth relative to income or taxes. and excise ad valorem taxes, however, can exacerbate inefficiencies if non-uniform, fostering via exemptions or cross-border shifts, though uniform application approximates a consumption levy with deadweight losses scaling quadratically with rates. Overall, ad valorem structures prioritize administrative simplicity over pure efficiency, trading some distortion for better compliance on value-based assessments.

Incentive Effects and Market Distortions

Ad valorem taxes introduce a proportional wedge between the price paid by consumers and the net price received by producers, thereby altering incentives and reducing the quantity of goods or services exchanged relative to the tax-free . This behavioral response—manifested as decreased , adjustments, or toward untaxed alternatives—generates a , representing the net loss of consumer and producer surplus from transactions that do not occur due to the elevated effective price. The magnitude of this distortion depends on the elasticity of ; higher elasticities amplify the reduction in traded volume, as agents more readily shift resources away from the taxed activity. In markets for durable goods like , ad valorem property taxes discourage investments that increase assessed value, such as renovations or expansions, since the tax rises commensurately with improvements, potentially leading to under-maintenance or suboptimal . Producers facing ad valorem levies on output may likewise curtail scale or quality enhancements to minimize tax exposure, distorting efficient across sectors. Empirical analyses of value-added taxes (), a common ad valorem form, reveal that rate increases prompt consumers to defer purchases or seek exemptions, with one exploiting a threshold in a finding localized reductions in taxable spending equivalent to 10-20% of the in affected areas. Such responses exacerbate distortions by favoring informal or cross-border , where reporting is harder to enforce. Ad valorem taxation also incentivizes evasion strategies tied to value manipulation, such as under-invoicing sales or classifying to lower taxable bases, which introduces additional inefficiencies by diverting resources toward costs and illicit activities rather than productive uses. In multiproduct monopolies, firms respond by adjusting relative prices to mitigate tax burdens on high-margin items, further skewing signals and reducing output diversity. Compared to specific (unit) taxes, ad valorem variants can yield lower deadweight losses under certain demand conditions by scaling with fluctuations, yet they persistently distort incentives in markets, as evidenced by models showing ad valorem rates amplifying effects in competitive settings. These effects underscore the causal link between proportional taxation and broader misallocation, where the pursuit of revenue compromises unless offset by lump-sum alternatives, which are rarely feasible at scale.

Incidence and Distributional Impacts

In economic theory, the incidence of an ad valorem tax—the distribution of its true economic burden—differs from its statutory incidence, which specifies the nominal payer such as sellers or buyers. Under competitive conditions with , the burden depends on the relative price elasticities of : the party with the more inelastic response absorbs a larger share, as the tax drives a wedge between buyer and seller prices without altering the underlying equilibrium quantity in the long run if elasticities are constant. For ad valorem taxes like or value-added taxes (s), which are levied as a of value, empirical studies confirm substantial pass-through to s via price increases, with consumers bearing 57% of the burden in new markets and 77% in repairs based on VAT reforms from 1987 to 1999. Recent U.S. similarly shows slight overshifting onto prices for taxes, amplifying the consumer share beyond the statutory rate. Theoretical models indicate that statutory incidence can influence economic outcomes for ad valorem taxes, contrary to classical neutrality results for lump-sum es: when sellers remit the tax, it reduces volume more than when buyers do, due to how the tax base interacts with pricing behavior. This effect arises because ad valorem taxes scale with value, potentially altering markup decisions under or salience constraints, where less visible taxes lead to incomplete pass-through. In contrast, for ad valorem property taxes, incidence often shifts to tenants through higher rents or to future buyers via capitalized lower property values, with owners bearing less in mobile capital markets. Distributionally, ad valorem consumption taxes exhibit regressivity when assessed against annual household , as lower-income groups devote a higher proportion of earnings to taxed necessities, increasing their effective relative to higher earners. analysis of 18 countries reveals these taxes reduce the progressivity of overall systems, with the bottom quintile facing rates up to twice those of the top in some cases, though exemptions for essentials like mitigate this somewhat. When measured against lifetime or expenditure-based —accounting for saving patterns and —the regressivity diminishes or reverses, as higher earners consume more over time but save disproportionately. For ad valorem property taxes, regressivity emerges from assessment errors and housing market sorting, where low-wealth households in inexpensive properties face effective rates exceeding those of affluent owners due to fixed costs and undervaluation of high-end assets.

Controversies and Criticisms

Valuation Disputes and Inaccuracies

Valuation disputes in ad valorem taxes frequently stem from taxpayers challenging assessors' determinations of , which form the basis for calculations, often alleging overvaluation relative to comparable sales or potential. These challenges typically proceed through administrative appeals to local boards or courts, where conflicting appraisal methods—such as the sales comparison, , or approaches—exacerbate disagreements, as seen in jurisdictions experimenting with land-only valuations for commercial properties like hotels to simplify assessments but sparking further litigation over method consistency. In the U.S., such appeals numbered over 1.5 million in 2019 across major counties, with success rates varying from 20% to 60% depending on the locality and evidence presented, highlighting systemic variability in assessor accuracy. Inaccuracies in property assessments often arise from mass appraisal techniques employed by under-resourced local governments, which rely on automated models prone to errors in capturing localized dynamics, such as neighborhood-specific appreciation or depreciation. Empirical analyses indicate these errors contribute to burdens, where lower-value properties are overassessed relative to higher-value ones due to less frequent updates and proportional error assumptions in valuation models; for instance, a 2021 study found that assessment ratios for homes under $100,000 averaged 10-15% higher than for those over $500,000 in sampled U.S. jurisdictions. Geographic clustering of inaccuracies, particularly undervaluation in high-growth areas or overvaluation in stagnant ones, amplifies disputes, as assessors may fail to adjust for locational premiums, leading to effective disparities of up to 2:1 between similar properties. Infrequent reassessments—sometimes occurring only every 4-6 years—compound these issues, with outdated valuations diverging from market realities by 20% or more in rapidly changing . In customs ad valorem duties, valuation disputes center on importers' declared transaction values versus customs authorities' alternative methods, such as deductive or computed valuation, when transactions are deemed non-arm's-length or influenced by related-party pricing. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) rejects approximately 5-10% of declarations annually for verification, often escalating to the Court of International Trade, as in cases involving commingled goods where the highest applicable duty rate is imposed pending resolution, resulting in duties exceeding $100,000 in disputed entries. Historical precedents, like the 1998 ruling in United States v. United States Shoe Corp., underscore tensions over whether value-based fees constitute duties, influencing ongoing challenges to ad valorem assessments on imported cargo. Such inaccuracies can stem from fluctuating exchange rates or incomplete documentation, with resolution times averaging 12-18 months and importers bearing the burden of proof for lower values.

Regressivity and Equity Concerns

Ad valorem taxes levied on consumption, such as sales taxes and , exhibit regressivity because lower- households devote a greater share of their to taxable purchases, resulting in a higher effective relative to their earnings compared to higher- groups. This pattern holds in empirical analyses of household expenditure surveys, where VAT and similar indirect taxes consume up to 10-12% of for the bottom quintile versus 4-6% for the top quintile in many countries as of 2018 data. Proponents of consumption taxation counter that annual snapshots overstate regressivity, as lifetime considerations reveal more proportional burdens, with savings and investment smoothing consumption over time; studies using dynamic models support this, showing VAT incidence shifting toward progressivity when accounting for age and earnings cycles. Equity critiques extend to violations of the ability-to-pay principle, where uniform rates on essentials like and —prior to exemptions—disproportionately strain low-income budgets without regard to fiscal capacity. Mitigative measures, such as basic necessities, reduce but do not eliminate regressivity, as evidenced by U.S. state-level studies where effective rates remain 2-5 times higher for the poorest even after exemptions. Critics from progressive policy circles argue this undermines vertical , favoring flat burdens over graduated ones, though reveals that regressivity stems from behavioral realities of expenditure patterns rather than inherent design flaws, with low-income groups exhibiting higher marginal propensities to consume out of . For ad valorem property taxes, regressivity concerns manifest in cases where fixed assessments burden households with stagnant incomes, such as retirees, amid rising market values; empirical in U.S. jurisdictions show effective rates exceeding 2% of income for lower-middle quintiles in high-appreciation areas, compared to under 1% for top earners. Horizontal issues arise from assessment inaccuracies, where similar-value properties yield disparate liabilities due to infrequent revaluations—studies indicate uniformity ratios deviating by 10-20% in under-assessed urban markets, eroding perceived fairness. Vertical debates question whether value-based rates proxy ability adequately, as ownership concentration among wealthier demographics imparts some progressivity, yet relief programs in states like , capping burdens at 3.5% of income since 1974, highlight targeted responses to these inequities without altering the ad valorem base.

Administrative and Political Challenges

Administering ad valorem taxes, particularly property taxes, involves substantial challenges in asset valuation, as determining requires ongoing appraisals that account for fluctuating market conditions, property improvements, and comparable sales data, often leading to inaccuracies and taxpayer disputes. In the United States, where most states mandate assessments at a of , the process demands inventorying diverse assets and conducting market analyses, which imposes high administrative costs on local governments and appraisal districts. These costs are exacerbated by the need for periodic reassessments—typically every one to five years depending on —to reflect economic changes, yet infrequent updates can result in outdated valuations that fail to capture or appreciation, prompting legal challenges. Enforcement of ad valorem taxes faces hurdles in compliance monitoring and collection, including tracking ownership transfers, exemptions, and delinquencies across vast property inventories. Taxpayers frequently appeal assessments through administrative boards, such as county boards of equalization, which handle complaints on valuation, classification, and equity, straining resources and delaying revenue realization. In cases of non-payment, enforcement relies on liens, tax certificates, and potential foreclosures, but legal constraints limit aggressive actions; for instance, in Florida, tax collectors cannot enforce certain non-ad valorem assessments beyond standard certificate sales without statutory authority. Complex properties, like multi-asset senior housing developments, further complicate enforcement by requiring specialized valuations that differ from financial reporting standards, increasing litigation risks. Politically, ad valorem taxes provoke resistance due to their visibility and perceived intrusiveness, often manifesting in voter initiatives to cap rates or mandate exemptions, as seen in where 2023 legislative efforts compressed school rates by billions amid record state revenues, yet faced pushback over shifting burdens to or taxes. Local governments encounter equity concerns when special ad valorem assessments bypass statutory rate limits, eroding public trust and fairness by imposing uneven burdens without broad voter approval, a trend noted in where such levies have proliferated since the 1990s. Reforms like full repeals, proposed in states such as in 2025, highlight fiscal dilemmas, as replacing lost revenue—often 30-50% of local budgets—risks underfunding essential services like and public safety without politically viable alternatives. Implementation globally, including in developing contexts, amplifies these issues through public unrest and demands for , underscoring the tension between revenue needs and taxpayer opposition.

Empirical Effects and Evidence

Revenue Performance

Value-added taxes (VAT), a primary form of ad valorem taxation, generated revenues equivalent to 7 percent of GDP on average in countries in 2022, marking a slight increase from 6.9 percent in 2021 despite post-pandemic economic pressures. In the , VAT accounted for 7.2 percent of GDP and 15.7 percent of total in 2023, underscoring its role as a of fiscal systems in VAT-adopting jurisdictions. Globally, VAT contributes over 30 percent of total tax revenues in more than 160 countries that levy it, reflecting its broad adoption and capacity to capture value across production and consumption chains. Within members, VAT represented 20.8 percent of total tax income in 2022, demonstrating resilience even as overall tax revenues stagnated amid and slower growth. In the United States, where no national exists, state and local sales taxes—another ad valorem mechanism—comprised 30.42 percent of total state in 2022, second only to individual income taxes in significance. Property taxes, levied ad valorem on assessed values, contributed 11 percent of aggregate U.S. across federal, state, and local levels in 2023, primarily funding local services such as and . State and local property tax collections reached approximately $2.095 trillion in total for 2024, with property taxes forming a stable base less volatile than income-based levies due to their linkage to asset values rather than transactional flows. Empirical trends indicate ad valorem taxes exhibit counter-cyclical elements in revenue performance; for instance, U.S. state sales tax collections grew 4.5 percent nominally in the fourth quarter of 2023, though real growth adjusted for inflation was more modest at 1.8 percent, highlighting sensitivity to consumer spending and price levels. In contrast, property tax yields benefit from periodic reassessments tied to market values, providing jurisdictions with predictable inflows; U.S. local governments derived 55 percent of their receipts from property taxes in recent years, enabling sustained funding amid economic fluctuations. Overall, these taxes demonstrate high revenue elasticity to economic expansion but require robust valuation and compliance mechanisms to mitigate shortfalls from evasion or downturns.

Behavioral and Economic Outcomes

Empirical analyses of ad valorem sales taxes reveal significant behavioral responses, particularly through price elasticities of demand that lead to reduced consumption volumes. For instance, a 1% increase in sales tax rates has been associated with a roughly 2% decline in online purchases among interested buyers, indicating high sensitivity to effective prices. This elasticity varies by product category; studies of food demand report mean own-price elasticities ranging from -0.27 for fruits to -0.81 for meats, reflecting substitution toward untaxed or lower-taxed alternatives. Tax salience further modulates these responses: consumers underreact to non-salient ad valorem taxes, such as those embedded in posted prices without itemization, resulting in lower avoidance and higher effective tax burdens than predicted by rational models. Property ad valorem taxes induce locational and investment behaviors, with evidence linking higher rates to increased outmigration, especially among higher-income households. Cross-state analyses show that tax differentials contribute to net outflows from high-property-tax jurisdictions, though aggregate economic disruptions from such migration remain modest, with a one percentage point top wealth tax hike (proximal to property levies) reducing local activity by less than 0.5%. Firms also respond by curtailing investment in high-tax areas, as elevated property taxes raise operational costs and distort site selection decisions. These patterns align with causal estimates from tax reforms, where property tax reductions boost housing investment but higher rates constrain access for financially limited buyers, potentially lowering overall homeownership rates. On economic outcomes, ad valorem taxes generate deadweight losses through distortions, though their incidence often exceeds statutory burdens due to imperfect pass-through. Retail studies find overshifting in some cases, where post-tax prices rise more than the tax increment, amplifying consumer costs and reducing , particularly for inelastic . taxes exhibit stabilizing effects, with a one rate increase causally linked to a 5-10% reduction in housing price during cycles, mitigating boom-bust dynamics via dampened . Broader comparisons indicate ad valorem structures can outperform specific taxes in preserving product variety under , but they elevate marginal distortions when demand elasticities are high, leading to net losses estimated at 10-20% of revenue in empirical simulations.

Recent Reforms and Case Studies

In the , reforms to (VAT) rules for cross-border , implemented in 2021 and further adjusted through 2025, abolished the €22 threshold for low-value imports and mandated online platforms to collect and remit VAT on behalf of sellers, aiming to level the playing with domestic retailers and reduce losses estimated at €7 billion annually prior to the changes. This shift resulted in a nearly 50% decline in Chinese online sales to the EU, as exporters faced higher compliance costs and reduced competitiveness, demonstrating the reform's effectiveness in curbing under-taxed imports but also highlighting disruptions to global supply chains. Empirical analysis indicates that while collection improved, small non-EU sellers experienced disproportionate impacts, prompting calls for transitional relief in subsequent EU VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals set for phased rollout starting 2028. China's enactment of a comprehensive law on December 25, 2024, effective January 1, 2026, represents a codification and modernization of its existing VAT system, which had operated under provisional rules since , introducing clearer definitions for taxable activities, refined input credits, and enhanced anti-fraud measures to stabilize revenue amid economic slowdowns. The law maintains ad valorem rates ranging from 3% to 13% but adds provisions for simplified regimes on cross-border services and , projected to boost compliance and generate an additional 1-2% of GDP in fiscal stability by reducing evasion through better mandates. Case studies from pilot implementations in provinces like show a 15-20% uptick in registered VAT filings post-similar pilots, though critics note potential burdens on small enterprises without adequate exemptions. In the United States, property tax reforms in the 2020s have addressed escalating assessments driven by housing market surges, with City's Advisory Commission on Property Tax Reform releasing a final report in 2023 recommending class-based equalization and vacancy taxation to mitigate inequities in ad valorem assessments, where commercial properties often receive favorable treatment relative to residential ones. Implementation challenges persist, as evidenced by Cook County's 2024 study revealing systematic undervaluation of commercial properties by up to 30% in assessments, leading to proposed valuation accuracy audits and appeals process overhauls to enhance equity without broad rate hikes. These efforts, mirrored in state-level debates, underscore trade-offs: while caps like those in North Dakota's 2025 truth-in-taxation laws limit levy increases to 5-8% annually, they risk shifting burdens to sales or income taxes, potentially eroding local service funding by 10-15% if not offset.

Global Applications

United States Practices

In the , ad valorem taxes are imposed across , , and local governments, primarily on the assessed value of real and , the transaction value of , and the customs value of imports. Property taxes constitute the largest category, serving as a cornerstone of , while taxes provide significant funding, and customs duties protect domestic industries under authority. These taxes are calculated as a percentage of value, with rates and assessment methods varying by jurisdiction to reflect local fiscal needs and statutory requirements. Real property taxes, levied annually by counties, municipalities, and school districts in all 50 states, are based on the assessed of land and improvements, typically determined by local assessors using standards such as comparable sales or income capitalization approaches. Tax rates are set through millage (e.g., $1 per $1,000 of assessed ) by voter-approved budgets or legislative bodies, resulting in effective rates averaging about 1% nationwide, though varying widely—for example, 1% of full cash in under Proposition 13 limits. Personal property taxes, applied in roughly 15 states to items like business equipment or vehicles, follow similar valuation principles but are less uniform, often self-reported by owners with audits for compliance. Assessments occur on cycles from annual revaluations in states like to less frequent updates elsewhere, with appeals processes available to contest valuations. Sales and use taxes, enacted by 45 states and the District of as of 2025, apply to the retail price of tangible and select services, excluding essentials like groceries in many jurisdictions to mitigate regressivity. State base rates range from 2.9% () to 7.25% (), with local add-ons pushing combined rates as high as 9.56% in ; five states (, , , , ) impose no statewide , relying instead on other revenues. Vendors collect the tax at and remit it quarterly or monthly to state revenue departments, which enforce through audits and rules expanded post-2018 South Dakota v. Wayfair to include economic presence for remote sellers. Use taxes ensure parity for out-of-state purchases, self-assessed by consumers but rarely audited individually. Federal customs duties, administered by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, are predominantly ad valorem under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the (HTSUS), which classifies imports into over 10,000 categories with rates from 0% (e.g., many raw materials) to 25% or higher for protected sectors like apparel or . Duties are computed on the transaction value declared by importers, verified against commercial invoices and appraised if disputed, with additional Section 301 or 232 tariffs imposed since 2018 averaging 10-25% on targeted goods from specific countries. As of July , reciprocal tariffs added a baseline 10% ad valorem duty on non-exempt imports from unlisted partners, escalating for transshipped goods to counter evasion.

European Variations

In the European Union, (VAT) serves as the predominant ad valorem tax on goods and services, harmonized under the VAT Directive (Council Directive 2006/112/EC) which requires a minimum of 15% while permitting member states to set higher rates and apply reduced rates to specific categories. As of 2025, VAT rates range from 17% in to 27% in , with examples including 18% in , 19% in , , and , 20% in and , 21% in and , 22% in (prior to potential adjustments), and recent increases to 23% in and 24% in effective January 1, 2025. Non-EU European countries exhibit similar structures but without EU constraints; the applies a of 20%, while uses 8.1% for most supplies, reflecting national autonomy in rate-setting. Real property taxes, another key ad valorem levy, display substantial variations across , typically calculated as a percentage of assessed cadastral or of immovable and often devolved to municipal authorities. Effective rates generally fall between 0.1% and 2% of value, but implementation differs: Germany's Grundsteuer bases assessments on 1960s-1980s unit values rather than current , resulting in uneven burdens and ongoing debates since a 2019 ruling deemed the system unconstitutional. In contrast, France's taxe foncière uses annually updated rental values, yielding higher reliance on taxation (around 1.5-2% of GDP in some regions), while the UK's banded approximates 1991 values, decoupling it from pure ad valorem principles. Central and Eastern European countries often collect lower revenues, typically under 1% of GDP, due to nominal base values, infrequent revaluations, and exemptions for , as seen in (above 1% of GDP) versus Latvia or (below 0.5%). Overall, property taxes constitute about 4.6% of total tax revenue in , far below the 12.2% in the United States, underscoring lighter reliance on ad valorem levies amid preferences for and taxes. Additional ad valorem elements appear in transaction-based duties, such as duties on property transfers (e.g., 2-12% in or 4-7% in the ), which vary by and property type but are not recurrent.

Other Jurisdictions

In , the functions as a federal levied at 5% on most supplies of goods and services, with provinces adding rates up to 15% in regions like , creating combined ad valorem rates of 13% or more. Provincial property taxes, such as British Columbia's property value tax, are assessed annually as an ad valorem levy on the assessed value of and improvements, with rates varying by to fund local services. Australia imposes a 10% Goods and Services Tax (GST) nationally on most goods and services, structured as an ad valorem consumption tax collected by the federal government and distributed to states. State-level land taxes apply ad valorem rates ranging from 0.75% to 4% on the unimproved value of land above thresholds, with variations like ' premium rates for high-value holdings exceeding AUD 6.57 million as of 2025. Stamp duties on property transfers are also ad valorem, calculated on transaction values and differing by state, often reaching several percentage points for residential purchases. India's Tax (), introduced in 2017, operates as a multi-tiered ad valorem value-added tax with slabs of 0%, 5%, 12%, 18%, and 28% applied to based on their classification, aiming to unify prior state-level levies like . Customs duties on imports are predominantly ad valorem, assessed on the CIF value at rates averaging 10% but up to higher levels for protected sectors. In , the ICMS (Imposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias e Serviços) serves as a state-level with ad valorem rates typically between 17% and 20%, varying by state and applied to the value of goods circulation, including imports calculated on CIF plus federal taxes. The federal IPI (Imposto sobre Produtos Industrializados) tax uses ad valorem rates from 0% to 365% based on product codes, targeting manufactured goods. South Africa's municipal property rates are levied ad valorem on the of and improvements, with rates set locally and rebated for primary residences, generating revenue for as per the Municipal Property Rates Act of 2004. Transfer duties on immovable sales apply graduated ad valorem rates up to 13% for values exceeding ZAR 2.475 million, while ad valorem excise duties target and vehicles.

References

  1. [1]
    Understanding Ad Valorem Tax: Definition, Calculation, and ...
    Sep 19, 2025 · The Latin phrase ad valorem means "according to value." Ad valorem taxes are levied based on the determined value of the item being taxed.What Is an Ad Valorem Tax? · How the Tax Works · Assessing Values for Ad...
  2. [2]
    ad valorem tax | Wex - Law.Cornell.Edu
    An ad valorem tax is commonly used in the taxation of real property. Ad valorem taxes are typically calculated on an annual basis.
  3. [3]
    Ad valorem tax: Overview & FAQs | Thomson Reuters
    Oct 9, 2024 · Ad valorem tax is a tax based on the assessed value of assets, goods, or services being taxed. Property tax is the most common form of ad ...
  4. [4]
    FAQs • What is the meaning of ad valorem property taxes?
    Ad valorem is Latin for "according to value," and is thought to be a fair basis for collecting taxes because the tax is proportional to your ability to pay and ...
  5. [5]
    What is ad valorem tax? - Tulare County
    Ad Valorem is a tax imposed based on value. The County levies an ad valorem property tax rate equal to one percent (1%) of the full assessed value. Additional ...
  6. [6]
    Ad Valorem Tariff: Definition and Examples - Taxes - SmartAsset.com
    Jan 21, 2025 · Ad valorem tariffs are taxes on the value of imported goods, making these items costlier and lessening competition with domestic products.
  7. [7]
    Definitions - Manatee County Property Appraiser
    Ad valorem means according to value. Ad valorem taxation is a tax based on the value of your property and is governed by Florida Law. The tax is determined ...
  8. [8]
    The History of Property Taxes - PropLogix
    Egypt was arguably the first to create direct taxes on property around 3000 BC to build grain warehouses, the pyramids and pay soldiers.<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    History of Property Taxes in the United States – EH.net
    Property taxes in the US originated from feudal obligations, grew with frontier conditions, and were initially based on specific items, later on value, and ...
  10. [10]
    History of the Property Tax | Napa County, CA
    Property taxes are called "ad valorem," from the Latin meaning "from the value," and are different from income taxes, which are based on earnings, and sales ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] The Economic Impact of and Strategy for Implementing an Ad ...
    The disadvantages are that a land area based property tax system is regressive and unequal, a limited revenue source, and distorting of land markets. The ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Capitalization of Property Tax Incentives: Evidence From Philadelphia
    Jan 1, 2024 · If property taxes are fully capitalized, home prices immediately reflect any changes to the tax, and the costs or benefits accrue to the current ...Missing: ad valorem
  13. [13]
    I. Valuation standards - Department of Taxation and Finance
    Apr 12, 2023 · All real property is assessed at its current full value. Guidance: The real property tax is an ad valorem tax, meaning it is imposed against the value of ...
  14. [14]
    Ad Valorem Property Tax - West Virginia Tax Division - WV.gov
    The assessed value of property is generally 60 percent of its fair market value, or 60 percent of its value determined under the valuation methodology ...Missing: formula methods
  15. [15]
    Definitions of Property Assessment Terms - NYC.gov
    The amount used to calculate your property taxes. The formula for calculating assessed value is market value times level of assessment equals assessed value.Missing: ad valorem
  16. [16]
    [PDF] How Property is Valued for Property Tax Purposes - NJ.gov
    Methods of Valuing Property: T here are 3 methods for determining property value for tax purposes. Selection of a method depends on the nature of the property.<|control11|><|separator|>
  17. [17]
    Fair assessments: A guide for property owners
    Jun 18, 2025 · The tax rate for properties in your community is then determined by dividing the tax levy by the total taxable assessed value of taxable real ...
  18. [18]
    Ad valorem tax - OneMoneyWay
    Oct 25, 2024 · Ad valorem taxes are structured to be proportional to the value of the taxable item. This means that those purchasing or owning more expensive ...Missing: theory | Show results with:theory
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Comparing Regressive, Progressive, and Proportional Taxes - IRS
    Complete the line graphs to compare how a regressive tax, a progressive tax, and a proportional tax affect different income groups.Missing: theory | Show results with:theory
  20. [20]
    Ad Valorem vs. Specific Taxes: Key Differences and Implications for ...
    Dec 6, 2024 · Ad valorem taxes are a percentage of an item's value, while specific taxes are fixed amounts per unit, independent of the item's value.
  21. [21]
    Excise Tax: What It Is and How It Works, With Examples - Investopedia
    Excise taxes can be ad valorem (paid by percentage) or specific (cost charged by unit). "Sin taxes" are a type of excise tax aimed at products like alcohol ...What Is an Excise Tax? · Ad Valorem Excise Taxes · Specific Excise Taxes
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Taxation and Price: Types of Taxes - Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids
    ○ Specific taxes minimize substitution and are more effective than ad valorem taxes at reducing consumption after a tax increase. ○ The specific tax is easier ...
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
    History of Taxes: A Brief Overview - Tax Foundation
    In ancient times, property taxes were levied in Babylon, Egypt, Persia, China, and elsewhere. Originally, these taxes were based on the production value of ...
  25. [25]
  26. [26]
    [PDF] A History of the Property Tax in America John Joseph Wallis ...
    Property tax was a mainstay for local governments, declining from 73% in 1902 to 40% in 1992. States abandoned it in the early 19th century, then resumed in ...
  27. [27]
    A Brief History of VAT - Sufio
    Aug 10, 2023 · Ultimately, it wasn't until April 10, 1954, that a country introduced a truly modern system of VAT. This happened in France, under President ...
  28. [28]
  29. [29]
    [PDF] 1 The Nature, Importance, and Spread of the VAT - IMF eLibrary
    Value-Added Tax or VAT, first introduced less than 50 years ago, remained confined to a handful of countries until the late 1960s. Today, however, most.
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Chapter 3 - US Trade Policy since 1934
    The average ad valorem equivalent tariff rose from 40.1 percent to 47.1 percent from mid-1929 to mid-1930. 9 More significantly, however, most tariff rates ...
  31. [31]
    The Problem of the Tariff in American Economic History, 1787–1934
    Sep 26, 2023 · This essay investigates the historical development of tariff policy between the Founding era and the end of World War II.
  32. [32]
    The dynamic dual role of tariffs: insight into specific and ad valorem ...
    Oct 21, 2020 · This brief article argues that tariffs must be used as dynamic tools that need periodic assessment. It goes on to discuss the two most known types of tariff.
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
    Assessments - Department of Taxation and Finance - NY.Gov
    Apr 19, 2024 · A property's assessment is based on its market value. Market value is how much a property would sell for under normal conditions.
  35. [35]
    Property Tax - Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxation
    The amount of the tax bill is determined by two factors: (1) the assessment and (2) the property tax rate for each jurisdiction (state, county, & municipal).Assessment Appeal Process · SDAT's Real Property... · Property Tax Exemptions<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    State and Local Tax Collections Per Capita by State, 2025
    May 13, 2025 · Virtually all of this is at the local level, where property taxes comprise 70.2 percent of all local government revenue. According to the latest ...
  37. [37]
    Property Taxes by State and County, 2023
    Sep 12, 2023 · The average level of property taxes paid in 2021 across the United States was $1,682. The lowest property tax bills in the country are in seven ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  38. [38]
    Real Property Taxes in Europe, 2025 - Tax Foundation
    Sep 24, 2025 · The highest property taxes as a share of the private capital stock occur in the United Kingdom (2.57 percent), Greece (1.16 percent), and France ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Housing Taxation in OECD Countries (EN)
    This report provides a comparative assessment of housing tax policies across OECD countries. It covers all taxes levied on the acquisition, ownership and ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] How Sales and Excise Taxes Work
    ... ad valorem tax—that is, a tax based on the price of the item sold. In theory, the sales tax applies to all retail transactions—or sales to the final ...
  41. [41]
    Ad Valorem Tax - Overview, Determining, Examples
    The most common ad valorem tax examples include property taxes on real estate, sales tax on consumer goods, and VAT on the value added to a final product or ...
  42. [42]
    What Is Excise Tax? Definition, Types & Examples - Vertex, Inc.
    Jul 12, 2024 · For example, a high ad valorem tax might be most effective for expensive luxury goods, discouraging excessive consumption. However, a fixed per- ...
  43. [43]
    Excise tax: Overview & FAQs | Thomson Reuters
    Ad valorem taxes. Ad valorem taxes are imposed as a percent of the total purchase price of goods or services or other defined value of products or commodities.
  44. [44]
    Global Excise Tax Application and Trends
    Apr 7, 2023 · Table 4 displays the wine tax rates for all OECD countries. Australia, Chile, Korea, and Mexico apply ad valorem taxes in lieu of ad quantum or ...
  45. [45]
    Excise taxes on beverages (%) - World Health Organization (WHO)
    - Ad valorem excise: is a tax on a selected beverage produced for sale within a country or imported and sold in that country. This tax comes in the form of a ...
  46. [46]
    How is an excise tax different from a sales tax? - Quaderno
    Feb 21, 2025 · Unlike general sales taxes, which are applied broadly, excise taxes are focused on particular products or services. These taxes are designed to ...What is an excise tax? · Types of excise taxes · What is the difference between...
  47. [47]
    What is excise tax and how does it work - Avalara
    Jun 15, 2025 · An ad valorem excise tax is based on a percentage of the purchase price. The 7.5% federal excise tax on the price of domestic airline tickets is ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Excise Taxes
    Ad valorem excises are based on a percentage of the value of the product or service sold. The 10 percent federal tax (declining to 7.5% by the year 2000) on the ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition<|separator|>
  49. [49]
    Consumption taxes - OECD
    Value added tax (VAT) is a tax on final consumption, levied on the value added at each stage of production and distribution of goods and services.
  50. [50]
    VAT - TPAF - International Monetary Fund (IMF)
    VAT is a broad-based tax on the consumption of goods and services. The tax liability arises at transactions taking place at each stage of the value chain (from ...
  51. [51]
    6 Value-Added Tax in - IMF eLibrary
    Value-added tax (VAT) is a main form of indirect taxation, a general tax on consumption proportional to the price of goods and services.
  52. [52]
    The Allure of the Value-Added Tax - International Monetary Fund (IMF)
    Brazil was the first Latin American country to adopt the VAT, in 1967, and Denmark's adoption of the VAT that same year marked the start of the tax's widespread ...<|separator|>
  53. [53]
    Consumption Tax Trends 2024 - OECD
    Nov 21, 2024 · Value-added taxes (VAT) generated 20.8% of total revenue in OECD countries on average in 2022. VAT continues to be the largest category of ...
  54. [54]
    How do US taxes compare internationally? - Tax Policy Center
    The VAT is employed worldwide in 160 countries, including in all 37 OECD member countries except the United States. Most consumption tax revenue in the United ...
  55. [55]
    Value-Added Tax Continues to Expand
    The ideal VAT system has a broad base comprising all final consumption and a single rate of tax, usually between 15 and 20 percent. This means consumers ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  56. [56]
    chapter 11 Effects of VAT on the Economy in: Value Added Tax
    The common case against the vat is that it is regressive, reducing the real consumption of low-income households by a greater percentage than for high-income ...Distribution · Efficiency and Neutrality · Savings and Investment · Foreign Trade24
  57. [57]
    Reassessing the regressivity of the VAT - OECD
    This paper reassesses the often-made conclusion that the VAT is regressive, drawing on tax microsimulation models constructed for an unprecedented 27 OECD ...
  58. [58]
    Is the Value-Added Tax Progressive? | Tax Foundation
    Aug 13, 2020 · Numerous studies have found that VAT appears to be regressive when measured as a percentage of current income.
  59. [59]
    1 The Nature, Importance, and Spread of the VAT in - IMF eLibrary
    VAT is a tax on consumption, charged at all production stages, with tax on purchases offset against sales tax. It's a broad-based tax on commodity sales.
  60. [60]
    WTO | Video - Let's talk trade - Let's Talk Tariffs
    These are called ad valorem duties and they are calculated using the customs value of the imported goods. However, tariffs can also be expressed as a ...
  61. [61]
    What Are Ad Valorem Tariffs? - Shapiro
    An ad valorem tariff is a customs duty calculated as a percentage of the total value of imported goods, fluctuating with the declared value.
  62. [62]
    Customs Valuation - Technical Information - WTO
    Customs valuation is a procedure to determine the value of imported goods, especially for ad valorem duties. The first method is based on transaction value.
  63. [63]
    Determining Duty Rates | U.S. Customs and Border Protection
    Nov 25, 2024 · Duty rates are determined using the HTS, with experts classifying items. CBP makes the final determination, and a database can provide an ...
  64. [64]
    How Trump's tariffs affect your money - Yahoo Finance
    Jul 9, 2025 · The 25% tariff imposed on steel in 2018, along with many imported Chinese goods, is an example of an ad valorem tariff.Missing: major | Show results with:major
  65. [65]
    Industrial Tariffs | United States Trade Representative
    Industrial tariffs are customs duties on non-agricultural merchandise imports, levied either on an ad valorem basis (percentage of value) or on a specific ...Tariff Schedules · Free Trade Agreements · Rules of Origin · Other Tariff Initiatives
  66. [66]
    Regulating Imports with a Reciprocal Tariff to Rectify Trade Practices ...
    Apr 2, 2025 · For rice in the husk, the U.S. MFN tariff is 2.7 percent (ad valorem equivalent), while India (80 percent), Malaysia (40 percent), and Turkey ( ...
  67. [67]
    Comprehensive tariff data on the WTO website
    The new WTO Tariff & Trade Data platform provides enhanced access to official tariff and trade figures for over 150 economies.Missing: major | Show results with:major<|control11|><|separator|>
  68. [68]
    Property Tax Valuation | Department of Revenue - Georgia.gov
    Property tax is an ad valorem tax--which means according to value--based upon a person's wealth. Wealth is determined by the property a person owns.Missing: characteristics | Show results with:characteristics
  69. [69]
  70. [70]
    Understanding Property Taxes in Colorado
    The county assessor is responsible for discovering, listing, classifying, and valuing all property in the county in accordance with state laws.
  71. [71]
    Property Assessment Process | Adams County, CO
    The Assessor's office values your property for ad valorem property taxation purposes. Mass appraisal is a process that allows for valuation of a universe of ...
  72. [72]
    How to Design and Implement Property Tax Reforms in - IMF eLibrary
    Sep 19, 2024 · Three standard valuation methods are commonly used to estimate market values. These are the “comparable sales” method; the “cost” method; and ...
  73. [73]
    Property Tax Terminology | Colorado Department of Local Affairs
    A property is valued as of an appraisal date of June 30 of even years using market data from a minimum of 18 months before and a maximum of 60 months before.
  74. [74]
    Valuation and Assessment of Immovable Property - OECD
    This paper addresses the following questions about immovable property taxation in OECD and partner countries: What is valued? How is it valued?
  75. [75]
    Assessment - Vermont Department of Taxes
    An assessment is a valuation (appraisal) of the property for ad valorem (town) tax purposes. Who Makes Property Assessments? Listers are unique to Vermont ...
  76. [76]
    Valuation standards - Department of Taxation and Finance - NY.gov
    May 21, 2021 · The application of appraisal techniques using the three approaches to value (i.e., cost approach, direct sales comparison approach, and income ...
  77. [77]
    [PDF] PROPERTY REASSESSMENT AND TAXATION
    simplified version of the tax rate-setting process is: Revenues Authorized Previous Year. $ 500,000. Cost of Living Allowance. + 2%. Current Year Revenues ...
  78. [78]
    Ad Valorem Tax | Lowndes County, GA - Official Website
    The tax is levied on the assessed value of the property which, by law, is established at 40% of the fair market value.
  79. [79]
    Truth-in-Taxation: Tax Rate Adoption - Texas Comptroller
    Truth in taxation means local taxing units must inform Texas property taxpayers of tax rate proposals.Tax Rate Calculation · Notice Requirements · Elections to Approve Tax Rate
  80. [80]
    Ad Valorem Taxes | Oklahoma State University
    Review of the Property Taxation Process ... Lastly, the property tax bill is calculated by multiplying the property's taxable value times a property tax rate.
  81. [81]
    [PDF] Managing and Improving Tax Compliance | OECD
    Managing and Improving Tax Compliance. 53. 170. Withholding systems are effective tax collection mechanisms due to their inherent ability to collect tax at the ...<|separator|>
  82. [82]
    [PDF] standard on property tax policy - IAAO
    lative body and may include several enforcement mechanisms to resolve the delinquency. These mechanisms can range from installment plans, garnishment of ...
  83. [83]
    [PDF] Mechanisms for the Effective Collection of VAT/GST | OECD
    The effective implementation and operation of these rules and mechanisms are priorities for countries around the world, to ensure that VAT/GST is properly paid ...
  84. [84]
    Sales and Use Tax Penalties - Department of Taxation and Finance
    Aug 6, 2025 · If you fail to follow the sales tax laws, you may be subject to civil or criminal penalties. This bulletin is an overview of those penalties.
  85. [85]
    Deadweight Loss of Taxation: Definition, How It Works, and Example
    Deadweight loss of taxation is a measurement of the economic loss that can be caused by a tax due to its damaging effects on supply and demand.What Is Deadweight Loss of... · Factors That Contribute · Special Considerations
  86. [86]
    [PDF] Tax analysis - MIT OpenCourseWare
    When producer prices rise, the amount of the ad valorem tax also rises ... high tax rates lead to high deadweight losses relative to revenue yield ...
  87. [87]
    [PDF] Taxation and Economic Efficiency
    This paper analyzes taxation distortions and tax system features that minimize them, including optimal commodity, linear, and nonlinear income taxation.<|separator|>
  88. [88]
    The comparative efficiency of ad valorem and specific taxes under ...
    Ad valorem taxes are more efficient under monopoly, but specific taxes are more efficient under monopsony. The efficiency depends on whether the buyer or ...
  89. [89]
    A Pareto comparison of ad valorem and unit taxes in noncompetitive ...
    The efficiency of indirect taxes under imperfect competition​​ Cost asymmetries strengthen the case for ad valorem taxation under Cournot competition, but unit ...
  90. [90]
    [PDF] Efficiency Aspects of the Value Added Tax, WP/25/165, August 2025
    This paper examines VAT's efficiency as a revenue tool, its potential to generate revenue with minimal distortions, and its use as a macroeconomic policy tool.
  91. [91]
    The value added tax: Its causes and consequences - ScienceDirect
    The concern of this paper, however, is to test it empirically: Is there any evidence that the VAT has, in fact, proved an especially efficient form of taxation?Missing: property | Show results with:property
  92. [92]
    Confronting the New Property Tax Revolt - Tax Foundation
    Nov 5, 2024 · Economic analysis consistently finds that property taxes are better for economic growth than income or sales taxes. We will review the empirical ...
  93. [93]
    Sales Taxes and Prices: An Empirical Analysis | National Tax Journal
    We employ a unique data source to examine the incidence of sales taxes. The main idea is to take information on the prices of specific commodities in ...
  94. [94]
    Efficiency and Incidence of Taxation with Free Entry and Love-of ...
    May 21, 2021 · This paper develops a theory of commodity taxation, finding specific taxes more efficient at the margin than ad valorem taxes.
  95. [95]
    [PDF] Lecture 3: Tax Incidence and Efficiency Costs of Taxation
    The inefficiency of any tax is determined by the extent to which consumers and producers change their behavior to avoid the tax; deadweight loss is caused by.
  96. [96]
    The Economic and Behavioral Effects of a Value Added Tax ...
    This research makes several contributions. It analyzes the effects of a VAT by exploiting a VAT rule that creates the conditions for a local random experiment.
  97. [97]
    [PDF] Ad Valorem Taxation in a Multiproduct Monopoly - ifo Institut
    Aug 30, 2024 · We characterize two mechanisms whereby an ad valorem tax on one good reduces all prices (Edgeworth's paradox), depending on the goods being ...
  98. [98]
    Efficiency comparison of unit and ad valorem taxation in mixed ...
    Jul 13, 2019 · Tax revenue will increase if the tax is fixed by an ad valorem tax rate, but it is indeterminate if the tax is fixed by a unit tax rate.<|control11|><|separator|>
  99. [99]
    Who pays sales taxes? Evidence from French VAT reforms, 1987 ...
    The consumer share of the sales tax burden is 57% in the new car sales market and 77% in the housing repair services market.Missing: bears | Show results with:bears
  100. [100]
    [PDF] -2cm Efficiency and Incidence of Taxation with Free Entry and Love ...
    Our empirical evidence indicates that sales taxes are slightly overshifted onto consumer prices, have a large effect on market demand, and meaningfully reduce ...
  101. [101]
    The legal incidence of ad valorem taxes matters
    Mar 8, 2024 · In this paper, we show that, for an ad valorem tax, this legal incidence does matter for the economic incidence.
  102. [102]
    [PDF] The legal incidence of ad valorem taxes matters
    Dec 19, 2023 · For ad valorem taxes, the legal incidence matters; the reduction in sales is larger when sellers pay the tax than when buyers do.
  103. [103]
    [PDF] Tax Incidence and Efficiency Costs of Taxation - UC Berkeley
    Key point: Taxes can be shifted: taxes affect directly the prices of goods, which affect quantities because of behavioral responses, which affect indirectly the ...Missing: proportionality equity
  104. [104]
    [PDF] The Distributional Effects of Consumption Taxes in OECD Countries ...
    The broad distributional analysis shows that consumption taxes are regressive when measured as a percentage of household income, but are generally either ...
  105. [105]
    Who bears the burden of a national retail sales tax?
    Theory and evidence suggest that the tax would be passed along to consumers via higher prices. Because lower-income households spend a greater share of ...Missing: ad valorem empirical
  106. [106]
    [PDF] Why Are Residential Property Tax Rates Regressive?
    Since individuals with low levels of wealth sort into inexpensive houses, the property tax system ends up overtaxing economically disadvantaged households. 2 ...
  107. [107]
    Should you appeal a property tax assessment | Avalara
    Apr 25, 2025 · A property tax appeal is a formal request to challenge the assessed value of a property. It's made by the property owner to the property assessor.
  108. [108]
    Dueling Valuation Methods Fuel Property Tax Disputes
    Oct 30, 2024 · For example, one jurisdiction removed all improvement value from hotel assessments and only applied land value in determining property tax ...
  109. [109]
    Rethinking Property Taxes | Government Finance Research Center
    Aug 27, 2024 · Frequent Reassessments: The most obvious cause of inaccurate assessments is that too much time has passed since the last revaluation. Imagine a ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
  110. [110]
    [PDF] Why Are Residential Property Tax Rates Regressive?
    Dec 1, 2021 · e is an error term that is normally distributed with unit mean and variance σ2. I assume that errors are proportional to true market values ...
  111. [111]
    How Lower-Income Americans Get Cheated on Property Taxes
    Apr 3, 2021 · The data show errors in valuation tend to cluster geographically. Underestimating the significance of location has the effect of discounting the ...
  112. [112]
    Inaccurate property assessments—causes, impacts and corrective ...
    Oct 4, 2023 · Inaccurate property assessments—causes, impacts and corrective actions ... That would reduce the need for all tax revenues, including property ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
  113. [113]
    [PDF] Slip Op. 20-60 - Court of International Trade
    May 6, 2020 · As such, Customs ascertained that the subject merchandise was “commingled goods” and thus subject to the highest duty rate of any one of the ...
  114. [114]
    [PDF] Slip Op. 25-73 - Court of International Trade
    Jun 11, 2025 · Plaintiff, the United States (“government”), seeks to recover unpaid antidumping duties and interest totaling $100,700 under a United States ...
  115. [115]
    United States v. United States Shoe Corp. | 523 U.S. 360 (1998)
    Prior cases in which this Court upheld flat and ad valorem charges as valid ... Revenue from imports and revenue from customs duties are thus synonymous in this ...
  116. [116]
    [PDF] Decisions of the United States Court of International Trade
    3−6. In response to Customs' protest decision, CSC, in its complaint here, claims that Customs erred in assessing ad valorem duties on. 5 Invoices submitted ...
  117. [117]
    Who would bear the burden of a VAT? - Tax Policy Center
    The burden of a VAT is regressive when measured as a share of current income: the tax burden as a share of income is highest for low-income households and ...
  118. [118]
    Consumption Taxes: An Overview - Congress.gov
    Jan 24, 2023 · A common critique of consumption taxes is that they tend to be regressive, where an individual's average tax rate decreases with income. ...
  119. [119]
    [PDF] Reassessing the regressivity of the VAT - OECD
    Using 2018 household expenditure survey microdata, they conclude that the VAT, and indirect taxes as a whole, are regressive when measured as a percentage of ...Missing: ad valorem
  120. [120]
    [PDF] Life Cycle versus Annual Perspectives on the Incidence of a Value ...
    A VAT appears regressive annually, but over a lifetime, it can be proportional or even progressive, depending on design.
  121. [121]
    [PDF] Assessment Frequency and Equity of the Property Tax
    If all properties of equal value are assessed and taxed at equal amounts, then the tax system achieves horizontal equity. Vertical equity is concerned with the ...
  122. [122]
    [PDF] Legal and Policy Issues for the Property Tax in the United States
    A tax that has been capitalized into property values reduces the economic burden on purchasers; an asset tax can help balance increasing reliance on regressive ...
  123. [123]
    Property tax valuation services. - The CPA Journal Archive
    Ad valorem tax calculations are based on the value of land or property in question. An ad valorem appraisal involves: inventorying assets; conducting market ...
  124. [124]
    Ad Valorem Tax Explained - Texas Tax Protest
    Jan 28, 2025 · Ad valorem tax, meaning 'according to value,' is based on the assessed value of property, like real estate, and is often called property tax.Missing: core principles
  125. [125]
    [PDF] AppeAls HAndbook for Assessors of property
    The county board of equalization is the first level of administrative appeal for all complaints regarding the assessment, classification, and valuation of ...
  126. [126]
    Non ad valorem assessments, collection methods - My Florida Legal
    Jun 11, 2002 · The tax collector may not enforce delinquent non-ad valorem assessments levied by a municipality in a manner other than selling tax certificates and tax deeds.
  127. [127]
    Don't Let Assessors Use Finance Valuations for Taxes
    Oct 4, 2023 · These multiple assets and asset types present a challenge when developing an appropriate ad valorem tax valuation. To appropriately value this ...
  128. [128]
    Property Tax Cuts as Large as Texas
    Unprecedented state revenues allowed Texas lawmakers this year to propose reducing school property taxes by billions of dollars to help ease some of the burden ...
  129. [129]
    The Problem of Ad Valorem Special Assessments Continues to Grow
    May 11, 2021 · They skirt the tax limitations imposed on general property taxes and create issues of fairness and equity. Ad valorem special assessments ...Missing: concerns | Show results with:concerns
  130. [130]
    There's No Good Way to Pay for Property Tax Repeal - Tax Foundation
    Oct 7, 2025 · Repealing property taxes would result in a loss of tax revenue that cannot be easily replaced without dramatically shifting tax burdens.
  131. [131]
    Weakening Local Governments by Eliminating Property Tax Revenue
    Feb 25, 2025 · Local governments would struggle to fund police, fire, schools, and other crucial public services.
  132. [132]
    Challenges and solutions in implementing ad valorem tax
    The main challenges are high costs, public resistance, and social unrest. Solutions involve transparency, inclusiveness, and public participation in the tax ...
  133. [133]
    VAT gap in the EU: 2024 report | Oxford Economics
    Jan 9, 2025 · In 2023, the VAT revenue-to-GDP ratio amounted to 7.2% of the EU GDP and 15.7% of total government revenue. This makes VAT essential for ...
  134. [134]
    Average global tax revenues flat but VAT takings rise: OECD
    Nov 21, 2024 · Despite the overall fall in tax revenue, the OECD noted that VAT revenues reached 20.8% of total tax income in 2022 (the most recently available ...
  135. [135]
    State Sales Tax Breadth and Reliance, Fiscal Year 2022
    Jul 23, 2024 · Sales taxes account for 30.42 percent of all state tax revenue, second only to individual income taxes (37.72 percent) in their contribution to state receipts.
  136. [136]
    Sources of US Tax Revenue by Tax Type, 2025 - Tax Foundation
    May 29, 2025 · Individual Taxes 39.9% ; Social Insurance Taxes 24% ; Consumption Taxes 16.8% ; Property Taxes 11% ; Corporate Taxes 8.3%.
  137. [137]
    Total Property Tax Collections Hit Record High in 2024 | NAHB
    Mar 31, 2025 · In 2024, tax revenue at the state/local level totaled $2.095 trillion, up 4.6% from $2.004 trillion in 2023. According to the Census Bureau's ...
  138. [138]
    [PDF] State Revenues Dropped in Calendar Year 2023 | Urban Institute
    May 15, 2024 · Total state government tax revenue collections rose by 4.5 percent in nominal terms and 1.8 percent in real terms in the fourth quarter of 2023 ...<|separator|>
  139. [139]
    What is the breakdown of revenues among federal, state, and local ...
    Tax receipts (largely property taxes) were 55 percent of the total and other receipts were another 7 percent. Thirty-eight percent of local government revenues ...
  140. [140]
    [PDF] NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES SALES TAXES AND INTERNET ...
    The study found substantial sensitivity to sales taxes, with a price elasticity of around -2 for interested buyers. A 1% increase in sales tax increases online ...
  141. [141]
    A Systematic Review of Research on the Price Elasticity of Demand ...
    We reviewed 160 studies on the price elasticity of demand for major food categories to assess mean elasticities by food category and variations in estimates by ...
  142. [142]
    [PDF] Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence
    This paper presents evidence that consumers under react to taxes that are not salient and characterizes the welfare consequences of tax policies when agents ...
  143. [143]
    Taxes and Migration: New Evidence from Academic Research
    Mar 12, 2024 · Descriptively, it has become evident in the post-pandemic years that taxes induce outmigration from high-tax states (see our recent analyses ...
  144. [144]
    [PDF] Taxing Top Wealth: Migration Responses and their Aggregate ...
    We find that the effects of tax-induced migration on aggregate economic activity are modest. A one percentage point increase in the top wealth tax rate ...
  145. [145]
    [PDF] The endogenous nature of property taxation makes it difficult to ...
    Abstract: The endogenous nature of property taxation makes it difficult to properly understand the effects of property taxation on businesses.Missing: VAT | Show results with:VAT<|control11|><|separator|>
  146. [146]
    [PDF] Property Taxes and Housing Allocation Under Financial Constraints
    Jun 19, 2025 · Low property taxes limit young families' housing access, while higher taxes can increase homeownership. Raising California's property taxes to ...
  147. [147]
    [PDF] Sales tax incidence.pdf
    Evidence of overshifting of sales tax on certain goods could lead policy makers to reduce taxation on them: taxes induce a price increase more than ...
  148. [148]
    Can Property Taxes Reduce House Price Volatility? Evidence from ...
    Nov 10, 2016 · We find that property tax rates have a negative impact on house price volatility. The impact is causal, with increases in property tax rates ...Missing: migration | Show results with:migration<|separator|>
  149. [149]
    [PDF] A Welfare Analysis of Tax Structures with Love-of-Variety Preferences
    This paper analyzes the trade-off between ad valorem and specific taxes using an economic model with love-of-variety preferences, deriving formulas for  ...
  150. [150]
    Impacts of the EU VAT reform on cross-border e-commerce
    The EU VAT reform abolished De Minimis and mandated platforms to collect taxes. · China's online sales to the EU have dropped by nearly 50% due to the reform.
  151. [151]
    VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) - Taxation and Customs Union
    The European Commission proposed measures to modernise the EU's Value-Added Tax (VAT) system, make it work better for businesses and more resilient to fraud.
  152. [152]
    China: New VAT Law passed – Companies must adapt - Roedl.com
    On December 25, 2024, China passed the new VAT law, effective January 1, 2026. It introduces significant changes and highlights for businesses.
  153. [153]
    Final Report - Property Tax Reform - NYC.gov
    The New York City Advisory Commission on Property Tax Reform released its final report with recommendations to create a simpler, clearer and fairer property ...
  154. [154]
    Cook County Property Tax (PTAX) Reform Group Releases Study on ...
    Dec 12, 2024 · This study highlights significant issues with current property tax assessment practices and offers actionable recommendations to improve equity, fairness and ...Missing: ad valorem case
  155. [155]
    Truth in Taxation: A Solution to the Growing Property Tax Problem
    Jul 2, 2025 · These included a consolidation of 15 different levies into one run by cities and a levy limit on that general fund of $8.10 per $1,000 in ...
  156. [156]
    What is ad valorem tax? - Auditor-Controller
    Feb 15, 2017 · The ad valorem tax is the property tax that the County levies at a rate equal to one percent (1%) of the full cash value.
  157. [157]
    State and Local Sales Tax Rates, Midyear 2025 - Tax Foundation
    Jul 8, 2025 · California has the highest state sales tax rate at 7.25 percent, followed by Indiana, Mississippi, Rhode Island, and Tennessee at 7 percent.
  158. [158]
    2025 US sales tax rates by state - Avalara
    State-by-state sales tax breakdown ; Arizona · 5.60%. 0%–5.6% ; Arkansas · 6.50%. 0%–5% ; California · 6.00%. 0.15%–3% ; Colorado · 2.90%. 0%–8.3%.Download rate tables · Florida sales · Illinois · Alabama
  159. [159]
    Further Modifying the Reciprocal Tariff Rates - The White House
    Jul 31, 2025 · In Executive Order 14257 of April 2, 2025 (Regulating Imports With a Reciprocal Tariff To Rectify Trade Practices That Contribute to Large and ...Missing: reforms | Show results with:reforms
  160. [160]
    VAT rules and rates: standard, special & reduced rates - Your Europe
    Each EU country has a standard rate which applies to the supply of most goods and services. This cannot be less than 15%.
  161. [161]
    2025 VAT Rates in Europe: Country Rates & Changes - VATAi Blog
    Mar 26, 2025 · Luxembourg levies the lowest standard VAT rate at 17%, followed by Malta (18%) and Cyprus, Germany, and Romania (all at 19%).
  162. [162]
    EU VAT Rates Table 2025: Complete by-Country Guide 2025 ?
    Jan 2, 2024 · Starting January 1, 2025, Slovakia will increase its standard VAT rate from 20% to 23%. Additionally, Estonia will raise its standard VAT rate from 22% to 24%, ...EU VAT Rates for 2025: The... · Applying VAT Rates in the EU...
  163. [163]
    WORLD: VAT RATES PER COUNTRY – 2025
    The highest standard VAT (Value Added Tax) rate in the world is 27% in Hungary. Some other countries, such as Sweden, have a standard VAT rate of 25%.
  164. [164]
    Comparing Europe's Tax Systems: Property Taxes
    Compare property taxes in Europe. Explore best and worst property tax systems in the OECD and the best and worst property tax systems in Europe.
  165. [165]
    Property taxes in Central and Eastern Europe and Baltic countries
    Feb 16, 2023 · Revenues from taxes on immovable property are low in most CEE countries. While Poland collects more property tax revenues (slightly above 1% of ...
  166. [166]
  167. [167]
    Property Tax Regimes in Europe - UN-Habitat
    Following a widely used structure for describing property tax systems, this report provides a survey of European property tax regimes.
  168. [168]
    Canada - Corporate - Other taxes - Worldwide Tax Summaries
    Jun 13, 2025 · The GST is a federal sales tax levied at a rate of 5% on the supply of most property and services made in Canada. It is a value-added tax ...<|separator|>
  169. [169]
    Municipal taxes - Province of British Columbia - Gov.bc.ca
    Jan 21, 2025 · Property value tax. Property value tax (also know as an ad valorem tax) is a tax applied the value of a land and improvements (buildings and ...
  170. [170]
    Australia Tax Rates & Rankings - Tax Foundation
    Rolled Tobaco - Ad valorem excise as percent of retail sales price, 0%, 17.3%. Rolled Tobaco - Specific Excise per 1,000 (in USD), $897.06, $139.55. Excise Tax ...<|separator|>
  171. [171]
    [PDF] Australian Stamp Duty & Land Tax Maps | PwC Australia
    rate | 2% for high value properties over the premium threshold of $6,571,000. From the 2025 land tax year the tax-free threshold ($1,075,000) and premium rate ...
  172. [172]
    India - Corporate - Other taxes - Worldwide Tax Summaries
    May 6, 2025 · All goods imported into India are subject to customs entry requirements and are subject to customs duty generally on an ad valorem basis, except ...
  173. [173]
    Brazil - Corporate - Other taxes - Worldwide Tax Summaries
    Oct 29, 2024 · The internal ICMS rates vary according to each State of Brazil, ranging, as a rule, from 17% to 20%. In the State of São Paulo, for example, ...
  174. [174]
    Indirect tax - Brazil - Grant Thornton International
    Jan 1, 2022 · ICMS – 17%, 18% or 20% (general internal rates, which may vary from each State), or 4%, 7% or 12% (interstate rates). · IPI – 0% to 365% (based ...
  175. [175]
    South Africa - Corporate - Other taxes - Worldwide Tax Summaries
    Property taxes. Local municipalities levy rates on land. These rates are based on a percentage of the municipal valuation of land and improvements and vary ...
  176. [176]
    South Africa - Individual - Other taxes - Worldwide Tax Summaries
    May 30, 2025 · An ad valorem duty is levied on certain luxury goods and automobiles. ... Transfer duty. Transfer duty is payable on the transfer of immovable ...