Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Excise

An excise tax is an indirect tax levied by governments on the manufacture, importation, or sale of specific goods or services, such as alcohol, tobacco, fuels, and certain activities like air travel.^[1]^[2] These taxes are typically collected from producers or importers but economically passed through to consumers via higher prices, distinguishing them from general sales taxes by their targeted application to particular items rather than broad consumption.^[3]^[4] Excise duties can be structured as specific taxes per unit of quantity or ad valorem rates based on value, often aiming to generate revenue while addressing perceived negative externalities associated with the taxed goods.^[5]^[6] Historically, excise taxes trace back thousands of years to ancient civilizations but gained systematic use in early modern Europe before adoption in the United States, where the first federal excise on distilled spirits in 1791 funded debts from the Revolutionary War yet ignited the Whiskey Rebellion due to opposition from frontier distillers.^[6]^[7] In the U.S., they have funded wartime efforts, infrastructure like highways via fuel taxes, and social programs, though their share of federal revenue has declined to about 1-2% in recent decades amid broader income and payroll tax dominance.^[2]^[8] Globally, excise taxes on "sin goods" like tobacco and alcohol empirically reduce consumption volumes, particularly among price-sensitive groups, while providing stable revenue streams less volatile than income taxes.^[6]^[9] Key characteristics include their potential regressivity, as lower-income households spend a larger proportion of income on taxed essentials like gasoline, though proponents highlight behavioral benefits in curbing excess consumption of harmful products.^[10]^[2] Controversies often arise over rate hikes, which can shift economic incidence to consumers or producers depending on demand elasticity, and their use in policy goals like environmental protection via carbon or fuel excises.^[2]^[11] Despite comprising a minor fiscal portion, excises remain integral for influencing market outcomes and funding targeted expenditures, such as trust funds for transportation.^[8]^[3]

Fundamentals of Excise Taxation

Definition and Distinctions

An excise tax constitutes an indirect tax imposed on the production, manufacture, sale, or consumption of particular goods, services, or activities, rather than on general income or broad retail transactions. In the United States, for instance, it applies to items such as fuel, tobacco products, alcohol, and airline tickets, with liability falling on manufacturers, importers, wholesalers, retailers, or end consumers depending on the specific levy.^[1]^[3] These taxes are typically embedded in the price paid by the ultimate consumer, distinguishing them from direct taxes assessed on individuals' earnings or assets.^[12] The etymology of "excise" traces to the Latin excisus, the past participle of excidere meaning "to cut out" or "to remove," underscoring the tax's selective nature in extracting revenue from designated sectors rather than applying universally.^[13] This origin, transmitted through Middle Dutch excijs and Old French accise, highlights its historical role as a targeted levy on commodities, often administered internally within a jurisdiction.^[13] Excise taxes differ from ad valorem sales taxes or value-added taxes (VAT), which calculate liability as a percentage of an item's retail value across diverse merchandise, by frequently using specific rates—a fixed monetary amount per unit of measure, such as $0.184 per gallon of gasoline—applied only to enumerated categories.^[12]^[14] In opposition to customs duties or tariffs, which target imported goods at borders to regulate trade flows or generate protectionist revenue, excises predominantly cover domestically produced or consumed items, though some overlap exists for imports treated as domestic equivalents post-entry.^[15] Unlike property taxes, which evaluate fixed assets or real estate holdings for ongoing wealth-based assessments, or income taxes, which directly tax personal or corporate earnings, excises operate as consumption-oriented indirect levies without regard to the taxpayer's overall financial capacity.^[12]^[16]

Core Principles and Types

Excise taxes operate through distinct structural mechanisms designed to target specific goods at points of production, import, or sale, with classifications primarily dividing them into specific and ad valorem types. Specific excises impose a fixed monetary amount per physical unit, such as per liter, gallon, or package, which simplifies administration and reduces incentives for substitution toward higher-value variants of the same good.^[5]^[17] For instance, the United States federal excise tax on gasoline levies 18.4 cents per gallon as of 2025, unchanged since its last adjustment in 1993.^[18]^[19] Ad valorem excises, by contrast, apply a percentage of the good's value, aligning tax liability with price fluctuations but potentially encouraging shifts to premium products to minimize relative burden.^[5]^[20] In practice, hybrid approaches combine both, as seen in certain alcohol duties where a base specific rate supplements an ad valorem component to balance stability and proportionality.^[21] Core principles governing excise taxation emphasize mechanical efficiency and targeted impact. Internalization requires embedding unaccounted societal costs—such as environmental degradation or health burdens—directly into the product's price, thereby incentivizing reduced consumption without relying on regulatory bans.^[22]^[23] Earmarking dedicates revenues to expenditures linked to the taxed activity, enhancing perceived fairness and fiscal discipline; for example, fuel excises often fund transportation infrastructure to offset usage-related wear.^[24] However, this practice demands alignment between revenue streams and spending needs, as mismatches can undermine sustainability.^[25] Revenue volatility arises from excises' sensitivity to consumption elasticity, where economic downturns or price-induced behavioral shifts—such as reduced demand amid inflation—can sharply curtail yields, complicating budgetary planning compared to broader-based taxes.^[26]^[27] These features collectively ensure excises function as precise fiscal instruments, though their narrow bases amplify responsiveness to market dynamics.^[28]

Historical Development

Ancient and Pre-Modern Origins

In ancient civilizations, excise-like levies on specific commodities arose as practical mechanisms for revenue generation, capitalizing on observable production or trade chokepoints where verification was feasible amid rudimentary administrative tools. These taxes targeted high-value or staple goods, avoiding the challenges of assessing diffuse agricultural yields or personal incomes. In the Roman Empire, vectigalia encompassed indirect duties on goods such as salt from state-operated salinae (salt-works), which provided steady imperial revenue, alongside portoria—tolls on internal transport and sales of wine and olive oil, essential Mediterranean staples that facilitated control at ports or markets.^[29] Such impositions, often at rates like 2-5% of gross product empire-wide, reflected the era's fiscal realism: taxing verifiable flows rather than elusive wealth estimates.^[30] Parallel developments occurred in imperial China, where dynastic rulers imposed excises on luxury exports to fund vast bureaucracies and military campaigns. During the Tang dynasty (618–907 CE), the quecha system established a state tea monopoly, classifying leaves by quality and levying a 10% tax that generated approximately 400,000 strings of cash annually, equivalent to significant imperial funding.^[31] Silk, another prized commodity, faced similar duties, often collected in-kind from producers, as seen in Ming-era (1368–1644) policies where households paid taxes in silk bolts alongside grain, leveraging centralized production hubs for enforcement.^[32] These measures underscored causal priorities: commodities like tea and silk, concentrated in specific regions, allowed tolls at bottlenecks such as monopolized processing or export points, bypassing broader income proxies impractical in agrarian societies. In medieval Europe, feudal fragmentation amplified localized excises, with lords extracting duties from ale brewing—a ubiquitous household activity—and wool, the era's economic linchpin. English manorial customs from the 12th–14th centuries included brewing fees or "scot" on ale sales, enforceable at village breweries or markets due to the beverage's perishability and local production.^[33] Wool exports, powering trade with Flanders and Italy, incurred heavy staples duties (e.g., up to 40 shillings per sack by the 1340s), collected at designated ports like Boston or London to curb smuggling amid high demand.^[34] This structure privileged tangible tolls over feudal renders in kind, as wool's commoditization enabled oversight at shearing or shipping stages.^[35] Under Islamic caliphates, revenue systems blended religious obligations with pragmatic levies on commerce, favoring specifics on movable luxuries over undifferentiated wealth assessments. Beyond zakat—a 2.5% alms on categories like gold, livestock, and trade goods—the Umayyad (661–750 CE) and Abbasid eras imposed ushr (10% on irrigated crops) and customs on imported luxuries such as silk or spices, collected at urban bazaars or caravan routes for caliphal treasuries.^[36]^[37] Jizya on non-Muslims supplemented these, but excise analogs targeted verifiable luxury flows, reflecting administrative realism: bottlenecks like Damascus markets allowed audits infeasible for nomadic or rural incomes. This approach sustained expansive empires by aligning taxation with observable economic nodes, prefiguring modern excise logic without relying on comprehensive censuses.

Industrial Era Expansions

The expansion of excise taxation during the 18th and early 19th centuries in Britain was driven by the fiscal demands of industrialization, colonial trade, and incessant warfare, shifting reliance from land-based levies to consumption duties that scaled with economic output and proved more resilient to evasion. The window tax, enacted in 1696 under William III, imposed graduated rates on dwellings according to the number of windows—exempting those with fewer than ten—to target wealthier households while generating steady revenue; it endured until its repeal in 1851 amid widespread distortionary effects, such as property owners bricking up windows to minimize liability.^[38] High duties on salt similarly fueled rampant smuggling networks, with Irish white salt evading levies to undercut English coastal producers, illustrating how excise structures inadvertently spurred illicit trade that eroded intended revenues and strained enforcement.^[39] These measures supplanted feudal land taxes, which were politically contentious and administratively cumbersome, enabling centralized collection on mobile goods like malt, soap, and leather that aligned with burgeoning manufacturing and commerce. Across the Atlantic, the nascent United States encountered similar frictions in establishing federal excises, as seen in the 1791 whiskey tax proposed by Alexander Hamilton to service Revolutionary War debts through duties of 6 to 18 cents per gallon on distilled spirits—disproportionately burdening small western distillers who relied on whiskey as currency.^[40] This provoked the Whiskey Rebellion in 1794, when Pennsylvania farmers violently resisted tax collectors, underscoring excise's role in asserting national authority over local economies and funding a standing military without direct property assessments; federal forces quelled the uprising, affirming the tax's constitutionality despite its regressive bite on frontier producers.^[40] Excise revenues proved pivotal during the Napoleonic Wars (1793–1815), spiking to finance Britain's fiscal-military apparatus amid export booms and naval supremacy; pre-war annual tax intake neared £18 million, augmented by an average additional £12.6 million per year through excises on traded and domestic goods like spirits, beer, and coal, which comprised the bulk of indirect levies and underpinned borrowing for sustained armies and fleets.^[41]^[42] This evolution intertwined customs on imports—such as cotton for textile mills—with inland excises on processed spirits and manufactures, funding imperial defense of trade routes while centralizing power by decoupling revenue from agrarian elites; the system's efficiency, rooted in professional bureaucracies, allowed warfare expenditures without feudal dependencies, though it amplified smuggling and economic distortions tied to global commodity flows.^[43]

Post-WWII and Contemporary Shifts

Following World War II, excise taxes expanded beyond traditional goods to support infrastructure and reconstruction efforts, with fuel excises emerging as a key mechanism. In the United States, the Highway Trust Fund was established by the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956, drawing revenue primarily from a 3-cent-per-gallon federal excise tax on gasoline and diesel, later adjusted upward, to finance the Interstate Highway System and related surface transportation projects.^[44] This user-pays approach linked excise revenues directly to highway maintenance and expansion, reflecting a post-war emphasis on economic recovery through targeted infrastructure investment. Tobacco and alcohol excises, which had provided significant wartime revenue, persisted but were supplemented by these new levies amid rising automobile dependency.^[2] The 1970s oil crises accelerated shifts toward fuel-related excises with environmental undertones, as supply shocks and price surges prompted conservation measures. The 1973 Arab oil embargo quadrupled global oil prices, leading to U.S. proposals for gasoline tax increases—such as President Nixon's 1970 suggestion of 2-3 cents per gallon—to curb demand and fund energy independence initiatives.^[45] ^[46] These events laid groundwork for excises aimed at internalizing energy externalities, though implementation focused more on revenue stabilization than pure environmental correction, with fuel taxes extended repeatedly to sustain trust funds amid diverging expenditures and revenues.^[47] In contemporary developments through 2025, declining consumption of traditional bases like tobacco and alcohol—driven by public health interventions and awareness—has eroded tax volumes, prompting diversification into "new sin" excises for revenue stability. Global tobacco use has dropped sharply since the 1990s, reducing excise yields in many jurisdictions despite rate hikes, as elasticity analyses show sustained demand suppression.^[48] Alcohol consumption trends similarly reflect health-driven declines, challenging fiscal reliance on these sources.^[9] Offsetting this, governments have imposed excises on sugar-sweetened beverages and emerging pollutants like plastics, with OECD data indicating expanded behavioral excises across member states to influence consumption patterns while maintaining overall revenue shares.^[49] In the U.S., air transportation excises rose effective January 1, 2025, with the segment tax increasing to $5.50 for domestic flights under IRC section 4261, and proposed regulations for a tax on designated drug sales—targeting manufacturer transfers—were published January 2, 2025, to capture value in pharmaceuticals amid pricing debates.^[50] ^[51] Empirical patterns show these adaptations preserve aggregate excise stability but underscore base erosion risks without broader reforms.^[52]

Theoretical Justifications

Revenue and Fiscal Efficiency

Excise taxes offer governments a relatively efficient revenue source by concentrating collection at limited points in the supply chain, such as manufacturers or importers, thereby reducing administrative overhead compared to income taxes that require processing returns from millions of individuals.^[17] Specific excise levies, applied per unit of good rather than as a percentage of value, further enhance enforceability and curb evasion, as quantities are verifiable through production records or shipments, unlike value-based assessments prone to underreporting.^[17] In the United States, federal excise taxes collected $101.4 billion in fiscal year 2024, accounting for about 2% of total federal revenues totaling $4.9 trillion.^[53]^[54] This yield demonstrates scalability for fiscal needs, as rates can be adjusted upward to offset deficits without the compliance complexities of expanding income tax bases or brackets. Moreover, excises align revenue with user-financed expenditures under the beneficiary-pays model; motor fuel taxes, at 18.4 cents per gallon for gasoline and 24.4 cents for diesel, produced roughly $35.8 billion in 2022, comprising 83% of inflows to the Highway Trust Fund dedicated to road and transit infrastructure.^[18]^[55] Such mechanisms minimize economic distortions inherent in progressive income taxation, which can deter labor participation and capital formation through marginal rate effects, whereas targeted excises on discrete transactions preserve incentives for untaxed activities.^[56] This fiscal approach supports stable, predictable inflows from goods with inelastic demand, enabling governments to fund operations or infrastructure without relying on volatile or distortionary broad-based levies.

Corrective and Externality-Based Rationales

Excise taxes serve as Pigouvian instruments when calibrated to approximate the marginal external cost of negative externalities, thereby aligning private decisions with social welfare by compelling producers or consumers to bear the full societal burden of harms such as pollution or public health burdens. In theory, a fuel excise reflecting the social cost of carbon emissions—estimated at $50–$100 per ton in recent integrated assessment models—internalizes climate damages, while tobacco excises aim to capture externalities like secondhand smoke and taxpayer-funded treatments for smoking-related illnesses, which totaled $300 billion annually in U.S. healthcare costs as of 2018. This approach requires precise empirical quantification of externalities, as assumptions of uniform harm across agents can distort incentives; for example, heterogeneous emission elasticities among firms undermine uniform tax efficacy, yielding suboptimal welfare gains compared to tailored alternatives.^[57]^[58] Evidence from fuel excises in OECD nations demonstrates partial success in curbing emissions, with carbon pricing mechanisms—including implicit prices via excises—linked to long-run CO2 reductions through elasticities of -0.2 to -0.5, implying a 1% price increase lowers emissions by up to 0.5% over time. A 2023 panel analysis of 38 OECD countries confirmed environmental taxes, encompassing fuel levies, inversely correlate with emissions, though causality weakens when controlling for GDP growth and energy efficiency gains independent of taxation. Critiques highlight overestimation risks, as models often neglect innovation offsets—such as accelerated renewable adoption—or leakage effects where emissions shift to untaxed jurisdictions, reducing net global internalization by 20–50% in border-adjusted scenarios.^[59]^[60]^[61] For health-related excises like those on alcohol or sugary products, empirical outcomes reveal challenges in fully internalizing externalities due to substitution toward untaxed substitutes with comparable risks, such as shifting from taxed sodas to untaxed energy drinks or alcohol variants evading volume-based levies. Post-tax studies in jurisdictions like Mexico and Philadelphia show targeted consumption drops of 10–20%, but negligible increases in healthier alternatives, with total caloric intake from sweetened beverages declining only modestly as consumers opt for unregulated options, potentially sustaining obesity-related costs estimated at 2–3% of GDP in affected populations. Mainstream economic models advocating expansive sin taxes, often from academia with documented left-leaning institutional biases, tend to overstate net benefits by underweighting these substitutions and private mitigations like voluntary cessation, leading to calls for supplementary evidence on long-term health trajectories rather than reliance on short-run demand curves.^[62]^[63]^[64]

Behavioral and Sumptuary Arguments

Sumptuary arguments for excise taxation trace back to efforts to regulate consumption signaling social status or moral excess, often through duties on luxury goods or vices to enforce class distinctions or curb perceived extravagance. In colonial New England, Puritan authorities imposed early sumptuary excises on items like fine clothing and imported foods to discourage ostentation and align spending with religious austerity, viewing such taxes as tools for moral governance rather than mere revenue.^[65] These historical precedents evolved into modern sin taxes, where excises on goods like alcohol and tobacco are justified as mechanisms to deter socially disfavored behaviors by raising costs and signaling disapproval, independent of externalities like health costs.^[66] Empirical assessments of these behavioral interventions reveal varied demand elasticities, with addictive substances often exhibiting inelastic responses among habitual users, limiting the taxes' deterrent effect. For instance, studies on alcohol consumption find price elasticities typically ranging from -0.3 to -0.7, indicating that a 10% price increase via excise reduces volume by only 3-7%, particularly among heavy drinkers whose habits resist price signals.^[67] Tobacco demand similarly shows overall inelasticity, with elasticities below -0.5 in aggregate, though youth and occasional users display higher sensitivity, suggesting excises may influence initiation more than cessation among dependents.^[68] Behavioral economics research further indicates that individuals with lower self-control reduce purchases less in response to tax hikes, undermining the paternalistic goal of uniform conduct modification.^[69] High excises intended to suppress vice frequently engender black markets, shifting activity underground and amplifying associated risks rather than eliminating them. During U.S. Prohibition (1920-1933), the outright ban—functionally an infinite excise—spawned vast illicit alcohol networks, fueling organized crime syndicates like those led by Al Capone and contributing to thousands of alcohol-related deaths from adulterated products, as legal deterrence collapsed into enforcement failures.^[70] Contemporary cigarette excises demonstrate analogous dynamics, with interstate smuggling rates exceeding 50% in high-tax states like New York, correlating with tax differentials and sustaining criminal enterprises that evade behavioral controls while eroding intended revenue and compliance.^[71] Such outcomes highlight causal pathways where punitive pricing incentivizes substitution toward unregulated channels, often escalating enforcement costs and ancillary crimes without proportionally curbing overall consumption.^[72] These sumptuary rationales rest on assumptions of governmental insight into optimal individual choices, yet evidence prioritizes consumer sovereignty, as persistent inelasticities and evasion suggest excises serve more as symbolic nudges than reliable architects of restraint. Where behavioral shifts occur, they disproportionately affect marginal users, leaving core vices entrenched and prompting critiques of overreach into personal liberty, as taxes compel conformity without addressing underlying preferences or habits through non-coercive means.^[73]

Targeted Goods and Services

Traditional Sin Taxes (Tobacco, Alcohol, Fuel)

Traditional sin taxes on tobacco, alcohol, and fuel represent longstanding excise levies applied to goods associated with personal consumption and perceived social costs, predating many modern regulatory frameworks. These taxes are typically structured as specific duties per unit volume or quantity, reflecting their origins in revenue generation from relatively inelastic demand. Empirical data indicate that demand for tobacco products exhibits low price elasticity, with estimates ranging from -0.2 to -0.5 overall, though higher inelasticity among chronic users due to addiction dynamics.^[74] Similarly, alcohol demand shows inelasticity, particularly for heavier consumers, while fuel taxes benefit from essential usage patterns tied to transportation infrastructure.^[74] Tobacco excises, among the earliest sin taxes, target cigarettes and related products through per-pack or per-unit rates. In the United States, the federal excise tax stands at $1.01 per pack of 20 cigarettes as of 2025, unchanged since its 2009 increase under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.^[75] Globally, tobacco consumption has declined amid rising taxes and other factors, with the World Health Organization reporting a drop from 1.38 billion users in 2000 to 1.2 billion in 2024, and prevalence falling from 32.7% to 21.7% among those aged 15 and older by 2020.^[76] ^[77] However, sharp tax hikes correlate with increased smuggling; studies across U.S. states using 2021 data show a strong positive relationship between state tax differentials and smuggling inflows, with high-tax jurisdictions like New York experiencing net smuggling losses exceeding 50% of consumption.^[78] While smuggling partially offsets revenue gains—reducing projected increases by 10-20% in some models—it does not reverse net fiscal benefits due to tobacco's inelastic demand.^[79] Alcohol excises vary by beverage type and alcohol content, often calculated per liter of pure alcohol to account for potency. In the United Kingdom, spirits duty is levied at £32.79 per liter of pure alcohol for products exceeding 22% ABV as of 2025, with rates scaling downward for lower-strength categories like beer (£0.227 per liter of product for draught up to 2.8% ABV).^[80] These structures aim to equalize tax burdens across proofs, though empirical elasticity remains low (-0.3 to -0.7), implying limited consumption shifts from moderate increases.^[74] Revenue from such taxes funds public expenditures, but evasion via cross-border purchases rises with differentials, similar to tobacco patterns. Fuel excises, applied to gasoline and diesel, are per-gallon or per-liter levies earmarked for infrastructure in many jurisdictions. The U.S. federal rate is 18.4 cents per gallon for gasoline and 24.4 cents for diesel as of 2025, supporting the Highway Trust Fund.^[19] Despite electric vehicle adoption, which bypasses fuel taxes, aggregate revenue has shown short-term stability; studies indicate minimal impact to date, with EVs comprising less than 10% of U.S. vehicle sales through 2024 and total motor fuel tax collections holding steady around $30-35 billion annually federally.^[81] ^[18] Demand inelasticity for essential mobility sustains yields, though long-term projections forecast erosion without alternatives like mileage-based fees, as fuel-efficient and zero-emission vehicles contribute less per mile traveled.^[82]

Vice and Regulated Activities (Gambling, Narcotics, Prostitution)

Excise taxes on gambling typically apply to the gross amount wagered, known as the "handle," rather than net winnings, to capture revenue at the source and simplify collection. In the United States, the federal excise tax on legal sports wagers stands at 0.25% of the total handle, with an additional annual occupational tax of $50 per agent accepting bets, a structure dating to the 1950s but retained amid expanded legalization post-2018 Supreme Court ruling on sports betting.^[83]^[84] State-level taxes vary widely, often as a percentage of gross gaming revenue (e.g., up to 51% in states like New York), funding public services while incentivizing licensed operators over underground markets; however, high rates can drive evasion, as evidenced by persistent illegal betting estimated at 20-30% of total U.S. volume despite regulation.^[85] This taxation balances revenue generation—yielding billions annually—with enforcement challenges, where over-taxation risks expanding unregulated sectors that evade oversight and contribute to associated crimes like match-fixing. For narcotics, excise taxes emerge primarily in jurisdictions post-legalization, targeting cannabis as a proxy for broader controlled substances where prohibition previously dominated. Canada's federal excise duty on cannabis, implemented since 2018, combines a flat rate of C$1 per gram of THC equivalent (or C$10 per 100 grams for low-THC products) with a 10% ad valorem component on the greater of the two, yielding effective rates often between 10% and 25% depending on market prices; provinces add their own levies, pushing combined burdens higher.^[86]^[87] In the U.S., state-level cannabis excises average 15-20% of retail price, generating over $20 billion in combined tax revenue across legal markets in 2024, with sales reaching $30 billion amid expansion to 24 states.^[88] These revenues have partially offset declining tobacco excise collections, which fell due to reduced consumption and vaping shifts, though black markets persist where taxes exceed 30-40% effective rates, undermining public health goals by favoring untaxed, untested products.^[89] Liberty considerations arise as such taxes, while funding regulation, can deter formal participation and sustain prohibition-era enforcement costs. Prostitution-related excises remain exceptionally rare globally, with most regulated models relying on licensing fees rather than per-transaction levies, reflecting challenges in monitoring consensual exchanges without broader criminalization. In Nevada, the sole U.S. state permitting licensed brothels in select counties, no specific excise tax applies to sex acts; operators pay county business fees (ranging from $100 quarterly to $20,000 annually) and state work permits ($50 per prostitute), alongside federal income taxes on earnings, generating local revenue but exempting the activity from state sales or excise duties.^[90]^[91] Empirical studies on legalization effects show mixed causal outcomes: decriminalization in places like Rhode Island (2003-2009) correlated with a 31% drop in reported rapes and lower STI incidence, suggesting reduced violence against sex workers via formal channels, yet cross-country analyses indicate legalized systems may increase human trafficking inflows by 20-30% due to expanded demand without proportional supply safeguards.^[92]^[93] Introducing excises could further deter legalization benefits by raising costs, potentially sustaining underground markets prone to coercion and evasion, while infringing individual autonomy in private transactions—a trade-off where empirical revenue gains (minimal in existing models) often fail to justify heightened regulatory intrusion.^[94]

Health and Environmental Levies (Sugar, Plastics, Emissions)

Mexico implemented a 10% excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) in January 2014, resulting in an initial 6% reduction in purchases of taxed beverages compared to pre-tax trends, with effects strengthening to nearly 10% by the second year.^[95] ^[96] However, longer-term evaluations showed diminishing impacts, with only a 4.4% sustained reduction in SSB purchases four years post-implementation, alongside increased consumption of untaxed alternatives like water and unsweetened beverages.^[97] Empirical studies on SSB taxes reveal frequent substitution effects, where consumers shift to untaxed caloric sources such as fruit juices, milk, or other high-sugar foods, potentially undermining net health benefits.^[98] ^[99] A meta-analysis of global SSB taxes estimated a 10% price increase correlates with a 10% drop in SSB intake, but this often fails to translate to overall caloric or obesity reductions due to such offsets, with public health-oriented research sometimes overstating causality by underemphasizing behavioral adaptations.^[100] In the environmental domain, the European Union introduced a levy in 2021 on non-recycled plastic packaging waste at €0.80 per kilogram, aimed at reducing plastic pollution and funding EU initiatives, with member states required to report and contribute based on national waste generation.^[101] ^[102] Complementary measures, such as plastic bag charges or bans across EU countries since Directive 2015/720, have cut lightweight bag consumption by over 90% in some nations like Ireland, though evidence indicates substitution toward thicker plastics or paper alternatives, which may not yield proportional environmental gains when lifecycle emissions are considered.^[103] ^[104] Carbon pricing mechanisms, including excise-style taxes, target emissions externalities; as of 2025, 23 European countries impose carbon taxes ranging from under €1 per metric ton in Ukraine to over €125 in Sweden, often hybridizing with the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) to cover non-ETS sectors like transport and buildings.^[105] ^[106] These hybrids provide price floors or taxes alongside cap-and-trade allowances, as seen in systems like Alberta's pre-2019 model, aiming to balance certainty and flexibility, though empirical reductions in covered emissions are partially offset by carbon leakage.^[107] In the United States, the excise tax on coal under Section 4121—levied at rates up to $1.10 per ton for underground-mined anthracite—funds the Black Lung Disability Trust Fund and implicitly discourages high-emission fuels, with provisions extended through ongoing authorizations as of 2025 amid energy policy debates.^[50] ^[108] Critically, environmental levies' efficacy is constrained by offshoring and leakage: unilateral carbon taxes prompt firms to relocate production to low-regulation jurisdictions, with evidence from trade-open economies showing emissions outsourcing that negates 20-50% of domestic reductions, as territorial accounting masks global impacts.^[109] ^[110] Such patterns underscore causal limits of isolated interventions, where purported gains from modeled scenarios often exceed real-world outcomes due to unaddressed international spillovers.^[111]

Other and Emerging Categories

The British window tax, introduced in 1696 under William III to offset revenue losses from coin clipping and repealed in 1851, levied charges on dwellings proportional to the number of windows, incentivizing behavioral distortions such as bricking up openings to reduce tax liability and thereby altering housing architecture.^[112]^[113] Salt excises, applied in 18th-century Britain as duties on essential commodities alongside items like soap and leather, exemplified early fiscal reliance on basic goods but generated administrative burdens due to widespread smuggling and evasion.^[114] Newspaper stamp duties, originating with the 1712 Stamp Act under Queen Anne, imposed escalating taxes on printed sheets and advertisements—reaching 4d per copy by 1815—disproportionately burdening lower-cost publications and prompting evasion through unstamped or reduced-size papers, which suppressed circulation and fueled campaigns against "taxes on knowledge."^[115]^[116]^[117] These historical measures often stemmed from wartime revenue needs but eroded over time amid public resistance to their perceived arbitrariness and interference with daily life or information access. In contemporary contexts, the U.S. imposed a 1% excise tax on corporate stock repurchases under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, applicable to publicly traded domestic corporations for buybacks exceeding issuances after December 31, 2022, with final regulations issued in 2024 requiring reporting via Form 7208 by October 31 of the following year.^[118]^[119] Proposals in January 2025 sought to raise this rate to 2% or 4% to further curb shareholder returns via buybacks, reflecting debates over capital allocation efficiency.^[120] The U.S. excise tax on designated drugs, codified in IRC Section 5000D as part of Medicare Drug Price Negotiation reforms, targets sales by manufacturers of high-cost pharmaceuticals selected for price caps, with proposed regulations released on January 2, 2025, outlining calculation methods based on negotiated maximum fair prices effective from 2026.^[51]^[121] Digital services taxes in jurisdictions such as France (3% on qualifying revenues since 2019) and the UK (2% on digital marketplaces, search, and social media) levy charges on gross receipts from user data and advertising, often exceeding €750 million in global turnover, though these face challenges from international trade disputes and OECD Pillar One reallocations.^[122]^[123] Such categories frequently arise from targeted policy agendas, like addressing perceived corporate excesses or healthcare costs, yet exhibit volatility; for instance, the Cook County, Illinois, sweetened beverage tax of 2017 was repealed after four months amid sharp sales drops, cross-border shopping evasion, and industry lobbying, yielding far less revenue than projected ($200 million vs. actual $3.8 million shortfall).^[124]^[125] This pattern underscores causal links between narrow excises and behavioral responses, including evasion or repeal, limiting their fiscal longevity absent broad enforcement.

Implementation and Administration

Structural Mechanisms (Specific vs. Ad Valorem)

Excise taxes are structured either as specific taxes, levied as a fixed monetary amount per unit of quantity (e.g., per liter, pack, or proof-adjusted volume), or as ad valorem taxes, imposed as a percentage of the good's value or price.^[126]^[127] Specific taxes provide administrative simplicity by avoiding valuation disputes and ensure uniform burden across product variants differing in quality or branding, while ad valorem taxes automatically scale with price changes, including inflation or quality upgrades, thereby maintaining real revenue without legislative adjustments.^[127]^[2] From an economic perspective, specific taxes exhibit greater revenue stability for goods with inelastic demand, as quantity consumed varies little with price hikes, yielding predictable collections tied primarily to volume rather than fluctuating producer prices or margins.^[128]^[6] In contrast, ad valorem taxes introduce volatility, as revenue depends on value, which can shift due to market conditions, supply chain costs, or strategic pricing by producers under imperfect competition; this can amplify fiscal uncertainty, particularly for elastic goods where quantity responses exacerbate swings.^[129] Specific structures also tend to minimize consumer substitution toward premium or untaxed alternatives, enhancing effectiveness in curbing consumption of targeted inelastic vices like tobacco, where empirical analyses show stronger price impacts and reduced demand compared to ad valorem equivalents.^[17]^[129] However, unindexed specific taxes erode in real terms over time due to inflation; for instance, the U.S. federal cigarette excise tax has remained fixed at $1.01 per pack since April 1, 2009, losing approximately 25-30% of its purchasing power by 2025 amid cumulative inflation exceeding 40%.^[130]^[2] Ad valorem taxes offer progressivity advantages for luxury or differentiated goods, imposing higher absolute burdens on expensive variants and aligning with equity goals by taxing value-added components like branding, though this can incentivize downshifting to cheaper substitutes, diluting behavioral impacts.^[21]^[131] Under oligopolistic markets common in excisable sectors, specific taxes often achieve more complete pass-through to consumers with less over-shifting—where prices rise disproportionately to the tax—compared to ad valorem forms, which interact with nonlinear pricing strategies and yield uneven incidence.^[129] National Bureau of Economic Research analyses confirm that specific excises reduce such over-shifting variability, stabilizing consumer prices relative to tax intent and minimizing windfalls to producers.^[128]^[132] For inelastic demands, first-principles incidence holds that specifics dominate by insulating revenue from markup manipulations, whereas ad valorem reliance on value exposes collections to upstream cost pressures or evasion via underreporting.^[133] Hybrid approaches combine elements of both, such as volume-based specifics adjusted for attributes like alcohol proof alongside value percentages, to balance stability and adaptability; these are prevalent in alcohol taxation, where European systems often layer category-specific rates (e.g., per hectoliter of pure alcohol) with ad valorem components to address strength variations without full volatility.^[134] U.S. federal alcohol excises remain predominantly specific (e.g., $13.50 per proof gallon for distilled spirits as of 2024), but state-level hybrids emerge in jurisdictions blending per-unit levies with sales-value surcharges to mitigate erosion while targeting potency.^[135] Empirically, hybrids mitigate specific taxes' inflation vulnerability for durable goods like beverages, though they complicate administration and may dilute the inelastic revenue predictability of pure specifics.^[136] Overall, design choice hinges on demand elasticity and fiscal priorities: specifics prevail for corrective aims on staples, ad valorem for value-sensitive luxuries, with causal evidence favoring the former to curb distortions in concentrated markets.^[133]^[6]

Collection Processes and Enforcement

Excise taxes are imposed and collected primarily at the stage of production or importation, with liability assigned to manufacturers, producers, or importers who must remit payment on behalf of the taxing authority.^[1]^[137] These entities typically file periodic returns, such as quarterly filings, detailing taxable activities and quantities, followed by direct payment to the revenue agency.^[3] To secure deferred payments or ensure compliance during import processes, bonding requirements are often mandated, obligating taxpayers to post financial guarantees against potential non-payment.^[138] Physical mechanisms like excise tax stamps are affixed to goods, particularly high-risk items such as alcohol and tobacco, to verify payment and enable tracking through the supply chain.^[139]^[140] These stamps serve as evidence of tax discharge and deter diversion by providing a tangible record of fiscal obligation. Modern enforcement incorporates digital tracking systems to monitor movements of excisable goods, especially under duty-suspension arrangements where taxes are deferred until release for consumption. For instance, computerized platforms facilitate real-time reporting of intra-jurisdictional transfers, reducing manual verification needs.^[141]^[142] Enforcement relies on audits of filed returns and records to detect underreporting or misuse, with penalties applied for failures in timely payment or accurate disclosure.^[143] Late payments incur interest and escalating fines, often calculated as a percentage of unpaid amounts per period of delinquency, while substantive violations like improper use of goods trigger additional excise liabilities treated as sales.^[144]^[145] Administrative costs for excise collection remain low relative to yield—generally under those of income taxes due to the concentrated collection points and simpler verification—facilitating efficient revenue recovery with minimal overhead.^[2]^[146]

Compliance Challenges and Evasion

Excise taxes on high-mobility goods like tobacco and alcohol face significant compliance hurdles due to incentives for evasion, including smuggling, counterfeiting, and illicit production, which erode intended revenue and foster underground economies.^[147] High tax differentials across borders exacerbate cross-border smuggling, as consumers and traffickers exploit price gaps; for instance, states or countries with excise rates exceeding 15-20% of retail price often see illicit shares rise disproportionately, driven by demand elasticity rather than fixed enforcement costs.^[148] Empirical studies link such elevated rates to expanded black markets, where evasion correlates with tax burdens, potentially offsetting fiscal gains and correlating with broader criminal activity.^[147] In tobacco markets, evasion manifests prominently through smuggling and counterfeit operations. In the European Union, illicit cigarette consumption reached 38.9 billion sticks in 2024, equating to 9.2% of total volume—the highest since 2015—fueled by cross-border flows from low-tax regions like Eastern Europe and Asia.^[149] Eastern European countries experience varying illicit rates, with Greece at 18% despite lower absolute taxes, while higher-tax Western markets like France and the Netherlands saw surges in 2024 due to organized smuggling networks.^[150] In the United States, states with stringent excise taxes, such as New York, reported over 54% of cigarettes consumed as smuggled in recent estimates, with inbound flows from lower-tax neighbors like Virginia dominating; California followed at 46.7%, highlighting interstate differentials as a key driver.^[151]^[71] Alcohol evasion often involves home distillation or informal production, known as moonshine, particularly in jurisdictions with prohibitive rates. U.S. federal data from the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau show persistent seizures of illicit spirits, though volumes have declined from peaks like 5,228 cases in 1970 to under 100 annually in recent decades, indicating underground persistence amid high compliance costs for small producers.^[152] Elevated excise duties, such as successive increases in countries like Ukraine (125% rise since 2009), have demonstrably boosted smuggling and parallel markets, where evasion thrives on weak enforcement and consumer preference for untaxed alternatives.^[153] Overall, excessive rates not only invite corruption among officials but undermine legal compliance, as the marginal revenue from hikes diminishes against rising illicit substitution, per analyses of tax elasticity in excisable goods.^[148]

Global and Regional Practices

United States

In the United States, excise taxes are levied at both federal and state levels on select goods and services, with federal taxes primarily targeting fuel, alcohol, tobacco, and air transportation. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) administers key federal excises, such as those on motor fuels, via quarterly filings on Form 720, while the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) oversees taxes on distilled spirits, beer, wine, and tobacco products including cigarettes at rates of $1.01 per pack federally.^[50]^[154]^[56] Federal fuel excises include 18.4 cents per gallon on gasoline and 24.4 cents on diesel, deposited into the Highway Trust Fund to support infrastructure.^[56] The origins of U.S. federal excises trace to the Excise Whiskey Tax Act of 1791, which imposed rates of 6 to 18 cents per gallon on distilled spirits and provoked the Whiskey Rebellion of 1794—a western Pennsylvania uprising suppressed by federal forces under President George Washington, affirming central authority over indirect taxation.^[40] States impose supplementary excises with significant variation; for instance, California's gasoline excise stands at 70.9 cents per gallon in 2025, the nation's highest, funding state transportation amid debates over revenue diversion to general funds.^[155] Other states like Missouri maintain minimal rates, such as 17 cents per pack on cigarettes.^[75] Federal excise revenue totaled $101 billion in fiscal year 2024, comprising about 2% of total federal receipts and primarily financing highways, aviation infrastructure, and deficit reduction rather than dedicated sin tax mitigation.^[156] For 2025, air transportation excises rose, with the rate on domestic flights increasing to 7.5% of the amount paid plus segment fees, and international departures to $23.30 per amount paid, aimed at bolstering FAA funding.^[157] Proposals for new federal excises on certain pharmaceuticals under Internal Revenue Code section 5000D target manufacturer sales of designated drugs, though broader narcotic levies remain state-domain amid legalization debates.^[158] Enforcement challenges persist, including cross-border evasion and underreporting, with IRS audits focusing on high-volume producers.^[1]

European Union

The European Union's excise duty framework seeks to harmonize structures and establish minimum rates across member states to minimize distortions in the single market, primarily through Council Directive 2008/118/EC on general arrangements for excise duties and sector-specific directives.^[159] For manufactured tobacco, Council Directive 2011/64/EU mandates a minimum excise of €1.80 per 20-cigarette pack alongside a duty comprising at least 60% of the weighted average retail price, with member states required to apply combined rates exceeding these thresholds.^[160] Alcohol excises, governed by Directive 92/84/EEC, impose minimum specific rates (e.g., €0.55 per hectolitre of pure alcohol for spirits as of recent alignments), though states retain flexibility to exceed them via ad valorem or specific structures.^[161] Energy products fall under Directive 2003/96/EC, setting minimum tax levels based on volume or energy content to approximate environmental costs, but exemptions for sectors like aviation persist, prompting ongoing debates over fiscal equity.^[162] Despite these minima, significant rate variations persist, reflecting national priorities and cultural differences, with Nordic countries like Sweden and Finland imposing among the highest excises—e.g., tobacco rates over €4 per pack and alcohol duties exceeding €50 per litre of pure alcohol—compared to lower Mediterranean levels in Portugal or Greece, where tobacco excises hover near the €2 minimum.^[49] These disparities, documented in OECD data, fuel empirical evidence of cross-border evasion, including tourist shopping and smuggling, with intra-EU tobacco flows estimated to cost €10-12 billion annually in lost revenue due to arbitrage opportunities.^[163] Harmonization efforts, such as proposed tobacco directive revisions in July 2025 to extend minima to novel products like heated tobacco, highlight tensions: while the Commission pushes for uniform health and environmental objectives, member states defend autonomy in rate-setting above floors, citing subsidiarity principles and domestic fiscal needs.^[164] Post-2020 developments, amid energy crises triggered by geopolitical events, have accelerated revisions to the Energy Taxation Directive, with a 2021 proposal under the Fit for 55 package aiming to raise minima for fossil fuels (e.g., aligning petrol taxes to €0.34 per litre equivalent) and introduce levies on plastics and emissions to incentivize decarbonization, though progress stalls over resistance from high-energy-import dependent states.^[165] Empirical analyses indicate these "green excises" could reduce emissions by 5-10% if adopted, but implementation varies, underscoring the EU's challenge in balancing supranational climate goals against national sovereignty in revenue tools.^[166] Overall, while directives curb extreme competition, persistent autonomy allows tailored applications, occasionally exacerbating evasion without fuller convergence.^[167]

United Kingdom

In the United Kingdom, excise duties are levied by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) on goods such as fuel, alcohol, tobacco, and emerging categories like vaping products, generating substantial revenue while allowing post-Brexit policy flexibility unbound by EU harmonization requirements. Following the UK's exit from the EU Customs Union on 1 January 2021, excise administration treats intra-UK movements without prior EU-derived suspensions, enabling deviations such as independent rate adjustments for alcohol and new duties on non-traditional products, diverging from the EU's more uniform structure for items like spirits and beer.^[168] In the 2023-24 tax year, the theoretical liability for excise duties (covering alcohol, tobacco, and oils) stood at approximately £53.4 billion, with an estimated tax gap of £3.1 billion or 5.8% due to evasion and noncompliance.^[169] Fuel duties, a major component, have remained frozen at 57.95 pence per litre since March 2011, a policy extended through multiple budgets to mitigate motoring costs amid fluctuating oil prices and post-Brexit supply dynamics.^[170] A temporary 5 pence per litre reduction, first enacted in the March 2022 Spring Statement, was prolonged annually thereafter and extended further to 31 March 2026, forgoing potential inflationary uplifts that would align with pre-Brexit escalator norms.^[171] This contrasts with EU member states' adherence to energy taxation minima under Directive 2003/96/EC, from which the UK is now exempt. Alcohol excise duties underwent a comprehensive overhaul effective 1 August 2023, shifting to a strength-based banding system calculated per litre of pure alcohol, independent of EU volumetric alignments for certain categories.^[172] Rates include £21.78 for beer, £16.10 for wine and fortified wine (up to 22% ABV), and £25.67 for spirits, with finer gradations for products exceeding 22% ABV or in draught form to support on-trade sectors; this reform increased duties on stronger wines while reducing them on lower-strength beers, reflecting UK-specific consumption patterns post-separation from EU-wide structures.^[173] Concurrently, the Alcohol Duty Stamps Scheme, inherited from EU anti-fraud measures and applied to spirits since 2006, was discontinued from 1 May 2025, eliminating mandatory stamping on retail containers to streamline compliance. Tobacco duties maintain high rates with annual adjustments, including hand-rolling tobacco facing an additional escalator beyond retail price index inflation, as legislated in the 2024 Finance Bill to curb consumption without EU-mandated minimums.^[174] Historically, excise evolution includes the abolition of the window tax—a levy on glazing introduced in 1696—on 24 July 1851 amid public health concerns over reduced natural light, and progressive phasing out of legacy stamp duties on succession and probate by the late 19th century.^[175] Emerging vaping excises mark a post-Brexit innovation, with the Vaping Products Duty set for 1 October 2026 at tiered rates (£1.00 per 10ml nicotine-free, up to £3.00 for higher nicotine liquids), accompanied by mandatory duty stamps from April 2027 to align fiscal treatment with traditional excisables absent EU precedents.^[176]

India and Developing Economies

In India, central excise duties prior to the implementation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) on July 1, 2017, were levied under the Central Excise Act of 1944 on domestically manufactured goods, with rates varying by product category but often reaching up to 12-15% ad valorem for many items, while states imposed additional variations through value-added taxes (VAT), entry taxes, and octroi that differed significantly across regions, leading to cascading effects and compliance complexities.^[177]^[178] Post-GST, most excises were subsumed into the GST framework, but specific excises persist on petroleum products, alcohol for human consumption, and tobacco, with tobacco products subject to a 28% GST rate plus compensation cess (often exceeding 100% on cigarettes), national calamity contingent duty, and residual excise elements to maintain high effective tax burdens aimed at curbing consumption.^[179]^[180] Recent GST Council decisions in September 2025 introduced a 40% slab for sin goods including tobacco, pan masala, and aerated drinks, integrating higher levies to offset potential revenue shortfalls while emphasizing deterrence against harmful products.^[181]^[182] Administrative hurdles in India include fragmented enforcement between central GST authorities and state bodies for non-GST excises, compounded by widespread informality where small-scale producers evade registration, resulting in estimated losses of 20-30% of potential collections from tobacco and alcohol sectors.^[183] Post-GST revenue from integrated excisable goods has grown robustly, with overall GST collections surging 12.6% year-on-year to ₹2.36 lakh crore in April 2025, driven by formalization efforts like invoice matching and e-way bills, yet this growth masks regressivity as lower-income households allocate a higher proportion of expenditure to taxed essentials and sin goods.^[184]^[185] In broader developing economies, excises form a cornerstone of fiscal revenue, often comprising 20-40% of indirect tax collections due to limited direct tax bases, but high informality—where 50-70% of economic activity evades formal tracking—facilitates evasion through underreporting production or smuggling, as seen in tobacco and fuel sectors across Southeast Asia and Africa.^[186]^[187] For instance, Indonesia's 2022 fuel subsidy cuts, which raised effective prices by 30% for subsidized fuels amid global energy shocks, indirectly bolstered excise-equivalent revenues by reducing fiscal outlays from Rp 700 trillion (US$46 billion) while exposing administrative challenges like black-market diversions and protests, amplifying regressivity in low-income contexts where fuel comprises 10-15% of household budgets.^[188]^[189] Empirical evidence indicates excise revenue expansion in these settings supports growth—correlating with 1-2% GDP boosts via formalization—but heightens inequality, as uniform rates burden the poor disproportionately without robust exemptions or compensatory transfers.^[190]^[191]

Other Notable Systems (Australia, Canada, China)

Australia's excise regime emphasizes automatic adjustments to counter inflation and consumption trends. Tobacco duties undergo biannual indexation to average weekly ordinary time earnings in March and September, with an additional annual 5% increase imposed from 1 September 2023 through 1 September 2026 to accelerate revenue and deter use.^[192]^[193] Fuel excises, applicable to petrol and diesel, receive quarterly consumer price index adjustments, yielding a rate of 49.2 cents per litre effective from February 2025 following prior temporary rebates.^[194]^[195] Canada maintains federal excises on vice goods alongside provincial sales taxes. Following cannabis legalization on 17 October 2018, the regime levies the greater of $1 per gram of dried flower or 10% of the producer's selling price, extended proportionally to THC equivalents in extracts and edibles, with revenue shared 75% to provinces.^[196]^[197] Alcohol and tobacco face specific volume-based or ad valorem rates under the Excise Act, 2001, with tobacco duties elevated post-February 2018 hikes.^[198]^[199] China's consumption tax serves as the primary excise equivalent, targeting 15 categories including tobacco, alcohol, cosmetics, and high-energy vehicles at ad valorem rates from 1% to 56%, collected at production or import stages.^[200] These taxes precede the 13% value-added tax, with no input crediting for consumption tax itself, embedding costs into supply chains and exports, where rebates have been curtailed—for instance, reduced to 9% for refined oils and batteries in December 2024, and eliminated for aluminum and copper from that date—potentially raising effective export burdens.^[201]^[202] Environmental excises are expanding, with proposals for specific carbon levies to internalize emissions costs amid subsidy reforms.^[203] Across these systems, 2024-2025 trends reflect subsidy reductions on fuels, reinstating upward excise pressures post-relief periods.^[204]

Economic Impacts

Market Distortions and Price Effects

Excise taxes introduce a wedge between the price paid by consumers and the price received by producers, altering relative prices and incentivizing a shift away from the taxed good toward untaxed substitutes, thereby generating deadweight loss through reduced transactions that would have occurred absent the tax.^[205] This distortion is particularly pronounced for selective excises on narrow bases, as they amplify inefficiencies compared to broad-based taxes by disproportionately affecting specific markets.^[206] The magnitude of deadweight loss depends on the elasticity of demand and supply; for inelastic goods like tobacco and alcohol, quantity reductions are smaller, mitigating but not eliminating the efficiency cost.^[207] Empirical studies consistently demonstrate high pass-through of excise taxes to consumer prices, often exceeding 100% in cases of overshifting, where producers raise prices by more than the tax increment to exploit inelastic demand.^[208] For tobacco products, analyses of cigarette excise hikes reveal full pass-through to median prices and overshifting to higher percentiles, with producer absorption remaining minimal even under varying market conditions.^[209] Similar patterns hold for alcohol, as evidenced by a 2002 tax increase in Alaska yielding an average pass-through rate of 200%, driven by limited consumer substitution due to habit formation.^[210] Overshifting reflects strategic pricing by firms in oligopolistic markets, further distorting incentives and potentially exacerbating deadweight loss beyond simple tax incidence models.^[211] From a first-principles perspective, excise taxes inherently reduce allocative efficiency relative to lump-sum taxes, which impose no behavioral distortions since they cannot be avoided through substitution.^[212] Selective excises on inelastic goods, while generating revenue with comparatively lower deadweight loss per dollar raised, still favor broad-based alternatives like value-added taxes to minimize overall economic inefficiency, as the latter spread distortions across more elastic margins without targeting specific sectors.^[206] This causal chain underscores why excises, despite their fiscal utility, elevate production costs and consumer prices in ways that lump-sum equivalents would not, leading to persistent market inefficiencies absent compensatory policy adjustments.^[213]

Revenue Dynamics and Fiscal Role

Excise taxes contribute significantly to global fiscal revenues, generating over $2 trillion annually across countries, primarily from levies on tobacco, alcohol, fuels, and vehicles.^[24] This figure underscores their role as a supplementary revenue source, often applied to "sin" goods or externalities without necessitating increases in broader income or sales taxes. However, revenue dynamics exhibit cyclical sensitivity, declining during economic recessions as consumption of taxed goods like fuels and vehicles falls with reduced economic activity, though levies on inelastic items such as tobacco maintain relative stability.^[22] In the United States, federal excise tax collections are projected to interact with broader fiscal offsets, with income and payroll tax adjustments mitigating 24.5% of excise revenue changes in 2024, rising to 26.4% by 2034 according to Joint Committee on Taxation estimates.^[214] These offsets reflect macroeconomic feedbacks where excise hikes may dampen consumption and thus taxable income, limiting net fiscal gains. Globally, earmarking excise proceeds—such as fuel taxes for infrastructure—remains a common but often illusory practice, as revenues frequently divert to general funds without dedicated linkage, undermining claims of direct funding for specific programs.^[215] Base erosion poses ongoing challenges to long-term revenue stability, particularly for fuel excises, where shifts to electric vehicles reduce taxable petroleum consumption; OECD analysis indicates potential multi-billion-dollar shortfalls in transport fuel tax revenues as decarbonization advances.^[216] For inelastic goods like tobacco, however, demand insensitivity to price changes ensures more predictable yields, supporting their use in fiscal planning despite narrower bases.^[6] Overall, excises serve as a volatile yet targeted fiscal tool, best positioned to address externalities rather than as a primary stable revenue pillar.^[22]

Employment and Growth Consequences

Empirical analyses of excise taxes on tobacco, alcohol, and sugar-sweetened beverages consistently indicate minimal net employment effects, countering industry assertions of substantial job losses. Studies across multiple jurisdictions, including the United States, Mexico, and the United Kingdom, have found no significant aggregate employment reductions following tax implementations, with some evidence of net gains from reallocation of consumer spending and tax revenues toward labor-intensive sectors.^[48] ^[217] For instance, simulations of alcohol tax increases in U.S. states projected job gains ranging from 621 to 4,583 positions per state, attributable to fiscal expenditures offsetting any contraction in taxed industries.^[217] Substitution effects further mitigate losses, as reduced demand in taxed sectors prompts shifts to untaxed alternatives without broader labor market disruption.^[48] High excise tax rates, however, impose distortions that elevate production costs and alter resource allocation, potentially impairing wages and job creation economy-wide. By incentivizing inefficient substitutions away from higher-value uses, excessive rates reduce overall economic efficiency per dollar raised compared to broader-based taxes, leading to contractions in output and employment in affected supply chains.^[215] Causal mechanisms include heightened prices curbing demand elasticity, which contracts capital investment and labor demand in elastic sectors, though the macroeconomic impact remains limited given the narrow scope of most excise applications.^[215] Long-term growth suffers as these distortions compound, diverting resources from productive activities and lowering potential GDP expansion, with evidence from cross-country patterns underscoring that overly punitive rates hinder competitiveness and innovation.^[215]

Consumption and Health Outcomes

Excise taxes on tobacco products demonstrate a price elasticity of demand averaging approximately -0.4 in high-income countries, such that a 10% price increase typically yields a 4% decline in adult consumption.^[218] For alcohol, elasticities are similarly inelastic overall, but heavy drinkers exhibit reduced responsiveness to tax-induced price hikes compared to moderate consumers, limiting the policy's reach among high-risk groups.^[219] This pattern holds across multiple studies, where addicted or habitual users prioritize consumption despite elevated costs, often sustaining intake through budgeting adjustments or sourcing cheaper alternatives.^[220] Health outcomes from these taxes show partial deterrence, with tobacco excises linked to modest reductions in smoking prevalence—such as 3-5% drops per 10% tax hike—but minimal long-term cessation among entrenched smokers without complementary interventions.^[221] For sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), taxes correlate with 10-15% sales declines in taxed categories, yet substitution toward untaxed drinks, including artificially sweetened variants, often offsets potential caloric or health benefits, yielding inconsistent impacts on obesity or diabetes metrics.^[222] Alcohol tax variations globally reveal further mixed evidence, as consumption dips post-hike but downstream health indicators like liver disease rates fluctuate due to behavioral adaptations, smuggling, and uneven enforcement, challenging causal claims of uniform public health gains.^[223] Black markets exacerbate these limitations, particularly for high-excise goods like cigarettes, where illicit trade surges with tax differentials, eroding intended consumption curbs and diverting revenue while exposing users to unregulated products of unknown potency.^[224] Empirical reviews underscore that while taxes deter initiation among youth and light users, entrenched patterns persist, rendering deterrence efficacy partial and context-dependent rather than transformative.^[225]

Regressivity and Equity Implications

Excise taxes on commodities such as tobacco, alcohol, and fuel impose a disproportionately higher burden on lower-income households, as these groups allocate a larger share of their expenditures to such goods relative to their income. Empirical analyses consistently classify excise taxes as regressive, with the effective rate exceeding 9% of income for the bottom income quintile in the United States, compared to far lower rates for higher earners.^[226] ^[227] This pattern arises because consumption of taxed "sin goods" like cigarettes and alcohol is more prevalent among low-income populations, amplifying the tax's incidence on those with limited financial flexibility.^[22] The equity implications are stark for vulnerable subgroups, including low-income smokers and drinkers, who face elevated effective tax rates without commensurate behavioral adjustments. Studies indicate that cigarette excise taxes, for instance, extract a greater proportional toll from poor consumers, who exhibit lower quit rates due to factors like addiction persistence and fewer cessation resources, thereby sustaining the regressive impact over time.^[226] Similar dynamics apply to alcohol excises, where lower socioeconomic groups bear a heavier relative load, as their consumption patterns do not diminish proportionally with price hikes.^[48] This regressivity undermines broader tax system progressivity, as excises counteract the redistributive effects of income-based levies.^[227] Proponents of excise taxes often argue that associated health improvements—such as reduced smoking-related illnesses—offset the regressive financial strain by enhancing long-term welfare for low-income groups. However, empirical evidence does not substantiate net positive equity gains, as price elasticity of demand among heavy, low-income users remains inelastic, leading to sustained consumption and tax payments without proportional health benefits realization.^[226] Analyses of tobacco and alcohol taxation reveal that while aggregate public health metrics may improve, the distributional costs fall disproportionately on the poor, who experience neither full cessation nor equivalent access to mitigating substitutes, rendering claims of welfare offset unsubstantiated for affected subgroups.^[48] This highlights excise taxes' role in exacerbating income inequality rather than alleviating it through purported secondary effects.

Unintended Consequences (Black Markets, Substitution)

High excise tax rates on goods like tobacco and alcohol often exceed consumer price elasticity, prompting evasion through black markets when legal prices become prohibitively expensive relative to demand. In the United States, states collectively lose approximately $5 billion annually in tax revenue due to cigarette smuggling induced by disparate excise rates across jurisdictions, with high-tax areas like New York experiencing inflows from low-tax neighbors or foreign sources.^[228] Similarly, in the European Union, the illicit tobacco trade results in an estimated €19.4 billion annual tax shortfall, exacerbated by minimum excise floors that widen price gaps and incentivize cross-border smuggling and counterfeiting.^[229] These markets not only erode intended revenue but foster organized crime, violence, and product adulteration, as seen historically during U.S. alcohol Prohibition (1920–1933), where outright bans—functionally akin to infinite excise rates—spawned bootlegging networks that supplied impure, high-potency liquor, contributing to thousands of annual poisoning deaths.^[230]^[70] Substitution effects arise as consumers pivot to less-taxed or untaxed alternatives, often yielding equivalent or amplified harms without reducing overall vice consumption. For tobacco, elevated cigarette excises drive shifts to roll-your-own tobacco or pipe tobacco, which face lower effective rates in some regimes; U.S. federal taxes on small cigars and roll-your-own were equalized with cigarettes in 2009, yet pipe tobacco and large cigars remain under-taxed, capturing market share and undermining cessation goals.^[89] Cross-product elasticity is evident in e-cigarette taxation: higher e-cigarette excises correlate with increased traditional cigarette use among adults, as the relative cost advantage reverses, potentially prolonging nicotine dependence.^[231] In alcohol markets, specific excise hikes on distilled spirits—such as Illinois's 2009 increase from $4.50 to $8.55 per gallon—prompted substitution toward lower-taxed beer, with no net decline in overall consumption volume but a reallocation to beverages with different risk profiles, like higher-volume drinking.^[232]^[233] Modern parallels in cannabis excise systems, post-legalization in regions like U.S. states since the 2010s, illustrate persistent substitution and black market persistence: high potency-based taxes (e.g., 15–37% ad valorem plus per-milligram levies) sustain illicit sales at 40–60% of the market in places like California as of 2023, where consumers opt for unregulated, higher-THC products evading compliance costs.^[234] Such dynamics reveal a core causal mechanism: when taxes distort relative prices beyond elasticity thresholds, demand reallocates to unregulated channels or substitutes, amplifying enforcement burdens and public health risks like contaminated products or intensified use patterns, without proportionally curbing underlying behaviors.^[235]

Criticisms and Debates

Paternalism and Liberty Infringements

Excise taxes on commodities like alcohol, tobacco, and sugary beverages are often rationalized through paternalistic rationales, positing that governments can better safeguard individuals' long-term welfare than the individuals themselves by elevating consumption costs to curb perceived self-destructive behaviors.^[236] This framework treats such levies as a form of "soft prohibition," where the state intervenes not merely to internalize externalities like secondhand smoke or drunk driving but to override personal valuations of immediate gratification against future health risks.^[237] Critics, drawing from classical liberal principles, reject this presumption of governmental omniscience, arguing that autonomous adults bear the primary responsibility for their choices absent direct harm to non-consenting others, as articulated in John Stuart Mill's harm principle which limits interference to cases of interpersonal injury rather than intrapersonal folly.^[238] Such taxes inherently infringe upon individual liberty by distorting voluntary exchanges and imposing coercive penalties on lawful transactions between consenting parties, effectively penalizing the exercise of property rights over one's labor and purchases.^[239] Historical precedents underscore this tension: the Whiskey Rebellion of 1794 arose from frontier farmers' armed opposition to the U.S. federal excise on distilled spirits enacted in 1791, which they decried as an illegitimate intrusion into their distilling practices and a betrayal of revolutionary ideals against arbitrary taxation without representation.^[240] The uprising, suppressed by a 13,000-strong militia under President George Washington, highlighted excise impositions as flashpoints for assertions of economic sovereignty, with protesters tarring revenue officers and erecting liberty poles to symbolize resistance against centralized fiscal overreach. Philosophically, right-leaning and libertarian perspectives prioritize personal autonomy and market-driven self-correction over state-directed behavioral engineering, viewing paternalistic excises as an erosion of the foundational liberty to pursue utility as subjectively defined, even if risky.^[241] In opposition, health-oriented advocates, frequently aligned with progressive institutions, endorse these taxes as mandates for societal well-being, yet empirical analyses reveal their inefficacy in fundamentally altering consumer utilities—reducing quantities demanded through price elasticity but failing to reprogram underlying preferences or time-inconsistent impulses, as modeled in behavioral economics frameworks that still hinge on unverifiable assumptions about rational deviation.^[242] This normative divide persists amid source biases, with academic literature often tilting toward interventionist justifications reflective of prevailing institutional leanings, while independent analyses emphasize the hubris of substituting collective judgment for individual agency.^[243]

Regressive Burden and Class Impacts

Excise taxes impose a disproportionate burden on lower-income households because these groups allocate a larger share of their income to consumption of taxed goods and services, such as gasoline, tobacco, and alcohol, resulting in effective tax rates that decline as income rises.^[244]^[245] According to analyses of U.S. federal taxes, excise levies are regressive across income quintiles, with the lowest-income households facing effective rates up to several times higher than those in the top quintile; for instance, low-income families devote approximately 7 percent of their income to sales and excise taxes combined, compared to about 1 percent for the highest earners.^[246]^[227] This pattern holds empirically even after tax rate increases, as lower-income consumers exhibit inelastic demand for essentials like fuel, sustaining the relative burden without significant substitution away from taxed items.^[227] The regressive structure erodes disposable income among working-class households without delivering commensurately higher benefits, as public expenditures funded by excises—such as infrastructure from gasoline taxes—are often provided on a per-capita basis rather than scaled to contributions.^[10] In contrast to flat-rate income taxes, which distribute burden proportionally to earnings, excises function as ad valorem or specific levies on units consumed, amplifying inequity for those with constrained budgets who cannot easily reduce usage of necessities.^[247] Empirical distributional models confirm that this dynamic persists across federal excise categories, with the bottom income quintile bearing around 5-6 percent of total excise liability despite comprising a smaller share of aggregate consumption.^[227] Historically, excise taxes emerged as sumptuary measures targeting luxury consumables to signal and restrain upper-class excess, but their modern application to broad-based necessities has inverted this intent, shifting the load onto vulnerable populations who lack alternatives.^[248]^[249] This evolution overlooks the original class-distinguishing rationale, as contemporary excises on items like fuel—essential for commuting in lower-wage jobs—fail to exempt or rebate for income levels, thereby exacerbating rather than mitigating class disparities.^[250]

Political Manipulation and Inefficiency

Excise taxes facilitate political manipulation by allowing governments to extract revenue with reduced public scrutiny, as these indirect levies are embedded in product prices and less salient to consumers than direct taxes like income or general sales taxes.^[251] ^[6] This opacity enables policymakers to pursue revenue increases or fiscal adjustments without the political resistance associated with broader tax reforms, often framing hikes as behavioral nudges against "sin" goods while diverting funds to general budgets.^[215] For instance, federal excise taxes on alcohol and tobacco, initially tied to sumptuary goals, have historically funded unrelated expenditures, with revenues subject to lobbying for earmarks that favor special interests over efficient allocation.^[215] Special interest groups exacerbate manipulation through rent-seeking, lobbying for exemptions, rate adjustments, or revenue hypothecation that distorts policy toward narrow benefits rather than public welfare.^[215] Industries affected by excises, such as tobacco producers, employ strategies like product reformulation or legal challenges to minimize liabilities, influencing tax design and undermining intended fiscal or regulatory aims.^[252] Empirical analysis of U.S. state-level data from 1970 to 2019 reveals limited partisan ideological divergence in excise rates on cigarettes, spirits, and gasoline, attributed to interstate competition and tax base mobility, suggesting manipulation arises more from competitive fiscal pressures than overt party ideology.^[253] These taxes exhibit structural inefficiencies, generating high deadweight losses per dollar of revenue due to their discriminatory application on narrow bases, which amplifies behavioral distortions and resource misallocation compared to broader levies.^[215] Volatility stems from consumption elasticity—e.g., declining cigarette smoking has eroded U.S. tobacco excise revenues despite rate hikes—rendering them unreliable for sustained funding and prompting repeated political interventions that compound fiscal unpredictability.^[6] Administrative burdens further erode efficiency; for alcohol excises, disparate rates based on ingredients rather than alcohol content impose compliance costs and collection complexities, with special occupational taxes yielding minimal revenue relative to enforcement expenses.^[254] Overall, such features incentivize governments to over-rely on excises for short-term gains, fostering cycles of rate escalation and evasion that diminish net fiscal productivity.^[215]^[6]

References

[1]
Excise tax | Internal Revenue Service
Jul 29, 2025 · Excise taxes are taxes imposed on certain goods, services, and activities. Taxpayers include importers, manufacturers, retailers, and consumers.Excise tax forms and... · About Publication 510, Excise... · 637 Registration Program
[2]
Federal Excise Taxes: Background and General Analysis
Oct 15, 2021 · Temporary excise tax provisions were imposed in the Revenue Act of 1918, passed during World War I, to help fund wartime spending, including the ...History of Federal Excise Taxes · Historical Trends · Revenue by Major Types of...
[3]
Basic things all businesses should know about excise tax - IRS
Excise tax is an indirect tax on specific goods, services and activities. Federal excise tax is usually imposed on the sale of things like fuel, airline tickets ...
[4]
Excise Tax Definition | TaxEDU Glossary - Tax Foundation
An excise tax is a tax imposed on a specific good or activity. Excise taxes are commonly levied on cigarettes, alcoholic beverages, soda, gasoline, insurance ...
[5]
Excise Tax: What It Is and How It Works, With Examples - Investopedia
An excise tax is an indirect tax charged by the government on the sale of a particular good or service. Learn how an excise tax works and when you may face ...What Is an Excise Tax? · Ad Valorem Excise Taxes · Specific Excise Taxes
[6]
Excise Tax Application and Trends
Mar 16, 2021 · A Short History of Excise Taxes. The history of excise taxes goes back at least 5,000 years. The first documented tax was in ancient Egypt ...Short History of Excise Taxes · Pigouvian Taxes · Principles for Excise Tax Design
[7]
The Whiskey Rebellion - George Washington's Mount Vernon
The 1791 passage of the whiskey excise tax was an attempt to begin paying down that debt through a direct tax on the distillation of alcohol. Unfortunately, ...<|separator|>
[8]
What Are Excise Taxes and How Do They Affect the Federal Budget?
Jul 15, 2024 · According to the Congressional Budget Office, excise tax revenues are projected to remain at 0.3 percent of GDP for most of the next decade. The ...
[9]
The Impact of Raising Alcohol Taxes on Government Tax Revenue
Feb 22, 2024 · Increasing alcohol excise taxes has the potential to lower alcohol consumption and the resulting harm, as well as increase revenue for the ...
[10]
Who bears the burden of federal excise taxes? | Tax Policy Center
An excise can raise the total price (inclusive of the excise tax) consumers pay, reduce the after-tax revenue available to compensate workers and investors, or ...
[11]
Why the Economic Effects of Taxes (Including Tariffs) Matter
Sep 30, 2024 · Consumption taxes, including excise taxes, create a wedge between the amount of money a person earns from labor and how much consumption a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[12]
Excise tax: Overview & FAQs | Thomson Reuters
Excise tax is not the same as sales tax. They are similar in that they are both an indirect tax. However, businesses must be aware that there are notable ...
[13]
Excise - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
"Excise" originates from Middle Dutch and Old French, meaning a tax on goods, and from Latin excisus, meaning cut out or removed, reflecting both tax and ...
[14]
Excise Tax - UW-Madison Business Services
an excise is typically a per unit tax, costing a specific amount for a volume or unit of the item purchased, whereas a sales tax or value-added tax is an ad ...
[15]
Difference Between Excise Duty and Custom Duty - Shiksha Online
May 13, 2025 · The key difference is that excise duty is imposed on goods produced domestically, while custom duty is levied on goods imported into a country.
[16]
How is an excise tax different from a sales tax? - Quaderno
Feb 21, 2025 · An excise tax is a targeted, consumption-based tax imposed on specific goods and services, often used as a tool for both revenue generation and social policy.Types Of Excise Taxes · Specific Excise Tax · Excise Tax Targeted On...<|separator|>
[17]
[PDF] Taxation and Price: Types of Taxes - Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids
Excise taxes include specific taxes (per quantity) and ad valorem taxes (as a percentage of value). Tiered systems apply different rates based on product ...
[18]
Motor Fuel Data - Policy | Federal Highway Administration
Aug 4, 2025 · The motor fuel excise tax, currently 18.4 cents per gallon for gasoline/gasohol, and 24.4 cents for special fuel (primarily diesel) raises the majority of the ...<|separator|>
[19]
Gasoline State Excise Tax Rates for 2025 - ComplyIQ
Oct 1, 2025 · Federal Motor Fuel Taxes ; Gasoline tax: $0.184 / gallon ; Diesel tax: $0.244 / gallon ; Aviation fuel tax: $0.194 / gallon ; Jet fuel tax: $0.219 / ...
[20]
Excise Tax: What It Is And How It Works | Bankrate
Jun 30, 2025 · Excise taxes can be classified as either ad valorem or specific, where one is a percentage-based tax and the other is per unit. Ad valorem ...What is an excise tax? · An example of an excise tax · Types of excise taxes
[21]
What Is Excise Tax? Definition, Types & Examples - Vertex, Inc.
Jul 12, 2024 · Excise tax, also known as a duty or sin tax, is a type of indirect tax levied on certain goods or services – typically those deemed as harmful ...How Excise Taxes Work · Examples Of Excise Tax · The Role Of Excise Tax In...
[22]
Global Excise Tax Application and Trends
Apr 7, 2023 · The excise tax rate should be determined by several factors, first and foremost being the negative externalities or costs the tax is serving to ...
[23]
[PDF] Excise Taxation Strategies for Enhancing Revenue Generation ... - ijrpr
Moreover, excise taxation helps internalize the external costs associated with fossil fuel consumption, such as pollution and greenhouse gas emissions [12].
[24]
What Should Be Done with Excise Tax Revenue? - Tax Foundation
Oct 8, 2025 · Excise taxes generate more than two trillion dollars worldwide each year. How should governments most effectively use that revenue?
[25]
https://trp.tax/tax-guide/excise-taxes-when-earmarking-revenue-works-and-when-it-fails/
[26]
How Americans Pay the Price for Vice | Tax Notes
Nov 25, 2020 · So, the takeaway is that excise taxes should not be a general fund revenue tool. They're too narrow and they're too volatile because they're ...
[27]
[PDF] Does Earmarking Lead to More per Capita Public Health Spending?
Aug 18, 2024 · While earmarked health taxes often face consumer opposition and the associated revenue stream is volatile, earmarking revenue from health taxes ...
[28]
[PDF] 3. Principles and Whole Tax Structure - Vermont.gov
Dec 23, 2020 · Volatility can result not only in changes in the tax base from year to year, but also in changes between the time the budget is prepared and ...
[29]
STATE FINANCE IN THE MIDDLE ROMAN REPUBLIC - jstor
However, the army did not eat grain alone. Sour wine, olive oil, salt, and meat supplemented the Roman military ration.25 Presumably these were also ...
[30]
Taxing times the Roman way | Alison Morton's Thrillers
May 20, 2019 · Globally, taxation under the Roman Empire was about 5 percent of gross product. Individuals typically paid from 2 to 5 percent.Missing: olive oil vectigal
[31]
chafa 茶法, tea administration, and quecha 榷茶, the tea monopoly
Tea was classified into three quality levels and taxed at ten per cent, yielding annual revenue of 400,000 strings (guan 貫) of cash (see money). The tea tax ...
[32]
What was the taxation system of Ming-dynasty China like? - Reddit
Mar 3, 2018 · The more regular taxes were paid either in cash, or more often in-kind in the form of what each household could provide: rice, silk, tea, etc.what was the prices of goods and land during 15th century ming ...How did ancient China protect their trade secrets? - RedditMore results from www.reddit.com
[33]
Taxation in premodern China - Wikipedia
Taxation in premodern China varied greatly over time. The most important source of state revenue was the tax on agriculture, or land tax.
[34]
List of price of medieval items
Of course, a price list is a misleading guide to a feudal economy, because so many goods were either produced within a household, or supplied by a lord.
[35]
Wool smuggling from England's eastern seaboard, c.1337–1345
Jan 24, 2022 · High taxes on wool exports led to smuggling, both small and large scale, due to high costs and customs system weaknesses.
[36]
History of the Wool Trade - Historic UK
Mar 13, 2015 · In medieval England, wool became big business. There was enormous demand for it, mainly to produce cloth and everyone who had land ...
[37]
Zakat | Charity, Almsgiving, Obligation | Britannica Money
The zakat is levied on five categories of property—food grains; fruit; camels, cattle, sheep, and goats; gold and silver; and movable goods—and is payable each ...
[38]
The Economy During the Umayyad Caliphate - History of Islam
Non-Muslims used to pay two taxes. Jizya was a tax levied on each non-Muslim household. It was in return for the protection of life, property, religion and ...
[39]
Bayt al-mal - Wikipedia
This practice continued well into the Abbasid era of the Caliphate. The taxes (including Zakat and Jizya) collected in the treasury of an Islamic government ...
[40]
Window Tax - UK Parliament
This tax was first imposed in England in 1696. It was intended to be a progressive tax in that houses with a smaller number of windows, initially ten, ...Missing: revenue | Show results with:revenue
[41]
Salt & the Salt Tax | Salt History - The Salt Association
As might be expected, there was widespread smuggling of white salt from Ireland back to England and this contributed to a decline of sea salt making down the ...
[42]
The Whiskey Rebellion | TTB
Jan 9, 2020 · The 1791 excise law set a varying six to 18-cent per gallon tax rate, with smaller distillers often paying more than twice per gallon what ...
[43]
[PDF] The Triumph and Denouement of the British Fiscal State: Taxation ...
Before the war British citizens paid nearly £18 million a year in taxes. Between 1793 and 1815 the government appropriated a further £12.6 million per annum ...Missing: spike | Show results with:spike
[44]
Dissecting the Sinews of Power: International Trade and the Rise of ...
Apr 9, 2025 · We provide new data on British excise and customs revenues over time that improve upon standard references. The data make clear that: (i) excise ...<|separator|>
[45]
[PDF] International Trade and the Rise of Britain's Fiscal-Military State ...
In a narrow sense, our disaggregation of the excise allows to connect Britain's rising fiscal capacity in the 18th and 19th centuries to specific goods.
[46]
The Highway Trust Fund - Policy - Federal Highway Administration
The HTF was created as a user-supported fund: highway users would pay taxes, the tax receipts would flow into the HTF, and HTF balances would be dedicated for ...
[47]
The Political Economy of Gasoline Taxes: Lessons from the Oil ...
In November of 1970, President Nixon proposed to Congress a modest two to three cents per gallon tax (9 and 14 cents in 2011 dollars, respectively) for leaded ...Introduction · II. Policy Responses · III. Were Gas Taxes on the... · IV. Conclusions
[48]
Oil Embargo, 1973–1974 - Office of the Historian
The price of oil per barrel first doubled, then quadrupled, imposing skyrocketing costs on consumers and structural challenges to the stability of whole ...
[49]
CRS History of Excise Tax on Gasoline - Tax Notes
Each time the Congress has extended the Highway Trust Fund it has also extended the federal excise tax on gasoline. [4] Expenditures have diverged three ...
[50]
Taxation of tobacco, alcohol, and sugar-sweetened beverages - NIH
Oct 9, 2023 · The article reviews the large body of evidence on how taxation affects the consumption of tobacco, alcohol, and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB).
[51]
Consumption Tax Trends 2024 - OECD
Nov 21, 2024 · Consumption Tax Trends provides information on Value Added Taxes/Goods and Services Taxes (VAT/GST) and excise duty rates in OECD member countries.Executive Summary · Main Consumption Tax Trends... · In The Same SeriesMissing: sugar | Show results with:sugar
[52]
Publication 510 (03/2025), Excise Taxes | Internal Revenue Service
The tax applies to highway motor vehicles with a taxable gross weight of 55,000 pounds or more. Vans, pickup trucks, panel trucks, and similar trucks generally ...
[53]
Excise Tax on Designated Drugs - Federal Register
Jan 2, 2025 · This document contains proposed regulations relating to the excise tax on certain sales of designated drugs by manufacturers, producers, and importers.Background · Imposition of Tax · Calculation of Tax · Effect of Invoicing Tax on Tax...
[54]
[PDF] Consumption Tax Trends 2024 | OECD
It presents cross- country comparative data on consumption taxes in OECD member countries, as of 1 January 2024. Tables using data from the National Accounts ...
[55]
[PDF] RECEIPTS BY SOURCE - SUMMARY - Fiscal.Treasury.gov
Excise Taxes were $101.4 billion in fiscal 2024, an increase of 33.8 percent or $25.6 billion above the prior fiscal year.
[56]
Revenues in Fiscal Year 2024: An Infographic
Mar 20, 2025 · Revenues received by the federal government in 2024 totaled $4.9 trillion, of which almost half was receipts from individual income taxes.
[57]
What is the Highway Trust Fund, and how is it financed?
The Highway Trust Fund tracks federal spending and revenue for surface transportation. The trust fund has separate accounts for highways and mass transit.
[58]
What are the major federal excise taxes, and how much money do ...
Excise tax revenues as a percentage of GDP gradually declined again throughout the 2000s to roughly 0.4 percent in recent years. General Fund or Trust Fund ...
[59]
[PDF] Taxing Externalities: Revenue versus Welfare Gains with an ...
Jan 15, 2025 · By internalizing marginal external costs, Pigouvian taxes calibrate private incentives to implement the socially efficient level of market ...
[60]
The Welfare Impact of Second-Best Uniform-Pigouvian Taxation
In this paper, we show that in the presence of heterogeneous externalities and elasticities, this type of indirect tax performs poorly. In our empirical ...Missing: excise | Show results with:excise
[61]
What role for carbon pricing in reducing emissions and generating ...
Nov 24, 2022 · The paper provides fresh evidence on the long-run responsiveness of CO2 emissions and government revenues to carbon pricing within a unified ...
[62]
Do Environmental Taxes Affect Carbon Dioxide Emissions in OECD ...
Jun 14, 2023 · While these findings provide some evidence of the significance of environmental taxes in reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the OECD, they do ...
[63]
[PDF] Pigou and the Climate Crisis – internalizing External Effects is no ...
Oct 26, 2024 · It is argued here that relying on grand scale carbon taxes as the chief or even only policy instrument will likely have limited success and ...
[64]
Sin Taxes: Good, Better, Best | NBER
Mar 31, 2023 · Economists have long recognized that when consuming a good produces externalities, welfare can be raised by imposing corrective taxes.
[65]
Uncalculated First‐Party Externalities Given a Beverage Tax
Mar 8, 2019 · This study finds that given a soda sin tax, soda consumers do not substitute healthier beverages, that is, beverages with relatively fewer ...Literature Review · Externalities Of Macrosocial... · Hypotheses Tests<|control11|><|separator|>
[66]
Policy lessons from health taxes: a systematic review of empirical ...
Jun 19, 2017 · Findings demonstrate that high tax rates on sugar-sweetened beverages are likely to have a positive impact on health behaviours and outcomes, ...
[67]
Theme 5: Impact of Taxes - Lesson 1: How Taxes Influence Behavior
Puritan founders of the New England colonies used the earliest sin taxes, called sumptuary taxes. High taxes were levied on certain foods, items of clothing, ...
[68]
Federal Excise Taxes: An Introduction and General Analysis
Aug 26, 2013 · Sumptuary taxes were traditionally imposed for moral reasons, but are currently rationalized, in part, to discourage a specific activity that is ...
[69]
[PDF] w7535.pdf - National Bureau of Economic Research
They find that cigarettes and liquor are substitutes in consumption, with an estimated cross price elasticity of demand for cigarettes with respect to the price ...
[70]
Sin taxes and their effect on consumption, revenue generation and ...
Apr 22, 2021 · Specifically, across all five countries, demand for tobacco products was found to be inelastic (with price elasticity of demand <−1, indicating ...
[71]
Sin Taxes and Self-Control - American Economic Association
When taxes increase, consumers with low self-control reduce purchases less strongly than consumers with high self-control. When taxes decrease, both groups ...
[72]
Alcohol Prohibition Was a Failure - Cato Institute
Jul 17, 1991 · Prohibition removed a significant source of tax revenue and greatly increased government spending. It led many drinkers to switch to opium, ...Missing: excise | Show results with:excise<|separator|>
[73]
Cigarette Taxes and Cigarette Smuggling by State, 2022
Nov 26, 2024 · Growing cigarette tax levels and differentials have made cigarette smuggling both a national problem and a lucrative criminal enterprise.
[74]
[PDF] Cigarette Taxes, Black Markets, and Crime - Cato Institute
Feb 6, 2003 · The negative effects of high cigarette taxes in New York provide a cau- tionary tale that excessive tax rates have serious consequences—even for ...
[75]
Price Isn't Everything: Behavioral Response Around Changes In Sin ...
Feb 24, 2023 · In traditional economic models, taxes change behavior by changing prices. In empirical analyses, factors other than price are thought to be ...
[76]
The economics and control of tobacco, alcohol, food products ... - NCBI
Although tobacco is universally found to be price inelastic, meaning that the percentage decline in consumption is less than the percentage increase in price, ...Introduction · Affordability · Price elasticity of demand · Different tobacco and non...
[77]
Tobacco & Cigarette State Excise Tax for 2025 - ComplyIQ
Oct 1, 2025 · Federal taxes are collected too. Here are the current federal cigarette and tobacco tax rates: Cigarettes: $1.01 / 20-pack. Large Cigars ...
[78]
Tobacco industry “fighting back” with new nicotine products, WHO ...
Oct 7, 2025 · It found the number of tobacco users fell from 1.38 billion in the year 2000 to 1.2 billion in 2024, with women quitting in greater numbers than ...
[79]
https://www.rti.org/sites/default/files/resources/8742_Excise_Taxes_FR_5-03.pdf
[80]
Cigarette Taxes and Cigarette Smuggling by State, 2021
Dec 5, 2023 · The most recent report uses 2021 data and finds a strong positive relationship between cigarette smuggling and tax rates across the country.
[81]
[PDF] State Cigarette Excise Taxes: Implications for Revenue and Tax ...
➤ Although cigarette tax avoidance and smuggling increase somewhat after cigarette tax increases, they do not cause state revenues to decline but only reduce ...<|separator|>
[82]
Alcohol duties - Office for Budget Responsibility
The rate on all alcoholic products (with a strength exceeding 22 per cent ABV) is £32.79 per litre of alcohol in the product. VAT is applied after alcohol duty, ...
[83]
Project 1: Implications of EV Penetration on State and Federal ...
Results of the study suggest that EVs currently and for the near future have very little if any impact on gas tax revenues. EVs have not yet made an impact into ...Missing: excise | Show results with:excise
[84]
The Future of the Highway Trust Fund: The Impact of EVs
Aug 25, 2023 · Gas-powered vehicle drivers pay 18.4 cents per gallon for gasoline and 24.4 cents per gallon for diesel towards the federal gas tax—a small ...
[85]
Sports wagering | Internal Revenue Service
Dec 13, 2024 · 0.25 % of the amount wagered, and · An annual occupational tax of $50 for each principal or agent accepting wagers.
[86]
Exorbitant Sports Betting Taxes Could Kill the Legal Market
May 15, 2025 · Legal sports wagers are subject to a federal tax of 0.25 percent of the sports betting handle, a term meaning the total amount of wagers.
[87]
Online Sports Betting Taxes by State, 2025 - Tax Foundation
Sep 16, 2025 · The highest tax rates are levied in New Hampshire, New York, Oregon, and Rhode Island at 51 percent of sportsbook revenues. Nevada and Iowa levy ...<|separator|>
[88]
Calculate the excise duty on cannabis - Canada.ca
Mar 19, 2025 · You must pay a flat-rate duty based on the number of milligrams of total THC in the cannabis product. This product is not subject to an ad valorem duty rate.
[89]
https://www.gao.gov/blog/tobacco-tax-revenue-has-gone-smoke-and-not-entirely-reason-you-think
[90]
2025 Marijuana Industry Statistics - Flowhub
In 2024, more than $20 billion in cannabis tax revenue was generated. Statista reported that the alcohol industry generated $9.6 billion in 2024. Cannabis ...Missing: offsetting | Show results with:offsetting
[91]
Tobacco Tax Revenue Has Gone Up in Smoke—And Not Entirely for ...
Aug 21, 2025 · Line graph showing a decline in tobacco tax revenues from FY 2024 to 2024. Differences in tax rates on tobacco products. Tax laws enacted ...Missing: cannabis offsetting
[92]
Indy Explains: How legal prostitution works in Nevada
May 27, 2018 · Although brothels and prostitutes pay a state business license fee, there is no excise tax on sex acts. In 2009, Democratic then-state Sen. Bob ...
[93]
Prostitution in Nevada Is a Legal Business - HG.org
Prostitution activities are not taxable. However, the brothel and business of prostitution do have a business license fee for the state. The sexual acts ...
[94]
[PDF] Decriminalizing Indoor Prostitution: Implications for Sexual Violence ...
Decriminalization increased the indoor market size, but also caused a decrease in both reported rape offenses and gonorrhea incidence.
[95]
Does Legalized Prostitution Increase Human Trafficking?
We find that countries with legalized prostitution have a statistically significantly larger reported incidence of human trafficking inflows. This holds true ...
[96]
Why Prostitution Shouldn't Be Legal - Demand Abolition
Countries that have legalized or decriminalized commercial sex often experience a surge in human trafficking, pimping, and other related crimes. Prostitution, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[97]
Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on ...
Jan 6, 2016 · The average volume of taxed beverages purchased monthly was 6% lower in 2014 compared with expected purchases with the tax absent.
[98]
SSB sales fall in Mexico after second year of taxes
Mar 1, 2017 · Purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages were down nearly 10 percent in the second year of the tax, a new study shows. “The tax is working” ...
[99]
Changes in sugar-sweetened beverages and non-essential energy ...
May 30, 2025 · Four years after the taxes were implemented in Mexico, there was a reduction of 7% and 4.4% in purchases of NEDF and SSBs, respectively, and ...Methods · Results · Discussion
[100]
[PDF] A Review of the Effects of U.S. Local Sugar-Sweetened Beverage ...
This research brief summarizes findings from peer-reviewed studies and governmental reports that evaluate substitution to untaxed beverages and food items in ...
[101]
Impact of the Seattle Sweetened Beverage Tax on substitution to ...
Jan 18, 2022 · The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of the $0.0175 per ounce Seattle, Washington, Sweetened Beverage Tax (SBT) on volume sold of alcoholic ...<|separator|>
[102]
Impact of sugar‐sweetened beverage taxes on purchases and ...
In the main meta‐analysis, the equivalent of a 10% increase in SSB tax was associated with a decline in purchases and dietary intake of 10.0% (95% CI: −5.0% to ...
[103]
Plastic Taxation in Europe: Update 2024 - WTS Global
May 8, 2024 · In 2021, European Union (EU) introduced a plastic levy on non-recycled plastic packaging waste to reduce waste and fund EU budgets, with rates set at EUR 0.80 ...
[104]
Special report 16/2024: EU revenue based on non‑recycled plastic ...
Sep 16, 2024 · In January 2021, the EU introduced a new own resource based on non-recycled plastic packaging waste generated by member states. The aim was to ...
[105]
Plastic bags - Environment - European Commission
EU rules on plastic bags to address the unsustainable consumption and use of lightweight plastic carrier bags.
[106]
Considerations, benefits and unintended consequences of banning ...
This study employs a systematic literature review to understand considerations, benefits and unintended consequences of banning plastic bags.
[107]
Carbon Taxes in Europe, 2025
Jul 1, 2025 · 23 European countries have implemented carbon taxes, ranging from less than €1 per metric ton of carbon emissions in Ukraine to more than €125 in Sweden, ...
[108]
Carbon taxes and greenhouse gas emissions trading systems
Thirteen of the countries with a carbon tax participate in the EU ETS. Switzerland and Alberta also have both a tax and an ETS.Footnote British Columbia has ...
[109]
[PDF] ETS and carbon tax - UNFCCC
▫ Get the “best of both worlds” (ETS and carbon tax):. - Flexibility for compliance. - Price certainty. Example of hybrid system: - Alberta (Canada); ...
[110]
[PDF] FY 2025 CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET JUSTIFICATION BLACK ...
The Trust Fund's primary income source is an excise tax on coal mined in the United States for domestic sale. Though the tax rates have varied over the ...
[111]
Carbon leakage: An additional argument for international ... - CEPR
Feb 16, 2024 · Our findings suggest that carbon taxes do indeed lead to carbon leakage, particularly for countries that are more open to trade. Importantly, ...Missing: offshoring | Show results with:offshoring
[112]
[PDF] Pollution havens? Carbon taxes, globalization, and the geography ...
Together, these findings suggest that countries with carbon taxes may offset the reduction in territorial emissions by outsourcing the production of emissions, ...Missing: offshoring | Show results with:offshoring
[113]
Trade, Leakage, and the Design of a Carbon Tax
In particular, a unilateral carbon tax on production might cause production, and the resulting emissions, to shift offshore, an effect known as leakage.
[114]
Window tax - The National Archives
The window tax, based on the number of windows in a house, was first introduced in 1696 by William III to cover revenue lost by the clipping of coinage.Missing: excise salt newspaper<|separator|>
[115]
[PDF] The Window Tax: A Case Study in Excess Burden
The window tax in Great Britain (1696–1851) provides a remarkable case of tax-induced distortions in resource allocation. Tax liabilities on dwelling units ...
[116]
Taxes the 18th century way - UK Parliament
Indirect tax. The commonest indirect taxes paid by most people in the 18th century were excise duties. These were levied by Parliament on basic commodities ...
[117]
Taxes on Knowledge: A brief history and its consequences
Jan 19, 2019 · It was in the year 1712 that a highly contentious and controversial tax was imposed on the British Newspapers for the first time.
[118]
[PDF] The Introduction in 1712 of Stamp Duties on Newspapers and ...
The article then looks at the impact of the tax on the press and the way in which newspapers attempted tax avoidance. The article concludes that the tax was ...
[119]
Taxes on Knowledge - Spartacus Educational
A tax was first imposed on British newspapers in 1712. The tax was gradually increased until in 1815 it had reached 4d. a copy. As few people could afford ...Primary And Secondary... · (2) Richard Carlile, The... · (3) The Poor Man's Guardian...<|control11|><|separator|>
[120]
About Form 7208, Excise Tax on Repurchase of Corporate Stock - IRS
Jul 13, 2025 · The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 established a stock repurchase excise tax under section 4501 equal to 1% of the fair market value (FMV) ...Missing: 2023 | Show results with:2023
[121]
Excise Tax on Repurchase of Corporate Stock-Procedure and ...
Jul 3, 2024 · The stock repurchase excise tax is equal to 1 percent of the fair market value of any stock of the covered corporation that is ( printed page ...
[122]
Raise the Excise Tax Rate on Stock Repurchases
Jan 13, 2025 · These two alternative proposals would increase the excise tax rate on stock repurchases from 1 percent to either 2 percent or 4 percent.
[123]
Proposed regulations and Rev. Proc. 2025-9: Excise tax under ...
Dec 31, 2024 · The US Treasury Department and IRS today released proposed regulations (REG-115560-23) relating to the excise tax imposed under section 5000D.
[124]
Digital Taxation around the World - Tax Foundation
Apr 30, 2024 · ... tax rates range from 1 percent in India to 30 percent in Peru. Table 4: Examples of Gross-Based Withholding Taxes on Digital Services ...
[125]
Digital Services Taxes State of Play - Tax Foundation
Jul 7, 2025 · Canada pivoted and rescinded its DST. DSTs often target US companies by design through high revenue thresholds for determining applicability.
[126]
Chicago-Area Soda Tax Repealed Despite Billionaire Bloomberg's ...
Oct 11, 2017 · The Cook County Board repealed a controversial penny-per-ounce soda tax after a public outcry and intense lobbying by Chicago's business ...
[127]
Soda tax goes flat in Chicago area's Cook County after clash over ...
Oct 11, 2017 · "Beverage taxes are really a money grab that has nothing to do with public health." The American Heart Association accused soda companies of ...
[128]
[PDF] NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES CIGARETTE EXCISE TAXATION
The two major excises are specific excise taxes (those imposed based on quantity or product characteristics) and ad valorem excise taxes (those imposed based ...Missing: shifting | Show results with:shifting
[129]
[PDF] Chapter 8: Excises - International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Under a specific-rate excise tax, disputes over valuation do not arise. The choice of manufacturer's taxes requires a more frequent use of specific taxes.<|separator|>
[130]
[PDF] w8829.pdf - National Bureau of Economic Research
Mar 4, 2002 · An example is a "specific" excise tax. In contrast, an ad valorem tax (τ) is some fraction or percentage of the product price, and so it raises ...<|separator|>
[131]
[PDF] THE COMPARISON BETWEEN AD VALOREM AND SPECIFIC ...
There is evidence of under and over-shifting and the specific tax has a significantly greater effect on price than the ad valorem. Keywords: Commodity Taxation, ...
[132]
Federal and State Cigarette Excise Taxes --- United States, 1995
May 22, 2009 · The federal excise tax increased from 24 cents per pack in 1995 to $1.01 per pack in 2009, and the average state excise tax increased from 32.7 cents per pack ...
[133]
The distribution of cigarette prices under different tax structures - NIH
Jun 21, 2013 · A specific excise tax is a monetary tax levied based on the quantity of tobacco products (eg, per pack or by weight). While an ad valorem excise ...
[134]
Excise Taxes, Consumer Demand, Over-Shifting, and Tax Revenue
"The Comparison Between Ad Valorem and Specific Taxation under Imperfect Competition: Evidence from the European Cigarette Industry," Studies in Economics ...
[135]
[PDF] -2cm Efficiency and Incidence of Taxation with Free Entry and Love ...
Our results indicate that specific taxes are more efficient at the margin than ad valorem taxes and that product variety is below the socially optimal level.
[136]
Modernization of the Alcohol Tax
Dec 19, 2023 · Most European countries apply a hybrid rate, in which tax rates are set separately for beer, wine, and spirits. Then, within each category, ...
[137]
Alcohol Excise Taxes: An Overview - Congress.gov
Sep 12, 2024 · Since their inception in 1791, federal excise taxes on alcohol have been imposed or increased primarily to fund emergency spending during ...Brief History of Federal Alcohol... · Distilled Spirits · Response to Higher Taxes
[138]
[PDF] Modernization of the Alcohol Tax
Excise taxes increase market prices and decrease (legal) consumption, thus decreasing the external harms that accompany alcohol consumption, such as drunk ...
[139]
[PDF] Excise Tax - Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) - PwC
It is a single-phased tax, levied once at import or at production stage within the country. · It is collected by businesses on behalf of the Tax Authority. · ...
[140]
26 CFR Part 48 -- Manufacturers and Retailers Excise Taxes - eCFR
Chapter 31 (relating to retail taxes) imposes tax on certain luxury items, special fuels, fuel used in commercial transportation on inland waterways, and heavy ...
[141]
About Tax Stamps
The main purpose of excise tax stamps is to provide a physical means of collecting tax. The stamps denote that a payment has been made – or is due to be made – ...Missing: bonding mechanisms<|separator|>
[142]
[PDF] The Evolution in the Role of Excise Tax Stamps for Specific ...
Although a number of countries now have the systems in place to implement a full-blown track and trace programme, many have not actually done so, only making ...Missing: bonding | Show results with:bonding
[143]
Excise Movement and Control System (EMCS)
The Excise Movement and Control System (EMCS) is a computerised system for monitoring the movement of excise goods under duty suspension in the EU.
[144]
Excise Movement Control System (EMCS)
The Excise Movement Control System (EMCS) is an IT system for monitoring the movement of excisable goods within the EU.
[145]
4.24.9 Excise Tax Penalties Guidance | Internal Revenue Service
Jan 30, 2025 · This IRM provides technical guidance about penalties pertaining to excise returns, excise claims, excise refunds and other excise compliance activities.Program Scope and Objectives · Common Penalty Features · IRC Section 6020(b...
[146]
Tax Penalties and Interest | TTB
If you do not timely pay your taxes, TTB will assess a penalty of 1/2 of 1% of your unpaid taxes for each month or part of a month after the due date that the ...
[147]
26 CFR § 48.4218-1 - Tax on use by manufacturer, producer, or ...
Section 4218 imposes tax on certain uses by manufacturers, producers, or importers, as if the article were sold, when used for purposes other than specified.
[148]
[PDF] ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS OF A CARBON TAX | Niskanen Center
The administrative costs of an excise tax as a proportion of its revenue are generally lower than that of an income tax or a value-added tax, as an excise tax ...<|separator|>
[149]
[PDF] The linkage between tax burden and illicit trade of excisable products
Whilst strong penalties for large-scale smuggling and heightened enforcement are key devices to tackle the illicit trade in high-tax countries, it is also ...
[150]
[PDF] Excises-Tax-Policy-Assessment-Framework.pdf
Further very high rates of excise also create a conducive environment for corruption among revenue officials as the demand to evade the excise taxes becomes ...Missing: black | Show results with:black
[151]
Illicit Cigarettes in European Union at Highest Level Since 2015 ...
Jun 11, 2025 · In 2024, 38.9 billion illicit cigarettes were consumed in the region—the highest level since 2015—accounting for 9.2% of total cigarette ...
[152]
Illicit tobacco trade surges in France, Netherlands: industry report
Jun 11, 2025 · Greece, which has lower excise duties, still recorded a high illicit rate of 18%. However, the report also found that 6.2 billion fewer illegal ...
[153]
Higher Excise Taxes Lead to More Interstate Smuggling
Jun 15, 2023 · More than 54% of all cigarettes consumed in the Empire State were smuggled. New York continues to have the highest inbound cigarette smuggling ...Missing: compliance | Show results with:compliance
[154]
ILLICIT LIQUOR ("MOONSHINE") | TTB: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax ...
May 30, 2024 · ILLICIT LIQUOR ("MOONSHINE") ; 1970, 5,228, 86,416 ; 1975, 889, 16,046 ; 1980, 106, N/A ; 1985, 8, 218 ...Missing: evasion | Show results with:evasion
[155]
Taxation & Economy - High tax, incentive for illicit alcohol
Mar 12, 2019 · The excise duty rate on spirits rose by 125% amidst the crisis with 4 consecutive increases since 2009. This fuelled smuggling, strengthened the ...
[156]
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau: Home | TTB
In a final rule published on September 29, 2025, we announce that we will remove obsolete regulations related to the 2009 tobacco floor stocks tax from the ...Contact Us · Permits Online Customer Page · Wine Industry · Alcohol Fuel
[157]
Gas Taxes by State, 2025
Sep 2, 2025 · The lowest gas tax rates are levied in Alaska at 8.95 cpg, followed by Hawaii at 18.5 cpg and New Mexico at 18.9 cpg. These rates do not include ...
[158]
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-irbs/irb25-06.pdf
[159]
Aircraft Club Nov 2024 Air transport excise tax rates for 2025 - PwC
Effective January 1, 2025, federal excise tax rates will increase for taxable air transportation of persons. Why is it relevant?
[160]
[PDF] Bulletin No. 2025–6 February 3, 2025 HIGHLIGHTS OF THIS ISSUE
Feb 3, 2025 · Section 5000D of the Internal Revenue Code imposes an excise tax on applicable sales of designated drugs by manufacturers, producers, and ...
[161]
Excise Taxes - Taxation and Customs Union - European Commission
Excise taxes are indirect taxes on the sale or use of specific products such as alcohol, tobacco, energy products and electricity.Alcohol · Tobacco · Energy
[162]
EU Tobacco Excise Tax Directive | Tax Foundation Europe
Mar 19, 2025 · The current minimum tax rates are €1.80 tax per pack of 20 cigarettes and a minimum duty of 60 percent of the country's weighted average retail price.
[163]
European Parliament Reviews Alcohol Taxes - Movendi International
Oct 17, 2024 · At the EU level, excise duties on alcohol, tobacco, and energy are subject to minimum rates, but Member States can set higher rates. The ...
[164]
Revision Energy Taxation Directive - Taxation and Customs Union
The new proposal aims to: align the taxation of energy products with EU energy and climate policies; promote clean technologies; remove outdated exemptions and ...Missing: post- 2020
[165]
[PDF] Annual Report on Taxation 2024 Review of ... - European Parliament
Jul 2, 2024 · ... tobacco and alcohol across borders has been growing, incentivized by large differences in applicable excise duty rates in EU countries.
[166]
[PDF] Revision of the Tobacco Taxation Directive - European Parliament
On 16 July 2025, the European Commission proposed a revision to the Tobacco Taxation Directive, alongside modifications to the general Excise Duty Directive ...
[167]
Revision of the Energy Taxation Directive (ETD) | Legislative Train ...
On 14 July 2021, the Commission tabled a proposal for a revision of the Energy Taxation Directive (ETD), as part of the Fit for 55 package.Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[168]
Minimum energy taxes for climate and clean air in the EU
Oct 17, 2025 · This paper assesses the environmental and distributional impacts a revised Energy Taxation Directive, broadening the tax base and increasing ...
[169]
[PDF] Harmonization and Deharmonization of Excise Duty in the European ...
The gradual deepening of differences in the political, legal, social, economic, environmental and cultural dimensions between individual Member States.Missing: tensions autonomy
[170]
EU-UK: A new relationship - Taxation and Customs Union
For the purposes of customs, the UK is now treated as any other non-EU country. In particular, customs procedures and formalities apply to trade between the UK ...
[171]
3. Tax gaps: Excise (including alcohol, tobacco and oils) - GOV.UK
Jun 19, 2025 · The excise duties gap is 5.8% of the overall excise duties theoretical liability, or £3.1 billion in absolute terms, in the 2023 to 2024 tax year.
[172]
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/changes-to-alcohol-duty-rates/alcohol-duty-rate-changes
[173]
Extension to the cut in fuel duty rates to March 2026 - GOV.UK
Feb 28, 2025 · This measure extends the temporary cut in the rates of fuel duty first introduced at Spring Statement in March 2022 for a further 12 months.
[174]
Alcohol Duty: rate changes - GOV.UK
duty on spirits, wine and other fermented products at least 3.5% but less than 8.5% ABV : £24.77 per litre of alcohol in the product; duty on sparkling cider ...
[175]
Alcohol Duty rates - GOV.UK
Beer, spirits, wine and other fermented products 3.5% to less than 8.5%, 18.76. Check the duty rates up to 31 January 2025. You can view previous Alcohol Duty ...
[176]
Clause 22 - Rates of tobacco products duty - TheyWorkForYou
Jan 16, 2024 · The duty charged on all tobacco products will rise in line with the tobacco duty escalator, with an additional increase for hand-rolling tobacco ...Missing: paused | Show results with:paused<|separator|>
[177]
The Window Tax - Adam Smith Institute
Jul 24, 2019 · It was on July 24th, 1851, that the hated Window Tax was finally abolished. Introduced under King William III, it was not intended to hit ...
[178]
UK to require duty stamps on all e-liquids under new vaping tax from ...
The UK will introduce a new excise tax, the Vaping Products Duty (VPD), on all e-liquids from 1st October 2026, with the tax framed as a public health measure ...Missing: emerging | Show results with:emerging
[179]
Excise Duty - What is Excise Tax and How It Works? - Policybazaar
Before the introduction of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in 2017, excise duty was one of the primary indirect taxes in India, levied on a broad range of ...
[180]
Excise Duty in India - Types & Latest Rates in 2025 - BankBazaar
Excise duty is a form of indirect tax that is levied by the Central Government of India for the production, sale, or license of certain goods.
[181]
GST on Cigarettes, Pan Masala and Gutkha - Impact of GST Rate on ...
Sep 18, 2025 · Tobacco products, including cigarettes, pan masala, gutkha, and chewing tobacco, will continue to attract 28% GST, along with excise duty, NCCD, ...
[182]
GST Council retains 28% tax and cess on tobacco, sin goods
Sep 4, 2025 · Currently, such products attract the highest GST rate of 28% plus compensation cess, central excise duty and national calamity contingent duty, ...
[183]
GST revamp introduces 40% tax rate: What are sin goods and why ...
Sep 5, 2025 · The GST Council has approved a significant tax hike on sin and luxury goods, introducing a new 40% slab for items like tobacco, aerated drinks, ...
[184]
Centre to impose additional levies on tobacco, pan masala ...
Sep 5, 2025 · CBIC says additional levies will keep tax incidence on tobacco, pan masala and cigarettes unchanged under GST 2.0 ... GST rate of 40% on sin goods ...
[185]
What is Excise Duty in India: Meaning & Different Types Explained
Excise duty was previously collected as Additional Excise Duty or Central Excise Duty. However, the Government consolidated several types of excise duty after ...
[186]
April GST Collection Surges 12.6% Year-on-Year—the Story Behind ...
May 3, 2025 · India's Goods and Services Tax (GST) revenue witnessed a robust year-on-year increase of 12.6% in April 2025, reaching a record-breaking ₹2.36 lakh crore.
[187]
The Regressive Bite Of Indirect Taxes - BW Businessworld
Nov 11, 2024 · The GST has compounded the existing regressive nature of indirect taxes, disproportionately affecting the country's lower-income population.
[188]
Informality, Consumption Taxes, and Redistribution - Oxford Academic
Instead, developing countries rely primarily on indirect consumption taxes to collect revenue, which are perceived as inequitable when applied uniformly. To ...
[189]
The role of tax evasion in the rapid growth of the informal sector in ...
Tax evasion is seen as a channel for avoiding the tax burden and facilitating the dynamics of the informal economy. It is linked to institutional constraints ...
[190]
Fuel subsidy cuts won't scratch Jokowi - East Asia Forum
Oct 19, 2022 · Without reform, the cost of the subsidy was expected to reach nearly Rp 700 trillion (US$46 billion). This is not the first time Jokowi has cut ...Missing: excise | Show results with:excise
[191]
Indonesia's Fuel Subsidies Reforms (English)
May 21, 2024 · This paper provides an assessment of the fiscal and social impacts resulting from the fuel price adjustments undertaken in 2022.Missing: cuts excise
[192]
Investigating the Implications of Goods and Services Tax Revenue ...
This study examines the impact of GST revenue on India's economic growth. The results demonstrate that GST revenue positively influences the Indian economy ...Missing: excise post regressivity
[193]
How Indirect Taxes Impact Economic Equity in India - Newsreel Asia
Mar 9, 2025 · The regressive nature of India's indirect tax, GST, disproportionately affects lower-income households, raising concerns about economic ...
[194]
Excise duty rates for tobacco - Australian Taxation Office
Aug 14, 2025 · The AWOTE indexation factor for rates on and from 1 September 2025 is 1.017. In addition to ordinary indexation, tobacco excise and excise ...Missing: escalators | Show results with:escalators
[195]
13.6 What tobacco taxes apply in Australia?
Excise rates for all tobacco products are to be increased by 5% annually in addition to routine indexation, starting 1 September 2023 to 1 September 2025.Missing: escalators | Show results with:escalators
[196]
Excise duty rates for fuel and petroleum products
Table 1 below reflects the release dates and the relevant indexation days. The CPI indexation factor for rates from 4 August 2025 is 1.016. Excise duty rates ...Missing: escalators | Show results with:escalators
[197]
Excise Tax Australia 2025: What It Means For Consumers | Cockatoo
May 19, 2025 · Fuel Excise: As of February 2025, the fuel excise rate is indexed to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and now sits at 49.2 cents per litre for ...Missing: escalators | Show results with:escalators
[198]
Splitting the Pot: Cannabis Taxation in Canada Explained - Ryan LLC
The federal framework uses an excise duty on cannabis, with rates of $1.00/gram for flower, $0.30/gram for trim, and $1.00/seed. 75% of revenue is shared with ...
[199]
Unresolved issues for cannabis excise duties - Policy Options
Sep 5, 2018 · Generally, producers must pay each month the higher of two amounts: either $1 per gram of cannabis included in the products or used in the ...
[200]
Excise duty rates - Canada.ca
If the flat-rate additional cannabis duty is payable, the 16.8% adjustment rate is multiplied by the base amount for the cannabis product. If the ad valorem ...
[201]
ARCHIVED - Excise and GST/HST News - No. 104 - Canada.ca
Jul 1, 2018 · Effective after February 27, 2018, Bill C-74 has increased the excise duty rates on tobacco products. These rates took effect February 28, 2018.
[202]
[PDF] The People's Republic of China Tax Facts and Figures 2024
The Customs shall levy import and export customs duty on goods that are allowed to be imported into or exported based on relevant Customs regulation. Customs ...Missing: excise | Show results with:excise
[203]
China Lowers the Export Tax Rebate Rate for Certain Products
Dec 4, 2024 · China has lowered the export tax rebate rate to 9 percent for 209 products such as refined oil, photovoltaic products, and batteries.Missing: excise levies
[204]
China's Revised Export Tax Rebates and Their Implications
May 22, 2025 · China will eliminate the export tax rebates for aluminum and copper starting December 1, 2024. This move will significantly impact processing enterprises.
[205]
A Revenue Mobilization Strategy for China in - IMF eLibrary
Feb 9, 2024 · Over the coming years, China could move to specific and higher excise tax rates; adjust the PIT schedule to raise average rates while reducing ...
[206]
Tax Policy Reforms 2025: Executive Summary | OECD
Sep 11, 2025 · Another notable shift in 2024 is the move away from temporary fuel tax reliefs towards increases in fuel excise taxes. In 2022 and 2023, many ...
[207]
[PDF] Lecture 3: Tax Incidence and Efficiency Costs of Taxation
The inefficiency of any tax is determined by the extent to which consumers and producers change their behavior to avoid the tax; deadweight loss is caused by.Missing: tobacco | Show results with:tobacco
[208]
[PDF] Taxation and Economic Efficiency - University of Michigan
The design of optimal taxes. Taxes (other than lump-sum taxes) distort behavior, yet society needs to collect revenue to pursue various social objectives.
[209]
The Economics of Tobacco Regulation: A Comprehensive Review
The inelastic nature of cigarette demand suggests cigarette excise taxes are an efficient revenue-generating instrument. A central policy question is what ...
[210]
[PDF] Excise Taxes, Consumer Demand, Over-Shifting, and Tax Revenue
In this regard, a number of studies have found empirical evidence of over-shifting, i.e. the price to consumers goes up by more than the amount of the excise ...
[211]
How cigarette excise tax pass-through to prices ... - Tobacco Control
Aug 30, 2023 · Cigarette excise taxes were fully shifted to the 25th and 50th percentile prices and overly shifted to the 75th percentile prices. The tax pass- ...
[212]
The pass-through of alcohol excise taxes to prices in OECD countries
An evaluation of the 2002 tax hike in Alaska shows an over-shifting of alcohol taxes to prices, with an average pass-through rate of two (i.e., a $1 increase in ...
[213]
[PDF] Wholesale Prices, Retail Prices and the Lumpy Pass-Through of ...
Oct 15, 2015 · This over-shifting of the tax burden onto consumers is difficult to rationalize with profit maximizing firm behavior and log-concave demand ( ...
[214]
Taxation and Economic Efficiency - ScienceDirect.com
Taxes (other than lump-sum taxes) distort behavior, yet society needs to collect revenue to pursue various social objectives. The optimal-taxation literature ...
[215]
[PDF] Lecture 3: Tax Incidence and Efficiency Costs of Taxation
Many studies examine how taxes affect prices. • These studies uniformly conclude that the price of cigarettes rises by the full amount of the excise tax.
[216]
JCX-9-24 - Joint Committee on Taxation
Income And Payroll Tax Offsets To Changes In Excise Tax Revenues For 2024–2034. The staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation releases its revised estimates ...
[217]
The Use and Abuse of Excise Taxes
And, because there is no clear justification for earmarking the revenues to particular government spending, most excise taxes generate revenues that inevitably ...
[218]
[PDF] Tax Revenue Implications of Decarbonising Road Transport | OECD
This report investigates how tax revenue from transport fuels could evolve over time as vehicles rely less on fossil fuels, providing a conceptual framework ...
[219]
Employment impacts of alcohol taxes - ScienceDirect.com
Opponents have argued that alcohol tax increases lead to job losses. However, there has been no comprehensive economic analysis of the impact of alcohol taxes ...
[220]
Effects of Tobacco Taxation and Pricing on Smoking Behavior in ...
On average, a price increase of 10% on a pack of cigarettes would reduce demand for cigarettes by about 4% for the general adult population in high income ...
[221]
Behavioral Economics and the Demand for Alcohol
Jun 21, 2012 · Higher excise taxes on alcohol reduce consumption by moderate drinkers and are of less importance in reducing heavy consumption. Download a PDF.
[222]
[PDF] The Effects of Alcohol Excise Tax Increases by Drinking Level and ...
This suggests that the tax increase reduced heavy drinking. The results we present in this paper show that heavy drinkers and other drinkers reduce purchases of ...
[223]
INCREASED CIGARETTE TAX IS ASSOCIATED WITH ... - NIH
Studies estimate that a 10% increase in cigarette taxes equates to a 3–5% decrease in cigarette consumption in adults (Chaloupka et al., 2012; Evans and ...
[224]
Outcomes Following Taxation of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages
Jun 1, 2022 · In this systematic review and meta-analysis of implemented SSB taxes worldwide, SSB taxes were associated with higher prices and lower sales of taxed beverages.Missing: black | Show results with:black
[225]
The Limits of Using Taxes to Improve Health and Reduce Harmful ...
Jul 7, 2025 · The academic consensus surrounding sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxes is that they have resulted in no discernable impact on obesity or body ...Missing: review 2024
[226]
[PDF] Should We Tax Sugar-Sweetened Beverages? An Overview of ...
By combining estimates of the price elasticity of demand for sugar-sweetened beverages, the effect of sugar-sweetened beverages on diabetes, cardiovascular ...
[227]
[PDF] Exploring Heterogeneity in Price Elasticities at High and Low Prices
This research is the first econometric study to examine the price elasticity of cigarette demand at different price levels. We use aggregate state-level ...
[228]
Poor Smokers, Poor Quitters, and Cigarette Tax Regressivity - PMC
The Brookings study found that “sales and excise taxes are clearly regressive throughout the entire income scale, [beginning] at over 9% of income at the bottom ...
[229]
[PDF] THE DISTRIBUTIONAL BURDEN OF FEDERAL EXCISE TAXES
Sep 2, 2015 · Overall, excise taxes are regressive, so somewhat reduce the overall progressivity of the federal tax system. In 2014, average effective excise ...Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
[230]
Cigarette Smuggling Cost States Billions in Tax Revenue
Dec 11, 2024 · States lose nearly $5 billion to cigarette smuggling each year. Learn more about the impact of cigarette smuggling on state tax revenue.
[231]
Revision of the Tobacco Excise Tax Directive (TED)
Jun 23, 2025 · According to estimates (KPMG report), the tax shortfall in the EU on tobacco products already amounts to around €19.4 billion per year. France ...
[232]
Unintended Consequences | Prohibition | Ken Burns - PBS
The most lasting consequence was that many states and the federal government would come to rely on income tax revenue to fund their budgets going forward.
[233]
The effects of traditional cigarette and e-cigarette tax rates on adult ...
Similarly, we find that higher e-cigarette tax rates increase traditional cigarette use and reduce e-cigarette use. Cross-tax effects imply that the products ...
[234]
Do the Effects of Alcohol Excise Taxes Differ by Drinking Level and ...
In absolute terms, the tax increases amounted to a change in spirits taxes from $4.50 to $8.55 per gallon, a change in wine taxes from $.73 to $1.39 per ...
[235]
The effect of changes in alcohol tax differentials on alcohol ...
The 2009 Illinois excise tax increase resulted in higher spirits and wine prices but no change in beer prices. This resulted in higher beer sales, which ...
[236]
[PDF] Tax Revenues When Substances Substitute: Marijuana, Alcohol ...
First, there is no consensus on the estimated size of Washington's black market prior to legalization. – estimates range from 85 to 225 metric tons annually ...
[237]
How Should Alternative Tobacco Products Be Taxed?
Aug 24, 2023 · The deterrent effect of cigarette excise taxes also increases when more affordable substitutes are readily available. Taxing nicotine ...
[238]
Sin Taxes and Sindustry: Revenue, Paternalism, and Political Interest
Sin Taxes and Sindustry. Revenue, Paternalism, and Political Interest. By ... The new paternalists advocate using excise taxes to discourage “undesirable ...Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
[239]
For Your Own Good | Mercatus Center
Jan 3, 2018 · The costs of sin taxes tend to fall hardest on low-income people, who tend to spend a higher percentage of their income on excise taxes. Chapter ...Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
[240]
Taxation infringes on liberty - TaxPayers' Alliance
Mar 27, 2020 · According to Mill, society may infringe upon our liberty in order to protect the freedom and liberty of others if an action causes harm.
[241]
Liberty and Taxes - FEE.org
Taxation, because it is necessary and because it is taking under constraint, is a principal danger to the maintenance of individual liberty in America. With ...Missing: excise | Show results with:excise
[242]
Whiskey Rebellion | George Washington's Mount Vernon
The Whiskey Rebellion was a reaction to a tax on distilled spirits, leading to violence and Washington's militia intervention. The tax was seen as unfair by ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
[243]
Government Should Not Impose Sin Taxes | Cato Institute
Feb 22, 2006 · The internalities approach provides a novel argument in favor of paternalistic government policies such as sin taxes (including fat taxes), ...Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
[244]
Studying Optimal Paternalism, Illustrated by a Model of Sin Taxes
O'Donoghue, Ted, and Matthew Rabin. 2003. "Studying Optimal Paternalism, Illustrated by a Model of Sin Taxes." American Economic Review, 93 (2): 186-191.Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
[245]
[PDF] Sin Taxes and Sindustry: Revenue, Paternalism, and Political Interest
Sin taxes are selective excise taxes on goods like tobacco, alcohol, and sugar-sweetened beverages, to offset costs and reduce sinful behavior.<|control11|><|separator|>
[246]
Are federal taxes progressive? - Tax Policy Center
By contrast, excise taxes are regressive and payroll taxes for Social Security and Medicare are regressive at the top of the income distribution (see figure 2).Individual Income Tax · Estate Tax · Payroll Taxes
[247]
[PDF] Taxes and Inequality
Excise taxes are also regressive because expendi- tures on goods subject to the taxes—alcoholic beverages, cigarettes, gasoline, tires, and other goods—make up ...
[248]
Who Pays? 7th Edition - Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy
Sales and excise taxes are very regressive. On average low-income families pay 7 percent of their incomes in sales and excise taxes, middle-income families pay ...
[249]
Are Consumption Taxes Really Regressive? - Baker Institute
Nov 30, 2017 · Many argue that sales and excise taxes are regressive based on the strict relationship between annual income and taxes paid.Description Of Data · Description Of Taxable Items · Measuring Progressivity<|separator|>
[250]
[PDF] Luxury Excise Tax Issues and Estimated Effects
Feb 26, 1992 · The luxury excise tax is 10% on sales over $100,000 for boats, $30,000 for cars, $250,000 for aircraft, $10,000 for jewelry and fur.
[251]
Sage Reference - Encyclopedia of Consumer Culture
A luxury tax is an excise levy on goods or services considered to be luxuries rather than necessities. ... luxury taxes were introduced on expensive cars, boats,.
[252]
Repeating Tax History — From Luxury Tax to Tanning Tax
A similar situation arose in 1990, when an excise tax on “luxury” cars was added at the last minute to the deficit-reduction package negotiated by Congress and ...
[253]
Hidden Taxes
As a result, the final cost of excise taxes is often hidden from consumers. These taxes lower consumption of the taxed product and increase consumption of other ...
[254]
Undermining government tax policies: Common legal strategies ...
We identified seven legal strategies to reduce tobacco tax liability (stockpiling, changing product attributes or production processes, lowering prices, over- ...
[255]
Partisan Politics and Excise Tax Rates in the United States
Aug 9, 2023 · The literature on excise tax rates has provided mixed evidence concerning how partisan ideology affects tax changes.
[256]
Alcohol Excise Taxes: Simplifying Rates Can Enhance Economic ...
GAO examined the economic inefficiencies and administrative problems associated with the current alcohol excise tax system.