Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Amalgamation

Amalgamation is the chemical process of combining mercury with one or more other metals to form an called an amalgam, which can range from a to a solid depending on the proportions and metals involved. The term derives from amalgama, itself from al-malgham meaning "to soften or ," reflecting its origins in metallurgical practices dating back to . Figuratively, amalgamation has come to denote the unification or blending of distinct entities into a cohesive whole, as seen in for extracting and silver from ores via mercury's affinity for precious metals—a employed historically but largely phased out due to mercury's toxicity. In business and , amalgamation specifically refers to the statutory of two or more companies into a single new entity, where the original firms cease to exist independently, differing from mergers where one may absorb the other or acquisitions involving purchase without full . This process, common in jurisdictions like and , facilitates resource pooling, market expansion, and operational efficiencies but can involve complex regulatory approvals, valuation disputes, and dilutions as potential drawbacks. Extended to social and cultural contexts, amalgamation describes the biological and cultural intermixing of diverse populations—such as through intermarriage or —to generate a hybrid group, akin to the "" model observed in historical immigrant societies where distinct ethnic traits blend over generations rather than one dominating or assimilating unilaterally. Empirical studies of such processes, including analyses, underscore causal mechanisms like driving population-level changes, though outcomes vary by selection pressures and isolation, challenging simplistic narratives of uniform integration.

Chemical and Metallurgical Contexts

Definition and Properties

Amalgamation is the chemical process of alloying mercury with one or more other metals to form an amalgam, a type of distinguished by its incorporation of mercury as a primary component. This reaction occurs readily with metals such as , silver, , tin, and due to mercury's high affinity for these elements, involving the dissolution of the solid metal into liquid mercury at or near . In metallurgical applications, amalgamation specifically denotes the technique of using mercury to extract precious metals from ores by wetting and binding fine particles of or silver, forming a separable amalgam . Amalgams exhibit physical states ranging from liquid (high mercury content) to soft paste or solid (low mercury content), with properties like , , and malleability varying based on and proportions; for example, gold-mercury amalgams typically form a dense, semi-solid paste suitable for mechanical separation. Chemically, these alloys differ from their constituent metals through altered structures and reactivity, as mercury's incorporation disrupts the base metal's , often reducing while enhancing amalgam under ambient conditions. Mercury in amalgams retains some but forms bonds that limit free elemental release until heated, enabling recovery of the via , a exploiting the amalgam's selective and at temperatures around 350–400°C.

Historical Development and Uses in Extraction

The use of mercury amalgamation for metal extraction dates back to ancient civilizations, with evidence of its application by the Phoenicians, Carthaginians, and Romans around 50 A.D. to concentrate precious metals from ores. Roman sources, including Pliny the Elder's Natural History, describe the process of alloying gold with mercury to facilitate recovery, a technique that relied on mercury's ability to dissolve and bind finely divided gold particles. This early method involved mixing mercury with pulverized ore, forming an amalgam that could be separated and heated to distill off the mercury, leaving behind the purified metal, though it was limited to small-scale operations due to mercury's scarcity and handling difficulties. The modern industrial-scale development of amalgamation occurred in the mid-16th century during colonial in the , where low-grade silver ores proved challenging for traditional . In 1554, Bartolomé de Medina, a merchant from , introduced the in , , adapting mercury amalgamation to silver ores more efficiently by mixing crushed ore with mercury, salt, and on large outdoor patios, where it was agitated by animal treading for weeks to form the amalgam. This innovation, granted a monopoly by Viceroy Luís de Velasco, dramatically increased silver yields from refractory ores containing impurities like and , enabling the extraction of up to 70-80% of the metal content compared to prior methods. The patio process spread rapidly across Spanish America, reaching Potosí, Bolivia, by the early 1570s, where local mercury from Huancavelica mines supported massive silver production that fueled the Spanish economy for centuries. For gold extraction, amalgamation was similarly employed, particularly on placer deposits and low-grade lode ores, by combining mercury with milled ore in sluices or pans to capture fine gold particles that gravity separation missed, a practice that became widespread in regions like colonial Mexico and later California during the 19th-century gold rush. In the early 17th century, Álvaro Alonso Barba refined the technique into pan amalgamation, using heated iron pans to accelerate chemical reactions and reduce processing time from months to days, further enhancing its utility for both silver and gold. Amalgamation's primary use in extraction was for precious metals from ores unsuitable for direct smelting, leveraging mercury's selective affinity for gold and silver to achieve high recovery rates—often exceeding 90% in optimized setups—while minimizing fuel and labor compared to pyrometallurgical alternatives. Its economic impact was profound, accounting for the bulk of New World silver output from the 16th to 19th centuries, though it required subsequent retorting to recover mercury, which introduced losses of 10-30% per cycle due to volatilization and residue retention. By the late 19th century, the process began declining with the advent of cyanidation, which offered safer and more efficient alternatives for certain ores, but amalgamation persisted in artisanal mining for its simplicity and low initial cost.

Industrial and Technological Applications

Amalgamation serves as a metallurgical for recovering precious metals, particularly , from ores by alloying mercury with metallic particles to form a separable amalgam. In industrial applications, it is predominantly utilized in placer and alluvial , where mercury is introduced to concentrates or slurries to capture free-milling grains that separation alone may miss. This process is especially viable for fine-grained disseminated in sizes below 100 , enabling recoveries of 60-90% in optimized setups, though efficiency depends on factors like ore , mercury dosage (typically 1-5 kg per ton of concentrate), and intensity. The method operates in two primary variants: internal amalgamation, conducted within grinding equipment like ball mills where mercury contacts during , and external amalgamation, applied post-grinding via mercury-coated copper plates, barrels, or pans for . Amalgamation barrels, cylindrical rotating vessels lined with mercury or amalgam, facilitate vigorous mixing of 100-500 kg charges of or , promoting wetting and coalescence of gold-mercury alloys over 1-4 hours of operation. This equipment, scaled for semi-industrial throughput, remains in use despite mechanized alternatives, as it requires minimal capital and handles variable feed grades effectively. In artisanal and small-scale (ASGM), which accounts for about 15% of global or roughly 400 tonnes annually, amalgamation predominates due to its simplicity and low cost, often recovering 50-70% of from whole or concentrates before retorting to vaporize mercury. Whole-ore amalgamation, involving mercury addition during crushing or sluicing without prior concentration, is common but inefficient, wasting mercury at rates up to 2 kg per gram of recovered and releasing vapors or contaminated with . Technological refinements, such as reticulated mercury collectors or gravity pre-concentration, aim to boost yields to over 80% while curbing losses, yet adoption lags in informal sectors. Beyond gold, amalgamation historically extracted silver via the , introduced in 1554 in , where ores were ground with salt and mercury, roasted, and amalgamated over weeks, yielding up to 70% recovery before cyanidation displaced it by the early . Current industrial reliance has waned due to mercury's , with the Minamata Convention (effective 2017) mandating reductions in ASGM emissions—estimated at 1,000 tonnes of mercury yearly—through phase-outs by 2025 in signatory nations, though enforcement varies and direct smelting or borax fluxing offers viable, mercury-free substitutes achieving comparable 90%+ recoveries.

Dental Amalgam

Composition, Procedure, and Clinical Use

Dental amalgam consists of a powdered primarily comprising silver (typically 40-60%), tin (20-30%), and (10-20%), with possible minor additions of (up to 2%) to reduce oxidation during mixing, or other elements like or for enhanced properties. This , known as the gamma when set, is combined with approximately 50% elemental mercury by weight to form a mass suitable for . The mercury enables the alloy particles to bind via a metallurgical , where tin reacts to form gamma-2 phase compounds that contribute to initial setting strength. The placement procedure begins with cavity preparation: the dentist removes decayed tooth structure using a high-speed drill, shapes the preparation to retain the amalgam (e.g., undercut walls for mechanical retention in Class I or II cavities), and may apply a liner or base for pulp protection if needed. The pre-proportioned alloy capsule is then triturated in an amalgamator for 5-10 seconds to achieve a uniform mix with mercury, yielding a workable putty-like consistency. This mass is incrementally condensed into the cavity using serrated condensers to minimize voids and achieve dense packing, followed by carving with instruments like hatchet or explorer to restore anatomical contours, occlusal anatomy, and contact points while the material is still soft. Setting occurs via mercury diffusion and phase transformations, reaching initial hardness in minutes and full strength after 24 hours; finishing and polishing with burs or rubber cups enhance marginal integrity and corrosion resistance. Clinically, dental amalgam is used for direct restorations of moderate-to-large posterior cavities (Class I and II), where its durability under masticatory forces exceeds that of alternatives in high-load areas, and for core build-ups or temporary repairs. It has historically comprised up to 75% of all restorations due to its longevity (often 10-15 years or more), cost-effectiveness, and ease of placement without requiring advanced bonding techniques. Usage has declined sharply, dropping about 80% in the U.S. from 2017 to 2023, amid preferences for tooth-colored , though amalgam remains indicated for patients with high caries risk or where moisture control is challenging.

Efficacy, Durability, and Comparative Advantages

Dental amalgam restorations demonstrate high in restoring posterior teeth, with clinical success rates often exceeding 90% over extended periods in randomized controlled trials and observational studies. A Cochrane of trials involving over 2,000 participants found amalgam fillings to have low annual failure rates, typically under 3%, primarily due to effective sealing against secondary caries and retention under occlusal loads. is attributed to amalgam's self-sealing properties from marginal expansion and corrosion products that fill microgaps, reducing leakage compared to moisture-sensitive alternatives. In terms of durability, amalgam exhibits superior longevity to resin composites, with median survival times surpassing 16 years in permanent posterior restorations versus 11 years for composites, based on systematic reviews aggregating data from cohorts followed for up to 20 years. Annual failure rates for amalgam range from 0.16% to 2.83%, yielding five-year survival rates of 94.4% in large practice-based studies, outperforming composites' 85.5% survival. Factors contributing to this include amalgam's high (around 300-500 ) and wear resistance, which withstand masticatory forces better than polymer-based materials prone to or degradation.
Restorative MaterialMedian Survival Time (Years)Annual Failure Rate (%)Key Failure Modes
Amalgam>160.16-2.83Secondary caries,
Resin Composite11Higher than amalgam, secondary caries
Comparative advantages of amalgam include lower cost—often 50-70% less than composites or cast —and reduced technique sensitivity, as it requires minimal enamel preparation and sets independently of operator skill in . Unlike composites, which demand precise layering and bonding to avoid voids, amalgam's bulk placement and condensation yield consistent marginal integrity, making it preferable for high-caries-risk patients or in resource-limited settings. Meta-analyses confirm amalgam's edge in preventing secondary caries, with risk ratios favoring it by 1.5-2 times over composites in posterior applications. These attributes position amalgam as a reliable option despite aesthetic drawbacks, particularly where trumps .

Health Risks, Mercury Exposure, and Regulatory Debates

Dental amalgam restorations typically consist of approximately 50% mercury by weight, alloyed with silver, tin, , and other metals, releasing low levels of mercury vapor primarily through chewing, brushing, and temperature changes. Studies estimate average daily mercury exposure from amalgam at 1-5 μg for individuals with multiple restorations, with higher estimates up to 7.4 μg per day in those with extensive fillings, though these levels remain below established safety thresholds such as the U.S. EPA's reference dose of 0.3 μg/kg body weight per day. Mercury vapor absorption occurs mainly via , with about 80% retained in the lungs and distributed systemically, potentially accumulating in the kidneys and , where mercury converts to inorganic forms. Empirical evidence from large-scale epidemiological studies and systematic reviews indicates no causal association between dental amalgam mercury exposure and systemic health effects in the general population, including neurological outcomes such as , , or chronic fatigue syndrome. For instance, a of over 500 women found no increased risk of disorders linked to amalgam surfaces, while randomized trials like the New England Children's Amalgam Trial reported no differences in neuropsychological function or urinary mercury levels compared to composite controls after five years. Occupational exposure in dental personnel, involving higher vapor levels during placement and removal, has shown subtle neurobehavioral effects like disturbances in some cross-sectional studies, but these are confounded by variables such as and do not establish for patient-level risks. Rare cases of reactions, affecting less than 1% of patients, manifest as oral lichenoid lesions or systemic symptoms, prompting recommendations for alternative materials in allergic individuals. Regulatory frameworks reflect precautionary approaches amid debates over low-dose chronic exposure. In the United States, the FDA classifies dental amalgam as a Class II , affirming its safety and effectiveness for adults and children over six based on insufficient of harm, but advises alternatives for high-risk groups including pregnant women, children under six, and those with neurological or renal impairments due to potential mercury sensitivity. The maintains that amalgam's record of is supported by extensive peer-reviewed data, dismissing unsubstantiated claims of toxicity as lacking causal . In contrast, the , implementing the , mandated phase-down measures from 2018, restricting use in , children under 15, and pregnant or women, culminating in a near-total ban by January 1, 2025, except for cases deemed strictly necessary by dental practitioners. Debates persist, with advocacy groups like the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology (IAOMT) arguing that FDA risk assessments underestimate and synergistic toxicities, citing petitions for reclassification to Class III and highlighting occupational studies suggesting neurological vulnerabilities, though mainstream reviews critique these as selective or methodologically weak. Proponents of continued use emphasize amalgam's durability and cost-effectiveness, noting that alternatives like composites have higher failure rates in posterior teeth per meta-analyses, while opponents invoke mercury's known at higher doses—evident in acute cases—as warranting precaution despite the absence of proven thresholds for low-level effects. Regulatory underscores tensions between empirical null findings in studies and calls for first-principles caution regarding cumulative exposure, with bodies like the International Association for Dental Research affirming safety absent allergies or severe renal disease.

Business and Corporate Contexts

Definition, Distinctions from Mergers and Acquisitions

In the corporate context, amalgamation denotes the statutory fusion of two or more existing into a single new legal , known as the amalgamated corporation, wherein the predecessor dissolve entirely, transferring their assets, liabilities, , and obligations to the successor without any original surviving independently. This process is typically authorized under specific corporate statutes, such as Canada's Business Corporations Act or India's , requiring approvals from shareholders (often by special resolution), directors, and sometimes regulatory bodies or courts, followed by filing articles of amalgamation to effect the change. Amalgamation differs from a merger in that the latter generally involves one absorbing another, with the acquiring entity persisting as the surviving —potentially retaining its original while integrating the target's operations, assets, and shareholders—rather than creating an entirely novel . For instance, under laws like Delaware's General , mergers often preserve the surviving entity's identity, whereas amalgamations, more common in jurisdictions, mandate the formation of a fresh corporate shell to consolidate ownership and eliminate legacy structures. In contrast to acquisitions, which center on one company purchasing control of another through share or asset buys—frequently resulting in the target operating as a without or mandatory operational integration—amalgamation emphasizes a complete blending of entities into a unified , prioritizing of over mere and often avoiding the hierarchical parent- dynamics. Acquisitions, as defined in frameworks like the U.S. Hart-Scott-Rodino , trigger antitrust scrutiny based on transaction value thresholds (e.g., over $119.5 million as of 2024), but lack the statutory inherent to amalgamations, allowing targets to retain separate post-deal. This distinction underscores amalgamation's utility for seamless , such as simplifying chains, though both M&A forms can incur similar tax treatments under provisions in laws like India's 2(1B). Amalgamation in the corporate context legally constitutes the fusion of two or more existing companies into a newly formed , wherein the participating companies dissolve and transfer their assets, liabilities, and operations to the successor . This process differs from a statutory merger, in which one company absorbs another and the absorbing entity retains its legal identity while the absorbed company ceases to exist. Jurisdictional variations exist; for instance, in , amalgamations under the Canada Business Corporations Act or provincial equivalents result in a single corporation inheriting all rights and liabilities of the predecessors without interruption. In the , amalgamations may proceed via schemes of arrangement under the , requiring court sanction to bind dissenting shareholders and creditors. India's , Sections 230-232, mandates tribunal approval, including valuation reports and fairness opinions to protect minority interests. The process commences with boards of directors drafting a scheme of amalgamation, detailing share ratios, asset transfers, and terms, often supported by valuations to ensure equitable . approval follows via special resolutions, typically requiring a 75% in value, alongside creditor consultations to address potential objections. Regulatory clearances are essential, including antitrust reviews under frameworks like the U.S. Hart-Scott-Rodino Act or EU Merger Regulation equivalents, to prevent monopolistic outcomes. Final or validates the scheme, followed by filing with corporate registries, asset re-registration, and issuance of new shares to original shareholders based on the . of predecessor entities occurs post-transfer, with tax implications assessed under jurisdiction-specific rules, such as carryover of tax attributes in qualifying reorganizations. Accounting treatment aligns with business combination standards, employing the acquisition method under both IFRS 3 and U.S. ASC 805, where one entity is identified as the acquirer based on indicators like voting rights or relative size. Identifiable assets and liabilities of the acquiree are measured at on the acquisition date, with non-controlling interests optionally at under IFRS but proportionate share under . Goodwill arises as the excess of transferred over net identifiable assets, tested annually for , while a bargain purchase results in a gain recognition. Transactions under common deviate, with U.S. requiring book-value carryover to reflect economic substance without step-up to , whereas IFRS lacks prescriptive guidance, often applying predecessor values or by analogy. Post-combination, the acquirer integrates operations, with deferred taxes recognized for temporary differences between book and bases.

Economic Benefits, Risks, and Notable Examples

Amalgamations in corporate contexts offer potential economic benefits through synergies such as , which can lower operational costs by consolidating supply chains and administrative functions, and enhancements from expanded and opportunities. Empirical analyses of mergers indicate that combined entities often achieve higher asset relative to peers, with post-merger firms showing statistically significant improvements in operating in select cases. Financial synergies, including advantages and diversified streams, can further bolster cash flows, though these gains depend on effective and are not guaranteed. Despite these potentials, risks predominate in empirical outcomes, with studies estimating that 70-90% of amalgamations fail to deliver creation, often destroying wealth due to overpayment premiums and unforeseen integration expenses. Key hazards include cultural clashes leading to talent attrition, regulatory scrutiny delaying benefits or imposing divestitures, and heightened debt default risk from leveraged financing, as evidenced in analyses of thousands of deals showing no long-term outperformance for acquirers. exacerbates these issues, where optimistic projections overlook operational disruptions, resulting in eroded efficiencies over time. Resource reallocation post-amalgamation may also fail to boost aggregate productivity if exiting firms' assets are inefficiently redeployed. Notable examples illustrate varied outcomes. The 1998-1999 amalgamation of Exxon and formed , yielding annual cost synergies exceeding $8 billion by 2000 through streamlined refining and exploration operations, contributing to sustained profitability amid price . In contrast, the 2000 AOL-Time Warner merger exemplifies risks, with an initial $350 billion valuation leading to a $99 billion write-down by 2002 due to integration failures and dot-com bust synergies that never materialized, ultimately separating the entities in 2009. More recently, the 2019 merger of and created , achieving projected $1 billion in annual savings by 2022 via optimizations, though early performance was tempered by sector headwinds. These cases underscore that while amalgamations in concentrated industries like energy can realize efficiencies, conglomerate-style combinations often falter under mismatched strategic fit.

Social, Biological, and Racial Contexts

Historical Usage and Terminology in Sociology and Anthropology

In early 20th-century and , "amalgamation" referred specifically to the biological fusion of distinct racial or ethnic groups via intermarriage and procreation, producing offspring that blended genetic ancestries and potentially formed a new . This terminology emphasized physical and hereditary intermixing, distinguishing it from , which focused on cultural, linguistic, and social absorption into a dominant group without requiring genetic merger. The concept drew from observations of immigrant and , where proponents viewed amalgamation as a pathway to reducing ethnic divisions through generational dilution of traits, though empirical rates of such intermixing remained low due to social barriers like norms and legal restrictions on miscegenation. Anthropologist , in works from the onward, incorporated amalgamation into discussions of racial , arguing that interbreeding could erode perceived immutable differences by demonstrating how traits varied under environmental influences rather than fixed heredity. Boas critiqued rigid racial typologies, suggesting amalgamation would reveal as a malleable , with biological outcomes like increased populations in the U.S. South serving as evidence against essentialist views—yet he acknowledged that such mixing often reinforced hierarchies, as lighter-skinned offspring gained social advantages. In colonial anthropology, the term appeared in analyses of policies promoting interracial unions, such as in 19th-century under Governor , where systematic mixing aimed to assimilate with Europeans into a unified "amalgamated" loyal to the , though outcomes frequently perpetuated dominance rather than equality. Sociological usage gained prominence through empirical studies like Ruby Jo Reeves 's 1944 analysis of New Haven marriage records from 1870 to 1940, which documented interethnic unions but found negligible interracial amalgamation, instead revealing a "triple melting pot" stratified by Protestant, Catholic, and Jewish affiliations. Kennedy's data—showing Catholic-Protestant intermarriages rising to 20-30% by the 1930s within ethnic lines, but cross-racial rates under 1%—challenged optimistic melting-pot theories, indicating that religious and cultural persisted as stronger barriers than anticipated biological convergence. This work, published in the American Journal of Sociology, highlighted amalgamation's rarity in practice, attributing it to persistent group loyalties and societal pressures, thus refining terminology to underscore biological amalgamation as an ideal rather than inevitable outcome of . Later mid-century sociologists, building on Kennedy, retained the term in models of , contrasting it with (group separation) and expulsion, but noted its limited applicability amid rising pressures post-World War II.

Biological Mechanisms, Genetic Outcomes, and First-Principles Analysis

Admixture occurs through the fusion of genetic material from reproductively populations during and fertilization, resulting in whose genomes exhibit segments of ancestry from distinct continental origins. Human populations differ in frequencies due to historical , , , and founder effects, with (FST) values around 0.15 indicating moderate differentiation comparable to in other mammals. Ancestry informative markers (AIMs), characterized by frequency disparities exceeding 40% between groups such as Europeans and Africans, enable quantification of proportions via decay patterns. In first-generation hybrids, increased heterozygosity often yields heterosis, or hybrid vigor, by masking homozygous recessive deleterious alleles and enhancing traits like or , as observed in crosses between divergent strains. However, in humans, for broad heterosis from interracial remains limited and context-specific; for instance, studies in admixed populations report phenotypic improvements in height and , but these effects diminish across generations due to recombination. arises when disrupts co-adapted complexes—epistatic interactions locally optimized by selection—leading to maladaptive trait combinations, such as mismatched immune responses or metabolic inefficiencies. From first principles, genetic emerges from the alignment of frequencies with environmental pressures, where populations evolve modular adaptations (e.g., in Europeans or sickle-cell in Africans). Amalgamation introduces maladaptive alleles into non-native contexts—such as higher frequencies of hypertension-linked variants in African ancestry transferred to low-salt environments—potentially elevating disease susceptibility unless offset by novel beneficial recombinations. Over multiple generations, random mating erodes , redistributing alleles toward population averages, but persistent can homogenize variation, reducing the raw material for future selection and increasing vulnerability to uniform environmental shocks. Empirical data on multiracial individuals reveal elevated risks, including higher rates of and anxiety compared to monoracial peers, attributable partly to genetic factors like disrupted serotonin regulation amid identity stressors, though causal attribution requires disentangling social confounders. No systematic hybrid vigor advantage manifests in human physical health metrics across large-scale studies; instead, admixed genomes exhibit mosaic risks, with European-African hybrids showing intermediate but not uniformly superior profiles for conditions like or due to varying ancestry proportions. Causal realism dictates that biological success hinges on niche-specific optimization rather than diversity per se—outbreeding benefits wane with , as distant crosses exceed the optimal threshold, favoring within adaptively coherent clusters over indiscriminate mixing. Academic sources, often institutionally inclined toward egalitarian interpretations, underemphasize outbreeding costs, yet genomic data affirm that human racial clusters reflect real, heritable differences in fitness-relevant traits, rendering universal amalgamation neither empirically neutral nor predictably advantageous.

Empirical Societal Impacts, Controversies, and Critiques of Integration Narratives

on the societal effects of racial and ethnic , often resulting from amalgamation and policies, has consistently identified short-term declines in social and . In a comprehensive study of over 30,000 individuals across 41 U.S. communities, Robert Putnam found that higher ethnic correlates with lower generalized , reduced confidence in neighbors, and decreased participation in community activities, a termed "hunker down." This effect persists even within racial groups, suggesting erodes intra-group as well. Meta-analyses of subsequent studies across multiple countries confirm a negative association between ethnic and social , with effect sizes indicating moderate but robust impacts, particularly at local levels. Violent crime rates also show empirical links to ethnic heterogeneity. Global analyses reveal that higher ethnic fractionalization—measuring the probability that two randomly selected individuals belong to different groups—positively correlates with rates, independent of or in many models. For instance, cross-national data from over 140 countries demonstrate that diverse societies experience elevated interpersonal , attributed partly to weakened norms and enforcement in heterogeneous settings. Economic outcomes exhibit similar patterns; econometric reviews find ethnic diversity associated with slower GDP growth, with a one-standard-deviation increase in fractionalization linked to 1-2% lower annual growth rates, potentially due to reduced and in divided groups. Controversies arise from conflicting interpretations of causality and confounders. Proponents of integration narratives cite long-term assimilation evidence, such as Putnam's caveat that diversity may foster broader identities over generations, yet short-term data predominates in observations from rapidly diversifying nations like those in post-2010s waves. Critics highlight that controls for or often fail to fully eliminate negative diversity effects, as seen in neighborhood-level U.S. studies where diversity predicts higher even after adjusting for . Critiques of prevailing integration narratives emphasize their overreliance on optimistic assumptions amid contrary evidence. These narratives, often advanced in policy circles, posit as inherently strengthening societies, yet empirical patterns of parallel communities and identity retreat challenge this, particularly in contexts like and where integration metrics (e.g., employment gaps) stagnate despite decades of . Such views have faced scrutiny for methodological nationalism or ignoring group-level differences in cultural compatibility, with data suggesting homogeneous societies like maintain higher and lower without equivalent amalgamation pressures. While some studies report neutral or positive diversity effects in controlled economic experiments, broader observational data underscores risks of social fragmentation, prompting calls for realism over ideological promotion.

Mathematical and Scientific Contexts

Amalgamation in and

In , the amalgamation property (AP) for a variety of algebras \mathcal{V} stipulates that for any algebras A, B_0, B_1 \in \mathcal{V} and embeddings f_i: A \hookrightarrow B_i (i=0,1), there exists an algebra C \in \mathcal{V} together with embeddings g_i: B_i \hookrightarrow C (i=0,1) such that g_0 \circ f_0 = g_1 \circ f_1. This property, generalized from to arbitrary algebras by Roland Fraïssé in 1954, facilitates the construction of free products and injective hulls within the variety, and it holds for varieties satisfying specific Mal'cev conditions, such as those permitting a term d(x,y,z) where d(x,x,y) \cong y and d(x,y,y) \cong x. Examples include the variety of groups, which amalgamates via free products, and varieties defined by basic equations, where AP follows from permutability of congruences. Conversely, not all varieties possess AP; for instance, certain quasivarieties of semigroups fail it due to non-cancellative issues. In , the AP applies to classes of relational structures and is defined analogously: a class \mathcal{K} of L-structures has AP if for any A, B_1, B_2 \in \mathcal{K} and embeddings f_i: A \hookrightarrow B_i (i=1,2), there exist D \in \mathcal{K} and embeddings g_i: B_i \hookrightarrow D such that g_1 \circ f_1 = g_2 \circ f_2. This , pivotal since Fraïssé's 1953 work on homogeneous structures, combines with the joint embedding to yield the Fraïssé —a unique countable, homogeneous, ultrahomogeneous model that is universal for \mathcal{K} and exists precisely when \mathcal{K} is a Fraïssé class. Theories with AP often exhibit quantifier elimination or homogeneity in their models; for example, the theory of dense linear orders without endpoints has AP, enabling the rational line \mathbb{Q} as its Fraïssé . Extensions include strict variants like the strict amalgamation (where the amalgam embedding is proper) and higher amalgamation for classifying unstable theories. The interplay between universal algebra and model theory manifests in the study of universal classes—hereditary classes closed under directed unions—with AP, which admit model-theoretic treatments akin to first-order theories, including notions of saturation and elementary embeddings. Such classes underpin algebraic model theory, where AP ensures embeddability and homogeneity, as in the case of representable relation algebras or certain lattice varieties. Weak forms of AP, like flat or n-amalgamation, relax the embedding conditions to address finite model properties or reducts, proving AP equivalent to finite amalgamation in primitive combinatorial theories.

Applications in Category Theory and Logic

The amalgamation property in , a cornerstone of structural analysis in , posits that for a \mathcal{K} of structures, given any A, B, C \in \mathcal{K} with embeddings f: A \hookrightarrow B and g: A \hookrightarrow C, there exists D \in \mathcal{K} and embeddings h: B \hookrightarrow D, k: C \hookrightarrow D such that h \circ f = k \circ g. This property underpins the construction of Fraïssé limits for relational structures satisfying hereditary property, joint embedding property, and amalgamation, yielding countable ultrahomogeneous models like the or the rational order. In abstract elementary es, amalgamation, paired with \aleph_0-stability and no maximal models, implies frame categoricity via Shelah's theorems, enabling precise control over isomorphism types in uncountable cardinalities. Stronger variants, such as the strong amalgamation property (), require that the intersection of images in D equals the image of A, excluding extraneous identifications; this holds for varieties axiomatized by basic equations without constants, facilitating congruence extension and permitting embeddings. Applications extend to positive model theory, where amalgamation bases represent optimal models of h-inductive theories, preserving existential closure and enabling inductive definitions in and . In simple theories, generalized amalgamation characterizes , distinguishing stable-like behavior from chaos, as explored in extensions beyond . In , amalgamation manifests as the capacity to complete spans Y_1 \leftarrow X \to Y_2 to squares via pushouts, a condition equivalent to under amalgamated colimits in certain algebraic categories. This property governs amalgamated products, such as free products of groups over subgroups or coproducts in varieties, underpinning universal constructions like codescent objects and data in fibered categories. For instance, categories of ordered abelian groups with automorphisms exhibit amalgamation, implying (non-independence property) for their inductive theories and enabling model-theoretic tameness in geometric contexts. Intersections with logic arise in , where amalgamation in residuated lattices or Maltsev varieties supports logical inference systems and constraint algebras, with strong amalgamation into unions (SAPU) preserving relational axioms like in amalgamated theories.

References

  1. [1]
    Amalgam Definition and Uses (Chemistry) - Science Notes
    Sep 19, 2020 · In chemistry, an amalgam is a mercury alloy and amalgamation is the process of forming a mercury alloy. Amalgams readily form between ...
  2. [2]
    Amalgam - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    Originating c.1400 from Old French and Medieval Latin, amalgam means a mercury alloy; figuratively, since 1790, it denotes a blend of diverse elements.
  3. [3]
    Amalgamation: Definition, Pros and Cons, vs. Merger & Acquisition
    An amalgamation is the combination of two or more companies into an entirely new entity. Amalgamations are distinct from acquisitions.What Is an Amalgamation? · How It Works · Pros and Cons · Example
  4. [4]
    What is Amalgamation? - Business Combination Methods & Examples
    In corporate finance, an amalgamation is the combination of two or more companies into a larger single company.What is Amalgamation? · What is the legal process of...
  5. [5]
    AMALGAMATION Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
    Amalgamation refers to a blending of cultures, rather than one group eliminating another (acculturation) or one group mixing itself into another (assimilation).
  6. [6]
    Amalgamation in Sociology | Overview, Definition & Theory
    Amalgamation, in Sociology, is the mixing of a minority and a majority culture to create an entirely new one. Also known as the melting pot theory.<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Mercury Amalgams - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Mercury amalgams are alloys formed by the reaction of zero valent mercury with other metals, especially gold and silver, for which they have high affinity [35].
  8. [8]
    What is the chemistry behind amalgamation? - ECHEMI
    An amalgam is an alloy of a metal with mercury, a solid solution that disrupts metal bonding. The mixture is not a reaction, but a mixture.
  9. [9]
    Mercury Alloys - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    A mercury alloy is defined as a metal amalgam primarily composed of mercury ... chemical properties and crystal structure are different from the parent metals.
  10. [10]
    The Use of Mercury Amalgamation in Gold and Silver Mining
    Mercury amalgamation is used to concentrate precious metals, a technique dating back to the Phoenicians and Carthaginians, and used by Romans around 50 A.D.
  11. [11]
    [PDF] The Extraction of Gold by Amalgamation and Chlorination
    The process of amalgamation of gold and silver by mercury (quicksilver) had been known for centuries. The Romans knew that gold would amalgamate with mercury.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] The Recovery of Gold From Its Ores - Idaho Geological Survey
    The amalgamation process is one of the oldest known methods of gold re- covery. It is mentioned by Pliny in his "Natural History" and descriptions of.
  13. [13]
    Bartolome de Medina - Mining and Minerals Education Foundation
    Armed with this knowledge, he left for Pachuca, New Spain (Mexico) in 1554 and established a model patio refinery to test the effectiveness of this new ...
  14. [14]
    Colonial Silver Mining: Mexico and Peru - Duke University Press
    Nov 1, 1972 · The situation was transformed in 1554 when at Pachuca Bartolomé de Medina, a merchant from Seville, developed the amalgamation process by use of ...
  15. [15]
    Mercury Production and Use in Colonial Andean Silver Production
    With a local source of mercury, the amalgamation process was adopted to refine silver in Potosí, Bolivia, in the early 1570s. As a result, large quantities of ...<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    Pan Amalgamation and Variations - Manhattan Gold & Silver
    Jun 11, 2014 · In order to speed up the process, Alvaro Alonso Barba invented the pa process, or pan amalgamation in the early 17th century. Instead of mixing ...
  17. [17]
    Summary of Mercury Amalgamation Gold Extraction Process
    Jan 4, 2020 · It is mainly used to extract part of free gold. Especially when the dissemination size of gold is fine, it can use this method for gold ...
  18. [18]
    What Factors Determine Gold Amalgamation Recovery Rate?
    Nov 15, 2023 · Gold amalgamation is a method of extracting gold from its ores by mixing it with mercury. It is an ancient gold separate method.
  19. [19]
    Amalgamation Process of Gold - 911Metallurgist
    Jul 27, 2016 · The amalgamation process, which has been widely used in a variety of forms from earliest times, depends upon the wetting and alloying of metallic gold and ...Gold Amalgamation Process... · Direct Gold Amalgamation · Use of Chemicals
  20. [20]
    Gold Amalgamation Equipment - 911Metallurgist
    Jun 17, 2016 · Amalgamation Barrel is used for batch grinding of gold concentrates and industrial materials. Originally it was developed for the gold milling ...Missing: applications | Show results with:applications
  21. [21]
    Use of Metallic Mercury in Artisanal Gold Mining by Amalgamation
    It is a highly valuable metal and has been much sought after as a symbol of prosperity, wealth, and, above all, an asset since the Bronze Age [46]. Even today, ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Reducing mercury use in artisanal and small-scale gold mining
    Whole ore amalgamation can be eliminated in most cases by moving to a system that first produces a concentrate that can recover equal or higher amounts of gold ...
  23. [23]
    Comparison of Gold Yield with Traditional Amalgamation and Direct ...
    Nov 27, 2019 · The amalgamation method used by artisanal small-scale miners is the single largest source of global mercury emission.<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    Anyone Else Use Amalgamation to Select Gold? - JXSC Machine
    Apr 11, 2022 · Amalgamation is widely used to separate gold and heavy sand minerals in placer gold mines; In vein gold mines, amalgamation is usually used as a ...Missing: applications | Show results with:applications
  25. [25]
    Artisanal and Small Scale Gold Mining (ASGM) - Zero Mercury
    Whole Ore amalgamation. In this process, mercury is added to a large amount of ore during crushing or sluicing, with little or no prior concentration. This is ...
  26. [26]
    Dental Amalgam - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The modern amalgam consists of a metallic alloy (silver, tin, and copper, sometimes with small amounts of zinc, indium, and/or palladium) mixed with mercury.
  27. [27]
    A Note on Dental Amalgam and its Properties - Walsh Medical Media
    Dental amalgam is made by mixing liquid mercury with an alloy of solid particles of silver, tin and copper. Some alloys may contain small amounts of zinc, ...
  28. [28]
    White Paper: FDA Update/Review of Potential Adverse Health Risks
    Oct 28, 2021 · Dental amalgam is a restorative material that contains approximately 50% mercury in the elemental form. Mercury vapor is released from amalgam ...Missing: composition | Show results with:composition
  29. [29]
    Dental amalgam: An update - PMC - NIH
    They found that mixing gallium with either nickel or copper and tin produced a pliable mass that could be condensed into a prepared cavity, which, after setting ...Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
  30. [30]
    Dental Amalgam Fillings - FDA
    Feb 18, 2021 · The chemical properties of elemental mercury allow it to react with and bind together the silver/copper/tin alloy particles to form an amalgam.What should I know before... · Potential Risks · Why is mercury used in dental...
  31. [31]
    Amalgam Placement, Carving, Finishing, and Polishing
    Feb 11, 2020 · 1. Use an explorer to carve the amalgam adjacent to the matrix band forming the occlusal embrasure. Keep the tip of the explorer against the ...
  32. [32]
    Class II Amalgam Restoration - My Dental Key
    Open the amalgam capsule and place the triturated amalgam into an amalgam well or onto a clean, circular cloth. Caution: do not touch amalgam with bare ...
  33. [33]
    Amalgam | American Dental Association
    Jun 21, 2023 · Use of a dental dam when placing or removing amalgam may have some utility in reducing mercury exposure, but the data on this are limited and ...
  34. [34]
    Is it the end of the road for dental amalgam? A critical review - PMC
    Over its long clinical history, dental amalgam has evolved, and current clinical restorations represent an effective low cost dental restorative treatment, ...
  35. [35]
    Use of dental amalgam restorations in the U.S. plummeted 80 percent
    Sep 12, 2024 · Between 2017 and 2023, dental amalgam restoration placements in US patients US plummeted by about 80%, according to a study published on September 6.
  36. [36]
    Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent ...
    Aug 13, 2021 · The evidence suggests that amalgam restorations are effective, enduring, and safe, while composite resin restorations are more likely to fail and lead to ...
  37. [37]
    Longevity of Amalgam Versus Composite Resin Restorations ... - NIH
    Jul 27, 2025 · Amalgam restorations exhibited superior longevity, with median survival times exceeding 16 years, compared to 11 years for composite ...
  38. [38]
    Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite ...
    The survival rate of the amalgam restorations was 94.4 percent; that of composite restorations was 85.5 percent. Annual failure rates ranged from 0.16 to 2.83 ...<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    The war between amalgam and composite: A critical review
    Amalgam offers certain advantages of low cost, high survival rate, high compressive strength, better tolerance to masticatory forces, excellent wear resistance, ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Longevity of Amalgam Versus Composite Resin Restorations in ...
    Jul 27, 2025 · Findings of the present systematic review highlight the superior longevity of amalgam restorations compared to composite resin restorations in ...
  41. [41]
    Survival Rates of Amalgam and Composite Resin Restorations from ...
    This study indicates that composite is superior to amalgam and therefore it is reasonable to cease using mercury-containing amalgam.Missing: composition | Show results with:composition
  42. [42]
    Low-quality evidence suggests that amalgam has increased ...
    Posterior resin-based composite restorations had decreased longevity and a greater incidence of secondary caries compared with amalgam restorations.
  43. [43]
    The Dental Amalgam Toxicity Fear: A Myth or Actuality - PMC - NIH
    Researchers agree that amalgam restorations leach mercury into the mouth, but consistent findings are not available to report whether it has any significant ...
  44. [44]
    Mercury in dental amalgam: a risk analysis - ScienceDirect.com
    Mercury is a highly potent cell toxin with effects on human and animal nervous systems. Mercury vapour released from dental amalgam is the predominant source of ...
  45. [45]
    Health effects of dental amalgam exposure: a retrospective cohort ...
    Allegations have particularly involved nervous system disorders, such as multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, and chronic fatigue syndrome.
  46. [46]
    Amalgam exposure and neurological function - PubMed
    No significant associations were found between amalgam exposure and clinical neurological signs of abnormal tremor, coordination, station or gait.
  47. [47]
    Neurotoxic effects of mercury exposure in dental personnel
    Dec 27, 2018 · Numerous studies have reported neurobehavioural effects in dental personnel occupationally exposed to chronic low levels of mercury (Hg).
  48. [48]
    Dental amalgam - Product Classification - FDA
    Product Classification ; Dental amalgam is a device that consists of a metallic alloy, such as silver, tin, copper, and zinc, that is mixed with liquid elemental ...
  49. [49]
    FDA Petition for Reconsideration 2025 - Ban Mercury Amalgam ...
    Aug 23, 2025 · FDA declined to restrict the use of dental amalgam in any meaningful way, failed to place mercury fillings in Class III, and failed to make ...
  50. [50]
    Safety of Dental Amalgam - IADR
    Jun 27, 2025 · IADR affirms the safety of dental amalgam for the general population without allergies to amalgam components or severe renal diseases.
  51. [51]
    Failure Risk of Composite Resin and Amalgam Restorations
    Two meta-analyses conducted in 2015 and 2021 have shown a higher failure rate for composite resin restorations compared to amalgam restorations. Despite the ...
  52. [52]
    Revision of Regulation (EU) 2017/852 on mercury | Legislative Train ...
    The co-legislators agreed to phase out the use of dental amalgam in the EU from 1 January 2025 except if deemed strictly necessary by the dental ...
  53. [53]
  54. [54]
    Corporate Amalgamation Briefly Explained - HC LLP
    Aug 23, 2024 · Amalgamation, or corporate merger, refers to two or more taxable corporations forming a new corporation through a compliant merger.
  55. [55]
    Amalgamation in Law: Meaning, Process, Benefits and Challenges
    Sep 10, 2025 · The term amalgamation refers to the combination of two or more companies into a new entity or the merger of one company into another. In essence ...
  56. [56]
    Merger vs Amalgamation: Key Differences Explained - CFO Bridge
    Aug 17, 2024 · A merger occurs when one company absorbs another, with one losing its identity, while an amalgamation is the combination of two or more ...
  57. [57]
    Spot the Difference: Mergers and Amalgamations in Corporate ...
    Mar 2, 2022 · In Canada, an amalgamation combines corporations, where both continue as one, while in the U.S., a merger has one corporation cease to exist.
  58. [58]
    Difference Between Amalgamation and Merger & Infographics
    Dec 10, 2018 · Amalgamation results in the formation of an entirely new company. However, a merger is a consolidation process wherein the resultant company may ...
  59. [59]
    Difference between Merger Acquisition and Amalgamation
    Sep 27, 2023 · Mergers are generally driven by the absorbing company only. Acquisition is mostly driven by the buyer company and with or without even the ...
  60. [60]
    Merger vs. Acquisition - Difference, Definitions
    Mergers and acquisitions both refer to the joining of two or more business entities that entail a restructuring of their corporate order.What is a Merger vs Acquisition? · What is a Merger? · What is an Acquisition?
  61. [61]
    Section 2(1B): The Hidden Definition of 'Amalgamation' That ...
    Section 2(1B) of Income Tax Act means the merger of either one or more companies with another company, forming the legal definition of amalgamation.<|separator|>
  62. [62]
    Guernsey Company Law Series -​ Guide to amalgamating or ...
    Jan 6, 2025 · The Law provides a modern, simple and flexible amalgamation regime for two or more bodies corporate to amalgamate and continue as one body corporate.
  63. [63]
    Scheme of Amalgamation: Key Components, Process & Legal Aspects
    Mar 11, 2025 · A Scheme of Amalgamation is a formal, structured plan outlining the process by which two or more companies merge to form a single entity.
  64. [64]
    Distinguishing Amalgamation, Absorption, and Reconstruction in ...
    Apr 23, 2024 · Legal and regulatory framework 🔗​​ Amalgamation requires approval from regulatory authorities and often involves complex legal procedures to ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Summary of Legal Aspects of Mergers, Consolidations, and ...
    A merger essentially involves one corporation becoming part of another “surviving” corporation; all assets, liabilities, and activities of the merging ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] US GAAP vs. IFRS: Business combinations | RSM US
    US GAAP and IFRS differ in defining control, business definition, pushdown accounting, and accounting for acquired operating leases and contingencies.
  67. [67]
    Accounting after the acquisition date | Grant Thornton insights
    Feb 20, 2025 · An acquirer shall measure and account for assets acquired, liabilities assumed or incurred, and equity instruments issued in a business combination.
  68. [68]
    Business combinations under common control - KPMG International
    Aug 27, 2021 · Under US GAAP, the receiving company always uses the book-value method when accounting for business combinations under common control. Unlike US ...
  69. [69]
    13.9 Combinations involving entities under common control
    US GAAP has specific rules for common control transactions, while IFRS excludes them. Generally, these combinations are recorded at historical cost, reflecting ...
  70. [70]
    [PDF] A guide to accounting for business combinations | RSM US
    Jul 1, 2023 · This guide covers the purpose of accounting for business combinations, definition, key steps, and scope of transactions affected by ASC 805.<|separator|>
  71. [71]
    How Economic Shocks Affect Merger Outcomes
    Oct 15, 2024 · Merging with rival firms can reduce competition, lower operational costs and expand existing markets, allowing companies to grow or at least ...Missing: amalgamation | Show results with:amalgamation
  72. [72]
    The economic geographies of mergers and acquisitions (M&As) - PMC
    This is because they allow firms to enter new markets, reach new consumers, create financial synergies and acquire new assets, talent and knowledge (Rompotis, ...Missing: amalgamation | Show results with:amalgamation
  73. [73]
    [PDF] Does corporate performance improve after mergers? - DSpace@MIT
    The results indicate that merged firms have significant improvements in asset productivity relative to their industries after the merger, leading to higher post ...Missing: amalgamation | Show results with:amalgamation
  74. [74]
    (PDF) The Impact of Merger and Acquisition on Value Creation
    The outcome of the study signs that mergers create positive value for post merger acquiring firms, and lagged synergy influences future synergies positively.
  75. [75]
    10 potential risks of mergers and acquisitions - Finance Alliance
    Oct 15, 2025 · 70 to 90% of mergers fail. To make sure your M&A is a success, here's how you can prepare for 10 common risks of mergers and acquisitions.
  76. [76]
    Mergers and Acquisitions: Value Creation or Destruction?
    However, empirical evidence reveals a persistent tension between value creation and destruction outcomes, with failure rates historically ranging between 70% ...
  77. [77]
    Corporate mergers and acquisitions: A strategic approach to ...
    Abstract. This study investigates the influence of corporate mergers and acquisitions on debt default risk by analyzing a dataset of 14,990 A-share listed ...Missing: amalgamation | Show results with:amalgamation
  78. [78]
    [PDF] Impact of Mergers and Acquisitions on Long-Term Value Creation
    Jun 13, 2025 · The study found no significant long-term performance difference between firms in the seventh merger wave and those in the fifth or sixth waves.
  79. [79]
    Trends and Risks in Mergers and Acquisitions: A Review - MDPI
    This analysis identifies four key M&A risk areas: (1) information asymmetry and emerging technologies, (2) performance and corporate reputation, (3) litigation, ...
  80. [80]
    impact of mergers on aggregate productivity: an empirical analysis ...
    Sep 18, 2025 · This study examines the impact of mergers on aggregate productivity by focusing on the reallocation of resources from firms exiting through ...Missing: amalgamation | Show results with:amalgamation
  81. [81]
    The 5 Biggest Mergers in History - Investopedia
    Jan 16, 2025 · America Online and Time Warner · Dow Chemical and DuPont · Anheuser-Busch InBev and SABMiller · H. J. Heinz and Kraft Foods · Exxon and Mobil · What ...
  82. [82]
    Mergers and acquisitions examples: Major deals from the past 7 years
    Jul 10, 2024 · Major M&A examples include ChemChina and Sinochem ($120B), United Technologies and Raytheon ($135B), Unilever plc and Unilever N.V. ($81B), and ...
  83. [83]
    35 Biggest Mergers and Acquisitions in History (Top M&A Examples)
    For example, a company called Haleon was created through a merger of GlaxoSmithKline's (GSK) and Pfizer's consumer healthcare businesses in 2019, with both GSK ...
  84. [84]
    [PDF] Assimilation and Amalgamation
    While assimilation means a social and cultural merging, amalgamation refers to the biological merging of an ethnic or a racial group with the native population.
  85. [85]
    [PDF] Race and Ethnicity
    Amalgamation is similar to assimilation in that a strong, unified national culture is viewed as the desired end result but differs because it represents a more ...
  86. [86]
    6.2: Intergroup Relations - Social Sci LibreTexts
    Jul 13, 2023 · Assimilation appears as another favorable intergroup consequence; however, it can also be argued that assimilation serves to deny one's ethnic ...<|separator|>
  87. [87]
    Race from Boas to the biocultural synthesis: A critical history of ...
    Jun 9, 2024 · Race “amalgamation,” as Boas recognized himself, would result in the influx of white “blood” into the black population, and a relatively small ...
  88. [88]
    The Racist Anti‐Racism of American Anthropology - AnthroSource
    Nov 2, 2021 · Boas's call for Negro amalgamation was a direct assault on race-antipathy; it is what we would call engaging in anti-racism today. However, his ...
  89. [89]
    The Experiment of Racial Amalgamation
    In its first two decades of colonial rule, New Zealand became a testing ground for the strategy and policies of 'racial amalgamation'.
  90. [90]
    The Triple Melting Pot: – Commentary Magazine
    In the early 1940's, Ruby Jo Kennedy undertook an investigation of intermarriage trends in New Haven from 1870 to 1940. She published her findings in the ...
  91. [91]
    Intergroup Relationships - OpenEd CUNY
    In assimilation, groups conform to the identity of the dominant group. In amalgamation, groups combine to form a new group identity. Section Quiz. Which ...
  92. [92]
    Measurement of admixture proportions and ... - PubMed Central
    These markers typically have high allele frequency differences between European and African populations as well as between EA and AA, and in some cases ...
  93. [93]
    The quagmire of race, genetic ancestry, and health disparities - JCI
    Jun 1, 2021 · Variation in prevalence of both common and Mendelian disease among populations can be due to differences in risk allele frequencies caused by ...
  94. [94]
    Race and genetics versus 'race' in genetics: A systematic review of ...
    However, biological and genetic are not equivalent terms as biological impact does not necessarily occur through a genetic mechanism.
  95. [95]
    Unraveling the genetic basis of hybrid vigor - PMC - NIH
    Aug 29, 2006 · Hybrid vigor, or heterosis, is the increase in stature, biomass, and fertility that characterizes the progeny of crosses between diverse parents.
  96. [96]
    (PDF) Hybrid Marriages and Phenotypic Heterosis in Offspring
    Feb 18, 2018 · PDF | In genetics, heterosis refers to the phenomenon that cross-breeding within species leads to offspring that are genetically fitter than ...
  97. [97]
    evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for ...
    Jan 24, 2007 · Outbreeding effects​​ Interpopulation hybridization sometimes results in an increase in fitness termed heterosis or hybrid vigour. This is the ...Missing: outcomes vigor
  98. [98]
    The influence of evolutionary history on human health and disease
    Jan 6, 2021 · Demographic events such as bottlenecks, introgression and population expansion shaped the genetic composition of human populations, whereas ...
  99. [99]
    Mental health outcomes of multiracial individuals: A systematic ...
    Feb 15, 2024 · Multiracial individuals tended to have worse mental health outcomes compared to their monoracial counterparts, with notable variations depending on the ...
  100. [100]
    Balancing Inbreeding and Outbreeding Risks to Inform ...
    Mar 23, 2025 · We found strong population structure and large differences in genetic diversity and effective population sizes across drainages.
  101. [101]
    Mental health differences between multiracial and monoracial ...
    Nov 17, 2022 · Multiracial young adult college students were more likely to have mental health problems than their monoracial counterparts.<|separator|>
  102. [102]
    The Downside of Diversity
    A Harvard political scientist finds that diversity hurts civic life. What happens when a liberal scholar unearths an inconvenient truth?
  103. [103]
    Ethnic Diversity and Social Trust: A Narrative and Meta-Analytical ...
    May 11, 2020 · This article reviews the literature on the relationship between ethnic diversity and social trust through a narrative review and a meta-analysis ...
  104. [104]
    [PDF] Does ethnic diversity increase violent crime? A global analysis of ...
    This means that as a society approaches greater homogeneity, or becomes more polarized, homicides increase.
  105. [105]
    Ethnic Diversity and Growth: Revisiting the Evidence - MIT Press Direct
    Jul 8, 2021 · The relationship between ethnic heterogeneity and economic growth is complex. Empirical research working with cross-country data finds a negative, or ...
  106. [106]
    Racially diverse neighborhoods in diverse areas are linked to lower ...
    Apr 1, 2022 · Many studies have found that racial diversity is associated with more crime in neighborhoods.
  107. [107]
    [PDF] Multiculturalism: Success, Failure, and the Future
    The data suggest that there is no inherent incompatibility between multiculturalism and civic integration, and this combination has indeed been central to ...
  108. [108]
    [PDF] Accommodating diversity: why current critiques of multiculturalism ...
    Abstract. Some European countries of immigration are currently experiencing a widespread 'moral panic' about immigrants and ethnic and religious diversity.
  109. [109]
    economic value of cultural diversity: evidence from US cities
    We argue that, in equilibrium, these correlations are consistent with a net positive effect of cultural diversity on the productivity of natives.<|control11|><|separator|>
  110. [110]
    [PDF] Amalgamation classes of some distributive varieties
    In its general form, the amalgamation property for :JC asserts that for any structures A, B0, B1 E :JC and embeddings a, of A into B, (i = 0, 1), there is a CE ...
  111. [111]
    [PDF] Amalgamation in varieties of Algebra - Open UCT
    Mar 3, 2016 · This property of groups, known as the amalgamation property was generalized to a universal-algebraic setting by R. Fralsse in 1954, and the.<|separator|>
  112. [112]
  113. [113]
    Inverse semigroup varieties with the amalgamation property ...
    Hall, T.E. Inverse semigroup varieties with the amalgamation property. Semigroup Forum 16, 37–51 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02194612. Download ...
  114. [114]
    amalgamation property - PlanetMath.org
    Mar 22, 2013 · A class of L L -structures S S has the amalgamation property if and only if whenever A,B1,B2∈S A , B 1 , B 2 ∈ S and fi:A→Bi f i : A → B i ...
  115. [115]
    amalgamation property in nLab
    May 6, 2023 · A class of structures has the amalgamation property if for any three structures A, B, C and embeddings fB:A ↪ B, fC:A ↪ C, there exist ...
  116. [116]
    Model theory for universal classes with the amalgamation property
    In this paper a complete model theory is constructed for classes of algebras and relational structures satisfying certain natural algebraic conditions.
  117. [117]
    Positive Model Theory and Amalgamations - Project Euclid
    A theory is said to have the amalgamation property if each model of T is an amal- gamation basis. ... An h-inductive theory that has the amalgamation property is ...
  118. [118]
    Semilattice modes II: the amalgamation property | Algebra universalis
    LetV be a variety of semilattice modes with associated semiringR. We prove that ifR is a bounded distributive lattice, thenV has the amalgamation property.
  119. [119]
    [PDF] Amalgamation and the finite model property - Alex Kruckman
    Mar 25, 2015 · A primitive combinatorial theory has the finite model property if and only if it has n-amalgamation for all n. Problem: Reducts. There are ...
  120. [120]
    The strong amalgamation property into union
    ### Summary of Amalgamation Property (AP) and SAPU from arXiv:2103.00563
  121. [121]
  122. [122]
    [PDF] CATEGORICITY AND AMALGAMATION FOR AEC, AND κ ...
    The amalgamation property holds for theories in first-order logic [CK73] and in Lκ,κ when κ is a strongly compact cardinal (see e.g. [MS90]: although ≺Lκ,κ ...
  123. [123]
    [PDF] Positive model theory and amalgamations - HAL
    Oct 28, 2012 · The models of an h-inductive theory that are amalgamation bases are those that represent best this theory. In our context, the positively ...
  124. [124]
    [PDF] GENERALIZED AMALGAMATION IN SIMPLE THEORIES AND ...
    The main topic of this part is investigation of generalized amalgamation properties for simple theories. Namely, we are trying to answer the question of when ...
  125. [125]
    [PDF] the strong amalgamation property and (effective) codescent ...
    Namely, the amalgamation (transferability; congruence extension) property is equivalent to the requirement that the class M be stable under pushouts along M- ...
  126. [126]
    (PDF) Amalgamations of Categories - ResearchGate
    Aug 6, 2025 · ... Categorically, the amalgamation of categories (with the same objects) has a universal property as a pushout of (identity-on-objects) ...