Angioedema is a medical condition characterized by the rapid onset of non-pitting swelling in the deeper layers of the skin (dermis and subcutaneous tissue) or mucous membranes, often affecting the face, lips, tongue, eyelids, hands, feet, and genitalia, due to increased vascular permeability and fluid leakage into surrounding tissues.[1][2] This swelling can occur with or without accompanying hives (urticaria) and is typically asymmetric and self-limited, resolving within 72 hours, though it may recur episodically.[3] Unlike superficial hives, angioedema involves deeper tissues and may cause discomfort, pain, or warmth rather than intense itching.[4] It affects approximately 10-20% of the population at least once in their lifetime, and a higher incidence of ACE inhibitor-induced angioedema in individuals of African descent.[2]Angioedema is classified into several types based on etiology and underlying mechanisms, broadly divided into histaminergic (mast cell-mediated, often allergic) and non-histaminergic (bradykinin-mediated) forms.[1] Histaminergic angioedema is commonly triggered by allergens such as foods (e.g., shellfish, nuts), medications (e.g., penicillin, NSAIDs), insect stings, or infections, and accounts for many acute cases.[3] Non-histaminergic types include hereditary angioedema (HAE types I–III), with types I and II caused by mutations in the SERPING1 gene leading to C1-inhibitor deficiency or dysfunction, and type III with normal C1-inhibitor levels due to mutations in other genes such as F12, affecting about 1 in 50,000 people and often presenting in childhood or adolescence; acquired angioedema (AAE), linked to lymphoproliferative disorders or autoantibodies; and drug-induced forms, notably from angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, which impair bradykinin breakdown and cause 0.1-0.7% of users to develop swelling.[1][2][5] Idiopathic angioedema, where no trigger is identified, comprises over 40% of cases and may be chronic if recurring beyond six weeks.[2]Symptoms typically develop abruptly over minutes to hours and include localized swelling that feels firm or rubbery, with possible abdominal pain, nausea, or diarrhea if the gastrointestinal tract is involved, particularly in bradykinin-mediated types.[1] Laryngeal or airway involvement, which affects up to 50% of individuals with HAE at least once in their lifetime, poses a significant risk of asphyxiation and requires immediate medicalintervention.[2][6]Diagnosis relies on clinical history, exclusion of other causes, and laboratory tests such as C4 levels (low in HAE/AAE), C1-inhibitor function, and serum tryptase (elevated in allergic reactions).[1]Treatment varies by type: antihistamines and epinephrine for histaminergic episodes, while bradykinin-mediated cases may require targeted therapies like C1-inhibitor concentrates, bradykinin receptor antagonists (e.g., icatibant), or kallikrein inhibitors (e.g., ecallantide), with long-term prophylaxis using attenuated androgens or regular C1-inhibitor infusions for HAE.[1] Early recognition and trigger avoidance are crucial, as untreated severe episodes can be fatal, though most cases resolve without long-term sequelae.[2]
Definition and Classification
Definition
Angioedema is defined as a circumscribed, non-pitting edema involving the subcutaneous and/or submucosal tissues, arising from increased vascular permeability that leads to fluid leakage from blood vessels into surrounding tissues, predominantly affecting deeper dermal layers.[1] This swelling typically develops rapidly and can occur in isolation or alongside other allergic manifestations.[3]In contrast to urticaria (hives), which primarily affects superficial skin layers and is characterized by pruritic, raised welts, angioedema involves deeper structures and often produces a sensation of pressure or pain rather than itching.[3][4] The absence of pruritus helps differentiate it clinically, though the two conditions may coexist in some cases.[1]Commonly affected areas include the face, lips, tongue, extremities, genitals, and gastrointestinal tract, with potential extension to visceral organs.[1] Episodes of angioedema usually resolve spontaneously within 1 to 3 days without treatment.[1] However, swelling in the larynx or airway can obstruct breathing, posing a risk of life-threatening asphyxiation.[3] Angioedema is broadly classified into histamine-mediated and bradykinin-mediated types based on underlying mechanisms.[1]
Types
Angioedema is broadly classified into histamine-mediated and bradykinin-mediated forms based on underlying etiologic mechanisms, with additional categories including idiopathic cases and rare variants.[1] This classification guides clinical evaluation by distinguishing those responsive to antihistamines from those requiring targeted therapies for bradykinin pathways.[7] Histamine-mediated angioedema arises from mast celldegranulation and is the most common type, often presenting acutely.[8]Histamine-mediated angioedema encompasses allergic subtypes, which are IgE-dependent and triggered by exposure to allergens such as certain foods, medications, or insect stings.[8] In allergic cases, it frequently overlaps with urticaria, forming the urticaria-angioedema syndrome characterized by superficial hives alongside deeper swelling.[9] Non-allergic or pseudoallergic forms occur without IgE involvement, resulting from direct mast cell activation by agents like nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or opioids.[1]Bradykinin-mediated angioedema involves dysregulation of the kallikrein-kinin system, leading to nonpruritic, nonpitting swelling that spares the skin surface.[1]Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is an autosomal dominant disorder with three main subtypes: type I, accounting for about 85% of cases, features low levels and function of C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH); type II involves normal or elevated C1-INH levels but reduced function due to dysfunctional protein; and type III, rarer and often estrogen-dependent, shows normal C1-INH levels and is linked to mutations in genes such as F12 (factor XII), ANGPT1 (angiopoietin-1), and PLG (plasminogen). As of 2025, classification of HAE with normal C1-INH continues to evolve with identification of additional genetic variants and some controversy in mechanistic groupings.[1][10][11] Acquired angioedema (AAE) mimics HAE but develops later in life due to acquired C1-INH deficiency or dysfunction; type I is typically associated with underlying lymphoproliferative disorders such as B-cell lymphomas, while type II involves autoantibodies against C1-INH often linked to autoimmune diseases.[12][13] Drug-induced bradykinin-mediated angioedema commonly results from angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, which impair bradykinin degradation and affect 0.1-0.7% of users.[1][14]Idiopathic angioedema refers to recurrent episodes without an identifiable trigger or underlying cause, comprising both histaminergic (responsive to antihistamines) and non-histaminergic (potentially bradykinin-related) variants.[7] It accounts for a significant portion of chronic cases where extensive evaluation yields no etiology.[15]Rare forms include vibratory angioedema, a physical urticaria variant triggered by sustained skinvibration, such as from jogging or machinery use, leading to localized swelling within minutes.[16] Another uncommon entity is episodic angioedema with eosinophilia, also known as Gleich syndrome, characterized by cyclic episodes of angioedema, fever, and marked blood eosinophilia occurring every 3-4 weeks without identifiable allergens.[17]
Clinical Presentation
Signs and Symptoms
Angioedema manifests as non-pitting, asymmetric swelling that typically evolves over several hours to a peak within 24 hours, often affecting the face, lips, tongue, extremities, genitalia, and occasionally the gastrointestinal tract.[1][18] The swelling is subcutaneous or submucosal, leading to a firm, doughy texture that resolves spontaneously over 1 to 3 days without treatment in most cases.[1]Patients usually experience pain, tightness, or a burningsensation in the affected areas rather than intense pruritus, distinguishing it from superficial urticaria.[19] In histamine-mediated angioedema, which often accompanies hives, there may be associated warmth, redness, or mild erythema, whereas bradykinin-mediated forms, such as hereditary angioedema, lack these inflammatory features and present with more pronounced discomfort.[1][9]Systemic symptoms can occur with visceral involvement, particularly in hereditary angioedema, where up to 50% of attacks feature severe abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea due to intestinal edema mimicking an acute abdomen.[5] Prodromal signs, such as mild erythema marginatum—a nonpruritic, serpiginous rash—or localized tingling, may precede swelling onset by hours in some hereditary cases.[5][18]Episodes in hereditary forms are frequently triggered by stress, minor trauma, infections, or hormonal fluctuations like those during menstruation or estrogen use, though many occur spontaneously.[5][9]
Complications
One of the most severe complications of angioedema is airway obstruction resulting from laryngeal edema, which can cause stridor, dysphonia, and respiratory distress, potentially leading to asphyxiation and death if untreated. In hereditary angioedema (HAE), laryngeal edema affects approximately 50% of patients at least once in their lifetime, with undiagnosed or mismanaged cases carrying a 30-50% mortality rate due to upper airway obstruction.[20][21] These manifestations often build upon acute swelling in the throat or tongue observed during episodes.Abdominal crises represent another critical complication, particularly in bradykinin-mediated forms like HAE, where intense pain and distension mimic surgical emergencies such as appendicitis or intestinal obstruction. Historically, this has resulted in unnecessary invasive procedures, including exploratory laparotomies, appendectomies (in up to 23% of patients), and cholecystectomies (in 16.4% of patients), due to misdiagnosis.[22][23]Recurrent angioedema episodes can lead to chronic disfigurement and functional impairment, especially from repeated swelling in the face, extremities, or genitalia, causing temporary cosmetic concerns, pain, and limitations in daily activities such as movement or speech.[2] In histamine-mediated allergic angioedema, complications overlap with anaphylaxis, incorporating systemic effects like hypotension and bronchospasm that escalate the reaction's severity and life-threatening potential.[24][1]The unpredictable recurrence of angioedema also imposes a substantial psychological burden, with patients experiencing high rates of anxiety (76%) and depression (71%), alongside impaired personality functioning and sleep disturbances. Quality of life is notably reduced, as quantified by the Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (AE-QoL), which reveals moderate impairment influenced by fear of attacks and their functional consequences.[25][26]
Pathophysiology
Histamine-Mediated Angioedema
Histamine-mediated angioedema arises primarily from the degranulation of mast cells and basophils, which releases histamine as a key mediator. In the allergic subtype, this process is triggered by the cross-linking of immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies bound to the surface of these cells upon re-exposure to an allergen, leading to rapid degranulation. In non-allergic or pseudoallergic forms, direct activation of mast cells occurs through non-IgE mechanisms, such as physical stimuli or certain drugs, bypassing the allergic cascade.[27][28][29]Once released, histamine binds predominantly to H1 receptors on vascular endothelial cells, initiating a signaling cascade that increases vascular permeability. This binding activates phospholipase C, resulting in intracellular calcium mobilization and subsequent endothelial cell contraction. The elevated calcium levels promote actin-myosin interactions, causing the endothelial cells to retract and form intercellular gaps, which allow plasma extravasation and localized edema. A simplified representation of this permeability increase involves histamine-induced Ca^{2+} influx, denoted as:\text{Histamine} \rightarrow \text{H1R activation} \rightarrow \text{Ca}^{2+} \text{ influx} \rightarrow \text{actin-myosin contraction} \rightarrow \text{gap formation}This mechanism underscores the rapid disruption of the endothelial barrier central to histamine-mediated swelling.[30][31][32]In addition to histamine, degranulation releases secondary mediators such as leukotrienes and prostaglandins, which amplify and prolong the vascular response. Leukotrienes, particularly cysteinyl leukotrienes, enhance permeability by recruiting additional inflammatory cells and sustaining endothelial gaps, while prostaglandins like PGD2 contribute to vasodilation and edema persistence. These mediators collectively extend the inflammatory effects beyond the initial histamine surge.[33][29][34]The clinical manifestation of histamine-mediated angioedema features a rapid onset, typically within minutes to hours following the trigger, distinguishing it from slower pathways. Episodes generally resolve spontaneously within 24 to 72 hours and show prompt responsiveness to interventions targeting histamine effects, such as H1-antihistamines or epinephrine, which counteract the mediator's actions and restore barrier integrity.[35][36][7]
Bradykinin-Mediated Angioedema
Bradykinin-mediated angioedema arises from dysregulation of the contact activation system, leading to excessive bradykinin production and subsequent vascular permeability without involvement of mast cell degranulation. This form occurs in hereditary angioedema types I and II (due to C1-inhibitor deficiency or dysfunction, respectively), hereditary angioedema with normal C1-inhibitor (type III; due to mutations such as in the F12 gene leading to increased bradykinin generation), acquired angioedema, and drug-induced cases such as those triggered by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors.[27][37]The process begins with activation of the contact system, where factor XII binds to negatively charged surfaces and autoactivates to factor XIIa, which then cleaves prekallikrein to generate plasma kallikrein. Plasma kallikrein subsequently cleaves high-molecular-weight kininogen (HMWK) to release bradykinin, a potent vasodilator, in a positive feedback loop that amplifies production. Under normal conditions, C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) regulates this pathway by inhibiting factor XIIa and kallikrein, preventing excessive bradykinin formation; however, in bradykinin-mediated angioedema, C1-INH is either deficient (as in hereditary angioedema type I) or dysfunctional (as in type II), resulting in uncontrolled bradykinin accumulation.[27][37][38]This regulatory mechanism can be represented as follows, where C1-INH inhibits key enzymes to block bradykinin release:\text{C1-INH} \rightarrow \text{Inhibits Factor XIIa and Kallikrein} \rightarrow \text{Prevents: Kallikrein + HMWK} \rightarrow \text{Bradykinin + Cleaved HMWK}Once released, bradykinin binds to constitutively expressed B2 receptors on endothelial cells, activating G-protein-coupled phospholipase C (PLC), which hydrolyzes phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) to inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG). IP3 triggers the release of intracellular calcium (Ca²⁺), leading to contraction of endothelial cells, opening of intercellular junctions, and plasma extravasation into surrounding tissues, causing localized swelling.[27][37][38]ACE inhibitors contribute to bradykinin-mediated angioedema by blocking the primary enzyme responsible for bradykinin degradation, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), which normally inactivates bradykinin via cleavage to inactive peptides; this inhibition leads to bradykinin accumulation and affects approximately 0.3% of users. Clinically, attacks have a slower onset over several hours and last 48-72 hours, showing no response to antihistamines or corticosteroids due to the non-histaminergic pathway, and they more frequently involve gastrointestinal and laryngeal sites, increasing risks of abdominal pain and airway compromise.[27][37][39]
Diagnosis
Clinical Evaluation
The clinical evaluation of angioedema begins with a thorough history-taking to identify patterns and potential etiologies. Patients should be queried about the frequency and duration of episodes, which typically last 24 to 72 hours and may recur unpredictably.[40] Key triggers to explore include foods, medications such as angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), physical trauma, stress, or insect stings, as these can precipitate attacks in allergic or acquired forms.[41] A family history of similar swelling is crucial, particularly for hereditary angioedema (HAE), which follows an autosomal dominant pattern with up to 25% of cases arising from spontaneous mutations.[40] Inquiry into associated features, such as urticaria or anaphylactic symptoms like hypotension and bronchospasm, helps distinguish histamine-mediated from bradykinin-mediated types, with urticaria present in approximately 50% of allergic cases but absent in HAE.[41]The physical examination focuses on assessing the extent and impact of swelling while prioritizing airway compromise. Swelling often involves distensible tissues like the face, lips, tongue, eyelids, hands, feet, or genitalia, appearing as nonpitting, asymmetric edema with ill-defined borders that spares muscle and bone.[40] Airway evaluation is paramount, involving inspection for oropharyngeal involvement (e.g., using the Mallampati score to gauge tongue size relative to the oropharynx) and auscultation for stridor or hoarseness, which signal laryngeal edema requiring immediate intervention.[35]Vital signs should be monitored closely for tachycardia, hypotension, or hypoxia indicative of systemic involvement or shock, especially in acute presentations.[41]Red flags during evaluation include rapid progression of swelling over hours, particularly in the airway, which heightens mortality risk, and isolated abdominal pain without urticaria, occurring in up to 93% of bradykinin-mediated episodes and suggesting visceral involvement.[41] To track severity and response to therapy, validated tools like the Angioedema Activity Score (AAS) can be employed, quantifying daily symptoms on a scale from 0 to 3 across affected sites for longitudinal monitoring.[42]Differentiation from mimics such as cellulitis or erysipelas relies on clinical features: angioedema presents with pale, nonerythematous, nontender swelling that resolves spontaneously without fever or leukocytosis, contrasting the warm, erythematous, indurated lesions of infection.[35] This initial assessment guides suspicion of angioedema and informs the need for further diagnostic steps, emphasizing prompt recognition to prevent complications.[40]
Laboratory Investigations
Laboratory investigations play a supportive role in diagnosing angioedema by identifying patterns consistent with specific mechanisms and excluding mimics such as infection or thrombosis. A complete blood count (CBC) with differential is often performed as part of initial evaluation. In histamine-mediated allergic angioedema, eosinophilia may be observed on CBC, reflecting an allergic response, whereas the CBC is typically normal in bradykinin-mediated forms without evidence of eosinophilia.[43][1]Serum tryptase levels are useful to distinguish histamine-mediated from bradykinin-mediated angioedema. Tryptase is elevated during acute episodes of histamine-mediated angioedema, peaking within 1-4 hours after symptom onset and returning to baseline thereafter; levels should be measured promptly during an attack for optimal utility.[44] In contrast, tryptase remains normal in bradykinin-mediated cases.[1]Complement studies provide key insights into bradykinin-mediated angioedema subtypes. Low levels of C4 are characteristically found in hereditary angioedema (HAE) and acquired angioedema (AAE) both during attacks and in the inter-attack period, supporting the diagnosis when clinical suspicion is high. These tests are typically normal in histamine-mediated angioedema.[43]Imaging modalities are employed when angioedema involves deeper tissues or internal organs to confirm edema and rule out other pathologies. Ultrasound is effective for visualizing subcutaneous edema, appearing as hypoechoic areas in affected tissues. For abdominal involvement, computed tomography (CT) reveals characteristic findings such as ascites, bowel wall thickening, or mucosal enhancement due to submucosal edema.[45]To exclude mimics, additional tests target specific differentials. D-dimer levels are normal in most cases of angioedema but become elevated in thrombotic conditions, aiding differentiation from vascular occlusion. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are assessed to rule out underlying infection, which may present with similar swelling; these are typically normal or mildly elevated in uncomplicated angioedema.[43][1]
Subtype-Specific Testing
Subtype-specific testing is essential for confirming the underlying mechanism of angioedema and distinguishing between hereditary angioedema (HAE), acquired angioedema (AAE), and drug-induced forms, particularly those involving bradykinin-mediated pathways.[46]For HAE type I, which accounts for approximately 85% of cases, testing begins with measurement of C1 inhibitor (C1-INH) antigenic levels, which are typically low (less than 50% of normal).[46] In HAE type II, comprising about 15% of cases, antigenic levels are normal or elevated, but functional C1-INH activity is reduced due to dysfunctional protein.[46] C1q levels remain normal in both HAE types I and II, helping to differentiate from AAE.[46] For HAE with normal C1-INH (type III), genetic testing is required, targeting mutations in the F12 gene, identified in approximately 20-30% of familial cases, while SERPING1 mutations are assessed for types I and II.[46][10]AAE testing mirrors that of HAE types I and II, with low C1-INH antigenic and functional levels, but is distinguished by low C1q levels, often due to autoimmune consumption.[47] Additional screening for underlying lymphoproliferative disorders or malignancies includes serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) and urine protein electrophoresis (UPEP) to detect paraproteins, as type I AAE is frequently associated with monoclonal gammopathies.[47]Drug-induced angioedema, most commonly triggered by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), lacks specific laboratory markers but is diagnosed primarily through temporal association with drug exposure and resolution of symptoms upon discontinuation, typically within 48-72 hours.[48] In ACEI-related cases, monitoring plasma renin and aldosterone levels may provide supportive evidence of bradykinin accumulation, though this is not routinely used for confirmation.[49]Family members of individuals diagnosed with HAE should undergo screening with C1-INH antigenic and functional assays, along with C4 levels, given the autosomal dominant inheritance pattern and risk of life-threatening attacks.[50]Genetic counseling is recommended for HAE probands and at-risk relatives to discuss inheritance risks, testing implications, and management strategies.[50]Recent advances since 2020 include the application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels to identify rare variants in SERPING1, F12, and other genes like PLG in unresolved HAE cases, allowing detection of deletions, intronic variants, and mosaicism.[51]
Treatment and Management
Acute Treatment
The primary goal of acute treatment for angioedema is to rapidly alleviate swelling, secure the airway if threatened, and prevent progression to life-threatening complications.[1] In cases of suspected laryngeal edema or airway obstruction, immediate assessment is critical; endotracheal intubation using fiberoptic or video laryngoscopy is recommended for moderate to severe involvement, while surgical cricothyrotomy serves as a definitive option if intubation fails, as up to 50% of patients requiring a definitive airway may need such surgical interventions.[41] For milder laryngeal edema, temporary measures such as nebulized racemic epinephrine (typically 2.25% solution, 0.5 mL in 3 mL saline) or heliox (70% helium/30% oxygen mixture) can reduce airflow resistance and buy time for resolution.[41]For histamine-mediated angioedema, which often overlaps with anaphylaxis, intramuscular epinephrine (0.3–0.5 mg of 1:1000 solution in adults, repeatable every 5–20 minutes) is administered if there are systemic symptoms like hypotension or bronchospasm.[52] Antihistamines, including H1 blockers such as diphenhydramine (25–50 mg IV/IM) and H2 blockers like ranitidine (50 mg IV), are given to block histamine effects, while systemic corticosteroids such as prednisone (40–60 mg orally) or methylprednisolone (125 mg IV) help reduce inflammation, though their benefit in isolated angioedema is more adjunctive.[1] These therapies are ineffective or minimally responsive in bradykinin-mediated forms, highlighting the need to differentiate subtypes early.[41]Supportive care plays a key role in symptom management across all acute episodes. Elevation of affected extremities or areas promotes dependent drainage and reduces swelling, while local cooling with ice packs can provide symptomatic relief without risking tissue damage.[1] Pain control may involve nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) like ibuprofen (400–600 mg orally), but these are contraindicated in ACE inhibitor-induced angioedema due to potential worsening of bradykinin accumulation.[41] Intravenous fluids are administered as needed to maintain hemodynamic stability, particularly in histamine-mediated cases with associated urticaria or hypotension.[52]Severe cases, especially those involving the airway or multi-site edema, warrant close monitoring in an intensive care unit to track vital signs, oxygen saturation, and serial airway assessments.[1] Resolution of symptoms typically occurs within 24 to 72 hours with prompt intervention, allowing for discharge once stable, though observation periods of 4–6 hours are standard for milder presentations.[41]All patients presenting with acute angioedema should have any implicated ACE inhibitors discontinued immediately, and these agents are contraindicated in acute management to avoid perpetuating bradykinin-mediated swelling.[52]
Type-Specific Therapies
For hereditary angioedema (HAE), on-demand therapies target the bradykinin pathway to provide rapid symptom relief during attacks. Plasma-derived C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) concentrates, such as Berinert, replace deficient or dysfunctional C1-INH to inhibit kallikrein and halt bradykinin production, with intravenous administration recommended for acute laryngeal or abdominal attacks.[53] Icatibant, a bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist, is administered subcutaneously to block bradykinin effects at tissue sites, offering effective relief for moderate to severe attacks.[54] Ecallantide, a plasma kallikrein inhibitor, is given subcutaneously to prevent bradykinin generation and is particularly useful for abdominal and facial attacks when administered early.[54] In 2025, sebetralstat (Ekterly), the first oral on-demand therapy, was FDA-approved as a plasma kallikrein inhibitor for adults and adolescents aged 12 years and older, providing faster onset compared to injectables and improving patient convenience.[55]In allergic angioedema, often associated with chronic urticaria, therapies address underlying IgE-mediated mechanisms for recurrent episodes. Allergen-specific immunotherapy or desensitization protocols can reduce attack frequency in patients with identifiable triggers, such as insect venom or foods, by inducing tolerance over time.[56] For refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria with angioedema, omalizumab, an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody, is administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks at 300 mg doses, significantly decreasing angioedema incidence and improving quality of life.[57]Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)-induced angioedema requires discontinuation of the offending agent, with alternative antihypertensives selected cautiously. Switching to angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may be considered under close monitoring, as they carry a lower but nonzero risk of recurrence due to shared renin-angiotensin pathway effects.[58]Tranexamic acid serves as an adjunctive oral or intravenous option to inhibit fibrinolysis and reduce bradykinin accumulation, showing efficacy in emergency settings for symptom resolution.[59]Acquired angioedema (AAE), typically linked to lymphoproliferative disorders or autoimmunity, focuses on treating the underlying condition alongside targeted interventions. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is used to deplete B cells and resolve autoantibodies against C1-INH, preventing recurrent attacks in up to 79% of cases when given as monotherapy or with chemotherapy.[60] Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) may be employed in select autoimmune-associated cases to modulate immune responses and stabilize C1-INH function, though evidence is limited to case reports.[61]Emerging therapies for HAE include lanadelumab, a monoclonal antibody inhibiting plasmakallikrein, FDA-approved in 2018 for subcutaneous administration to reduce attack frequency, representing a shift toward targeted biologics.[62]
Prophylaxis and Long-Term Management
Long-term prophylaxis for hereditary angioedema (HAE) aims to reduce the frequency and severity of attacks through targeted therapies, particularly for patients with frequent or severe episodes. Plasma-derived C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH), such as Cinryze, is recommended as a first-line option for routine prophylaxis in HAE types 1 and 2, administered intravenously at a dose of 1000 units every 3 to 4 days, which has been shown to reduce attack rates by approximately 50%.[63] This approach replaces deficient or dysfunctional C1-INH levels, providing effective prevention with a favorable safety profile compared to older agents.[64]Attenuated androgens, such as danazol, represent older prophylactic options that induce hepatic synthesis of C1-INH, reducing attack rates to as low as 2% of baseline in responsive patients, with typical maintenance dosing of 200 to 600 mg per day titrated to the lowest effective dose.[65] However, these agents are associated with significant side effects, including virilization, lipid abnormalities, and hepatotoxicity, necessitating regular monitoring of liver function tests, lipid profiles, and clinical symptoms every 3 to 6 months.[63]Tranexamic acid, an antifibrinolytic agent, serves as an alternative older therapy for long-term prophylaxis, particularly when C1-INH is unavailable, reducing attack frequency in about 60% of patients at doses of 1 to 3 grams daily, though it is less effective than androgens and limited by gastrointestinal side effects.[63]Lifestyle modifications, including avoidance of estrogen-containing contraceptives and prompt discontinuation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), are essential adjuncts to minimize triggers that exacerbate HAE.[66]Recent FDA approvals in 2025 have expanded prophylactic options for HAE. Garadacimab, a monoclonal antibody inhibiting factor XIIa, was approved on June 16, 2025, for monthly subcutaneous administration, demonstrating over 90% reduction in attack rates in clinical trials.[67] Donidalorsen (Dawnzera), the first RNA-targeted antisense oligonucleotide, was approved on August 21, 2025, for subcutaneous dosing every 4 to 8 weeks, achieving up to 81% mean reduction in attack rates.[68] These biologics align with guideline recommendations prioritizing modern therapies over attenuated androgens due to improved efficacy and tolerability.Patient education forms a cornerstone of long-term management, with individualized action plans outlining recognition of prodromal symptoms, self-administration of prophylactic injectables, and emergency response strategies to empower patients and improve quality of life. Training in subcutaneous or intravenous self-injection techniques for therapies like C1-INH is recommended for suitable patients, enabling home-based administration and reducing reliance on healthcare facilities. A multidisciplinary approach, involving allergists, genetic counselors, psychologists, and other specialists, supports holistic care by addressing physical, emotional, and social impacts of HAE through coordinated monitoring and psychological support.[69]Recent guidelines from 2023 to 2025, including updates from the World Allergy Organization/European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (WAO/EAACI) and international consensus panels, emphasize shared decision-making in selecting prophylaxis, prioritizing modern biologics (such as kallikrein inhibitors) over attenuated androgens due to superior efficacy, tolerability, and reduced long-term risks.[63] These updates advocate for annual reassessment of prophylactic regimens to optimize outcomes based on attack patterns and patient preferences.[70]
Epidemiology
Incidence and Prevalence
Angioedema encompasses a range of subtypes with varying prevalence, where histamine-mediated (allergic) forms are the most common, while bradykinin-mediated types such as hereditary angioedema (HAE) and acquired angioedema (AAE) are rare.[1] Lifetime prevalence of angioedema in the general population has been estimated at 7.4% based on surveys in Denmark, though this may include predominantly allergic cases often accompanying urticaria.[15] Allergic angioedema affects 10-20% of individuals at some point, frequently co-occurring with urticaria, which has a lifetime prevalence of 15-25%; angioedema accompanies approximately 40% of chronic urticaria cases.[8][71]Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is rare, with a global prevalence of approximately 1 in 50,000 individuals, or 1.22 cases per 100,000 based on systematic reviews.[5][72] Among HAE cases, type I accounts for about 85%, type II for 15%, and type III (normal C1-inhibitor) for less than 1%.[5] Acquired angioedema (AAE), typically due to C1-inhibitor deficiency, is even rarer, with prevalence estimates ranging from 1:100,000 to 1:150,000.[13][73]Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)-induced angioedema occurs in 0.1-0.7% of users, representing a significant portion of drug-related cases, with the risk persisting over time and being up to twofold higher in Black populations.[14][74] Globally, underdiagnosis is prevalent in developing regions due to limited access to diagnostic tools and awareness, leading to lower reported rates in Asia and Africa compared to Europe and North America.[75][72] Recent years have seen the COVID-19 pandemic trigger flares in some patients.[76]
Risk Factors and Demographics
Angioedema susceptibility varies by subtype, with hereditary angioedema (HAE) primarily driven by genetic factors. HAE is inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern due to mutations in the SERPING1 gene, leading to C1-inhibitor deficiency or dysfunction, and a positive family history is present in approximately 75-80% of cases.[5] In contrast, idiopathic angioedema lacks a strong genetic link, as it arises from unidentified triggers without consistent hereditary patterns.[77]Demographic factors influence risk across angioedema types. HAE affects males and females equally in terms of prevalence, but women experience more frequent and severe attacks, particularly during high-estrogen states such as pregnancy, menstruation, or oral contraceptive use, due to estrogen's role in exacerbating bradykinin-mediated swelling.[78] For ACE inhibitor-induced angioedema, risk is higher among females, individuals over 65 years, and smokers, possibly due to interactions with bradykinin metabolism and vascular sensitivity.[79]African Americans face an elevated risk for ACE inhibitor-associated cases, attributed to genetic variations affecting angiotensin-converting enzyme activity.[80]Comorbidities contribute to angioedema risk in specific subtypes. Atopy, including conditions like allergic rhinitis, asthma, and eczema, increases susceptibility to histamine-mediated allergic angioedema by heightening IgE responses to allergens.[81] Acquired angioedema (AAE) is often linked to underlying lymphoproliferative disorders such as monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance or B-cell malignancies, as well as autoantibodies against C1-inhibitor that promote complement consumption.[82]Socioeconomic factors affect diagnosis and management of angioedema. Low-income individuals and those in resource-limited settings experience diagnostic delays and higher mortality risks, stemming from limited access to specialized testing and treatments like C1-inhibitor concentrates.[83]
History
Early Descriptions
The earliest recognition of angioedema as a distinct clinical entity emerged in the mid-19th century, initially conflated with other forms of swelling due to limited understanding of its pathophysiology. In 1876, Britishphysician John Laws Milton described recurrent episodes of significant facial and limb swelling in four patients, terming the condition "giant urticaria" to highlight its resemblance to enlarged hives, though it lacked the typical itching and superficial nature of true urticaria.[84] Milton's observations marked the first systematic documentation of non-pitting, deep-tissue edema without urticarial wheals, but the cases were often overlooked or dismissed as atypical allergies by contemporaries.[84]Building on these reports, German physician Heinrich Irenaeus Quincke provided a more precise clinical delineation in 1882, publishing a series of cases under the term "acute circumscribed skinedema" (Über acute umschriebene Hautödem) in the Monatshefte für praktische Dermatologie.[84] Quincke emphasized the sudden onset, transient nature, and predilection for areas like the face, lips, and extremities, distinguishing it from infectious or inflammatory conditions, yet early 19th-century instances were frequently misdiagnosed as erysipelas—a bacterial skin infection characterized by fiery redness and fever—leading to ineffective treatments like lancing or cauterization.[84] This confusion arose from overlapping superficial resemblances, such as localized erythema and swelling, before angioedema's unique subcutaneous involvement was appreciated.[85]The nomenclature evolved further in 1885 when Paul Strübing proposed the term "angioneurotic edema" (Angioneurotisches Ödem), attributing its episodic flares to nervous system influences, such as emotional stress or vasomotor instability, an idea reflecting the era's fascination with neurogenic mechanisms in dermatologic disorders.[84] This outdated emphasis on a "nervous origin" underscored the initial theoretical framework, predating recognition of allergic hypersensitivity as a potential trigger and far preceding the later identification of bradykinin-mediated pathways.[84] Meanwhile, the condition's similarity to urticaria persisted as a source of diagnostic error, with many cases erroneously treated as histamine-driven hives using rudimentary antiallergic measures.[85]A pivotal advancement came in 1888 from Canadian physician William Osler, who reported hereditary episodic edema across five generations in a single family, establishing its familial and hereditary pattern for the first time in the American Journal of Medical Sciences.[86] Osler's detailed pedigree analysis and description of recurrent, nonpruritic swellings involving skin, gastrointestinal tract, and airways highlighted the condition's potential lethality, such as from laryngeal involvement, while reinforcing early attributions to allergic or idiopathic precipitants like trauma or infection rather than purely nervous causes.[86] These 19th-century accounts laid the groundwork for separating angioedema from urticaria, though misdiagnoses as erysipelas or simple allergies remained common until refined classifications emerged.[84]
Key Advances
In 1963, Virginia H. Donaldson and Robert R. Evans identified the absence of serum inhibitor of C'1-esterase (now known as C1 esterase inhibitor, or C1-INH) as the biochemical abnormality underlying hereditary angioedema (HAE), marking a pivotal shift from descriptive clinical reports to mechanistic understanding of the disease.[87] This discovery established HAE types I and II as resulting from quantitative or functional deficiencies in C1-INH, which regulates the complement, contact, and fibrinolytic systems, thereby preventing uncontrolled bradykinin production.[38]During the 1970s, research elucidated the central role of bradykinin in non-histaminergic angioedema pathogenesis, with early studies detecting elevated kinin-like activity in HAE patient plasma during attacks, linking it to vascular permeability increases.[88] Subsequent investigations in the 1980s highlighted angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)'s function in degrading bradykinin, coinciding with the introduction of ACE inhibitors (e.g., captopril in 1981), which led to a marked rise in acquired angioedema cases due to bradykinin accumulation.[89] By the late 1980s and 1990s, ACE inhibitor-associated angioedema accounted for up to 0.3% of users, often presenting with oropharyngeal swelling and emphasizing the need for alternative antihypertensives in at-risk populations.[90]The year 2000 brought recognition of HAE type III, an estrogen-dependent variant with normal C1-INH levels, initially described in affected families and later (by 2006) attributed to gain-of-function mutations in the F12 gene encoding coagulation factor XII, which enhances kallikrein activation and bradykinin generation. This subtype, predominantly affecting women, expanded diagnostic criteria beyond C1-INH testing and underscored genetic heterogeneity in HAE.[91]Therapeutic progress accelerated in the late 2000s with targeted bradykinin pathway inhibitors: icatibant, a B2receptor antagonist, gained European approval in 2008 for acute HAE attack treatment, offering rapid symptom relief via subcutaneous administration.[92]Ecallantide, a plasmakallikrein inhibitor, followed with U.S. FDA approval in 2009, providing another on-demand option that reduced attack severity in clinical trials.[93] By 2018, lanadelumab, a monoclonal antibody inhibiting kallikrein, was approved for prophylaxis, significantly lowering attack rates (up to 87% reduction) compared to placebo in phase 3 studies.[62]Entering the 2020s, treatment paradigms shifted from attenuated androgens (e.g., danazol), which carried risks like hepatotoxicity and virilization, toward safer targeted biologics such as C1-INH concentrates and kallikrein inhibitors, improving long-term prophylaxis efficacy and patient quality of life.[94] Recent 2024-2025 developments include FDA approval of sebetralstat, the first oral on-demand therapy, which demonstrated noninferiority to injectable icatibant in resolving HAE attacks within two hours while enhancing patient convenience.[55] Concurrently, advances in genetic screening, including next-generation sequencing panels for SERPING1, F12, and other loci, have improved early diagnosis of all HAE subtypes, enabling personalized management and family counseling.[95]