Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Big Bang Theory

The Big Bang theory is the leading scientific model describing the origin and evolution of the universe, positing that it began as an extremely hot and dense singularity approximately 13.8 billion years ago and has been expanding and cooling ever since.^[1] This model, rooted in general relativity, explains the universe's large-scale structure, composition, and observed phenomena, transforming cosmology in the 20th century.^[2] Developed through contributions from physicists like Alexander Friedmann, Georges Lemaître, and Edwin Hubble, the theory gained traction in the 1920s when Hubble's observations revealed that galaxies are receding from Earth at speeds proportional to their distance, implying an expanding universe that traces back to a common origin.^[3] The term "Big Bang" was coined mockingly by astronomer Fred Hoyle in 1949 during a BBC radio broadcast, contrasting it with the steady-state model he favored, though the theory's foundations were solidified by earlier proposals of an expanding cosmos from a "primeval atom."^[1] Key evidence supporting the Big Bang includes the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation, discovered accidentally in 1965 by Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson, which represents the cooled remnant of the universe's initial heat at about 2.7 Kelvin and is uniform across the sky with tiny fluctuations that seeded galaxy formation.^[3] Additional pillars are the observed abundances of light elements like helium-4 and deuterium, produced in the first few minutes through Big Bang nucleosynthesis when temperatures exceeded 10 billion kelvin, and the redshift of distant galaxies confirming ongoing expansion.^[1] These observations align with predictions from the theory, ruling out alternatives like the steady-state model. The timeline of the early universe begins at t=0, with infinite density and temperature in the singularity, followed by rapid cosmic inflation around 10⁻³² seconds that expanded the universe faster than light, smoothing out irregularities.^[3] Around 10^{-6} seconds, protons and neutrons formed from quarks; by one second, the plasma consisted of protons, neutrons, electrons, and neutrinos; at three minutes, nuclei of hydrogen and helium emerged; and after 380,000 years, the universe cooled enough for atoms to form, releasing the CMB photons.^[1] Today, the universe is about 13.8 billion years old, with roughly 5% ordinary matter, 27% dark matter, and 68% dark energy driving accelerated expansion, though tensions like the Hubble constant discrepancy persist in measurements.^[3] While the theory robustly describes events from 10⁻⁴³ seconds onward, it does not explain the singularity itself or what preceded it, leaving room for extensions like quantum gravity or multiverse hypotheses, but it remains the cornerstone of modern cosmology due to its predictive power and empirical validation.^[2]

Overview

Core Principles

The Big Bang theory posits that the universe originated from an extremely hot and dense state approximately 13.8 billion years ago, evolving through continuous expansion and cooling to its current form.^[4] This initial condition, often referred to as the singularity, represents a point of infinite density and temperature where the laws of physics as currently understood break down.^[5] From this state, the universe underwent rapid expansion, with distances between points increasing over cosmic time, leading to a progressive decrease in temperature and density.^[5] Central to the theory is the concept of cosmic time, defined as the proper time elapsed since the initial expansion for observers at rest relative to the overall expansion of the universe, or comoving observers.^[6] The evolution of the universe is described by the scale factor, a dimensionless function a(t) that quantifies the relative size of the universe at any given cosmic time t, normalized such that a(t) = 1 at the present day and smaller values in the past, reflecting how spatial distances scale with expansion.^[7] The Big Bang model, grounded in Einstein's general theory of relativity, applies these elements to outline the universe's large-scale dynamics. The hot Big Bang phase characterizes the early universe as a plasma of radiation and particles at extraordinarily high temperatures, dominating the initial evolution.^[5] During this period, the universe was radiation-dominated, meaning the energy density was primarily contributed by relativistic particles and photons rather than non-relativistic matter.^[8] As expansion continued, the universe cooled sufficiently for a transition to a matter-dominated era, where the energy density of ordinary and dark matter surpassed that of radiation, marking a shift in the dominant physical processes governing expansion.^[8] The theory's scope encompasses the universe's development from roughly 10^{-43} seconds after the singularity—corresponding to the Planck time, the scale at which quantum gravitational effects become significant—onward, excluding the absolute initial moment due to the limitations of current physical frameworks.^[9]

Key Predictions

The Big Bang theory makes several specific, testable predictions that set it apart from alternative cosmological models, such as a static universe. These predictions arise from the model's foundational assumptions about the early universe's hot, dense state and its subsequent evolution under general relativity. Central among them is the expectation of universal expansion, where the fabric of space itself stretches over time, causing distant galaxies to recede from observers at speeds proportional to their distance. This expansion implies that light emitted from these galaxies would be redshifted, with the degree of redshift increasing with distance, as the wavelengths are stretched by the expanding metric. Another key prediction concerns the existence of a relic radiation field permeating the universe, a remnant of the intense heat in the primordial era. As the universe expanded and cooled from its initial high-temperature state, this radiation—originally in thermal equilibrium with matter—would decouple and persist as a uniform blackbody spectrum, with its temperature scaling inversely with the expansion factor. Theoretical calculations estimated this cosmic background radiation at approximately 5 K, later refined to around 2.7 K based on the universe's age and expansion history. The theory also forecasts the primordial abundances of light elements formed during the first few minutes after the Big Bang, when the universe was hot enough for nuclear reactions but cool enough for stable nuclei to form. Specifically, it predicts that roughly 75% of the universe's baryonic mass would be hydrogen-1, about 25% helium-4, with trace amounts of deuterium, helium-3, and lithium-7, determined by the neutron-to-proton ratio at freeze-out and subsequent fusion processes. These ratios depend sensitively on the baryon-to-photon number density and the expansion rate during nucleosynthesis. Finally, the Big Bang model incorporates the cosmological principle, positing that the universe is homogeneous and isotropic on sufficiently large scales, meaning its large-scale structure appears the same from any vantage point and in any direction. This assumption underpins the theory's expectation of a uniform distribution of matter and radiation across cosmic horizons, avoiding preferred centers or directions in the overall geometry. These predictions align with solutions to Einstein's general relativity equations for a dynamic cosmos.

Historical Development

Precursors and Early Observations

In ancient cosmologies, Greek philosophers like Aristotle proposed an eternal, unchanging universe characterized by uniform circular motion in the celestial realm, contrasting sharply with religious creation narratives in traditions such as Judaism, Christianity, and various mythologies that depicted a finite cosmos brought into existence by divine act at a specific point in time.^[10]^[11] These creation stories, found in texts like the Book of Genesis, emphasized a beginning from nothingness, implying a temporal origin rather than perpetual existence.^[12] During the medieval period, scholars in Christian, Jewish, and Islamic traditions largely reconciled Aristotelian influences with scriptural views by advocating a finite, created universe, often positing that the cosmos had a definite beginning despite incorporating elements of eternal divine order.^[13] Figures like Thomas Aquinas integrated Aristotle's physics with Christian doctrine, arguing that while the world might appear eternal in its operations, it remained contingent upon a creator, thus preserving the idea of a temporally bounded existence.^[14] Similarly, Jewish philosopher Maimonides and Islamic thinkers emphasized creation ex nihilo to counter purely eternal models, aligning cosmology with theological imperatives of divine origination.^[15] The 19th century introduced thermodynamic concepts that further challenged notions of an eternal, static universe, with William Thomson (Lord Kelvin) articulating the "heat death" scenario in which the second law of thermodynamics—positing increasing entropy—would lead the cosmos to a state of maximum disorder and equilibrium, implying an evolutionary history rather than timeless stability.^[16] Kelvin's 1852 and 1862 writings suggested that the universe, like a heat engine, was dissipating energy over time, influencing early ideas of cosmic evolution and finite age.^[17] This perspective, drawn from observations of cooling Earth and stellar systems, laid groundwork for viewing the universe as dynamic and directional.^[18] In the early 20th century, observational astronomy provided key evidence of cosmic motion, as Vesto Slipher's spectroscopic measurements from 1912 to 1917 at Lowell Observatory revealed large radial velocities for spiral nebulae, with most showing redshifts indicating recession from the Milky Way at speeds up to thousands of kilometers per second.^[19] These findings, published in the Lowell Observatory Bulletins, suggested a systematic expansion rather than random motions, challenging static models.^[20] In response, Albert Einstein introduced the cosmological constant in his 1917 paper "Cosmological Considerations in the General Theory of Relativity" to balance gravitational contraction in a static, finite universe, modifying his field equations to permit a closed, unchanging cosmos.^[21] A direct precursor to the Big Bang theory emerged in Georges Lemaître's 1927 paper in the Annales de la Société Scientifique de Bruxelles, where he proposed an expanding universe model based on general relativity, incorporating Slipher's redshifts to estimate a Hubble-like constant and suggesting a primordial state akin to a "primeval atom" from which all matter originated.^[22] Lemaître's solution built briefly on Alexander Friedmann's 1922 dynamic models but uniquely tied expansion to observational data, implying a finite past for the universe.^[23]

Formulation in the 20th Century

In 1922, Russian mathematician Alexander Friedmann derived solutions to Albert Einstein's field equations of general relativity that permitted a dynamic, expanding universe, challenging the prevailing static model.^[24] Friedmann assumed a homogeneous and isotropic universe and obtained equations describing the evolution of the cosmic scale factor with time, leading to scenarios of expansion from a singularity, possible contraction, or cyclic behavior.^[25] His seminal paper, "Über die Krümmung des Raumes," published in Zeitschrift für Physik, outlined these non-static solutions, estimating a universe lifetime on the order of 10 billion years for a periodic model.^[26] Einstein initially rejected the work as mathematically erroneous but retracted his criticism in 1923 after verification, though he remained skeptical of its physical implications until observational evidence emerged.^[24] Friedmann's theoretical framework gained empirical support in 1929 when American astronomer Edwin Hubble confirmed the expansion of the universe through observations of distant galaxies.^[27] Using Cepheid variable stars as standard candles to measure distances—calibrated from their period-luminosity relation first established by Henrietta Leavitt—Hubble plotted galaxy recession velocities against distances, revealing a linear relationship known as Hubble's law.^[28] His analysis yielded a Hubble constant of approximately 500 km/s/Mpc, indicating that galaxies recede faster with increasing distance, consistent with an expanding cosmos.^[29] This landmark result, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, transformed Friedmann's abstraction into a cornerstone of modern cosmology.^[28] Building on these foundations, in the late 1940s, George Gamow, Ralph Alpher, and Robert Herman advanced the hot Big Bang model by developing the theory of primordial nucleosynthesis and predicting a relic radiation background.^[30] In their 1948 Physical Review paper, Alpher, Hans Bethe, and Gamow explained the observed abundances of light elements like hydrogen and helium as products of nuclear reactions in the dense, hot early universe, where neutrons decayed and captured protons to form nuclei during rapid expansion.^[30] Alpher and Herman extended this in subsequent works, calculating that the universe's initial high temperature would cool to a residual blackbody radiation field of about 5 K today, serving as a fossil signature of the Big Bang.^[31] Their predictions, detailed in a 1949 Physical Review article, underscored the thermal history of the cosmos but received little attention at the time due to limited observational capabilities. The Big Bang model's viability was decisively bolstered in 1965 by the serendipitous discovery of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) by Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson at Bell Laboratories.^[32] While using a sensitive horn-reflector antenna to study radio signals from the Milky Way, they detected an isotropic excess noise temperature of 3.5 K across the sky, initially attributed to equipment issues like bird droppings but persisting after exhaustive checks.^[33] Published in the Astrophysical Journal, their measurement aligned closely with Alpher and Herman's forecast, confirming the CMB as relic radiation from the hot early universe cooled by expansion. Despite initial opposition from steady-state cosmology proponents like Fred Hoyle, who favored a static universe with continuous matter creation, the discovery shifted consensus toward the Big Bang, earning Penzias and Wilson the 1978 Nobel Prize in Physics.^[32]

Observational Evidence

Cosmic Expansion and Hubble's Law

The observation of cosmic expansion provides foundational evidence for the Big Bang theory, demonstrating that the universe is dynamically growing on large scales. In the early 20th century, astronomers measured the spectra of distant galaxies and found that their light is systematically shifted toward longer, redder wavelengths, a phenomenon known as redshift. This redshift is not primarily due to the Doppler effect from relative motion through space, but rather arises from the expansion of space itself, which stretches the wavelengths of photons as they travel from distant sources to observers.^[34]^[35] Edwin Hubble's seminal 1929 analysis quantified this expansion by establishing a proportional relationship between the recession velocities of galaxies and their distances. Using Cepheid variable stars to estimate distances and spectroscopic redshifts to infer velocities, Hubble demonstrated that farther galaxies recede faster, formalized as Hubble's law: v = H_0 d, where v is the recession velocity, d is the proper distance, and H_0 is the Hubble constant representing the current expansion rate.^[36] This law implies that the universe has been expanding since its hot, dense early phase, with the scale factor increasing over time. Modern measurements place H_0 at values ranging from approximately 67 to 73 km/s/Mpc depending on the method, reflecting ongoing discrepancies.^[37] Further evidence for expansion came from observations of Type Ia supernovae in the 1990s, which act as standardized candles due to their consistent peak luminosity. Teams led by Saul Perlmutter, Brian Schmidt, and Adam Riess analyzed high-redshift Type Ia supernovae (up to z ≈ 0.6) and found that these events were fainter than expected in a decelerating universe, indicating that expansion has been accelerating for the past several billion years.^[38]^[39] This acceleration, driven by dark energy, was confirmed through comparisons of supernova distances with those predicted by Friedmann models incorporating a cosmological constant. Measurements of H_0 have evolved significantly since Hubble's initial estimate of around 500 km/s/Mpc, refined over decades through improved distance indicators like Cepheids and the cosmic distance ladder. Early space-based observations, such as those from the Hubble Space Telescope, reduced systematic errors and yielded values around 70-75 km/s/Mpc by the 2000s.^[40] However, a persistent "Hubble tension" emerged in the 2010s, with local measurements (e.g., using supernovae and Cepheids) favoring H_0 \approx 73 km/s/Mpc, while early-universe probes like the cosmic microwave background yield H_0 \approx 67 km/s/Mpc—a discrepancy of about 5-10% that challenges the standard cosmological model.^[41]^[42] Measurements from the James Webb Space Telescope as of 2025 have confirmed the local value of H_0 \approx 73 km/s/Mpc using Cepheid variables, deepening the tension, although some independent analyses using alternative methods yield values around 70 km/s/Mpc, and the discrepancy remains unresolved.^[43]^[44]

Cosmic Microwave Background

The cosmic microwave background (CMB) represents the thermal remnant radiation from the Big Bang, filling the universe as a nearly uniform glow of microwaves that provides a snapshot of the early cosmos.^[45] This radiation originated when photons decoupled from matter during the epoch of recombination, approximately 380,000 years after the Big Bang, at a redshift of z ≈ 1100, when the universe had cooled enough for neutral atoms to form and allow photons to travel freely.^[46] The CMB's discovery in 1965 by Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson, using a radio antenna at Bell Labs, revealed an excess noise temperature of about 3.5 K isotropic across the sky, later identified as the predicted Big Bang relic radiation.^[47] The CMB exhibits a near-perfect blackbody spectrum with a temperature of 2.725 K, as precisely measured by the Far Infrared Absolute Spectrophotometer (FIRAS) instrument on the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) satellite in the 1990s, with deviations from a blackbody form limited to less than 50 parts per million of the peak intensity.^[48] Tiny temperature anisotropies, at the level of ΔT/T ≈ 10^{-5}, encode fluctuations in the early universe's density and were first detected by COBE's Differential Microwave Radiometer in 1992, confirming the presence of primordial inhomogeneities that seeded cosmic structure formation.^[49] Subsequent missions, including the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) in the 2000s and the Planck satellite from 2009 to 2013, mapped these anisotropies with increasing resolution and sensitivity, revealing the CMB's statistical isotropy and small-scale variations down to arcminute angular scales.^[50]^[51] Analysis of the CMB's angular power spectrum, which quantifies temperature fluctuations as a function of angular scale, uncovers a series of acoustic peaks arising from sound waves in the primordial plasma before decoupling; these peaks provide robust constraints on cosmological parameters, such as the baryon density parameter Ω_b h^2 ≈ 0.022, as determined from Planck's high-precision measurements.^[4] The first acoustic peak, at multipole ℓ ≈ 220, corresponds to the sound horizon at recombination and helps calibrate the universe's overall geometry, while higher peaks refine the relative contributions of baryons and dark matter to the early density oscillations.^[52] The CMB also carries polarization information, divided into E-modes (curl-free, primarily from scalar density perturbations) and B-modes (curl patterns, potentially from primordial gravitational waves), with Planck detecting E-mode polarization across a wide range of scales and setting upper limits on tensor-to-scalar ratios r < 0.06.^[52] Extracting these signals requires sophisticated foreground subtraction to remove Galactic dust, synchrotron emission, and free-free radiation, which contaminate the microwave bands; techniques like internal linear combination and component separation have been essential for Planck's cleaned polarization maps, though B-mode detection remains challenged by residual foregrounds and lensing effects.^[53]

Big Bang Nucleosynthesis

Big Bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) refers to the production of the lightest atomic nuclei in the dense, hot plasma of the early universe, occurring approximately 10 seconds to 3 minutes after the Big Bang, when temperatures ranged from about $10^{10} K to $10^9 K (corresponding to 1 MeV to 0.1 MeV).^[54] During this brief epoch, the universe transitioned from a state dominated by free nucleons and photons to one where stable light nuclei could form, setting the primordial abundances that constitute a key testable prediction of the standard Big Bang model.^[55] The process is governed by the expansion rate, weak interaction rates, and nuclear reaction cross-sections, with the neutron-to-proton ratio established earlier at freeze-out around t \approx 1 s and T \approx 1 MeV, yielding an initial n/p \approx 1/6 after corrections.^[56] A critical phase in BBN is the deuterium bottleneck, which delays significant nucleosynthesis until the universe cools sufficiently to prevent the photodissociation of deuterium by the high-energy tail of the photon spectrum.^[54] This bottleneck persists until temperatures drop to about 0.1 MeV (t \approx 100 s), when the reaction p + n \leftrightarrow D + \gamma can proceed without immediate reversal, allowing deuterium to accumulate and serve as a seed for heavier nuclei.^[56] The binding energy of deuterium (B_D = 2.224 MeV) plays a pivotal role here, as higher temperatures maintain an equilibrium where deuterium is scarce due to the abundance of energetic photons.^[54] The primary nuclear reactions begin with the deuterium formation p + n \to D + \gamma, followed by rapid captures such as D(p,\gamma){}^3\mathrm{He} and {}^3\mathrm{He}(D,p){}^4\mathrm{He}, which efficiently convert nearly all available neutrons into {}^4\mathrm{He} due to its high binding energy (B \approx 28 MeV).^[55] Trace amounts of {}^3\mathrm{He}, {}^3\mathrm{H}, and {}^7\mathrm{Li} form via subsequent branches like D(D,p){}^3\mathrm{He} and {}^3\mathrm{He}(\alpha,\gamma){}^7\mathrm{Be} (where \alpha = {}^4\mathrm{He}), but heavier elements are limited by the short timescale and Coulomb barriers.^[54] These abundances strongly depend on the baryon-to-photon ratio \eta \approx 6 \times 10^{-10}, which determines the nucleon density relative to the photon bath; higher \eta increases capture rates and reduces fragile isotopes like deuterium while boosting helium.^[55] This parameter, \eta_{10} = 6.1 \pm 0.1 in standard models, is independently constrained by cosmic microwave background measurements of the baryon density.^[54] Standard BBN predictions yield a primordial composition of approximately 75% hydrogen (^1\mathrm{H}) and 25% helium-4 ({}^4\mathrm{He}) by mass, with trace amounts of deuterium (D/{}^1\mathrm{H} \approx 2.5 \times 10^{-5} by number), {}^3\mathrm{He}/H \approx 1.0 \times 10^{-5}, and {}^7\mathrm{Li}/H \approx 5 \times 10^{-10}.^[55] These values emerge from detailed numerical integrations of the reaction network, incorporating updated nuclear data and expansion dynamics.^[54] Observational tests confirm these predictions, with primordial deuterium abundances measured via absorption lines in high-redshift, low-metallicity quasar spectra yielding D/H = (2.53 \pm 0.04) \times 10^{-5}, in excellent agreement with theory. Similarly, the helium-4 mass fraction Y_p \approx 0.245 is inferred from recombination lines in spectra of extragalactic H II regions and metal-poor stars, consistent with BBN after corrections for stellar processing.^[55] While the primordial lithium-7 abundance shows mild tension (observed Spite plateau values around $1.6 \times 10^{-10} versus predicted $5 \times 10^{-10}), the overall concordance for D and {}^4\mathrm{He} provides robust validation of the model.^[54]

Large-Scale Structure of the Universe

The large-scale structure of the universe, encompassing the distribution of galaxies, clusters, and voids, emerges from tiny initial density fluctuations generated during the inflationary epoch of the early Big Bang universe. These primordial perturbations originate as quantum fluctuations in the inflaton field, which are stretched to super-horizon scales by the rapid expansion of inflation, providing the seeds for subsequent gravitational collapse.^[57] As the universe transitions to the radiation- and matter-dominated eras, these fluctuations grow under gravity, evolving into the observed cosmic web.^[58] In the hierarchical merging paradigm of structure formation, small dark matter halos condense first at high redshifts, approximately z ≈ 10–20, corresponding to about 200–500 million years after the Big Bang, before merging into larger structures such as galaxies, groups, and clusters. This bottom-up process, driven by cold dark matter dynamics, leads to the formation of filamentary walls, massive clusters at their intersections, and expansive voids in between, shaping the three-dimensional cosmic web over billions of years.^[59] The initial conditions set by inflation ensure that this evolution aligns with the Lambda cold dark matter (ΛCDM) model, where gravitational instability amplifies the primordial seeds into the observed hierarchy of structures.^[60] Observational evidence for this structure is provided by large galaxy surveys like the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), which map the filamentary distribution of galaxies across cosmic volumes. These surveys reveal a web-like pattern of matter concentrations, with galaxies preferentially aligned along filaments and separated by voids, confirming the predictions of gravitational collapse from inflationary seeds. Additionally, both SDSS and DESI detect baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) as a characteristic scale of approximately 150 Mpc in the galaxy clustering, imprinted by sound waves in the early plasma and serving as a standard ruler for measuring cosmic expansion. The statistical properties of these fluctuations are quantified by the matter power spectrum P(k), which describes the amplitude of density perturbations as a function of wavenumber k. On large scales (small k), where the transfer function approaches unity, P(k) ∝ k^{n_s} with the scalar spectral index n_s ≈ 0.96, indicating a nearly scale-invariant primordial spectrum slightly tilted redward as predicted by inflation.^[61] This power-law form, combined with growth factors, matches the observed clustering statistics from surveys, underscoring the Big Bang model's success in explaining the universe's structural evolution.

Theoretical Foundations

Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker Metric

The Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker (FLRW) metric describes the geometry of a spacetime that is homogeneous and isotropic, serving as the cornerstone for modeling the expanding universe in general relativity. This metric assumes the cosmological principle, which posits that the universe appears the same at every point (homogeneity) and in every direction (isotropy) on large scales. It was first derived by Alexander Friedmann in 1922 as a solution to Einstein's field equations for a dynamic universe. Independently, Georges Lemaître proposed a similar form in 1927, incorporating an expanding model with constant mass. The metric was generalized in the 1930s by Howard Robertson and Arthur Walker, who established its unique form under the assumptions of spatial homogeneity and isotropy. The line element of the FLRW metric, in comoving coordinates (t, r, \theta, \phi), is given by

ds^2 = -c^2 dt^2 + a(t)^2 \left[ \frac{dr^2}{1 - k r^2} + r^2 (d\theta^2 + \sin^2 \theta \, d\phi^2) \right],

where a(t) is the dimensionless scale factor that describes the relative expansion of the universe over time, c is the speed of light, k is the curvature parameter (with dimensions adjusted such that k = 0, +1, -1 in normalized units), and the angular part d\Omega^2 = d\theta^2 + \sin^2 \theta \, d\phi^2 spans the 2-sphere. The scale factor a(t) is normalized such that a(t_0) = 1 at the present epoch t_0. To obtain the dynamical equations, the FLRW metric is substituted into Einstein's field equations,

G_{\mu\nu} + \Lambda g_{\mu\nu} = \frac{8\pi G}{c^4} T_{\mu\nu},

assuming a perfect fluid stress-energy tensor T_{\mu\nu} = (\rho + p/c^2) u_\mu u_\nu + (p/c^2) g_{\mu\nu}, where \rho is the total energy density, p is the isotropic pressure, u^\mu is the four-velocity of comoving observers, G is the gravitational constant, and \Lambda is the cosmological constant. The nonzero components of the Einstein tensor G_{\mu\nu} for the FLRW metric yield the two Friedmann equations. The first, from the $00-component, governs the expansion rate:

\left( \frac{\dot{a}}{a} \right)^2 = \frac{8\pi G}{3} \rho - \frac{k c^2}{a^2} + \frac{\Lambda c^2}{3},

where \dot{a} = da/dt and the Hubble parameter is H = \dot{a}/a. The second, from the spatial components (or via the trace of the field equations), describes the acceleration:

\frac{\ddot{a}}{a} = -\frac{4\pi G}{3} \left( \rho + \frac{3p}{c^2} \right) + \frac{\Lambda c^2}{3}.

These equations encapsulate the interplay between gravity, matter-energy content, curvature, and the cosmological constant in driving the universe's evolution. The curvature parameter k determines the global geometry of spatial hypersurfaces: k = 0 corresponds to a flat, Euclidean geometry with infinite spatial extent; k > 0 to a positively curved, closed hypersurface akin to a 3-sphere, which is finite but unbounded; and k < 0 to a negatively curved, open hyperbolic geometry with infinite extent. Solutions to the Friedmann equations vary by the dominant energy component (e.g., matter \rho \propto a^{-3}, radiation \rho \propto a^{-4}) and \Lambda. For a flat, matter-dominated universe without \Lambda (k=0, p=0), the scale factor evolves as a(t) \propto t^{2/3}, indicating decelerating expansion. In a closed universe (k > 0) with \Lambda = 0, the solution expands from a Big Bang to a maximum size and then recollapses in a Big Crunch, while open universes (k < 0) expand indefinitely. Including \Lambda > 0 can lead to accelerating expansion in all cases for late times. In inflationary cosmology, rapid early expansion drives k \approx 0, yielding a nearly flat universe.

Inflationary Cosmology

Inflationary cosmology proposes a brief period of accelerated expansion in the early universe, occurring shortly after the Big Bang, to address certain fine-tuning issues in the standard model. This phase is driven by a hypothetical scalar field known as the inflaton, denoted φ, whose potential energy dominates the energy density, leading to exponential expansion of the universe. In Alan Guth's seminal 1980 model, the scale factor grows as a(t) \propto e^{H t}, where H is the nearly constant Hubble parameter, resulting in approximately 60 e-folds of expansion (N \approx 60) to sufficiently dilute initial irregularities while matching the observed large-scale uniformity. The dynamics of this expansion rely on the slow-roll approximation, where the inflaton field evolves gradually down a flat potential V(\phi). Key slow-roll parameters quantify the flatness required for prolonged inflation: the first parameter \epsilon = \frac{1}{2} \left( \frac{V'}{V} \right)^2 measures the steepness of the potential, and the second \eta = \frac{V''}{V} assesses its curvature, both in Planck units where M_{\rm Pl} = 1. Successful inflation demands \epsilon \ll 1 and |\eta| \ll 1, ensuring the field's kinetic energy remains subdominant to its potential energy, allowing the Hubble parameter to stay nearly constant over many e-folds.^[61] Quantum fluctuations in the inflaton field during this epoch seed the primordial density perturbations observed today. These microscopic variations \delta \phi are stretched to cosmic scales by the rapid expansion, generating a nearly scale-invariant power spectrum for scalar curvature perturbations, given by P_R(k) \approx \frac{H^2}{8 \pi^2 \epsilon}, evaluated when modes exit the Hubble horizon. This spectrum, with a slight tilt n_s \approx 1 - 6\epsilon + 2\eta \approx 0.96, aligns with measurements from the cosmic microwave background and provides the initial conditions for large-scale structure formation. Variants of the model, such as eternal inflation proposed by Andrei Linde, arise when quantum fluctuations prevent the inflaton from uniformly reaching the slow-roll violation point, leading to perpetual inflation in some regions while others transition to a hot Big Bang phase. In this scenario, the universe becomes a self-reproducing multiverse with exponentially growing bubble universes. Post-inflation, the reheating process converts the inflaton's coherent energy into relativistic particles through parametric resonance or perturbative decays, restoring thermal equilibrium and initiating standard Big Bang nucleosynthesis, with the reheating temperature typically around $10^{15} GeV depending on the model.

Horizons and Homogeneity Issues

The horizon problem arises in the standard Big Bang model because the cosmic microwave background (CMB) exhibits remarkable uniformity in temperature across the sky, with fluctuations δT/T on the order of 10^{-5}, yet distant regions separated by angles greater than about 2° were never in causal contact during the universe's early history. In the absence of a mechanism to synchronize these regions, their thermal equilibrium appears inexplicable, as light could not have traveled between them since the Big Bang. The particle horizon, defined as the proper distance light has traveled since t=0, is given by d_h = a(t) \int_0^t \frac{c \, dt'}{a(t')}, where a(t) is the scale factor; at the present epoch, this evaluates to d_h ≈ 46 billion light-years (or about 3 c / H_0 in the standard ΛCDM model), with H_0 the present-day Hubble constant, limiting causal connections to scales much smaller than the observed CMB uniformity.^[62] This issue extends to the broader homogeneity of the universe, as enshrined in the cosmological principle, which posits that the universe is homogeneous and isotropic on large scales, with density contrasts δρ/ρ constrained to less than 10^{-5} from CMB observations.^[63] Without causal communication, such homogeneity requires improbable initial conditions, challenging the standard model's ability to explain the observed large-scale structure uniformity.^[62] The flatness problem compounds these concerns, as the present-day total density parameter Ω ≈ 1, measured as Ω_m ≈ 0.315 from Planck data (including baryonic and dark matter contributions), implies that the early universe's energy density ρ + Λ was extraordinarily fine-tuned to satisfy the Friedmann equation for a flat geometry: ρ + Λ = 3H^2 / (8πG).^[63] In the standard Big Bang, deviations from this balance would grow rapidly with expansion, making the observed near-critical density (Ω ≈ 1) require precise initial conditions at temperatures above 10^{10} K, with tuning better than 10^{-60} at the Planck epoch.^[62] Grand unified theories (GUTs) exacerbate these issues by predicting the production of magnetic monopoles during early phase transitions, yielding a relic density n ∝ a^{-3} that would dominate the universe's energy content today, contradicting observations of no such particles.^[62] Inflationary cosmology addresses the horizon, flatness, and monopole problems by positing a brief period of exponential expansion, which stretches causal horizons to encompass the entire observable universe, drives Ω toward 1 regardless of initial conditions, and dilutes monopole densities by a factor of e^{-3N} where N ≈ 60 e-folds of expansion suffices to render them unobservable.^[62]

Open Questions and Challenges

Dark Matter and Dark Energy

Dark matter, a non-baryonic form of matter that interacts primarily through gravity, accounts for approximately 27% of the universe's total energy density in the standard ΛCDM model.^[63] Its existence was first inferred from observations of galaxy cluster dynamics in the 1930s, where Fritz Zwicky noted that the velocities of galaxies in the Coma Cluster implied far more mass than visible matter could provide, suggesting a "missing mass" component. Decisive evidence came in the 1970s from studies of galactic rotation curves by Vera Rubin and collaborators, who measured flat rotation velocities in spiral galaxies like Andromeda, indicating that unseen mass extends well beyond the luminous disks to maintain orbital speeds against centrifugal forces.^[64] Leading candidates for dark matter particles include weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs), hypothetical particles with masses around the electroweak scale (~100 GeV) that naturally arise in extensions of the Standard Model, such as supersymmetry, and could be thermal relics from the early universe. Recent direct detection experiments, such as LUX-ZEPLIN and XENONnT as of 2025, have yielded null results, tightening constraints on WIMP parameter space and motivating alternative candidates.^[65] Another prominent candidate is the axion, a light pseudoscalar boson originally proposed to resolve the strong CP problem in quantum chromodynamics via a dynamical Peccei-Quinn symmetry-breaking mechanism. These particles are non-relativistic ("cold") in the present epoch, forming extended halos around galaxies that align with the observed large-scale structure while evading direct electromagnetic detection. Dark energy, comprising about 68% of the universe's energy content, is the dominant component driving the observed acceleration of cosmic expansion.^[63] Its discovery stemmed from Type Ia supernova (SNIa) observations in the late 1990s, which revealed that distant supernovae were fainter than expected in a decelerating universe, implying a repulsive force counteracting gravity on large scales.^[66] In the ΛCDM model, dark energy is modeled as a cosmological constant Λ with a nearly uniform energy density, estimated at Λ ≈ 1.1 × 10^{-52} m^{-2}, contributing a negative pressure that accelerates the expansion as described in the Friedmann equations of the FLRW metric.^[63] The equation of state for dark energy, defined as w = \frac{p}{\rho c^2} where p is pressure, \rho is energy density, and c is the speed of light, is constrained to w \approx -1, consistent with a constant vacuum energy.^[67] This value has been tightly bounded by SNIa distance measurements, which probe luminosity evolution, and baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) features in the galaxy distribution, which serve as a cosmic standard ruler for expansion history; combined analyses yield w = -1.03^{+0.03}_{-0.03} at 68% confidence.^[66] Recent James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) observations from 2022 to 2025 have identified unexpectedly massive and mature galaxies at redshifts z > 10, corresponding to less than 500 million years after the Big Bang, posing challenges to cold dark matter hierarchies in ΛCDM by suggesting faster structure formation than predicted by standard simulations.^[68] These galaxies, with stellar masses up to approximately $10^{10} solar masses, imply efficient early star formation and merging that may require adjustments to dark matter models or feedback processes.^[68]

Baryon Asymmetry

The observed baryon asymmetry in the universe manifests as a small excess of baryons over antibaryons, quantified by the baryon-to-photon ratio \eta = n_b / n_\gamma \approx 6.1 \times 10^{-10}, where n_b is the net baryon number density and n_\gamma is the photon number density.^[63] This value, derived from cosmic microwave background measurements, implies that for every billion photons, there is roughly one excess baryon, ensuring the survival of matter-dominated structures after the early universe's particle-antiparticle annihilations.^[63] The asymmetry is uniform on large scales, with no evidence for significant antimatter regions, as confirmed by the absence of annihilation gamma-ray signals from cosmic ray interactions or intergalactic boundaries.^[69] In 1967, Andrei Sakharov outlined three necessary conditions for generating this asymmetry dynamically during the early universe's evolution: (1) processes that violate baryon number conservation, (2) charge conjugation (C) and combined charge-parity (CP) symmetry violation to distinguish matter from antimatter, and (3) departure from thermal equilibrium to prevent symmetry restoration.^[70] These criteria, now known as the Sakharov conditions, frame baryogenesis as a non-equilibrium process occurring at high temperatures, where quantum effects or heavy particle interactions preferentially produce baryons.^[71] Several mechanisms within the Big Bang framework satisfy these conditions to produce the observed \eta. In grand unified theories (GUTs), heavy gauge bosons or scalars decay out of equilibrium at energies around $10^{15} GeV, directly violating baryon number and generating an initial asymmetry, though subsequent electroweak sphaleron processes—non-perturbative transitions in the standard model that violate baryon plus lepton number (B+L)—can partially convert this into the final value.^[71] Leptogenesis, an alternative, arises from the out-of-equilibrium decays of heavy right-handed neutrinos at scales near $10^{10} GeV, creating a lepton asymmetry via CP-violating interactions, which sphalerons then redistribute into a net baryon asymmetry with \eta \sim 10^{-10} consistent with observations.^[72] Additionally, the standard model's CP violation, parameterized by the complex phase in the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix, provides the necessary asymmetry source, as evidenced by the observed imbalance in neutral kaon decays (K^0 \to \pi^+ \pi^- versus \overline{K}^0 \to \pi^- \pi^+), though its magnitude alone is insufficient without amplification by non-equilibrium dynamics.^[73] This asymmetry aligns with big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) predictions, where the derived \eta \approx 6 \times 10^{-10} from CMB data matches the primordial abundances of light elements like deuterium and helium-4, confirming a consistent baryon content at temperatures around 1 MeV. The lack of observed antimatter domains further supports a global asymmetry, as large-scale antimatter regions would produce detectable gamma-ray fluxes from matter-antimatter annihilation at cosmic interfaces, which are absent in surveys by instruments like Fermi-LAT.^[69]

Recent Observational Tensions

One of the most prominent recent tensions in cosmology is the Hubble tension, which arises from discrepant measurements of the Hubble constant H_0. Local measurements using the cosmic distance ladder, particularly from the SH0ES collaboration employing Cepheid variables and Type Ia supernovae, yield H_0 \approx 73 km/s/Mpc.^[74] In contrast, early-universe inferences from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) by the Planck satellite give H_0 \approx 67 km/s/Mpc.^[75] This discrepancy exceeds 5σ significance and persists in 2025 analyses, suggesting potential new physics beyond the standard ΛCDM model, such as early dark energy or modified gravity.^[76] Another key tension is the S_8 discrepancy, which measures the amplitude of matter fluctuations on scales of 8 h^{-1} Mpc, combining the matter density parameter \Omega_m and the RMS fluctuation \sigma_8. CMB data from Planck prefer S_8 \approx 0.81, reflecting robust early-universe structure growth.^[77] However, late-universe probes like weak gravitational lensing surveys (e.g., KiDS and DES) report lower values around S_8 \approx 0.76, indicating suppressed structure formation in the local universe.^[78] This 2-3σ tension, highlighted in 2025 reviews, challenges ΛCDM predictions for matter clustering and may point to baryonic feedback effects or neutrino masses altering growth rates.^[79] Observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) since 2022 have revealed an unexpectedly high abundance of massive galaxies at redshifts z > 10, corresponding to less than 500 million years after the Big Bang. These galaxies, with stellar masses up to $10^9 M_\odot, exceed ΛCDM expectations by over an order of magnitude in number density, as confirmed in deep-field surveys like JADES.^[68] By 2025, discoveries such as JADES-GS-z14-0 at z \approx 14.3 further underscore rapid early galaxy assembly, prompting revisions to star formation efficiency models or dark matter halo properties to accommodate faster growth.^[80] The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) results from 2024-2025, using over 6 million galaxies and quasars, have refined the matter density to \Omega_m \approx 0.30, aligning closely with CMB priors but exacerbating tensions with a cosmological constant \Lambda.^[81] When combined with CMB data, DESI DR2 shows approximately 4σ preference for evolving dark energy over static \Lambda as of 2025, as the BAO scale tensions with flat ΛCDM geometry.^[82] This inconsistency, detailed in 2025 analyses, suggests dynamical dark energy or modified expansion history to reconcile measurements.^[83]

Alternatives and Extensions

Steady-State and Cyclic Models

The steady-state theory, proposed independently by Hermann Bondi and Thomas Gold, as well as Fred Hoyle in 1948, posits an expanding universe that maintains a constant average density of matter through the continuous creation of new matter at a rate compensating for the dilution due to expansion.^[84]^[85] This model adheres to the perfect cosmological principle, asserting that the universe appears unchanging on large scales at any epoch, avoiding a singular origin.^[84] However, the theory encountered significant challenges from observations; the discovery of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) in 1965 provided evidence of a hot, dense early phase incompatible with steady-state predictions of negligible relic radiation. Additionally, the evolution of quasars and radio sources, with higher densities observed at greater redshifts indicating a younger, more active universe in the past, contradicted the expectation of uniformity across cosmic time.^[86] Cyclic models offer alternatives to a singular Big Bang by envisioning the universe undergoing repeated phases of expansion and contraction. The ekpyrotic scenario, developed by Paul Steinhardt and Neil Turok in 2002, draws from string theory and describes the hot Big Bang as emerging from a collision between higher-dimensional branes in a cyclic process, where the universe contracts to a high-density state before rebounding without a classical singularity.^[87] This model replaces cosmic inflation with brane dynamics to explain the universe's flatness and homogeneity. Similarly, Roger Penrose's conformal cyclic cosmology, introduced in 2010, proposes that the universe consists of infinite "aeons," where the remote future of one aeon—approaching a conformally invariant state at null infinity—conformally rescales to become the Big Bang of the next, preserving causal structure across cycles. In this framework, black hole evaporation and dilution of matter lead to a smooth, low-entropy transition, addressing the puzzle of the initial conditions. Bounce scenarios, particularly within loop quantum cosmology, resolve the Big Bang singularity by incorporating quantum gravity effects that prevent classical collapse to infinite density. In these models, spacetime undergoes a quantum bounce when the energy density approaches a maximum value near the Planck density, ρ_max ≈ 0.41 ρ_Pl, transitioning from contraction to expansion without a true singularity. Seminal work by Abhay Ashtekar, Tomasz Pawlowski, and Parampreet Singh in 2006 demonstrated this mechanism using effective loop quantum dynamics for a flat Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson–Walker universe with a scalar field, yielding a pre-bounce contracting phase that seeds the observed post-bounce expansion. Key differences between these alternatives and the standard Big Bang model include the absence of an initial singularity, replaced by eternal expansion, cycles, or quantum bounces, which circumvents issues like the origin of the universe from "nothing." Cyclic and bounce models also offer potential resolutions to entropy problems by recycling low-entropy states from previous phases—such as through conformal rescaling in Penrose's framework or dilution during contraction—rather than invoking a finely tuned initial condition.^[87]

Multiverse and Quantum Interpretations

In the context of Big Bang cosmology, eternal inflation emerges as a quantum extension where inflation does not end globally but persists indefinitely in certain regions, leading to the continuous nucleation of bubble universes with potentially varying physical constants. This scenario was first proposed by Alexander Vilenkin in 1983, who described the quantum tunneling of universes from a false vacuum state into expanding de Sitter spaces, akin to bubble formation.^[88] Subsequently, Andrei Linde extended this in 1986 through chaotic inflation models, showing that quantum fluctuations in the inflaton field can perpetually drive inflation in parts of spacetime, while other regions thermalize into distinct universes with different vacuum energies and coupling constants. These bubble universes arise from stochastic quantum processes, implying a vast multiverse where our observable universe is just one such pocket, resolving fine-tuning issues through the statistical diversity of constants across the ensemble.^[89] The multiverse framework gains further support from string theory's landscape of possible vacua, which provides a concrete mechanism for the variation of constants observed in eternal inflation. In type IIB string theory compactifications, fluxes and moduli stabilization yield an enormous number of metastable de Sitter vacua, estimated at approximately $10^{500}, each corresponding to different values of the cosmological constant \Lambda and other parameters.^[90] This landscape, popularized by Leonard Susskind in 2003, suggests that anthropic selection explains the small positive \Lambda and low baryon-to-photon ratio \eta \approx 6 \times 10^{-10} in our universe, as only vacua permitting complex structure and observers like us would be inhabited.^[91] Eternal inflation populates this landscape by nucleating bubbles in different vacua, linking quantum cosmology to the observed uniformity and flatness of the Big Bang via selection effects rather than initial conditions alone. Quantum cosmology formalizes these ideas by treating the entire universe as a quantum system, governed by the Wheeler-DeWitt equation, which attempts to quantize general relativity in a timeless framework. Derived by Bryce DeWitt in 1967, the equation takes the form

\hat{H} \Psi = 0,

where \hat{H} is the Hamiltonian constraint operator and \Psi is the wave function of the universe, encoding probabilities for different three-geometries and matter configurations without an external time parameter.^[92] A prominent solution is the Hartle-Hawking no-boundary proposal from 1983, which defines \Psi via a Euclidean path integral over compact four-geometries with no initial boundary, yielding a ground-state wave function that favors smooth, inflationary expansions from a quantum origin, avoiding singularities in the Big Bang.^[93] This approach predicts a universe emerging seamlessly from "nothing," with inflationary fluctuations briefly referenced as seeding the observed cosmic microwave background anisotropies. The black hole information paradox, wherein Hawking radiation appears to destroy quantum information, connects to early universe cosmology through holographic principles exemplified by the AdS/CFT correspondence. Introduced by Juan Maldacena in 1997, AdS/CFT posits that gravity in anti-de Sitter space is dual to a conformal field theory on its boundary, preserving unitarity and resolving information loss by encoding bulk dynamics on the boundary. Extensions to de Sitter-like cosmologies, as explored in holographic models of the early universe, suggest that the inflationary horizon behaves analogously to a black hole event horizon, implying that primordial information is holographically stored and retrievable, thus tying quantum gravity insights from black holes to the singularity-free emergence in Big Bang scenarios.^[94]

References

[1]
The big bang | Institute of Physics
Most physicists believe the universe was born in a big bang 13.8 billion years ago. In it, the energy making up everything in the cosmos we see today was ...
[2]
The Big Bang - NASA Science
Feb 28, 2024 · Study how the universe evolved, learn about the fundamental forces, and discover what the cosmos is made of.
[3]
What is the Big Bang Theory? - Space
Jan 29, 2025 · The Big Bang Theory explains how the universe began with an infinitely hot and dense single point that inflated to form the ever-expanding ...The beginning of the universe · Big Bang theory FAQs · Modelling the Big Bang
[4]
[PDF] Planck 2018 results. I. Overview, and the cosmological legacy of ...
Jul 16, 2018 · Planck was dedicated to studying the early Universe and its ... Age[Gyr] . . . . . . . . . 13.7971. 13.7839. 15For ns this claim depends ...
[5]
WMAP Big Bang Theory - NASA
Mar 1, 2012 · It postulates that 12 to 14 billion years ago, the portion of the universe we can see today was only a few millimeters across.Missing: core | Show results with:core
[6]
Big Bang Cosmology - University of Pittsburgh
Cosmic time is measured by the proper time elapsed along the world lines of the galaxies. The cosmic epoch associated with each snapshot of space is given by ...
[7]
review of the standard presentation of cosmology
where the dimensionless function a(t) is called the cosmic scale factor. This line element describes an expanding (or contracting) universe that, at the ...
[8]
The Early Universe
The Big Bang After about 50,000 years, the density of matter exceeded the density of radiation for the first time, eventually dominating the universe.Missing: equality | Show results with:equality
[9]
Planck time - CODATA Value
Click symbol for equation. Planck time $t_{\rm P}$. Numerical value, 5.391 247 x 10-44 s. Standard uncertainty, 0.000 060 x 10-44 s.
[10]
Cosmology and Theology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Oct 24, 2011 · Aristotle's cosmology belonged to the class of steady-state theories in so far that his universe was changeless and eternal. When Einstein in ...Missing: narratives | Show results with:narratives
[11]
[PDF] Liberty University The Development of Cosmological Theories and ...
May 3, 2025 · However,. Aristotle's belief in an eternal universe challenged Christian doctrine, which held that the universe had a beginning in time, created ...
[12]
[PDF] Creation and Temporality in Medieval Jewish Philosophy
Oct 1, 1997 · Aristotle posits an eternal universe in which time is potentially, if not actu- ally, infinite; neither time nor the universe was created.
[13]
Aquinas and the Big Bang - Freddoso
An eternal universe seemed incompatible with a universe created ex nihilo, and so some medieval Christians thought that Greek science, especially in the person ...Missing: Islamic | Show results with:Islamic
[14]
Cosmology and Religion - Encyclopedia of the History of Science
Through most of human history, cosmology and religion have been closely intertwined, and such was still the case during the scientific revolution.
[15]
[PDF] Maimonides' Arguments for Creation Ex Nihilo in the Guide of the ...
Mai- monides seems to recognize that the Platonic view is much closer to the Biblical concept of creation than is the Aristotelian one. The Aristotelian view ...<|separator|>
[16]
[PDF] Thermodynamics: The Unique Universal Science
This claim by Kelvin involving a universal tendency towards dissipation has come to be known as the heat death of the universe. The universal tendency towards ...
[17]
[PDF] Entropy's Child - BYU ScholarsArchive
Jun 17, 2020 · 2 As early as1852, William. Thomson (Lord Kelvin) concluded that the universe would inevitably arrive at “a state of universal rest and death.
[18]
Cosmic radioactivity and the age of the universe, 1900 - NASA ADS
... universe from the heat death. Soddy was convinced that the universe was cyclical and eternal. In 1907 he suggested that radioactive processes were ...
[19]
Vesto Slipher, Nebular Spectroscopy, and the Birth of Modern ...
Apr 1, 2022 · This article looks at Vesto Slipher's work on nebular spectroscopy between 1912 and 1922 as well as related research by other astronomers of the period.
[20]
[PDF] Galaxies - University of Maryland Astronomy
Vesto Slipher. Page 29. Cosmological redshift. Redshift is caused by the expansion of space! Page 30. Galaxies vs. nebulae. Hubble 1936. • Roughly in the 1930's ...
[21]
100 years of mathematical cosmology: Models, theories, and ...
On 8 February 1917, Einstein announced the first application of general relativity to the universe considered as a whole, the Einstein static universe [8]. It ...
[22]
[PDF] Georges Lemaître, The beginning of the world from the point of view ...
Jul 16, 2011 · Reviewed and improved during the following decades, Lemaître's primeval atom hypothesis has become the standard Big Bang model. Let us now ...
[23]
[PDF] Lemaître's Big Bang - arXiv
It was a remarkable prediction, since the most recent estimate for the age of the universe is 13.8 billion years. Einstein reacted quickly to Friedmann's ...
[24]
Alexander Friedmann and the origins of modern cosmology
Oct 1, 2012 · Friedmann's 1922 paper 1 cited the original papers by Einstein and de Sitter, as well as Eddington's 1920 book, Space, Time and Gravitation, ...
[25]
May/June 1922: Friedmann Imagines a Changing Universe
May 15, 2024 · Alexander Friedmann used Einstein's general theory of relativity to propose a universe that could expand or contract.Missing: original | Show results with:original
[26]
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01332580
[27]
The Hubble constant, explained - UChicago News
The Hubble constant is one of the most important numbers in cosmology because it tells us how fast the universe is expanding.Jump To A Section · How Does It Work? · What Are Possible...
[28]
1929: Edwin Hubble Discovers the Universe is Expanding
In 1929 Hubble published a paper that would lead to the realization that the universe was expanding. As astronomers' abilities to measure the distance and ...<|separator|>
[29]
Hubble's Law and the expanding universe - PMC - NIH
Mar 17, 2015 · Hubble's value for Ho was 500 km/s/Mpc, whereas today's well-calibrated value is Ho = 70 (±∼2) km/s/Mpc (15–20).
[30]
This Month in Physics History | American Physical Society
On April 1, 1948 a paper was published in the Physical Review by Alpher, Bethe, and Gamow, entitled “The Origin of Chemical Elements.
[31]
[PDF] Ralph A Alpher, George Antonovich Gamow, and the Prediction of ...
The first prediction of the existence of “relict radiation” or radiation remaining from the “Big Bang” was made in 1948.
[32]
[PDF] Nobel Lecture - Cosmic Microwave Background radiation
This paper is about the discovery of the cosmic microwave background radiation. It starts with a section on radio astronomical measuring techniques. This is ...
[33]
June 1963: Discovery of the Cosmic Microwave Background
Jul 1, 2002 · Bell Labs physicists Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson, who set out to map radio signals from the Milky Way and wound up being the first to measure the cosmic ...
[34]
ESA - What is 'red shift'? - European Space Agency
The term can be understood literally - the wavelength of the light is stretched, so the light is seen as 'shifted' towards the red part of the spectrum.
[35]
How do we know the Universe is expanding? - Euclid Consortium
Sep 8, 2023 · As the universe expands, it stretches the wavelengths of light along with it, a process called redshift. The farther away an object is, the more ...
[36]
Hubble's Law and the expanding universe - PNAS
Mar 17, 2015 · Hubble showed that galaxies are receding away from us with a velocity that is proportional to their distance from us: more distant galaxies recede faster than ...
[37]
Hubble Space Telescope on Track for Measuring the Expansion ...
Mar 20, 2025 · The goal of the project is to measure the Hubble Constant to ten percent accuracy. The Hubble Space Telescope Key Project team, an international ...
[38]
[astro-ph/9805201] Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an ...
May 15, 1998 · Abstract: We present observations of 10 type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) between 0.16 < z < 0.62. With previous data from our High-Z Supernova ...
[39]
Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating ...
We present spectral and photometric observations of 10 Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) in the redshift range 0.16 ≤ z ≤ 0.62. The luminosity distances of ...
[40]
A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble ...
A comprehensive measurement of the local value of the Hubble constant with 1 km s−1 Mpc−1 uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES team.
[41]
The Hubble tension - CERN Courier
Mar 26, 2025 · Vivian Poulin asks if the tension between a direct measurement of the Hubble constant and constraints from the early universe could be resolved by new physics.
[42]
The Hubble Tension Is Becoming a Hubble Crisis | Scientific American
Apr 2, 2025 · “We constrain all of them and find no evidence for new physics or a higher Hubble constant.”
[43]
Cosmic Microwave Background - Observational Cosmology
The Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) is the leftover radiation from the Big Bang, with a temperature of about 2.7K, and is nearly uniform.
[44]
[PDF] arXiv:2307.13083v1 [astro-ph.CO] 24 Jul 2023
Jul 24, 2023 · released approximately 380, 000 years after the Big Bang when the universe had cooled sufficiently for atoms to form (at redshift z ∼ 1100).
[45]
A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at 4080 Mc/s.
A MEASUREMENT OF EXCESS ANTENNA TEMPERATURE AT 4080 Mc/s Measurements of the effective zenith noise temperature of the 20-foot horn-reflector antenna ...
[46]
Cosmic Background Explorer - Nasa Lambda
FIRAS - The cosmic microwave background (CMB) spectrum is that of a nearly perfect blackbody with a temperature of 2.725 +/- 0.002 K.
[47]
ESA Science & Technology - Summary - European Space Agency
COBE determined that the CMB exhibits anisotropies at a level of one part in 105 and showed that the CMB spectrum matched that of a black body with a ...
[48]
Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP)
Aug 9, 2024 · The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) is a NASA Explorer mission that launched June 2001 to make fundamental measurements of cosmology.News · WMAP Mission Overview · Cosmology · Nine Year Microwave Sky ImageMissing: COBE 5
[49]
The Planck Mission - LAMBDA
The basic scientific goal of the Planck mission is to measure CMB anisotropies at all angular scales larger than 10 arcminutes over the entire sky with a ...
[50]
[PDF] 29. Cosmic Microwave Background - Particle Data Group
In addition, CMB lensing creates B modes from E modes, further complicating ... Figure 29.4: Power spectrum of E-mode polarization from Planck, together with WMAP ...
[51]
Planck 2015 results - XV. Gravitational lensing
The baryon density is given a Gaussian 1σ prior Ωbh2 = 0.0223 ± 0.0009, as measured independently from big bang nucleosynthesis models combined with quasar ...
[52]
None
### Summary of Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN)
[53]
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2016/10/aa25941-15/aa25941-15.html
[54]
https://pdg.lbl.gov/2024/reviews/rpp2024-rev-bbang-nucleosynthesis.pdf
[55]
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1505.01076.pdf
[56]
ΛCDM Model of Cosmology - Nasa Lambda
Density fluctuations in the primordial plasma are seeded by quantum fluctuations in the field driving inflation. ... large scale structure (Eisenstein & Hu 1998).Missing: bang | Show results with:bang
[57]
[PDF] arXiv:astro-ph/0410173v1 7 Oct 2004
The most successful cosmological models to date envision structure formation as a hierarchical process in which gravity is constantly drawing lumps of matter ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[58]
[PDF] Exploring cosmological constraints on galaxy formation time - arXiv
Sep 30, 2025 · JWST observations [25] pushed these limits further, identifying galaxies at z ∼ 3–4 that formed at zf ∼ 10–20 within tf ∼ 0.2–0.5 Gyr. A ...
[59]
[PDF] 23. Inflation - Particle Data Group
The standard Big-Bang model of cosmology provides a successful framework in which to under- stand the thermal history of our Universe and the growth of cosmic ...Missing: n_s | Show results with:n_s
[60]
Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness ...
Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems. Alan H. ... 1980 (unpublished) A. H. Guth and E. J. Weinberg, [17]. Omitted ...
[61]
[1807.06209] Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters - arXiv
Jul 17, 2018 · Planck found dark matter density \Omega_c h^2 = 0.120\pm 0.001, baryon density \Omega_b h^2 = 0.0224\pm 0.0001, and Hubble constant H_0 = (67.4 ...
[62]
https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.23.347
[63]
https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.06209
[64]
[PDF] 28. Dark Energy - Particle Data Group
Dec 1, 2023 · For dark energy with an equation of state w(z), the cosmological constant contribution to the expansion, ΩΛ, is replaced by a redshift ...
[65]
[2412.03534] Galaxy Formation in the Early Universe - arXiv
Dec 4, 2024 · Recent observations by the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) have revealed the presence of bright and well-formed galaxies at high redshifts, ...
[66]
[PDF] How Do We Know Antimatter Is Absent?
This then is the main charge of this lecture: to review and explore our evidence for a baryon asymmetry. SLAC Summer Institute on Particle Physics (SSI04), Aug.
[67]
Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon ... - Inspire HEP
Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe. A.D. Sakharov(. Lebedev Inst. ) 1967.Missing: baryogenesis | Show results with:baryogenesis
[68]
Baryogenesis from the weak scale to the grand unification scale - arXiv
Sep 15, 2020 · We review the current status of baryogenesis with emphasis on electroweak baryogenesis and leptogenesis.
[69]
[0802.2962] Leptogenesis - arXiv
Feb 20, 2008 · We review the basic mechanism, and describe subclasses of models. We then focus on recent developments in the understanding of leptogenesis: ...
[70]
[PDF] 12. CKM Quark-Mixing Matrix - Particle Data Group
Jun 1, 2020 · CP-violation measurements in B-meson decays provide direct information on the angles of the unitarity triangle, shown in Fig. 12.1. These ...<|separator|>
[71]
[PDF] arXiv:2503.21600v2 [astro-ph.CO] 10 Apr 2025
Apr 10, 2025 · Our results suggest a potential tension between the Hubble constant H0 of the SH0ES measurement and the phantom-to-quintessence transition ...
[72]
https://arxiv.org/abs/0802.2962
[73]
[PDF] Hubble tension updates - CERN Indico
○ Hubble tension > 5σ. – Not just SH0ES Cepheids vs Planck CMB. – General “direct” vs “FLRW-based”. (BAO+BBN, Cosm. Chron. , Masers, SBF, BTF, type II ...
[74]
[PDF] Insights from Tensions in Cosmology 2025 - arXiv
Sep 29, 2025 · Overall, the consensus at the meeting was that the S8 tension is now significant enough to warrant theoretical attention on par with the Hubble ...
[75]
Is the sigma-8 tension being sheared away? Cosmology with weak ...
The data from KiDS seems to suggest the \sigma_8 (or equivalently \Sigma_8) tension may become less of a concern for cosmologists.
[76]
Physics - No Easy Fix for Cosmology's “Other” Tension
Mar 4, 2025 · The S8 tension—a disagreement between cosmic-clumpiness measurements—is not going away, according to a new analysis of galaxy lensing data.Missing: weak | Show results with:weak
[77]
On the stunning abundance of super-early, massive galaxies ... - arXiv
Aug 1, 2022 · The earliest JWST observations have revealed an unexpected abundance of super-early (z>10), massive (M_*\approx 10^9\, M_\odot) galaxies.Missing: 2022-2025 | Show results with:2022-2025
[78]
The new, farthest galaxy has been found by JWST, only 280 million ...
May 22, 2025 · The JWST has discovered a series of increasingly distant, ancient galaxies. JADES-GS-z14-0 was the record holder at a redshift of 14.32.
[79]
DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of ...
Apr 3, 2024 · This paper presents cosmological results from Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) measurements using DESI data, measuring transverse comoving ...Missing: tension | Show results with:tension
[80]
On the tension between DESI DR2 BAO and CMB - arXiv
May 6, 2025 · Recent DESI DR2 baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurement shows inconsistency with the cosmic microwave background (CMB) observation in Λ Λ ...
[81]
Cosmological constraints on dark energy models using DESI BAO ...
Aug 22, 2025 · Observations from DESI DR2 are challenging the Λ \Lambda CDM ... DESI BAO results suggest potential thawing behaviour in dark energy.
[82]
Steady-State Theory of the Expanding Universe - Oxford Academic
Bondi, T. Gold, The Steady-State Theory of the Expanding Universe, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 108, Issue 3, June 1948, Pages ...
[83]
New Model for the Expanding Universe - Oxford Academic
The new model uses continuous creation of matter in general relativity to obtain a stationary universe with expansion without a cosmical constant.Missing: link | Show results with:link
[84]
Errors in the Steady State and Quasi-SS Models
Feb 23, 2015 · The Steady State model makes some definite predictions. The first one to be tested involved the number of faint radio sources.
[85]
[hep-th/0111030] A Cyclic Model of the Universe - arXiv
Nov 4, 2001 · We propose a cosmological model in which the universe undergoes an endless sequence of cosmic epochs each beginning with a bang and ending in a crunch.Missing: ekpyrotic original
[86]
Birth of inflationary universes | Phys. Rev. D
Jun 15, 1983 · Vilenkin, Tufts University Report No. TUTP-83-2, 1983 (unpublished); S. Dimopolous and H. Georgi, Phys. Lett. 117B, 287 (1982); P. J. ...Missing: paper | Show results with:paper
[87]
[PDF] Eternal inflation and its implications - arXiv
Feb 22, 2007 · Nonetheless, Andrei Linde [30] showed in 1986 that chaotic inflation can also be eternal. In this case inflation occurs as the scalar field ...
[88]
[hep-th/0301240] de Sitter Vacua in String Theory - arXiv
Jan 29, 2003 · We outline the construction of metastable de Sitter vacua of type IIB string theory. Our starting point is highly warped IIB compactifications.Missing: 500 | Show results with:500
[89]
[hep-th/0302219] The Anthropic Landscape of String Theory - arXiv
Feb 27, 2003 · I discuss the theoretical and conceptual issues that arise in developing a cosmology based on the diversity of environments implicit in string theory.Missing: 500 selection
[90]
Quantum Theory of Gravity. I. The Canonical Theory | Phys. Rev.
The conventional canonical formulation of general relativity theory is presented. The canonical Lagrangian is expressed in terms of the extrinsic and intrinsic ...Missing: original | Show results with:original
[91]
Wave function of the Universe | Phys. Rev. D
Dec 15, 1983 · The quantum state of a spatially closed universe can be described by a wave function which is a functional on the geometries of compact three-manifolds.
[92]
[1904.05821] Holography for the very early Universe and the ... - arXiv
Apr 11, 2019 · We show that standard puzzles of hot Big Bang cosmology that motivated the introduction of cosmological inflation, such as the smoothness and horizon problem,Missing: review | Show results with:review