Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Books of Samuel

The Books of Samuel, originally a single composition in the Hebrew Bible divided into First Samuel and Second Samuel in most Christian canons, narrate the establishment of kingship in ancient Israel through the intertwined stories of the prophet Samuel, Israel's first king Saul, and the future king David.^[1]^[2] These texts detail Samuel's birth and prophetic calling, the anointing of Saul amid Philistine threats, Saul's disobedience and rejection, David's emergence as a shepherd-warrior, his conflicts with Saul, and David's consolidation of power following Saul's death.^[1]^[3] Scholars regard the Books of Samuel as part of the Deuteronomistic History, a theological-historiographical framework linking earlier traditions to covenantal themes of obedience and divine judgment, though evidence points to incorporation of ancient materials possibly dating to the tenth century BCE.^[4]^[5] While traditional attribution credits Samuel, Gad, and Nathan, modern analysis identifies redactional layers from exilic or post-exilic periods, yet core narratives reflect early monarchic realities corroborated by archaeological and comparative Near Eastern sources.^[4]^[6] The books emphasize causal dynamics of leadership failure and divine election, portraying Saul's tragic decline due to presumption and David's successes amid moral complexities, including his affair with Bathsheba, as pivotal to Israel's political and spiritual formation.^[2] These accounts, blending etiology, poetry like Hannah's song and David's laments, and battle reports, have shaped Jewish and Christian understandings of monarchy as divinely ordained yet humanly flawed.^[1] Debates persist on historicity, with some minimalist views questioning the united monarchy's scale, countered by evidence for Davidic dynasty's endurance and tenth-century developments at sites like Khirbet Qeiyafa.^[4]^[6]

Canonical and Textual Foundations

Placement and Division in Scripture

In the Hebrew Bible, known as the Tanakh, the Books of Samuel constitute a single undivided work positioned within the second division, the Nevi'im (Prophets), specifically among the Former Prophets.^[7] This placement follows the book of Judges and precedes the book of Kings, forming part of a sequential historical narrative tracing Israel's leadership transition from judges to monarchy.^[8] The Tanakh's tripartite structure—Torah, Nevi'im, and Ketuvim—reflects a canonical order finalized by the second century CE, with Samuel's inclusion in Nevi'im emphasizing its prophetic and historical character rather than purely didactic or wisdom literature.^[8] Originally composed and transmitted as one book on a single scroll in Hebrew manuscripts, such as those underlying the Masoretic Text, the work's length—approximately 55 chapters—necessitated division for practical reasons in later translations.^[2] The Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures completed between the third and second centuries BCE, split it into two books, designating them as the First and Second Books of Kingdoms (or Reigns), with the subsequent books of Kings as the Third and Fourth.^[9] This division influenced the Latin Vulgate translation by Jerome in the late fourth century CE, which retained the naming as First and Second Kings for the Samuel material, followed by Third and Fourth Kings for the Kings books, prioritizing translational and liturgical utility over the Hebrew unity.^[9] In Protestant Christian Bibles, influenced by the Hebrew order but adopting the Septuagint's division, the text appears as two separate books—1 Samuel and 2 Samuel—within the historical section of the Old Testament, immediately after Judges and before 1 Kings.^[2] Catholic and Orthodox canons similarly divide it into 1 and 2 Samuel but include additional deuterocanonical books elsewhere, maintaining the core sequence from the Former Prophets while aligning with the Septuagint's broader arrangement.^[8] This dual tradition underscores a consensus on the narrative's integrity as a unified history of Samuel, Saul, and David, despite variations in titling and segmentation driven by scribal and translational practices.^[9]

Manuscript Traditions and Variants

The Books of Samuel are preserved in three principal textual traditions: the Masoretic Text (MT), the Septuagint (LXX), and fragments from the Dead Sea Scrolls (DSS). The MT, the standardized Hebrew consonantal text vocalized and accented by the Masoretes between the 7th and 10th centuries CE, is exemplified in medieval codices such as the Leningrad Codex (dated 1008 CE) and the Aleppo Codex (c. 930 CE, though the Samuel portion is partially extant). This tradition underlies most modern Hebrew Bibles and Jewish scriptural readings, yet it displays exceptional instability in Samuel, with frequent grammatical irregularities, metrical inconsistencies, and apparent omissions compared to other biblical books.^[5]^[10] The LXX, the ancient Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible produced primarily in Alexandria between the 3rd and 1st centuries BCE, often preserves readings that diverge significantly from the MT in Samuel, including expansions, alternative wordings, and rearranged sequences. Textual critics regard the LXX as reflecting a Hebrew Vorlage (underlying text) distinct from the proto-MT, potentially closer to an earlier form of the Samuel narrative; for instance, the LXX version of the David and Goliath account (1 Samuel 17–18) is approximately 40% shorter than the MT, omitting details such as Goliath's armor description and David's taunts, which may represent MT additions or LXX abbreviations. Dead Sea Scrolls fragments, particularly 4QSama (4Q51, dated to the 1st century BCE), align more closely with the LXX against the MT in roughly half of tested variants, supporting the view of a pluriform textual history predating the MT standardization. These DSS manuscripts, discovered at Qumran and comprising portions from both 1 and 2 Samuel, include unique readings such as fuller narratives in 1 Samuel 1–2 and suggest scribal transmission involved deliberate harmonizations or errors like homoioteleuton (eye-skip omissions) in the MT lineage.^[11]^[12]^[13] Notable variants include numerical discrepancies (e.g., differing army sizes in battles) and narrative elements, such as the MT's inclusion of Saul's consultation with the medium at Endor (1 Samuel 28) in a form expanded relative to some LXX witnesses. While the MT's vocalization aids interpretation, its consonantal base in Samuel is deemed "hopelessly corrupted" by some scholars due to accumulated scribal glosses and losses, prompting reconstructions that prioritize LXX and DSS for historical-critical editions like the Hebrew University Bible. No single tradition is uniformly superior, but the convergence of LXX and DSS against MT in key passages underscores Samuel's role as a pivotal case in Hebrew Bible textual criticism, revealing a fluid pre-Masoretic transmission process spanning centuries.^[10]^[14]

Narrative Content

Summary of 1 Samuel

The narrative of 1 Samuel opens with the barrenness of Hannah, wife of Elkanah, who vows to dedicate her son to God if granted fertility; she gives birth to Samuel and fulfills her vow by leaving him at the tabernacle in Shiloh under priest Eli's care.^[2] Samuel grows in service there, while Eli's corrupt sons, Hophni and Phinehas, profane their roles, leading to divine judgment against Eli's house.^[15] God calls young Samuel as a prophet, revealing the impending doom on Eli's family.^[16] In chapters 4–7, the Israelites suffer defeat by the Philistines at Ebenezer, losing the Ark of the Covenant captured as a supposed talisman; Eli dies upon hearing the news, and the Ark afflicts the Philistines with plagues until returned after seven months.^[2] Samuel then leads Israel as judge, rallying them to repent and destroy foreign idols, resulting in a victory over the Philistines at Mizpah, establishing peace during his lifetime.^[15] As Samuel ages, the people demand a king to rule like other nations, rejecting theocratic governance; God instructs Samuel to warn them of monarchy's burdens, but anoints Saul of the tribe of Benjamin as Israel's first king after Saul searches for lost donkeys and encounters Samuel.^[16] Saul's kingship is confirmed by lot and a successful campaign against the Ammonites, though Samuel admonishes fidelity to God over the king.^[15] Saul's early reign falters through impatience in offering sacrifice at Gilgal, prompting Samuel's declaration of divine rejection, and later disobedience in sparing Amalekite king Agag and livestock against God's command to utterly destroy them, sealing Saul's deposition.^[2] God directs Samuel to anoint David, son of Jesse from Bethlehem, as future king; David enters Saul's service as a musician to soothe Saul's tormenting spirit.^[16] David gains fame by slaying the Philistine champion Goliath with a sling and stone during a standoff at Socoh, routing the enemy; he forms a covenant of loyalty with Saul's son Jonathan.^[15] Saul's jealousy erupts as David's successes and chants of superiority over Saul spread, leading to repeated attempts on David's life; David marries Saul's daughter Michal but flees with Jonathan's aid, sparing Saul's life twice in caves despite opportunities to kill him.^[2] Saul consults a medium at Endor for guidance from Samuel's spirit, receiving a prophecy of defeat; in the ensuing battle at Mount Gilboa, Saul's sons Jonathan, Abinadab, and Malchishua perish, and Saul, wounded, falls on his sword to avoid capture by Philistines.^[16] Thus, 1 Samuel traces Israel's shift from prophetic judgeship to monarchy, highlighting obedience's role amid leadership transitions.^[15]

Summary of 2 Samuel

The second book of Samuel narrates the consolidation of David's kingship over Israel following Saul's death, beginning with David's execution of the Amalekite who claimed to have killed Saul and his composition of a lament for Saul and Jonathan.^[17] David is anointed king over the tribe of Judah in Hebron, where he reigns for seven years and six months amid civil strife with Ish-bosheth, Saul's son, who is supported by Abner as king over the northern tribes.^[18] Abner's defection to David, followed by his murder by Joab, David's commander, and Ish-bosheth's assassination lead to David's anointing as king over all Israel, marking the unification of the kingdom around 1000 BCE.^[19] David captures Jerusalem from the Jebusites, establishing it as his capital, and receives support from Hiram of Tyre for palace construction.^[17] David achieves military triumphs against surrounding nations, including the Philistines, Moabites, Arameans, Edomites, and Ammonites, expanding Israel's territory and amassing wealth, which he dedicates to the temple.^[20] He brings the Ark of the Covenant to Jerusalem amid celebrations, but only after divine judgment on Uzzah for touching it.^[21] The prophet Nathan relays God's covenant promise to David, establishing an eternal dynasty through his line, in response to David's desire to build a temple.^[17] David's successes peak with administrative organization of the kingdom, including appointments of officials and lists of his mighty warriors.^[18] The narrative shifts to David's moral failings, as he commits adultery with Bathsheba and arranges the death of her husband Uriah the Hittite to cover it up.^[17] Nathan confronts David with a parable, leading to his repentance but foretold consequences of strife within his house, including the death of the child born to Bathsheba.^[20] Familial discord ensues: David's son Amnon rapes his half-sister Tamar, prompting Absalom to kill Amnon in revenge; Absalom later rebels, declaring himself king in Hebron, forcing David to flee Jerusalem.^[17] Absalom's forces are defeated at the battle of Ephraim, where Joab kills Absalom against David's orders, deepening the king's grief.^[19] Subsequent events include Sheba's brief revolt, quelled by Joab, and David's psalm of deliverance and final words affirming God's faithfulness.^[21] David's census of the fighting men incurs divine wrath, resulting in a plague halted by his repentance at Araunah's threshing floor, the future site of the temple.^[17] The book concludes with appendices on David's warriors and a plague-recital psalm, underscoring themes of triumph, sin's repercussions, and covenant endurance.^[2]

Historicity and Empirical Evidence

Archaeological Corroborations

The Tel Dan Stele, discovered in 1993 at Tel Dan in northern Israel, dates to the mid-9th century BCE and records an Aramean king's victories over the "House of David," providing the earliest extra-biblical reference to a Davidic dynasty in Judah.^[22] This Aramaic inscription, erected by an adversary boasting of conquests against Israelite and Judahite kings, implies the existence of a foundational ruler named David whose lineage ruled Judah by the 9th century BCE, aligning with the portrayal in 2 Samuel of David establishing a royal house in Jerusalem.^[23] Scholars widely accept the "House of David" reading based on the stele's paleography and context, though some minimalists question its implications for a grand united monarchy, favoring evidence of a smaller Judahite polity.^[24] The Mesha Stele, a Moabite inscription from around 840 BCE found at Dhiban, details King Mesha's rebellions against Israel and references conquests over the "House of David" in Judah, corroborated by advanced imaging techniques revealing faded text linking Moabite campaigns to Judahite territory.^[25] This supports the biblical accounts in 2 Samuel and subsequent books of Moabite-Israeli conflicts during the early monarchy, with Mesha claiming to have seized lands previously held by Omri's Israel and extended into Judahite areas, consistent with David's expansions described in 2 Samuel 8.^[26] The stele's authenticity and dating are undisputed, though interpretations vary on whether it implies direct Davidic rule or later dynastic continuity.^[27] Excavations at Khirbet Qeiyafa, a fortified hilltop site in the Judean Shephelah, yield radiocarbon dates of circa 1025–975 BCE from short-lived olive pits, placing its occupation in the late 11th to early 10th century BCE, contemporaneous with the Saulide and early Davidic periods in 1–2 Samuel.^[28] The site's massive city walls, two gates, and absence of pig bones—contrasting with Philistine sites—along with an ostracon bearing proto-Canaanite script resembling early Hebrew, indicate a Judahite administrative center countering Philistine threats, as narrated in 1 Samuel 17's Valley of Elah battles.^[29] Lead excavator Yosef Garfinkel interprets it as a Davidic outpost, evidenced by no cultic idols and centralized storage facilities suggesting state-level organization, challenging low-chronology views that posit minimal Iron Age IIA Judahite complexity.^[30] Critics propose alternative identifications, such as a Philistine or northern Israelite site, but faunal and ceramic data favor Judahite affiliation.^[31] At Tell es-Safi (biblical Gath), ongoing excavations reveal 11th-century BCE Philistine fortifications, including colossal gates and walls over 7 meters thick, aligning with the period of Philistine dominance and conflicts in 1 Samuel, such as David's encounters with Goliath from Gath.^[32] A pottery sherd inscribed with "ALWT" or "WLT," akin to Goliath's name in proto-Canaanite script, dates to the 10th century BCE, supporting the cultural milieu of Philistine warriors described in Samuel.^[33] Philistine pottery and Aegean-style architecture confirm their presence as a pentapolis power, with Gath's growth reflecting the biblical rivalry, though no direct Saul or David artifacts have emerged.^[34] These finds empirically validate the Philistine threat's scale, countering claims of exaggerated biblical portrayals by demonstrating advanced urbanism in Philistia during the proposed monarchy transition.^[35] Evidence for Saul remains indirect, with sites like Tell el-Ful (possible Gibeah) showing Iron Age I fortifications potentially linked to his capital in 1 Samuel 10–11, but lacking inscriptions.^[36] Seals from Khirbet Summeily in southern Judah, dated to the 10th century BCE, indicate early administrative seals possibly under Davidic oversight, supporting state formation amid tribal unification efforts.^[37] Overall, while no artifacts name Samuel, the convergence of dated sites, inscriptions, and material culture corroborates a historical kernel of emerging Judahite and Israelite polities confronting regional powers, as depicted in Samuel, against scholarly skepticism emphasizing later redaction over empirical discontinuities.^[38]

Challenges to Historical Reliability

One primary challenge to the historical reliability of the Books of Samuel stems from the paucity of extra-biblical archaeological and inscriptional evidence corroborating the existence of Saul or the early career of David as depicted. No contemporary records from Egyptian, Philistine, or other Near Eastern sources mention Saul, and direct references to David appear only in later 9th-century BCE inscriptions like the Tel Dan Stele, which alludes to the "House of David" in the context of victories over Judahite kings, leaving the specific events of Samuel—such as Saul's battles or David's rise—without independent verification.^[39] Archaeological surveys of Iron Age I-IIA sites in the Judahite highlands reveal settlement patterns inconsistent with a unified, expansive monarchy in the 11th-10th centuries BCE, featuring small, unfortified villages with low population estimates (around 20,000-40,000 in Judah) and minimal urban development at key locations like Jerusalem, which spanned only about 10-12 acres with no monumental structures attributable to Davidic rule. Critics in the minimalist school, including Israel Finkelstein, contend that this data—combined with the absence of widespread destruction layers or administrative complexes—suggests the narrative exaggerates a tribal chiefdom into an imperial entity, with larger-scale architecture (e.g., at Megiddo, Hazor) more plausibly dated to the 9th century BCE under the Omride dynasty via radiocarbon analysis.^[40]^[41] Alleged anachronisms further fuel skepticism, with some analyses pointing to references to iron tools (e.g., 1 Samuel 13:19-21), domesticated camels in military contexts (1 Samuel 30:17), and sophisticated Philistine weaponry or tactics that align better with later Iron Age developments, implying composition or redaction centuries after the purported events. Internal discrepancies, such as variant accounts of David's introduction to Saul (1 Samuel 16-17) or the Ark's movements, alongside numerical variances with parallel Chronicles texts (e.g., differing plague death tolls in 2 Samuel 24 vs. 1 Chronicles 21), suggest composite sources prone to legendary accretion rather than precise historiography.^[42]^[43] These challenges are amplified by the books' late compilation, likely post-exilic (6th-5th centuries BCE), which minimalist views interpret as ideological constructs retrojecting Deuteronomistic theology onto sparse historical kernels to legitimize Judahite claims amid Persian-era identity formation, rather than reliable annals akin to Assyrian royal inscriptions. While absence of evidence does not conclusively disprove the core figures' existence—especially for a peripheral highland polity—the empirical gap between narrative scale and material record persists as a central point of contention among scholars.^[44]^[45]

Composition and Origins

Traditional Authorship Views

In Jewish tradition, the Books of Samuel—originally a single work known as the Book of Samuel—are attributed primarily to the prophet Samuel, with subsequent sections completed by the prophets Nathan and Gad. This view is articulated in the Babylonian Talmud (Bava Batra 14b–15a), which states that Samuel authored his own book up to the account of his death in 1 Samuel 28:3, after which Nathan and Gad, as succeeding prophets, recorded the remaining events through prophetic testimony.^[46] The Talmudic reasoning addresses the narrative's continuation beyond Samuel's lifetime by emphasizing divine inspiration enabling later prophets to verify and document subsequent history.^[46] This attribution draws support from internal biblical references, particularly 1 Chronicles 29:29, which cites records from "the book of Samuel the seer," "the book of Nathan the prophet," and "the book of Gad the seer" as sources for King David's acts, implying a composite authorship relying on eyewitness prophetic chronicles.^[47] Traditional Jewish exegesis, as preserved in rabbinic literature, posits that Samuel compiled earlier materials while alive, including judgments on Israel's transition to monarchy (1 Samuel 10:25), with Nathan contributing accounts of David's early reign and Gad detailing later events such as the census and its consequences (2 Samuel 24).^[48] Early Christian traditions largely align with this Jewish framework, viewing Samuel as the principal author for the portions within his lifetime, supplemented by Nathan and Gad for the rest, without significant divergence in attributing prophetic authority to these figures.^[49] This perspective underscores the texts' role as historical-prophetic records, emphasizing fidelity to divine revelation over singular human authorship, and contrasts with later critical theories by prioritizing the antiquity and coherence of the attributed sources.^[50]

Critical Source Hypotheses

Critical scholarship on the Books of Samuel posits that the texts incorporate multiple pre-existing sources, redacted into a cohesive narrative, rather than originating as a unified composition. This approach, rooted in 19th-century higher criticism, identifies literary seams, stylistic variations, and thematic shifts as evidence of disparate origins, though such inferences rely on subjective analysis without direct manuscript attestation of the hypothesized sources.^[44] For instance, the narrative's transitions between prophetic, royal, and ark-focused episodes suggest compilation from independent traditions, potentially including court annals or oral sagas, but empirical verification remains elusive due to the absence of extra-biblical corroboration for these components.^[51] A prominent hypothesis within the Deuteronomistic History (DtrH) framework, proposed by Martin Noth in 1943, views Samuel as part of a larger exilic-era editorial construct spanning Joshua to Kings, unified by theological retrospection on Israel's covenant failures.^[52] However, Samuel exhibits fewer explicit Deuteronomistic phrases—such as covenantal reward-punishment motifs—compared to Joshua or Kings, prompting debates over its integration; some scholars argue it was a later addition or distinct from the core DtrH, with Deuteronomistic layers superimposed on earlier materials around the 6th century BCE.^[53] This model assumes a primary exilic redactor synthesizing sources to interpret historical events through a deuteronomic lens, yet critics note its circularity, as source divisions often presuppose the theological bias it seeks to explain, with limited archaeological ties to proposed editorial dates.^[54] The Succession Narrative (SN), identified by Leonhard Rost in 1926, hypothesizes a coherent source in 2 Samuel 9–20 and 1 Kings 1–2, detailing David's familial intrigues and succession to Solomon, potentially derived from early 10th-century Judean court records.^[55] Proponents cite its secular tone, psychological depth, and focus on realpolitik—contrasting with prophetic elements elsewhere—as markers of an independent document composed shortly after the events, possibly under Solomonic patronage to legitimize the dynasty.^[56] Yet, challenges persist: seams with surrounding texts (e.g., integration with 2 Samuel 1–8) and repetitive motifs suggest it may not be a discrete "document" but a retrospective elaboration, with no surviving parallels in Near Eastern historiography to confirm such a genre.^[57] Other proposed sources include the Ark Narrative (1 Samuel 4–6; 2 Samuel 6), viewed as an early cultic legend emphasizing Yahweh's sovereignty, and narratives of Saul's rise (1 Samuel 9–15) and David's ascent (1 Samuel 16–2 Samuel 5), potentially drawn from "acts of Saul" or "acts of David" referenced in Chronicles.^[58] These fragment theories, favored over parallel-document models akin to the Pentateuch, attribute the text's growth to accumulative editing, but they falter on unverifiable assumptions about lost records, with stylistic unity in Hebrew prose undermining claims of stark source discontinuity.^[59] Overall, while these hypotheses illuminate potential compositional layers, their reliance on internal criteria invites skepticism, as post-Enlightenment biblical studies have historically prioritized fragmentation over holistic authorship, often sidelining ancient attributions to prophets like Samuel or Nathan without proportionate empirical counter-evidence.^[60]

Redaction and Dating Theories

The predominant critical theory posits that the Books of Samuel underwent redaction as components of the Deuteronomistic History (DH), a hypothesized corpus spanning Deuteronomy through Kings, shaped by editors imposing a theological framework emphasizing covenantal obedience and retribution.^[52] Martin Noth originated this model in 1943, arguing for a single exilic redactor (circa 550 BCE) who compiled disparate sources to interpret Israel's monarchy as divine judgment for infidelity to Yahweh's law.^[61] Subsequent refinements, such as Frank Moore Cross's double-redaction hypothesis, propose an initial pro-monarchic edition during Josiah's reign (late 7th century BCE) followed by exilic revisions amplifying punitive themes.^[62] Redaction-critical analysis identifies layers in Samuel: putative early narrative strands, such as ark stories (1 Samuel 4–6) or Saulide cycles, derived from oral or archival traditions predating the monarchy's fall, overlaid with Deuteronomistic insertions like prophetic oracles (e.g., 1 Samuel 12).^[60] These editors, per the theory, harmonized contradictions—such as variant David-Saul encounter accounts—while subordinating the text to a didactic agenda, evidenced by recurring motifs of kingship legitimation and prophetic authority.^[5] However, Deuteronomistic phraseology appears sparingly in Samuel compared to Joshua-Kings, prompting debates on whether it represents peripheral redaction or independent composition later incorporated into DH.^[52] Dating estimates hinge on linguistic markers, theological anachronisms, and allusions to post-monarchic events, with critical consensus favoring final redaction in the 6th century BCE amid Babylonian exile, though proto-Samuel materials may trace to the 8th–7th centuries BCE.^[63] Proponents cite alignments with Deuteronomic idiom and hindsight reflections on Judah's collapse as exilic hallmarks.^[64] Conservative scholars counter with earlier timelines, often 10th–9th centuries BCE, invoking narrative unity, archaic Hebrew forms, and congruence with extrabiblical records like the Mesha Stele (circa 840 BCE) to argue against prolonged transmission distortions.^[65] They critique late-dating criteria as circular, presupposing evolutionary religious development unsubstantiated by empirical manuscript evidence predating the 3rd century BCE Dead Sea Scrolls.^[66] Challenges to DH-centric redaction include synchronic literary approaches, which treat Samuel as a cohesive Iron Age artifact rather than layered strata, and minimalist revisions questioning any pre-exilic kernel due to sparse archaeological corroboration for United Monarchy scale.^[60] Yet, these models often rely on hypothetical reconstructions vulnerable to confirmation bias in source attribution, with peer-reviewed dissent highlighting Samuel's relative narrative seamlessness as evidence of earlier, less interventionist editing.^[67] Empirical constraints—absence of autographs and reliance on internal diagnostics—underscore the provisional nature of all theories, favoring parsimonious explanations over multi-stage elaborations absent direct attestation.^[68]

Theological and Philosophical Themes

Divine Providence and Judgment

In the Books of Samuel, divine providence manifests as God's sovereign orchestration of events to fulfill his purposes for Israel, including the selection and rejection of kings, often mediated through prophets like Samuel. This sovereignty is evident in the transition from judges to monarchy, where God responds to the people's request for a king "like all the nations" by anointing Saul, yet subordinates human agency to divine will, as seen in Samuel's declaration that obedience trumps ritual (1 Samuel 15:22).^[69]^[70] Providence extends to David's rise, with God directing Saul's spear-throwing fits and Philistine pursuits to preserve David, culminating in the Davidic covenant promising an eternal throne (2 Samuel 7:12-16).^[71] Divine judgment operates as retributive justice against covenant unfaithfulness, emphasizing causal consequences of sin rather than arbitrary punishment. Saul's rejection stems from partial obedience in sparing Agag and Amalekite livestock, prompting God's regret over his kingship and transfer of favor to David (1 Samuel 15:11, 28).^[72]^[70] Earlier, judgment falls on Eli's household for his sons' sacrilege and his failure to restrain them, resulting in the capture of the ark and death of Eli's lineage (1 Samuel 2:27-36; 4:11-18).^[69] Under David, providence and judgment intertwine: God grants victories, such as against Goliath, attributing success to divine intervention rather than military prowess (1 Samuel 17:46-47), but imposes consequences for David's adultery with Bathsheba and orchestrated killing of Uriah, foretold by Nathan as sword never departing from David's house (2 Samuel 12:9-10).^[71] The census in 2 Samuel 24 incites God's anger, leading to a plague killing 70,000, framed as divine incitement testing David's trust in numbers over God (2 Samuel 24:1, 10-15).^[73] These episodes underscore a theology where God's rule ensures accountability, with judgment reinforcing providence by purging unfaithful elements to advance redemptive aims.^[74]

Monarchy and Leadership Dynamics

The Books of Samuel portray the establishment of monarchy as a reluctant concession by Yahweh to Israel's demand for centralized human rule, shifting from the decentralized leadership of judges and prophets. In 1 Samuel 8, the elders explicitly reject divine kingship by seeking a monarch "like all the nations," prompting Samuel to warn of the king's exploitative demands, including forced labor, taxation of produce, and seizure of fields and vineyards.^[75]^[76] God interprets this as rejection of His direct rule but authorizes the appointment, establishing kingship as theocratic—subordinate to Yahweh and mediated through prophetic figures like Samuel.^[69] Saul's leadership exemplifies the vulnerabilities of monarchy when decoupled from covenant obedience, highlighting causal links between royal actions and divine judgment. Anointed amid charismatic signs, Saul achieves initial military successes but incurs rejection through disobedience: offering unauthorized sacrifice due to impatience (1 Samuel 13:8-14) and sparing Amalekite king Agag and livestock against explicit command (1 Samuel 15:8-23). These acts reveal a pattern of rationalization over repentance, eroding Saul's legitimacy and precipitating dynastic failure, as the narrative attributes his downfall to lacking "fear of the Lord"—a disposition prioritizing self-preservation over divine will.^[77]^[78] David's kingship, by contrast, models qualified success through alignment with God's purposes, though tempered by moral realism in depicting leadership flaws. Chosen as "a man after [Yahweh's] own heart" for non-reliance on external stature (1 Samuel 16:7), David consolidates power via covenant loyalty, evidenced in sparing Saul twice despite provocation (1 Samuel 24; 26) and seeking prophetic counsel. Yet, his adultery with Bathsheba and murder of Uriah (2 Samuel 11) trigger familial strife and loss, with swift repentance upon Nathan's rebuke (2 Samuel 12:13) distinguishing him from Saul's deflection. The Davidic covenant in 2 Samuel 7 promises eternal dynasty contingent on obedience, underscoring monarchy's potential for stability when leaders embody covenant fidelity amid human frailty.^[79]^[69] These dynamics reveal monarchy's instrumental role in unifying Israel against Philistine threats while exposing risks of absolutism, with prophetic intervention—Samuel's anointing/rejection of Saul, Nathan's confrontation of David—enforcing accountability. The text's portrayal resists idealization, emphasizing empirical outcomes: obedience yields prosperity, disobedience invites collapse, independent of charismatic origins.^[80]^[81]

Character Portrayals and Moral Realism

The Books of Samuel present characters with profound psychological depth and moral complexity, eschewing idealized heroism in favor of portrayals that align with moral realism—wherein human actions trigger objective consequences governed by divine standards of obedience and righteousness, independent of subjective intent or cultural relativism. Saul, Israel's first king, exemplifies this through his initial military successes against the Ammonites and Philistines, yet his impatience in offering unauthorized sacrifice at Gilgal (1 Samuel 13:8-14) and partial obedience in sparing Amalekite spoils (1 Samuel 15:9-23) precipitate his rejection by God, as declared by Samuel: "To obey is better than sacrifice."^[82] These episodes reveal Saul's core flaws of self-deception and self-exaltation, where rationalizations for disobedience—such as blaming the people—fail to avert causal repercussions like the torment of an evil spirit and ultimate dynastic downfall.^[83] David's arc further underscores moral realism, depicting a figure of extraordinary valor, as in slaying Goliath (1 Samuel 17), juxtaposed against grave ethical lapses, including the orchestrated murder of Uriah after adultery with Bathsheba (2 Samuel 11:14-17). Unlike propagandistic royal narratives, David's portrayal includes unvarnished accountability: Nathan's rebuke elicits genuine repentance (2 Samuel 12:13), yet the sin's effects cascade into familial strife, including Absalom's rebellion and Amnon's rape of Tamar (2 Samuel 13). Scholar Robert Alter highlights this "gritty historical realism," arguing that the narrative's psychological acuity—evident in David's cunning survival tactics and manipulative court politics—serves to illustrate how divine purposes unfold amid human frailty, with moral failings yielding inexorable judgments rather than narrative sanitization.^[84]^[85] Secondary figures like Jonathan and Samuel reinforce this framework; Jonathan's loyalty to David defies paternal jealousy without romanticization (1 Samuel 20), while Samuel transitions from prophetic authority to flawed judgeship, tolerating his sons' corruption (1 Samuel 8:3). Such characterizations reject simplistic binaries, instead positing a causal moral order where virtues like courage or fidelity mitigate but do not erase vice's toll, as analyzed in narratological studies emphasizing rounded, relatable figures over flat archetypes.^[83] This realism, per Alter, stems from the Hebrew Bible's theological insistence on human agency within providential history, yielding portrayals that prioritize empirical fidelity to behavior's outcomes over didactic moralizing.^[86]

Literary and Interpretive Analysis

Narrative Techniques and Structure

The Books of Samuel demonstrate a unified narrative arc chronicling Israel's shift from the era of judges to monarchy, commencing with Samuel's birth and prophetic call amid Eli's corrupt priesthood (1 Samuel 1–3) and culminating in David's death and Solomon's anointing (2 Samuel 1–24). This structure divides into discernible phases: the establishment of Samuel's authority and the Philistine threats (1 Samuel 1–7), Saul's anointing, reign, and rejection (1 Samuel 8–15), his pursuit of David contrasted with David's loyalty (1 Samuel 16–31), and David's kingship marked by triumphs, sins, and succession (2 Samuel). Scholars identify overarching chiastic patterns, such as symmetrical arrangements in pericopes that mirror events like anointings and rejections to emphasize divine sovereignty over human kingship.^[60]^[87] Literary techniques privilege repetition and variation to underscore causality and moral consequences, as in the poetics of recurring motifs in 1 Samuel 1–7, where Hannah's barrenness and Samuel's dedication parallel Eli's sons' downfall, building thematic resonance through iterative divine-human interactions.^[88] Parallel episodes, such as Saul's and David's encounters with women and prophets, employ contrastive irony: Saul's impulsive oaths lead to ruin, while David's restraint yields favor, revealing character through action rather than explicit moralizing.^[89] Type-scenes—stock biblical conventions like battle announcements or betrothal meetings—are subverted for psychological depth; David's Goliath confrontation inverts heroic expectations by emphasizing cunning over brute force, with intensifying patterns in folk-tale elements heightening narrative tension.^[90] The narrator adopts a third-person perspective with controlled omniscience, integrating direct speech (often comprising over half the text) to convey motivations and prophecies, while manipulating chronology via analepses (recalling past events, e.g., Saul's early zeal) and prolepses (foreshadowing downfall, e.g., David's future throne). This Genette-inspired interplay of voice and time creates dramatic irony, as readers perceive divine election amid characters' blindness, evident in Saul's doomed kingship paralleling David's ascent.^[91] Chiasms within larger units, such as 2 Samuel 6–12 centering on David's covenant failures, focalize ethical realism by bracketing sins with judgments, avoiding didactic closure in favor of ambiguous human agency under providence.^[92] Such devices cohere the books as historiography infused with poetics, prioritizing causal sequences over linear chronicle.^[44]

Poetic and Prophetic Elements

The Books of Samuel embed several poetic compositions within their predominantly narrative prose, functioning as theological commentaries that highlight divine intervention and human frailty. Hannah's song (1 Samuel 2:1-10) exemplifies this, comprising a hymn of thanksgiving that extols Yahweh's power to exalt the lowly and abase the proud, with motifs of reversal echoing throughout the books' depiction of leadership transitions.^[93]^[94] Scholars note its structural parallelism and independent origins, likely predating the narrative frame, as it anticipates royal and eschatological themes without direct reference to Samuel's birth.^[95] David's lament over Saul and Jonathan (2 Samuel 1:19-27), known as the "Song of the Bow," employs elegiac repetition and hyperbolic praise of their military prowess to evoke communal grief, strategically omitting Saul's failures to unify Israel under the new regime.^[96] Its chiastic structure—framed by calls to mourn—centers on fraternal loyalty, distinguishing it from prophetic dirges by its secular tone amid sacral context.^[97] Similarly, David's song of deliverance (2 Samuel 22) parallels Psalm 18, portraying Yahweh as a warrior rescuing the king from enemies through cosmic imagery of storm and earthquake, reinforcing covenantal fidelity.^[98] The "last words of David" (2 Samuel 23:1-7) blend oracle and poetry, declaring the ideal ruler as Yahweh's instrument of justice, with metaphors of dawn and rod underscoring moral governance.^[98] Prophetic elements manifest through oracles and ecstatic behaviors that authenticate divine authority amid political upheaval. Samuel delivers judgments like the oracle against Eli's house (1 Samuel 2:27-36; 3:11-14), structured as woe pronouncements with accusation and inevitable doom, fulfilling a pattern of prophetic condemnation for priestly corruption.^[99] Nathan's oracle (2 Samuel 7:8-16) constitutes the Davidic covenant, promising perpetual dynasty despite human sin, interpreted in scholarship as conditional on obedience yet pivotal for messianic expectations.^[100] Instances of prophetic frenzy, such as Saul's stripping and prophesying (1 Samuel 10:10-12; 19:20-24), parody unauthorized ecstasy to critique his kingship, contrasting genuine prophetic mediation by figures like Gad (2 Samuel 24:11-19).^[101] These elements underscore prophecy as causal mechanism for historical judgment, embedded without altering the books' realistic narrative flow.^[102]

Reception and Scholarly Controversies

Interpretations in Jewish and Christian Traditions

In Jewish tradition, the Books of Samuel, part of the Nevi'im (Prophets), narrate the transition from tribal confederacy to monarchy under divine guidance, emphasizing prophetic oversight in selecting leaders like Saul and David to uphold Torah obedience. Rabbinic commentators such as Rashi prioritize the pshat, or contextual meaning, while integrating midrashic elements to derive ethical teachings, for instance, portraying Hannah's supplication in 1 Samuel 1 as exemplifying fervent prayer amid affliction.^[103]^[104] The Midrash Shmuel expands on these texts through haggadic homilies, often prefacing interpretations with verses from Psalms or Proverbs to underscore themes of divine justice and human agency, such as Saul's downfall due to partial obedience versus David's ascent through humility and reliance on God. The Davidic covenant in 2 Samuel 7 receives particular attention as an unconditional promise of perpetual lineage alongside conditional blessings for fidelity, informing later messianic expectations while cautioning against royal hubris.^[105]^[106]^[107] Christian exegesis, from patristic fathers onward, employs typological reading, wherein Samuel foreshadows prophetic heralds of the Messiah and David embodies the anointed king whose trials, victories, and covenant prefigure Christ's kingship, suffering, and eternal reign. Early church writers identify David's anointing and rejection by Saul as paralleling Christ's rejection by Israel, with the shepherd-king motif in 1 Samuel 16 evoking Jesus as the Good Shepherd.^[108]^[109] Augustine interprets Davidic psalms linked to Samuel's narratives, such as Psalm 51, as confessions of universal sinfulness redeemed by grace, applying David's repentance after moral failure to the believer's need for divine mercy. Medieval theologians like Thomas Aquinas reference Samuel in discussions of just war and divine command, viewing Saul's Amalekite campaign in 1 Samuel 15 as illustrating obedience's primacy over human rationale. The Davidic promise in 2 Samuel 7:12-16 is fulfilled christologically, establishing Christ's throne as everlasting per New Testament affirmations.^[110]^[111]

Modern Debates on Ideology and Bias

Modern scholarly debates on the Books of Samuel often center on the text's apparent ideological ambivalence toward monarchy, with interpreters divided on whether it ultimately endorses or critiques centralized kingship. In 1 Samuel 8, Samuel warns the elders of Israel that a king will impose heavy burdens, such as conscripting sons for military service, appropriating fields, and taxing produce, framing the demand for monarchy as a rejection of divine rule. Yet the narrative proceeds to depict Saul's anointing and David's rise as divinely ordained, suggesting a conditional acceptance of monarchy under prophetic oversight and covenant fidelity, rather than outright opposition. This tension has led some scholars to argue for an anti-monarchical bias embedded in the Deuteronomistic framework, viewing the Saulide failures as illustrative of inherent flaws in human rule, while others contend the text promotes dynastic legitimacy, particularly through David's successes and the establishment of his line as a theological ideal.^[112] Such interpretations frequently reveal biases in biblical criticism, where historical and archaeological evidence for a United Monarchy under David—supported by inscriptions like the Tel Dan Stele referencing the "House of David" from the 9th century BCE—is sometimes downplayed in favor of minimalist reconstructions that portray the accounts as largely fictional or propagandistic. Critics of these minimalist views, including those emphasizing textual and material corroboration, argue that scholarly skepticism often stems from ideological commitments to reducing biblical narratives to ideological constructs devoid of historical kernel, as seen in debates over the extent of David's empire. This approach contrasts with evidence-based readings that affirm a core historicity while acknowledging the text's theological shaping, without dismissing it as mere etiology.^[113] Another focal point involves modern ideological overlays, particularly queer interpretations of David and Jonathan's relationship, where passages like 1 Samuel 18:1-4 ("the soul of Jonathan was knit to the soul of David") and 2 Samuel 1:26 ("your love to me was wonderful, passing the love of women") are read as evidence of homoerotic bonds. These readings, proliferating since the late 20th century, impose contemporary categories of sexual orientation onto ancient Near Eastern contexts, where covenantal language of loyalty and "love" (hesed) denoted political alliance and filial devotion, not romantic or sexual intimacy, as paralleled in treaties like those between Hittite kings. Scholars critiquing this lens highlight how such exegeses prioritize ideological agendas over philological and cultural analysis, reflecting broader trends in academia where postmodern frameworks retroject modern identities, often sidelining the text's emphasis on male friendship within warrior ethos.^[114] These debates underscore a meta-issue of bias in source selection and interpretation: institutions like university biblical studies departments, dominated by secular and progressive scholars, frequently favor deconstructions that align with anti-theistic or egalitarian ideologies, marginalizing traditional readings that view the narratives as affirming divine sovereignty amid human frailty. Empirical scrutiny reveals that while the Books of Samuel exhibit a pro-Davidic slant—portraying Saul's house as flawed to justify dynastic shift—this serves causal realism in explaining political transitions, not uncritical hagiography, as David's own moral lapses (e.g., Bathsheba affair in 2 Samuel 11) demonstrate unvarnished realism over idealization. Rigorous analysis thus privileges the text's internal coherence and external evidential anchors over ideologically driven skepticism.^[115]

References

[1]
The Book of Samuel | My Jewish Learning
Samuel is both a historical and literary work. It begins with the leadership of the prophet Samuel, the last of the pre-monarchic rulers of Israel.
[2]
Books of 1 and 2 Samuel | Guide with Key Information and Resources
Mar 30, 2023 · Samuel is a key leader and prophet through the first section of the book (1 Sam. 1-7), and he continues to play a key role in the next section.
[3]
1 Samuel | Research Starters - EBSCO
The Book of 1 Samuel is a significant text in the Hebrew Bible that narrates the transition of Israel from a collection of tribes to a formal monarchy.
[4]
(PDF) The Book of Samuel: Its Composition, Structure and ...
Aug 7, 2025 · The book of Samuel contains ancient and original materials and both main versions were composed as early as the tenth century BCE.
[5]
Introduction | Samuel and the Shaping of Tradition | Oxford Academic
This book explores the literary depth and complexity created by the shaping of earlier sources concerning Samuel, the biblical figure known for his role in ...
[6]
The Book of Samuel: Its Composition, Structure and Significance as ...
The book of Samuel contains ancient and original materials and both main versions were composed as early as the tenth century BCE.
[7]
The Old Testament in Order - Conciliar Post
Dec 13, 2024 · Canonical Order – Jewish Bible ; Torah. Genesis; Exodus; Leviticus; Numbers; Deuteronomy ; Former Prophets. Joshua; Judges; 1-2 Samuel; 1-2 Kings.Missing: placement Tanakh
[8]
Jewish and Christian Bibles: Comparative Chart - Catholic Resources
Jun 11, 2021 · Jewish Bibles are based on the HB; · the OT section in Christian Bibles is arranged according to the order of books in the "Septuagint" (LXX), ...
[9]
Books of Samuel - Search results provided by BiblicalTraining
In the LXX the Books of Samuel and the Books of Kings are called Books of Kingdoms (I-IV); the Vulgate numbers them similarly but names them Books of Kings.
[10]
Her Word versus His: Establishing the Underlying Text in 1 Samuel ...
The Masoretic version of the book of Samuel is notoriously difficult from a text- critical perspective. Scholars have long suspected that this situation ...
[11]
https://brill.com/view/journals/text/33/1/article-p1_1.xml
[12]
Why Is David and Goliath's Story 40% Longer in the MT Than in the ...
Jul 4, 2023 · The version of the story of David's triumph over Goliath (1 Samuel 17–18) in the Septuagint (LXX) is missing many details present in the Masoretic Text (MT).
[13]
https://brill.com/downloadpdf/book/edcoll/9789047443872/Bej.9789004179578.i-304_002.pdf
[14]
Textual Criticism and the Ancient Versions in Bible Translation
Jun 30, 2025 · Case Study: The Hebrew Text of Samuel and its Translation The traditional text (the “Masoretic Text”, hereafter MT) of Samuel has historically ...
[15]
Outline of 1 Samuel - Enter the Bible
David's anointing by Samuel introduces his status as God's chosen one. His first encounter with Saul at court and his defeat of Goliath ...
[16]
Introduction to 1–2 Samuel | ESV.org
The purpose of 1 Samuel is to highlight two major events: the establishment of the monarchy in Israel (chs. 8–12); and the rise of David to be king after Saul ...
[17]
Summary of the Book of 2 Samuel - Bible Survey | GotQuestions.org
Nov 25, 2024 · The book of 2 Samuel can be divided into two main sections—David's triumphs (chapters 1-10) and David's troubles (chapters 11-20) ...<|separator|>
[18]
Outline of 2 Samuel - Enter the Bible
1. DavidSecond king of Israel, David united the northern and southern kingdoms. · 2. David Becomes King of Israel (2 Samuel 3:6-5:16) · 3. David Consolidates the ...
[19]
Second Samuel - Insight for Living
Second Samuel is set in the land of Israel during the reign of David and follows the course of his forty years as king of Israel (1011–971 BC).
[20]
Book of 2 Samuel Summary | Watch an Overview Video
Feb 5, 2020 · The book of 2 Samuel continues to show us the virtue of humility, the destructiveness of pride, and the faithfulness of God's promise. We see David succeed and ...
[21]
Outline for 2 Samuel by Dr. J. Vernon McGee - Blue Letter Bible
I. TRIUMPHS of David, Chapters 1-10. A. David mourns the deaths of Saul and Jonathan, Chapter 1. B. David made king over Judah, Chapter 2.
[22]
The Tel Dan Inscription: The First Historical Evidence of King David ...
The Tel Dan inscription, or “House of David” inscription, was discovered in 1993 at the site of Tel Dan in northern Israel in an excavation directed by Israeli ...
[23]
Museum of the Bible to Display Earliest Historical Reference to King ...
Sep 3, 2025 · Dating to the 9th century BC, the Tel Dan Stele contains a memorial inscription by an Aramean king boasting of his triumphs over the king of ...
[24]
The Three 'David' Inscriptions | ArmstrongInstitute.org
The Tel Dan inscription was a broken chunk of a Syrian victory stele. The Mesha Stele is a Moabite victory stele, belonging to King Mesha and fitting alongside ...
[25]
The Mesha Stele and King David of the Bible
Jan 11, 2023 · It chronicled his military victories over his enemies, including Israel and possibly Judah, called the “House of David.” Unfortunately, the ...
[26]
The Mesha Stele and King David - Biblical Archaeology Society
The ninth-century BCE Mesha Stele from ancient Moab includes a reference to the Kingdom of Judah, identified in the stela as the “House of David” (btdwd).
[27]
New technology connects ancient stele with King David—but not ...
Jan 22, 2023 · Researchers have concluded that the “Mesha Stele,” which dates to the ninth century BCE and bears a Canaanite inscription in the name of King Mesha of Moab, ...
[28]
King David's City at Khirbet Qeiyafa: Results of the Second ...
Feb 23, 2016 · The dating of these samples is ~1000 BC. Khirbet Qeiyafa is currently the earliest known example of a fortified city in the Kingdom of Judah and ...
[29]
Khirbet Qeiyafa
Recent excavations at Khirbet Qeiyafa, the first early Judean city to be dated by 14C, clearly indicate a well planned fortified city in Judah as early as the ...Missing: Davidic | Show results with:Davidic
[30]
A Network of Davidic Cities | ArmstrongInstitute.org
During excavations at Khirbet Qeiyafa from 2007 to 2013, Professor Garfinkel was stunned to find evidence of a single-period Judahite site that was in operation ...
[31]
Was Khirbet Qeiyafa a Davidic Fortress?
Mar 19, 2024 · [5] In 2007 Yosef Garfinkel (Hebrew University) and Saar Ganor (Israel Antiquities Authority) led the six seasons of excavation (2007-2012).
[32]
Colossal ancient structures found at Gath may explain origin of story ...
Jul 26, 2019 · Newly unearthed, unusually large fortifications from the 11th century BCE could be the genesis of the biblical tall tale, says Tell ...
[33]
Top Ten Discoveries Related to David - Bible Archaeology Report
Jun 11, 2021 · In 2005, an inscribed ostracon (inscribed pottery sherd) was unearthed at Tell es-Safi (the site of the biblical Philistine city of Gath) that ...
[34]
Giant Goliath Slept Here - Biblical Archaeology Society
Jul 30, 2019 · An older, large city at Tell es-Safi, possibly Gath, with large fortifications, may have inspired the stories of Goliath and other giants.
[35]
Tell es-Safi/Gath Project
During the last several decades, archaeological excavations have revealed substantial information about the Philistines during the biblical period.
[36]
King Saul in Archaeology and Text - Examining The Bible
Apr 10, 2024 · In this article, we will investigate some of the textual and archaeological evidence pertaining to the Israelite kingdom under Saul.
[37]
Is there any historical evidence of an encounter between King Saul ...
Jan 12, 2024 · Six clay seals found at the archaeological site of Khirbet Summeily in Israel offer evidence that supports the existence of Biblical Kings David ...How closely do the history books of the Old Testament (Kings ...Is there evidence to support the existence of King Saul, or is he a ...More results from www.quora.com
[38]
Archeological Evidence for Samuel; Dr. Titus Kennedy - YouTube
May 22, 2022 · Dr. Titus Kennedy leads us through substantial archeological evidence for the characters, locations and events found in 1 and 2 Samuel.
[39]
Is there any historical evidence for the Biblical king Saul, David or ...
Dec 7, 2022 · There is no extra-biblical evidence for Saul. The Tell Dan Stela is good evidence that David was regarded as the founder of the royal line of ...Is there any historical evidence of an encounter between King Saul ...Is there historical proof of the existence of the kings of a united Israel ...More results from www.quora.com
[40]
Evidence for Saul, David, and Solomon · Creation.com
Jul 9, 2023 · Several influential archaeologists reject the Bible's portrayal of the monarchy led by Saul, David, and Solomon, claiming that the physical evidence ...
[41]
Did King David Actually Exist? - The Bart Ehrman Blog
Sep 20, 2022 · ... historical context and archaeological findings. Devers has some pretty harsh critiqicism of Finlkelstein's late and minimalist viewpoints.
[42]
[PDF] ON SOME ALLEGED ANACHRONISMS IN THE BOOKS OF SAMUEL
In a book published in 1992 the eminent Egyptologist Donald. Redford argued that the books of Samuel cannot be treated as trustworthy historical sources. He ...
[43]
Seeming contradictions between Samuel/ Chronicles historical ...
May 10, 2024 · I've been reading 1st and 2nd Samuel alongside of 1st Chronicles, and in the parallel accounts, it seems certain names or numbers don't match.1st and 2nd Samuel are certainly historical prose, but they ... - RedditAre there any anachronisms in the Bible? : r/AskBibleScholars - RedditMore results from www.reddit.com
[44]
[PDF] The Book of Samuel: Its Composition, Structure and Significance as ...
Pfeiffer made an attempt to reconstruct the earlier (E and J) sources of the book of Samuel and to delineate the sparse Deute-.
[45]
A Minimalist Disputes His Demise - Biblical Archaeology Society
Jun 19, 2012 · In this case, “minimalism” is defined, apparently, as the belief that David and Solomon and their “United Monarchy” did not exist.
[46]
Bava Batra 14b-15a - Talmud - Sefaria
It is also stated in the baraita that Samuel wrote his own book. The Gemara asks: But isn't it written: “And Samuel died” (I Samuel 28:3)? The Gemara ...
[47]
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Chronicles+29%3A29&version=NKJV
[48]
Who wrote the book of 1 Samuel? Who was the author of 1 Samuel?
Nov 25, 2024 · Nevertheless, the Jewish Talmudic tradition attributes a substantial portion of the book to the prophet Samuel, with the section recounting his ...
[49]
Who Wrote the Book of Samuel? - Thomas Nelson Bibles
Sep 19, 2023 · The author of 1 and 2 Samuel is anonymous, but Jewish Talmudic tradition says that it was written by Samuel. Samuel may have written the first ...
[50]
An Introduction to Samuel - Third Millennium Ministries
Traditional ancient Jewish and Christian positions on the authorship of Samuel are represented in the Babylonian Talmud, a record of traditional rabbinic ...
[51]
Samuel - The Society for Old Testament Study
The book tells the story of the formation of ancient Israel from a coalition of separate tribes into a unified state.
[52]
Is Samuel among the Deuteronomists? Current Views on the ... - jstor
Scholars agree that Samuel contains texts with Deuteronomistic themes and language, but such texts are rather rare and are considered late. In comparison with ...
[53]
current views on the place of Samuel in a Deuteronomistic history
Is Samuel among the Deuteronomists?: current views on the place of Samuel in a Deuteronomistic history. Cynthia Edenburg and Juha Pakkala. Restricted.
[54]
Understanding the Old Testament! Joshua - 2 Kings as the ...
The Deuteronomistic History includes Joshua, Judges, 1 & 2 Samuel (as one book), and 1 & 2 Kings, covering Israel's history from entry to exile.
[55]
Succession Narrative - Biblical Studies - Oxford Bibliographies
Sep 25, 2018 · “Succession Narrative” (SN; German Thronfolgegeschichte and similar terms) refers to a block of text in 2 Samuel and 1 Kings thought by many ...
[56]
HE history of David's family is found in 2 Samuel 9-20 and 1 Kings 1-2.
the composition of the narrative which range from extending the pentateuchal sources to ... bry (The Succession Narrative [SBT 2/9; London: SCM, 1968] 20) agrees ...
[57]
Succession narrative: a "document" or a phantom? - Gale
I will also argue that the concept of kingship in general and Davidic monarchy in particular that found its expression in 2 Sam 1-1 Kgs 2 broadly matches the ...
[58]
The formation of judges and samuel and the deuteronomistic ...
The other sources were: the "acts of Saul"; the "acts of David,"and the "book of Jashar."The second edition of Samuel and the third of Judges were edited by a ...
[59]
The Book of Samuel: Its Composition, Structure and Significance as ...
The theory of parallel written sources as main components in the development of biblical books was also criticized by scholars who attribute greater import to ...
[60]
The Literary Structure of the Books of Samuel: Setting the Stage for a ...
Nov 1, 2017 · This article provides both a survey and a critique of modern commentaries on Samuel, as well as specific studies dealing with the structure of Samuel.
[61]
[PDF] Deuteronomistic History and a 'history of redaction criticism'
This thesis presents a history of redaction criticism in biblical scholarship, focusing on the relationship between Deuteronomy and the Former Prophets, an ...
[62]
The Double Redaction of the Deuteronomistic History - Sage Journals
This article argues that the Deuteronomistic History (DH) was first composed during the reign of Josiah and then revised by the addition of limitedamounts ...
[63]
Date of composition: the Books of Samuel/Kings : r/AcademicBiblical
Aug 31, 2020 · A good source to survey the various positions is Thomas Romer's The So-Called Deuteronomistic History. It traces the history of the ...
[64]
[PDF] Redaction Criticism: 1 Kings 8 and the Deuteronomists - HAL
Oct 19, 2022 · Both models, even if they seem to be contradictory, are interested in investigating the different intentions of the Deuteronomistic redactors.
[65]
(DOC) The Authorship of Samuel - Academia.edu
This paper explores the authorship of the biblical books of Samuel, discussing both internal and external evidence supporting the traditional view of Samuel ...
[66]
Linguistic Dating of Biblical Texts | Bible Interp
At the other extreme, the LBH authors and scribes exhibited a much less conservative attitude, freely adopting a variety of linguistic forms in addition to ( ...
[67]
The Literary Structure of the Books of Samuel: Setting the Stage for a ...
Diachronic methods usually divide the books into smaller blocks assuming different levels of redaction. Synchronic methods assume that the books of Samuel is a ...
[68]
The Rise and Demise of the Deuteronomistic History
Nov 28, 2014 · Such a process of redaction criticism simply takes critical studies to the brink of the unbelievable. K. L. Noll cites an extensive ...
[69]
Samuel, First and Second, Theology of - Bible Meaning & Definition
Kingship and Covenant. It is within the overarching perspective of God's sovereignty, and men and women's responsibility to respond in faith and obedience to ...
[70]
12. Saul and the Amalekites (1 Samuel 15:1-35) - Bible.org
May 25, 2004 · Samuel tells him that God doesn't err in such judgments, and thus He will not “repent” of the course He has determined for Saul.<|control11|><|separator|>
[71]
The Theology of Samuel (Sovereign God / Restored People ...
Apr 25, 2022 · The sovereign hand of God is seen throughout David's life, both granting victory and glory through David's obedience and shame and judgment ...
[72]
[PDF] An Analysis of God's Rejection of King Saul
In 1 Samuel 9:16-17, God tells Samuel that He chose Saul to be king because God heard the cry of His people and He sought someone who could deliver them from ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
[73]
[PDF] 2 Samuel 21-24: A theological reflection on Israel's kingship
The two narratives (21:1-14; 24:1-25) which frame this section feature the divine judgments of Israel because of the sins of her first two kings, Saul and.
[74]
A Biblical Theology of Divine Sovereignty and Human Responsibility
May 7, 2025 · The establishment of monarchy demonstrates both divine sovereignty in selecting kings (1 Sam 16:1-13) and human responsibility in their ...
[75]
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Samuel+8&version=ESV
[76]
From Tribal Confederation to Monarchy: 1 Samuel | Theology of Work
Jun 2, 2014 · 1 Samuel describes Israel's transition from a tribal confederation to a monarchy, the calling of Samuel, and the reigns of Saul and David.
[77]
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Samuel+13%3B15&version=ESV
[78]
The King's Fear of the Lord as a Theme in the Books of Samuel
The difference between David and Saul becomes a parable that generations of leaders cannot afford to miss. Bringing to life through story a teaching given ...
[79]
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Samuel+16%3B2+Samuel+7%3B11-12&version=ESV
[80]
https://brill.com/view/journals/vt/73/4-5/article-p546_4.xml
[81]
Samuel and the Rise of the Monarchy
latter is a brief history of Saul written from old and historically reliable. (unstreitig historische) sources: chapters 9, 10 (vss. 1-16), 13, and 14.7. For ...
[82]
King Saul & Self-Deception - The Bible Project
Mar 19, 2017 · Saul's root character flaw is self-exaltation and self-deception. He thinks he knows better than everyone else, including God.Missing: realistic | Show results with:realistic
[83]
Characters and Characterization in the Book of Samuel
This book is a collection of recent studies on characters and characterization in the book of Samuel. Seventeen biblical scholars delve into mechanisms ...Missing: realism | Show results with:realism
[84]
The David Story: A Translation with Commentary of 1 and 2 Samuel
Rating 4.3 (626) Alter rejects both these scholarly positions with his realistic, literary analysis that reveals the human, often abusive, worldly realities of the story.
[85]
Robert Alter, “The David Story: A Translation with Commentary of I ...
Jan 18, 2018 · The gritty historical realism of the story—what Hans Frei shrewdly identified as its “history-like” character—surely argues against the notion ...
[86]
A Literary Approach to the Bible - Commentary Magazine
Dec 1, 1975 · The implicit theology of the Hebrew Bible dictates a complex moral and psychological realism in biblical narrative because God's purposes are ...
[87]
Literary structure (chiasm, chiasmus) of Books of Samuel
This text includes, one 40 paired (81 pericopes) whole concentric structure, divided in two 20 paired concentric structures, divided in three 13 paired ...
[88]
[PDF] 29180-play-it-again-sam-the-poetics-of-narrative-repetition-in-1 ...
A final form reading of 1 Samuel 1–7 is offered here, examining the narrative poetics of repetition and its relationship to complete and.
[89]
A Literary Study of Judges and the Books of Samuel | Bible Interp
Many literary studies of the books of Samuel appear to take for granted that the frame is history (or propaganda) or a kind of didactics.Missing: redaction | Show results with:redaction
[90]
Book review: “The David Story: A Translation with Commentary of 1 ...
May 31, 2018 · Robert Alter writes at the start of his 1999 book The David Story, a translation of all 65 chapters with a detailed commentary.
[91]
[PDF] Narrative Voice and Chronology in the Books of Samuel - SciELO SA
This article adopts Genette's fourfold model of the relation between narrative voice and chronology to the books of Samuel, arguing that they employ all four ...
[92]
Chiastic Structure of 2 Samuel 6–12
11–12. Through the chiastic links, David's actions are compared and contrasted, as well as the characters Bath-Sha'ul and Bathsheba (and Uzzah and Uriah).
[93]
1 Samuel 2:1-10 – Hannah's Song - Enter the Bible
Hannah's song of praise introduces several themes that will appear in the books of Samuel. The song serves as a model for the Magnificat in Luke 1:46-55.
[94]
[PDF] The Song of Hannah in 1 Samuel 2— Logotechnical Analysis
Dec 7, 2014 · The Literary Context of the Song of Hannah: 1Sam. 1:1-2:11. • The literary context framing the Song of Hannah is the story of Samuel's birth ...
[95]
The Textual History of the Song of Hannah: 1 Samuel II 1-10 - jstor
The thanksgiving hymn found in 1 Sam. ii 1-10 has a timeless character. Most scholars assert that it had an independent life apart from its present context.
[96]
2 Samuel | Commentary | S. A. Fix and J. Robert Vannoy | TGCBC
The song is a beautiful poem in many respects, as it deeply mourns the loss of Israel's first king and his son, who was beloved by David (2Sam 1:26). The ...
[97]
2 Samuel 1:19-27* (David's Lament) | BIBLICAL CHIASM EXCHANGE
Aug 28, 2019 · The Lament is made up of six couplets. The five complete couplets make up the body of the lament; the introductory and closing lines together form the sixth.<|separator|>
[98]
Studies in the Books of Samuel: I. David's Three Poems - jstor
the critical theory of the late date of the Psalms, and similar ... The poem consists of two parts: an Exordium (vv. 1-3), and the Oracle (vv. 4 ...Missing: elements scholarly analysis
[99]
[PDF] "Thus Saith the Lord": Prophetic Language in Samuel's Speech
The characteristic woe oracle consists of the accusation, the addressee, the intent of the accusation, and the promise of judgment. The prophet Samuel uttered a ...
[100]
Michael Avioz, Nathan's Oracle (2 Samuel 7) and Its Interpreters
The biblical passages that attract Avioz's attention are those linked to Nathan's oracle by theme (prophecy and fulfillment, sin and punishment), style, motif, ...
[101]
Saul's prophetic representations and its parody in 1 Samuel
In particular, Saul is often described as prophesying, involved in prophetic activity, in the company of the prophets, or moved by the spirit of prophecy.
[102]
Theological Themes in 1 Samuel - Enter the Bible
1 Samuel explores themes of God's justice, the ark, kingship, and the role of prophecy, structured around the rise of kingship.
[103]
Rashi on I Samuel - Sefaria
While quoting many midrashim and Talmudic passages, Rashi, in his commentary, states that his purpose is to present the pshat (contextual meaning) of the text.
[104]
Shmuel I - I Samuel - Chapter 1 - Tanakh Online - Torah - Chabad.org
Features an English translation of the entire Tanakh (Jewish Bible) with Rashi's commentary. In this Book. Torah (The Pentateuch) · Nevi'im (Prophets) · Ketuvim ...
[105]
Midrash Shmuel - Sefaria
It incorporates both line-by-line interpretation on the Book of Samuel, as well as longer discourses on themes related to the book. The midrashim are taken from ...
[106]
SAMUEL, MIDRASH TO - JewishEncyclopedia.com
The midrash contains haggadic interpretations and homilies on the books of Samuel, each homily being prefaced and introduced by a verse taken from some ...
[107]
The Eternal Davidic Covenant in II Samuel Chapter 7 and its Later ...
The Davidic covenant promised an eternal kingship, but the throne's continuation over all Israel was conditional on faithfulness, while reign over Judah was ...
[108]
https://journals.openedition.org/rsr/9403
[109]
[PDF] The Typology of David's Rise to Power: Messianic Patterns in the ...
The theory that we can learn to interpret the Bible typologically from the authors of the New Testa- ment and apply the method to passages they them- selves do ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[110]
CHURCH FATHERS: Exposition on Psalm 51 (Augustine)
David has taken upon him the person of mankind, and has heeded the bonds of all men, has considered the offspring of death, has adverted to the origin of ...
[111]
Objections Series: Killing in the Old Testament: How Can It Be Just?
Oct 24, 2015 · Thomas Aquinas says is “promulgated by the very fact that God instilled it into man's mind” (ST I-II, 90, 4). By it, we know that killing ...
[112]
Review of The Book of Samuel and Its Response to Monarchy ...
The book's focus upon the power of the monarchy highlights a key issue within the book of Samuel and the editors have chosen an appropriate theme. The book ...
[113]
Is Old Testament History Reliable? - Knowing Scripture
May 7, 2019 · Some scholars view Old Testament history as fiction, while others see it as partial and agenda-driven, but all past knowledge depends on ...
[114]
The love of David and Jonathan: Ideology, text, reception
Were David and Jonathan “gay” lovers? This very modern question lies behind the recent explosion of studies of the David and Jonathan narrative.
[115]
Biblical Literature as Politics: The Case of Samuel - Academia.edu
Various scholars who accepted the ideological stance df the story before the 1980s are mentioned in P. K. McCarter, "'Plots, True or False': The Succession Nar ...<|separator|>