Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Broadcast network

A broadcast network is a telecommunications system comprising affiliated local television stations that receive and simultaneously transmit programming from a central production hub over public airwaves, enabling free access to viewers equipped with antennas within signal range. In the United States, the dominant broadcast networks—ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox—have shaped national media since the mid-20th century, originating from radio-era affiliations in the 1920s and transitioning to television by the late 1930s and 1940s. These networks distinguish themselves from cable providers by relying on over-the-air spectrum licensed by the Federal Communications Commission, which imposes public interest obligations such as local news coverage and limits on content deemed indecent, fostering broad reach but constraining commercial flexibility compared to subscription-based alternatives. Pivotal in milestones like live sports broadcasts, presidential inaugurations, and prime-time dramas, broadcast networks achieved peak influence during the 1970s and 1980s "golden age" before fragmenting audiences amid cable proliferation and digital streaming, yet they retain primacy for major events due to universal accessibility without paywalls.

Definition and Fundamentals

Core Definition and Purpose

A broadcast network consists of a centralized entity that produces or acquires programming and distributes it via dedicated lines, satellites, or other means to multiple affiliated local radio or television stations, which then transmit the content simultaneously over-the-air using terrestrial radio frequencies to reach the public. This structure enables a single source of content to serve geographically dispersed audiences through owned-and-operated stations and independent affiliates that commit to airing the network's schedule. In the United States, major examples include the American Broadcasting Company (ABC), CBS, NBC, and Fox, each operating under Federal Communications Commission (FCC) licenses that allocate spectrum for such transmissions. The core purpose of broadcast networks is to deliver mass-scale dissemination of , , sports, and educational content to households equipped only with standard antennas, fostering a model that requires no subscription or . By pooling resources for expensive productions—like national coverage or prime-time dramas—networks achieve cost efficiencies that individual local stations could not sustain, while affiliates benefit from ready-made programming supplemented by local news and ads. This system historically prioritized universal accessibility, supporting public service obligations such as emergency alerts and diverse viewpoints, as evidenced by FCC mandates for broadcasters to operate in the "public interest, convenience, and necessity" since the Radio Act of 1927. Empirically, broadcast networks have driven high penetration rates; for instance, as of 2023, over 15% of U.S. households relied exclusively on over-the-air signals, underscoring their role in serving non-cable audiences including rural and low-income viewers. The model's causal efficacy lies in its one-to-many paradigm, which minimizes distribution costs per viewer compared to point-to-point alternatives, though it faces constraints and signal challenges inherent to analog and early digital terrestrial methods.

Key Operational Characteristics

Broadcast networks function through a hub-and-spoke model, wherein a central entity produces, acquires, or commissions programming—such as primetime series, , and —and distributes it simultaneously to a nationwide of affiliated local stations for over-the-air retransmission. These affiliates, which comprise both network-owned-and-operated (O&O) stations and independently owned outlets under contractual agreements, number in the hundreds across the , enabling coverage of over 90% of households without direct ownership of all transmitters. The affiliation system relies on compensation flows: networks historically paid affiliates for carriage, but since the mid-2010s, affiliates increasingly pay "reverse compensation" fees to networks for programming rights, reflecting shifts in leverage amid declining linear viewership. Programming distribution occurs via high-capacity satellite uplinks or dedicated fiber optic feeds from network hubs (e.g., or ) to affiliate facilities, ensuring near-real-time synchronization adjusted for time zones via delayed feeds for western markets. Affiliates integrate national content into their schedules, typically clearing 70-80% of primetime and daytime slots, while reserving "avails" for local insertions of commercials, , , and announcements—averaging 12-18 minutes per hour of local ad time. This local-national hybrid allows networks to achieve in content production while affiliates monetize regional , with national ad rates determined by audience metrics from Nielsen ratings, which track viewership in designated market areas (). Operations are governed by (FCC) regulations under Title 47 of the , including licensing of local stations on VHF (channels 2-13) and UHF (14-36) bands, obligations requiring cable and satellite providers to transmit local affiliates without compensation, and mandates such as children's educational programming (e.g., three hours weekly minimum) and participation. Unlike cable networks, broadcast operations emphasize free, accessible over-the-air signals receivable via antennas, supported primarily by advertiser revenue rather than subscriptions, though networks derive additional income from retransmission consent fees negotiated with multichannel video programming distributors (MVPDs) since the 1992 Consumer Protection Act—totaling $4.2 billion across major networks in 2023. since the 1980s has minimized direct content oversight, prioritizing spectrum efficiency and competition over prescriptive standards.

Distinctions from Cable, Satellite, and Digital Alternatives

Broadcast networks transmit signals over-the-air via terrestrial radio frequencies allocated by the (FCC), enabling free reception within a coverage area using an , in contrast to cable systems that deliver content through wired or fiber-optic infrastructure directly to subscribers' homes. , meanwhile, relays signals from geostationary satellites to receiver dishes, providing subscription-based access that extends to remote areas lacking cable infrastructure but susceptible to weather-related disruptions like . streaming services, such as or , distribute content over the protocols, requiring connectivity and often device-specific apps, which decouples delivery from traditional spectrum use entirely. Regulatory frameworks further differentiate broadcast networks, which operate on scarce public airwaves and thus face stringent FCC oversight, including obligations for local programming, emergency alerts via the , and restrictions on indecent content to serve the public interest. Cable and satellite providers, not reliant on public , encounter lighter content regulations, allowing greater flexibility in programming without equivalent rules for local stations or mandates. Streaming platforms face negligible FCC content regulation, treated akin to unregulated services, enabling unfiltered and minimal accountability for or beyond platform self-policies. Content models highlight linear, scheduled broadcasting on networks—optimized for simultaneous mass audiences during slots, such as the major U.S. affiliates reaching over 90% of households via in 2023—versus the niche, multi-channel variety of and , or the on-demand, personalized playback of streaming that supports without fixed timetables. Broadcasts prioritize live events and broad-appeal programming funded primarily by national , yielding higher per-viewer ad rates due to guaranteed reach, whereas alternatives blend subscriptions with targeted ads, fostering specialized genres but fragmenting audiences and reducing communal viewing experiences. This shift has seen broadcast viewership decline amid , with U.S. streaming surpassing traditional TV hours in 2023 per Nielsen data, though retains advantages in reliability during outages.

Historical Development

Origins in Early Radio Networks (1920s)

The emergence of broadcast networks originated from the limitations of independent radio stations in the early , which struggled to produce sufficient high-quality programming to fill airtime amid rapid growth following the first commercial broadcast by KDKA in on November 2, 1920. By 1922, over 500 stations operated in the United States, but most relied on local talent and faced challenges in attracting advertisers without broader reach. This scarcity prompted experimentation with interconnected "" broadcasting, linking multiple stations via dedicated lines to distribute simultaneous programming, enabling in content production and national advertising sales. AT&T, through its station WEAF in , initiated the first sustained broadcasts in 1923, starting with a January 4 linkage to WNAC in for a relayed over wires on a basis, where stations or sponsors paid for line usage. This model expanded with events like the April 1923 broadcast of the National Electrical Light Association meeting to stations in , Washington, D.C., and other cities, demonstrating the feasibility of simultaneous multi-station distribution. AT&T's approach emphasized advertiser-funded "toll broadcasting," where national sponsors purchased time for messages aired across linked affiliates, contrasting with emerging donation or direct-sale models. Concurrently, RCA's WJZ in formed parallel chains, such as with WGY in Schenectady, fostering competition and highlighting telephone infrastructure's role in enabling geographic expansion without on-site duplication of talent. Regulatory and competitive pressures culminated in the formation of the first permanent national network when sold WEAF and its networking operations to for $1 million in early 1926, amid antitrust scrutiny over 's control of transmission lines. On November 15, 1926, the , backed by , , and , launched with an inaugural broadcast from New York's Waldorf-Astoria Hotel, distributed over 19 affiliated stations from the East Coast to Kansas City. This structure divided into "Red" and "Blue" chains—later networks—prioritizing live talent from centralized studios, setting the template for coordinated national broadcasting that prioritized efficiency and advertiser appeal over local autonomy.

Expansion and Maturation in Television Era (1930s–1960s)

The transition from radio to broadcasting began in the 1930s, with radio networks like and investing in experimental stations in major cities such as . launched regular broadcasts from its New York station W2XBS (later ) in 1939, featuring programming like boxing matches and variety shows, though viewership was limited to a few thousand sets nationwide. These efforts were curtailed by , as resources shifted to military applications and commercial development stalled, leaving only about 5,000 to 7,000 receivers in use by 1945. Postwar demand surged, with the (FCC) authorizing limited commercial operations in 1941, but rapid applications for new stations led to technical from signal and inconsistent standards. In , the FCC imposed a four-year "freeze" on new licenses to resolve allocation issues between (VHF) and ultrahigh frequency (UHF) bands, assess propagation problems, and finalize standards, effectively halting network expansion during a period of burgeoning consumer interest. This freeze, lasting until April 1952, restricted growth to existing outlets—primarily and affiliates—while the upstart (), spun off from NBC's in 1943, initiated its television service on April 19, , with initial feeds to affiliates like WFIL-TV in . Despite these constraints, household penetration rose from under 1% in (about 172,000 sets) to 9% by (roughly 5 million sets), driven by affordable receivers and programming like shows and early bulletins. The DuMont Network, another early entrant, operated briefly as a fourth option but struggled with limited affiliates and folded by the mid-1950s due to financial pressures. The 1952 lifting of the freeze via the FCC's Sixth Report and Order enabled a boom in station construction, prioritizing VHF channels for major markets and allocating UHF for others, which facilitated network affiliation growth to over 100 stations by the mid-1950s. and microwave relay systems expanded national distribution, allowing , , and to deliver simultaneous live programming across time zones, with household ownership reaching 75% by 1955 and 90% by 1960 (45.7 million sets). Programming matured with structured prime-time schedules featuring serialized dramas, sitcoms, and live events, while news divisions professionalized— exemplified investigative reporting on shows like starting in 1951. Technological maturation included the FCC's 1953 approval of the RCA-developed color standard, compatible with black-and-white sets, though adoption lagged until the 1960s due to high costs; CBS's earlier mechanical color system (1950) failed commercially for incompatibility. By the late 1950s, networks consolidated dominance through affiliation agreements, with affiliates carrying 80-90% network content, solidifying broadcast television as a mass medium for and dissemination, though regulatory scrutiny over monopolistic practices began emerging. This era cemented the oligopoly of the "" networks, shaping cultural uniformity while facing nascent competition from independent stations.

Global Proliferation and Peak Influence (1970s–1990s)

The 1970s marked the zenith of broadcast network dominance in the United States, where , , and —collectively known as the —commanded over 90% of prime-time viewership, serving as the primary conduit for national , , and cultural events. This era's influence stemmed from near-universal household penetration of black-and-white and emerging color television sets, bolstered by affiliate stations numbering over 700 by the mid-1970s, which distributed programming via microwave relays and coaxial cables to local markets. Nielsen ratings from 1970 reflect this monopoly, with the networks capturing 95% of total audience share, enabling advertisers to reach tens of millions simultaneously and shaping public discourse on events like the coverage in 1973–1974. Into the 1980s, technological advancements such as satellite distribution via systems like those operated by RCA Americom facilitated more efficient national feeds, sustaining network primacy despite early cable incursions that reached only 19% of households by 1980. The debut of Fox Broadcasting Company on October 9, 1986, as the first major challenger since the 1950s, introduced independent production models and youth-oriented fare like The Simpsons (premiering 1989), eroding the Big Three's share to 67% by 1989 while still asserting collective control over 80% of non-cable viewing. This period's peak saw networks dictate primetime schedules with hits drawing 30–50 million viewers per episode, exemplified by Cheers averaging 23 million weekly in the late 1980s, underscoring their role in unifying mass audiences before multichannel fragmentation. Globally, the 1970s–1990s accelerated broadcast network proliferation as over-the-air systems proliferated in , , and , often emulating U.S. affiliate models with national hubs feeding regional transmitters. In Western Europe, public broadcasters like the expanded color services to 95% coverage by 1975, while private entrants such as Germany's launched in 1984 via satellite-augmented terrestrial relays. Developing nations followed suit: India's achieved nationwide reach by 1982 with color introductions for the , serving 200 million viewers; China's grew from one channel in 1978 to multiple by the 1990s, blanketing 85% of the population. This expansion, fueled by declining receiver costs and infrastructure investments, elevated broadcast networks to peak societal influence, disseminating imported U.S. programming alongside local content to audiences exceeding 1 billion television households worldwide by the late 1990s, prior to satellite and cable dilution.

Technical Foundations

Signal Transmission and Distribution Methods

Broadcast networks distribute programming from central production facilities to affiliated local stations primarily via geostationary satellite systems, where baseband or compressed video signals are uplinked to satellites operating in C-band (4–8 GHz) or Ku-band (12–18 GHz) frequencies and downlinked to receive-only earth stations at affiliate sites, enabling simultaneous nationwide delivery with high reliability and coverage. Fiber optic terrestrial links supplement satellite feeds for scenarios demanding ultra-low latency, such as live sports or news, by transporting uncompressed or lightly compressed signals over dedicated dark fiber or wavelength-division multiplexed (WDM) networks spanning thousands of miles. These methods replaced earlier reliance on AT&T's coaxial cable systems and point-to-point microwave relay chains, which by the early 1950s supported transcontinental live broadcasts—such as the 1951 transmission of President Truman's speech from San Francisco to New York—using repeater stations every 20–30 miles to amplify signals over L-band (1–2 GHz) microwave paths. Local affiliate stations receive the network feed, perform any required processing like commercial insertion or format conversion, and retransmit the signal over-the-air from tower-mounted using for analog (pre-2009) or vestigial sideband modulation for digital ATSC signals in the VHF (54–216 MHz, channels 2–13) and UHF (470–608 MHz, channels 14–36 post-2017 spectrum reallocation) bands. Transmitter () ranges from 16–50 kW for VHF stations to 1–5 MW for UHF, with antenna heights often exceeding 300 meters to maximize coverage, achieving typical service contours of 40–80 miles in flat terrain via direct wave . Terrestrial signal propagation occurs mainly as line-of-sight electromagnetic waves, governed by proportional to the square of distance and inversely to frequency squared, with VHF signals benefiting from slightly greater over obstacles compared to UHF, though both are attenuated by terrain, buildings, and foliage; tropospheric super-refraction can occasionally extend range by 20–50% under specific atmospheric conditions like temperature inversions. incorporates (FEC) and trellis coding in ATSC to combat multipath and , allowing robust reception via rooftop or indoor antennas within the signal footprint. Microwave links may still serve as short-haul interconnects between studio, , and transmitter sites at affiliates, operating in 6–11 GHz bands for or in areas lacking .

Broadcasting Standards and Frequencies

In the United States, television broadcast stations operate on channels allocated 6 MHz wide within the VHF band (54–216 MHz for channels 2–13) and the UHF band (470–608 MHz for channels 14–36, post-digital transition adjustments). These allocations, managed by the (FCC), ensure separation from other services like mobile communications, with VHF providing longer-range propagation suitable for rural coverage and UHF enabling higher capacity in urban areas despite greater signal . Low-power television stations and translators may reuse these bands under secondary status. Analog television standards historically dominated broadcasting, with the system in specifying 525 scan lines and 29.97 frames per second for compatibility with 60 Hz power grids. In contrast, Europe's PAL standard employs 625 lines at 25 frames per second aligned to 50 Hz mains frequency, offering better vertical resolution but requiring phase alternation line-by-line for color stability. The system, used in and former Soviet states, also features 625 lines at 25 frames per second but encodes color sequentially to mitigate transmission errors in early satellite links. These analog formats, developed mid-20th century, prioritized monochrome backward compatibility while adding color subcarriers—3.58 MHz for , 4.43 MHz for PAL and . The shift to digital standards addressed analog limitations like susceptibility to noise and fixed resolutions. In the , the ATSC 1.0 standard, mandated for full-power stations by June 12, 2009, uses modulation within the same 6 MHz channels to deliver compressed video up to resolution and AC-3 audio. Internationally, in Europe and ISDB-T in Japan employ OFDM modulation for multipath resistance and mobile reception, often in 8 MHz channels spanning 470–862 MHz. , deployed voluntarily since 2017, introduces IP-based delivery, /HEVC support, and enhanced robustness via layered division multiplexing, with over 100 markets adopting it by 2025 for next-generation broadcasting. Radio broadcasting, foundational to network models, uses distinct allocations: AM stations in the band (535–1705 kHz) with 10 kHz spacing for , and in VHF (88–108 MHz) with 200 kHz channels for , enabling stereo and higher fidelity. These frequencies support wide-area coverage, with AM propagating via ground waves and FM relying on line-of-sight, influencing affiliate station placement in networks. standards like overlay analog signals in the same bands without disrupting legacy receivers.

Modern Technological Advancements

The transition to in the United States, completed on June 12, 2009, when full-power television stations ceased analog transmissions and adopted the ATSC 1.0 standard, enabled high-definition programming, multiple subchannels per frequency, and improved signal reliability through digital compression and error correction. This shift freed up spectrum for public safety uses and allowed broadcasters to deliver enhanced content without the interference-prone limitations of analog signals. Subsequent advancements culminated in , approved by the FCC in November 2017 as a voluntary standard, which introduces IP-based transmission protocols compatible with modern networks, supporting ultra-high-definition video, (HDR) imaging, and immersive audio formats like . As of 2025, deployment covers over 75% of U.S. households in major markets, including early adopters like and since 2018, enabling features such as mobile reception, hyper-localized emergency alerts, and interactive program guides. High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC, or H.265), integrated into ATSC 3.0 specifications since 2019, achieves 25% to 50% greater compression efficiency compared to prior H.264/AVC standards, permitting higher video quality within the same bandwidth or additional services like datacasting. This standard supports bitrates up to 66 Mbps for content, reducing bandwidth demands while maintaining perceptual quality, as verified through standardized testing profiles. Datacasting capabilities, enhanced under , allow broadcast networks to transmit packets for non-video data—such as software updates, metadata, or file distribution—directly over-the-air to unlimited devices without relying on congested infrastructure, with platforms like Sinclair's Broadspan enabling secure, wide-area delivery since 2024. These -integrated features bridge traditional terrestrial with ecosystems, supporting hybrid reception models while preserving spectrum efficiency through (OFDM) for robust signal propagation.

Economic and Business Models

Primary Revenue Mechanisms

The primary revenue mechanism for broadcast networks is the sale of commercial advertising airtime during their programming schedules. Networks divide airtime into segments allocated to paid advertisements, with rates primarily determined by expected audience size and composition, measured via metrics like Nielsen ratings for key demographics such as adults aged 18-49. Advertisers purchase these slots either through "upfront" markets, where commitments are made annually in advance for discounted bulk rates, or "scatter" markets for remaining inventory at potentially higher prices closer to airdate. This model leverages the networks' ability to aggregate mass audiences via over-the-air signals distributed through local affiliates, enabling broad reach without direct subscription fees from viewers. In the United States, national constitutes the core income for major broadcast networks including , , , and , with total U.S. television expenditures projected at $60.6 billion in 2024, a substantial portion attributable to broadcast despite competition from digital platforms. High-profile events like games, which networks air under multi-billion-dollar rights deals—such as the $11 billion annual contracts shared among , , , and others through 2033—command premium ad rates due to elevated viewership, often exceeding 100 million for Super Bowls. However, has faced pressure from audience fragmentation and , prompting networks to adjust inventory and pricing; for instance, U.S. broadcast station ad revenue rose 8.4% to $36.68 billion in 2024, buoyed by political in election cycles but still vulnerable to long-term declines in linear viewership. A secondary but increasingly vital stream involves retransmission consent fees negotiated with multichannel video programming distributors (MVPDs) like , , and virtual providers, which pay for the right to retransmit local affiliate signals carrying network content. These fees, authorized under U.S. federal regulations since 1992, have grown as ad markets soften, with gross industry-wide retransmission estimated at $14.8 billion in 2024, reflecting a 3% year-over-year increase before slowing growth projections. Networks typically receive a share of these payments through agreements with groups, supplementing ad ; for example, station owners like Nexstar reported $2.9 billion in retransmission in 2024, outpacing their core ad sales and highlighting the mechanism's role in offsetting linear TV erosion. While not the dominant source for networks proper—advertising remains foundational—these fees underscore a shift toward models amid declining traditional ad . Other mechanisms, such as of off-network programming and limited digital ad extensions, contribute marginally, often under 10% of total revenue, as networks prioritize live and primetime content to maximize ad scalability. This reliance on advertising-driven models traces to broadcast's origins, where public accessibility necessitates monetization via third-party sponsors rather than direct consumer payments, though sustainability hinges on maintaining audience scale against streaming alternatives.

Ownership Structures and Market Consolidation

Major U.S. broadcast networks operate under ownership by large media conglomerates, reflecting decades of mergers and regulatory changes that have concentrated control among a few entities. The (ABC) is wholly owned by , following its 1995 acquisition for $19 billion, which integrated the network with Disney's film, cable, and theme park assets. The National Broadcasting Company (NBC) is a division of , a subsidiary of Corporation, acquired in a 2011 deal valued at $30 billion that combined NBC with Comcast's broadband and cable operations. CBS falls under (recently restructured with involvement), stemming from the 2019 merger of and Viacom, creating a entity with extensive cable and streaming holdings. is controlled by , separated from in 2019 after Disney's purchase of the latter's film and international assets, leaving the with voting control over broadcast and news properties. The CW Television Network is majority-owned by (75% stake acquired in 2022 for $100 million equity value), with holding the remainder, marking a shift from its prior between and .
NetworkPrimary OwnerKey Acquisition/Merger Details
ABCAcquired 1995 for $19 billion; integrates with ESPN and Disney studios.
NBC (NBCUniversal)Acquired 2011 for $30 billion; pairs with cable networks like USA.
CBSViacom-CBS merger 2019; includes Showtime and MTV assets.
FoxSpun off 2019 post-Disney deal; Murdoch family retains control.
The CW (75%)Acquired 2022; focuses on local station synergies.
Market consolidation accelerated after the , which repealed national ownership caps on radio stations and relaxed television limits, allowing entities to reach up to 35% of U.S. households (later raised to 39%). This facilitated mergers, reducing the number of owners from over 5,000 in the mid-1990s to fewer than 1,000 by 2020, as conglomerates pursued amid rising production costs and competition from cable. Empirical analysis of 1990s shows consolidated stations experienced 1-2% higher revenues but no significant viewership gains, attributed to enabling cross-promotion with cable and syndication arms. By 2025, the top four networks (, , , ) control over 90% of prime-time broadcast viewership, though FCC rules still prohibit their merger under the "network rule" to preserve competition—a policy under review for potential repeal amid streaming fragmentation. Further consolidation in local affiliates has compounded national trends, with firms like Nexstar owning over 200 stations reaching 39% of households by 2023, enabled by FCC duopoly relaxations in the . Critics argue this erodes viewpoint , as evidenced by homogenized news content in consolidated markets, while proponents cite efficiency gains in a multi-platform era where broadcast shares have declined from 90% of TV viewing in 1980 to under 20% in 2024. Regulatory caps, including local market limits (no more than two stations per DMA for the top networks), persist but face challenges from digital alternatives, prompting ongoing quadrennial reviews to assess necessity.

Affiliation and Syndication Practices

Broadcast networks primarily distribute programming through a combination of owned-and-operated (O&O) stations and affiliated independent stations, with agreements governing the relationship. These contracts typically require affiliates to carry a specified amount of network programming, often during slots, in exchange for access to popular content that drives viewership and local advertising revenue. The (FCC) regulates these agreements under 47 CFR § 73.658, prohibiting exclusive affiliations that unduly restrict competition or prevent stations from acquiring non-network programming, a rule rooted in the 1941 Chain Broadcasting Regulations aimed at curbing network dominance over affiliates. Networks compensate affiliates through a mix of cash payments, advertising spot allocations for local sales, and revenue sharing from national ads, though O&O stations retain full control without such terms. Compensation practices have evolved significantly since the mid-20th century. Initially, paid affiliates for carriage to build coverage, but by the , reverse compensation became prevalent, where affiliates pay fees—sometimes exceeding $100 million annually for major markets—to secure amid declining over-the-air viewership and competition from . This shift reflects ' leverage from premium programming, with affiliates offsetting costs via retransmission fees from multichannel video programming distributors (MVPDs), though some stations now pay more than they earn from retransmission. agreements often include clauses on promotional support, news service access, and termination rights, with like requiring stations to prioritize their programming and maintain technical standards. The FCC's oversight ensures no undue control, such as optioning future affiliate time without firm commitments. Syndication practices involve licensing programming rights to multiple non-network stations, enabling revenue extension beyond initial network runs and filling affiliate schedules with cost-effective content. Off-network syndication resells successful primetime shows like The Big Bang Theory after their network tenure, while first-run syndication produces original fare such as courtroom programs (Judge Judy, debuting 1996) or talk shows for direct station sales. Stations purchase syndication rights via barter (trading ad time for programming) or cash, with distributors handling clearance across markets to avoid overlap. The FCC's Financial Interest and Syndication (Fin-Syn) Rules, enacted in 1970, barred networks from owning syndication rights to their primetime shows or financing independent producers to prevent monopolistic control, fostering independent syndicators; these were phased out by 1995, allowing networks greater involvement. Syndication deals specify run lengths, exclusivity windows, and territories, with economic viability tied to a show's proven ratings—typically requiring 100+ episodes for viability. This model sustains affiliate profitability by providing affordable, high-demand filler outside network feeds.

Regulatory Environment

Spectrum Allocation and Licensing Processes

The (FCC), established by the , holds primary authority over non-federal spectrum allocation and licensing in the United States, including for broadcast television stations that form the backbone of national networks. The FCC collaborates with the (NTIA) to divide the , designating specific bands for broadcasting to prevent interference while promoting public interest uses. For television, allocated bands include VHF () channels 2–13 (54–216 MHz) and UHF () channels 14–36 (originally up to 83, but reduced after the 2016 incentive auction reclaimed 600 MHz for ). These allocations are codified in the FCC's Table of Frequency Allocations and updated via rulemaking proceedings that incorporate engineering studies, international agreements under the , and domestic policy goals. Spectrum for full-power broadcast television is assigned through the FCC's Table of Allotments (47 CFR § 73.622), which specifies channels available in designated communities to ensure nationwide coverage and minimize . This allotment process originates from historical rulemaking, such as the 1952 Sixth Report and Order that separated VHF and UHF bands, prioritizing larger markets for VHF due to superior propagation characteristics. Amendments to the table occur via notice-and-comment proceedings, often triggered by technological shifts like the 2009 , which repurposed analog for digital signals and multicasting. Unlike auction-based methods for mobile services, broadcast allotments prioritize non-commercial criteria, reflecting the "public trustee" model where is deemed a scarce resource allocated to serve needs rather than highest bidder. Licensing follows allotment and involves applicants filing Form 301 for a construction permit, demonstrating technical feasibility, financial qualifications, and intent to operate in the . The FCC evaluates applications administratively or, in competitive cases, through comparative hearings assessing factors like commitments and diversification of ownership, though lotteries have supplemented hearings since for certain services. Successful permit holders must build and operate within specified timelines, obtaining a full upon verification of compliance; licenses are granted for eight-year terms and renewable if the station has served the public convenience, necessity, or interest, with denials possible for violations like indecency or failure to maintain minimum operating hours. National broadcast networks, such as or , do not directly hold spectrum licenses; instead, they affiliate with locally licensed stations, whose FCC-granted authorizations enable over-the-air distribution of network programming. Recent reforms, including the 2016–2017 broadcast incentive auction, allowed voluntary spectrum relinquishment by stations for compensation, enabling reallocation of 84 MHz of UHF band while repacking remaining channels to maintain service.

Government Oversight and Content Regulations

In the United States, the , established by the , exercises oversight over broadcast networks primarily through the licensing and regulation of affiliated local stations, requiring operations that serve the public interest as determined during license renewals every eight years for television stations. This framework mandates that broadcasters provide programming responsive to community needs, though the FCC does not directly license national networks but influences their content distribution via affiliate compliance. Violations can result in fines, license non-renewal, or revocation, with enforcement emphasizing technical standards alongside content obligations derived from the scarcity of spectrum resources. Content regulations prohibit obscene material at all times, defining it under the (1973) test as lacking serious value and appealing to prurient interest in a patently offensive way, while indecent content—depicting sexual or excretory activities in a patently offensive manner—is barred from broadcast between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m., when children may be in the audience. The FCC has imposed significant fines for violations, such as the $550,000 penalty against in 2004 for the halftime show incident involving fleeting nudity, later increased under the Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act of 2005, which raised maximum forfeitures to $325,000 per violation or $3 million for repeated ones. Profane language is similarly restricted during those hours, with enforcement actions totaling millions in penalties, including over $2 million in fines against stations airing for explicit discussions prior to stricter rules. These rules stem from 18 U.S.C. § 1464, balancing First Amendment protections with public airwave trusteeship, though courts have upheld them narrowly due to broadcasting's pervasive nature. Political content faces requirements like the equal opportunities rule under Section 315 of the Communications Act, mandating comparable airtime for opposing candidates if one is granted access, with exemptions for news coverage, debates, and bona fide newscasts. Broadcasters must also disclose sponsorships under Section 317 and avoid hoaxes that could harm public safety. The Children's Television Act of 1990, amended in 2004, compels commercial stations to air at least three hours weekly of educational and informational programming for children aged 16 and under, with the FCC monitoring compliance during renewals. Historically, the , adopted in 1949 and repealed by the FCC in August 1987, required balanced presentation of controversial public issues and contrasting viewpoints, but its elimination was justified as fostering robust debate rather than enforced neutrality, enabling the growth of partisan formats like while critics argued the prior policy chilled speech due to regulatory uncertainty. Internationally, oversight varies; for instance, the European Union's Audiovisual Media Services Directive imposes quotas for European (at least 50% of transmission time) and protects minors from harmful material, enforced by national regulators like the UK's , which can fine broadcasters up to 10% of turnover for impartiality breaches. In contrast to U.S. commercial emphasis, public broadcasters in countries like (via CRTC) face stricter mandates for and cultural reflection, with fines for non-compliance exceeding CAD $10 million in severe cases. These regimes reflect causal trade-offs between state intervention for diversity and risks of censoring dissenting views, often critiqued for enabling bureaucratic bias in judgments.

Antitrust and Competition Policies

Antitrust policies have historically targeted broadcast networks to prevent monopolistic control over programming distribution and affiliate relations, stemming from concerns over chain broadcasting practices that limited stations' access to content and revenue. In the 1940s, the Department of Justice (DOJ) pressured to divest its due to dominance in radio, which became the ABC network, reflecting early efforts to foster competition amid limited spectrum availability. Similar scrutiny extended to television, where networks' exclusive affiliation contracts were viewed as restraining trade by dictating terms that disadvantaged non-affiliates. By the 1970s, amid growing network power, the DOJ secured consent decrees from , , and in 1978, prohibiting practices such as networks owning syndication rights to their own programming or acquiring financial interests in independent shows, which were seen as foreclosing competition in the . These decrees, modeled on the 1948 case against film studios, aimed to separate production from distribution to encourage diverse content creation, though enforcement revealed tensions between antitrust goals and the FCC's spectrum-based regulatory framework, which sometimes permitted practices antitrust might challenge. The FCC complemented these with rules like the (1969-1995), limiting network evening hours to promote local and syndicated alternatives, indirectly supporting antitrust by curbing . Deregulation accelerated in the , with the DOJ lifting the major consent decrees in 1995 following petitions arguing that cable and emerging video competition diminished networks' , enabling mergers like Disney's acquisition of in 1995 and Viacom's with in 2000. The further relaxed FCC ownership caps, raising the national audience reach limit from 25% to 35% (later adjusted to 39%), shifting emphasis from structural limits to case-by-case merger reviews under 7 of the Clayton . In contemporary enforcement, the DOJ and prioritize horizontal effects in local markets during mergers, as seen in the 2018 settlement requiring , Tribune, Meredith, Nexstar, Gray, and TEGNA to cease sharing competitive data like pricing and programming strategies, which facilitated coordinated rate increases harming advertisers. While FCC rules address broadcast-specific scarcity to ensure viewpoint diversity, antitrust authorities focus on economic harms like reduced output or higher costs, often approving deals with divestitures—such as blocking Sinclair's merger in over local dominance—absent evidence of nationwide given streaming alternatives. Critics argue has concentrated programming decisions, potentially stifling independent voices, though empirical data shows affiliate has waned as networks leverage national scale against fragmented rivals. Recent DOJ guidance emphasizes vertical risks in mergers, but broadcast cases remain rare, with policies adapting to rather than presuming inherent monopolies.

Regional Examples and Variations

North American Networks

The major commercial broadcast television networks in the United States—, , , and —operate primarily through an affiliation model, distributing national programming to over 200 local stations each, including owned-and-operated outlets and independent affiliates that provide regional content such as . This structure emerged post-World War II, with launching experimental TV broadcasts in 1939 and commercial service in 1941 via its New York station W2XBS (later ), followed by in July 1941. , spun off from 's in 1943 and fully operational by 1948, completed the initial "" triad, which dominated until entered in 1986 as the first successful fourth network by targeting younger demographics and avoiding evening newscasts. These networks are regulated by the (FCC), which enforces affiliation agreements limiting dual-network affiliations in most markets to promote competition, though O&Os allow direct control in key cities like and . As of 2024, affiliates must carry at least 85% of a network's prime-time schedule under typical contracts, with compensation flowing from networks to stations via reverse comp fees averaging $1-2 per subscriber in recent retransmission deals. Public broadcasting supplements commercial networks via the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), a non-commercial distributor formed in 1969 that aggregates content for 350+ member stations funded by federal grants, viewer donations, and state support, emphasizing educational programming without ads. The CW, a joint venture of CBS and Warner Bros. Discovery launched in 2006, serves as a smaller commercial network with about 100 affiliates, focusing on youth-oriented scripted series and sports like WWE NXT. FCC ownership rules cap national reach at 39% of households for Big Four networks to curb monopoly risks, a limit adjusted in 2004 and reaffirmed in 2024 quadrennial reviews amid cord-cutting pressures reducing linear viewership to under 20% of total TV hours by 2023. In Canada, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) functions as the public broadcaster, operating English and French networks with 14 television stations and emphasizing national content under CRTC mandates requiring 50-60% Canadian programming. Private networks CTV (owned by since 2011) and (under ) dominate commercial broadcasting, with CTV holding an 8.8% audience share and Global 9.8% as of recent data, distributing U.S. imports alongside domestic shows via 20-30 affiliates each. These networks face rules enforced by the CRTC, replacing U.S. signals with Canadian versions during live events to protect local ad revenue. Mexico's broadcast landscape is a duopoly led by , which operates flagship network (formerly Canal de las Estrellas) reaching over 200 stations and pioneering color TV in 1963, and , privatized in 1993 with channels and covering 179 outlets. Televisa commands 70-80% of prime-time viewership through telenovelas and news, while TV Azteca holds 20-30%, both subject to IFT regulations limiting foreign ownership and mandating 50% Mexican content. This concentration has drawn antitrust scrutiny, including a 2010 IFT probe into alleged collusion, though mergers like Televisa-Univision in 2022 preserved domestic news silos.

European Public and Commercial Networks

European public service broadcasters operate under mandates to deliver impartial, educational, and culturally relevant programming, funded primarily through public mechanisms to insulate them from commercial pressures. In 2023, public service media across the (EBU) area received €40 billion in total income, with 78% derived from public sources such as household levies or direct government grants. Common models include license fees, as with the 's £174.50 annual color TV license in the UK effective from April 2025, or broadcasting contributions tied to household taxes in countries like , where ARD and collect approximately €8.5 billion annually via the Rundfunkbeitrag. These entities, including , in , and NOS in the , are required by national charters and EU directives to prioritize public interest over profit, often broadcasting news, documentaries, and minority-language content with limited —typically capped at 20 minutes per day under the Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD). Commercial broadcast networks in , by contrast, rely on revenues and private , emphasizing entertainment and audience maximization to attract advertisers. Prominent examples include and M6 Group in , which together command significant market share through channels like TF1 and W9; , operating in , , and beyond with channels such as and ; and ITV in the UK, which generates revenue from ads and program sales. These networks often feature reality TV, , and imported content, with advertising minutes per hour regulated nationally but generally more permissive than public quotas—up to 12 minutes per hour in many markets excluding news and children's programming. concentration is evident in multinational groups like Bertelsmann's , which spans multiple countries, though antitrust rules under competition policy limit dominance to foster pluralism. Regulatory frameworks distinguish the two models through graduated oversight: public broadcasters face stricter for , such as multi-stakeholder boards and prohibitions on political , while entities endure quotas for European works (at least 50% under AVMSD) and restrictions to protect minors and promote . networks enjoy priority for terrestrial transmission but must demonstrate value-for-money amid funding debates, with models shifting in some nations from licenses to taxes (e.g., ) to stabilize revenues against evasion. operators benefit from market flexibility but compete under "" principles allowing cross-border services, subject to national enforcement for harmful . Criticisms of bias have intensified, particularly against public broadcasters, which face accusations from conservative and populist groups of systemic left-leaning tendencies favoring urban, progressive narratives over rural or traditional viewpoints—evident in coverage of migration, climate, and cultural issues in outlets like the BBC and ARD. Right-wing politicians in Hungary, Poland, and Germany have proposed defunding or restructuring PSM, arguing taxpayer money subsidizes elite ideologies rather than balanced discourse, though empirical analyses show public media often outperform commercial peers in trust metrics despite these claims. Commercial networks, while less ideologically scrutinized, draw fire for sensationalism driven by ratings, exacerbating echo chambers in fragmented markets. Both sectors grapple with streaming competition, prompting hybrids like BBC iPlayer and RTL+ to blend free and paid models while adhering to public value tests.

Asian and Other International Networks

In Asia, broadcast networks frequently exhibit substantial state or public oversight, reflecting national priorities in information dissemination and cultural promotion, often with limited commercial competition compared to North American models. China's (CCTV), established as the national broadcaster, operates under direct government control through the , prioritizing state-approved content including news, education, and aligned with directives. CCTV maintains over 50 channels, with terrestrial signals reaching nearly all households via mandatory installations, emphasizing centralized production in . This structure ensures uniformity but restricts independent , as evidenced by its role in synchronizing national narratives during events like the 2008 Olympics coverage. Japan's broadcaster , founded in 1926 and restructured post-World War , functions as the country's , funded primarily through viewer fees rather than to maintain editorial . operates two primary for general programming and for instructional content—broadcasting nationwide via a network of over 10,000 relay stations, with digital transition completed by 2011. Private commercial networks, such as and , complement in a duopoly-like system of seven key broadcasters, where terrestrial signals remain dominant for older demographics despite cable penetration. This hybrid model balances mandates, like alerts, with market-driven entertainment. India's , managed by the autonomous corporation under the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, serves as the primary public terrestrial network, with its flagship channel launching experimental broadcasts on September 15, 1959, and expanding to full national coverage by the 1980s via satellite uplinks. boasts the world's largest studio and transmitter infrastructure, delivering content in multiple regional languages to promote national unity and rural outreach, though it faces competition from private satellite channels. In , public entities (KBS) and (MBC), alongside commercial (SBS), form the core of terrestrial broadcasting, collectively capturing about 79% of viewership as of 2023; KBS, as the public flagship, runs ad-free general and educational channels funded by fees and limited ads, focusing on news and cultural exports like K-dramas. Beyond Asia, Latin American broadcast networks often feature powerful private conglomerates with cross-border reach. Mexico's Grupo Televisa, originating from Telesistema Mexicano in 1955, dominates terrestrial airwaves through channels like Las Estrellas and Canal 5, exporting telenovelas and to audiences across the Americas via satellite partnerships established since the 1960s. In , public broadcasters prevail amid infrastructural challenges; South Africa's South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC) provides six free-to-air channels serving diverse linguistic groups, while Nigeria's (NTA), Africa's largest by network size, operates over 100 affiliate stations for nationwide coverage, though both grapple with funding shortages and digital transitions. These international variants highlight adaptations to local governance, with state dominance in authoritarian contexts enabling control over discourse, whereas public models in democracies like emphasize fee-based autonomy to mitigate commercial biases.

Programming and Operational Dynamics

Content Production and Scheduling

Broadcast networks typically commission original content from independent production companies or leverage owned subsidiaries rather than producing most programming in-house, as vertical integration allows control over costs and distribution rights but external expertise drives creative output. The process starts with network executives reviewing pitches and scripts, advancing promising concepts to pilot episodes—short test programs budgeted at $1-5 million each, filmed over 7-10 days with casts assembled via talent agencies. Successful pilots, evaluated through focus groups and early metrics, lead to series orders; for example, NBC's 2023-2024 slate included 10 new scripted pilots, with only a fraction greenlit based on projected audience appeal and advertiser interest. Networks like ABC (under Disney) and NBC (under Comcast) maintain production arms such as Disney Television Studios and NBCUniversal Television, which handled 40-50% of their primetime originals in 2023, while outsourcing reality formats and news to specialists for efficiency. Scheduling, managed by dedicated programming departments, optimizes viewer retention through data-driven strategies informed by Nielsen ratings and . Core techniques include dayparting, dividing the broadcast day into segments like morning (news-heavy), daytime (syndicated talk shows), early fringe (pre-primetime fillers), and primetime (8-11 PM ET, anchoring 70-80% of ad revenue via flagship dramas and comedies). clusters similar genres to build loyalty, such as CBS's Thursday comedy blocks from 2000-2020, which sustained 10-15 million weekly viewers by leveraging lead-in effects where a strong prior show boosts the next by 20-30% in tune-ins. Counterprogramming pits dissimilar content against rivals—e.g., Fox's animated comedies versus NBC's dramas—to capture underserved demographics, while stripping airs syndicated reruns daily in the same slot, as seen in ABC's afternoon game shows averaging 2-3 million viewers. Bridging and tentpoling further enhance flow, placing hits centrally to "tentpole" weaker shows, with algorithms now incorporating streaming data for hybrid scheduling. Sweeps periods—February, May, July, and November, each lasting four weeks—intensify these efforts, as they generate the primary local market ratings data for affiliate ad rate negotiations, historically accounting for 60-70% of annual pricing leverage despite year-round measurement shifts. During sweeps, networks deploy events like season premieres or specials; November 2021 sweeps, for instance, saw ABC's promotions drive a 5-10% ratings uptick for new fall lineups amid pressures. This focus yields verifiable impacts: Primetime viewership during May 2024 sweeps averaged 5.2 million households across networks (ABC, CBS, NBC, ), down 20% from 2014 but stabilized via targeted family and older demographics. Empirical declines underscore causal links to , prompting adaptations like shorter seasons and multiplatform tie-ins, though linear scheduling retains value for live events where 80% of games in 2023 drew over 15 million concurrent viewers.

Affiliate Relations and Local Integration

In the United States, broadcast networks such as , , , and primarily distribute their national programming through affiliation agreements with independently owned local television stations, known as affiliates, rather than solely relying on network-owned-and-operated (O&O) stations. These agreements, governed in part by (FCC) regulations under 47 CFR § 73.658, specify terms for program carriage, exclusivity within designated market areas (DMAs), and operational coordination, allowing stations to affiliate with up to two networks simultaneously to accommodate dual affiliations in smaller markets. Affiliates, which number in the hundreds for each major network—for instance, NBC maintains affiliations with over 200 stations—handle the final over-the-air transmission, integrating national feeds with localized elements to serve regional audiences. Affiliate relations have evolved from early radio-era chain broadcasting models, regulated by the FCC's 1941 Chain Broadcasting Rules that limited network control over to prevent monopolistic practices, to modern contracts typically spanning three to five years. Under these pacts, networks provide programming via satellite distribution, while commit to "clearing" specified time slots, particularly prime-time hours, in exchange for rights and, historically, compensation payments that have reversed in direction since the early . This "reverse compensation" model now requires many to pay networks fixed or variable fees—often escalating to tens of millions annually for larger markets—to secure popular content like sports and news, shifting financial burdens as networks leverage for leverage in retransmission negotiations with providers. Smaller , facing fixed fees amid declining pay-TV revenues, have pushed for performance-based models tied to viewership or ad sales, highlighting tensions in the relationship where networks prioritize national revenue streams over local viability. Local integration occurs through affiliates' customization of the network signal, where stations insert regional commercials during non-prime programming, produce independent blocks, and occasionally network content for community-specific events, though preemption rates remain low at under 5% for prime-time shows to avoid affiliation disputes. For example, affiliates typically air local newscasts leading into network evening —such as a 6:00 p.m. market-specific broadcast before the 6:30 p.m. national feed—enabling seamless blending of hyper-local reporting on , , and elections with national coverage, which boosts overall audience retention and ad revenue for both parties. This structure, rooted in FCC policies promoting localism since the 1941 rules, ensures affiliates retain autonomy over non-network time slots for syndicated or original content, fostering market-specific programming while networks focus on centralized production. In practice, relies on technical standards for signal , with affiliates using systems to splice feeds, though disputes over clearance for special events like overruns can strain relations, as seen in periodic negotiations where networks impose penalties for non-compliance.

News and Information Dissemination

Broadcast networks primarily disseminate news through structured national programs, such as evening newscasts, which aggregate reporting from correspondents, wire services, and affiliate stations for broad over-the-air distribution. These programs, originating in the mid-20th century, evolved from radio bulletins to visual formats, with CBS launching the first regular TV news in 1948 and the "big three" networks (ABC, CBS, NBC) establishing 15- or 30-minute evening slots by the 1960s that reached millions via chain affiliations. Affiliates localize national feeds by inserting regional stories, ensuring dissemination across 200+ U.S. markets while maintaining a unified brand for events like elections or disasters, where live coverage provides real-time updates to non-cable households. In the 2024-2025 television season, ABC's World News Tonight averaged 7.594 million total viewers, followed by NBC's Nightly News at approximately 5.5 million and CBS's Evening News at around 4 million, reflecting a combined still dominant among older demographics but down 10-20% year-over-year amid . Fox Broadcasting, while less focused on traditional evening news, integrates informational segments into its prime-time lineup, drawing from its cable counterpart's resources for broader reach. Operational dynamics emphasize speed in dissemination, with satellite trucks and embeds enabling on-scene reporting, though this prioritizes volume over , as seen in historical rushes during crises like the 1979 Iran hostage coverage. Empirical analyses reveal consistent left-leaning partisan bias in the big three networks' newscasts, measured by topic selection, language tone, and source framing from 2001-2012 data, where , , and favored Democratic narratives on issues like and . A 2025 study of nearly a decade of transcripts (2012-2022) confirmed this divergence, with broadcast outlets underrepresenting conservative viewpoints compared to cable peers, attributable to journalistic hiring patterns and institutional cultures rather than explicit mandates. Such biases correlate with eroded public trust; only 22% of Americans expressed high confidence in broadcast news accuracy in recent surveys, with Republicans citing ideological slant as a primary factor, while overall viewership trust hovers below 30% across parties. This systemic tilt, documented in peer-reviewed content analyses, undermines neutral dissemination, as networks amplify certain causal narratives (e.g., alarmism) while downplaying counter-evidence from empirical datasets.

Societal Impact and Controversies

Role in Shaping Public Discourse

Broadcast networks have historically served as primary gatekeepers of information , exerting significant influence over public discourse by determining which events receive national attention and how they are framed. Through mechanisms such as agenda-setting—where the prominence of issues in network coverage correlates with their salience in —networks like , , and shaped collective priorities during the mid-20th century when they commanded over 90% of television viewership. For instance, empirical studies from the 1968 Chapel Hill study onward demonstrated that the order of issue importance in network news mirrored public surveys, indicating that repeated exposure to selected topics primed viewers to prioritize them over others. A pivotal example is the networks' coverage of the , often cited as the first "television war," where graphic footage broadcast nightly eroded public support for U.S. involvement. anchor Walter Cronkite's February 27, 1968, editorial declaring the war a stalemate reportedly swayed opinion, with President later stating it influenced his decision not to seek re-election; polls showed approval for the war dropping from 61% in 1965 to 35% by 1968 amid intensified negative reporting. Similarly, investigative reporting on the by and journalists amplified revelations of executive misconduct, contributing to a 20-point decline in President Richard Nixon's approval ratings between 1972 and 1974 and fostering a culture of adversarial that persists. In contemporary contexts, broadcast networks continue to influence discourse, particularly among older demographics where Nielsen data indicate ABC, CBS, and NBC evening newscasts retain audiences exceeding 5 million viewers nightly as of 2023, though fragmented by cable and digital alternatives. However, studies reveal partisan tilts: analyses of newscasts from 2001–2012 position ABC, CBS, and NBC left of center in topic selection and language, while Fox News tilts right, with divergences widening post-2012 in coverage of economic and social issues. This bias, often attributed to journalistic demographics skewing liberal, can frame narratives—such as emphasizing systemic inequities over individual agency—potentially distorting causal understandings of events; for example, a 2022–2023 content analysis found broadcast networks underrepresenting conservative viewpoints on immigration by 15–20% relative to polling data. Such patterns underscore networks' role not just in informing but in selectively constructing interpretive lenses, though viewer self-selection and cross-media exposure mitigate uniform effects.

Allegations of Ideological Bias

A content analysis by the Media Research Center (MRC) of ABC, CBS, and NBC evening news coverage during the 2020 presidential campaign found 92% of evaluative statements about Donald Trump were negative, compared to only 52% negative for Joe Biden, with the networks airing 150 times more negative stories on Trump than on Biden. Similar disparities persisted in 2024, where MRC documented 85% negative coverage of Trump versus 78% positive for Kamala Harris across the same outlets, marking the most lopsided election coverage in MRC's tracked history. These findings stem from systematic coding of on-air statements for positive, negative, or neutral tone, highlighting a pattern of disproportionate scrutiny on conservative figures that critics attribute to ideological slant rather than journalistic neutrality. Peer-reviewed research supports claims of left-leaning bias in mainstream broadcast news. Economists Tim Groseclose and Jeffrey Milyo developed an ideological index by comparing media outlets' citations of think tanks and policy groups to those by U.S. Congress members, finding ABC's World News Tonight, CBS Evening News, and NBC Nightly News scored between -10 and -20 on a zero-centered scale (negative indicating liberal bias), aligning closely with the citation patterns of Democratic lawmakers, while FOX News' Special Report scored near zero, suggesting relative centrism. This methodology, which avoids subjective interpretation by relying on observable citation frequencies, indicates mainstream networks' content tilts leftward, potentially reflecting journalists' demographics—surveys consistently show U.S. newsroom professionals identifying as liberal or Democratic at rates exceeding 80% in recent decades. Allegations against center on conservative bias, with empirical studies showing its content and effects skew rightward. Exposure to has been linked to increased voting by 0.4 to 0.7 percentage points per viewer in affected markets, per a quasi-experimental analysis of cable expansions, implying persuasive conservative framing influences attitudes on issues like and . Content analyses, including Groseclose and Milyo's , position FOX as the least left-leaning major outlet, though critics cite internal memos and opinion programming as evidence of pro- favoritism, such as amplified coverage of Democratic scandals. Public perceptions reinforce this divide: surveys indicate 47% of Americans view FOX as "mostly conservative," with Democrats expressing low trust, mirroring distrust of the networks. Broader analyses of broadcast versus cable reveal mainstream networks exhibit subtler but consistent leftward tilts in topic selection and language, diverging less extremely than MSNBC (left) or FOX (right) but still favoring progressive narratives on social issues. These patterns, drawn from machine learning of transcripts over a decade (2012–2022), underscore causal links between outlet ideology and framing, with broadcast news showing bias in economic and immigration coverage akin to audience demographics. While MRC's conservative orientation warrants scrutiny for potential counter-bias in selection, its replicable coding aligns with independent academic metrics, suggesting systemic left-leaning tendencies in non-FOX broadcast journalism stem from institutional homogeneity rather than isolated errors.

Major Scandals and Accountability Issues

Broadcast networks have encountered significant scandals centered on journalistic integrity, including the dissemination of unverified or fabricated information and deceptive editing practices, often resulting in personnel changes, public retractions, and substantial financial liabilities through lawsuits. These incidents have prompted scrutiny over accountability mechanisms, such as internal investigations, regulatory oversight by the (FCC), and civil litigation, though networks have rarely faced license revocations. One prominent case involved CBS News in 2004, when 60 Minutes II aired a report relying on documents purportedly authored by Lt. Col. Jerry Killian, George W. Bush's deceased Texas Air National Guard commander, suggesting Bush had received preferential treatment and failed to fulfill duties. The memos, known as the Killian documents, were quickly challenged for containing typographic elements inconsistent with 1970s-era typewriters, leading CBS to admit on September 20, 2004, that it could not verify their authenticity. Anchor Dan Rather resigned in March 2005 amid the fallout, which an internal CBS review attributed to flawed reporting processes and overreliance on a single anonymous source. NBC News faced a major credibility crisis in 2015 with anchor , who repeatedly claimed his helicopter had been hit by fire during a 2003 reporting trip, a detail contradicted by military personnel and Williams' own prior accounts. On February 10, 2015, NBC suspended Williams for six months without pay after an internal confirmed the misrepresentation, which he had aired on as recently as January 30, 2015. Williams later attributed the falsehoods to "ego," and the incident contributed to his demotion from the nightly anchor role, highlighting vulnerabilities in personal storytelling within . Fox News, while primarily a entity with broadcast affiliations, settled a high-profile suit with on April 18, 2023, for $787.5 million over on-air claims that Dominion's machines rigged the 2020 presidential election against . Internal communications revealed Fox hosts and executives privately doubted the allegations but aired them to retain viewers, as ruled by a court in pretrial findings that Fox had acted with "." The settlement, one of the largest in media history, underscored through private rather than on-air corrections, with Fox issuing a statement acknowledging the claims' falsity without a formal . More recently, CBS's 60 Minutes drew accusations of deceptive editing in its October 7, 2024, interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris, where a promotional clip featured a response on Israel policy differing from the aired version, prompting claims of substituting answers to improve clarity. Donald Trump filed suit alleging election interference, leading Paramount Global (CBS's parent) to settle for $16 million on July 2, 2025, earmarked for Trump's presidential library, while CBS maintained the edits complied with standard broadcast practices for time constraints. The FCC released unedited transcripts in February 2025 confirming the changes derived from the same response segment, but the controversy fueled debates over transparency in interview handling and potential regulatory interventions. These scandals illustrate recurring accountability challenges, including delayed retractions and reliance on litigation over proactive self-correction, with financial penalties serving as primary deterrents absent consistent FCC enforcement. Networks have defended such practices as editorial necessities, but critics argue they erode public trust, particularly when internal doubts contrast with broadcast narratives.

Decline and Contemporary Challenges

Disruption by Streaming and Digital Platforms

The advent of streaming services fundamentally altered the media landscape by offering on-demand content consumption, decoupling viewers from fixed broadcast schedules and enabling ad-skipping or ad-free models via subscriptions. pioneered widespread video streaming in 2007 and shifted to original programming in 2013 with series like , attracting audiences away from linear television. This model proliferated with competitors such as (launched 2008, emphasizing next-day TV episodes) and later Disney+ (2019), which drew subscribers through exclusive content libraries and flexible viewing, eroding the traditional broadcast networks' reliance on simultaneous, appointment-style programming. Empirical data underscores the scale of disruption: by September 2025, streaming accounted for 45.2% of total U.S. TV usage, surpassing broadcast television's share at 22.3%. Broadcast viewership specifically fell below 20% of national TV consumption for the first time in June 2025, reflecting a broader decline in linear TV from 72.2% of video time in 2020 to a projected 56.5% by end-2024. accelerated this trend, with U.S. cable and pay-TV subscribers dropping from 88% household penetration pre-2010s to 64% by 2023, and cord-cutting households projected to reach 77.2 million by 2025—more than doubling since 2018. Younger demographics drove much of the shift, as streaming's format aligned with preferences for and personalized recommendations over scheduled broadcasts. Revenue models faced parallel erosion, as advertisers reallocated budgets to platforms offering targeted metrics over broadcast's broad-reach demographics. Traditional networks' ad declined amid fragmentation, with streaming's rise prompting a 71% increase in its TV usage share since 2021; by May 2025, platforms like (12.8%), (8.3%), and others collectively outpaced broadcast and combined at 44.8%. Broadcast entities, dependent on real-time ad insertions during live events or primetime slots, struggled against streaming's data-driven and subscription stability, exacerbating financial pressures from lost affiliate fees as pay-TV bundles shrank— subscribers fell to 68.7 million in 2024 from 72.2 million in 2023. This causal chain—convenience-driven viewer migration leading to fragmented audiences and diverted ad dollars—compelled networks to confront existential threats, though streaming's content costs and churn rates reveal not unqualified superiority but a for flexibility.

Empirical Evidence of Audience and Revenue Shifts

Nielsen data indicates a marked decline in broadcast networks' share of total U.S. TV usage over recent years. In May 2025, broadcast accounted for 20.1% of TV viewership, down from higher shares in prior periods as streaming reached 44.8%, surpassing combined linear TV for the first time. By June 2025, this share fell to a record-low 18.5%, with streaming climbing to 46%. Historical trends show broadcast's share dropping approximately 4.9 percentage points over the four years preceding mid-2025, amid a broader contraction in linear TV from 72.2% of TV video time in 2020 to 56.5% by late 2024. Absolute audience metrics for major broadcast networks reflect fragmentation, though year-over-year fluctuations occur due to events like sports and elections. For , average total viewers across , , , and varied: averaged 5.055 million (up 12% from 2023), 4.990 million (up 10%), 3.861 million (down 1%), and 2.841 million (down 15%). Primetime viewership for non-cable news programming has similarly eroded in context, with Channel—often compared for its linear draw—averaging 2.43 million viewers in summer 2025, outpacing , , and in some quarters. These figures occur against a backdrop of overall TV usage shifts, where streaming's rise correlates with broadcast's diminished dominance. Revenue trends underscore the audience exodus, with U.S. broadcast advertising—core to network-affiliate models—projected at $32.97 billion for 2025, a 9.4% decline from $36.40 billion in 2024. Structural pressures persist, with broadcast TV ad markets forecasted for a -5.4% through 2029. Network news divisions, reliant on linear ads, saw advertiser spending drop substantially across , , and since 2020, reflecting viewer migration to digital platforms. While affiliate fees provide some offset, overall linear ad revenues have contracted amid streaming's ad-supported growth, eroding broadcast's economic viability.

Potential Adaptation and Revival Strategies

Broadcast networks have pursued hybrid distribution models that integrate linear television with streaming platforms to retain audiences and advertisers amid trends. For instance, NBCUniversal's Peacock service, launched in 2020, now offers live feeds of affiliates alongside on-demand content, enabling the network to capture both traditional viewers and digital subscribers; by mid-2025, Peacock reported over 34 million paid subscribers, bolstered by exclusive sports rights like the Olympics. Similarly, Disney's integration of content into has allowed bundled access, with reaching 50 million subscribers by Q2 2025, demonstrating how networks leverage parent company assets to bridge linear and nonlinear viewing. A core strategy emphasizes live and event-based programming, where broadcast retains advantages in real-time engagement and communal viewing that streaming struggles to replicate at scale. Sports broadcasts, such as games on and , continue to draw massive linear audiences—'s in February 2025 averaged 123.7 million viewers—while networks secure hybrid rights deals that distribute overflow content to streamers like or Peacock. News operations, including ABC's "World News Tonight" and NBC's "Nightly News," maintain daily linear slots but extend reach via apps and clips on and , with reporting a 15% uptick in views year-over-year in 2025. These efforts capitalize on empirical data showing live content accounting for over 40% of total TV usage in ad-supported households. Networks are also expanding into (FAST) channels to revive ad revenue without subscriber fees, repurposing archival content into linear-like digital feeds. Fox's platform, with 80 million monthly active users by 2025, streams network-adjacent programming and has grown ad revenue by 25% annually, positioning it as a low-cost revival vector for off-network shows. , post its 2024 merger with Skydance, plans to revive legacy brands like through FAST integration on , aiming to restore cultural relevance via targeted youth demographics. Technological upgrades, such as transitioning to standards, offer potential for enhanced over-the-air () delivery with interactive features and better mobile compatibility, approved by the FCC in 2025 for major affiliates of , , , and . This could revive free OTA access for cord-cutters, with pilots showing improved signal quality and data overlay capabilities for personalized ads, though implementation risks alienating legacy antenna users without upgrades. Strategic partnerships, like ' seamless blending of linear pay TV with streaming apps in 2025, further enable networks to access MVPD (multichannel video programming distributor) bundles while experimenting with options. Diversification into addressable advertising and data analytics represents another adaptation, allowing networks to compete with streaming's targeting precision. CBS and NBC have piloted household-level ad insertion on linear feeds via ATSC 3.0 trials, potentially increasing CPMs (cost per mille) by 20-30% through viewer data integration, as evidenced by 2025 industry benchmarks. However, success hinges on regulatory approval and infrastructure investment, with critics noting that without aggressive cost-cutting—such as reducing unscripted production—revival remains uncertain given linear ad revenue's 10-15% annual decline since 2020.

References

  1. [1]
    The Difference Between Broadcast Network vs. Cable - Bloom Ads
    Mar 19, 2019 · Broadcast channels use public airwaves to transmit programs that are theoretically available to any TV set within range of a broadcast transmitter, at no cost ...
  2. [2]
    Broadcast network - (Television Studies) | Fiveable - Fiveable
    A broadcast network is a telecommunications network that distributes television programs to local television stations, which then air the content to viewers.
  3. [3]
    The Origins of America's First TV Networks
    Mar 4, 2019 · The oldest of the major broadcast networks in the United States, the National Broadcasting Company was founded in 1926 by the Radio Corporation ...
  4. [4]
    Broadcast TV Networks | History, Major Networks & Uses - Study.com
    As mentioned previously, broadcast TV networks are a collection of television stations that can be located in different parts of the country. The TV networks ...
  5. [5]
    TV Broadcast & Cable Networks Industry Profile - First Research
    Sep 15, 2025 · In the US, major broadcast TV networks are ABC, NBC, and Paramount, while leading cable networks include ESPN, Fox News, MSNBC, and USA Network.
  6. [6]
    The Public and Broadcasting | Federal Communications Commission
    Sep 13, 2022 · FCC Regulation of Broadcast Radio and Television. The FCC allocates a portion of the broadcast spectrum to new broadcast stations based upon ...
  7. [7]
    What Is Over-the-Air (OTA) TV? - CableTV.com
    Oct 21, 2024 · Over-the-air (OTA) TV is high-definition television broadcast from local television stations in your area. The only things you need to enjoy ...
  8. [8]
    Broadcast Media : Meaning, Advantages, Disadvantages, Working ...
    Jul 23, 2025 · Broadcast media is a way of sharing audio and video content with a large audience through platforms like, television, radio, and online streaming.
  9. [9]
    Beyond big data: The audience watching over the air - Nielsen
    A smaller, yet consistent, portion of TV homes continue to thrive on the over-the-air (OTA) broadcast programming they access for free using digital antennas.Missing: characteristics | Show results with:characteristics
  10. [10]
    Broadcast Television - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Broadcast television refers to a widely used service that transmits television signals over specific frequency bands to provide high-quality visual content to ...
  11. [11]
    Television – Introduction to Film & TV - OPEN OKSTATE
    Like radio, television networks are comprised of both owned & operated stations, which as the name suggests are owned and operated by the network itself, and ...
  12. [12]
    Affiliates: An Inscrutable TV Model Key to U.S. Networks
    Jan 9, 2024 · The changing system revolving around the affiliate relations business model doesn't concern just programming, but also the financial arrangements.
  13. [13]
    How the Broadcasting Industry Works | Umbrex
    Broadcasting is a complex value chain that begins with content creation and ends with content reaching and monetized from audiences.<|separator|>
  14. [14]
    Broadcast, Cable and Satellite | Federal Communications Commission
    Jun 26, 2025 · FCC consumer guides dealing with broadcast, cable and satellite issues.
  15. [15]
    Cable Television - Federal Communications Commission
    Apr 1, 2025 · Cable television is a video delivery service via coaxial cable or fiber optics, including transmission of video programming to subscribers.
  16. [16]
    Cable vs Satellite TV - Difference and Comparison - Diffen
    Cable TV is less likely to be affected by the weather, but is typically more expensive than satellite TV service.
  17. [17]
    Broadcasting vs Streaming: What's the Difference? - Castr
    Aug 31, 2024 · Broadcast TV sends the same content to a larger audience simultaneously. Streaming services deliver content to viewers on a one-to-one basis.📺Broadcasting vs Streaming... · How streaming technology works
  18. [18]
    The FCC and Speech | Federal Communications Commission
    Aug 31, 2022 · The FCC has limited authority to restrict speech, especially on cable/satellite, and does not regulate online content. It has some restraints ...
  19. [19]
    The Future Of Television Is Broadcast & Streaming: Here's Why
    Aug 8, 2024 · Among the reasons for the growth in streaming video include better shows, programs can be binged, and their on-demand capabilities. Nielsen's ...
  20. [20]
    History of Commercial Radio | Federal Communications Commission
    November 2, 1920​​ Harding and James Cox. Westinghouse obtained the first U.S. commercial broadcasting station license just one month prior, in October of 1920, ...
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    Radio in Virginia - Network Radio
    On January 24, 1923, the first radio network was born when WEAF in New York fed a broadcast of a concert to WNAC in Boston through the telephone lines.Missing: chain | Show results with:chain
  23. [23]
    AT&T's forgotten plot to hijack the US airwaves - Ars Technica
    Apr 4, 2010 · In 1923 it broadcast the annual meeting of the National Electrical Light Association via its copper wires across AT&T stations in New York, ...
  24. [24]
    See Toll Plant Chain (1923) - Early Radio History
    The January 4, 1923 WEAF-WNAC broadcast described in this review was the first joint broadcast that used AT&T longlines. However, contrary to the statement ...
  25. [25]
    Radio's Rapid rise
    AT&T developed the concept of toll broadcasting in 1922. That same year, WEAF and WMAF, followed by WJZ and WGY, began the concept of chain broadcasting. By ...
  26. [26]
    the beginnings of the nbc network - 1927 to 1933
    The National Broadcasting Company made its inaugural broadcast from the ballroom of the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel in New York on November 15, 1926.
  27. [27]
    NBC Debuts on Radio (November 15, 1926) - We Are Broadcasters
    On November 15, 1926, NBC made its debut over 19 stations extending from the East Coast to Kansas City, Missouri.
  28. [28]
    The National Broadcasting Company at the Library of Congress
    Nov 2, 2018 · The National Broadcasting Company was formed in 1926 when the Radio Corporation of America (RCA) purchased radio station WEAF in New York ...<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    1920s – 1960s: Television | Imagining the Internet - Elon University
    In the 1930s, a number of experimental broadcast stations began producing some special television programming. Radio powers NBC and CBS built New York stations ...
  30. [30]
    The complete history of television: From the 1920s to 2025
    Aug 29, 2025 · One of the very first regularly scheduled TV broadcasts happened in 1928 in the U.S. by a company called W2XBS (which later became NBC). They ...
  31. [31]
    History of the TV | Professional TV Installation | AVE
    By 1949, it was estimated that only 6,000 U.S. households had televisions. However, that would change quickly. Television in the 1950s. 1950s tv set. Family ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Television Network Development: The Early Years
    The FCC in deciding to allow limited commercial operations had not adopted any uniform technical standards for television trans- mitters and receivers. Its ...Missing: impact | Show results with:impact<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    The History of the Federal Communications Commission - Mitel
    In 1948, the FCC put a freeze on awarding new television station licenses ... This act allows the FCC to impose fines of $325,000 on networks that broadcast ...
  34. [34]
    April 19, 1948...The Start Of The ABC Television Network
    Apr 19, 2016 · 68 years ago today, on April 19, 1948, the ABC Television Network began its broadcasts on its first primary affiliate, WFIL-TV in Philadelphia.
  35. [35]
    The Impact of Television in the 1950s - RampNow
    Aug 3, 2021 · 1946 – 7,000 TVs; 1948 – 172,000 TVs; 1950 – 5 million. Through the 1950s, the US went from 20 percent of homes having a television to nearly 90 ...
  36. [36]
    WDTV, DuMont Network and The 1948 FCC "Freeze" by Richard Wirth
    Nov 26, 2018 · Some were beginning to interfere with each other. And it became woefully clear the 500 plus channels would not be enough.Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Impact of the UHF Promotion: The All-Channel Television Receiver ...
    Finally, on April 14, 1952, the FCC issued its Sixth Report and Order which ended the freeze on applications for construction permits. 16.
  38. [38]
    [PDF] The History of Television
    Television in the 1960s. • Television journalism came of age thanks to several significant events in American and broadcasting history. – Networks expanded ...
  39. [39]
    Color television - SRI International
    By 1953, RCA devised the first complete electronic color TV system. The U.S. Federal Communications Commission adopted RCA's system as its National Television ...
  40. [40]
    Television in the United States - Late Golden Age ... - Britannica
    In 1950 only 9 percent of American households had televisions; by 1959 that figure had increased to 85.9 percent. The nature of programming would reflect the ...
  41. [41]
    TV Milestones | American Experience | Official Site - PBS
    RCA's National Broadcasting Company (NBC) begins regular telecasts from New York City. In 1939 the network broadcasts the opening of the World's Fair and the ...
  42. [42]
    Television in the United States - Miniseries, Broadcasting, Networks
    In the late 1970s, more than 90 percent of the prime-time viewing audience was tuned to ABC, CBS, or NBC; by 1989 that number was down to 67 percent, and it ...<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    Television Programming
    1970 -- NBC, ABC and CBS had 95% of the total audience. 2000: Broadcasters (the 7 networks) have about 49% of the total audience. Fragmentation of audience. Why ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Nielsen Media Research - World Radio History
    Nielsen Media Research has been tracking television usage in the United States since 1950. Through those years, broadcast network primetime programs have ...
  45. [45]
    The Rise And Fall Of Cable Television - Forbes
    Nov 2, 2020 · In 2012, the number of scripted entertainment shows on basic cable (125), surpassed broadcast TV (119), peaking at 189 in 2015. · In 1976, the ...
  46. [46]
    Advertising History of the Television Business Models - Broadpeak
    Nov 21, 2024 · The goal of this new blog is to focus on the history of the television business, examining how the industry has generated revenue over time.Network Advertising... · Digital Ads: The Age Of... · Global Streaming And Ad...
  47. [47]
    The History of Television (or, How Did This Get So Big?)
    The television has exploded at a greater than exponential growth rate from 1950 to the 1970s. This growth has propelled the television to almost 1 billion units ...
  48. [48]
    Distribution | International Datacasting
    ... distribution of live radio and television network programming to affiliates. The architecture is scalable from simple solutions for backing up satellite ...
  49. [49]
    An Overview of Broadcast Chain; Key Components and Processes
    Jan 22, 2025 · This chain encompasses multiple stages, including audio video content creation, signal processing, signal transmission, and signal distribution.
  50. [50]
    [PDF] CONNECTING A CONTINENT: AT&T and the Broadcast Networks
    Apr 11, 2021 · We end around 1945 when wirelines were about to be overtaken by microwave radio and “The Coaxial Cable.” e-Outline. In Chapter One we follow ...
  51. [51]
    Television Transmission Formats - Videomaker
    Television Transmission Over the Air · Analog Television Transmission · Digital Television Transmission · Television Transmission Through Cable and Space.
  52. [52]
    47 CFR Part 73 Subpart E -- Television Broadcast Stations - eCFR
    This subpart contains the rules and regulations (including engineering standards) governing TV broadcast stations.<|separator|>
  53. [53]
    Terrestrial VHF Radio Signal Coverage - BLOS - VU2NSB.com
    Nov 9, 2020 · At VHF, UHF, and higher microwave frequencies, the general nature of propagation is primarily as a direct wave. The phenomena like Ionospheric ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] VHF/UHF/Microwave Radio Propagation: A Primer for Digital ...
    This paper covers radio propagation from upper VHF to microwave, including path loss, refraction, diffraction, reflections, and non-LOS links, with a focus on ...
  55. [55]
    Television Broadcast Frequencies and RF Channels - OTA DTv
    A TV station broadcast Radio Frequency (RF) channel is allocated 6 MHz of bandwidth for over-the-air transmission in the VHF or UHF Radio Frequency Band.
  56. [56]
    [PDF] U.S. Frequency Allocation Chart
    This chart is a graphic single-point-in-time portrayal of the Table of Frequency Allocations used by the. FCC and NTIA. As such, it does not completely reflect ...
  57. [57]
    Television Broadcast - SpectrumWiki
    Each TV channel is 6 MHz wide. Digital broadcasting is by the ATSC standard. Some Low Power Television (LPTV), TV translators, and Class A television stations ...
  58. [58]
    What are the NTSC, PAL, and SECAM video format standards? - Sony
    Jun 4, 2025 · NTSC (US, Japan) has 525 lines at 29.97 fps. PAL (Europe) has 625 lines at 25 fps. SECAM (Eastern countries) has 625 lines at 25 fps, but is ...Missing: ATSC | Show results with:ATSC
  59. [59]
  60. [60]
    Digital Television - Federal Communications Commission
    Aug 9, 2016 · Since June 13, 2009, full-power television stations nationwide have been required to broadcast exclusively in a digital format. The switch from ...
  61. [61]
    Broadcasters: Preparing America for the DTV Transition
    On June 12, 2009, America's broadcast television stations and networks ushered the nation into the digital age with the smooth transition to free digital ...
  62. [62]
    Spotlight ATSC 3.0 - ATSC : NextGen TV - ATSC.org
    ATSC 3.0 is a next-gen broadcast system improving TV with better video/audio, improved compression, and robust transmission for fixed and mobile devices.
  63. [63]
    ATSC 3.0 as the Bridge Between Broadcasting and AI-Driven Media
    Jul 10, 2025 · ATSC 3.0—the "NextGen TV" standard—provides broadcasters with the technical foundation to transform their operations from passive content ...
  64. [64]
    How ATSC 3.0 (NextGen TV) Works And Why It's a Game Changer
    Jun 13, 2025 · ATSC 3.0, also known as NextGen TV, is reshaping over-the-air broadcasting with 4K, HDR, better audio, and targeted content.
  65. [65]
    [PDF] ATSC Standard: Video – HEVC, with Amendment No. 1
    Mar 2, 2021 · This section establishes a specific subset of the HEVC video compression standard [2]. ... In addition, in some regions these broadcast signals ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Overview of the High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) Standard
    The main goal of the HEVC standard- ization effort is to enable significantly improved compression performance relative to existing standards—in the range of 50 ...
  67. [67]
    ATSC 3.0 Datacasting | Device Solutions Inc
    ATSC 3.0 enhances content delivery with 4K video, immersive audio, and interactive features, enabling targeted, high-quality broadcasts to a wide range of ...
  68. [68]
    Sinclair Launches "Broadspan" Datacasting Platform
    Apr 15, 2024 · Using a broadcaster's ATSC 3.0 channel, the Broadspan platform will allow businesses to distribute files, updates, or video over the air to any ...
  69. [69]
    ATSC 3.0 Technology | How Does ATSC 3.0 Work and What's New?
    Aug 27, 2025 · ATSC 3.0, or NextGen TV, uses IP for content delivery, enabling 4K, HDR, Dolby Atmos, and interactive features, bridging over-the-air and ...
  70. [70]
    Broadcast outlook 2024: Challenges, opportunities facing US TV ...
    Feb 23, 2024 · The US broadcast station industry is expected to reach $36.68 billion in total advertising revenue in 2024, up 8.4% from $33.84 billion in 2023.
  71. [71]
  72. [72]
    Sports broadcasting contracts in the United States - Wikipedia
    The NFL has the largest television contracts, and earns about $11 billion annually from its contracts with Fox, CBS, NBC and ESPN for the 2023 through 2033 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  73. [73]
    Affiliates Seek To Change How They Pay Networks for Programming
    Mar 1, 2024 · Gross retransmission fees were estimated to rise 3% to $14.8 billion this year by S&P Global Market Intelligence. Growth is expected to slow, ...
  74. [74]
    Here's Why Your Cable or Streaming TV Bill is So Expensive..
    Jun 25, 2025 · In 2023, Nexstar made $2.57 billion from retransmission fees—far outpacing their ad revenue. In 2024 that number rose to $2.9 billion. The ...<|separator|>
  75. [75]
    Retransmission fees give lift to TV broadcast revenue as advertising ...
    Sep 11, 2019 · The answer lies in so-called retransmission fees. Broadcasters are making up for their ad revenue shortfalls, in part, by placing more emphasis ...
  76. [76]
    Navigating the decline of linear TV - PwC
    Recommendations for legacy media companies​​ Diversify revenue sources by exploring additional revenue streams beyond direct monetization of content, such as ...
  77. [77]
    2024 US TV revenue grew 5% to $226 billion - nScreenMedia
    May 26, 2025 · US TV revenue grew by $11 billion to $225.6 billion in 2024, driven by SVOD, vMVPDs, and CTV ads. Traditional TV sources still commanded 65% of ...
  78. [78]
    On Its 20th Anniversary, Looking Back at How ... - Broadcast Law Blog
    Feb 10, 2016 · The Telecommunications Act eliminated all national caps on the number of stations that a radio broadcaster could own (from previous caps of 20 AM and 20 FM ...
  79. [79]
    The Telecommunications Act of 1996 Killed Local Radio - 35000 Watts
    Feb 22, 2022 · Within five years of the Act, radio station ownership dropped from 5100 owners to 3800. This trend has continued to the present, with corporate ...
  80. [80]
    Effects of Deregulation and Consolidation of the Broadcast ...
    This paper exploits deregulation in the 1990s to estimate viewership and revenue effects of consolidation in broadcast television.
  81. [81]
    US FCC to consider ending merger ban among US broadcast ...
    Sep 30, 2025 · The FCC said it would consider public comments before deciding whether to reverse the rule that bars a merger among the "Big Four" networks: NBC ...
  82. [82]
    FCC Approves Broadcast Ownership NPRM, Advancing 2022 ...
    Oct 2, 2025 · The Local Television Ownership Rule prohibits an entity from owning more than two television stations in the same Designated Market Area (DMA).
  83. [83]
    Redrawing the bottom line: How FCC deregulation reshapes ...
    Mar 31, 2025 · In 1985, the FCC had a one-to-a-market rule that prohibited owning more than one broadcast station in a media market.
  84. [84]
    FCC Prepares to Revisit Broadcast Ownership Rules
    Sep 25, 2025 · ... network rule, which prohibits any merger among the “Big Four” broadcast networks – ABC, CBS, Fox and NBC. The national TV ownership cap ...
  85. [85]
    47 CFR § 73.658 - Affiliation agreements and network program ...
    A television broadcast station may affiliate with a person or entity that maintains two or more networks of television broadcast stations unless such dual or ...
  86. [86]
    [PDF] Federal Communications Commission § 73.658 - hallikainen.org
    § 73.658 Affiliation agreements and network program practices; terri- torial exclusivity in non-network program arrangements. (a) Exclusive affiliation of ...
  87. [87]
    abc affiliation agreement - SEC.gov
    During the term of the affiliation agreement and in exchange for the consideration and other benefits received under it, each Station agrees to become ABC's ...
  88. [88]
    Are The Broadcast Networks Killing Their Affiliates? - TV News Check
    May 6, 2024 · Some affiliates are now paying their networks more in programming fees than they receive in retransmission payments from cable and satellite companies.
  89. [89]
    Setting the Standards for the TV Network-Affiliate Relationship
    Sep 7, 2008 · Affiliation agreements cannot give networks the right to "option" time in the future unless they make a commitment to fill that time with ...Missing: practices | Show results with:practices
  90. [90]
    Broadcast Syndication Then & Now: A Brief History - dotstudioPRO
    Jul 12, 2023 · Broadcast syndication is the sale or distribution of TV programming to various markets for non-network airings. Any content can be syndicated: ...
  91. [91]
    Syndication Regulation and TV's Big Three: Broadcasting ...
    Jan 31, 2023 · Television broadcasting, from its inception until the 1970s, was dominated by “The Big Three” networks. From creation to production to ...
  92. [92]
    [PDF] The Influences of Syndication on Broadcast Programming Decisions
    Off network syndication is the process of selling reruns of a network show that originally aired during network prime time to the local stations. Off network ...<|separator|>
  93. [93]
    The Federal Communications Commission's Spectrum Auction ...
    In 1934, Congress created the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), an independent agency, to manage and allocate nonfederal use of spectrum.
  94. [94]
    Spectrum Management
    NTIA manages the Federal government's use of spectrum, ensuring that America's domestic and international spectrum needs are met.
  95. [95]
    [PDF] Radio Spectrum Allocations 101 - SpectrumWiki
    AM broadcast. 530 kHz – 1.7 MHz. Broadcast television. 54 ~ 88, 174 – 216, 470 ~ 698 MHz. FM broadcast. 88 – 108 MHz. Cell phones. ~750, ~850, ~1700, ~1950, ~ ...
  96. [96]
    Radio Spectrum Allocation | Federal Communications Commission
    The FCC's Table of Frequency Allocations consists of the International Table of Frequency Allocations ("International Table") and the United States Table of ...Missing: television | Show results with:television
  97. [97]
    How to Apply for a Radio or Television Broadcast Station
    Oct 11, 2024 · Full power TV stations in the United States are allocated through a Table of Allotments (47 CFR Section 73.622). Parties interested in creating ...
  98. [98]
    [PDF] FCC ALLOCATION HISTORY FILE
    Jan 11, 2021 · The FCC Allocation History File lists amendments to the Allocation Table since 2000, with the table codified at 47 CFR § 2.106.
  99. [99]
    Broadcast Licensing Procedures & Legal Requirements - Justia
    Jul 1, 2025 · A license lasts for eight years, as does a renewal of an existing license. The FCC may issue a license if it serves public convenience, interest, and necessity.
  100. [100]
    Licensing - Federal Communications Commission
    Jan 16, 2025 · The FCC is responsible for managing and licensing the electromagnetic spectrum for commercial users and for non-commercial users including: state, county and ...About Licensing · Search FCC Databases · REgistration System for the FCC · Fees
  101. [101]
    FCC Spectrum Auction Authority: Background and Proposals for ...
    The FCC manages spectrum use and allocates it via auctions. The FCC's auction authority, authorized in 1993, has been extended multiple times.
  102. [102]
    Broadcast of Obscenity, Indecency, and Profanity
    Dec 20, 2022 · The FCC has authority to issue civil monetary penalties, revoke a license or deny a renewal application. The FCC vigorously enforces this law ...
  103. [103]
    Obscene, Indecent and Profane Broadcasts
    Jan 13, 2021 · Broadcasting obscene content is prohibited by law at all times of the day. Indecent and profane content are prohibited on broadcast TV and radio ...
  104. [104]
    Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act of 2005 (2005)
    Jan 1, 2017 · The Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act of 2005 increased fines against broadcasters tenfold—from $32,500 to $325,000 per incident for broadcast ...Missing: rules | Show results with:rules
  105. [105]
    Broadcast Content Regulation Under Federal Law - Justia
    Jul 1, 2025 · The First Amendment generally prevents the government from regulating broadcast content unless it contains obscene, indecent, ...
  106. [106]
    Program Content Regulations | Federal Communications Commission
    Mar 12, 1998 · Cable operators are responsible for compliance with the commercial limits on locally originated programming and on cable network programming, ...Missing: oversight | Show results with:oversight
  107. [107]
    The Return of the Fairness Doctrine – What it Was and Why it Won't ...
    Feb 11, 2021 · The Fairness Doctrine required that stations provide balanced coverage of all controversial issues of public importance.
  108. [108]
    The repeal of the fairness doctrine accelerated the polarization of ...
    Apr 22, 2025 · The repeal of the fairness doctrine accelerated the polarization of US media. When broadcasters no longer had to present diverse viewpoints, conservative radio ...
  109. [109]
    What's the FCC's role in regulating broadcast content in an era of ...
    Sep 29, 2025 · The FCC regulates local licenses but just a few companies, like Sinclair and Nexstar, control many local broadcasting stations.Missing: oversight | Show results with:oversight
  110. [110]
    Content Regulation: Obscene, Profane, and Indecent Broadcasts
    The United States Code prohibits the broadcast of any material that is “obscene, indecent, or profane,” but offers no definition for those terms.
  111. [111]
    [PDF] Broadcasting and the Antitrust Laws
    The complaint also alleges that the contract of May i6, 1955, by which Westinghouse agreed to exchange its Philadelphia stations for NBC's Cleveland television ...
  112. [112]
    [PDF] Antitrust and the FCC: The Problem of Network Dominance
    There is, in the first place, the underlying policy of the Congress which induced it to set up a system of governmental regulation in the field of broadcasting.
  113. [113]
    How Monopolies are Making TV Worse - ProMarket
    Nov 10, 2023 · Beginning in 1978, the Department of Justice required the Big Three to sign consent decrees solidifying their antitrust commitments. Similar to ...
  114. [114]
    Media Ownership Rules and Antitrust Laws - Justia
    Jul 1, 2025 · The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) built on these antitrust laws with a cross-ownership ban that barred media companies from owning a ...
  115. [115]
    Justice Department Requires Six Broadcast Television Companies ...
    Nov 13, 2018 · Justice Department requires six broadcast television companies to terminate and refrain from unlawful sharing of competitively sensitive information.Missing: mergers | Show results with:mergers
  116. [116]
    [PDF] Before the U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division Washington ...
    May 23, 2025 · To the extent it has identified competition in broadcast TV station mergers, the Division has focused on local effects of any merger, as it has ...
  117. [117]
    Media and Entertainment Industry Gets a Turn in DOJ-FTC Antitrust ...
    May 4, 2022 · FTC Chair Lina Khan opened the forum by highlighting significant market changes in the media and entertainment industry over the last decade.
  118. [118]
    [PDF] Federal Communications Commission FCC 25-64
    Sep 30, 2025 · The Dual Network Rule provides that “[a] television broadcast station may affiliate with ... Through this affiliation model, the Big Four networks ...
  119. [119]
    United States media guide - BBC News
    Jun 20, 2023 · Television ; ABC · - major commercial network ; CBS · - major commercial network ; NBC · - major commercial network ; Fox · - major commercial network.
  120. [120]
    [PDF] September 9, 2025 FCC FACT SHEET* 2022 Quadrennial ...
    Sep 9, 2025 · The three rules now subject to this quadrennial review are the. Local Radio Ownership Rule, the Local Television Ownership Rule, and the Dual ...
  121. [121]
    U.S. TV Station Ownership Rules And Loopholes: An Explainer
    Nov 7, 2024 · The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is responsible for regulating broadcast television station ownership in the United States.
  122. [122]
    Answers to Common Questions - CBC/Radio-Canada
    While CBC's television audience share is 4.6%, CTV's is 8.8%, and Global's is 9.8%. No Canadian TV network has more than 10% audience share, and in the case of ...
  123. [123]
    U.S. programs: their role in Canadian television
    The CBC carried less U.S. programming than the private stations, and for a while was able to cherry pick the strongest programs, sometimes out-bidding CTV for ...
  124. [124]
    History of Grupo Televisa, S.A. - FundingUniverse
    The company's four Mexican television networks broadcast to more than 225 Mexican television stations, of which Televisa owns more than 200, and reach more ...
  125. [125]
    TV Azteca, S.A. de C.V. | Encyclopedia.com
    TV Azteca, SA de CV is a Mexican holding company that, through its three principal subsidiaries, is engaged in the broadcasting and production of television ...
  126. [126]
    Televisa-Univision and TV Azteca Make News
    May 22, 2021 · The Azcarraga family, which controls Televisa, will keep all news content production in Mexico. Televisa received $3 billion for its assets ...
  127. [127]
    Funding of Public Service Media - EBU
    PSM income amounted to EUR 40 billion in the EBU area in 2023. PSM are 78% publicly funded in the EBU area. Taking inflation into account, PSM funding dropped ...
  128. [128]
    TV licence fee to rise by £5 to £174.50 in 2025 - BBC
    Nov 29, 2024 · The cost of a TV licence is to rise by £5 to £174.50 in 2025, the government has announced. Thousands more households are also to be offered ...
  129. [129]
    [PDF] public service broadcasting - ifo Institut
    In twelve countries, funding is derived from general taxation. In two cases (Poland and New Zealand), commercial rev- enues respectively advertising revenues ...
  130. [130]
    Audiovisual Media Services Directive - general principles
    Graduated regulation. The distinction between traditional TV channels and on-demand services is the basis for a two-tier regulatory approach. The Directive ...
  131. [131]
    PSM Funding Models - Public Media Alliance
    Worldwide, PSMs are asking: how should we be funded? This resource analyses the main funding models in use today, and their pros/cons.
  132. [132]
    [PDF] Regulation of television advertising - Toulouse School of Economics
    Abstract. Regulation of television advertising typically covers both the amount of time devoted to commercials per hour and restrictions on the commodi-.
  133. [133]
    [PDF] Top players in the European AV industry - https: //rm. coe. int
    Top players include Warner Bros Discovery, Paramount, Comcast's Sky, Disney, Vodafone, Deutsche Telekom, Netflix, Amazon Prime, DAZN, Apple TV+, ARD, BBC, ...
  134. [134]
    In brief: media law and regulation in European Union - Lexology
    Jun 13, 2023 · A look at some of the key features of the legal and regulatory framework governing the media sector in European Union, including broadcast ...
  135. [135]
    Changing PSB funding models: precedents and outcomes
    Jun 24, 2024 · Three main models have been adopted in its place: a state grant system, a ring-fenced income tax, and a premises levy—nowhere has chosen to fund ...
  136. [136]
    [PDF] Regulating online TV and radio broadcasting | European Parliament
    Sep 14, 2016 · Regulation extends the 'country of origin' principle, facilitates licensing, and includes rules on 'direct injection' for online TV and radio, ...
  137. [137]
    Populists are threatening Europe's independent public broadcasters
    Apr 8, 2021 · Critics there complained that the broadcasters focus too much on big cities and on themes such as gay rights and gender that appeal to educated ...
  138. [138]
    Why Europe's right-wing populists hate public broadcasters - EJO
    Jul 10, 2019 · Many people like to complain that public broadcasters are not good value for money. The licence fees that fund the broadcasters and guarantee ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  139. [139]
    European Public Broadcasters Facing Twin Threats - VOA
    Apr 20, 2021 · The criticism in Central Europe by populists of public broadcasters is echoed by counterparts in western Europe, who identify public media as ...
  140. [140]
    Public Service Media in Europe: Exploring the Relationship between ...
    May 21, 2019 · This paper contributes to the debate about funding models and the assessment of public service media by exploring the relationship between funding (input) and ...
  141. [141]
    Television Broadcasting, Production of | Encyclopedia.com
    These phases are the conceptualization phase, the preproduction phase, the production phase, and the postproduction phase. Completion of these phases may take ...Missing: network | Show results with:network
  142. [142]
    NBC - Anatomy of a TV Network Class Notes - Fiveable
    The journey from idea to screen involves multiple stages, including ideation, scripting, pre-production, production, and post-production. Distribution channels ...
  143. [143]
    The History of the Access-to-Content Shift in TV - The Streaming Book
    A simple and powerful example of the shift from access to content-based competition is HBO. HBO launched in 1972 to provide ad-free access to Hollywood movies.
  144. [144]
    Broadcast Programming | Definition, Techniques & Types - Lesson
    By using scheduling strategy in tv programming, today's broadcasters can establish an audience for a new show, hold onto that audience, or compete with the ...What is Broadcast... · Broadcast Programming... · Broadcast Schedule
  145. [145]
    GCSE Media Studies TV Scheduling - Mediaknowall
    Television scheduling is part art, part science. The art comes from predicting which programmes viewers might watch together in blocks.Social Media And The Tv... · Segmentation · Time Zones Or Dayparting
  146. [146]
    What are broadcast programming strategies? - Quora
    Mar 14, 2023 · Some of the major broadcast programming techniques are block programming, bridging, counterprogramming and dayparting.How does TV scheduling work? How do basic cable networks play ...How are TV schedules made? - QuoraMore results from www.quora.com
  147. [147]
    Programming and Scheduling Strategies - TV Management - Fiveable
    These techniques involve analyzing viewer preferences, selecting content, and strategically organizing shows to maximize engagement and revenue. Key concepts ...
  148. [148]
    How Sweeps Week Works | HowStuffWorks - Entertainment
    Aug 4, 2014 · Since paper diaries take much longer to process, Nielsen confines Sweeps Weeks to four, four-week periods throughout the traditional television ...
  149. [149]
    November Use To Be Filled With Blockbuster TV Programming ...
    Nov 9, 2021 · The November sweeps were of particular importance since it allowed stations to evaluate, for the first-time, the new programming schedules that had debuted in ...
  150. [150]
    What is Sweeps Week? Understanding TV Ratings - Voices.com
    Dec 4, 2024 · Sweeps Week occurs four times a year, and is crucial for measuring television ratings and determining advertising rates.The Sweeps Week Phenomenon · When is Sweeps Week in 2025?
  151. [151]
    Sweeps is over. What did you learn?
    Jun 2, 2022 · Typically, there are no vacations during May sweeps at local TV stations, and only limited vacation during the less-important July sweeps.
  152. [152]
    [PDF] THE IMPACT OF THE FCC'S CHAIN BROADCASTING RULES
    On October 11, 1941, the Commission amended three of the regulations in order to clarify them or to lighten their burden on the networks.
  153. [153]
    What is the relationship between local affiliates and networks (NBC ...
    Dec 12, 2023 · Network affiliation is a cooperative agreement between a network and a local broadcaster to retransmit network programming. Usually with the ...
  154. [154]
    Network News Fact Sheet - Pew Research Center
    Sep 14, 2023 · Financially, advertiser expenditures for the news programs of the three major networks (ABC, CBS and NBC) have declined substantially since 2020 ...
  155. [155]
    20 Events and People in the Evolution of Televised News in the ...
    Sep 10, 2018 · In 1970 American television news was dominated by the three major networks, CBS, NBC, and ABC. Local affiliates produced news of their own ...
  156. [156]
    A History of Television News in America by Charles L. Ponce de Leon
    To pay for program development, the networks and individual stations “sold” airtime to advertisers. Advertisers, in turn, produced programs—or selected ones ...
  157. [157]
    Here Are the Evening News Ratings for the 2024-2025 TV Season
    Sep 23, 2025 · Its year-ago week numbers were down by -16% in total viewers and -23% in the demo. ABC, NBC, CBS. • Total Viewers: 6,990,000, 5,541,000 ...
  158. [158]
    fox news channel beats cbs and abc in third quarter and remains ...
    Oct 1, 2025 · During weekday 3Q'2025, FNC drew 2,934,000 viewers and 299,000 in the 25-54 demo in primetime, ahead of ABC (2.751 million viewers) and CBS ( ...
  159. [159]
    A Brief Look at the History of Broadcast Journalism - NYFA
    Apr 1, 2015 · In 1979 when 52 Americans were captured by Iranian militants from Tehran's U.S. Embassy, television viewers needed extensive information beyond ...
  160. [160]
    Measuring partisan media bias in US newscasts from 2001 to 2012
    This paper investigates the positioning in political news coverage of the big four US newscasts, ABC News, CBS News, FOX News and NBC News
  161. [161]
    Unpacking media bias in the growing divide between cable ... - Nature
    May 21, 2025 · We measure bias in the production of TV news at scale by analyzing nearly a decade of TV news (Dec. 2012–Oct. 2022) on the largest cable and broadcast stations.
  162. [162]
    Republicans' trust in info from news outlets and social media rises
    May 8, 2025 · 53% of Republicans have at least some trust in information from national news outlets in 2025, up from 40% in 2024.Missing: broadcast | Show results with:broadcast
  163. [163]
    [PDF] Media Bias on Television and Its Determinants - Harvard DASH
    Both find that increased exposure to Fox News increases the Republican vote share. My paper contributes to this strand of literature by examining the mechanism ...
  164. [164]
    [PDF] The Agenda-Setting Role of the Mass Media
    In sum, the news media have a substantial influence on the content of the public agenda, and the phrase “setting the agenda” has become commonplace in ...
  165. [165]
    The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media - jstor
    In choosing and displaying news, editors, newsroom staff, and broadcasters play an important part in shaping political reality. Readers learn not only.
  166. [166]
    (PDF) The Agenda-Setting Role of the Mass Media in the Shaping of ...
    The Agenda-Setting Role of the Mass Media in the Shaping of Public Opinion ; Agenda-setting effects also have been found at the local level, and the evidence for.
  167. [167]
    Vietnam War and the media | History, Walter Cronkite ... - Britannica
    Sep 22, 2025 · They argue that the media's tendency toward negative reporting helped to undermine support for the war in the United States while its uncensored ...
  168. [168]
    Vietnam: The First Television War - Pieces of History
    Jan 25, 2018 · Televising the Vietnam War helped to divide a nation that took pride in its ability to unify. The dramatization of stories in the news distorted the public's ...
  169. [169]
    Watergate, Vietnam and the birth of the adversarial press - Salon.com
    Oct 10, 2015 · Certainly not Watergate; Watergate was a capstone to a journalism that had become increasingly assertive in the Vietnam years.Missing: examples discourse
  170. [170]
    [PDF] Media Bias: It's Real, But Surprising - UCLA College
    While. Special Report proved to be right of center, the study found ABC's World News Tonight and NBC's Nightly. News to be left of center.All three outlets were ...
  171. [171]
    The Agenda-Setting Function of Television News - Sage Journals
    The present study investigates static and dynamic approaches to agendasetting research by means of cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.<|separator|>
  172. [172]
    Broadcast networks deliver 92% negative coverage for Trump, 66 ...
    Oct 27, 2020 · The country's major broadcast news media outlets have never been more negatively biased against a sitting president than Donald Trump, ...
  173. [173]
    TV Hits Trump With 85% Negative News vs. 78% Positive Press for ...
    Oct 28, 2024 · A new analysis from the Media Research Center finds that broadcast evening news coverage of the 2024 presidential race has been the most lopsided in history.
  174. [174]
    [PDF] A Measure of Media Bias
    Few studies provide an objective measure of the slant of news, and none has provided a way to link such a measure to ideological measures of other political ...
  175. [175]
    [PDF] The Liberal Media: It's No Myth - Harvard University
    Many people think the mainstream media have a liberal bias. Media spokesmen, however, usually deny such claims. So who's right? Is there a left-wing bias, ...
  176. [176]
    [PDF] The Fox News Effect: Media Bias and Voting*
    If media bias alters voting behavior, deregulation of media markets may have a large impact on political outcomes. In this paper, we present empirical evidence ...
  177. [177]
    A Measure of Media Bias - jstor
    We measure media bias by estimating ideological scores for several major media outlets. To compute this, we count the times that a particular media outlet.
  178. [178]
    Fox News Viewed as Most Ideological Network | Pew Research Center
    Oct 29, 2009 · Nearly half of Americans (47%) say they think of Fox News as “mostly conservative,” 14% say it is “mostly liberal,” and 24% say it is “neither in particular.”Missing: empirical studies
  179. [179]
    The truth is there's little the government can do about lies on cable
    Mar 16, 2023 · If a company makes a false claim in an advertisement, the government has the power to hold that company accountable and not allow consumers ...
  180. [180]
    In Trump's first week, FCC chair signals headaches ahead for media ...
    Jan 24, 2025 · Throughout the campaign, Trump railed against certain broadcasters, saying the FCC should yank their broadcast licenses. Advertisement. ABC, NBC ...<|separator|>
  181. [181]
    A Look Back At The Controversy - CBS News
    Jan 10, 2005 · The documents were reportedly written by one of Mr. Bush's Guard commanders, Lt. Col. Jerry Killian, now deceased. The documents appeared to ...
  182. [182]
    Years after CBS scandal, answers to Bush questions elusive
    Oct 22, 2015 · They suggested Killian's letter contained a computer character inconsistent with typewriters at the time. CBS initially defended the story, then ...
  183. [183]
    CBS News admits Bush documents can't be verified
    Sep 20, 2004 · The so-called Killian documents indicated he was being pressured to “sugarcoat” the performance ratings of a young Bush, then the son of a ...
  184. [184]
    Brian Williams Suspended From NBC for 6 Months Without Pay
    Feb 10, 2015 · Ms. Turness said in a memo to NBC News staff that executives decided to suspend Mr. Williams because he misrepresented the Iraq episode on the “ ...
  185. [185]
    Brian Williams controversy: What led to the NBC anchor's suspension
    Jun 4, 2015 · Brian Williams was suspended without pay as managing editor and anchor of the NBC Nightly News, a position he had held since 2004.
  186. [186]
    The Brian Williams helicopter scandal: a clear timeline | Vox
    Feb 9, 2015 · As the criticism built, Williams apparently believed he had little choice but to step back temporarily from anchoring NBC Nightly News. He ...<|separator|>
  187. [187]
    Fox, Dominion reach $787M settlement over election claims
    Apr 18, 2023 · Fox and Dominion Voting Systems have reached a $787 million settlement in the voting machine company's defamation lawsuit.
  188. [188]
    Fox News settles Dominion Voting Systems defamation lawsuit - NPR
    Apr 18, 2023 · Fox News and its parent company Fox Corp. have struck a deal averting a trial in the blockbuster defamation suit filed by the election tech company Dominion ...
  189. [189]
    Fox News settles Dominion defamation case for $787.5m - BBC
    Apr 18, 2023 · "Lies have consequences," says a lawyer for the voting firm about the network's false election claims.
  190. [190]
    Paramount settles with Trump for $16m over 60 Minutes interview ...
    Jul 2, 2025 · The lawsuit alleged that CBS, via its news show 60 Minutes, deceptively edited an interview with Harris – then the US vice-president as well ...
  191. [191]
    A statement from 60 Minutes - CBS News
    Oct 20, 2024 · Former President Donald Trump is accusing 60 Minutes of deceitful editing of our Oct. 7 interview with Vice President Kamala Harris. That is false.
  192. [192]
    The FCC just published CBS' raw Kamala Harris '60 Minutes' interview
    Feb 5, 2025 · As criticism mounted and Trump threatened to sue, CBS said it merely edited her answer for time, in accordance with television news standards.
  193. [193]
    CBS hits back at FCC over probe into '60 Minutes' edits
    Mar 10, 2025 · CBS has asked the Federal Communications Commission to end its investigation into edits of its “60 Minutes” Kamala Harris interview.
  194. [194]
    Trump claimed '60 Minutes' replaced Harris' interview ... - PolitiFact
    Feb 7, 2025 · The full, unedited interview transcript shows that CBS News' "60 Minutes" took Harris' answers in both videos from the same three-and-a-half-minute exchange on ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  195. [195]
    [PDF] the-evolution-and-impact-of-streaming-services-changing-the-media ...
    Dec 30, 2024 · Streaming shifted media to on-demand platforms, disrupting traditional TV, and causing "cord-cutting" and binge-watching.
  196. [196]
    The Impact of Streaming Services on the Entertainment Industry
    Sep 12, 2025 · Streaming services have disrupted the traditional television model by investing heavily in original content production. Netflix, in particular, ...
  197. [197]
  198. [198]
    2025 Media Trends: The Changing World of Watching
    In 2020, linear TV accounted for 72.2% of the time US viewers spent watching video on TV screens. By the end of 2024, this figure is forecasted to drop to 56.5% ...
  199. [199]
    Streaming Reaches Historic TV Milestone, Eclipses Combined ...
    Jun 17, 2025 · Streaming Notches a Record 44.8% of Total TV Usage in May. Streaming Usage Up 71% Since 2021, with YouTube, Netflix and Other Platforms ...Missing: revenue | Show results with:revenue
  200. [200]
    U.S. Cable TV Subscribers 2025: Ongoing Decline & Cord-Cutting ...
    Sep 24, 2025 · Since 2018, the number of cord-cutting households has more than doubled, rising from 37.3 million to a projected 77.2 million by 2025. During ...
  201. [201]
    Broadcast TV Slips To All-Time Low Audience Share In Nielsen's ...
    Jul 15, 2025 · Broadcast TV slipped to a record-low 18.5% of overall viewing in June as streaming climbed to 46% of the total, Nielsen said in its latest ...Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025
  202. [202]
    Streaming surpasses broadcast, cable for first time in monthly US TV ...
    Jun 17, 2025 · While broadcasting is down around 4.9 percentage points over the last four years, cable networks combined share has fallen nearly 15 points.
  203. [203]
    Most-Watched Television Networks: Ranking 2024's Winners and ...
    Dec 26, 2024 · THE MOST-WATCHED NETWORKS OF 2024 (BY TOTAL VIEWERS) · 1. CBS, 5,055, +12% · 2. NBC, 4,990, +10% · 3. ABC, 3,861, -1% · 4. Fox, 2,841, -15% · 5. Fox ...
  204. [204]
    Fox News beats ABC, NBC, CBS in primetime ratings for summer 2025
    Sep 3, 2025 · Fox News averaged 2.43 million primetime viewers this summer, surpassing ABC, NBC and CBS while dominating cable rivals MSNBC and CNN in ...
  205. [205]
    Broadcast outlook 2025: Challenges, opportunities facing US TV ...
    Oct 7, 2025 · In 2025, the US broadcast station industry is anticipated to generate $32.97 billion in advertising revenue, a 9.4% decrease from $36.40 ...Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025
  206. [206]
    US Online and Traditional Media Advertising Outlook, 2025-2029
    Sep 3, 2025 · Not surprisingly, then, the US broadcast TV advertising market is in structural decline. The overall 2024-2029 CAGR for this market is -5.448%, ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  207. [207]
    TV's Dirty Truth: Network & Streaming Need Each Other To Survive
    Oct 4, 2025 · It's a reality in which broadcast networks and streamers both offer something the other lacks, and neither can thrive without the other.
  208. [208]
    Broadcast TV's Existential Crisis Is (Now) Unavoidable - TVREV
    Oct 2, 2025 · Streaming has officially overtaken traditional TV. In May 2025, streaming services captured 44.8% of all U.S. viewing, edging past broadcast ( ...
  209. [209]
    2025 Linear TV Trends: Adaptation Strategies Amid Streaming Growth
    Aug 17, 2025 · In 2025, streaming surpasses linear TV in total viewership, but linear TV leads in ad-supported viewing. Linear TV subscriptions and ad ...
  210. [210]
    FAST linear and diginets lead linear TV revival - nScreenMedia
    Oct 4, 2022 · Content providers view FAST linear and diginets as a single market. They are buying broadcasters and unifying brands across OTT and OTA.
  211. [211]
    Paramount Skydance's Strategic Revival of Legacy Cable Brands in ...
    Sep 6, 2025 · For investors, the strategic revival of legacy cable brands like CBS, MTV, and BET under the new ownership structure offers a compelling case ...
  212. [212]
    The FCC Will Allow ABC, CBS, FOX, & NBC TV Stations ... - Facebook
    Sep 2, 2025 · The FCC Will Allow ABC, CBS, FOX, & NBC TV Stations to Shutdown Free ATSC 1.0 & Switch to ATSC 3.0 Only.
  213. [213]
    MediaTalk | Season 3 | Ep. 25 - Charter's Gambit to Revive Linear ...
    Jun 19, 2025 · In this episode, Tom shares insights on how Charter is reviving linear pay TV by blending traditional programming with innovative streaming deals.
  214. [214]
    How Linear TV is Navigating Reinvention in the Streaming Era
    May 28, 2025 · The future of TV lies in hybrid strategies, blending Linear, Addressable TV, and digital streaming. As healthcare advertisers navigate the ...Missing: revival | Show results with:revival