Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Community of interest

A community of interest is a social grouping formed by individuals who share a common interest, passion, or concern, enabling the exchange of ideas, information, and experiences among members unbound by geographic proximity or shared professional roles.^[1]^[2] Unlike communities of place, which coalesce around physical locations, or communities of practice, which emphasize collective learning and refinement of skills within a domain, communities of interest prioritize affinity and discussion over structured collaboration or expertise development.^[3]^[2] Such communities often emerge organically through shared hobbies, advocacy for specific causes, or intellectual pursuits, fostering networks that can influence behavior, innovation, and social support without formal hierarchies.^[1] Examples include book discussion groups, enthusiast clubs for niche activities like birdwatching or vintage car restoration, and online forums dedicated to topics such as environmental conservation or amateur astronomy, where participants connect primarily to explore and express mutual enthusiasms.^[1]^[2] In organizational contexts, they facilitate informal knowledge sharing across boundaries, though they may lack the sustained interaction that drives practical advancements seen in more action-oriented groups.^[3] While generally benign and facilitative of personal fulfillment, communities of interest can amplify echo chambers if interactions reinforce preconceptions without external challenge, potentially hindering broader causal understanding of complex issues.^[3] Their rise in digital eras underscores a shift toward virtual affiliations, enabling scale but also raising questions about depth of engagement compared to traditional forms.^[2]

Definition and Core Concepts

Definition

A community of interest is a social grouping formed by individuals who share a common passion, concern, or affinity, enabling them to connect, exchange knowledge, and collaborate without reliance on geographic proximity.^[1] This type of community arises from voluntary bonds tied to specific topics, such as hobbies (e.g., birdwatching enthusiasts coordinating via newsletters since the 19th century), professional pursuits (e.g., software developers discussing open-source projects), or advocacy issues (e.g., global climate activists linking through petitions).^[4] Unlike obligatory or location-based affiliations, participation stems from intrinsic motivation, fostering interactions that prioritize shared ideas over demographic uniformity.^[5] The term underscores causal mechanisms of affiliation: mutual interests generate sustained engagement by aligning participants' goals and reducing barriers imposed by distance, as evidenced in early sociological observations of cooperative networks transcending local antipathies through common pursuits.^[6] Empirical studies of such groups, including online forums with millions of active users by the 2010s, confirm that relational ties strengthen via repeated idea-sharing, often yielding emergent norms and collective actions independent of formal structures.^[2] In contrast to economically driven or circumstantial groupings, communities of interest prioritize ideational cohesion, though they may overlap with other forms when interests align with practices or locales.^[7]

Key Characteristics

Communities of interest are primarily bound by members' shared passions, hobbies, or concerns, rather than geographic proximity or professional collaboration. This shared focus drives voluntary participation and interaction, often centered on exchanging ideas, information, or experiences related to the common topic.^[8]^[9] Unlike communities of place, which rely on physical location for cohesion, communities of interest form across dispersed populations, enabling global or regional networks unbound by spatial constraints. Members' engagement stems from intrinsic motivation, fostering symbolic ties through communication rather than structural dependencies like shared infrastructure.^[10]^[1] These communities exhibit fluid boundaries, with membership determined by self-identification with the interest rather than formal criteria, allowing for dynamic growth or fragmentation based on evolving enthusiasms. Interactions frequently yield mutual support and enhanced subjective wellbeing, as participants derive fulfillment from self-expression and collective affirmation around the interest.^[10]^[11] In practice, such groups prioritize topical relevance over hierarchical organization, with cohesion arising from reciprocal value in discussions or activities, though sustained vitality depends on active facilitation to maintain relevance amid members' varying commitment levels.^[12]^[13]

Historical Development

Origins in Sociological Theory

The concept of community of interest emerged in early 20th-century sociological and anthropological theory as a framework for understanding group formation beyond territorial or kinship ties, emphasizing shared purposes or values as the binding mechanism. Edward Sapir, in his 1932 entry on "Group" in the Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, articulated that "any group is constituted by the fact that there is some interest which holds its members together," ranging from transient aggregates, such as a crowd responding to an event, to enduring institutions like a trade union or nation-state.^[14] This formulation positioned community of interest as a universal feature of social organization, distinct from physically proximate or casual groupings, and aligned with symbolic or purpose-driven cohesion where roles and identities preexist individual participation. Sapir's analysis reflected broader debates in the Chicago School tradition, influenced by figures like William I. Thomas, who highlighted emergent cooperative interests counteracting social hostilities in urban settings.^[6] Theoretical development of the concept gained traction amid industrialization and urbanization, which eroded traditional place-based communities and elevated interest-driven associations. Sociologists observed that modern mobility fostered groups defined by common objectives rather than locale, as evidenced in Robert Nisbet's 1953 The Quest for Community, which critiqued the fragmentation of organic social bonds and the rise of functional, interest-oriented substitutes like voluntary associations.^[9] This shift paralleled Ferdinand Tönnies' earlier distinction between Gemeinschaft (intimate, locality-rooted ties) and Gesellschaft (calculative, interest-based relations), though Tönnies (1887) did not employ the precise term "community of interest." By mid-century, the framework underscored causal dynamics of social change: economic specialization and geographic dispersion incentivized non-territorial groupings to fulfill needs unmet by declining local structures.^[15] Saul Alinsky's 1971 Rules for Radicals explicitly reframed "community" in this light, asserting that "in a highly mobile, urbanized society the word 'community' means community of interest, not geographic location," reflecting empirical observations of organizing tactics in diverse, dispersed populations.^[16] This theoretical pivot informed later distinctions from communities of place, prioritizing causal realism in how shared stakes—economic, ideological, or practical—sustain cohesion amid individualism, as opposed to inherited or spatial proximity. Such origins laid groundwork for analyzing modern social networks, where empirical data on group persistence increasingly validated interest as a primary adhesive over traditional anchors.^[10]

Evolution in the 20th Century

In the early 20th century, sociological analysis increasingly differentiated traditional locality-bound social structures from emerging interest-driven associations, building on Ferdinand Tönnies' late-19th-century framework of Gemeinschaft (organic, place-based communities) and Gesellschaft (rational, interest-oriented societies), which gained prominence amid rapid industrialization and urbanization.^[17] By the 1920s, as urban populations swelled—reaching over 50% in the United States by 1920—these shifts eroded localized ties, prompting observers to note the rise of voluntary groups formed around shared professions, hobbies, or ideologies, such as trade unions and fraternal organizations, which numbered in the tens of thousands by mid-century.^[17] Technological innovations accelerated this evolution: the proliferation of automobiles, with U.S. registrations exceeding 23 million by 1930, enabled physical gatherings across distances, while radio broadcasting, adopted by over 40% of American households by 1930, fostered simultaneous shared experiences among dispersed listeners, laying groundwork for national-scale interest communities like fan clubs for serial dramas or political broadcasts.^[18] Post-World War II suburbanization further decoupled residence from affiliation, with sociologists documenting how mass media and improved infrastructure supported "functional" communities tied to economic or cultural pursuits rather than geography.^[10] Mid-century thinkers, confronting perceived atomization in mass societies, elevated communities of interest as vital for social cohesion; Robert Nisbet's 1953 The Quest for Community critiqued modern individualism and advocated voluntary associations—united by ideological or practical interests—as modern equivalents to lost primordial bonds, influencing subsequent analyses of group dynamics.^[9] By the 1980s, amid policy applications like electoral redistricting, the concept formalized in frameworks emphasizing perceptual, economic, and communicative dimensions, as in New Zealand's 1989 local government discussions defining it as groups sharing stakes irrespective of location.^[19] This period also saw empirical refinement, with David McMillan and David Chavis's 1986 sense-of-community model—encompassing membership, influence, integration, and shared emotional connection—applied to non-proximate groups, underscoring their psychological viability despite lacking spatial anchors.^[20]

Influence of Digital Technology

Digital technology has profoundly expanded the scope and viability of communities of interest by enabling instantaneous global connectivity among individuals sharing niche passions, transcending geographical barriers that previously confined such groups to local or in-person interactions. Prior to widespread internet adoption, communities of interest—defined as voluntary associations formed around common hobbies, ideologies, or pursuits—relied on physical gatherings, print media, or postal correspondence, limiting membership to proximate participants; for instance, fan clubs for specific authors or collectors' societies often numbered in the dozens or hundreds. The advent of the internet in the 1990s, particularly through bulletin board systems (BBS) and Usenet newsgroups launched in 1979 and popularized by the mid-1990s, allowed asynchronous discussions on specialized topics, fostering early digital communities of interest such as alt.fan groups dedicated to media franchises.^[21] Web 2.0 technologies, emerging around 2004, further catalyzed growth by introducing user-generated content platforms and social networking sites that facilitated real-time interaction and content sharing. Sites like Reddit, founded in 2005, evolved into hubs for subreddits—sub-communities organized by specific interests, such as r/philosophy with over 18 million subscribers as of 2023—enabling scalable, self-moderated discourse among millions. Similarly, platforms like Discord, launched in 2015, provided voice, video, and text channels tailored for interest-based servers, supporting over 150 million monthly active users by 2021, many in gaming or hobby-focused groups. These tools reduced coordination costs, allowing communities of interest to form rapidly around transient events, such as viral memes or global crises, while algorithmic recommendations on platforms like Facebook (2004) and Twitter (now X, 2006) amplified discovery and recruitment.^[13]^[22] However, digital facilitation has introduced causal challenges, including echo chambers where algorithmic curation reinforces homogeneity, potentially stifling diverse viewpoints within communities of interest; a 2018 Pew Research Center study found that 64% of Americans perceive social media as worsening societal divisions by creating insular groups. Moreover, reliance on proprietary platforms introduces fragility, as policy changes or deplatforming can disrupt communities—evident in the 2021 exodus of interest-based groups from Facebook to alternatives like Telegram following content moderation controversies. Despite these, empirical data indicates net positive scaling: a 2022 analysis by the Oxford Internet Institute reported that online communities of interest correlate with higher individual engagement in real-world activities, such as hobbyist meetups, due to initial digital vetting and planning.^[23]^[24]

Versus Community of Practice

A community of practice is defined by three interrelated elements: a shared domain of knowledge or competence that creates identity; a community of members who interact and build relationships to address challenges in that domain; and a shared practice involving mutual engagement, joint enterprise, and a repertoire of communal resources such as tools, styles, and narratives developed through sustained interaction.^[3]^[25] This framework, originating from Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger's 1991 analysis of situated learning, emphasizes active participation where members advance collective expertise rather than merely consuming information.^[26] In contrast, a community of interest groups individuals around a common affinity, concern, or topic without requiring regular interaction, collaborative problem-solving, or the development of a shared practice.^[27] Such groups may form passively through self-identification with an idea, hobby, or issue—such as enthusiasts of a particular genre of literature or advocates for a policy cause—but lack the structured engagement that characterizes communities of practice.^[3] The primary distinctions lie in purpose, structure, and outcomes: communities of practice prioritize knowledge generation and refinement through reciprocal activities, fostering innovation and competence evolution, whereas communities of interest focus on affiliation and information exchange without necessitating skill-building or collective accountability.^[27]^[25] For instance, software developers collaborating on open-source code exemplify a community of practice due to their joint enterprise in refining tools and standards, while fans discussing books online represent a community of interest, bonded by enthusiasm but not by co-created practices.^[3] This separation highlights how shared interest alone does not yield the learning dynamics inherent to practice-oriented groups, as empirical studies of organizational knowledge transfer underscore the role of interaction in CoPs over mere topical alignment in CoIs.^[27]

Versus Community of Place

A community of place comprises individuals bound together by shared geographic territory, such as residents of a neighborhood, town, or region, where proximity facilitates routine interactions influenced by local environmental and infrastructural factors.^[1]^[28] In such groups, social cohesion arises from physical co-location, often addressing collective concerns like municipal services, land use, or neighborhood safety, with membership typically involuntary and enduring due to residential stability.^[1]^[28] By contrast, a community of interest unites members through voluntary alignment around specific shared affinities, such as professional expertise, hobbies, or ideological pursuits, without dependence on spatial contiguity.^[1]^[28] These communities form around mutual goals or exchanges of knowledge, enabling participation from dispersed locations; for instance, global networks of environmental activists or amateur astronomers coordinate via shared platforms rather than local gatherings.^[28] Membership is fluid, driven by individual choice and relevance to personal objectives, rather than fixed boundaries.^[28] The core divergence stems from the mechanisms of bonding: communities of place leverage territorial embeddedness to cultivate organic, context-dependent ties, often yielding denser, multifaceted relationships shaped by everyday proximity and shared externalities like traffic or public amenities.^[10]^[1] Communities of interest, however, prioritize instrumental or elective affinities, fostering specialized interactions that may lack the serendipitous depth of place-based encounters but offer scalability and focus on niche concerns.^[10]^[28] Empirical analyses indicate no rigid dichotomy, as digital tools increasingly hybridize the two—e.g., local residents forming interest subgroups online—yet place-based communities retain advantages in enforcing accountability through visibility, while interest-based ones excel in aggregating expertise across barriers.^[10]^[29] Communities of interest differ from other social networks, particularly personal or ego-centered networks, by forming around shared substantive pursuits rather than pre-existing interpersonal or familial ties. Personal social networks typically consist of strong, multiplex relationships—such as those with family or close friends—where ties serve multiple purposes including emotional support, resource sharing, and daily coordination, often embedded in local or relational contexts.^[30] In contrast, communities of interest emphasize uniplex ties focused on a specific domain, such as a hobby or advocacy issue, enabling dispersed individuals to connect voluntarily for idea exchange or problem-solving without broader relational commitments.^[2]^[31] Structurally, other social networks often exhibit higher density among core alters due to repeated interactions in shared life spheres, fostering trust through proximity or kinship, whereas communities of interest rely on homophily in attitudes or expertise, resulting in sparser but broader networks optimized for information diffusion.^[32] For instance, sociological analyses of network formation highlight how interest-based groups, like online forums for rare disease support, aggregate weak ties across geographies, contrasting with the localized, durable bonds in kinship networks that prioritize reciprocity over specialized knowledge.^[33] This distinction arises causally from selection mechanisms: personal networks emerge from cumulative life exposures, while interest communities self-assemble via deliberate affinity, as evidenced in studies of voluntary associations where participation correlates with topical alignment rather than social proximity.^[34] Functionally, communities of interest promote targeted outcomes like collective mobilization or skill-sharing, often yielding bridging capital across diverse actors, unlike the bonding capital dominant in personal networks that reinforces in-group solidarity but limits external reach.^[31] Empirical data from network analyses show interest-driven groups achieving higher propagation of domain-specific innovations—e.g., open-source software collaborations—due to their modular tie structure, whereas personal networks excel in generalized support but underperform in niche dissemination.^[35] These differences underscore how communities of interest adapt to modern mobility and specialization, supplanting traditional networks in scenarios demanding scalable, interest-aligned coordination.^[36]

Applications and Examples

In Politics and Redistricting

In the context of redistricting, a community of interest refers to a geographically cohesive group of individuals sharing common socioeconomic, cultural, or policy concerns that warrant representation within a single electoral district to preserve cohesive voting power and policy influence.^[37]^[38] This criterion emerged as a counter to partisan gerrymandering, aiming to align district boundaries with natural social divisions rather than arbitrary political advantage.^[39] In the United States, while not federally mandated, communities of interest are explicitly considered in redistricting processes across multiple states, with 24 states incorporating the factor for legislative districts and 13 for congressional ones as of the 2020 cycle.^[40] State redistricting commissions and legislatures often define communities of interest through public testimony and data analysis, prioritizing factors such as shared economic interests, ethnic or linguistic ties (without sole reliance on race, per Supreme Court rulings on racial gerrymandering), housing patterns, or regional industries.^[41]^[42] For instance, California's 2011 redistricting reforms, implemented via Proposition 11 and Proposition 20, required the independent Citizens Redistricting Commission to maintain communities of interest, leading to maps that preserved urban neighborhoods in Los Angeles and rural agricultural areas in the Central Valley intact across districts.^[43] In New York, advocacy during the 2020 cycle highlighted Asian-American enclaves in Queens, such as Flushing and Bayside, where shared immigrant experiences and commercial ties justified unified districts to avoid vote dilution.^[44] Empirical applications demonstrate that respecting communities of interest can enhance electoral competitiveness and representation. A 2021 analysis proposed algorithmic tools to quantify COIs using census data on commuting patterns and socioeconomic metrics, showing potential reductions in district fragmentation by up to 20% in simulated maps for states like Virginia.^[45] However, implementation varies; partisan mapmakers may selectively interpret COIs to favor incumbents, as seen in critiques of North Carolina's 2022 congressional maps, which split rural farming communities despite shared agricultural policy needs.^[46] Proponents argue that rigorous COI standards, informed by public input and neutral data, promote causal links between voter preferences and outcomes, reducing the incidence of "cracking" or "packing" tactics that fragment or concentrate similar groups.^[38]^[39] Beyond districting, communities of interest underpin political mobilization in broader contexts, such as forming advocacy coalitions around issues like environmental policy or trade, where shared stakes drive collective action independent of geography.^[47] In redistricting-adjacent politics, these groups submit testimony to commissions, influencing maps; for example, Native American tribes in Arizona successfully argued for COI status based on reservation proximities and water rights concerns during the 2021 process, resulting in consolidated districts.^[48] This application underscores COIs' role in fostering accountable governance by ensuring districts reflect lived realities over engineered divisions.^[49]

In Organizational and Professional Settings

In organizational contexts, communities of interest emerge as informal networks of employees or professionals connected by shared topics, hobbies, or concerns, distinct from structured teams or hierarchies, and often spanning departments to promote voluntary collaboration and personal engagement. These groups differ from communities of practice by lacking a commitment to mutual advancement in a joint enterprise, instead prioritizing dialogue around common curiosities without coordinated practice or domain expertise development.^[50] Such formations support employee well-being by providing outlets for non-work-related affinities, potentially improving retention through enhanced social ties, as evidenced by workplace surveys linking interest-aligned activities to higher job satisfaction rates.^[51] Examples include company-sponsored interest groups focused on leisure pursuits like gardening, skiing, reading clubs, or art appreciation, which utilize internal communication tools such as dedicated Slack channels or intranet forums to organize events and discussions.^[52]^[53] In larger enterprises, these may extend to professional curiosities, such as cross-functional forums on emerging technologies like blockchain or sustainability initiatives, facilitating ad-hoc idea sharing that indirectly bolsters innovation without formal mandates.^[54] In governmental and military professional environments, communities of interest adopt a more formalized structure for operational purposes; the U.S. Marine Corps implemented a Community of Interest Program in 2016, delineating nineteen distinct occupational communities to align civilian workforce skills with service needs, including targeted recruitment and training pathways. Likewise, in federal information systems, the National Institute of Standards and Technology defines a community of interest as a collaborative user group operating at specified security levels to exchange domain-specific data securely, underpinning secure collaboration models in defense and intelligence sectors.^[55] These applications demonstrate how communities of interest can bridge individual affinities with institutional goals, though their efficacy depends on voluntary participation and minimal bureaucratic oversight to avoid diluting intrinsic motivation.^[2]

In Online and Digital Spaces

In digital environments, communities of interest emerge as virtual aggregations of individuals who interact through shared passions, curiosities, or pursuits, transcending geographic constraints via internet platforms such as forums, social media groups, and messaging apps. These groups prioritize affinity over professional collaboration or local ties, enabling global participation in discussions, resource exchanges, and collective sense-making around topics like hobbies or ideologies. Empirical analyses define them as social entities where common interests drive sustained engagement, distinct from transactional networks.^[56] A primary example is Reddit's subreddit system, where users self-organize into over 100,000 active communities as of 2025, each focused on niche interests such as model railroading, cryptocurrency speculation, or historical reenactment, drawing 416 million weekly active users globally.^[57]^[58] Participation statistics show 66% of online community members join to connect with those sharing similar interests, underscoring the appeal of these digitally mediated bonds.^[59] Other platforms host analogous structures, including Discord servers for real-time interactions in gaming fandoms or creative writing circles, and Facebook Groups dedicated to specialized pursuits like birdwatching or vintage car restoration, which facilitate asynchronous sharing and event coordination.^[60] Virtual transnational communities of immigrants exemplify hybrid applications, blending online forums with offline ties to preserve cultural interests and social support across borders, as observed in studies of digital immigrant networks.^[61] Case studies highlight practical dynamics: one examination of online mothers' groups revealed how interest-based virtual forums enable self-organization through knowledge sharing on child-rearing challenges, fostering mutual aid without formal hierarchies.^[62] Engagement in such communities correlates with a sense of virtual belonging, though empirical validation indicates weaker cohesion in pure interest-driven groups compared to those involving joint activities, potentially due to lower mutual accountability.^[63]^[64] The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated adoption, with online community engagement rising 81% from early 2020 onward, as physical restrictions amplified reliance on digital spaces for sustaining interest-based connections and combating isolation.^[65] Market data reflect this trajectory, with online community platforms valued at $2 billion in 2024 and projected to grow at 15% CAGR through 2030, driven by scalable tools for interest alignment.^[66] Communities of interest in social and hobby-based groups coalesce around shared recreational passions, enabling participants to exchange knowledge, experiences, and resources without reliance on geographic proximity or professional obligations. These groups often emerge organically from individual enthusiasms, such as collecting stamps or playing board games, fostering sustained engagement through mutual reinforcement of interests.^[13]^[1] For instance, book clubs exemplify this dynamic, where members convene to analyze literature, with studies indicating such gatherings enhance social bonds and intellectual stimulation among diverse participants.^[1] Hobby-based communities of interest frequently adopt structures akin to "serious leisure," a framework describing dedicated pursuits that involve skill-building, subcultural norms, and communal rituals. Amateur astronomy clubs illustrate this, where enthusiasts collaborate on observations and telescope maintenance, as documented in ethnographic research showing tailored practices that deepen individual commitment and collective learning.^[67]^[68] Similarly, photography clubs allow members to critique techniques and share equipment, promoting iterative improvement through peer feedback rather than formal instruction.^[69] Empirical evidence links participation in these communities to measurable psychological benefits, including reduced depressive symptoms and improved subjective wellbeing. A 2023 meta-analysis of longitudinal data from 16 countries found hobby engagement correlated with better mental health outcomes, attributing this partly to the social support inherent in interest-aligned groups.^[70] However, causal mechanisms remain debated, with some analyses suggesting self-selection—where inherently resilient individuals gravitate toward such communities—confounds direct attribution of benefits to group dynamics.^[71] In practice, these groups mitigate isolation by providing low-stakes venues for interaction, as seen in board game circles that facilitate rapport-building among introverts via structured play.^[72] Challenges arise when hobby communities prioritize exclusivity, potentially alienating newcomers and reinforcing insular norms. Research on information-sharing in passionate hobbyist networks reveals that while shared values accelerate knowledge dissemination, gatekeeping behaviors can hinder broader accessibility.^[67] Nonetheless, digital platforms have amplified these groups' reach since the early 2010s, enabling global birdwatching forums or vintage car restoration collectives to sustain activity through virtual meetups and resource repositories.^[73]

Benefits and Impacts

Communities of interest, formed around shared affinities rather than geographic proximity or professional practice, provide psychological benefits by fulfilling fundamental human needs for belonging and social connection. According to social identity theory, individuals derive enhanced self-esteem and a positive self-concept from identifying with such groups, as group membership allows for favorable in-group comparisons that bolster personal worth.^[74]^[75] Empirical studies support this, showing that possessing multiple social identities, including those from interest-based affiliations, correlates with higher self-esteem and reduced vulnerability to identity threats.^[76] Participation in these communities reduces feelings of isolation and loneliness, which are risk factors for mental health disorders. Research indicates that affinity groups, a form of community of interest, promote identity development and mental well-being by creating psychologically safe spaces for discussion and mutual support.^[77]^[78] For instance, in educational and professional settings, such groups have been shown to increase self-efficacy and social connectivity among members, particularly for historically underrepresented individuals, through peer learning and solidarity.^[79] Online communities of interest extend these advantages by offering accessible social support, with members reporting greater feelings of group belonging and reduced symptoms of depression and anxiety.^[80] Studies of online peer interactions highlight how shared interests foster affective support and meaningful engagement, contributing to overall psychological resilience.^[81] Diversity in group memberships, including interest-based ones, further predicts improved well-being by satisfying varied psychological needs and providing coping resources against stressors.^[82]

Practical and Economic Benefits

Communities of interest facilitate practical efficiencies by enabling targeted collaboration among individuals sharing specific concerns, allowing for streamlined information exchange and reduced duplication of efforts across geographic boundaries. In organizational contexts, such as government-industry forums, COIs promote the development of best practices through structured dialogues, accelerating policy and technical advancements without the constraints of formal hierarchies.^[83] This approach has been implemented in initiatives like the ACT-IAC's COIs, where cross-sector working groups address topics from cybersecurity to acquisition, yielding actionable recommendations that enhance operational effectiveness.^[83] Economically, COIs drive cost savings by pooling resources and expertise, as seen in cooperative models where members commit to shared business interests, leading to bulk purchasing, joint marketing, and risk mitigation that lower individual expenditures. For instance, agricultural or trade COIs negotiate favorable supply terms, with studies on cooperatives indicating sustained economic viability through these mechanisms since at least the early 20th century reforms.^[84] In digital spaces, interest-based online communities reduce support costs for brands by fostering peer-to-peer assistance, with reports estimating that user-generated interactions can cut customer service expenses by enabling self-resolution of queries.^[85] Innovation benefits emerge from COI-driven knowledge sharing, which fosters collaborative problem-solving and product development, contributing to broader economic productivity gains. A McKinsey analysis of social technologies supporting COIs projects annual value creation of up to $1.5 trillion globally by enhancing worker collaboration and reducing search times for expertise, with knowledge-intensive sectors seeing potential productivity lifts of 20-25%.^[86] These dynamics are evident in open-source software COIs, where collective contributions have generated economic impacts exceeding billions in enterprise value, as measured by foundation audits of code reuse and maintenance efficiencies.^[86]

Empirical Evidence of Effectiveness

Empirical studies on communities of practice, a subset of communities of interest focused on professional knowledge sharing, demonstrate measurable improvements in participant outcomes. A 2015 analysis of CoPs in healthcare and education sectors found that involvement enhanced professional identity development and work performance, with participants reporting higher competence and innovation through shared problem-solving.^[87] Similarly, a 2024 study on CoPs in learning health systems showed they strengthen learning cycles by facilitating knowledge exchange and providing emotional support, leading to sustained behavioral changes among members.^[88] In online interest-based networks, research indicates robust social capital accumulation. A 2024 investigation of interest-driven social networking sites revealed that interactions foster bridging and bonding ties, resulting in higher trust, reciprocity, and access to diverse resources compared to non-interest-based platforms; users engaging with both human and content "objects of interest" exhibited stronger network effects on informational and emotional support.^[89] ^[90] For stigmatized groups, participation in topic-specific online forums correlates with elevated well-being, as members gain validation and coping strategies absent in broader social ties.^[91] Health-related interest communities yield tangible psychological benefits. Supportive online groups have been linked to reduced suicidal ideation risk and improved overall well-being, with longitudinal data showing decreased depressive symptoms among frequent interactors who receive targeted empathy and advice.^[92] In educational contexts, interest-aligned online communities boost knowledge acquisition in micro-learning environments; a 2024 experiment found participants in such groups outperformed controls in retention and application, attributing gains to peer reinforcement and motivation.^[93] Quantitative metrics from larger platforms underscore scalability. Analysis of small online communities highlights that benefits like information access and opportunity creation scale positively with membership size, though optimal engagement plateaus around active subgroups of 100-500 users for personalized connections.^[94] These findings, drawn from diverse datasets including server logs and surveys, affirm COIs' causal role in amplifying individual agency through specialized interactions, though effectiveness diminishes without moderation to curb misinformation.^[81]

Criticisms and Controversies

Risks of Echo Chambers and Polarization

In communities of interest, where individuals self-select into groups based on shared ideologies, hobbies, or professional affinities rather than geographic proximity, echo chambers emerge when members predominantly interact with reinforcing viewpoints, minimizing exposure to dissenting ideas. This dynamic, amplified by algorithmic recommendations on platforms like social media, fosters selective exposure that entrenches beliefs and diminishes opportunities for viewpoint diversity. Empirical analyses indicate that such environments contribute to ideological fragmentation, as participants encounter homogeneous content that aligns with preconceptions, often at the expense of broader informational ecosystems.^[95]^[96] Polarization intensifies within these groups through group polarization effects, where deliberation among like-minded individuals shifts opinions toward extremes, increasing confidence in initial positions without rigorous scrutiny. A study of social media users during the COVID-19 pandemic found prevalent political echo chambers, particularly among right-leaning communities, correlating with heightened affective polarization—dislike of out-groups—and reduced cross-ideological engagement. Systematic reviews of echo chamber research confirm that network homophily in interest-based online spaces leads to polarized subgroups, with users in ideologically aligned clusters showing greater divergence from moderate positions over time.^[97]^[98]^[99] These risks extend to societal division and the propagation of misinformation, as echo chambers facilitate the rapid diffusion of unverified claims within insulated networks, eroding trust in shared facts. For instance, short-video platforms have been linked to echo chamber effects that amplify rumors and biased narratives, yielding negative social outcomes like diminished public discourse quality. In professional or hobby-based communities of interest, such insularity can stifle innovation by discouraging challenge to dominant paradigms, as evidenced in organizational settings where homogeneous groups exhibit impaired decision-making and lower adaptability. While some research suggests moderating factors like high political interest may mitigate entrapment, the predominant causal pathway—self-reinforcement via limited dissent—poses verifiable threats to rational deliberation and social cohesion.^[100]^[101]^[102] Furthermore, prolonged immersion in these environments heightens vulnerability to extremism, with online interest groups serving as conduits for radicalization by normalizing fringe views through repeated affirmation. Analyses of terrorism cases reveal the internet's role in escalating radical ideologies within affinity-based networks, where echo chambers provide ideological insulation that escalates from moderate interests to violent extremism. This pattern underscores a causal link: unchecked reinforcement in communities of interest not only polarizes but can precipitate real-world conflicts, as polarized attitudes translate into behavioral divides, including reduced tolerance for opposing groups. Peer-reviewed evidence prioritizes these mechanisms over anecdotal claims, though institutional biases in academia may underemphasize symmetric effects across ideological spectrums.^[103]^[104]^[105]

Challenges in Political Applications

The criterion of preserving communities of interest (COIs) in electoral redistricting, intended to ensure districts reflect groups with shared socioeconomic, cultural, or policy concerns, faces significant definitional ambiguity that complicates objective implementation. COIs are broadly described as geographic areas or populations with common interests warranting unified representation, yet no standardized metrics exist for identification, leading to reliance on subjective assessments by mapmakers or commissions.^[43]^[106] This vagueness allows disparate interpretations, such as ethnic enclaves, economic sectors, or urban neighborhoods, without verifiable thresholds for cohesion, as evidenced in state processes where public testimony often invokes anecdotal rather than data-driven claims.^[44] COI preservation frequently conflicts with other redistricting mandates, including equal population distribution, compactness, and contiguity, forcing trade-offs that undermine overall fairness. For instance, adhering to COIs may require elongated or non-compact districts to avoid splitting rural agricultural communities or urban ethnic clusters, which can violate compactness scores used in judicial reviews, as seen in post-2020 cycles where California’s independent commission balanced these tensions but still faced lawsuits over perceived deviations.^[106] Empirical analyses indicate that maximizing COI integrity does not consistently yield more responsive legislators, with studies of U.S. state districts showing minimal causal links between COI-based maps and policy alignment with constituent preferences after controlling for partisanship.^[107] Partisan actors exploit COI criteria to justify gerrymandered maps, diluting its neutral intent and exacerbating polarization. In competitive redistricting environments, dominant parties selectively emphasize COIs aligned with their voter bases—such as packing minority or ideological groups—to minimize opposition influence, as critiqued in analyses of 2021-2022 cycles where maps in states like New York and Georgia invoked COIs to defend irregular boundaries later invalidated by courts.^[44] Legal prohibitions against race-based COIs, stemming from Supreme Court rulings like Miller v. Johnson (1995), further constrain applications, requiring multifaceted justifications that proxies like shared employment or commuting patterns fail to provide rigorously, per network-based identification methods tested in recent simulations.^[108]^[109] Quantifying COI adherence remains empirically challenging, with traditional approaches yielding inconsistent outcomes compared to data-driven alternatives like contact graphs or thematic clustering. A 2024 RAND study of legislative districting found that graph-based COI detection alters boundary proposals in up to 20% of cases versus ad hoc methods, highlighting how unverified COIs perpetuate inefficiency without proven representational gains.^[109]^[110] Absent rigorous standards, COI criteria risk becoming symbolic rather than substantive, as proposed reforms for algorithmic validation encounter resistance from stakeholders favoring interpretive flexibility.^[44]

Limitations in Measurement and Definition

Defining communities of interest (COIs) lacks a standardized framework, as they are often described as groups united by shared values, themes, or cognitive alignments rather than fixed geographic or institutional ties, leading to overlapping concepts with affinity groups or networks without clear demarcation.^[110]^[47] This ambiguity complicates operationalization, as COIs may manifest as thematic regions based on demographics or land-use patterns, yet statutory definitions remain rare, particularly in electoral contexts where they influence redistricting but evade precise legal criteria.^[44] Empirical studies highlight that functional boundaries of COIs frequently misalign with administrative divisions, rendering them elusive for policy applications like local governance.^[19] Measurement of COI cohesion and size faces methodological hurdles, including inconsistent scales for shared norms, behaviors, and beliefs, which vary across contexts such as online versus offline settings.^[111] Surveys assessing participation or identification suffer from low response rates, framing biases, and mode effects, while ecometric approaches to cohesion yield heterogeneous results due to differing indicators like trust or interaction frequency.^[112]^[113] Network-based quantification, reliant on digital traces or self-reports, encounters data access barriers and privacy constraints, often failing to capture fluid membership or weak ties that define interest-driven bonds.^[114] Questionnaires like the Community of Inquiry instrument reveal further limitations, such as misalignment between intended constructs and respondent interpretations, undermining reliability in empirical validation.^[115] These definitional and metric gaps contribute to causal inference challenges, as studies struggle to isolate COI effects from confounding factors like socioeconomic status or platform algorithms, with academic operationalizations often prioritizing subjective perceptions over observable interactions.^[116] Prioritizing peer-reviewed metrics over anecdotal reports is essential, yet persistent variability across disciplines—evident in social science reviews—highlights the need for consensus to enable comparable, verifiable assessments.^[117]^[118]

Recent Developments

Post-2020 Shifts in Digital COIs

The COVID-19 pandemic from 2020 onward catalyzed a rapid expansion of digital communities of interest (COIs), as mobility restrictions confined individuals to online spaces for social and hobby pursuits. Global digital adoption surged, with e-commerce and remote engagement compressing a decade's worth of growth into roughly 100 days, enabling interest-based groups on platforms like Reddit and Discord to proliferate for activities such as gaming and virtual learning.^[119] Screen time among those under 18 escalated, with 44% reporting four or more hours daily by late 2020, up from 21% pre-pandemic, fueling sustained participation in niche online forums.^[120] This period marked a transition from physical "third places" to digital equivalents, where shared-interest communities provided emotional support and practical exchanges absent in isolated environments.^[121] Following the easing of lockdowns around 2021-2022, digital COIs adapted by emphasizing privacy, specialization, and monetization amid waning broad social media appeal. Public feeds on major platforms declined in favor of gated or algorithmic-curated groups, such as subscription newsletters and Discord servers, which by 2025 supported targeted interactions for professional, entrepreneurial, and hobbyist networks.^[122] Niche platforms grew, with trends toward short-form video communities and AI-driven personalization enhancing retention in interest-specific cohorts.^[123] ^[124] Economic interest groups, for instance, intensified digital lobbying during the crisis, with U.S. spending on such activities reaching near-record levels in early 2020 quarters, a pattern that persisted into subsequent years for policy influence.^[125] These shifts, however, introduced structural challenges, including deepened echo chambers and uneven access. Post-pandemic analyses revealed heightened political homogeneity in online networks, exacerbating polarization as users gravitated to affinity-based digital enclaves over diverse interactions.^[126] Digital divides widened for marginalized groups, with remote learning disparities highlighting how pre-existing inequalities limited COI participation in education and skill-sharing communities.^[127] By 2025, while hyperscale video platforms dominated casual interest aggregation, engagement hurdles—such as algorithm fatigue and moderated content—prompted innovations in decentralized models, though empirical measures of long-term efficacy remain limited to platform-specific metrics like retention rates.^[128]^[129]

Policy and Redistricting Updates

In the redistricting cycles following the 2020 census, communities of interest—defined as groups sharing common social, cultural, economic, or geographic ties—emerged as a prominent criterion in state processes, mandated or encouraged in over 20 states for legislative districts and at least 13 for congressional ones.^[130] Independent commissions in states like California and Michigan explicitly weighed COI alongside compactness and contiguity, aiming to minimize splits of cohesive groups such as urban ethnic enclaves or rural agricultural regions, though application often involved subjective testimony from stakeholders.^[130] This emphasis stemmed from state constitutions and statutes updated pre-2020, with no uniform federal mandate beyond Voting Rights Act constraints on racial dilution, leading to varied interpretations where COI sometimes conflicted with equal population requirements.^[43] Select states adjusted COI prioritization post-2020. In Utah, August 2025 legislation elevated COI above compactness in statutory criteria for future maps, responding to prior litigation over fragmented Mormon and Native American groups.^[130]^[131] Virginia's 2021 guidelines ranked COI as the top non-population factor, influencing remedial congressional maps adopted after court challenges.^[132] North Carolina updated congressional criteria in October 2023 to strengthen COI preservation, amid ongoing suits alleging dilution of coastal and Appalachian communities.^[133] These tweaks reflected efforts to codify COI against partisan map-drawing, though critics argued they enabled disguised racial gerrymanders by broadening "interest" beyond demographics.^[130] Federal and state courts adjudicated numerous COI disputes from 2023 to 2025, highlighting enforcement challenges. In Texas, a 2024 Fifth Circuit ruling overturned the 1987 Baytown precedent allowing "coalition districts" combining Black and Hispanic voters as protected COI under the Voting Rights Act, prompting a 2025 legislative redraw that dismantled four such districts to favor Republican incumbents, potentially netting five GOP seats.^[134]^[135] In California, an August 2025 petition to the state Supreme Court challenged legislatively drawn congressional maps for fracturing COI intact under the prior independent commission's 2021 plans, such as Silicon Valley tech hubs.^[136] Alabama's ongoing Stone v. Allen litigation, with a November 2024 bench trial, invoked COI to demand additional Black-performing districts in Huntsville and Montgomery, tying into broader Section 2 claims upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2023.^[137] These developments underscore COI's dual role in promoting representation while inviting litigation over vagueness; for instance, Washington's 2023 remedial map for Latino COI in District 15 was upheld by the Ninth Circuit in August 2025, but similar multi-ethnic claims faced reversal elsewhere, as courts prioritized verifiable racial cohesion over expansive interests.^[138] Empirical analyses in cases like Alaska's 2021-2023 challenges showed COI splits correlating with vote dilution for low-income diverse areas, yet measurable criteria like shared industry data proved elusive amid partisan incentives.^[139] Absent federal standardization, state-specific evolutions continue, with mid-decade redraws in Texas and potential Ohio revisions in 2025 testing COI durability against political pressures.^[140]

Future Trends and Predictions

Advancements in artificial intelligence are poised to transform communities of interest by enabling hyper-personalized experiences and automated moderation. Large language models (LLMs) will increasingly serve as virtual assistants for content curation and conflict resolution, reducing administrative burdens while fostering deeper member interactions, as projected in analyses of community management tools.^[141]^[142] However, this integration may amplify risks of algorithmic bias, where AI prioritizes engagement over diverse viewpoints, potentially exacerbating echo chambers unless countered by transparent human oversight.^[143] Niche and decentralized communities are expected to proliferate, driven by user dissatisfaction with centralized platforms' data practices and content moderation inconsistencies. Predictions indicate a shift toward private, blockchain-enabled groups offering greater autonomy and data sovereignty, appealing to users seeking unfiltered discourse on specialized topics like professional networking or hobbyist collaborations.^[144]^[145] By 2025, recurring revenue models, such as paid memberships for exclusive access, will sustain these groups, with niche platforms capturing segments underserved by mass-market social media.^[146] Hybrid models blending virtual and in-person engagement will emerge as dominant, supported by mobile-first applications and gamification elements to boost retention. Forecasts suggest that post-pandemic normalization will revive physical meetups within interest-based networks, enhancing trust and real-world impact, though measurement challenges persist in quantifying cross-format value.^[147]^[148] Data security enhancements, including end-to-end encryption, will be critical to mitigate breaches that erode member confidence, with experts emphasizing balanced automation to preserve authentic human connections.^[148] Overall, these trends point to more resilient, member-driven COIs, contingent on addressing scalability and inclusivity hurdles through empirical validation of outcomes.^[149]

References

[1]
Five ways to think about community | UMN Extension
Aug 23, 2021 · Two: A community of interest. Describes communities of people who share the same interest or passion. Examples of this include book clubs ...Missing: sociology | Show results with:sociology
[2]
Social networks and communities of interest | Health Knowledge
When groups of people from different areas and backgrounds get together to solve problems that affect them all they are termed “community of interest”. They ...
[3]
Introduction to communities of practice - wenger-trayner
A community of practice is not merely a community of interest–people who like certain kinds of movies, for instance. Members of a community of practice are ...
[4]
Considering Community: What types of community are there?
Dec 22, 2014 · i) A community of interest · ii) A community of practice · iii) A community of inquiry · iv) A community of action · v) A community of place · vi) A ...
[5]
What do you mean by 'the community'? - Business Lab
Sep 15, 2021 · Community of place refers to a group that exists in a certain geographic area. ... Community of Interest. This type of community exists ...
[6]
Kimball Young: Contributions of William Isaac Thomas to Sociology II
Feb 22, 2010 · ( 126) Out of this cooperation a community of interest arises which counteracts antipathy and hostility. The latter, however, continue to ...
[7]
Types of Communities and Activities Within Them - FeverBee
Oct 8, 2012 · Community of Action · Community of Circumstance · Community of Interest · Community of Place · Community of Practice · Hybrid Communities.
[8]
Neighborhoods and Community - ResearchGate
A community of interest, as noted earlier, is defined simply as a group of people who share a common interest or passion (Newman 1981). These people exchange ...
[9]
Sense of Community: A Definition and Theory - Dr. David McMillan
Sep 7, 2025 · Community of interest. New York: Anchor Books. Nisbet, R. A. (1953). The quest for community. New York: Oxford University Press. Nisbet, R ...
[10]
Communities of place and communities of interest? An exploration ...
Oct 24, 2011 · Findings from this 'community of interest' indicated very positive impacts on subjective wellbeing, partly from the self-expression involved ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
[11]
Using cluster analysis to identify communities of interest for ...
May 12, 2024 · What is a community of interest (COI)? Broadly speaking, it is a gathering of people assembled around a topic of common interest (Henri and ...
[12]
https://meta.discourse.org/t/types-of-community-their-characteristics/276489
[13]
Types of Communities: a guide for marketers - Hall
Mar 9, 2025 · What defines a community of interest. Communities of interest bring together people united by shared passions, hobbies, or enthusiasms. Unlike ...
[14]
Edward Sapir: Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences: Group
Feb 22, 2010 · The community of interest may range from a passing event which assembles people into a momentary aggregate to a relatively permanent ...
[15]
COMMUNITY - jstor
A Bricolage of Community. ^ Community of interest... ^ ' f Community as ... 1972. Ritzer, G. (2008). Classical Sociological Theory (5th edition), New York, McGraw ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins<|separator|>
[16]
Community-Based Research: A Grass-Roots and Social Justice ...
Alinsky (1971) noted that “in a highly mobile, urbanized society the word 'community' means community of interest, not geographic location” (p. 120). This ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
[17]
Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft | Research Starters - EBSCO
Toennies' theories suggest that as societies evolve from Gemeinschaft to Gesellschaft, social relationships become increasingly intricate, reflecting the ...
[18]
[PDF] Rethinking the Concept of Community
AT THE END of the twentieth century, political discourse and debate often invoke such value-laden concepts as “family” “nation”, and “community”. Historians ...
[19]
[PDF] The Concept of Community of Interest - A Discussion Paper - 1989
The term “community of interest” is also referred to incidentally in Gifford's “The. Australian Local Government Dictionary”, dealing with the word ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
[20]
An Evolved Perspective on Sense of Community - Dr. David McMillan
Apr 1, 2025 · This article revisits the theory of sense of community originally developed in 1976 and subsequently presented by McMillan and Chavis (1986).
[21]
Online communities - ScienceDirect.com
... community of interest. This article examines the concept and practice of online communities. It commences with an examination of the origins of online ...
[22]
The Two Types of Online Communities That Can Drive Growth
Feb 21, 2013 · Two types of online communities exist: communities of interest and communities of practice. A community of interest may be people who love ...
[23]
How Is Digital Technology Changing Our Interactions With Each ...
Communities have always been central to our relationships, but digital technology is allowing people to create communities across wide reaches of geography.
[24]
The Role of Technology in Strengthening Modern Communities
Mar 11, 2025 · Technology has fundamentally reshaped community life, creating new platforms for interaction, bridging distances, promoting participation, and facilitating ...Niche Communities And... · Technology In Public Spaces... · The Role Of Ai And Data<|separator|>
[25]
[PDF] Communities of practice
Three characteristics are crucial: 1. The domain: A community of practice is not merely a club of friends or a network of connections between people. It has ...
[26]
Jean Lave, Etienne Wenger and communities of practice - infed.org
The characteristics of communities of practice · Relationships, identity and shared interests and repertoire.introduction · communities of practice · legitimate peripheral... · references
[27]
Communities of Practice: Learning as a Social System
A community of practice is different from a team in that the shared learning and interest of its members are what keep it together. It is defined by knowledge ...
[28]
10 A Model of Community-Based Environmental Education
... community of place; a community of identity; or a community of interest.1 In ... Community of interest is a useful characterization because community ...
[29]
Communities of place and communities of interest? An exploration ...
Aug 7, 2025 · For that, the distinction among community of place, community of identity and the recognition of a community of interest (Means and Evans 2012) ...
[30]
Structure in personal networks: Constructing and comparing ...
Personal network structure refers to the distribution of social ties among the personal contacts (alters) of a focal individual (ego), and to characteristics of ...
[31]
Social Capital - Sage Publishing
Community of place refers to social relationships in a particular locality, whereas community of interest refers to social relationships based on a common set ...Missing: historical | Show results with:historical
[32]
Homophily and Contagion Are Generically Confounded in ...
... community of interest. To separate the effects of contagion from those of homophily, a large and rich table of covariates on an individual's personal and ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition<|separator|>
[33]
[PDF] Network Perspectives on Communities - Digital Commons @ USF
New types of grouping based on congeniality, business association, or community of interest are springing up on all sides, but nothing has so far appeared.
[34]
[PDF] The 'Community' in 'Community Social Work' - IOSR Journal
Sep 5, 2017 · in terms of locality or territory; another as a community of interest or interest group; and thirdly, a community ... social network has come to ...
[35]
Influence propagation in social networks: Interest-based community ...
The objective of this work is to rank interest-based communities using influence propagation. The contribution of this work is threefold.
[36]
[PDF] Aberystwyth University Communities of/for Interest
longer used as an advertisement for this business but as a community of interest: ... Wellman B (1997) An electronic group is virtually a social network.
[37]
Community of Interest (COI) - Redistricting Data Hub
A community of interest COI is a group of people with shared concerns, interests, and characteristics. It is a common redistricting criteria.
[38]
[PDF] Rules of Redistricting: Communities of Interest
A community of interest is a neighborhood, community, or group of people who have common policy concerns and would benefit from being maintained in a single ...
[39]
[PDF] COMMUNITIES OF INTEREST - Brennan Center for Justice
like following county or ... purposes of these Guidelines, a community of interest is defined as an area with recognized.
[40]
Community of interest - Ballotpedia
A total of 24 states consider communities of interest when drawing state legislative districts, and 13 when drawing congressional districts. See also.
[41]
[PDF] Communities-of-Interest-FAQ.pdf - League of Women Voters New York
2. Can a community of interest be defined by race alone? No. The Supreme Court decisions on racial gerrymandering make it clear that. “race ...
[42]
Share Your Community of Interest - Contra Costa County
Communities of interest do not include relationships with political parties, incumbents, or political candidates." One of the guidelines for drawing district ...
[43]
Where are the lines drawn? - All About Redistricting
Various rules limit where district lines may or may not be drawn. Rules about equal population and minority voting rights have federal backing.
[44]
[PDF] turning communities of interest - into a rigorous standard for fair
Despite their shared interests, Flushing and Bayside have historically been divided among multiple electoral districts, thus diluting the minority voting.
[45]
Turning Communities Of Interest Into A Rigorous Standard For Fair ...
Apr 19, 2021 · Recent technological advances make possible a practical, rigorous application of communities of interest (“COIs”) to redistricting measures.
[46]
How Partisan Redistricting Divides and Harms Communities
Jun 24, 2022 · In this piece, we highlight four communities that were split up and silenced by partisan Republican redistricting this cycle.
[47]
Communities of Interest — - ACE Electoral Knowledge Network
In this instance, an electoral district that follows the administrative boundary would divide a community of interest. In general, criteria related to ...
[48]
New 50 State Report Finds Massive Failures in Redistricting Process
Oct 11, 2023 · Drawn after the 2020 Census, the new maps will influence political outcomes and community representation for years to come, including the 2024 ...
[49]
Fair Maps 2030: Making redistricting inclusive, transparent, and ...
The Fair Maps 2030 campaign supports ballot initiatives, legislation, litigation, and public education to ensure that the drawing of voting districts is ...
[50]
[PDF] Communities of practice: - wenger-trayner
community of practice is thus different from a community of interest or a geographical community, neither of which implies a shared practice. A community of ...
[51]
Communities of Interest in the World of Work - PeopleShift
Mar 21, 2019 · Communities of Interest are simply informal groups of individuals who share a common interest and like to get together to talk about it.
[52]
Types of Employee Communities - Teleskope
Jul 28, 2023 · Examples of interest-based groups include gardening, skiing, reading, art etc. Having a community at work which involves their interests makes ...
[53]
How To Build a Sense of Community in the Workplace
Jun 17, 2024 · Slack channels or workplace social media interest groups can be a great way to stay connected to other employees and build community. For ...
[54]
3 Inspiring Examples of Workplace Communities in Action - Cultivate
3 Inspiring Examples of Workplace Communities in Action · TEDxAlconR&D · Communities of Belonging at GitHub · Intuit.
[55]
community of interest (COI) - Glossary | CSRC
community of interest (COI) ... Definitions: A collaborative group of users (working at the appropriate security level or levels) who exchange information in ...
[56]
Typology of Virtual Communities: a Multi-Disciplinary Foundation for ...
In this paper, a virtual community is defined as an aggregation of individuals or business partners who interact around a shared interest.
[57]
Reddit User and Growth Stats (Updated) - Backlinko
Sep 24, 2025 · Reddit has 416.4 million weekly active users as of Q2 2025. An increase from 342.3 million weekly unique visitors in Q2 2024. Reddit Weekly ...
[58]
Reddit Statistics 2025: Key Insights for POD & Ecommerce - Podbase
Aug 28, 2025 · Reddit user statistics in 2025 recorded over 100,000 active communities. Members set the tone and guidelines for interaction. Also, volunteer ...
[59]
15+ Top Stats about Online Communities - Personify
77% of users join online communities to discover new things. 66% of users join online communities to connect with people who have similar interests.
[60]
7 Types of Online Communities: How To Build Community - Shopify
Oct 25, 2024 · One network of virtual communities is Reddit, an online forum where users can join subreddits (text-based threads) based on their interests.
[61]
[PDF] The Use of the Internet by Transnational Communities of Immigrants
of Immigrants (VTCI) as a hybrid community of interest where participants use off-line and online channels of communication to nurture their social ties 8 and ...<|separator|>
[62]
Knowledge Sharing in Communities of Interest for Better Self ...
Aug 29, 2025 · The research method is case study of community of interest of mothers by conducting qualitative survey. The qualitative methodology was ...
[63]
Accessing the Impact Mechanism of Sense of Virtual Community on ...
Jun 15, 2022 · In educational virtual communities, sense of virtual community is the key to effective online learning and an important antecedent variable ...Abstract · Introduction · Research Model and... · Research and Discussion
[64]
Understanding the Sense of Community and Continuance Intention ...
Jul 8, 2019 · Communities of interest have “the least community” of the different types studied in this research. Thus, community of interest participants are ...
[65]
40 Statistics You Should Know About Online Communities - social.plus
Jun 2, 2022 · From the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, there was an 81% uptick in online community engagement. 81% uptick in online community engagement ...
[66]
https://www.futuredatastats.com/online-community-platforms-market
[67]
Full article: How Passionate People Seek and Share Various Forms ...
Dec 1, 2019 · This paper presents an analytical review of the existing literature about Human Information Behaviour (HIB) in the context of Serious Leisure (SL).
[68]
The Tailored Practice of Hobbies and Its Implication for the Design of ...
The empirical basis of the research is a set of ethnographic records of two communities of amateur astronomers, as well as the details of astronomers' ...
[69]
The 24 Different Types of Communities - Orgo
Jan 5, 2025 · Communities of interest arise from shared hobbies, passions, or professional pursuits. Unlike location-based communities, they are formed ...Communities of Interest... · Communities of Action... · Communities of Place...
[70]
Hobby engagement and mental wellbeing among people aged 65 ...
Sep 11, 2023 · A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies representing 16 countries found that hobby engagement was associated with better mental and self-reported health in ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[71]
Positive association between hobby participation and objective and ...
The theoretical model suggests that hobbies may first improve mental health indicators which may then optimize cognitive preservation. Temporal patterns of ...
[72]
81 Best Social Hobbies to Meet People (Even For Introverts)
Oct 9, 2025 · The most effective social hobbies for adults include team sports, dance classes, board game groups, and volunteering. These activities provide ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[73]
Hobby Communities and Events
Nov 6, 2023 · Hobby communities offer a unique platform for individuals with shared interests to connect and engage. They provide a sense of belonging, a ...
[74]
Social Identity Theory In Psychology (Tajfel & Turner, 1979)
Oct 5, 2023 · It suggests that people seek to enhance their self-esteem by identifying with in-groups and differentiating from out-groups. This can lead to ...
[75]
Social Identity Theory - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Social identity theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) posits that positive identity is maintained by affiliation with valued groups, and social comparisons.
[76]
The Role of Social and Personal Identities in Self-Esteem Among ...
The study found that individuals with high levels of multiple social and personal identities had the highest self-esteem.
[77]
Educational Affinity Groups: The Why and How | Columbia Social ...
Feb 28, 2020 · Educational affinity groups are a powerful tool for identity development, mental wellbeing, and social justice advancement.
[78]
Evidence-Based Guidelines for Creating Affinity Groups in Nursing ...
Affinity groups can improve feelings of belongingness in historically excluded students (HES). · An evidence-based model for creating and sustaining affinity ...Full Length Article · History Of Affinity Groups · Benefits Of Affinity Groups
[79]
A role for affinity groups in promoting social connectivity, self-efficacy ...
Jan 12, 2024 · We hypothesize that affinity groups such as CC Bio INSITES may be leveraged to increase an individual's connectivity to other novice or expert ...
[80]
The future of mental health care: peer-to-peer support and social ...
People with serious mental illness report benefits from interacting with peers online from greater social connectedness, feelings of group belonging.
[81]
Online communities come with real-world consequences for ... - Nature
Aug 2, 2024 · We focus on online communities that are exemplary for three domains: work, hate, and addictions. We review the risks that emerge from these online communities.
[82]
Diversity of Group Memberships Predicts Well-Being - NIH
Groups have their health and well-being impacted by satisfying their members' needs and providing resources to help cope with threats.
[83]
Communities of Interest (COI) - ACT-IAC
The Communities of Interest (COIs) are the heart of the ACT-IAC collaborative forum, where government and industry are working together to develop best ...Missing: economic | Show results with:economic
[84]
Cooperative memberships have benefits, but require a commitment ...
Apr 30, 2012 · Membership in a cooperative is a long-term commitment to both the business community of interest as well as the community it's geographically ...
[85]
10 benefits of online communities for brands - Khoros
Aug 13, 2025 · Online communities can decrease support costs, build brand loyalty, connect with customers, gain insights, drive revenue, and enhance marketing ...Missing: savings | Show results with:savings
[86]
[PDF] Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies
Finally, social technologies can empower individuals to form communities of interest around specific issues or causes, providing societal benefits. 4 In ...
[87]
The effectiveness of communities of practice: An empirical study
Aug 7, 2025 · Empirical studies of CoPs in these sectors identified that they help participants develop their professional identities; improve their work- ...
[88]
How to use communities of practice to support change in learning ...
Mar 5, 2024 · Specifically, our results show that CoPs can (a) act as communities of interest, (b) strengthen learning cycles, (c) provide social and ...
[89]
Social capital development on interest-based networks - Nature
Jan 31, 2024 · The primary objective of the present study is to investigate how relational capital accumulates through online interactions on SNSs, and how ...
[90]
(PDF) Social capital development on interest-based networks
Jan 31, 2024 · This study advanced our understanding of social capital theory by examining its applicability in an interest-based SNS, identifying OIs with ...
[91]
Individual and social benefits of online discussion forums
Online discussion forums have benefits at individual and society level. They are positively linked to well-being for stigmatised group members.
[92]
Potential Benefits of Social Media - NCBI - NIH
Some evidence indicates that supportive online communities can decrease risk of suicidal ideation and improve well-being (De Choudhury and Kıcıman, 2017).
[93]
Does participating in online communities enhance the effectiveness ...
Sep 13, 2024 · This study examined the effect of learning communities on knowledge acquisition and learning experience in non-formal micro-learning settings.<|control11|><|separator|>
[94]
[PDF] Why Do People Participate in Small Online Communities? - arXiv
Aug 9, 2021 · Many benefits of online communities—such as obtaining new information, opportunities, and social connections— increase with size.
[95]
The echo chamber effect on social media - PNAS
Feb 23, 2021 · This paper explores the key differences between the main social media platforms and how they are likely to influence information spreading and echo chambers' ...
[96]
Echo chambers, filter bubbles, and polarisation: a literature review
Jan 19, 2022 · This is similar to broader dynamics online where communities of interest tend to coalesce, often around perfectly benign shared interests ...
[97]
Danger in the internet echo chamber - Harvard Law School
Mar 24, 2017 · It's group polarization, which means that if you listen to people like you, you'll probably get more extreme and more confident too. If ...
[98]
Social Media Polarization and Echo Chambers in the Context of ...
Aug 5, 2021 · We provided empirical evidence that political echo chambers are prevalent, especially in the right-leaning community, which can exacerbate the ...
[99]
A systematic review of echo chamber research
Apr 7, 2025 · This systematic review synthesizes research on echo chambers and filter bubbles to explore the reasons behind dissent regarding their existence, antecedents, ...
[100]
Echo chamber effects on short video platforms - PubMed Central
Apr 18, 2023 · However, echo chambers can contribute to the spread of misleading information, false news, or rumors, which have negative social impacts.
[101]
The Perils of Participating in Echo Chambers in Business - Rod's Blog
Feb 17, 2025 · Echo chambers are detrimental to the vitality and success of businesses. They limit innovation, impair decision-making, and decrease employee engagement.
[102]
The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political ...
Jan 29, 2018 · This study examines the relationship between political interest as well as media diversity and being caught in an echo chamber (measured by five different ...
[103]
Terrorism and the internet: How dangerous is online radicalization?
Oct 13, 2022 · This work is concerned with the extent and magnitude of threat related to online radicalization in the context of terrorist acts and related offending.
[104]
The Use of the Internet in 15 Cases of Terrorism and Extremism
Study findings confirm that the internet had a significant influence in the radicalization process of the violent extremists and terrorists whose cases were ...
[105]
Political polarization and its echo chambers: Surprising new, cross ...
Dec 9, 2021 · A series of new studies that examine political polarization as a collection of complex ever-evolving systems.
[106]
Challenges of Redistricting - Carolina Demography
Nov 18, 2015 · Maintaining communities of interest. How do we define a community of interest? Whose interests are captured? These priorities can conflict with ...
[107]
Conflicting Goals of Redistricting: Do Districts That Maximize ...
Legislative redistricting is a contentious process that is closely tied to perceptions of political winners and losers in the decade of elections that follows.
[108]
Communities of interest and minority districting after Miller v. Johnson
In the early 1990s, the US Department of Justice displayed the transcendent community of interest concept in maximizing majority-minority districts across the ...Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges
[109]
[PDF] Identifying Communities of Interest Using Contact Graphs - RAND
Apr 8, 2024 · A community of interest is a contiguous group with shared interests. This document introduces a method using contact graphs and community ...Missing: effectiveness | Show results with:effectiveness
[110]
Defining the community of interest as thematic and cognitive regions
In this paper, we explore defining a community of interest as a thematic region, according to demographic and land-use attributes, and as a cognitive region.
[111]
Measuring online community culture: Scale development and ...
In this study, OCC is defined as the shared values among community members, consisting of behavior patterns, norms and rules, and invisible shared beliefs.
[112]
The challenges of measuring social cohesion in public health research
Jan 21, 2022 · This review's goal was to study the ecometric measurement properties of social cohesion in order to describe dissimilarities in its measurement.1. Introduction · 2.1. Search Strategy And... · 3. Results
[113]
[PDF] MEASURING SOCIAL COHESION - UNECE
Oct 10, 2024 · Addressing ongoing methodological challenges concerning declining survey response rates, survey mode and framing effects, survey design and ...Missing: boundaries | Show results with:boundaries
[114]
[PDF] Community: Issues, Definitions, and Operationalization on the Web
Apr 16, 2012 · ABSTRACT. This paper addresses the concepts of community and online community and discusses the physical, functional, and symbolic.
[115]
An Investigation of the Community of Inquiry Questionnaire Limitations
In this paper, we outline the misalignment we have encountered when using the CoIQ in our own research and ways we think future research on communities of ...<|separator|>
[116]
What Is Community? An Evidence-Based Definition for Participatory ...
Increased emphasis on community collaboration indicates the need for consensus regarding the definition of community within public health.
[117]
Integrating social sciences in community engagement in ...
Sep 12, 2024 · Challenges found include different understandings (e.g., on standardization), languages and methods used by practitioners and social scientists, ...
[118]
(PDF) Measuring social cohesion - ResearchGate
Nov 14, 2024 · Social ties are often distinguished as weak or strong, which can be perceived as having a bias towards positive.
[119]
Emerging consumer trends in a post-COVID-19 world - McKinsey
Homebound consumers abandoned ingrained shopping habits, hurtling ecommerce into hyperdrive and compressing a decade's worth of digital adoption into 100 days.
[120]
5 major trends that are being accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic
Dec 7, 2020 · 44% of people under the age of 18 now report four hours or more of screen time per day – up from 21% prior to the pandemic. Gaming is another ...
[121]
Third Place Changes: The Shift from Physical to Digital Spaces ...
Dec 9, 2024 · These platforms create communities based on shared interests, hobbies, or experiences, replacing some of the functions of physical third places.
[122]
https://collectivemindset.substack.com/p/the-evolution-of-online-communities
[123]
The Evolving Landscape of Social Media in 2025: Key Trends to ...
Sep 5, 2025 · Explore 2025 social media trends short-form video, AI content, social commerce, niche platforms, and community building shaping the future ...
[124]
Digital 2025: Global Overview Report - DataReportal
Feb 5, 2025 · Unique mobile subscribers have increased by 112 million over the past 12 months, delivering year-on-year growth of 2.0 percent. Meanwhile, data ...
[125]
[PDF] How pandemic has influenced the game between interest groups ...
Reports indicate that lobbying spending has increased under COVID-19. According to Open Secrets, Coronavirus stimulus spurred near-record first-quarter lobbying ...
[126]
Transformation of social relationships in COVID-19 America - NIH
Dec 20, 2023 · COVID-19 showcased the resilience of core human social networks but also an alarming rise in political echo chambers.
[127]
What was a gap is now a chasm: Remote schooling, the digital ...
Jun 12, 2023 · This article reviews literature on the impacts of the pandemic on the educational outcomes of marginalized youth due to remote learning and the digital divide.
[128]
2025 Digital Media Trends | Deloitte Insights
Mar 25, 2025 · Hyperscale social video platforms are shaping digital media trends, challenging traditional media and redefining content consumption.
[129]
Building Engaging Online Communities in 2025 - RumbleTalk
Mar 16, 2025 · In this article, we'll explore the current state of online community engagement, discuss the shifting challenges of user behavior, and offer ...
[130]
Redistricting Criteria - National Conference of State Legislatures
State legislatures or commissions tasked with redistricting must consider various criteria, or principles, when deciding how to draw new maps.Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[131]
https://vote.utah.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Proposition-4.pdf
[132]
https://www.virginiaredistricting.org/2021/Data/Ref/2021%20Redistricting%20Guidelines%20and%20Criteria%208-19-2021.pdf
[133]
https://webservices.ncleg.gov/ViewDocSiteFile/81643
[134]
How two Texas legal battles led to the 2025 redraw
### Summary of Communities of Interest in Texas Redistricting Legal Battles and 2025 Redraw
[135]
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/696/1128/1422192/
[136]
[PDF] Case No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 25, 2025 · ... communities of interest that had been preserved in the prior independent citizens redistricting commission's maps. (See Decl. of Trende at ...
[137]
https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/2023-07/Thomas%20v.%20Merrill%20%5BThird%20Amended%20Complaint%5D.pdf?inline=1
[138]
Redistricting Litigation Roundup | Brennan Center for Justice
This tracker provides a summary of the litigation brought around the country to challenge congressional and legislative maps drawn after the 2020 census.
[139]
https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/2021-12/Matanuska-Susitna%20Borough%20v.%20Alaska%20Redistricting%20Board.pdf?inline=1
[140]
Mid-Decade Congressional Redistricting: Key Issues - Congress.gov
Aug 11, 2025 · Ohio drew congressional district boundaries seven times between 1878 and 1892, conducting five consecutive House elections under different ...
[141]
Community Trends to Keep on Your Radar for 2024 & Beyond
Sep 19, 2025 · 1. Virtual Assistants: LLM-Powered Bots Leading the Way · 2. Mastering Moderation: LLMs as Your Online Community's Digital Sheriff · 3. Multimodal ...
[142]
The Future of Online Communities: Trends, Value, and What's Next
Discover the latest trends in online communities, how to prove community ROI, and how different generations prefer to engage.
[143]
Future of Community: 5 Trends Set to Redefine ... - Chris Detzel
Oct 24, 2023 · Future of Community: 5 Trends Set to Redefine Communities · Trend 1: AI Comes to Community · Trend 2: Quantum Computing Charges AI Progress · Trend ...
[144]
The Future of Online Communities: Trends to Watch in 2025 - LinkedIn
May 5, 2025 · StellarUp · AI-Powered Community Engagement · Decentralized and Private Communities on the Rise · Hyper-Personalization: No More Generic ...
[145]
15 social media trends shaping 2025 [mid-year update]
whether that's creating your own private community, offering subscription-based content, or diving deeper ...<|separator|>
[146]
The 2025 Community Trends Report by Circle
The report identifies 12 trends, including social media for growth, niche communities, platform consolidation, recurring revenue, and the return of in-person ...
[147]
The Future of Community Engagement: Trends You Need to Know
May 20, 2025 · Key trends include AI-powered content, community-generated content, gamification, hybrid/virtual spaces, mobile-first apps, and analytics- ...
[148]
7 Community Management Trends to Know in 2025 - Bevy
The 7 trends are: Hyper-Personalization, AI Integration, In-Person Events, Niche Communities, Humanizing Your Brand, Data Security, and Balancing Automation & ...
[149]
Prediction 2025: Marketers, It's Time To Let Go And Trust Communities
Dec 10, 2024 · Consumers are not shy about signaling to brand marketers that their messages are no longer ruling how products are perceived.