Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Conventional weapon

A conventional weapon is a military armament that relies on kinetic force, chemical explosives, incendiary agents, or directed to inflict damage, explicitly excluding , biological, chemical, or radiological mechanisms classified as weapons of mass destruction. These weapons encompass a broad spectrum of equipment, including , systems, bombs, missiles, armored vehicles, combat aircraft, and , which collectively enable precision targeting, area denial, and in non- conflicts. Unlike devices, which derive explosive power from or chain reactions yielding magnitudes thousands to millions of times greater than chemical explosives, conventional weapons operate through contained chemical reactions in propellants or warheads, limiting their and fallout while prioritizing tactical . Conventional weapons constitute the core arsenal of national militaries worldwide, underpinning deterrence, defense, and offensive operations in the majority of armed engagements, where empirical assessments of battlefield efficacy—such as casualty rates from kinetic impacts and explosive fragmentation—demonstrate their decisive role over alternatives. Their proliferation and transfer are governed by frameworks like the , which seeks to prevent diversion to illicit actors while affirming to , though enforcement varies due to geopolitical divergences. Notable advancements, including precision-guided munitions and hypersonic delivery systems, have enhanced accuracy and speed, reducing in ideal conditions but raising concerns over escalations absent binding limits. Certain subclasses, such as cluster munitions and anti-personnel landmines, have generated controversy for their lingering hazards to civilians post-conflict, prompting partial prohibitions under protocols to the , ratified by over 100 states but rejected by major powers citing operational necessities in . These debates underscore a tension between humanitarian imperatives and military utility, with data from conflict zones indicating persistent use despite norms, as verifiable stockpiles and exports continue to sustain conventional force structures essential for .

Definition and Classification

Core Definition

A conventional weapon, also termed a conventional arm, encompasses any armament excluding weapons of mass destruction, which are defined as , biological, radiological, or chemical devices capable of causing widespread, indiscriminate harm beyond immediate military targets. These weapons primarily function through transfer, as in bullets or projectiles; explosive chemical reactions generating blast, fragmentation, or heat; or directed mechanical force, enabling targeted effects on personnel, structures, or in scenarios. Unlike weapons of mass destruction, conventional arms are engineered for precision or proportionality in application, though their deployment can still result in significant depending on , delivery method, and tactical context. The category includes a broad spectrum of systems, from small arms like rifles and pistols—fired by individual operators—to heavy ordnance such as shells and aerial bombs, which utilize high-explosive fillers like trinitrotoluene () or for destructive power. Vehicular platforms, including tanks with main guns firing armor-piercing rounds at velocities exceeding 1,200 meters per second, and missiles guided by inertial or satellite systems, exemplify advanced conventional capabilities designed for doctrines emphasizing maneuver and fire superiority. As of 2023, conventional weapons accounted for over 90% of global military expenditures and stockpiles, reflecting their ubiquity in state arsenals and inventories due to relative ease of production, deployment, and regulatory frameworks under treaties like the of 2013.

Distinction from Weapons of Mass Destruction

Conventional weapons are distinguished from weapons of mass destruction (WMD) primarily by their mechanisms of action and scale of indiscriminate harm; WMD encompass nuclear, radiological, chemical, and biological agents designed to cause widespread casualties and destruction through toxic, radioactive, or self-replicating effects, whereas conventional weapons rely on kinetic energy, blast, fragmentation, or incendiary effects from high explosives, propellants, or mechanical forces without such agents. This distinction traces to international legal frameworks, such as the 1925 Geneva Protocol prohibiting chemical and biological weapons, which implicitly separated them from standard armaments like artillery shells filled with high explosives. In military doctrine, conventional systems—such as rifles, bombs, or missiles using conventional warheads—are tactical or operational tools for targeted engagements, often allowing for proportionality under laws of war, unlike WMD, which are strategic deterrents with potential for existential threats due to their uncontrollable spread or fallout. The absence of a universally codified numerical threshold for "mass" destruction in WMD definitions underscores a qualitative divide: conventional weapons, even in large salvos like the 1945 firebombing of Tokyo (which killed approximately 100,000 civilians via incendiary bombs), produce effects attributable to scalable, containable physics rather than the exponential or persistent hazards of WMD, such as nerve agents dispersing via wind or pathogens incubating asymptomatically. United Nations frameworks reinforce this by classifying conventional arms as all non-WMD systems, including small arms and armored vehicles, subject to export controls under the Arms Trade Treaty (2013), while WMD proliferation is addressed via specialized regimes like the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (1968), Chemical Weapons Convention (1993), and Biological Weapons Convention (1972). Proliferation risks differ markedly; conventional weapons are ubiquitous and producible with industrial capabilities, numbering in billions globally, but WMD require advanced, specialized expertise and materials, limiting their actors to states or advanced non-state groups. Legal and doctrinal separations also reflect usability and escalation dynamics: conventional weapons permit discriminate use in compliance with , as per Additional Protocol I to the (1977), whereas WMD employment often violates norms against superfluous injury or environmental harm due to their inherent area-denial effects. In U.S. , as outlined in the 2002 National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction, conventional forces counter immediate threats through precision strikes, while WMD countermeasures emphasize denial, dismantlement, and deterrence against high-consequence events. This binary, though critiqued for blurring with advanced conventional munitions like cluster bombs or fuel-air explosives that mimic some WMD effects in density of casualties, maintains operational validity by excluding agent-based persistence.

Legal and Technical Classifications

Conventional weapons are technically defined as armaments that derive their destructive effects primarily from kinetic energy, explosive forces, or incendiary mechanisms, in contrast to weapons of mass destruction (WMD), which involve nuclear fission/fusion, biological agents, or toxic chemicals designed for indiscriminate, large-scale harm. This classification emphasizes weapons that target specific military objectives through directed physical impacts, such as bullets, bombs, or missiles propelled by conventional propellants like gunpowder or high explosives, rather than relying on radiological, pathogenic, or persistent toxic dissemination. Military doctrines, including those outlined in United Nations frameworks, further categorize them by platform and capability, encompassing small arms, light weapons, armored vehicles, artillery systems exceeding 100mm caliber, combat aircraft, attack helicopters, warships, and missile launchers, as tracked in the UN Register of Conventional Arms established in 1991. Legally, conventional weapons are distinguished from WMD in international treaties by their lack of inherent mass-destructive intent or capability, permitting their possession and use under Article 51 of the UN Charter for individual or collective , subject to (IHL) constraints. Unlike WMD regimes—such as the 1968 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, 1972 , and 1993 , which impose near-total bans—conventional arms face no categorical prohibition but must adhere to IHL principles from the 1949 and 1907 Regulations, prohibiting indiscriminate effects, superfluous injury, or disproportionate civilian harm. The 2013 (ATT), ratified by 113 states as of 2023, regulates their international transfer to prevent violations or conflict fueling, requiring risk assessments for diversion or misuse. Specific subclasses of conventional weapons deemed excessively injurious are restricted under the 1980 (CCW), which entered into force in and has 127 states parties as of ; it codifies customary IHL by banning or limiting weapons like those with non-detectable fragments (, 1980), certain booby-traps and landmines (, amended 1996), incendiary weapons against civilians (, 1980), blinding laser systems (Protocol IV, 1995), and addressing explosive remnants of war (Protocol V, 2006). Standalone treaties extend these controls: the 1997 Ottawa Convention bans anti-personnel landmines (ratified by 164 states, excluding major producers like the , , and ), while the 2008 prohibits their use, production, and stockpiling (ratified by 112 states, with similar non-participation by key powers). These instruments reflect empirical assessments of weapons' effects, prioritizing verifiable data on injury patterns and civilian impacts over doctrinal preferences, though enforcement gaps persist due to non-universal adherence and verification challenges.

Historical Development

Ancient and Pre-Industrial Eras

The earliest conventional weapons emerged during the era, with stone tools dating back to approximately 2.6 million years ago, consisting of simple flaked cores and choppers used for hunting and combat by early hominins. By around 1.76 million years ago, hand axes and larger cutting tools appeared, enabling more effective thrusting and slashing. Wooden spears with fire-hardened tips, suitable for thrusting or throwing, date to at least 400,000 years ago, as evidenced by finds in , marking a shift toward projectile weapons for ranged attacks. In the Neolithic period, composite tools advanced, including atlatls (spear-throwers) and bows by around 20,000–10,000 BCE, increasing projectile velocity and range for hunting large game or warfare. The transition to the Bronze Age around 3300 BCE introduced smelted copper-tin alloys for durable blades, with the first true swords—tapered, lightweight designs resembling elongated daggers—appearing between 1700 and 1600 BCE in the Near East and Europe. These enabled closer-quarters combat, supplanting stone and early copper implements, while spears and axes retained prominence for their versatility in infantry and chariot warfare. Ancient Mesopotamian and Egyptian forces relied on bronze spears, composite bows accurate to 200 yards, and maces for infantry engagements from circa 3000 BCE, with chariots amplifying mobility. The Egyptian , a sickle-sword for slashing and hooking shields, became iconic by the New Kingdom (circa 1550–1070 BCE), often paired with axes and daggers in elite hands. In Greece during the 8th–4th centuries BCE, hoplite phalanxes wielded 2.5-meter doru spears as primary thrusting weapons, supplemented by short swords and large hoplon shields, as seen in battles like in 480 BCE. Roman legionaries from the 3rd century BCE standardized the (a 55–60 cm short sword for stabbing in tight formations) and (2-meter iron-shafted javelin designed to bend on impact, disabling shields), thrown en masse before melee to disrupt enemy lines. The , beginning around 1200 BCE, democratized weapon production with cheaper, harder iron replacing bronze for swords, spears, and arrowheads across , enhancing lethality despite brittleness issues. Medieval Europe from the 5th–15th centuries featured refined swords (e.g., Viking-era pattern-welded blades) and crossbows, which appeared widely after 1100 CE for their penetrating power against armor, requiring less skill than longbows but slower reloading. In , innovations included fire lances—bamboo tubes propelling charges—by the CE, evolving into metal-barreled hand cannons by the 13th century. Gunpowder's spread to by the 13th century introduced bombards (early cannons) for sieges, such as at the 1346 , while arquebuses emerged in the , bridging and ranged paradigms before industrialization scaled production. These pre-industrial firearms, hand-loaded and muzzle-fired, extended effective combat ranges to 100–200 meters but suffered from misfires in wet conditions, coexisting with edged weapons until the .

Industrialization and World Wars

The late 19th-century facilitated the mass production of conventional weapons through interchangeable parts, assembly lines, and steel manufacturing advances, transitioning warfare from artisanal craftsmanship to industrialized output. Breech-loading rifles with rifled barrels, such as the Prussian introduced in 1841 and later the French Lebel Model 1886, enabled higher firing rates and accuracy compared to earlier muzzle-loaders, with production scaling to tens of thousands annually by the 1890s in major powers like and . The , patented in 1884 by , exemplified this shift, capable of sustained fire at 450–600 rounds per minute using recoil-operated mechanisms and belt-fed , allowing a single weapon to suppress advances over hundreds of yards. By 1914, these technologies had proliferated: stockpiled over 10,000 machine guns, while and held fewer than 1,000 each, underscoring pre-war industrial disparities. World War I (1914–1918) marked the full realization of industrialized warfare, with belligerents converting civilian factories to munitions production, yielding millions of small arms and pieces. output exploded from approximately 12,000 units across at war's outset to over 100,000 by 1916, as firms like in and in adopted conveyor systems for rapid assembly. dominated casualties, with high-explosive shells—enabled by and fillers—produced in quantities exceeding 1.5 billion rounds by the and combined; alone manufactured over 200 million shells in 1917 via dedicated plants employing tens of thousands. This scale favored defensive tactics, as and entrenched lines, causing over 8 million infantry deaths from such firepower. Innovations included the British Mark I tank, deployed September 15, 1916, at the with rhomboidal tracks for trench traversal and 57mm naval guns, though initial production was limited to 150 units due to mechanical unreliability; by war's end, over 2,000 tanks were fielded across prototypes. , powered by rotary engines like the Gnome (50–80 horsepower), evolved from reconnaissance roles to dogfighters, with production reaching 100,000 planes total, exemplified by the yielding 5,490 units for Allied air superiority. In (1939–1945), industrialization reached unprecedented levels, with assembly-line efficiencies producing tens of thousands of tanks, aircraft, and guns monthly, decisively influencing outcomes through sheer volume. The manufactured over 84,000 medium tanks from 1940 onward, featuring sloped armor and 76mm guns for enhanced penetration, via relocated factories that output 1,000 vehicles monthly by 1943. The , leveraging firms like and , produced 49,000 Sherman M4 tanks and 300,000 aircraft, including 12,731 P-51 Mustangs with liquid-cooled V-12 engines for long-range escort, converting automotive plants to wartime use by 1942. Artillery innovations, such as the German 88mm Flak gun repurposed for anti-tank roles with muzzle velocities over 800 m/s, saw production exceed 20,000 units, while self-propelled variants integrated with Panzer divisions for . Small arms like the German MP40 , stamped from sheet metal for cost efficiency, totaled over 1 million produced, reflecting resource conservation amid Allied bombing. This industrial mobilization—Allies outproducing by ratios up to 3:1 in armor and aviation—enabled combined-arms doctrines, shifting from static fronts to mechanized offensives.

Cold War and Post-Cold War Evolution

The era (1947–1991) saw the and prioritize conventional weapons to address the potential for direct confrontation in , where faced Warsaw Pact numerical superiority in , , and . This arms buildup complemented nuclear deterrence, with conventional forces designed for sustained ground warfare; by the , the U.S. maintained over 7,000 main battle tanks and thousands of armored vehicles in , while the Soviets fielded approximately 50,000 across their forces. Advancements focused on mobility and firepower, including second-generation main battle tanks like the U.S. series (introduced 1960) and Soviet (1961), evolving to composite armor and improved fire control systems in models such as the (1980) and (1973). Aircraft development emphasized supersonic jets and air superiority fighters, with the F-4 Phantom II (1961) and MiG-21 (1959) exemplifying early mass-produced platforms capable of Mach 2 speeds and beyond-visual-range missiles. Precision-guided munitions (PGMs) emerged as a key innovation during this period, initially spurred by the inaccuracies of unguided bombing in the (1955–1975), where only about 5–10% of dropped ordnance hit intended targets. The U.S. developed the first laser-guided bombs, such as the (1966) and series (1968), which used semi-active laser homing to achieve (CEP) accuracies under 10 meters, a vast improvement over the 200–300 meters of iron bombs. By the 1970s, PGMs were integrated into doctrines for countering Soviet armored thrusts, with systems like the air-to-ground (1972) enabling standoff attacks; however, their use remained limited in major conflicts due to cost, weather dependency, and the emphasis on nuclear escalation risks. Proxy wars, including (1950–1953) and (1979–1989), tested and refined conventional tactics, with shoulder-fired anti-tank weapons like the U.S. TOW (1970) proving effective against Soviet armor. Post-Cold War, conventional weapons evolved toward precision, lethality, and integration with information systems, reflecting reduced emphasis on massed forces and a shift to expeditionary operations against regional powers. The marked a watershed, where coalition forces employed for about 8% of munitions, including laser-guided GBU-12 bombs and GPS-aided systems, destroying key Iraqi command nodes with minimal and achieving a 40:1 munitions efficiency over Vietnam-era campaigns. This demonstrated the Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA), prioritizing stealth platforms like the F-117 Nighthawk (operational 1983, combat debut ) and cruise missiles (), which enabled deep strikes without risking pilots. By the late 1990s, PGM usage rose sharply—to 29% in the 1999 Kosovo campaign—driven by advancements in inertial navigation, satellite guidance, and inertial measurement units, reducing CEPs to under 3 meters. The post-1991 period emphasized "smart" conventional capabilities as substitutes for tactical weapons in deterrence, with U.S. investments yielding systems like the (JDAM, 1998), converting unguided bombs to GPS-guided for under $25,000 per unit. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), such as the MQ-1 Predator (1995), integrated PGMs like the Hellfire missile (1984, UAV-adapted 2001), enabling persistent surveillance and strikes in asymmetric conflicts like (2001–2021). treaties, including the 1990 Conventional Forces in Europe (CFE) Treaty, reduced stockpiles by over 70,000 tanks and artillery pieces by 2001, allowing reallocation to high-tech R&D; however, proliferation to non-state actors and revisionist states persisted, with conventional exports emphasizing modular, networked systems. This evolution enhanced operational tempo but raised concerns over dependency on vulnerable enablers like GPS satellites.

Types and Categories

Small Arms and Light Weapons

Small arms and light weapons (SALW) encompass man-portable lethal armaments that expel or launch projectiles through explosive propulsion, designed primarily for infantry-level engagement rather than large-scale destruction. This category excludes antique or replica items and focuses on weapons operable by individuals or small crews without vehicular mounting. The defines SALW broadly to include any such device that can be readily converted for lethal use, emphasizing their role in direct combat over strategic bombardment. Small arms are specifically engineered for single-person operation, facilitating personal defense and in tactical scenarios. They comprise:
  • Revolvers and self-loading pistols for close-range sidearm use.
  • and carbines for medium-range precision fire.
  • Sub-machine guns and rifles for suppressive or automatic fire.
  • Light machine guns for sustained individual or squad-level support.
Light weapons, by contrast, demand a of two or more for effective deployment, extending against personnel or light vehicles. Examples include heavy machine guns for area suppression, hand-held launchers for projection, portable anti-tank and anti-aircraft systems like recoilless rifles, and mortars under 100 mm caliber for . These distinctions arise from operational requirements, with prioritizing mobility and light weapons balancing portability against enhanced lethality. In , SALW constitute the foundational tools of ground forces, enabling to seize, hold, and maneuver terrain through , , and defensive postures against armored advances. Their ubiquity—over one billion firearms worldwide, with 85% in civilian possession—amplifies their strategic weight, as low production costs (often under $500 per unit for basic rifles) and simple sustain prolonged engagements. SALW inflict the preponderance of battlefield , outpacing heavier ; in modern conflicts, they account for roughly 90% of civilian deaths and contribute to over 260,000 annual global fatalities from intentional as of 2021. exacerbates conflict duration and intensity, as illicit transfers empower non-state actors and undermine ceasefires, with empirical data linking SALW stockpiles to elevated rates in unstable regions.

Explosive and Kinetic Ordnance

Explosive ordnance refers to munitions containing chemical explosives designed to produce destructive effects through rapid expansion of gases, generating blast waves, fragmentation, or shaped-charge penetration upon initiation. These include projectiles, aerial bombs, grenades, mortars, and land/sea mines that are primed, fused, or armed for detonation via impact, , time delay, or command. Protocol V to the defines explosive ordnance as such devices prepared for use in armed conflict, with unexploded variants remaining hazardous as remnants of war. Common explosive fillers encompass trinitrotoluene () for its stability and , cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine () or hexogen for higher , and mixtures like (59.5% , 39.5% , 1% wax) for balanced performance in shells and bombs. In conventional operations, these munitions enable area suppression, breaching, or anti-personnel effects, though their reliability varies; failure rates of 10-40% in some conflicts contribute to post-combat contamination. Kinetic ordnance consists of non-explosive projectiles that derive lethality exclusively from , calculated as one-half mass times velocity squared, to defeat targets through direct impact, erosion, or spalling without . These are typically solid, high-density rods or cores—often of or —launched from guns, rifles, or experimental rail systems, prioritizing velocity (commonly 1,200-1,800 m/s for tank-fired variants) and for armor penetration. Unlike explosive types, kinetic avoids fuzing complexities, reducing dud rates but limiting effects to the impact locus without or radius; effectiveness scales with target hardness, excelling against composite or reactive armors via hydrodynamic penetration principles where projectile and armor behave as fluids under extreme stress. Examples include armor-piercing discarding sabot (APDS) and fin-stabilized (APFSDS) rounds employed in main battle tanks, such as those using for self-sharpening properties during impact. The categorical divide emphasizes causal mechanisms: explosive ordnance amplifies initial kinetic input via deflagration to detonation transitions, yielding energies orders of magnitude beyond the projectile's inertial contribution, whereas kinetic ordnance adheres strictly to Newtonian mechanics, demanding precise mass-velocity optimization for . This renders explosive variants versatile for soft targets or volume fire but vulnerable to countermeasures like electronic jamming of fuzes, while kinetic types offer reliability in environments at the cost of reduced multi-role utility. Both categories form core elements of conventional firepower, with explosive dominating and kinetic prevailing in direct anti-armor engagements.

Vehicular and Platform-Based Systems

Vehicular and platform-based systems integrate mobility, armor, and direct or indirect firepower to enable , distinguishing them from standalone by emphasizing crew survivability and operational persistence in contested environments. These platforms span ground vehicles optimized for breakthrough and support roles, aerial assets for precision strikes and , and maritime vessels for sea control and littoral operations, all relying on kinetic and explosive effects rather than mass destruction. Development prioritizes balancing protection against conventional threats—like armor-piercing rounds or anti-tank guided missiles—with systems for cross-terrain or high-speed transit, as evidenced by tracked on land platforms that distribute weight over uneven surfaces for during fire-on-the-move scenarios. Ground systems form the backbone of armored maneuver, with main battle tanks (MBTs) exemplifying heavy direct-fire capabilities through composite armor and stabilized high-velocity guns. The M1 Abrams MBT employs a 120 mm smoothbore gun firing armor-piercing fin-stabilized discarding sabot (APFSDS) rounds at velocities exceeding 1,500 m/s, paired with a 1,500 hp gas turbine engine enabling speeds up to 67 km/h despite a combat weight of approximately 66 metric tons. Comparable platforms include the German Leopard 2, powered by a 1,500 hp MTU diesel engine and armed with a 120 mm L55 gun for enhanced penetration, and the Russian T-90, lighter at around 46.5 metric tons with a 125 mm smoothbore gun and diesel propulsion for better fuel efficiency in extended operations. Infantry fighting vehicles (IFVs), such as those derived from BMP or Bradley designs, augment troop transport with 25-30 mm autocannons and provision for dismounted infantry engagement, offering greater firepower than armored personnel carriers (APCs) which focus on protected mobility with machine guns under 20 mm caliber. Self-propelled artillery, like variants mounting 155 mm howitzers on tracked hulls, delivers sustained indirect fire while maintaining pace with mechanized units, with ranges typically exceeding 30 km using base-bleed or rocket-assisted projectiles. Aerial platforms extend conventional weapon reach through speed and standoff, with dedicated emphasizing loiter time and survivability over air superiority. The A-10 Thunderbolt II, fielded since 1977, centers on a 30 mm GAU-8 seven-barrel firing rounds at 3,900 rpm to defeat light armor, supplemented by hardpoints for unguided bombs and rockets in roles. Multirole fighters like the F-16, operational since 1978 with over 2,000 units in service as of 2025, adapt air-to-air configurations for ground attack via 20 mm cannons and precision-guided munitions, achieving versatility across theaters. Rotary-wing assets, including AH-64 Apache variants, provide hovering precision with 30 mm chain guns, missiles, and 70 mm rockets, enabling low-altitude suppression in dynamic battlespaces. Maritime platforms leverage displacement hulls for sustained presence, mounting gun systems for anti-surface and shore bombardment amid missile-dominant arsenals. Destroyers and frigates typically feature 127 mm (5-inch) dual-purpose guns, such as the Mk 45 Mod 4, with automated loading for rates up to 20 rounds per minute and effective ranges of 24 km against surface targets using high-explosive or guided projectiles. Close-in weapon systems like the , integrating a 20 mm M61A1 Vulcan , autonomously engage incoming threats at 4,500 rpm, serving as terminal defense on platforms including Arleigh Burke-class destroyers. These systems underscore causal trade-offs in naval design, where gun caliber limits yield to volume fire for saturation effects against small boats or drones.

Guided and Unguided Missiles

Guided missiles are unmanned, self-propelled projectiles equipped with onboard or external systems to actively alter their flight path during transit, enabling precise targeting through mechanisms such as inertial guidance, GPS, homing, or designation. This distinguishes them from unguided variants, which lack corrective controls and rely solely on initial launch , , and ballistic physics for trajectory, resulting in dispersion patterns suitable primarily for rather than point targets. In conventional applications, both types carry non-nuclear warheads—typically high-explosive, fragmentation, or penetrator payloads—but guided systems prioritize accuracy to minimize unintended effects, while unguided rockets emphasize volume fire for suppression. Unguided missiles, often designated as rockets in military nomenclature, include systems like the U.S. 2.75-inch (70 mm) Hydra series, which deliver unguided high-explosive warheads from aircraft or helicopters against ground or surface targets without trajectory adjustments post-launch. The Soviet-designed BM-21 Grad multiple launch rocket system (MLRS), introduced in 1963, fires salvos of 122 mm unguided rockets from 40 tubes, achieving maximum ranges of 20-40 km depending on propellant variants, with a circular error probable (CEP) of approximately 200-500 meters at full range due to aerodynamic and environmental factors. Such weapons excel in rapid, high-volume barrages for counter-battery fire or infantry suppression but incur high collateral risks from inaccuracy, as evidenced by their use in conflicts like the 1973 Yom Kippur War where Grad rockets caused widespread area devastation. Guided missiles are categorized by launch platform and target type under frameworks like the U.S. Tri-Service designation system, including air-to-air interceptors (e.g., with for beyond-visual-range engagements), surface-to-air defenses (e.g., using guidance for anti-aircraft roles), and surface-to-surface cruise missiles. The BGM-109 land-attack variant, operational since 1983, exemplifies long-range precision with turbofan propulsion sustaining subsonic flight over 1,000-2,500 km, employing digital scene matching area correlator (DSMAC) and GPS for terminal accuracy within 10 meters CEP, paired with a 454-1,000 kg unitary conventional warhead. Anti-ship guided missiles, such as the , use active radar seekers to home on maritime targets at ranges up to 124 km, enhancing naval strike capabilities against conventional threats. Technologically, guidance integration in conventional missiles has evolved from wire-guided systems in early anti-tank models like the TOW (operational since 1970, with semiautomatic command line-of-sight control) to fire-and-forget infrared homing in man-portable air-defense systems (MANPADS) such as the FIM-92 Stinger, which lock onto heat signatures for short-range intercepts up to 8 km. Unguided counterparts, by contrast, remain cost-effective for massed fires—Hydra rockets cost under $1,000 per unit versus millions for advanced guided munitions—but their uncorrectable errors amplify in contested environments with wind or electronic interference. Both categories propel via solid-fuel rockets or jet engines, but guided designs often incorporate sustained-thrust air-breathing engines for loitering or evasion, underscoring their role in precision conventional operations over indiscriminate rocketry.

Technological Features

Propulsion and Materials Science

Conventional weapons rely on chemical systems, primarily solid-fuel rockets for missiles and artillery shells, where propellants like composites generate through rapid gas expansion in confined chambers. Liquid bipropellants, such as and used in some tactical missiles like the , offer higher but require complex storage and ignition mechanisms, limiting their use in unguided munitions. and engines, employed in advanced cruise missiles like the , enable sustained supersonic speeds by compressing incoming air for combustion, achieving ranges exceeding 300 km without onboard oxidizers. These systems prioritize reliability over efficiency, as evidenced by the U.S. Tomahawk's , which uses JP-10 fuel for over 1,000 nautical miles of loiter capability. Gun propulsion in and employs deflagrating propellants, typically nitrocellulose-based smokeless powders, which burn at 2,000-3,000 m/s to produce muzzle velocities up to 1,200 m/s in rifled barrels. Electrothermal-chemical guns, tested by the U.S. Army in the 1990s, augment traditional propellants with plasma arcs to increase by 50%, though scalability issues have confined them to prototypes. Railguns, leveraging from electromagnetic rails, propel projectiles at 2,500 m/s using stores, as demonstrated in U.S. trials reaching 200 nautical miles, but material erosion limits operational viability. Materials science advancements emphasize high-strength alloys and composites to withstand extreme pressures and temperatures. (DU) alloys, with 0.7% additives, provide self-sharpening penetrators in rounds, achieving armor penetration depths 1.5 times greater than due to adiabatic shear banding. like dominate construction in missiles for their 900 MPa yield strength and corrosion resistance, reducing weight by 40% compared to steel. (CFRP) in modern warheads offer a strength-to-weight superior to aluminum, enabling lighter casings that fragment more effectively upon , as in the GMLRS rocket's . Explosive fillers drive material innovations, with polymer-bonded explosives (PBX) like PBXN-110 incorporating crystals in matrices for insensitivity to shock, reducing accidental risks by 70% in handling tests. Additive has enabled of complex geometries, such as nozzles for solid rocket motors, cutting production times from months to weeks while maintaining 1,500°C thermal tolerance. However, supply chain vulnerabilities in rare earths for advanced ceramics highlight dependencies, as seen in U.S. assessments of materials requiring hafnium-carbide coatings for 2,000°C reentry .

Targeting and Precision Enhancements

Precision enhancements in targeting have transformed operational effectiveness by integrating guidance technologies that correct trajectories mid-flight, achieving circular error probables (CEPs) of less than 3 meters in modern systems compared to hundreds of meters for unguided munitions. Early efforts in the focused on radio-guided glide bombs tested by the U.S. Army Air Corps, yielding accuracies around 1,200 feet, though limited by rudimentary electronics and vulnerability to interference. These laid groundwork for subsequent homing and , emphasizing causal factors like reliability and environmental resilience over volume fire. Laser guidance marked a pivotal advancement, enabling semi-active homing via ground- or air-designated targets. The I system, introduced in 1968 during the , achieved a 50% hit rate initially, improving to 61% direct hits by 1969, with over 20,000 units dropped and CEPs as low as 25 feet in clear conditions. II, refined in the 1970s with folding fins and enhanced seekers, delivered 6-meter CEPs in optimal weather, though susceptible to obscurants like clouds or smoke. This technology's empirical success—evidenced by 10,500 laser-guided bombs used in 1972 operations, yielding thousands of direct hits—demonstrated reduced requirements and collateral risks relative to unguided bombing. Satellite-aided inertial navigation systems (INS) addressed laser's weather dependencies, fusing with onboard gyroscopes for all-weather precision. The (JDAM), a tail-kit retrofit for unguided bombs, became operational in , achieving a 4-meter CEP in its 1999 debut and enabling 95% success rates in contested environments like Operation Allied Force. Over 371,000 kits have been produced since, with ranges up to 13 nautical miles, prioritizing jam-resistant receivers and multi-mode fallbacks. Inertial enhancements alone, as in cruise missiles like the (service entry 1980s), provide autonomous mid-course corrections via accelerometers, maintaining accuracy to 10 meters even without GPS lock. Artillery precision has similarly evolved with GPS/INS-guided projectiles like the M982 Excalibur 155mm shell, developed in the early 2000s for first-round effects at ranges exceeding 40 kilometers. It reduces CEP to approximately 2 meters from unguided baselines of 267 meters, enabling close-support fires within 75-150 meters of friendly forces while minimizing dispersion errors from barrel wear or propellant variability. Hybrid systems combining laser, GPS, and INS—such as in upgraded Paveway IV or Hellfire missiles (1982 introduction, 4.3-nautical-mile range)—further enhance terminal guidance against moving targets, with infrared seekers for low-signature acquisition. Ongoing enhancements emphasize and resilience, integrating electro-optical/infrared (EO/IR) for terminal homing with data links for man-in-the-loop overrides, as in the (1980s). These mitigate jamming via inertial backups and multi-frequency GPS, empirically validated in operations like Desert Storm (1991), where PGMs constituted 6% of munitions but destroyed 50% of high-value targets. Such integrations reflect first-principles prioritization of verifiable hit probabilities over raw payload, though vulnerabilities like GPS denial underscore reliance on diverse, empirically tested modalities.

Integration with Electronics and AI

Electronics have been integrated into conventional weapons primarily through guidance, navigation, and control systems that enhance accuracy and reduce collateral damage compared to unguided ordnance. The (JDAM), developed by and fielded by the U.S. since 1998, exemplifies this by retrofitting unguided free-fall bombs with a tail kit incorporating GPS-aided inertial navigation systems (INS), enabling all-weather precision strikes with a (CEP) of approximately 5 meters. Similar electronic upgrades appear in artillery projectiles and missiles, where onboard computers process sensor data from accelerometers, gyroscopes, and satellite signals to correct trajectories in , as seen in systems like the U.S. Army's integration of capabilities into armored platforms for maneuverable battlefield effects. These integrations rely on trusted integrated circuits hardened against tampering or failure, a focus of DARPA's efforts to secure military electronics supply chains. Further advancements incorporate countermeasures and multi-sensor , allowing weapons to operate in contested electromagnetic environments. For instance, precision-guided munitions (PGMs) employ inertial-based and chip-scale clocks as backups to GPS, mitigating vulnerabilities observed in conflicts like , where Russian has disrupted JDAM performance. Integrated systems on naval and ground platforms fuse , , and communication sensors to enable defensive responses, such as automated or deployment, without interfering with primary weapon functions. However, these systems remain susceptible to adversarial attacks, underscoring the need for resilient hardware designs over software alone. Artificial intelligence augments these electronic foundations by enabling adaptive targeting and decision support in conventional munitions, though full autonomy in lethal engagements is constrained by policy and technical limitations. U.S. Department of Defense Directive 3000.09, updated in 2023, mandates that autonomous and semi-autonomous weapon systems incorporate appropriate human judgment for decisions involving lethal force, while permitting AI for non-lethal functions like target identification via machine learning algorithms trained on imagery data. In practice, AI enhances PGMs through real-time data processing for sub-meter accuracy, as in smart ammunition with embedded sensors for GPS-independent tracking and adaptive guidance against electronic countermeasures. Examples include loitering munitions, such as those deployed in Ukraine and Gaza, where onboard AI enables persistent surveillance, target discrimination, and strike optimization without constant human input, though operators retain veto authority to align with international humanitarian law. AI-driven systems also support swarm tactics in drones, using algorithms for coordinated navigation and threat prioritization, but empirical tests reveal challenges like algorithmic brittleness in novel environments, limiting deployment to supervised roles. Despite hype, AI integration has not supplanted human oversight in conventional weapons, as policies prioritize accountability and verifiable performance over unchecked delegation.

Strategic and Operational Roles

Deterrence and National Defense

Conventional weapons form a critical component of deterrence strategies by enabling states to impose high costs on potential through credible denial capabilities, making or limited militarily unviable without resorting to escalation. Unlike arsenals, which primarily deter via threats, conventional forces emphasize forward-deployed assets, rapid response units, and integrated air-land-sea operations to signal resolve and , thereby discouraging attacks by demonstrating that gains would be offset by proportional or greater losses. This approach aligns with first-principles of rational in , where adversaries weigh expected utility against risks of attrition and logistical overextension. In national defense frameworks, such as the U.S. Department of Defense's 2018 National Defense Strategy, conventional forces underpin the mission to deter aggression and secure national interests by maintaining combat-credible militaries capable of prevailing in high-intensity conflicts against peer competitors like China and Russia. The strategy prioritizes investments in advanced conventional systems— including precision-guided munitions, armored brigades, and carrier strike groups—to ensure layered defenses that protect homeland territories, sea lanes, and allies without immediate nuclear reliance. Empirical analyses indicate that robust conventional postures, such as NATO's pre-2022 deployment of multinational battlegroups in the Baltic states and Poland (totaling around 10,000 troops by 2021), have contributed to deterring direct Russian incursions into alliance territory following the 2014 annexation of Crimea, as evidenced by Moscow's restraint despite rhetorical threats. The effectiveness of conventional deterrence is supported by historical precedents, including the Cold War-era conventional balance in , where NATO's superior airpower and armored divisions (e.g., over 4,000 tanks in by the 1980s) deterred advances without triggering nuclear exchange, as aggressors anticipated unsustainable casualties from prolonged . Modern enhancements, such as hypersonic conventional missiles and AI-integrated targeting, further bolster this by blurring lines with strategic weapons, potentially raising escalation thresholds for adversaries while preserving usability in sub-nuclear scenarios. However, success hinges on sustained readiness and alliance cohesion; lapses, as critiqued in assessments, can invite miscalculation if perceived as bluffing. In asymmetric contexts, conventional superiority also deters non-state actors by enabling precise, overwhelming responses that degrade terrorist infrastructures, as seen in U.S. operations against ISIS using conventional airstrikes and from 2014 onward, which inflicted over 80,000 enemy casualties by 2019.

Offensive and Defensive Tactics

Offensive tactics in prioritize disrupting enemy formations through integrated maneuver, concentrated fires, and rapid tempo to seize initiative and achieve decisive results. U.S. Marine Corps , as outlined in MCWP 3-01 published on September 20, 2019, stresses principles such as , , and relentless pressure, focusing operations on the enemy rather than fixed terrain to shatter cohesion and exploit vulnerabilities. Key forms of maneuver include , which applies overwhelming combat power on a narrow front to rupture defenses for subsequent ; , maneuvering around flanks to attack rear areas and isolate forces; and infiltration, using small, covert units to bypass strongpoints and create internal disruptions. These tactics rely on integration, synchronizing , , and assaults with suppressive fires to mass effects at critical points, often supported by for vertical via . A prominent historical application occurred during the German invasion of France starting May 10, 1940, where tactics employed concentrated panzer divisions—totaling around 2,500 tanks—spearheaded by armored breakthroughs through the Ardennes Forest, coordinated with dive-bombers and to paralyze French command and achieve speeds of up to 50 kilometers per day, culminating in the French armistice on June 22, 1940. Such operations underscore the causal role of mobility and synchronized firepower in conventional offensives, enabling attackers to outpace defensive responses and collapse enemy lines before reserves can consolidate. Defensive tactics in conventional warfare aim to attrit advancing forces, deny objectives, and preserve combat potential for counteroffensives, leveraging depth, , and obstacles to canalize and destroy attackers. MCWP 3-01 advocates flexibility, mutual support among positions, and massed fires at engagement areas, with preparations emphasizing countermobility measures like minefields and barriers integrated with antiarmor weapons and . Primary forms include area defense, which uses fortified positions and interlocking fires to hold in depth; mobile defense, committing reserves for decisive counterattacks to target disrupted enemies; and retrograde operations, such as delays or withdrawals, to trade space for time while inflicting maximum casualties. elements, including screens and guards, provide early warning and fix threats, enabling final protective fires to blunt assaults. During the 1973 , Egyptian defensive tactics east of the exemplified effective use of antitank guided missiles, deploying over 1,000 AT-3 Sagger wire-guided systems alongside launchers and in layered positions, which destroyed approximately 500 Israeli tanks in the initial phase starting October 6, 1973, stalling armored thrusts and demonstrating how precision conventional weapons can shift tactical advantages to defenders against superior mobility. This approach highlighted the empirical dominance of integrated, standoff antiarmor fires in negating offensive momentum, forcing attackers to disperse and expose flanks.

Integration in Asymmetric Warfare

In asymmetric warfare, non-state actors and weaker militaries integrate —such as , rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs), and improvised explosive devices (IEDs) constructed from scavenged shells or commercial explosives—into guerrilla tactics to exploit vulnerabilities in superior adversaries' forces, emphasizing mobility, surprise, and attrition over direct confrontation. These weapons enable low-cost, high-impact operations that avoid symmetric engagements where technological disparities would prove decisive, allowing insurgents to impose persistent costs on occupation forces through ambushes, roadside attacks, and supply line disruptions. For instance, guerrilla strategies historically prioritize light, portable conventional arms to conduct hit-and-run raids, undermining enemy morale and without requiring sustained territorial control. In the insurgency following the U.S.-led , IEDs emerged as a pivotal conventional weapon , for a significant portion of coalition casualties by targeting armored convoys with buried or vehicle-borne explosives derived from surplus munitions. Between and 2009, IED attacks caused over 60% of U.S. fatalities at their peak, demonstrating how insurgents leveraged readily available conventional ordnance to negate advanced vehicle armor and force protective measures, thereby prolonging the conflict despite overwhelming U.S. air and precision strike superiority. Similarly, in from 2001 onward, fighters employed launchers—Soviet-era conventional anti-tank weapons smuggled or captured—to ambush patrols, exploiting terrain for close-range hits that evaded aerial surveillance and inflicted disproportionate losses relative to the weapons' simplicity and cost. Small arms, including assault rifles like the , form the backbone of asymmetric integration, providing insurgents with reliable firepower for urban skirmishes and rural ambushes where numerical inferiority demands rapid disengagement. These weapons' ubiquity, durability, and ease of concealment facilitate sustained operations by irregular forces, as seen in both and , where they complemented IEDs and RPGs to create layered threats that eroded conventional armies' operational tempo. Such adaptations highlight the causal role of in amplifying asymmetric advantages, as cheaper, proliferated systems counterbalance high-end defenses, compelling stronger powers to invest heavily in countermeasures like mine-resistant vehicles without fully eliminating the threat.

Regulatory Frameworks

International Treaties and Protocols

The Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects (CCW) was adopted on October 10, 1980, in and entered into force on December 2, 1983. It seeks to prohibit or restrict weapons causing superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering to combatants or indiscriminate effects on civilians, with 128 states parties as of 2023. The framework includes five protocols: Protocol I bans non-detectable fragments; Protocol II (amended in 1996) restricts land mines, booby traps, and other devices, requiring precautions against civilian harm and post-conflict clearance; Protocol III limits incendiary weapons, prohibiting attacks on civilians; Protocol IV bans blinding weapons; and Protocol V, added in 2003 and effective from 2006, addresses clearance and risk reduction of explosive remnants of war. Separate but related instruments address specific conventional weapons outside the core CCW structure. The 1997 Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on Their Destruction (Ottawa Treaty) bans anti-personnel landmines entirely, with over 160 states parties, though major powers like the United States, Russia, and China remain non-signatories. The 2008 Convention on Cluster Munitions prohibits cluster munitions due to their indiscriminate effects, ratified by 112 states as of 2023, excluding key producers and users such as the United States and Russia. The (ATT), adopted by the on April 2, 2013, and entered into force on December 24, 2014, regulates the international trade in conventional arms to prevent abuses and illicit transfers. It covers eight categories of major conventional arms—battle tanks, armored combat vehicles, large-caliber , combat aircraft, attack helicopters, warships, missiles, and small arms/light weapons—requiring exporting states to assess risks of , , or violations of before authorizing transfers. As of 2023, it has 113 states parties, but non-participation by major exporters like the , , and limits its enforcement scope. These instruments complement broader under the but face challenges in universal adherence and verification, with non-signatories often citing national security needs over restrictive protocols.

National Export Controls

In the United States, exports of conventional weapons are primarily governed by the of 1976, which authorizes presidential control over defense articles and services to advance foreign policy and national security objectives. The Department of State administers the (ITAR), requiring licenses for items on the (USML), encompassing categories such as firearms, , combat vehicles, and —key conventional armaments. The Bureau of Industry and Security under the Department of Commerce oversees the (EAR) for dual-use goods with potential military applications, though most pure conventional weapons remain under ITAR jurisdiction, with mandatory end-user certifications and congressional notifications for major sales exceeding specified thresholds. European Union member states implement national export controls aligned with the 2008 Common Position on arms exports, which mandates assessment against eight criteria, including risks of violations, internal repression, or diversion to unauthorized ends in the recipient country. Each state maintains its own licensing authority; for instance, Germany's Federal Office for Economic Affairs and evaluates applications for items on the EU Common Military List, denying exports where overriding risks exist. In the , post-Brexit controls under the Export Control Act 2002 and consolidated criteria require licenses for military equipment, with annual reports detailing refusals—over 100 licenses revoked in 2023 due to emerging risks in destinations like . Russia's regime, managed by the Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation, separates conventional arms policy from dual-use goods under Federal Law No. 183-FZ on Export Controls, requiring presidential and governmental approval for all export contracts to ensure alignment with national interests. Exports, which constituted 16% of global major conventional arms deliveries from 2019-2023, prioritize strategic allies like India and Algeria, with less emphasis on humanitarian criteria compared to Western systems. In China, the 2020 Export Control Law establishes a unified framework for military products, including conventional weapons, with the State Council compiling control lists and ministries issuing licenses to curb illicit trade and mitigate risks, though state-owned firms dominate transfers—accounting for 5.8% of global exports in 2019-2023, often to developing nations without stringent end-use transparency. Emerging exporters like regulate via the Special Chemicals, Organisms, Materials, Equipment, and Technologies (SCOMET) list under the , with defense exports needing clearance, reflecting a shift toward amid 2024 exports valued at $2.63 billion, primarily missiles and radars to allied states. These national systems vary in rigor and transparency, often influenced by geopolitical priorities, with Western controls incorporating multilateral guidelines like the while others focus on bilateral ties and economic gains.

Verification and Compliance Mechanisms

Verification and compliance for primarily rely on voluntary measures, national licensing, and information-sharing arrangements rather than mandatory inspections, due to the decentralized nature of production and trade in non-prohibited arms. Unlike nuclear or chemical weapons regimes, which feature dedicated verification bodies like the , conventional arms controls emphasize self-reporting and peer oversight to build confidence and deter illicit transfers. The Register of Conventional Arms (UNROCA), established by UN Resolution 46/36 L in 1991, serves as a key transparency tool, requiring annual voluntary reports on imports and exports of seven categories of major conventional arms, including battle tanks, armored combat vehicles, large-caliber , combat aircraft, attack helicopters, warships, and missiles or missile launchers. As of 2023, participation remains inconsistent, with only about 50-60 states submitting reports annually out of 193 UN members, often with incomplete data on or actual deliveries, limiting its effectiveness in verifying compliance or detecting discrepancies. Under the (ATT), which entered into force on December 24, 2014, and has 113 states parties as of 2023, states must establish national control systems including risk assessments for exports to prevent diversions or uses in violations, with annual reporting on transfers and implementation to a secretariat. Compliance is monitored through voluntary submissions and working group reviews, but lacks coercive mechanisms; non-compliance is addressed via diplomatic pressure or suspension of participation rather than penalties, with only 70 states submitting initial reports by 2020. End-use monitoring, such as certificates and post-export verification visits, is recommended but implemented variably at the national level. The on Export Controls for Conventional Arms and Dual-Use Goods and Technologies, formed in 1996 with 42 participating states, facilitates information exchange on controlled transfers twice yearly and promotes harmonized licensing criteria, including end-user assurances and denial notifications to prevent . Verification occurs domestically through export license reviews and occasional post-shipment checks, but the arrangement imposes no binding obligations or independent audits, relying instead on mutual trust and national intelligence to address potential evasions. Challenges to effective verification include underreporting, forged end-use documentation, and the difficulty of monitoring secondary markets or diversions to non-state actors, as evidenced by discrepancies between reported transfers and battlefield observations in conflicts like those in and . National agencies, such as the U.S. Bureau of Arms Control, Verification and Compliance, supplement international efforts with bilateral monitoring and sanctions enforcement, but global compliance remains fragmented without universal adherence or intrusive verification protocols.

Controversies and Criticisms

Proliferation Risks and Illicit Trade

The proliferation of conventional weapons, particularly small arms and light weapons (SALW), poses significant risks due to their widespread availability, low production costs, and ease of smuggling, enabling non-state actors such as terrorist groups and criminal organizations to acquire them for insurgencies and organized violence. Unlike weapons of mass destruction, which face stringent international regimes, conventional arms lack equivalent barriers, resulting in diversion from legal stockpiles in conflict zones—such as Libya and Syria—to illicit markets across Africa and the Middle East, where they exacerbate instability and undermine arms embargoes. Advanced conventional weapons, including precision-guided munitions, amplify these dangers when proliferated to unstable regimes or proxies, potentially shifting regional power balances and escalating conflicts through enhanced lethality without nuclear thresholds. Illicit trade in conventional arms operates through diversion from licit exports, looting of government arsenals, and underground manufacturing, with smuggling routes spanning porous borders in regions like the and . Global estimates indicate that illicit transactions constitute approximately 20% of the total arms market by value, fueled by , weak export controls, and demand from armed groups. Data from 81 member states recorded 5,676 unique illicit weapon cases involving 11,175 seizures in 2022 and 2023, predominantly SALW trafficked via container shipping, air cargo, and overland convoys, highlighting underreporting and the challenges of tracing origins amid falsified documentation. These dynamics contribute to sustained , with SALW responsible for the majority of direct deaths—estimated at over 250,000 annually in the early 2020s—by empowering asymmetric threats that evade monopolies on force. Proliferation risks are compounded by technological adaptations, such as 3D-printed components bypassing traditional supply chains, and geopolitical disruptions like the , which have increased diversion incidents from Eastern European stockpiles to black markets. Despite international frameworks like the UN Programme of Action, enforcement gaps persist, as evidenced by declining participation in the UN Register of Conventional Arms, dropping to 65 states in 2024 from 74 in 2023, allowing illicit flows to evade .

Humanitarian and Ethical Debates

Conventional weapons, while regulated under to distinguish between combatants and civilians and to ensure proportionality in attacks, have sparked debates over their inherent potential for widespread civilian harm in densely populated or urban environments. Empirical data from conflicts such as the (2011–present), where conventional artillery and airstrikes accounted for over 90% of documented civilian casualties according to the Syrian Network for Human Rights, underscore concerns that even precision-guided munitions fail to eliminate when used en masse. Critics, including the International Committee of the Red Cross, argue that the scale of explosive remnants and from conventional bombings exacerbates post-conflict suffering, with millions affected annually by injuries or displacement, as reported in UN Mine Action Service data from 2023 showing over 5,000 civilian casualties from such remnants globally. Ethically, posits that conventional arms must adhere to jus in bello principles, prohibiting superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering, yet proponents of stricter controls contend that weapons like cluster munitions—deployed in over 20 conflicts since 2010 per —violate these by leaving high-failure-rate submunitions that indiscriminately endanger non-combatants long after hostilities cease. The 1980 (CCW) protocols have banned or restricted specific types, such as blinding laser weapons (Protocol IV, 1995) and incendiary munitions in civilian areas (, 1980), reflecting consensus on mitigating inherent cruelties, though non-signatories like and the highlight enforcement gaps. Philosophers like emphasize that while conventional weapons enable defensive necessity, their proliferation risks moral erosion when supplied to authoritarian regimes, as seen in Yemen's conflict where Saudi-led coalition imports fueled over 17,000 civilian deaths from airstrikes between 2015 and 2022, per the Yemen Data Project. Counterarguments rooted in realist ethics assert that demonizing conventional arms overlooks their role in deterrence and proportionate response to , where alternatives like invite greater atrocities; for instance, NATO's 1999 Kosovo campaign, criticized for 500 civilian deaths, arguably averted on a scale seen in Srebrenica (1995), saving thousands per post-war analyses. Nonetheless, investment and trade ethics debates intensify scrutiny, with reports from Ploughshares Institute in 2025 linking conventional arms exports—valued at $100 billion annually by SIPRI—to sustained cycles of violence in fragile states, prompting calls for akin to anti-landmine campaigns, though such measures risk unilateral disadvantages for democratic nations. These tensions reveal no inherent immorality in the weapons themselves but in their deployment and distribution, demanding rigorous adherence to verifiable targeting protocols to align with causal accountability in warfare.

Geopolitical Disparities in Regulation

The regulation of conventional weapons exhibits significant geopolitical disparities, primarily along lines of alliance structures, economic interests, and strategic priorities, resulting in uneven global standards. Western-led multilateral frameworks, such as the (ATT) adopted in 2013 and entered into force on December 24, 2014, have achieved 116 ratifications as of 2023, predominantly among European states, Latin American countries, and some African nations, but major exporters including the (which signed but did not ratify), , and remain non-parties. This exclusion of key producers—accounting for over 60% of global arms exports between 2019 and 2023—undermines the treaty's aim to establish binding criteria for preventing transfers that risk violations or conflict escalation, as non-signatories face no legal obligations under the ATT. Russia's rejection stems from concerns over and potential restrictions on exports to allies, while China has criticized the treaty as selectively enforced by Western powers to constrain competitors. The , established in 1996 as a voluntary regime for conventional arms and dual-use goods, further highlights these divides, with 42 participating states—largely members and aligned democracies like and —committing to deny licenses for transfers to non-members that could undermine regional stability. Non-participants such as , , and operate outside these transparency and restraint norms, enabling unrestricted sales; for instance, accounted for 5.8% of global conventional arms exports from 2019 to 2023, often to recipients shunned by Wassenaar adherents, including and African states embroiled in insurgencies. Russia's participation was suspended following its 2022 invasion of , exacerbating asymmetries, as continued exports to and Wagner Group-linked entities in Africa without Wassenaar reporting requirements. These gaps allow revisionist actors to sustain military supply chains, while participating states self-impose economic costs through forgoing lucrative deals, as evidenced by U.S. denials of over 1,000 export licenses to annually under tightened bilateral controls since 2018. Domestic and regional variations compound international disparities, particularly in (SALW), where Western nations enforce stringent licensing and traceability—such as the European Union's 2008 directive mandating end-user certificates—contrasting with lax oversight in parts of the , , and . The Programme of Action on SALW, adopted in 2001, relies on voluntary national reports, but compliance is inconsistent; over 90% of illicit SALW flows originate from unregulated stockpiles in non-Western states, fueling conflicts in and , whereas countries report near-total accountability through integrated databases. Geopolitically, this enables state and non-state actors in adversarial spheres to acquire weapons via gray markets, bypassing controls that bind U.S. and EU exporters; for example, Iran's procurement of Chinese and Russian evades ATT-like scrutiny, sustaining proxy operations against and . Such imbalances reflect causal realities of power competition, where universalist regulatory ideals falter against national security imperatives, prompting calls for reciprocal enforcement but yielding limited progress amid mutual distrust.

Emerging Concerns with Autonomy

Autonomous features in , such as AI-driven targeting and decision-making in and loitering munitions, have raised apprehensions regarding the delegation of lethal force to machines without sufficient human oversight. These systems, including Turkey's Kargu-2 deployed in in 2021, exemplify the shift toward weapons capable of independently selecting and engaging targets, prompting debates on compliance with (IHL). Critics argue that such autonomy undermines the principles of distinction and under IHL, as algorithms may fail to accurately discriminate between combatants and civilians in environments, potentially leading to erroneous strikes. A primary concern is the accountability gap, where attributing responsibility for autonomous decisions becomes challenging amid opaque AI processes. Legal scholars and organizations like the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) highlight that programmers or commanders may evade culpability if machines exhibit unpredictable behavior due to adaptations, complicating post-conflict investigations. This issue is compounded by technical vulnerabilities, including susceptibility to adversarial attacks or software flaws, which could cause unintended escalations; for instance, simulated interactions have demonstrated rapid, uncontrollable proliferations of engagements. Empirical data from military exercises indicate error rates in AI target recognition exceeding 20% in cluttered urban settings, raising doubts about reliability without human intervention. Proliferation risks amplify these dangers, as autonomous systems lower technical barriers for non-state actors, enabling groups like to repurpose commercial drones for swarming tactics observed in Syria and Iraq since 2016. Unlike manned systems requiring skilled pilots, these weapons can be mass-produced cheaply—loitering munitions costing under $20,000 per unit—and deployed by minimally trained operatives, facilitating diffusion to rogue entities. Geopolitical tensions exacerbate an , with reports indicating over 30 countries, including and , accelerating development, potentially outpacing regulatory efforts and heightening escalation risks through hair-trigger autonomous responses. International forums reflect these tensions, with the UN Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) Group of Governmental Experts (GGE) on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS) convening annually but failing to produce binding norms as of 2025, due to disagreements among major powers favoring human oversight over outright bans. The UN General Assembly's December 2024 resolution, supported by 161 states, urged expanded discussions on meaningful human control, yet abstentions by the , , and others underscore enforcement challenges. UN Secretary-General reiterated calls for a global prohibition in May 2025, citing risks to human dignity and stability, though proponents of autonomy counter that it enhances precision and reduces operator fatigue in prolonged conflicts like , where AI-assisted munitions have minimized compared to unguided . Despite these arguments, the absence of verifiable testing standards for reliability persists as a core unresolved issue, with SIPRI analyses warning of degraded strategic stability in multi-domain operations.

Impacts and Comparisons

Casualty Patterns vs. WMDs

Conventional weapons have historically inflicted the overwhelming majority of war casualties, vastly outnumbering those from weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) such as nuclear, chemical, and biological arms. In World War II, the atomic bombings of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, and Nagasaki on August 9, 1945, caused an estimated 135,000 total casualties in Hiroshima (including 66,000 deaths) and 64,000 in Nagasaki (including 39,000 deaths), primarily through blast, heat, and acute radiation effects. These figures represent a fraction—less than 0.3%—of the war's overall estimated 70 to 85 million fatalities, which stemmed predominantly from conventional ordnance like artillery shells, conventional aerial bombings, tanks, and small arms in protracted ground campaigns across Europe, Asia, and the Pacific. Similarly, in , chemical agents such as , , and —deployed starting with German use of at on April 22, 1915—resulted in approximately 90,000 deaths and 1.3 million casualties among combatants, yet accounted for only about 1% of the conflict's total 16 to 20 million deaths. The bulk of fatalities arose from conventional rifle fire, machine guns, , and assaults in , with chemical effects often manifesting as non-lethal injuries like respiratory damage that strained medical resources without proportionally elevating mortality. Biological weapons saw negligible combat use in major wars, with no verified large-scale deployments yielding comparable casualty data. Post-1945, nuclear weapons have caused zero combat deaths despite proliferation, while conventional arms have driven nearly all armed conflict fatalities, including over 100,000 annually in some peak proxy wars and ongoing conflicts like those in (1955–1975, ~3.8 million total deaths) and the . Chemical weapons, restricted by the 1993 , have been sporadically used in asymmetric conflicts (e.g., Iraq's 1980s campaigns against , causing ~50,000 casualties), but these pale against conventional totals in the Iran-Iraq (~1 million deaths overall). Casualty patterns differ markedly: conventional engagements produce sustained, attrition-based losses, with and small arms causing 70-80% of battlefield deaths through and hemorrhage, often yielding higher survivor rates due to evacuable wounds and medical interventions. WMDs, by contrast, generate acute, high-density fatalities— via thermal burns and blast overpressure (up to 50% instant lethality in epicenters), chemical via asphyxiation or blistering (fatality rates 2-5% per exposure)—but their infrequency stems from risks and retaliation doctrines, limiting aggregate impact. Conventional warfare's scalability, through and repeated strikes, thus amplifies total human cost, underscoring that deterrence has constrained WMDs more effectively than conventional .

Economic Dimensions of Production

The production of demands substantial capital investment in manufacturing infrastructure, raw materials, and skilled labor, contributing to a global valued through metrics like corporate revenues and national budgets. In 2022, the world's 100 largest arms-producing and services companies generated combined revenues of $597 billion, a figure that has risen amid escalating conflicts and modernization drives, though precise allocations to conventional systems versus services remain opaque due to classified data. Unit production costs for major vary widely based on technological complexity, production volume, and national efficiencies; for example, Russia's Kalibr and Kh-101 cruise missiles incur costs ranging from $1.5 million to $5.6 million per unit, influenced by state-subsidized supply chains and wartime prioritization. Economies of scale play a critical role in cost dynamics, with high-volume producers like and achieving lower per-unit expenses through streamlined assembly and domestic sourcing, contrasting with Western systems burdened by stringent quality controls and smaller batch sizes. expanded shell output to approximately 250,000 rounds per month by 2025, leveraging converted civilian facilities to offset sanctions-induced shortages, while 's firms reported $103 billion in revenues, focusing on mass replication of , , and missiles. In the United States, production costs are elevated by advanced electronics and testing regimes; remedial investments, such as $6 billion allocated for 155mm shell factory upgrades, aim to bridge capacity gaps against peer competitors, yet reveal structural challenges in scaling output rapidly. Global military expenditure, which funds much of this production, surged to $2.718 trillion in 2024—a 9.4 percent real-term increase—predominantly directed toward conventional procurement amid conflicts like the Russia-Ukraine war. dependencies on critical materials, such as rare earth elements for guidance systems, introduce volatility; disruptions can inflate costs by 20-50 percent in affected programs, underscoring the causal link between resource security and production economics. While arms production sustains employment in sectors like and —employing millions indirectly—its opportunity costs divert resources from civilian economies, though empirical analyses of net GDP multipliers remain contested due to varying national accounting methods.

Effectiveness in Modern Conflicts

In symmetric conflicts against state adversaries, conventional weapons have demonstrated high effectiveness when integrated with advanced targeting and precision guidance systems. During the 1991 , coalition forces employed laser-guided bombs and GPS-aided munitions to destroy over 80% of Iraq's armored vehicles and units in the ground campaign phase, which lasted just 100 hours, resulting in Iraqi losses exceeding 20,000 personnel compared to fewer than 300 coalition fatalities. This showcased a qualitative advancement in conventional firepower, enabling "" from standoff distances and minimizing friendly losses through superior reconnaissance-strike complexes. The ongoing Russia-Ukraine war since 2022 further illustrates conventional weapons' potency in attritional, high-intensity engagements, particularly artillery and long-range systems. Ukrainian use of Western-supplied HIMARS rocket artillery has enabled deep strikes against Russian logistics, disrupting supply lines and contributing to territorial gains in and regions in late 2022, with each system firing precision-guided munitions that achieve hit probabilities over 90% under optimal conditions. Ground-based air defenses, such as S-300 and systems, have denied Russian air superiority, downing hundreds of fixed-wing aircraft and cruise missiles, thereby preserving ground maneuver effectiveness. However, electronic warfare countermeasures have reduced the reliability of unjammable guidance in contested environments, underscoring that effectiveness depends on layered defenses and rapid adaptation rather than standalone platforms. In asymmetric warfare against non-state actors or , conventional weapons face inherent limitations due to urban terrain, civilian intermingling, and political constraints on escalation, often requiring restraint to avoid disproportionate . Operations in and (2001–2021) revealed that while air-delivered precision munitions neutralized high-value targets with minimal on-site personnel risk, they failed to achieve strategic victory against dispersed networks, as exploited mobility and improvised explosives to impose costs exceeding 4,000 U.S. fatalities in alone despite overwhelming conventional superiority. Heavy platforms like tanks prove vulnerable to anti-tank guided missiles in close-quarters fighting, as evidenced by high attrition rates in urban battles such as (2016–2017), where coalition forces relied on infantry-supported but incurred prolonged campaigns lasting months. Overall, empirical outcomes affirm as the decisive force in modern conflicts when matched against peer forces with comparable doctrines, but their utility diminishes in irregular settings without complementary tactics, highlighting the causal primacy of force employment over raw destructive power. Advances in and information integration, as observed in , mitigate some vulnerabilities by enhancing targeting , yet proliferation of cheap countermeasures like drones continues to erode unchallenged dominance.

References

  1. [1]
    Conventional Weapons - Office for Disarmament Affairs - unrcpd
    Conventional weapons encompass a wide range of equipment, including but not limited to armoured combat vehicles, combat helicopters, combat aircraft, ...
  2. [2]
    Fact Sheet: The Basics of Nuclear Weapons
    Jul 21, 2012 · Nuclear weapons use fissionable materials to fuel an explosion, whereas conventional weapons do not. Only a relatively few radioactive materials ...
  3. [3]
    The Energy from a Nuclear Weapon - Atomic Archive
    One of the fundamental differences between a nuclear and a conventional explosion is that nuclear explosions can be many thousands (or millions) of times ...
  4. [4]
    10. Conventional arms control and the regulation of inhumane ...
    The main multilateral treaty for regulating inhumane weapons is the 1981 Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) Convention, alongside separate conventions on ...
  5. [5]
    Conventional weapons - Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade
    The Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) establishes common global standards for the international trade in conventional weapons.
  6. [6]
    Advanced Conventional Weapons - state.gov
    ACW are modern, sophisticated munitions designed for conventional warfare. The international community faces growing new threats related to the proliferation ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] 13. Conventional arms control and new weapon technologies - SIPRI
    Overview. Conventional arms control by states usually falls within one of two ... the production, trade and use of conventional weapons: the 1981 Convention.
  8. [8]
    Conventional arms - United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs
    Conventional arms are weapons other than weapons of mass destruction. They are the most commonly known and widely used weapons in conflict and crime ...
  9. [9]
    https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1561&context=ils
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Conventional Arms and Nuclear Peace - Air University
    These distinctions influence the way in which arms-control arrangements aimed at conventional arms-race stability and crisis stability must be conceptualized ...
  11. [11]
    Weapons of mass destruction
    Weapons of mass destruction include nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons. Nuclear weapons are the most dangerous, while biological weapons can spread ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Defining "Weapons of Mass Destruction" | Occasional Paper 8
    definition by making a stark differentiation between “conventional weapons” and. WMD. ... Defining “Weapons of Mass Destruction” of conventional armaments.
  13. [13]
    Weapons of Mass Destruction - Oxford Public International Law
    1 Limited Test Ban Treaty prohibits the carrying out of any nuclear weapon test explosion, or any other nuclear explosion, at any place under the jurisdiction ...C. Developments Under The... · 1. Nuclear Disarmament · 2. Biological And Chemical...
  14. [14]
    Conventional weapons - How does law protect in war? - ICRC
    The term distinguishes this class of weapons from weapons of mass destruction (i.e., nuclear, chemical and biological/bacteriological weapons).
  15. [15]
    Conventional arms - United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs
    A more recent example of legally binding regulations and limitations in the use of conventional weapons is the 1980 Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions ...Missing: doctrine | Show results with:doctrine
  16. [16]
    The Outer Space Treaty at a Glance | Arms Control Association
    The term "weapons of mass destruction" is not defined, but it is commonly understood to include nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons. The treaty, however, ...
  17. [17]
    National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction
    As with the war on terrorism, our strategy for homeland security, and our new concept of deterrence, the U.S. approach to combat WMD represents a fundamental ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Bridging the Weapons Gap The Convergence of Conventional Arms ...
    Apr 19, 2022 · The third distinction focuses on the rapidity of destruction afforded by weapons of mass destruction. The destructive effects of nuclear weapons ...
  19. [19]
    Conventional weapons - admin.ch
    Conventional weapons include fighter aircraft, warships, tanks, heavy artillery and small and light weapons, such as rifles and pistols.<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    Disarmament | United Nations
    Conventional Weapons. Conventional arms are weapons other than weapons of mass destruction. They are the most commonly known and widely used armaments in ...Nuclear Disarmament And... · Chemical Weapons · Conventional Weapons
  21. [21]
    Conventional weapons - Global Affairs Canada
    Aug 21, 2023 · Conventional weapons include small arms, light weapons, cluster munitions, and landmines, which are easily accessed and can cause great harm.Arms Trade Treaty · Anti-Personnel Mines · Cluster Munitions
  22. [22]
    The Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons
    Its purpose is to ban or restrict the use of specific types of weapons that are considered to cause unnecessary or unjustifiable suffering to combatants or to ...
  23. [23]
    Weapons - The Practical Guide to Humanitarian Law
    In general, IHL prohibits any weapon “of a nature to cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering” and any that may have indiscriminate or excessively ...Weapons · I. Humanitarian Law Limits... · 2. Firearms<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    Early Stone Age Tools - Smithsonian's Human Origins
    Jan 3, 2024 · The earliest stone toolmaking developed by at least 2.6 million years ago. The Early Stone Age includes the most basic stone toolkits made by early humans.
  25. [25]
    Stone Tools | The Smithsonian Institution's Human Origins Program
    Jan 3, 2024 · By about 1.76 million years ago, early humans began to make Acheulean handaxes and other large cutting tools. Middle Stone Age Tools. Explore ...Early Stone Age Tools · Middle Stone Age Tools · Later Stone Age Tools
  26. [26]
    EARLY MODERN HUMANS VIOLENCE, MURDER, WARFARE ...
    One of the spears was 8-feet-long and had a point fashioned from a mammoth tusk. The earliest weapons on record are spears with stone points dating to 460,000 ...WAR AND EARLY MODERN... · Murder and Bravery and Early...<|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Stone Age Weapons | Definition, Types & Uses - Lesson - Study.com
    The earliest Stone Age tools were just stones and rocks. Later humans learned to create composite tools, developing hand axes, spears, atlatls, harpoons, and ...
  28. [28]
    Mesopotamia Military: All the Secrets of Their Warfare Tactics
    Jan 11, 2022 · The Mesopotamians were experts in metal works. Their expertise revolutionized weapons. They used copper, tin, and later iron to make weapons.Mesopotamia Warfare · Mesopotamian Weapons · Composite Bows
  29. [29]
    Greek Hoplite (8th - 4th century B.C) - Warfare History Network
    Spear: A hoplite's principal offensive weapon was his eight-foot-long spear (doru). It was made of ash wood and fitted with a leaf-shaped bronze or iron blade. ...
  30. [30]
    The Weapons of the Roman Legionary: An In-Depth Guide
    Aug 17, 2023 · The gladius, the scutum, and the pilum were designed solely for their intended purpose, to close with and efficiently destroy the enemies of ...
  31. [31]
    3 Important Roman Weapons Used by Legionaries - History Hit
    Jul 24, 2018 · What kind of weapons did the Romans use? There were three essential Roman weapons: the gladius (sword), the pugio (dagger), and the pilum (spear) ...
  32. [32]
    Focus on Arms and Armor: “The Early Metal Ages: How Bronze ...
    Jan 12, 2024 · As early as 6000 BCE in Anatolia, Neolithic man experimented with copper tools and weapons. But it was not until the fourth millennium BCE that ...
  33. [33]
    Weaponry of Middle Ages - Chateau Charmant
    Medieval Crossbow. Picture. After 1100 BC became a popular long-range weapon. It is similar to the bow and arrow but conceals easier. The arrows for the ...
  34. [34]
    The Origins of the Gunpowder Age - Medievalists.net
    Nov 26, 2022 · A look at the invention and innovations of gunpowder weapons in China and Europe during the Middle Ages
  35. [35]
    Gun Timeline | History Detectives - PBS
    The timeline starts with the first firearm in 1364, matchlock in 1400s, wheel lock in 1509, flintlock in 1630, percussion in 1807, and automatic handguns in ...
  36. [36]
    Gunpowder in Medieval China – Science Technology and Society a ...
    Early on, black powder was used to enhance traditional weapons like fire-arrows and siege catapults, providing frightening new ways to assault fortifications or ...Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-
  37. [37]
    Weapons of World War I: Machine Guns, Mortars, and More
    Jul 25, 2014 · WW1 Machine guns ... Most machine guns of World War 1 were based on Hiram Maxim's 1884 design. They had a sustained fire of 450–600 rounds per ...Ww1 Mortars · Ww1 Tanks · Ww1 Aircraft<|control11|><|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Weapons of World War I - Alpha History
    The German army stocked more than 10,000 units in 1914 while the British and French had fewer than 1,000 machine guns each. Production was prioritised and by ...
  39. [39]
    The Factories That Fed The Front in the First World War
    Around 21 August, 1917. See object record. The effectiveness of the escalation in war production is illustrated by the quantities of material manufactured ...
  40. [40]
    Military Technology in World War I | Articles & Essays
    Thus trench warfare was born. The British introduced tanks in 1916; they were used with airplanes and artillery to advance the front. The advent of chemical ...
  41. [41]
    Technology and equipment developed during World War I
    Jun 9, 2025 · Innovation on both sides created more destructive and effective weapons. Communications, medicine and transportation were also advanced. But not ...
  42. [42]
    Weapons of Mass Production – 10 of History's Most Widely ...
    Oct 14, 2020 · Weapons of Mass Production – 10 of History's Most Widely Produced Fighting Machines ; Messerschmitt Bf-109. Despite the ; Ilyushin Il-2 Sturmovik.
  43. [43]
    The Scientific and Technological Advances of World War II
    Added to this, advances in the technology of warfare fed into the development of increasingly powerful weapons that perpetuated tensions between global powers, ...Missing: conventional | Show results with:conventional
  44. [44]
    [PDF] REARMING FOR THE COLD WAR 1945-1960 - OSD Historical Office
    technologies led to remarkable advances in aircraft, missiles, ships, satellites, land vehicles, electronic equipment, and many other weapons and supporting.
  45. [45]
    Conventional Military Deterrence - Its Rise to Dominance and ... - DTIC
    During the Cold War, military deterrence evolved into a mutually supportive, strategic nuclear and conventional approach. Conventional deterrence, though ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Precision-Guided Munitions: Background and Issues for Congress
    Feb 28, 2020 · Precision munitions were introduced to military operations during World War II; however, they first demonstrated their utility operationally ...
  47. [47]
    America's Ultimate Weapon of War: Precision-Guided Munitions
    Oct 2, 2014 · Over the 1970s and 1980s, PGMs became deeply integrated into U.S. plans to fight the Soviet Union. They played a small role in the 1989 invasion ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  48. [48]
    [PDF] The Evolution of Precision Strike - CSBA
    This observation suggested that conventional precision munitions could, in many cases, be substituted for nuclear ones, thereby achieving the required levels of ...Missing: advancements | Show results with:advancements
  49. [49]
    [PDF] The Gulf War as a Harbinger of a Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA)
    While introduction of precision-guided munitions and information technology certainly made progress in the three decades, such efforts were an extension of.
  50. [50]
    Armaments Developments Since the Cold War - Oxford Academic
    Whereas 8 per cent of the munitions employed during the Gulf War were guided, 29 per cent of those used over Kosovo eight years later, 60 per cent of those ...Missing: advancements | Show results with:advancements
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Conventional Arms Control and American Policy in the 21st Century.
    During the Cold War arms control was placed in the context of the confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union.
  52. [52]
    [PDF] A Framework for Precision Conventional Strike in Post-Cold War ...
    By providing the capability to con- duct precise, effective strikes against critical targets, these weapons can increase the effectiveness of military ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Small Arms - the United Nations
    For the purposes of this instrument, “small arms and light weapons” will mean any man- portable lethal weapon that expels or launches, is designed to expel or ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] SALW Definitions - SEESAC
    small arms and light weapons will mean any man-portable lethal weapon that expels or launches, is designed to expel or launch, or may be readily converted to ...
  55. [55]
    Small Arms and Light Weapons (SALW) - OSCE
    They include revolvers and self-loading pistols; rifles and carbines; sub-machine guns; assault rifles; and light machine guns.
  56. [56]
    Small arms and light weapons (SALW) and mine action (MA) - NATO
    Oct 4, 2023 · Small arms are weapons intended for use by an individual. They include pistols, rifles, submachine guns, assault rifles and light machine guns; ...
  57. [57]
    Global Firearms Holdings - Small Arms Survey
    There are over one billion firearms globally, with 857 million (85%) in civilian hands, 133 million (13%) in military arsenals, and 23 million (2%) with law ...Missing: proliferation | Show results with:proliferation<|control11|><|separator|>
  58. [58]
    Small Arms and Light Weapons: Controlling the Real Instruments of ...
    The increased availability of low-cost small arms and light weapons contributes to the likelihood, intensity and duration of armed conflict.
  59. [59]
    Over 700 a day dying from small arms fire; main 'weapons of choice ...
    Dec 15, 2023 · According to 2021 figures, small arms claimed over 260,000 lives, amounting to 45 per cent of all violent deaths.
  60. [60]
    Small Arms—they cause 90% of civilian casualties - Global Issues
    Small arms cause some 90 percent of all civilian casualties in modern conflicts. Various nations, especially the richer nations that are prominent ...
  61. [61]
    Small Arms and Light Weapons
    Together, both instruments constitute the normative framework on small arms and light weapons, which all UN Member States have agreed upon. ... The UN process ...
  62. [62]
    Explosives - GlobalSecurity.org
    Jul 7, 2011 · Traditionally, munitions designers have used such ex-plosives as Comp-B, TNT, or LX-14, depending upon the particular application.
  63. [63]
    [PDF] EXPLOSIVE WEAPON EFFECTS - GICHD
    Jul 20, 2006 · Explosive weapon systems have traditionally used munitions delivering signif- icant quantities of high explosive compositions, commonly ...
  64. [64]
    Kinetic Munition
    Kinetic energy weapons use the high speed of a projectile to cause damage to a target. These projectiles do not typically contain any explosive material.<|control11|><|separator|>
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Kinetic Energy Penetrator Long Term Strategy Study - DTIC
    To address the perceived increasing burdens associated wito use of depleted uranium (DU) as a kinetic energy (KE) penetrator.
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Kinetic Energy Weapons - The Simons Center
    In 1948, the UN Commission for Conventional Armaments defined weapons of mass destruction. (WMD) as “…atomic explosive weapons, radioactive material weapons ...
  67. [67]
    Armored Combat Vehicle [ACV] - GlobalSecurity.org
    Jan 7, 2021 · An Armored Combat Vehicle [ACV] is a self-propelled vehicle with armored protection and cross-country capability. Armoured combat vehicles ...<|separator|>
  68. [68]
    Leopard 2 vs M1 Abrams | Comparison tanks specifications
    Specifications ; Engine: MTU-12-cylinder-Diesel engine MB 873-Ka 501, Honeywell AGT1500C multi-fuel turbine engine ; Speed: 72 km/h (45 mph), 67 km/h (42 mph) - ...
  69. [69]
    T-90 vs Leopard 2 | Comparison tanks specifications
    Main armament: 2A46M 125 mm smoothbore gun with 43 rounds (T-90), 120 mm Rheinmetall L55 smoothbore gun. Engine: 950 hp (736 kW) for V-92S2 12-cyl. diesel ...
  70. [70]
    This Is Not A Tank! A Layperson's Guide To Armored Fighting Vehicles
    Nov 25, 2020 · Self-propelled artillery incorporate tracks to help negotiate rough terrain and keep up with fast-moving tank units, and light armor to protect ...
  71. [71]
    F-16s carrying the A-10's 30mm cannon actually saw combat
    The F-16 entered service in 1978 but proved so well suited for ground-attack operations that by 1981, every F-16 to roll off the assembly line came standard ...
  72. [72]
    Mk 45 Mod 4 Naval Gun System - BAE Systems
    The 5-inch (127-mm) 62-caliber Mk 45 Mod 4 Naval Gun system is in US Navy service today, and is ready to significantly enhance Naval Surface Fire Support (NSFS)
  73. [73]
    Naval Platform Systems - General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical ...
    General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems produces the 20mm M61A1 Gatling gun and ammunition handling system for the Phalanx Close-In Weapon System.
  74. [74]
    [PDF] Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Weapons of Mass Destruction
    Guided missile: An unmanned aerial vehicle whose trajectory can be altered by external or internal mechanisms (i.e., seeker heads, laser designators, or fly ...
  75. [75]
    Ask Us - Bombs, Rockets & Missiles - Aerospaceweb.org
    Jan 16, 2005 · A rocket has no form of guidance and remains a "dumb" weapon. However, the rocket has a means of propulsion that allows it to travel farther ...
  76. [76]
    [PDF] AIR-LAUNCHED GUIDED MISSILES AND ... - GlobalSecurity.org
    Guided missiles are classified according to their range, speed, and launch ... The two types of guided missiles are service and nonservice guided missiles.
  77. [77]
    The United States Army | Redstone Arsenal Historical Information
    An unguided air-to-ground rocket which uses a variety of warheads, the 2.75-inch HYDRA-70 rocket system is fired from helicopters by the Army and from both jets ...
  78. [78]
    BM-21 122-mm Multiple Rocket Launcher - GlobalSecurity.org
    May 25, 2022 · The 122mm 40-tube multiple launch rocket system Grad (Hail), with a firing range of up to 20 km, was introduced into operational service with ...
  79. [79]
    BM-21 Grad Russian 122mm Multiple Rocket Launcher (MRL) - ODIN
    Dec 19, 2024 · The vehicle is powered by a water-cooled V-8 180 hp gasoline engine, has a maximum road speed of 75 km/h (47 mph), a road range of up to 750 ...
  80. [80]
    Tomahawk | NAVAIR
    The Tomahawk Block III Conventional variant (TLAM-C) contains a 1,000-lb class blast/fragmentary unitary warhead while the Submunition variant (TLAM-D) includes ...
  81. [81]
    Tomahawk | Missile Threat - CSIS
    TASM, along with other Tomahawk conventional variants, carried a 454 kg conventional warhead. Its range was shorter than other variants at 460 km.
  82. [82]
    MANPADS: Combating the Threat to Global Aviation - State.gov
    Man-Portable Air Defense Systems (MANPADS) are surface-to-air missiles that can be carried and fired by a single individual or carried by several individuals ...
  83. [83]
    [PDF] Six Decades of Guided Munitions and Battle Networks - CSBA
    history was to highlight some of the key technological developments that eventually produced the Mark-24 and provided the proof-of- concept for subsequent ...
  84. [84]
    [PDF] The Development of Precision Guided Bombs - DTIC
    When Desert Storm initiated in 1991 there were very few guided weapons that had not been extensively tested on training ranges and in combat. The precision ...Missing: milestones | Show results with:milestones
  85. [85]
    Raytheon Paveway II - Designation-Systems.Net
    Feb 4, 2024 · In good conditions, a Paveway II LGB has an accuracy of about 6 m (20 ft) CEP. However, laser guidance doesn't work very well in bad weather, ...
  86. [86]
    Joint Direct Attack Munition GBU- 31/32/38 - AF.mil
    The Joint Direct Attack Munition is a guidance tail kit that converts existing unguided free-fall bombs into accurate, adverse weather smart munitions.Missing: electronics | Show results with:electronics
  87. [87]
    Excalibur Projectile | Raytheon - RTX
    Unlike “near precision” guidance systems, the Excalibur weapon provides accurate first-round effects at all ranges in all weather conditions. This weapon system ...
  88. [88]
    Artillery: Accuracy For Every Occasion - StrategyWorld.com
    Nov 4, 2017 · Both Excalibur and PGK provide unprecedented accuracy. An unguided shell will normally land within 267 meters of where it is aimed at maximum ...
  89. [89]
    M982 Excalibur 50-Miles Away Precision Artillery Shell - YouTube
    Jul 18, 2022 · ... artillery precision to an astounding 2-meter margin of error. The novel guided projectile is expected to combine the advantages of an artillery ...Missing: GPS accuracy<|separator|>
  90. [90]
    America's Tank Division Modernizes Electronic Warfare Capabilities
    Jul 20, 2020 · “Commanders can now fit electronic warfare into their scheme of maneuver and use it as a weapon system on the battlefield to achieve mission ...
  91. [91]
    TRUST: Trusted Integrated Circuits - DARPA
    DARPA has initiated its TRUST in Integrated Circuits program to develop technologies that will ensure the trust of ICs used in military systems.
  92. [92]
    Army showcases new electronic warfare tech | Article
    Aug 23, 2019 · This approach includes the integration of non-radio frequency technologies on the battlefield, such as inertial-based navigation systems, chip- ...
  93. [93]
    Jamming JDAM: The Threat to US Munitions from Russian ... - RUSI
    Jun 6, 2023 · The Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) began life in the wake of the US-led Operation Desert Storm which evicted Iraq from Kuwait in 1991.
  94. [94]
    [PDF] Integrated Electronic Warfare Systems Aboard the United States ...
    Dec 18, 2009 · System must be integrated with other defensive weapons on the platform. System must not interfere with communications or navigation systems.
  95. [95]
    [PDF] DoD Directive 3000.09, "Autonomy in Weapon Systems
    Jan 25, 2023 · Purpose: This directive: • Establishes policy and assigns responsibilities for developing and using autonomous and semi-.
  96. [96]
    Smart Munitions Market Outlook 2025-2032 - Intel Market Research
    Jul 14, 2025 · The integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning into munitions guidance systems has enhanced strike accuracy to under 1 meter ...
  97. [97]
    AI in Warfare: What You Need to Know in 2025
    Jul 15, 2025 · Ukraine's war is the most visible, but it's hardly the only AI arms race. In Gaza, AI-powered loitering munitions and surveillance networks ...Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025
  98. [98]
    (PDF) Artificial Intelligence-Driven Weapons System and the Future ...
    Aug 24, 2025 · PDF | The research focuses on the transformative impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven weapons systems on modern warfare.
  99. [99]
    Review of the 2023 US Policy on Autonomy in Weapons Systems
    Feb 14, 2023 · The 2023 DoD Directive 3000.09 on Autonomy in Weapons Systems revises, but does not radically change, the department's original policy on the topic.
  100. [100]
    Deterrence 101: Nuclear and Conventional | The Cove
    Sep 11, 2024 · Because deterrent effects also rely on the relative destructiveness of conventional capabilities, the types of costs that they can impose on an ...
  101. [101]
    [PDF] Strategic Studies Quarterly, Winter 2018, Volume 12, No. 4
    SSQ: Have determinants of the success of conventional deterrence changed? JJM: I think the basic determinants remain unchanged. One could argue, however ...
  102. [102]
    [PDF] Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy
    The Department of Defense's enduring mission is to provide combat-credible military forces needed to deter war and protect the security of our nation.
  103. [103]
    Topic: Deterrence and defence - NATO
    Sep 19, 2025 · NATO is a defensive alliance. Its members are committed to safeguarding the freedom and security of all Allies, against all threats, from all directions.NATO's purpose: safeguarding... · Bolstering NATO's deterrence...
  104. [104]
    [PDF] THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CONVENTIONAL DETERRENCE
    The aim of this research is to understand the effectiveness of forward deployed forces to conventionally deter adversaries and reduce or stop conflict. A ...
  105. [105]
    [PDF] Understanding Deterrence - RAND
    Successful deterrence typically involves a combination of taking the aggressor's motivations seriously, being clear about what the defender seeks to deter and ...
  106. [106]
    The Potentially Revolutionary Impact of Emerging and Disruptive ...
    At the same time, strategic conventional weapon systems (including hypersonic missiles) have deterrence characteristics comparable to nuclear weapons.
  107. [107]
    Conventional-Nuclear Integration to Strengthen Deterrence - CSIS
    Oct 4, 2023 · The evolving geopolitical landscape demands strategies for disincentivizing adversarial nuclear use to advance regional goals.
  108. [108]
    None
    Below is a merged summary of offensive and defensive tactics from MCWP 3-01, consolidating all information from the provided segments into a dense, structured format. To maximize detail while maintaining clarity, I’ve organized the content into tables in CSV format for key sections, supplemented by narrative summaries where appropriate. This ensures all information is retained while adhering to the constraint of no thinking tokens.
  109. [109]
    Maneuver and Breakthrough in 1940 France: Insights for the U.S. ...
    Jan 3, 2024 · ... invasion of France in 1940. Theoretical and Historical Context. The concept of employing mobile ground forces with high-end capability to ...
  110. [110]
    Reconstitution Under Fire: Insights from the 1973 Yom Kippur War
    Aug 21, 2025 · ... tactical capabilities. The Egyptian use of Sagger antitank missiles and surface-to-air missiles, in particular, decisively defeated Israeli ...
  111. [111]
    Tank Clash in the Sinai - Warfare History Network
    To stop the Israeli tank attacks, the Egyptians were relying on a combination of AT-3 Saggers and RPG-7s. The Sagger was an antitank missile that could be ...
  112. [112]
    Guerrilla Warfare Is Different | Proceedings - April 1962 Vol. 88/4/710
    Conventional war is chiefly the attempt to undermine the morale of an enemy force, to win over the civil population, and to bring about the political collapse ...
  113. [113]
    Weapons of the Weak: Technological Change, Guerrilla Firepower ...
    Jan 10, 2025 · The standard tools of guerrilla warfare are small arms – weapons carried out by individual soldiers or transported on light vehicles (e.g., ...
  114. [114]
    [PDF] Improvised Explosive Devices in Iraq, 2003-09 - USAWC Press
    Apr 1, 2011 · This Letort Paper argues that the threat of impro- vised explosive devices (IEDs) that has emerged in conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan since ...
  115. [115]
    Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) in Iraq and Afghanistan - DTIC
    Since October 2001, Improvised Explosive Devices IEDs, or roadside bombs have been responsible for many of the more than 2,000 combat deaths in Iraq, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  116. [116]
    [PDF] Of IEDs and MRAPs: Force Protection in Complex Irregular Operations
    16 However, while this armor provided increased protection against small arms fire, RPGs, and shrapnel, it was not particularly effective against IEDs,.
  117. [117]
    Terrorism and Conventional Weapons
    Conventional terrorist weapons include manufactured and improvised firearms, bombs and other explosives. The UN Terrorism Prevention Branch describes ...
  118. [118]
    Rethinking IED Strategies: from Iraq to Afghanistan | Article - Army.mil
    By attacking with IEDs, a single insurgent can successfully attack an entire formation of heavily armed vehicles that are protected with the latest armor- ...
  119. [119]
    How the IED Won: Dispelling the Myth of Tactical Success and ...
    May 1, 2017 · The U.S. military seems to have settled on the narrative that it won every tactical engagement in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
  120. [120]
    Certain Conventional Weapons - United Nations Treaty Collection
    The Government of the People's Republic of China has decided to sign the Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons ...
  121. [121]
    High Contracting Parties and Signatories CCW
    The Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons currently has a total of 128 High Contracting Parties and 4 signatories. For information on ratifying or ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  122. [122]
    Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) At a Glance
    Protocol III regulates the use of weapons designed to set fire to or burn their target. The protocol proscribes targeting civilians with incendiary weapons and ...
  123. [123]
    https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?chapter=26&clang=_en&mtdsg_no=XXVI-2-c&src=IND
  124. [124]
    https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?chapter=26&clang=_en&mtdsg_no=XXVI-10&src=TREATY
  125. [125]
    The Arms Trade Treaty At a Glance
    The Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) establishes common standards for the international trade of conventional weapons and seeks to reduce the illicit arms trade.
  126. [126]
    [PDF] The Arms Trade Treaty
    1. This Treaty shall apply to all conventional arms within the following categories: (a) Battle tanks; (b) Armoured combat vehicles; (c) Large-calibre ...
  127. [127]
    [PDF] Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain ...
    The Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons is another important treaty in this area.1 Along with the Geneva Conventions of. 1949 and their Additional ...
  128. [128]
    22 U.S. Code § 2778 - Control of arms exports and imports
    The President is authorized to control the import and the export of defense articles and defense services and to provide foreign policy guidance.
  129. [129]
    U.S. Export Controls - International Trade Administration
    The United States imposes export controls to protect national security interests and promote foreign policy objectives.Missing: major | Show results with:major
  130. [130]
    Overview of U.S. Export Control System - State.gov
    The ITAR sets out the requirements for licenses or other authorizations for specific exports of defense articles and services. The AECA requires the State ...
  131. [131]
    L_2008335EN.01009901.xml - EUR-Lex - European Union
    Member States shall ensure that their national legislation enables them to control the export of the technology and equipment on the EU Common Military List.
  132. [132]
    An introduction to UK arms exports - House of Commons Library
    Jan 24, 2024 · A short introduction to UK arms exports. This briefing explains what arms exports are, what controls are in place and the process for granting licenses.
  133. [133]
    [PDF] UK Strategic Export Controls Annual Report 2024 - GOV.UK
    Jul 17, 2025 · Export controls seek to ensure that goods exported from the UK do not contribute to the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) or a ...
  134. [134]
    [PDF] Russia and the Arms Trade - SIPRI
    Jan 7, 2025 · In Russia policy as regards conventional arms is separate from policy on dual-use goods. 19 At present there are no clear links between Russian ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  135. [135]
    Full Text: China's Export Controls
    Dec 29, 2021 · China is committed to regulating the trade in conventional arms, combating illicit trafficking of weapons, and mitigating humanitarian issues ...
  136. [136]
    [PDF] CSP7 General Statement - China (English Version).pdf
    In October. 2020, China promulgated the Export Control Law which further strengthened the legislative system of export control including military products ...
  137. [137]
    India Export Control Information - Bureau of Industry and Security
    India maintains a list of items controlled for export: the Special Chemicals, Organism, Material, Equipment and Technologies (SCOMET) list.
  138. [138]
    Multilateral Export Control Regimes - Bureau of Industry and Security
    The MTCR has grown to include 35 member countries that have agreed to coordinate their national export controls to stem missile proliferation. bisLogo ...Missing: major | Show results with:major
  139. [139]
    [PDF] Arms control verification | UNIDIR
    This issue of Disarmament Forum takes a look at the verification of arms control agreements. How do states parties to international treaties verify ...<|separator|>
  140. [140]
    Witness for the Prosecution: International Organizations and Arms ...
    A monitoring and verification regime is intended both to deter violations from being committed and to detect violations that do occur.
  141. [141]
    Register of Conventional Arms
    The UN General Assembly established the UN Register of Conventional Arms (UNROCA) in 1991 through resolution 46/36 L to promote transparency in armaments.
  142. [142]
    Reporting to the United Nations Register of Conventional Arms for ...
    This paper focuses on reporting for 2017, the most recent reporting year, as indicative for both the problems of participation and quality.
  143. [143]
    ROCA (United Nations Register of Conventional Arms)
    United Nations Register of Conventional Arms. UNROCA. Transparency in the global reported arms trade. Home · Participation · About · Categories.Categories · About · Participation statistics
  144. [144]
    [PDF] Guidance Document - The Arms Trade Treaty
    The Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) is an international treaty regulating international trade in conventional arms, aiming to prevent illicit trade and diversion.
  145. [145]
    [PDF] Taking Stock of the Arms Trade Treaty - SIPRI
    Dec 10, 2020 · The Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) aims to regulate international arms trade, establish minimum standards, and has 110 states parties. It has also ...
  146. [146]
    [PDF] BASIC DOCUMENTS - The Wassenaar Arrangement
    The licensing procedure itself covers all the measures taken to verify the data provided with an export licence application from an end-use controls perspective ...
  147. [147]
    Wassenaar Arrangement
    The Wassenaar Arrangement is an export control regime with 42 participating states that promotes transparency of national export control regimes on conventional ...
  148. [148]
    [PDF] Bureau of Arms Control, Verification and Compliance
    The NNRRC provides 24/7/365 secure communication notification linkages with over. 50 international partners on issues ranging from nuclear and conventional arms ...
  149. [149]
    Sobering Impact of Conventional Weapons Deserves 'No Less ...
    Legacy ...Missing: doctrine | Show results with:doctrine<|control11|><|separator|>
  150. [150]
    Illicit Small Arms and Light Weapons in Sub-Saharan Africa - SIPRI
    The report provides a typology on the sources of illicit SALW in the states and regions under embargo and discusses the challenges of enforcing arms embargoes ...
  151. [151]
    [PDF] Advanced Conventional Weapons and Emerging Technologies
    The proliferation of advanced conventional weapons (ACW) poses a grave threat to international peace and security. The acquisition by a growing number of ...
  152. [152]
    [PDF] REALITIES, CHALLENGES, AND OPPORTUNITIES Report
    Illicit firearms trafficking, although limited, can be destabilizing for security, with. South-east Asia and South Asia being the most affected subregions. With ...<|separator|>
  153. [153]
    [PDF] Controlling the international trade in conventional weapons
    Sep 24, 2025 · Beyond legal transfers, the illicit conventional arms market is substantial, estimated by dollar value to account for 20 percent of all ...
  154. [154]
    [PDF] Illicit Trade Report 2023 - Small Arms Survey
    In 2022-2023, 5,676 weapon cases with 2,388,036 items interdicted were reported. Lethal small arms increased, while other components decreased. Cases and ...
  155. [155]
    Disarmament by the numbers | United Nations
    Global military spending surged to a record $2.4 trillion in 2023, the ninth consecutive year of growth. In the same year, the economic impact of small arms ...
  156. [156]
    [PDF] measuring the scope and scale of illicit arms trafficking
    ... (2023), the combined data from 81 reporting WCO member countries highlighted a total of 5 676 unique weapon cases (11 175 seizures) in 2022 and 2023, with 2 388 ...<|separator|>
  157. [157]
    UNODA 2024 Yearbook
    ... Conventional Arms fell to 65 States in 2024, from 74 in 2023. Meanwhile ... In its 2024 resolution on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons ...
  158. [158]
    Disarmament efforts essential to address humanitarian concerns of ...
    Oct 19, 2020 · The associated erosion of human control over the use of force creates clear risks for civilians and combatants who are no longer fighting, ...
  159. [159]
    13. Conventional arms control and regulation of new weapon ...
    The main treaty is the CCW Convention. Efforts to regulate autonomous weapon systems and control cyberspace use are ongoing, with some progress in 2021.
  160. [160]
    The Humanitarian Impacts and Investment Risks of Conventional ...
    Apr 3, 2025 · Another concern is proliferation. Military weapons get exported to regimes with poor human rights records who use them against their own ...
  161. [161]
    Treaty Status - The Arms Trade Treaty
    The ATT was adopted by the UN General Assembly on 2 April 2013 with 154 votes in favour, 3 votes against, and 23 abstentions*. The Treaty opened for signature ...
  162. [162]
    Towards a Universal Arms Trade Treaty - RAND
    Oct 26, 2016 · This report aims to support universalisation of the Arms Trade Treaty by identifying barriers and obstacles to its ratification and by ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  163. [163]
    About us - The Wassenaar Arrangement
    About us. The Participating States of the Wassenaar Arrangement are: Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Czech Republic, ...
  164. [164]
    China's arms industry is increasingly global, but don't expect it to ...
    Aug 28, 2024 · China had 5.8 percent of all global arms exports between 2019 and 2023, making it the fourth largest supplier of conventional weapons.
  165. [165]
    The Wassenaar Arrangement at a Glance - Arms Control Association
    Another limiting factor is that some major arms exporters, such as Belarus, China, and Israel are not members. During the arrangement's years of operation, ...
  166. [166]
    Supranational small arms control and the challenges of ...
    Nov 26, 2024 · The growth in arms volumes globally heightened the security dilemma, with increases in the amount and lethality of weapons perpetuating cycles ...Missing: ethical | Show results with:ethical
  167. [167]
    [PDF] The changing role of conventional arms control in preventing and ...
    Progress on virtually all peace and security, human rights and development goals is severely hampered in areas where arms and ammunition are poorly regulated.
  168. [168]
    Bolstering Arms Control in a Contested Geopolitical Environment
    Oct 31, 2022 · This paper recommends three measures to reinvigorate arms control: sustaining long-term engagement between major powers; adopting a multi-stakeholder approach.
  169. [169]
    Autonomous Weapons Systems: Homepage
    Given the speed and scale at which they are capable of operating, autonomous weapons systems introduce the risk of accidental and rapid conflict escalation.The Risks · Solutions · Our videos · Resources
  170. [170]
    [PDF] AUTONOMOUS WEAPON SYSTEMS - ICRC
    Another speaker also raised the risks associated with proliferation of autonomous weapon systems, including the potential for unpredictable interactions if ...
  171. [171]
    A Hazard to Human Rights: Autonomous Weapons Systems and ...
    Apr 28, 2025 · Autonomous weapons systems present numerous risks to humanity, most of which infringe on fundamental obligations and principles of international human rights ...
  172. [172]
    Assessing Autonomous Weapons as a Proliferation Risk - RUSI
    Feb 8, 2024 · This paper considers the risks associated with LAWS based on the likelihood and impact of their proliferation in relation to three broad categories.
  173. [173]
    Countering the proliferation of artificial intelligence - UNIDIR
    Aug 18, 2025 · The risks of AI proliferation remain, however, relatively underexplored and somewhat simplified to imply diversion of autonomous weapons to non- ...
  174. [174]
    Geopolitics and the Regulation of Autonomous Weapons Systems
    The quest for regulating autonomous weapons systems continues to be hindered by geopolitical tensions, procrastination, and insufficient political momentum.Missing: disparities | Show results with:disparities
  175. [175]
    Group of Governmental Experts on Lethal Autonomous Weapons ...
    The 2024 Meeting of the High Contracting Parties to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) decided to organize "the Group of Governmental Experts ...
  176. [176]
    161 states vote against the machine at the UN General Assembly
    Nov 5, 2024 · Resounding support for the second UNGA resolution on autonomous weapons expands discussions in 2025, mandating talks in New York including all ...
  177. [177]
    UN chief calls for global ban on 'killer robots' | UN News
    May 14, 2025 · UN Secretary-General António Guterres has once again called for a global ban on lethal autonomous weapon systems – machines capable of taking human lives ...Missing: emerging | Show results with:emerging<|separator|>
  178. [178]
    The Future of Warfare: National Positions on the Governance of ...
    Feb 11, 2025 · A lethal autonomous weapon system can be characterized as an integrated combination of one or more weapons and technological components that ...
  179. [179]
    SIPRI experts join UN meeting on autonomous weapon systems
    Sep 18, 2025 · SIPRI experts join UN meeting on autonomous weapon systems. 18 September 2025.
  180. [180]
    Total Casualties | The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
    Total casualties were estimated at 135,000 in Hiroshima and 64,000 in Nagasaki. The dead were 66,000 and 39,000, respectively.
  181. [181]
    How many people died in the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
    It is estimated that more than 170,000 people died in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In Hiroshima, over 100,000 died by year's end, and in Nagasaki, at least 30,000 ...
  182. [182]
    Terror Weapons: The British Experience of Gas and Its Treatment in ...
    Chemical weapons accounted for only 1 per cent of the 750000 British troops killed in the First World War and yet caused disproportionate casualties ...
  183. [183]
    Conventional Weapons Are a Serious Threat to International Security
    May 3, 2018 · Nuclear weapons have been responsible for zero deaths since 1945, whereas conventional weapons have been responsible for nearly all conflict ...
  184. [184]
    History | OPCW
    History was made on 29 April 1997 with the entry into force of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC)—the world's first multilateral disarmament agreement ...
  185. [185]
    Mortality associated with use of weapons in armed conflicts, wartime ...
    During the fighting of war the number of people wounded is at least twice the number killed and may be 13 times as high.
  186. [186]
    Counting the dead at Hiroshima and Nagasaki
    Aug 4, 2020 · The Joint Commission had itself estimated that around 40,000-50,000 (about 70% of their 64,000 total) died at Hiroshima on the first day. They ...
  187. [187]
    Developments in Arms Production and the Effects of the War in ...
    Aug 2, 2024 · In 2022, the combined arms revenue of the world's largest arms-producing and military services companies (the SIPRI Top 100) was $597 billion.
  188. [188]
    [PDF] fact sheet - SIPRI
    Unit cost data for major conventional weapons are not available from most countries, even those which publish information about aggregate procurement spending.
  189. [189]
    https://defence-blog.com/analysts-break-down-real-cost-of-russian-missiles/
  190. [190]
    Russia and China's Military Production Surge
    Apr 8, 2025 · Beyond equipment, Russia has vastly expanded its munitions production. The U.S. European Command estimates Russia can produce 250,000 artillery ...
  191. [191]
    The Economics of War - Daily Times
    Jun 30, 2025 · Meanwhile, China is accelerating its rise with $103 billion in arms revenues. Chinese firms like Norinco and Poly Technologies are flooding ...
  192. [192]
    America's Scale Problem - Foreign Policy Research Institute
    Oct 1, 2025 · Congress has approved $6 billion to expand shell production and modernize factories, while the Army is investing $742 million to increase High ...Missing: cost | Show results with:cost
  193. [193]
    [PDF] Trends in World Military Expenditure, 2024 - SIPRI
    Apr 28, 2025 · ș World military expenditure rose by 9.4 per cent in real terms to $2718 billion in 2024, the highest global total ever.<|separator|>
  194. [194]
    Arms production - SIPRI
    SIPRI's arms production project monitors, describes and analyses trends and developments in arms production worldwide.
  195. [195]
    The economic impact of higher defence spending
    May 19, 2025 · Defence expenditure in the Union increased to 1.3% of GDP in 2023, and it is estimated to have risen further in 2024, especially in Member ...
  196. [196]
    The Long Shadow of the Gulf War
    Feb 24, 2016 · “Tank plinking” and shelter-busting demonstrated that U.S. conventional weapons had made a qualitative leap since the Vietnam War. The Gulf War ...
  197. [197]
    Modern war: increased lethality showcases a greater need for peace.
    May 29, 2025 · The use of long range munitions such as the American HIMARS systems have undoubtedly given Ukraine a tactical advantage, able to strike deep ...
  198. [198]
    [PDF] The Implications of the Fighting in Ukraine for Future U.S.-Involved ...
    May 22, 2025 · Throughout the Russia-Ukraine war, ground-based air defenses (GBADs) have proven highly effective in denying air control and destroying manned ...<|separator|>
  199. [199]
    Geopolitical and Military Lessons from the Russia–Ukraine Conflict (II)
    Oct 2, 2025 · Electronic warfare has proven to be an “invisible weapon” with direct effects on coordination capability and the effectiveness of artillery or ...
  200. [200]
    Asymmetry Is Strategy, Strategy Is Asymmetry - NDU Press
    Asymmetry is thus clearly compatible with conventional warfare, simply because it is good strategy. During World War II, the conventional war par excellence ...
  201. [201]
    The Russia-Ukraine War: It Takes a Land Force to Defeat a Land ...
    Attacks from the sky are empirically proven to be less effective against land forces hiding beneath the surface of the land or in urban terrain. Thus, to defeat ...
  202. [202]
    Lessons from the Ukraine Conflict: Modern Warfare in the Age of ...
    May 2, 2025 · These emerging technologies are revolutionizing battlefield dynamics, extending operational reach while minimizing risks to human forces and ...<|separator|>
  203. [203]
    Arms Trends in Ukraine: 11 August - 17 August, 2025
    Aug 18, 2025 · Justin Bronk of RUSI argues that while UAVs have become Ukraine's main tool of attrition, their effectiveness depends on traditional firepower— ...