Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Debye length

The Debye length, denoted \lambda_D, is a fundamental characteristic length scale in the physics of and solutions, representing the typical distance over which mobile charged particles rearrange due to thermal motion to screen (or shield) an produced by a test charge. This screening effect arises from the collective response of or electrons, leading to an of the away from the charge, with \lambda_D setting the decay length. The concept was originally developed by and Erich Hückel in their 1923 theory to explain deviations from ideal behavior in solutions, where it quantifies the spatial extent of the ionic atmosphere around a central . In solutions, \lambda_D is given by \lambda_D = \sqrt{\frac{\epsilon_0 \epsilon_r k_B T}{2 N_A e^2 I}}, where \epsilon_0 is the , \epsilon_r is the of the , k_B is Boltzmann's constant, T is the temperature, N_A is Avogadro's number, e is the , and I is the of the solution; this formula highlights how \lambda_D decreases with increasing ion concentration, resulting in stronger screening in more concentrated solutions. For s, an analogous expression applies, \lambda_D = \sqrt{\frac{\epsilon_0 k_B T_e}{n_e e^2}} for electron-dominated screening (with T_e the electron temperature and n_e the electron density), underscoring its role as a key parameter for quasi-neutrality and the validity of approximations over distances much larger than \lambda_D. The Debye length thus serves as a criterion for the parameter N_D = n \lambda_D^3 \gg 1, ensuring dominates over particle interactions. Beyond its foundational role in Debye-Hückel theory, which predicts limiting laws for electrolyte properties like activity coefficients and freezing point depression, the Debye length influences diverse applications, including colloidal stability, electrochemical interfaces, and astrophysical plasmas. In modern contexts, such as semiconductor devices and fusion research, \lambda_D helps model sheath formation at boundaries and wave propagation, where its value—often on the order of micrometers in laboratory plasmas or angstroms in dense electrolytes—determines the transition from screened to unscreened electrostatic interactions.

Physical Origin

Electrostatic Screening

In ionized media, such as and solutions, electrostatic screening arises from the collective response of mobile charges to an external or test charge . When a test charge is introduced, it generates an that attracts oppositely charged particles while repelling those of the same sign, leading to a spatial redistribution of these charges. This rearrangement forms a diffuse screening cloud of net opposite charge around the test charge, which partially neutralizes its field and confines its influence to short distances. The process is governed by the balance between electrostatic attraction and thermal agitation, which spreads the cloud and determines its density profile. The Debye length serves as the fundamental scale for this screening effect, representing the typical radius of the beyond which the decays exponentially rather than following the long-range inverse-distance form. Inside the Debye length, significant charge separation occurs, allowing the test charge's to dominate locally, but outside this distance, the cumulative effect of the screening renders the net negligible. This exponential attenuation ensures that electrostatic interactions remain localized, preventing the buildup of large-scale charge imbalances. Electrostatic screening is essential for upholding quasi-neutrality in these systems, where the average is zero on scales much larger than the Debye length, thereby suppressing long-range interactions that could otherwise lead to instability or . By enabling the medium to act as an effective shield, this mechanism mimics the behavior of a or , where free carriers redistribute to oppose applied fields. Analogously, it resembles screened potentials in condensed matter, such as Yukawa interactions, where collective responses dampen the propagation of disturbances much like waves attenuated by friction.

Historical Development

The concept of the Debye length originated in the work of and Erich Hückel, who introduced it in as a key parameter in their theory of strong s. In their seminal paper, they described the Debye length as the characteristic distance over which electrostatic interactions between ions in dilute solutions are screened by surrounding charges, enabling the derivation of the limiting law for activity coefficients. This development addressed the deviations from ideal behavior in solutions, building on earlier ideas of ionic atmospheres proposed by Gouy and Chapman, and marked a foundational advance in . In the late 1920s, Irving Langmuir extended the Debye-Hückel framework to ionized gases, applying the Debye length to describe screening in plasmas. Langmuir's analyses of glow discharges and positive ion sheaths incorporated the Debye length to explain the formation of electrostatic boundaries and plasma oscillations, where it quantifies the scale of charge neutrality restoration. This adaptation was pivotal in establishing plasma physics as a distinct field, with Langmuir coining terms like "plasma" and "sheath" during his studies at General Electric. Key milestones in the mid-20th century included applications to physics in the 1950s, where himself contributed to understanding screening in materials like . In collaboration with Esther Conwell, Debye used the Debye length to model electrical conductivity and dielectric properties in impure , influencing early development. Later, the concept found uses in colloidal science through the of the 1940s, extended in subsequent decades to predict stability in charged suspensions, and in for analyzing space plasmas, such as in models from the 1950s onward. The Debye length has profoundly influenced fields like surface chemistry and , serving as a foundational for interpreting distributions at interfaces and in biological systems, such as protein interactions and membrane potentials. Its versatility underscores its enduring impact across disciplines reliant on electrostatic screening.

Mathematical Formulation

Poisson-Boltzmann Equation

The Poisson-Boltzmann equation serves as the core mathematical framework for modeling the distribution of electrostatic potential in systems featuring both fixed charges and mobile ionic species distributed according to principles. Developed in the context of interfaces, it integrates fundamental with to capture how mobile charges rearrange to screen fixed charges. Poisson's equation governs the electrostatic potential \phi in a dielectric medium with permittivity \varepsilon, expressed in SI units as \nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon}, where \rho denotes the total and \varepsilon incorporates the \varepsilon_0 and \varepsilon_r of the medium (\varepsilon = \varepsilon_0 \varepsilon_r). The total comprises contributions from fixed external charges \rho_\text{ext} and mobile charges \rho_\text{mobile} = \sum_i z_i e n_i, where z_i is the of ionic i, e is the , and n_i is the local of that . In , the mobile ions obey the , assuming their spatial arrangement is determined solely by the electrostatic relative to : n_i(\mathbf{r}) = n_{i0} \exp\left( -\frac{z_i e \phi(\mathbf{r})}{k_B T} \right), where n_{i0} is the uniform bulk far from any charge sources, k_B is the , and T is the absolute temperature. This distribution presupposes an where ions behave as non-interacting point particles, with no accounting for short-range correlations or effects. Inserting the Boltzmann expression for n_i into produces the Poisson-Boltzmann equation: \nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho_\text{ext}}{\varepsilon} - \frac{1}{\varepsilon} \sum_i z_i e n_{i0} \exp\left( -\frac{z_i e \phi}{k_B T} \right). Here, the summation runs over all mobile ionic species, and the equation remains nonlinear due to the exponential dependence on \phi. The derivation relies on key assumptions: an treating ions as a dilute gas without pairwise correlations (mean-field approximation), local , and dominance of over electrostatic interactions in the bulk (though the full nonlinear form applies more broadly). In SI units, \varepsilon has dimensions of farads per meter (F/m), k_B is 1.381 \times 10^{-23} J/, and T is in , ensuring dimensional consistency for \phi in volts.

Derivation of the Debye Length

The derivation of the Debye length begins with the Poisson-Boltzmann equation, which describes the electrostatic potential \phi in a with mobile charged under . For weak potentials satisfying e |\phi| \ll k_B T / |z_i|, where e is the , k_B is Boltzmann's constant, T is , and z_i is the of i, the Boltzmann factor for ion densities can be linearized. Specifically, the exponential term \exp(-z_i e \phi / k_B T) \approx 1 - z_i e \phi / k_B T. Substituting this approximation into the charge density \rho = \sum_i z_i e n_{i0} \exp(-z_i e \phi / k_B T), where n_{i0} is the of species i, yields \rho \approx \rho_\text{ext} - \frac{e^2 \phi}{k_B T} \sum_i n_{i0} z_i^2, assuming overall charge neutrality \sum_i z_i n_{i0} = 0 and \rho_\text{ext} as any external . \nabla^2 \phi = -\rho / \varepsilon, with \varepsilon the , then becomes the linearized form \nabla^2 \phi = \frac{\phi}{\lambda_D^2} - \frac{\rho_\text{ext}}{\varepsilon}, where the Debye length \lambda_D emerges as the characteristic screening scale. The explicit expression for the Debye length is given by \frac{1}{\lambda_D^2} = \frac{e^2}{\varepsilon k_B T} \sum_i n_{i0} z_i^2, summing over all charged species i. This parameter \lambda_D represents the distance over which electrostatic interactions are screened by the redistribution of mobile charges, with the inverse screening parameter \kappa = 1 / \lambda_D quantifying the strength of this effect. For special cases, such as a single-species dominated by electrons (with ions providing a neutralizing background), the formula simplifies to \lambda_D = \sqrt{\varepsilon k_B T / (n e^2)}, where n is the . In multi-species systems, like solutions, the summation \sum_i n_{i0} z_i^2 accounts for contributions from all ions, weighted by their bulk densities and valences.

Applications in Physical Systems

In Plasmas

In plasma physics, the Debye length quantifies the scale over which electrostatic potentials are screened due to the redistribution of mobile charges, enabling the collective behavior characteristic of plasmas. For electrons, the Debye length is expressed as \lambda_{De} = \sqrt{\frac{\epsilon_0 k_B T_e}{n_e e^2}}, where \epsilon_0 is the vacuum permittivity, k_B is Boltzmann's constant, T_e is the electron temperature, n_e is the electron number density, and e is the elementary charge. This formula arises from linearizing the Poisson-Boltzmann equation under thermal equilibrium assumptions. In a typical electron-ion plasma, the effective Debye length \lambda_D incorporates contributions from both species via \frac{1}{\lambda_D^2} = \frac{1}{\lambda_{De}^2} + \frac{1}{\lambda_{Di}^2}, with the ion Debye length \lambda_{Di} defined analogously using the ion temperature T_i and density n_i; often \lambda_D \approx \lambda_{De} since electrons, being lighter and hotter, dominate screening. A key indicator of plasma quasineutrality is the plasma parameter \Lambda = \lambda_D / r_\mathrm{mean}, where r_\mathrm{mean} \approx n^{-1/3} is the mean interparticle distance and n is the total particle density. The condition \Lambda \gg 1 (equivalently, the number of particles in a Debye sphere N_D = \frac{4}{3} \pi n \lambda_D^3 \gg 1) ensures that long-range collective interactions prevail over short-range collisions, maintaining approximate charge neutrality over scales larger than \lambda_D. The Debye length governs Debye shielding in sheaths, regions near confining walls or immersed objects where charge separation occurs; sheath thicknesses typically span several \lambda_D, influencing ion acceleration and -wall interactions in devices like fusion reactors and thrusters. It also connects to the \omega_{pe} \approx \sqrt{n_e e^2 / (\epsilon_0 m_e)}, where with wavenumbers k \lambda_D \lesssim 1 propagate with near \omega_{pe}, while shorter wavelengths (k \lambda_D \gg 1) experience strong collisional or , limiting wave coherence to scales beyond \lambda_D. Typical lengths vary widely across environments, reflecting differences in and . In fusion plasmas, such as those in tokamaks, \lambda_D \sim 10^{-4} m for n_e \approx 10^{20} m^{-3} and T_e \approx 10 keV. In the Earth's ionosphere, \lambda_D \sim 0.002 m prevails at n_e \approx 10^{12} m^{-3} and T_e \approx 1000 K. Astrophysical plasmas, like the , exhibit \lambda_D \sim 10--$100 m under conditions of n_e \approx 10^7 m^{-3}\) and T_e \approx 10$ eV.

In Electrolyte Solutions

In solutions, the Debye length characterizes the spatial extent of electrostatic screening by solvated in a medium, adapting the general concept to account for the solvent's properties and ionic concentrations. The inverse square of the Debye length is given by \frac{1}{\lambda_D^2} = \frac{e^2}{\varepsilon k_B T} \sum_i n_i z_i^2, where e is the , \varepsilon = \varepsilon_r \varepsilon_0 is the of the solution with relative dielectric constant \varepsilon_r (approximately 80 for at ) and \varepsilon_0, k_B is the , T is the temperature, n_i is the of ion i, and z_i is the . When expressed in terms of concentrations c_i (in mol/L), the formula becomes \frac{1}{\lambda_D^2} = \frac{e^2 N_A \times 10^3}{\varepsilon k_B T} \sum_i c_i z_i^2, with N_A Avogadro's number, reflecting the dense ionic environment typical of aqueous solutions. This formulation underpins Debye-Hückel theory, which models interactions in dilute solutions and yields the limiting law for mean ionic activity coefficients: \log \gamma_\pm = -A |z_+ z_-| \sqrt{I}, where A \approx 0.509 (mol/L)^{-1/2} for at 25°C, z_+ and z_- are cation and anion valences, and I = \frac{1}{2} \sum_i c_i z_i^2 is the in mol/L. The I is inversely proportional to \lambda_D^2, linking screening length directly to deviations from ideal behavior in ; this law holds for I \lesssim 0.001 mol/L, where the ionic atmosphere around each extends over the Debye length. In the context of electrical double layers at charged interfaces, such as electrodes or colloidal particles, the Debye length approximates the thickness of the diffuse layer where counterions accumulate to screen surface charge, with the potential decaying exponentially over \sim \lambda_D. This layer contributes to the double-layer capacitance C_{dl} \approx \varepsilon / \lambda_D, which increases with ionic strength due to thinner screening, enabling high charge storage in electrochemical systems. Typical Debye lengths in aqueous NaCl solutions at 25°C span from sub-nanometer to tens of nanometers, depending on concentration: for 1 M NaCl (I = 1 mol/L), \lambda_D \approx 0.3 nm, comparable to ion sizes and indicating strong screening; for dilute 10^{-3} M NaCl (I = 10^{-3} mol/L), \lambda_D \approx 10 nm, allowing longer-range interactions. These values highlight the sensitivity to \varepsilon_r, as lower dielectric constants in non-aqueous solvents would yield shorter \lambda_D for equivalent concentrations.

In Semiconductors

In semiconductors, the Debye length quantifies the spatial extent over which electric fields are screened by mobile charge carriers and ionized impurities, arising from the redistribution of electrons, holes, and dopants in response to potential perturbations. The inverse square of the Debye length is expressed as \frac{1}{\lambda_D^2} = \frac{e^2}{\epsilon k_B T} (n + p + N_D^+ + N_A^-), where e is the elementary charge, \epsilon is the semiconductor permittivity, k_B is the Boltzmann constant, T is the absolute temperature, n and p are the electron and hole concentrations, and N_D^+ and N_A^- are the ionized donor and acceptor concentrations, respectively. In heavily doped semiconductors dominated by one carrier type and its associated dopants, this simplifies to \lambda_D = \sqrt{\epsilon k_B T / e^2 N}, with N representing the effective ionized impurity concentration. This formulation adapts the Poisson-Boltzmann approach for semiconductors, using Boltzmann statistics for non-degenerate carriers, though Fermi-Dirac statistics apply more precisely in degenerate regimes. The Debye length is essential in space charge regions of devices, such as the depletion layers in p-n junctions, where it sets the characteristic scale for charge screening and the transition from depleted to quasi-neutral zones. In p-n junctions, the depletion layer thickness is typically several times the Debye length, influencing junction , built-in potential, and reverse ; for instance, abrupt junctions exhibit depletion widths proportional to \sqrt{\epsilon V / e N}, modulated by the Debye screening that blurs the edges of the region. Additionally, the Debye length governs the screening of ionized impurities, reducing their Coulombic interaction range and thereby affecting , , and overall properties in doped materials. The Debye length exhibits strong dependence on both and doping level: it increases with temperature due to enhanced aiding redistribution, while decreasing with higher doping as increased strengthens screening. In intrinsic at 300 (with intrinsic n_i \approx 1.5 \times 10^{10} cm^{-3}), \lambda_D \approx 24 μm; for n-type doping at $10^{16} cm^{-3}, it drops to about 40 nm, and at $10^{18} cm^{-3}, to roughly 4 nm. In (GaAs), which has a similar (\epsilon_r \approx 12.9) but lower intrinsic (n_i \approx 2 \times 10^6 cm^{-3}), typical values for doped samples range from ~30 nm to ~3 nm across doping levels of $10^{16}–$10^{18} cm^{-3} at (300 ), reflecting comparable screening behavior to but with adjustments for band structure differences. These scales highlight the Debye length's role in nanoscale device physics, where high doping confines screening to atomic dimensions.

In Colloidal Suspensions

In colloidal suspensions, charged particles are dispersed in a medium containing , where the Debye length \lambda_D characterizes the extent of electrostatic screening by the surrounding ions. The \lambda_D is primarily determined by the of the , adapting the from to the vicinity of the particles. This screening leads to an effective pairwise interaction potential between colloidal particles that takes the Yukawa form, V(r) \propto \frac{\exp(-r / \lambda_D)}{r}, where r is the interparticle separation, reflecting the decay of the repulsion over the screening distance \lambda_D. The Debye length plays a central role in colloidal stability through the , which balances the attractive van der Waals forces with the repulsive electrostatic interactions screened by the . In this framework, originally developed by Derjaguin and Landau in 1941 and extended by Verwey and Overbeek in 1948, stability arises when the repulsive barrier in the total potential exceeds , preventing aggregation; conversely, aggregation occurs if the screening is too strong (small \lambda_D), reducing the repulsion range relative to particle size. Charging of colloidal particles typically arises from of surface functional groups, such as carboxyl or groups on polymers, or adsorption of ions from the , resulting in a zeta potential \zeta that quantifies the effective surface charge and influences the strength of the screened repulsion. In aqueous colloidal suspensions, typical \lambda_D values range from about 10 at 10^{-3} M salt concentration (1 mM for 1:1 electrolytes) to 1 at 100 mM, setting the scale for interparticle forces in practical systems. These lengths are crucial for applications in paints and inks, where controlled screening ensures dispersion stability against during storage and application, and in biological systems like protein solutions, where \lambda_D modulates and prevents unwanted precipitation.

Limitations and Extensions

Validity of Approximations

The Debye-Hückel approximation, which underlies the standard formulation of the Debye length, relies on several key assumptions to ensure its validity across physical systems such as s and solutions. Primarily, it assumes weak , where the dimensionless potential e \phi / k_B T \ll 1, meaning the electrostatic potential energy of charges is much smaller than their , allowing of the Poisson-Boltzmann . Additionally, the theory operates in the dilute limit, requiring the Debye length \lambda_D to be much larger than the average interparticle distance, ensuring that screening effects dominate without significant short-range correlations. The approximation further neglects quantum effects, treating particles as classical point charges with Maxwell-Boltzmann distributions, which holds when the thermal de Broglie wavelength is smaller than the interparticle spacing. Central to assessing the validity are dimensionless parameters that quantify the regime of applicability. In plasmas, the plasma parameter \Lambda = \frac{4\pi}{3} n \lambda_D^3, representing the number of particles within a Debye sphere, must satisfy \Lambda \gg 1 (typically greater than 10–100) for weak coupling, where collective behavior is screened effectively without strong pairwise interactions. The coupling parameter \Gamma = \frac{(Z e)^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 a k_B T}, with a = n^{-1/3} as the mean interparticle distance, further characterizes the system; weak coupling requires \Gamma \ll 1, indicating thermal motion overwhelms Coulomb interactions. In electrolyte solutions, analogous parameters include the Debye number, which measures screening strength relative to system size, and the Bjerrum length compared to ion spacing, enforcing similar dilute conditions. Breakdown of these approximations occurs in regimes of strong fields or high densities, leading to nonlinear effects or correlations that invalidate the linear model. For strong fields, when e \phi / k_B T > 1, the potential exceeds thermal scales, necessitating the full nonlinear Poisson-Boltzmann equation to capture saturation of screening. At high densities, \Gamma > 1 signals strong coupling, where ion correlations and pairing dominate, as seen when \lambda_D approaches or falls below the interparticle distance, violating the dilute assumption. In such cases, short-range effects like hard-sphere repulsions or quantum degeneracy become prominent, rendering the Debye length ill-defined or requiring modified theories. Experimental validations confirm the approximation's robustness in dilute regimes but highlight its limitations in concentrated systems. In electrolyte solutions, the theory accurately predicts activity coefficients and conductivities up to ionic strengths of about 0.01 M for 1:1 salts like NaCl, with errors below 5%, but deviates significantly above 0.1–0.3 M due to ion pairing. In plasmas, such as gas discharges or solar atmospheres where \Lambda > 40, the Debye shielding approximation holds within 1–5% even at distances as short as 0.05 \lambda_D; however, it fails in dense plasmas where strong coupling (\Gamma > 1) leads to correlations and poor agreement with simulations.

Nonlinear and Advanced Models

The nonlinear Poisson-Boltzmann equation extends the linear Debye-Hückel approximation by retaining the full exponential dependence of ion densities on the electrostatic potential, enabling accurate descriptions of high-potential regimes such as electric double layers and dense plasmas where the linearization fails. In this formulation, the charge density is given by \rho = -2 n_0 e z \sinh\left( \frac{z e \phi}{k_B T} \right) for a symmetric z:z electrolyte, leading to the equation \nabla^2 \phi = \frac{2 n_0 e z}{\epsilon_0 \epsilon_r} \sinh\left( \frac{z e \phi}{k_B T} \right), which must typically be solved numerically except in planar geometries. For the electric double layer at a charged surface, the Gouy-Chapman solution provides an exact analytical expression for the potential profile, \phi(x) = \frac{4 k_B T}{z e} \ln \left( \frac{1 + \gamma e^{- \kappa x}}{1 - \gamma e^{- \kappa x}} \right), where \gamma = \tanh\left( \frac{z e \phi_0}{4 k_B T} \right) and \kappa is the inverse Debye length, revealing a more compact screening layer than the linear case at high surface potentials. In dense plasmas, numerical solutions of the nonlinear equation demonstrate enhanced screening and ion layering effects, with the effective screening length deviating from the classical Debye length by up to 20-50% depending on coupling strength. Advanced theoretical models address ion correlations and strong coupling beyond mean-field approximations like Poisson-Boltzmann. The spherical approximation (MSA) treats ions as charged and solves the Ornstein-Zernike equation with a that approximates pair correlations, yielding a screened potential with a modified Debye length that accounts for finite size and short-range repulsions, improving predictions of in electrolytes over Debye-Hückel for moderate concentrations. For strongly coupled systems where the coupling parameter \Gamma > 1 (ratio of potential to ), variational methods such as the variational modified hypernetted-chain (VMHNC) optimize a free-energy functional to capture bridge functions and higher-order correlations, providing accurate radial distribution functions in Yukawa plasmas compared to simulations. simulations complement these theories by directly sampling ionic configurations in strong-coupling electrolytes, revealing overscreening and like-charge attractions due to correlations. Quantum extensions incorporate Fermi-Dirac statistics for degenerate plasmas, replacing the classical screening with the Thomas-Fermi model, where the screening length is \lambda_{TF} = \left( \frac{\epsilon_0 E_F}{3 n_0 e^2} \right)^{1/2} with E_F, applicable to dense semiconductors and quantum plasmas where thermal de Broglie wavelengths exceed interparticle distances. In such systems, the nonlinear Thomas-Fermi equation \nabla^2 \phi = \frac{e}{\epsilon_0} \int \frac{d^3 p}{(2\pi \hbar)^3} \left[ f(p + e \phi) - f(p) \right] (with f the Fermi function) yields a shorter screening length than classical predictions, enhancing localization of charge perturbations in high-density regimes like white dwarf interiors. Molecular dynamics simulations apply these nonlinear and advanced models to modern systems, such as electrolytes in lithium- batteries, where they quantify clustering and double-layer , showing lengths of 0.5-2 nm that influence charge transfer rates and capacity fade. In fuel cells, similar simulations reveal correlation-induced transport enhancements in proton-exchange membranes, with effective screening lengths modulating proton by 20-40%. For dusty s, and methods model nonlinear screening around charged grains, demonstrating collective attractions and phase transitions in dense clouds relevant to astrophysical environments and processing.

References

  1. [1]
    Debye Shielding
    Not surprisingly, the lengthscale associated with such shielding is the Debye length. Let us consider the simplest possible example.
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Chapter 1 Introduction
    This is called the Debye Length. Perturbations to the charge density and potential in a plasma tend to fall off with charac teristic length λD . In Fusion ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] "Historic Papers in Electrochemistry"
    Dehye u. Huckel, Zur Theorie der Elektrolyte. Physik. Zeitschr. XXIV, 1923. Ionenwirkungen. Dementsprechend zerlegen wir. U in zwei Bestandteile ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Peter Debye and Electrochemistry - Indian Academy of Sciences
    mally seek values of the activity coefficient, Debye in 1924 reformulated his original paper with Hückel (1923), which dealt with osmotic coefficient. It is ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD)
    Jan 23, 2019 · The Debye length is the scale over which mobile charge carriers screen out electric fields in plasmas and other conductors. 𝜆D. 2 = 𝜀KT. 2nie2.
  6. [6]
    [PDF] ECE 507 – Lecture 2 - ECE507 - Plasma Physics and Applications
    Notice that we arrived to the definition of λ. D assuming a Maxwellian distribution. However in some types of plasmas ... Debye length. Plasma frequency.
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Lecture Notes in Physics Introduction to Plasma Physics
    We say that the plasma charges effectively screen out the electric field of the test charge outside of the Debye sphere r = rD. ... In the analysis of the Debye ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] THE DISCHARGE SCIENCE OF IRVING LANGMUIR MA Lieberman ...
    Oct 10, 2005 · We shall use the name plasma to describe this region containing balanced charges of ions and electrons.” (from L. Tonks and I. Langmuir, “ ...Missing: 1920s | Show results with:1920s
  9. [9]
    Debye Length - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The Debye length is the distance from the charged surface where the potential has decayed to the 1/e point or 36.7% of the surface potential.
  10. [10]
    Debye length | Plasma-Universe.com
    The Debye length, named after the Dutch physical chemist Peter Debye, is the scale over which mobile charge carriers (eg electrons) screen out electric fields.
  11. [11]
    Sur la constitution de la charge électrique à la surface d'un électrolyte
    9, 457-468 (1910) DOI ... Sur la constitution de la charge électrique à la surface d'un électrolyte. M. Gouy. Without abstract. Télécharger le PDF de article.
  12. [12]
    LI. A contribution to the theory of electrocapillarity
    A contribution to the theory of electrocapillarity. David Leonard Chapman Jesus College, Oxford. Pages 475-481 | Published online: 08 Jun 2010.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] The Poisson-Boltzmann Equation - CCoM
    To motivate the work, we provide a thorough discussion of the Poisson-Boltzmann equation, including derivation from a few basic assumptions, discussions of ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
  14. [14]
    Derivation of the Debye length - Fusion Technology Institute
    Derivation of the Debye length. In the electrostatic approximation, consider a distribution of electrons that is immersed in a uniform background of positive ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Lecture Notes on Introduction to Plasma Astrophysics
    collisions, but has its long range attenuated by Debye screening). However, this ... diffusion mechanism.) Dust grains complicate this estimate greatly ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Plasma Technologies for Aerospace Applications - University of ...
    • Typical values of the Debye Length under different conditions: n [m-3]. T[eV] Debye Length [m]. Interstellar. 106. 10-1. 1. Solar Wind. 107. 10. 10. Solar ...
  17. [17]
    Landau Damping
    We can interpret Equation (7.9) as the dispersion relation for electrostatic plasma waves, relating the wavevector, ${\bf k}$ , to the frequency, $\omega ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Estimating the Debye length - UMD Physics
    The Debye length is the distance over which a charge Q is shielded by the ions in a solution. What this means, referring to the picture at.
  19. [19]
  20. [20]
    Double Layer Thickness - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The capacitance values are very high because of the small double-layer thickness, Cdl is about 20 μF/cm2.
  21. [21]
    [PDF] The Electrostatic Screening Length in Concentrated Electrolytes ...
    Within the Debye-Hückel region, below ca. 0.1 M, the screening length decreases with concentration according to the Debye theory reaching a minimum when the ...
  22. [22]
    Debye screening - how it affects zeta potential - Malvern Panalytical
    Oct 3, 2018 · Debye screening describe the charge cloud around nanoparticles. It effectively reduces the influence of charge through shielding.
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Physics of Semiconductor Devices
    In this Third Edition of Physics of Semiconductor Devices, over 50% of the material has been revised or updated, and the material has been totally reorganized.
  25. [25]
    Theoretical calculations of Debye length, built-in potential and ...
    The results show that: (1) bandgap narrowing and carrier degeneracy have important effects on the junction built-in potential; (2) carrier degeneracy and dopant ...Missing: silicon | Show results with:silicon
  26. [26]
  27. [27]
    Colloidal Systems in Concentrated Electrolyte Solutions Exhibit Re ...
    May 5, 2022 · The Debye length is a measure of the range of electrostatic interactions. The Debye length decreases with an increase in salt concentration ...1. Introduction · 2.1. Colloidal Stability... · 3.1. Nanoparticle Stability
  28. [28]
    Breakdown of the Yukawa model in de-ionized colloidal suspensions
    Mar 10, 2008 · We attribute this to many-body effects that become relevant at low salinity due to the long Debye length (which sets the interaction range in ...
  29. [29]
    An overview of surface forces and the DLVO theory | ChemTexts
    Jul 22, 2023 · This lecture text focuses on surface forces and interactions in a liquid medium, with particular emphasis on the surface-surface interactions described by the ...Surface Forces And Dlvo... · Van Der Waals Forces Between... · Extended Dlvo Theory And...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Flow-induced structure in colloidal suspensions
    Jan 14, 2005 · Colloidal dispersions are encountered in many consumer products, including paints, inks, ... (Debye) length is sufficiently large relative ...
  31. [31]
    Phase behavior of colloids and proteins in aqueous suspensions
    Aug 28, 2012 · The colloidal screening can be quantified by the Debye length,18,69 κ−1. In contrast, the addition of non-adsorbent polymers can cause a ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] On the accuracy of the Debye shielding model - arXiv
    We give quantitative criteria to set the limit of the approximation when the number of particles is very small, or the distance to the test charge too short.<|control11|><|separator|>
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
    Plasma Parameter - Richard Fitzpatrick
    ... Debye sphere is densely populated, corresponds to a weakly coupled plasma. It can also be appreciated, from Equation (1.20), that strongly coupled plasmas ...Missing: Γ validity approximation<|control11|><|separator|>
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Nonlinear Electrostatics. The Poisson-Boltzmann Equation - arXiv
    Despite its nonlinearity the PB equation for the mean electrostatic potential can be solved analytically for planar or wall geometry, and we present analytic ...
  36. [36]
    Poisson–Boltzmann Description of the Electrical Double Layer ...
    The electrical double layer is examined using a generalized Poisson–Boltzmann equation that takes into account the finite ion size.Missing: original | Show results with:original
  37. [37]
    [PDF] arXiv:1010.4944v1 [physics.class-ph] 24 Oct 2010
    Oct 24, 2010 · The general solution to the nonlinear Poisson-Boltzmann equation for two parallel charged plates, ... Debye length ℓDB. This includes many ...<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Simple electrolytes in the mean spherical approximation
    Energy-Scaled Debye–Hückel Theory for the Electrostatic Solvation Free Energy in Size-Asymmetric Electrolyte Solutions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B ...
  39. [39]
    Description of strongly coupled Yukawa fluids using the variational ...
    Jun 2, 2004 · The variational modified hypernetted chain approach as proposed by Rosenfeld [J. Stat. Phys. 42, 437 (1986)] is used to describe strongly ...
  40. [40]
    A Monte Carlo study of the electrical double layer of a shape ...
    Oct 25, 2018 · In this paper, we present a Monte Carlo simulation study on the structure of the electrical double layer around a spherical colloid ...
  41. [41]
    Unified description of linear screening in dense plasmas | Phys. Rev. E
    Mar 6, 2015 · The new potential theoretically connects limits of Debye-Hückel–Yukawa, Lindhard, Thomas-Fermi, and Bohmian quantum hydrodynamics descriptions.<|separator|>
  42. [42]
    Benchmarking Classical Molecular Dynamics Simulations for ...
    Jun 20, 2025 · In this study, we benchmark the ability of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with Class 1 force fields to model the transport and structural properties of ...
  43. [43]
    The high dust density regime of dusty plasma: Theory and simulations
    Aug 12, 2024 · Hence, in this regime, the Debye screening is the dominant screening process. The plasma consists of the electrons, the ions, and the dust. The ...