Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Delta wing

A delta wing is a triangular planform configuration for an aircraft's main wing, resembling the Greek letter delta (Δ), which is optimized for high-subsonic and supersonic flight due to its low drag and structural efficiency.^[1] This design features a straight leading edge and tapers to a point at the trailing edge, providing a large surface area relative to its span while minimizing wave drag at transonic and supersonic speeds.^[2] The concept of the delta wing dates back to the 19th century, with the first patent granted in 1867 to English inventors J.W. Butler and E. Edwards for a jet-powered aircraft design incorporating the shape, though it was not built at the time.^[2] Practical development advanced in the 1930s and 1940s under German aeronautical engineer Alexander Lippisch, who conducted wind tunnel tests and built gliders like the DFS 40 and DM-1 to explore its aerodynamics.^[3] The first powered delta-wing aircraft to fly was the American Convair XF-92A, which made its maiden flight on September 18, 1948, serving as a research platform that influenced subsequent designs.^[3] Delta wings offer key advantages including reduced drag in supersonic regimes through their swept leading edges, which delay shock wave formation, and inherent structural strength from the triangular geometry that allows for simpler construction and greater internal fuel capacity.^[2] They also generate vortex lift at high angles of attack, enhancing maneuverability for fighter aircraft and stability during reentry for vehicles like the Space Shuttle.^[4]^[5] Notable examples include the Concorde supersonic airliner, the Dassault Mirage series of fighters, the Convair F-102 Delta Dagger interceptor, and the North American XB-70 Valkyrie bomber, demonstrating their versatility in military, commercial, and space applications despite challenges like higher induced drag at low speeds.^[2]

Overview

Definition and Geometry

A delta wing is a fixed-wing aircraft configuration characterized by a triangular planform that approximates the shape of the Greek letter delta (Δ) when viewed from above, often forming a pure triangle or a trapezoid with a very small tip chord.^[6] This geometry distinguishes it from conventional straight or swept wings by blending the wing directly with the fuselage, creating a continuous lifting surface that enhances overall aerodynamic integration.^[7] The primary geometric parameters of a delta wing include the leading-edge sweep angle \Lambda, which measures the angle between the leading edge and a line perpendicular to the aircraft's longitudinal axis, typically ranging from 45° to 70° to suit subsonic or supersonic applications.^[7] The aspect ratio AR, defined as AR = b^2 / S where b is the wing span and S is the reference wing area, is characteristically low at 1 to 3, reflecting the compact, high-sweep design; for a pure delta wing, it simplifies to AR = 4 \cot \Lambda.^[8] The taper ratio \lambda = c_t / c_r, the ratio of tip chord c_t to root chord c_r, approaches zero in pure delta configurations. The mean aerodynamic chord (MAC), important for stability and control references, equals \frac{2}{3} c_r for a flat pure delta wing.^[9] The wing area S for a pure delta is given by S = \frac{1}{2} b c_r, with the root chord related to the sweep by c_r = \frac{b}{2} \tan \Lambda.^[8] Compared to straight wings, which have higher aspect ratios and distinct fuselage-wing junctions, the delta shape promotes seamless integration that minimizes interference drag while distributing loads over longer internal paths, thereby increasing structural weight requirements.^[7]

Advantages and Limitations

Delta wings offer several key advantages in aircraft design, particularly for high-speed applications. At supersonic speeds, they achieve a high lift-to-drag ratio due to their swept geometry, which minimizes wave drag and enables efficient cruise performance.^[8] The design's structural simplicity, with fewer joints and a continuous triangular planform, reduces weight and manufacturing complexity while providing inherent strength through even stress distribution.^[6] Additionally, the large root chord allows for substantial internal volume, accommodating greater fuel capacity and, in military variants, weapons storage without significantly increasing drag.^[10] The high sweep angle also delays the transonic drag rise, improving performance during the transition to supersonic flight.^[3] Despite these benefits, delta wings have notable limitations, especially at lower speeds. They generate poorer low-speed lift compared to conventional wings, resulting in high stall speeds and the need for leading-edge devices like slats or mechanisms to promote vortex lift for mitigation.^[11] At subsonic speeds, the low aspect ratio leads to high induced drag, reducing overall efficiency during takeoff, landing, and loiter.^[12] Without additional control surfaces such as tails or canards, maneuverability is compromised, often exhibiting pitch-up tendencies and reduced stability in tailless configurations.^[3] This contributes to increased landing speeds, typically in the range of 150-200 knots, necessitating longer runways and more demanding pilot techniques.^[13] The primary trade-off with delta wings lies in balancing their supersonic efficiency against subsonic handling challenges. While they excel in high-speed regimes with low drag, their maximum lift coefficient (C_L max) is generally lower, around 0.8-1.2 for basic configurations, compared to 1.5 or higher for conventional straight or moderately swept wings, limiting payload and requiring compensatory design features.^[12] Operationally, this design favors long-range, high-altitude missions but imposes constraints on short-field performance and versatility in mixed-speed profiles.^[6]

Structural Characteristics

Materials and Construction

Early delta wing aircraft primarily utilized aluminum alloys for their skins and spars, valued for their high strength-to-weight ratio and corrosion resistance formed by surface aluminum oxide.^[14] Alloy 7075-T6, in particular, was commonly employed in load-bearing components like spars due to its superior tensile strength exceeding 500 MPa.^[15] In supersonic delta wing designs, titanium alloys such as 6Al-4V were incorporated in high-heat areas, including engine nacelles and leading edges, to maintain structural integrity at elevated temperatures up to 600°C while resisting corrosion.^[16] Contemporary delta wing construction has shifted toward carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP) since the late 20th century, particularly in stealth and high-performance aircraft, offering 20-30% weight reduction compared to aluminum equivalents and inherent radar-absorbing properties through tailored resin matrices.^[17] For instance, the B-2 Spirit bomber employs extensive CFRP throughout its delta wing structure for enhanced strength-to-weight performance and low observability, with more recent examples including the B-21 Raider stealth bomber (first flight 2023).^[18]^[19] Sandwich constructions incorporating honeycomb cores, often aluminum or aramid-based, provide additional stiffness and impact resistance in these composite panels.^[20] Key construction techniques for delta wings include the wet wing design, where fuel is stored directly within sealed structural compartments to maximize volume without added tanks, as seen in many fighter configurations.^[20] Stressed-skin monocoque builds integrate the outer skin as a primary load-bearing element, distributing stresses across aluminum or composite surfaces supported by internal ribs and spars.^[20] Leading-edge extensions (LEX) are often added during assembly to bolster structural integrity, providing additional torsional support and attachment points for control surfaces.^[21] Low-aspect-ratio delta wings pose significant challenges in achieving torsional rigidity, as their slender, triangular geometry amplifies twisting under aerodynamic loads, necessitating reinforced spars and composite layups to prevent aeroelastic divergence.^[22] Additionally, repeated high-G maneuvers induce fatigue in these structures, with cyclic stresses leading to crack propagation in metal skins or delamination in composites, requiring rigorous inspection protocols and material selections optimized for over 10,000 flight hours.^[23]

Internal Framework and Load Distribution

The internal framework of a delta wing is designed to withstand significant aerodynamic and inertial loads, primarily through a torsion box configuration formed by spanwise box spars. These include a front spar positioned at approximately 15-20% of the local chord and a rear spar at 60-70% of the chord, which together create a closed structural cell capable of resisting both bending and torsional moments.^[24] Ribs extend chordwise between the spars to maintain the wing's aerodynamic profile, transfer loads from the skin to the primary structure, and prevent buckling under compression.^[20] Stringers, running parallel to the spars along the skin, provide additional stiffening to distribute shear and prevent local deformations in the upper and lower surfaces.^[25] Load paths in the delta wing framework prioritize efficient transfer of lift-induced bending and torsion. The primary bending moments from distributed lift are carried by the spar caps, while vertical shear forces are borne by the spar webs, with shear stress given by \tau = \frac{VQ}{It}, where V is the shear force, Q is the first moment of area about the neutral axis, I is the second moment of area, and t is the web thickness.^[25] Torsional loads, prominent due to the wing's swept geometry and vortex-dominated flow, are resisted by the closed-cell geometry of the torsion box, which distributes twisting moments across the skins and spars without relying on open-section warping.^[26] Design considerations for delta wings emphasize robustness against high wing loadings, often in the range of 400-500 kg/m² for supersonic applications, necessitating reinforced torsion boxes to handle combined shear, bending, and torsion without excessive deflection.^[27] For instance, fuel tanks integrated within the wing structure serve dual purposes, providing propulsion while acting as ballast to maintain center-of-gravity position amid varying load conditions and fuel consumption.^[28] Advancements in delta wing structural analysis have incorporated finite element methods to model complex stress distributions and optimize load paths, enabling precise prediction of responses under dynamic loads as seen in experimental validations of scaled models.^[29] Research since 2010 has explored the integration of smart materials, such as shape-memory alloys and piezoelectric actuators, into adaptive frameworks, enabling experimental real-time morphing of the internal structure to mitigate loads and enhance stability across flight regimes.^[30]

Aerodynamic Characteristics

Low-Speed Flight and Vortex Lift

Delta wings face significant challenges in low-speed flight due to their low aspect ratio, which promotes early tip stall as the flow separates from the swept leading edges at moderate angles of attack. This results in a relatively low maximum lift coefficient, typically around 0.9 without enhancements, limiting performance during takeoff and landing.^[31] At higher angles of attack, exceeding approximately 10°, a leading-edge vortex lift mechanism activates, where the separated flow rolls up into stable conical vortices above the upper surface of the wing. These vortices effectively increase the camber and circulation, generating a nonlinear lift increment ΔCL of up to 0.8, which can contribute as much as 50-70% of the total lift in some configurations. The total lift coefficient can be expressed as C_L = C_{L_{\text{linear}}} + C_{L_{\text{vortex}}}, where the vortex component is approximated empirically as C_{L_{\text{vortex}}} \approx k \alpha^2 with k ranging from 0.001 to 0.003 per degree (α in degrees), depending on the sweep angle and planform.^[32]^[33] The strength of these leading-edge vortices is governed by the Kutta-Joukowski theorem, which relates the lift per unit span to the circulation Γ as L' = \rho V \Gamma, where ρ is air density and V is freestream velocity; the circulation arises from the vortex core's induced low-pressure region over the wing.^[32] To enhance and stabilize vortex lift, control devices such as strakes or leading-edge extensions (LEX) are often incorporated, generating auxiliary vortices that interact with the primary leading-edge vortices to delay breakdown and extend the usable stall angle beyond 30°. These devices improve vortex core positioning and burst resistance, significantly boosting high-angle-of-attack performance in aircraft like fighters.^[34]^[35]

Subsonic Flight

In subsonic flight, the high sweep angle of delta wings effectively delays the onset of compressibility effects, allowing operation up to Mach numbers around 0.8 without significant wave drag rise. However, this geometry results in a low aspect ratio (AR typically 1–3), which substantially increases induced drag compared to straight or moderately swept wings. The induced drag coefficient is given by the formula C_{D_i} = \frac{C_L^2}{\pi \, AR \, e} where C_L is the lift coefficient, AR is the aspect ratio, and e is the Oswald efficiency factor (often around 0.7–0.8 for delta wings). Due to the low AR, C_{D_i} is notably higher for a given C_L, leading to reduced overall aerodynamic efficiency in attached-flow conditions.^[36]^[37] The lift distribution on a delta wing in subsonic flow approximates elliptical loading for minimum induced drag but is skewed outward along the span because of the high sweep, concentrating more lift toward the tips. This outward shift arises from the effective reduction in perpendicular flow component across the swept leading edge, altering the spanwise loading and introducing a roll-off moment that can affect lateral stability.^[38]^[39] Efficiency metrics for delta wings in subsonic cruise (Mach 0.6–0.8) show maximum lift-to-drag ratios (L/D) typically in the range of 8–10, significantly lower than the 15+ achieved by conventional straight-wing designs with higher AR. This penalty stems primarily from the elevated induced drag, compounded by yaw stability challenges in tailless configurations lacking vertical surfaces, where dihedral effects and sideslip can lead to directional divergence without active control.^[40]^[41] To mitigate these limitations and boost lift coefficient (C_L) for cruise or approach, trailing-edge flaps are employed on delta wings, increasing camber and effective wing area to improve L/D by 10–20% in subsonic regimes. However, the triangular planform limits flap span and effectiveness compared to rectangular wings, as outboard sections are shorter and hinge moments are higher, constraining maximum deflection without excessive drag penalties.^[42]^[43]

Transonic and Low-Supersonic Flight

In the transonic regime, spanning Mach numbers from approximately 0.8 to 1.2, delta wings benefit from their high sweep angles, which delay the critical Mach number—the free-stream Mach number at which local sonic conditions first occur—to values around 0.7 to 0.85.^[44] This delay arises because the sweep reduces the component of the free-stream velocity normal to the leading edge, slowing the onset of compressibility effects compared to straight wings.^[45] As the Mach number approaches or exceeds this critical value, drag divergence occurs primarily due to the formation of shock waves on the upper surface, where accelerating flow over the wing reaches sonic speeds, leading to a sudden pressure rise and increased wave drag.^[7] To account for compressibility in this regime, the Prandtl-Glauert correction adjusts subsonic lift coefficients for higher Mach numbers using the relation:

C_{L_{\text{compr}}} = \frac{C_{L_{\text{incomp}}}}{\sqrt{1 - M^2}}

where C_{L_{\text{compr}}} is the compressible lift coefficient, C_{L_{\text{incomp}}} is the incompressible value, and M is the free-stream Mach number.^[46] This correction highlights how lift increases nonlinearly as Mach approaches 1, but it breaks down near the transonic regime due to shock formation and flow nonlinearities. Wave drag, a key component in transonic flow, stems from these shocks and can be approximated in linear theory as proportional to the square of the airfoil thickness-to-chord ratio, emphasizing the need for slender designs.^[7] In low-supersonic flight, up to Mach 2, delta wing configurations incorporate area ruling to optimize fuselage-wing integration, smoothing the longitudinal cross-sectional area distribution to minimize transonic drag rise by distributing volume to avoid abrupt changes that amplify shock strengths.^[47] This results in minimum drag coefficients (C_{D_{\min}}) typically ranging from 0.01 to 0.015 at Mach numbers between 1.2 and 1.8, reflecting efficient wave drag management for swept delta shapes.^[48] Shock-induced boundary layer separation, which can exacerbate drag and reduce control effectiveness, is mitigated through the use of thin airfoils with thickness-to-chord ratios (t/c) less than 5%, as these profiles limit the strength of adverse pressure gradients behind shocks.^[31]

High-Speed Supersonic Waveriding

In high-speed supersonic flight at Mach numbers greater than 2, delta wings achieve optimized performance through the waveriding principle, where the highly swept leading edges generate attached oblique shock waves that propagate from the wing's apex, enveloping the planform in a conical flow field. This configuration ensures that the flow remains attached to the surface, minimizing separation and allowing the wing to effectively "ride" its own shock structure for efficient lift generation and reduced drag. The swept geometry aligns the leading edge sweep angle closely with the Mach angle, resulting in weaker oblique shocks compared to those on less swept or straight wings, which substantially lowers wave drag—studies indicate reductions on the order of 50% relative to equivalent straight-wing configurations at similar conditions.^[7] At these regimes, the lift-to-drag ratio (L/D) for delta wings can reach values of 6 to 7, as exemplified by the Concorde's ogival delta configuration achieving approximately 7.5 at Mach 2 cruise, enabling sustained efficient flight. With wave drag minimized, skin friction becomes the dominant drag component, typically contributing a friction drag coefficient (C_{Df}) of about 0.002 to 0.005 for turbulent boundary layers on smooth surfaces, depending on Reynolds number and surface conditions. This shift emphasizes the importance of low-wetted-area designs and laminar flow maintenance to further enhance overall efficiency.^[49]^[50] Key aspects of this aerodynamics are captured in linearized supersonic theory. For weak oblique shocks approximating Mach waves, the shock angle \beta is given by

\beta = \arcsin\left(\frac{1}{M}\right),

where M is the freestream Mach number; this represents the limiting case for infinitesimal deflections. Lift arises primarily from the pressure difference across the shock-influenced boundary layer, with the linearized pressure coefficient difference yielding

\Delta C_p = \frac{4\alpha}{\sqrt{M^2 - 1}},

where \alpha is the angle of attack in radians, providing the basis for normal force coefficient C_N \approx \frac{4\alpha}{\sqrt{M^2 - 1}} per unit span in two-dimensional approximations extended to delta planforms.^[51]^[52] However, these high speeds impose severe thermal limits due to aerodynamic heating, with the convective heat flux scaling as q \approx 0.5 \rho V^3, where \rho is air density and V is velocity; at Mach 2+, this can exceed 100 kW/m² on leading edges, necessitating advanced materials like ablative coatings or active cooling systems to prevent structural failure.

Design Variations

Tailless Delta

The tailless delta wing configuration integrates the fuselage directly with a triangular planform wing, eliminating horizontal and vertical stabilizers or empennage to form a pure flying wing structure. This design relies on trailing-edge control surfaces known as elevons, which function as combined elevators and ailerons to manage both pitch and roll attitudes. Pitch control is achieved through symmetric deflection of the elevons, while differential deflection provides roll authority, simplifying the control system by reducing the number of moving surfaces required.^[53]^[54] Due to the absence of a tail, tailless delta wings exhibit relaxed static stability, particularly in pitch, making them prone to instability without active augmentation. Modern implementations typically incorporate fly-by-wire systems to maintain controllability, as the center of gravity is positioned aft to enhance trim and efficiency, resulting in neutral or negative static margins. This configuration demands precise computational modeling for stability derivatives, as flight tests have shown discrepancies between predicted and actual longitudinal and lateral responses, especially in dynamic maneuvers. At high angles of attack, a pitch-up tendency arises from the wing's sweep and leading-edge vortex formation, which can lead to departure if not mitigated by control laws.^[55]^[56] One key advantage of the tailless delta is its potential for reduced radar cross-section (RCS) in stealth applications, as the blended fuselage-wing shape minimizes edges and protrusions that scatter radar waves, achieving lower observability compared to tailed designs. However, disadvantages include compromised low-speed control authority, where elevon effectiveness diminishes near stall, limiting approach speeds and increasing the risk of altitude excursions during landing. Vortex lift from the leading edges can partially enhance high-alpha performance in these scenarios, but it does not fully resolve the inherent control challenges. Overall, the aerodynamic integration offers benefits like lower drag through the absence of tail interference, promoting efficiency in cruise, though it necessitates advanced flight control for safe operation across the flight envelope. Recent developments include blended-wing-body designs, such as JetZero's concept partnered with Delta Air Lines in 2025, aiming for improved fuel efficiency in future aircraft.^[57]^[58]^[59]^[60] Notable examples include the Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit stealth bomber, which uses a flying wing configuration derived from delta principles.^[61]

Tailed Delta

The tailed delta configuration features a triangular delta mainplane combined with aft-mounted horizontal and vertical stabilizers to augment control authority and longitudinal stability. The horizontal stabilizer functions as both a fixed surface for trim and an elevator for pitch adjustments, while the vertical stabilizer incorporates a rudder for yaw control, addressing limitations in the pure delta wing's inherent stability, particularly at off-design conditions. This arrangement is commonly employed in high-speed aircraft where the delta wing provides efficient supersonic performance but requires supplemental surfaces for balanced handling across flight envelopes.^[62] A key design parameter is the horizontal tail volume coefficient, given by V_h = \frac{S_t l_t}{S \bar{c}}, where S_t is the horizontal tail area, l_t is the tail arm length from the center of gravity, S is the wing reference area, and \bar{c} is the wing mean aerodynamic chord; typical values for tailed delta fighters range from 0.4 to 0.6 to ensure adequate stabilizing moments without excessive structural weight.^[63] The vertical tail volume coefficient follows a similar nondimensional approach, often around 0.06 for directional stability in such designs. These coefficients guide sizing to achieve desired static margins while minimizing interference with the main wing's vortex lift. This configuration offers benefits in enhanced low-speed handling, where the tail provides additional lift and damping to improve stall characteristics and takeoff/landing performance, as the delta wing alone can exhibit reduced control effectiveness below stall angles. Yaw control is effectively managed by the rudder, enabling precise sideslip correction and turn coordination, which is critical for agile maneuvers. The horizontal tail also mitigates the pitch-up tendency of delta wings at high angles of attack by generating a restorative moment through downforce, thereby improving overall longitudinal stability during subsonic operations.^[64] However, drawbacks include a 5-10% increase in total drag due to the added wetted area of the tail surfaces, which can reduce lift-to-drag ratios compared to tailless deltas, particularly in cruise. Structural complexity rises from the need to integrate and fair the tails into the fuselage, and roll control remains dependent on trailing-edge elevons, potentially complicating high-rate maneuvers.^[62] In design practice, the tail surfaces are often swept to match the delta wing's leading-edge angle, ensuring consistent cross-sectional area distribution for transonic flow and adherence to the area rule, which helps control wave drag rise without introducing discontinuities in the pressure distribution.^[7] Notable examples include the Convair F-102 Delta Dagger interceptor and the Dassault Mirage III fighter.^[65]

Canard Delta

A canard delta configuration incorporates a small forward-placing foreplane, or canard, ahead of the primary delta wing to enhance aerodynamic performance and control. The canard typically comprises 15-25% of the main wing's area, with examples showing a projected area of about 20%, allowing it to act as a lifting surface while maintaining the delta's swept geometry for high-speed efficiency.^[66] This setup provides key advantages in lift generation and stability management. By producing positive lift forward of the center of gravity, the canard offers download relief compared to conventional tail designs that often require negative lift for trim, thereby increasing the overall lift coefficient through direct contribution and beneficial interactions; studies indicate increments of up to 0.25 in lift coefficient due to canard positioning relative to the wing.^[67] Additionally, vortex formation from the canard interacts with the main wing's leading-edge vortices, generating extra lift at high angles of attack and improving maneuverability.^[68] Pitch control is enhanced by the canard's forward placement, which provides greater authority over longitudinal stability without relying solely on rear surfaces. Control in canard delta designs relies on differential deflection of the canard surfaces for primary pitch input, complemented by elevons on the trailing edge of the main delta wing for roll and secondary pitch authority. These configurations often incorporate static instability to achieve superior agility, as the forward lift shifts the aerodynamic center ahead of the center of gravity, necessitating fly-by-wire systems for precise handling but enabling rapid response in dynamic flight regimes.^[69] Despite these benefits, challenges arise in managing flow behaviors. The canard is intentionally designed to stall prior to the main wing to avert pitch-up tendencies and ensure recovery, yet this requires careful airfoil selection and positioning to maintain effective control margins without premature loss of authority.^[69] Furthermore, the addition of the canard introduces complexity in transonic flow, where interactions between the foreplane and delta wing can lead to shifts in the aerodynamic center and unpredictable vortex dynamics, demanding advanced computational modeling for optimization.^[70] Close-coupled variants, where the canard is positioned nearer the main wing, amplify these vortex effects for further lift gains but are explored in dedicated configurations.^[69] Notable examples include the Saab JAS 39 Gripen multirole fighter.

Historical Development

Early Research and Concepts

The origins of the delta wing concept trace back to the work of German aerodynamicist Alexander Lippisch in the 1930s, who conducted early glider tests exploring tailless configurations with triangular planforms.^[3] Lippisch's experiments, including the powered Delta I aircraft flown in 1931, demonstrated the potential for stable flight using highly swept delta-shaped wings without conventional tails.^[71] In 1933, he secured a U.S. patent for an airfoil design that supported these tailless delta structures, emphasizing their aerodynamic efficiency.^[71] Theoretical advancements accelerated during World War II, with American engineer Robert T. Jones developing swept-wing theory in 1945 at the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA). Jones' analysis showed that highly swept wings, including delta forms, could delay compressibility effects and reduce drag at transonic and supersonic speeds by effectively lowering the aspect ratio and perpendicular airflow component.^[72] This work built on earlier European ideas but provided a rigorous mathematical framework for high-speed applications. Key experiments in the 1940s validated these concepts through wind tunnel testing. NACA conducted supersonic tests on delta and swept-wing models, revealing favorable lift-to-drag ratios and stability at Mach numbers above 1, which highlighted the configuration's suitability for high-speed flight.^[73] Post-World War II, British researchers at institutions like the Royal Aircraft Establishment explored tailless delta designs in gliders and powered prototypes, focusing on inherent stability and control challenges to inform future jet aircraft development.^[74] A significant milestone in Lippisch's work was the 1944 Messerschmitt Me 163 Komet, a rocket-powered interceptor with Lippisch-designed swept wings influenced by his tailless research, which achieved speeds over 1,000 km/h and demonstrated the practical viability of such forms in operational settings despite stability limitations.^[75] These early efforts recognized the delta wing's low drag at high Mach numbers, laying the groundwork for subsequent supersonic designs.^[72] Following World War II, the Convair XF-92A became the first jet-powered delta-wing aircraft to fly, making its maiden flight on September 18, 1948. Developed as a research platform by the United States, it validated the delta configuration's aerodynamics at transonic speeds and influenced the design of later military aircraft, including the F-102 Delta Dagger.^[76]

Subsonic Thick-Wing Designs

In the 1950s and 1960s, subsonic thick-wing delta designs emerged as practical applications for military interceptors and experimental civilian transports, emphasizing structural robustness through higher thickness-to-chord ratios compared to later thin-wing supersonic variants. These wings typically featured moderate leading-edge sweeps around 50 to 60 degrees to balance subsonic cruise efficiency with transonic capability, allowing integration of fuel tanks and avionics within the wing volume. The focus was on all-weather interception roles at speeds below Mach 1, where the delta's large root chord provided inherent strength against bending loads.^[77]^[78] A key example was the Convair F-102 Delta Dagger, which entered USAF service in 1956 as the first operational delta-wing supersonic interceptor, replacing earlier subsonic fighters like the Northrop F-89 Scorpion in air defense squadrons. With a 60-degree leading-edge sweep, the F-102's wing prioritized subsonic cruise performance up to Mach 0.9, achieving a maximum speed of Mach 1.25 at altitude through afterburner use, while its thicker airfoil section supported internal armament bays for AIM-4 Falcon missiles and unguided rockets. Low-speed lift limitations, common to delta configurations due to reduced aspect ratio and vortex-dominated flow, were mitigated by leading-edge slats that extended airflow attachment and delayed stall onset during takeoff and landing, improving the maximum lift coefficient by up to 20% in wind-tunnel tests of similar designs.^[79]^[78]^[80]^[77] European efforts paralleled U.S. developments, with the Dassault Mirage III prototypes representing innovative subsonic delta applications in the late 1950s. First flown in November 1956, the Mirage III featured a 60-degree swept delta wing optimized for subsonic interception, reaching Mach 1.52 during early high-altitude tests and demonstrating stable cruise at Mach 0.8 to 0.9. Like the F-102, it employed slats and boundary-layer fences to address low-speed handling, where abrupt stall due to leading-edge vortex burst could occur at angles of attack above 15 degrees, a characteristic confirmed in subsonic wind-tunnel evaluations of delta wings. The USAF's broader adoption of such fighters in the 1950s, including over 1,000 F-102s produced, underscored the configuration's reliability for continental defense amid Cold War threats.^[81]^[82]^[83] These designs collectively validated delta wings for Mach 1.5 envelope limits in mixed subsonic-transonic regimes, enabling rapid climb rates over 25,000 feet per minute, but exposed persistent stall challenges at low speeds—often requiring pilot training for vortex-induced pitch-up—prompting refinements like automatic slat deployment in subsequent variants.^[84]^[83]

Supersonic Thin-Wing Developments

During the 1960s, advancements in supersonic delta wing design emphasized thin airfoils with thickness-to-chord (t/c) ratios below 5% to minimize wave drag and enable sustained Mach 2+ flight, as seen in the Soviet MiG-21, which featured a TsAGI S-12 airfoil with approximately 4.2% t/c at the root for efficient high-speed performance.^[85] Similarly, the American Convair F-106 Delta Dart incorporated a modified NACA 0004-65 airfoil with a 4% t/c, optimizing lift-to-drag ratios during supersonic intercepts..pdf) These thin profiles reversed earlier subsonic trends toward thicker wings, prioritizing low drag over low-speed lift, and were often integrated with the area rule to further reduce transonic drag by shaping the fuselage to maintain uniform cross-sectional area distribution.^[86] Key designs from this era exemplified these principles, such as the British English Electric Lightning, introduced in 1959, with its notched delta wing at about 5% t/c and 60° sweep, enabling Mach 2.0 dashes while leveraging waveriding for stability at high speeds.^[87] The French Dassault Mirage III, entering service in 1961, adopted a similar 5% t/c delta wing with 60° sweep and explicit area ruling in its fuselage, achieving Mach 2.2 capability and becoming a benchmark for export fighters focused on supersonic interception.^[81] Both aircraft relied on the delta's inherent structural efficiency and vortex lift for waveriding, where shock waves formed under the wing to support sustained supersonic cruise without excessive trim drag. Challenges in these developments included managing aerodynamic heating from skin friction and shock compression, addressed through heat-resistant materials like stainless steel skins on leading edges and special coatings to prevent thermal buckling during prolonged Mach 2 flights.^[88] Engine integration posed additional hurdles, as the slender fuselages required compact afterburning turbojets—such as the Tumansky R-11 in the MiG-21 or Pratt & Whitney J75 in the F-106—positioned to avoid disrupting the area-ruled profile while ensuring adequate airflow at high Mach numbers.^[89] By the 1970s, refinements focused on enhancing fixed delta configurations for reliability, with variable-geometry wings explored in some programs but often rejected in favor of simpler, lighter fixed deltas that avoided mechanical complexity and maintenance issues, as evidenced in ongoing evolutions of the Mirage series.^[90] This preference solidified the thin delta's role in military interceptors, balancing supersonic efficiency with operational simplicity.

Close-Coupled Canard Configurations

Close-coupled canard configurations emerged in the 1970s as an evolution of delta-wing designs, integrating a forward canard surface positioned closely to the main wing—typically with a gap less than one main wing chord—to enhance aerodynamic performance in fighter aircraft. The Saab JA 37 Viggen, entering service in 1971, represented the pioneering application of this layout, building on a 1963 Saab patent for a delta-wing canard arrangement that addressed stability and interference challenges through tight foreplane-main wing spacing. This design enabled short takeoff and landing (STOL) capabilities critical for dispersed operations in Sweden's rugged terrain, with the canard's placement optimizing vortex interactions at high angles of attack. By the 1990s, the configuration advanced in multinational projects like the Eurofighter Typhoon, which incorporated movable close-coupled canards to support relaxed static stability and supercruise performance, achieving initial operational capability in 2003 after development starting in the late 1980s.^[91]^[92]^[93] These configurations provided key aerodynamic benefits, particularly for supermaneuverability in close-quarters combat. The close proximity of the canard generated leading-edge vortices that interacted with those on the delta main wing, delaying vortex burst and maintaining lift at extreme angles of attack exceeding 50 degrees, which enabled post-stall maneuvers such as the Pugachev's Cobra. This vortex management also contributed to trim drag reduction by allowing the canard to offload the main wing, minimizing the need for elevon deflections and improving overall efficiency during sustained turns. Additionally, the setup enhanced pitch authority and roll control at high alpha, supporting thrust-vectoring integration in later variants for enhanced agility without excessive structural loads.^[94]^[95]^[66] Russian developments in the 1980s further refined close-coupled canards through upgrades to the Sukhoi Su-27 platform, with the Su-27M (later designated Su-35) prototype featuring added foreplanes from 1986 onward to boost high-alpha stability and maneuverability. This iteration, initiated in the early 1980s, incorporated canards to counterbalance increased nose weight from advanced avionics, achieving flight testing by 1988 and influencing subsequent Flanker-family exports. Concurrently, the adoption of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tools in the 1980s and 1990s revolutionized design processes, enabling simulations of complex vortex flows over canard-delta combinations that reduced reliance on costly wind-tunnel testing and optimized spacing for minimal interference drag. These methods, evolving from Euler solvers to full Navier-Stokes codes, were instrumental in validating configurations like the Typhoon's, predicting lift enhancements up to 20% at post-stall regimes.^[93]^[96]^[97] Despite these advantages, close-coupled canards introduced challenges related to aeroelasticity, where canard oscillations could couple with main-wing flexing, potentially leading to flutter at transonic speeds. Early Viggen testing revealed the need for damping systems to mitigate these dynamic instabilities, arising from the tight aerodynamic coupling that amplified structural vibrations under gust loads or maneuvers. Mitigation involved refined materials and active control laws in fly-by-wire systems, as seen in 1990s designs, to ensure aeroelastic margins without compromising the layout's agility benefits.^[69]^[98]

Supersonic Transport Applications

The development of supersonic passenger transport in the 1960s and 1970s prominently featured delta wing configurations to meet the demands of Mach 2 cruise speeds while accommodating civilian requirements for passenger capacity, range, and operational efficiency. The Tupolev Tu-144, which achieved its first flight on December 31, 1968, employed a double-delta wing with an inboard leading-edge sweep of 76° and an outboard sweep of 57°, enabling stable supersonic performance.^[99]^[100] Similarly, the Anglo-French Concorde, with its first flight on March 2, 1969, utilized an ogival delta wing featuring a leading-edge sweep of approximately 55°, optimized for low drag at high speeds.^[101]^[102] These designs, with sweeps in the 55-60° range, facilitated efficient cruise at Mach 2 by delaying shock wave formation and reducing wave drag.^[103] Unique to civilian supersonic transports, the delta wings incorporated features to enhance low-speed handling and passenger comfort. The Tu-144's double-delta planform improved lift generation during takeoff and landing by promoting stronger leading-edge vortices, addressing the inherent low lift of pure deltas at subsonic speeds.^[103] Concorde's ogival delta similarly enhanced low-speed lift through its curved leading edge, which generated beneficial vortex flow without traditional high-lift devices like flaps.^[104] For visibility during the high-angle-of-attack approaches required by these wings, both aircraft featured a droop nose mechanism; Concorde's visor-equipped nose could lower by 12.5° to provide pilots an unobstructed view of the runway.^[105] Additionally, the expansive wing volume stored approximately 80% of the total fuel capacity—around 95 tons for Concorde—allowing extended transatlantic ranges while maintaining a slender fuselage for aerodynamic efficiency.^[106] Operational challenges ultimately curtailed these applications, with noise regulations playing a pivotal role in ending commercial service. The intense engine thrust needed for supersonic acceleration produced takeoff noise levels exceeding modern standards, leading to restrictions on overland flights and contributing to Concorde's retirement in October 2003 after 27 years of service.^[107] Economic pressures, including high fuel consumption (four times that of subsonic jets) and escalating maintenance costs for aging airframes, further eroded profitability, especially post-2000 crash and amid rising oil prices.^[108] The legacy of these delta-wing SSTs includes critical insights into thermal management; Concorde's aluminum alloy structure endured skin temperatures up to 130°C during cruise, causing measurable expansion (up to 20 cm in fuselage length) that informed designs for future high-speed materials.^[109]

Flexible Delta Wings

The flexible delta wing, commonly known as the Rogallo wing, was invented in 1948 by NASA engineer Francis M. Rogallo and his wife Gertrude Rogallo as a lightweight, controllable alternative to traditional parachutes.^[110] Their design featured a V-shaped or delta planform made of flexible fabric that could be self-inflated by ram air, forming a tensioned structure without rigid spars or leading edges.^[111] This innovation was patented in 1951 under the name "flexible kite," emphasizing its ability to conform to airflow for enhanced stability compared to fixed surfaces.^[111] Key characteristics of the Rogallo wing include its adaptive camber, achieved through the fabric's flexing under aerodynamic loads, which allows the wing to adjust its shape dynamically for varying flight conditions. At low speeds, lift is generated primarily through tensioning of the fabric via suspension lines or inflatable tubes, creating a curved airfoil profile that promotes vortex formation over the delta planform.^[112] The absence of rigid structural elements enables compact storage and easy deployment, making it suitable for recovery systems, while the delta shape contributes to inherent roll stability.^[113] These wings leverage low-speed vortex lift to maintain performance in unpowered descent or gliding.^[77] In the early 1960s, NASA adopted the Rogallo wing for the Gemini program's Paraglider Landing System, testing it on the Paresev (Paraglider Research Vehicle) to enable controlled runway landings for space capsules instead of ocean splashdowns.^[114] The system involved a deployable, inflatable delta wing with a span of up to 30 meters, but it was ultimately abandoned in 1964 due to persistent deployment and inflation reliability issues during high-altitude tests.^[115] Despite not flying operationally on Gemini missions, the research validated the wing's potential for steerable, low-drag descent profiles.^[116] The 1970s saw a recreational boom in hang gliding, where the Rogallo wing was adapted into foot-launched, framed gliders by pioneers such as Barry Palmer in the U.S. and John W. Dickenson in Australia, transforming it from a recovery device into a sport vehicle capable of sustained flight.^[117] Dickenson's 1963 ski-wing design, featuring a delta planform with flexible battens for camber control, became a foundational model, leading to widespread adoption and the establishment of hang gliding clubs worldwide by the mid-1970s.^[118] This era marked the wing's shift toward human-carrying applications, with typical gliders achieving glide ratios of 8:1 to 10:1 at speeds around 30-40 km/h.^[117] Post-1980s developments in paragliding further evolved the Rogallo concept into ram-air inflated wings, many retaining a delta-like planform for lateral stability and ease of handling in low-speed maneuvers.^[117] Modern paragliders, often with aspect ratios of 5-6, use the delta shape to minimize tip vortices and enhance roll damping, building on Rogallo's original tension-structure principles for safe, portable free flight.^[119]

Modern Applications and Advancements

Military and Fighter Aircraft

China's Chengdu J-20, operational since 2017, employs a canard-delta hybrid configuration that balances supersonic performance with enhanced maneuverability, achieving speeds exceeding Mach 2 while maintaining stealth characteristics through radar-absorbent materials and shaped surfaces. The delta wing contributes to high-altitude stability and lift at transonic speeds, integrated with canards for improved low-speed control during carrier operations in planned variants. This fifth-generation fighter emphasizes network-centric warfare, with the wing structure facilitating internal bays for missiles and fuel to preserve low RCS.^[120]^[121] The Northrop Grumman B-21 Raider, unveiled in 2022 and in flight testing as of 2025, features a flying wing configuration with a delta planform optimized for stealth, long range, and payload capacity in strategic bombing roles. Its smooth, blended delta shape minimizes radar cross-section while providing efficient supersonic dash capabilities.^[19] Advancements in composite materials have further reduced RCS in delta-wing fighters by incorporating radar-absorbent composites that absorb electromagnetic waves rather than reflect them, achieving up to 90% reduction in certain frequency bands compared to traditional metals. Thrust vectoring nozzles, paired with delta wings in concepts like upgraded J-20 variants, enable sustained Mach 1.8+ supercruise with enhanced agility, allowing post-stall maneuvers without reliance on aerodynamic surfaces alone. In the U.S. Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) program, concepts as of 2025 feature potential hypersonic delta-wing designs with adaptive engines, prioritizing seamless integration of manned fighters with collaborative systems for air superiority in contested environments.^[122]^[123]^[124]

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Drones

Delta wings have found significant application in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and drones, particularly for stealth reconnaissance missions. The Lockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel, developed in the 2000s, exemplifies this use with its jet-powered, delta-winged flying wing configuration, enabling high-altitude, long-endurance operations while minimizing radar cross-section for covert intelligence gathering.^[125] Similarly, loitering munitions like the Iranian Shahed-136 employ delta flying wing designs to achieve extended on-station times, with low drag facilitating over 24 hours of endurance in tactical scenarios.^[126] High-altitude endurance platforms leverage delta-like configurations for sustained flight in other designs. In the 2020-2025 period, hypersonic UAVs have advanced delta wing integration for extreme-speed operations; for instance, DARPA's Hypersonic Air-breathing Weapon Concept (HAWC), with successful Mach 5+ tests in 2022, incorporates delta wings with elevons for maneuverability in air-launched scramjet-powered flights.^[127] Key advantages of delta wings in UAVs include their compact form factor, which simplifies launch from tubes or rails, and low induced drag, enabling efficient loitering for intelligence missions lasting over 24 hours.^[128] These wings provide inherent structural efficiency and high lift at low speeds, ideal for autonomous operations in diverse environments.^[129] Modern delta wing UAV designs emphasize miniaturized composite materials, such as carbon fiber reinforced polymers, to reduce weight while maintaining rigidity in small-scale platforms like the Alpi Aviation Strix-C mini UAV.^[130] Autonomous stability is enhanced through AI-based control systems that model nonlinear aerodynamics, improving navigation accuracy for delta-winged vehicles in turbulent conditions.^[131] For VTOL hybrid configurations, vortex control techniques, including generators and blowing methods, manage leading-edge vortices to boost low-speed lift and transition stability without mechanical complexity.^[132] Despite these benefits, challenges persist in delta wing drones, particularly battery limitations in compact designs that restrict mission durations despite efficient aerodynamics.^[133] Swarming tactics amplify these issues, as coordinating multiple delta-wing UAVs demands advanced energy management to sustain formation flight and collective decision-making under power constraints.^[134]

Spacecraft and Experimental Uses

Delta wings have been integral to spacecraft reentry vehicles, providing lift and control during atmospheric descent from orbital velocities. The Space Shuttle orbiter, first flown in 1981, featured a double-delta wing configuration with leading-edge sweeps of 75° inboard and 45° outboard, enabling unpowered gliding reentry from low Earth orbit while managing hypersonic heating and aerodynamic stability.^[135] This design allowed the vehicle to achieve cross-range capabilities of up to 1,100 nautical miles, transitioning from hypersonic to subsonic flight through high angles of attack that leveraged vortex lift from the swept planform.^[136] The Boeing X-37B Orbital Test Vehicle, operational since 2010, employs a similar unmanned delta-wing configuration scaled from the Space Shuttle, with stubby wings optimized for autonomous reentry and runway landing after extended orbital missions.^[137] Its compact delta planform supports precise attitude control during deorbit, enduring peak heating rates while maintaining structural integrity for reusability across multiple flights lasting up to 908 days.^[138] In experimental hypersonic applications, the NASA X-43A scramjet demonstrator, tested in 2004, utilized a triangular delta-wing planform to achieve a world-record air-breathing speed of Mach 9.6 during a 10-second powered flight.^[139] The vehicle's integrated delta shape facilitated stable flight at extreme Mach numbers, with the forebody compression aiding scramjet inlet performance and the wing providing necessary lift for trajectory control post-burnout. More recent prototypes, such as the Boeing X-51 Waverider tested in 2013, incorporate delta-derived waverider shapes for sustained hypersonic cruise. The triangular control surfaces on vehicles like SpaceX's Starship, tested from 2020 to 2025, provide delta-like aerodynamic control during reentry, enabling hypersonic maneuvering and soft splashdown or landing after orbital insertion, though the primary structure relies on lifting body principles.^[140]^[141] Key characteristics of delta wings in these reentry contexts include the use of ablative materials to withstand surface temperatures exceeding 1,600°C during peak heating phases, where frictional and radiative loads can reach 100 W/cm². At hypersonic conditions around Mach 10, these wings generate modest lift-to-drag ratios of 1 to 2, prioritizing volumetric efficiency and stability over high glide performance to ensure controlled descent trajectories.^[142] Advancements in delta-wing hypersonics have leveraged computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations to model plasma sheath formation and flow interactions during reentry, capturing nonequilibrium effects like ionization and radiative heating on wing surfaces.^[143] Post-2020 reusable designs emphasize non-ablative ceramic tile heat shields combined with active flap controls to enable rapid turnaround, reducing mission costs through elimination of single-use ablators while maintaining delta-derived aerodynamic stability.^[140]

References

[1]
Delta Wing Aircraft - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Delta wing aircraft is defined as a type of aircraft featuring a delta wing configuration, which is optimized for high-subsonic or supersonic flight and ...
[2]
Delta Wings - Centennial of Flight
Their primary advantage is efficiency in high-speed flight. The first patent for a delta-wing aircraft design was granted to Englishmen J.W. Butler and E.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[3]
XF-92A Delta-Wing Aircraft - NASA
Feb 28, 2014 · The XF-92A was a delta-wing research aircraft, initially a proposed interceptor, later used for research, and was a test vehicle for the delta ...
[4]
Convair XF-92A - Air Force Museum
The XF-92A was the world's first jet aircraft to fly with the radical delta-wing configuration pioneered by Germany's Dr. Alexander Lippisch.Missing: invention history
[5]
D-2: Aerodynamics of Wings (2) - Eagle Pubs
The delta wing is a special case of highly swept wing with extremely low aspect ratio. ... ratio of a flat delta wing. The delta wing leading edge vortices ...Compressibility Effects · High-Lift (lift... · Wingtip Devices<|control11|><|separator|>
[6]
[PDF] 3upersonic Aerodynamics of Delta Wings
This report summarizes the inviscid aerodynamics of delta wings at supersonic speeds, evaluating the effects of airfoil profile, wing sweep, and Mach number.
[7]
[PDF] Maximum lift-drag-ratio characteristics of rectangular and delta ...
For delta wings the aspect ratio may be expressed in terms of sweep angle which results in A = 4 cot A. A plot of this relation is presented in fig- ure 12(c) ...
[8]
How to Find or Calculate the Mean Aerodynamic Chord (MAC) of a ...
To locate the mean aerodynamic chord on a tapered or delta wing, measure the root and tip chord. Then draw the following lines on the plans.
[9]
[PDF] CFD Analysis of an Aircraft delta wing - IRJET
efficient and provide a large internal volume which can be used for fuel tanks. They are also relatively simple and inexpensive to manufacture. At this ...
[10]
Low speed aerodynamic characteristics of non-slender delta wing at ...
The aerodynamics of a half-span delta wing are studied using wind tunnel experiments at subsonic flow regime. ... Lift coefficient at each angle of attack is ...Missing: comparison | Show results with:comparison
[11]
[PDF] Lift Enhancement for Supersonic Delta Wing at Low Speed Using ...
Jul 31, 2021 · Compared with the baseline flapped delta wing with CL of 0.856 and CL/CD of 3.64, the CFJ delta wing achieves an increase of lift coefficient by ...
[12]
What will be the performance penalties of increasing the wing area ...
Jun 1, 2019 · Delta winged aircraft such as the Dassault Mirage III have an approach speed of 170 knots as specified by the manufacturer.Why are delta wings not commonly used in commercial airliners?Why do fighter jets land faster than Jumbo commercial aircraft?More results from aviation.stackexchange.com
[13]
[PDF] Chapter 2: Aerospace Materials Characteristics
Nov 2, 2020 · Aluminum alloys have good corrosion resistance due to the formation of aluminum oxide on the surface. The primary use of high strength aluminum ...
[14]
Aerospace Materials – Introduction to Aerospace Flight Vehicles
An aerospace engineer must choose between aluminum alloy 7075-T6 and titanium alloy 6Al-4V for machining a critical load-bearing component for a spar on an ...
[15]
Materials Selection for Supersonic Aircraft Structures & Engines
▻ Various aerospace aluminum alloys, titanium alloys, superalloys, and composites have been recommended. ▻ A new materials-selection guide for aerospace ...
[16]
Why Is Carbon Fiber Preferred for Aircraft Manufacturing?
Jun 30, 2025 · Carbon fiber allows plane manufacturers to reduce weight by 20%. This leads to drastic reductions in fuel costs.
[17]
the Future: The Resurgence of the Flying Wing in the 21st Century
Dec 17, 2019 · In addition, Northrop constructed the B-2 with materials such as carbon-fiber composite plastics and covered the aircraft with an anti ...Missing: delta | Show results with:delta
[18]
Aerospace Structures – Introduction to Aerospace Flight Vehicles
A box beam wing section that uses riveted aluminum-stressed skin construction. Over the last 50 years, there has been a steady increase in the use of honeycomb ...Missing: LEX | Show results with:LEX
[19]
[PDF] Delta Wing with Leading Edge Extension and Propeller Propulsion ...
Design of the delta wing MAV's with. LEX appears to be non-trivial because of the. LEX propeller interference problem. Details of the design, wind tunnel ...
[20]
Dynamic Structural Scaling Concept for a Delta Wing Wind Tunnel ...
Despite the slender structure of delta wings, which feature small aspect ratios, elastic deformations play a major role. This is due to several factors ...
[21]
[PDF] F/A-18 Fatigue Loads & Wing Deformation via CFD
At high angles of attack (which are typical for high g manoeuvres), the wing has to maintain a very high lift to carry the whole loads on the aircraft. As a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[22]
[PDF] DESIGN OF SINGLE ENGINE DELTA WING FIGHTER AIRCRAFT ...
There are two spars, one located at 15-20% of the chord known as the front spar, the other located at 60-70% of the chord known as the rear spar. Some of ...
[23]
Introduction to Wing Structural Design - AeroToolbox
An introduction to the structural design of an aircraft wing, looking at the wing loading and design of a semi-monocoque structure.Loads Acting On A Wing · Shear And Bending On A Wing · Analysis MethodsMissing: wet | Show results with:wet
[24]
[PDF] Aircraft Structures Definitions A - Aerostudents
Delta wing. - a wing in a triangular planform. Dihedral. - wing in a v-shape ... Torsion box. - combined spars and skin that create a closed box in the ...
[25]
Airframe Weights & Load - Heritage Concorde
Max landing weight 111,130 kg (245,000 lb). Max wing loading approx 488 kg/m2 (1,000 lb/sq ft). Max power loading approx 268 kg/kN (2.5 lb/lb st). Why not join ...Missing: delta | Show results with:delta
[26]
Is fuel moved around during flight on a passenger or cargo plane? If ...
Aug 16, 2017 · Most modern airliners store the fuel fairly close to the CG (in the wings or belly for that matter). The Concorde's unique delta wing design ...
[27]
[PDF] 19770020485.pdf - NASA Technical Reports Server
of inertia for the model beams based on the torsion box area and the effective skin ... of a complex delta wing would predict the response of the wing to load ...
[28]
Morphing aircraft based on smart materials and structures: A state-of ...
Dec 22, 2016 · Adaptive wings have been constructed by adding pressured air in the sealed honeycombs to obtain the optimal configuration for a given flight condition (Barrett ...
[29]
Delta Wing - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The delta wing/fuselage configuration is supposed to be a discontinuous, thick, lifting delta wing, which is here also called thick, lifting delta wing (EDW).<|control11|><|separator|>
[30]
[PDF] A concept of the vortex lift of sharp-edge delta wings based on a ...
The concept is based on an analogy between vortex lift and leading-edge suction, relating pressures to maintain flow about the leading-edge vortex.
[31]
[PDF] Breaking Down the Delta Wing Vortex /t,,'-o.z -a
Experimental x-wire measurements of the flowfield above a 70 ° and 75° flat plate delta wing were performed at a Reynolds number of 250,000. Grids.
[32]
Velocity Measurements in Vortical Flow of a LEX-Delta Wing ...
At a high angle of attack, the strong strake or LEX vortex stabilizes the main wing vortex, and delays the breakdown of the main wing vortex at a higher angle ...
[33]
[PDF] 19660025758.pdf - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
The theory for the lift developed by highly-swept delta wings at low speeds was first developed by Jones (ref. 6 ) for small angles of attack, and later ...
[34]
Swept wing - Wikipedia
It has the effect of delaying the shock waves and accompanying aerodynamic drag rise caused by fluid compressibility near the speed of sound, improving ...Reasons for sweep · Aerodynamic design · Variant designs · History
[35]
[PDF] Induced Drag and High-Speed Aerodynamics - Robert F. Stengel
Subsonic Lift-Drag Polar. Low-AR wing has less drag than high-AR wing, but less lift as well. High-AR wing has the best overall subsonic L/D. 12. Page 7. 7.
[36]
[PDF] chapter 2 subsonic aerodynamics - DTIC
A high aspect ratio wing reduces the effects of induced drag. 3. Induced drag coefficient is proportional to the lift coefficient, squared-at high angles of ...
[37]
[PDF] Effects of Wing Sweep
On a delta-wing at low speeds, the vortex is formed along the entire wing surface and produces most of the lift. • Vortical-lift generation at high angles-of- ...Missing: disadvantages | Show results with:disadvantages
[38]
[PDF] Studies of various factors affecting drag due to lift at subsonic speeds
Studies of various factors affecting the subsonic drag due to lift of thin highly swept wings indicate that wings having sharp leading edges exhibit low.
[39]
[PDF] 19850021610.pdf - NASA Technical Reports Server
The double-delta wings exhibited lower zero-lift drag values than the delta wings having the same aspect ratio, whereas delta wings provided lower drag due.
[40]
[PDF] Analysis of a Low Boom Supersonic Flying Wing Preliminary Design
Jan 5, 2015 · It turns out that the volume is in general easy to achieve due to the inherent advantage of flying wing. Once the sweep and dihedral angles ...Missing: disadvantages | Show results with:disadvantages<|separator|>
[41]
Flying wing - Wikipedia
For any aircraft to fly without constant correction it must have directional stability in yaw. Flying wings lack anywhere to attach an efficient vertical ...List · Blended wing body · Circular wing · Oblique wing
[42]
[PDF] Flap Systems on Supersonic Transport Aircraft
Flap systems on delta wing, supersonic commercial transport aircraft, will be used to increase the subsonic cruise and low speed aerodynamic performance in ...
[43]
[PDF] Effect of Leading- and Trailing-Edge Flaps on Clipped Delta Wings ...
At subsonic speeds lift can be produced more efl:iciently and drag may be reduced by spreading the upper surface suction more evenly over the cambered wing. ( ...Missing: boost | Show results with:boost
[44]
AIAA 2000-0167 The Design Revolution in Supersonic ...
speeds exceeded “critical Mach numbers.“t In ... In this case, the critical Mach number if 0.8, not 1.0. ... innovative delta wing. They gave the plane a ...
[45]
Wing Sweep - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The flow over a delta wing is characterized by a pair of counter-rotating leading-edge vortices that are formed by the roll-up of vortex sheets as shown in Fig.
[46]
[PDF] NASA TN D-6243 CHARTS FOR PREDICTING THE SUBSONIC ...
Charts for use in calculating the potential- and vortex-flow terms for the lift and drag are presented, and a subsonic compressibility correction procedure.
[47]
The Whitcomb Area Rule: NACA Aerodynamics Research ... - NASA
The area rule revolutionized how engineers looked at high-speed drag and impacted the design of virtually every transonic and supersonic aircraft ever built.
[48]
[PDF] CHAPTER 5 WING DESIGN
A triangular (Delta) wing with a 20 m span and a 3 m root chord (AR = 13.33; please note that the wing has two sections (left and right)). 9. A triangular ...
[49]
[PDF] From Concorde to new supersonic aircraft projects - AAE
“Three engines, delta wing, 45 to 50 passengers, 18 m wingspan, 51 m length ... Reference Wing Area (m2). 358. 218. 160. 164. Length (m). 61.66. 51. 51,8. 37.
[50]
Skin friction coefficient - CFD Online
Jan 14, 2016 · For a turbulent boundary layer several approximation formulas for the local skin friction for a flat plate can be used: 1/7 power law: C_f = ...Missing: supersonic 0.002-0.005 delta wing
[51]
Linearized Supersonic Flow - Richard Fitzpatrick
The aim of this section is to re-examine the problem of supersonic flow past a thin, two-dimensional airfoil using the small-perturbation theory.
[52]
Mach Angle
With a little algebra, we can determine that the cone angle mu is equal to the inverse sin of one over the Mach number. sin(mu) = 1 / M. mu = asin(1 / M). where ...Missing: arcsin( | Show results with:arcsin(
[53]
[PDF] Numerical Stability and Control Analysis Towards Falling-Leaf ...
The second configuration is the LMTAS tailless delta wing, referred to here (and in many ear- lier publications) as the Innovative Control Effectors (ICE) model ...
[54]
[PDF] A Study on Flight Mechanics of Tailless Aircraft
The Control Surfaces of flying wings are designed to compensate for the stability provided by a tail. Yaw stability is achieved by a method called differential.
[55]
Correlation of Predicted and Flight Derived Stability and Control ...
Correlation of Predicted and Flight Derived Stability and Control Derivatives with Particular Application to Tailless Delta Wing Configurations Flight ...
[56]
Engineering Notes Lateral Stability and Control of a Tailless Aircraft ...
Aug 6, 2025 · The yaw stability and control surface effectiveness of a tailless aircraft are investigated in this study. A wind tunnel model is used for ...
[57]
Monostatic radar cross section of flying wing delta planforms
The cost reduction comes by virtue of the improved lift to drag and consequent reduced fuel burn and empty weight reduction by removal of the conventional ...
[58]
[PDF] EVALUATION OF DELTA WING EFFECTS ON THE STEALTH ...
14000 kg. Empty weight. 6600 kg. Weapons weight. 4000 kg. Range. 3000 km. Service ceiling. 16500 m. Wing loading. 415 kg/m2. T/W ratio. 0.92. Engine. Pratt & ...
[59]
A Flight Investigation of the Low-Speed Handling Qualities of a ...
Carrier landing-approach studies of a tailless delta-wing fighter airplane disclosed that approach speeds were limited by ability to control altitude and ...
[60]
[PDF] Supersonic Aerodynamic Characteristics of Canard, Tailless, and Aft ...
The 60° delta wing configurations have a 5- to 10-percent greater. (L/D)max than the 44° trapezoidal wing configurations. Note that the strake-off.
[61]
Volume coefficients for various types of aircraft.
Horizontal tail volume coefficient (¯VH), Vertical tail volume coefficient (¯VV). 1, Glider and motor glider, 0.6 ... 0.4, 0.07. 10, Fighter (With canard), 0.1 ...
[62]
[PDF] TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
(Ref. 6). Refers t o Yornt Brak Nar. CL,max . Appllo~ble through Tnnsmio Speeds. Taper ratio not oonsidered.
[63]
[PDF] Aerodynamic Characteristics of the Close-Coupled Canard ... - DTIC
point for the canard is located at the 40-percent point of the exposed root chord. The projected canard area is 20 percent of the wing area for the data ...
[64]
[PDF] the effect of canard and vertical tails on the aerodynamic ...
The aerodynamic characteristics for the configuration with the high wing location are presented in figures 12 to 16.
[65]
[PDF] Computational Study of Flow Interactions over a Close Coupled ...
This study computationally examines how a canard wing increases lift and delays stall, and how its position affects flow interactions and vortex dynamics.
[66]
[PDF] A Look at Handling Qualities of Canard Configurations
Conventional (tail-aft) con- figurations could not be made to tumble in ... For an aft-tail fighter aircraft, the tail is sized to provide positive ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[67]
Numerical analysis of the vortical flow around a delta wing-canard ...
Detailed study of complex flow fields of aerodynamical configurations ... Supersonic vortex breakdown over a delta wing in transonic flow · HAMDY KANDIL ...
[68]
MS 243 Alexander Lippisch - Iowa State University
Scientific Research, 1943-1944: Delta-wing center of gravity/neutral point ... Publications, 1948-1982: "Germany and the Delta Wing" by Lippisch in Aero Digest ...
[69]
[PDF] Robert Jones - National Academy of Sciences
swept wings to have much less drag than straight wings. The sweep analysis appeared in circulation-restricted reports later in 1945 and as an unrestricted ...
[70]
https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/3.46782
[71]
History of the Flying Wing - Century of Flight
Rating 4.7 (63) Nov 10, 2019 · The tailless aircraft concept was present in Britain throughout World War II, and many of the designs came from Handley Page, Armstrong Whitworth, General ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[72]
Aeroplane Database: Messerschmitt Me 163 Komet - Key Aero
Sep 2, 2021 · The origins of the Me 163 short-range rocket interceptor, known as the Komet, go back to 1937 with the design of a delta-wing sailplane by Professor Alexander ...
[73]
[PDF] a review of the planform effects on the low-speed aerodynamic ...
"Flight Evaluation of Three Techniques of Demonstrating the Minimum. Flying Speed of a Delta-Wing Airplane," NASA TN. D-2337,. July, 1964. 120. Riebe, J. M ...
[74]
[PDF] Aerodynamic Flow Characteristics of Utilizing Delta Wing ...
1 Experimental lift coefficient values (Dsouza &Basawarj, 2015) [12]. Page 20. Aerodynamic Flow Characteristics of Utilizing Delta Wing Configurations in.Missing: comparison | Show results with:comparison
[75]
F-102 Delta Dagger - AF.mil
1950's -- The primary mission of the F-102 "Delta Dagger" was to intercept and destroy enemy aircraft. It was the world's first supersonic all-weather jet ...
[76]
F-102 Delta Dagger | Key Aero
It could hit a maximum speed of Mach 1.25 (825 mph). Armed with six AIM-4 Falcon AAM's plust 24 70-mm Mighty Mouse FFAR's (Folding Fin Aerial Rockets), the ...Missing: low lift slats stall
[77]
Dassault Mirage III - fighter-bomber - Aviastar.org
First flown on 17 November 1956, the prototype attained Mach=1.52 at 11600m during its sixth flight on 30 January 1957. After the installation of the SEPR ...
[78]
Issue 17 - Mirage - Aviation Classics
Oct 3, 2016 · The Mirage III prototype wing design was changed from that of the Mirage I as a result of this and other research, with the leading edge ...
[79]
[PDF] leading-edge 'vortex flaps' for enhanced subsonic aerodynamics of ...
A selection of experimental results has been presented highlighting the potential of vortex flaps in improving the low-speed aerodynamics of highly-swept delta ...<|separator|>
[80]
BAC One-Eleven & Fokker Jetliners - AirVectors
Jul 1, 2025 · The wing had a sweepback of 20 degrees at quarter-chord, with a wing fence about a third of the way from the fuselage. Each wing featured three- ...Missing: thickness | Show results with:thickness
[81]
[PDF] Vortex Flows at Supersonic Speeds
These data suggest that the aerodynamic performance of thin, slender wings at supersonic speeds and low p cot A is a function of Mach number and angle of attack ...
[82]
Angle of Attack Limit | FSDeveloper
Aug 14, 2011 · The Mig21 airfoil is TsAGI S-12 (4.2%) at the root and TsAGI S-12 (5%) at the tip. This airfoil is not quite symmetrical, but if you use 0 0 as ...Missing: thickness | Show results with:thickness
[83]
[1.0] Mirage III, 5, & 50 - AirVectors
Oct 1, 2024 · The wing was a delta configuration, with a 5% ratio of wing thickness to chord and 60 degree sweep. The delta wing has a number of limitations.
[84]
[PDF] Profile-Publications-Aircraft-114---English-Electric-P-1-Lightning.pdf
on the trailing edges; with a mean thickness/chord ratio of about 5% the wings were five-spar structures built up in two panels, joined on the centre-line and.
[85]
Numerical aero-thermal-structural analyses of a fighter jet wing ...
In the case of supersonic flights where aerodynamic heating is inevitable [31] , Inconel-718 can be an excellent choice for airframe skin since, at higher ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[86]
[PDF] Aerodynamics - NASA Technical Reports Server
establ i shed by the Viggen, Mig-21, and F-106 aircraft. One reason for the higher maneuver drag for these slender wings is that they have a fixed camber shape ...
[87]
https://www.gruppofalchi.com/files/Profile-Publications-Aircraft-114---English-Electric-P-1-Lightning.pdf
[88]
US3188022A - Delta wing canard aircraft - Google Patents
Hence it can be said to be an object of this invention to provide an arrangement of the main and secondary wings in a delta wing canard aircraft whereby the ...Missing: JA 37 Viggen<|separator|>
[89]
DATABASE: Saab 37 Viggen Development - Key Aero
Sep 10, 2020 · The canard configuration was seen as essential in meeting the STOL requirement. On 30 October 1962, the type configuration was settled upon.Missing: coupled | Show results with:coupled
[90]
[2.0] Second-Generation Su-27s & Derivatives - AirVectors
Oct 1, 2025 · Su-27 wings, tail, and engines are retrained, though canards have been added. The Su-34 has fixed-geometry engine inlets, meaning it is not ...
[91]
[PDF] Lift Enhancement Using Close-Coupled Canard/Wing Vortex ... - DTIC
It was found that a properly- located canard enhanced the lift at all tested angles of attack, compared to the baseline wing/body configuration results. The.
[92]
[PDF] With a Close-Coupled Canard at - NASA Technical Reports Server
Canards, when positioned appropriately, offer attrac- tive features such as increased trimmed lift capability and the potential for reduced trimmed drag. When ...
[93]
Enhanced Maneuverability of a Delta-Canard Combat Aircraft by ...
Here, leading-edge vortex flows with intense interaction and breakdown effects dominate the flow. To appreciably enhance the maneuverability beyond limits, ...Missing: supermaneuverability | Show results with:supermaneuverability
[94]
Historical development and use of CFD for separated flow ...
As interests in high-speed and supersonic flight advanced, aircraft development included delta-wing applications such as the Convair F-106, the Mig-21, and the ...
[95]
[PDF] A CLOSE-COUPLED CANARD-WING CONFIGURATION by Blair B ...
For the configurations with the canard in the wing chord plane, increasing the canard dihedral angle from -18.60 to 18.60 increased the maximum lift coefficient ...
[96]
Tupolev Tu-144 - all you need to know - Key Aero
Jul 23, 2021 · The swept angle of the root section decreased to 76°, while the outer section increased to 57°. Wing area increased by 7%; and the internal ...
[97]
[PDF] Longitudinal Handling Qualities of the Tu-144LL Airplane and ...
The Tu-144 aircraft (fig. 1), which cruises at a speed of Mach 2, is a delta-wing aircraft similar in size and weight to the Concorde.
[98]
DELTA WING - CONCORDE SST
Looking head-on at the Concorde wing, it does not just sweep back (by 55 degrees) but it twists and droops, making what appears to be a very simple design in ...
[99]
Concorde and the Future of Supersonic Transport
The agreement was reached by November 1962 converging on a con- figuration featuring 1) a modified delta wing low mounted with a continuous spanwise spar, 2) no ...
[100]
[PDF] THE EDGE SUPERSONIC TRANSPORT
The nose of The Edge is designed with a half angle of 8"; this effectively minimizes the wave drag carried by the aircraft, and induces a Mach cone such that ...
[101]
Concorde wing
Subsonic aircraft wings may have more than 50 moveable devices, which may include complex flaps, leading edge slats for additional lift at slow speeds, and ...
[102]
Droop Nose - Aerospace Bristol
Concorde's droop nose was designed to give pilots better visibility during takeoff and landing. The droop nose of Concorde Alpha Foxtrot has not operated since ...
[103]
Concorde fuel system - General description
In fact most of Concorde's 95 tons of fuel is kept in tanks in the wings, but the forward two, and another in the tail cone, are used for trim as well as ...
[104]
Concorde | Federal Aviation Administration
Aug 19, 2025 · Technical and economic challenges to the Concorde resulted in only 20 aircraft being produced, and it was retired from service in 2003. At ...
[105]
The Economics of Concorde - Etonomics
May 14, 2025 · Combined with the rising maintenance costs of a near 30 year old aircraft, Concorde failing to return to profit in 2003, and new, more fuel ...
[106]
CONCORDE: THE LEGEND AND THE INNOVATIONS - Key Aero
Aug 17, 2017 · Kinetic heating restricted the maximum speed (nose and leading edge temperatures typically peaked at 130°C and 105°C) but at Mach 2.0, heating ...
[107]
Francis and Gertrude Rogallo - Lemelson-MIT
In 1948, the pair successfully tested a flexible v-shaped fabric and frame wing they called the “Flexi-kite,” also known as the parawing. Its flexible structure ...
[108]
US2546078A - Flexible kite - Google Patents
In general we achieve the above object by constructing a kite of a substantially jquadrilateral piece of fabric, paper or other light and flexible material, ...
[109]
[PDF] 19630009860.pdf - NASA Technical Reports Server
Pitching-moment data for three wings have been transferred to a vertical location of the center of gravity that was 75 percent of the keel length below the wing.
[110]
[PDF] TECHNICAL NOTE
The aspect-ratio-6 cylindrical parawing provided a maximum lift-drag ratio of approximately 13.6. The results also indicated that, for conical type canopies, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[111]
Parachutes Not Required | National Air and Space Museum
Sep 23, 2024 · Although never used to recover a crewed spacecraft, the system proved useful in developing alternate landing techniques—and the Rogallo wing was ...
[112]
Wing, Rogallo Paraglider, Gemini | National Air and Space Museum
This inflatable delta wing was part of a test program in the early 1960s to develop a controllable system for landing two-person Gemini capsules on land.
[113]
Gemini's wing and a prayer (part 1): Rogallo Wings, the Paresev ...
Sep 8, 2025 · Rogallo's invention consisted of a lifting surface stretched over an inflatable frame. The entire structure could be folded into a small package ...
[114]
History of Hang Gliding, Paragliding, and Speedflying - USHPA
One major impetus for this rebirth was the adaptation to hang gliding of a new type of flexible wing, now commonly referred to as the “Rogallo Wing.” In 1948, ...
[115]
John Dickenson - Otto-Lilienthal-Museum
In the spring of 1963 an Australian, Mr John Dickenson, built the aircraft that evolved into the modern Hang Gliders built today.
[116]
[PDF] Design and Performance of a Hang Glider | Tiliqua Books
The modern flexible wing hang glider is based on the self-inflating wing designed by. Francis Rogallo in 1948. The Rogallo wing is a delta shape supported by ...
[117]
F-35 Lightning II | Lockheed Martin
Explore the F-35 Lightning II, a leading stealth fighter equipped with advanced sensors and supersonic speed. Learn more at Lockheed Martin.
[118]
Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II - program supplier guide - Airframer
Airframe is 35% composite and designed to enhance stealth with trapezoidal mid-wing configuration, twin tailfins and internal weapons bay. All-electric flying ...
[119]
Face It: China's J-20 Is A Fifth-Generation Fighter - Aviation Week
Apr 5, 2021 · Moreover, the J-20's design features—the extensive flight-control surfaces on its wing, its bubble canopy, the use of foreplanes for angle-of- ...Missing: delta hybrid
[120]
China's J-20 Mighty Dragon Stealth Fighter Might Be a 'Quarterback ...
Aug 21, 2025 · The J-20's airframe is optimized for stealth and maneuverability. It features a canard-delta wing configuration, diverterless supersonic ...Missing: hybrid | Show results with:hybrid
[121]
How Aerospace Composites Can Reduce Aircraft Radar Signatures
Aerospace composites, like fiberglass and carbon fiber, reduce radar signatures by absorbing and deflecting electromagnetic waves, enhancing aircraft ...
[122]
[PDF] THRUST VECTORING NOZZLE FOR MILITARY AIRCRAFT ENGINES
Thrust Vectoring can provide modern military aircraft with a number of advantages regarding performance and survivability, all of which has an influence upon ...
[123]
U.S. Air Force Publishes Concept Art of Secretive Next Generation ...
In its biennial report for acquisition published on April 9, a large NGAD aircraft with a delta-style, flying wing-type design can been seen armed with weapons.
[124]
United States Drone Force
The Lockheed RQ-170 Sentinel is a high-speed, jet-powered delta-winged drone operated by the USAF through around 20 active examples. These are utilized in the ...
[125]
Why does the Shahed-136 suicide drone use a delta flying wing ...
Oct 28, 2023 · In terms of flight characteristics, delta wings excel at high angles of attack, making them suitable for specific low-speed maneuvers. The ...Why do Shaheed drones have a delta wing (instead of long thin ...Why does the Shahed-136 use a delta flying wing design for low ...More results from www.reddit.com
[126]
Zephyr High Altitude Platform Station (HAPS) | UAS - Airbus
Zephyr, the world's most persistent fixed-wing, solar-electric stratospheric HAPS, enables a new layer of earth observation and connectivity services.Missing: delta | Show results with:delta
[127]
China's MD-19 hypersonic drone lands flawlessly, shocks Pentagon
Apr 23, 2025 · Its wedge-shaped fuselage, delta wings, and canted vertical tails reduce drag and enhance stability at high speeds. Unlike air-breathing ...
[128]
DARPA's Hypersonic Weapons Almost Ready for Flight Testing
Sep 2, 2020 · Completing the captive carry series of tests demonstrates both HAWC designs are ready for free flight ... delta wings with movable elevons, hinged ...
[129]
7 Compelling Reasons the Best Delta Wing UAV Drone Outperforms ...
From enhanced flight efficiency and extended range to superior stability and versatility in diverse applications, the innovative design of the Delta Wing UAV ...
[130]
What are the advantages and disadvantages of a large delta wing ...
Nov 30, 2023 · The delta wing offers advantages in structural integrity and both high-speed and low-speed flight. Because of the wing's large surface area compared to its ...Missing: UAVs | Show results with:UAVs
[131]
Strix-C Mini Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) - Army Technology
Sep 29, 2014 · The Strix-C mini UAS features flying wing sweepback configuration. It consists of seven main components made of composite materials, carbon ...
[132]
Aerodynamic modeling of a delta-wing UAV for model-based ...
Mar 19, 2024 · This study aims to identify an optimal aerodynamic model for a delta-wing UAV for model-based navigation, using wind-tunnel and flight data, ...
[133]
[PDF] Flow Control and Performance Enhancement of VTOL UAVS Using ...
Oct 16, 2025 · Passive control is achieved via vortex generators, while active control is implemented using blowing methods. A novel UAV design incorporating ...Missing: miniaturized composites AI stability
[134]
The challenges of powering military drones - Galvion
Battery capacity constraints can reduce mission duration, forcing operators to frequently retrieve drones for recharging, which interrupts operations and ...Missing: swarming delta wing
[135]
UAV swarms: research, challenges, and future directions
Jan 28, 2025 · This paper provides a comprehensive exploration of UAV swarm infrastructure, recent research advancements, and diverse applications.Missing: wing | Show results with:wing
[136]
[PDF] SPACESHUTTLE _-_.
... Space Shuttle Orbiter. The basic model was of the blended wing-bod_ design utilizing a double delta wing (75°/hS°ALE), full span elevens (unswept hingeline) ...
[137]
[PDF] REVUEW OF DELTA WILING SPACE SN3TTLE VEIUUCLE DY ...
A careful review of the unsteady flow problems of the delta wing shuttle orbiters indi- cates that there is every reason to believe that the problems can be ...
[138]
X-37B - Boeing
The Boeing-built X-37B is an uncrewed, autonomous spaceplane designed for advanced experimentation and technology testing.
[139]
Air Force Academy satellite to launch aboard X-37B Orbital Test ...
May 6, 2020 · A satellite built by Air Force Academy cadets will launch into space May 16 aboard the X-37B Orbital Test Vehicle sponsored by the ...Missing: delta configuration
[140]
X-43A Hyper-X - NASA
Jan 5, 2024 · Mach 6.8 was reached on March 27, 2004, and Mach 9.6 was achieved in the final flight on Nov. 16, 2004. X-43A and Pegasus Booster Rocket ...Missing: delta | Show results with:delta
[141]
Updates - SpaceX
Cargo variants of the Starship lander will be capable of landing up to 100 metric tons directly on the surface, including large payloads like unpressurized ...Ship 36 · Starship At The Space Coast · To FlyMissing: wing | Show results with:wing
[142]
[PDF] Studies relating to the attainment of high lift-drag ratios at hypersonic ...
interaction is found to affect the lift-drag ratio significantly. This is shown in figure 2 by results from a thin delta wing for a Mach number near 10.
[143]
A Two-Temperature Open-Source CFD Model for Hypersonic ... - MDPI
hy2Foam is a newly-coded open-source two-temperature computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solver that has previously been validated for zero-dimensional test