Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Education and technology

Education and technology, commonly known as educational technology or edtech, refers to the systematic application of digital hardware, software, networks, and artificial intelligence to design, deliver, and assess learning experiences, aiming to optimize educational processes beyond traditional methods.^[1] Originating with early 20th-century audiovisual tools and accelerating post-1950s through programmed instruction devices and computer-assisted learning, the field has expanded to encompass online platforms, virtual simulations, and data-driven personalization, fundamentally altering access to knowledge while raising questions about pedagogical efficacy.^[2] Empirical meta-analyses indicate that technology enhances outcomes primarily in blended formats combining digital and face-to-face elements, with effect sizes comparable to or slightly exceeding traditional instruction in higher education, though results in primary and secondary levels show no consistent superiority and often depend on teacher training and integration quality.^[3]^[4] Notable achievements include democratized access via massive open online courses (MOOCs) and adaptive platforms that scale instruction to millions, particularly in resource-scarce regions, yet these gains are tempered by persistent implementation failures, where up to 85% of tools underperform due to misalignment with classroom needs.^[5] Controversies center on causal factors like the digital divide exacerbating inequities—where low-income students lag in device access and digital literacy—and potential harms from excessive screen exposure, including reduced attention spans and social development, alongside privacy risks from data collection in student analytics.^[6] Peer-reviewed evaluations underscore that while technology facilitates personalization and immediate feedback, it rarely substitutes for human-guided inquiry, with overhyped claims often stemming from industry-funded studies rather than rigorous, independent trials.^[7] This duality defines edtech's trajectory: a tool for amplification when grounded in evidence-based pedagogy, but a vector for inefficiency and distraction absent causal scrutiny of its mechanisms.

Historical Development

Early Innovations and Foundations

The introduction of lantern slides in the late 19th and early 20th centuries marked an early technological aid for visual instruction, enabling educators to project detailed images for demonstrations in subjects like anatomy and history.^[8] These glass-based slides, often hand-painted or photographic, were used in classrooms and lectures to supplement textbooks, with widespread adoption by the 1910s in U.S. public schools for instructional purposes.^[9] By the 1920s, film projectors further advanced this approach, allowing motion pictures to illustrate dynamic processes such as biological functions or industrial operations, though their effectiveness depended on teacher facilitation to ensure comprehension beyond passive viewing.^[10] Radio broadcasts emerged as a scalable medium for education in the 1920s, with stations like those affiliated with the National Association of Educational Broadcasters delivering lessons to schools lacking resources for specialized instruction.^[11] Programs such as "Schools of the Air" in the U.S. and Australia supplemented curricula in subjects like music and current events, reaching rural and urban audiences alike by the 1930s.^[12] Empirical assessments from the era, including listener surveys and school reports, indicated radio expanded access—serving millions of students annually—but yielded mixed retention outcomes, as passive listening without interactive reinforcement often failed to match in-person teaching efficacy.^[13] In the 1950s, programmed instruction pioneered individualized learning through structured sequences of questions and immediate feedback, exemplified by B.F. Skinner's teaching machines introduced in 1954 at Harvard University.^[14] These mechanical devices presented material in small, mastery-based steps, drawing on Skinner's operant conditioning principles to adapt pacing to the learner, with prototypes handling arithmetic and language drills for 15 minutes daily per student.^[15] Early trials reported improved drill performance over traditional methods, yet broader adoption stalled due to high costs and limited evidence of transfer to complex problem-solving.^[16] Post-World War II geopolitical pressures, particularly the 1957 Sputnik launch amid Cold War competition, spurred U.S. federal investments in technical education, including the establishment of basic computer facilities in universities by the early 1960s.^[17] Institutions like MIT and Stanford integrated early mainframes for student simulations in engineering and sciences, influenced by National Defense Education Act funding aimed at bolstering STEM proficiency.^[18] Initial evaluations highlighted potential for computational modeling but revealed challenges in accessibility and pedagogical integration, with usage confined largely to elite programs rather than widespread classroom application.^[19]

Digital Revolution and Computing Integration

The integration of personal computers into education accelerated in the 1980s, with the Apple II becoming a staple in U.S. schools due to its affordability, expandability, and availability of educational software tailored for programming exercises and drill-and-practice applications.^[18] By 1983, the Apple II achieved widespread adoption, fitting the prevailing teacher-managed instructional model, while initiatives like Apple's 1982 lobbying for tax deductions on computer donations to schools facilitated procurement.^[20] Organizations such as the Minnesota Educational Computing Consortium (MECC) developed and adapted software, including titles like The Oregon Trail, enabling students to engage in basic coding via languages like BASIC and repetitive skill reinforcement in math and reading.^[21] Early empirical evaluations of these standalone systems revealed targeted benefits, such as improved computational fluency, but limited transfer to broader cognitive or problem-solving abilities without teacher mediation.^[22] Computer-assisted instruction (CAI) systems emerged as a core framework during this era, evolving from 1960s mainframe experiments to microcomputer-based drills and tutorials in the 1980s, promising individualized pacing and immediate feedback.^[23] Proponents hyped CAI as transformative for rote learning, yet controlled trials from the 1970s through 1990s demonstrated only modest gains, particularly in mathematics—meta-analyses indicate effect sizes around 0.2 to 0.35 standard deviations for supplemental use, confined to procedural skills rather than conceptual understanding or overall achievement.^[24]^[25] These findings underscore causal limitations: CAI's drill format reinforced isolated facts effectively in randomized settings but failed to supplant human instruction, with null or negligible impacts on non-math domains due to software rigidity and lack of adaptive depth.^[22] The 1990s saw a shift toward multimedia via CD-ROMs, which enabled richer simulations for science and history, such as virtual dissections or ecosystem models, bypassing hardware constraints of prior decades.^[26] Studies on these tools reported specific skill enhancements—for instance, equivalent retention to physical alternatives in biology simulations—but no consistent elevation in general learning outcomes, as benefits hinged on brief, targeted exposure rather than sustained integration.^[26]^[27] Declining hardware costs, driven by Moore's Law and commoditization, reduced average PC prices from over $3,000 in the early 1980s to under $1,500 by the late 1990s, broadening school access beyond elite districts.^[28] However, adoption faced headwinds from educator resistance, rooted in inadequate training—surveys from the period highlight that many teachers lacked proficiency, viewing computers as disruptive to established pedagogy rather than augmentative tools.^[29]^[30] This gap perpetuated underutilization, as causal evidence links effective implementation to professional development, absent which technology reinforced inequities in skill application.^[31]

Internet Expansion and Online Learning Boom

The expansion of high-speed internet access in the early 2000s facilitated the development of learning management systems (LMS) such as Blackboard, which originated in 1997 and enabled institutions to deliver asynchronous course materials, assignments, and forums online.^[32] Platforms like Khan Academy, launched in 2008, further popularized self-paced video tutorials, attracting millions of users by decoupling learning from fixed classroom schedules and geographic constraints.^[33] These tools scaled rapidly due to broadband proliferation, with U.S. household internet penetration rising from 50% in 2000 to over 80% by 2010, allowing broader dissemination of educational content without physical infrastructure. The 2010s witnessed a surge in massive open online courses (MOOCs), exemplified by Coursera and edX, both founded in 2012, which partnered with universities to offer free or low-cost courses to global audiences, touting democratization of higher education.^[34]^[35] Enrollment exploded, reaching hundreds of millions by mid-decade, yet empirical analyses revealed low completion rates, with medians around 12.6% across courses and many below 10%, attributed to factors like lack of accountability and self-motivation challenges rather than access barriers.^[36]^[37] Proponents claimed scalability would rival traditional models, but adoption data showed persistent gaps, as only a fraction of registrants engaged deeply, questioning the causal link between availability and learning outcomes. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provided mixed evidence on internet-based tools' impacts, particularly in remote areas where initial access gains—such as through tablet distributions—improved basic skill exposure but yielded diminishing returns over time.^[38] For instance, studies in underserved regions demonstrated short-term literacy boosts from online modules, yet long-term efficacy waned due to infrastructural inconsistencies like unreliable connectivity. Concurrent research highlighted distractions as a key limiter, with multitasking behaviors—such as social media use during sessions—significantly higher in online environments than face-to-face, correlating with reduced cognitive processing and academic performance.^[39]^[40] High-profile initiatives, like the Los Angeles Unified School District's 2013 iPad rollout to over 600,000 students costing $1 billion, underscored logistical pitfalls despite connectivity hype, including widespread theft, software glitches, and inadequate teacher preparation, leading to program suspension by 2015.^[41] These cases illustrated that while internet expansion enabled theoretical scalability, real-world implementation often faltered on human and systemic factors, with audits revealing no substantial gains in standardized test scores attributable to the devices alone.^[42]

AI-Driven Advancements and Recent Shifts

The COVID-19 pandemic's shift to remote learning in 2020 catalyzed subsequent AI integrations, with platforms deploying generative AI tutors by 2023 to enable personalized instruction beyond basic digital tools. Khan Academy released Khanmigo in March 2023, an AI-powered guide leveraging GPT-4 for adaptive tutoring, lesson planning, and student interaction prompts that encourage critical thinking rather than direct answers.^[43] ^[44] Duolingo followed in March 2023 with Duolingo Max, incorporating GPT-4 features such as "Explain My Answer" for detailed feedback and AI-driven roleplay simulations to enhance language proficiency through contextual practice.^[45] These tools marked a pivot from static content delivery to dynamic, real-time adaptation, with early pilots showing increased user engagement but necessitating safeguards against over-reliance. By 2024-2025, classroom implementations prioritized AI guardrails to address ethical concerns, including hallucination risks where models generate plausible but incorrect information. Frameworks like those from educator symposia emphasized teacher training for prompt engineering and verification protocols, ensuring AI augments rather than supplants human oversight; for example, restricted AI tutors that prompt student reasoning improved outcomes compared to unrestricted versions, which sometimes reduced deeper learning.^[46] ^[47] Immersive technologies complemented this with affordable VR hardware, such as the Meta Quest 3S headset launched in October 2024 at $299, facilitating simulations for subjects like history and science that promote experiential understanding in resource-constrained settings.^[48] Empirical meta-analyses from 2022-2024 reveal AI's boosts to engagement and cognitive skills, with generative AI yielding moderate positive effects on overall learning outcomes (effect size ~0.3-0.5 in controlled studies), though standardized test score gains remain inconsistent without integrated human facilitation.^[49] ^[50] Risks of bias and factual errors persist, underscoring the need for vetted datasets in educational AI. The edtech sector, propelled by private firms' rapid iterations amid public institutions' regulatory delays, projects global market value surpassing $404 billion by 2025, reflecting AI's outsized role in scaling innovations like adaptive platforms.^[51] ^[52]

Core Technologies and Applications

Hardware and Basic Infrastructure

Essential hardware components in education technology encompass personal computing devices such as laptops and tablets, alongside classroom fixtures like interactive whiteboards and smartboards, which facilitate direct student interaction with digital content.^[53] One-to-one device programs, which provide individual laptops or tablets to students, expanded significantly during the 2010s, with initiatives in regions like the United States and parts of Europe aiming to bridge access gaps through widespread distribution.^[54] These programs often prioritized low-cost, ruggedized hardware to withstand school environments, yet empirical evaluations highlight persistent durability concerns in high-usage settings, including frequent screen cracks, battery failures, and mechanical wear from daily transport and handling.^[55] Reliable power supply and internet bandwidth form the foundational infrastructure supporting these devices, without which hardware deployment yields limited efficacy. In developing countries, electricity access remains a barrier, with World Bank analyses indicating that low connectivity to power grids—coupled with frequent outages—constrains edtech implementation, as devices cannot charge or operate consistently during blackouts affecting millions of schools.^[56] Globally, UNESCO reports that only about 50% of lower secondary schools had internet connectivity as of 2022, with bandwidth limitations exacerbating issues by slowing data transfer and rendering resource-intensive applications unusable.^[57] Field studies underscore that unstable infrastructure leads to operational disruptions, such as unplanned downtime for recharging or troubleshooting connectivity, which can consume up to several hours weekly in under-resourced settings.^[58] Empirical evidence links stable hardware availability to modest improvements in student engagement metrics, including slight attendance increases in programs where devices remain functional, as reliable access encourages consistent school participation.^[59] Conversely, hardware breakdowns correlate with learning disruptions, as repairs divert instructional time and frustrate users, with reviews of one-to-one initiatives noting that technical failures contribute to uneven outcomes by interrupting workflow and requiring ad-hoc fixes.^[60] Cost-benefit analyses reveal declining hardware prices—exemplified by Chromebooks dropping from around $400 in 2011 to under $250 by mid-decade through manufacturer subsidies and economies of scale—have lowered entry barriers for adoption.^[61] However, ongoing maintenance burdens, including replacement parts and technical support, often offset these savings, with districts reporting sustained annual costs equivalent to 20-30% of initial investments due to wear in intensive educational use.^[62]

Software Platforms and Learning Management Systems

Learning management systems (LMS) serve as centralized digital platforms for organizing educational content, facilitating interactions between instructors and learners, and tracking progress through features like assignment distribution, automated grading, and discussion forums. These systems enable scalable content delivery by integrating multimedia resources and enabling real-time collaboration, with core mechanics rooted in database-driven architectures that store user data and generate reports on engagement metrics. Early LMS prototypes date to the 1980s, but widespread adoption accelerated in the 2000s with the rise of web-based tools designed for institutional use.^[63] Open-source platforms like Moodle, released on August 20, 2002, by Martin Dougiamas, democratized access by allowing free customization and community-driven development, supporting over 300 million users globally by emphasizing modular plugins for tracking student performance and fostering collaborative learning environments. Commercial alternatives, such as Canvas launched by Instructure in 2011, prioritized intuitive interfaces and cloud-based scalability, enabling seamless integration of quizzes, analytics dashboards, and mobile access to appeal to K-12 and higher education districts seeking vendor-supported reliability. These evolutions shifted LMS from static content repositories to dynamic tools for data-informed instruction, though empirical evaluations highlight variable efficacy tied to implementation quality.^[64]^[65] Adaptive software platforms extend LMS capabilities by employing algorithms to tailor content difficulty based on real-time student responses, as seen in DreamBox Learning's math program, which adjusts lessons dynamically for K-5 learners. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the 2010s, including those reviewed by the What Works Clearinghouse, demonstrate modest positive effects on mathematics achievement, with average effect sizes of approximately +0.10 standard deviations in targeted skills like problem-solving, though gains are often confined to supplemental use and require consistent engagement. Such platforms rely on machine learning models to analyze response patterns and recommend individualized pathways, contrasting with traditional LMS by prioritizing personalization over uniform delivery.^[66]^[67] Analytics features in modern LMS, including usage logs and predictive dashboards, reveal patterns of low sustained engagement, with studies estimating that 70-80% of implementations fail to achieve intended outcomes due to inadequate training or resistance to change. Poor execution often manifests as underutilized tools, where initial adoption drops after rollout, underscoring the need for evidence-based deployment strategies. Integration challenges across school districts frequently arise from incompatible data standards and legacy systems, leading to fragmented workflows; modular, API-driven architectures in platforms like Moodle mitigate this by allowing selective interoperability over rigid monolithic designs.^[68]^[69]^[70]

Emerging Tools like AI, VR, and Gamification

Artificial intelligence tools have increasingly facilitated personalized learning and automated grading in educational settings by 2025, adapting content to individual student needs and reducing teacher workload for routine assessments. For instance, Stanford University reports highlight AI's role in K-12 classrooms for tasks like grading and tutoring, enabling scalable personalization while processing vast datasets to identify learning gaps.^[71]^[72] However, these systems necessitate human oversight to mitigate errors in nuanced evaluations and potential algorithmic biases, as emphasized in expert analyses from the same period.^[71] Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies support experiential learning through simulated environments, such as virtual labs that replicate complex experiments without physical resources. In 2025 pilots, VR implementations in technical training reduced operational costs compared to traditional methods by minimizing material and facility expenses, with some programs reporting substantial savings in hands-on instruction.^[73] Meta's education initiatives, including Quest headsets integrated into classrooms via managed solutions, have driven private-sector adoption of VR for immersive content discovery and delivery.^[74] Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicate VR enhances empathy in targeted training, such as simulations for healthcare or social understanding, outperforming conventional lectures in fostering emotional perspective-taking.^[75] Yet, evidence from related studies reveals risks of distraction during extended sessions, potentially undermining focus in non-specialized applications.^[76] Gamification incorporates game-like elements into educational apps to elevate short-term student motivation and engagement, as demonstrated by platforms like Prodigy, which align math exercises with reward systems to sustain interest. Empirical reviews from 2024-2025 confirm gamification's positive effects on initial cognitive and emotional involvement, though motivation often wanes over longer durations without adaptive reinforcement.^[77]^[78] Recent studies on AI-enhanced microlearning, integrating gamified bursts of content, show improved retention in skill acquisition, particularly when tailored via algorithms, but outcomes vary by implementation fidelity.^[79] Private-sector tools like these outpace public adoption, highlighting scalability challenges in resource-constrained institutions where integration lags despite proven pilots.^[80]

Empirical Impacts on Learning Outcomes

Documented Benefits and Causal Evidence

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of AI-driven adaptive tutoring systems have demonstrated causal improvements in mathematical proficiency, particularly when used to personalize instruction. In a 2024 Stanford study involving human tutors assisted by AI, students of lower-performing tutors achieved up to a 9 percentage point increase in math pass rates compared to controls, with effect sizes indicating substantial gains in problem-solving accuracy. Similarly, a Carnegie Mellon University RCT across 140 schools found that an AI tutor doubled annual math learning gains relative to traditional methods, attributing this to real-time feedback loops that adjusted difficulty based on student responses. These findings align with a 2024 arXiv preprint analysis of AI math support, reporting an effect size of 0.37 on growth scores in scalable interventions.^[81]^[82]^[83] Interactive simulations have causally enhanced retention and conceptual understanding in STEM subjects through engagement with visual models. PhET simulations, developed by the University of Colorado Boulder, improved retention ability in physics topics like states of matter in a quasi-experimental study of grade 6 students, with post-treatment scores significantly higher than controls (p < 0.05), due to repeated interaction fostering deeper encoding. A 2022 PMC study on oscillations and waves confirmed PhET's positive impact on academic achievement and motivation, with experimental groups outperforming peers by enabling hypothesis testing without physical constraints. Meta-analytic evidence supports such tools' role in boosting STEM outcomes, as seen in reviews aggregating RCTs where simulations increased knowledge retention by facilitating active exploration over passive lectures.^[84]^[85]^[86] Massive open online courses (MOOCs) have expanded access to self-paced upskilling for adults, with causal evidence from RCTs showing labor market benefits. A 2024 RCT of curated Coursera MOOCs for job training reported improved employment outcomes and skill certification rates among participants, particularly low-income adults, versus non-participants, via flexible, on-demand modules. Another analysis linked MOOC participation to wage premiums and job transitions, with propensity score matching indicating causal effects from credential attainment in tech and business domains. These gains stem from asynchronous access enabling repeated practice, though completion rates vary; nonetheless, completers exhibit verifiable skill uplifts per employer-verified assessments.^[87]^[88] Longitudinal and experimental data underscore that edtech benefits are most pronounced when deployed as supplements to core instruction rather than full replacements. A NBER study contrasting computer-assisted learning (CAL) as a substitute found null effects on test scores, but supplemental usage in hybrid models yielded positive gains by reinforcing teacher-led content without displacing human interaction. Meta-analyses of technology integration corroborate this, showing moderate effect sizes (e.g., 0.3-0.5 SD) for blended approaches in collaborative settings, where tools augment rather than supplant foundational teaching, per aggregated RCTs from 2010-2023.^[89]^[90]

Limitations, Drawbacks, and Null Findings

Numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating educational technology interventions have produced null or negative findings on broad learning outcomes, indicating limited efficacy in many implementations. A review of over 120 RCTs across categories such as device access and computer-assisted learning found that while targeted uses occasionally yield small gains, general edtech deployments frequently fail to improve achievement metrics, with null results predominant in unrestricted access scenarios.^[91] Similarly, experimental evidence on computer-assisted learning software has shown no significant effects on student performance, even among groups familiar with computers, suggesting that technological inputs alone do not substitute for pedagogical structure.^[92] Distraction from screens, including those intended for educational use but often idle or misused, further undermines potential benefits. Systematic reviews document that digital devices foster multitasking and off-task behavior, impairing comprehension for both users and adjacent peers in classroom settings.^[93] Practitioner audits exacerbate concerns, estimating that 85% of edtech tools represent poor fits or inadequate implementations, lacking alignment with instructional needs and contributing to fragmented engagement rather than enhanced critical thinking.^[94] Excessive screen time integral to edtech environments correlates with attention deficits, supported by longitudinal data establishing temporal precedence. Cohort studies tracking children from infancy reveal that higher screen exposure predicts elevated ADHD symptoms and developmental delays in attention and problem-solving by ages 2-4, with Mendelian randomization analyses indicating causal pathways from screen use to neurobehavioral impairments.^[95]^[96]^[97] These drawbacks impose opportunity costs, as edtech expenditures—often in the billions annually—divert funds from higher-impact alternatives like teacher training. RCTs of professional development programs demonstrate reliable gains of 0.18 standard deviations in student achievement, contrasting with edtech's inconsistent or absent broad effects and underscoring misallocation risks in resource-scarce systems.^[98]^[91]

Adoption and Implementation Dynamics

Teacher Training and Institutional Factors

Surveys in developed countries reveal substantial deficiencies in teacher training for educational technology integration. In the United States, a 2022 International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) survey of new teachers found that over half felt unprepared to effectively use technology in the classroom, with fewer than one-quarter reporting adequate preparation.^[99] These gaps contribute to underutilization of edtech tools, as teachers often revert to traditional methods due to lack of confidence and skills, limiting potential impacts on student engagement and outcomes.^[100] Institutional barriers, including bureaucratic procurement processes and rigid policies in public school systems, further impede adoption. Public education structures often involve multi-layered decision-making that delays technology approvals and implementation, contrasting with more agile private or charter school environments.^[101] ^[102] Charter schools, unbound by district-level union contracts and administrative hierarchies, demonstrate higher rates of innovative edtech integration, such as personalized learning platforms, due to their operational flexibility.^[102] Teacher unions have historically shown caution toward rapid tech shifts, prioritizing job protections and workload concerns over swift adoption, though recent partnerships with tech firms for AI training signal evolving engagement.^[103] ^[104] Evidence from professional development (PD) programs underscores training's role in enhancing efficacy. A study on computer-based PD for eighth-grade math teachers reported student score gains equivalent to up to 13 weeks of additional grade-level progress.^[105] Broader meta-analyses link sustained PD—such as 49 hours of coaching and collaboration—to student achievement increases of approximately 21 percentile points, accounting for up to 10% of variance in learning outcomes through improved tech-pedagogy alignment. ^[106] In market-driven contexts, private edtech vendors provide targeted, on-demand training that outpaces public mandates, enabling faster iteration and higher utilization in flexible institutions.^[107]

Access Disparities and Economic Realities

Access disparities in educational technology implementation are closely tied to socioeconomic status, with income levels strongly correlating to household device and broadband availability. In 2023, only 56% of U.S. households earning under $25,000 annually had wireline broadband access, compared to nearly 90% in higher-income brackets.^[108] Pew Research data from 2024 confirms that while smartphones penetrate most income tiers, affluent households (over $100,000 yearly) maintain superior home broadband and multi-device ownership, perpetuating gaps in sustained edtech use.^[109] Urban-rural divides persist despite post-2020 subsidies like the Emergency Broadband Benefit, which temporarily increased rural connections but saw service fade after funding lapsed, leaving 15% of households without high-speed internet as of 2023.^[110]^[111] Economic realities amplify these issues, as the global edtech sector reached $163 billion in 2024, involving substantial upfront costs for hardware, software licenses, and maintenance that strain lower-resourced districts.^[112] Peer-reviewed assessments reveal mixed ROI, with scalable digital platforms potentially cutting per-student expenses by 25-30% but often underdelivering when infrastructure prerequisites are absent, favoring targeted, cost-effective deployments over expansive proprietary systems.^[113]^[114] Open-source alternatives address these barriers by minimizing licensing fees, as evidenced in pilots evaluating adaptive learning tools that enhanced equity without high costs.^[115] Causal analyses prioritize physical infrastructure—reliable power, devices, and bandwidth—as the dominant obstacle to adoption, outweighing policy measures alone, since material deficits directly impede usability regardless of regulatory frameworks.^[116]^[117] Empirical low-budget implementations underscore that infrastructure investments yield concrete gains in access, challenging narratives overemphasizing policy as the sole equalizer.^[118]

Applications in Developing Countries

Notable Successes and Case Studies

The DIKSHA platform, launched by India's National Council of Educational Research and Training in September 2017, serves as a national digital infrastructure for sharing knowledge resources, enabling teachers and students to access offline-compatible content tailored to the curriculum.^[119] By late 2021, it had facilitated billions of individual learning sessions, with surveys indicating positive teacher feedback on its utility for lesson planning and assessments, particularly during the COVID-19 disruptions when 96% of sampled teachers reported learning to use it effectively.^[120]^[121] In sub-Saharan Africa, SMS-based educational interventions have demonstrated scalability in low-infrastructure settings, such as Kenya's Eneza Education platform, which delivered bite-sized lessons and interactive queries via text messages to millions of students during 2020 school closures induced by the pandemic.^[122] These low-tech approaches leverage widespread mobile phone penetration, allowing asynchronous access without reliable internet, and have supported continuity in foundational subjects like mathematics and literacy where traditional infrastructure falters.^[123] Variants of the One Laptop per Child (OLPC) initiative, initiated in 2005, have shown targeted benefits in specific cognitive domains despite broader null findings on standardized test scores. A randomized evaluation in rural Peruvian communities found that providing laptops increased students' general cognitive skills, as measured by improvements in Raven's Progressive Matrices, verbal fluency, and coding tasks, alongside enhanced familiarity with computer use.^[124] Such outcomes highlight the potential of device provision in isolated areas to foster problem-solving abilities when complemented by minimal training, though effects were not uniform across academic subjects.^[125] These cases underscore the efficacy of adaptive, infrastructure-light technologies—such as offline repositories, text messaging, and rugged hardware—that prioritize accessibility over high-bandwidth demands, enabling measurable engagement and skill-building in resource-constrained environments.^[126]

Structural Barriers and Failures

In many developing countries, persistent infrastructural deficiencies severely undermine edtech deployments. In Sub-Saharan Africa, approximately 600 million people lacked access to electricity as of 2023, with the majority in rural areas where grid extension remains challenging.^[127] ^[128] Fixed broadband penetration stood at just 12% continent-wide by mid-2023, far below global averages, compounded by frequent outages from undersea cable damages and government-imposed shutdowns that cost the region $1.74 billion in economic losses in 2023 alone.^[129] ^[130] These voids render devices and online platforms unusable for extended periods, as power unreliability and connectivity gaps prevent sustained engagement with educational software. Teacher training deficits and cultural misalignments further erode adoption rates. Studies from 2014 onward identify key barriers including inadequate professional development for educators, insufficient technical support, and content not adapted to local languages or contexts, leading to low utilization even when hardware is distributed.^[116] ^[131] In resource-constrained settings, educators often revert to traditional methods due to unfamiliarity with tools, exacerbating implementation failures without complementary pedagogical reforms. The One Laptop per Child (OLPC) initiative exemplifies these structural shortcomings, with deployments criticized as hardware distributions lacking ecosystem support. By 2009, only hundreds of thousands of units reached target nations, yielding null impacts on reading or math outcomes in rigorous evaluations.^[132] ^[133] Projects in places like Papua New Guinea and Ethiopia highlighted issues such as theft, breakage without maintenance infrastructure, and negligible learning gains, underscoring that isolated tech provision fails amid broader systemic neglect.^[134] Underlying corruption and funding misallocation compound these barriers, diverting resources from foundational needs to flashy procurements. In developing contexts, graft in public spending often prioritizes procurement kickbacks over sustainable infrastructure or training, perpetuating cycles where edtech initiatives serve elite interests rather than bridging educational divides.^[135] ^[136] Such dynamics reveal that technological interventions alone cannot override entrenched institutional frailties, demanding holistic reforms for viable outcomes.

Key Controversies and Critiques

Privacy Risks and Data Exploitation

Educational institutions face substantial vulnerabilities in protecting student data, exacerbated by frequent cyberattacks and breaches. In 2023, U.S. schools experienced 3,713 data breaches that exposed 37.6 million records, marking a sharp rise from prior years.^[137] Ransomware incidents targeting K-12 schools surged 92% between 2022 and 2024, with attacks increasing 23% year-over-year in the first half of 2025 alone.^[138] ^[139] Regulatory responses include updates to the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) on May 24, 2024, aimed at enhancing protections amid these threats, though critics argue for mandatory cybersecurity requirements to address enforcement shortcomings.^[140] ^[141] Edtech companies often exploit student data for commercial gain, circumventing privacy safeguards through practices like third-party tracking and monetization. A 2021 analysis highlighted how edtech platforms leverage FERPA loopholes to collect and sell student information, posing risks to privacy and safety without adequate consent mechanisms.^[142] Congressional testimony in 2025 noted widespread edtech data collection in K-12 settings, enabling profiling that can lead to discriminatory outcomes or targeted advertising harms.^[143] The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) responded in January 2025 by amending the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) to restrict companies' ability to monetize children's data, citing evidence of psychological harms from such practices.^[144] Integration of AI in educational tools amplifies these risks by facilitating pervasive surveillance and behavioral manipulation. AI systems deployed in schools for monitoring attendance or engagement often collect biometric and behavioral data, enabling unauthorized profiling and raising concerns over long-term privacy erosion.^[145] Student advocates have documented cases of AI-driven surveillance perpetuating biases and infringing on civil liberties, with insufficient oversight to prevent misuse.^[146] Empirical studies link AI nudges—algorithmic prompts designed to influence choices—to altered student behaviors, such as increased retention but at the cost of autonomy, underscoring causal pathways from data exploitation to subtle coercion.^[147] ^[148] Emerging decentralized technologies, such as blockchain-based identity systems, offer potential mitigations by distributing data control to users and minimizing centralized repositories vulnerable to breaches.^[149] These approaches store verifiable credentials on immutable ledgers, enhancing privacy through pseudonymity and user-owned data portability without relying on edtech intermediaries.^[150] However, adoption remains limited due to technical complexities, regulatory gaps, and the absence of widespread enforcement, leaving systemic exploitation unaddressed in most implementations.^[151]

Evidence Gaps and Commercial Overhyping

The edtech sector has undergone pronounced hype cycles, notably in the 2010s with adaptive learning platforms and massive open online courses (MOOCs), followed by a post-COVID-19 investment surge that reached $20.8 billion globally in 2021 before contracting sharply.^[152] Many touted products, such as personalized tutoring apps and AI-driven analytics, promised transformative outcomes but often underdelivered, with comprehensive reviews documenting over 100 significant debacles including unsubstantiated efficacy claims and scalability failures.^[153] Educators report that approximately 85% of edtech tools represent poor fits or exhibit ineffective implementation, contributing to minimal returns on substantial school expenditures.^[6] Venture capital dynamics exacerbate evidence gaps by favoring rapid user acquisition and engagement metrics over randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or longitudinal validation, resulting in products optimized for market penetration rather than causal impact on learning. Edtech investments, while yielding average returns of 17% for venture funds—below the 36% for broader tech sectors—prioritize scalable pilots in controlled settings that fail to generalize across diverse classrooms.^[154] This commercial bias, driven by competitive pressures, leads to premature scaling without robust proof, as evidenced by the scarcity of high-quality RCTs amid abundant correlational marketing data.^[155] Longitudinal analyses underscore the disconnect, showing stagnant or widening achievement gaps in standardized assessments like NAEP despite pervasive edtech adoption; for instance, U.S. fourth-grade reading scores declined post-2019 amid increased digital tool use, with no attributable tech-driven reversal. Meta-analyses of technology interventions reveal mixed effects at best, with many studies indicating null or negative impacts on core outcomes when implementation fidelity is low.^[57]^[156] Critics, including neuroscientists, contend this pattern reflects systemic overhyping that misdirects public funds toward unproven vendors, advocating for evidence mandates akin to medical device approvals.^[157] Proponents of market-led approaches argue that iterative failures foster innovation, warning that excessive regulation could hinder adaptive technologies in a field where early evidence is inherently provisional.^[158]

Pedagogical Erosion and Societal Costs

The integration of digital technologies into education has been associated with a degradation in traditional pedagogical depth, as students increasingly engage in superficial processing rather than sustained, effortful learning. Empirical studies indicate that reliance on AI tools and digital interfaces correlates with diminished critical thinking skills; for instance, a 2024 analysis found a significant negative correlation between frequent AI usage and critical thinking abilities, with heavy users exhibiting reduced capacity for independent analysis and problem-solving.^[159]^[160] Similarly, digital reading formats yield lower comprehension outcomes compared to print, with research in Psychological Science demonstrating that students process digital texts with less retention and higher mind-wandering, impairing the development of deep reading habits essential for complex inference and synthesis.^[161]^[162] This erosion extends to cognitive effort more broadly, where overdependence on technology fosters "cognitive offloading," reducing the mental exertion required for tasks that once built resilience and creativity. A 2022 study documented a 20% decline in effort exerted on daily cognitive activities compared to peers eight years prior, attributing this to habitual tech reliance that atrophies problem-solving and sustained attention.^[163] In classroom settings, frequent device use has been linked to fragmented attention, with NIH-funded research showing inverse relationships between daily digital tool exposure and reading comprehension scores, as multitasking and notifications disrupt the focused deliberation central to pedagogical mastery.^[162]^[164] Societally, these pedagogical shifts impose substantial costs, including a youth mental health crisis exacerbated by pervasive screen-based education. Data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reveal that adolescent depression rates tripled between 2010 and 2019, coinciding with widespread smartphone adoption and school device integration around 2012, which displaced unstructured play and face-to-face interaction critical for emotional regulation and social development.^[165] Jonathan Haidt's analysis in The Anxious Generation (2024) synthesizes global evidence linking this "phone-based childhood" to surges in anxiety, self-harm, and suicide ideation, with girls particularly affected due to social media's role in amplifying comparison and relational aggression—outcomes that extend into educational contexts where devices enable constant distraction.^[166] Further costs manifest in attenuated attention spans and physical health declines, with excessive screen time in educational environments contributing to myopia epidemics and sleep disruptions that impair learning consolidation. Longitudinal tracking of adolescent screen trajectories shows high usage predicting poorer academic trajectories and heightened emotional dysregulation, compounding societal burdens through reduced workforce productivity and increased mental health service demands.^[167]^[168] These effects are not merely correlational; causal mechanisms include the supplantation of embodied, interactive learning with passive consumption, yielding generations less equipped for causal reasoning and resilient inquiry.^[169]

References

[1]
Comprehensive evaluation of the use of technology in education - NIH
This paper presents a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) of an instrument that incorporates eight key dimensions: learning, affective, behavioral, technology, ...
[2]
A Brief History of Educational Technology - EdTech Books
Since the early 1900s, education and training professionals have been intrigued with the potential of new technologies to advance human learning.The Educational... · Sputnik and the National... · Evolution of “AV Education...
[3]
[PDF] A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies
What conditions influence the effectiveness of online learning? This meta-analysis and review of empirical online learning research are part of a broader study.
[4]
[PDF] The Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning: A Meta-Analysis ...
Online learning is one of the fastest growing trends in educational uses of technology. By the 2006–2007 academic year, 61% of US higher edu- cation ...
[5]
7 Research Findings About Technology and Education - Edutopia
Sep 5, 2024 · Here's what research shows about the effectiveness of technology for learning and when less tech can be more productive. By Liz Kolb.
[6]
Edtech has an evidence problem | code acts in education
Apr 19, 2024 · According to the Edtech Evidence Exchange, educators estimate that “85% of edtech tools are poor fits or poorly implemented”, indicating very weak returns.
[7]
Key factors influencing educational technology adoption in higher ...
Apr 29, 2025 · The use of educational technology could enhanced educational efficiency, improved the learning experience, and cater to the diverse learning ...
[8]
Lantern Slides (1850s to 1940s) - Early Photographic Formats and ...
Jun 16, 2025 · The lantern slides in the collection were used as military training aids during World War I, and can be found in Boxes 03 and 04. Paul E.
[9]
Division of Visual Instruction instructional lantern slides
... Lantern slides were compiledas instructional aids for the public school ... slides instruction Women--History Visual education Visual aids New York (State).Missing: film 20th century
[10]
Learning with Light and Shadows: Educational Lantern and Film ...
Feb 6, 2024 · ... visual teaching aid. When film's potential as an educational medium ... educational aids, not seldom in direct relation to each other.
[11]
Origins of the NAEB and Educational Media - Unlocking the Airwaves
The NAEB, originally ACUBS in 1925, built public media. Early educational radio emerged in the early 20th century, and the NAEB changed its name in 1935.
[12]
Schools of the Air: How Educators Tried to Innovate With Radio
Apr 19, 2023 · Long before there were podcasts, there were attempts to use the radio as a way to distribute educational programming.
[13]
Can Radio Really Educate? - JSTOR Daily
Sep 15, 2021 · In the 1920s, radio was an exciting new mass medium. It was known for providing entertainment, but educators wondered if it could also be used for education.
[14]
Programmed Instruction Educational Model - eLearning Industry
Apr 28, 2025 · Summary: 1954 - B. F. Skinner and J. G. Holland implemented Programmed Instruction Educational Model at Harvard. Check the Instructional ...
[15]
[PDF] Teaching Machines B. F. Skinner Science, New Series, Volume 128 ...
Apr 16, 2002 · Fifteen minutes per day on a machine should suffice for each of these programs, the machines being free for other students for the rest of each ...
[16]
Programmed Instruction | Research Starters - EBSCO
Programmed instruction is a structured pedagogical approach developed in the 1950s by psychologist BF Skinner, designed to enhance learning.Abstract · Applications · Terms & Concepts
[17]
[PDF] THE COLD WAR, TECHNOLOGY AND THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY
Sputnik made the US fear technological failure, leading to increased federal funding for universities, and the government becoming the primary source of R&D ...
[18]
History of Computers in Education
1946: First vacuum tube-based computers are developed, and universities helped in computer development effort.
[19]
[PDF] The Cold War Brings the Best of Times to American Higher Education
Nov 6, 2016 · American higher education rose to fame and fortune during the Cold War, when both student enrollments and funded research shot upward.
[20]
Carmen Sandiego and Educational Computing with the Apple II
Dec 21, 2024 · In 1982, Apple began lobbying for a bill that would provide tax deductions for donations of computers to schools, museums, and libraries to ...
[21]
The Tech Class: The Computer Enters the 1980s Classroom
Apr 9, 2019 · MECC adapted many existing educational titles to the Apple II, adding graphics and sound, as well as creating new titles, and sold them outside ...Missing: initiatives | Show results with:initiatives
[22]
[PDF] Computer-Assisted Instruction - Education Northwest
Fortunately, a great deal of research has been conducted during the 1970s, 1980s, and early. 1990s on the effects of computer use on student achievement, ...
[23]
Computer - Assisted Instruction | Research Starters - EBSCO
Evolution of CAI. The advent of microcomputers as a pervasive feature of schools in the 1980s, whether in separate computer labs or within classrooms, altered ...Abstract · Viewpoints · Terms & Concepts
[24]
The Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction on Mathematics ...
This meta-analysis examined the effect of computer-assisted instruction (CAI) on mathematics achievement in mainland China.
[25]
Evaluating the Impact of Supplemental Computer-Assisted Math ...
A meta-analysis of rigorous studies also found positive effects of CAI in math when used as a supplement to classroom instruction (Cheung & Slavin, Citation2013); ...
[26]
View of Using CD-ROMs in teaching science
Kinzie, Strauss and Foss (1993) and Strauss and Kinzie (1991) demonstrated that a simulation of a frog dissection was as potent as a'real' dissection in terms ...
[27]
Exploring four decades of research in Computers & Education
CD-ROMs, simple simulation programmes for PCs and computer-based tutorials and educational games were becoming available and there was increasing ...
[28]
[PDF] The Case of the Occasionally Cheap Computer: Low-cost Devices ...
the 1990s saw such rapid decline in PC prices that a low enough threshold for a “computer for the poor,” as then imagined, could be attained by the market ...
[29]
Computers Meet Classroom; Classroom Wins - Education Week
Nov 11, 1992 · Why is it that with so much talk of information technologies computers are used far less in schools than in other organizations?
[30]
(PDF) Teachers: technology, change and resistance - ResearchGate
Feb 4, 2016 · This text empowers the reader to understand why they should (or should not) use digital technologies, when it is appropriate (or not), and the implications ...
[31]
[PDF] A Trip to the Past and Future of Educational Computing
In 1959, an individualized instruction system called PLATO was developed by a number of scientists in the University of Illinois. PLATO was a computer-assisted ...
[32]
A Brief History of Blackboard - ListEdTech
Mar 20, 2022 · In 1997, Michael Chasen and Matthew Pittinsky founded Blackboard with an innovative approach in mind: proposing an online learning solution.
[33]
What is the history of Khan Academy?
Jun 2, 2022 · Khan Academy is a not-for-profit educational organization started by Salman Khan in 2008. Our mission is to provide a free, world-class education to anyone, ...
[34]
Coursera's Mission, Vision, and Commitment to Our Community ...
Our story. Coursera was founded by Daphne Koller and Andrew Ng in 2012 with a vision of providing life-transforming learning experiences to learners around the ...Terms of Use · What We Offer · Press · Privacy NoticeMissing: date | Show results with:date
[35]
About Us - edX
edX is the online learning platform from world-leading digital education company 2U, LLC edX was founded by Harvard and MIT as an experiment to make the ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
[36]
Massive open online course completion rates revisited - IRRODL
Completion rates (defined as the percentage of enrolled students who completed the course) vary from 0.7% to 52.1%, with a median value of 12.6%.
[37]
What factors influence MOOC course completion? An investigation ...
Nov 22, 2022 · It has been revealed that the course completion rate for MOOCs is currently only between 5 and 40% (Bezerra and Silva, 2017). Improving course ...
[38]
Investigating the impact on learning outcomes through the use of ...
The authors concluded that the eLearn tablets reduced student achievement by roughly 0.4 standard deviations, a finding they ascribed to the tablets diverting ...<|separator|>
[39]
Off Task During Online Learning: Kent State Study Finds Student ...
Dec 9, 2022 · Results of the study revealed that students' multitasking behavior is significantly greater in online courses compared to face-to-face courses.
[40]
College Students' Distractions from Learning Caused by ... - NIH
Sep 6, 2022 · This study compared Romanian college students' off-task use of digital devices in online courses with their digital distractions in face-to-face courses.
[41]
What Schools Must Learn From LA's iPad Debacle - WIRED
May 8, 2015 · The difference is now, under the leadership of Superintendent Ramon Cortines, the district is trying to learn from its mistakes and do some ...
[42]
The Failure of the iPad Classroom | The Walrus
Nov 7, 2016 · OLPC successfully created several devices that met this goal, but in every other respect, OLPC was a colossal failure that typifies the hubris ...
[43]
Update: Introducing... Khanmigo! Khan Academy's AI Tool
Mar 28, 2023 · We are proud to introduce Khanmigo, a new experimental artificial intelligence (AI) guide, which a limited number of users will have access to.
[44]
Meet Khanmigo: Khan Academy's AI-powered teaching assistant ...
Khanmigo, built by nonprofit Khan Academy, is a top-rated AI for education. Save time on prep, tackle homework challenges, and get personalized tutoring.Learners · Free, AI-powered teacher... · Parents · Writing Coach
[45]
Introducing Duolingo Max, a learning experience powered by GPT-4
Mar 14, 2023 · Duolingo Max is a new subscription tier above Super Duolingo that gives learners access to two brand-new features and exercises: Explain My Answer and Roleplay.How the Duolingo English Test... · Working with AI-generated... · Practice Hub
[46]
[PDF] Commonsense Guardrails for Using Advanced Technology in Schools
In August 2024, we convened the AFT/Microsoft Symposium on AI in Education and Beyond—gathering 200 educators and school staff from across the country, ...
[47]
AI Tutors Can Work—With the Right Guardrails | Edutopia
Mar 27, 2025 · Research suggests that unrestricted AI use can hinder learning, but AI tutors designed to prompt and prod can be powerful teaching tools.
[48]
Meta unveils $299 Quest 3S VR headset, Orion AR glasses prototype
Sep 25, 2024 · The device will go on sale on Oct. 15, and it'll retail starting at $299, down from the $499 starting price for 2023's Quest 3. The device can ...Missing: affordable | Show results with:affordable
[49]
A Meta‐Analysis of the Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on ...
Sep 1, 2025 · This meta-analysis shows that GAI has a significant positive impact on overall learning outcomes, particularly in cognitive and skill dimensions ...
[50]
[PDF] Meta-Analysis of Artificial Intelligence in Education - ERIC
Mar 22, 2025 · Recent research has demonstrated that AI technologies can potentially enhance student engagement, personalize learning experiences, and improve ...
[51]
Inside EdTech Market Trends 2025: AI, VR & Beyond
Global EdTech spending is on track to exceed USD 404 billion by 2025, expanding at a CAGR of roughly 16 percent from 2019 to 2025.
[52]
The 2025 AI Index Report | Stanford HAI
Nearly 90% of notable AI models in 2024 came from industry, up from 60% in 2023, while academia remains the top source of highly cited research. Model scale ...The 2023 AI Index Report · Status · 2024 · Education
[53]
[PDF] The Naked Truth about 1:1 Laptop Initiatives and Educational Change
This special issue of the Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment focuses on the educational impacts and outcomes of 1:1 computing initiatives and ...
[54]
[PDF] One-to-One Computing in Public Schools: Lessons from “Laptop for ...
This report examines the largest state-driven one-to-one computing initiatives in Maine, Michigan,. Texas, and Pennsylvania as well as district-wide laptop ...Missing: durability | Show results with:durability
[55]
Leading 1:1 laptop schools: roles, risks, and reflections of school site ...
Nov 25, 2020 · Integrating 1:1 laptop programs has also brought unique set of challenges. Some of the most common challenges include financial sustainment ...Missing: durability | Show results with:durability
[56]
[PDF] EdTech in Developing Countries: A Review of the Evidence
While the relatively low levels of access to inputs such as electricity, the internet, and hardware might be challenges that hinder EdTech's.Missing: outages | Show results with:outages
[57]
Technology in education - 2023 GEM Report
Globally, the percentage of internet users rose from 16% in 2005 to 66% in 2022. About 50% of the world's lower secondary schools were connected to the internet ...Missing: bandwidth | Show results with:bandwidth
[58]
EdTech in Developing Countries: A Review of the Evidence
In this paper, I review and synthesize all existing studies with credible causal identification frameworks of EdTech interventions in developing countries.
[59]
(PDF) Custodial Grandchildren's School Attendance and Academic ...
Sep 12, 2023 · The results imply the need to provide stable internet and digital devices to grandfamilies without access to these services or devices, as well ...Missing: field | Show results with:field<|control11|><|separator|>
[60]
Results & Lessons Learned from1:1 Laptop Initiatives: A Collective ...
Aug 9, 2025 · Our review, in line with other research, shows that non-technical issues are as important as technical issues (Holcomb 2009; Tedre et al. 2011).
[61]
Chromebook price cuts: Will users bite, finally? - CNET
Nov 21, 2011 · Google has cut the price on its Chromebook laptop computers, offering the Web-connected device with minimal offline capability at prices ...
[62]
[PDF] Quantifying the Economic Value of Chromebooks for K–12 Education
Chromebooks reduced the per-device cost of ownership for these schools ... With the Chromebook's new pricing, the three-year infrastructure cost drops to $429.Missing: decline post-
[63]
The Evolution of the Learning Management System (LMS)
The first known LMS was created in 1983 by software developer Phil Bookman and human resource development executive Rich Silton, who together formed the company ...
[64]
Moodle turns 18!
Aug 19, 2020 · This time 18 years ago in August 2002, our founder & CEO Martin Dougiamas first released the Modular Object-Oriented Dynamic Learning System.
[65]
Instructure History: Founding, Timeline, and Milestones - Zippia
Launched in 2011, Canvas is currently used by over 800 learning institutions. From 2011 through the present, Canvas began to dominate the market dynamics – ...
[66]
DreamBox Math - Evidence for ESSA
DreamBox Math is an adaptive, online program with a "strong" rating. Studies show an average effect size of +0.10, with significant positive results in two ...
[67]
[PDF] DreamBox Learning - Institute of Education Sciences
Dec 10, 2013 · DreamBox Learning is an online, adaptive math program for grades K-5, using games and puzzles, with potentially positive effects on math ...
[68]
Why Do 70–80% of LMS Implementations Fail? Lessons for Tech ...
Sep 8, 2025 · Fact: According to eLearning Industry, 41% of organizations abandon LMS platforms within the first year due to poor planning. ✓ Best Practice: ...<|separator|>
[69]
LMS Integrations - Reach Capital
Feb 11, 2019 · Tips & Challenges of Integrating With an LMS · There is an inherent overhead cost of maintaining the integration. · The LMS integration is ...Lms Integrations · The Lms Landscape · Start With The Why<|separator|>
[70]
Why Digital Learning Platforms Needs Strong Rostering and LMS ...
Sep 2, 2024 · Challenges to Rostering and LMS Integrations · Siloed and fragmented data, spread across various subsystems in often incompatible formats. · Data ...
[71]
What parents need to know about AI in the classroom | Stanford Report
Sep 29, 2025 · AI appears in a wide range of education contexts today, from personalized education and tutoring to immersive learning experiences and grading ...
[72]
As AI transforms everything from personalized tutoring to automated ...
Oct 8, 2025 · As AI transforms everything from personalized tutoring to automated grading in K-12 classrooms, students heading into the 2025-26 school ...
[73]
Immersive Learning in 2025: AI & XR Trends - Edstutia LLC
Apr 10, 2025 · The program—cited by Business Insider in a January 2025 spotlight—now trains over 1,800 technicians per year, reducing physical training costs ...Immersive Learning In 2025... · The Hardware Renaissance · Higher Ed Embraces Virtual...
[74]
https://www.meta.com/blog/meta-for-education-quest-classroom-educators-vr-mixed-reality/
[75]
Can virtual reality technology be used for empathy education in ...
This study is the first randomized case-control study to investigate the effect of two different versions of VR on empathy development toward depression for ...Missing: distraction | Show results with:distraction
[76]
Effects of Virtual Reality-Based Distraction of Pain, Fear, and Anxiety ...
Apr 18, 2022 · This meta-analysis aimed to examine the effects of VR on pain, fear, and anxiety related to needle procedures in children and adolescents.
[77]
Gamifying Education: Why and How - Prodigy
Sep 29, 2024 · Digital game-based learning is a research-backed way to improve engagement, motivation and overall educational achievement.How Dgbl Is Used In The... · Prodigy: Digital Game-Based... · Prodigy Case StudiesMissing: RCT | Show results with:RCT
[78]
The role of gamified learning strategies in student's motivation ... - NIH
The results suggest a positive influence of gamification strategies on students' motivation, although in the long run, such motivation can decline.Missing: Prodigy RCT
[79]
Microlearning beyond boundaries: A systematic review and a novel ...
Jan 30, 2025 · The most important findings from the reviewed studies indicate that microlearning has positive impact on learning outcomes. The key learning ...
[80]
[PDF] Next-Gen Education: Enhancing AI for Microlearning - arXiv
Aug 18, 2025 · While previous studies have highlighted the general benefits of microlearning and AI ... Generative AI in Higher Education, Springer, 2024, pp.
[81]
How AI can improve tutor effectiveness
Oct 7, 2024 · Students of lower-rated tutors who used the AI assistance increased their math proficiency up to 9 percentage points on average compared to ...
[82]
Millions Learned More Math with Our AI Tutor
Widespread improvements in math learning. A randomized controlled trial in 140 schools demonstrated a doubling of math learning during the school year for ...Missing: score | Show results with:score
[83]
Effective and Scalable Math Support: Evidence on the Impact of an AI
Feb 15, 2024 · The study found that the AI tutor group had substantially higher math growth scores, with an effect size of 0.37, and statistically significant ...Missing: RCT improvements
[84]
(PDF) Effect of physics education technology project simulation on ...
Oct 19, 2024 · There was a statistically significant difference in the retention ability after treatment with a PhET simulation, compared to the control group.
[85]
The Impact of Physics Education Technology (PhET) Interactive ...
Dec 19, 2022 · The study investigated the impact of PhET simulation-based learning on students' motivation and academic achievement in learning oscillations and waves among ...Missing: retention trial
[86]
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of STEM ...
Aug 12, 2025 · With the help of meta-analysis, the findings are inferential rather than causal, and the results of the data show that the effect of STEM ...
[87]
Is online job training for all? Experimental evidence on the effects of ...
We report on the first randomized evaluation of a job training program offering cost-free access to curated, short Coursera MOOCs and certificates.
[88]
Open to MOOCs? Evidence of their impact on labour market outcomes
This paper investigates the effect that participation in massive open online courses (MOOCs) ecosystem can have on workers' labour market outcomes, mainly ...
[89]
[PDF] Does EdTech Substitute for Traditional Learning? Evidence from a ...
3 Our study is also one of the only studies that evaluates CAL as a direct substitute for traditional learning instead of being provided as a supplemental ...
[90]
a meta-analysis based on empirical literature - Nature
Sep 26, 2025 · The findings indicate that: (1) Technology-supported collaboration can enhance student learning outcomes to a certain extent, with an overall ...
[91]
[PDF] Education Technology: An Evidence-Based Review
In particular, we examine RCTs across the following categories of education technology: (1) access to technology, (2) computer-assisted learning, (3) technology ...
[92]
[PDF] Isolating the “Tech” from EdTech: Experimental Evidence on ...
The null finding for the CAL technology effect is not due to schoolchildren not being familiar with using computers at school. Second, we examine whether the ...
[93]
Digital distractions in education: a systematic review of research on ...
Aug 7, 2025 · Digital distraction in education describes the interruption of learner's concentration during academic tasks. With the increase in digital ...
[94]
Code Acts in Education: Edtech Has an Evidence Problem
May 22, 2024 · According to the Edtech Evidence Exchange, educators estimate that “85% of edtech tools are poor fits or poorly implemented”, indicating very weak returns.Missing: tiers fit audits
[95]
Screen Time Exposure at Age 1 Year and Developmental Delay at ...
Aug 21, 2023 · In this study, greater screen time for children aged 1 year was associated with developmental delays in communication and problem-solving at ages 2 and 4 years.
[96]
Toddler Screen Time: Longitudinal Associations with Autism and ...
Nov 29, 2024 · Greater screen time is associated with increased symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (autism), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and lower ...<|separator|>
[97]
Relationships between screen time and childhood attention deficit ...
This study performed a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to confirm the causality between screen time and childhood ADHD.
[98]
Teacher Professional Development: Costs, Benefits and Policy
The results from three successive RCTs of MTP in the U.S. suggest a medium-sized impact on student learning of approximately 0.18 standard deviations (s.d.).
[99]
[PDF] 2023 ISTE Research Study: Transforming Teacher Education
Data from a survey of new teachers conducted in 2022 showed that over half felt unprepared to use technology in the classroom, and slightly less than a quarter ...Missing: proficiency | Show results with:proficiency
[100]
Professional Development in EdTech: Why Training Matters - Swivl
Sep 10, 2025 · Professional development helps teachers unlock EdTech's full potential, building confidence and driving classroom impact.
[101]
Seizing the moment: harnessing the power of EdTech to accelerate ...
Apr 17, 2025 · Another barrier to technology adoption in education stems from inherent limitations in procurement and usage within public education systems.
[102]
Charter Schools Advance Innovation—But Often Not in the Ways ...
Charter schools are better positioned than district schools to adopt and faithfully implement personalized instruction and new approaches to teacher training.
[103]
Teachers Unions, AI, and the Classroom - Capital Research Center
Jan 18, 2024 · Training and Reskilling: Teachers unions may advocate for professional development and reskilling programs to help educators adapt to AI ...
[104]
Teachers Union's AI Deal Raises Questions—and Concerns
Jul 14, 2025 · Tech companies are giving AFT $23 million to train educators in AI tools, but will it help students learn?
[105]
[PDF] The Impact of Education Technology on Student Achievement
Eighth-grade students whose teachers received professional development on computers showed gains in math scores of up to 13 weeks above grade level ...
[106]
Teachers' professional learning and its impact on students' learning ...
Analysis of these studies suggest that training, ongoing coaching, collaborative Continuous Professional Development (CPD) promote student skills and learning.
[107]
Why Professional Development for EdTech is Key | Parmetech
Mar 25, 2024 · Boosting Student Achievement. Research shows a clear link between effective technology integration and improved student outcomes. When ...<|separator|>
[108]
The FCC Needs a Complete Picture of the Digital Divide
Sep 11, 2025 · 56% of households whose annual incomes are below $25,000 had wireline broadband at home in 2023 compared with nearly 90% for households whose ...
[109]
Americans' Use of Mobile Technology, Home Broadband
Jan 31, 2024 · Smartphones are common across income levels, but those in households earning $100,000 or more annually are far more likely than those earning ...
[110]
Federal broadband subsidies boosted rural internet, but service ...
Sep 26, 2024 · Federal broadband subsidies boosted rural internet, but service faded once funding ended, researchers find ... A federal multibillion-dollar ...
[111]
[PDF] 2023 Federal Broadband Funding Report - Investing In Internet for All
Aug 7, 2024 · With approximately 15 percent of American households lacking access to high-speed Internet service in 2023, a digital divide continues to.
[112]
Global Education Technology Market Size & Outlook
The global education technology market size was estimated at USD 163,492.3 million in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 348,410.6 million by 2030, growing at ...
[113]
The Economics of Education: Evaluating the Impact of Digital ...
Oct 8, 2024 · Digital learning platforms offer considerable scalability benefits and reduce costs per student by 25–30%, as shown in this review.
[114]
[PDF] Cost-Effectiveness and EdTech - Considerations and case studies
This document is a guide for decision-makers to examine the cost-effectiveness of EdTech programs, covering key considerations and case studies.
[115]
An Evaluation of Open Source Adaptive Learning Solutions - MDPI
Jan 17, 2023 · The purpose of this first study is to provide an empirical evaluation of the existing open source Ed-tech projects, which will serve as the basis for the ...<|separator|>
[116]
5 Key Barriers to Educational Technology Adoption in the ...
Apr 16, 2014 · 5 Key Barriers to Educational Technology Adoption in the Developing World · 1. Electrical Power · 2. Internet Connectivity · 3. Training and ...Missing: bureaucracy | Show results with:bureaucracy
[117]
Key Challenges in EdTech Adoption And How To Overcome Them
The absence of proper digital infrastructure is a major barrier to EdTech adoption, especially in underdeveloped or isolated places. Many schools do not have ...
[118]
(PDF) Barriers to Educational Technology Adoption: Navigating ...
Aug 4, 2025 · The purpose of the study was to explore the potential challenges that affect the adoption of educational technology by female college teachers.Missing: bureaucracy | Show results with:bureaucracy<|control11|><|separator|>
[119]
[PDF] Quality and Innovation Report - Ministry of Education
May 17, 2023 · DIKSHA (Digital Infrastructure for Knowledge Sharing) was formally launched by the Hon'ble Vice. President of India on 5th September 2017.
[120]
DIKSHA: a transformational bet on educational outcomes in India?
Nov 11, 2022 · By late 2021, DIKSHA had seen billions of individual 'learning sessions', and many teachers responded positively about the platform and its ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[121]
[PDF] Access and Use of DIKSHA for School Teachers and Students Amid ...
The study findings indicate that 96 per cent of teachers learnt to use DIKSHA during a pandemic and used the portal for lesson plans, assessments, question ...
[122]
'The largest classroom in Africa': How text messages mean millions ...
Jan 4, 2021 · Eneza Education is using texts messages to deliver classes. Their bite-size lessons delivered via text and “Ask a Teacher” feature are providing ...
[123]
[PDF] The Use of SMS and Other Mobile Phone-based Messaging to ...
Jul 22, 2023 · We find that there has been a notable increase in studies which have used SMS to promote and support education at a large scale. In addition to ...Missing: retention 2020s
[124]
[PDF] Evidence from the One Laptop per Child Program
Although many countries are aggressively implementing the One Laptop per. Child (OLPC) program, there is a lack of empirical evidence on its effects. This.
[125]
Evidence from the One Laptop per Child Program
No evidence is found of effects on test scores in math and language. There is some evidence, though inconclusive, about positive effects on general cognitive ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical<|control11|><|separator|>
[126]
[PDF] EdTech in Developing Countries: A Review of the Evidence
Jul 27, 2023 · I find that EdTech interventions centered around self-led learning and improvements to instruction are the most effective forms of. EdTech at ...
[127]
Key findings – Africa Energy Outlook 2022 – Analysis - IEA
At present, 600 million people, or 43% of the total population, lack access to electricity, most of them in sub-Saharan Africa. Countries such as Ghana, Kenya ...<|separator|>
[128]
Access to electricity – SDG7: Data and Projections – Analysis - IEA
The number of people without electricity in 2023 stabilised at around 600 million, well above the number before the Covid-19 pandemic thanks to record sales of ...
[129]
[PDF] Africa Broadband Outlook 2023 - Omdia
As of mid-2023, fixed broadband penetration in Africa was 12% compared with 63% globally, but the growth rate of broadband subscriptions in the African ...<|separator|>
[130]
Sub-Saharan Africa lost $1.74 billion in 2023 due to government ...
Jan 8, 2024 · The total financial loss incurred due to Internet outages in 2023 decreased by 67% compared to 2022 but increased by 45% compared to 2021.Missing: reliability | Show results with:reliability
[131]
Barriers developing countries face in implementing Edtech solutions
Jan 24, 2022 · 1. Access to constant electric supply · 2. Internet connectivity · 3. Local languages and context · 4. Lack of adequate training and support.
[132]
Reconsidering the Failure of the One Laptop Per Child Initiative
By 2009, only a few hundred thousand laptops had been shipped to the developing nations.[2] Today, the OLPC initiative is often cited by critics as a failure.
[133]
One Laptop Per Child is not improving reading or math. But, are we ...
Jun 14, 2012 · The study found no effects of OLPC in Peru on test scores in reading and math, no improvements in enrollment or attendance, no change in time spent on homework ...
[134]
5 Reasons Why Educational Laptops Were Doomed in Papua New ...
Mar 28, 2019 · In time, those of us who pointed out its failures were proved right. OLPC was a failure outside of a few special cases like Plan Ceibal. One ...
[135]
Corruption and education in developing countries: The role of public ...
The paper explains how enrollment in publicly funded higher education institutions affects years of schooling at different corruption levels. Using data from 88 ...
[136]
Are emerging technologies helping win the fight against corruption ...
ICT can support anti-corruption by promoting transparency, but also create new opportunities for corruption. The impact depends on the local context.
[137]
US schools leaked 37.6 million records in 3,713 data breaches
May 14, 2024 · The number of records impacted in education data breaches in 2023 reached almost 4.3 million–a vast increase on 2021's and 2022's figures of ...<|separator|>
[138]
Data, privacy, and cybersecurity in schools: A 2025 wake-up call
Jul 30, 2025 · According to ThreatDown's 2024 State of Ransomware in Education report, ransomware attacks on K-12 schools increased by 92 percent between 2022 ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
[139]
Ransomware attacks in education jump 23% year over year
Jul 21, 2025 · Ransomware attacks against schools, colleges and universities rose 23% year over year in the first half of 2025, according to a report from ...
[140]
Complying with FERPA and Protecting Higher Education Students ...
Jul 2, 2024 · The most recent updates to the FERPA occurred on May 24, 2024, and earlier in 2023.
[141]
Fixing FERPA: Adding Cybersecurity Requirements
Jul 3, 2025 · FERPA should be updated to include clear, enforceable cybersecurity requirements that address today's threat landscape while maintaining ...Why This Matters: The Stakes... · A Path Forward: Modernizing... · Mandatory Vendor Security...<|separator|>
[142]
[PDF] The FERPA Loophole EdTech Exploits to Monetize Student Data
Jan 21, 2021 · Safety Risks and Privacy Concerns for EdTech Data Collection. Schools ... EdTech companies place student privacy at risk because they ...
[143]
[PDF] 1. The use of student's personal devices a - Congress.gov
Jun 10, 2025 · EdTech companies, particularly the way in which they collect and monetize data ... EdTech is widespread, and so are its harms. In 2022, the K-12 ...
[144]
FTC Finalizes Changes to Children's Privacy Rule Limiting ...
Jan 16, 2025 · FTC Finalizes Changes to Children's Privacy Rule Limiting Companies' Ability to Monetize Kids' Data ... harm their mental health. The Commission ...
[145]
AI is a serious threat to student privacy
Oct 5, 2023 · In schools, AI will not only affect cheating and writing, but will also threaten student privacy. And that risk is being worryingly overlooked.
[146]
As Students, We Face Invasive AI-powered School Surveillance ...
Students care about their privacy but are facing invasive levels of AI-powered surveillance in schools, perpetuating existing discrimination. NJ students are ...
[147]
Vulnerable student digital well‐being in AI‐powered educational ...
Jul 16, 2024 · The empirical study by Rodríguez et al.'s (2022) shows how AI-informed nudges have helped student retention, learner performance and overall ...
[148]
Autonomy and AI Nudges: Distinguishing Concepts and Highlighting ...
Aug 5, 2025 · Recent literature has highlighted heightened ethical concerns about autonomy in AI-driven nudges compared to traditional nudges.<|separator|>
[149]
Benefits and Use Cases of Decentralized Identity in Education
Dec 16, 2024 · Decentralized identity systems protect student privacy by removing the need for centralized databases that store large amounts of personal data.
[150]
Blockchain-Assisted Self-Sovereign Identities on Education: A Survey
Blockchain technology is the foundation infrastructure for SSI by tightly integrating the concepts of verifiable credentials and decentralised identifiers.
[151]
Unlocking the power of blockchain in education - ScienceDirect.com
Decentralized Learning Platforms: Blockchain technology can be used to create decentralized learning platforms that are owned and controlled by the learners ...
[152]
EdTech in 10 Charts - HolonIQ
1. Education will be a $7T+ industry by 2025. Education is one of the world's single largest industries, making up more than 6% of GDP.
[153]
The 100 Worst Ed-Tech Debacles of the Decade - Hack Education
Dec 31, 2019 · A “ban laptops” op-ed may be the greatest piece of ed-tech clickbait ever devised. It is the instructional designer and tenured professor's ...
[154]
Fixing Ed-Tech's Investment Model (SSIR)
Dec 13, 2023 · Ed-tech venture funds average a 17 percent return, while other tech VCs average 36 percent, following data from Preqin for all VCs that have ...
[155]
Applying the science of learning to EdTech evidence evaluations ...
Sep 6, 2023 · The scientific consensus is that EdTech can have a strong positive impact on educational outcomes if there are certain conditions in place, ...
[156]
EdTech. A solution looking for a problem? | UCL IOE Blog
Sep 17, 2024 · Poor student outcomes. EdTech is also frequently proposed as a way to improve student outcomes. However, despite decades of EdTech research and ...
[157]
The EdTech Revolution Has Failed - by Jared Cooney Horvath
Nov 12, 2024 · In this post, neuroscientist and educator Jared Cooney Horvath goes further, arguing that the EdTech revolution has been a failure.
[158]
Has the EdTech Revolution Been a Failure? Or Are We Missing a ...
Dec 19, 2024 · The Classroom Management Plan to Avoid an Ed Tech Failure. The EdTech revolution hasn't failed—it remains an ...
[159]
AI is Killing Critical Thinking—But it Doesn't Have to Be That Way
May 27, 2025 · A recent study by Michael Gerlich “…revealed a significant negative correlation between frequent AI tool usage and critical thinking abilities.” ...
[160]
The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students ...
Jun 18, 2024 · The study reports the potential reduction in critical thinking skills when depending on AI (75%), the risk of excessive reliance on technology ( ...
[161]
The Digital Divide: Reading Comprehension in the Age of Screens
Jan 28, 2025 · One study published in the journal Psychological Science found that reading comprehension was significantly lower when students read on digital devices ...
[162]
Relation between digital tool practices in the language arts ... - NIH
Results revealed that amount of daily use of digital devices was negatively related to scores on a reading comprehension test. In addition, teachers' uses of ...
[163]
(PDF) The Erosion of Cognitive Skills in the Technological Age
Jun 15, 2024 · A 2022 study found that people exert up to 20% less effort on common daily tasks than their counterparts did just 8 years prior, suggesting an ...
[164]
The Threat of Technology to Students' Reading Brains
Sep 18, 2024 · Digital devices can diminish the brain's capacity for deep reading, as habits developed for digital reading can impair attention and patience ...
[165]
'The Great Rewiring of Childhood' - NYU
Jun 28, 2024 · Jonathan Haidt explains how the spike in smartphone use among young people has correlated with a rise in anxiety and depression.
[166]
Capitalisn't: The Economic Costs of a Phone-Based Childhood
Jul 18, 2024 · New York University's Jonathan Haidt discusses the effects of childhoods spent under the influence of smartphones and overprotective ...
[167]
Trajectories of Screen Time across Adolescence and Their ... - NIH
May 6, 2023 · This study aimed to characterize joint developmental patterns of time spent on videogames, surfing/chatting the Internet, and TV/DVDs during adolescence
[168]
Screen time: impacts on education and wellbeing - Parliament UK
May 25, 2024 · However, we have heard evidence to suggest that screen time has a generally negative impact on the mental health of children and young people.
[169]
Screen on = development off? A systematic scoping review and a ...
The present literature review focused on the influences of screen time on various developmental outcomes of children aged zero to 36 months.<|separator|>