Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Felling

Felling is the of severing a standing from its stump to direct its fall toward a predetermined location, serving as the initial phase in timber harvesting and operations. This practice, historically executed with axes or crosscut saws, now predominantly employs chainsaws or mechanized feller bunchers for efficiency and precision. Essential for procuring wood resources used in production, and , felling also supports ecological objectives such as stand improvement, , and habitat diversification when conducted selectively. Successful felling demands rigorous safety protocols, including evaluation of tree characteristics, environmental factors like and , and clear routes to mitigate risks of from falling timber or kickback. Techniques typically involve creating a directional on the felling side followed by a back cut to guide the tree's descent, minimizing damage to residual stands and surrounding property. Originating from ancient necessities for land clearance and shelter, the evolution of felling methods reflects advancements in tool , from manual implements to powered machinery, enhancing productivity while necessitating regulatory oversight to balance economic yields with preservation. Although indiscriminate felling contributes to loss and carbon emissions, evidence indicates that controlled harvesting can foster resilience and regeneration, countering narratives of inherent destructiveness.

Historical Development

Pre-Industrial Techniques

Prehistoric humans felled primarily using hafted stone axes and adzes, as demonstrated by replicating tools capable of cutting down small to medium , though requiring significant labor—up to several hours per tree depending on size and wood hardness. Archaeological evidence from sites like those in and the confirms such tools enabled early procurement for and structural uses by at least 476,000 years ago, with polished stone variants improving efficiency for larger trunks. Fire-assisted techniques, including to kill by removing rings before axe work, supplemented these methods to reduce chopping effort, a practice verified through ethnographic analogies and stump analysis. In ancient civilizations such as and , transitioning to and axes around 3000 BCE allowed faster felling for , , and , with adzes used for hewing trunks post-felling; these tools prioritized durability over the brittle stone predecessors, enabling clearance of denser forests for expanding settlements. axes, widespread by 1000 BCE in and , further accelerated rates, as metallurgical advances reduced breakage and sharpened edges more effectively, directly supporting population-driven land conversion from to arable fields. Billhooks and similar curved blades emerged for undergrowth clearance, aiding selective felling in managed woodlands for sustained yield, though overuse often led to localized observable in records. Indigenous practices in emphasized minimal invasive felling, relying on controlled burns and to open canopies for hunting and cultivation without fully harvesting large specimens, preserving services like amid nomadic or semi-sedentary lifestyles. in the 17th and 18th centuries adapted axe-dominated methods from homeland traditions, felling vast eastern white stands for masts and export—over 3 billion board feet annually by the mid-1700s in —using single-bit felling axes weighing 3-5 pounds, followed by into logs with the same tool due to scarce saws. This labor-intensive approach, reliant on teams of axemen and oxen for , cleared millions of acres for farms, causally linking timber demand to colonial and exhaustion cycles. Transitional innovations like the two-man , originating in by the mid-15th century but adopted for North American felling only around 1880 in regions like , marked the cusp of pre-industrial efficiency by enabling precise directional cuts without sole reliance on axes, reducing wedging risks in hardwoods. Early communities, from fjord clearers to frontiersmen, honed techniques like to control fall direction, minimizing damage to adjacent trees and facilitating on rivers, though high injury rates from kickback underscored the physical toll absent modern . These methods underpinned economies, where felling rates scaled with demographic pressures, often exceeding natural regeneration in cleared zones.

Industrialization and Mechanization

The industrialization of tree felling accelerated in the late 19th and early 20th centuries amid rising timber demands for railroads, urban expansion, and industrial construction, prompting shifts from manual axes and crosscut saws to powered equipment. Steam engines, widely adopted in sawmills by the late 1800s, enhanced log processing efficiency, indirectly supporting larger-scale felling operations by enabling quicker conversion of felled trees into lumber. In logging camps, early mechanized hauling with steam donkeys facilitated transport of felled timber from remote areas, though tree cutting itself relied on human labor until chainsaw innovations. Motorized chainsaws emerged as a transformative tool for felling, with forestry-adapted designs patented around 1905 and portable gasoline-powered models developed in the 1920s by companies like , allowing two-man teams to operate heavy units for faster cuts. These devices supplanted manual methods, where crews felled perhaps 10-20 trees daily per pair with crosscut saws, enabling rates up to several times higher and spurring timber production surges in regions like the U.S. . By the 1930s, adoption reduced per-tree felling time and costs, though initial models weighed over 100 pounds and required significant maintenance. World War II intensified mechanization to offset male labor shortages, with timber output ramping up for military , packaging, and fuel. In the UK, the Women's Timber Corps (lumberjills), formed in 1942, numbered up to 18,000 by war's end, employing crosscut saws alongside emerging power tools to fell trees at rates supporting 18 million tonnes of processed timber. U.S. efforts similarly mobilized women and advanced equipment in the Northwest, where expanded into steeper terrains using steam and early diesel aids, boosting annual harvests despite hazards. Mechanization from 1900-1950 lowered felling costs by streamlining cuts and transport, with production rising amid railroad and power saw integration, though rates remained high until refinements due to rudimentary features. Economic analyses indicate gains cut labor needs per , enabling industrial-scale clearcuts while reducing manual strain , though falls and failures persisted.

Post-20th Century Innovations

Feller-bunchers, which mechanically fell and accumulate trees for subsequent extraction, were pioneered in the late 1960s with track-type prototypes by Erv Drott, marking a shift toward full in operations. By the , these machines incorporated and saw heads, replacing chainsaws in many and harvests, as they allowed operators to process multiple stems per cycle while improving bunching for skidders. Accumulating felling heads (AFH), affixed to excavator-based carriers, further advanced handling of small-diameter trees in dense young stands during the late ; empirical studies demonstrate productivity gains through continuous cutting and on-site accumulation, reducing handling time and enabling whole-tree harvesting without intermediate delimbing. In the 2020s, GPS integration in harvesters and feller-bunchers has enabled precise and automated path optimization, minimizing disturbance and overlap in selective felling across varied terrains. via and satellite data supports pre-felling planning by mapping canopy structure and identifying harvestable stems, while post-operation monitoring assesses impacts on residual stands. Drone-based surveys augment this by deriving individual tree metrics for inventories, accelerating site assessment in selective operations where manual marking is labor-intensive. For urban and peri-urban adaptations, portable devices emerged around for remote branch trimming or partial felling near power lines, using non-conductive beams to mitigate electrocution risks without aerial lifts or direct contact. These tools, compliant with safety standards like IEC 60825, operate at distances exceeding 30 meters, enhancing efficiency in hazard-prone settings where traditional mechanical methods pose higher dangers.

Felling Methods

Manual Felling

felling employs handheld tools, primarily axes or , to sever at the base, enabling precise directional control in rugged or restricted environments unsuitable for mechanized equipment, such as steep inclines or dense undergrowth. This technique leverages the operator's direct manipulation of cutting angles to exploit gravitational pull and wood fiber tension, directing the trunk's rotation via a retained of uncut material that acts as a . Historically, axe felling predominated until the mid-20th century, when chainsaws supplanted them by reducing physical exertion and accelerating cuts through powered reciprocating teeth. The process commences with evaluation of the tree's lean—determined by visual alignment of trunk center of gravity with base—alongside identification of hazards like overhead branches or wind influence, followed by clearing an unobstructed fall zone and plotting a 135-degree escape route from the anticipated lay. A directional notch, typically 45 degrees with depth one-third the trunk diameter, is then incised on the fall side: an initial level undercut removes a wedge of wood, succeeded by an angled top cut meeting it to form a V or open-face profile, which predetermines the pivot axis by offsetting support removal. The back cut, executed horizontally from the opposite side at notch height minus hinge thickness (often 2.5-5 cm for control), severs holding wood while preserving the hinge to guide descent; wedges may be driven into the kerf to counter lean or binding. Adhering to these steps mitigates perils inherent to wood's anisotropic properties, where on the lean side stores ; improper back-cut sequencing can trigger barber chairing—a longitudinal propagating upward from release—or kickback from pinched bars binding against fibers. To avert barber chair, the back cut initiates low on the face before transitioning higher, gradually unloading stresses per principles that prioritize sequential fiber severance over simultaneous. Occupational data underscore planning's criticality: between 2010 and 2020, 190 U.S. workers died from strikes by felled trees or fragments, with many incidents traceable to deviated cut patterns or unassessed dynamics rather than tool failure. In practical deployment, manual methods suit selective harvesting in sensitive ecosystems or urban proximities, where machinery risks or . Productivity for proficient operators averages 13-19 trees per hour in moderate conditions, factoring delays like repositioning, vastly exceeding axe-era rates of 1-2 trees per hour limited by manual swing kinetics and blade dulling. This efficiency stems from chainsaws' in overcoming wood's , which axes address solely through repeated percussive impacts.

Mechanical Felling

Mechanical felling utilizes powered machinery, including feller-bunchers, harvesters, and skidders, to sever trees at the base and facilitate in commercial-scale operations. These systems are particularly suited to high-volume harvesting in even-aged stands or clearcuts, where equipment like rubber-tired skidders can handle loads exceeding average stem volumes per cycle, as observed in southern operations with cable-assisted models achieving higher capacities. Feller-bunchers equipped with or saw heads bunch felled trees for subsequent processing, minimizing manual intervention and enabling continuous workflows in flat to moderate terrains. In cut-to-length (CTL) configurations, harvesters integrate felling, delimbing, and into a single machine pass, while forwarders load and transport short logs to landings, supporting efficient material flow in or regeneration cuts. Productivity analyses of such systems reveal time consumption influenced by extraction distance and , with forwarders maintaining viable output up to several hundred meters despite exponential declines beyond optimal ranges. On flat , wheeled feller-bunchers demonstrate superior cycle times over tracked variants, with high-capacity units felling dozens of trees per hour under favorable conditions, yielding rates that surpass manual operations by factors tied to stem size and . Advancements in hydraulic systems contribute to operational efficiencies, as multi-pump configurations with variable pressure circuits optimize power delivery, indirectly lowering demands through precise control of cutting and maneuvering functions. Hybrid drive integrations in harvesters have demonstrated savings of up to 33% by recovering from operational cycles, correlating to reduced emissions per cubic meter harvested due to lower overall consumption. Soil protection features, such as low-ground-pressure tracks on feller-bunchers and forwarders, distribute weight over larger contact areas, mitigating compaction risks compared to wheeled skidders, especially in moist conditions where rutting could otherwise exceed sustainable thresholds. Tracked designs exhibit ground pressures below those of tires, preserving and infiltration rates during repeated passes in extraction corridors. Cost models incorporating these adaptations show lower long-term site impacts, balancing initial equipment investments against reduced remediation needs in sensitive terrains.

Advanced and Specialized Techniques

Boom-corridor thinning (BCT) employs a harvester's boom to systematically fell trees along narrow 1–2 m wide corridors, optimizing operations in dense young stands with small-diameter trees such as Pyrenean oak (Quercus pyrenaica) or Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). Developed primarily in Scandinavian forestry contexts since the late 2000s, BCT facilitates linear cutting motions that enhance efficiency over traditional selective methods by reducing positioning time and enabling continuous accumulation. Field experiments in high-density Pyrenean oak stands during the 2020s reported harvester felling and bunching productivity gains of up to 50% relative to selective thinning, attributed to streamlined boom reach and minimized maneuvering. Similarly, trials in young Scots pine stands demonstrated elevated productivity through corridor-based harvesting between strip roads, with systematic patterns preserving residual stand structure while accelerating removal rates. Accumulating felling heads (AFHs), integrated with BCT systems, allow harvesters to grasp, cut, and bundle multiple small-diameter trees in sequence without frequent unloading, sustaining in early operations. studies, including those from and researchers, quantify lower damage to residual trees—such as reduced wounds and cracks—due to confined machine tracks and geometric cutting that limits off-trail incursions. For instance, AFH-equipped harvesters in dense stands achieved up to 20–30% less collateral impact on leave trees compared to conventional heads, as evidenced by post-thinning assessments of stand density and vitality. In urban and hazard-prone settings, such as near powerlines, drone-integrated and enable precise volumetric mapping of tree canopies and structural risks, informing felling plans to minimize contact hazards. These technologies support non-invasive pre-felling evaluations, with utility sector applications reporting enhanced worker safety through remote that avoids direct proximity to energized lines. Empirical data from 2024–2025 implementations indicate risk reductions of approximately 40% in vegetation management scenarios by prioritizing targeted removals over broad manual exposure. Such integrations complement mechanical felling in constrained environments, yielding productivity uplifts via optimized cut sequences.

Types of Felling Cuts

Directional and Notching Cuts

Directional and in tree felling establish the intended fall path by creating a of uncut wood that leverages the tree's weight and momentum for controlled descent. The , made on the side facing the desired , removes a wedge-shaped section to initiate around the , while the back cut from the opposite side severs most of the , leaving the intact to the . This approach exploits the physics of and in the hinge wood, typically 10% of the in thickness, to prevent premature breakage and ensure the pivots predictably rather than barber-chairing or kicking back. Common notch types include the conventional notch, featuring a 45-degree angle formed by a horizontal bottom cut and an angled top cut; the Humboldt notch, an inverted V with a horizontal top cut and angled bottom cut suited for trees on slopes; and the open-face notch, with a 70- to 90-degree opening via a steeply angled top cut (70 degrees downward) and shallower bottom cut (20 degrees upward). The open-face notch maintains hinge integrity longer during descent, providing superior directional control compared to conventional or Humboldt notches, particularly for trees with heavy lean or in precision scenarios, as the wider opening delays notch closure and enhances leverage. Back cuts vary to preserve holding wood, positioned 1 to 2 inches above the notch's upper corner to allow hinge flex without , and often incorporate wedges for trees leaning oppositely to counter natural forces and reduce bind risks from or . In wind-prone areas, tapered or flat back cuts minimize slippage by distributing evenly across the , enabling adjustments via wedging to redirect up to 90 degrees against lean. OSHA guidelines emphasize these cuts to mitigate kickback and uncontrolled falls, with proper hinge management central to avoiding common hazards like stump jumps.

Harvesting Patterns: Selective vs. Clearcutting

Selective harvesting involves the targeted removal of individual mature or high-value trees, typically accounting for 10–40% of the standing timber volume per cutting cycle, while preserving the majority of the canopy and forest structure. This approach maintains partial shade and continuity, with empirical studies in tropical and montane forests indicating faster recovery of diversity and reduced compared to full removal methods, as the retained canopy mitigates runoff and stabilizes root systems. However, selective methods incur higher per-unit harvesting costs due to the need for precise planning, directional felling to minimize damage to residuals, and extended skidding distances, often making them less economically viable for low-value species or large-scale operations. In contrast, entails the complete removal of all trees within defined patches or blocks, facilitating the establishment of even-aged stands that regenerate rapidly from seed, sprouts, or planted stock, particularly in fire-adapted ecosystems like boreal conifers. Data from North American boreal forests demonstrate that post-clearcut regrowth can achieve quicker initial rates through dense, fast-growing cohorts, with managed rotations enabling sustained yields; for instance, U.S. Forest Service models prescribe 50-year cycles for like Douglas-fir, balancing with regrowth to prevent depletion over multiple generations. also reduces risks of pathogen buildup, as comprehensive removal disrupts disease cycles that persist in uneven-aged selective systems, where wounded residuals and retained hosts can propagate fungi or over decades. Biodiversity retention varies by context: selective harvesting supports higher short-term in managed stands by avoiding large-scale disruption, ranking above in meta-analyses of local diversity loss. Yet, in fire-prone or disturbance-adapted forests, mimics natural cycles, promoting resilient regeneration for , whereas prolonged selective intervals may accumulate competition or invasive vines, indirectly eroding long-term timber quality. Economic viability favors for uniform, high-volume extraction, though both methods sustain forests under regulated rotations when aligned with site-specific , as evidenced by stable carbon stocks in Canada's managed estate from 1990–2008.

Purposes and Benefits

Economic and Resource Utilization

Felling underpins the global timber economy by supplying raw materials for diverse products, generating significant revenue and . The worldwide wood and timber products market was valued at USD 992.43 billion in 2024, driven primarily by demand for sawnwood, panels, and products derived from felled . The sector, including operations, employs approximately 33 million people globally, representing about 1% of total and sustaining livelihoods in rural areas across , , and . In the United States, the forest products —rooted in timber harvesting—produces an annual economic output of $288 billion, accounting for roughly 4% of GDP, while supporting around 950,000 direct jobs. Harvested timber yields multiple resource streams, optimizing economic value from each tree. Primary outputs include logs processed into for construction and furniture, for and , and bark or branches converted into and via chipping or pelletization. Logging residues, often comprising 20-40% of felled volume, are increasingly directed toward production, enhancing per ; for instance, woody from U.S. harvests supports domestic and power generation facilities. These outputs create cascading economic benefits, as industries multiply the initial value through value-added . Sustainable felling practices further amplify economic returns by minimizing waste and ensuring resource renewability. Reduced-impact methods, which involve pre-harvest planning to limit , have yielded net financial gains of US$3.7 per cubic meter in operational studies, primarily through higher skidding efficiency and greater merchantable volume recovery compared to conventional techniques. In managed forests, harvesting followed by regeneration—via natural seeding or replanting—enables rotational cycles that sustain s over decades, with global planted forest area expanding by 1.2% annually from to 2020 according to FAO assessments, countering depletion risks and supporting long-term rural . This approach privileges empirical over static preservation, as actively managed stands provide verifiable timber flows without exhaustive resource drawdown.

Forest Health and Ecosystem Management

Felling practices, particularly , address overcrowding in by reducing inter-tree competition, thereby emulating natural disturbances like wildfires or that prevent stagnation in pre-industrial ecosystems. Residual trees in thinned stands gain enhanced access to , , and nutrients, leading to measurable improvements in vigor and productivity. For instance, U.S. Forest Service studies report average increases of approximately 26% in thinned areas five years post-treatment, while other research documents radial growth rate elevations from 0.2–0.27 cm/year in controls to 0.32–0.57 cm/year following thinning. Unmanaged , by contrast, exhibit accelerated degradation through suppressed and elevated background mortality, with European data indicating median annual rates of 1.1% and patterns of re-degradation via canopy loss in naturally regenerating unmanaged stands. Targeted felling of diseased or infested serves as a primary for disease control, interrupting and cycles that proliferate in dense, unmanaged conditions. Bark outbreaks, for example, drive widespread mortality in forests, but sanitary felling in managed stands limits spread by removing brood trees, yielding lower overall mortality than in unmanaged areas where beetle migration sustains epidemics. Comparative analyses confirm this causal link, with buffer zones around managed sites showing reduced impacts when combined with proactive removal, underscoring felling's role in maintaining stand resilience against eruptive pests. Selective felling enhances by generating habitats and canopy gaps that foster regeneration and structural heterogeneity. These alterations boost availability of browse and cover, correlating with elevated populations of ungulates like deer in post-harvest areas, as observed in tropical and Alaskan studies where logged sites supported higher deer densities and compared to intact forests. Such interventions promote by creating niches absent in stagnant, closed-canopy unmanaged forests, with evidence from vertebrate surveys highlighting that amplify habitat functionality for edge-adapted species.

Public Safety and Urban Applications

In urban settings, tree felling serves critical public safety functions by eliminating hazards from dead, diseased, or unstable trees proximate to residences, roadways, and utilities. These trees, weakened by or structural defects, frequently fail during storms, inflicting damage to and posing risks to human life. Municipalities bear substantial liability for such incidents; for example, the City of has disbursed over $18 million in settlements to residents for property damage attributable to city-maintained trees since 2021. Homeowners policies generally indemnify against sudden falls damaging structures or vehicles, provided the event qualifies as an unforeseen peril rather than foreseeable , but they exclude coverage for removal of healthy trees or preventive maintenance. Insurers often mandate inspections and felling of high-risk specimens to avert claims, underscoring the causal link between unaddressed hazards and elevated financial exposures in populated zones. Sectional dismantling emerges as the predominant technique for felling where spatial limitations preclude directional felling. Arborists ascend the via ropes, excising branches and segments sequentially from to base, employing systems, lowering devices, or cranes to direct debris away from obstacles. This controlled enhances precision, curtails to adjacent properties, and safeguards workers and civilians, rendering it indispensable in confined locales like residential neighborhoods or near power . Proactive felling mitigates broader risks, including disruptions to from downed lines or blocked thoroughfares, though quantifying precise reductions in incident rates demands localized data amid variable storm frequencies. Nonetheless, arboricultural standards emphasize hazard tree identification and removal to forestall failures, aligning with empirical observations that timely averts many avoidable urban tree-related calamities.

Environmental Considerations

Positive Ecological Outcomes

Selective felling, when conducted as reduced-impact , has been associated with increased in managed forests compared to unmanaged dense stands, as evidenced by a global of practices showing positive effects on under selection systems. This approach accelerates by opening the canopy, allowing light to reach the and fostering the growth of diverse pioneer and shade-tolerant that enhance overall multifunctionality, including nutrient cycling and provision. Thinning through felling reduces fuel loads and canopy in -prone , substantially lowering the risk and severity of wildfires; for instance, mechanical treatments have been shown to limit crown behavior for over 20 years in conifer-dominated western U.S. . Empirical data from treated areas indicate decreased intensity and spread, with meta-analyses confirming that such interventions mitigate high-severity burns by altering to more closely resemble pre-suppression historical conditions. Regrowing forests following managed felling exhibit higher annual rates than mature or old-growth stands due to rapid accumulation in young trees, which absorb CO2 more quickly during early phases. Additionally, carbon from felled trees is transferred into harvested wood products, creating long-term storage pools in durable materials like and structures, where it can persist for decades or centuries, contributing to sustained atmospheric CO2 reduction without the decay losses typical of standing forests. This dual mechanism—enhanced regrowth uptake and product —supports net carbon benefits from sustainable harvesting over static old-growth preservation.

Potential Adverse Impacts

Clearcutting can elevate rates in the short term due to removal of vegetative cover and root systems that stabilize , with studies documenting increased sediment yields from roads and skid trails as primary contributors. In the , bare on harvest approaches exhibited erosion rates of 43.7 tons per per year, compared to 5.8 tons per per year on graveled sites, highlighting the role of site preparation in exacerbating runoff. Selective , while less disruptive overall, damages 5–15% of residual trees through incidental felling and equipment compaction, indirectly contributing to localized instability. Forest harvesting induces temporary wildlife displacement via and , which alter microclimates and increase predation vulnerability for interior- species. creation from reduces aboveground by an estimated 9% globally, equivalent to 58 petagrams of carbon loss, with short-term declines in for groups like and certain following disturbance. Meta-analyses indicate net neutral outcomes over decades for many taxa, though initial dips occur in abundance for disturbance-sensitive organisms. Empirical assessments reveal that environmental harms from legal, regulated felling are often overstated in public discourse, with statistical biases in early studies inflating perceived loss from selective harvesting. Most severe stems from illegal or poorly executed operations rather than felling itself, as evidenced by overestimation of timber volumes in fraudulent permits and unregulated clearcuts driving disproportionate damage.

Sustainable Practices and Mitigation

Reduced-impact logging (RIL) techniques, including directional felling to control tree fall direction and pre-planned skid trails to minimize disturbance, have been shown to reduce stand damage in tropical forests by 30-50% compared to conventional methods. These practices involve pre-harvest inventories to select trees, removal to prevent , and optimized yarding paths, which collectively lower canopy opening and ground compaction while preserving future crop trees. In Amazonian studies, RIL maintained post-harvest carbon stocks closer to unlogged levels, with emissions reductions equivalent to 29-50% of those from standard selective . Certification programs such as the American Tree Farm System (ATFS) under its 2021 Standards of Sustainability require landowners to implement regeneration plans post-felling, including timely restocking of desired on harvest sites to sustain timber yields. These standards mandate for multiple objectives, with third-party audits verifying compliance through documented and growth projections that ensure long-term productivity without depleting stand volumes. ATFS-certified forests, covering over 25 million acres as of 2023, demonstrate maintained or increased yields via even-aged regeneration and site-specific , countering depletion risks in working woodlands. Remote sensing technologies, including from platforms like Global Forest Watch, enable real-time monitoring of felling activities to enforce sustainable harvest limits below annual growth increments. High-resolution optical and data detect canopy gaps and track compliance with allowable cut volumes, reducing over-harvesting by providing verifiable of extraction patterns against pre-approved plans. In operational forestry, such tools integrate with GIS for precision assessments, ensuring mitigation of cumulative impacts through iterative adjustments to felling schedules based on detected regeneration rates.

Regulations and Standards

Worker Safety Protocols

Worker safety protocols in tree felling emphasize hazard identification, proper equipment use, and procedural safeguards to mitigate risks such as kickback, tree binding, and falling debris, which contribute to 's elevated rates exceeding 14,000 incidents per 100,000 full-time workers as reported in early 1990s data from the . Under standards like OSHA's 29 CFR 1910.266, operators must conduct pre-felling assessments to evaluate site-specific dangers, including snags (standing dead trees), terrain slope, and overhead hazards, ensuring trees are felled uphill from or level with previously cut timber to prevent log rollback. These protocols mandate clear escape paths at 45 degrees from the tree's intended , with no personnel approaching within two tree lengths until the feller signals safety, directly addressing common causes of struck-by incidents. Personal protective equipment (PPE) forms a foundational layer of defense, requiring hard hats, eye and face shields, hearing protection, gloves, and to guard against lacerations, impacts, and . , embedded with cut-retardant materials, are critical for felling operations, as chainsaw-related injuries account for approximately one-fourth of all injuries, with kickback—a sudden upward —being a primary mechanism. programs, including operation , enhance recognition and procedural compliance; studies indicate such licensing substantially improves users' risk perception and adoption of safe practices, though quantitative fatality reductions vary by implementation. Technological aids further reduce physiological strains, with anti-vibration systems in modern —incorporating springs, rubber buffers, and foam—mitigating hand-arm syndrome (HAVS), a cumulative disorder linked to prolonged exposure. Ergonomic features like reduced-vibration handles correlate with lower risks in use, including tasks, by dampening transmitted forces that exacerbate repetitive strain. Protocols also enforce regular equipment , such as chain sharpness and bar lubrication, to minimize binding and kickback during undercuts and backcuts, where the undercut must be sized to guide the tree's fall without splitting. Compliance with these measures, verified through site audits and operator logs, has been associated with broader declines in injury severity since mandatory standards were enacted.

Environmental and Land-Use Rules

In the United States, large-scale felling operations on necessitate compliance with the (NEPA) of 1969, requiring environmental assessments or impact statements to evaluate potential habitat disruption and emissions from machinery and biomass decay. These reviews typically span 3.6 to 7.2 years before treatments commence, hindering fuel reduction efforts aimed at prevention. Critics argue that such protracted processes exacerbate fire risks by delaying thinning in overgrown stands, as evidenced by stalled projects like the Smokey Project, where litigation under NEPA obstructed 7,000 acres of mitigation work. Balanced enforcement has emerged through reforms, such as the 2024 Fix Our Forests Act, which streamlines approvals for hazardous fuel reduction while preserving core environmental safeguards. Riparian buffer zones, mandated under laws like the Clean Water Act, establish no-cut or restricted-felling areas typically 30 to 100 meters wide adjacent to streams and wetlands to minimize sediment erosion and habitat fragmentation during harvesting. Empirical studies demonstrate these buffers reduce sediment delivery to waterways by 60% to 90%, with effectiveness tied to width and vegetation density, as narrower zones under 15 meters fail to fully mitigate forestry-induced connectivity of sediments to streams. However, overly expansive buffers can impede targeted riparian thinning for invasive species control or flood resilience, prompting adaptive guidelines that allow selective felling in buffers when supported by site-specific hydrologic data. Internationally, the European Union's (1992) and Timber Regulation enforce stringent habitat protections, prioritizing retention through selective felling and minimal soil disturbance, often resulting in lower harvest intensities than in . In contrast, U.S. and frameworks permit greater under models, with data indicating that EU-style restrictions inversely correlate with proactive interventions like prescribed burns or density reductions, potentially elevating risks from unthinned fuels. Emission regulations, such as those under the EU's system, indirectly constrain felling by accounting for short-term carbon releases from felled , though sustainable practices in laxer jurisdictions like emphasize replanting to offset such impacts without curtailing essential land-use adjustments.

Property Rights and Jurisdictional Variations

In jurisdictions emphasizing rights, landowners often retain authority to fell trees on their own land without prior governmental approval, provided the trees pose no protected status or public hazard. In , the Federal Nature Conservation Act permits the removal of trees located entirely on , reflecting a balance between ownership prerogatives and ecological safeguards, though state-level ordinances may impose restrictions on healthy trees felled for non-essential reasons such as . This approach contrasts with more interventionist regimes, where state oversight prioritizes collective environmental goals over individual control, potentially leading to inefficiencies in . Poland's 2017 amendment to the Act on the Protection of Nature marked a significant , allowing private owners to fell any number of trees on their property without permits or notification, except in protected areas. Enacted under Szyszko, the law aimed to enhance timber availability and reduce bureaucratic hurdles for owners, resulting in a surge of felling activities that increased wood supply but drew criticism for inadequate controls. Empirical outcomes demonstrated that easing restrictions facilitated rapid resource utilization by proprietors, underscoring causal links between property autonomy and heightened harvest rates, though subsequent adjustments reintroduced some notification requirements for areas. On public lands, such as those administered by the (USFS), felling requires permits and adheres to federal planning targets that critics argue prioritize administrative processes over responsive to local conditions. USFS timber sale programs, governed by statutes like the National Forest Management Act, set annual harvest volumes but have faced lawsuits alleging that rigid quotas undermine by favoring prolonged bureaucratic reviews rather than owner-like incentives for proactive . In , conversely, the Forest Law imposes stringent quotas and licensing even on private holdings, with illegal felling treated as a criminal offense punishable by and fines; for instance, a 2021 case saw a farmer receive a for exceeding personal quotas, illustrating state dominance that enforces compliance through deterrence but limits owner discretion. Jurisdictional differences are pronounced in federal systems like , where tree felling on private land falls under state and local purview, with only the Australian Capital Territory and enforcing blanket protections for regardless of size. In and , for example, permits are mandatory for "significant" trees exceeding diameter thresholds, often requiring assessments that delay removal and elevate costs, leading to documented cases where over-regulation discourages routine essential for sustainable health on private estates. Such variations highlight empirical tensions: permissive frameworks in places like rural enable efficient resource use, while prescriptive models in urban or quota-bound can inadvertently constrain proprietors, fostering underutilization or black-market incentives absent robust enforcement.

Controversies and Criticisms

Debates Over Sustainable Harvesting

Debates center on whether selective felling in managed forests enables long-term renewability superior to strict preservation, with empirical evidence favoring active management for sustained timber yields and ecosystem health. In Europe, post-World War II reforestation efforts demonstrated regenerative capacity, as forest area in the European Union expanded by 37% from 1950 to 2020, accompanied by a 138% increase in growing stock volume due to systematic planting and harvesting cycles that promote faster regrowth than natural succession in untouched stands. Similarly, western European forests grew by nearly 30% in area over the 50 years following the war, driven by afforestation on marginal lands and harvest practices that maintain net annual increments exceeding removals by about 75% on average. These outcomes underscore that treating trees as renewable crops through controlled felling—akin to agricultural rotation—avoids the stagnation of unharvested forests, where overmature stands experience higher mortality and reduced vitality. Opponents, often from environmental activism groups, argue that any felling risks irreversible and degradation, prioritizing "hands-off" preservation to mimic pre-industrial conditions. However, global data from the (FAO) refute claims of systemic collapse, showing that designated for production have remained relatively stable in area worldwide, while net global loss slowed to 4.7 million hectares annually between 2010 and 2020, with managed systems contributing to offsets via replanting. Preservationist models overlook causal dynamics where unmanaged accumulate deadwood, releasing substantial carbon—decaying biomass emits approximately 10.9 billion tonnes of CO2 equivalent yearly, exceeding emissions from equivalent harvested volumes redirected to long-lived products like timber. In contrast, managed store up to three times more carbon per acre in live trees and wood products after accounting for harvest and mortality, outperforming untouched equivalents by enabling substitution effects that displace fossil fuel-intensive materials. Certification schemes like the (FSC) aim to ensure and sustainable practices but face criticism for lax oversight enabling scandals, including ties to by certified entities such as Samling Global, which was found guilty of harvesting within protected areas. Investigations have documented cases where FSC labels masked destructive practices, like in and , where infiltrated nearly the entire certified sector, undermining despite benefits for legal supply chains. Proponents counter that such systems, when rigorously applied, facilitate renewability by incentivizing replanting and monitoring, as evidenced by sustained yields in certified managed forests that exceed unmanaged decay rates in carbon retention. Overall, data indicate managed felling sustains and carbon benefits more effectively than preservation alone, though integrity remains contested.

Conflicts Involving Old-Growth and Wildfire Prevention

In the United States, conflicts over management intensified during the Biden administration's tenure (2021–2025), as policies prioritized amid concerns, often at odds with evidence-based wildfire mitigation strategies. 14008, issued on January 27, 2021, directed federal agencies to conserve mature and s to enhance , prompting the U.S. Forest Service to propose amendments in 2024 restricting commercial logging in such stands across 50 million acres of national forests. These measures, supported by environmental groups like the , aimed to protect hotspots but faced opposition from forestry experts and industry stakeholders, who argued that prohibiting selective exacerbates fuel accumulation from decades of fire suppression, heightening risks of stand-replacing megafires. Empirical data underscores the efficacy of in bolstering old-growth against . A 2024 of over 100 studies across North American forests found that mechanical , particularly when combined with prescribed burning, reduced subsequent severity by altering fuel structures and canopy , with treated areas exhibiting up to 88% lower prevalence of high-severity fires persisting for 20 years or more. For example, in California's 2020 —one of the largest in state history— stands in the burned at moderate severity, preserving larger old-growth trees, whereas adjacent dense, untreated areas suffered near-total canopy loss due to ladder fuels enabling transition. Similarly, analyses of 2019–2020 Australian eucalypt forests showed lowered severity by 30–50% in treated plots, countering claims of inherent old-growth resistance by demonstrating how overstocked conditions from suppressed natural regimes amplify mega- intensity. These disputes pit activist-driven narratives against causal evidence of density-driven fire escalation. Organizations such as the Center for Biological Diversity have litigated to block projects, asserting they fragment s and release stored carbon, potentially harming species like the , while downplaying how unthinned old-growth has lost 13–19% of mature giant sequoias to high-severity fires in the late 2010s and early 2020s. In contrast, timber industry analyses and peer-reviewed forestry research highlight economic losses from idle mills—exacerbated by restrictions—and emphasize that selective targets competitive trees, fostering vigor in fire-resilient overstory veterans without net degradation. A balanced assessment reveals that while absolute protection safeguards immediate ecological value, empirical outcomes favor targeted interventions: unmanaged stands face higher probabilistic destruction from escalating regimes, whereas judicious has preserved more old-growth volume overall by averting total stand mortality in events like the 2020s Western U.S. fire seasons. This tension reflects broader institutional biases in , where advocacy from academia and NGOs—often prioritizing preservationist ideals over longitudinal data—delays adaptive practices proven to sustain forests under changing climates.

Illegal Practices and Certification Challenges

Illegal logging accounts for an estimated 15–30% of global timber trade, generating annual revenues between $52 billion and $157 billion while driving habitat loss and across tropical regions. In , 91% of Amazon from August 2023 to July 2024 occurred without authorization, often involving unauthorized felling on public and private lands that exacerbates erosion and species decline. has similarly high rates, with 40–55% of classified as illegal, contributing to the loss of over 840,000 hectares of in 2012 alone and fragmenting habitats for like orangutans. These practices frequently involve organized networks evading traceability, leading to underreported volumes and economic distortions that disadvantage legal operators. Certification systems, such as the (FSC), seek to combat illegality through chain-of-custody verification and audits, yet they have been plagued by scandals documented in the FSC "hall of shame," including cases of certified timber sourced from corrupt operations in Europe's Carpathian forests and in . Weak oversight, such as inadequate field inspections and conflicts of interest among certifiers, has enabled false claims, with former FSC integrity officials estimating 20–30% of certifications involve unaddressed irregularities. Despite these flaws, empirical studies of certified concessions in and community-managed forests show reductions in illegal felling rates compared to uncertified areas, attributed to enhanced monitoring and market premiums that incentivize compliance. Flawed frameworks highlight systemic vulnerabilities to , particularly in regions with graft-prone bureaucracies, where bribes facilitate forged documents and evade . Industry participants, however, possess inherent incentives for self-regulation, as legal sourcing secures access to premium markets and shields against reputational risks from scandals. Coverage in outlets, which often align with environmental , tends to emphasize ecological harms while understating property rights violations—such as from private forest owners—and the role of clear economic incentives in fostering verifiable legality over coercive oversight.

Notable Case Studies

Boom-Corridor Thinning Experiments

Boom-corridor thinning (BCT) entails felling trees along narrow, linear corridors (typically 1–2 meters wide) using sweeping motions of a harvester's boom in young, dense stands with high stem densities, facilitating systematic removal rather than individual tree selection. This method, first systematically studied in Sweden around 2009, targets unmanaged or early-stage forests to enable cost-effective early intervention, where conventional selective thinning proves inefficient due to maneuvering challenges. Experiments conducted in the 2010s and 2020s, primarily in Scandinavia, have evaluated BCT's application in species such as Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and birch (Betula spp.), with trials extending to Pyrenean oak (Quercus pyrenaica) in Spain. Field trials demonstrate substantial harvester productivity gains with BCT relative to selective thinning (ST), with a 2022 Swedish study reporting 16% higher felling and bunching output (in dry tonnes per productive machine hour) and 27% reduced work time per tree, attributed to minimized boom repositioning in dense conditions. Complementary simulations of BCT in young forests predict scalability, potentially yielding 50–200% efficiency improvements in unmanaged stands by optimizing corridor spacing and removal intensity for biomass extraction. A Spanish trial in high-density Pyrenean oak stands (over 20,000 stems per hectare) confirmed enhanced harvester performance with BCT, alongside potential forwarder benefits from aligned extraction paths. Post-treatment assessments reveal BCT incurs lower soil damage than ST, with rutting and compaction limited to under 8 meters per 100 meters of corridor due to straighter travel paths and reduced harvester turns. Residual tree injury rates average lower overall with BCT (e.g., fewer damaged stems along extraction routes), though corridor-edge trees exhibit elevated bark wounds or stem bending in 10–20% of cases from felled-tree impacts, without translating to long-term growth deficits over 4–5 years. These outcomes position BCT as viable for Scots pine and Pyrenean oak in dense, pre-commercial stages, supporting scalable management of neglected forests to preempt overcrowding and enhance future timber quality.

High-Profile Felling Disputes

In September 2023, the iconic Sycamore Gap sycamore tree, located adjacent to in , , was illegally felled in a deliberate act of , prompting widespread outrage and coverage. The tree, estimated to be 100 to 120 years old based on growth ring analysis, had become a symbol of , featured in films and visited by thousands annually. Two individuals, Adam Carruthers and , were subsequently convicted and imprisoned for the act, which involved cuts that brought down the tree without any prior authorization or safety justification. While some post-incident commentary drew parallels to legitimate tree removals driven by structural instability risks—such as potential endangering paths—no evidence indicated pre-felling instability in this case, highlighting tensions between cultural preservation and unmanaged natural hazards elsewhere. In 2024, environmental organizations filed lawsuits against the U.S. Forest Service, challenging the agency's annual timber targets as inadequately analyzed for impacts, including carbon emissions from older that store significant . These suits, including one by the Southern Environmental Law Center, argued that targets—set without full review—prioritize volume over ecological considerations, potentially undermining forest amid rising atmospheric CO2. Counterarguments from agency data emphasize that , including targeted felling, reduces severity by lowering loads, with untreated forests experiencing up to 26% loss to fires versus 6% to in managed areas, thereby mitigating net emissions from uncontrolled burns. Poland's 2017 , which relaxed restrictions on felling in state-owned areas and allowed unlimited private landowner harvests without permits, drew accusations of a "chainsaw massacre" from critics concerned about in ancient woodlands like . The ruled the increased logging in protected sites violated habitat directives, halting operations justified by the government as sanitary measures against infestations. However, satellite-based monitoring from Global Forest Watch indicates no net tree cover loss nationally; between 2000 and 2020, Poland gained 407,000 hectares (3.8%) overall, with 892,000 hectares added versus 485,000 lost, even as harvest volumes rose post-2015 amid Europe's 49% regional increase in felled area. This empirical stability contrasts media narratives, suggesting heightened supply met demand without depleting standing forests, though localized impacts in sensitive zones fueled ongoing disputes.

References

  1. [1]
    Felling - Technology and Development at the USDA Forest Service
    Felling: Severing the tree from the stump is referred to as felling. Historically this was carried out with an axe or bow-saw.
  2. [2]
    Felling, Limbing and Bucking Trees | MU Extension
    Felling involves cutting a standing tree and dropping it in the place you want it. Limbing is the removal of the branches from either standing or downed trees.Felling A Tree · Limbing A Tree · Bucking A Tree
  3. [3]
    Tree cutting does have positive environmental consequences
    Nov 29, 2012 · Cutting trees provides for regeneration, improved habitat for many species, maintains forest health, and helps us shape forests for the future.
  4. [4]
    eTool : Logging - Manual Operations - Felling Trees - OSHA
    Felling means to cut the tree in such a way that it falls in the desired direction and results in the least damage to the tree. To safely fell any one tree, you ...
  5. [5]
    6 steps to successful tree felling | Husqvarna IN
    6 steps to successful tree felling · 1. Plan ahead. When it comes to tree removal by using a chainsaw, preparation is key. · 2. Check the felling direction.1. Plan Ahead · 2. Check The Felling... · 4. Decide On Cutting...
  6. [6]
    The History Of Tree Felling - Complete Tree Care
    Tree felling dates back hundreds of years, and was first used to clear areas for farm land, collect firewood and build houses.
  7. [7]
    Why cutting trees isn't always a bad thing - Mass.gov
    May 1, 2021 · Trees remove carbon from the atmosphere and store it as wood, which helps mitigate the negative impacts of climate change.
  8. [8]
    Healthy Forests: 'It's Never About Cutting an Individual Tree'
    Sep 26, 2022 · Cutting trees, when done in appropriate ways, can lead to a more resilient forest while yielding renewable forest products.Missing: felling | Show results with:felling
  9. [9]
    Tree Felling with Stone Axes: Pre-Bending Matters but Feller Sex ...
    Jan 20, 2023 · This research questions the emphasis in the experimental archaeology literature on felling of large trees by stone-axe-wielding males working alone.<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    Expedition Magazine | A Tree Falls in Philadelphia - Penn Museum
    Examples of different axes that have been used in experimental tree-felling. From left to right: a 6000-year-old Scandinavian ground flint stone axe from the ...Missing: prehistoric evidence
  11. [11]
    Evidence for the earliest structural use of wood at least ... - Nature
    Sep 20, 2023 · Wood from tree trunks enabled humans to construct large objects such as platform foundations that necessitated tools for felling and hewing. The ...
  12. [12]
    The Adze and the Ungrooved Axe of the New England Indians - jstor
    Trees can be felled with stone axes without the aid of fire, as the writer has proved by experiment. Of course axes of the ungrooved variety were less ...
  13. [13]
    TOOLS OF THE TRADE: THE FIRE AXE • FireRein EcoGel
    Jan 22, 2021 · The stone head axe was made of hard stone; usually sharpened flint. It was used to cut down trees for firewood, building materials, and daily use items.
  14. [14]
    The ancient tools that shaped our woodlands - Forestry Commission
    Jul 22, 2025 · The flat, widened blade enabled more efficient tree felling, which meant people could cut down trees of greater age. The metal adze enabled more ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Trees, Woodlands, and Archaeology - Program in Agrarian Studies
    Trees relate to archaeology through pollen analysis, charcoal, long-lived trees, dendrochronology, and wood-lots, and can be found in forests with  ...
  16. [16]
    American Prehistory: 8000 Years of Forest Management
    During this era, Native Americans cleared land by girdling (cutting away a ring of bark from trees to stop growth) or setting fire to a group of trees and used ...Missing: felling | Show results with:felling
  17. [17]
    Harvesting the Stands of Eastern White Pine
    In recent centuries, the forests of eastern North America have undergone drastic changes. Land clearing by European settlers and the various episodes of logging ...
  18. [18]
    https://oxfordre.com/americanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.001.0001/acrefore-9780199329175-e-188
  19. [19]
    Chapter 2 - Early Methods of Logging | Industrial Workers of the World
    Crosscut saws, which had to be imported from England, were scarce and costly; hence the tree trunks were made into logs by chopping instead of sawing. The ...
  20. [20]
    Log Cabin Living: Large Tools Saws
    Crosscut saws first became popular in Europe during the mid-15th century. Before 1850, trees in North America were commonly felled by axe and then cut ...
  21. [21]
    7771-2508-MTDC: Crosscut Saw Manual - USDA Forest Service
    About 1880, Pennsylvania lumbermen began felling trees with the crosscut. Before that time, all trees had been ax-felled and crosscut into lengths. Until the ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Saws-That-Sing.pdf - Back Country Horsemen of America
    Historical Origin of Crosscut Saws. The crosscut saw did not come into common use in. Europe until the mid-15th century. These early saws were rectangular ...
  23. [23]
    History of the Logging Industry in the United States - Cherry Outlet
    Jun 15, 2025 · The practice of pit-sawing was common, where logs were cut into planks by two men, one standing in a pit beneath the log and the other above.
  24. [24]
    Sturgeon's Mill Restoration Project – A Step Back In Time
    All of the equipment, tools, and steam engines are original. This sawmill is an authentic time capsule of late 19th – early 20th century saw-milling and logging ...
  25. [25]
    Hull-Oakes Sawmill | THISisCarpentry
    Feb 25, 2011 · Hull-Oakes Lumber may be the last steam-powered commercial saw mill in the country, and they're one of the few mills capable of cutting large timbers up to 85 ...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    The Logging Industry (1900-1920) - Historic Toxaway Foundation
    The Logging Industry (1900-1920). By the early twentieth century, western North Carolina's economy was dominated by two industries: tourism and timber.
  27. [27]
    Fun Fact: Unfortunately, Chainsaws Were Invented for Childbirth
    Mar 26, 2021 · This led to the mechanized chainsaw eventually getting adopted by the timber industry in 1905, allowing the instrument to be applied to trees, ...<|separator|>
  28. [28]
    The History of the Chainsaw - Waldwissen.net
    Dec 12, 2007 · The first chainsaws were developed in the 1920's. The development of the motorised saw led to an increase in timber production.
  29. [29]
    https://sawzillaparts.com/blogs/default-blog/how-the-chainsaw-changed-the-logging-industry
  30. [30]
    https://www.greenworkstools.com/blogs/greenworks-blog/history-of-the-chainsaw
  31. [31]
    Land Girls and Lumber Jills - Historic UK
    Land Girls were part of the Women's Land Army (WLA) in agriculture, while Lumber Jills were part of the Women's Timber Corps (WTC) in lumber production.
  32. [32]
    TheLumberjills - Facebook
    Rating 5.0 (2) By the end of WW2, 18 million tonnes of trees had been converted into hundreds of products for war. Thanks to the 15-18,000 strong Women's Timber Corps, we ...<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    Logging - Northwest Power and Conservation Council
    During World War II, the Northwest logging industry increased substantially. Loggers moved farther into watersheds and used more sophisticated equipment. ...
  34. [34]
    Technology and Labor - Oregon History Project
    Until the mechanization of most work processes following World War II, extractive industries in the Pacific Northwest were labor intensive, with a work force ...
  35. [35]
    Northwest Forest Worker Safety - DEOHS Home
    Injury and death rates in logging and related industries have often been cyclical. For example, injuries among Oregon loggers increased 77% after the 1980-1981 ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Logging Cost and Productivity Associated with Labor and ...
    Aug 11, 2012 · The logging railroad could arguably be considered the first advent of mechanization in timber harvesting, replacing human and animal power in ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] CHANGES IN THE LOGGING LABOR FORCE
    This increased mechanization has affected both the quantity and type of labor needed by the industry. According to the 1970 Census of Population, 123,829 ...
  38. [38]
    A Good Reflection | Timber Harvesting
    Erv Drott fabricated a late '60s track-type feller-buncher, and a pal of his, Norval Morey, gave us the Morbark pulpwood debarker, tree shear, whole tree ...
  39. [39]
    The evolution of the Interior's forest industry | Williams Lake Tribune
    Jan 22, 2015 · Mechanized shears and feller bunchers started replacing the chain saws. The 1970s saw even more technological transformations with the ...<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    Effects of Boom-Corridor and Selective Thinnings on Harvester ...
    Whole-tree harvesting reduces costs and increases productivity (e.g., Laina et al. 2013) by using accumulating felling heads with no delimbing of stems, which ...
  41. [41]
    The productivity and cost of harvesting whole trees from early ...
    The novel accumulating felling head is attached to the boom of the crawler excavator, and trees are harvested at full-tree length. The crosscutting is done ...
  42. [42]
    Revolutionizing Forestry - Wheeled Harvesters - Farmonaut
    GPS-guided harvesting for improved accuracy; Drone-assisted surveying and planning; Satellite imagery for forest health assessment; Data analytics for optimized ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] USING GPS TO EVALUATE PRODUCTlVITY AND PERFORMANCE ...
    When used on mobile forest harvesting machines, data collected from GPS and additional external sensors can improve forest engineering design and management ...<|separator|>
  44. [44]
    Remote sensing for planning harvesting operations and monitoring ...
    Artificial Intelligence (AI) holds significant potential to transform harvesting operations by supporting tree-level decision-making and optimizing harvest ...
  45. [45]
    Augmenting forest inventories: Using drones to derive individual tree ...
    Aug 8, 2025 · Unmanned aerial systems (drones) hold the potential to characterize both traditional and less-traditional forest inventory metrics for ...
  46. [46]
    Goman Introduces Portable Laser Cannon to Tree Care Industry
    Sep 20, 2024 · Laser cannon involves less labor and less time in some situations, and is a revolutionary device for tree care industry.
  47. [47]
    SPT Lasers for Cut Tree Branches: Best Solutions 2025 - Accio
    Rating 5.0 (123) Can SPT lasers operate near power lines? Yes—non-conductive beams and 30m+ working distances comply with utility safety standards when IEC 60825-certified. How ...
  48. [48]
    How To Cut Down a Tree: Safe and Effective Tree Felling, Limbing ...
    The felling wedge is inserted into the final cut to keep the tree from settling back on the chainsaw bar. Wedges are tapped firmly into the cut space (kerf) ...
  49. [49]
    How to Fell a Tree | Tree Felling Tips | STIHL USA
    Felling a tree can be done using two methods: the conventional cut and the open-face cut. This video walks you through both processes.
  50. [50]
    the postwar development era, 1946-1959 - NPS History
    The chainsaw soon replaced the crosscut and bucksaws for felling trees, as well as the remaining ax work. The chainsaw also made new felling techniques possible ...
  51. [51]
    Husqvarna Chainsaw Academy: How to fell a tree
    This resource provides step-by-step guides, animations, videos, checklists, and recommendations for safe and efficient tree felling, including basic and ...
  52. [52]
    Chain Saw Safety: Tree Felling | Mississippi State University ...
    Step 2: Use the Chainsaw. Safely felling a tree requires at least two different cuts, the face cut and the back cut. The face cut is a wedge (typically cut ...
  53. [53]
    Chainsaw Safety: Preventing Common Tree Felling Accidents
    Nov 15, 2022 · Work through the Five Step Tree Felling Plan (Kohlich et al., 2020) to avoid barber chair. Identify lean and any hazards which might increase ...
  54. [54]
    Advanced Felling Techniques - Tree Care Industry Magazine
    Dec 1, 2024 · Low back cuts can cause barber chair, which causes splitting. It also will give a lot of resistance and make the tree a pain to wedge. Felling ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  55. [55]
    Occupational tree felling fatalities: 2010–2020 - Wiley Online Library
    Aug 29, 2021 · We identified 190 employees who were killed from being hit by a tree, or parts thereof, while engaged in felling activity. An additional 30 ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Tree Felling Techniques Manual - Wisconsin Master Logger
    Determine a safe pattern, identify hazards, make a notch, give a warning, and make a back cut at the same level as the notch, leaving enough hinge wood.
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Performance, Capability and Costs of Motor-Manual Tree Felling in ...
    May 2, 2025 · /hour) with delay times. Also, the hourly production of chainsaw felling with and without delay time was 13 trees per hour and 19 trees hour ...
  58. [58]
    History of Logging and Forestry Equipment: From Axes to Harvesters
    One notable early harvester was the feller-buncher, which could cut down trees and gather them into bunches for more accessible transportation.
  59. [59]
    [PDF] productivity of rubber-tired skidders - Southern Research Station
    The cable skidders operating solo had a relatively high volume per load for the average number of stems per load because they were observed on three uneven-aged ...
  60. [60]
    Feller Buncher - Equipment-catalog - USDA Forest Service
    Their ability to control the felling of the trees can reduce residual stand damage in comparison with manual felling.
  61. [61]
    Effect of Working Conditions on Forwarder Productivity in Cut-to ...
    It was found that the forwarder productivity reduced exponentially with increasing distance of timber extraction, and independently of the payload.
  62. [62]
    A Comprehensive Guide to Feller Bunchers - SAN Forestry
    Jan 10, 2025 · High-capacity feller bunchers are highly efficient and capable of cutting dozens of trees per hour under ideal conditions. Equipped with ...
  63. [63]
    Factors Influencing Productivity and Cost in the Whole-Tree ...
    Jul 10, 2020 · Relatively large trees allow the machine to cut greater volumes of wood per machine hour.17 For example, a 0.4-inch increase in average tree ...
  64. [64]
    [PDF] 901
    Hydraulics. The 901's immense work capacity is much due to the brand new 3-pump hydraulics, split into dual circuits with separate pressure levels.
  65. [65]
    Study on Drive System of Hybrid Tree Harvester - PMC
    This unique machine uses recovered energy from the swing to load your trucks all-day long using up to 33 percent less fuel ‎[8]. In addition to the greater ...
  66. [66]
    Forestry Equipment Chassis Configurations - USDA Forest Service
    Tracked equipment generally benefits from decreased ground pressure, which minimizes soil compaction. They also have a high breakout force, which means that ...
  67. [67]
    Effect of Feller-Buncher Model, Slope Class and Cutting Area on the ...
    The study found that feller-buncher model and slope class influenced productivity and costs. Feller-buncher 1 had lower costs despite lower productivity than ...
  68. [68]
    Effects of boom-corridor thinning on harvester productivity and ...
    Boom-corridor thinning (BCT) is a novel working method in which trees are cut with linear movements of the harvester's boom reach, along narrow (1–2 m wide) ...
  69. [69]
    Techniques and Systems for Boom Corridor Thinning in Young ...
    Boom-corridor thinning (BCT) is a novel working method in which trees are cut with linear movements of the harvester's boom reach, along narrow (1-2 m wide) ...
  70. [70]
    Comparison of Boom-Corridor Thinning and Thinning From Below ...
    Oct 17, 2025 · However, higher productivity can be achieved when trees between strip roads are harvested in about 1 m-wide corridors with a length ...
  71. [71]
    Effect of boom corridor and selective thinning on the post-treatment ...
    Boom corridor thinning (BCT) is a harvester's working method, primarily suitable for dense, unmanaged young stands. The method was first studied in Sweden ...
  72. [72]
    Environmental Impacts of Boom-Corridor and Selectively Thinned ...
    Small-tree harvesting is costly using conventional methods but using accumulating felling heads (AFH) in combination with a novel boom-corridor thinning ...
  73. [73]
    [PDF] Effects of boom-corridor thinning on harvester productivity and ... - SLU
    Apr 17, 2022 · The effectiveness of the accumulating felling head technology used could potentially be increased by implementing a feed-roller system when ...
  74. [74]
    https://silvafennica.fi/article/1428
  75. [75]
    Why Electric Utilities Are Turning to Drone LiDAR for Vegetation ...
    Jul 19, 2024 · Electric utilities are turning to drone LiDAR technology, which offers a safer, more efficient, and cost-effective solution for maintaining vegetation around ...Missing: urban | Show results with:urban
  76. [76]
    Transforming Powerline Inspections with Drones - YouTube
    Jul 7, 2025 · Join us for an exclusive webinar exploring how drones are transforming powerline inspections, featuring a real-world case study.Missing: laser tree felling urban
  77. [77]
    Technology & Trees: The Data-Driven Future of Urban Forestry
    Jul 22, 2025 · By measuring laser light reflection times, LiDAR systems capture precise tree heights, crown volumes, and structural details with millimeter ...Missing: felling | Show results with:felling
  78. [78]
    LiDAR Drones: An In-Depth Guide [New for 2025] - UAV Coach
    LiDAR refers to Light Detection and Ranging, a technology that uses laser pulses to create high-resolution 3D maps of the terrain and structures below. It is ...Missing: felling | Show results with:felling
  79. [79]
    Understanding directional felling - Husqvarna Chainsaw Academy
    The hinge guides the tree down during the felling and as the directional notch closes, the hinge breaks and separates the tree from the stump.
  80. [80]
    The Science Behind Tree Felling: How Trees React to Different Cuts
    Mar 17, 2025 · The Role of the Hinge in Tree Felling · Controls the speed of the fall · Prevents premature splitting · Ensures the tree lands as expected.
  81. [81]
    eTool : Logging - Manual Operations - Felling Trees - Kinds of Notches
    Open-faced Notch Click here to learn how to cut an Open-faced Notch ; Conventional Notch Click here to learn how to cut a Conventional Notch ; Humbolt Notch Click ...
  82. [82]
    Types of Tree Felling Cuts: 5 Expert Techniques Guide
    The siswheel represents one of the most advanced types of tree felling cuts. This technique actually steers leaning trees against their natural fall direction.
  83. [83]
    How to make a directional notch - Husqvarna Chainsaw Academy
    Again, our recommendation is to use the Open face notch, aiming with a top cut, since it is safe, easier and well-suited for most tree felling applications.<|separator|>
  84. [84]
    eTool : Logging - Special Techniques for Felling Difficult Trees - OSHA
    A large tree may be felled against its natural lean by inserting one or more wedges in the back cut. As the back cut is sawn, the wedges are driven in with an ...
  85. [85]
    Selective harvesting | Department of Primary Industries, Queensland
    Selective harvesting involves: A minimum of 50% of the forest stand must be retained, but a significantly greater percentage is usually kept.Missing: preservation | Show results with:preservation
  86. [86]
    The impacts of selective logging and clear-cutting on woody plant ...
    Selectively logged forest had faster recovery rate than clear-cut forest. •. Logged montane rain forest has a higher conservation potential than other disturbed ...Missing: speed empirical
  87. [87]
    Selective Logging: Pros, Cons, And Implementation Methods
    Aug 17, 2022 · Selective logging is the most profitable timber-harvesting method, which explains its choice for economic reasons.Selective Cutting Methods · Selective Cutting Negative... · Satellite Technologies For...Missing: speed erosion costs empirical
  88. [88]
    Carbon dynamics of North American boreal forest after stand ...
    The objective of this review was to synthesize the literature on C dynamics of North American boreal forests after most common disturbances, stand replacing ...
  89. [89]
    Managing temperate forests for carbon storage: impacts of logging ...
    Jun 25, 2014 · The rotation length for clearcutting is prescribed as 50 years (DPI ... Sustainable production is assumed over the course of the rotations.Methods · Carbon Stock Change Over... · Results<|separator|>
  90. [90]
    [PDF] Extended Rotations and Culmination Age of Coast Douglas-fir
    Maximum ages of coast Douglas-fir ranged from 90 to 117 years. Rotations can be extended without reducing long-term timber production.
  91. [91]
    Log/remove trees within forests: effects on mature trees
    One replicated, controlled study in Canada found that logging trees in forests increased tree mortality rate. About key messages. Key messages provide a ...Missing: buildup risk
  92. [92]
    Impact of Forest Management on Species Richness: Global Meta ...
    Apr 4, 2016 · We show that in terms of local species richness loss, forest management types can be ranked, from best to worse, as follows: selection and ...Missing: speed erosion empirical
  93. [93]
    Selective logging causes long-term changes to forest structure
    Feb 18, 2015 · Selective logging is causing long-term changes to tropical forests in Africa by facilitating the growth of weeds and vines, which reduces plant diversity and ...Missing: buildup | Show results with:buildup
  94. [94]
    Carbon in Canada's boreal forest — A synthesis
    Canada's managed boreal forest stores 28 Pg of carbon, acting as a carbon sink from 1990-2008, removing CO2 from the atmosphere.
  95. [95]
    Wood And Timber Products Market | Industry Report, 2030
    The global wood and timber products market size was estimated at USD 992.43 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 1,251.26 billion by 2030, ...
  96. [96]
    Forest sector employs 33 million around the world, according to new ...
    Nov 24, 2022 · Worldwide, the forest sector employed an estimated 33 million persons, or 1 per cent of global employment. Although Asia accounted for just 15 ...
  97. [97]
    Forest Products | US Forest Service Research and Development
    Jan 8, 2025 · The U.S. Forest products industry generates $288 billion annually (approximately 4 percent of the total U.S. manufacturing GDP). · Approximately ...
  98. [98]
    121+ Wood Industry Statistics for 2025 - Customcy
    Sep 2, 2025 · The global wood and timber products market was valued at $992.43 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach $1,025.92 billion in 2025. The global ...
  99. [99]
    [PDF] Woody Biomass for Bioenergy and Biofuels in the United States
    Woody biomass for use in bioenergy and biofuel production is generally considered from the following sources: short-rotation woody crops (SRWC), residues from ...
  100. [100]
    [PDF] Technical Report - cifor-icraf
    Aug 4, 2002 · operational costs and reduced waste. Barreto et al. (1998) demonstrated that RIL techniques resulted in a net financial benefit of US$3.7 per m.
  101. [101]
    State of the World's Forests 2020
    Between 2015 and 2020, the rate of deforestation was estimated at 10 million hectares per year, down from 16 million hectares per year in the 1990s. The area of ...Missing: regrow faster
  102. [102]
    [PDF] The Benefits of Variable-Density Thinning - USDA Forest Service
    Five years after treatment, there was a noticeable difference in growth rates throughout the study area. In thinned areas, average growth was nearly 26 percent ...
  103. [103]
    The influence of different restoration thinning treatments on tree ...
    Apr 1, 2019 · All three thinning treatments increased tree growth-rates similarly (0.32–0.57 cm/yr), compared with the controls (0.2–0.27 cm/yr).
  104. [104]
    Trends in background mortality in unmanaged forests across Europe ...
    Aug 5, 2025 · We observed an overall median annual background mortality rate of 1.1%. Spruce-dominated forests had the largest increase in annual mortality ...
  105. [105]
    Article Unmanaged naturally regenerating forests approach intact ...
    Jun 21, 2024 · However, we interpret the substantial tree-cover loss in naturally regenerating forests without management as likely re-degradation. The re- ...
  106. [106]
    Influence of different forest protection strategies on spruce tree ...
    Sep 27, 2017 · In buffer zones, the effects of sanitary management on tree mortality remained limited due to the migration of bark beetles from unmanaged areas ...
  107. [107]
    Managing bark beetle impacts on ecosystems and society: priority ...
    Oct 18, 2016 · The effects of bark beetle outbreaks on ecosystems are often measured in terms of area affected, host tree mortality rates, and alterations to ...
  108. [108]
    [PDF] 11 - Management tactics to reduce bark beetle impacts in North ...
    Tree mortality attributed to bark beetles influence the function, structure, and composition of forests by regulating aspects of primary production, nutrient ...
  109. [109]
    [PDF] Impacts of Selective Logging on Wildlife in the Chiquibul Forest ...
    May 15, 2025 · Some species may benefit from the altered habitat structure created by logging, such as deer populations, which increased in logged areas in.
  110. [110]
    [PDF] Effects of Selection Logging on Deer Habitat in Southeast Alaska
    Based on the fieldwork, we believe light selective logging provides more understory than very heavy selective logging, although considerable variation exists ...Missing: biodiversity increase
  111. [111]
    Ungulate occurrence in forest harvest blocks is influenced by forage ...
    Apr 5, 2023 · Deer, elk and moose occurrence was higher in younger harvest blocks. Mule deer and white-tailed deer occurrence was lower in blocks with higher ...
  112. [112]
    Creation of forest edges has a global impact on forest vertebrates
    Forest edges influence more than half the world's forests and contribute to worldwide declines in biodiversity and ecosystem functions.<|separator|>
  113. [113]
    https://www.cbsnews.com/losangeles/news/los-angeles-city-trees-fall-damage-cbs-california-investigates/
  114. [114]
    Does Homeowners Insurance Cover Tree Damage? - USAA
    Jan 4, 2022 · Homeowners insurance may cover damage from a falling tree, but not if the tree was rotted or poorly maintained. Removal may be covered, but not ...
  115. [115]
    Fallen Tree Damage and Homeowners Insurance | Allstate
    If a tree damages your home, your policy may help pay up to $350,000 to repair or rebuild your home. Keep in mind that you'll have to pay your deductible, which ...
  116. [116]
    Sectional Dismantling: A Solution for Trees in Tight Spaces
    Sectional dismantling involves the systematic removal of a tree in small, manageable sections. This technique is particularly useful in urban or residential ...
  117. [117]
    Sectional Dismantling: The Smart Choice for Difficult Tree Removal
    Sectional dismantling offers unmatched precision in tree removal. Each cut is carefully planned, ensuring that the removal process is methodical and controlled.
  118. [118]
    Sectional Felling Dismantling | Norfolk-Trees.co.uk
    Sectional Felling Dismantling of a tree is carried out when the tree cannot be felled in one within the surrounding space. There are many different techniques.
  119. [119]
    Tree damage claim complexities - Sedgwick | temporary housing
    May 4, 2020 · Insurers typically cover tree damage claims that are sudden and accidental. On the other hand, insurers are less likely to cover gradual tree ...
  120. [120]
    Homeowners insurance and tree damage - ISA Texas
    Apr 4, 2022 · Homeowners insurance may cover tree damage if caused by a covered peril, like storms, but not rot or age. Removal is covered if it blocks ...
  121. [121]
    Impact of Forest Management on Species Richness: Global Meta ...
    Apr 4, 2016 · An increase in species richness, such as we found in selection and retention systems and under reduced impact logging, does not necessarily ...
  122. [122]
    Selective logging enhances ecosystem multifunctionality via ...
    Sep 24, 2020 · The results basically met our first prediction: selective logging could directly significantly improve EMF except logging one time also ...
  123. [123]
    Forest thinning and prescribed burning treatments reduce wildfire ...
    Feb 7, 2024 · We conclude that reducing canopy bulk density via mechanical thinning treatments can help to limit crown fire behavior for 20 years or more.
  124. [124]
    Tamm review: A meta-analysis of thinning, prescribed fire, and ...
    Jun 1, 2024 · Although combining mechanical thinning and prescribed burning is a common treatment used for mitigating wildfire severity, mechanical thinning ...
  125. [125]
    [PDF] Forest Carbon from Young vs. Old Forests - NCASI
    Old forests have accumulated more carbon than younger forests; however, young forests grow rapidly, removing much more CO2 each year from the atmosphere than an ...
  126. [126]
    The potential for storing carbon by harvested wood products - Frontiers
    Unlike wildfires, timber harvesting moves the carbon from forest sections to HWPs and creates a HWPs carbon pool, which can store the carbon for a long period ...Introduction · Technological advancement · Socioeconomic factors · Discussion
  127. [127]
    Harvested Wood Products: A Growing Contributor to America's ...
    Jan 5, 2023 · In 1990, HWPs represented 3.7% of all forest carbon stored in the US. In 2019, HWPs represented nearly 5% of all carbon stocks. In the US, HWPs ...
  128. [128]
    Estimated Erosion from Clearcut Timber Harvests in the ...
    May 27, 2022 · Bare approaches had an average erosion rate of 43.7 t/ac/yr (98 mg/ha/yr) whereas graveled sites averaged 5.8 t/ac/yr (13 mg/ha/yr), and rates ...Estimated Erosion From... · Abstract · Results
  129. [129]
    [PDF] EROSIONAL CONSEQUENCES OF TIMBER HARVESTING
    Most activities increase erosion; clearcutting on steep slopes may increase mass erosion. Roads are a major cause of increased erosion, and fire with logging ...
  130. [130]
    A globally consistent negative effect of edge on aboveground forest ...
    Sep 15, 2025 · We estimate that edge effects have reduced the total aboveground biomass of forests by 9%, equivalent to a loss of 58 Pg. These findings ...Missing: wildlife short-
  131. [131]
    A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Harvesting on the Abundance and ...
    Apr 29, 2023 · Overall, forest harvesting was found to decrease the abundance of soil fauna while not affecting its richness.
  132. [132]
    Scientists point to research flaw that has likely exaggerated the ...
    Jan 23, 2013 · The impact of logging on tropical forest species has likely been exaggerated by statistical problems, according to a new study in Conservation Biology.
  133. [133]
    Fake legal logging in the Brazilian Amazon | Science Advances
    Aug 15, 2018 · We found a strong overestimation bias of high-value timber species volumes in logging permits. Field assessments confirmed fraud for the most ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  134. [134]
    Illegal logging is a major driver of global deforestation
    Aug 29, 2024 · Loggers without proper permits might cut down more trees than is sustainable for the forest, log past boundaries into fragile forest areas, or ...
  135. [135]
    Logging damage and injured tree mortality in tropical forest ...
    Jan 25, 2019 · Estimates for the fraction of the remaining stand that gets damaged during harvest range from 48% to 65% for CL and from 28% to 38% for RIL ( ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
  136. [136]
    [PDF] Forest Ecology and Management Reduced-impact logging
    Reduced-impact logging (RIL) are timber harvesting guidelines to mitigate environmental impacts of tree felling, yarding, and hauling. RIL can reduce impacts ...<|separator|>
  137. [137]
    Sustainable forest management of tropical forests can reduce ...
    We found that use of reduced-impact logging (RIL) techniques alone in tropical production forests (PdF) could reduce carbon emissions equivalent to 29–50% of ...
  138. [138]
    ATFS 2021 Standards of Sustainability - American Tree Farm System
    The AFF Standards of Sustainability and Requirements for certification under the American Tree Farm System are the basis for claims of third-party forest ...Missing: regeneration yields
  139. [139]
    ATFS Certification - American Tree Farm System
    ... standards. ATFS-certified family forests meet eight standards of sustainability and are managed for multiple purposes: water, wildlife, wood and recreation.Missing: 2020-2025 yields
  140. [140]
    American Tree Farm System (ATFS) - PEFC - PEFC
    The American Tree Farm System (ATFS) is the oldest and largest sustainable woodland system in America. ATFS is a signature program of the American Forest ...Missing: 2020-2025 yields
  141. [141]
    Global Forest Watch: Forest Monitoring, Land Use & Deforestation ...
    Global Forest Watch offers free, real-time data, technology and tools for monitoring the world's forests, enabling better protection against illegal ...Map · About · Forest Watcher · Global Forest Watch Pro
  142. [142]
    Forest Monitoring App & Aerial Imagery For Forestry - Farmonaut
    Compliance Verification: Satellite monitoring helps verify compliance with harvest regulations and sustainable forestry certifications. By leveraging ...
  143. [143]
    Preventing Injuries and Deaths of Loggers (95-101) | NIOSH - CDC
    In 1992, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that logging had a workplace injury rate of more than 14,000 injuries per 100,000 full-time workers compared ...Missing: kickback | Show results with:kickback
  144. [144]
    https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.266
  145. [145]
    https://www.osha.gov/etools/logging/manual-operations/felling/retreat-path
  146. [146]
    https://www.osha.gov/etools/logging/manual-operations/logger/personal-protective-equipment
  147. [147]
    [PDF] Chainsaw Operations in the Logging Industry - CDC Stacks
    Chain saw fatality statistics are not significant, but injuries related to chain saws account for about one-fourth of the total logging injuries. The majority ...
  148. [148]
    Knowledge Retention and Changes in Licensed Chainsaw Workers ...
    Apr 2, 2022 · The chainsaw licence and associated training substantially enhance chainsaw users' perceived risk awareness and use of safe working practices.
  149. [149]
    STIHL Anti-Vibration System For Chainsaws
    STIHL chainsaws feature a complex shock absorption system, consisting of steel-spring elements, rubber and hard-foam buffers.
  150. [150]
    Vibration and Ergonomic Exposures Associated With ...
    Occupational exposures to whole-body or hand–arm vibration were significantly associated with or resulted in MSDs of the shoulder and neck.
  151. [151]
    https://www.osha.gov/etools/logging/manual-operations/felling/cuts
  152. [152]
    Chain Saw Kickback Significantly Reduced | CPSC.gov
    According to Commission estimates, such kickback was involved in about 22,000 medically attended chain saw related injuries in 1982.
  153. [153]
    [PDF] Does Environmental Review Worsen the Wildfire Crisis? - PERC
    Environmental reviews delay fuel treatments, taking 3.6-7.2 years to start, making it unlikely to treat 20 million acres in 10 years.
  154. [154]
    How NEPA Litigation Obstructs Critical Projects
    Jul 24, 2025 · The Smokey Project was a forest management project which aimed to perform about 7000 acres worth of treatment to mitigate wildfire risk in the ...Missing: increasing | Show results with:increasing<|separator|>
  155. [155]
    Wildfire mitigation bill passes U.S. House - American Experiment
    Sep 27, 2024 · The House passed H.R. 8790, the “Fix Our Forests Act,” which intends to reduce the risk of wildfires and promote forest health.
  156. [156]
    The Science Behind the Need for Riparian Buffer Protection
    The buffers reduced sediment load in the runoff by 60% to 90%. The effectiveness of the filters varied with the erosiveness of the watershed and storm intensity ...Benefits · Filter Sediments · Vegetation Removes Pollutants · Aquatic Habitat
  157. [157]
    The role of riparian buffer width on sediment connectivity through ...
    Sep 15, 2024 · Forest harvesting increased sediment connectivity in the streams regardless of buffer width, indicating that buffers wider than 15 m are necessary to reduce ...
  158. [158]
    [PDF] Riparian buffer width effectiveness
    Jan 22, 2011 · In this case study, we examined the effect of riparian buffer width on stream water quality following upland forest management activities in ...
  159. [159]
    [PDF] Guidelines - on Closer-to-Nature Forest Management
    Under the European Green Deal, the EU biodiversity strategy for 20301 sets a path for the recovery of Europe's biodiversity, including its forest biodiversity.Missing: strictness | Show results with:strictness
  160. [160]
    Understanding Europe's Forest Harvesting Regimes - AGU Journals
    Feb 8, 2025 · Our results offer much needed detail in our understanding of the contemporary forest management practices in Europe and can act as a baseline ...
  161. [161]
    [PDF] Global Environmental Forest Policies: Canada as a Constant Case ...
    For the purposes of this comparison, we have chosen to focus on buffer zone widths and management restrictions within buffer zones as they related to harvest ...Missing: active | Show results with:active
  162. [162]
    Cutting down trees on your own property - Engel & Völkers Germany
    Sep 29, 2021 · According to the Federal Nature Conservation Act, it is generally permissible to cut down a tree as long as it is located entirely on your own property.
  163. [163]
    Trees | Bedeutung & Erklärung | Legal Lexikon
    Rating 4.6 (946) Sep 17, 2025 · Felling a healthy tree purely for aesthetic reasons is highly restricted by law and generally requires a permit if tree protection statutes or ...
  164. [164]
    Polish law change unleashes 'massacre' of trees - The Guardian
    Apr 7, 2017 · New law allows private landowners to cut down any number of trees without applying for permission or even informing authorities.
  165. [165]
    Outrage over tree felling in Poland – DW – 05/09/2017
    May 9, 2017 · Private landowners are no longer required to apply for permission to cut down trees on their property. Jan Szyszko, Poland's environment ...
  166. [166]
    Tree felling in Poland without permission - Mar-masz.pl
    Tree felling in Poland without permission. In Poland from January 1, 2017 year came into force new recipes allowing for felling trees without permission.
  167. [167]
    Tree Cutting | US Forest Service
    A permit is required, obtained from the local forest office. Trees must be 200 feet from roads, with a trunk six inches or less in diameter, and cut no more ...
  168. [168]
    Groundbreaking lawsuit takes aim at U.S. Forest Service's 'timber ...
    Feb 29, 2024 · A new, first-of-its-kind lawsuit that alleges the Forest Service's 'timber target' decisions put the climate at risk, undermine the Biden administration's ...Missing: felling property rights
  169. [169]
    Boosting timber harvesting in national forests while cutting public ...
    Sep 8, 2025 · The Trump administration and members of Congress propose cutting environmental reviews and public involvement to boost logging.Missing: felling property
  170. [170]
    Forest Law of the People's Republic of China
    Dec 28, 2019 · Article 57 Felling licenses shall be issued by the competent authorities of forestry of people's governments at or above the county level.
  171. [171]
    Farmer Given Suspended Jail Time For Felling Own Trees – Social ...
    Apr 13, 2021 · ... fined 10,000 yuan. Four fellow defendants were given suspended terms of between 6 months and a year. China has a tree felling quota system ...
  172. [172]
    China's top court stresses crackdown on illegal tree felling - Xinhua
    Aug 14, 2024 · In the released court cases, punishments were imposed on a number of individuals for offenses including damaging trees to plant cash crops, ...Missing: penalties | Show results with:penalties
  173. [173]
    Tree protection laws in Australian states and territories - Treenet
    Only two jurisdictions have specific statutes to provide blanket protection to native and non-native tree species on private land – the ACT and SA. Other ...
  174. [174]
    Removing and pruning trees on private land
    These trees can be removed without Council consent by the owner of the tree subject to the owner obtaining written confirmation from the arborist that clearly ...Missing: felling | Show results with:felling
  175. [175]
    Understanding Australian Tree Removal Laws: A Guide for ...
    Feb 28, 2024 · Tree removal in Australia is governed by a complex mix of federal, state, and local laws designed to balance development needs with environmental protection.
  176. [176]
    [PDF] Private Forestry Guidance Materials
    All native forest timber harvesting on private land is regulated by local government and requires a planning permit in addition to complying with the Code.
  177. [177]
    How have forest resources in the European Union developed?
    Nov 21, 2022 · From 1950 to 2020, there has been an increase in forest area (+37%) and a steep increase in growing stock (+138%), in net annual increment (+95 ...
  178. [178]
    [PDF] Forest dynamics in Europe and their ecological consequences
    Nov 27, 2018 · In the 50 years after the Second World War, the forest area in western Europe increased by almost 30 %.Missing: regrowth II
  179. [179]
    Have European forests grown older, or are they actually getting ...
    Dec 13, 2012 · The forest area increased by 30% between 1950 and 2000 as low productive agricultural lands were abandoned and many countries were carrying out ...Missing: regrowth statistics
  180. [180]
    Global Forest Resource Assessment 2020
    Worldwide, the area of forest designated primarily for production has remained relatively stable but the area of multiple-use forest has decreased by about ...
  181. [181]
    Decaying forest wood releases a whopping 10.9 billion tonnes of ...
    Sep 3, 2021 · Decaying forest wood releases a whopping 10.9 billion tonnes of carbon each year. This will increase under climate change · We used mesh cages to ...
  182. [182]
    [PDF] Facts About Managed Forests in Washington
    After deducting emissions from mortality & harvest, carbon stored per acre in live trees and wood products is 3x greater than unmanaged forests at 2.78 vs .81 ...
  183. [183]
    FSC Latest: Investigation Finds Samling Guilty of Illegal Logging
    May 6, 2025 · Malaysian timber company Samling illegally harvested timber within a National Park and destroyed High Conservation Value (HCV) forest.
  184. [184]
    FSC hall of shame: The ethical wood label's long line of scandals
    Oct 25, 2021 · The world's largest wood, paper and pulp firms are complicit in illegal logging, destructive land clearances, corruption and human rights abuses ...
  185. [185]
    “Without traceability, FSC risks becoming irrelevant”: Earthsight's ...
    Oct 16, 2025 · In Ukraine, Earthsight documented widespread corruption and illegal logging across a sector that was almost entirely certified. “The volumes ...
  186. [186]
    Greenwashed Timber: How Sustainable Forest Certification Has ...
    Feb 20, 2018 · A Chinese company marketing in the U.S. offered to put an FSC label on illegal wood in exchange for a 10 percent markup. In 2015, the U.S. ...
  187. [187]
    Sustainably managed forests can save at least ten times more CO2 ...
    The managed forest absorbed and emitted more CO2 over the same period of time (balanced result) but in addition, the harvested timber was used as a substitute ...
  188. [188]
    Politically Driven Nationwide Old Growth Amendment Fails to ...
    Jun 20, 2024 · Politically Driven Nationwide Old Growth Amendment Fails to Address Primary Threats to Old Forests, Harms Efforts to Address Wildfire Crisis.Missing: thinning | Show results with:thinning
  189. [189]
    Forest thinning and prescribed burning treatments reduce wildfire ...
    We conclude that reducing canopy bulk density via mechanical thinning treatments can help to limit crown fire behavior for 20 years or more.
  190. [190]
    Does forest thinning reduce fire severity in Australian eucalypt forests?
    Sep 15, 2020 · Forest thinning has been proposed to reduce fire severity. However, evidence to support this strategy in Australia is scant.2 Methods · 2.3 Fire Severity And Other... · 3 Results
  191. [191]
    Old forests, new fires, and a scientific standoff over active management
    Aug 18, 2025 · For example, research reveals that wildfires killed 13-19% of mature giant sequoias in their native range in the late 2010s and early 2020s. But ...
  192. [192]
    Opportunities and limitations of thinning to increase resistance and ...
    Mar 31, 2022 · Thinning also increases the growth and vigor of residual trees, making them less susceptible to eruptive insects and pathogens, while ...
  193. [193]
    Adapting western North American forests to climate change and ...
    Aug 2, 2021 · Forest thinning in these forest types is aimed at retaining larger, more fire-resilient tree species, and restoring open canopy structure.
  194. [194]
    Compared to Wildfire, Management Practices Reduced Old-Growth ...
    The objective of this study was to identify the main attributes differentiating burned and logged stands prior to disturbance in boreal forests.
  195. [195]
    https://www.worldwildlife.org/our-work/forests/deforestation-and-forest-degradation/stopping-illegal-logging
  196. [196]
    CBP Stops Illegal Logging | U.S. Customs and Border Protection
    Dec 9, 2024 · Generating between $52 and $157 billion dollars annually, the illegal timber industry attracts all sorts of criminal organizations willing to ...
  197. [197]
    91% of Brazilian Amazon deforestation last year was illegal, report ...
    Mar 4, 2025 · The findings showed that from August 2023 to July 2024, only 9% of deforestation in the Amazon and 49% in the Cerrado had authorization.
  198. [198]
    Illegal Logging in Indonesia: Environmental, Economic, & Social ...
    May 4, 2010 · A 2007 United Nations Environment Program report estimated that 73-88% of timber logged in Indonesia is illegally sourced.
  199. [199]
    Former FSC Integrity Director: 20-30% of claims are false
    Oct 8, 2025 · The FSC label promises responsibly sourced products. But former FSC Integrity Director Phil Guillery says that trust has been eroded from ...
  200. [200]
    A Critical Comparison of Conventional, Certified, and Community ...
    Mar 11, 2016 · However, the logging that occurs in the vast majority of tropical forests is unsustainable and results in large-scale forest degradation ...Missing: faster | Show results with:faster
  201. [201]
    [PDF] Effectiveness and Economic Viability of Forest Certification
    In Brazil, forest disturbance was minor in forest inside an FSC-certified logging company than outside due to illegal mining outside the certified forest [84].
  202. [202]
    NGOs urge 'immediate' reform at ethical wood label to fight global ...
    Oct 25, 2021 · Earthsight's 'FSC hall of shame', detailing some of the ethical wood label's recent scandals involving environmental and human rights abuses ...
  203. [203]
    Comparing the characteristics of boom-corridor and selectively ...
    Jun 16, 2021 · The boom-corridor thinning (BCT) method in young stands is one kind of mechanised systematic thinning method (Bergström 2009; Sängstuvall et al.
  204. [204]
    [PDF] INFOSHEET - Smallwood
    Soil damages were lower than 8 m. / 100 m ... The number of damaged trees observed after thinning was lower in boom corridor thinning than in selective.
  205. [205]
    Britain's Sycamore Gap tree felled in 'deliberate act of vandalism'
    Sep 28, 2023 · Police said they had arrested a 16-year old male in connection with the felling of the statuesque sycamore in northern England, which is set in ...
  206. [206]
    By Counting Growth Rings, Researchers Solve the Mystery of the ...
    Sep 23, 2025 · A new analysis shows that the historic tree was at least 100 to 120 years old in September 2023, when two men illegally chopped it down.
  207. [207]
    Sycamore Gap: Who are the tree fellers and why did they do it? - BBC
    Jul 15, 2025 · Adam Carruthers and Daniel Graham have been jailed for cutting down the Sycamore Gap tree on Hadrian's Wall in Northumberland. Who are they?
  208. [208]
    The fate of the Sycamore Gap tree has shed light on a deeper concern
    Jul 14, 2025 · The felling has prompted calls for stricter legal protections for other trees and drawn attention to wider issues.
  209. [209]
    Timber Targets Have Environmental Consequences | ELPC
    Jun 18, 2024 · The Forest Service sets mandatory logging targets for national forests, but doesn't consider environmental consequences. An innovative lawsuit may change that.Missing: prevention | Show results with:prevention
  210. [210]
    Forest Service Facts
    Benefits of active forest management- Reduces wildfire severity and spread, Improves forest productivity and. Active Forest Management Provides a Stronger ...
  211. [211]
    Solutions | American Forest Resource Council
    Approximately 6% of the Forest's growth was harvested for wood products. · Approximately 26% of the Forest's growth was lost to wildfire or natural mortality · 18 ...<|separator|>
  212. [212]
    Poland violated EU law by logging in ancient forest — ECJ - DW
    Apr 17, 2018 · The European Commission took Poland to court in 2017 arguing that the forest, that boasts unique plant and animal life, was being destroyed. ...
  213. [213]
    Poland Deforestation Rates & Statistics | GFW - Global Forest Watch
    Components of net change in tree cover in Poland. From 2000 to 2020, Poland experienced a net change of 407 kha (3.8%) in tree cover. Stable forest. 9.11 Mha.Missing: satellite 2016-2018
  214. [214]
    Satellites reveal a 49 per cent increase in tree felling in Europe
    Jul 1, 2020 · Satellite images suggest that the forest area harvested each year between 2016 and 2018 was 49 per cent higher than the area harvested each year between 2011 ...Missing: Poland 2017 law massacre net<|control11|><|separator|>