Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Sustainable yield

Sustainable yield denotes the highest rate of extraction from a renewable natural resource—such as timber, fish, or groundwater—that maintains the resource's stock at equilibrium over the long term, permitting perpetual harvesting without depletion.^[1]^[2] Originating in 18th-century European forestry to counteract widespread timber shortages, the principle was formalized in Germany with the term Nachhaltigkeit in 1713, emphasizing regulated cutting to match forest regeneration rates, and later refined through systematic yield calculations around 1800.^[3]^[4] The concept underpins resource management across domains, including fisheries where maximum sustainable yield (MSY) represents the theoretical peak catch under models of logistic population growth, balancing recruitment against harvesting to avoid collapse. In practice, however, sustainable yield calculations often falter due to incomplete data on growth parameters, environmental variability, species interactions, and overoptimistic biomass estimates, leading to systematic overharvesting rather than stability.^[5]^[6] Fisheries histories reveal MSY's role in stock depletions worldwide, as managers treat it as a target despite its inherent risks, with critics arguing it masquerades as objective science while enabling politically driven exploitation.^[7]^[8] These challenges underscore that true sustainability demands conservative buffers below theoretical maxima, accounting for uncertainty and ecosystem dependencies, rather than rigid adherence to modeled optima.^[9]

Definition and Principles

Conceptual Foundations

The concept of sustainable yield constitutes the harvest rate from a renewable natural resource that matches its intrinsic regeneration capacity, thereby preserving the resource stock indefinitely without diminution. This equilibrium-based approach recognizes that resources such as forests, fisheries, and groundwater exhibit biological or hydrological replenishment processes, enabling perpetual utilization when extraction does not exceed net production.^[10] The principle underpins resource management by distinguishing renewable assets—those with self-renewing mechanisms—from non-renewable ones, focusing on maintaining productive capital akin to drawing only accrued returns from an invested principal.^[11] At its core, sustainable yield derives from population and ecosystem dynamics, where growth is density-dependent: low densities yield high per-capita increases due to abundant resources, while high densities impose constraints via competition, predation, or environmental limits, culminating in a carrying capacity beyond which net gain declines. Harvesting intervenes in this cycle, with sustainable levels stabilizing the population at points where removal equals natural increment, avoiding runaway depletion or inefficient underutilization. The maximum sustainable yield (MSY) identifies the apex harvest possible under such conditions, corresponding to the population size maximizing overall productivity, as observed across biological systems from timber stands to fish stocks.^[12]^[13] This framework assumes accurate estimation of regeneration parameters through empirical observation, such as growth rates and environmental tolerances, rather than relying on static quotas disconnected from real-time stock assessments. Conceptually, it prioritizes causal linkages between harvest intensity and resource persistence, informed by precedents in European forestry where sustained cutting rotations preserved woodland volumes since the 18th century, later extended to fisheries via analogous yield-growth modeling.^[14] While MSY optimizes yield volume, foundational applications often incorporate buffers against variability, like climatic fluctuations or measurement errors, to avert tipping into irreversible decline.^[15]

Mathematical and Modeling Approaches

The mathematical modeling of sustainable yield centers on dynamic systems where harvest rates are calibrated to match the intrinsic growth rates of renewable resources, ensuring long-term equilibrium without depletion. Core formulations derive from population growth models, particularly the logistic equation, which posits that resource biomass B evolves as \frac{dB}{dt} = rB\left(1 - \frac{B}{K}\right) - H, where r is the intrinsic growth rate, K is the carrying capacity, and H is the harvest rate.^[16] At steady state (\frac{dB}{dt} = 0), sustainable yield equals the surplus production Y = rB\left(1 - \frac{B}{K}\right), maximized at the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) of Y_{MSY} = \frac{rK}{4} when B = \frac{K}{2}.^[17] These models aggregate biological processes into surplus production functions, facilitating estimation from catch and effort data without detailed age-structure information.^[18] Surplus production models, such as the Schaefer model prevalent in fisheries, extend this framework by incorporating fishing effort E via catchability coefficient q, yielding H = qEB.^[16] Equilibrium yield becomes Y = qEB = rB\left(1 - \frac{B}{K}\right), with parameters r and K fitted to time-series data on catches and effort using methods like least-squares regression or Bayesian inference.^[19] The Fox model variant assumes a different functional form for effort-yield relationships, often yielding similar MSY estimates but with adjustments for asymmetry in production curves.^[16] Extensions include stochastic versions accounting for environmental variability and non-equilibrium dynamics, solved via numerical integration or Kalman filtering to predict yields under variable effort.^[20] In forestry, the Faustmann rotation model optimizes sustained yield through infinite periodic harvests, maximizing land expectation value (LEV) as LEV = \frac{\int_0^T e^{-\delta t} \cdot g(t) \, dt - C}{(1 - e^{-\delta T})}, where g(t) is volume growth, C is regeneration cost, \delta is the discount rate, and T is the rotation length satisfying the optimality condition \frac{f'(T)}{f(T)} = \delta + \frac{f(T) - C}{LEV}, with f(T) as stumpage value at harvest.^[21] This contrasts with biological MSY approaches by incorporating economic discounting, yielding shorter rotations under positive \delta compared to undiscounted sustained yield maxima.^[22] Numerical solutions, often via dynamic programming, handle uneven-aged stands or multi-product outputs.^[23] Optimal control theory generalizes these for multi-resource systems, framing sustainable yield as solutions to Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations minimizing a cost functional subject to resource dynamics, such as \max \int_0^\infty e^{-\delta t} [p H(t) - c(E(t))] dt with state equation \dot{B} = g(B) - H(t, B, E).^[24] Discrete-time analogs using Leslie matrices enable linear programming for harvest schedules achieving MSY under age-class constraints.^[24] Empirical calibration relies on observational data, with sensitivity analyses quantifying parameter uncertainty via Monte Carlo simulations.^[25]

Historical Development

Early Origins in Resource Management

The concept of sustainable yield emerged in the context of severe timber shortages in 17th- and early 18th-century Europe, particularly in regions like Saxony where intensive mining, shipbuilding, and fuel demands led to widespread deforestation. By the late 1600s, wood supplies for silver mining supports had dwindled, prompting officials to recognize the finite nature of forest resources despite their renewability.^[26] This crisis underscored the need for systematic management to prevent exhaustion, shifting from ad hoc exploitation to principles balancing harvest with regeneration.^[3] In 1713, Hans Carl von Carlowitz, a Saxon mining administrator, articulated the foundational idea in his treatise Sylvicultura Oeconomica, introducing the term Nachhaltigkeit (sustained yield) to describe harvesting wood only at rates matching natural regrowth through planned reforestation and silvicultural practices.^[27] Von Carlowitz advocated calculating allowable cuts based on forest inventories, age-class distributions, and growth rates, emphasizing long-term economic viability over short-term gains.^[26] His approach was pragmatic, rooted in empirical observations of forest dynamics rather than abstract theory, and aimed at perpetual timber production for mining and other uses.^[28] Practical methods to implement sustainable yield were developed in German and Austrian state forests around 1800, including even-aged management, rotation cycles, and yield tables derived from periodic inventories.^[3] These techniques formalized von Carlowitz's principles, enabling regulators to prescribe annual cuts equaling increment, as seen in Prussian forestry reforms under figures like Friedrich Wilhelm von Reden.^[28] Early successes stabilized supplies but revealed limitations, such as assumptions of uniform growth ignoring site variability and pests, yet they established sustainable yield as a cornerstone of European resource policy.^[3]

Evolution in 20th-Century Applications

In the early decades of the 20th century, sustained yield principles gained formal application in U.S. forestry through the establishment of the U.S. Forest Service in 1905, where Chief Gifford Pinchot emphasized scientific management to ensure perpetual timber harvests without exhausting forest resources, drawing on European precedents of regulated cutting cycles.^[29] This approach involved inventory assessments and rotation planning to match annual cuts with growth rates, as implemented on federal lands amid rapid industrialization-driven deforestation.^[30] A pivotal legislative advancement occurred in 1937 with the Oregon and California Revested Lands Sustained Yield Management Act, which directed the management of 2.4 million acres of former railroad grant lands in western Oregon for permanent forest production, requiring the General Land Office (predecessor to the Bureau of Land Management) to determine and sustain annual productive capacities through subdivided forest units and timber sales.^[31] ^[32] This act institutionalized sustained yield by prioritizing watershed protection, local economic contributions via 75% revenue sharing with Oregon counties, and prevention of liquidation logging, reflecting empirical lessons from earlier unchecked exploitation.^[33] The framework broadened in 1960 via the Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act, which mandated national forests be administered to yield sustained outputs of timber, range, water, wildlife, and recreation without impairment of productivity for future generations, integrating non-commodity values into quantitative planning models like allowable annual cuts based on growth-yield tables.^[34] Parallel evolution occurred in fisheries management, where overfishing crises in the 1920s–1930s prompted quantitative shifts. British fisheries scientist Michael Graham, analyzing catch data from stocks like North Sea herring, demonstrated in 1935 that yields initially rose with effort but peaked and declined due to recruitment failure, advocating harvest restrictions to stabilize populations at levels yielding maximum long-term catches—foundational to the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) concept.^[7] Graham formalized these insights in his 1943 analysis, arguing that unregulated expansion of fishing capacity eroded profits and sustainability, influencing post-World War II policies; by the 1950s, models like Beverton and Holt's 1957 equilibrium framework operationalized MSY via logistic growth equations, estimating optimal fishing mortality rates (F=1/M, where M is natural mortality) for species-specific quotas in international agreements.^[35] ^[36] These applications extended MSY to global fisheries assessments, though early implementations often overestimated stock resilience due to incomplete data on environmental variability.^[7]

Applications Across Resources

Forestry Practices

Sustainable yield in forestry entails harvesting timber volumes that do not surpass the net annual growth of forest stands, thereby preserving the productive capacity of the resource over indefinite periods. This principle requires periodic assessments of forest inventory, growth rates, and mortality to compute the allowable cut, often expressed as the mean annual increment (MAI) once stands reach culmination.^[37]^[38] The foundational practices emerged in early 18th-century Germany amid timber shortages for mining and construction, with Hans Carl von Carlowitz introducing the concept of Nachhaltigkeit in his 1713 treatise Sylvicultura oeconomica, advocating regulated planting and cutting to secure perpetual wood supplies. Subsequent developments by figures like Wilhelm Gottfried Moser in 1757 and Georg-Ludwig Hartig in 1795 refined sustained yield through silvicultural systems, including the area allotment method (Flächenfachwerk), which divided forests into compartments harvested cyclically, and the volume allotment method (Massenfachwerk), which aligned removals with measured growth increments. These approaches emphasized even-aged management via clearcutting followed by uniform regeneration, enabling precise control over rotation lengths typically spanning 80-120 years for central European species like spruce and beech, based on yield tables derived from empirical plot data.^[26] In the United States, the Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act of June 12, 1960, codified the policy for national forests to achieve high-level, perpetual outputs of timber, range, water, and recreation without impairment of productivity for future generations. Practical implementation involves zoning forests into suitable timber lands, applying uneven-aged selective logging with harvest limits of 10-20% of basal area to maintain stand vigor, or even-aged regeneration harvests where clearcuts limited to 40 acres are replanted promptly to emulate natural disturbance cycles. Empirical monitoring through the U.S. Forest Service's nationwide grid of permanent plots tracks diameter growth and volume increments, adjusting allowable cuts downward if regeneration lags, as evidenced by reduced harvest levels in overmature stands to avert depletion.^[39]^[15] Contemporary practices incorporate reduced-impact logging techniques, such as directional felling and vine cutting, which minimize soil compaction and damage to residual trees, sustaining yields while curbing erosion rates by up to 50% compared to conventional methods in tropical applications adaptable to temperate zones. Yield sustainability hinges on site-specific factors like soil fertility and climate, with models integrating stochastic elements for pest outbreaks or drought to avoid overestimation of MSY, which historical data shows can exceed actual growth by 20-30% in uncalibrated scenarios.^[40]^[38]

Fisheries Management

In fisheries management, the concept of sustainable yield centers on the maximum sustainable yield (MSY), defined as the largest long-term average catch that can be taken from a fish stock under existing environmental conditions without causing the stock to decline.^[41] This principle derives from population dynamics models, notably the Beverton-Holt model published in 1957, which evaluates yield per recruit by balancing fishing mortality, growth, and recruitment to identify optimal harvest rates.^[42] The model assumes logistic population growth and age-structured harvesting, providing a framework for estimating the fishing mortality rate (F_MSY) that maximizes yield while maintaining stock biomass above critical levels.^[43] Management strategies implement MSY through tools such as total allowable catch (TAC) limits, set annually based on stock assessments to approximate or fall below MSY proxies, preventing overfishing.^[44] Individual transferable quotas (ITQs) allocate shares of the TAC to fishers, incentivizing compliance and reducing race-to-fish dynamics, as seen in Iceland's implementation since 1993, which stabilized cod catches around 172,000 tonnes annually.^[45] International bodies like the European Union's Common Fisheries Policy mandate TACs consistent with achieving MSY by 2020 for all stocks under their influence, though enforcement varies.^[46] These approaches aim to keep stock biomass (B) above B_MSY, the level producing MSY, with overfished stocks defined as those below this threshold.^[47] Successful applications include U.S. fisheries, where 47 stocks have been rebuilt since 2000 through MSY-based controls, reducing overfishing from 26 stocks in 2020.^[48] However, empirical failures highlight estimation uncertainties and compliance issues; the Grand Banks cod stock collapsed in 1992 after decades of harvests exceeding sustainable levels, dropping biomass to 20% of MSY reference points despite prior management attempts.^[49] This case underscores how optimistic MSY proxies and illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing can lead to depletion, with the moratorium failing to fully restore the stock by 2024.^[50] Globally, FAO assessments indicate that approximately 35% of monitored fish stocks were overfished in 2021, with unsustainable fishing pressure contributing to yield losses estimated at 10.6 megatonnes if MSY targets were met for depleted stocks.^[51] Challenges persist due to data-limited stocks, environmental variability, and multispecies interactions, where targeting one species affects others, often requiring ecosystem-based adjustments to traditional MSY frameworks.^[52] Despite these, MSY remains a core benchmark, with ongoing refinements like hybrid TAC systems proposed to balance target and bycatch species.^[53]

Groundwater Extraction

Sustainable yield in groundwater extraction refers to the maximum rate of withdrawal from an aquifer that maintains long-term equilibrium between extraction and recharge, preventing indefinite depletion of storage or degradation of water quality.^[54] This concept, often termed "safe yield," accounts not only for natural recharge from precipitation and surface water infiltration but also potential induced recharge from pumping effects, such as increased leakage from confining layers or capture from nearby streams, though excessive capture can harm ecosystems by reducing baseflows.^[55] Unlike surface resources, groundwater systems exhibit delayed responses to overextraction, with drawdowns propagating slowly through porous media governed by Darcy's law, which quantifies flux as Q = -K A \frac{dh}{dl}, where K is hydraulic conductivity, A is cross-sectional area, and \frac{dh}{dl} is the hydraulic gradient.^[56] Estimation of sustainable yield typically relies on water balance equations, equating average annual recharge (inflows from precipitation, rivers, and irrigation return flows) minus unavoidable outflows (evapotranspiration, natural discharge to springs) to permissible pumping, while minimizing storage decline over decades.^[57] Numerical models integrate Darcy's law with mass balance to simulate scenarios, but specific yield—a key parameter representing drainable porosity—varies widely (0.01–0.30 for unconsolidated aquifers) and introduces uncertainty, often calibrated via pumping tests or lysimeter experiments under varying water table depths.^[58] ^[59] In practice, achieving sustainable yield faces empirical challenges, including aquifer heterogeneity, sparse monitoring data, and climate-driven recharge variability, leading to frequent overestimation of extractable volumes.^[60] For instance, the Ogallala Aquifer underlying the U.S. High Plains has experienced water-level declines exceeding 100 feet in parts since intensive irrigation began post-1950, with 2023 data showing average drops of 1.65 feet in Nebraska and over a foot in western Kansas locales, outpacing recharge rates of 0.5–2 inches annually in many areas.^[61] ^[62] ^[63] Similarly, California's Central Valley has seen accelerated depletion since the 1980s, with GRACE satellite data indicating losses of 20–30 km³ per decade, exacerbated by drought and agricultural demand, resulting in land subsidence up to 30 cm annually in overdrafted basins.^[64] ^[65] Overexploitation in India, where groundwater supplies 60% of irrigation, has caused declines of 1–4 meters per decade in Punjab and Rajasthan since the 1970s Green Revolution, with warming temperatures projected to amplify depletion by 20–50% by 2050 through reduced recharge and higher crop evapotranspiration.^[66] ^[67] These cases underscore causal risks: prolonged pumping beyond sustainable limits induces inelastic aquifer compaction, saltwater intrusion in coastal zones, and ecosystem disruption via lowered water tables, often requiring policy interventions like extraction caps or conjunctive surface-groundwater use to restore balance.^[55] Despite modeling advances, real-world applications reveal that sustainable yield is not fixed but context-dependent, demanding ongoing monitoring to adapt to hydrogeologic variability and human pressures.^[68]

Other Renewable Resources

Sustainable yield principles extend to terrestrial wildlife populations, where harvest quotas for game species like deer, elk, and upland birds are calibrated to match natural recruitment rates without depleting stocks. Management strategies often aim for maximum sustainable yield (MSY), achieved by harvesting at rates equal to the population's intrinsic growth rate divided by two, maintaining equilibrium populations near 50% of carrying capacity to maximize annual surplus.^[69] For instance, in white-tailed deer populations across North American rangelands and forests, MSY harvest models recommend culling 20-30% of does annually alongside antlered bucks to stabilize numbers while optimizing hunter yields, as supported by population dynamics simulations incorporating density-dependent reproduction.^[70] In the United Kingdom, grouse and partridge shoots compute sustainable bags from annual census data, adjusting harvests to ensure breeding stocks recover fully each season, with guidelines from conservation trusts emphasizing post-breeding counts to avoid overexploitation amid variable predation and weather factors.^[71] For large mammals like African elephants, MSY assessments indicate low harvest thresholds suffice for ivory or trophy yields, with models projecting equilibria at near-pristine population levels under rates below 1-2% annually, though empirical data from protected areas reveal higher poaching-driven declines necessitate conservative quotas.^[72] These applications underscore estimation challenges, as spatial heterogeneity and illegal harvesting often inflate uncertainty, prompting adaptive management via aerial surveys and camera traps to refine quotas dynamically.^[73] In rangeland grazing systems, sustainable yield manifests through stocking rates that align livestock numbers with annual forage biomass production, preventing soil erosion and vegetation shifts. Stocking rates, typically measured in animal unit months (AUM)—the forage needed for one 1,000-pound cow for a month—are site-specific; for example, mixed aspen-rose communities in western U.S. forests sustain 0.1 AUM per acre.^[74] Recent analyses in eastern Colorado's shortgrass steppe document a 72% increase in long-term sustainable stocking rates since the mid-20th century, linked to CO2 fertilization boosting plant growth by 20-30% under elevated atmospheric levels, enabling higher livestock outputs without degradation.^[75] Rotational grazing intensifies this by mimicking natural herd movements, with multi-paddock systems in Australian and U.S. rangelands sustaining yields 30-50% above continuous grazing while enhancing soil carbon sequestration, though overstocking risks persist in drought-prone areas where production forecasts must incorporate climate variability.^[76] Empirical monitoring via vegetation transects and livestock performance metrics ensures rates remain below thresholds that trigger irreversible shrub encroachment or biodiversity loss.^[77]

Scientific and Practical Limitations

Estimation Challenges and Uncertainties

Estimating sustainable yield requires models that parameterize population dynamics, growth rates, and carrying capacities, but these often rely on equilibrium assumptions that ignore stochastic fluctuations in recruitment, mortality, and environmental drivers, leading to biased predictions. In fisheries, for example, logistic or surplus production models assume constant parameters, yet real-world variability—such as unpredictable larval survival or oceanographic shifts—can cause recruitment to deviate substantially from averages, inflating estimated maximum sustainable yields (MSY) by failing to account for non-equilibrium states.^[78]^[79] Non-equilibrium dynamics, including transient responses to perturbations like overfishing, further complicate assessments, as standard yield equations overlook cohort-specific vulnerabilities and recovery lags spanning decades.^[80] Data deficiencies amplify these modeling limitations; reliable inputs like biomass surveys, age-structured catch records, and natural mortality rates are often sparse or imprecise, particularly for data-poor stocks comprising over 80% of global fisheries.^[79] Poor data quality stems from inconsistent monitoring, illegal unreported fishing, and measurement errors in stock assessments, resulting in confidence intervals for MSY estimates that can span 50% or more of the point value.^[10] In forestry applications, similar issues arise with growth-and-yield models, where allometric equations for tree volume and increment propagate uncertainties from individual measurements to landscape scales, often underreporting variance due to unmodeled site-specific factors like soil heterogeneity or pest outbreaks.^[81] National forest inventories, for instance, report biomass uncertainties exceeding 20-30% in some cases, driven by sampling errors and extrapolation assumptions.^[82] These challenges extend to other renewables like groundwater, where sustainable extraction rates hinge on uncertain recharge estimates from hydrological models sensitive to climate variability and aquifer heterogeneity, but empirical validation remains limited by long lag times in drawdown responses.^[83] Overall, parametric sensitivity analyses reveal that small errors in key variables—such as discount rates or density dependence—can shift sustainable yield projections by factors of two or more, underscoring the need for precautionary buffers in harvest limits to mitigate collapse risks under unresolved uncertainties.^[84]^[80]

Empirical Failures and Overexploitation Risks

The northern cod fishery off Newfoundland, managed under maximum sustainable yield (MSY) principles for decades, collapsed in 1992 after stocks declined to less than 1% of historical levels, prompting a moratorium on commercial fishing that idled over 30,000 workers and cost the Canadian economy billions.^[85] Despite scientific assessments aiming to maintain harvests below estimated MSY thresholds—peaking at around 800,000 tonnes annually in the 1960s—overexploitation persisted due to inaccurate stock projections, illegal fishing in international waters, and quota-setting influenced by economic pressures rather than conservative buffers.^[49] Post-collapse, MSY-based frameworks failed to facilitate rebuilding, with ongoing directed and bycatch fisheries preventing recovery even after 30 years of restrictions, as stocks remained below 10% of pre-collapse biomass in many areas.^[86] Similar patterns emerged in other fisheries, where MSY targets systematically overestimated sustainable harvests amid environmental variability and ecosystem shifts; for instance, the Northwest Atlantic cod stocks exhibited delayed recovery signals despite moratoria, underscoring how MSY ignores multi-species interactions and amplifies risks from serial overfishing.^[87] Overexploitation risks intensify under MSY because equilibrium assumptions rarely hold in dynamic systems, leading to "fishing down the food web" where predator removals cascade into prey explosions and habitat degradation, as seen in cod-driven urchin overgrazing of kelp forests.^[88] Attribution of such collapses solely to harvest exceeds MSY aligns with demographic models showing population crashes from sustained extraction rates above replacement levels, without confounding factors like climate alone explaining the magnitude.^[89] In groundwater management, sustainable yield concepts have faltered in the Ogallala Aquifer, where extraction rates since the 1950s—reaching 10-30 billion cubic meters annually across the High Plains—have exceeded recharge by factors of 5-10 in key areas like Texas and Kansas, depleting storage by over 30% overall and rendering thousands of wells inoperable by the 2000s.^[90] Policies framing depletion as "managed" sustainable yield enabled irrigated agriculture yields to triple corn production to 150+ bushels per acre but masked irreversible drawdown, with saturated thickness declining 50 meters or more in parts of western Kansas since 1950, heightening drought vulnerability and subsidence risks.^[91] This overexploitation stems from localized pumping incentives overriding basin-wide yield caps, as recharge estimates (often under 50 mm/year) prove unreliable amid variable precipitation, resulting in "tragedy of the commons" dynamics where individual users externalize depletion costs.^[92] Forestry applications reveal parallel risks, with selective logging under sustained yield formulas contributing to degradation in regions like the Amazon, where certified sustainable operations still drove 20-40% canopy loss in managed concessions from 2000-2010 due to unmodeled edge effects, soil compaction, and invasive species proliferation. Empirical data indicate that even reduced-impact logging exceeding calculated annual allowable cuts by 10-20%—common under economic quotas—erodes long-term timber volumes by 50% within decades, as recovery lags assumptions of uniform regrowth. Overexploitation hazards escalate from parametric uncertainties in growth models, which undervalue biodiversity losses and fire susceptibility, turning ostensibly sustainable harvests into de facto liquidation.^[93]

Economic and Policy Dimensions

Balancing Harvest with Economic Viability

In renewable resource management, economic viability requires aligning harvest rates not merely with biological sustainability, as in maximum sustainable yield (MSY), but with net economic returns, often captured by the maximum economic yield (MEY). MEY occurs at a lower harvest effort than MSY, preserving a larger resource stock to minimize marginal costs while maximizing rents, as harvesting costs rise with depleting stocks and effort competition.^[10]^[94] This shift accounts for factors like variable fish prices, fuel costs, and vessel capital, which biological MSY overlooks, potentially leading to economically suboptimal overharvesting even if biologically sustainable.^[95] The Gordon-Schaefer model, formulated by H. Scott Gordon in 1954, exemplifies this integration in fisheries by combining Schaefer's logistic growth equation with economic profit functions. It predicts that open-access conditions drive effort beyond MEY toward MSY or collapse, dissipating economic rents through excess capitalization, as each fisher expands effort until average costs equal revenue, leaving zero profit.^[96] Optimal management thus targets MEY via limited entry, quotas, or taxes to internalize externalities, as implemented in Australian fisheries where MEY benchmarks replaced MSY to enhance profitability and stock resilience.^[95] Similar dynamics apply in forestry, where economic models like the Faustmann rotation optimize harvest cycles by discounting future timber values against growth rates and regeneration costs, favoring longer rotations under low discount rates to maximize soil expectation value. Empirical assessments, such as in Mexican community forests from 2012–2016, reveal that revenues often fall short of management costs by a factor of 2.6, underscoring the need for subsidies or diversified income (e.g., carbon credits) to achieve viability without accelerating cuts.^[97] High discount rates, reflecting impatient capital markets, can push harvests toward short-term gains, eroding long-term viability unless offset by secure property rights or incentives.^[98] Across resources, balancing requires robust data on cost structures and market dynamics; for instance, a 2025 study of global fisheries found MEY-aligned targeting of mid-trophic species yields high economic returns with minimal ecological disruption, contrasting MSY's focus on top predators.^[99] Policy failures arise when ignoring these, as subsidies for effort (e.g., vessel buybacks) fail to curb rent dissipation without addressing open-access incentives.^[94]

Regulatory Implementation and Debates

In fisheries management, the United States implements sustainable yield principles primarily through the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA) of 1976, as amended in 2007, which mandates the prevention of overfishing while achieving optimum yield (OY)—defined as the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) adjusted downward for relevant economic, social, or ecological factors.^[100]^[101] Fishery management plans under the MSA require annual catch limits (ACLs) and accountability measures to maintain stocks at biomass levels capable of producing MSY on a continuing basis, with rebuilding plans for overfished stocks targeted within 10 years where possible.^[102]^[103] In the European Union, the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), reformed in 2013, legally commits to achieving MSY for all exploited stocks by 2020, using multiannual management plans with total allowable catches (TACs) derived from scientific advice on MSY reference points, though implementation has faced delays due to data gaps and negotiation challenges.^[104]^[105] Forestry regulations incorporate sustained yield through allowable annual cut (AAC) formulas, as seen in Canada's Forest Management Plans, which balance harvest volumes against projected growth rates to ensure long-term timber production without depleting standing volume.^[106] In the United States, the Oregon and California (O&C) Lands Act of 1937 promotes sustained-yield management on federal timberlands, requiring harvest levels that maintain forest productivity, often calculated via growth-yield models accounting for increment minus mortality.^[37] Certification standards like those from the Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) enforce regulatory compliance by mandating protection of biodiversity and water quality alongside yield targets, with audits verifying adherence to sustained harvest rates.^[107] Debates surrounding regulatory implementation center on the tension between MSY's theoretical optimality and practical risks of overexploitation, with critics arguing that MSY targets, when treated as hard limits without precautionary buffers, disguise political pressures favoring short-term economic gains as scientific imperatives.^[7] Empirical evidence from post-World War II fisheries policies shows MSY frameworks often enabled stock collapses, such as North Atlantic cod, due to optimistic biomass estimates and inadequate enforcement, prompting calls for ecosystem-based alternatives over single-species yield models.^[80] In the EU CFP, adoption of MSY has been critiqued as rhetorically driven by international obligations rather than domestic consensus, with persistent non-compliance in TAC settings reflecting industry lobbying and data uncertainties that undermine yield sustainability.^[6] Proponents counter that MSY-aligned reforms, like MSA's ACLs, have reduced overfished US stocks from 92 in 2006 to 28 by 2023, though skeptics highlight selection bias in success metrics and the policy's failure to fully integrate economic viability or biodiversity externalities.^[108]^[109] These disputes underscore causal challenges in enforcing yield limits amid variable environmental conditions and incentives for quota evasion, often requiring hybrid approaches balancing yield with maximum economic yield to align long-term incentives.^[110]

Criticisms and Controversies

Ecological and Biodiversity Concerns

The application of sustainable yield principles, particularly maximum sustainable yield (MSY), in resource management often prioritizes single-species population dynamics over holistic ecosystem interactions, leading to unintended ecological disruptions. In fisheries, MSY targets can drive overharvesting of prey species, triggering trophic cascades that diminish populations of predators like seabirds, sharks, and marine mammals, as forage fish serve as foundational links in food webs.^[99] This focus neglects multispecies dependencies, reducing overall ecosystem resilience to perturbations such as climate variability or disease outbreaks.^[88] Biodiversity losses are exacerbated by selective harvesting pressures under sustainable yield regimes, which alter genetic diversity within targeted stocks by favoring faster-growing or earlier-maturing individuals, potentially eroding adaptive capacity to environmental changes. Empirical analyses of exploited marine systems reveal that biodiversity hotspots, including non-target species affected by bycatch and habitat damage from gear, decline even when yields are ostensibly sustained, with food web stability hinging on preserved species richness to buffer against collapses.^[99]^[111] In forest contexts, sustained yield logging practices fragment habitats and reduce structural complexity, disadvantaging old-growth-dependent species such as canopy-dwelling invertebrates and fungi, which constitute a significant portion of forest biodiversity.^[112]^[113] These concerns stem from the inherent limitations of equilibrium-based models underlying sustainable yield, which assume static carrying capacities and ignore nonlinear ecosystem feedbacks, as evidenced by recurrent overexploitation events where managed yields masked underlying declines in community composition.^[111] Transitioning to ecosystem-based approaches has been advocated to mitigate such risks, though implementation lags due to data gaps on interspecies interactions.^[88]

Misuse in Policy and Political Contexts

In fisheries management, the concept of maximum sustainable yield (MSY) has been frequently invoked by policymakers to justify harvest quotas that exceed scientifically advised limits, often prioritizing short-term economic and political gains over long-term stock viability. This misuse typically involves selecting optimistic estimates of MSY from ranges provided by assessments, which inherently carry high uncertainties due to data gaps and model assumptions, thereby legitimizing overexploitation under the guise of sustainability. For instance, international agreements like the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea embed MSY as a target, yet political pressures lead regulators to set total allowable catches (TACs) at or above these levels to appease fishing industries and maintain employment, as critiqued in analyses of the policy's scientific veneer masking economic imperatives.^[7] A prominent example is the orange roughy fishery, where MSY calculations misconstrued the species' slow growth and low productivity, resulting in quotas that depleted stocks across multiple seamount populations in the 1980s and 1990s; policymakers aggregated independent stocks into single MSY estimates to inflate allowable yields, accelerating collapses despite warnings. Similarly, in the European Union's Common Fisheries Policy, which mandated achieving MSY by 2015 for all stocks under its purview, political negotiations frequently overrode scientific advice, with TACs set up to 200% above fishing mortality rates needed for MSY, perpetuating overexploitation in at least ten key stocks as of 2014. These practices reflect a broader pattern where MSY serves as a politically expedient benchmark, abused to delay restrictive measures amid lobbying from stakeholders, even as empirical evidence mounts of ensuing biomass declines and fishery failures.^[114]^[115]^[116] Such misapplications extend beyond fisheries to forestry and groundwater policies, where "sustainable yield" rhetoric has been deployed to endorse extraction rates ignoring cumulative ecological thresholds, often in response to industry influence or electoral pressures. Critics argue this embeds a bias toward perpetual growth narratives, as seen in historical U.S. forest management under the Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act of 1960, where yield targets were adjusted upward based on partial data to support timber economies, contributing to regional overharvesting. In politically charged contexts, this misuse undermines causal accountability, as decision-makers cite MSY compliance to deflect blame for depletions onto external factors like climate variability, despite assessments showing harvest exceedance as the primary driver.^[9]^[117]

Maximum Economic Yield Approaches

Maximum economic yield (MEY) represents the harvest level in renewable resource management that maximizes net economic benefits, typically defined as the sustainable catch or effort providing the largest difference between total revenues and total costs, including opportunity costs of capital.^[118]^[13] Unlike maximum sustainable yield (MSY), which prioritizes biological yield without economic considerations, MEY occurs at lower effort levels—often 10-20% below MSY—corresponding to larger stock biomass where marginal revenue equals marginal cost, thereby reducing overcapitalization and enhancing long-term profitability.^[13]^[94] Primary approaches to achieving MEY rely on bioeconomic models that integrate population dynamics with economic variables. The foundational Gordon-Schaefer model extends the Schaefer surplus production model by incorporating price (p), catchability (q), effort (E), biomass (B), and unit cost of effort (c), yielding profit π = p q E B - c E; equilibrium MEY is derived where dπ/dE = 0, resulting in optimal effort E_MEY = (r K)/(4 q) under linear assumptions, with r as intrinsic growth rate and K as carrying capacity—substantially less than E_MSY = r/(2 q).^[96]^[119] Static versions assume constant parameters for simplicity, while dynamic bioeconomic models account for time discounting, stochasticity, and stock growth via optimal control theory, maximizing present value of profits ∫ e^{-δ t} π(t) dt, where δ is the discount rate, often yielding even more conservative harvests to preserve capital value.^[95]^[119] Implementation requires stock assessments for biological parameters (e.g., via surplus production or age-structured models), fishery-dependent data on catch per unit effort (CPUE), and economic inputs like variable costs (fuel, labor) and market prices; nonlinear catchability adjustments refine MEY estimates, as hyperstability in CPUE can bias toward overexploitation if ignored.^[94]^[120] In multi-species or multi-fleet contexts, coupled models allocate effort across interacting stocks or gears to joint MEY, potentially increasing optimal effort for low-cost fleets while decreasing it for others, demanding fleet-specific cost data.^[121] For instance, Australian fisheries have adopted MEY as a target since the early 2000s, using dynamic models to set total allowable catches that balance assessments with economic viability, though success hinges on accurate parameter estimation and enforcement.^[95] Refinements address uncertainties, such as climate impacts on productivity, via stochastic dynamic programming in bioeconomic frameworks to derive robust MEY under varying growth rates or costs.^[122] These approaches prioritize empirical validation through simulations and historical data, revealing MEY's potential to avert economic dissipation observed at MSY levels, but necessitate credible cost-revenue monitoring to counter incentives for effort creep.^[94]^[96]

Integration with Ecosystem-Based Methods

Ecosystem-based methods extend sustainable yield principles beyond single-species maximum sustainable yield (MSY) by incorporating multispecies interactions, habitat dynamics, and broader environmental factors to maintain overall ecosystem resilience while permitting resource harvest.^[123] This integration, often termed ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM), recognizes that isolated MSY targets can overlook trophic cascades and bycatch effects, potentially leading to unintended biodiversity declines.^[124] For instance, the Food and Agriculture Organization's Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries (EAF) framework advocates balancing harvest rates with ecosystem structure, using risk assessments to adjust yields dynamically rather than fixing them at species-specific MSY levels.^[125] Implementation involves tools like trophic ecosystem models to estimate ecosystem-wide sustainable yields, accounting for predator-prey relationships and environmental variability.^[126] These models, such as Ecopath with Ecosim, simulate how fishing one species affects others, enabling derivations of fishing mortality rates (F_MSY) that sustain aggregate productivity across the food web.^[127] In practice, EBFM applies ecosystem yield caps, limiting total allowable catch to prevent overexploitation in multispecies fisheries, as demonstrated in simulations where single-species MSY application reduced community biomass by up to 50% in balanced ecosystems.^[128] Challenges persist due to data limitations and uncertainty in predicting nonlinear ecosystem responses, complicating the translation of single-species MSY into holistic targets.^[126] For example, incorporating climate-driven shifts requires adaptive indicators like trophic level indices or regime shift detection, yet empirical validation remains sparse, with many regions relying on precautionary buffers to mitigate risks.^[129] Despite these hurdles, successes in areas like the Northeast U.S. shelf highlight improved outcomes, where EBFM reduced overfished stocks from 32% in 2000 to under 10% by 2020 through integrated yield assessments.^[130] Overall, this integration prioritizes long-term ecosystem stability over short-term maximization, fostering yields that align with natural productivity limits.^[99]

Empirical Evidence and Case Studies

Successes in Sustained Resource Use

In fisheries management, the U.S. Alaska pollock fishery exemplifies successful application of sustainable yield principles. As the largest fishery by volume in the United States, producing around 1.5 million metric tons annually, it has maintained stock biomass above target levels for over two decades through science-based quotas and ecosystem considerations, avoiding overfishing while supporting economic output exceeding $1.9 billion yearly.^[131]^[132] This approach, informed by annual stock assessments, has earned repeated certifications for sustainability from independent bodies like the Marine Stewardship Council since 2000.^[133] The Northeast Arctic cod fishery, shared between Norway and Russia, demonstrates sustained yield through harvest control rules targeting fishing mortality rates that preserve spawning stock biomass above 500,000 tonnes, the threshold for maximum sustainable yield.^[134] Quotas advised by the Institute of Marine Research have stabilized catches at approximately 400,000-500,000 tonnes per year since the 1990s, with biomass recovering from lows in the 1980s to levels supporting long-term productivity without depletion.^[135] This bilateral management regime prioritizes empirical data on recruitment and environmental factors, yielding consistent harvests while preventing collapse seen in unmanaged stocks.^[136] Broader empirical evidence from U.S. federal management shows 50 fish stocks rebuilt to sustainable levels since 2000, including the Snohomish coho salmon declared rebuilt in 2023 after overfishing determination in 2018.^[137] These recoveries, achieved via total allowable catch limits aligned with maximum sustainable yield proxies, have restored populations to biomass levels capable of producing long-term yields, enhancing both ecological stability and fishery value.^[48] In forestry, Sweden's sustained yield practices have tripled growing stock volume from 2.2 billion cubic meters in 1923 to over 3.3 billion cubic meters by 2020, while annual harvests remained stable at around 80-100 million cubic meters, supported by regulations promoting afforestation and even-aged management since 1948.^[138] This high-input system, emphasizing clear-cutting for regeneration, has enabled Sweden—holding just 0.4% of global productive forest—to supply 10% of the world's sawn timber, demonstrating causal links between intensive silviculture and perpetual yield without net deforestation.^[139] Peer-reviewed analyses confirm that such methods sustain productivity by aligning harvest rates with growth increments derived from national inventory data.^[140]

Lessons from Resource Depletions

The collapse of the northern cod stock off Newfoundland in 1992 exemplifies the consequences of prolonged overharvesting beyond sustainable levels. By the early 1990s, cod populations had declined to approximately 1% of their historical biomass, primarily due to decades of fishing pressure that exceeded the stock's reproductive capacity, exacerbated by technological advancements such as sonar and factory trawlers that intensified catch efficiency.^[141] Despite scientific warnings from the 1970s onward about declining yields and recruitment rates, regulatory quotas were often set higher than recommended, leading to commercial extinction and a federal moratorium on July 2, 1992, which idled over 30,000 fishers and devastated coastal economies.^[85] Analysis attributes the collapse solely to human overexploitation rather than environmental factors, with catch rates surpassing the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) estimated at around 200,000-300,000 tonnes annually for that stock.^[89] Similar patterns emerged in 19th-century whaling, where open-ocean commons access drove sequential depletion of species like right and sperm whales. U.S. whaling fleets, peaking at over 700 vessels by 1846, harvested baleen and oil without regard for stock regeneration, causing whale populations to plummet and prices to rise sharply by the 1850s as scarcity set in; this continued until petroleum substitutes reduced incentives, but not before many stocks neared collapse.^[142] The industry's failure stemmed from the absence of enforceable limits in international waters, illustrating how individual actors, each seeking marginal gains, collectively erode shared renewable resources—a dynamic formalized as the tragedy of the commons.^[143] These depletions underscore that sustainable yield requires institutional mechanisms to counteract short-term incentives for overexploitation, such as exclusive property rights or binding quotas enforced across jurisdictions. In open-access regimes, harvests inevitably approach or exceed MSY due to the "race to fish," where delayed restraint benefits competitors, leading to stock crashes that impair long-term productivity; empirical models show that fishing even at estimated MSY leaves populations vulnerable to variability in recruitment and environmental shocks.^[7] Effective management demands accurate stock assessments using metrics like intrinsic growth rate (r) to set conservative harvest rates below MSY—often 50-70% of it—to build resilience buffers, coupled with real-time monitoring and adaptive adjustments.^[89] Political overrides of scientific advice, as seen in the cod case where quotas ignored biomass thresholds, highlight the need for depoliticized decision-making insulated from economic lobbying.^[144] Historical recoveries, such as partial rebound in some whale populations post-International Whaling Commission quotas from 1975, affirm that halting excess harvest allows regeneration, but incomplete enforcement or illegal takes prolong vulnerability; northern cod remains below 10% of pre-collapse levels three decades after the moratorium, emphasizing that depletion's legacy includes altered ecosystems and hysteresis effects hindering full restoration.^[145] Precautionary principles—reducing uncertainty by erring toward underharvesting—emerge as critical, as precise MSY estimation proves elusive amid data gaps and model errors, often resulting in optimistic biases that precipitate booms-and-busts.^[146] Ultimately, these cases reveal that sustainable yield hinges not merely on biological models but on causal enforcement of limits, revealing systemic failures in commons governance as the root driver of depletion rather than inherent resource fragility.

References

[1]
[PDF] Sustainable Yield - UHERO Hawaii
In general, sustainable yield (SY) is the path of natural resource use that leads to constant consumption into the indefinite future. Figure 6 shows the growth ...
[2]
[PDF] Considering the Effects of Climate Change on Natural Resources in ...
13. “Sustainable yield” refers to the ecological yield (i.e., harvestable population growth) that can be extracted from a natural resource base without reducing ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[3]
The origin and early application of the principle of sustainable forest ...
The need for sustainable forests was first expressed in Germany in 1713. Methods to achieve sustainability were introduced in Germany and Austria around 1800.
[4]
200 years of sustainability in forestry: Lessons from history - ADS
The original principle of sustained yield has gradually been broadened to a more inclusive principle of sustainable forest management.<|control11|><|separator|>
[5]
What are the challenges of Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) and ...
Oct 20, 2015 · Estimation problems · Variability in environmental conditions (e.g. regime shift, climate change) · Species interactions that affect MSY (e.g. ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
[6]
The hesitant emergence of maximum sustainable yield (MSY) in ...
The dismal record of fisheries management worldwide is often blamed on managers' and scientists' bigoted pursuit of the flawed Maximum Sustainable Yield ...
[7]
Maximum sustained yield: a policy disguised as science
The criticism of MSY at its adoption has been lost to sight. There is voluminous criticism of MSY, from both scientists and economists, who have tried to “fix” ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
[8]
Sustainability: A flawed concept for fisheries management? | Elementa
Jan 29, 2019 · The concept of sustainable fishing is well ingrained in marine conservation and marine governance. However, I argue that the concept is deeply flawed.<|separator|>
[9]
Fisheries managers should not abuse Maximum Sustainable Yield
Jan 4, 2021 · MSY is the highest catch a fish stock can support, but it's abused by using lower biomass levels, and should be a limit, not a target, to avoid ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
[10]
Maximum Sustainable Yield - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Maximum sustainable yield (MSY) is defined as the highest average catch that can be continuously taken from an exploited population under average environmental ...
[11]
43 CFR Part 5040 -- Sustained-Yield Forest Units - eCFR
Designating new sustained-yield forest units abolishes previous O. and C. master unit or sustained-yield forest unit designations. Until new sustained-yield ...
[12]
Maximum sustainable yield and species extinction in a prey ... - NIH
In population ecology, the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) is theoretically the largest yield (or catch) that can be taken from a species stock over an ...
[13]
[PDF] MSY - Maximum Sustainable Yield
MSY: Maximum sustainable yield is, theoretically, the largest yield (catch) that can be taken from a specific fish stock over an indefinite period under ...
[14]
Federal Land Management: When “Multiple Use” and “Sustained ...
Jun 21, 2023 · It defines sustained yield as "the achievement and maintenance in perpetuity of a high-level annual or regular periodic output of the various ...
[15]
Sustained timber yield claims, considerations, and tradeoffs for ...
Jul 1, 2022 · Here, we examine the sustained timber yield (STY) component of SFM for the 25% of Earth's forest subjected to selective logging.
[16]
[PDF] yield using surplus production models
9.1. THE SCHAEFER AND FOX MODELS. The maximum sustainable yield (MSY) can be estimated from the following input data: f(i) effort in year i, i. 1,2,. **. * ? n.
[17]
Estimating surplus production and maximum sustainable yield from ...
A simple method of estimating maximum sustainable yield (MSY), we first demonstrate that the parameters of the two well-known surplus production models of ...
[18]
Surplus production models: a practical review of recent approaches
Oct 17, 2022 · Surplus production models estimate the temporal evolution of aggregated biomass (targeted by fishing) by combining the general effects of growth ...
[19]
Good practices for surplus production models - ScienceDirect.com
SPMs typically require a time series of fishery removals and a relative measure of stock abundance (either as catch-per-unit-effort or from a survey index).
[20]
Chapter 7 Surplus Production Models - GitHub Pages
Surplus production models provide for the simplest stock assessments available that attempt to generate a description of such stock dynamics.
[21]
Forest Land Expectation Value or Maximum Sustained Yield ... - MDPI
May 19, 2023 · The Faustmann formula, equivalent to the land expectation value (LEV), yields the present value, starting with bare land, of an infinite ...
[22]
Full article: Maximum Sustained Yield, Forest Rent or Faustmann
The efficiency gains when harvests are determined using the Faustmann approach instead of Maximum Sustained Yield (MSY), Forest Rent or some silvicultural ...
[23]
Faustmann formula and its use in forest asset valuation: A review ...
The Faustmann formula, created by Martin Faustmann in 1849, is a method for evaluating land for timber growth and asset valuation.
[24]
Optimal Sustainable Yield of a Renewable Resource - ResearchGate
5 Aug 2025 · Linear programming approach based on Leslie matrix has been used to determine optimal sustainable harvesting of a forest by Rorres (1976 Rorres ...
[25]
A study on imprecise mathematical model for optimal management ...
In this article, we present an imprecise mathematical model for optimal management and utilization of renewable resources by population.
[26]
[PDF] 300 years of sustainable forestry
In. 1713 – 300 years ago this year – Hans. Carl von Carlowitz, a German, published his book Silvicultura oeconomica, which advocated the conservation, growing.
[27]
Hans Carl von Carlowitz and “Sustainability”
His view that only so much wood should be cut as could be regrown through planned reforestation projects, became an important guiding principle of modern ...
[28]
200 years of sustainability in forestry: Lessons from history
Sustainability in forestry has been accepted since the 18th century, evolving from sustained yield to sustainable forest management, but its application ...<|separator|>
[29]
Gifford Pinchot (1865-1946) - Forest History Society
And as for sustained yield, no such idea had ever entered their heads. The few friends the forest had were spoken of, when they were spoken of at all, as ...
[30]
Managing Multiple Uses on National Forests, 1905-1995 - NPS History
Twenty-seven years later, Congress formally defined the management of multiple uses on national forests as national policy in the Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield ...<|separator|>
[31]
O&C Lands - Bureau of Land Management
The Oregon and California Revested Lands Sustained Yield Management Act of August 28, 1937 gave the General Land Office even more conservation responsibilities.
[32]
[PDF] O&C Sustained Yield Act: The Land, the Law, the Legacy
The O&C Act of 1937 directed that O&C lands be managed for permanent forest production under sustained yield management.
[33]
Oregon and California Lands Act
Jun 1, 2022 · The Oregon and California Lands Act, from 1937, aimed to provide a permanent timber supply, protect watersheds, and contribute to local ...
[34]
Laws and Regulations | US Forest Service
Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act of 1960: Addresses the establishment and administration of national forests to provide for multiple use and sustained yield ...
[35]
[PDF] Optimum Sustainable Yield as a Concept in
Of more than 20 fisheries proposals sub mitted during the LOS preparatory meetings only six, including that of the United States, dealt with yield concepts.
[36]
(PDF) Maximum Sustainable Yield - ResearchGate
Jul 14, 2018 · that still allows the population to sustain itself indefinitely through somatic growth, spawning, and recruitment (Graham, 1943;FAO,. 2001).
[37]
Sustained Yield Forestry - Association of O&C Counties
Sustained Yield Definition: Harvesting at a rate that is in balance with, and does not exceed, the growth rate of the forest.
[38]
[PDF] Assessing potential sustainable wood yield - USDA Forest Service
forestry and wilderness management (Nambiar. 1996). Texts exist on procedures for determining maximum sustainable yield (Assmann 1970;. Clutter et al. 1983) ...
[39]
[PDF] 10. multiple-use sustained-yield act of 19601 - USDA Forest Service
(b) ''Sustained yield of the several products and services'' means the achievement and maintenance in perpetuity of a high- level annual or regular periodic ...
[40]
Improving forest management by implementing best suitable timber ...
Jan 15, 2022 · We developed a spatial decision support system to allocate estimated best suitable harvesting methods to plots, while concurrently considering hauling route ...
[41]
Maximum sustainable yield - Introduction to stock assessment
Aug 8, 2024 · Maximum sustainable yield (MSY) is the maximum average annual catch that can be removed from a stock over an indefinite period of time under ...
[42]
Reference Summary - Beverton, R.J.H. and S.J. Holt, 1957 - FishBase
Citation, Beverton, R.J.H. and S.J. Holt, 1957. On the dynamics of exploited fish populations. Fish. Invest. Ser. 2 Mar. Fish. G.B. Minist. Agric. Fish.Missing: MSY | Show results with:MSY
[43]
Harvest reference points for the Beverton and Holt dynamic pool ...
Harvest reference points were obtained for the Beverton and Holt dynamic pool model using concepts from surplus production models.
[44]
Management tools & enforcement - Sustainable Fisheries UW
A TAC is meant to keep a fishery at MSY or to limit catch in order to rebuild the stock to MSY. A TAC is the most important tool for fishery managers, though ...
[45]
3. ESTABLISHING THE TOTAL ALLOWABLE CATCH
Introduction of a individual transferable quota management system in 1993 has resulted in a stabilisation of catches around the annual catch quota of some 1720 ...
[46]
[PDF] Lessons From Implementation of the EU's Common Fisheries Policy
Stock biomass for all harvested species be restored and maintained above levels that can produce MSY. · Total allowable catches (TACs) be set in accordance with ...
[47]
Fish and Overfishing - Our World in Data
A fish stock with abundance below the biomass that would produce the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) is potentially considered "overfished". Fish stocks ...
[48]
Status of Stocks 2020 | NOAA Fisheries
Apr 24, 2025 · At the end of 2020, there were 26 stocks on the overfishing list and 49 on the overfished list. Since 2000, 47 stocks have been rebuilt.
[49]
500 years of the once largest fishery in the world - ScienceDirect.com
That collapse caused the loss of sustained catches of + 300,000 t cod - equivalent to a landed value of $476 million (CAD) in 2019 (1 kg = $1.587312) (Fisheries ...
[50]
Signatures of the collapse and incipient recovery of an overexploited ...
Jul 5, 2017 · The Northwest Atlantic cod stocks collapsed in the early 1990s and have yet to recover, despite the subsequent establishment of a continuing fishing moratorium.Missing: yield | Show results with:yield<|control11|><|separator|>
[51]
FAO analyses depend on estimates - Eurofish
Jul 11, 2024 · According to the FAO, the proportion of overfished fish stocks increased from 10 to 35.4 per cent between 1974 and 2019. A dramatic finding, ...
[52]
Introducing maximum sustainable yield targets in fisheries could ...
Jan 17, 2025 · Maximum sustainable yield management of overfished stocks could increase yields by 10.6 Megatons, equivalent to 12% of total catches and 6% of aquatic animal ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
[53]
Hybrid total allowable catch strategy can sustain productive mixed ...
A “hybrid TAC” system, combining SSTAC for target species and MSTAC for non-target species, offers a balanced approach to conserving vulnerable species.
[54]
sustainable yield of groundwater, safe yield, groundwater recharge ...
Sustainable yield depends on the amount of capture, and whether this amount is socially acceptable as a reasonable compromise between little or no use, on one ...
[55]
[PDF] Sustainability of ground-water resources
The term “safe yield” commonly is used in efforts to quantify sustainable ground- water development. The term should be used with respect to specific effects of ...
[56]
4.1 Darcy's Law – Hydrogeologic Properties of Earth Materials and ...
Darcy's law is the fundamental equation used to describe the flow of fluid through porous media, including groundwater. \displaystyle Q=-K\frac{\Delta h} ...
[57]
3.2 Water Balance – Groundwater Resource Development - GW Books
Combining this principle (as a continuity equation) with Darcy's Law yields a partial differential equation describing changes in head and flux through a ...
[58]
Estimation of Specific Yield for Regional Groundwater Models ...
Dec 20, 2021 · Specific yield values are uncertain in many models of unconsolidated aquifers Models with inappropriate specific yield values can produce ...
[59]
An assessment of different methods to determine specific yield for ...
Sep 20, 2021 · Four methods to determine the specific yield (S y ) were analyzed under different water table depths in lysimeters.
[60]
A roadblock on the path to aquifer sustainability - IOP Science
Depletion of aquifers across the globe is challenging our ability to maintain critically needed agricultural production and provide potable water supplies ...
[61]
[PDF] 2023 Status of the High Plains Aquifer in Kansas
Dec 16, 2023 · The water levels have dropped so much in some areas of the Ogallala region that less than 40% of the original aquifer thickness remains (fig. 4) ...
[62]
[PDF] 2023 - Nebraska Statewide Groundwater-Level Monitoring Report
Nov 20, 2023 · “safe yield” or “sustainable limit” on the rate of groundwater ... 2023, Groundwater levels in Nebraska recorded an average decline of 1.65.
[63]
Ogallala Aquifer Drops by More Than a Foot in Parts of Western ...
Jan 28, 2025 · Aquifer levels in parts of western Kansas that rely on groundwater for everything from drinking to irrigation fell more than a foot last year, ...
[64]
Groundwater depletion in California's Central Valley accelerates ...
Dec 19, 2022 · A pattern of short phases of recharge followed by longer phases of groundwater loss emerges, resulting in longer-term groundwater depletion over ...
[65]
California ranks high worldwide for rapidly depleted groundwater
Jan 24, 2024 · “The major contribution is to bring into much sharper focus this global problem of groundwater depletion and over-pumping,” said Graham Fogg, a ...
[66]
groundwater use and Indian agriculture under climate change
Groundwater overexploitation has led to drastic declines in groundwater levels, threatening to push this vital resource out of reach for millions of small-scale ...
[67]
Warming temperatures exacerbate groundwater depletion rates in ...
Sep 1, 2023 · Overall, our results suggest that warming temperatures will substantially amplify groundwater depletion across India over the coming decades.
[68]
Aquifer‐Scale Limits to Groundwater Withdrawals - Bhalla - 2025
Sep 9, 2025 · Managing groundwater sustainably is challenging because every aquifer is different and data on complex system dynamics are often sparse. It also ...<|separator|>
[69]
Lecture Notes for Biology of Wildlife Populations
The harvest rate that generates the maximum yield, r/2 r / 2 is also called the Maximum Sustainable Yield, or MSY. The total amount harvested at that point is r ...
[70]
Maximum Sustainable Yield - Deer Friendly
Maximum Sustainable Yield: The maximum number of deer that can be harvested from the population on a continual basis. The population level that produces the ...
[71]
[PDF] PRINCIPLES OF SUSTAINABLE GAME MANAGEMENT
Grouse and wild partridge shoots should assess their proposed bag by calculating the sustainable yield based on annual game counts and follow GWCT ...
[72]
An assessment of the maximum sustainable yield of ivory from ...
Results indicate that the maximum sustainable yield is achieved at very low harvest rates with population levels close to the pristine equilibrium.
[73]
Aligning population models with data: Adaptive management for big ...
... game management, designed to use data commonly collected by state and ... sustainable yield (MSY). Data were obtained from winter aerial surveys and ...
[74]
[PDF] Forest Grazing
The sustainable stocking rate is. 0.1 AUM/acre, meaning you would need 10 acres of this community type to graze one 1,000 lb. cow for one month. ➢ Aspen/rose/ ...
[75]
Change in Long-Term Sustainable Stocking Rate in Eastern Colorado
Apr 1, 2021 · Researchers at the USDA-ARS recently found that the long-term sustainable stocking rate of the shortgrass steppe has increased by 72% in the ...
[76]
[PDF] Benefits of Multi-Paddock Grazing Systems on Rangelands
Those aiming for maximum sustainable yield generally use the more intensive multi-paddock systems ... paddock, high-density rotational grazing in rangeland ...
[77]
Range management on the basis of a model which does not seek to ...
A sustainable yield of livestock products can be harvested from such an equilibrium. All possible states of the vegetation can be arrayed on a single ...
[78]
Low optimal fisheries yield creates challenges for sustainability in a ...
Oct 31, 2023 · Large-scale studies suggest a series of ecological thresholds associated with fish biomass that will have consequences for ecological processes, ...
[79]
Fact sheet: Understanding MSY - Stockholm University Baltic Sea ...
Apr 8, 2022 · Estimation problems arise due to poor assumptions in some models and lack of reliability of the data. For example, biologists do not always have ...
[80]
[PDF] The Some Good and Mostly Bad about Maximum Sustainable Yield ...
MSY was used to force Japanese fishermen to abstain, and is a qualified objective. However, MSY-exploitation is not always profitable and can be inefficient.
[81]
Scaling up uncertainties in allometric models: How to see the forest ...
Jun 1, 2023 · Allometric uncertainty is often incorrectly estimated or omitted from forest budgets. · Uncertainties are reported as individual predictions or ...
[82]
[PDF] Measurement uncertainty in a national forest inventory
Jun 29, 2023 · Reporting uncertainties associated with forest resource inventories is required for greenhouse gas accounting, for example, by the United ...
[83]
Update on current approaches, challenges, and prospects of ...
This review critically examines recent advances in modeling and simulation in the energy sector, with few insights on its approaches, challenges, and prospects.
[84]
The role of uncertainty in the design of sustainable and ...
Jul 18, 2020 · We introduce the concepts of maximum expected stationary yield (MESY), maximum expected log-sustainable yield (MELSY), and maximum expected ...
[85]
Cod Moratorium - Newfoundland and Labrador Heritage
Although overfishing in international waters did tremendous damage to northern cod, Canada also failed to maintain a sustainable fishery within its 200-mile ...
[86]
Impact of maximum sustainable yield-based fisheries management ...
Jul 17, 2014 · The failure of most Canadian and NAFO managed cod stocks to rebuild can be attributed in large part to ongoing fisheries, either directed or ...
[87]
Signatures of the collapse and incipient recovery of an overexploited ...
Jul 5, 2017 · The Northwest Atlantic cod stocks collapsed in the early 1990s and have yet to recover, despite the subsequent establishment of a continuing ...Missing: yield | Show results with:yield
[88]
Ecologically Sustainable Yield | American Scientist
We propose a change from maximum sustainable yield to ecologically sustainable yield (ESY): the yield an ecosystem can sustain without shifting to an ...
[89]
What Can Be Learned from the Collapse of a Renewable Resource ...
We conclude that the collapse of northern cod can be attributed solely to overexploitation and that population sustainability indices such as r provide a means ...<|separator|>
[90]
Conserving the Ogallala Aquifer: Efficiency, Equity, and Moral Motives
At present, many of the wells in major parts of Western Kansas have failed the minimum discharge rate to meet the evapotranspiration needs of crops for optimal ...
[91]
Kansas has been running out of water for decades. Why has no one ...
Nov 16, 2023 · But, at risk of alienating voters and hurting the economy, officials fail to use their substantial political power to avert disaster, kicking ...
[92]
[PDF] Chronicle of a Demise Foretold: State vs. Local Groundwater ...
whether the de facto 'managed depletion' of the Ogallala Aquifer in Texas should be seen as an achievement or a failure. KEYWORDS: Groundwater governance ...
[93]
Over-exploitation of natural resources is followed by inevitable ...
Mar 29, 2019 · Examples include the over-harvesting of fish and timber that degrades fisheries and forests, and non-sustainable agriculture and land-use ...<|separator|>
[94]
Maximum Economic Yield and Nonlinear Catchability - AFS Journals
Jun 24, 2021 · Economists have argued that MEY is the preferred benchmark compared to maximum sustainable yield (MSY) because fisheries operating at the ...SCHAEFER'S MAXIMUM... · CONCEPTUAL... · SIMULATION AND RESULTS
[95]
On implementing maximum economic yield in commercial fisheries
Maximum economic yield (MEY) has been identified as a primary management objective for Australian fisheries and is under consideration elsewhere.<|separator|>
[96]
2. Bioeconomic Models
The economic model developed by Gordon (1954) is based on Schaefer's model, and introduced the concept of economic overfishing in open access fisheries.
[97]
Economic viability of community-based forest management for ...
We found that this group of CFs currently is not economically viable, with forest management costs 2.6 times forest revenues over the five-year study period.
[98]
Economics of sustainable forest management - PMC - PubMed Central
In the recent years, carbon sequestration has emerged as one of the most critical contributions of forest ecosystems to humans and other living-beings. Hence, ...
[99]
Maintaining ecological stability for sustainable economic yields of ...
Sep 25, 2025 · Real-world fisheries are mostly managed using maximum sustainable yields to maximize the value of net revenues, which requires foreseeing ...
[100]
Laws & Policies: Magnuson-Stevens Act | NOAA Fisheries
The Magnuson–Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act is the primary law that governs marine fisheries management in US federal waters.
[101]
50 CFR § 600.310 - Optimum Yield. - Law.Cornell.Edu
Conservation and management measures shall prevent overfishing while achieving, on a continuing basis, the optimum yield (OY) from each fishery for the US ...
[102]
Fish Stock Sustainability | NOAA Fisheries
Jan 16, 2025 · The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act requires that a fishery management plan specify objective and measurable criteria, ...
[103]
Magnuson-Stevens Act - U.S. Regional Fishery Management Councils
Annual catch limits are used to ensure that fish stocks can reproduce to levels that allow continuous yield year over year.
[104]
Common fisheries policy (CFP)
The CFP is a set of rules for sustainably managing European fishing fleets and conserving fish stocks.
[105]
Maximum sustainable yield in the EU's Common Fisheries Policy
Mar 10, 2021 · The objective of the plan as proposed was “achieving and maintaining maximum sustainable yield for the stocks concerned”. The Commission had ...
[106]
Sustainable forest management in Canada
Sep 8, 2025 · Sustainable forest management is a way of using and caring for forests to maintain their environmental, social, cultural and economic values ...
[107]
SFI Forest Management Standard - Sustainable Forestry Initiative
These requirements include measures to protect water quality, biodiversity, wildlife habitat, species at risk and forests with exceptional conservation ...<|separator|>
[108]
[PDF] how the magnuson-stevens act is helping rebuild us fisheries | nrdc
The MSA is a critical tool for rebuilding our fish populations and the fisheries they support. We must stay the course to ensure that fish populations recover ...
[109]
Lessons From Implementation of the EU's Common Fisheries Policy
Mar 22, 2021 · This report presents eight key lessons learned from this work to help implement the EU's fisheries policy, each lesson augmented by a deeper look at a specific ...<|separator|>
[110]
Quota implementation of the maximum sustainable yield for age ...
In this paper, we propose a fishing rights allocation mechanism or management system, which specifies catch limits for individual fishing fleets to implement ...
[111]
A Review Characterizing 25 Ecosystem Challenges to Be ... - Frontiers
A review characterizing 25 ecosystem challenges to be addressed by an ecosystem approach to fisheries management in Europe.
[112]
Can Forest Management Practices Counteract Species Loss Arising ...
Human land use, especially by agriculture and forestry, is causing an unprecedented decline in global biodiversity. As forests host 70% of terrestrial species ...
[113]
Mitigating forest biodiversity and ecosystem service losses in the era ...
Increasing forest harvest levels to meet the needs of the bioeconomy may conflict with biodiversity protection and ecosystem services provided by forests.
[114]
Maximum Sustainable Yield –misconstrued and abused - Q-quatics
Jan 15, 2021 · In fisheries management, Maximum Sustainable Yield or MSY refers to ... misuse of MSY led to the collapse of numerous stocks of orange roughy.
[115]
MSY needs no epitaph—but it was abused - Oxford Academic
Dec 26, 2020 · An example of such abuse is the computation of a single MSY based on adding the biomasses of independent seamount-specific populations of ...
[116]
Minimising unsustainable yield: Ten failing European fisheries
The illegality of these unsustainable fisheries will be enshrined in EU law. •. Some stocks experience up to 200% over the fishing mortality needed to produce ...
[117]
The failure of fisheries science - Irish Wildlife Trust
Feb 20, 2022 · When you realise that MSY is not a tool for conservation but rather for over-exploitation then the whole system starts to make sense. The ...
[118]
Maximum economic yield [MEY]
Maximum economic yield [MEY] ... The value of the largest positive difference between total fishing revenues and total costs of fishing (including the cost of ...
[119]
Maximum economic yield - Grafton - 2010 - Wiley Online Library
Jul 23, 2010 · Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. Free Access. Maximum economic yield. R. Quentin Grafton,. R. Quentin Grafton. Search ...Introduction · Static bMEY · Dynamic bMEY · Dynamic bMEY under...
[120]
Maximum Economic Yield and Non-Linear Catchability
Jun 24, 2021 · Maximum economic yield (MEY) as derived from Schaefer's (1957) bioeconomic model was potentially a major contribution to fishery management, ...<|separator|>
[121]
Estimating MSY and MEY in multi-species and multi-fleet fisheries ...
Optimal effort at MEY is lower than at MSY, but when accounting for multi-fleet the optimal effort decreases for some fleets while increases for gillnetters.
[122]
Maximum Economic Yield Fishery Management in the Face of ...
This paper deals with fishery management in the face of the ecological and economic effects of global warming. To achieve this, a dynamic bioeconomic model ...
[123]
Annex 1. Institutional foundation to the ecosystem approach to ...
Its fisheries section refers to the maximum sustainable yield, corresponding to the level at which biological productivity (rate of growth and renewal capacity) ...
[124]
Possible ecosystem impacts of applying MSY policies from single ...
We show that widespread application of single-species MSY policies would in general cause severe deterioration in ecosystem structure, in particular the loss ...
[125]
[PDF] Ecosystem approach to fisheries (EAF) - FAO Knowledge Repository
Fisheries management took on a whole new dimension once the interactions between fisheries and the entire ecosystem now had to be taken into account.
[126]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165783615301041
[127]
An analytical solution to ecosystem-based F MSY using trophic ...
Nov 10, 2022 · A simple method for data-limited fisheries to estimate ecosystem-based F MSY and how EBFM modellers could mimic the way natural fish communities function.
[128]
Evaluating ecosystem caps on fishery yield in the context of climate ...
May 12, 2025 · Projected climate change led to decreased groundfish yield, and predation from the underexploited groundfish predator arrowtooth flounder ( ...Methods · Fishing Simulation... · ResultsMissing: biodiversity | Show results with:biodiversity
[129]
Marine ecosystem regime shifts: challenges and opportunities for ...
We discuss the suitability and short-comings of methods summarizing the status of ecosystem components, screening and prioritizing potential risks, and ...
[130]
Ecosystem-based Fisheries Management
A systematic approach to fisheries management in a geographically specified area that contributes to the resilience and sustainability of the ecosystem.
[131]
Alaska's Pollock Fishery: A Model of Sustainability
Oct 28, 2019 · For more than 20 years, NOAA Fisheries has been successfully managing the pollock fishery with a holistic ecosystem-based management model.
[132]
The Sustainable Management of the U.S. Alaska Pollock Fishery
Aug 6, 2024 · The US Alaska pollock fisheries were also among the first fisheries in the world to be certified as sustainable by third party schemes.Missing: success | Show results with:success
[133]
Largest US fishery proves it's sustainable, again
Jan 14, 2016 · Alaska Pollock has successfully created and maintained new markets, especially in the U.S. and Europe, over the past decade. We are extremely ...
[134]
A lesson to be learned from the Northeast Arctic cod stock
The analysis shows that the size of the spawning stock should be no less than 500 000 tonnes and that highest yield is obtained through a rate of exploitation ...
[135]
Sustainable Cod - Norwegian Seafood Council
Quotas Ensure Sustainable Yield of Fish stocks ... The Institute of Marine Research (IMR) has presented scientific advice for the quotas of Northeast Arctic cod, ...
[136]
[PDF] Towards the Optimal Management of the Northeast Arctic Cod Fishery
Jun 14, 2011 · The total biomass that supports a maximum sustainable yield (MSY) thus equals 5.41/2 2.7. = million tonnes of cod, and the associated MSY is ...
[137]
A Major Rebuilding Milestone: 50th Fish Stock Rebuilt
Oct 17, 2023 · We rebuilt our 50th fish stock. The Snohomish coho salmon stock was declared overfished in 2018 and has now rebuilt to its sustainable level.
[138]
The Swedish forestry model: More of everything? - ScienceDirect.com
It was gradually reinforced and by 1948 it included strong regulations promoting afforestation and even-aged stand management to sustain (or increase) yields, ...
[139]
Sweden does not meet agreed national and international forest ...
Sweden hosts only 0.4% of the global productive forest cover (FAO, 2015), but due to effective sustained high yield forestry provides 10% of the sawn timber, ...
[140]
Sustained Yield Forestry in Sweden and Russia - PubMed Central
For this study we used two large forest management units as case studies, one in Sweden and one in the Russian Federation. Both case study areas have similar ...
[141]
A Tragedy with No End | Science History Institute
Sep 5, 2024 · ... Grand Banks for their livelihoods. Despite such drastic measures, the cod population didn't rebound. The government extended the moratorium ...Missing: yield | Show results with:yield
[142]
Energy Prices and Resource Depletion: Lessons from the Case of ...
The present paper examines the cycle of whaling in the nineteenth century, showing that for both whale bone and whale oil the smoothed price curve shows a ...Missing: industry | Show results with:industry
[143]
Saving the Whales: Lessons from the Extinction of the Eastern Arctic ...
Jun 10, 2004 · In this article we investigate the possibility that a regulatory regime designed to maximize the profitability of the early Dutch whaling ...
[144]
The Newfoundland Cod Stock Collapse: A Review and Analysis of ...
... causes of the collapse of the North Atlantic Cod fishery ... Resource mismanagement versus sustainable livelihoods: The collapse of the Newfoundland Cod fishery.
[145]
Lessons for stock assessment from the northern cod collapse
Fisheries assessment scientists can learn at least three lessons from the collapse of the northern cod off Newfoundland.
[146]
Stopping overexploitation of living resources on the high seas
It illustrates progress and continuing challenges to stopping the overexploitation of living resources in high seas areas beyond national jurisdictions.