Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Geocaching

Geocaching is an outdoor recreational activity in which participants, using GPS receivers or smartphone applications, navigate to specific coordinates to locate hidden containers known as geocaches. These geocaches typically contain a for signing and small items for trading, with participants expected to exchange items of equal or greater value while adhering to principles of minimal environmental disturbance. The activity fosters exploration of natural and urban landscapes worldwide, promoting physical activity and community interaction among geocachers. The practice originated on May 3, 2000, when American computer consultant Dave Ulmer concealed the first geocache—a container of items including a can of beans—near Beavercreek, , leveraging improved GPS accuracy following the U.S. government's discontinuation of Selective Availability restrictions. This event marked the inception of a game that quickly evolved through online listing services, with Geocaching.com becoming the primary platform for publishing coordinates and descriptions. Early iterations emphasized the thrill of discovery, evolving into diverse cache types such as traditional hides, multi-stage challenges, and virtual caches that highlight educational or historical sites without physical containers. Geocaching operates under strict guidelines to ensure and , prohibiting caches that require trespassing, without permission, or inclusion of hazardous materials like food that could attract . While the community self-regulates through these rules, occasional issues arise from irresponsible placement or searching, such as unintended trail erosion or conflicts with landowners, underscoring the causal importance of permission and in maintaining access to public and private lands. By 2025, the hobby sustains over 3.3 million active geocaches across more than 190 countries, reflecting sustained popularity driven by accessible technology and the intrinsic human drive for navigational puzzle-solving.

History

Precursors and Origins

Geocaching's conceptual precursors include letterboxing, which originated in 1854 when guide James Perrott placed a containing his at Cranmere Pool in , , inviting visitors to add their own and report the find by . This practice evolved into hiding stamps and logbooks for via clues, emphasizing outdoor exploration without electronic aids. , formalized in during the late from military exercises, involved competitive map-and-compass routing to control points, providing a structured analog to location-based hunts predating GPS. The technological foundation emerged with the U.S. government's discontinuation of Selective Availability on May 1, 2000, which had intentionally degraded civilian ; this policy change, directed by President , enhanced positional accuracy from roughly 100 meters to 10-20 meters under normal conditions, enabling precise civilian geocaching. Two days later, on May 3, 2000, Dave Ulmer, an Oregon-based computer consultant and GPS enthusiast, initiated the first GPS-based stash by concealing a black plastic bucket filled with trinkets—including a can of beans, a can of vegetables, and videos—in woods near Beavercreek, , at coordinates 45°17.460′N 122°24.800′W. Ulmer posted the details online to a GPS users' group, proposing the "GPS Stash Hunt" to test newfound accuracy and inviting others to locate it without prior clues beyond coordinates. Early participants, including Mike Teague—who achieved the first documented find—refined practices through shared experiences: searchers were encouraged to trade items of equal or greater value, sign a logbook to record visits, and leave the container intact rather than emptying it. Teague established the "GPS Stash Hunt" mailing list to facilitate discussion and coordinate additional hides, fostering community norms around item exchange and documentation. On May 30, 2000, list member Matt Stum proposed the term "geocaching"—merging "geo" (earth) with "caching" (hiding supplies)—to supplant "stash hunt" and its illicit undertones, marking the activity's formal nomenclature.

Establishment and Early Expansion

Geocaching.com, the first centralized online listing service for GPS-based caches, was launched on September 2, 2000, by software developer Jeremy Irish, who compiled approximately 75 known caches from scattered postings and mailing lists into a searchable database equipped with features like proximity searches. Later in 2000, Irish partnered with coworkers Elias Alvord and Bryan Roth to establish Groundspeak Inc. (now Geocaching HQ), initially operating from a home connection before relocating to servers funded by merchandise sales such as t-shirts. This institutionalization shifted geocaching from postings to a structured platform, enabling easier discovery and placement without centralized regulatory oversight. The platform facilitated organic expansion through enthusiast-driven word-of-mouth and media exposure on outlets like , , and , alongside the affordability of consumer GPS units after the U.S. government's deactivation of selective availability on , , which improved civilian signal accuracy from 100 meters to 10 meters. By early 2001, cache numbers had surged into the thousands, reflecting individual initiatives rather than organized promotion. The inaugural community event cache, GC389, convened geocachers on March 24, 2001, at Schlotsky's deli in , fostering social connections and demonstrating the activity's potential for group participation. To address early concerns from land managers regarding environmental impact and misconceptions of geocaching as "" akin to littering, core guidelines were codified by mid-2001, explicitly prohibiting or , which required caches to remain at or above ground level unless explicitly permitted otherwise on private land. This , rooted in voluntary self-regulation, helped sustain access to public lands. Internationally, adoption accelerated concurrently, with Europe's inaugural cache (GC43) hidden along the coast on June 3, 2000, and placements documented across multiple continents by the site's debut, underscoring diffusion unbound by geographic or institutional barriers. By 2005, active caches exceeded 100,000 worldwide, propelled by these dynamics rather than top-down mandates.

Milestones and Modern Growth

The adoption of caches faced restrictions in 2006, when Groundspeak ceased approving new ones on Geocaching.com, shifting them to the separate following community discussions on maintaining physical container standards for the core activity. Geocaching's expansion accelerated with key numerical benchmarks: the published its 1,000,000th cache in March 2010, reached 2,000,000 active caches by February 2013, and exceeded 3 million active caches worldwide by 2023. In 2023, participants completed 4,835,932 across 66,996 active ones, reflecting robust engagement. Smartphone proliferation after 2010 drove usage, enabling and logging without dedicated GPS units, which broadened participation amid rising digital tool accessibility. Marking the 25th anniversary in 2025, Geocaching HQ facilitated over 100 large-scale community events worldwide, alongside special souvenirs like those for International Geocaching Day, emphasizing exploration in more than 190 countries. This organic growth persists through player-driven events on all seven continents, independent of heavy institutional marketing.

Core Mechanics

Rules and Objectives

The primary objective of geocaching is for participants to navigate to specific GPS coordinates to locate concealed containers called , which generally include a for recording discoveries. Upon finding a , the participant signs and dates the to claim the find, optionally trades small personal items by taking one and leaving another of equal or greater value if tradeables are present, and meticulously returns the to its precise original concealment to preserve the hide for others. Geocaching functions as a self-regulated pursuit governed by core guidelines that prioritize minimal environmental disruption and respect for public and private spaces. Participants follow "" practices, such as adhering to established trails and avoiding vegetation damage, while voluntary Cache In/Trash Out (CITO) initiatives encourage removing encountered during hunts to enhance natural areas. Cache placements must secure landowner permission when applicable, prohibit burying or digging without explicit approval to prevent conflicts with authorities, and ensure long-term accessibility without requiring special arrangements or high-impact actions. Cache hiders rate each listing's difficulty—reflecting puzzle or search challenges—and terrain—indicating physical access demands—on a 1-to-5 star scale, enabling finders to self-select based on their capabilities. Post-discovery, online logging of finds on platforms like Geocaching.com documents experiences, fosters verification, and unlocks virtual souvenirs for achievements such as visiting new regions. Absent a centralized body, adherence relies on platform listing policies, reporting of violations, and individual accountability to sustain the activity's emphasis on exploratory problem-solving.

Cache Placement and Discovery Process

Cache hiders select durable, weatherproof containers suited to the environment and size rating, such as ammo cans for regular-sized caches or bison tubes and micro vials for smaller hides, ensuring resistance to moisture, impacts, and UV degradation. These containers typically house a and optional trade items, placed in camouflaged but accessible spots to withstand natural wear without requiring or attachment hardware. To determine coordinates, hiders record GPS and apply averaging techniques—collecting multiple stationary readings over several minutes—to reduce positional variance and achieve precision within 1-3 meters under optimal conditions. Accompanying hints, often riddles or offsets from the waypoint, guide finders while preserving the challenge. Seekers download coordinates from centralized listing services and transfer them to handheld GPS units or smartphone apps for real-time navigation via compass bearing and distance indicators. Arrival at the waypoint prompts a ground search within the device's reported accuracy radius, usually 3-5 meters in open areas, where visual cues, terrain assessment, and hint decryption reveal the hide. Multi-stage caches require iterative processes, with each intermediate find yielding data or objects needed to compute subsequent waypoints or solve for the final. Upon locating the cache, finders verify discovery by signing the logbook with date and initials, replacing the container precisely as found to maintain coordinates for subsequent seekers, and sometimes trading small items if swappable goods are present. Discreet behavior mitigates interactions with unaware passersby, termed "muggles," which can complicate searches. Causal factors in failed attempts include GPS multipath propagation in urban settings, where signal reflections from structures introduce errors up to 20-30 meters, elevating rates of "did not find" (DNF) logs as seekers probe inaccurate zones.

Cache Classifications

Traditional and Multi-Caches

Traditional caches constitute the simplest and most common variant of geocaching, featuring a single set of published coordinates that directly lead to a physical equipped with a for sign-ins and frequently small tradeable items referred to as . The itself varies in size and type, from compact magnetic micros to robust ammo cans often concealed in natural settings like wooded areas, prioritizing unadorned GPS-guided navigation over interpretive elements. This format underscores empirical discovery dynamics, where participants rely on precise positioning data and on-site terrain assessment to locate the hide without prerequisite solving. Multi-caches, sometimes termed offset caches, introduce sequential complexity by designating the initial coordinates to an intermediate stage—such as a marker, stamped , or clue-bearing object—that provides data to compute or reveal subsequent coordinates, progressing through one or more points to the ultimate physical with its . These staged hunts amplify navigational demands through chaining, potentially spanning varied terrains and requiring iterative verification of each leg's accuracy before advancing. Unlike single-point traditions, multis demand sustained skills, fostering extended exploration while maintaining a physical endpoint. In terms of prevalence, traditional caches dominated the activity as of March 2019, numbering 2,428,699 out of 3,103,177 active geocaches worldwide, or roughly 78%, with multi-caches adding 159,187 for a combined share exceeding 80% of physical finds. Their renders traditional caches particularly suitable for novice participants and family groups, enabling quick entry into GPS-based outdoor pursuits without advanced preparation. Multi-caches, by contrast, appeal to those seeking graduated challenges, though both types hinge on owner maintenance to prevent site degradation from unserviced containers.

Puzzle, Virtual, and Hybrid Caches

Puzzle caches, formally classified as a subtype of mystery caches, present published coordinates that serve as a starting point or decoy, requiring solvers to decipher puzzles such as riddles, ciphers, mathematical equations, or contextual clues—often drawn from , , or the cache page itself—to compute the true final location. This pre-fieldwork reasoning demands analytical skills, distinguishing them from location-based hunts and appealing to participants seeking intellectual engagement beyond navigation. Virtual caches eliminate physical containers entirely, directing participants to predefined sites like statues, plaques, or natural features where they must gather specific information—such as inscriptions, measurements, or photographs—to verify the visit and log the find per the owner's criteria. Publication of new virtual caches halted in 2005 amid issues with placement quality, verification consistency, and owner maintenance, though pre-existing caches persist and select new ones have been permitted via limited reward programs since 2017. Hybrid caches integrate geocaching with external traditions or technologies. Letterbox hybrids feature a physical container with a distinctive for collectors to ink impressions in personal logbooks, often employing riddle-based clues akin to traditional letterboxing rather than precise GPS coordinates. Wherigo caches pair a downloadable GPS —creating interactive scenarios with prompts, zones, and tasks—with a final physical stage, enhancing immersion through programmable adventures. EarthCaches, operating as educational without containers, center on geological sites where finders observe features like rock formations or erosion patterns and submit answers to science-oriented questions, promoting literacy under oversight from the Geological Society of America. These variants foster problem-solving and thematic depth, though puzzle solutions sometimes circulate online, prompting debates within the community over the value of independent effort.

Event, Challenge, and Specialized Caches

Event caches are temporary gatherings organized by geocachers to foster social interaction, typically specifying a date, time, and coordinates for attendees to meet. The first event cache occurred on March 24, 2001, in Austin, Texas, drawing local participants shortly after geocaching's inception. Since 2001, nearly 500,000 such events have been hosted worldwide, contributing to community building through shared activities and discussions. Mega-events, a subset requiring at least 500 attendees, often feature planned programs, new cache placements nearby, and annual recurrence, while giga-events demand 3,000 or more participants. These large-scale gatherings strengthen ties among participants but can strain local resources, prompting cache owners to temporarily disable nearby hides to mitigate search traffic. Challenge caches mandate locating a physical after satisfying predefined criteria, such as accumulating a specific number or type of prior finds verifiable via online logs. Common examples include finding 500 traditional caches or 500 within a designated , rewarding dedicated participants with milestone recognition upon proof submission. Recent guidelines, updated in August 2025, restrict event-based challenges to standalone attendance tallies without combining other requirements, aiming to maintain fairness and verifiability. Adventure Lab caches, introduced as app-guided multi-stage experiences, parallel challenges by directing users through virtual waypoints culminating in a physical log, though they operate independently without a final in some variants. Specialized caches encompass legacy and promotional variants emphasizing unique proof or themes over standard hides. Webcam caches, grandfathered since 2001, require positioning at coordinates visible to a webcam for a timestamped photo as evidence, with no new listings permitted due to maintenance challenges from offline cameras. Project A.P.E., launched May 24, 2001, comprised 14 sponsored caches tied to the film promotion, each containing movie props hidden globally to spark interest, with only a few enduring today. Locationless caches, originally allowing logs from qualifying sites without fixed coordinates, were revived for the 25th anniversary as "Where's 25?" (GCA2025), permitting one-time entries from January 25 to December 31, 2025, upon photographing a prominent "25" anywhere. The Geocaching HQ cache (GCK25B), established July 22, 2004, at headquarters in , serves as a specialized milestone for visitors, logged over 20,000 times by those booking entry to sign its .

Technological Foundations

GPS Devices and Navigation Tools

Geocaching relies on GPS receivers to determine latitude and longitude coordinates for navigating to hidden caches, with dedicated handheld units like the enabling waypoint storage for up to thousands of locations and providing rugged, long-battery operation suitable for outdoor use. The termination of Selective Availability on May 1, 2000, eliminated intentional signal degradation, boosting civilian GPS accuracy from roughly 100 meters to 10-15 meters under optimal conditions, which directly facilitated the precise mechanics of geocaching. Common error sources include ionospheric and tropospheric delays in the atmosphere, multipath reflections from buildings in urban canyons, and dilution of precision from poor satellite or blockage by . Users mitigate these inaccuracies by averaging multiple stationary readings to reduce noise—often yielding sub-5-meter results over several minutes—and activating (WAAS) where available, which applies satellite-based corrections to achieve 1-3 meter precision. Integrated electronic compasses in many units, such as models, calibrate bearings while stationary to guide final offsets from GPS fixes, compensating for momentary signal loss. From the early reliance on specialized hardware, geocaching shifted in the toward ubiquitous smartphones embedding GPS chips, accelerometers, and cameras, though dedicated devices retain advantages in battery endurance and signal reliability amid foliage or interference.

Software, Apps, and Data Management

The official Geocaching® app supports live mapping to locate nearby caches, offline downloads for areas without connectivity, and access to cache details, logs, and trackable items. Third-party options like the open-source c:geo app for offer comparable functionality, including from geocaching.com for offline use and integration with multiple platforms, enabling users to bypass official app limitations. GPX files serve as a standard format for importing and exporting geocache data, facilitating transfer to GPS devices or desktop software for custom management. Users apply filters within these tools—by cache type, difficulty , or ownership—to curate lists, with converters available for datum adjustments beyond the default WGS84 standard employed across the hobby. This format promotes user-driven workflows, such as sorting large GPX collections to focus on specific criteria without reliance on platform-specific interfaces. By the 2020s, mobile applications had driven a substantial shift in data handling, with users increasingly relying on them for navigation, logging, and personalized tracking amid growing volumes exceeding 3 million active listings worldwide as of 2025. Privacy enhancements, such as puzzle-based or temporarily concealed coordinates in select cache designs, further support discreet location management. Managing this scale poses challenges like , necessitating robust search algorithms in apps and tools to efficiently query and display relevant data without performance degradation or excessive resource demands. GPX interoperability and third-party filtering mitigate proprietary constraints, allowing geocachers to tailor datasets for devices or preferences independently.

Community and Practices

Participant Demographics and Engagement

Geocaching attracts over three million active participants worldwide, spanning diverse age groups and family structures. Surveys indicate an average participant age of approximately 38 years, with substantial involvement from families including children aged 6-12, who benefit from the activity's integration of GPS technology and outdoor exploration to foster skills such as , problem-solving, and spatial reasoning. Participation extends from children as young as 8 to adults over 80, appealing particularly to those with interests in and nature-based , as evidenced by its promotion in educational programs for youth development. Gender distribution counters of tech hobbies as predominantly male-dominated, with estimates placing participation at around 40 percent based on event attendance and analyses, though formal surveys lower figures of 15-28 percent . This broad appeal is reflected in the activity's adaptability for mixed groups, including couples and parent-child teams, rather than solo enthusiasts. Engagement metrics demonstrate sustained global interest, with cumulative "Found It" logs surpassing 642 million since 2000 and annual finds exceeding 83 million as of 2022. In 2024, nearly 1.85 million participants logged at least one find, averaging 48 per active cacher, often tied to milestone souvenirs awarded for events like equinoxes or challenges that encourage repeated participation. Social aspects, including online forums and in-person meetups, further bolster retention through shared progression systems like cache challenges, though anecdotal reports note drop-off among newer players due to perceived maintenance burdens on hides.

Ethical Standards and Community Norms

Geocachers maintain ethical standards rooted in individual accountability, prioritizing minimal disruption to natural and social environments through voluntary adherence to principles such as . These include planning activities to anticipate impacts, traveling on durable surfaces to avoid trail damage, and properly disposing of all waste encountered during hunts. Cache owners commit to routine maintenance, investigating reported issues promptly and archiving hides if personal circumstances prevent upkeep, thereby preventing prolonged neglect. Swag exchanges follow norms discouraging items that could attract , such as food or scented materials, to avert damage to caches or surrounding areas from interference. Participants quality, with many advocating avoidance of low-value trinkets that encourage , favoring durable, non-perishable tokens like keychains or small toys of equal or greater value to taken items. Logging practices emphasize honesty and discretion, requiring physical confirmation of finds via logbook signatures while online entries avoid spoilers that could undermine the challenge for others. Stealth is encouraged when muggles—non-participants—are present, to minimize complaints or interference without violating public access norms. The Cache In Trash Out (CITO) initiative exemplifies voluntary , launched in 2002 to organize community cleanups that enhance outdoor spaces without reliance on external mandates. Enforcement occurs through peer reporting and self-policing, where community members flag guideline deviations, prompting owners to correct or disable caches, fostering accountability over top-down regulation.

Permissions, Laws, and Jurisdictional Variations

Geocaching placement hinges on securing explicit permission from landowners or land managers to uphold , as mandated by guidelines and local statutes. Groundspeak, the operator of Geocaching.com, requires cache owners to affirm possession of necessary permissions prior to listing, ensuring compliance with applicable laws without necessitating special licenses in low-impact scenarios. On worldwide, direct owner consent is imperative, often documented to mitigate liability risks associated with public access. Public lands exhibit jurisdictional variability, with allowances typically contingent on agency policies emphasizing non-disruptive activity. In the United States, the U.S. Forest Service generally permits geocaching without formal permits on managed lands, provided caches avoid wilderness areas and adhere to "leave no trace" principles, though local districts may impose additional reviews. Similarly, the Bureau of Land Management endorses geocaching in suitable non-sensitive locations but prohibits it in wilderness study areas to preserve ecological integrity. In contrast, Australia's regulations diverge by state; New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service demands written consent for park placements under clause 13 of the National Parks and Wildlife Regulation 2019, while Queensland permits notification post-placement in managed areas per operational policies. The adopts a permissive stance on open access lands under the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000, facilitating public traversal but still requiring geocache-specific permissions from managers to avoid unauthorized fixtures. protected areas often enforce stricter controls; for instance, many national parks restrict placements to prevent habitat disturbance, with guidelines prohibiting burial or environmental alteration, as seen in analyses of Austrian parks where conservation priorities limit approvals. Comprehensive bans remain infrequent globally, though they are expanding in ecologically sensitive zones like U.S. wilderness designations, where agencies cite risks to pristine conditions outweighing potential visitor traffic benefits to landowners. This framework underscores permissions as the causal determinant of legitimacy, enabling controlled access that can yield ancillary advantages such as increased stewardship and foot traffic for consenting properties.

Prohibitions, Enforcement, and Notable Incidents

Physical geocaches are prohibited on lands managed by the United States National Park Service, as they constitute leaving in violation of 36 CFR 2.1(a), which bans abandoning property in park areas. Burying caches further contravenes regulations against unauthorized digging or soil disturbance. Certain state parks impose outright bans; for instance, in discontinued geocaching in 2010, with rangers actively removing existing caches. Enforcement typically involves preemptive measures rather than frequent penalties, with Groundspeak reviewers rejecting cache listings that violate land manager policies, such as those in prohibited areas. Fines for littering or trespassing remain rare, though possible if a cache is deemed abandoned litter under general statutes; documented cases of citations specifically for geocache placement are scarce, often stemming from misunderstandings rather than systematic crackdowns. Non-participants ("muggles") occasionally remove caches, prompting owners to archive and retrieve them to avoid escalation. Notable incidents highlight risks from poor container choices or neglect, but these are infrequent outliers attributable to individual errors rather than systemic issues. In the early 2000s, ammo can caches were repeatedly mistaken for explosive devices, including a 2003 case in a local where summoned a after discovery by non-players, and a 2011 incident in , , where a cache triggered a bomb scare and road closure. Abandoned caches have necessitated community-led cleanups, with Groundspeak's Cache In Trash Out initiatives facilitating removal of orphaned containers to prevent environmental . disturbances are minimal and undocumented in major cases, though general studies note potential for off-trail if participants stray from ethical norms. Such mishaps underscore the efficacy of archiving unresponsive listings and owner retrieval, fostering community vigilance over prohibitive blanket measures.

Environmental Considerations

Potential Impacts and Criticisms

Geocaching activities can cause localized ecological disturbances, particularly through off-trail navigation that leads to trampling, , and . A 2011 assessment across 21 state parks examined 117 geocache sites and documented an average impact area of 39.3 square feet per site, encompassing 1,727 square feet of trampled and 321 square feet of eroded in total. Forty percent of sites in natural areas exhibited heavy impacts, ranging from 134 to 324 square feet, with effects linked more to surface type and cache ownership than to visitation frequency or distance from trails. These disturbances mirror those from , including widened paths and secondary trails, but stem from repeated searches converging on hidden locations. Critics, including some land managers, have characterized geocaches as due to their hidden plastic containers, which could persist if lost or neglected. In the mid-2000s, officials in areas like , raised concerns over off-trail caches exacerbating in sensitive habitats, equating them to unauthorized debris. Unlike random , however, geocaches are designed for retrieval and ongoing maintenance by owners, with platforms archiving inactive ones to prevent abandonment; empirical data on long-term persistence remains limited but indicates rarity outside urban settings. Disturbed soil from cache placement and searches may promote establishment or dispersal, as evidenced by non-native plant spread noted in impacted sites. Vehicle travel to dispersed caches generates emissions, critiqued as inconsistent with the activity's outdoor , though no studies quantify this as exceeding norms for equivalent like trail-based . Micro-caches using small plastics pose risks of environmental retention if displaced, amplifying concerns over non-biodegradable materials in wild areas. Studies conclude that ecological footprints are minimal under guideline adherence, such as trail proximity and habitat avoidance, with issues attributable to isolated poor practices rather than systemic flaws. Comparative analysis reveals geocaching's effects comparable to or lesser than unregulated foot traffic, suggesting disproportionate scrutiny overlooks broader recreational pressures on ecosystems.

Mitigation Strategies and Positive Contributions

Geocachers employ targeted strategies to minimize ecological footprints, including prohibitions on burying caches and directives to avoid fragile habitats such as wetlands or archaeological sites. Placement guidelines specify non-food "swag" items to deter wildlife scavenging, while the "lift, look, replace" technique ensures minimal soil disruption during searches. These practices, aligned with protocols, promote dispersed access that contrasts with the concentrated erosion from established trails or motorized recreation. The Cache In Trash Out (CITO) program, initiated in , coordinates volunteer-led cleanups that have engaged over 675,000 participants across more than 37,000 events as of , collectively removing substantial volumes from public lands. Such efforts exemplify self-regulation, where norms enforce and avoidance of high-impact zones, yielding outcomes that surpass restrictive bans in sustaining . Geocaching drives physical fitness through navigational pursuits, with a 2014 Texas A&M University analysis revealing participants averaged 10 miles walked monthly—equivalent to about 1.5 miles per hunt across roughly 72 annual outings—correlating with reduced days of poor physical and mental health relative to state benchmarks. EarthCaches, a specialized cache type vetted by the Geological Society of America since 2000, deliver site-based lessons on geological formations and processes, educating millions on Earth sciences without physical containers and thereby amplifying awareness of natural dynamics. This format extends to observation in under-visited locales, fostering causal appreciation for ecosystems via direct, low-intervention encounters. Partnerships with organizations like Tread Lightly! reinforce these benefits by disseminating geocaching-specific advisories on trail adherence and respect, underscoring how activity-induced exploration prioritizes health gains and over isolated environmental concerns.

Reception and Impact

Achievements and Societal Benefits

Geocaching has sustained a global community for 25 years since its inception on May 3, 2000, with over 3.3 million active hidden across 191 countries and all seven continents as of 2025. This scale reflects its enduring appeal, evidenced by milestones such as the 2025 anniversary celebrations, which include quarterly hiding themes, a locationless challenge (GCA2025 "Where's 25?"), and over 100 large-scale events like Block Parties in 17 countries and the Geocaching International (GIFF) from November 6-16. These gatherings, including Community Celebration Events hosted worldwide between January 1 and December 31, 2025, foster international ties by uniting participants in shared activities without relying on heavy commercialization. The activity promotes physical and gains, as demonstrated by a 2014 Texas A&M University study finding that geocachers reported fewer days of poor physical and compared to the general . Participation surged post-COVID-19, with the pandemic reviving interest in outdoor, low-contact pursuits like geocaching, which encourages walking, , and while reducing stress through achievable goals and nature exposure. A 2020 qualitative study further highlighted its role in active aging, combining geocaching with self-tracking to enhance group exercise and social interactions among older adults. In education, geocaching integrates principles by teaching GPS technology, geospatial mapping, , and problem-solving; programs like those from TeachEngineering use it to simulate tasks, while extensions incorporate it for hands-on science and technology lessons. Economically, it bolsters , particularly in rural areas, with the global geocaching tourism market valued at $1.32 billion in 2024 and projected growth through visitor spending on accommodations and local services; studies note its potential to draw tech-savvy travelers and stimulate agricultural tourism without large infrastructure demands. Culturally, geocaching democratizes exploration by empowering individuals and to engage in self-directed adventures, contrasting with structured guided tours. Surveys indicate high family inclusivity, with an average participant age of 38 and a significant portion involving children aged 6-12, fostering bonding and outdoor skills in a low-barrier format.

Controversies, Debates, and Challenges

Within the geocaching community, debates over have centered on suspicious find logs, where participants claim discoveries that appear implausible based on timing, location, or . For instance, logs reporting finds on caches reported missing or after repeated "did not find" entries by experienced cachers have prompted discussions on , with some advocating for mandatory physical logbook signatures to claim online finds. Such practices undermine trust, as cache owners can cross-check physical logs but lack tools to challenge high-volume suspicious claims, potentially inflating statistics for prolific finders. Reviewer decisions have also sparked contention, with accusations of inconsistency or perceived in rejecting listings, such as those referencing competing activities or deemed uninteresting, leading to calls for clearer guidelines from platform operators. Community forums highlight cases of abrupt rejections without detailed feedback, fostering frustration among hiders who view reviewers as gatekeepers enforcing subjective standards. Ethical concerns regarding —small tradeable items—include critiques of cheap, disposable toys potentially sourced via exploitative labor practices, such as child labor in hubs, which some argue perpetuates for low-cost goods. Participants whether such items degrade the activity's value, favoring higher-quality or educational swaps over mass-produced trinkets that accumulate as if not traded responsibly. Cache saturation poses a structural challenge, with densely packed areas—often exceeding guideline minimums of 161 meters between traditional caches—resulting in repetitive, low-effort hides that diminish exploratory appeal. This overcrowding correlates with declining new cache publications in mature regions, attributed to limited viable locations and reviewer reluctance to approve proximate hides. Maintenance neglect exacerbates the issue, as inactive owners leave "dead" caches—unrepaired or missing—cluttering maps and requiring community flagging for archival, though adoption of orphaned caches remains rare. Critics externally decry geocaching's fuel consumption and off-trail impacts as environmentally burdensome, yet empirical assessments indicate minimal aggregate effects compared to high-volume pursuits like golfing, with studies documenting low and in dispersed searches. pushback against such views emphasizes individual responsibility over blanket prohibitions, arguing that geocaching encourages low-impact navigation akin to . Internally, "lazy" caching—favoring easy urban micros over challenging —erodes perceived quality, with complaints of guardrail or bush hides prioritizing quantity over creativity. Despite narratives of stagnation, activity metrics refute decline: in 2023, 1,811,232 participants logged at least one find, averaging 47 caches each, rising slightly to 1,846,540 finders and 48 averages in 2024, signaling sustained engagement amid these debates.

Digital Platforms and Data

Geocaching.com and Groundspeak Dominance

Groundspeak, Inc., established in 2000 by Jeremy Irish, Bryan Roth, and Elias Alvord in , operates Geocaching.com as the central hub for the activity. The site launched in September 2000 with just 75 known caches worldwide and has since grown to host over 3.3 million active listings, establishing it as the overwhelming majority platform due to its early-mover advantage and comprehensive database. This dominance arises from network effects, wherein —caches, logs, and community interactions—draws in participants, reinforcing the site's utility and creating for competitors. Geocaching.com employs a freemium model, offering basic free access while reserving advanced features for subscribers at $39.99 per year (or $6.99 monthly for new users post-June 2023). benefits include attribute-based searches, offline lists, custom maps, detailed statistics like find milestones, and access to premium-only caches, which comprise a significant portion of listings. Additional engagement tools, such as souvenirs—digital collectibles earned via task completion—and monthly challenges via the Wheel of Challenges system, further incentivize participation and retention. In 2025, Groundspeak revamped its Treasures feature, introducing a new visual interface in September, puzzle-based collections exclusive to premium members, and streamlined prerequisites for earning items like hammers to unlock chests, aiming to deepen user investment in virtual collectibles. Revenue streams center on these subscriptions, supplemented by merchandise sales and partnerships, sustaining a staff of around 95 employees as of 2022. While this centralized structure has empirically enabled global scale—facilitating over 1.8 million annually and caches in 191 countries—critics highlight risks of dependency on data silos, which restrict exportability and , and opaque prioritization in search algorithms that may favor certain listings without transparent criteria. Such centralization, though enabling coordinated features like worldwide events, arguably limits decentralized innovation but has proven essential for the hobby's mainstream viability.

Alternative Sites and Data Ownership Issues

Several alternative geocaching platforms have emerged to provide options beyond Groundspeak's Geocaching.com, often emphasizing access, principles, or distinct verification processes. Opencaching, operating through a network of independent sites like Opencaching (opencaching.us), functions without memberships or paywalls, allowing users to list and find caches entirely for while supporting features such as GPX exports and access for third-party apps. This model aligns with an open-source ethos, fostering community-driven development and avoiding subscription barriers that Groundspeak imposes for advanced searches and downloads. Other platforms include TerraCaching.com, which requires find verification by independent reviewers to confirm logs, enhancing trust in reported discoveries, and Navicache.com, which maintains a smaller database focused on user-submitted caches with basic listing tools. GPSgames.org serves as a niche alternative, accommodating non-physical "locationless" and moving caches that Groundspeak largely discontinued, thus preserving variety in gameplay formats. Data ownership disputes center on Groundspeak's control over cache listings, which it treats as proprietary content under its , asserting over descriptions, coordinates, and associated media uploaded by users. This stance limits bulk data exports—such as capping pocket queries at 1,000 caches per file and imposing API rate limits like 500 trackable discoveries per day—to deter scraping for competing sites, prompting criticisms that it undermines users' rights to their own contributions. Proponents of argue that geocache information, derived from public coordinates and community efforts, should not be siloed, as restrictive policies hinder innovation and force reliance on a dominant platform that can alter rules unilaterally, such as by archiving non-compliant caches. The OpenCaching Network exemplifies pushback against these practices, promoting standardized APIs (like ) and full GPX availability to enable seamless across sites, which encourages competition and reduces risks by allowing users to migrate caches without loss of . While Groundspeak's approach has sustained a vast database of over 3 million active caches as of 2023, alternatives highlight benefits like lower and specialized features, potentially spurring broader adoption if improves. Empirical evidence from platform growth shows that free models like Opencaching sustain active communities— with thousands of caches listed—demonstrating that can compete without , though scale remains challenged by network effects favoring the .

References

  1. [1]
    the History of Geocaching
    Geocaching is a treasure hunting game where you use a GPS to hide and seek containers with other participants in the activity. Geocaching.com is the listing ...
  2. [2]
    Follow the guidelines - Geocaching
    Get permission from land managers · Create a comprehensive cache page · Choose an appropriate sized container · Don't put food or scented items in your cache.
  3. [3]
    What is Geocaching? – Official Blog
    Mar 5, 2018 · Geocaching is a real-world, outdoor adventure that is happening all the time, all around the world. To play, participants use the Geocaching app and/or a GPS ...
  4. [4]
    Updated Geocache Hiding Guidelines – Official Blog
    Sep 5, 2017 · Caches must be accessible · Caches cannot be buried – except with permission · Definition of container and logbook · Don't hide caches far from ...
  5. [5]
    Start here - Geocaching
    Caches won't require you to trespass. Leave the geocache area better than how you found it. Try not to disrupt local wildlife and pack any trash you see.
  6. [6]
    Fast Facts - Geocaching Newsroom
    There are more than 3.3 million active geocaches worldwide. · Geocaches are hidden in 191 different countries on all seven continents (even Antarctica)! · More ...
  7. [7]
    History of Letterboxing - Letter boxing on Dartmoor
    In 1854 a Chagford guide called James Perrott set up the first letterbox at Cranmere Pool on North Dartmoor, originally it was just a cairn (small pile of rocks ...
  8. [8]
    History of Letterboxing | Atlas Quest
    Letterboxing began in 1854 on Dartmoor with a bottle containing a calling card. It evolved to a tin box, then a logbook with a rubber stamp. It grew slowly ...
  9. [9]
    The (brief) history of orienteering
    Orienteering began in late 19th century Sweden, first used in 1886. It grew from military training, first public competition in Norway in 1897, and spread to ...<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    The Real Reason Selective Availability Was Turned Off
    Jul 1, 2000 · But today, the removal of SA has moved GPS from a +/- 100-meter navigation system to one providing all users with +/- 10 to 20 meters (32.8 to ...<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    May 3, 2000: Geocaching Gets Geeks Going in Great Outdoors
    May 3, 2011 · The stash, squirreled away by Dave Ulmer, an Oregon computer consultant and GPS enthusiast, was intended to test the accuracy of the global ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  12. [12]
    Episode 25: Jeremy Irish, Geocaching HQ co-founder – Official Blog
    Jeremy Irish launched Geocaching.com on September 2, 2000. He co-founded Geocaching HQ, along with Bryan Roth and Elias Alvord.
  13. [13]
    Celebrating 10 Years of Event Caches – Official Blog - Geocaching
    Mar 24, 2011 · Austin seems to have enough people interested in geocaching to pull this off.” The date was March 24, 2001. The name of the event was “Austin ...
  14. [14]
    Who originally created the no burying rule? - Geocaching Forums
    Jul 18, 2009 · Just was wondering who created the no burying rule. Have watched the youtube video with Dave Ulmer who planted the first Geocache and he ...
  15. [15]
    GC43 Europe's First (Traditional Cache) in Leinster ... - Geocaching
    The first geocache in Europe, placed on 3rd June 2000 - just one month after the demise of selective availability. When selective availability was turned off, ...Missing: 2001 | Show results with:2001
  16. [16]
    Milestone: Geocaching.com approaches 2M geocaches - GeekWire
    Feb 19, 2013 · Geocaching.com started with 75 geocaches in 2000 and reached 1 million in March of 2010. Groundspeak is marking the milestone with a countdown ...
  17. [17]
    Where's The Virtual Choice? - General geocaching topics
    Mar 4, 2006 · Virtuals no longer exist on geocaching.com, they have been moved to Waymarking.com. Those virtuals that existed when the switchover occured, ...Missing: approval | Show results with:approval<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Hide a cache - Geocaching
    In sensitive areas, the reviewer may ask for details of land manager permission to ensure they are aware of the Virtual Cache. ... Since 2006, all Locationless ...
  19. [19]
    Geocache Statistics: Is Geocaching Still Popular In 2023? - Positionly
    Dec 13, 2023 · October to November 2000 Groundspeak Inc., also known as Geocaching HQ, was founded by Jeremy Irish (also known as Elias Alvord) and Bryan Roth ...
  20. [20]
    Geocaching in 2023: A year in review – Official Blog
    Jan 8, 2024 · 66,996 active Adventures · 9,630 new Adventures created · 4,835,932 Adventures were completed · Top 5 countries with the most Adventures were:.
  21. [21]
    According to Google Trends, interest in Geocaching is the lowest it's ...
    Jan 24, 2017 · ... smartphone adoption is still new and exciting. In Canada and the US? I think the game has peaked in terms of popular awareness and adoption.
  22. [22]
    Geocaching celebrates 25 years of outdoor adventure in 2025
    Mar 12, 2025 · The worldwide geocaching community is marking the 25th anniversary by hosting more than 100 (and counting) large-scale events, including Block ...
  23. [23]
    New Souvenirs: International Geocaching Day 2025! – Official Blog
    Jul 1, 2025 · To celebrate 25 years of geocaching, there are two new souvenirs to earn for International Geocaching Day 2025!
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    Geocaching
    Shop Geocaching. The official online store of Geocaching HQ. Explore a wide variety of geocaching supplies, tools, trackables, and gear. Shop now. Get to Know ...Geocaching 101 · 20[1] · Geocaching Premium · Shop Geocaching
  26. [26]
    Five unwritten rules of geocaching you shouldn't break – Official Blog
    Nov 5, 2019 · 1. Leave no trace. It's important to be conscious of your surroundings when geocaching so we can preserve the world around us and the geocaching game board!
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
    Ratings for difficulty and terrain - Geocaching
    Every geocache has a difficulty (D) rating and a terrain (T) rating on a 5-star scale. It is known as the D/T rating.
  29. [29]
  30. [30]
    Geocaching Souvenirs - GPS Tracklog
    Oct 23, 2014 · Simply log a qualifying cache and the souvenir will automatically be awarded. For the location based ones, this means just logging a find in ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  31. [31]
    Cache Hider Checklist – Official Blog - Geocaching
    Feb 14, 2022 · Cache Hider Checklist · Choose a container. Ideally it should be as large as your hiding location can support. · Check your local land policies.
  32. [32]
    Examples Of Common Geocache Containers
    Classic geocache container: military suprlus metal ammunition cans. Waterproof and durable. Any military markings or references to ammo should be covered or ...Missing: weatherproof | Show results with:weatherproof
  33. [33]
    Waypoint Averaging - How do I...? - Geocaching Forums
    Feb 14, 2020 · I was told a good way, if not the best way, is to use Waypoint Averaging. So when I placed two caches recently I did that. Then on the cache ...Missing: precision | Show results with:precision
  34. [34]
    How to hide a geocache – Official Blog
    Sep 3, 2019 · How to hide a geocache · 1. Choose where you want to place your geocache · 2. Decide what and how you want to hide it · 3. Submit your geocache for ...
  35. [35]
    Hide your cache - Geocaching
    Get permission from the landowner or land manager before you hide a cache. Some areas are private property, or don't allow geocaching. The Regional Geocaching ...
  36. [36]
    5.3 GPS Error Sources | GEOG 160: Mapping our Changing World
    Multipath errors are particularly common in urban or woody environments, especially those with large valleys or mountainous terrain, and are one of the ...
  37. [37]
    how do i find a multi cache? - Geocaching Forums
    May 2, 2023 · Generally you show up at the icon on the map, and read the description (you really need to read these ones!) - it will tell what you need to do ...
  38. [38]
    Geocaching etiquette refresher: tips for cache finders – Official Blog
    Jul 11, 2022 · Follow these tips to keep the cache in good condition, show gratitude to owners, and model good caching for newbies.
  39. [39]
    What is GNSS multipath mitigation? - u-blox
    Sep 13, 2023 · GNSS multipath mitigation, also often called GPS multipath mitigation, is the process of minimizing or correcting multipath errors.
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Statistical Analysis of GNSS Multipath Errors in Urban Canyons
    Unlike previous approaches, this study analyzes the varia- tion of multipath pseudorange measurement errors with respect to urban canyon features.
  41. [41]
    Geocache Types
    Traditional Cache​​ This is the simplest form of a geocache. It consists of a container with a log sheet, and is located at the posted coordinates. Cache ...
  42. [42]
    Learn about cache types - Geocaching
    Learn about cache types. 2.1. Traditional Caches. 2.2. Multi-Caches. 2.3 ... Multi-Cache or Mystery Cache? It can be tricky to tell the difference between ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  43. [43]
    How many geocaches are there of each type - traditional, multistage ...
    Mar 13, 2019 · 3,103,177 total active caches. 2,428,699 active traditional caches. 428,613 active mystery caches. 159,187 active multi-caches. Edited March 13 ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
  44. [44]
    Geocaching Types Explained: Traditional, Multi, Virtual, EarthCache ...
    Dec 8, 2022 · Traditional geocaches are the most common type of geocache and are great for beginners. Multi-caches are a bit more challenging and are great for experienced ...
  45. [45]
    Learn about cache types - Geocaching
    All clues needed to solve the puzzle must be on the cache page, and the information to solve the puzzle must be publicly available.
  46. [46]
    How to solve Mystery Caches (also known as Puzzle Caches)
    Mar 21, 2018 · Some basic tricks to start filling your bag: Source code. Many times clues are hidden in the coding for a cache page. Local latitude and longitude.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  47. [47]
    Top Tips for Puzzle Caches – Official Blog - Geocaching
    Aug 12, 2014 · Puzzle caches, Mystery caches, or Unknown caches are a type of geocache for those who enjoy an extra challenge. They require geocachers to solve complicated ...By Dani Navarre · Do Puzzle Caches Leave You... · So Don Your Trenchcoat And...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  48. [48]
    Learn about cache types - Geocaching
    Virtual Caches. A Virtual Cache is about discovering a location rather than a container. The requirements for logging a Virtual Cache vary.
  49. [49]
    Learn about cache types - Geocaching
    Virtual Caches must be placed in locations where geocachers are allowed to enter. In sensitive areas, the reviewer may ask for details of land manager ...
  50. [50]
    2.4. Letterbox Hybrids - Hide a cache - Geocaching
    The only exceptions are Wherigo Caches, challenge caches, and bonus caches. Traditional + Stamp = Letterbox Hybrid. Multi Cache + Stamp = Letterbox Hybrid.Missing: earthcache | Show results with:earthcache
  51. [51]
    EarthCaches - Geocaching
    An EarthCache provides an earth science lesson through a visit to a unique geological feature. For examples and ideas, see our list of 11 Stunning EarthCaches.
  52. [52]
    EarthCache FAQs - Geological Society of America
    EarthCaches are in effect a type of virtual cache. They have no physical container or log book. However, EarthCaches are different from other virtual caches.
  53. [53]
    Am I the only one annoyed by how many puzzle caches there are?
    Aug 16, 2023 · I will take a puzzle cache over a traditional every day of the week. Different caches for different caching preference.How to get Better as Puzzle Caches? : r/geocaching - RedditHow do you learn to decipher the puzzle caches? : r/geocachingMore results from www.reddit.com
  54. [54]
    Celebrating 25 years of geocaching milestones! – Official Blog
    May 6, 2025 · November 3, 2000: Jeremy Irish, Elias Alvord, and Bryan Roth found the company now known as Geocaching HQ to support the game of geocaching.
  55. [55]
    Event Caches - Geocaching
    Mega-Events are large-scale geocaching events that are attended by 500+ geocachers. Mega-Events include planned activities and are usually held annually. Giga- ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  56. [56]
    Disabling cache during Mega-events - Geocaching Forums
    Jan 17, 2025 · If I owned a traditional cache that was within 100m of a mega event location, then I'd probably disable the listing and retrieve the cache for a ...Missing: overcrowding | Show results with:overcrowding
  57. [57]
    Learn about cache types - Geocaching
    Aug 20, 2025 · A challenge cache requires seekers to find an associated physical cache, and to find an additional set of geocaches as defined by the challenge owner.
  58. [58]
    Douglas County Challenge Cache - 500 - Geocaching
    Jan 27, 2020 · OK, so for the challenge: To qualify for this cache, you must have found 500 total caches (any type) within Douglas County, Colorado. Any cache ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  59. [59]
    Challenge cache criteria update - Geocaching HQ communications
    Aug 20, 2025 · If Event Caches are specified as challenge criteria, no additional criteria can be used. Examples: “Attend 10 Events” is generally publishable.
  60. [60]
    Adventure Lab Caches - General geocaching topics
    Jan 30, 2019 · "To be eligible, you must meet the following criteria: Finds: You must have found at least two lab caches. Ownership: You must have owned at ...
  61. [61]
    Learn about cache types - Geocaching
    Webcam Caches are a legacy cache type. You cannot submit new Webcam Cache pages for review, but you can find those that remain active and log them.
  62. [62]
    20 years of Project A.P.E. – Official Blog - Geocaching
    May 25, 2021 · The geocaching community learned of Project APE, a promotion sponsored by 20th Century Fox that aimed to generate interest for their summer blockbuster movie, ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  63. [63]
    Find “25” and celebrate the 25th anniversary with a ... - Geocaching
    Jan 21, 2025 · This Locationless Cache is available to log January 25, 2025 through December 31, 2025. Here are the logging requirements: Include one (1) photo ...Missing: webcam revival GCK25B
  64. [64]
    Welcome to Geocaching HQ's Visitor Center!
    Jul 22, 2004 · You do not need to book an appointment to sign the logbook and log the HQ cache, but you must book an appointment to enter the Visitor Center.
  65. [65]
  66. [66]
    eTrex 10 Geocaching Bundle - Garmin
    eTrex 10 retains the core functionality, rugged construction, affordability and long battery life that made eTrex the most dependable GPS device available.
  67. [67]
    GPS Selective Availability signal degradation discontinued May 1 ...
    May 1, 2000 · What do you know about GPS accuracy? GPS Selective Availability signal degradation was discontinued May 1, 2000! PRESS RELEASE FROM THE WHITE ...
  68. [68]
    Improving the Prediction of GNSS Satellite Visibility in Urban ...
    Signals from global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs) in urban areas suffer from serious multipath errors caused by building blockages and reflections. The ...Missing: geocaching | Show results with:geocaching
  69. [69]
    Averaging techniques for Handheld GPS - Geocaching Forums
    Mar 7, 2009 · This is why, in my experiment, I wrote down every change in readings while the unit was stationary (I also calcualated the average of the data).A simple method to improve position accuracy - Geocaching ForumsWAAS - GPS technology and devices - Geocaching ForumsMore results from forums.geocaching.comMissing: mitigating | Show results with:mitigating
  70. [70]
    5.4 Correcting GPS Errors | GEOG 260: Mapping our Changing World
    The WAAS satellite then broadcasts differentially-corrected signals at the same frequency as GPS signals. WAAS signals compensate for positioning errors ...
  71. [71]
    Electronic Compass - GPS technology and devices
    Jan 6, 2012 · In the early years of geocaching there was no such thing as a magenetic compass in a GPS and gachers were finding caches just fine. Garmin added ...Electronic compass - GPS technology and devicesHow to use a GPS for geocaching?More results from forums.geocaching.com
  72. [72]
    The History and Evolution of Geocaching - Globe Chaser
    The term “geocaching” was coined by Matt Stum on May 30, 2000, combining “geo” (meaning Earth) and “cache” (a hidden storage place).
  73. [73]
    The Best Handheld GPS of 2025 | Tested & Rated - Outdoor Gear Lab
    Rating 4.8 · Review by Chris McNamaraDevices like the eTrex SE are non-mapping devices that can be used in conjunction with the Garmin Explore app, which can then group marked waypoints, geocaches, ...
  74. [74]
    Geocaching® - Apps on Google Play
    Rating 4.6 (151,950) · Free · AndroidFind Geocaches on the Map: Use the app's map to locate hidden containers (geocaches) near your current location or plan adventures on your favorite hike or ...
  75. [75]
    Geocaching® on the App Store - Apple
    Rating 4.8 (62,051) · Free · iOSThis app walks you through the adventure of finding your first few geocaches. There are tips, hints, and instructions for geocaching as well as using the app.
  76. [76]
    c:geo – Geocaching for Android
    An open-source, full-featured, always ready-to-go Geocaching application. Free Download for Android. Google Play APK File F-Droid. Multiple Platforms.FAQ · Send2cgeo · User Guide · Support
  77. [77]
    c:geo - Apps on Google Play
    Rating 4.1 (72,101) · Free · Androidc:geo is an open source, full-featured, always ready-to-go unofficial client for geocaching.com and offers basic support for other geocaching platforms.
  78. [78]
    GPS - Geocaching
    Search for a cache on the map, toggle a geocache, and select the Download GPX button from the map preview to download the cache to your GPS or computer.
  79. [79]
    Groundspeak > Geocaching Software
    Even if you don't download to your GPS device you can use GPX files to help manage the geocaches you have found or plan to look for in the future. If your ...<|separator|>
  80. [80]
    WGS84 datum - GPS technology and devices - Geocaching Forums
    Aug 19, 2010 · Geocaching uses the WGS84 datum by default. We also use the format HDDD MM.MM, which is a standard for GPS receivers (like the eTrex). HDD means ...Datum Used In Geocaching.com - How do I...?Correct Map Datum Setting? - GPS technology and devicesMore results from forums.geocaching.com
  81. [81]
    Coordinate conversion - Geocaching Toolbox
    This tool converts coordinates from one datum to another datum. For example from WGS 1984 to Dutch grid or from UTM to Ordnance Survey Great Britain 1936.Missing: standard | Show results with:standard
  82. [82]
    New application to filter / sort the content of your GPX files
    Dec 19, 2012 · The basic idea is to allow you to use as many filter as you want on your GPX collection to find out the caches you want. This program is free.
  83. [83]
    Geocache Statistics: Is Geocaching Still Popular In 2025?
    Yes, geocaching is still popular in 2025 and it's actually growing. In just one day (February 29, 2024), there were 618,976 geocaches found worldwide. Not only ...What Is Geocaching? · Geocache Historial Timeline · Key Geocache Statistics
  84. [84]
    More Than 3 Million Geocaches Are Waiting to be Found
    Apr 28, 2025 · There are 3 million active geocaches and more than 6 million geocachers worldwide, according to geocaching.com. But, what is geocaching anyway?
  85. [85]
    Hide your cache - Geocaching
    Record coordinates. Choose any cache on your app; From the cache page, tap the compass icon; Wait until accuracy settles and record current coordinates.
  86. [86]
  87. [87]
    Managing thousands of GPX files - Geocaching Forums
    Apr 7, 2018 · I've just gotten into geocaching recently and am wondering how all of you manage your GPX files. I have a Garmin eTrex 30x and purchased the ...
  88. [88]
    Statistics of ALL Cachers - General geocaching topics
    Feb 27, 2011 · Other than ranking by # of caches found, the only way to get the statistics you mentioned is to do a query on Groundspeak's database. They do ...How Many Caches and How Many Cachers - Geocaching ForumsAverage ratio of DNFs to found caches - Geocaching ForumsMore results from forums.geocaching.comMissing: puzzle | Show results with:puzzle
  89. [89]
    Get your kids outside with geocaching – Official Blog
    Jul 21, 2020 · Whether you have kids, tweens, or teens, here's how to get started. Getting your kids outside with geocaching, broken down by age group: GeoKids ...Missing: demographics | Show results with:demographics
  90. [90]
    Women vs. Men - General geocaching topics
    Feb 17, 2012 · Based on most events in my area, I'd guesstimate that about 40% of geocachers are female. 59% are male. And 1% are other (dogs, mostly). Quote ...Missing: distribution | Show results with:distribution
  91. [91]
    [PDF] Geocaching - USDA Forest Service
    The current estimate of the percent of population of people in the United States of age 16 and older who participate in geochaching is 3 .5 percent (based on.Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  92. [92]
    Geocaching in 2024: A year in review – Official Blog
    Jan 7, 2025 · On average geocachers found 48 geocaches this year · 1,846,540 geocachers found at least one geocache · February 29, 2024 had the most finds of ...Missing: worldwide | Show results with:worldwide
  93. [93]
    Four low-impact principles to follow while geocaching – Official Blog
    Jan 23, 2023 · Four low-impact principles to follow while geocaching · 1. Know before you go · 2. Stay on the trail · 3. Practice your ABCs: Always Be CITO-ing · 4 ...
  94. [94]
    Geocachers Code Of Ethics - Geocaching Forums
    Nov 23, 2004 · When seeking a cache, know your limitations and be aware of your surroundings. Don't attempt anything beyond your abilities. A cache you own, or ...
  95. [95]
    Geocaching Trade Items: Things you should NEVER put in a cache
    Jul 18, 2021 · This include candies, gum, nuts and all other things that animals might want to get at. Besides, would you want your kid eating food they found ...
  96. [96]
    SWAG to leave in geocaches – Official Blog
    Dec 10, 2019 · Good SWAG to leave in geocaches includes keychains, small toys, trackables, and custom items. If you take something, leave something of equal ...Missing: avoid | Show results with:avoid
  97. [97]
    Cache In Trash Out - Geocaching
    Cache In Trash Out (CITO) is an environmental initiative supported by the geocaching community. Since 2002, CITO has helped preserve the natural beauty of ...Cache In Trash Out® (CITO ...What does CITO mean?The story of Cache In Trash ...6 steps to organize a CITO eventOfficial Blog
  98. [98]
    Was I overstepping my bounds? - Geocaching Forums
    Jul 15, 2009 · Geocaching must be largely self policing. There are caches that I will simply walk away from, as they make me uncomfortable (usually, the ...
  99. [99]
    How to get permission to place a new geocache – Official Blog
    Apr 22, 2022 · By submitting a cache page, you agree that you have all necessary permissions from the landowner or land manager to hide your geocache at that location.Missing: USFS | Show results with:USFS
  100. [100]
    Legal/land managers - Geocaching
    All local laws and land management policies apply. Get all necessary permissions from the landowner or land manager. Do not bury geocaches, either partially or ...Missing: EU | Show results with:EU
  101. [101]
    Getting Permission to Place a Geocache
    You must have permission to place a geocache on both private and public property. This is a requirement of the listing site and also the law.Missing: permissive access
  102. [102]
    Federal Lands that require NO permission. - Geocaching Forums
    Oct 13, 2006 · The US Forest Service allows geocaching in national parks but does not require permits. Unfortunately that's not true. Geocaches are not allowed in the ...
  103. [103]
    BLM Guidelines for Geocaching on public lands
    Even though geocaching appears to be an acceptable activity on BLM managed land, it is an activity that would only be welcome in appropriate locations. Policy/ ...
  104. [104]
    Park policies Geocaching - Environment and Heritage
    Jul 1, 2024 · The placement of a physical cache in a park requires written consent from the park authority (NPWS) under clause 13 of the National Parks and ...Missing: state | Show results with:state
  105. [105]
    [PDF] QPW/2015/1375 Geocaching on QPWS managed areas
    Local QPWS must be notified via email of cache details once it has been placed (refer Geocaching Activity Guidelines).Missing: regulations | Show results with:regulations
  106. [106]
    GAGB - Geocaching Code of Conduct
    Seek permission on all private property that's not generally open to public access. · Check if public land has a geocaching policy and respect existing policies.Missing: permissive | Show results with:permissive
  107. [107]
    Rules for geocaching in protected areas
    Jun 4, 2019 · Geocaches should not be buried in the ground and their placement must not damage the surrounding environment; Landowners or managers can report ...
  108. [108]
    (PDF) Geocaching in Austrian National Parks - ResearchGate
    This paper analyses the situation in Austrian national parks and discusses possible effects on conservation goals.
  109. [109]
    BLM seeks ban on geocaches in wilderness - The Spokesman-Review
    Apr 30, 2014 · The US Bureau of Land Management is trying to get geocaches removed from wilderness and environmentally sensitive areas in Central Oregon.<|control11|><|separator|>
  110. [110]
    australia wide policies - Geocaching.com Wiki - Confluence
    You must still obtain permission to place your geocache from the landowner or land manager,comply with all applicable laws, and follow the Geocaching Listing ...Missing: regulations | Show results with:regulations
  111. [111]
    [PDF] GPS-based Recreational Activities in National Park Areas
    Oct 1, 2009 · (It is important to note that the rules established for listing a geocache on the Geocache.com web site prohibit burying a cache or using ...
  112. [112]
    California - Geocaching.com Wiki - Confluence
    Caching is no longer allowed in Anza Borrego Desert State Park, and the Rangers have been actively removing caches in the park. Below is the former policy that ...
  113. [113]
    caches not welcome in Anza-Borrego Desert State Park
    Dec 3, 2010 · To all those who own caches in Anza-Borrego Desert State Park: Please immediately Temporarily Disable your caches. This is based on the direct ...
  114. [114]
    Geocaching Frequently Asked Questions - California State Parks
    Geocaching ("geo-cashing") is an entertaining adventure game for gps users. Participating in a cache hunt is a good way to take advantage of the wonderful ...
  115. [115]
  116. [116]
    Is a geocache "litter"? - Geocaching Forums
    Nov 13, 2007 · But I don't believe regulations against littering apply to placing geocaches or letterboxes. ... The various litter laws I have read do not apply ...Missing: enforcement trespass
  117. [117]
  118. [118]
    Bomb scare Wetherby over internet treasure hunt box
    Jul 1, 2011 · To avoid confusion and alarm when a cache is discovered accidentally, clearly label it as a "geocache" on the outside of the container. Yup, we ...<|separator|>
  119. [119]
    Cache In Trash Out – Page 2 – Official Blog - Geocaching
    Oct 1, 2018 · CITO events aim to improve the geocaching game board (Earth) by bringing people together to pick up trash, remove invasive species, restore greenspaces, or ...
  120. [120]
    [PDF] Environmental Impacts of Human Activity Associated With Geocaching
    Jun 2, 2010 · Several factors have been identified that affect changes in environment along trails. One prominent factor is trampling by hikers. Trampling is ...
  121. [121]
    Found an abandoned cache - now what? - General geocaching topics
    Apr 17, 2016 · Transferring previously archived caches to a new account is nice. Enforcing the removal of abandoned geocaches and not allowing them to become ...Missing: cleanups | Show results with:cleanups
  122. [122]
    [PDF] An Assessment of the Impacts of Geocaching on Natural Resources ...
    ABSTRACT. This report summarizes the results of a study conducted by the Minnesota Department of Natural. Resources – Division of Parks & Trails (MNDNR-PAT) ...Missing: notable incidents<|separator|>
  123. [123]
    Environmental Impacts of Human Activity Associated With Geocaching
    This paper begins with the development of geocaching through the advent of GPS and discusses past research involving recreational ecology and environmental ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
  124. [124]
    [PDF] Forest Service National Geocaching Policy
    Nationally recognize that geocaching should be prohibited in designated Wilderness Areas and. Wilderness Study Areas. It may also be desirable to promulgate ...
  125. [125]
    The perils of geocaching (September 14, 2005) - Palo Alto Online
    Sep 14, 2005 · Off-trail use opens a "Pandora's box of soil erosion," some land managers state. They believe degradation of an endangered species habitat may ...
  126. [126]
    (PDF) Mutual Impacts of Geocaching and Natural Environment
    Nov 3, 2016 · Rising popularity of geocaching is linked to increased risk of negative impacts on natural environment. Based on that, this paper intends to ...
  127. [127]
    Geocaching - Tread Lightly!
    The National Park Service (NPS), for example, has strict geocaching regulations. Obtain permission first before leaving a cache on NPS lands. (Where can I ...
  128. [128]
    Six tips for finding a geocache in an environmentally friendly way
    Mar 4, 2019 · 1. Come prepared. When planning a geocaching trip, make sure to read the geocache description carefully. · 2. Stay on track · 3. Bring garbage ...Missing: strategies | Show results with:strategies
  129. [129]
    The Role of Geocaching in Promoting Environmental Awareness
    Another challenge is the maintenance of geocaches. Abandoned or poorly maintained caches can become litter and negatively impact the environment. Geocaching ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  130. [130]
    Cache In Trash Out® (CITO) Announcement for 2024 - Geocaching
    Feb 13, 2024 · Since 2002, more than 675,000 geocachers logged attendances at over 37,000 CITO Events that helped improve the outdoors. Actions often speak ...Missing: removal | Show results with:removal
  131. [131]
    Geeky study: Yes, Geocaching can help you lose weight - GeekWire
    Jul 25, 2014 · They also walked on average 10 miles per month while geocaching, the study said. So, grab your smartphone and go try to find the nearest ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  132. [132]
    Texas A&M study transforms traditional perceptions of physical activity
    Jul 24, 2014 · ... miles per month while geocaching alone, walking approximately 1-½ miles on each geocaching trip and averaging 72 geocaching trips a year.Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  133. [133]
    New Texas A&M Study: Geocaching Improves Physical and Mental ...
    Nov 21, 2013 · Research showed that geocachers reported fewer days of poor physical and mental health compared to state level data.Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  134. [134]
    EarthCache program with GSA's Matt Dawson - Geocaching
    Mar 28, 2024 · It's actually, I suppose millions now, people have had earth science education experiences through this program. It also helps people have ...Missing: benefits | Show results with:benefits
  135. [135]
    [PDF] EarthCaching: An Educator's Guide - Geological Society of America
    Using existing EarthCache™ sites, through either actual site or online visits, can aid teachers in guiding students to valuable learning about Earth and its ...
  136. [136]
    EarthCaching: - NAGT
    EarthCaching can support standards and enhance learning in a variety of disciplines.
  137. [137]
    Geocachers: Benefits sought and environmental attitudes
    Seven benefit factors emerged related to geocaching: physical fitness, nature experiences, learning, stimulation, relaxation, autonomy, and socialization.Missing: mitigation strategies
  138. [138]
    Celebrate 25 years of geocaching – Official Blog
    Jan 14, 2025 · Celebrate not only 25 years of geocaching, but 25 years of community with geocoins, trackable tags, and collectibles to commemorate this milestone.Locationless cache · A new hiding theme per quarterMissing: webcam project revival GCK25B
  139. [139]
    Celebrate 25 years of geocaching at Community Celebration Events
    Feb 27, 2024 · Events may be hosted from January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025. The final date to submit the cache page of your Community Celebration Event is ...
  140. [140]
    Geocache your way to wellness – Official Blog
    Mar 28, 2022 · In fact, a 2014 study from Texas A&M University found that geocachers reported fewer days of poor mental and physical health than the general ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
  141. [141]
    Texas A&M Study Revels Health Benefits of Geocaching
    Jul 28, 2014 · Study participants reported walking on average 10 miles a month while geocaching. Study author Whitney Garney, M.P.H., says "GEAR ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  142. [142]
    The pandemic revives the world's largest treasure hunt | CBC News
    Oct 24, 2021 · Geocaching has been called the world's largest treasure hunt where people hide capsules of varying sizes in all kinds of locations around the world.
  143. [143]
    Using Geocaching to Promote Active Aging: Qualitative Study - PMC
    Jun 11, 2020 · Demographics of study participants. Demographics, Number of participants. Age (years). 60-70, 6. 71-80, 7. Above 80, 1. Gender. Male, 1. Female ...
  144. [144]
    Geometry and Geocaching Using GIS & GPS - Activity
    Nov 28, 2018 · Students take on the role of geographers and civil engineers and use a device enabled with the global positioning system (GPS) to locate geocache locations.
  145. [145]
    [PDF] Geocaching The 4-H Way - Purdue Extension
    Our science programs tackle important national and global issues such as climate change, workforce development, and technological innovation. To address ...Missing: STEM | Show results with:STEM
  146. [146]
    Geocaching Tourism Market Research Report 2033 - Dataintelo
    According to our latest research, the global geocaching tourism market size reached USD 1.32 billion in 2024, exhibiting a robust growth trajectory.
  147. [147]
    Fostering rural and agricultural tourism: exploring the potential of ...
    Mar 7, 2017 · An agriculturally focused geocache program could foster tourism, interest and educational opportunities about rural and agricultural areas, and ...
  148. [148]
    Exploring the attitudes towards and experiences of Geocaching ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · Findings suggest that geocaching is a feasible activity to promote physical activity, particularly among families. Further robust and larger ...
  149. [149]
    Extraordinary Number of Bogus Finds? - Geocaching Forums
    Aug 18, 2022 · Some of these logs are on caches that aren't even there, some 'finds' occur after a long string of DNFs by experienced cachers, and none include ...
  150. [150]
    Found It = Didn't Find It - Discussion thread. - Geocaching Forums
    Feb 23, 2012 · Certainly it is true that if a find logs appears to be suspicious, a cache owner can look in the phyiscal log book to see if a signature ...
  151. [151]
    High Cache Finds: Are They Real? - Geocaching Forums
    Dec 23, 2024 · What is the cache count where it becomes Too Many Finds, a suspicious number of caches? I've found 1822 caches. I know non-Geocachers who ...
  152. [152]
    Caches not published due to potential bias from reviewer
    Aug 2, 2021 · Geocaching HQ has asked the Reviewers not to permit text on cache listings that promotes this competing geolocational gaming activity. This ...Missing: debates | Show results with:debates
  153. [153]
    Bad Reviewers Take The Fun Out Of Geocaching.
    May 20, 2006 · In my case, the reviewer questioned the validity of my caches because I made several caches with similar sounding names and descriptions. Then ...Missing: bias debates
  154. [154]
    Rude And Arrogant Approvers/reviewers - General geocaching topics
    Apr 6, 2005 · Has anyone else had to deal with rude and arrogant approvers/reviewers of caches? I have emailed Groundspeak about the tone and abrasiveness ...Missing: bias debates
  155. [155]
    The Negative Side Of Geocaching - Geocaching Forums
    Mar 7, 2004 · Geocaching encourages more fuel consumption, and thus produces more pollution. Buying of cheap schwag may furthur the use of child labor in ...Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
  156. [156]
    Why is so much of the swag just bad? : r/geocaching - Reddit
    Feb 9, 2024 · The swag I take with me is mostly aimed at children, like toy animals or cars, stuff like that. They are always cheap, but clean and complete/not broken.What do you think the biggest issue is in the geocaching community?Swag etiquette : r/geocaching - RedditMore results from www.reddit.comMissing: ethics | Show results with:ethics
  157. [157]
    Geocache saturation. It is time for Groundspeak to act? - Reddit
    Dec 13, 2017 · My area is saturated by addicted owners who carry around sacksful of cheap containers and plunk them down everywhere. If a new park or trail ...It's time to change the cache saturation rules : r/geocaching - RedditWhy is there a required distance between caches? : r/geocachingMore results from www.reddit.com
  158. [158]
    Geocache Saturation, Is it possible that some areas are over ...
    Nov 21, 2021 · Is it possible that some areas are over saturated with geocaches? What do you think? I love caching and finding ANY cache, so for me there ...
  159. [159]
    Factors driving the decline in the publication of geocaches
    There were nearly 3,153,000 in November 2018 suggesting that the rate of growth in the number of active geocaches has slowed despite increased accessibility.Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
  160. [160]
    Caches Not Maintained - General geocaching topics
    Sep 29, 2021 · If caches are already flagged as needing maintenance, then use the "Cache should be archived" flag on your log. This will alert the reviewer and ...Missing: neglect | Show results with:neglect
  161. [161]
    Requiring caches to be maintained and auto archival if abandoned
    Jun 28, 2023 · So theoretically up to 74 caches could be archived if not immediately within the next 2 year cycle. In my area there are even more unknown ...
  162. [162]
    How Geocachers Are Killing Geocaching - • A Crock of Schmidt
    Dec 5, 2016 · Geocachers are getting lazy, with poor treasure quality like broken toys, dog poop bags, and uninspired items, ruining the experience.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  163. [163]
    All Hide, No Seek - Northeast - Geocaching Forums
    Dec 13, 2015 · A parking lot guardrail hide is 100% hide, 0% seek: You plug in the coords for the cache in your auto GPS, drive to the obvious location, and look for the hide.Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
  164. [164]
    Startup Business: Groundspeak and the Worldwide Game of ...
    Jun 9, 2017 · Founded in 2000 by Jeremy Irish, Bryan Roth and Elias Alvord, Groundspeak founders believe the world is a better place with geocaching.Missing: date | Show results with:date
  165. [165]
    Geocaching - Overview, News & Similar companies | ZoomInfo.com
    Founded in 2000, Groundspeak, Inc. creates the toolset for building location-based adventures in the real world using a unique combination of technology and ...
  166. [166]
    This June, we're updating our pricing for new subscribers
    Apr 18, 2023 · On June 6, 2023, we will increase the prices of Premium membership for new subscribers to $39.99 USD per year or $6.99 USD per month.
  167. [167]
    Premium vs. Basic membership features chart - Geocaching
    Create/delete offline Lists, Get started with Geocaching® app, Download geocaches to GPS device, GPS Customer Service, Other
  168. [168]
    Geocaching Premium
    Premium membership includes detailed geocaching statistics such as your best caching day, geocaching milestones, custom maps, challenges, and more. Follow your ...
  169. [169]
    Introducing Wheel of Challenges – Official Blog - Geocaching
    Mar 20, 2023 · Geocachers must complete specific geocaching challenges each month in order to earn souvenirs for Wheel of Challenges. This means that the tasks ...
  170. [170]
    Treasures has a new look! – Official Blog - Geocaching
    Sep 16, 2025 · With this update to Treasures, we are removing most prerequisites for collections. ... October 20, 2025. We asked you: What advice do you ...Missing: revamp | Show results with:revamp
  171. [171]
    the first puzzle Treasure collection and a new souvenir – Official Blog
    Oct 6, 2025 · A new Treasure collection is now available for Premium members, and it's a little different from previous collections—it's a puzzle!
  172. [172]
    No hiding from its popularity: At 20, Geocaching still seeks to turn ...
    still $30 a year since starting about 20 years ago. Geocaching HQ employs 95 ...
  173. [173]
    Get ready for Block Parties in 2025 – Official Blog - Geocaching
    Aug 20, 2024 · Currently, there are more than 40 confirmed Block Parties scheduled in 17 countries! Check out the list of published Block Parties in 2025.
  174. [174]
    Opencaching in North America
    Total geocaches. 3,057. Active geocaches. 1,882. Geocaches rated as excelent. 720. Active users. 1,283. Active GeoPaths. 3. Total Searches. 5,596. New geocaches.
  175. [175]
    OpenCaching North America Geocaching Blog – A general interest ...
    Our OpenCaching Network API (OKAPI) was down. This means c:geo and all OC compatible smartphone apps were down. Our cache maps were broken; our “statistics” ...
  176. [176]
    Other geocache sites? - Geocaching Forums
    Mar 24, 2009 · Terracahing.com and navicache.com seem to be the boggest two alternative geocaching sites, though I believe some regions have local listing sites as well.Missing: Opencaching | Show results with:Opencaching
  177. [177]
    gpsgames.org - OpenCaching North America Geocaching Blog
    As well as plug the fact that we still accept them on our website, as do fellow alternative Gecoaching websites Navicache.com, Terracaching.com and GPSgames.org ...
  178. [178]
    When is Groundspeak going to raise the gpx limit on pocket queries?
    Oct 24, 2019 · There is no excuse these days for them to only have a 1,000 gpx limit on pocket queries.Geocache saturation. It is time for Groundspeak to act? - RedditGroundspeak is KILLING geocaching for me.... - RedditMore results from www.reddit.comMissing: ownership issues
  179. [179]
    Geocaching API
    Users are limited to 500 trackable discoveries per 24 hours per API license (500 discovered logs per user/license combination). If a user has surpassed the ...
  180. [180]
    Alternatives to Geocaching.com - GPS Tracklog
    Jul 10, 2013 · We take a look at some of the alternative listing sites available for geocachers and some of the differences in terms of the features they offer.