Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

High Flux Isotope Reactor

The High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) is a pressurized, light-water-cooled and moderated nuclear research reactor located at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee, employing a beryllium-reflected flux-trap design fueled by highly enriched uranium to achieve peak thermal neutron fluxes exceeding 5 × 10¹⁵ neutrons per square centimeter per second in its central target position. Completed in 1965 and operating at a steady-state thermal power of 85 megawatts, HFIR provides the highest continuous neutron flux of any reactor-based source in the United States, enabling advanced applications in isotope production, materials irradiation, and neutron scattering experiments. Originally constructed to address the demand for transuranic isotopes such as californium-252, which are essential for industrial gauging, medical therapies, and sources, HFIR has evolved into a versatile facility supporting research through its 14 horizontal beam tubes and vertical experiment facilities. Its high economy has facilitated breakthroughs including the discovery of (element 117) via cold-source irradiation and contributions to Nobel Prize-winning studies. The reactor's operation has included periodic upgrades, such as the ongoing replacement to extend service life beyond initial projections, amid challenges like maintaining high with potential shifts to low-enriched uranium fuel.

History

Development and Construction (1960s)

The development of the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) originated from the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission's (AEC) imperative to enhance transuranium isotope production, spurred by the Soviet Union's 1958 disclosure of a flux trap reactor for transplutonium elements. In January 1958, the AEC evaluated its transuranium program, culminating in a November 24, 1958, recommendation to construct HFIR at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) employing a flux trap configuration to generate exceptionally high thermal neutron fluxes in a central target region. Preliminary design studies, informed by mid-1950s feasibility work at ORNL, produced a design report in March 1959, with formal authorization granted in July 1959. The reactor's core adopted an innovative annular fuel assembly encircling a reflector and central isotope irradiation zone, engineered for a of 2 megawatts per liter to yield milligrams of californium-252 from targets. ORNL Director Alvin Weinberg mandated inclusion of horizontal beam tubes during design to enable neutron scattering experiments alongside isotope production. ORNL's cost estimate of $10 million proved competitive against Argonne National Laboratory's $45 million projection, securing the project for ORNL. Construction initiated in fiscal year 1961, with preliminary site preparation in June 1961, and progressed without documented major setbacks to completion by early 1965. Final hydraulic and mechanical testing preceded fuel loading, achieving initial criticality on August 25, 1965. Low-power operations at 8.5 megawatts commenced in January 1966 for crew training, escalating to the full design power of 100 megawatts by September 1966.

Initial Operations and Early Missions

The High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) at achieved initial criticality on August 25, 1965, marking the start of low-power testing and calibration phases. Operations progressed to full power of 100 megawatts by early 1966, enabling the reactor's beryllium-reflected, flux-trap core design to generate peak exceeding 5 × 10¹⁵ per square centimeter per second in the flux trap region. Initial runs focused on verifying core performance, control rod worthiness, and safety parameters under controlled conditions, with fuel elements consisting of enriched to 93% loaded in curved plates around a central target position. Early missions prioritized the production of transuranic isotopes, particularly heavy elements like californium-252, curium-244, and americium-243, which were irradiated in target rods placed in the high-flux trap at the core's center. This capability addressed a national need for such isotopes, which have applications in neutron radiography, , and industrial gauging but are challenging to synthesize in sufficient quantities elsewhere due to required neutron exposures. By 1967, HFIR had begun routine cycles yielding gram quantities of californium-252, supporting U.S. Department of Energy programs for weapons-grade materials research and peaceful applications, with production rates far surpassing prior reactors like the Oak Ridge . In parallel, initial experimental facilities were commissioned for materials and neutron scattering studies, leveraging the reactor's eight radial beam tubes for early beamline experiments on . These operations established HFIR as a key asset for transplutonium element synthesis, with over 100 kg of processed in early targets to generate multiple curies of high-value isotopes per cycle, though outputs were limited by the nascent understanding of product buildup and target degradation. No major incidents occurred during this period, affirming the reactor's features like coefficients and robust containment.

Major Shutdowns, Repairs, and Upgrades (1980s–1990s)

In November 1986, the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) was shut down after surveillance specimens revealed that neutron irradiation had embrittled the more rapidly than anticipated, prompting extensive safety reviews by (ORNL) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). This 2.5-year outage involved detailed evaluations of vessel integrity, leading to modifications such as reducing primary coolant operating pressure and lowering core power from 100 MW to 85 MW to mitigate further embrittlement and extend operational life into the . Additional upgrades included an overhaul of the reactor structure for enhanced reliability and improvements in management practices to address operational oversight. The reactor restarted on April 18, 1989, initially at reduced power of 8.5 MW to allow crew retraining and verification of modified systems, with gradual ramp-up toward the new nominal 85 MW level. However, shortly after this restart, HFIR faced another shutdown lasting nine months due to concerns over procedural adherence and adequacy in safety protocols. During this period, oversight was transferred to the DOE Office of Nuclear Energy, culminating in approval for resumption by Secretary of Energy James Watkins in 1990. Full power operations at 85 MW resumed on May 18, 1990, marking the completion of these safety-focused repairs and upgrades, which prioritized vessel longevity while maintaining HFIR's capabilities for research and isotope production. These interventions ensured continued service without further major disruptions in the , though they reflected broader post-Chernobyl emphases on reactor safety analysis.

Post-2000 Operations and Recent Developments

Following its resumption of full-power operations at 85 megawatts in 1990 after extensive –1990s upgrades, the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) entered the post-2000 era with routine operational cycles typically lasting about 25 days each, enabling approximately seven cycles annually for scattering research and isotope production. In the early , HFIR underwent enhancements to its capabilities, including the of advanced systems that cooled s to temperatures nearly ten times colder than , facilitating ultra-cold experiments and improving resolution in condensed matter studies. A scheduled six-month shutdown in 2000 allowed for the replacement of the removable reflector segments and other core components as part of the HFIR Scientific Facilities Upgrade Project, which aimed to modernize scattering instruments with minimal additional downtime. HFIR experienced an unplanned shutdown in November 2018 due to a detected issue with a fuel assembly, leading to a nearly one-year outage that impacted approximately 600 experiments and 500 users reliant on its beams. The reactor restarted on October 29, 2019, following thorough inspections, repairs, and regulatory approvals, restoring its role as the ' highest-flux reactor-based . Operations have since continued reliably, with the reactor supporting materials testing under high , including of 3D-printed steel capsules qualified in July 2025 and the first 3D-printed rabbit capsule tested in January 2025 to accelerate advanced for applications. Recent developments emphasize longevity and enhanced performance, including the ongoing HFIR Beryllium Reflector Replacement project to address the aging permanent beryllium reflector—installed after the 1990s overhaul and now exceeding 20 years of service—ensuring sustained high-flux operations beyond current projections through at least 2040. Beamline upgrades, such as larger horizontal beam tubes, a new monochromator drum for the HB-1 instrument, and a redesigned HB-2 system, were implemented to boost experimental throughput and precision in neutron scattering. In September 2025, the U.S. Department of Energy announced funding for a collocated Radioisotope Processing Facility, the first new nuclear construction at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in over six decades, to expand HFIR's capacity for medical and industrial isotope production. These initiatives, alongside HFIR's 60th anniversary in August 2025, underscore its enduring centrality to neutron science amid planning for broader infrastructure sustainment.

Technical Design

Reactor Core Assembly and Fuel Elements


The reactor core assembly of the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) is housed within an 8-foot (2.44 m) diameter pressure vessel located 17 feet (5.18 m) below the pool surface, with the core mid-plane at 27.5 feet (8.38 m) depth. The core itself is cylindrical, measuring approximately 2 feet (0.61 m) in height and 15 inches (38.1 cm) in diameter, featuring a central 5-inch (12.7 cm) diameter flux trap hole for high-flux irradiation targets. It employs two concentric fuel elements surrounding the flux trap: an inner element with 171 curved involute-shaped fuel plates and an outer element with 369 such plates, designed to maintain constant coolant channel widths between plates.
Fuel plates consist of U₃O₈-Al cermet fuel meat, where uranium oxide is dispersed in an aluminum matrix, clad in aluminum alloy, with highly enriched uranium-235 (typically 93% enrichment) providing a total core loading of 9.4 kg of ²³⁵U. The fuel distribution is non-uniform to minimize radial power density variations, and the inner element incorporates boron-10 as a burnable poison to flatten the radial neutron flux profile. Each plate spans 24 inches (61 cm) axially, with the active fuel region covering 20 inches (51 cm). The assembly supports operation at 85 MW thermal power for approximately 23 days per cycle before refueling. Cooling is provided by light water flowing at 16,000 gallons per minute (1.01 m³/s) total, with 13,000 gpm (0.82 m³/s) directed through the fuel region, entering at 120°F (49°C) and exiting at 156°F (69°C) under a of about 110 . The core assembly integrates with reflectors and control elements, including shimming and safety plates, to manage reactivity and enhance economy.

Neutron Flux Generation and Beam Facilities

The High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) employs a flux-trap to achieve exceptionally high densities, featuring two concentric annular elements surrounding a central cylindrical region known as the flux trap, which is filled with light water. This configuration, operating at a steady-state thermal power of 85 megawatts, leverages as a reflector to direct neutrons inward toward the center, resulting in a peak of 2.5 × 10^{15} neutrons cm^{-2} s^{-1} within the flux trap. The light-water moderator slows fast neutrons produced by fission in the involute-shaped plates, while the reflector minimizes leakage and enhances flux uniformity in the peripheral regions. Neutron beam facilities at HFIR extract flux from the beryllium reflector via four radial horizontal beam tubes, each penetrating approximately 60 cm into the reflector to access thermal s for external experiments. These beams support a suite of scattering instruments, including triple-axis spectrometers and diffractometers, enabling studies in and . Additionally, a cold source, positioned adjacent to one beam tube, moderates s to lower energies (around 25 meV) for enhanced resolution in scattering applications, with cold s transported via curved supermirror guides to remote instrument halls. The reflector's fast and thermal profiles, peaking at about 10^{14} to 10^{15} n cm^{-2} s^{-1}, provide versatile beam qualities tailored to experimental demands.

In-Core Experimental Configurations

The High Flux Isotope Reactor's in-core experimental configurations primarily revolve around the central flux trap, a cylindrical region devoid of fuel elements that maximizes for purposes. This flux trap accommodates 31 vertical target positions, originally developed for transplutonium via target rods but adaptable for diverse experiments including materials and . These positions support static capsules compatible with the reactor's flow, with neutron fluxes reaching approximately 2.5 × 10¹⁵ n/cm²/s and fast fluxes around 1.2 × 10¹⁵ n/cm²/s in select locations such as Position 4. Two of these positions, and , are instrumented to enable real-time monitoring of experimental parameters during . Complementing the flux trap are six peripheral target positions located at the outer edge of the flux trap, optimized for experiments requiring elevated fast-neutron exposures due to their proximity to the surrounding fuel elements. These positions exhibit comparable fluxes of about 2.5 × 10¹⁵ n/cm²/s alongside high fast fluxes of 1.2 × 10¹⁵ n/cm²/s, making them suitable for production and materials damage studies, though with restrictions on neutron-absorbing materials (e.g., limited to 200 g aluminum or 35 g per capsule to minimize flux depression). Experiments in these configurations endure full reactor cycles, typically 23-25 days at 85 MW power, leveraging the reactor's reflector to enhance overall neutron economy. The hydraulic tube facility, positioned centrally within the flux trap (e.g., at B3), provides dynamic irradiation capabilities distinct from static targets, allowing samples to be inserted and extracted mid-cycle via "rabbit" capsules for short-duration exposures not exceeding cycle length. This setup supports applications like medical isotope production, with heat flux limits of 74,000 Btu/h-ft² and neutron fluxes mirroring those of the flux trap. Such flexibility enables precise control over fluence, critical for experiments sensitive to irradiation time, while maintaining compatibility with the reactor's high-flux environment. Overall, these in-core setups facilitate a broad spectrum of research, from transuranic element synthesis to advanced materials testing under extreme neutron bombardment.

Reflectors, Control Systems, and Safety Features

The High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) employs a reflector surrounding the core to enhance neutron economy by reflecting s back into the fissile region, thereby increasing the overall available for experiments and isotope production. The reflector is segmented into three parts: a permanent reflector (PB) in direct contact with the core, a semi-permanent reflector (SPB) that includes control rod access plugs and irradiation facilities, and a removable reflector (RB) for periodic and access. This configuration supports high steady-state fluxes exceeding 2.5 × 10^{15} n/cm²/s in the reflector region. beam tubes extend into the reflector to extract s for external beam experiments, optimizing utilization without direct core penetration. Ongoing efforts include redesigning and replacing segments of the reflector to mitigate from -induced swelling and cracking, with a major scheduled for 2028–2031 to sustain long-term performance. HFIR's control systems utilize two concentric poison-bearing cylinders positioned in an annular region between the outer element and the reflector. The inner cylinder, approximately 1 thick, serves for fine shimming and power regulation through axial movement, lacking a fast function. The outer element comprises four quadrant shim-safety plates, each with dedicated drives and spring-loaded mechanisms for rapid insertion during scrams, ensuring reactivity with neutron-absorbing materials such as oxide, , and aluminum in zoned configurations to minimize flux perturbations. These plates are withdrawn upward for startup and can achieve criticality with a narrow neutron window formed between the inner cylinder and safety plates. The system prioritizes operational continuity while incorporating pressure-equalizing holes in elements to balance flows. Safety features emphasize and reliability, featuring three channels operating on a 2-out-of-3 logic for reactor shutdowns, which mitigates risks of spurious while ensuring prompt response to abnormalities. Any single quadrant of the outer shim-safety plates or the inner cylinder can ly achieve shutdown, providing inherent diversity in control. The reactor vessel is submerged in a surrounding of demineralized water, offering and shielding against potential leaks or accidents. Additional safeguards include a backup shutdown system and rigorous monitoring of control plate performance to verify scram efficacy under operational transients. Light-water cooling and , combined with the flux-trap geometry, limit peak power densities and support stable operation at 85 MW thermal.

Operational Facilities and Capabilities

Horizontal and Vertical Beam Tubes

The High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) is equipped with four horizontal beam tubes—designated HB-1, HB-2, HB-3, and HB-4—that originate within the reflector surrounding the core and extend to external experimental stations. These tubes facilitate the extraction of s, primarily s but also s from specialized moderators, for use in neutron scattering instruments dedicated to condensed matter research, , and studies. Operating at power levels up to 85 MW, the beam tubes provide access to one of the highest steady-state fluxes available from a in the , enabling experiments that probe atomic-scale structures and dynamics in materials. HB-1 and HB-3 are positioned tangentially to , differing primarily in length, and serve spectrometers with featuring a 2.75-inch by 5.5-inch constructed from nickel-plated ; shutters incorporate and high-density for shielding. HB-2, aligned radially to directly view the elements, is the largest with a 6-inch by 10-inch enhanced by two inserts and a fast- filter in its , supported by additional shielding blocks. HB-4, also tangential, integrates a vacuum-sealed moderator cooled to 17 K, generating cold neutrons with wavelengths of 4 to 12 Å suitable for low-energy applications; its offers multiple apertures up to 1.61 inches by 4.33 inches, with cryogenic support integrated into the -shielded shutter. Upgrades to these tubes, including enlarged apertures and improved shutters, have enhanced delivery since the reactor's restart in following major refurbishments. While HFIR's primary extraction occurs via the horizontal tubes, vertical access for -related experiments is provided through in-core and reflector-based facilities rather than dedicated vertical beam tubes for external beaming. These include the hydraulic tube in the central flux trap, which allows real-time sample insertion and removal for short-duration irradiations under high flux conditions exceeding 2 × 10^{15} s per cm² per second, and two pneumatic "rabbit" tubes in the reflector for rapid . Additionally, two slant facility tubes at the reflector periphery support engineering experiments with angled access, complementing the horizontal s for in-vessel capabilities without direct external delivery.

Gamma Irradiation Facility

The HFIR Gamma Irradiation Facility utilizes spent fuel elements stored in the reactor pool to deliver controlled gamma radiation exposures to experimental samples, enabling studies of isolated from significant fluxes. Located within the HFIR building at , the facility employs a irradiation chamber with an internal of approximately 3.75 inches, capable of accommodating samples up to 25 inches in length, positioned in the cadmium-shielded post of fuel loading stations to minimize contamination. The chamber supports both uninstrumented configurations, sealed with a top and inert gas lines for basic , and instrumented setups featuring extensions and umbilicals for electrical cabling, gas supply, and of parameters such as and dose via thermocouples or dosimeters. es like or are maintained at about 15 psig to control the sample environment, with samples typically supported from the bottom or ; optional internal heater allow management. Operating temperatures vary from a minimum of around 100°F to over 500°F depending on fuel decay time, with higher rates achievable using recently discharged elements. Dose rates range from as low as 30 /h (approximately 3,000 /h) with highly decayed to peak values exceeding 1.8 × 10^8 /h at the chamber center using fresher spent assemblies, allowing customization based on the desired level and , which approximates a Maxwellian with an average of about 1 MeV. The facility's neutronic models characterize dose distributions as symmetrical along the chamber axis, facilitating precise total dose delivery, such as 40 MGy in under a month at high rates or billions of over shorter periods in specific experiments. Applications focus on materials testing under gamma-dominated radiation environments relevant to nuclear reactors, space systems, and harsh terrestrial conditions, including evaluations of radiation-hardened , optical fiber sensors, polymers, and nano-modified concretes for degradation mechanisms like embrittlement or dosimetry response. Access requires proposal submission to HFIR staff for design support and , prohibiting hazardous items such as explosives, high-pressure vessels exceeding 100 psig, or corrosives, with operations integrated into HFIR's cycle schedule but separate from neutron beam user programs.

Target and Experiment Positions

The High Flux Isotope Reactor's incorporates a central flux trap, a 12.7 cm diameter cylindrical void, housing thirty positions arranged in a configuration for high-flux . These positions primarily accommodate rods for transplutonium production, such as curium-244 and californium-252, but are adaptable for materials experiments and other capsules requiring peak fluxes exceeding 2.5 × 10^{15} neutrons per square centimeter per second. Six peripheral target positions encircle the outer radial edge of the trap, offering slightly lower but still intense fluxes for targeted , including fast exposures suitable for damage studies in materials. These positions enable precise placement based on requirements, with selections influenced by experiment volume, instrumentation needs, and duration. Vertical irradiation facilities extend into the beryllium reflector surrounding the core, providing numerous positions for experiments outside the highest flux zones, including six large vertical experiment facilities for bulkier assemblies and pneumatic "rabbit" tubes for rapid, short-duration activations. The hydraulic tube facility further supports dynamic insertion of instrumented experiments into reflector positions, facilitating real-time monitoring and adjustment during operations. Overall, these configurations maximize utilization of HFIR's 85 MW thermal power for diverse scientific objectives, with position assignments coordinated through the reactor's experiments lead to optimize neutron economy and safety.

Applications and Scientific Impact

Transuranic and Specialized Isotope Production

The High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) utilizes its compact core design and peak thermal exceeding 2.5 × 10^{15} neutrons/cm²/s in target irradiation positions to facilitate the of transuranic elements through sequential and processes on targets. Originally constructed in the mid-1960s with transplutonium isotope as its primary mission, HFIR enables the of heavy that are scarce or impossible to produce in significant quantities elsewhere due to the required sustained high-flux environment. These capabilities stem from in-core facilities such as the flux trap and pneumatic tubes, where targets are exposed for cycles lasting weeks to months, yielding milligram-scale outputs of elements beyond . Californium-252 (Cf-252), a key transuranic isotope with a half-life of 2.645 years, is produced at HFIR by irradiating berkelium-249 or -244 targets, followed by chemical separation at the adjacent Radiochemical Engineering Development Center (REDC). HFIR accounts for approximately 70% of global Cf-252 supply, with production campaigns validating yields through neutronics modeling and post-irradiation assays, maintaining capabilities even under low-enriched uranium fuel transitions planned for enhanced non-proliferation compliance. The reactor's design target of 1 gram per year has been exceeded in optimized runs, supporting applications in neutron radiography and reactor startups, though outputs remain limited by target fabrication and efficiencies. Heavier transplutonium elements like berkelium-249 and isotopes have also been generated in trace amounts via successive captures on or precursors, fulfilling early programmatic goals through 78 documented production campaigns at Oak Ridge. Plutonium-238 (Pu-238), essential for radioisotope thermoelectric generators in space missions, is manufactured by irradiating oxide targets in HFIR's core, with annual capacity for up to 6,800 grams of neptunium processed in batches irradiated for 3 weeks to 6 months. Production restarted in 2015 after a decades-long hiatus, contributing to U.S. Department of Energy goals of 1.5 kg/year combined with other reactors, including material recycled from prior targets to minimize waste. Sensitivity studies confirm flux variations impact yields by up to 10-15%, necessitating precise modeling for target placement. HFIR also produces specialized isotopes such as actinium-227 for targeted alpha therapy in , nickel-63 for betavoltaic power sources, selenium-75 for industrial gamma , and strontium-89 for palliative care in bone metastases, leveraging its versatile irradiation channels and post-processing infrastructure. These outputs, totaling several curies annually for certain radionuclides, rely on HFIR's steady-state operation at 85 MW, with seven 24-day cycles per year ensuring consistent supply despite the challenges of short-lived precursors and radiological handling.

Neutron Scattering and Condensed Matter Research

The High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) supports neutron scattering experiments that probe the atomic-scale , dynamics, and magnetic properties of condensed matter systems, leveraging its high steady-state of up to 5 × 10^{15} neutrons per cm² per second in the beryllium reflector region. These capabilities enable techniques such as for determination, inelastic scattering for and excitations, and for nanoscale features in materials like superconductors, magnets, and polymers. Operating at 85 megawatts thermal power since its restart in 1986, HFIR delivers both thermal neutrons (around 25 meV energy) from the core and cold neutrons (below 5 meV) moderated by a source installed in 2007, broadening access to low-energy phenomena critical for research. The facility attracts approximately 500 researchers annually for such studies, prioritizing empirical investigations into fundamental properties without reliance on interpretive biases in source reporting. HFIR's four horizontal beam tubes—HB-1, HB-2, HB-3, and HB-4—channel neutrons to dedicated guide halls housing up to 15 specialized instruments, with seven optimized for neutrons to enhance resolution in and diffuse experiments. Thermal beamlines like HB-1 and HB-3 support triple-axis spectrometers for precise and energy transfer measurements, while the HB-2 cold source feeds instruments for imaging and reflectometry, allowing in-situ studies under extreme conditions such as or temperature gradients mimicking nuclear environments. These setups, developed through iterative upgrades including supermirror neutron guides for minimal , facilitate quantitative data on lattice vibrations and spin correlations, as verified by direct measurements and cross-section validations rather than modeled assumptions. In condensed matter applications, HFIR has contributed to discoveries in , such as elucidating frustration effects in spin liquids via polarized neutron diffraction, and advancing battery electrode dynamics through quasi-elastic on lithium-ion intercalation processes. These experiments yield causal insights into electron-phonon coupling and phase transitions, supported by the reactor's ability to sustain long-duration runs for statistically robust datasets, outperforming pulsed sources in steady-state flux for certain low-Q regimes. Peer-reviewed outcomes from HFIR beam time, allocated via competitive proposals to the HFIR-SNS User Facility, underscore its role in materials synergies, where post- correlates neutron damage with microstructural evolution in alloys. Such research maintains focus on verifiable mechanisms, discounting unsubstantiated claims from less rigorous institutional narratives.

Materials Irradiation and Damage Studies

The High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) supports materials experiments to examine in alloys and composites destined for and reactors, accelerating microstructural changes and mechanical degradation that occur over decades in service. These studies utilize HFIR's elevated fast fluxes to induce displacements per (dpa) at rates far exceeding commercial power reactors, enabling efficient evaluation of embrittlement, swelling, and . Primary facilities for damage studies include the six peripheral target positions (PTPs), which deliver high fast fluxes for displacement damage, and the eight large removable (RB*) positions in the reflector, designed for materials with options for spectral modification to tailor production via (n,α) reactions. The hydraulic tube facility permits rapid sample insertion and retrieval for short-term exposures, while pneumatic capsules—available in finned, unfinned, and perforated variants—facilitate low-temperature irradiations through direct contact. Neutron fluxes vary by position: thermal fluxes peak at 2.3 × 10^{15} /cm²·s in the flux trap, but fast fluxes in PTPs and * drive damage rates of up to 9 dpa/year in optimized configurations, with cumulative doses reaching 50 dpa over 2–4 years of continuous operation at 85 MW. Experiments maintain sample temperatures from near-ambient (via perforated rabbits) to hundreds of degrees , controlled by capsule design and reactor at 49–69°C inlet-outlet. Standardized capsule platforms ensure flexibility in specimen geometry and , with pre- and post- analyses—including thermal modeling and as-built verification—quantifying dose uniformity and temperature profiles for accurate correlation to property changes like reduction. For example, HFIR irradiations of reduced-activation ferritic/martensitic F82H have revealed significant degradation in under fusion-simulating conditions of and transmutant / accumulation. These capabilities extend to advanced alloys, such as alumina-forming steels, tested for corrosion resistance post-irradiation, and pressure vessel steels evaluated for embrittlement, informing designs for light water reactors and beyond. Post-irradiation examinations in ORNL hot cells measure shifts in yield strength, , and microstructure, validating models for and helium embrittlement.

Neutron Activation Analysis Applications

Neutron activation analysis (NAA) at the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) utilizes the reactor's high thermal neutron flux to irradiate samples, inducing radioactivity in target elements for subsequent gamma-ray spectrometry to quantify elemental compositions with exceptional sensitivity. This non-destructive or minimally destructive method detects approximately 65 elements across major, minor, and trace concentrations, achieving limits from parts-per-million to parts-per-trillion levels, with sub-parts-per-billion precision for select analytes. HFIR's pneumatic tube (PT) systems enable rapid sample insertion: PT-1 delivers a thermal flux of 4 × 10¹⁴ neutrons cm⁻² s⁻¹ with 2.5-second rabbit transit times, while PT-2 provides 4 × 10¹³ neutrons cm⁻² s⁻¹ for slower irradiations; samples in 1.5 cm³ polyethylene or graphite capsules accommodate diverse matrices. Automated delayed-neutron counting at HFIR enhances detection, quantifying 20-30 picograms of ²³⁵U in five minutes, supporting applications requiring ultra-trace analysis. Irradiations occur during HFIR's operational cycles at 85 megawatts, with post-irradiation handling in hot cells for radiochemical separations, such as extraction. Access is available to and users via with ORNL staff, facilitating custom protocols for complex samples. HFIR NAA has advanced through multi-element profiling of bullet fragments and , enabling material sourcing and comparative matching with high specificity. In , it verifies purity in semiconductors and refractories like silica and , detecting impurities that impact performance. Environmental applications include mapping in remediation efforts, while support for the U.S. has informed regulatory assessments of contaminants in foods and pharmaceuticals. Additionally, nuclear forensics leverages HFIR's capabilities for isotopic signatures in safeguards and attribution studies.

Safety Record, Risks, and Controversies

Historical Incidents and Mitigation Efforts

In November 1986, surveillance tests revealed that the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) vessel was experiencing -induced embrittlement at a rate exceeding initial predictions, primarily due to fast leakage from the reflector surrounding the core. This discovery prompted an immediate shutdown to assess structural integrity and accumulation, marking the primary historical safety incident for the facility. The reactor remained offline from 1986 until April 1995, during which extensive analyses, including probabilistic risk assessments and material evaluations, identified contributions from high-flux operations and reflector configuration allowing unintended streaming to the walls. efforts implemented prior to restart included reducing maximum thermal power from 100 MW to 85 MW to limit fluence, repositioning or removing certain in-core experiments to minimize fast paths, and installing flux suppressors within the reflector to attenuate damaging radiation spectra. These modifications, validated through updated safety analyses, extended life while preserving core performance for isotope production and scattering. Post-restart, HFIR underwent further upgrades, including enhanced surveillance programs for vessel materials and procedural refinements informed by the embrittlement event, contributing to sustained operations without subsequent major disruptions. In 2007, a dedicated reliability and program was initiated to address emerging concerns over aging components, incorporating , component testing, and integration of tools to proactively mitigate potential failure modes across systems like control rods and cooling circuits. Ongoing efforts have focused on fuel qualification for low-enriched uranium conversion and reflector replacements, scheduled for 2028–2029, to further reduce risks and enhance long-term safety margins.

Operational Safety Performance and Metrics

The High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) has demonstrated consistent operational safety performance characterized by adherence to U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) standards and minimal unplanned disruptions. A 2017 DOE Enterprise Assessment of nuclear reactor facility operations at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) determined that HFIR is operated safely in accordance with DOE Orders such as 422.1 (Conduct of Operations) and 426.1 (Implementation of Worker Safety and Health Programs), with experienced operators maintaining informed control during startups and routine cycles. No unplanned reactor scrams requiring condition reports occurred in the year prior to the November 2016 review period. Key safety metrics include effective integration, where control technicians and physicists collaborate on experiment setups under work permits, ensuring controlled and . HFIR's operational reliability supports cycles of approximately 25 days at 85 MW , with seven cycles typically scheduled annually, reflecting high uptime between refuelings and maintenance. A single procedural deficiency was identified in the assessment—informal handling of a valve switch during Mode 1 operations—but overall compliance and enhancements, including a 2015 Nuclear Improvement Plan, were rated positively. Subsequent evaluations reinforce this performance, with a DOE independent assessment of the program at HFIR and associated facilities concluding that fire hazards analyses are well-integrated into basis documents, supporting robust . ORNL's broader worker initiatives, including a "" emphasizing learning from near-misses without punitive measures, have contributed to HFIR's alignment with laboratory-wide records of low incident rates, as evidenced by progress toward milestone achievements in . These metrics underscore HFIR's capacity for sustained, low- operations in production and .

Environmental and Regulatory Considerations

The High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) generates primarily in the form of , activated metal components, and low-level effluents such as short-lived like and isotopes released during operation. practices include volume reduction, segregation, and packaging for off-site shipment, as demonstrated in the 2000-2001 of HFIR cooling towers, which processed over 10,000 cubic yards of while meeting cost and schedule targets without reported environmental releases. HFIR's is directed to clay-lined ponds for settling and treatment prior to potential discharge, minimizing migration to surface waters like White Oak Creek. Environmental monitoring at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), where HFIR is located, encompasses radiological surveillance of air, water, and soil, with HFIR contributions integrated into annual reports showing compliance with federal limits and no exceedances attributable to reactor operations. Activation analysis methodologies have been developed specifically for characterizing HFIR-generated metal waste to ensure proper classification and disposal, supporting safe handling of neutron-damaged materials. Effluent trends for are tracked using isotope ratio plots to verify containment integrity and predict release behaviors, with data indicating controlled, short-lived emissions. Regulatory oversight for HFIR falls under the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), which enforces technical safety requirements, environmental protection protocols, and waste disposition standards rather than Nuclear Regulatory Commission licensing typical of commercial reactors. Operations require adherence to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for modifications, with documented compliance during restarts and upgrades, including matrix support for waste management. Spent fuel shipping containers, such as those for HFIR elements, undergo regulatory testing to certify compliance with DOE transportation standards, ensuring safe interim storage and potential dry storage pilots. Independent DOE assessments, including fire protection and emergency exercises, affirm HFIR's alignment with hazard mitigation and operational safety metrics.

Debates on Risks, Benefits, and Policy Implications

The High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) generates substantial benefits through its production of specialized isotopes critical for medical applications, such as actinium-227 used in targeted alpha therapy for cancer patients, and californium-252 employed in industrial gauging and medical brachytherapy. These outputs support over 500 users annually and enable domestic supply chains less vulnerable to foreign disruptions, as HFIR remains one of the few U.S. facilities capable of high-volume transuranic production. Proponents argue that the reactor's high steady-state neutron flux—up to 5 × 10^{15} neutrons per cm² per second—facilitates irreplaceable research in neutron scattering and materials irradiation, advancing fields like advanced nuclear fuels and condensed matter physics. Critics of continued operation emphasize risks from HFIR's 1965-era design, including radiation-induced embrittlement of the , which prompted a power from 100 MW to 85 MW in 1986 to mitigate fracture potential and extend service life. Beryllium reflector degradation, driven by helium gas accumulation from (producing swelling and reduced reflectivity), has caused unplanned outages, such as the 2018-2019 shutdown triggered by elevated reflector temperatures, disrupting approximately 600 experiments and highlighting vulnerabilities in aging components. Probabilistic risk assessments indicate a low core damage frequency (around 10^{-5} per reactor-year for internal events), but external hazards like seismic events require ongoing scrutiny, with no historical fuel failures or radiological releases beyond licensed limits. Policy debates center on whether to pursue through major upgrades—such as replacement projected for the early 2030s—or decommission in favor of new facilities, amid tensions between non-proliferation goals (converting from highly fuel) and preserving capabilities. A 2020 Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee report urged the Department of Energy () to initiate planning for refurbishment to sustain operations beyond 2040, citing HFIR's role in security and neutron leadership, though at estimated costs exceeding $1 billion for vessel and reflector replacements. Operation extensions balance empirical safety performance—zero Category 1 incidents since inception—against fiscal pressures and alternatives like accelerator-based production, which lack HFIR's flux intensity for certain transuranics. policy favors continued investment, as evidenced by ongoing reliability programs and replacement projects, to avoid capability gaps in national infrastructure.

References

  1. [1]
    High Flux Isotope Reactor Technical Parameters
    High Flux Isotope Reactor Technical Parameters. HFIR is a beryllium-reflected, light-water-cooled and -moderated, flux-trap type reactor that uses highly ...
  2. [2]
    HFIR - High Flux Isotope Reactor - Oak Ridge National Laboratory
    High Flux Isotope Reactor Operating at 85 MW, HFIR is the highest flux reactor-based source of neutrons for research in the United States, and it provides ...
  3. [3]
    High Flux Isotope Reactor | Neutron Science at ORNL
    High Flux Isotope Reactor. Completed in 1965 and operating at 85 megawatts, HFIR's steady-state neutron beam is the strongest reactor-based neutron source in ...HFIR Schedule · Reactor Overview · Reactor Core Assembly · Read more here
  4. [4]
    History of the High Flux Isotope Reactor | Neutron Science at ORNL
    The High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) was constructed in the mid-1960s to fulfill a need for the production of transuranic isotopes—heavy elements such as ...
  5. [5]
    7 Fast Facts About the High Flux Isotope Reactor at Oak Ridge ...
    Apr 17, 2018 · HFIR's cold-source capabilities were used in discovering element 117 in 2010. The element, officially named tennessine seven years later by the ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  6. [6]
    High Flux Isotope Reactor a fit for Nobel laureate's designer proteins
    just announced as a recipient of the Nobel Prize for Chemistry — turned to the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) at Oak ...
  7. [7]
    HFIR Pressure Vessel Replacement Project - ORNL Neutron Sciences
    The High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) is a versatile, high-performance nuclear research reactor that provides world-class scientific capabilities in several ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] HFIR pioneer Dick Cheverton recalls early years leading to ...
    “In 1958, the Russians revealed they were building a flux trap reactor for producing transplutonium isotopes,” said Dick, who possesses a long set of notes on ...Missing: 1960s | Show results with:1960s
  9. [9]
    [PDF] High Flux Isotope Reactor - OSTI.GOV
    constructed at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory with construction to start in fiscal year 1961. A preliminary design report was issued in March 1959 for ...
  10. [10]
    History of the High Flux Isotope Reactor | Neutron Science at ORNL
    The High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) was constructed in the mid-1960s to fulfill a need for the production of transuranic isotopes.
  11. [11]
    High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) - DOE Office of Science
    The High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR), at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, is a light-water cooled and moderated research reactor that began full-power operations ...Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Modeling and Simulations for the High Flux Isotope Reactor Cycle 400
    Mar 23, 2015 · The modeling and simulation (M&S) of the HFIR core has evolved over the years since design of the reactor started in the early 1960s, taking ...Missing: construction | Show results with:construction
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Neutronic ...
    This multipurpose reactor is mainly used for neutron scattering experiments and isotope production. It has two fuel elements made of involute-shaped fuel plates ...Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Volume 1: Introduction - HFIR Futures - INFO
    Since it began operating at full power in 1966, the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) has contributed unparalleled neutron science capabilities to research on ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] ORNL Review
    With the startup of the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) in. 1966, ORNL once ... aging High Flux Isotope Reactor operating at slightly reduced power to ...
  16. [16]
    A History of Neutron Scattering at ORNL
    Jun 13, 2018 · The High Flux Isotope Reactor achieved criticality in August 1965.
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Alternate Design Concepts for the High Flux Isotope Reactor using ...
    Mar 20, 2019 · After a long shutdown and modification made to the operating pressure of the primary coolant, the reactor was re-started in April 1989 and ...
  18. [18]
    Reactor Facilities | NIDC - National Isotope Development Center
    Operating at 85 MW, HFIR is one of the highest flux reactor-based sources of neutrons for condensed matter physics research in the United States, and it ...Missing: original | Show results with:original
  19. [19]
    [PDF] HFIR Scientific Facilities Upgrade Project - INIS-IAEA
    The U.S. Department of Energy's High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR), at Oak. Ridge, is undergoing a multiyear upgrade of its neutron scattering capabilities.
  20. [20]
  21. [21]
    About 600 experiments affected by HFIR shutdown - Oak Ridge Today
    Jan 13, 2020 · It was not the longest shutdown in HFIR history. HFIR was shut down for about 2.5 years for an evaluation from November 1986 to April 1989 ...
  22. [22]
    3D-printed steel capsules endure nuclear reactor testing | ORNL
    Jul 18, 2025 · HFIR provides one of the world's highest neutron flux environments, allowing researchers to test and qualify fuels and materials under ...
  23. [23]
    Oak Ridge National Laboratory Creates First 3-D Printed Rabbit ...
    Jan 15, 2025 · Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) designed, printed, and successfully tested a specimen capsule for use in its High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR).
  24. [24]
    HFIR Beryllium Reflector Replacement | Neutron Science at ORNL
    The beryllium reflector helps drive neutron production by reflecting stray neutrons back into the core as they are generated. After more than 20 years of ...
  25. [25]
    Scientific upgrades at the high flux isotope reactor at Oak Ridge ...
    Jan 14, 2025 · Funding for the first upgrade project was initiated in 1996 and all presently identified upgrade projects are expected to be completed by the ...
  26. [26]
    Investment in new facilities expands critical isotope supply chains
    Sep 30, 2025 · The Stable Isotope Production Facility, funded by DOE's Office of Isotope R&D and Production (DOE IRP) and completed in Spring 2025, uses a gas ...
  27. [27]
    Happy birthday, HFIR! - Oak Ridger
    Aug 22, 2025 · The $25M High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory is now a critical source of radioisotopes for the United States.
  28. [28]
    HFIR Celebrates 60 Years in August 2025 | Neutron Science at ORNL
    Completed in 1965 and operating at 85 megawatts, the High Flux Isotope Reactor's steady-state neutron beam is the strongest reactor-based neutron source in the ...Missing: 1960s | Show results with:1960s<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    High Flux Isotope Reactor Core Assembly | Neutron Science at ORNL
    The fuel region is composed of two concentric fuel elements. The inner element contains 171 fuel plates, and the outer element contains 369 fuel plates. The ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) - ORNL Neutron Sciences
    ... High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, with a fundamental focus on isotope research and production. Since it first went critical ...
  31. [31]
    Modeling and simulation of a High Flux Isotope Reactor ...
    The High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) is a versatile research reactor that is operated at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and serves a broad range of ...Missing: early | Show results with:early
  32. [32]
    Illustration of fuel plate profiles in HFIR fuel elements. - ResearchGate
    All fuel plates have an axial length of 24 in. (60.96 cm), with the active fuel region in the plate spanning 20 in. (50.8 cm) of this length.<|control11|><|separator|>
  33. [33]
    None
    ### Summary of Reactor Core Assembly, Fuel Design, and Fuel Elements from HFIR User Guide 2.0
  34. [34]
    Neutron Scattering Facilities at HFIR
    Neutron Sciences Directorate One Bethel Valley Rd Oak Ridge, TN 37831. Office Phone: 865-574-0558. User Office Phone: 865-574-4600. QUICK LINKS. Do Research ...
  35. [35]
    In-Vessel Irradiation Experiment Facilities at HFIR | Neutron Science ...
    Thirty-one target positions are provided in the flux trap. These positions were originally designed to be occupied by target rods used for the production of ...Peripheral Target Positions · Hydraulic Tube Facility · Small Vertical Experiment...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Reactor Performance Improvement Options to Sustain High Flux ...
    The improvement areas discussed herein include replacing the reactor pressure vessel, upgrading the neutron reflector, and ensuring that reactor performance is ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] 07-15-65 Report on High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) - NRC
    The HFIR reactor contains a number of novel features. The reactor core consists of a series of concentric annular regions surrounding a 5-inch diameter ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] A Computational Model of the High Flux Isotope Reactor for the ...
    The control elements of the HFIR contain small holes throughout to equalize pressures of the coolant material. These holes are not explicitly modeled in the ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] High Flux Isotope Reactor Technical Specifications - OSTI.gov
    DESIGN FEATURES. 5 . 1 REACTOR FUEL. 1. Applicability. This specification applies to the fuel elements used in the reactor core. 2. Objective. The objective ...
  40. [40]
    The High Flux Isotope Reactor's Horizontal Beam Tubes
    The HB-4 cold neutron source beam tube is situated tangential to the reactor core so that the tube points at reflector material and does not point directly at ...
  41. [41]
    Gamma Irradiation Facility at HFIR - ORNL Neutron Sciences
    The HFIR Gamma Irradiation Facility is an experimental facility designed to irradiate materials with gamma radiation from spent fuel elements.
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Vanderbilt University Gamma Irradiation of Nano-modified Concrete ...
    Aug 14, 2017 · Sanchez proposed using the. HFIR Gamma Irradiation Facility, which accommodates gamma dose rates up to 1.8E+08 Rad/hr. This facility is a ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Oak Ridge National Laboratory Initial Radiation of Nuclear Power ...
    This work was carried out using the instrumented gamma irradiation system that is part of the High Flux Isotope Reactor Gamma Irradiation Facility (HFIR GIF).
  44. [44]
    [PDF] ORNL/CP-94834 - INIS-IAEA
    The energy spectrum of the gamma radiation from the HFIR spent-fuel rods is. Maxwellian, with an average energy of ~1 MeV (Fig. 3). This is roughly similar to ...
  45. [45]
    Performing Experiments at HFIR | Neutron Science at ORNL
    The Research Reactors Division (RRD) has the responsibility to ensure that all experiments pose no unacceptable risks to the safety of the reactor or personnel ...
  46. [46]
    Testing of an Optical Fiber--Based Gamma Thermometer in the High ...
    Aug 1, 2023 · This report describes the design, thermal modeling, and gamma irradiation testing of an optical fiber–based gamma thermometer (OFBGT), ...<|separator|>
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Radiation Hardened Electronics for Terrestrial and Space Nuclear ...
    Furthermore, spent fuel cores from HFIR are stored for a decay period and used as a gamma irradiation facility. Gamma dose rates up to 1.8x108 Rad/hr can be ...
  48. [48]
    Neutron flux characterization of a peripheral target position in the ...
    The HFIR flux trap also accommodates the hydraulic tube (HT), which is a single tube that inserts into the bundle and exits the reactor through a special ...
  49. [49]
    Californium-252 production at the High Flux Isotope Reactor
    HFIR was designed with a compact and high-power-density core to promote neutron leakage into experiment regions, delivering unparalleled irradiation facility ...
  50. [50]
    High-resolution neutron spectrum regulation for promoting ...
    Jul 7, 2025 · The High-Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) is currently the primary facility for transuranic isotope production, accounting for 70% of the global 252 ...<|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Transuranic elements and the high‐flux isotope reactor
    A high‐flux isotope reactor, designed and built at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, will produce 1 g/yr of Cf252 and appreciable amounts of other transuranic ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Production of Cf-252 and other transplutonium isotopes at Oak ...
    Seaborg's vision of HFIR and REDC producing milligram quantities of berkelium, californium, and einsteinium has been fulfilled through 78 production ...
  53. [53]
    ORNL-produced plutonium-238 to help power Perseverance on Mars
    Jul 29, 2020 · Leftover neptunium is recycled to make more Pu-238. HFIR can irradiate up to 6,800 grams of neptunium per year in batches that stay in the ...
  54. [54]
    Full article: Plutonium-238 Production Program Results, Implications ...
    Apr 12, 2022 · Initial operations have begun at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) to produce 238Pu by irradiating 237Np in the High Flux Isotope Reactor ( ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Plutonium-238 Production Sensitivity and Validation Studies ...
    This paper presents the results from a series of 238Pu production sensitivity and validation studies, expanding on the research documented in previous work ...
  56. [56]
    HFIR: Leading the World in Isotopes and Science | ORNL
    For nearly six decades, the High Flux Isotope Reactor, or HFIR, at Oak Ridge National Laboratory has been one of the world's most powerful research reactors.Missing: achievements controversies
  57. [57]
    Upgrading scientific capabilities at the high-flux isotope reactor
    For neutron scattering, there are two major enhancements and several smaller ones. The first is the installation of a small, hydrogen cold neutron source in one ...
  58. [58]
    Broad Research in Condensed Matter | Neutron Science at ORNL
    Mar 26, 2014 · Neutron scattering provides unique and pivotal information about quantum materials and QCMD collaborates widely with researchers from the US and ...
  59. [59]
    The state of the art for neutron irradiation experiments from the ...
    This paper presents an expert-informed overview of irradiation experiment design at the High Flux Isotope Reactor. It addresses the nuclear materials research ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Neutron fluxes in test reactors - Idaho National Laboratory
    Jan 30, 2017 · ... damage rates reach about 9 displacements per atom (dpa)/year. When ... materials irradiation facilities of the High Flux Isotope ...
  61. [61]
    HFIR irradiation facilities improvements — Completion of the HIFI ...
    Damage levels up to ∼50 dpa can be achieved over 2–4 years in the highest power mixed spectrum reactors, and up to ∼100–150 dpa can be achieved over similar ...
  62. [62]
    Effects of HFIR neutron irradiation on fracture toughness properties ...
    Dec 15, 2020 · The harsh environment of a fusion reactor, such as neutron irradiation and He/H damage, can result in significant degradation of F82H fracture ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] Status Report on HFIR Irradiation of Optimized Alumina Forming Alloys
    Mar 2, 2024 · [11]. “High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) User Guide – A guide to in-vessel irradiations and experiments”, Revision 2.0, Oak Ridge National ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies<|separator|>
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Evaluation of HFIR (High Flux Isotope Reactor) pressure-vessel ...
    The design of the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) pressure vessel included consideration of radiation embrittlement, which enhances the chances of vessel ...
  65. [65]
    Neutron Activation Analysis at HFIR
    Neutron Activation Analysis (NAA) is an extremely sensitive technique used to determine the existence and quantities of major, minor and trace elements in a ...Missing: applications | Show results with:applications
  66. [66]
    [PDF] The Reliability and Risk Management Program at the High ... - TRTR
    ➢ The HFIR reliability improvement initiative began in 2007 due to these concerns. Page 3. 3 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy.
  67. [67]
    Report weighs prospects for aging High Flux Isotope Reactor
    Oct 5, 2020 · The report points to an opportunity to simultaneously replace its pressure vessel, implement upgrades, and convert it from the use of high-enriched uranium to ...
  68. [68]
    None
    ### Summary of Operational Safety Performance and Related Metrics for HFIR (April 2017 Assessment)
  69. [69]
    ORNL on track for record year for worker safety
    Jul 21, 2017 · Powers said enabling a "just culture" is the key to maintaining the safety record at HFIR. "We're a learning organization, so if you have a ...
  70. [70]
    Short-lived noble gas effluent trends from a research reactor
    Short-lived Xe and Kr isotopes were measured at the High Flux Isotope Reactor. •. Isotope activity ratio plots were used to understand the Xe and Kr behavior.
  71. [71]
    white oak creek radionuclide releases oak ridge reservation (us doe ...
    The HFIR ponds, built for storing wastewater from the HFIR and for providing further settling before treatment or discharge to surface waters, are clay-lined, ...
  72. [72]
    [PDF] TDEC 2013-Environmental-Monitoring-Report.
    Apr 15, 2014 · General areas of interest determine the substance of the reports: Air Quality, Biological, Drinking Water, Groundwater, Radiological, and ...
  73. [73]
    Development of an Activation Analysis Methodology to Support the ...
    Sep 27, 2021 · During operation and maintenance of the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR), metal waste from reactor components is generated.
  74. [74]
    [PDF] ORNL - Restart of the High Flux Isotope Reactor 2-07
    All environment compliance and waste management matrix support functions are identified for HFIR's operations. • Appropriate environmental protection/waste ...
  75. [75]
    [PDF] DOE Presentation for the HFIR Package -96 Amendment Request
    The Oak Ridge National. Laboratory HFIR shipping containers deliver the inner and outer fuel elements required for reactor isotope production and neutron.
  76. [76]
    [PDF] Independent Assessment of the Fire Protection Program at the Oak ...
    Three reviewed maintenance issues in HFIR Building 7900 demonstrated the appropriate use of ACTS to track and resolve ITM issues. Furthermore, review of a ...
  77. [77]
    [PDF] Independent Assessment of the 2024 Full-scale Emergency ...
    The HFIR technical planning basis is documented in ORNL/7900/EPHA, Emergency Planning Hazards. Assessment for the High Flux Isotope Reactor, Building 7900.
  78. [78]
    [PDF] Reactor Performance Improvement Options to Sustain High Flux ...
    2, the flux trap contains one hydraulic tube, six peripheral target positions, and thirty additional interior positions. The fuel assembly consists of the ...
  79. [79]
    Associate Laboratory Director Message: HFIR Outage
    Feb 14, 2019 · In November 2018, operators at HFIR manually shut the reactor down during a cycle and placed it in a safe condition in response to elevated ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  80. [80]
    [PDF] Identification and Quantification of Risk Scenarios for a Unique ...
    Oct 23, 2018 · An examination of the available 20 years of operating history, including the quarterly technical reports. • Review of the HFIR Accident Analysis ...<|separator|>
  81. [81]
    The use of PRA (Probabilistic Risk Assessment) in the management ...
    Dec 31, 1989 · The High Flux Isotope reactor (HFIR) is a high performance isotope production and research reactor which has been in operation at Oak Ridge ...Missing: concerns | Show results with:concerns
  82. [82]
    DOE Urged to Prepare for Oak Ridge Research Reactor Overhaul
    Oct 1, 2020 · To address this issue, the facility has since operated at 85 megawatts instead of its design power of 100 megawatts. Although the vessel is ...
  83. [83]
    [PDF] US Domestic High Performance Reactor Based Research Facility
    Neutrons are generated within a nuclear reactor, such as the High Flux Isotope Reactor. (HFIR) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory and the reac- tor at the NIST ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  84. [84]
    Production Review of Accelerator-Based Medical Isotopes - PMC
    ... isotopes. There are many advantages to using medical isotopes produced by accelerators: (1). Supervision is easier, and safety is improved [40];. (2). The ...
  85. [85]
    [PDF] Neutrino Science Opportunities at the High Flux Isotope Reactor
    Reactor Beryllium Reflector Replacement. – Reactor Beryllium Reflector currently at historic operational lifetime of 279 GWd. – Replacement of permanent Be ...