Josh Gottheimer
Joshua S. Gottheimer (born March 8, 1975) is an American attorney, author, and politician serving as the U.S. Representative for New Jersey's 5th congressional district since January 3, 2017.[1][2] A Democrat representing a competitive district encompassing parts of Bergen, Essex, Passaic, Morris, Sussex, and Warren counties, Gottheimer emphasizes bipartisan problem-solving, economic growth, and national security in his legislative agenda.[2][3] Gottheimer graduated from the University of Pennsylvania with a bachelor's degree and earned a Juris Doctor from Harvard Law School, funding his legal education through scholarships and part-time work.[4] Before entering elected office, he served as a speechwriter in the Clinton White House, advised presidential campaigns, and held senior roles in the private sector, including as managing director at Prudential Financial and director of Microsoft's Office of Public-Private Initiatives.[5][6] In Congress, he co-founded and co-chaired the Problem Solvers Caucus, a bipartisan group aimed at bridging partisan divides on fiscal and policy issues, and has prioritized legislation supporting first responders, veterans, infrastructure investment, and regulatory relief for businesses.[2][3] Gottheimer has also been a vocal advocate for strengthening U.S.-Israel relations and combating antisemitism, particularly in response to campus unrest and international events following October 7, 2023.[2]
Early life
Family and upbringing
Joshua Gottheimer was born on March 8, 1975, in North Caldwell, Essex County, New Jersey, to Ashkenazi Jewish parents.[7][8] His mother worked as a preschool teacher, while his father owned a small business that he initially started in the family's basement before expanding it in northern New Jersey.[2][9] Gottheimer was raised in North Caldwell, where he gained early exposure to entrepreneurship and hard work through assisting in his father's store during his youth.[2] This family environment instilled values of self-reliance and community involvement, as reflected in his later public statements crediting his parents for teaching him the importance of perseverance amid business uncertainties, including lean years for the family enterprise.[9] His upbringing in a modest, working-class household emphasized practical experience over formal privilege, shaping his approach to economic issues in subsequent roles.[10]Education
Gottheimer graduated from West Essex Senior High School in North Caldwell, New Jersey, in 1993.[1] He earned a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia in 1997.[1] Following his undergraduate studies, Gottheimer received a Thouron Fellowship, which enabled him to attend Pembroke College at the University of Oxford.[2] Gottheimer subsequently obtained a Juris Doctor from Harvard Law School in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 2004, funding his legal education through personal means without relying on scholarships or loans.[1][2]Pre-political career
Corporate and business roles
Prior to his political career, Gottheimer held several executive positions in the private sector focused on strategic communications, corporate strategy, and public affairs. Following the 2004 U.S. presidential election, he joined Ford Motor Company as Director of Strategic Communications, where he worked to rebuild the automaker's public image amid financial challenges and contributed to the promotion of its first American hybrid vehicle, the Ford Escape Hybrid.[2][11] In 2006, Gottheimer was appointed Executive Vice President Worldwide at Burson-Marsteller, a global public relations and communications consulting firm, and served as global chair of its issues and crisis practices.[11] In this role, which he held until 2010, he oversaw operations across more than 80 offices worldwide and advised multinational corporate clients on reputation management, crisis communications, and public affairs strategies.[12][13] From approximately 2012 until his 2015 congressional campaign, Gottheimer served as General Manager for Corporate Strategy at Microsoft Corporation, where he directed efforts to expand the company's presence in cloud computing, e-commerce, and related technologies.[2][5] These roles emphasized leveraging innovation and strategic planning to drive business growth and address competitive challenges in technology and automotive sectors.[9]Political speechwriting and advising
Gottheimer began his career in political speechwriting during the Clinton administration, joining the White House in 1998 at age 23 as a special assistant to the director of speechwriting.[14] [15] He contributed to presidential speeches addressing topics including the economy, education, foreign policy, and national security, serving until the end of Clinton's term in January 2001.[2] [12] Following his White House tenure, Gottheimer advised Hillary Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign, leveraging his prior experience in Democratic messaging and strategy.[16] This role built on his connections within the Clinton network, positioning him as a behind-the-scenes contributor to campaign communications amid a competitive primary contest against Barack Obama.[16]Entry into elective office
2016 congressional campaign
Josh Gottheimer, a former executive at Microsoft and speechwriter for President Bill Clinton, announced his candidacy for the Democratic nomination in New Jersey's 5th congressional district on February 23, 2016.[17] The district, encompassing affluent suburbs in Bergen, Passaic, and Sussex counties, had been held by Republican incumbent Scott Garrett since 2003, with Garrett winning re-election by margins exceeding 10 points in prior cycles. Gottheimer positioned himself as a moderate Democrat emphasizing bipartisanship, economic growth, tax relief, and infrastructure investment, drawing on his private-sector experience to appeal to the district's business-oriented voters. In the Democratic primary held on June 7, 2016, Gottheimer faced no opponents and secured the nomination automatically. His campaign received support from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee's Red to Blue program, which targets competitive Republican-held seats. Fundraising efforts proved robust, with Gottheimer raising over $3.8 million by October 2016, surpassing previous New Jersey House race benchmarks and enabling a significant advertising advantage over Garrett, who raised approximately $2.5 million for the cycle.[18] The general election campaign against Garrett was marked by intense negativity, including personal attacks on Garrett's record of opposing federal funding for programs supporting LGBT service members and his refusal to contribute to Republican leadership dues.[19] [20] The candidates participated in a single debate on October 31, 2016, where exchanges focused on economic policy, national security, and Garrett's conservative stances versus Gottheimer's calls for compromise across party lines.[21] Endorsements for Gottheimer included the National Association of Realtors, reflecting his pro-business platform, alongside local Democratic committees. On November 8, 2016, Gottheimer defeated Garrett, receiving 172,587 votes (51.1%) to Garrett's 157,690 (46.7%), with independent Claudio Belusic taking 7,424 votes (2.2%). The victory flipped the district from Republican control, providing a rare Democratic gain in a year when Donald Trump carried New Jersey by 3 points statewide, attributed to Gottheimer's appeal to moderate and independent voters alienated by Garrett's hardline positions.[19] [22] Garrett conceded the following day after initial reluctance.[23]Initial election and district representation
In the 2016 United States House of Representatives elections, Josh Gottheimer, a Democrat with no prior elected experience, defeated twelve-term Republican incumbent Scott Garrett to flip New Jersey's 5th congressional district. The general election occurred on November 8, 2016, with Gottheimer securing 169,884 votes (51 percent) against Garrett's 154,987 votes (47 percent), yielding a margin of 14,897 votes.[24][19] The victory marked a rare Democratic gain in a district that had been held by Republicans for decades, attributed in part to Gottheimer's centrist campaign emphasizing bipartisanship, economic issues, and criticism of Garrett's opposition to infrastructure funding and women's rights protections.[19] New Jersey's 5th congressional district spans northern portions of the state, including affluent suburbs in Bergen and Passaic counties as well as rural areas in Sussex County, stretching from urban edges near the George Washington Bridge eastward to the Delaware Water Gap. As of 2023, the district had a population of 773,000, a median age of 43.4 years, and a median household income of $131,132, reflecting its mix of high-income commuters, manufacturing hubs, and agricultural communities.[25][26] The area features competitive electoral dynamics, with a Cook Partisan Voting Index rating it as leaning Republican prior to 2016, though subsequent redistricting and demographic shifts have sustained its battleground status. Gottheimer was sworn into office on January 3, 2017, as part of the 115th Congress, becoming the first Democrat to represent the district since 1993. In his initial term, he prioritized constituent services and local infrastructure, co-founding the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus to advocate for compromise on fiscal policy and transportation funding relevant to the district's commuter-dependent economy. His early legislative efforts included pushing for Gateway Program rail improvements to alleviate congestion at key Hudson River crossings serving district residents.[27][19]
Congressional tenure
Re-elections and electoral performance
Gottheimer secured re-election to the U.S. House in New Jersey's 5th congressional district, a competitive area encompassing parts of Bergen, Passaic, Essex, Morris, Sussex, and Warren counties, in each cycle from 2018 to 2024. The district, which has shifted between Democratic and Republican presidential preferences in recent elections, has consistently favored Gottheimer due to his moderate positioning and focus on bipartisan issues, allowing him to outperform Democratic national vote shares in several cycles.[28]| Election Year | Opponent(s) | Gottheimer Vote % | Opponent Vote % | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | John McCann (R) | 56.2% | 42.5% | +13.7% |
| 2020 | Frank Pallotta (R) | 53.2% | 45.6% | +7.6% |
| 2022 | Frank Pallotta (R) | 54.7% | 44.3% | +10.4% |
| 2024 | Mary Jo Guinchard (R) | 54.6% | 43.3% | +11.3% |
Committee assignments and caucus involvement
Gottheimer has served on the House Committee on Financial Services since the 115th Congress, focusing on subcommittees related to capital markets, digital assets, financial technology, and artificial intelligence, including membership on the Task Force on Artificial Intelligence.[2] In the 118th Congress, he was appointed to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where he holds the position of Ranking Member of the National Intelligence Enterprise Subcommittee, overseeing aspects of U.S. intelligence operations and policy.[32][2] He also participates in the Joint Economic Committee during the 118th and 119th Congresses, contributing to analyses of economic policy and forecasts.[33] Gottheimer is actively involved in several bipartisan caucuses emphasizing pragmatic governance. He has co-chaired the Problem Solvers Caucus since February 2017, a group comprising equal numbers of Democrats and Republicans aimed at advancing compromise legislation on fiscal and economic issues, and currently serves as one of its vice chairs in the 119th Congress.[2][34] As co-chair of the bipartisan SALT Caucus, he advocates for reforming state and local tax deduction limits to benefit high-tax states like New Jersey.[2] He additionally co-chairs the Law Enforcement Caucus, promoting policies to support police funding and training.[2] Gottheimer holds membership in the House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee, influencing Democratic legislative priorities.[2]Key legislative initiatives and bipartisan efforts
Gottheimer serves as co-chair of the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus in the House of Representatives, which comprises 58 members evenly split between Democrats and Republicans and focuses on advancing cross-party legislation to address national challenges such as infrastructure, economic policy, and security.[35] The caucus has endorsed multiple Gottheimer-backed bills, including the Dignity Act for immigration reform on October 18, 2024, which aims to secure borders while providing pathways for legal workers, and the HOPE Act on December 4, 2024, to expand tax-advantaged health savings accounts.[36][37] Through this role, Gottheimer has emphasized pragmatic solutions over partisan divides, contributing to negotiations that bridged gaps in divided government.[38] A cornerstone of Gottheimer's bipartisan efforts was his involvement in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, signed into law by President Biden on November 15, 2021, which allocated $1.2 trillion for transportation, broadband, and resilience projects nationwide.[39] Gottheimer helped negotiate and pass the Senate-approved version in the House on November 5, 2021, by a vote of 228-206, securing specific provisions for New Jersey including funding for the Gateway rail tunnel replacement estimated at $16 billion. The law has since directed over $7 billion in investments to New Jersey for roads, bridges, and public transit, creating jobs and addressing aging infrastructure.[40] In financial regulation, Gottheimer led bipartisan pushes for consumer protections, including H.R. 6572, the Senior Financial Protection Act, which unanimously passed the House on September 18, 2024, to establish a federal task force combating scams targeting seniors and recovering an estimated $3.4 billion in annual losses.[41] He also co-sponsored legislation passed by the House on September 23, 2024, enabling victims of domestic financial abuse, including human trafficking survivors, to more easily repair credit histories distorted by abusers.[42] On law enforcement, Gottheimer introduced the bipartisan Invest to Protect Act (H.R. 2711) on April 8, 2025, authorizing $50 million annually in grants for small and midsize police departments with fewer than 175 officers to enhance training, retention, and equipment, building on prior versions that garnered Problem Solvers Caucus support.[43][44] The bill addresses recruitment challenges in under-resourced agencies, with endorsements from law enforcement groups highlighting its targeted federal aid.[45] Gottheimer has advocated for regulatory clarity in emerging technologies, co-sponsoring the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (FIT21, H.R. 4763), which passed the House on May 22, 2024, by a 279-136 vote with support from 71 Democrats, establishing a framework dividing oversight of digital assets between the SEC and CFTC to foster innovation while protecting investors from fraud.[46][47] The legislation clarifies commodity versus security classifications for cryptocurrencies, aiming to reduce regulatory uncertainty that has hindered U.S.-based development.[48] In national security, Gottheimer co-led bipartisan legislation introduced on April 14, 2025, to bolster maritime cooperation among the U.S., Israel, Greece, and Cyprus through joint training and information-sharing protocols, enhancing deterrence against regional threats.[49] These initiatives reflect Gottheimer's focus on alliance-building amid geopolitical tensions.Policy positions
Economic and fiscal policy
Gottheimer has positioned himself as a pro-business moderate emphasizing economic growth through infrastructure investment, tax relief, and regulatory clarity while advocating fiscal restraint to curb deficits and debt. As co-chair of the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus, he has led efforts on initiatives like the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which allocated $1.2 trillion for transportation, broadband, and resilience projects to stimulate job creation and long-term productivity.[50] He has also supported measures to counter economic threats from China, including funding for the CHIPS and Science Act to bolster domestic semiconductor manufacturing and reduce reliance on foreign supply chains.[51] These positions reflect his background in financial services and a focus on private-sector incentives to prevent offshoring and promote innovation.[52] On fiscal matters, Gottheimer has consistently opposed legislation that would significantly expand federal deficits without corresponding offsets or revenue measures. In 2017, he voted against a Republican budget resolution, arguing it would "blow up the deficit" and create market uncertainty through trillions in added debt.[53] Similarly, he criticized the Trump administration's budget proposals as an "assault" on families via cuts to essential programs while adding to the debt burden.[54] During negotiations over the Build Back Better framework in 2021, he joined centrist Democrats in expressing concerns over the $1.75 trillion social spending package's impact on national finances, pushing for fiscal offsets before expressing confidence in a negotiated version, though the bill ultimately stalled.[55] He has backed debt ceiling increases to avert default, as in 2023, but only alongside bipartisan commitments to smarter spending and waste reduction.[56] Regarding taxation, Gottheimer has advocated cutting rates for middle-class families and businesses to spur growth, including a 2017 bipartisan plan with Rep. Leonard Lance to preserve the state and local tax (SALT) deduction, reduce corporate rates, and close loopholes to lower the deficit by an estimated $1 trillion over a decade.[57] He has opposed broad tax hikes, arguing instead for "lower taxes, higher growth, and better, smarter government spending" over funding expanded programs through increased levies.[58] In trade policy intersecting with fiscal impacts, he has introduced the Tariff Impact Act requiring Congressional Budget Office analyses of proposed tariffs' economic effects, criticizing Trump-era measures as a "tax" raising consumer prices without sufficient justification or strategy.[59][60]Taxation and government spending
Gottheimer has consistently opposed tax increases on middle-class families and small businesses, advocating instead for relief measures such as restoring the full deductibility of state and local taxes (SALT). In multiple legislative efforts, including a 2025 bipartisan SALT Tax Cut Strategy, he has pushed to eliminate the $10,000 cap on SALT deductions imposed by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, arguing it results in double taxation for residents of high-tax states like New Jersey. He has also introduced bills to prevent excessive taxation on remote workers by multiple states and to provide temporary tax breaks for individuals relocating to New Jersey.[61][62][63] In early 2025, amid his exploratory bid for New Jersey governor, Gottheimer outlined a detailed tax cut plan projecting a nearly 15% reduction in property taxes through incentives for local governments to consolidate services and eliminate redundancies, alongside annual $500 rebates for renters and income tax cuts for families and seniors. He has framed tariffs proposed by President Trump as effective tax hikes that raise costs on essentials like groceries and utilities, introducing legislation in June 2025 to mitigate their impact on consumers. Gottheimer has sponsored tax credit expansions, such as a refundable credit for residential energy costs and up to $2,000 for youth sports expenses, aiming to offset household expenditures without broad rate hikes.[58][64][65] Regarding government spending, Gottheimer emphasizes efficiency and waste reduction to enable tax relief, proposing cuts to bureaucratic redundancies—even citing minor examples like state agency soda machines—in his 2025 fiscal plans, while pledging to maintain essential services. He has voted for continuing resolutions to fund government operations, including a 3.1% pay raise for military personnel and extensions of health programs, prioritizing stability over shutdowns. However, he has criticized Republican-led budget proposals for excessive cuts to entitlements, opposing a 2025 bill that would have reduced Medicaid funding affecting over 87,000 constituents in his district, which he described as abandoning vulnerable populations. Conservative scorecards, such as Heritage Action's 5% rating for the 118th Congress, reflect his resistance to stringent spending caps and debt limit reforms, indicating a preference for targeted efficiencies over broad austerity.[66][67][68][69]Labor relations and business regulation
Gottheimer has supported legislation enhancing labor protections and union rights. In March 2021, he voted in favor of the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act (H.R. 842), which passed the House 224-194 and aimed to strengthen workers' rights to organize and collectively bargain by amending the National Labor Relations Act, including penalties for employer interference.[70] He co-introduced the Tax Fairness for Workers Act to permit union members to deduct dues from taxable income, addressing tax code changes under the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that limited such deductions.[71] Additionally, Gottheimer backed the Public Service Freedom to Negotiate Act to guarantee collective bargaining rights for public service employees and the No Tax Breaks for Union Busting Act to deny corporate tax incentives for anti-union activities.[71] [72] He has engaged directly with labor groups, hosting roundtables with North Jersey leaders to advocate for job security, infrastructure funding, and protections during government shutdowns, while earning endorsements from unions including the New Jersey State Council of Machinists, State Firefighters Mutual Benevolent Association, and Operating Engineers.[73] [74] These efforts reflect support for measures like expanded paid family leave and fair taxation of union dues and public pensions.[72] On business regulation, Gottheimer has pursued bipartisan deregulation of outdated rules to reduce burdens on employers. In February 2017, he introduced the Regulatory Improvement Act, establishing an independent commission to review and recommend repeal of obsolete federal regulations, emphasizing economic growth without undermining essential protections.[75] He has diverged from Democratic leadership on certain regulatory votes, opposing bills like the REINS Act that would mandate congressional approval for major rules, arguing it politicizes scientific and expert-driven processes.[76] This approach aligns with his background in business, including roles at AOL and as a lobbyist, balancing labor advocacy with incentives for private-sector job creation.[77]Cryptocurrency and innovation
Gottheimer has supported bipartisan legislation aimed at establishing regulatory clarity for cryptocurrencies to foster innovation, protect consumers from scams, and encourage industry investment and job creation in the United States.[78] In May 2024, the House passed the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (FIT21), which Gottheimer backed to modernize digital asset regulation, enhance consumer protections, and maintain U.S. leadership in innovative financial technologies.[47] The bill delineates oversight between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) for digital assets, addressing ambiguities that have hindered market development.[46] In July 2025, Gottheimer co-led efforts for the passage of the GENIUS Act and CLARITY Act, marking the first major federal crypto legislation approved by Congress, focusing on stablecoin regulations and market structure to provide "rules of the road" while cracking down on illicit activities.[79][80] He argued that such measures would bring certainty to the marketplace and prevent the U.S. from lagging behind global competitors in cryptocurrency development.[81][82] Earlier, Gottheimer helped introduce the Stablecoin Transparency and Accountability for a Better Ledger Economy (STABLE) Act to impose transparency requirements on stablecoin issuers, balancing innovation with financial stability.[83] Beyond cryptocurrencies, Gottheimer has championed innovation in emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI). In June 2025, he introduced bipartisan legislation directing the National Security Agency to develop an AI security playbook to protect American AI advancements from foreign adversaries.[84] In July 2025, he co-led a bicameral bill to promote AI innovation within financial services, aiming to integrate advanced technologies while mitigating risks.[85] These efforts reflect his emphasis on regulatory frameworks that enable technological progress without stifling economic growth or national competitiveness.[86]Domestic social issues
Gottheimer supports expanded background checks for firearm purchases and other measures to reduce gun violence, including requirements for microstamping on firearms and raising the minimum age for gun ownership to 21.[87] He voted in favor of the Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2021, which mandates background checks for nearly all gun sales and transfers.[33] In 2022, he announced a strategy with Moms Demand Action to enhance school safety and combat gun violence through bipartisan legislation.[88] Gottheimer has opposed concealed carry reciprocity laws that would mandate states to honor out-of-state concealed carry permits and rallied against court rulings striking down New Jersey's AR-15 ban in 2024.[89][90] He also backs efforts to regulate "ghost guns" and ensure trafficked weapons are transferred to U.S. allies rather than adversaries.[91][92] On abortion, Gottheimer has introduced legislation to safeguard access to mifepristone, a medication used in medication abortions, in response to legal challenges in 2024.[93] He voted for the Women's Health Protection Act of 2022, aimed at codifying abortion access nationwide, and has criticized crisis pregnancy centers for misleading women on reproductive health options.[94][95] Gottheimer advocates protecting abortion access and in vitro fertilization (IVF) availability, stating in 2025 that he would work to ensure women in New Jersey can access such healthcare.[96] Gottheimer favors targeted immigration enforcement, including votes in 2025 to expand detention and deportation for immigrants accused of low-level offenses, aligning with Republican-led measures.[97] He has pushed for "commonsense immigration reform," including Department of Labor studies on work visas' impact on U.S. employment and resolutions encouraging federal action against sanctuary policies that hinder immigration enforcement.[98][99] Gottheimer has questioned the use of private immigration detention facilities like Delaney Hall, citing overcrowding concerns in 2025.[100] In health care, Gottheimer supports extending Affordable Care Act premium tax credits set to expire in 2025 to maintain affordability for families.[101] He has opposed budget proposals that would cut Medicare and Medicaid funding, arguing they threaten access to medications and hospital care for seniors and families.[102] Gottheimer advocates lowering prescription drug prices through transparency measures in Medicare and Medicaid and has been recognized for promoting patient access to treatments.[103][104] Gottheimer prioritizes infrastructure investments, particularly the Gateway rail tunnel project connecting New Jersey and New York, which he has defended against funding cuts proposed by the Trump administration in 2025.[40] He helped secure bipartisan funding for transportation upgrades via the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and proposes expanding bus services and transit repairs to boost affordability and job growth.[105][106]Firearms policy
Gottheimer supports federal restrictions on firearms ownership and sales, including expanded background checks for nearly all gun transfers and a ban on semiautomatic assault weapons.[107][108] He voted in favor of the Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2019 (H.R. 8) and 2021, which would require background checks for most private sales and transfers, as well as the Enhanced Background Checks Act in 2019 and 2021 to strengthen the existing system.[108] In July 2022, he voted yes on H.R. 1808, the Assault Weapons Ban of 2022, prohibiting the manufacture, sale, and possession of certain semiautomatic rifles and large-capacity magazines.[108][109] He has backed red flag laws and other preventive measures, voting yes on the Federal Extreme Risk Protection Order Act of 2021 (H.R. 2377), enabling temporary firearm removal from individuals deemed a risk, and the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act of 2022 (S. 2938), which funds state red flag programs, closes the "boyfriend loophole" for domestic abusers, and enhances checks for buyers under 21.[108] Gottheimer also supported the Protecting Our Kids Act (H.R. 7910) in June 2022, raising the age for purchasing semiautomatic rifles to 21 and funding school safety, and rallied for "commonsense gun safety measures" in August 2024 following a federal court's invalidation of New Jersey's AR-15 ban, describing the ruling as misguided.[108][90] Opposing expansions of gun rights, Gottheimer voted against the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017 (H.R. 38), which would have mandated states to honor other states' concealed carry permits, and the Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act of 2017 (H.R. 1181), aimed at limiting VA reporting of veterans to the background check system.[108] His positions have earned endorsements from gun safety organizations, including Giffords Law Center in 2018 for opposing the gun lobby and Everytown for Gun Safety in 2022.[89][110] He has advocated for bipartisan approaches, announcing a "Common Sense Strategy" in June 2022 to address gun violence through school safety and law enforcement support, and urging Republican cooperation on such bills in 2024.[88][111]Abortion and reproductive rights
Gottheimer supports abortion rights and has described himself as unequivocally committed to protecting women's reproductive healthcare access, opposing restrictions that interfere with medical decisions between patients and providers.[96] He has sponsored multiple bills aimed at preserving access to abortion medications and services, including the Protecting Personal, Private Medical Decisions Act introduced on April 9, 2024, which seeks to safeguard mifepristone availability amid legal challenges.[93] In May 2024, he advanced the Stop Anti-Abortion Disinformation Act, directing the Federal Trade Commission to regulate advertising by crisis pregnancy centers for potentially misleading information on abortion options.[95] In January 2024, Gottheimer urged colleagues to oppose federal funding for crisis pregnancy centers, arguing they provide deceptive counseling to pregnant women.[112] He voted for the Women's Health Protection Act in September 2022, which aimed to establish a statutory right to abortion services by prohibiting undue restrictions from states or providers.[94] Gottheimer has also advocated repealing the Hyde Amendment to remove federal restrictions on Medicaid funding for abortions, enabling coverage for low-income women beyond cases of rape, incest, or life endangerment.[113] Pro-life organizations, such as the Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, have criticized Gottheimer for consistently voting against measures to prohibit taxpayer funding of abortions and to require care for infants born alive after failed abortions, assigning him a 0% pro-life rating across multiple Congresses.[114] Following the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision, Gottheimer pledged to introduce comprehensive federal legislation codifying Roe v. Wade protections, but as of December 2024, no such bill had been filed despite his gubernatorial campaign emphasizing reproductive rights.[115] In 2025, he co-sponsored H. Res. 65, reaffirming support for medication abortion access and criticizing efforts to limit it.[116]Immigration and border security
Gottheimer has consistently supported bipartisan immigration reforms aimed at enhancing border security alongside legal immigration pathways. As a member of the Problem Solvers Caucus, he participated in the caucus's 2019 bipartisan visit to the U.S.-Mexico border, where members highlighted insufficient investments in border infrastructure, personnel, and processing capacity as root causes of systemic breakdowns, calling for comprehensive fixes rather than partisan blame.[117] The caucus, with Gottheimer's involvement as a key figure, endorsed the DIGNIDAD Act of 2023 in October 2024, a bill that proposes mandatory employment verification, expanded border barriers and technology, increased deportation capacity to 1 million annually, and pathways to legal status for certain long-term undocumented residents, framing it as a means to reduce illegal crossings by over 80% through enforcement and regularization.[36] In specific votes, Gottheimer has occasionally aligned with Republican-led measures on enforcement. On January 23, 2025, he voted in favor of H.R. 29, the Laken Riley Act, which mandates detention and expedited deportation for undocumented immigrants charged with theft-related offenses, breaking from most Democrats to prioritize public safety amid rising concerns over migrant-related crimes.[97] Earlier, in June 2018, he co-sponsored a resolution condemning the Trump administration's family separation policy at the border, arguing it undermined humanitarian standards without improving security outcomes.[118] However, his voting record shows opposition to numerous standalone Republican bills emphasizing unilateral enforcement, such as the Secure the Border Act equivalents and resolutions denouncing Biden-era policies, with "Nay" votes on over 20 such measures between 2023 and 2025, reflecting a preference for integrated reforms over isolated crackdowns.[119] Gottheimer has also critiqued operational failures in immigration detention, demanding in May 2025 that the Trump administration explain conditions at Delaney Hall, a private New Jersey facility used for immigrant detention, citing overcrowding and prior bipartisan concerns over for-profit operations.[100] In New Jersey, he has expressed support for the state's existing policies limiting local cooperation with federal civil immigration enforcement, aligning with moderate Democratic stances that balance sanctuary elements with criminal deportations.[120] These positions underscore his emphasis on pragmatic, evidence-based security enhancements—such as technology and personnel—over symbolic or extreme measures, informed by border site visits and caucus negotiations.Health care and pharmaceuticals
Gottheimer has advocated for extending enhanced premium tax credits under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to reduce health insurance costs for families, emphasizing bipartisan action to prevent premium increases following their scheduled expiration. On September 22, 2025, he rallied with local health care workers in New Jersey's Fifth District to demand this extension, warning that failure to act would result in "skyrocketing health care costs" for constituents.[101] He opposes repealing ACA mandates requiring health insurance coverage and has expressed opposition to nationalized health care systems.[121] As co-chair of the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus, Gottheimer has prioritized collaborative legislation addressing health care supply chains and affordability. In January 2022, he introduced the Medical and Health Stockpile Accountability Act to modernize data infrastructure for medical supplies, aiming to prevent shortages and inequitable distribution exposed during the COVID-19 pandemic.[122] He has also supported bills enhancing care for specific groups, including the POW Priority Care Act (introduced September 19, 2025, with Reps. Walberg and Krishnamoorthi) to prioritize former prisoners of war in VA health services, and a Family Caregiving Plan to provide financial relief for unpaid caregivers.[123][124] On pharmaceuticals, Gottheimer backed the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, which empowers Medicare to negotiate prices for select high-cost drugs, caps annual out-of-pocket prescription costs at $2,000 for Medicare beneficiaries, and limits monthly insulin costs to $35—benefiting approximately 5,700 residents in his district.[125] In June 2019, as part of the Problem Solvers Caucus, he joined Senators Collins and Manchin in urging bipartisan passage of measures to lower out-of-pocket drug costs, criticizing delays in addressing "far too many Americans" facing high expenses.[126] Critics from progressive outlets have accused him of moderating aggressive drug price reductions in earlier negotiations, noting pharmaceutical industry support for moderate Democrats opposing expansive Medicare negotiations, though his vote for the IRA contradicts claims of outright opposition to price controls.[127][128]Infrastructure and transportation
Gottheimer played a central role in negotiating and passing the Bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) in November 2021, which allocated $1.2 trillion overall, including $550 billion in new spending for transportation infrastructure such as roads, bridges, rail, and public transit.[39] The legislation provided specific funding for New Jersey projects, including repairs to aging NJ Transit systems, expansions of the Hudson-Bergen Light Rail, and initial investments in the Gateway Program to replace century-old Hudson River rail tunnels.[129] A key focus of Gottheimer's infrastructure advocacy has been the Gateway Program, a multi-billion-dollar initiative to build new rail tunnels under the Hudson River between New Jersey and New York, addressing capacity constraints and flood vulnerabilities exposed by Superstorm Sandy in 2012.[40] He secured dedicated funding for the project through the IIJA and has toured sites like Tonnelle Avenue to highlight progress, emphasizing its projected creation of thousands of jobs and prevention of daily economic losses exceeding $100 million from potential tunnel disruptions.[130][131] In response to threats from the incoming Trump administration in October 2025 to withhold or redirect federal funds from the Gateway Project, Gottheimer announced actions to safeguard the initiative, including requests to NJ Transit and Amtrak for detailed impact assessments of any funding interruptions on commuters and regional supply chains.[132] He publicly urged reversal of cancellation plans, arguing the project's completion by 2035 is essential for reliable transit serving over 200,000 daily riders and national freight movement.[133][134] Gottheimer introduced the All Aboard Act in August 2024, incorporating a Rail Passenger Bill of Rights to mandate refunds and transparency for delays on Amtrak and NJ Transit services, aiming to enhance accountability in public rail operations amid frequent disruptions.[135] This builds on his broader push for surface transportation reforms, including timelines for project approvals to accelerate investments in aging infrastructure.[136]Environmental and energy policy
Gottheimer has advocated for environmental protections emphasizing clean water, air, and open spaces, including a Green Action Plan to address lead contamination in schools and communities while preserving parks and watersheds in New Jersey's Highlands region.[137] He cosponsored legislation in 2021 to strengthen safeguards against pollution and support lead pipe replacement in North Jersey districts.[138] These efforts contributed to his receipt of a 97% environmental scorecard rating from the League of Conservation Voters for the 2023 congressional session, based on votes supporting measures like the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which allocated funds for clean energy transitions and greenhouse gas reductions.[139][140] Despite alignment with environmental advocacy groups on select issues, Gottheimer's record includes votes opposing certain regulatory expansions, such as those challenging federal authority over liquefied natural gas exports, oil and gas leasing reforms, and clean water rule enhancements, as tracked by the League of Conservation Voters.[141] The Sierra Club criticized him in 2021 for positions perceived as blocking comprehensive climate progress, urging stronger advancement of emissions reductions and renewable incentives.[142] Gottheimer has countered such critiques by framing his approach as pragmatic, prioritizing measurable outcomes like pollution abatement over expansive regulatory frameworks that could raise energy costs without verifiable environmental gains. On energy policy, Gottheimer promotes an "all-of-the-above" strategy integrating renewables, such as solar and wind, with domestic fossil fuel extraction to meet demand, enhance grid reliability, and curb utility price spikes, which rose 40% in New Jersey households between 2023 and 2024.[143][144] In April 2024, he introduced the Energy Costs Relief Act to deliver up to $350 in refundable tax credits to offset household energy expenses and bolster U.S. energy independence through expanded domestic production, including onshore oil resources.[145][146] He voted in favor of the Clean Economy Jobs and Innovation Act in 2020, providing grants for rural renewable energy projects, while opposing measures that overly restrict fossil fuel development in favor of costlier alternatives without proven scalability.[147] Gottheimer's energy independence focus ties to broader economic resilience, arguing that reliance on foreign supplies exacerbates price volatility; he has called for incentivizing electric vehicles, power grid upgrades, and alternative sources alongside traditional fuels to reduce emissions without compromising affordability or security.[140] This balanced stance reflects his moderate Democratic positioning, diverging from progressive demands for rapid fossil fuel phase-outs, as evidenced by his support for bipartisan bills protecting low-income heating assistance programs like LIHEAP amid staffing and funding shortfalls.[148]Climate change skepticism and adaptation
Gottheimer has publicly affirmed the existence of a climate crisis driven by human activity, stating in October 2021 that "We are in the middle of a major climate crisis. It's not something we can just ignore and hope will get better."[149] He has supported federal legislation aimed at both reducing greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing resilience to climate impacts, including cosponsoring the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law in 2021, which provided funding for coastal resiliency, ecosystem restoration, and flood mitigation projects.[149] In New Jersey, particularly vulnerable to sea-level rise and coastal flooding, Gottheimer has secured federal grants for adaptation measures. In July 2024, he announced $72 million in funding recovered from the federal government to prevent coastal flooding and bolster resilience against extreme weather along the state's shoreline. Additionally, in 2023, he helped obtain $4.7 million for climate-resilient infrastructure in towns including Englewood, Emerson, Leonia, and Ridgefield, focusing on flood prevention to mitigate damages from intensified storms.[150] Gottheimer's environmental record, as scored by the League of Conservation Voters, reflects strong support for adaptation alongside mitigation, earning scores of 100% in 2022 and 2023, and 97% in 2024, based on votes favoring clean energy investments and resilience-building initiatives like those in the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022.[140] While progressive groups such as the Sierra Club have criticized his occasional opposition to expansive spending in climate bills due to fiscal concerns, his positions prioritize bipartisan, infrastructure-focused adaptation to address localized risks without rejecting the underlying climate science.[142]Energy independence
Gottheimer has advocated for an "all-of-the-above" energy strategy emphasizing domestic production of oil and natural gas alongside renewables to achieve U.S. energy independence and reduce reliance on foreign suppliers.[151] In March 2022, he announced this plan, which calls for tapping federal lands for oil extraction, expediting permitting for domestic drilling, and partnering with U.S. energy producers to boost output amid rising global prices.[151] The approach aims to lower gasoline costs for consumers, with Gottheimer citing the need to avoid dependence on adversarial nations like Russia and Iran.[146] Following Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Gottheimer co-led bipartisan legislation, the Ban Russian Energy Imports Act, to prohibit U.S. imports of Russian oil, gas, and petroleum products while promoting increased domestic production to offset supply disruptions.[152] He argued that enhancing American output would shield families from geopolitical volatility and maintain energy security without inflating costs.[152] In 2025, Gottheimer co-sponsored H.R. 662, the Promoting Domestic Energy Production Act, which seeks to streamline federal leasing and permitting for oil and gas on public lands to accelerate output.[153] Gottheimer has criticized policies perceived as undermining domestic energy capabilities, including opposition to measures that could restrict fossil fuel development in favor of unproven alternatives, warning they threaten independence and affordability.[154] In an October 2022 op-ed, he urged resetting U.S. energy policy toward balanced production to stabilize prices, support manufacturing resurgence, and mitigate inflation risks from import dependence.[155] His positions reflect a pragmatic focus on empirical supply-demand dynamics, prioritizing verifiable increases in domestic reserves—U.S. crude production reached 13.3 million barrels per day in 2023 under such policies—over ideological constraints on hydrocarbon extraction.[151]Foreign policy and national security
Josh Gottheimer has emphasized robust national security measures, serving as Ranking Member of the National Security Agency and Cyber Subcommittee on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where he addresses threats from adversaries including China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea. He also holds positions on the Defense Intelligence and Overhead Architecture Subcommittee and the Subcommittee on National Security, Illicit Finance, and International Financial Institutions under the House Financial Services Committee. These roles inform his bipartisan push for enhanced cyber defenses, intelligence capabilities, and financial sanctions against illicit actors.[2] Gottheimer is a staunch supporter of Israel, condemning antisemitism and Hamas's October 7, 2023, attacks while advocating for Israel's right to eliminate terrorist threats and secure hostage releases. He has co-sponsored resolutions recognizing Israel as a key democratic ally and backed funding for systems like Iron Dome, alongside efforts to combat the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement. In response to Iranian attacks on Israel, Gottheimer has called for strategies to curb Tehran's regional expansion, including in Syria, and supported U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities as essential for Middle East peace. He opposes the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, arguing it failed to prevent weaponization, and leads bipartisan calls for zero uranium enrichment in any future agreement, alongside legislation like the Bunker Buster Act to equip Israel against underground threats.[156][157][2][158][159][160][161] Regarding China, Gottheimer prioritizes economic and technological decoupling to safeguard U.S. interests, authoring amendments to counter Beijing's influence and introducing bills like the No DeepSeek on Government Devices Act to prohibit Chinese AI apps on federal systems due to national security risks. He has urged action against CCP-linked firms such as TikTok and raised alarms over Chinese ownership in U.S. infrastructure like E-ZPass systems. On Ukraine, Gottheimer has been instrumental in bipartisan packages providing over $60 billion in security aid since 2022, including the 2024 supplemental appropriations, framing support as vital to deterring Russian aggression and upholding transatlantic alliances. His approach underscores a commitment to counterterrorism without compromise, targeting groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda across the Middle East.[162][163][164][165][166][167][168]Support for Israel and counterterrorism
Josh Gottheimer has consistently advocated for strong U.S. support for Israel, emphasizing its role as a democratic ally amid threats from terrorist organizations. Following the Hamas-led attacks on October 7, 2023, which killed approximately 1,200 Israelis and resulted in over 250 hostages taken, Gottheimer condemned the assault and demanded that Hamas unconditionally surrender and release all captives.[169] He co-sponsored H. Res. 771, which affirmed U.S. solidarity with Israel in defending against the "barbaric war launched by Hamas and other terrorists," and voted in favor of the resolution on October 25, 2023.[170] Gottheimer opposed efforts to condition U.S. military aid to Israel, arguing on November 18, 2023, that such measures would empower Hamas in its aim to destroy Israel and the Jewish people.[171] He supported the $26.38 billion Israel aid package passed by the House in April 2024, which included funding for Iron Dome replenishment and other defensive systems.[172] In June 2025, he praised Israel's strikes on Iranian targets, framing them as necessary responses to aggression from a state sponsor of terrorism.[173] Gottheimer co-led the first bipartisan House Intelligence Committee delegation to Israel since October 7, visiting the Kerem Shalom crossing and meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to discuss security cooperation.[174] His counterterrorism efforts align closely with bolstering Israel's security, as evidenced by bipartisan legislation he introduced or supported to disrupt terrorist financing. In November 2023, the House passed Gottheimer's bill imposing sanctions on foreign entities supporting Hamas or Palestinian Islamic Jihad, targeting their financial networks to prevent further attacks.[175] As a member of the House Homeland Security Committee's Intelligence and Counterterrorism Subcommittee, Gottheimer has advanced measures like the Eastern Mediterranean Counterterrorism & Maritime Security Partnership Act in September 2025, enhancing regional cooperation against threats including Iranian proxies.[176] He co-introduced a bill requiring social media platforms to disclose the presence of designated foreign terrorist organizations and combat online extremism financing.[177] Gottheimer's work extends to broader Middle East stability, including a 2024 trip to Jordan and Iraq where he discussed countering Iranian aggression and bolstering counterterrorism partnerships.[178] Through National Defense Authorization Act amendments, he secured provisions extending reporting on counterterrorism activities and prioritizing veteran involvement in these efforts.[179]Relations with China and economic decoupling
Gottheimer has prioritized countering Chinese Communist Party (CCP) influence in strategic technology sectors, advocating for selective decoupling to safeguard U.S. national security and innovation. In February 2025, he co-introduced the bipartisan "No DeepSeek on Government Devices Act" with Rep. Darin LaHood (R-IL), prohibiting federal agencies from using or downloading DeepSeek AI software due to its direct ties to CCP-linked entities and potential for espionage or data exfiltration.[163][180] The legislation targets risks from Chinese AI tools that could undermine American technological edge, reflecting Gottheimer's emphasis on restricting CCP access to U.S. systems rather than broad economic isolation. In June 2025, he joined bipartisan efforts to introduce measures defending U.S. AI innovation, directing the National Security Agency to develop security protocols against foreign adversaries like China.[84] His approach extends to combating CCP economic espionage, including support for the China Financial Threat Mitigation Act in February 2025, which aims to protect U.S. financial systems from Beijing's predatory practices.[181] Gottheimer has backed amendments, such as those passed in September 2024, to enhance public-private coordination against Chinese theft of intellectual property and to bolster U.S.-Taiwan ties amid Beijing's aggression.[182] In December 2024, the House approved his amendment to restrict China's sway over American education and research institutions, underscoring a focus on targeted restrictions in critical domains like academia and supply chains.[162] While supportive of security-driven decoupling in tech and intelligence, Gottheimer opposes indiscriminate tariffs that he argues inflate costs for U.S. consumers and disrupt domestic industries. In March 2025, he criticized proposed broad tariffs under President Trump as "reckless," warning they would exacerbate inflation without strategically pressuring China, and advocated for precision-targeted duties on adversaries like the CCP.[60] This stance echoes his 2019 efforts to secure tariff exclusions for New Jersey businesses hit by U.S.-China trade actions, prioritizing economic resilience alongside security.[183] In April 2025, he outlined a plan to curb executive overreach on tariffs, proposing congressional oversight to balance competition with China against unintended domestic harm.[184]Iran nuclear deal and sanctions
Gottheimer opposed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the 2015 Iran nuclear agreement negotiated under President Barack Obama, citing its failure to permanently block Iran's path to nuclear weapons, address its ballistic missile development, or curb its support for terrorism.[185] He argued that the deal's temporary restrictions on uranium enrichment and other nuclear activities provided Iran with sanctions relief and economic benefits exceeding $100 billion, enabling increased funding for proxy militias like Hezbollah and Hamas without verifiable constraints on non-nuclear threats.[185][186] Following President Donald Trump's withdrawal from the JCPOA on May 8, 2018, Gottheimer endorsed the "maximum pressure" campaign of reimposed sanctions, which targeted Iran's oil exports, reducing them from 2.5 million barrels per day in 2018 to under 300,000 by 2020 and constraining Tehran's terrorist financing.[158] He praised subsequent Treasury Department actions, such as sanctions on Iranian entities involved in petrochemical sales that generated over $10 billion annually for the regime's illicit activities.[187] Gottheimer has consistently opposed efforts to revive the JCPOA or negotiate similar agreements under President Joe Biden, leading bipartisan congressional letters in 2022—including one signed by 50 members urging consultation with Congress before any deal and another by 21 members demanding safeguards against Iran's uranium enrichment beyond civilian needs.[188][189] In June 2025, he co-led a letter with Rep. Don Bacon insisting on zero nuclear enrichment allowances for Iran in any future talks, emphasizing that partial deals reward Iran's non-compliance, which included exceeding JCPOA limits by stockpiling 60% enriched uranium sufficient for multiple bombs by 2022.[159][190] To enforce restrictions, Gottheimer has sponsored or cosponsored legislation strengthening sanctions, including the Solidify Iran Sanctions Act of 2023, which removes the sunset clause from the 1996 Iran Sanctions Act to impose permanent penalties on foreign firms investing over $20 million in Iran's energy sector, and the Enhanced Iran Sanctions Act of 2025, expanding measures against entities aiding Iran's weapons proliferation.[99][191] In September 2025, he introduced the bipartisan SEIZE Act to authorize U.S. partners to repurpose captured Iranian drones and missiles, such as those supplied to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, thereby disrupting Tehran's arms exports valued at billions.[192] He has also advocated for European allies to trigger JCPOA "snapback" sanctions, which could reinstate UN penalties lapsed in 2023, to counter Iran's ballistic missile tests violating UN Resolution 2231.[193]Ukraine aid and Russia
Gottheimer has consistently advocated for substantial U.S. military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine in response to Russia's invasion, emphasizing bipartisan support to counter Russian aggression. In May 2022, he backed H.R. 7691, the Additional Ukraine Supplemental Appropriations Act, which authorized $40 billion in emergency funding for Ukraine's defense and related U.S. security interests.[194][195] On April 20, 2024, as co-chair of the Problem Solvers Caucus, Gottheimer helped secure passage of a $95 billion national security supplemental package that included approximately $61 billion for Ukraine, providing weapons, intelligence sharing, and economic support to bolster its resistance against Russian forces.[166] He collaborated with Republican Representative Markwayne Mullin to advance this aid amid House Republican divisions, framing it as essential to deterring Russian expansionism and protecting U.S. national security.[196] In February 2024, Gottheimer joined Representative Jared Moskowitz in issuing a joint statement urging swift approval of a supplemental aid package for Ukraine alongside Israel and Taiwan, arguing that delays empowered adversaries like Russia.[197] Earlier that month, he led a group of 91 bipartisan House members in a letter to Speaker Mike Johnson, pressing for a floor vote on the Senate-passed national security supplemental to provide Ukraine with critical resources against Russia's ongoing offensive.[198] By November 2024, Gottheimer highlighted his leadership in bipartisan Ukraine aid efforts, stating they were vital for American interests and alliance commitments.[199] In the 119th Congress, he cosponsored H.R. 2913, the Ukraine Support Act of 2025, aimed at sustaining long-term assistance.[200] Gottheimer has also pushed for intensified economic measures against Russia, focusing on its energy sector to undermine war funding. In March 2022, he cosponsored bipartisan legislation to prohibit U.S. imports of Russian crude oil, petroleum products, and natural gas, which passed the House as part of broader efforts to isolate Russia's economy following the February invasion.[201] In July 2025, he co-led the introduction of the PEACE Act with Representative Zach Nunn, authorizing sanctions on foreign financial institutions facilitating Russia's energy exports, with Gottheimer asserting that such measures were necessary to starve Vladimir Putin's war machine without relying on diplomatic overtures alone.[202] He further supported H.R. 2548, the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025, which imposes penalties on entities aiding Russian military or malign activities.[203] These actions align with Gottheimer's broader foreign policy stance viewing Russia as part of an "axis of evil" alongside China and Iran, warranting aggressive deterrence through sanctions and allied support.[99]Syria and Middle East stability
Gottheimer has advocated for measures to counter Iranian influence in Syria as part of broader efforts to curb Tehran's regional expansion. In 2023, he supported legislation directing the President to develop and report to Congress a strategy preventing Iran from increasing its power in Syria, Iraq, and Lebanon, emphasizing the need to address Iran-affiliated forces operating there.[99] He has condemned Iranian-backed militias in Syria for repeatedly targeting U.S. troops, linking these attacks to Iran's proxy network that includes groups in Iraq and Syria.[204] In response to post-Assad instability, Gottheimer monitored developments in southern Syria and condemned violence against the Druze community there on July 16, 2025, highlighting risks to minorities amid ongoing regional tensions.[205] He has also criticized Turkey's role in complicating humanitarian exits, as in the December 2024 case of New Jersey resident Besher Cabbad, a dual U.S.-Syrian citizen blocked from leaving Syria despite repeated U.S. requests, with Gottheimer accusing Turkish officials of inconsistent cooperation.[206][207] These actions reflect his focus on protecting U.S. interests and allies near Syria's borders, including Israel. Gottheimer views countering Iranian proxies and promoting alliances as key to Middle East stability. Following bipartisan intelligence trips to Jordan and Iraq in September 2025, he emphasized strengthening ties with regional partners to advance shared goals of peace and counterterrorism, arguing that such stability bolsters U.S. national security.[178] He praised the 2020 Israel-UAE normalization agreement as a step toward regional peace, extending this logic to efforts against destabilizing actors like Iran, whose activities in Syria he sees as undermining broader equilibrium.[208] In August 2025, he reiterated that fostering Middle East stability directly enhances American security interests.[209]Governance and institutional reform
Gottheimer has advocated for measures to prevent government shutdowns, cosponsoring the Government Shutdown Prevention Act of 2025, which aims to establish automatic funding mechanisms during fiscal impasses.[210] He voted for bipartisan continuing resolutions to avert shutdowns, such as the 2023 measure funding operations until November 17 that passed 331-91.[211] [76] In October 2025, amid ongoing shutdown risks, Gottheimer collaborated with Republican colleagues like Tom Kean Jr. to seek compromise solutions, emphasizing practical governance over partisan standoffs.[212] As co-chair of the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus since at least 2023, Gottheimer has prioritized institutional reforms promoting cross-party collaboration, delivering priority agendas to President Biden in 2021 and endorsing investigations into events like the January 6 Capitol attack.[213] [214] The caucus, under his leadership with Brian Fitzpatrick, has pushed fiscally responsible legislation on issues like healthcare stabilization and border security frameworks, though its influence has waned amid House partisanship by 2024.[215] [216] Gottheimer hailed the 2018 passage of the Comprehensive Regulatory Review Act, which he cosponsored to streamline federal oversight and reduce bureaucratic burdens on small businesses.[217] On congressional ethics, Gottheimer cosponsored the bipartisan Trust in Congress Act in February 2022 to prohibit members and their families from trading individual stocks, arguing in January 2022 that lawmakers should not be directly involved in such activities due to conflicts of interest.[218] [219] Despite this, financial disclosures show he executed numerous stock trades post-2015 entry to Congress, including Nvidia and Microsoft sales in early 2025, and violated the STOCK Act's disclosure requirements in August 2022 alongside other Democrats.[220] [221] He and Rep. Tom Kean Jr. pledged blind trusts in 2022-2023 but had not implemented them by October 2024.[222]Congressional stock trading and ethics
Josh Gottheimer has advocated for restrictions on congressional stock trading while engaging in extensive personal trading activity himself. In February 2022, he cosponsored the bipartisan "Trust in Congress Act," introduced by Rep. Abigail Spanberger, which aimed to prohibit members of Congress, their spouses, and dependent children from owning or trading individual stocks, requiring divestment into mutual funds or ETFs instead.[218] During a January 2022 CNBC appearance, Gottheimer stated that lawmakers "shouldn't be directly involved in stock trading," emphasizing the need for blind trusts or similar mechanisms to avoid conflicts of interest.[219] Despite these positions, Gottheimer has disclosed thousands of personal stock trades since entering Congress in 2017, involving over 500 companies and a reported trade volume exceeding $272 million.[223] Public financial disclosures show ongoing activity, including purchases of shares in companies like Natera Inc. and Sysmex Corp. in October 2025, as well as CommVault Systems Inc. valued between $1,001 and $15,000 reported on October 15, 2025.[224][225] In 2022 and 2023, Gottheimer pledged to place his stock holdings into a blind trust to mitigate ethical concerns, but as of October 2024, he had not done so, alongside Rep. Tom Kean Jr.[222] Gottheimer has faced scrutiny for ethics compliance. In August 2022, he was among four House Democrats cited for violating the STOCK Act, which mandates timely disclosure of securities transactions over $1,000, by failing to file required reports within the 45-day window.[221] These lapses highlight broader debates over enforcement of congressional ethics rules, where disclosures rely on self-reporting without automatic penalties for delays unless investigated by the Office of Congressional Ethics. Gottheimer's trading patterns, tracked via mandatory periodic transaction reports, have not been linked to proven insider advantages in public records, though critics argue the volume raises appearance-of-conflict issues amid his access to nonpublic policy information.[226]Government funding and shutdowns
Gottheimer, as co-chair of the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus, has consistently advocated for negotiated funding agreements to prevent government shutdowns, emphasizing the economic harm caused by lapsed appropriations, including furloughs of federal workers and disruptions to services.[211] He has argued that shutdowns exacerbate fiscal uncertainty without resolving underlying budgetary disputes, often crossing party lines to support continuing resolutions (CRs) that maintain government operations at prior funding levels.[212] In December 2024, Gottheimer voted in favor of two stopgap measures to avert an imminent shutdown, supporting bills that extended funding through short-term CRs amid partisan disagreements over spending cuts and disaster aid.[227] These votes aligned with his caucus's push for compromise, contrasting with hardline positions from both parties that risked defaulting on obligations. Earlier, in September 2023, he backed a CR that funded operations until November, criticizing Republican demands for policy riders as obstacles to basic governance.[76] Gottheimer co-sponsored the Government Shutdown Prevention Act of 2025 (S.499), which proposes automatic CRs and pay deferrals for members of Congress during shutdowns to incentivize timely appropriations without extraneous concessions.[210] The bill reflects his view that repeated brinkmanship undermines public trust and economic stability, drawing on data from prior shutdowns showing billions in lost productivity.[228] In January 2018, he was one of six House Democrats to vote for a short-term GOP-backed spending bill, prioritizing avoidance of closure over Democratic objections to immigration provisions.[229] During the October 2025 shutdown threat, Gottheimer collaborated across aisles to protect regional priorities like Gateway rail funding, urging restoration of withheld allocations and highlighting impacts on transit commuters and jobs.[212] However, in March 2025, he opposed a specific CR due to concerns over insufficient safeguards against excessive spending, illustrating his selective support for measures balancing fiscal restraint with continuity.[230] Throughout these episodes, his office has maintained constituent services, providing guidance on federal benefits during lapses.[228]Bipartisan collaboration versus partisanship
Josh Gottheimer has emphasized bipartisan collaboration through his role as co-chair of the House Problem Solvers Caucus, a bicameral group comprising moderate Democrats and Republicans focused on negotiating compromises to advance legislation amid congressional gridlock.[231] The caucus, which Gottheimer co-leads with Republican members, has endorsed over 30 bills in the 118th Congress addressing issues from border security to fiscal policy, demonstrating a track record of cross-aisle endorsements.[232] Under his involvement, the group helped develop the framework for the 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, which allocated $1.2 trillion for transportation and broadband upgrades, securing votes from 13 Senate Democrats and 19 Republicans.[233] Gottheimer has co-sponsored dozens of bills with Republican colleagues, including the Promoting Lifelong Activity for Youth (PLAY) Act of 2025 with Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY), which expands tax credits for youth sports expenses to promote physical activity and affordability for families.[234] Other initiatives include the bipartisan Senior Investor Protection Act, passed by the House on July 22, 2025, co-sponsored with Republicans like Reps. Bill Huizenga (R-MI) and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA), establishing a federal task force to combat financial scams targeting seniors.[235] He also partnered with Lawler on the IGO Anti-Boycott Act, reintroduced January 31, 2025, to prevent international organizations from boycotting Israel, reflecting shared priorities on foreign policy enforcement.[236] While Gottheimer's approach prioritizes problem-solving over strict party loyalty, it has drawn rebukes from progressive Democrats who accuse him of undermining party unity by voting with Republicans on measures like immigration enforcement and regulatory rollbacks, as seen in his support for a 2023 bill blocking Biden administration housing rules, which passed 249-181.[237] Critics from outlets like The American Prospect have labeled him part of a "right-wing fringe" within the Democratic Party for such deviations, arguing they dilute progressive agendas on economic regulation.[238] Nonetheless, Gottheimer maintains that rejecting hyper-partisanship is essential for legislative progress, as evidenced by his repeated breaks from Democratic leadership on spending and oversight bills to avert government shutdowns and advance centrist reforms.[77]Criticisms and controversies
Progressive Democratic opposition
Progressive Democrats have criticized Representative Josh Gottheimer for his centrist positions that frequently obstruct key elements of their legislative agenda, particularly on domestic spending and foreign policy. In October 2021, Gottheimer led a group of moderate Democrats in demanding the separation of the bipartisan infrastructure bill from the larger Build Back Better social spending package, defying the strategy of the Congressional Progressive Caucus and the Biden administration, which aimed to link the bills to ensure passage of progressive priorities.[239] This action drew sharp rebukes from progressive activists, who organized protests outside his district office and called for primary challenges, though none materialized due to his strong fundraising—over $11 million in campaign funds—and the incumbent-friendly New Jersey ballot system.[239] Gottheimer's foreign policy stances have intensified opposition, especially his staunch support for Israel and resistance to progressive resolutions curtailing U.S. involvement in conflicts like Yemen. In 2019, he organized Democratic opposition to a War Powers Resolution aimed at ending U.S. support for the Saudi-led war in Yemen, attempting to attach an anti-BDS amendment to tie it to Israel policy, reflecting his alignment with pro-Israel lobbying groups.[240] Progressives, including members of the Squad such as Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar, viewed this as prioritizing foreign lobbies over humanitarian concerns, positioning Gottheimer as a self-appointed leader of a "Democratic counterrevolution" against their influence.[240] Electoral challenges from the left have been limited but symbolic. In the 2020 Democratic primary, progressive activist Arati Kreibich ran against Gottheimer, criticizing his conservatism and ties to corporate interests, but he won with 72% of the vote in a district not dominated by urban progressive voters.[241] Progressive groups like the Working Families Party have protested his votes, including a December 2021 incident where demonstrators confronted him over opposition to Biden's economic agenda; Gottheimer accused them of antisemitic slurs by yelling "Jew," though a Jewish protester later claimed it was a non-slur rebuke akin to familial scolding.[242] Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has labeled him the "Tea Party" of the Democratic Party, encapsulating broader progressive frustration with his fiscal demands for spending offsets in bills like Build Back Better.[243]Staff management allegations
Former staffers have alleged that Representative Josh Gottheimer maintains a demanding and volatile management style, contributing to exceptionally high employee turnover in his congressional office. According to LegiStorm data, Gottheimer's office recorded the 10th highest staff turnover rate in 2018 among all 535 members of the House and Senate, with similar patterns persisting in subsequent years; for instance, it ranked among the top offenders for poor retention in 2022.[244][245][246] In a 2019 investigative report by The Intercept, multiple anonymous former aides described Gottheimer as a "narcissistic, egotistical sociopath" who engaged in frequent shouting matches, emotional manipulation, and instances of hurling office supplies during fits of anger.[244][247] Staffers reported feeling belittled and subjected to unrealistic demands for personal loyalty, with one noting that Gottheimer would "cycle through staff at a startling speed" due to his intolerance for perceived disloyalty or errors. These accounts, drawn from interviews with over a half-dozen ex-employees, highlighted a culture of fear where aides worked long hours under intense scrutiny, often handling both professional and personal tasks for the congressman.[244] The allegations prompted internal pushback, including threats of mass resignations from staff in early 2019, which led Gottheimer to conduct an all-staff conference call apologizing for his "general behavior" and committing to improvements.[244] Employee reviews on Glassdoor, including those from current and former staff, have corroborated elements of these claims, rating the office poorly for management (2.8/5 overall) and citing a "toxic work environment," inefficiency, and persistent high turnover as key issues.[248] Gottheimer has not publicly disputed the turnover statistics but has emphasized his focus on results-oriented leadership in responses to broader congressional staffing challenges.[249] No formal investigations or legal actions have arisen from these staff complaints, though the patterns align with wider House-wide retention crises driven by low pay and demanding workloads.[245]Immigration and deportation stances
Gottheimer has expressed support for strengthening border security alongside targeted deportation measures focused on criminal non-citizens. In January 2025, he voted in favor of the Laken Riley Act (H.R. 29), legislation requiring the mandatory detention of undocumented immigrants charged with theft or burglary offenses pending deportation proceedings, positioning himself as one of fewer than 10 Democrats to back the bill amid broad party opposition.[250][251] This vote aligned with Republican priorities to expand detention authority for certain low-level crimes, reflecting Gottheimer's emphasis on public safety through enforcement against offenders.[97] On January 24, 2025, Gottheimer again crossed party lines by supporting a House bill authorizing the detention and deportation of immigrants accused of low-level offenses, such as shoplifting or assault, arguing it addresses gaps in current policy that allow release of potentially dangerous individuals.[97] His position contrasts with progressive Democrats who view such expansions as overly punitive, but aligns with data indicating over 13,000 criminal non-citizens released into U.S. communities in fiscal year 2023 under prior administrations, per Department of Homeland Security reports. Gottheimer advocates for "commonsense immigration reform" that pairs enforcement with legal pathways, opposing blanket amnesty but favoring deportation prioritization for those with criminal records or national security risks.[98] In the context of New Jersey's policies, he has endorsed the state's existing framework, which prohibits local law enforcement from honoring federal civil immigration detainers absent criminal warrants, while mandating cooperation on violent crimes—a balance intended to maintain community trust without undermining federal deportation of felons.[120] This stance draws criticism from both enforcement hawks, who see it as insufficiently aggressive, and immigrant advocates, who argue it still enables overreach.[252]Accusations of anti-Muslim rhetoric
In October 2023, during a closed-door House Democratic caucus meeting discussing the Israel-Hamas war, Gottheimer reportedly questioned the absence of "Jewish imams" speaking out against Hamas, a remark interpreted by attendees as disparaging toward Muslim clergy and revealing ignorance or bias, given that imams are exclusively Muslim religious leaders.[253] [254] The comment drew immediate backlash from progressive Democrats in the room, with one describing it as a "sh-t thing to say" amid heated debates over U.S. support for Israel.[254] The Council on American-Islamic Relations' New Jersey chapter (CAIR-NJ), an advocacy group whose national parent organization has faced allegations of ties to Hamas and other Islamist entities from federal investigations and critics including the U.S. Department of Justice, condemned the remarks as anti-Muslim and urged Gottheimer to address Israeli actions in Gaza instead.[255] In January 2024, CAIR-NJ again accused Gottheimer of defamatory anti-Muslim statements after he publicly criticized the Teaneck, New Jersey, school district for partnering with CAIR on anti-bullying programs, arguing the collaboration endangered Jewish students' safety due to CAIR's history of anti-Israel activism and associations with groups opposing U.S. anti-terrorism policies.[256] [257] CAIR countered that Gottheimer's rhetoric endangered Muslim students by stigmatizing the organization, which positions itself as combating Islamophobia but has been designated by the United Arab Emirates as a terrorist-linked entity.[256] Gottheimer's objections stemmed from CAIR's post-October 7, 2023, calls to halt U.S. military aid to Israel and its criticism of groups like the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) for conflating anti-Zionism with antisemitism.[257] These accusations have recurred in contexts tied to Gottheimer's pro-Israel advocacy, including his September 2025 letter to the New Jersey State Board of Education opposing CAIR-NJ's push to sever school ties with the ADL, which he described as essential for educating against antisemitism, Islamophobia, and other hatreds.[258] Critics from CAIR and aligned progressive voices framed such positions as fostering anti-Muslim sentiment, though Gottheimer has simultaneously sponsored bipartisan resolutions denouncing both antisemitism and Islamophobia, such as H.Res. 1068 passed in April 2024.[259] No formal investigations or congressional findings have substantiated claims of inherent anti-Muslim bias in Gottheimer's record, which includes support for interfaith dialogue and funding for houses of worship security encompassing Muslim sites.[260]Other disputes including union and media conflicts
In December 2024, Gottheimer publicly condemned the Rutgers University American Association of University Professors-American Federation of Teachers (AAUP-AFT) and the Rutgers Adjunct Faculty Union for voting to endorse a Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) resolution against Israel, describing it as an antisemitic measure that undermined the university's mission.[261][262] This followed a similar rebuke in June 2021, when he criticized the Rutgers part-time lecturers' union for issuing a statement accusing Israel of apartheid and calling for divestment from companies linked to Israel, arguing that such positions fostered an unsafe environment for Jewish and pro-Israel students and faculty.[263][264] These academic union clashes extended to broader labor disputes in October 2025, when Gottheimer demanded that the New Jersey Education Association (NJEA), the state's largest teachers' union, immediately terminate Ayat Oraby, the newly appointed editor of its flagship magazine NJEA Review, citing her social media posts that praised Hamas attacks and contained antisemitic rhetoric.[265][266] Joined by other New Jersey officials including Rep. Mikie Sherrill, Gottheimer argued that retaining Oraby legitimized hate and contradicted the union's educational responsibilities, amid reports of the NJEA defending her appointment despite the controversy.[267] The incident drew widespread scrutiny, with critics highlighting it as evidence of unions prioritizing ideological alignment over combating antisemitism in public education settings.[268] Gottheimer's positions have occasionally strained relations with progressive-leaning media outlets, which have portrayed his advocacy for legislation targeting online antisemitism—such as a July 2025 bipartisan bill co-sponsored with Republicans to penalize platforms failing to remove certain content—as an effort to suppress criticism of Israel rather than address hate speech.[269] Outlets like Common Dreams attributed the measure to post-October 7, 2023, pressures from pro-Israel groups, framing it as censorship amid broader debates over free speech and foreign policy influence.[269] Gottheimer defended the bill as a necessary response to surging disinformation and violence, including the 2025 shooting of Israeli embassy staffers, emphasizing empirical rises in antisemitic incidents documented by federal data.[269] Such coverage reflects tensions with media skeptical of his moderate Democratic stance, though direct confrontations remain limited compared to his union engagements.Recent activities and future prospects
2024-2025 legislative actions
In 2024, Gottheimer led bipartisan efforts to address antisemitism on college campuses through the Antisemitism Awareness Act, which passed the House on May 1 by a vote of 320-91 and directs the Department of Education to use the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's definition of antisemitism when enforcing federal anti-discrimination laws.[270] The bill faced opposition from some Democrats concerned about free speech implications, though Gottheimer argued it targets discriminatory conduct rather than protected expression.[270] Gottheimer co-introduced the bipartisan Bunker Buster Act on July 2, 2025, authorizing the U.S. to provide Israel with advanced munitions capable of penetrating hardened underground facilities to counter Iran's nuclear program, emphasizing U.S. national security interests in preventing Iranian weaponization.[161] He also unveiled bipartisan legislation on October 7, 2025, to incorporate education on the 2023 Hamas attacks into school curricula nationwide, aiming to combat rising antisemitism amid documented increases in incidents following the attacks.[271] On cryptocurrency regulation, Gottheimer championed the passage of bipartisan bills including the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (FIT21) and related measures, which cleared the House on May 22, 2024, by establishing a framework dividing oversight between the SEC and CFTC, enhancing consumer protections against fraud while promoting U.S. innovation and job growth in the sector.[47][46] In July 2025, he supported the GENIUS and CLARITY Acts, which further clarified stablecoin rules and market structures, passing the House with provisions to curb scams and encourage domestic investment.[80] Addressing senior vulnerabilities, Gottheimer's bipartisan Senior Financial Security Act passed the House on July 22, 2024, creating a federal task force to combat scams targeting older Americans, building on his broader Senior Security Strategy that included measures against social media fraud announced earlier in the year.[235] He also introduced legislation on September 23, 2024, to protect domestic violence victims from financial abuse by enhancing federal reporting and intervention tools.[42] For election integrity, Gottheimer announced two bills on September 30, 2024, to shield poll workers from violence and harassment, including enhanced federal penalties and training, amid rising threats documented by the FBI.[272] On November 1, 2024, he co-sponsored the Ballot Box Protection Act, making intentional destruction of drop boxes a federal crime with up to five years' imprisonment.[273] Earlier, on September 13, 2024, he co-launched a bipartisan "Unity Commitment" with over 30 members pledging to respect election outcomes and reduce partisan rhetoric.[274] Gottheimer rejoined bipartisan school safety pushes, reintroducing the Alyssa's Legacy Youth in School Safety Alert Act to mandate silent panic alarms in schools for rapid law enforcement response.[275] He supported Ukraine security assistance via H.R. 8035, which allocated $60.1 billion, including air defense systems, passed in 2024.[276]Gubernatorial ambitions and New Jersey politics
On November 15, 2024, Gottheimer announced his candidacy for the Democratic nomination in the 2025 New Jersey gubernatorial election, pledging to apply his congressional record of bipartisan compromise to address the state's affordability challenges at the state level.[277][278] His campaign platform centered on reducing New Jersey's high property taxes and living costs, which rank among the nation's highest, through a proposed "Tax Cut Plan" aimed at providing relief to families and businesses without increasing deficits.[279][280] Gottheimer positioned himself as a centrist alternative in a crowded field, criticizing partisan gridlock in Trenton and drawing on his experience in the House Problem Solvers Caucus to advocate for pragmatic reforms in areas like infrastructure funding and economic growth.[281] Gottheimer's bid highlighted tensions within New Jersey's Democratic Party, where his moderate stances on fiscal issues and national security clashed with more progressive candidates such as Newark Mayor Ras Baraka and Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop.[282] He secured endorsements from influential groups, including the Lakewood Vaad representing Orthodox Jewish communities, underscoring his appeal in suburban and culturally conservative Democratic enclaves amid the state's diverse electorate.[283] Campaign ads and events emphasized his outsider perspective on state governance, contrasting New Jersey's fiscal pressures—exacerbated by high utility rates and out-migration—with federal successes in securing infrastructure investments for the state.[280] In the June 10, 2025, Democratic primary, Gottheimer finished behind Rep. Mikie Sherrill, who secured the nomination with a plurality in a six-way contest that reflected voter preferences for her prosecutorial background and anti-Trump messaging over Gottheimer's economic focus.[284][285] Following the defeat, Gottheimer endorsed Sherrill on June 20, 2025, urging party unity for the general election against Republican Jack Ciattarelli and signaling his intent to continue influencing New Jersey politics through his congressional seat rather than executive office.[286] This outcome underscored the challenges for moderate Democrats in New Jersey's primary dynamics, where machine politics and progressive mobilization often favor candidates aligned with Gov. Phil Murphy's progressive legacy on issues like education funding and climate policy.[287]Electoral history
U.S. House of Representatives elections
Gottheimer first won election to represent New Jersey's 5th congressional district in the 2016 general election, flipping the Republican-held seat from incumbent Scott Garrett by emphasizing bipartisanship and local economic issues in a district rated as leaning Republican by political analysts. He received 169,085 votes (53.4 percent) to Garrett's 146,444 (46.2 percent), with the remainder to minor candidates.[22][288] In subsequent elections, Gottheimer faced Republican challengers in a district encompassing suburban areas of Bergen, Essex, Morris, Passaic, Sussex, and Warren counties, maintaining victories through broad appeals to independents and crossover voters amid national partisan shifts. His 2018 reelection against John McCann yielded 56.0 percent of the vote.[289] In 2020, he defeated Frank Pallotta with 53.2 percent.[290] The 2022 rematch with Pallotta resulted in 54.7 percent for Gottheimer.[291] He secured a fifth term in 2024 against Mary Jo Guinchard, garnering 208,359 votes (55.3 percent) to her 165,287 (43.8 percent), with the balance to independents and third-party candidates.[31][292]| Year | Candidate | Party | Votes | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Josh Gottheimer | Democratic | 169,085 | 53.4%[22] |
| Scott Garrett | Republican | 146,444 | 46.2%[22] | |
| 2018 | Josh Gottheimer (incumbent) | Democratic | 174,036 | 56.0%[289] |
| John McCann | Republican | 134,010 | 43.1%[289] | |
| 2020 | Josh Gottheimer (incumbent) | Democratic | 225,175 | 53.2%[290] |
| Frank Pallotta | Republican | 193,333 | 45.7%[290] | |
| 2022 | Josh Gottheimer (incumbent) | Democratic | 145,559 | 54.7%[291] |
| Frank Pallotta | Republican | 117,873 | 44.3%[291] | |
| 2024 | Josh Gottheimer (incumbent) | Democratic | 208,359 | 55.3%[31] |
| Mary Jo Guinchard | Republican | 165,287 | 43.8%[31] |