Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Lilial


Lilial, chemically 2-(4-tert-butylbenzyl)propanal ( 80-54-6), is a synthetic compound employed as a fragrance to impart a fresh, green-floral scent reminiscent of lily muguet in perfumes, , and detergents. Widely utilized for its diffusive and substantive properties that enhance floral accords, Lilial synergizes with notes like phenylethyl alcohol and to amplify radiance in compositions. However, empirical toxicological data indicating , including impaired and developmental effects in animal models, led to its classification as a Category 1B reprotoxicant under regulations. Consequently, Lilial was prohibited in cosmetic products across the and Northern Ireland effective March 2022, prompting industry shifts toward alternatives despite its prior prevalence in up to 97% of certain fragrance formulations. Additionally, it is recognized as a potential skin sensitizer associated with .

Nomenclature and Chemical Identity

Synonyms and Classification

Lilial is the for the synthetic fragrance compound 2-(4-tert-butylbenzyl)propanal, also known by synonyms including butylphenyl methylpropional (BMHCA), lysmeral, lily aldehyde, p-tert-butyl-α-methylhydrocinnamaldehyde, and Lilyal. The compound bears 80-54-6 and EINECS number 201-289-8. Chemically, Lilial belongs to the class of aromatic aldehydes, characterized by a ring substituted with a tert-butyl group and an α-methylated propanal , imparting a fresh, lily-of-the-valley profile used in perfumery. It is produced industrially as a single or racemate, with no significant natural occurrence documented beyond trace levels in certain plants. Under the Classification, Labelling and Packaging ( (EC) No 1272/2008, Lilial is classified as a reprotoxic substance category 1B (H360FD: may damage fertility and the unborn child), leading to its in cosmetic products effective March 1, 2022. This classification stems from indicating at doses around 150-500 mg/kg body weight per day, though human exposure levels in fragrances were typically far lower. It is also recognized as a potential skin sensitizer associated with in susceptible individuals.

Molecular Formula and Structure

Lilial has the molecular formula C14H20O. Its IUPAC name is 2-(4-tert-butylphenyl)propanal, also known as 2-(4-tert-butylbenzyl). The consists of a benzene ring with a tert-butyl (-C(CH3)3) at the 4-position and a side chain at the 1-position comprising a linked to a chiral carbon bearing a and a formyl group (-CH2-CH(CH3)CHO). This functionality imparts the characteristic lily-of-the-valley odor profile associated with the compound. The molecular weight is 204.31 g/mol.

Physical and Chemical Properties

Appearance, Odor, and Sensory Characteristics

Lilial is a colorless to pale yellow clear oily liquid at room temperature. Its odor is characterized as fresh, green, and floral, with prominent muguet (lily-of-the-valley) facets, accompanied by watery, powdery, and subtle cumin undertones. In perfumery applications, it delivers a light, blooming floral profile with medium odor strength and notable substantivity, persisting up to 236 hours in formulations. The compound's sensory appeal stems primarily from its (R)-enantiomer, which imparts the intense lily-like scent, whereas the (S)-enantiomer contributes minimally to the overall aroma in racemic mixtures.

Solubility, Stability, and Reactivity

Lilial exhibits low in , with values reported as 0.033 g/L at 20°C. This hydrophobicity is reflected in its () of 4.2 at 24°C, facilitating in organic solvents such as , oil, and oils. The compound demonstrates under standard storage conditions, including protection from excessive heat, light, and ignition sources, with no hazardous expected in properly handled formulations. However, exposure to air induces slow oxidation, particularly in aqueous solutions at pH 7 and 25°C, leading to degradation products. Lilial shows no significant hydrolytic instability but requires antioxidants like alpha-tocopherol in some applications to mitigate oxidative loss. Reactivity is typical of aliphatic aldehydes, with incompatibility toward strong oxidizing agents, acids, and bases, which can promote oxidation to the corresponding , formation, or unintended condensations. No explosive or highly exothermal reactions occur under normal conditions, though contact with reducing agents or alkalies should be avoided to prevent potential or .

Synthesis and Manufacturing

Synthetic Routes

The primary synthetic route to Lilial, chemically 2-(4-tert-butylbenzyl)propanal, involves a crossed between 4-tert-butylbenzaldehyde and , yielding the intermediate 4-tert-butyl-α-methylcinnamaldehyde, followed by selective of the α,β-unsaturated double bond. This process is the dominant industrial method, leveraging the aromatic aldehyde's lack of α-hydrogens to favor crossed product formation under basic conditions, such as 1-5 mol% NaOH in at 0-5°C, achieving yields exceeding 85% for the step. employs catalysts like 5% Pd/C at 3 and , or noble metals such as , , or Pd-Pr₂O₃ on Al₂O₃ supports, delivering >95% conversion and >98% selectivity to the saturated while preserving the carbonyl. Industrial variants utilize continuous flow reactors with MgO/alumina for at 80-100°C and or Cu-chromite for at 100-150°C under 10-20 , supporting global production capacities over 5,000 metric tons annually. Alternative laboratory-scale routes include acetal protection of 4-tert-butylbenzaldehyde as its dimethyl , reaction with enolate generated by LDA at -78°C, , and , which enables stereocontrol with chiral catalysts like derivatives for up to 92% enantiomeric excess. Friedel-Crafts of 4-tert-butylbenzene with methacrolein or its diacetate provides another pathway, analogous to cyclamenaldehyde , though less selective industrially due to polyalkylation risks. Specialized methods encompass Rh-catalyzed of 1-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1-methoxypropene followed by partial , or Pd-catalyzed coupling of 4-tert-butylphenyl halides with methallyl alcohol; these are niche, offering higher purity but increased complexity and cost compared to the aldol route. Dehydrogenation of 3-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-2-methylpropanol over silver catalysts represents a further variant, typically for small-scale refinement rather than primary production.

Industrial Production Methods

Lilial is manufactured on an industrial scale predominantly through a two-step process beginning with the base-catalyzed of 4-tert-butylbenzaldehyde and (propionaldehyde), typically using in an alcoholic to form the intermediate α,β-unsaturated , 2-[(4-tert-butylphenyl)methylidene]propanal. This condensation step proceeds under controlled conditions to minimize side reactions, such as self-condensation of propanal, and is often conducted at temperatures around 20–40°C to achieve high selectivity toward the desired crossed aldol product. The unsaturated intermediate undergoes selective , commonly using a or catalyst under (typically 1–5 ) at moderate temperatures (50–100°C), to saturate the and yield Lilial as a of (R)- and (S)-enantiomers in a 1:1 ratio. The process is optimized for high yield (often exceeding 90%) and purity through , with major producers like employing continuous flow or batch reactors scaled for production to meet fragrance demands. Alternative routes, such as modifications involving different catalysts or solvents, exist but are less common due to lower efficiency compared to the standard aldol-hydrogenation sequence.

Commercial Applications

Use in Fragrances and Perfumery

Lilial serves as a key synthetic fragrance in perfumery, prized for its ability to evoke the subtle, fresh scent of lily-of-the-valley (muguet), with characteristic light green, floral, and notes. This contributes watery, clean, and slightly powdery facets, enabling perfumers to construct white floral accords and enhance compositions across fine fragrances, soaps, and household products. Its (R)- delivers the primary odor intensity, while the compound's overall profile integrates seamlessly with , , , and green odorants for balanced, spring-like effects. In , Lilial is typically incorporated at levels of 0.5% to 3% in fine fragrance compounds for optimal impact without overpowering delicacy, though broader applications allow up to 15% in perfume bases depending on the . It exhibits high performance ratings (9/10) in alcoholic perfumes, lotions, shampoos, and bath gels, owing to its stability and longevity in diverse matrices. Perfumers often pair it with hedione, , and phenylethyl alcohol to amplify floral hearts and add diffusion, making it suitable for both modern clean scents and classic floral blends. Prior to regulatory restrictions, Lilial's scalability and consistent synthetic production from precursors supported its widespread adoption in commercial perfumery since the mid-20th century, underpinning elegant, versatile accords in products ranging from eau de parfums to fabric softeners. The International Fragrance Association (IFRA) previously capped its use at 1.4% in finished products to ensure safety margins, reflecting its established role in sensory-driven formulations.

Applications in Cosmetics and Household Products

Butylphenyl methylpropional, commonly known as Lilial, functions primarily as a synthetic fragrance in , providing a fresh, floral muguet (lily-of-the-valley) profile that enhances product sensory appeal. In cosmetic formulations, it has been employed in rinse-off products such as soaps, shampoos, shower gels, and bath cleansers, typically at concentrations up to 0.1% according to industry standards for safety evaluation. Leave-on , including body lotions (up to 0.06%), hand creams (up to 0.05%), face creams (up to 0.05%), and make-up products like foundations (up to 0.04%), have also incorporated Lilial to impart long-lasting scent without requiring rinsing. Deodorants have utilized it at levels as low as 0.09% to avoid excessive dermal exposure. These applications leverage Lilial's stability in aqueous and emulsified systems, though its use in sprayable has been deemed unsafe due to potential risks.
Product CategoryExample ProductsMaximum Proposed Concentration (IFRA Standards)
Rinse-offSoaps, shampoos, gels0.1%
Leave-on dermal lotions, hand/face creams0.05–0.06%
Make-upFoundations, eye products0.04%
Antiperspirants0.09%
In household products, Lilial has been added to detergents, fabric softeners, and general cleaners to mask chemical odors and provide a pleasant, enduring fragrance during use and on treated surfaces. Its inclusion in these items extends to air fresheners and deodorizers, where low concentrations suffice to achieve olfactory effects amid high-dilution scenarios. Specific quantitative use levels in non-cosmetic applications remain less documented in regulatory assessments, but exposure considerations highlight dermal via residues on cleaned fabrics and from aerosolized cleaners as primary routes. Prior to restrictions, Lilial's volatility and substantivity made it suitable for products requiring scent persistence post-application, such as detergents.

Toxicological Studies

Acute and Subchronic Toxicity Data

Acute toxicity studies indicate low hazard potential for Lilial (p-t-Butyl-α-methylhydrocinnamaldehyde). Oral LD50 values in rats range from 1390 mg/kg body weight (bw) (95% : 1019–1867 mg/kg bw) to 3700 mg/kg bw (95% : 2600–5400 mg/kg bw), depending on the study protocol and analysis method. Dermal LD50 in rabbits exceeds 2000 mg/kg bw, with no systemic toxicity or mortality observed. Inhalation exposure data are limited due to low volatility ( 0.0025 at 20°C), but rats exposed to saturated atmospheres showed no mortality, though minor systemic effects were noted without reaching lethal thresholds. Subchronic toxicity assessments, primarily via oral gavage in rats, reveal dose-dependent effects on systemic parameters and male reproductive organs. In a 90-day study compliant with good laboratory practice (GLP), the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) for systemic toxicity (including liver hypertrophy, reduced body weight, and adrenal changes in females) was 5 mg/kg bw/day, while the NOAEL for testicular toxicity (atrophy and degeneration in males) was 25 mg/kg bw/day; adverse effects emerged at ≥50 mg/kg bw/day for testes and ≥25 mg/kg bw/day for systemic endpoints. Shorter repeated-dose oral studies (5–14 days) in rats corroborated testicular effects at ≥50 mg/kg bw/day, with liver and body weight alterations at similar doses. A dermal repeat-dose study (5 days in rats) showed testicular toxicity only at the high dose of 2000 mg/kg bw/day. No dedicated 90-day dermal or inhalation subchronic studies were identified. These findings stem from industry-submitted data reviewed by regulatory bodies, with effects mechanistically linked to hepatic enzyme induction and hormonal disruption at higher exposures.

Reproductive and Endocrine Effects in Animal Models

In male Wistar rats administered Lilial orally via gavage, repeated-dose toxicity studies (e.g., 90-day exposure) revealed testicular atrophy, reduced sperm motility, and impaired spermatogenesis at doses ≥50 mg/kg body weight per day (bw/day), with a no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) of 25 mg/kg bw/day for male reproductive endpoints. Similar effects, including aspermia and testes degeneration, were noted in a one-generation reproduction study at ≥62.6 mg/kg bw/day, yielding a NOAEL of 28.7 mg/kg bw/day. These findings indicate rats as the most sensitive species for male reproductive toxicity compared to dogs (NOAEL 40 mg/kg bw/day for testicular effects) and limited data in mice, rabbits, and monkeys showing lesser or no effects. Developmental toxicity assessments in pregnant Wistar rats (OECD TG 414, gestational days 6-20 via gavage) demonstrated reduced fetal body weights, increased skeletal variations, and tissue malformations at ≥12.7 mg/kg bw/day, with a NOAEL of 4.1 mg/kg bw/day; these outcomes were associated with maternal toxicity rather than selective teratogenicity. An extended one-generation reproduction toxicity study (OECD TG 443) in Wistar rats (doses up to 15.1 mg/kg bw/day via gavage, spanning pre-mating to lactation) found no impacts on fertility indices, estrous cycles, or reproductive organ histopathology up to the highest dose, but pup body weight reductions occurred at 15.1 mg/kg bw/day (developmental NOAEL 4.5 mg/kg bw/day), again tied to parental toxicity. Multi-generation and screening studies (e.g., OECD TG 421) corroborated reduced litter sizes, pup survival, and body weights at ≥150 mg/kg bw/day, with NOAELs of 50 mg/kg bw/day. Endocrine-related effects in animal models remain inconclusive, with no alterations in hormone levels (T3, T4, TSH) or reproductive hormones observed in the TG 443 study up to 15.1 mg/kg bw/day. However, higher-dose exposures (≥150 mg/kg bw/day) in rats induced increased weights and histopathological changes, suggesting potential disruption at non-reproductive thresholds. Testicular toxicity in rats is considered species-specific, with low relevance to humans due to metabolic differences in . These data underpin the harmonized classification of Lilial as Repr. 1B (may damage ; suspected of damaging the unborn child), though endocrine disruption mechanisms lack strong causal linkage beyond reprotoxicity endpoints.
Study TypeSpeciesKey EffectsNOAEL (mg/kg bw/day)LOAEL (mg/kg bw/day)Source
Repeated-dose (90-day)Male Wistar rats, impaired 2550SCCS/RIFM
Developmental (OECD 414)Pregnant Wistar ratsReduced fetal weight, skeletal variations4.112.7RIFM/SCCS
Extended one-generation (OECD 443)Wistar rats (F0/F1)Pup weight reduction; no fertility effectsReproduction: 15.1; Development: 4.515.1RIFM/SCCS
Screening/multi-generationWistar ratsReduced litter size, pup survival50150Canada assessment

Genotoxicity, Carcinogenicity, and Allergenicity Assessments

Genotoxicity assessments of Lilial (butylphenyl methylpropional, p-BMHCA) have consistently shown no evidence of mutagenic or genotoxic potential in standard in vitro assays. Bacterial gene mutation tests using Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli strains, conducted both with and without metabolic activation, yielded negative results. Similarly, mammalian cell gene mutation assays, such as those in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells, and chromosomal aberration tests in human lymphocytes demonstrated no clastogenic or aneugenic effects. A 2023 study further confirmed the absence of genotoxicity in additional in vitro models, including DNA damage assays, aligning with prior evaluations by the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS). Carcinogenicity data for Lilial are limited to indirect from repeated-dose studies, with no dedicated long-term rodent bioassays available. Subchronic and chronic oral exposures in rats and mice showed no induction of , neoplasia, or preneoplastic lesions in target organs such as testes, liver, or kidneys, even at doses up to 300 mg/kg body weight per day. The SCCS (2015) concluded there was no of carcinogenic potential from these studies, and structural analogies to non-carcinogenic aldehydes like support this finding. Regulatory classifications, including the EU's CMR Category 1B for reprotoxicity, do not extend to carcinogenicity, as empirical data lack support for such effects. Allergenicity evaluations indicate Lilial acts as a sensitizer, with documented cases of in s. Bioassay-guided of perfumes identified Lilial as a causative agent in fragrance-induced allergic , confirmed via structure-activity relationships predicting moderate potential. The SCCS has affirmed a risk of , classifying it among 26 fragrance allergens requiring labeling in when exceeding 0.01% in leave-on products. Local lymph node assays in mice reported EC3 values (estimated concentration for 3-fold stimulation) around 5-10%, indicative of moderate potency, though predictive tests like HRIPT show variability, with rates below 1% at typical use levels (0.1-1%). No with common haptens has been noted, but testing data link it to eczematous in susceptible individuals.

Human Exposure and Risk Characterization

Exposure Pathways and Levels

The primary human exposure pathway to Lilial (butylphenyl methylpropional, p-BMHCA) is dermal absorption from and , particularly leave-on formulations such as perfumes, body lotions, hand creams, and deodorants, where absorption rates range from 1.4% ( human data) to 8.5–13.5% (, formulation-dependent). contributes secondarily via sprayable products like fine fragrances or air fresheners, though volatility is low and specific data are limited; oral exposure is minor and typically indirect, such as from hand-to-mouth transfer after dermal application or incidental ingestion from lip products, with no significant use in oral cosmetics like toothpastes. Concentrations of Lilial in finished products vary by category, with higher levels in fragrances: up to 1.42–1.86% in hydroalcoholic perfumes (IFRA standards), 0.09% in deodorants, 0.05% in face/hand creams, 0.06% in body lotions, and 0.1% in bath products. Systemic exposure doses (SEDs) are estimated using dermal absorption assumptions (e.g., 5% for ethanolic solutions, 25% for creams) and application factors, yielding individual SEDs such as 13.7 μg/kg bw/day from perfumes and 6.6 μg/kg bw/day from body lotions, with aggregate SED across products at 0.028 mg/kg bw/day (28 μg/kg bw/day). Biomonitoring studies confirm low-level population exposure, with urinary metabolites (e.g., tert-butylbenzoic acid, lysmerol) indicating median daily intakes of 1.63 μg/kg bw/day (95th percentile: 4.69 μg/kg bw/day) in adults from 2000–2018, declining over time due to reduced use; children and adolescents show higher exposures in females (e.g., from perfumes and fabric softeners), with peaks in ages 3–5 and 14–17 years.
Product CategoryTypical Lilial Concentration (%)Key Exposure Notes
Hydroalcoholic Fragrances/Perfumes1.42–1.86Highest dermal load; IFRA-limited.
0.09Spray/roll-on application.
Body/Hand Creams, Lotions0.05–0.06Leave-on; higher absorption in emulsions.
Bath Products0.1Rinse-off; lower retention.

Epidemiological and Biomonitoring Evidence

Human studies have detected metabolites of Lilial (2-(4-tert-butylbenzyl)propionaldehyde, also known as lysmeral or p-BMHCA) in samples, confirming systemic and widespread exposure primarily via dermal routes from and fragrances. A human study following a single oral dose of 5.26 mg administered to five volunteers identified major urinary metabolites including tert-butylbenzoic acid (TBBA, 14.3% of dose), lysmerol (1.82%), lysmerylic acid (0.16%), and hydroxyl-lysmerylic acid (0.20%), with over 97% excreted within 24 hours and peak excretion between 2-5 hours post-dose. Back-calculations from urinary levels in 40 subjects estimated median daily exposures of 140-220 μg per person. Analysis of samples from the German Environmental Specimen Bank (2000-2018), collected from 329 young adults aged 20-29, revealed quantifiable concentrations of TBBA and lysmerol in nearly all samples, indicating near-universal detection and ongoing population-level exposure during that period. concentrations declined significantly over time, with the sharpest reductions occurring between 2012 and 2015, correlating with voluntary industry reductions in Lilial use ahead of regulatory restrictions; median daily intake was estimated at 1.63 μg/kg body weight/day (95th percentile: 4.69 μg/kg bw/day), representing 2.6-7.5% of the derived no-effect level (DNEL) of 62.5 μg/kg bw/day. These levels were derived from strong correlations between the two biomarkers (Spearman's rho > 0.8), validating their use for . In a separate biomonitoring effort from the German Environmental Survey for Substances in Urine (GerES V, 2014-2017), lysmeral metabolites were measured in 2,294 children and adolescents aged 3-17, showing higher exposures in females ( urinary TBBA: 15.5 μg/L) compared to males (6.3 μg/L), attributed to greater use of containing fragrances. No significant associations with socioeconomic factors were noted beyond gender-specific behaviors. Epidemiological investigations specifically linking Lilial to reproductive, endocrine, or other endpoints in remain absent, with available data limited to confirmation rather than outcome correlations; regulatory concerns stem from animal-derived classifications rather than direct . Ongoing monitoring frameworks, such as GerES VI, are recommended to track post-ban trends given the persistence of legacy sources.

Dose-Response Relationships and Thresholds

In , dose-response relationships for butylphenyl methylpropional (p-BMHCA, also known as Lilial) indicate thresholds primarily in the range of 3–5 mg/kg body weight per day for systemic and developmental effects, with higher thresholds for endpoints. A prenatal developmental toxicity study in rats administered oral doses of 0, 4.1, 12.7, and 40.7 mg/kg bw/day identified a (NOAEL) of 4.1 mg/kg bw/day for both maternal and prenatal developmental outcomes, such as reduced fetal weights and skeletal variations, with a lowest-observed-adverse-effect level (LOAEL) of 12.7 mg/kg bw/day. At the highest dose, post-implantation loss increased to 15.1%, demonstrating a dose-dependent progression of effects. An extended one-generation study in rats established NOAELs of 3 mg/kg bw/day for general systemic (e.g., liver and reduced body weight), 10 mg/kg bw/day for and reproductive organ effects, and 4.5 mg/kg bw/day for developmental in F1 and F2 progeny, where pup weights decreased at 10 mg/kg bw/day. Subchronic repeated-dose studies in rats confirmed a systemic NOAEL of 5 mg/kg bw/day, with effects like decreased plasma and liver alterations emerging at ≥25 mg/kg bw/day, while -related thresholds (e.g., testicular ) were higher at 25 mg/kg bw/day (NOAEL). In dogs, a NOAEL of 40 mg/kg bw/day was noted for testicular effects in repeated-dose studies. Derived reference doses from fragrance industry assessments (RIFM) incorporate uncertainty factors of 100 applied to NOAELs, yielding thresholds of 0.041 mg/kg bw/day for , 0.045 mg/kg bw/day for general systemic effects, and 0.15 mg/kg bw/day for testicular/ toxicity. studies show no , , or endocrine disruption up to 100–500 µM, suggesting high thresholds for these mechanisms relative to limits. Overall, dose-response data reveal low potency for adverse effects, with reproductive endpoints most sensitive in rats but absent or less pronounced in other models .

Regulatory History and Status

Pre-Ban Evaluations and Classifications

Prior to its in cosmetic products, butylphenyl methylpropional (Lilial) underwent evaluations under the European Union's , resulting in a harmonized as a reproductive toxicant category 2 (Repr. 2), specifically suspected of damaging (H361f). This , approved via the 15th Adaptation to Technical Progress (ATP15) and published in the Official Journal on August 11, 2020, was based on indicating potential effects on at high doses, though human relevance remained uncertain due to differences in exposure and . The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) issued multiple opinions assessing Lilial's safety in cosmetics. In its 2015 opinion (SCCS/1540/14, adopted August 12, 2015), the SCCS concluded that Lilial was not safe for use as a fragrance ingredient in leave-on and rinse-off cosmetic products at proposed concentrations up to 0.54%, citing concerns over skin sensitization and potential systemic exposure leading to reproductive effects observed in rodent studies. Following a revised dossier from the International Fragrance Association (IFRA) proposing lower use levels, the SCCS released a preliminary opinion in December 2017 (with comments until February 2018) and a final opinion on May 10, 2019 (SCCS/1591/17), affirming risks of skin sensitization at concentrations above 0.0015% and deeming it unsafe for aggregate exposure across multiple products, despite acceptability in isolated low-level uses when stabilized with alpha-tocopherol. These opinions emphasized empirical data from dermal and oral toxicity studies but highlighted uncertainties in extrapolating multigenerational rat findings—showing reduced fertility at doses exceeding 100 mg/kg/day—to typical human cosmetic exposure levels below 1 µg/kg/day. The International Fragrance Association (IFRA) maintained voluntary standards restricting Lilial's use prior to regulatory bans, categorizing it under fragrance ingredients requiring limits to ensure safe application. Pre-2020 amendments, such as those in IFRA Standards 48 and earlier, permitted Lilial in fragrances up to approximately 3.2%, in other consumer products up to 0.8-1.2%, and prohibited it in categories like oral care or intimate wipes, based on no-expected-sensitization-induction-level (NESIL) data from human repeated insult patch tests and quantitative models. These restrictions, updated iteratively through amendments like the 49th in 2020, reflected industry self-regulation informed by for Fragrance Materials (RIFM) evaluations, prioritizing margins of safety above 100 for systemic endpoints derived from rodent no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) adjusted for human exposure. However, IFRA standards did not fully align with emerging regulatory concerns over , leading to eventual prohibition in Amendment 49.

European Union Restrictions

In December 2020, the European Commission classified Lilial (butylphenyl methylpropional) as toxic to reproduction category 1B under the Classification, Labelling and Packaging Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, based on animal data from multigenerational reproductive toxicity studies in rats showing reduced fertility, prolonged estrous cycles, and developmental effects at doses around 15-45 mg/kg body weight per day. This presumed hazard classification (H360FD: May damage fertility; may damage the unborn child) presumes relevance to humans without direct epidemiological confirmation, relying on extrapolation from high-dose rodent models where no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) were identified but deemed insufficient for safe margins in consumer products. Article 15 of the Cosmetics Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 prohibits category 1A or 1B CMR substances in finished products unless a safe use concentration is scientifically demonstrated and authorized, a threshold not met for Lilial due to uncertainties in dermal and cumulative risks. Commission Regulation () 2021/1902, adopted on 24 October 2021, explicitly added Lilial to Annex II (prohibited substances list, entry 1581) effective 1 March 2022, banning its intentional addition and requiring absence in products placed on the market from that date onward, with no phase-out or granted. This applies EU-wide to all , including perfumes, soaps, and leave-on products where Lilial comprised up to 4-6% in fragrances, targeting potential risks to via dermal routes despite estimated consumer exposures below 1 μg/kg body weight daily. Prior to the ban, Lilial faced restrictions under Annex III (entry 83) mandating labeling at concentrations exceeding 0.001% in rinse-off products or 0.01% in leave-on products, following Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) assessments identifying it as a sensitizer but initially deeming it safe up to 0.02% before reclassification prompted by additional reproductive data. The prohibition does not extend to non-cosmetic uses under REACH, though a 2022 proposal sought its inclusion in Annex XIV for requirements due to persistent concerns. Regulatory rationale emphasizes precaution for vulnerable populations, yet critiques highlight over-reliance on animal-derived thresholds without robust human biomonitoring or dose-response validation at realistic exposures, potentially amplifying perceived risks beyond empirical causal evidence.

Status in the United States and Other Regions

In the United States, butylphenyl methylpropional (Lilial) is not prohibited by federal regulations from the (FDA) or Agency (EPA) for use in or other consumer products as of October 2025. The FDA regulates under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which prohibits ingredients rendering products adulterated or misbranded, but Lilial has not been classified as such or added to the list of restricted substances. However, the fragrance industry voluntarily adheres to standards from the International Fragrance Association (IFRA), which, under the 49th Amendment effective in 2021, prohibits Lilial in all finished consumer products intended for skin contact, including , due to concerns; this has led to its effective phase-out in IFRA-compliant formulations sold domestically. Advocacy groups have pushed for state-level restrictions, such as California's AB 496 introduced in 2023 to ban it in , but did not pass, and no state-wide prohibitions exist as of 2025. In , has not imposed a regulatory ban on Lilial in but classifies it as a potential reproductive toxicant and recommends minimizing exposure through product labeling and reformulation. As of February 2024, it is not listed on the Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist as prohibited or restricted, though ongoing assessments under the Food and Drugs Act monitor its safety in leave-on products; industry compliance with IFRA standards similarly limits its practical use. Other regions outside the exhibit varied statuses without uniform bans. In , no specific prohibition exists under the Australian Industrial Chemicals Introduction Scheme or for , relying instead on voluntary IFRA adherence. Japan maintains usage limits for fragrance allergens via the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, but Lilial is not explicitly banned, with concentrations capped indirectly through safety standards. In , the does not list Lilial among prohibited cosmetic ingredients in the Inventory of Existing Cosmetic Ingredients, though new formulations require safety assessments, and IFRA compliance influences market availability. The , post-Brexit, aligns with EU restrictions, enforcing a in since March 2022. Globally, IFRA's prohibitions drive industry-wide avoidance in fragranced products, even absent mandatory regulations, prioritizing empirical risk data over uniform governmental action.

Controversies and Scientific Debates

Interpretation of Preclinical Data

Preclinical studies on Lilial (butylphenyl methylpropional, p-BMHCA) have consistently reported adverse effects on the in rats, including , reduced quality, and histopathological changes in the testes and , observed in repeated-dose oral gavage and dietary exposure studies at doses ranging from 100 to 750 mg/kg body weight/day. These effects were frequently accompanied by systemic , such as liver and elevated liver enzymes, indicating that the reproductive outcomes may not be selective but part of broader metabolic overload at high exposures. No-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) for reproductive endpoints were identified at 15–52.5 mg/kg/day across studies, with developmental effects in offspring limited to reduced pup weight at maternally toxic doses above 150 mg/kg/day. In multigeneration toxicity studies, parental and reproductive performance in F0 and F1 generations showed no adverse effects, despite offspring impacts at elevated doses, suggesting thresholds below which no reproductive impairment occurs. assessments, including Ames tests, chromosomal aberration assays, and tests, have uniformly tested negative, ruling out mutagenic mechanisms and pointing toward non-genotoxic modes of action potentially involving metabolic intermediates or indirect endocrine influences. investigations revealed weak estrogenic activity in cell proliferation assays, with potency orders of magnitude lower than reference estrogens like 17β-estradiol, and no significant binding to receptors or disruption of steroidogenesis pathways at relevant concentrations. Interpretation of these data for human risk hinges on interspecies extrapolation challenges, as rat-specific metabolism—particularly rapid oxidation to potentially reactive aldehydes—may amplify testicular vulnerability at doses far exceeding human cosmetic exposures (systemic doses typically <0.01 mg/kg/day). The absence of adversity in parental generations and weak in vitro endocrine signals undermine claims of broad reproductive hazard, with effects likely requiring sustained high systemic burdens not replicable in humans via dermal routes, where absorption is limited to 1–10%. Regulatory classifications as Repr. 1B emphasize presumptive human relevance from animal data consistency, yet this precautionary stance overlooks dose-response thresholds and lack of corroborative human biomonitoring or mechanistic human cell data, potentially overstating risk absent empirical human adversity. Critics, including recent toxicological reviews, argue the data support a threshold-based safe exposure margin exceeding 1,000-fold, aligning with non-linear toxicology principles for non-genotoxicants.

Regulatory Precaution vs. Empirical Evidence

The European Union's restriction on Lilial (butylphenyl methylpropional, or p-BMHCA) in cosmetic products, effective from March 2022 under Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009, stems from its classification as a Category 1B , indicating presumed human based on harmonized criteria under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. This classification derives primarily from multiple studies demonstrating adverse effects on reproductive organs, such as testicular , tubular atrophy, and reduced fertility, observed at oral doses of 45 mg/kg body weight per day or higher in subchronic and assays, with no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) identified at 15-45 mg/kg bw/day. The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) concluded in 2015 and 2019 opinions that aggregate dermal exposure from cosmetics could yield margins of safety (MOS) below 100 for certain product combinations at proposed use levels up to 0.2-1.6%, prompting the precautionary prohibition despite acknowledging non-genotoxic mechanisms and absence of carcinogenicity. In contrast, quantitative assessments incorporating empirical data reveal substantial margins. Systemic doses (SEDs) from cosmetic use are estimated at 0.3-3 μg/kg bw/day across product types like perfumes and lotions, yielding values exceeding 5,000 relative to the lowest reprotoxicity NOAEL of 15 mg/kg bw/day (15,000 μg/kg bw/day), far surpassing conventional thresholds like 100 for consumer products. biomonitoring and studies indicate low dermal penetration (approximately 4-10% ) and rapid , with no accumulation; a 2023 in vitro investigation using cell lines (e.g., for , HepG2 for ) found no , mutagenicity, or activation of pathways at concentrations up to 100 μM, aligning with environmentally relevant exposures. Canada's 2024 assessment similarly determined that consumer exposures, including from non-cosmetic sources, pose no , citing the absence of adverse outcomes despite decades of widespread use in fragrances at concentrations up to 5%. Epidemiological evidence remains absent, with no population-level studies linking Lilial to reproductive impairments in humans, even amid high-volume production (thousands of tons annually) and global application since the 1970s. Animal-derived hazards, while consistent across models via non-genotoxic pathways like proliferation, involve dose levels 10,000-fold above typical human systemic burdens, underscoring species-specific sensitivities not replicated in human-relevant assays. Regulatory reliance on hazard-based classification prioritizes potential over exposure-normalized probability, as critiqued in frameworks emphasizing dose-response thresholds; for instance, the SCCS noted safe individual product use but deferred to aggregate precaution, potentially overlooking first-principles causal chains where low-dose irrelevance predominates. This approach aligns with the EU's but diverges from empirical characterization, where verifiable human safety data and high support continued permissibility under evidence-based standards, as reflected in non-EU jurisdictions like the and lacking equivalent bans.

Industry Perspectives and Economic Implications

The fragrance industry, through organizations like the International Fragrance Association (IFRA), had imposed usage restrictions on Lilial (butylphenyl methylpropional) years prior to regulatory bans, based on preclinical assessments indicating potential reproductive risks at high exposures, while maintaining that levels in finished products remained safe under those limits. Industry groups such as the Fragrance Creators Association have contended that Lilial poses negligible risks to consumers at typical low concentrations in —often below 0.1%—emphasizing a lack of direct human epidemiological of harm and critiquing precautionary bans as disproportionate given real-world exposure data. The European Union's prohibition of Lilial in effective March 1, 2022, compelled manufacturers to reformulate thousands of products, including iconic perfumes reliant on its muguet (lily-of-the-valley) floral profile, leading to estimated , , and testing costs of up to €1 million per flagship fragrance. This has disrupted supply chains for major players like and , with pre-ban stockpiling and discounted sales of affected inventories reflecting immediate market adjustments. Economically, the global Lilial ingredient market stood at approximately US$227 million before restrictions intensified, underscoring the scale of lost revenue for suppliers and the broader implications for a fragrance sector valued in tens of billions annually, where even subtle scent alterations risk eroding consumer loyalty and . Ongoing pressures in regions like —where lobbied against similar bans—and , which initiated assessments in 2024, signal potential further costs for global harmonization and innovation to mitigate performance gaps without equivalents. While advocates highlight accelerated R&D in safer alternatives as a long-term benefit, short-term reformulations have strained smaller formulators and elevated compliance burdens amid varying international standards.

Alternatives and Industry Adaptations

Chemical Substitutes and Reformulations

Following the European Union ban on Lilial (butylphenyl methylpropional) in cosmetics effective March 1, 2022, fragrance manufacturers reformulated numerous products to eliminate the ingredient while preserving its characteristic fresh, aldehydic muguet (lily-of-the-valley) profile with powdery floral and citrus nuances. Reformulations typically involved proprietary blends of multiple aroma chemicals rather than single-molecule drop-in replacements, as no substitute fully replicates Lilial's odor strength, substantivity, and stability in formulations. Industry suppliers like International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) and Bordas developed such blends, with Bordas' Mugal offering a fresh floral-aquatic alternative at comparable performance and cost levels. Key single-chemical substitutes include Silvial (3-(4-tert-butylcyclohex-3-en-1-yl)propanal) from , a powerful muguet aldehyde with vibrant freshness, subtle , and aldehydic facets, often used in lily-of-the-valley accords to approximate Lilial's sensory impact. Perfumers note Silvial as among the closest matches, though it leans more and less floral than Lilial, requiring adjustments in usage levels up to IFRA Category 4 limits of 7.5% in finished products. Research has explored γ-unsaturated via Claisen rearrangements as potential replacers, yielding compounds with similar propanal structures but modified phenyl substituents to enhance odor fidelity while addressing regulatory concerns. Patents describe optimized floral compositions combining such with supporting notes like or hedione to mimic Lilial's role as a primary perfuming . Reformulated fragrances, such as Layton, demonstrate practical adaptations, where Lilial's removal prompted shifts to alternative muguet materials, potentially affecting sillage or longevity but maintaining overall scent integrity per manufacturer claims. These changes complied with Regulation 2021/1902, which classified Lilial as a CMR Category 1B substance, prompting global adjustments even in non-banned regions like the , where reformulations potential restrictions. Substitutes undergo IFRA assessments, but their long-term toxicological data may lag behind Lilial's extensive preclinical studies, reflecting industry's focus on over exhaustive empirical validation.

Challenges in Replacement and Performance Equivalence

Lilial's distinctive olfactory profile, characterized by a fresh, aldehydic lily-of-the-valley note with green-floral nuances, diffusive radiance, and the capacity to impart fluffy softness and roundness to fragrance compositions, complicates direct substitution. Often incorporated at concentrations of 7-14% in formulas, it functions not merely as a top note but as a structural element that enhances bouquet opening and harmonizes with other accords, making isolated replacement insufficient for maintaining equivalence. Perfumers emphasize that mechanical substitution fails, as Lilial's interactions alter the perceptual balance, often resulting in thinner or less cohesive profiles when alternatives are used. Efforts to develop equivalents, such as Givaudan's Nympheal (introduced in ), prioritize olfactory proximity alongside , yet achieve only partial matching; Nympheal provides greater intensity but lacks Lilial's subtle integration and softening effect. Other candidates like BASF's Florosa, Firmenich's Lilflore, and Givaudan's Dupical replicate the muguet (lily-of-the-valley) facet with varying persistence, but none fully duplicate Lilial's versatility across floral, aldehydic, and oriental contexts. Industry analyses note a proliferation of such "muguet" substitutes since the effective March 2022, reflecting ongoing but underscoring the absence of a universal match. Performance metrics like substantivity—Lilial's contribution to on and textiles—and in formulations pose additional hurdles, as high-volume usage amplifies these traits, which blends struggle to emulate without reformulating entire accords. Reformulations demand iterative testing, with perfumers reporting challenges in recreating the "fluffy softness sensation" Lilial provides, often requiring dozens of materials that inadvertently shift radiance or sillage. While some adaptations yield comparable or enhanced results in specific contexts, empirical feedback from reformulated classics like Dior's Diorissimo indicates detectable differences in thickness and persistence, highlighting incomplete equivalence.

References

  1. [1]
    Lilial | C14H20O | CID 228987 - PubChem
    Lilial | C14H20O | CID 228987 - structure, chemical names, physical and chemical properties, classification, patents, literature, biological activities, ...
  2. [2]
    Lilial - the NIST WebBook
    IUPAC Standard InChIKey: SDQFDHOLCGWZPU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copy; CAS Registry Number: 80-54-6; Chemical structure: C14H20O This structure is also available as a ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Opinion on the safety of Butylphenyl methylpropional (p-BMHCA) in ...
    80-54-6 with INCI name Butylphenyl methylpropional is a fragrance ingredient used in many compounds for cosmetic products as well as in non-cosmetic products.
  4. [4]
    Lose the lilial: European Union ban shows risks of chemical in ...
    Mar 21, 2022 · With this classification, lilial was set to be prohibited from use in cosmetics sold in the EU and Northern Ireland as of March 2022. Due to ...
  5. [5]
    Toxicological investigation of lilial - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
    Oct 28, 2023 · Lilial is listed as one of 26 fragrance ingredients that cause allergic contact dermatitis, which must be declared on cosmetic products.
  6. [6]
    Lilial | C14H20O | CID 228987 - PubChem - NIH
    Lilial | C14H20O | CID 228987 - structure, chemical names, physical and chemical properties, classification, patents, literature, biological activities, ...
  7. [7]
    2-(4-tert-Butylbenzyl) propionaldehyde - ECHA
    Hydrocinnamaldehyde, p-tert-butyl-alpha-methyl- (6CI, 7CI, 8CI) · Lilestralis · LILIAL · Lilial · Lilial = lysmeral · Lilyal · Lysmeral · Monastral Red B.
  8. [8]
    Chemical Properties of Lilial (CAS 80-54-6) - Cheméo
    CAS: 80-54-6; Other Names. Propanal, «alpha»-methyl-«beta»-(p-tert.-butylphenyl)-; p-tert-Butyl-«alpha»-methylhydrocinnamaldehyde; Benzenepropanal, 4-(1,1 ...
  9. [9]
    Butylphenyl Methylpropional (Lilial): Cosmetic Ingredient INCI
    Apr 21, 2023 · CAS Number: 80-54- ; /IUPAC Name: 2-(4-tert-Butylbenzyl)propionaldehyde; BMHCA ; EINECS/ELINCS No: 201-289- ; REF No: 31735 ...
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
    Butylphenyl Methylpropional - Cosmetics Info
    Butylphenyl methylpropional (lilial) is classified as a reproductive toxicant according to the EU Regulation on the classification, labelling, and packaging of ...
  12. [12]
    EWG Skin Deep® | What is LILIAL
    Lilial (butylphenyl methylpropanal) is a synthetic scent ingredient; associated with allergies and contact dermatitis.
  13. [13]
    Lily aldehyde | 80-54-6 - ChemicalBook
    Lily aldehyde (also known as lysmeral or Lilial) is a chemical compound commonly used as a perfume in cosmetic preparations and laundry powders1-3. It is fresh ...Missing: classification | Show results with:classification
  14. [14]
    Lilial - CAS Common Chemistry
    CAS Name. Lilial. Molecular Formula. C14H20O. Molecular Mass. 204.31. Discover more in SciFinder. Cite this Page. Lilial. CAS Common Chemistry. CAS, a division ...Missing: IUPAC | Show results with:IUPAC
  15. [15]
    lilyall, 80-54-6 - The Good Scents Company
    farnesol. FL/FR. floral butanal. FR. floral pyranol. FR. floral specialty. FR. freesia acetate. FR. gardenia oxide. FR. geraniol. FL/FR. geranyl acetate
  16. [16]
    The Lilials
    (S)-(+)-Lilial® - lily of the valley odor but slightly less strong than the (R)-(-)-isomer; also described as "aldehydic, chemical" (Yamamoto).Missing: appearance characteristics
  17. [17]
  18. [18]
    80-54-6(Lily aldehyde) Product Description - ChemicalBook
    Lily aldehyde Property ; Odor Type, floral ; Water Solubility, 33mg/L at 20℃ ; BRN, 880140 ; InChIKey, SDQFDHOLCGWZPU-UHFFFAOYSA-N ; LogP, 4.2 at 24℃.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] LILIAL - Prodasynth
    No hazardous reactions if stored and handled as prescribed/indicated. 10.2. Chemical stability. The product is stable if stored and handled as prescribed/ ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Safety Data Sheet - LILIAL BASE
    Feb 26, 2025 · STABILITY AND REACTIVITY ... Avoid any potential source of heat. 10.5. Incompatible materials. Strong acids - Oxidising agents - Bases. 10.6.
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Safety Data Sheet - Glentham Life Sciences
    Apr 5, 2023 · Lilial. CAS: 80-54-6. EC: REACH: Not applicable. 96.0%. H302, Acute Tox. 4. H315, Skin Irr. 2. 4. First aid measures. 4.1. Description of first ...
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
    Lilial (C14H20O) properties
    Synthesis and Preparation Methods. Laboratory Synthesis Routes. Laboratory synthesis of lilial typically employs aldol condensation methodology. The most ...
  24. [24]
    Cas 80-54-6,Lily aldehyde | lookchem
    Lily aldehyde (also known as lysmeral or Lilial) is a chemical compound commonly used as a perfume in cosmetic preparations and laundry powders1-3.
  25. [25]
    Lilial Production Cost Analysis Reports 2025 - Procurement Resource
    Production from p-tert-benzaldehyde and n-propanal: The manufacturing process of Lilial starts with the addition of an alkaline solution of p-tert-benzaldehyde ...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    Industrial processes for the manufacturing of Lilial - ResearchGate
    This study presents an eco-friendly, high-efficiency protocol for the industrial production of terpenes using a continuous flow process with metal plate ...
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
    Lilial - The Ingredient Directory - The Fragrance Conservatory
    Lilial is a fragrance ingredient with a floral scent, used to give the essence of lilies. It is an aldehyde, and is banned in the EU for cosmetics.
  29. [29]
    Lilial - PerfumersWorld
    What is feeeel... the smell..? Odour. The odour and uses of Lilial Odour=> fresh light green floral lily notes muguet lindenblossom. Perfume-Uses=> Muguet ...Missing: fragrance profile
  30. [30]
    Lilial (Lily of the valley) perfume ingredient - Wikiparfum
    Lilial (Lily of the valley). Delicate, light, fresh, natural, subtle, fragile, green. Light, crisp and green—lily of the valley is the epitome of spring.
  31. [31]
  32. [32]
    Butylphenyl Methylpropional (Lilial) Ingredient Allergy ... - SkinSAFE
    A trial-anderror method of avoiding a fragrance allergen in a product can be performed by applying the product to the forearm in the same small area twice a day ...
  33. [33]
    Lilial: From Popular Fragrance Ingredient to Global Ban in Cosmetics
    Oct 10, 2024 · Industrial Production: How Lilial is Made​​ The production of Lilial is a complex chemical process, with BASF leading the industry in large-scale ...Missing: methods | Show results with:methods<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    Butylphenyl Methylpropional in Cosmetics & Personal Care Products
    Sensory Attributes​​ Lilial® (p-BMHCA) undergoes significant oxidation (about 30% during 168 h). Alpha-tocopherol is usually added to stabilize the compound.Missing: appearance characteristics
  35. [35]
    [PDF] OPINION ON Butylphenyl methylpropional (BMHCA)
    Aug 12, 2015 · The NOAEL for testicular toxicity and systemic toxicity was suggested to be at 25 mg/kg bw/day and 5 mg/kg bw/day, respectively. Follow up study ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, pt-butyl-α
    May 24, 2020 · A NOAEL of 25 mg/kg/day in male rats is substantiated by studies applying the test material for 5 days, 90 days, or in the 1-generation range ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Draft assessment for terpenes and terpenoids - Canada.ca
    results, study authors determined NOAELs for general toxicity of 151.5 and 294.6 mg/kg ... In the only dermal toxicity study, undiluted lilial was applied as ...
  38. [38]
    Toxicological investigation of lilial | Scientific Reports - Nature
    Oct 28, 2023 · Lilial did not show genotoxicity and mutagenicity in a variety of further mentioned in vitro studies. No genotoxic and mutagenic potential ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Benzenepropanal, 4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-.alpha.-methyl
    Nov 25, 2016 · Identification of Lilial as a fragrance sensitizer in a perfume by bioassay-guided chemical fractionation and structure-activity relationships.
  40. [40]
    Identification of Lilial as a fragrance sensitizer in a perfume by ...
    The aim of this study was to identify in a perfume fragrance allergens not included in the fragrance mix, by use of bioassay-guided chemical fractionation.
  41. [41]
    Lysmeral Exposure in Children and Adolescences Participating in ...
    The predominant exposure route is dermal, but lysmeral can also be inhaled or taken orally.
  42. [42]
    Quantitative analysis of fragrance allergens in various matrixes ... - NIH
    Lyral, atranol, and chloroatranol are banned fragrance substances, and not allowed to use in cosmetic manufacture since 2019 August 31, and as of August 23, ...
  43. [43]
    Human biomonitoring in urine samples from the Environmental ...
    The chemical 2-(4-tert-butylbenzyl)propionaldehyde is a prominent fragrance substance, usually termed as lysmeral or lilial, and labelled on consumer products ...Missing: pathways | Show results with:pathways
  44. [44]
    Lysmeral Exposure in Children and Adolescences Participating in ...
    Dec 19, 2022 · We analyzed differences in exposure to lysmeral, a compound commonly found as a fragrance in cosmetics, personal care, and household products, in 2294 children ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] esr-health-risk-assessment-butylphenyl-methylpropional-cosmetics ...
    This is a health risk assessment of butylphenyl methylpropional in cosmetic products, including its presence in products, recalls, and hazard identification.<|separator|>
  46. [46]
    Butylphenyl Methylpropional (BMHCA, Lilial) - Msl.io
    Aug 19, 2020 · ... Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation, has been published in The Official Journal of the European Union on 11 August 2020.
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety SCCS
    Aug 12, 2015 · Doses: 0, 100 mg/kg bw/day, once daily. Route: Oral (suspended in fluid baby food). Page 23. SCCS/1540/14. Revision of opinion on Butylphenyl ...<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    SCCS Final Opinion on Butylphenyl Methylpropional Safety
    Jul 26, 2019 · Discover the SCCS's final opinion on the safety of Butylphenyl Methylpropional (p-BMHCA) in this detailed analysis by Obelis.
  49. [49]
    IFRA Standards - International Fragrance Association
    Explore the IFRA Standards—globally recognized guidelines that ensure safe use of fragrance ingredients through scientific evaluation.<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    Lilial and Zinc pyrithione banned in the EU & UK - Obelis Group
    Mar 23, 2022 · As of March 1, 2022, two common cosmetic ingredients are banned for use in the EU. They are Butylphenyl Methylpropional (Lilial) and Zinc pyrithione.
  51. [51]
    Prohibited & Restricted Ingredients in Cosmetics - FDA
    Feb 25, 2022 · It's against the law for a cosmetic to contain any ingredient that makes the product harmful when consumers use it according to directions on the label.Missing: Lilial EPA<|separator|>
  52. [52]
    Using the IFRA Standards - International Fragrance Association
    For example, Butylphenyl Methylpropional (BMHCA), also known commercially as Lilial, has been banned in cosmetic products (both existing and new) in the ...
  53. [53]
    Banning Lilial from use in products in the United States is way ...
    Jul 24, 2023 · Lilial is a reproductive toxicant causing sperm damage and fertility issues. The industry kept this research secret, and it is banned in other ...
  54. [54]
    Lilial and your health - Canada.ca
    Feb 2, 2024 · Lilial is a synthetic substance generally used as a fragrance ingredient in a variety of products available to consumers.
  55. [55]
    Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist: Prohibited and Restricted ... - Canada.ca
    Nov 13, 2024 · List of substances that are described as restricted or prohibited in cosmetics under the Food and Drugs Act (FDA) and the Cosmetic Regulations (CR).Missing: Lilial Australia Japan China
  56. [56]
    [PDF] i+Cosmetics - INDITEX
    307 MAC = 8% except in Australia, Canada, South Korea and USA where the MAC is 4% and in Japan where the MAC is 3%. 308 According to the legislation of ...
  57. [57]
    "SCCS OPINION ON the safety of Butylphenyl methylpropional (p ...
    In vitro studies report that lilial does not exhibit genotoxicity and mutagenicity. It has been reported that it does not carry genotoxic and mutagenic ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Find up-to-date information at www.toxicology.org/2023 - CDC Stacks
    Butylphenyl methylpropional, more commonly known as Lilial®, is a synthetic aromatic compound that has historically been used as a fragrance additive in a.
  59. [59]
    California bans cosmetics chemicals, following EU (again)
    Oct 10, 2023 · The Fragrance Creators Association asked that one ingredient, lilial, be excluded from the new law, arguing that it's not risky to consumers ...
  60. [60]
    European Union • New European rules could spell trouble for L ...
    May 22, 2025 · Glitz understands that it can cost up to a million euros to reformulate a flagship perfume, and heliotropin would be especially difficult to ...
  61. [61]
    Reformulations Continue: March 1st Sets New Limit ~ Raw Materials
    Feb 21, 2022 · After animal studies found it to be toxic for reproduction, Lilial was reclassified as a prohibited substance in the EU, and banned from use in ...<|separator|>
  62. [62]
    Fragrance Ingredients Are at Risk in the European Union - WWD
    Jul 7, 2023 · Already some fragrance ingredients have been banned, such as butylphenyl methylpropional, or lilial, which gives the essence of lilies. On March ...
  63. [63]
    Bans on substances under EU cosmetics law - CMS LawNow
    As a result, Lilial can no longer be used in cosmetics as of March 2022 (Article 14 (1) b) EU Regulation on cosmetic products).
  64. [64]
    Lilial Replacer - The Perfumers Apprentice
    Fresh slightly green lily watery. This replacer is a formula provided by IFF to replace the scent profile of Lilial in a blend. It is a mixture.<|separator|>
  65. [65]
    Best Lilial Replacer - Basenotes
    Jun 8, 2024 · For what it's worth: according to Hekserij, SIlvial is "one of the best substitutes": It is one of the best substitutes for Lilial, although it ...
  66. [66]
    LILIAL REPLACER - Bordas S.A.
    Oct 11, 2022 · Butylphenyl Methylpropional (BMHCA), also known as Lilial, is a green-floral fragrance ingredient that has been widely used in the perfume ...Missing: compound | Show results with:compound
  67. [67]
    Silvial™ | Givaudan
    Silvial™ is a powerful, vibrant muguet ingredient with a slight citrus undertone and a fresh, aldehydic touch. It is used in perfumery in the same way as ...Missing: replacement | Show results with:replacement
  68. [68]
    Silvial® (CAS N° 6658-48-6) - ScenTree
    Silvial is usually used to replace regulated aldehydes as Lilial or Lyral in lily of the valley accords for example. It brings a powerful and fresh note.
  69. [69]
    γ-Unsaturated aldehydes as potential Lilial replacers - PubMed
    A series of Claisen rearrangements was undertaken in order to find a replacement for Lilial (=3-(4-(tert-butyl)phenyl)-2-methylpropanal), a high-tonnage ...
  70. [70]
    Floral perfuming compositions as substitutes for lilial - Google Patents
    A floral fragrance composition for use as a replacement for 3-(4-tertbutylphenyl)-2-methylpropanal (LILIAL®) that is a primary perfuming ingredient composition ...
  71. [71]
    PdM Layton reformulation | Basenotes
    Nov 29, 2021 · It's official: an allergen ban in the EU has made PdM reformulate their best-seller. Lilial (butylphenyl methylpropional) was used as a ...
  72. [72]
    Regulation (EU) 2021/1902. - Cosmeservice
    As of 1st of March 2022, cosmetics containing Butylphenyl Methylpropional (Lilial) must be not present at cosmetic products. Zinc Pyrithione – CAS No. 13463-41- ...
  73. [73]
    Lilial Substitute IFRA | PerfumersWorld
    Lilial Substitute IFRA is IFRA-49 and EU compliant and can be used to replace Lilial in almost all applications where Lilial would be used.Missing: fragrance | Show results with:fragrance
  74. [74]
    Reformulation: How Do They Do It? ~ Interviews - Fragrantica
    Nov 26, 2024 · Lilial was banned due to being allergenous, if a material is banned ... The only factor for reformulating a perfume is to cheapen costs.
  75. [75]
    Discovery of Nympheal: The Definitive Muguet Aldehyde
    Feb 20, 2018 · It has a universal white floralcy, and combines very well with rose, violet and jasmine odorants of all sorts, even integrates green facets up ...
  76. [76]
    The Trends of the Past 20 Years in the Chemistry of Odorants
    Oct 17, 2025 · The replacement of Lilial and Lyral kept the industry busy in the floral domain with a plethora of new “muguets”. There was continued activity ...Missing: substantivity | Show results with:substantivity