Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

MacArthur Foundation

The John D. and Foundation is an independent grantmaking institution established on October 18, 1970, by insurance magnate and his wife , which commenced operations in 1978 after inheriting approximately $1 billion in assets following John's death and has since distributed over $8.27 billion in grants across the and 117 countries. With assets totaling $9.2 billion as of December 31, 2024, the foundation's mission centers on supporting creative individuals and effective organizations to foster a more just, verdant, and peaceful world through targeted investments in areas such as climate solutions, , , nuclear risk reduction, and community development in . Its most renowned initiative, the —launched in 1981 and often called "genius grants"—annually awards $800,000 in unrestricted funds to 20 to 30 exceptionally original thinkers and creators across diverse fields, recognizing potential for transformative impact without application processes or lifetime achievement criteria. Other signature efforts include the 100&Change competition, which provides $100 million for bold solutions to global challenges, and "Big Bets" for high-risk, high-reward projects addressing era-defining issues. The foundation's grantmaking has evolved from broad early support for programs in , , and to deeper emphases on , , and policy research, though its initiatives—such as the Safety and Justice Challenge, which conditions funding on reducing and jail populations—have sparked disputes, including grant withholdings and contract terminations by recipients like San Francisco's district attorney's office and Palm Beach County over unmet metrics and perceived overreach.

History

Founding and Initial Operations

The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation was established on October 18, 1970, by , a self-made executive and investor, and his wife , after their longtime attorney William T. Kirby persuaded John that a foundation would ensure his amassed fortune supported beneficial causes beyond his lifetime. The initial board of directors comprised Catherine MacArthur, Kirby, the couple's son Roderick MacArthur, radio broadcaster , and construction firm executive Louis Feil. John MacArthur, who had built Bankers Life and Casualty Company into a privately held insurer with over $1 billion in assets by 1977 through frugal management and opportunistic acquisitions, provided the foundational endowment but offered no specific programmatic guidelines, reflecting his preference for broad, unstructured aligned with his conservative fiscal principles. John MacArthur's death from cancer on January 6, 1978, transferred control of his estate—valued at approximately $1 billion, including insurance holdings and extensive real estate—to the foundation, marking the start of its substantive operations from its headquarters in the Marquette Building. The foundation's first grants, each totaling $50,000, were issued that year to for human rights advocacy and to the of Cities for municipal governance support, illustrating an early emphasis on international and local civic efforts without a predefined ideological framework. Under inaugural president John E. Corbally, a former University of Illinois chancellor, initial operations through the early 1980s prioritized liquidating non-strategic assets from the estate and cautiously building grantmaking capacity, with total disbursements reaching $42 million by 1980 focused on education, good government, and general-purpose philanthropy. A notable early award included up to $500,000 in 1979 to the Chicago Better Government Association for investigative work on public integrity, underscoring support for anti-corruption initiatives in MacArthur's adopted hometown. Catherine MacArthur's death on December 15, 1981, further consolidated the foundation's independence, as it transitioned from ad hoc giving to more structured programs amid internal debates over direction influenced by board members like Roderick MacArthur.

Strategic Shifts and Mission Evolution

The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation was established in 1970, with active grantmaking commencing in 1978 following the death of founder , initially pursuing a broad exploratory approach to without predefined focus areas. Early initiatives under first president John Corbally included launching the in 1981, alongside programs in public radio, international peace and security, , and environmental conservation, reflecting an experimental phase aimed at identifying high-impact opportunities across diverse fields. In the and , under president Adele Simmons, the foundation expanded internationally, establishing a major Population Program with offices in , , , and to address demographic and reproductive health issues, while opening a office after the Soviet Union's collapse to support emerging . This period emphasized cross-cutting themes such as and global development, but by the late , the foundation began evaluating program efficacy, leading to closures like the Population Program in 2000 after two decades of investment exceeding $400 million, as leadership determined that external policy shifts and achieved milestones warranted reallocation to emerging priorities. The 1990s and 2000s under president Jonathan Fanton marked a shift toward deeper engagement in select areas, including , juvenile justice, , and initiatives like the , with a deliberate move to fewer, larger, and longer-term grants to maximize leverage and sustainability. President Robert L. Gallucci, from 2009 to 2014, further embedded program assessment mechanisms and introduced discovery grants alongside new emphases on strengthening and global security. A pivotal narrowing occurred in under Julia Stasch, who reduced the portfolio from 18 active programs to concentrated "Big Bets"—time-limited, high-stakes investments targeting transformative outcomes in areas such as climate solutions, , nuclear challenges, and anti-corruption in —allocating over $1 billion across these by 2024 to address era-defining problems with audacious scale. This strategy, formalized in 2015, coincided with the launch of the 100&Change competition offering $100 million for bold solutions to global issues, alongside adoption of the "Just Imperative" framework to integrate equity and justice into operations and grantmaking. Subsequent leadership under from 2019 has sustained this focused, evidence-driven model while winding down completed Big Bets, such as nuclear challenges by 2023, to enable adaptation to new threats like escalating geopolitical risks.

Governance and Leadership

Board of Trustees

The governs the John D. and Catherine T. Foundation, managing its property and affairs, approving budgets, overseeing investments, and guiding strategic priorities in alignment with the foundation's mission. The board consists of up to 16 members, including the as an ex officio participant, though it currently comprises 13 individuals selected for their expertise in fields such as , , , and . It operates through standing committees, including Audit (chaired by Stephanie Bell-Rose), Budget/Compensation, Institutional Policy, Investment, and Nominating, which handle specific oversight functions like financial audits, compensation decisions, and director nominations. Juan Salgado serves as the current chair, elected on March 31, 2025, and assuming the role in June 2025; as chancellor of since 2015, Salgado has emphasized workforce development and economic opportunity programs for underserved communities. Prior chairs include , who held the position starting in June 2022 after election in March 2022, and earlier Marjorie Scardino in 2012. The board adheres to a enforcing high ethical and professional standards, with directors contributing to decisions on grants and impact investments totaling over $800 million annually as of recent fiscal reports. Notable current members include , a social scientist and former deputy assistant to President Biden for science and society; Amy C. Falls, a leader; William F. Lee, a litigator and former co-managing partner at WilmerHale; Cecilia Muñoz, former domestic policy advisor to President Obama; and , president emerita of and former president, who joined in June 2023. Recent additions encompass Dr. Megan Bang, a scholar focusing on , joining in September 2025, and Dr. Mariko Silver, a transformation specialist, elected in June 2025. President serves ex officio, providing operational leadership. This composition reflects a concentration of expertise in progressive policy areas, with multiple members holding prior roles in Democratic administrations, potentially influencing the foundation's funding emphases on and equity initiatives.

Executive Presidents and Key Figures

The John D. and Foundation's executive leadership has been headed by a since its operational following the receipt of its endowment in 1978. The first , John E. Corbally, served from 1979 to 1989 and played a pivotal role in establishing the foundation's initial programmatic identity, including early grantmaking in population studies and international affairs. Adele Simmons succeeded Corbally as the second president, holding the position from 1989 to 1999, during which the foundation expanded its international programs and emphasized support for and global peace initiatives. Jonathan F. Fanton served as the third president from 1999 to 2009, overseeing a period of strategic refinement that included increased focus on , , and the . Robert Gallucci acted as interim or transitional president around 2009, drawing on his expertise in nuclear nonproliferation before the appointment of a permanent successor. Julia M. Stasch became the fifth president in July 2014 and led until 2019, implementing "Big Bets" for high-impact investments in areas like climate solutions and , while narrowing the foundation's grantmaking portfolio for deeper engagement. John G. Palfrey, the current sixth president since September 2019, has directed the foundation toward bolder responses to global challenges, including increased payout rates in to address urgent needs in and environmental domains, with approximating $8 billion. Key figures among the executive team include managing directors overseeing core functions: Chris Cardona for discovery and programs, Chantell Johnson for evaluation and learning, and Kenneth Jones as senior vice president for programs, supporting the president's strategic direction.
PresidentTenureNotable Contributions
John E. Corbally1979–1989Established foundational programs in population and international affairs.
Adele Simmons1989–1999Expanded global and education initiatives.
Jonathan F. Fanton1999–2009Advanced and fellows program.
Robert Gallucci~2009 (transitional)Focused on nuclear security expertise.
Julia M. Stasch2014–2019Introduced "Big Bets" for targeted impact.
John G. Palfrey2019–presentEmphasized adaptive amid global crises.

Core Programs

MacArthur Fellowship Program

The MacArthur Fellows Program awards unrestricted fellowships of $800,000—disbursed as $200,000 per year for five years—to exceptionally creative individuals demonstrating potential for significant future contributions across diverse fields, including the arts, sciences, , and public endeavors. Established in 1981 by the John D. and Foundation, the program invests in recipients' originality and dedication without requiring proposals or predefined outcomes, aiming to enable risk-taking and unhindered by conventional constraints. Typically, 20 to 30 fellows are selected annually from a broad spectrum of nominees, with awards announced each fall following a secretive process that surprises recipients via unsolicited phone calls. Nominations originate from a confidential network of external individuals, such as prior fellows, scholars, and professionals, rather than self-submissions, ensuring to minimize biases in . An Selection Committee, comprising rotating experts from , sciences, and , assesses candidates using nomination letters, expert consultations, work samples, and references against three core criteria: exceptional evidenced by a track record of notable achievements; concrete promise for advancing knowledge or creative practice; and the fellowship's capacity to catalyze further breakthroughs. Eligibility is limited to U.S. citizens or residents not holding elective office or senior government roles, excluding lifetime achievement recognitions in favor of those "on the precipice" of transformative work. The committee's recommendations are reviewed by the foundation's president and board before final approval. Since , the has recognized over 1,100 fellows, fostering interdisciplinary pursuits and enabling shifts toward high-risk projects that might otherwise lack . A internal evaluation of selections from 2005 to 2023, covering 228 fellows and $100.8 million in awards, documented substantial career impacts, including new creative endeavors, expanded collaborations, and ripple effects on peers and disciplines, though some recipients experienced heightened public scrutiny or personal disruptions. The program's emphasis on unrestricted support has been credited with amplifying underrepresented voices and unconventional ideas, yet it maintains no fixed quotas for fields, demographics, or institutions. Selections have faced scrutiny for perceived ideological skews, with critics from conservative outlets contending that the process, influenced by the foundation's progressive grantmaking history, disproportionately favors recipients aligned with left-leaning causes over those prioritizing empirical rigor or dissenting views. For instance, the 2021 fellowship to , whose framework has been challenged for conflating descriptive correlations with causal prescriptions absent controlled evidence, exemplifies claims of rewarding advocacy over falsifiable scholarship. Earlier critiques, dating to the 1990s, similarly highlighted patterns of in choices, reflecting broader institutional biases in philanthropic and academic networks that undervalue heterodox perspectives.

100&Change Competition

The 100&Change competition, launched by the MacArthur Foundation in October 2015, awards a single $100 million to support one bold proposal promising substantial and measurable progress toward solving a critical global problem. Unlike traditional grantmaking that disperses funds across multiple recipients, this initiative concentrates resources on a high-impact idea, emphasizing evidence of feasibility, , and rigorous outcome over good intentions alone. The program seeks applications from organizations, collaborations, or teams worldwide, without field or geographic restrictions, provided the proposal addresses an urgent challenge and includes a clear plan for tracking results. Administered by Lever for Change, the MacArthur Foundation's nonprofit affiliate specializing in large-scale , the selection process involves multiple stages: initial proposal review yielding a "Top 100" of highest-scoring submissions; advancement to semi-finalists who receive tailored support for refining plans and building capacity; selection of up to five finalists by the MacArthur Board of Directors, who then develop detailed project blueprints with expert advisors; and final pitches evaluated on criteria such as problem significance, solution innovation, team strength, and evidence-based impact potential. The grant is disbursed over several years, with winners required to report on predefined metrics to demonstrate progress. This structure aims to mitigate risks of large-scale funding by prioritizing verifiable pathways to change. In the first round, concluded in November 2016, the (IRC) and received the $100 million grant for Ahlan Simsim ("Welcome Sesame"), a multimedia educational initiative targeting young refugee children in the and amid displacement crises. The project combined Sesame Street-style content with on-the-ground services to mitigate learning loss and trauma, aiming to reach 1.5 million children by promoting and school readiness. Independent evaluations later documented improved cognitive and social-emotional outcomes for participants. The second round, with applications closing in 2018 and winner announced on April 7, 2021, awarded the grant to Community Solutions for its Built for Zero initiative, focused on systemically ending and chronic in 75 U.S. communities by 2026 through data-driven community coordination, real-time tracking, and quality improvement cycles. The funding supported expansion of proven interventions like rapid rehousing and supportive services, with early results showing over 20 communities achieving functional zero for veterans by 2023. The third round launched on May 22, 2024, with proposals due in September 2024; five finalists were announced on April 30, 2025, addressing challenges in areas such as health access, , tele-mentoring for clinicians, local journalism, and wildlife crime prevention. As of October 2025, finalists are in the project development phase, with the winner expected to be selected following board review in late 2025 or early 2026. No additional rounds have been confirmed beyond this.

Impact Investments Initiative

The MacArthur Foundation's Impact Investments Initiative deploys catalytic capital—patient, risk-tolerant funding that accepts lower financial returns to prioritize social and environmental outcomes—to nonprofits, social enterprises, and investment funds addressing challenges such as , , and . This approach aligns with by filling capital gaps where traditional financing falls short, using instruments like loans, equity investments, and guarantees to promote inclusive economic growth and equity. Since its inception in 1983, the initiative has committed over $800 million to nearly 200 entities in the United States and internationally, demonstrating a long-term commitment to program-related investments (PRIs) and mission-related investments. The program's strategy emphasizes additionality, whereby investments catalyze additional private capital; systemic impact through field-building; and by prioritizing underserved communities and geographies. MacArthur manages a dedicated $500 million portfolio for active impact investments, with $390.5 million committed as of December 31, 2024, including unfunded guarantees and staged disbursements. Focus areas include the Commitment for , solutions to mitigate environmental risks, support for autonomy via entrepreneurial investments, the Just Home Project for , and bolstering and ecosystems. Evaluations, such as the 2024 interim report on the Catalytic Capital Consortium conducted with partners like New Philanthropy Capital, assess effectiveness in scaling impact and are publicly available to inform ongoing refinements. A cornerstone of the initiative is the Catalytic Capital Consortium (C3), launched in 2019 in collaboration with foundations including the Rockefeller Foundation and Omidyar Network, which pools resources from over a dozen impact investors to expand catalytic capital deployment. C3 has facilitated 15 investments across sectors and regions while funding nearly 30 learning projects to build practitioner knowledge, addressing an estimated $2.5–4 trillion annual financing gap for sustainable development. Complementary efforts, such as Benefit Chicago—a partnership with the Chicago Community Trust and Calvert Impact Capital—aim to mobilize $100 million for local nonprofits and social enterprises. Complementing direct investments, the initiative allocates approximately $5 million annually in grants to strengthen the global ecosystem, focusing on , , integrity, and in . Eligible recipients include nonprofits, for-profits, funds, and public entities, but unsolicited proposals are not accepted; interested parties must contact program staff to discuss alignment with priorities. This dual structure of investments and grants underscores MacArthur's goal of not only providing capital but also fostering market development to sustain long-term social progress.

Funding Priorities

Climate and Environmental Solutions

The MacArthur Foundation's Climate Solutions program, established in 2014 as a time-limited "Big Bet" initiative, prioritizes reducing —primarily and —from energy-related sources to limit to below 2°C. Its strategy targets halving emissions by 2030 and achieving net-zero balance between emissions and removals by 2050, with grantmaking emphasizing subnational efforts in the United States and , alongside equitable transitions for communities disproportionately impacted by , including communities of color, , rural areas, and workers displaced by energy shifts. Grantmaking operates through four core theories of change: altering political to highlight equitable solutions; advancing and enforcing climate-friendly policies and regulations; expanding financing for clean deployment and transitions; and building power among affected communities via citizen engagement, , and seed funding for innovations in , , and . Expected outcomes by 2025 include implementation of decarbonization policies at national and subnational levels, strengthened enforcement of environmental laws, increased funding flows to impacted communities, and establishment of organizations led by , , and people of color (BIPOC), rural groups, and displaced workers as influential actors. The foundation does not accept unsolicited proposals, instead inviting inquiries aligned with these priorities via designated channels. Since 2014, the program has disbursed $458.7 million in grants to 138 organizations, supporting mitigation efforts such as clean energy technology deployment, policy advocacy, and community-led initiatives. Representative grants include over $6 million announced on January 28, 2025, to bolster U.S. journalism outlets like Canary Media ($300,000 over three years) and Inside Climate News, aiming to enhance public understanding and discourse on emissions reduction. Additional funding has gone to entities like the , which connects local , environmental, and economic concerns to broader clean energy advocacy. Community-based projects supported by the foundation have projected impacts, with analyses indicating that each dollar invested mitigates one metric ton of CO2-equivalent emissions by 2030. Prior to the Solutions program's focus on emissions , the foundation's environmental efforts from 1979 to 2020 centered on and , committing over $724 million to preserve ecosystems, protect species, and promote environmentally respectful growth. This earlier work complemented subsequent shifts toward policy-driven , though current priorities exclude direct support for activities unrelated to energy emissions reduction or equitable power building. The program's emphasis on subnational and equity-oriented strategies reflects a causal approach linking local , financing innovations, and community empowerment to broader emissions stabilization in developing regions and reductions in high-emission economies like the U.S.

Nuclear and Global Security Challenges

The MacArthur Foundation has directed significant resources toward mitigating risks as a core component of addressing challenges, emphasizing the prevention of , the securing of weapons-usable materials, and the promotion of stable reductions in arsenals. Through its Challenges program, launched as a capstone initiative, the Foundation supported efforts to eliminate stockpiles of weapons-usable and build a diverse cadre of experts capable of tackling threats. This built on prior investments totaling approximately $460 million over three decades in broader activities, including on and for enhanced standards. Grantmaking under these priorities targeted civil society organizations to strengthen nuclear materials security and governance, with roughly $100 million allocated specifically to nuclear risk reduction efforts. Key recipients included the , which received funding to address proliferation concerns through global materials security enhancements; the Partnership for Global Security, supported for advancing nuclear security governance ahead of international summits; and the World Institute for Nuclear Security, backed since 2008 for professional training in safeguards and security practices. Additional grants went to the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation and the Arms Control Association to promote nonproliferation policies and reduce the availability of fissile materials. In January 2022, the Foundation disbursed $21.3 million across 28 organizations to foster a more robust and inclusive expertise community, incorporating analysis of risks tied to expansion as a mitigation strategy. This initiative addressed gaps in technical capacity and diversity within the field, aiming to sustain long-term efforts against existential threats like nuclear accidents or amid geopolitical tensions. A capstone evaluation released on October 15, 2025, reviewed these investments, highlighting their role in influencing international norms while noting persistent challenges such as stagnant progress among nuclear-armed states. The Foundation's nuclear-focused grantmaking, originating in the , has extended to broader global security by prioritizing causal interventions like materials and assessments over diplomatic alone, though critics argue such emphases may overlook deterrence dynamics in favor of unilateral reductions. Despite the conclusion of dedicated programs, the approach underscores a commitment to empirical mitigation, with ongoing relevance to 21st-century challenges including fissile material controls and power's dual-use potentials.

Journalism, Media, and Information Ecosystems

The MacArthur Foundation's and Media program, established as an enduring commitment, aims to bolster an ecosystem capable of scrutinizing institutional actions and policy outcomes while fostering accurate, compelling narratives. This initiative supports three primary areas: professional nonprofit reporting, storytelling, and participatory civic media, with grants directed toward national and international nonprofit organizations possessing broad reach and influence. The program emphasizes building sustainable organizations and networks to serve diverse public needs, prioritizing just and inclusive amid challenges like declining infrastructure and . A key component is the Local News program, framed as a "Big Bet" investment, which targets underserved communities with high news deserts or low trust in . It allocates funds to strengthen local newsrooms earning community trust, accelerate supportive for news production and distribution, close gaps in equity, and foster collaborative ecosystems through intermediaries and support organizations. In December 2024, the foundation disbursed $20 million to revitalize local newsrooms and , focusing on innovation in nascent ecosystems. This included $6.5 million in June 2025 to seven Chicago-based entities fortifying the city's landscape. Further, in July 2025, $1.5 million went to the American Journalism Project to enhance nonprofit news and access to trusted local reporting. The foundation has also addressed specialized threats to media viability, such as funding cuts. In August 2025, MacArthur contributed to a $36.5 million multi-foundation effort—providing $10 million in direct grants to stations, programs, and organizations, plus support for a stabilization fund offering immediate grants and low-interest loans to vulnerable public media outlets nationwide. Additionally, in January 2025, over $6 million was granted to expand in the United States, targeting coverage of and amid growing public demand. These efforts reflect a strategic focus on resilience against economic pressures and technological disruptions, though critics have questioned the program's emphasis on equity-driven narratives potentially aligning with institutional biases in funding.

Criminal Justice and Community Safety

The MacArthur Foundation directs significant funding toward reforming local criminal justice systems, with a focus on reducing jail over-incarceration and addressing racial and ethnic disparities in pretrial detention and sentencing practices. This priority recognizes that local jails account for over 7 million admissions annually in the United States, often serving as the entry point for broader system involvement. The foundation's approach emphasizes data-driven strategies to safely lower jail populations without compromising public safety, including alternatives to pretrial detention and diversion programs for low-risk individuals. The cornerstone initiative is the Safety and Justice Challenge, launched in 2015 to build a network of over 50 cities, counties, and states committed to these reforms. By 2019, the program had awarded $113 million across 141 grants to support local planning, implementation of evidence-based policies, technical assistance, and on jail trends. Investments target reducing average daily jail populations—such as through in lieu of for misdemeanors and expanded community supervision—while analyzing disparities, where and individuals are disproportionately held pretrial. Additional grants fund communications efforts to shift public narratives toward viewing jail reduction as compatible with community safety. Participating jurisdictions have reported collective jail population declines of approximately 20 percent since the initiative's start, equating to nearly 18,000 fewer incarcerated daily as of recent assessments. A 2019 evaluation found early implementation phases correlated with decreases in bookings and average daily populations in most sites, alongside national trends in falling rates during baseline periods, though causal attribution requires comparison to non-participating areas. Follow-on funding, such as $18 million awarded in 2021 to 15 sites and sustaining grants to five communities in 2024, aims to embed these changes amid post-pandemic challenges like fluctuating admissions. The foundation conditions continued support on progress metrics, withholding funds in cases of rising populations, as seen in in 2024. Beyond direct grants, the program supports allied organizations like the Alliance for Safety and Justice to advocate for policy changes prioritizing crime victims and system-impacted individuals in reducing jail misuse. Evaluations emphasize sustained to track not only incarceration metrics but also improvements, with ongoing NORC assessments examining long-term system effects. While self-reported outcomes highlight feasibility of reductions, independent verification of public safety correlations remains ongoing, given national crime fluctuations during reform periods.

Other Grantmaking Domains

The MacArthur Foundation's grantmaking extends beyond its primary national and global priorities to include targeted support for local initiatives in , primarily through the Chicago Commitment program launched in 2016. This enduring commitment focuses on investing in people, places, and partnerships to advance racial equity and foster a more inclusive city, with subareas encompassing Advancing Leadership, Culture, Equity, and the Arts, and Vital Communities. Since 1979, the Foundation has directed over $1.5 billion toward nearly 1,700 Chicago-based organizations and individuals, addressing regional challenges such as economic , cultural , and . In 2024 alone, it awarded 150 grants and impact investments totaling $69,031,500 to support these efforts, including collaborations for equitable business growth and leadership development programs. Between May 2016 and February 2022, the program disbursed more than $120 million to 235 organizations, emphasizing measurable progress in equity metrics like access to and participation. Within the Culture, Equity, and the Arts subarea, the Foundation provides annual to arts organizations with budgets exceeding $1 million, typically ranging from $55,000 to $80,000 per year for three-year terms, alongside loans via the Arts & Culture Loan Fund for needs among smaller entities. In 2025, fifteen such organizations received awards totaling an undisclosed amount, prioritizing practices that enhance in underrepresented communities. This domain contrasts with the Foundation's broader priorities by concentrating on hyper-local cultural preservation and economic resilience rather than systemic national reforms. Historically, the Foundation supported other domains such as policy, committing $347 million in and from the to promote stable housing for low-income residents, though these efforts have since integrated into Chicago-specific or impact channels. Additional field support has occasionally extended to and international NGOs, often via fellowships or past initiatives like the MacArthur Award for Creative and Effective Institutions, which recognized sustainable nonprofits globally until its discontinuation. These areas represent opportunistic rather than core ongoing commitments, with current emphasis remaining on Chicago's localized equity goals.

Financial Overview

Endowment and Revenue Sources

The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation's endowment originated from the estate of , who transferred assets valued at approximately $1 billion to the foundation upon his death on January 6, 1978; these assets stemmed primarily from his ownership stakes in insurance companies, including and Casualty Company. The foundation, formally documented in , began operations with this bequest, marking the start of its self-sustaining financial structure without dependence on ongoing external contributions. Through compounded returns over subsequent decades, the endowment has expanded significantly, reflecting disciplined aimed at achieving a targeted 5% real annual return net of and fees. As of December 31, 2023, total assets stood at $8.7 billion, increasing to $9.2 billion by December 31, 2024, driven by market performance across diversified holdings. Revenue derives almost exclusively from the endowment's activities, encompassing dividends, , realized gains, and unrealized appreciation in a broadly diversified portfolio that includes public equities, , , real assets, and impact investments. In 2023, net investment returns generated $835.5 million, with negligible additional of $2.3 million from gifts and other sources, underscoring the foundation's from donor dependencies common to other philanthropies. The 2024 portfolio of 12.25% net of costs exemplifies this mechanism, operations and without eroding principal over time. Impact investments, comprising commitments of $390.5 million as of December 31, 2024 (allocated as 47% loans, 35% , and 18% guarantees), blend financial yields with programmatic goals but remain subordinate to overall objectives. The John D. and Foundation's grant disbursements have shown a consistent upward trend since the early , rising from approximately $255 million in to around $386 million in 2023, reflecting endowment growth and strategic adjustments to maintain philanthropic impact amid economic fluctuations. This increase aligns with the foundation's assets expanding from $5.7 billion in to $8.7 billion by 2023, enabling higher absolute payouts while adhering to the U.S. minimum distribution requirement of roughly 5% of assets annually. Over its 46-year history through 2024, the foundation has disbursed more than $8.27 billion in s and impact investments to nearly 10,000 recipients across 119 countries, averaging about $180 million per year historically but accelerating in recent decades due to larger-scale initiatives like "Big Bets" launched in 2015.
YearGrants and Similar Amounts Paid ($ millions)
2011255
2018360
2019341
2020364
2021392
2022374
2023386
Disbursement volumes peaked at $392 million in 2021 before stabilizing near $350-386 million in subsequent years, with official figures reporting $298 million in 2022, $345 million in 2023, and $353 million in 2024 (including impact investments but excluding certain mission-related investments). Variations stem from multi-year grant commitments, cash payout timing, and crisis responses; for instance, during the 2020 economic downturn, the foundation elevated its payout above 5% by drawing deeper from its investment portfolio and expediting $42 million in payments to accelerate support for grantees. Similarly, echoing actions taken during the , the foundation announced in 2025 a temporary raise to at least 6% of endowment value for 2025 and 2026—projecting an additional $150 million in grants—to address heightened needs amid federal funding uncertainties, marking a countercyclical strategy to sustain grantee operations. Recent trends also indicate a higher volume of grants, with approximately 2,400 awards totaling $1.4 billion between 2020 and 2024, averaging about 480 grants annually and roughly $583,000 per grant, compared to historical averages of fewer than 220 grants per year over the foundation's lifespan. This shift toward more numerous, often smaller grants coincides with diversified programming, including participatory and trust-based models, though administrative expenses have hovered around 15% of total charitable outlays in recent years. Overall, these patterns demonstrate a commitment to scaling disbursements in line with endowment performance while prioritizing flexibility during exogenous shocks, without evidence of systematic deviation from standards.

Controversies and Criticisms

Allegations of Ideological Bias and Political Influence

The John D. and Foundation has faced allegations from conservative critics that its grantmaking reflects a pronounced left-leaning ideological , diverging from the staunchly conservative political views of its founder, , who was described as holding "nineteenth-century" perspectives favoring and free enterprise. Despite occasional support for center-right organizations, the foundation's priorities—such as , climate initiatives, and racial equity programs—predominantly align with agendas, prompting claims that it advances a worldview under the guise of . Critics, including analyses from donor-watchdog groups, argue that the foundation exerts political influence by funding advocacy efforts that shape toward left-liberal outcomes, particularly in areas like reducing incarceration rates through initiatives such as the Safety and Justice Challenge, which provided over $100 million since 2015 to local governments aiming to cut by at least 15% in targeted areas. This program has been faulted for prioritizing ideological goals over of public safety, as evidenced by the foundation's 2024 withholding of $625,000 from San Francisco's district attorney's office after jail populations rose amid policy shifts, a decision that the DA's office labeled as racially motivated but which detractors viewed as enforcing progressive metrics on crime reduction. Similarly, , terminated its MacArthur grants in October 2025, citing up to $600,000 in potential costs to sustain programs without the foundation's ideological strings, including possible DEI requirements that conflicted with local priorities. Further allegations of political partisanship emerged in February 2025, when the foundation announced plans to increase grant payouts by $150 million over two years—beyond its standard 5% endowment distribution—in response to what it termed a induced by the incoming administration's policies, interpreted by observers as a preemptive counter to anticipated conservative reforms on issues like and . This move, alongside the foundation's 2021 joint statement with other philanthropies condemning the Capitol events as "insurrectionist mob violence" without equivalent commentary on left-leaning unrest, has fueled claims of selective political engagement that amplifies progressive narratives while marginalizing conservative viewpoints. Broader critiques, such as those in pieces highlighting trillion-dollar foundations' systemic leftward tilt, position as emblematic of how private wealth influences ecosystems in favor of expansive government roles and frameworks, often at the expense of or evidence-based alternatives.

Specific Grant Disputes and Withholdings

In August 2024, the MacArthur Foundation withheld the final $625,000 installment of a multi-year grant to the as part of its Safety and Justice Challenge initiative, which aims to reduce jail populations through reforms. The decision, outlined in a letter dated August 5, 2024, cited insufficient progress on benchmarks, including a rise in the county jail's 180-day average population to 1,151 inmates—up from 850-931 during 2020-2022—and failure to implement a pre-arraignment or launch a prosecutorial fellowship focused on alternatives to incarceration. The program had previously awarded $5.2 million to the office starting in 2018 under former , whose progressive policies aligned with MacArthur's goals, but shifted after Boudin's 2022 voter recall and the appointment of , who prioritized addressing rising crime rates, leading to increased pretrial detentions. Jenkins' office rejected the funds on August 21, 2024, with Monifa Willis stating the treated recipients as "sharecroppers to a foundation's vision" and measured success solely by rapid releases regardless of public safety risks, which she deemed irresponsible. Willis, who is as is Jenkins, accused the Foundation—led by white staff—of in lecturing leaders and announced the office would no longer collaborate, redirecting the pre-arraignment program to the Department of and Public Defender's Office. The responded that it would consider redirecting support to another agency if the DA's office could not lead reforms, emphasizing data-driven accountability tied to conditions. A similar dispute arose in , where the Board of County Commissioners voted on October 7, 2025, to terminate remaining grants exceeding $500,000 from MacArthur's Safety and Justice Challenge, which funded efforts to lower jail populations. Officials cited misalignment between the program's reduction mandates and local priorities, including public safety and continuation of key services amid state-level efficiency initiatives under Governor ' Department of Government Efficiency. The county's Commission and administrator's office initiated the termination, effectively refusing the funds rather than risk non-compliance with metrics that could conflict with voter-driven demands. These cases illustrate tensions in MacArthur's grantmaking, where performance tied to decarceration goals clashed with policy shifts toward stricter enforcement following public backlash against prior reforms.

Impact Assessments and Evaluations

Program-Specific Reviews

The Foundation's evaluation efforts emphasize strategic learning over for individual , with assessments commissioned to analyze portfolio-level outcomes, challenges, and adaptations. These reviews, often conducted by external firms like NORC or internal teams, prioritize qualitative insights alongside quantitative metrics such as population changes or process efficiencies, though independent verification of long-term causal impacts remains limited. In the Criminal Justice program, the Safety and Justice Challenge—aimed at reducing pretrial jail populations through data-driven reforms—underwent an initial evaluation in 2019 that established baseline incarceration trends across participating U.S. jurisdictions. Subsequent analyses reported an 18% average decline in jail populations among first-cohort sites from 2015 to 2018, with updated 2024 findings attributing reductions to policy shifts like expanded pretrial diversion, without evidence of increased rates or in those areas compared to national averages. An independent outcome study by NORC, ongoing as of 2023, compares participant sites to non-participants using public safety metrics, media tracking, and surveys to isolate the initiative's contributions amid confounding factors like the . Critics, including some advocates, have questioned whether short-term reductions sustain public safety, citing anecdotal reversals in select locales, though empirical data from challenge reports do not substantiate widespread crime spikes. The , , and Ecosystems program's 2021 developmental reviewed early grantmaking under its strategy to promote "accurate, just, and inclusive" news narratives for . It documented investments in local reporting networks and , but highlighted challenges in measuring audience trust or behavioral shifts, relying instead on grantee self-reports and ecosystem mapping. No large-scale randomized assessments exist, and outcomes are framed qualitatively, such as strengthened under-resourced outlets, amid broader industry declines in ad revenue and audience reach. For the 100&Change competition, a 2017 learning and evaluation report analyzed the inaugural round's selection process, which awarded $100 million to a single bold solution after vetting over 1,000 proposals. It identified strengths in attracting innovative ideas but recommended refinements like clearer criteria for future cycles, with post-award monitoring emphasizing grantee milestones over counterfactual impact. Recipients, such as Community Solutions' 2021 homelessness initiative, report progress toward targets like housing 75 communities by 2026, though external audits of cost-effectiveness are absent. The , known as "genius grants," received a 2024 evaluation surveying over 200 past recipients, revealing that unrestricted $625,000 awards (paid over five years) enabled 78% to pursue new projects, with 65% reporting career trajectory shifts toward higher-risk endeavors. Quantitative impacts included increased publications and collaborations, but the review noted selection biases toward established networks, potentially limiting diversity in outcomes. Other domain-specific reviews, such as the 2025 assessment of the Arts and Culture Loan Fund, affirmed its utility in bridging cash-flow gaps for mid-sized nonprofits via low-interest loans totaling over $10 million since , with repayment rates exceeding 95% and qualitative benefits in operational stability. Across programs, evaluations underscore adaptive strategies but often lack rigorous controls for attribution, reflecting the foundation's philanthropic emphasis on experimentation over strict ROI metrics.

Broader Organizational Effectiveness

The John D. and Foundation integrates evaluation into its operations through independent assessments commissioned for major initiatives, enabling iterative improvements in strategy and grantmaking. For example, the foundation partnered with NORC at the to evaluate its International Connections Fund in 2019, which examined the program's role in fostering cross-border collaborations and recommended enhancements to deepen policy influence. Similarly, ORS Impact has provided ongoing evaluation support for the Nuclear Challenges Big Bet since 2017, delivering annual reports that track progress toward reducing nuclear risks and inform resource allocation adjustments. These efforts reflect a structured approach to measuring intermediate outcomes, such as network building and evidence generation, though they emphasize learning over strict accountability metrics. Financial audits underscore , with independent reviews confirming prudent endowment management and compliance with nonprofit standards. The foundation's 2023 consolidated , audited by a certified public accounting firm, detail exceeding $8 billion, supporting sustainable levels while adhering to a spending policy that balances current disbursements with long-term preservation. To bolster grantee performance, MacArthur raised indirect cost recovery rates to 29% on new project s in —nearly double prior levels—allowing recipients greater flexibility for administrative and capacity-building expenses, which evaluations suggest can amplify programmatic impact. Despite these mechanisms, broader organizational effectiveness lacks holistic, external benchmarking against philanthropic peers, with most public data confined to siloed program reviews rather than portfolio-wide return on investment. Abt Associates' 2018 evaluation of the 100&Change competition, for instance, highlighted strengths in attracting innovative proposals and generating positive media but noted challenges in scaling evidence-based selection for transformative outcomes. Instances of grant-related disputes, such as reallocations in funded district attorney offices where priorities diverged from funders' expectations, illustrate risks in influencing public systems, potentially diluting intended effects. Quantifying net societal impact remains elusive, as philanthropic interventions often involve high-risk, long-horizon bets with diffuse causality, though the foundation's adaptive use of evaluation data supports claims of strategic responsiveness over static efficiency.

References

  1. [1]
    Our History - MacArthur Foundation
    The MacArthur Foundation was established in 1970, with John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur as quiet philanthropists. It assumed assets in 1978 and made its ...
  2. [2]
    Investments - MacArthur Foundation
    As of December 31, 2024, MacArthur's assets totaled $9.2 billion. The Foundation's investment portfolio had a return of 12.25 percent in 2024, net of investment ...
  3. [3]
    About the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
    The MacArthur Foundation supports creative people and effective institutions committed to building a more just, verdant, and peaceful world.
  4. [4]
    MacArthur Fellows
    The MacArthur Fellowship is an $800,000, no-strings-attached award to extraordinarily talented and creative individuals as an investment in their potential.About · Class of 2024 · FAQs · Fellows Search
  5. [5]
    100&Change - MacArthur Foundation
    A competition for a $100 million grant to fund a single proposal that promises real and measurable progress in solving a critical problem of our time.TimelineAward RecipientsStrategy100&Change ApplicantsFAQs
  6. [6]
    New Work - MacArthur Foundation
    Beginning in 2015, MacArthur established a roadmap for grantmaking via three new modes: Big Bets, aimed at audacious solutions to era-defining challenges; ...
  7. [7]
    MacArthur Foundation withholds $625K from SF — DA cries racism
    Aug 23, 2024 · Foundation cited rising jail populations in withholding criminal justice grant; DA's office says it won't work with grantmaker any longer.
  8. [8]
    County says goodbye to MacArthur Foundation grants. DEI could be ...
    Oct 10, 2025 · Palm Beach County has terminated a contract with the MacArthur Foundation, refusing grant money intended to reduce the local jail population.
  9. [9]
    About John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur
    The MacArthur Foundation supports creative people and effective institutions committed to building a more just, verdant, and peaceful world.
  10. [10]
    The MacArthur Foundation - Capital Research Center
    Sep 6, 2005 · John D. MacArthur was not only a thrifty man; like most of the founders of large foundations, he was a political conservative who treasured the ...<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
    In 1980, the foundation's grants totaled $42 million. While $9-$ 10 million continued to support good government and education “general grants, ...Missing: early | Show results with:early
  12. [12]
    Grant Will Aid Chicago Study - The New York Times
    Mar 21, 1979 · Chicago‐based John D and Catherine T MacArthur Foundation announces that its 1st major grant of up to $500000 will go to Chicago Better Govt ...
  13. [13]
    Creating, Changing, and Closing Areas of Philanthropic Activity
    Jun 24, 2003 · As other foundations do, MacArthur has a portfolio of strategies that can be deployed at different stages of an issue's evolution. Some ...
  14. [14]
    About our Big Bets - MacArthur Foundation
    What are Big Bets? Big Bets are time-limited investments in grantmaking with the potential for transformative change.Climate Solutions · Criminal Justice · On Nigeria · Local News
  15. [15]
    [PDF] bylaws.pdf - MacArthur Foundation
    Through the end of 2011, the property and affairs of the corporation shall be managed by a Board of Directors composed of up to 16 persons (Base Number), ...Missing: Trustees composition
  16. [16]
    Our Governance - MacArthur Foundation
    The Foundation is governed by a Board of Directors of up to 16 persons including the President who serves ex-officio as a member of the Board.
  17. [17]
    Staff Demographics - MacArthur Foundation
    There are 13 total members of the Board of Directors. Our Commitment to Diversity. The MacArthur Foundation believes that our work is deeper and richer ...Missing: Trustees | Show results with:Trustees
  18. [18]
    [PDF] BY-LAWS - MacArthur Foundation
    Sep 23, 2020 · The Board of. Directors shall have the following Standing Committees: Audit, Budget/Compensation, Institutional Policy,. Investment and ...Missing: composition | Show results with:composition
  19. [19]
    Juan Salgado Elected to Chair MacArthur Board
    Mar 31, 2025 · Juan Salgado, career champion for economic mobility, was elected to chair the MacArthur Board of Directors and will assume the role in June 2025.Missing: Trustees | Show results with:Trustees
  20. [20]
    Martha Minow Elected to Chair MacArthur Board
    Mar 17, 2022 · Martha Minow, legal and human rights scholar, was elected to chair the MacArthur Board of Directors and will assume her new role in June 2022.
  21. [21]
    Marjorie Scardino Elected to Chair MacArthur Foundation Board of ...
    Mar 16, 2012 · Marjorie M. Scardino, Chief Executive Officer of Pearson, was elected to chair the 15-member Board of Directors of the John D. and Catherine T. ...Missing: Trustees | Show results with:Trustees<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation - GuideStar Profile
    MacArthur Foundation supports creative people and effective institutions committed to building a more just, verdant, and peaceful world. Ruling year info. 1971.
  23. [23]
    Three Distinguished Leaders Join MacArthur Board of Directors
    Jun 12, 2024 · Amy C. Falls, William F. Lee, and Alondra Nelson have been elected to join the MacArthur Foundation Board of Directors.
  24. [24]
    Ruth Simmons Joins MacArthur's Board
    May 23, 2023 · Esteemed academic leader Dr. Ruth Simmons will join the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Board of Directors next month. Dr. Ruth ...
  25. [25]
    Two Transformational Leaders Elected to MacArthur Board of Directors
    Jun 16, 2025 · Dr. Megan Bang and Dr. Mariko Silver to join MacArthur's Board of Directors. Two leaders known for driving meaningful transformation have been ...Missing: Trustees | Show results with:Trustees
  26. [26]
    John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation | iPhil.
    John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Founded 1975 Focus Public affairs, the media, thearts Location Marquette Building, Chicago,Illinois Key people ...
  27. [27]
    Jonathan F. Fanton papers | The New School Archives & Special ...
    After resigning as president of The New School, Fanton became president of the MacArthur Foundation, serving two five-year terms between 1999 and 2009. Fanton ...
  28. [28]
    MacArthur Foundation Names New President
    Robert Gallucci, dean of the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, will take over as president of the MacArthur Foundation on July 1.
  29. [29]
    MacArthur President Julia Stasch to Step Down Next Year
    Sep 25, 2018 · Julia M. Stasch, who has served as President of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation since July 2014, announced today that she will step down in ...
  30. [30]
  31. [31]
    MacArthur Foundation to increase giving for two years in response ...
    Feb 27, 2025 · The foundation reported it had $8.7 billion in assets in 2023 and it pays out around $400 million annually. Palfrey said he expected to grant ...Missing: size | Show results with:size
  32. [32]
    MacArthur Fellows Program Strategy
    Awarding unrestricted fellowships to talented individuals who have shown extraordinary originality and dedication in their creative pursuits.
  33. [33]
    MacArthur Fellows Frequently Asked Questions
    The MacArthur Fellowship is not a lifetime achievement award; we are looking for individuals on the precipice of great discovery or a game-changing idea.
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Frequently Asked Questions - MacArthur Foundation
    Individuals cannot apply for this award; they must be nominated. What are the selection criteria? The selection decisions focus primarily on exceptional.
  35. [35]
    Evaluation of the MacArthur Fellows Program
    Dec 10, 2024 · The MacArthur Fellows Program aims to identify extraordinarily creative individuals with a track record of excellence in a field of scholarship or area of ...
  36. [36]
    Impact of major awards on the subsequent work of their recipients
    Aug 9, 2023 · Our sample of 238 individuals who won a MacArthur Fellowship from 2004–2013 represented 67 of 90 unique fields, 15 of 18 Arts fields, 8 of 17 ...<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    Ibram X. Kendi MacArthur Grant: Ridiculous - National Review
    Sep 28, 2021 · It is absurd to pretend that Ibram X. Kendi is some marginal figure in desperate need of cultural or financial support.<|control11|><|separator|>
  38. [38]
    The MacArthur Mistake - Commentary Magazine
    Dec 1, 2010 · Despite its luster, the MacArthur Fellowship is a philanthropic mistake—a project that fails on its own terms. Through the wise guidance of ...
  39. [39]
    MacArthur 'Genius' Grants Get Some Heat and a New Head
    Dec 9, 1997 · Critics on the right accused the program of choosing fellows on the basis of political correctness, favoring what John Leo, a U.S. News ...
  40. [40]
    100&Change 2025 - Lever for Change
    100&Change is a competition awarding a $100 million grant to solve critical social challenges, using a unique, unrestricted funding model.
  41. [41]
    100&Change
    100&Change is a competition funding a single proposal for a critical problem, over two years, requiring a bold, lasting, and impactful solution.
  42. [42]
    Five Years Later - Has MacArthur's $100-Million "Big Bet" Paid Off?
    Oct 25, 2023 · Now, after more than five years of on-the-ground operation of the winning 100&Change proposal, MacArthur officials have published the results of ...<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    The MacArthur Foundation awards Community Solutions $100 ...
    Apr 7, 2021 · The MacArthur Foundation awarded a $100 million grant to Community Solutions to accelerate an end to homelessness in 75 US communities by 2026.Missing: 1 | Show results with:1
  44. [44]
    New Competition for a $100 Million Grant: Round Three of ...
    May 22, 2024 · MacArthur today announced the launch of a new round of its 100&Change competition for a single $100 million grant to help solve one of the world's most ...
  45. [45]
    Five Finalists Announced in $100 Million Competition
    Apr 30, 2025 · Five Finalists for the third round of 100&Change, a global competition awarding a single $100 million grant to help solve one of the world's most critical ...
  46. [46]
    Impact Investments - MacArthur Foundation
    An investment, learning, and market development initiative bringing together leading impact investors seeking to harness the full potential of catalytic capital ...
  47. [47]
    Impact Investments Program Strategy - MacArthur Foundation
    We have made impact investments totaling more than $800 million to just under 200 nonprofits, social enterprises, and funds in the United States and globally.
  48. [48]
    Catalytic Capital Consortium - MacArthur Foundation
    An investment, learning, and market development initiative bringing together leading impact investors to encourage greater impact and use of catalytic capital.
  49. [49]
    Impact Investment and Grant Guidelines - MacArthur Foundation
    We award about $5 million in grants each year. Our grantmaking goals are to strengthen and grow the field of impact investing globally.
  50. [50]
    Climate Solutions Program Strategy - MacArthur Foundation
    Funding Priorities. Our grantmaking focuses on reducing greenhouse gas emissions (carbon dioxide, methane, etc.) from energy-related sources. There is an ...
  51. [51]
    Climate Solutions - MacArthur Foundation
    Our Climate Solutions grantmaking is organized around four general approaches: altering political discourse, advancing and enforcing climate-friendly energy ...
  52. [52]
  53. [53]
    Climate Solutions Grant Guidelines - MacArthur Foundation
    Overview. Grantmaking concentrates on reducing greenhouse gas emissions (carbon dioxide, methane, etc.) from energy-related sources.
  54. [54]
    More than $6 Million in Support of Climate Journalism
    Jan 28, 2025 · The MacArthur Foundation today announced more than $6 million in grants to support the growing field of climate journalism in the United States.
  55. [55]
    Climate and Clean Energy Equity Fund - MacArthur Foundation
    The Climate and Clean Energy Equity Fund supports organizations that connect local concerns about communities' health, environmental, and economic wellbeing ...
  56. [56]
    Community-Based Climate Solutions Lead to Big Impact
    Jul 21, 2025 · The MacArthur Foundation supports creative people and effective institutions committed to building a more just, verdant, and peaceful world.
  57. [57]
    Conservation & Sustainable Development - MacArthur Foundation
    From 1979 to 2020, MacArthur committed more than $724 million to preserving ecosystems and species and promoting development that respects the environment.
  58. [58]
    [PDF] ENHANCING NUCLEAR SECURITY - MacArthur Foundation
    MacArthur's grantmaking in the area of nuclear security seeks to prevent nuclear terrorism, address security challenges arising from national efforts to ...
  59. [59]
    Nuclear Challenges - MacArthur Foundation
    The Nuclear Challenges' goal was to eliminate stockpiles of weapons-useable material. With this goal in mind, the program focused grantmaking on protecting ...
  60. [60]
    Rethinking Global Security - MacArthur Foundation
    Research on nuclear weapons and material security issues, including investigations of nuclear smuggling and a campaign to improve international standards ...
  61. [61]
    Nuclear Challenges Capstone Evaluation and Learning Synthesis
    Oct 15, 2025 · MacArthur has invested in civil society to reduce nuclear risks for over three decades, providing roughly $100 million in grants to the nuclear ...
  62. [62]
    Nuclear Threat Initiative - MacArthur Foundation
    This award will support NTI's efforts to strengthen global nuclear materials security and reduce proliferation concerns. As part of its work under this general ...
  63. [63]
    Partnership for Global Security - MacArthur Foundation
    The Partnership for Global Security (PGS) is a nonpartisan think tank that provides actionable responses to 21st century security challenges.
  64. [64]
    World Institute for Nuclear Security - Grants - MacArthur Foundation
    The MacArthur Foundation supports creative people and ... Launched in 2008 by the Nuclear Threat Initiative, the World Institute for Nuclear Security ...
  65. [65]
    Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation - MacArthur Foundation
    The Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation is a national nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to the promotion of nuclear arms control.
  66. [66]
    Arms Control Association - MacArthur Foundation
    Grantmaking supported efforts to reduce the threat of nuclear weapons by decreasing the availability of weapons-useable nuclear material and by developing a ...
  67. [67]
    $$21 Million to Support a Stronger, More Diverse Nuclear Field
    Jan 11, 2022 · Grants to 28 organizations for our nuclear capstone project ... security implications of nuclear power's expansion as a climate solution.
  68. [68]
    Training Scientists for the Long, Global Struggle Against Nuclear ...
    Apr 10, 2023 · Globally, the five nuclear weapons states in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (the U.S., Russia, UK, France, and China) show no progress in ...<|separator|>
  69. [69]
    Reflecting on the Origins and Successes of Our Nuclear Grantmaking
    Nov 20, 2024 · Former and current MacArthur Staff discuss the Foundation's impact on the nuclear security and nonproliferation landscape.
  70. [70]
    Progress on Nuclear Disarmament, Nonproliferation Inadequate
    Jul 20, 2016 · The MacArthur-supported report is the third in a series that measures progress on nonproliferation, disarmament, and nuclear security issues. ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  71. [71]
    Remaining Hopeful Amid Global Security Challenges
    Feb 1, 2024 · Reducing nuclear risk is an existential issue that existed long before MacArthur and will exist well beyond the Nuclear Challenges Program.
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Enhancing nuclEar SEcurity - MacArthur Foundation
    MacArthur's grantmaking in the area of nuclear security seeks to prevent nuclear terrorism, promote stabilizing nuclear weapons reductions, and address the ...
  73. [73]
    Journalism & Media - MacArthur Foundation
    We seek to strengthen and sustain an independent media ecosystem that investigates the actions of institutions, explores the implications of policies, ...
  74. [74]
    Journalism & Media Program Strategy - MacArthur Foundation
    Our Journalism and Media program seeks to strengthen and sustain an independent media ecosystem that investigates the actions of institutions, explores the ...
  75. [75]
    Journalism & Media Grant Guidelines - MacArthur Foundation
    Build strong, independent, and sustainable organizations and networks that anchor a resilient and independent media ecosystem designed to meet the needs of a ...
  76. [76]
    Local News Program Strategy - MacArthur Foundation
    Strengthening nascent and emerging local news ecosystems by providing support for essential tools, training, capacity, and services, as well as direct financial ...
  77. [77]
    $$20 Million in Support of Local News - MacArthur Foundation
    Dec 12, 2024 · The MacArthur Foundation today announced $20 million to support newsrooms and provide journalism infrastructure as part of its commitment to revitalize local ...
  78. [78]
    $$6.5 Million to Strengthen Chicago's Local News Ecosystem
    Jun 25, 2025 · MacArthur awarded $6.5 million in funding to seven Chicago-based organizations that are fortifying the city's local news ecosystem.
  79. [79]
    MacArthur Foundation invests $1.5 million in the American ...
    Jul 29, 2025 · The program focuses on building strong local news ecosystems by investing in trusted newsrooms, accelerating solutions, closing inequalities, ...Missing: grants | Show results with:grants
  80. [80]
    Foundations Commit $36.5 Million to Protect Public Media in ...
    Aug 19, 2025 · This places them at risk of drastically reducing service or even closing after October 2025 without emergency funding. Rural, Indigenous, and ...Missing: focus shifts
  81. [81]
    Local News Grant Guidelines - MacArthur Foundation
    Local News will prioritize newsrooms, trusted messengers, funding intermediaries, and journalism support organizations (JSOs) that serve communities with high ...
  82. [82]
    Criminal Justice - MacArthur Foundation
    Through the Safety and Justice Challenge, we aim to create national demand for local justice reforms that will safely reduce jail populations and make the ...
  83. [83]
    Criminal Justice Program Strategy - MacArthur Foundation
    Through the Safety and Justice Challenge, we are investing in local reform, research, innovation, and communications to create national demand for local ...
  84. [84]
    Safety and Justice Challenge
    reducing jail incarceration and increasing equity for all.Resources · MacArthur Foundation awards... · The Problem · Finding Solutions
  85. [85]
    Safety and Justice Challenge Expands to 52 Cities, Counties
    Oct 24, 2018 · Three years after its launch, MacArthur's Safety and Justice Challenge Network has grown into a collaborative of 52 cities and counties ...
  86. [86]
    Safety and Justice Challenge Evaluation Report
    May 22, 2019 · Impact evaluation activities document contributions from the Safety and Justice Challenge toward broader national changes in jail populations, ...
  87. [87]
    Case Study: Safety and Justice Challenge - CUNY ISLG
    The Safety + Justice Challenge helps jurisdictions across the U.S. safely implement data-informed strategies to reduce the misuse and overuse of jails ...
  88. [88]
    MacArthur Foundation Awards $18 Million in Grants to Rethink Local ...
    Feb 9, 2021 · The new funding will support 15 cities and counties that are already working to reduce over-incarceration and advance racial equity in local criminal justice ...
  89. [89]
    Sustaining Progress on Local Justice Reform - MacArthur Foundation
    Feb 20, 2024 · The MacArthur Foundation made grants to five communities to continue safely reducing jail populations while working to address inequities in the justice system.
  90. [90]
    Alliance for Safety and Justice - MacArthur Foundation
    This award enables ASJ to center its core constituencies—crime survivors and justice-impacted individuals—in support of public safety solutions to jail misuse ...
  91. [91]
    Jail Admissions and Violent Crime in the Years Following COVID-19
    Dec 18, 2024 · The data from SJC communities suggests reducing the size of the jails is not only possible but does not lead to a rise in crime broadly or a rise in violent ...
  92. [92]
    Chicago Commitment - MacArthur Foundation
    Investing in people, places, and partnerships to advance racial equity and build a more inclusive Chicago.StrategyGrant GuidelinesAdvancing LeadershipCulture, Equity, and the ArtsVital Communities
  93. [93]
    The Chicago Commitment to Equity: How We Are Refining Our ...
    Aug 16, 2023 · Since its launch in 2016, MacArthur's Chicago Commitment team has invested in people, places, and partnerships to advance racial equity and ...<|separator|>
  94. [94]
    MacArthur in Chicago: Reflections on 2024
    Feb 27, 2025 · In 2024, MacArthur reinforced our strong commitment to the city we call home. With 150 grants and impact investments totaling $69,031,500, we ...Missing: endowment size<|separator|>
  95. [95]
    Chicago Commitment Evaluation - MacArthur Foundation
    Jul 5, 2023 · The Chicago Commitment team disbursed more than $120 million directly to 235 organizations in the Chicago region between May 2016 and February 2022.
  96. [96]
    Culture, Equity, and the Arts in Chicago - MacArthur Foundation
    We make grants directly to organizations with budgets above $1 million. Grant sizes range from $55,000 to $80,000 per year, typically for three years. In ...Missing: science housing
  97. [97]
    2025 Culture, Equity, and the Arts Grants - MacArthur Foundation
    Mar 17, 2025 · Fifteen arts and culture and/or arts-centered organizations, in these and other arts practices, will receive 2025 Culture Equity and the Arts awards, totaling ...Missing: science international
  98. [98]
    Housing - MacArthur Foundation
    We continue our commitment to address some related underlying challenges through our other programs, including Impact Investments and Chicago Commitment, among ...
  99. [99]
    [PDF] SuppOrT FOr SCIenCe - MacArthur Foundation
    The Foundation has awarded grants to individuals in support of science through the MacArthur Fellowship and various other programs and initiatives. Since ...
  100. [100]
    MacArthur Award for Creative & Effective Institutions
    The MacArthur Award for Creative and Effective Institutions recognizes exceptional NGOs and helps ensure their long-term sustainability.Missing: science | Show results with:science
  101. [101]
    Foundation FAQs
    MacArthur is one of the nation's largest independent foundations. Since our founding in 1978, we have supported organizations that work in 117 countries. In ...
  102. [102]
    [PDF] JOHN D. AND CATHERINE T. MACARTHUR FOUNDATION ...
    Aug 1, 2024 · Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements as a whole are free from material ...
  103. [103]
    John D & Catherine T Macarthur Foundation - Nonprofit Explorer
    John G Palfrey (Director / President), $1,293,489, $88,478. Mark Franke (Managing Director), $1,087,727, $572,356. Caixia Ziegler (Managing Director) ...
  104. [104]
    Financials - MacArthur Foundation
    In 2024, the Foundation paid out $352.9* million in grants and impact investments to organizations and individuals in the United States and around the world.
  105. [105]
    Set it at Six: Supporting Civil Society in Need with Increased Giving
    Feb 25, 2025 · In 2020, we used two strategies to increase our giving: first, we drew more from our investment portfolio, allowing our charitable payout to ...
  106. [106]
    Six Hard Questions about 'Set it at Six' - MacArthur Foundation
    Mar 6, 2025 · Since we decided to increase our charitable spending for 2025 and 2026 to a new floor of 6 percent rather than the typical IRS minimum of 5 ...
  107. [107]
    MacArthur Foundation boosts giving to 6 percent in wake of crisis
    Mar 3, 2025 · The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation has announced plans to increase its giving over the next two years to 6 percent of its endowment.Missing: size | Show results with:size
  108. [108]
    The foundation spent $1.4 billion on nearly 2,400 grants ... - Facebook
    May 6, 2025 · The foundation spent $1.4 billion on nearly 2400 grants between 2020 and 2024, of which almost 90% went to U.S.-based grantees.
  109. [109]
    John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation - InfluenceWatch
    MacArthur Foundation (also known as the MacArthur Foundation) was the 20th ... controversial concept of “implicit racial bias” and proposed numerous ...
  110. [110]
    The MacArthur Foundation - Bias and Credibility
    Mar 13, 2024 · We rate the MacArthur Foundation as Left-Center biased due to its support for initiatives that align with progressive values.
  111. [111]
    Philanthropies Condemn Political Violence, Call on Leaders to ...
    Jan 8, 2021 · MacArthur joins philanthropies in repudiating the insurrectionist mob violence that took place in Washington, DC, January 6, 2021 and calls for action to move ...Missing: influence allegations
  112. [112]
    Stop Treating Left-Wing Advocacy Groups Like Charities | Opinion
    Oct 13, 2021 · But the power of these institutions also creates a massive left-wing bias at the heart of our society. The Left has stashed a trillion-dollar ...<|separator|>
  113. [113]
  114. [114]
    MacArthur, the San Francisco DA, and the Pitfalls of Funding ...
    Oct 9, 2024 · In a letter signed by the DA's chief of staff, MacArthur was even accused of treating the DA's office like “sharecroppers.” (For more about ...
  115. [115]
    A courageous refusal to “be used as sharecroppers to a ...
    Aug 27, 2024 · This gutsy display of grantee push-back came in the face of the MacArthur Foundation's decision to withhold $625,000 in grant funds from the ...
  116. [116]
    Palm Beach County cuts jail population reduction grants after urging ...
    Oct 8, 2025 · The Palm Beach County Board of Commissioners voted to terminate two grants from the Safety and Justice Challenge, citing misalignment with ...
  117. [117]
    Is Florida's DOGE to blame for Palm Beach grant returns? | Opinion
    Oct 9, 2025 · Palm Beach County just decided to give back more than $500,000 in criminal justice grants to the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.
  118. [118]
    Palm Beach County terminated its MacArthur Foundation money ...
    Oct 16, 2025 · The Criminal Justice Commission was winning the Safety and Justice Challenge. Then they quit before crossing the finish line.
  119. [119]
    Palm Beach County votes to end Safety and Justice Challenge ...
    Oct 7, 2025 · The Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners voted on Oct. 7 to terminate remaining local awards tied to the John D. and Catherine T.
  120. [120]
    Evaluation Strategy - MacArthur Foundation
    The MacArthur Foundation evaluates for learning, focusing on the portfolio and strategy, not individual grants, with a learning focus, and continuous input.
  121. [121]
    What We're Learning - MacArthur Foundation
    We evaluate to learn about the landscape, impact, and outcomes of our strategies to keep them dynamically working toward their purpose.
  122. [122]
    Finding Solutions - Safety and Justice Challenge
    The combined jail populations in the first cohort of Safety and Justice Challenge participating cities and counties declined by 18% in the initiative's first ...
  123. [123]
    Updated Findings on Jail Reform, Violent Crime and the COVID-19 ...
    Jun 11, 2024 · The analysis found that jail populations were lowered safely, without driving an increase in crime or an increase in returns to jail custody. A ...
  124. [124]
    MacArthur Safety & Justice Challenge Evaluation
    Outcome study: Examine the extent to which SJC contributed to changes in key public safety and criminal justice system outcomes as compared to non-SJC sites.
  125. [125]
    Initial Evaluation of the Journalism and Media Program
    Apr 30, 2021 · The JAM strategy seeks to strengthen US democracy by supporting accurate, just, and inclusive news and narratives that inform, engage, and activate people ...Missing: review | Show results with:review
  126. [126]
    [PDF] 100&Change learning and evaluation report - MacArthur Foundation
    Evaluation Findings .............................................................................................................. 10.
  127. [127]
    100&Change Program Strategy - MacArthur Foundation
    The evaluation was designed to identify areas that worked well and should be preserved for future rounds of the competition and those that could be improved.Missing: outcomes | Show results with:outcomes
  128. [128]
    Arts and Culture Loan Fund Program Evaluation
    Mar 12, 2025 · The Arts and Culture Loan Fund provides small- and medium-sized arts and culture organizations with loans to address cash flow shortages.
  129. [129]
    Evaluations - MacArthur Foundation
    Research on whether our strategic work is producing results. Overview · Evaluation Strategy · Evaluations · Grantee Research · Perspectives. Keyword.Missing: assessments | Show results with:assessments
  130. [130]
    [PDF] icf-evaluation-report-final.pdf - MacArthur Foundation
    Jan 31, 2019 · NORC | Evaluation of the MacArthur Foundation's International Connections Fund (ICF) Program. FINAL REPORT | I. Table of Contents. Evaluation ...
  131. [131]
    Nuclear Challenges Big Bet: 2020 Evaluation Report
    Feb 4, 2021 · Since November 2017, ORS Impact has served as evaluation and learning partner to the Nuclear Challenges team. ... MacArthur Foundation. Creative ...Missing: effectiveness | Show results with:effectiveness
  132. [132]
  133. [133]
    MacArthur Foundation to Increase Overhead Support for Grantees
    MacArthur Foundation has announced that, starting in 2020, it will support an indirect cost recovery rate of 29 percent on all new project grants, nearly double ...<|separator|>
  134. [134]
    Taking Risk and Requiring Evidence - MacArthur Foundation
    Jan 6, 2017 · A single grant of $100 million is inherently risky. An additional source of risk in 100&Change comes from the transparency to which we have ...