Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Men Against Fire

"Men Against Fire" is the fifth of the third season of the British science fiction anthology series , first released on on October 21, 2016. Written by series creator and directed by Jakob Verbruggen, it stars as soldier , who operates in a near-future equipped with the MASS neural implant that overlays to depict human enemies as grotesque "roaches," thereby facilitating combat by exploiting perceptual . The narrative centers on Stripe's experience after a malfunction exposes the implant's true function in enabling systematic extermination of civilian populations deemed threats, raising questions about consent, , and the of technologically enforced violence. The episode draws its title from Men Against Fire: The Problem of Battle Command, a 1947 book by U.S. military historian , which analyzed infantry performance and asserted, based on purported after-action interviews, that only 15 to 25 percent of American soldiers fired their weapons in combat due to an innate psychological resistance to killing fellow humans. Marshall's findings influenced post-war training reforms emphasizing instinctive firing, but subsequent scholarly scrutiny has revealed methodological flaws, including the absence of records for the claimed group interviews and inconsistencies with independent data on ammunition use indicating much higher firing rates. Despite these criticisms, the core idea of reluctance to kill has persisted in discussions and inspired 's exploration of technological overrides on human moral inhibitions. Notable for its visceral depiction of war's psychological toll and critique of state-sanctioned deception, the episode received mixed reviews for its heavy-handed messaging but has been praised for and performances, particularly Kirby's portrayal of dawning . It underscores causal mechanisms in warfare where perceptual manipulation circumvents individual agency, echoing real-world tactics of enemy observed historically, though amplified through speculative neural tech.

Synopsis

Plot Summary

In a near-future , Toby "Stripe" Toop and his , including Raiman, are equipped with neural implants called the Mass Edifice Targeting System (MASS), which overlay enhancements such as improved targeting overlays, , audio cues for enemy detection, and perceptual alterations to render adversaries as , insect-like "roaches." These implants also suppress empathy toward targets and provide holographic maps and translator functions during operations. The squad receives a distress call from villagers reporting a infestation contaminating food supplies and stealing equipment, prompting a on a 's . leads the assault, killing several that appear as feral mutants with insectoid features and sharp teeth, while capturing a named Heidekker. During the fight, retrieves a small device emitting a green light from a dead , which triggers headaches and visual glitches in his . Returning to base, undergoes evaluation by Arquette, who diagnoses the issue as psychosomatic from his first kills and recalibrates , enhancing Stripe's fabricated dream sequences of an idyllic life with a romantic partner. Glitches persist during a subsequent , causing Stripe to perceive a targeted "roach" family—led by a named Katarina—as ordinary humans, leading him to hesitate and question the mission. Raiman executes the family, but Stripe spares and interrogates Katarina, who explains that the "roaches" are genetically inferior humans marked for extermination, with implants altering soldiers' perceptions to facilitate indiscriminate killing without moral conflict. Confronted by his squad, Stripe kills Raiman in self-defense and flees, only to be recaptured by Arquette, who discloses that Stripe voluntarily received the implant to "protect the bloodline" and offers a choice: undergo a full wipe and perceptual reset to resume service, or refuse and face execution or . Stripe opts for the reset, erasing his recollections of the events; the concludes with him in , approaching the woman from his enhanced dreams in a simulated domestic setting.

Production

Conception and Development

The episode "Men Against Fire" draws its title from S.L.A. Marshall's 1947 book Men Against Fire: The Problem of Battle Command, which analyzed World War II combat data and concluded that only 15-25% of infantry soldiers fired their weapons due to innate reluctance to kill fellow humans. This concept, later expanded in Dave Grossman's 1995 book On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society, informed the episode's exploration of psychological barriers in combat, as Charlie Brooker referenced Grossman's work in discussing the script's focus on soldiers' hesitation to engage enemies. Brooker's initial inspiration stemmed from the 2010 documentary The War You Don’t See by , which his wife recommended, highlighting sanitized media coverage versus the raw human cost of the , including accounts of civilian atrocities. This led to an early draft titled "Inbound," depicting a conflict mistaken for an alien invasion—specifically a war against —but Brooker revised it after feedback deemed the premise heavy-handed and lacking subtlety. The script evolved to center on perceptual alteration technology, such as the implant, to depict how military conditioning overrides natural inhibitions, drawing parallels to real-world dehumanizing rhetoric like columnist ' 2015 reference to migrants as "cockroaches." Developed for Black Mirror's third season under Netflix's production deal, the was written by Brooker in the lead-up to its October 21, 2016 premiere, with Belgian director Jakob Verbruggen attached to helm it for its emphasis on grounded over fantastical elements. The narrative twist hinges on implant-induced visual distortions that transform perceived threats, avoiding traditional sci-fi tropes by rooting the technology in plausible extensions of for enhancing soldier lethality and compliance.

Casting and Filming

Malachi Kirby was cast in the lead role of soldier Stripe after auditioning in February or March 2016 under director Jakob Verbruggen. Kirby, previously known for his role in the 2016 miniseries Roots, prepared through 3-4 days of combat and firearms training to portray the psychological toll of augmented warfare. Michael Kelly, recognized from House of Cards, portrayed the military psychiatrist Arquette, engaging in extended dialogue scenes that highlighted the episode's themes of mental manipulation. Supporting actors including Madeline Brewer as Hunter were selected to depict unit dynamics under combat stress. Filming occurred in 2016, primarily at Racetrack in , , which served as the military base and simulated war-torn environments through its expansive grounds and structures. Practical props, such as modified rifles and neural implants, grounded the near-future setting, with production designer Joel Collins prioritizing tangible elements to enhance actor immersion over heavy digital reliance. were employed selectively for the (Massive Augmented Soldier System) overlays, distorting human figures into insect-like "roaches" to convey the implant's dehumanizing interface without overwhelming the gritty realism. Challenges included shooting in freezing conditions that mirrored the harsh but tested , alongside filming a 15-page emotional confrontation between Kirby and Kelly over one to two days. The integration of effects required balancing VFX with on-set practicalities to maintain plausibility and focus on character performance amid the technological horror.

Themes and Interpretations

Dehumanization in Warfare

In the episode, the MASS neural implant deployed to soldiers like Stripe induces perceptual alterations that transform enemy fighters into , forms, thereby enabling aggressive engagement by suppressing the innate human reluctance to kill others of the same . This mechanism directly addresses non-participation, as evidenced by historical observations of low firing rates among , where psychological barriers—rooted in and moral inhibition—prevent most soldiers from directing lethal force at perceived humans. Empirical accounts, such as those synthesized by military psychologist Dave Grossman, highlight a biological and cultural aversion to , with pre-modern and showing firing or engagement rates as low as 1-2% without conditioning, escalating only through deliberate training to override such instincts. The narrative culminates in Stripe's malfunction, restoring his unfiltered vision of human adversaries and triggering intense guilt and psychological distress, underscoring the causal pathway from dehumanized perception to uninhibited killing and the reciprocal moral recoil upon recognizing shared humanity. This post-revelation trauma mirrors documented cases of in combatants, where violating one's ethical framework—facilitated by altered cognition—leads to persistent aversion and self-reproach, as soldiers confront the reality of their actions against fellow humans rather than abstracted threats. Critiques from commentators frame the episode's technology as a dystopian amplifier of genocidal tendencies, arguing it mechanizes the of to justify violence, akin to how perceptual filters could entrench biases in real conflicts. In contrast, analyses grounded in warfare affirm that emerges organically through , , and —portraying foes as or subhuman—to erode inhibitions, a tactic observed across conflicts where linguistic and visual precedes atrocities without requiring implants. Such methods, while effective in boosting participation rates to near 90-95% in modern eras via desensitization, reveal the underlying human the episode extrapolates: killing efficiency demands severing empathetic bonds, whether via or traditional means.

Augmented Reality and Soldier Performance

In the episode "Men Against Fire," the Massive Augmented System (MASS) integrates retinal projections and neural interfaces to deliver targeting reticles, enemy highlighting, and directional audio cues for incoming threats, enabling s like Stripe to achieve precise, rapid engagements in . These features are shown to elevate hit probabilities and suppress hesitation, allowing augmented troops to neutralize multiple hostiles with minimal return fire during defensive patrols. Empirical assessments of unaugmented performance underscore the baseline limitations MASS addresses: dynamic peer engagements often yield hit rates under 20%, with U.S. Army data from indicating roughly 50,000 small-arms rounds expended per enemy casualty due to factors like stress-induced aiming degradation and obscured sightlines. Causal analysis reveals how AR overlays counteract fog-of-war distortions—such as visual clutter and rapid target movement—by superimposing stabilized aiming aids and predictive trajectories, thereby compressing decision cycles from seconds to milliseconds and minimizing dispersion errors inherent to manual sighting under duress. Analogous real-world systems, including the U.S. Army's (IVAS), incorporate similar heads-up displays for enhanced and ballistic computation, with developmental iterations demonstrating potential to amplify in low-visibility conditions despite initial testing hurdles like reduced hit efficiency in prototypes. By automating threat prioritization, such augmentations could curtail incidents, which comprise up to 20% of casualties in conventional operations, through augmented identification fidelity absent in unassisted scenarios. The episode's narrative frames as a double-edged tool, culminating in operational revelations that expose augmentation-induced perceptual distortions, serving as a cautionary of unchecked technological . Pragmatically, however, first-principles prioritizes : unenhanced soldiers' documented accuracy deficits and reflexive pauses—exacerbated by physiological —correlate with elevated in sustained firefights, suggesting AR interventions could yield net gains by enforcing consistent engagement discipline and offsetting human frailties in high-stakes defensive postures. Ongoing AR trials, such as IVAS 1.2 , report soldier feedback affirming improved situational responsiveness, reinforcing the causal logic that targeted enhancements outperform baseline human variability for dominance.

Real-World Connections

Historical Military Research

, a U.S. Army combat historian, conducted after-action interviews with units during and immediately after battles, concluding in his 1947 book Men Against Fire that only 15-25% of fired their weapons at the enemy in typical engagements. He attributed this low "ratio of fire" primarily to innate against killing other humans, rather than or incompetence, arguing that most troops aimed to suppress or avoid direct lethal engagement. Marshall's findings, drawn from debriefings without contemporaneous notes, suggested that such hesitation contributed to prolonged battles and higher casualties among friendly forces by failing to decisively neutralize threats. Marshall's claims faced significant scrutiny posthumously, with researchers uncovering a lack of primary , such as or statistical data, in military archives; critics like historian and others contended that the ratios may have been exaggerated or fabricated, as no supporting evidence from Marshall's files corroborated the figures. Contemporary analyses, including Canadian from the same period, indicated higher firing participation rates, challenging the universality of non-firing behavior. Despite these debates over methodological rigor, the study profoundly shaped by highlighting potential human factors in ineffectiveness. In response to Marshall's reported insights, the U.S. Army revised training post-World War II, emphasizing reflexive firing drills with human-silhouette pop-up targets and conditioning techniques to override inhibitions, which military analysts later credited with raising engagement rates to approximately 55% in the and 90-95% in . These adaptations focused on instinctive responses, reducing deliberate hesitation through repetitive, stress-inoculated practice akin to Pavlovian conditioning. The Men Against Fire episode's MASS neural implant represents a speculative escalation of these historical efforts to eliminate psychological barriers, mirroring real-world concerns that unmitigated soldier reluctance in scenarios endangered units by allowing enemies to advance unchecked and extended firefights unnecessarily. Marshall's emphasis on conditioning aggression to enhance unit survival underscored how firing aversion could cascade into tactical disadvantages, a dynamic the episode dramatizes through augmented overrides of natural .

Modern Augmented Reality Applications

The U.S. Army's (IVAS), developed in partnership with and , represents a key real-world analog to the episode's implant, providing soldiers with heads-up displays that overlay critical data such as terrain maps, compass bearings, and targeting cues directly into their . IVAS enhances through fused and low-light sensors, enables rapid assistance by projecting reticles aligned with sights, and integrates feeds from drones and sensors to improve detection and in low-visibility or complex environments. Field tests since the program's rapid prototyping phase in the late have demonstrated empirical gains in soldier accuracy and response times, with prototypes accepted for evaluation in 2023 showing reduced during by streamlining data presentation without requiring soldiers to divert attention from the primary sightline. Other systems, such as the ARC4 (Augmented Reality Command, Control, Communicate, Coordinate) technology developed by Applied Research Associates with funding, further exemplify cognitive augmentation for dismounted s by overlaying virtual icons for navigation, target designation, and feature tagging onto the real-world view via helmet-mounted displays. This enables day-night and facilitates among units, empirically aiding threat prioritization in by highlighting potential hazards without perceptual distortion of the environment. Integration of feeds into visors, as seen in emerging platforms like Anduril's EagleEye mixed-reality , projects live aerial imagery and sensor data to reduce , with tests indicating faster of distant or obscured targets compared to unaided observation. These technologies align with the episode's depiction of tech-mediated by overlaying verifiable to decrease operational hesitation and enhance , though they differ fundamentally by augmenting information processing rather than fabricating perceptual alterations; limitations include potential over-reliance on battery life and network , as evidenced in IVAS prototyping , but overall trends point toward scalable deployment for over 100,000 soldiers to boost precision in peer or near-peer conflicts.

Reception

Critical Reviews

Critics offered mixed assessments of "Men Against Fire," praising its technical achievements while faulting its narrative execution and thematic subtlety. The episode holds a 57% approval rating on based on 23 reviews, reflecting divided professional opinions on its effectiveness within the anthology. Reviewers commended Jakob Verbruggen's handling of action sequences and the depicting the MASS implant's overlays, which enhanced the portrayal of soldier disorientation. Malachi Kirby's performance as , capturing a psychological akin to PTSD, drew particular acclaim for its intensity and emotional depth. Outlets such as highlighted the episode's realism in exploring wartime , viewing it as a about technology enabling moral detachment in combat, though noting a relative lack of sustained compared to other installments. The Verge similarly appreciated its speculative take on future warfare, emphasizing how neural implants could streamline killing by altering perceptions of enemies, aligning with the series' tradition of tech-driven horror. These elements positioned it as a solid, if not exceptional, entry in the format, with strong production values elevating its commentary on . However, detractors criticized the plot's predictable central twist revealing the "roaches" as ordinary humans, arguing it relied on overused tropes of perceptual and drew unsubtle parallels to historical without fresh . The world-building felt underdeveloped, with sparse details on the broader or societal , leading some to describe the as meandering and the anti-technology message as heavy-handed. On , it scores 7.5 out of 10 from over 46,000 user ratings, often ranked mid-tier among episodes for prioritizing visceral impact over innovation.

Episode Rankings and Audience Response

"Men Against Fire" holds a 7.5/10 rating on IMDb from 46,360 user votes, positioning it mid-tier among Black Mirror episodes, below high-rated entries like "White Bear" (8.5/10) and "San Junipero" (8.4/10) but above lower ones such as "Playtest" (7.0/10). In fan-voted polls, such as Gold Derby's 2025 ranking aggregating viewer preferences, it scores 7.5/10 and ranks toward the lower end of Season 3 episodes, trailing "Shut Up and Dance" (8.5/10) while surpassing "Hated in the Nation" (7.0/10). Collider's 2024 compilation of IMDb scores similarly places it at 7.5/10, reflecting consistent audience evaluation across over 40,000 ratings. Audience discussions on platforms like frequently cite the episode's memory-wipe conclusion as a key factor in its polarizing reception, with users in 2017 threads praising its psychological impact for evoking unease comparable to real soldier trauma, though many anticipated the early, diminishing surprise. Later threads from 2023-2025 highlight rewatch value for its immersive soldier perspective, with commenters noting heightened disturbance amid ongoing global conflicts, yet critiquing pacing as rushed in the final act. No individual Emmy or major streaming awards were conferred on the episode, though it garnered mentions in 2025 tech-ethics forums for prompting viewer debates on augmentation. Season 3's release on October 21, 2016, drove massive overall viewership, with becoming one of the streamer's top originals that year, but per-episode metrics remain undisclosed; fan anecdotes from contemporaneous discussions indicate "Men Against Fire" sustained engagement through its action-oriented narrative, contributing to binge patterns. Recent 2025 analyses, including 's examination of its parallels, have revived audience interest, tying viewer reflections to contemporary and targeting tech deployments.

Debates and Controversies

Ethical and Moral Critiques

Critics of the episode's implant system have argued that it morally enables indiscriminate killing by technologically targets into insect-like "roaches," facilitating what they describe as eugenics-inspired atrocities through perceptual alteration rather than mere . Such interpretations draw analogies to historical tactics, warning that advanced targeting tech could lower psychological barriers to mass violence against designated groups, echoing concerns over tech-amplified . These views frame the narrative as a against biopolitical violence, where state or military authorities impose perceptual filters to justify elimination of perceived threats, potentially eroding individual . Media and academic analyses often portray the episode as an indictment of the military-industrial complex, highlighting how post-revelation guilt exposes the ethical hollowness of tech-dependent warfare that outsources moral reckoning to implants, leaving soldiers to confront unaltered human suffering. This perspective emphasizes the erasure of as a deliberate systemic , critiquing how such tools prioritize operational efficiency over humanitarian considerations, with the protagonist's breakdown symbolizing inevitable psychological backlash against suppressed . Countering these objections, military historical data underscores that innate human aversion to killing—manifesting as low participation—has empirically increased friendly in real conflicts, necessitating interventions to overcome -induced for and . S.L.A. Marshall's 1947 analysis of infantry engagements found that only 15-20% of soldiers fired their weapons when facing the enemy, attributing this reluctance to moral inhibitions that allowed adversaries to advance unchecked, thereby elevating unit losses. Although Marshall's precise figures have faced scholarly scrutiny for lacking primary documentation, the U.S. Army's subsequent reforms—emphasizing reflexive firing in training—yielded higher participation rates exceeding 50% in the , correlating with improved and reduced -related vulnerabilities. This evolution reflects causal realities of warfare, where unchecked can equate to unilateral restraint against non-reciprocating foes, as evidenced by historical patterns of higher attrition in under-engaging units.

Pro-Military and Tactical Justifications

Military theorists have argued that innate human psychological resistance to killing fellow humans undermines combat effectiveness, necessitating technological interventions to ensure soldiers reliably engage enemy threats. S.L.A. Marshall's post-World War II analysis of units reported that only 15-25% of riflemen fired their weapons during engagements, attributing this to aversion rather than fear, which contributed to tactical routs and higher casualties among committed fighters. This empirical observation, though debated for methodological issues, underscores the rationale for perceptual aids like the episode's MASS system: by altering threat perception to bypass hesitation, such technology enforces participation rates approaching 100%, preventing failures and enabling decisive victories against existential aggressors. In scenarios of defensive warfare against dehumanizing aggressors—who routinely employ portraying defenders as subhuman— enhancements prioritize causal outcomes over moral qualms, saving allied lives through superior force application. Proponents contend that critiquing such tools as dystopian overlooks the episode's pacifist underemphasis on aggressor-initiated , which already warps combatants' perceptions to justify atrocities, rendering reciprocal aids a pragmatic equalizer rather than innovation. Tactical realism demands focusing on survival imperatives: unimpeded engagement preserves defensive lines, as historical non-firer data correlates with operational collapses where partial commitment invites exploitation by resolute foes. Contemporary systems exemplify these justifications by augmenting lethality and precision without relying solely on perceptual distortion. The U.S. Army's (IVAS), tested in scenarios, enables soldiers to acquire targets obscured by obstacles or dust, track movements in , and receive instant alerts, thereby reducing targeting errors and enhancing . evaluations position IVAS as advancing ethical warfare by integrating layered overlays that minimize through precise identification and engagement, transforming potential dystopian overreach into verifiable progress in and discrimination.

References

  1. [1]
    "Black Mirror" Men Against Fire (TV Episode 2016) - IMDb
    Rating 7.5/10 (46,360) Future soldiers Stripe and Raiman must protect frightened villagers from an infestation of vicious feral mutants.Full cast & crew · Men Against Fire · User reviews · Parents guide
  2. [2]
    Men Against Fire - University of Oklahoma Press
    540-day returnsS.L.A. "Slam" Marshall was a veteran of World War I and a combat historian during ... Men Against Fire. The Problem of Battle Command. by S. L. A. Marshall.
  3. [3]
    [PDF] S.L.A. Marshall and the Ratio of Fire
    Abstract: The famous “ratio of fire” data proposed by S.L.A. Marshall claims that no more than 15-20 percent of soldiers fired their weapons in combat.Missing: methodology | Show results with:methodology
  4. [4]
    [PDF] S. L. A. Marshall's Men Against Fire - USAWC Press
    Aug 1, 2003 · S. L. A. Marshall, Men Against Fire: The Problem of Battle Command in Future War (Washington: In- fantry Journal; New York: William Morrow, ...
  5. [5]
    Hope on the Battlefield - Greater Good Science Center
    Jun 1, 2007 · Resistance to killing. S.L.A. Marshall's methodology has been criticized, but his findings have been corroborated by many other studies. Indeed, ...
  6. [6]
    "Black Mirror" Men Against Fire (TV Episode 2016) - User reviews
    Intensely disturbing. ... Men against Fire is a classic episode of Black Mirror, it has so many things going for it, but for me, it's the what if scenario posed ...
  7. [7]
    'Black Mirror's Most Horrifying Episode Has Eerie Connections to ...
    Jul 4, 2025 · Charlie Brooker wrote the first draft of "Men Against Fire" after being directly inspired by a brutal war documentary, making the episode's real-life ...
  8. [8]
    Black Mirror season 3, episode 5: “Men Against Fire” is a warning ...
    Oct 21, 2016 · “Men Against Fire” is set in a near future where the promise and optimism of 20th- and 21st-century technologies have been gamed out to their frightening but ...
  9. [9]
    'Black Mirror' Recap: A Modern Parable of Genocide and Perception
    ### Plot Summary of "Men Against Fire" (Black Mirror Season 3, Episode 5)
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
    Charlie Brooker: 'Someone threatened to smuggle a rifle through ...
    Oct 19, 2016 · there's an episode in this season called Men Against Fire, which is to do with this book called On Killing [By Dave Grossman], about the ...
  12. [12]
    This Horrifying Black Mirror Episode Was Inspired By A Real War ...
    Jun 24, 2025 · Although the spark behind "Men Against Fire" was set back in 2010, Brooker's early draft of the episode was still hard to recognize from what it ...Missing: SLA Marshall
  13. [13]
  14. [14]
    Malachi Kirby on Starring in 'Black Mirror' Episode 'Men Against Fire'
    Oct 23, 2016 · "Men Against Fire" is well within the traditional Black Mirror wheelhouse. Kirby stars as Stripe, a soldier whose unit is tasked with finding ...Missing: casting | Show results with:casting
  15. [15]
    "Black Mirror" Men Against Fire (TV Episode 2016) - Full cast & crew
    "Black Mirror" Men Against Fire (TV Episode 2016) - Cast and crew credits, including actors, actresses, directors, writers and more.
  16. [16]
    "Black Mirror" Men Against Fire (TV Episode 2016) - Filming ... - IMDb
    Men Against Fire: Future soldiers Stripe and Raiman must protect frightened ... Filming locations. Silverstone Racetrack, Northamptonshire, England, UK.
  17. [17]
    Production design of “Black Mirror” – interview with Joel Collins
    Feb 22, 2017 · We talk about the beginning of his career, his love of all things physical, how “Black Mirror” started and how it evolved when it transitioned to Netflix.
  18. [18]
    Black Mirror's Production Designer on Crafting Season 3's Warped ...
    Dec 16, 2016 · The episode features some of the show's most amazing VFX work and production work to date. “In truth, the show itself is more about the mind ...Missing: practical | Show results with:practical
  19. [19]
    Veterans Perspectives on the Psychosocial Impact of Killing in War
    Nov 21, 2016 · In alignment with discussions of killing as aversive vis-à-vis social norms, in the recent years, there has been increasing interest in ...
  20. [20]
    'Black Mirror' Study Guide: Men Against Fire | by Howard Chai
    Jan 23, 2018 · In “Men Against Fire”, we follow a soldier, Stripe, as he discovers the true nature of the war he's fighting and the enemy he's tasked with killing.Missing: development timeline
  21. [21]
    Dehumanization - Beyond Intractability
    Dehumanization is the psychological process of demonizing the enemy, making them seem less than human and hence not worthy of humane treatment. This can lead ...
  22. [22]
    Men Against Fire | Black Mirror Wiki - Fandom
    Oct 21, 2016 · Men Against Fire is the fifth episode of season three of Black Mirror. It was written by series creator Charlie Brooker and premiered on ...<|separator|>
  23. [23]
    Bang on Target? Infantry Marksmanship and Combat Effectiveness ...
    The most frequently quoted 'shots per casualty' ratio for the Vietnam War is the US Army's figure of 50,000 rounds of small arms ammunition per enemy casualty.
  24. [24]
    The Tactical Considerations of Augmented and Mixed Reality ...
    We identify multiple areas and research topics for investigation in order for AR devices to become a combat multiplier. The acquisition and fielding process for ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] The Tactical Considerations of Augmented and Mixed Reality ...
    These platforms are intended to improve tactical awareness, target ac- quisition, and situational awareness, and also to develop an information upstream for ...Missing: rates | Show results with:rates
  26. [26]
    Army Hopeful Troubled Headset Program Is Finally Looking Up
    Apr 2, 2024 · Soldiers hit fewer targets and engaged targets more slowly” when equipped with IVAS, according to the Director, Operational Test and ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Rates of Advance in Historical Land Combat Operations - DTIC
    This paper analyzes historical data on rates of advance in land combat, using a larger, more varied data set and considering alternative hypotheses.Missing: soldier hit
  28. [28]
    r/MVIS on Reddit: Weapon Systems Annual Assessment-Integrated ...
    Jun 18, 2024 · The program office tested and conducted user assessments for the first two prototype builds of IVAS 1.2 and received positive soldier feedback and test results.
  29. [29]
    S.L.A. Marshall's Ratio of Fire | - War Chronicle
    In an average experienced infantry company in an average day's action, the number engaging with any and all weapons was approximately 15 per cent of the total ...
  30. [30]
    The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society
    Jul 1, 1996 · Changes in training, however, increased this firing rate, which reached 55 percent in the Korean War and 90 percent to 95 percent in Vietnam.
  31. [31]
    Army accepts prototypes of the most advanced version of IVAS | Article
    Aug 1, 2023 · Specifically, IVAS 1.2 incorporates reliability upgrades, features an improved low-light sensor and introduces a new form factor with a lower ...
  32. [32]
    IVAS' Campaign of Learning Ensures Development, Production and ...
    Mar 14, 2023 · The Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS) will change the way Soldiers fight, rehearse, and train.
  33. [33]
    Audit of the Army's Integrated Visual Augmentation System (DODIG ...
    Apr 22, 2022 · The objective of this audit was to determine whether Army officials effectively managed the Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS) program to meet user ...
  34. [34]
    ARC4: Advanced Augmented Reality Technology - ARA
    ARC4 RECON is advanced augmented reality (AR) technology that delivers heads-up tactical situational awareness, day or night.Missing: cognitive augmentation
  35. [35]
    Augmented reality technology for day/night situational awareness for ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · ARC4 system also can provide the function of tracking, navigation, target delivery, image sharing, and tagging of features in the environment [9] ...Missing: detection | Show results with:detection
  36. [36]
    U.S. Army Begins Rolling Out Augmented Reality For Soldiers
    Sep 15, 2022 · The US Army has received the first of tens of thousands of augmented reality goggles designed to make soldiers more effective in close combat.Missing: applications visors
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS)
    IVAS is a Middle Tier of Acquisition program in the rapid prototyping and fielding phases intended to equip over. 100,000 soldiers with the system, using an ...
  38. [38]
    Army's Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS) - Congress.gov
    Sep 11, 2025 · The U.S. Army is developing the Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS) as part of an effort to improve the combat effectiveness and ...
  39. [39]
    Black Mirror – Season 3, Episode 5 Men Against Fire
    Rating 57% (23) Oct 21, 2016 · Rotten score. Critics Consensus. "Men Against Fire" boasts high production value and a disquieting conclusion, but this Black Mirror ...
  40. [40]
    In Men Against Fire, Black Mirror takes on the future of warfare
    Oct 27, 2016 · “Men Against Fire” is set in some indeterminate future where soldiers are augmented with an implant called MASS, which displays information and ...Missing: practical | Show results with:practical
  41. [41]
    Black Mirror: Season 3, Episode 5 | Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes
    Men Against Fire is a meandering bore, not even able to proffer the visual flare making even the most mediocre Black ...
  42. [42]
    Black Mirror Recap: Know Your Enemy, Know Why You Fight - Vulture
    Rating 2.0 · Review by VultureOct 21, 2016 · “Men Against Fire” is also the most gratuitously violent episode of the new Black Mirror batch, probably by design. Even if Brooker and ...
  43. [43]
    'Black Mirror' episodes ranked by fans (updated) - Gold Derby
    Apr 15, 2025 · black mirror episodes ranked Men Against Fire. Photo : Netflix. 7.5/10 – 'Men Against Fire'. Season 3, Episode 5. Air date: October 21, 2016.
  44. [44]
    All 27 'Black Mirror' Episodes, Ranked According to IMDb - Collider
    Feb 26, 2024 · IMDb Rating: 7.5/10. Stripe in the episode Men Against Fire from Black Mirror.<|separator|>
  45. [45]
    Why is Men Against Fire usually said to be one of the worst episodes?
    Jun 21, 2017 · Men Against Fire was an episode I really liked. It taught a harsh lesson, and the twist was really dark (the fact that they were killing regular people that ...What's Everyone's Beef with Men Against Fire? : r/blackmirror - RedditMen against fire is so disturbing to rewatch : r/blackmirror - RedditMore results from www.reddit.comMissing: critical | Show results with:critical
  46. [46]
    Men against fire is so disturbing to rewatch : r/blackmirror - Reddit
    Apr 30, 2025 · The thing with Men against Fire is that its horror doesnt match with irl. We have literal soldiers on the ground killing and dehumanizing people ...
  47. [47]
    Men Against, what do you think about this episode? : r/blackmirror
    Feb 16, 2025 · Men Against, what do you think about this episode? DISCUSSION. Today I watched the episode Men Against Fire (5th episode of the 3rd season).
  48. [48]
    Black Mirror [Episode Discussion] - S03E05 - Men Against Fire
    Oct 21, 2016 · This is an obvious and extreme example of how tech can distort the representation of so many things, and it made me think about how it's already ...Missing: script | Show results with:script
  49. [49]
    “Men Against Fire” | - Insert Comma
    Jan 1, 2019 · Viewing “Men Against Fire” through examples such as eugenic thinking reveals how discriminatory rhetoric against poor, minority, and other ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Dehumanization and the Power Hierarchy in Black Mirror's “Men ...
    “Men Against Fire,” like many episodes of Black Mirror, is a fictionalized reflection of some of the darkest characteristics of our society: technology's ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Dehumanization in Black Mirror - MatheO
    This distinction between “subhuman” and “superhuman” is particularly interesting for the analysis of “Men Against Fire” because the episode contains characters ...<|separator|>
  52. [52]
    [PDF] griffith journal of law & human dignity
    The Black Mirror episode 'Men against fire'15, is a technophobic commentary on the role of death and killing when biopolitics draws from a violent undercurrent ...<|separator|>
  53. [53]
    Revisiting BLACK MIRROR: Men Against Fire - Warped Factor
    Jul 8, 2023 · The recent series "Altered Carbon" explores similar themes around the manipulation of perception and memory in a future where consciousness can ...Missing: script | Show results with:script
  54. [54]
    Issues in Men Against Fire (Black Mirror Series) - IvyPanda
    Aug 7, 2024 · This essay analyzes the episode of "Men Against Fire" through its cultural context and the dehumanization resulting from those in power, ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Marshall's Men Against Fire
    Thus the ordinary rifleman was found to fire his weapon very infrequently in any given engagement of World War II. But those back of the lines and using crew- ...
  56. [56]
    The long-dead hand of S.L.A. Marshall misleads historians
    Nov 15, 2018 · One of the most widely read military historians of the 20th century, S.L.A. Marshall was also a liar and a shameless self-promoter.
  57. [57]
    The Secret of the Soldiers Who Didn't Shoot - AMERICAN HERITAGE
    With repetition, the assertion became stronger, and nonfiring edged up to 85 percent: “we found that on average not more than 15 per cent of the men had ...
  58. [58]
    Dehumanization as a weapon of war - Akutmag
    Dehumanization as a weapon of war is a primary tactic to achieve moral disengagement, making it easier to fight the enemy and accept atrocities.
  59. [59]
    US Army's IVAS Lets Troops Fire Around Obstacles, See Through Dust
    Dec 31, 2023 · The US Army is preparing for the final test of its augmented reality devices in 2024. The device aims to improve shooting and navigation and ...
  60. [60]
    Integrated Visual Augmented Reality Goggles to Enhance Close ...
    IVAS is designed to enhance the lethality and survivability of the Army's Close Combat Force through a combination of technologies and augmented reality ...