Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Mercury Interactive

Mercury Interactive Corporation was an American software company specializing in and business technology optimization tools, founded in 1989 in , by entrepreneurs Amnon Landan and Aryeh Finegold. The company developed products such as TestSuite2000, Topaz, and ActiveWatch, which focused on to detect flaws, optimize performance, and manage IT processes for clients. Initially established to address growing needs in , Mercury Interactive shipped its first products in 1991 and went public on (ticker: MERQ) in 1993, marking early expansion under Landan's leadership as president from 1995. The late brought rapid growth, particularly with the rise of , as web-based testing solutions propelled revenues from $77 million in 1997 to $307 million in 2000, earning it a spot on Fortune's list of the 100 Fastest-Growing Companies. By 2002, the company employed over 2,100 people across 26 countries and reported $400.1 million in annual revenue, solidifying its position as a leader in the competitive market. To bolster its portfolio, Mercury acquired Performant, Inc., in May 2003 for performance management tools, and Kintana, Inc., in June 2003 for $225 million to enhance capabilities. Facing industry consolidation and challenges like stock options controversies, the company was ultimately acquired by () in July 2006 for $4.5 billion in cash, integrating its technologies into HP's software division and expanding HP's annual software revenue beyond $2 billion. Following HP's 2017 spin-off of its software business to International, Mercury's legacy products continued under Micro Focus's R&D operations, particularly in , until Micro Focus was acquired by in January 2023.

Company Overview

Founding

Mercury Interactive was established in 1989 by Zvi Schpizer, Ilan Kinreich, and Arye Finegold, three entrepreneurs with extensive backgrounds in and . Schpizer and Kinreich had prior experience in roles at tech firms like Daisy Systems, while Finegold had founded Daisy Systems itself, a pioneering company. Their collective expertise in software tools and systems positioned them to tackle pressing challenges in the burgeoning IT sector. The company was incorporated in on July 26, 1989, but operated initially with core research and development activities centered in , reflecting the founders' origins and the nation's growing tech ecosystem. This setup allowed Mercury Interactive to leverage Israel's talent pool in while targeting global markets. Early operations emphasized innovation in solutions, with the initial U.S. headquarters established in , in the early 1990s to facilitate access to Silicon Valley's resources. From its inception, Mercury Interactive's primary focus was developing tools for and performance monitoring to meet the rising demands of enterprise IT environments. In the late , manual testing processes were labor-intensive and prone to errors, particularly as software complexity grew with the expansion of personal computers and networked systems. The founders envisioned automated solutions to streamline , ensuring software compatibility and identifying performance flaws efficiently, thereby reducing deployment risks for businesses. The first product concepts emerged directly from these inefficiencies, aiming to automate repetitive testing tasks that had previously relied on human oversight. This approach not only addressed immediate pain points in but also laid the groundwork for broader innovations, positioning the company as a key player in optimizing IT operations from the outset.

Headquarters and Operations

Mercury Interactive established its initial U.S. headquarters in , in the early 1990s to serve as the base for sales, administration, and executive operations, leveraging proximity to Silicon Valley's technology ecosystem. The headquarters was relocated to 379 North Whisman Road, 94043, in the second quarter of 2004, occupying a 253,000 leased facility. The company's research and development center in , functioned as the main hub for and innovation since its inception in 1989, housing the core technical teams in two owned buildings totaling 285,000 square feet, with additional leased space and a new facility under construction by 2005. This Israeli site capitalized on local talent, while the U.S. facilitated and global business coordination. By the early 2000s, Mercury Interactive expanded its global presence with offices across , including the and , as well as in through locations in , , , , , and , primarily to support international and . Overall, the company operated 71 and offices worldwide as of December 31, 2005, distributed across the (38 offices), , , and (22 offices), (9 offices), and (2 offices). Employee numbers grew to 2,854 by the end of 2005, with approximately 1,390 in the and 1,464 outside the region, emphasizing roles in , direct sales (944 employees), (286 employees), and (279 employees). This workforce supported a dual-headquarters operational model that integrated Israel's R&D strengths with U.S.-led commercial activities, enabling efficient global delivery of software solutions.

Historical Milestones

Early Development and Growth

Mercury Interactive launched its flagship product, WinRunner, in as an automated tool designed to streamline processes. This release marked a pivotal moment in the company's early development, enabling it to address the growing demand for efficient testing solutions amid the rapid expansion of client-server applications in the mid-1990s. The company experienced significant revenue growth during its startup phase, transitioning from modest beginnings to achieving $307 million in annual revenue by 2000, primarily driven by widespread adoption of its testing tools. This expansion was fueled by the increasing complexity of and the need for reliable performance validation in business-critical systems. In 1993, Mercury Interactive went public on the under the symbol MERQ, which provided essential capital for further product development and . In the late , the company executed a strategic pivot from offering standalone testing tools to developing integrated IT management suites, aligning with the rise of web-based and applications. This shift positioned Mercury Interactive to deliver comprehensive solutions for . By 2003, it had achieved substantial penetration into companies, particularly for application performance monitoring, solidifying its role in enterprise IT optimization.

Key Acquisitions

Mercury Interactive pursued a series of strategic acquisitions from 2000 to 2006 to bolster its offerings in , performance optimization, and IT management, integrating technologies that complemented its core products in . In 2000, the company acquired Conduct Software Technologies through a share-swap valued at approximately $50 million. This move enhanced Mercury's capabilities in testing by incorporating Conduct's tools for automated testing of web-based systems. The following year, in , Mercury acquired Freshwater Software for $147 million in cash. Freshwater's expertise in and performance monitoring allowed Mercury to strengthen its position in , enabling better simulation of user traffic on web sites. In 2003, Mercury made two notable purchases. It first acquired Performant Inc. for $22.5 million, integrating performance optimization tools that helped diagnose and resolve issues in Java-based applications, thereby expanding Mercury's diagnostic portfolio. Later that year, Mercury bought Kintana Inc. for $225 million in a deal that introduced software, allowing customers to prioritize and track IT projects more effectively. Continuing its expansion in 2004, Mercury acquired Appilog for $49 million in cash. Appilog's application dependency mapping technology enabled better visualization of relationships between applications and infrastructure, aiding in IT operations and . In 2005, the company purchased BeatBox Technologies (formerly ClickCadence) for $14 million. This acquisition bolstered Mercury's business service management offerings by adding real-user tools that tracked clickstream data and page performance to optimize online user experiences. Finally, in early 2006—just months before its own acquisition by —Mercury acquired Systinet for $105 million in cash. Systinet's web services governance platform extended Mercury's reach into , providing tools for managing the lifecycle of web services and ensuring compliance in enterprise environments. These deals, totaling over $560 million, focused on acquiring complementary technologies that filled gaps in Mercury's IT management suite and supported its growth in the competitive market during the early 2000s.

Products and Innovations

Software Testing Tools

Mercury Interactive's software testing tools portfolio centered on automating performance, functional, and monitoring tasks for enterprise applications, enabling developers and testers to simulate real-world usage scenarios without extensive hardware resources. Among these, , launched in 1993, emerged as a flagship product for load and of client-server and web-based applications. It allowed users to generate realistic load by simulating hundreds or thousands of virtual users interacting with the system simultaneously, helping identify bottlenecks in and response times under high demand. This capability was particularly valuable for enterprise environments, where LoadRunner's protocol support extended to various communication layers, including HTTP, FTP, and database protocols, facilitating protocol-independent testing that abstracted away low-level details for broader compatibility. Complementing performance testing, Mercury Interactive developed tools for functional validation, starting with WinRunner, introduced in the mid-1990s as an automated testing solution primarily for Windows applications. WinRunner employed a capture-replay mechanism to record user interactions—such as mouse clicks and keyboard inputs—and replay them as scripts in Mercury's proprietary Test Script Language (TSL), enabling efficient to verify application stability across iterations. This approach reduced manual effort in repetitive testing tasks, focusing on and to handle dynamic GUI elements reliably. Building on this foundation, QuickTest Professional (QTP) represented an evolution in , with version 9.0 released in April 2006 incorporating key features from WinRunner to create a unified tool for automated and . QTP utilized as its , allowing testers to parameterize tests, handle data-driven scenarios, and integrate checkpoints for validating application outputs against expected results. Its object-based testing model supported a wide array of technologies, from and to systems, streamlining test maintenance in complex environments. The 2003 acquisition of Performant, Inc., for $22.5 million further strengthened performance management tools, integrating capabilities for application optimization into Mercury's testing suite. For ongoing monitoring, SiteScope served as an agentless tool acquired by Mercury Interactive from Freshwater Software in May 2001, designed to track server and application performance metrics in . It offered over 80 monitor types for elements like CPU usage, , traffic, and web transactions, with built-in alerting mechanisms via or SNMP to notify administrators of thresholds breaches. SiteScope's scalability enabled deployment across distributed IT infrastructures, providing dashboards for proactive issue detection without requiring software installation on monitored hosts. These tools collectively introduced innovations in protocol-independent testing, where scripts could operate across diverse protocols without recoding, and enterprise-scale , supporting simulations of massive user loads to mirror production conditions. Such advancements allowed organizations to conduct comprehensive testing cycles efficiently, minimizing risks in .

Application Lifecycle Management Solutions

Mercury Interactive's (ALM) solutions offered integrated platforms to orchestrate the software development process, encompassing requirements definition, test planning, execution, defect tracking, and deployment oversight. These tools emphasized end-to-end visibility and collaboration, enabling teams to align with broader development goals across both agile and traditional methodologies. By centralizing data and workflows, Mercury's ALM offerings reduced between development and testing phases, facilitating faster issue resolution and compliance with project timelines. A cornerstone of these solutions was TestDirector, launched in 1999 as Mercury's flagship . It functioned as a web-based central repository for organizing test cases, tracking requirements, and logging defects, allowing teams to manage the entire testing lifecycle from a unified interface. TestDirector supported integration with other Mercury tools for automated testing, streamlining manual and automated processes while providing reporting capabilities to monitor progress and coverage. Its adoption grew rapidly due to its role in standardizing practices in enterprise environments. TestDirector evolved into Quality Center with the release of version 8.0 in , enhancing its scope to address broader ALM needs under Mercury's portfolio. Quality Center introduced advanced modules for and risk-based testing, maintaining the core functionality while adding support for distributed teams through . This evolution positioned it as a more robust platform for coordinating complex projects, with features like customizable workflows to adapt to varying development methodologies. Following Mercury's acquisition by later that year , Quality Center was rebranded and further developed into HP Quality Center. The 2003 acquisition of Kintana for $225 million significantly expanded Mercury's ALM capabilities by incorporating IT governance and portfolio management features. Kintana's tools were integrated to provide oversight of project portfolios, , and reporting, bridging testing activities with strategic IT planning. This addition enabled organizations to prioritize initiatives based on and risk, enhancing decision-making in ALM processes. The merged offerings created a cohesive for managing application from to . Key features across Mercury's ALM solutions included traceability matrices to link requirements, tests, and defects for comprehensive coverage analysis; customizable dashboards for real-time visibility into project metrics; and collaboration tools such as shared repositories and notifications to support team interactions. These elements ensured bidirectional , allowing changes in requirements to propagate through testing phases, while dashboards offered configurable views for stakeholders to track key performance indicators without deep technical dives. Collaboration functionalities facilitated and audit trails, promoting accountability in multi-user environments. HP ALM emerged as the direct successor to Mercury's Quality Center, integrating testing with full development workflows to support and agile practices. It extended the platform's repository model by incorporating modules for code management and release planning, enabling seamless handoffs between development and teams. This integration reduced cycle times by automating status updates and providing analytics to optimize resource use across the lifecycle. As of April 2006, Mercury's ALM solutions had achieved widespread adoption, with eight of the top ten companies on the list relying on them, such as Mercury Quality Center and Mercury Performance Center, for optimizing application quality and performance in QA processes. This level of penetration among 100-level enterprises underscored their impact on standardizing lifecycle management in high-stakes software environments.

Corporate Controversies

Stock Options Backdating Scandal

In the mid-2000s, Mercury Interactive became embroiled in a stock options backdating that revealed a systematic to manipulate option grant dates for the benefit of executives and employees. The practice involved retroactively altering the recorded grant dates of stock options to periods when the company's share price was at a low point, thereby allowing recipients to exercise options at below-market prices without properly for the resulting compensation expense. This spanned from to 2005, affecting 49 instances of option grants, including all 45 grants made to executives and employees between and April 2002. By backdating these grants, Mercury Interactive concealed millions in additional compensation costs, leading to overstated financial results and the need for significant restatements of earnings. Central to the were several senior executives who orchestrated and benefited from the manipulated grants. Key figures included CEO and Chairman Amnon Landan, CFO Douglas P. Smith, and General Counsel Susan J. Skaer, who resigned abruptly on November 2, 2005, following an internal investigation that uncovered their personal gains from the backdating. Earlier CFO Sharlene Abrams was also implicated in the scheme during her tenure from 1997 to 2002, where she allegedly participated in selecting favorable past dates for grants while signing off on false financial disclosures. The method relied on undisclosed alterations to grant documentation, often using hindsight to choose dates preceding stock price increases, which avoided immediate expense recognition under then-prevailing accounting rules and enriched participants through "in-the-money" options. The came to light through an internal probe initiated in mid-2005 amid growing scrutiny of options practices across , spurred by Wall Street Journal reports highlighting suspicious patterns in executive grants. Mercury Interactive's launched the investigation in July 2005 after receiving a regulatory , revealing the extent of the backdating by 2005. The disclosures prompted immediate reaction, with shares dropping 25-27% on the announcement of the resignations. As a direct consequence, the company delayed its financial filings to restate results, missing deadlines that led to delisting from on January 4, 2006.

Legal Consequences and Settlements

The U.S. initiated an investigation into Mercury Interactive's stock option granting practices in July 2005, following reports of potential irregularities in . This probe uncovered a scheme involving the backdating of stock options from 1997 to 2005, during which the company concealed over $258 million in compensation expenses by falsifying grant dates to coincide with favorable stock prices. On May 31, 2007, the announced a with Mercury Interactive, requiring the company to pay a $28 million without admitting or denying the allegations of , earnings manipulation, and violations of reporting and requirements. As part of the resolution, Mercury agreed to a permanent against future violations of securities laws. In parallel, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) conducted a into the backdating practices, but ultimately declined to bring charges against the company itself, directing its focus toward individual executives. The DOJ's probe led to criminal indictments against at least one former executive, Sharlene Abrams, the company's former , on charges related to the scheme, though the case against her was later resolved without a conviction. No criminal charges were filed against Mercury Interactive as an entity. The SEC also pursued civil enforcement actions against four former senior executives implicated in the misconduct: Amnon Landan (former chairman and CEO), Sharlene Abrams (former CFO), Douglas T. Smith (former CFO), and Susan L. Skaer (former general counsel). These individuals faced charges of fraud, including backdating 45 stock option grants, falsifying company records, and misleading investors through inaccurate financial disclosures. Resolutions varied; for instance, Landan settled in 2013 by disgorging profits and paying a $1 million civil penalty, while Abrams agreed to return approximately $1.4 million in compensation and faced additional personal sanctions. Other executives, including Skaer, reached separate settlements involving disgorgement and penalties totaling up to $1.5 million in some cases, along with permanent bars from serving as officers or directors of public companies. The prompted significant financial restatements by Mercury Interactive, covering the period from 1992 to 2004, which reduced the company's previously reported by $525.4 million, primarily due to unrecorded stock option expenses. These revisions addressed the to expense over $258 million in compensation related to the backdated grants, ensuring with standards under the Financial Accounting Standards Board's rules. Shareholder litigation followed swiftly, culminating in a major class-action lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California alleging . In October 2007, Company, which had acquired Mercury Interactive in November 2006, agreed to settle the suit on behalf of the company for $117.5 million, providing recovery to affected shareholders without any admission of liability. This settlement, one of the largest related to at the time, resolved claims spanning the class period from 2000 to 2006 and was preliminarily approved by the court in 2008.

Post-Acquisition Legacy

Integration with Hewlett-Packard

Hewlett-Packard Company announced its acquisition of Mercury Interactive on July 25, 2006, agreeing to purchase all outstanding shares for $52 per share in cash, valuing the deal at approximately $4.5 billion. The transaction was completed on November 7, 2006, following a , marking HP's largest software acquisition to date and integrating Mercury as a wholly owned within its Software Division. The primary rationale for the acquisition was to strengthen 's software portfolio, particularly its Business Technology Optimization (BTO) offerings, by incorporating Mercury's expertise in application testing, performance management, and IT governance tools. HP aimed to combine Mercury's solutions, such as for , with its existing OpenView management software to provide end-to-end capabilities, thereby expanding its competitive position in markets. This move was expected to nearly double HP's annual software revenue and enhance its ability to address customer needs in application development and deployment. Post-acquisition involved rebranding Mercury's key products under the umbrella, with becoming HP LoadRunner to align with HP's strategy while retaining core product identities. Mercury's operations and approximately 3,000 employees were absorbed into HP's Software Division, with efforts focused on streamlining duplicative functions through a plan that eliminated around 370 positions, primarily in the U.S. and , incurring $45 million in severance and facility exit costs. The emphasized merging Mercury's application tools into HP's OpenView suite to accelerate product development and support services. Short-term challenges included the transfer of ongoing investigations into Mercury's pre-acquisition stock practices, which had led to executive resignations and regulatory scrutiny. However, management assured investors that these liabilities would not result in material financial impacts, and subsequent settlements, such as a $28 million fine in 2007, confirmed minimal disruption to operations. The acquisition added roughly $400 million in annual revenue to 's software portfolio, contributing to a 78.7% year-over-year increase in the division's net revenue to $2.325 billion in fiscal 2007.

Subsequent Ownership Changes and Product Evolution

In November 2015, Hewlett-Packard completed its corporate split, separating into , focused on personal systems and printing, and (HPE), which inherited the enterprise services and software assets, including those originally acquired from Mercury Interactive. This transition positioned Mercury's legacy tools, such as and Quality Center, within HPE's broader software portfolio as the company streamlined its operations post-split. In September 2017, HPE divested its non-core software business, encompassing 's integrated products, to International in a valued at $8.8 billion, which included a and merger structure granting HPE shareholders 50.1% ownership in the combined entity. The deal, completed on September 1, 2017, led to the rebranding of key Mercury-derived tools under , with products like HP ALM reintroduced as ALM/Quality Center to align with the new ownership's strategy. Micro Focus's tenure with these assets ended in January 2023 when Corporation acquired the company for $6.0 billion in an all-cash transaction, integrating Mercury's legacy tools into OpenText's expansive and application delivery portfolio. This acquisition, announced in August 2022 and finalized on January 31, 2023, expanded OpenText's capabilities in and performance testing, preserving the continuity of Mercury-originated solutions like and ALM/Quality Center under a unified brand. Under and subsequently , Mercury's products evolved with enhancements focused on modern development practices, including AI-driven features in Professional, such as the AI-powered Aviator introduced in version 25.3 for automated scripting, interaction, and faster analysis. Similarly, ALM/Quality Center received integration updates, enabling deployment in various environments with improved support for hybrid workflows and seamless data migration to models. As of 2025, these tools continue to serve as industry standards for performance testing and application , with providing ongoing support through regular updates and guided migrations to deployments, ensuring compatibility with cloud-native architectures and pipelines.

Competitive Landscape

Primary Competitors

During its peak in the early 2000s, Mercury Interactive faced significant competition in the , (ALM), and markets from established players offering overlapping tools for , testing, and . These rivals challenged Mercury's offerings like for , SiteScope for infrastructure , and Kintana for IT governance and . BMC Software competed directly with Mercury in , particularly through its product, which provided real-time monitoring and alerting for , positioning it as a key alternative to SiteScope in the space. In 2005, industry analyses identified as one of Mercury's primary rivals alongside tools from , , and for overall IT operations monitoring. CA Technologies emerged as a strong competitor in and management after acquiring Niku in 2005, integrating its Clarity suite to rival Mercury's Kintana for IT and in environments. Clarity focused on strategic and execution, directly challenging Kintana's capabilities in automating IT workflows and . Compuware provided testing and mainframe-focused tools that overlapped with Mercury's portfolio, notably through TestPartner for automated and, following its acquisition of ChangePoint, offerings in IT governance that competed with Kintana for project tracking and resource management. By the mid-2000s, Compuware was recognized as one of Mercury's chief rivals in application performance and testing alongside and . IBM's Tivoli suite posed a broad challenge in enterprise monitoring and automation, with tools for and performance optimization that vied against both SiteScope and in large-scale IT environments. Tivoli's with IBM's broader allowed it to compete effectively in application lifecycle and infrastructure monitoring, where Mercury had gained ground in the testing segment by the early 2000s. Microsoft's System Center, particularly Operations Manager, targeted Windows-centric IT operations with and alerting features that competed with SiteScope for and application oversight in Microsoft-dominated infrastructures. Quest Software focused on database and application , offering tools that directly rivaled Mercury's diagnostic and optimization solutions for enterprise data environments during the . Quest was viewed as operating in similar markets to Mercury, with strengths in specialized that challenged SiteScope's broader scope. Other notable competitors included Systems, which specialized in project planning and scheduling software that overlapped with Kintana in portfolio management for complex, resource-intensive initiatives. 's tools emphasized enterprise-level project execution, serving as a rival in the ALM space for industries requiring detailed planning beyond pure IT governance.

Market Influence and Industry Impact

Mercury Interactive played a pivotal role in shaping the landscape, particularly through its tool, which established industry benchmarks for performance and . By the early , the company had achieved dominant market position, capturing 63% of the global web market and influencing a broader shift toward automated in environments. This leadership not only accelerated the adoption of predictive testing methodologies but also set standards for load simulation protocols that other vendors later emulated, enhancing overall reliability in . The company's tools became integral to educational programs in , fostering widespread training in performance testing techniques. LoadRunner, in particular, was incorporated into university curricula and technical syllabi, such as those in B.Tech programs, where it served as a core resource for hands-on learning in automated testing and system scalability analysis. This educational footprint helped standardize performance testing knowledge among professionals globally, contributing to more robust practices in academia and industry. Economically, Mercury Interactive's innovations delivered measurable value by enabling that optimized and reduced operational risks. Users reported significant cost efficiencies, including up to 50% reductions in testing expenses through streamlined load simulations and avoidance of costs averaging $500,000 per hour, collectively translating to substantial savings across deployments. These benefits underscored the company's impact on IT budgeting and efficiency. Post-acquisition by in 2006, Mercury's foundational technologies endured as key enablers in evolving software delivery paradigms, integrating into workflows and / (CI/CD) pipelines to support automated testing at scale. This legacy facilitated faster release cycles and higher-quality outputs in modern agile environments, perpetuating Mercury's influence on industry standards for continuous performance assurance.

References

  1. [1]
    Mercury Interactive Corporation - Company-Histories.com
    2003: Mercury acquires Performant, Inc. and Kintana, Inc. most astute ... Company History: Mercury Interactive Corporation helps corporate customers ...
  2. [2]
    HP To Acquire Mercury Interactive For $4.5 Billion - InformationWeek
    Jul 25, 2006 · HP To Acquire Mercury Interactive For $4.5 Billion. The deal would push HP's software business to over $2 billion a year. HP CEO Hurd says he is ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  3. [3]
    Mercury Interactive - Startup Nation Finder
    Oct 26, 2021 · The company was acquired by HP in 2006 and later became part of the Micro Focus R&D center in Israel. More Less ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  4. [4]
    Mercury Interactive - 2025 Company Profile, Team & Competitors
    May 28, 2025 · The founders of Mercury Interactive are Arye Finegold, Zvi Schpizer and Ilan Kinriech. Here are the details of Mercury Interactive's key team ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] RADWARE LTD. - AnnualReports.com
    Jan 1, 2011 · Kinreich was a co-founder and Vice. President R&D of Mercury Interactive. From 1984 until 1989 Mr. Kinreich was R&D manager at Daisy Systems.<|control11|><|separator|>
  6. [6]
    GRASS-ROOTS BUSINESS; Roots in Israel, Head in Silicon Valley
    Jun 30, 2002 · In 1989, led by Daisy's founder, Aryeh Finegold, they started Mercury Interactive to make software testing tools, raising $11.5 million in ...Missing: founded | Show results with:founded
  7. [7]
    Mercury Interactive LLC - Company Profile and News
    INCORPORATED. 07/26/1989. ADDRESS. 379 North Whisman Road Mountain View, CA 94043 United States. WEBSITE. www.merc-int.com. NO. OF EMPLOYEES. --. Most Popular.Missing: date | Show results with:date
  8. [8]
    Mercury Interactive - Crunchbase Company Profile & Funding
    Mercury Interactive was acquired by Hewlett-Packard Company. The company provides business technology optimization (BTO) software and services in the United ...
  9. [9]
    Mercury Interactive Corporation | Encyclopedia.com
    Mercury Interactive Corporation helps corporate customers optimize the performance of their software applications. The company's software testing products ...
  10. [10]
    Form 10-K - SEC.gov
    Table of Contents. Proposed Acquisition of Mercury Interactive by Hewlett-Packard Company. On July 25, 2006, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger ( ...
  11. [11]
    HP Buying Mercury for $4.5 Billion - Business - Haaretz
    Jul 26, 2006 · It has become an American company with a very big R&D center in Israel, specifically - in the industrial zone of Yehud. Anyway, even Mercury's ...
  12. [12]
    Software Testing Timeline
    1995 First release of Winrunner. The record & playback tool Winrunner is released by Mercury. 1995 SAST formed. The Swedish Association for Software Testing ...
  13. [13]
    “Mercury is poised to become a billion dollar company" - Globes
    Jan 18, 2001 · ... Mercury Interactive Corporation (Nasdaq: MERQ) unscathed. Mercury ... Mercury's revenue for 2000 was $307 million – 64% higher than in ...
  14. [14]
    Notice To Members 93-91 | FINRA.org
    Dec 1, 1993 · IntegraCare, Inc. 10/29/93. 1000. MERQ. Mercury Interactive Corporation. 10/29/93. 500. PTREF. PartnerRe Holdings Ltd. 10/29/93. 1000. PETR.
  15. [15]
    Next best to a sure thing - Globes English - גלובס
    May 12, 2003 · ... Mercury Interactive Corporation (Nasdaq: MERQ). Azulay, David ... Azulay joined Mercury with the acquisition of Conduct Software, but ...
  16. [16]
    Mercury buys freshwater for $147 million -- ADTmag
    Mercury Interactive Corp. has acquired Freshwater Software, a privately-held maker of performance monitoring products based in Boulder, Colorado, for $147 ...
  17. [17]
    Technology Briefing | Software: Mercury Buys Performant For $22.5 ...
    May 13, 2003 · Shares of Mercury rose $1.77, or about 5 percent, to $37.52. A version of this article appears in print on May 13, 2003, Section C, Page 4 of ...Missing: Fortune 500
  18. [18]
    Mercury Interactive To Acquire Kintana In $225M Deal - CRN
    Jun 10, 2003 · The purchase price is more than four times Kintana's sales of $44.5 million in 2002, a high premium in the midst of the current IT spending ...Missing: history Conduct Freshwater BeatBox
  19. [19]
    https://www.crn.com/news/applications-os/18824449/mercury-interactive-to-acquire-kintana-in-225m-deal
  20. [20]
    Mercury buys BeatBox Technologies for $14m - Globes English - גלובס
    Sep 12, 2005 · Mercury plans to use BeatBox technology to extend the real user monitoring capabilities of its BTO software and to enhance its performance ...
  21. [21]
    Mercury buys registry maker Systinet - CNET
    Jan 9, 2006 · Mercury buys registry maker Systinet. Mercury Interactive pays $105 million to get foothold in service-oriented architecture software market.
  22. [22]
    What is HP ALM? Quality Center(QC) Testing Tool - Guru99
    May 24, 2025 · So Mercury Quality Center became HP Quality Center; In 2011, Version 11 was released, and Quality center was rechristened as HP ALM.
  23. [23]
    QSS Moves Requirements Management to the Test Cycle
    Sep 22, 1999 · QSS will incorporate Mercury Interactive's product TestDirector, an application designed to manage the entire testing process, into its product ...
  24. [24]
    Hp-QC - Quick Guide - Tutorials Point
    1. Test Director, v1.52 to v8.0, Mercury Interactive. 2. Quality Center, v8.0 to v9.0 ...
  25. [25]
    Traceability matrix - ADM Help Centers
    The traceability matrix helps you verify that all requirements are met and identify changes to the scope of your requirements when they occur.
  26. [26]
    LARGEST GLOBAL COMPANIES ADOPT MERCURY TO OPTIMIZE ...
    Apr 12, 2006 · Today, Mercury Interactive Corporation (OTC: MERQ), the global leader in business technology optimization (BTO) software, announced that ...Missing: ALM Fortune
  27. [27]
    Mercury Interactive, LLC (f/k/a Mercury Interactive Corporation ...
    The SEC alleges that the former senior officers perpetrated a fraudulent and deceptive scheme from 1997 to 2005 to award themselves and other employees ...Missing: Zvi Schpizer
  28. [28]
    https://influencing.com/pr/3098/largest-global-companies-adopt-mercury-to-optimize-application-quality-and-performance
  29. [29]
    3 Software Executives Quit Amid Inquiry - The New York Times
    Nov 3, 2005 · Mercury Interactive's chief executive Amnon Landan, chief financial officer Douglas P Smith and general counsel Susan J Skaer resign amid ...
  30. [30]
    Sharlene Abrams, Former Chief Financial Officer of Mercury ...
    On May 31, 2007, the Commission filed civil fraud charges against Mercury based on the stock option backdating scheme and other fraudulent conduct noted above.
  31. [31]
    https://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/03/business/3-software-executives-quit-amid-inquiry.html
  32. [32]
    Executives at Mercury Interactive Step Down - Los Angeles Times
    Nov 3, 2005 · Its shares plunged 27%. Chief Executive Amnon Landan, Chief Financial Officer Douglas Smith and General Counsel Susan Skaer resigned, effective ...
  33. [33]
    Mercury Being Delisted From Nasdaq Main Market From January 4 ...
    The delisting takes effect tomorrow, January 4. The reports in question are its financial statements for the second and third quarters of 2005. The stock will ...
  34. [34]
    Mercury Interactive Probe Shows Focus Still On Options
    Jul 11, 2005 · Mercury Interactive is apparently taking seriously a regulatory probe into prior stock option grants. The $685.5 million business software ...
  35. [35]
    Press Release: SEC Settles With Mercury Interactive and Sues ...
    May 31, 2007 · The SEC alleges that the company backdated 45 different stock option grants to executives and employees, representing every grant made by the ...Missing: reduction | Show results with:reduction
  36. [36]
    Spotlight on Stock Options Backdating - SEC.gov
    Jul 19, 2010 · Former Mercury Interactive CFO Indicted in Stock Options Backdating ... Criminal Indictment. Brocade Vice-President, Stephanie Jensen ...Missing: DOJ outcome
  37. [37]
    Grand jury indicts Mercury Interactive exec - SFGATE
    Apr 23, 2008 · The Securities and Exchange Commission filed a civil suit in June against Abrams and three other former Mercury officials - Ammon Landan, former ...Missing: fines | Show results with:fines
  38. [38]
    SEC settles options backdating cases with Brocade, Mercury ...
    May 31, 2007 · Crime and Public Safety · California News · National News · World News ... The SEC filed charges against four former officers of Mercury ...Missing: probe | Show results with:probe
  39. [39]
    ENFORCEMENT—Former Mercury Interactive CEO Fined $1 Million ...
    ENFORCEMENT—Former Mercury Interactive CEO Fined $1 Million in Options Backdating Case, (Feb 22, 2013). Law Firms Mentioned:Davis Polk & Wardwell | Orrick, ...
  40. [40]
    Litigation Release No. 22623 / February 21, 2013 - SEC.gov
    FORMER MERCURY INTERACTIVE CEO/CHAIRMAN AND CFO SETTLE SUIT ALLEGING STOCK OPTIONS BACKDATING AND OTHER MISCONDUCT. Executives to be Permanently Enjoined, to ...
  41. [41]
    https://www.vitallaw.com/news/enforcement-former-mercury-interactive-ceo-fined-1-million-in-options-backdating-case/sld0137e409847b851000b1e200215ad74790077
  42. [42]
    Notice: SCAC Restructuring - Securities Class Action Clearinghouse
    The case was brought on behalf of all shareholders who purchased or acquired Mercury Interactive securities during the class period. This case is also brought ...
  43. [43]
    $$117.5 Million Settlement Reported in Options Case
    Oct 16, 2007 · An S.E.C. investigation concluded that Mercury had failed to pay more than $258 million in compensation expenses from 1997 to 2005 as a result ...
  44. [44]
    https://securities.stanford.edu/filings-case.html?id=103502
  45. [45]
    https://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/16/technology/16option.html
  46. [46]
    HP to buy Mercury Interactive for $4.5 billion - NBC News
    Jul 25, 2006 · Hewlett Packard Co. is paying $4.5 billion to buy Mercury Interactive Corp., a maker of business management software that has been entangled in a stock options ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  47. [47]
    HP to drop Mercury brand as deal closes - Tech Monitor
    Nov 7, 2006 · Ten weeks after the long-rumored deal was actually announced, Hewlett Packard Co has closed its $4.5bn acquisition of Mercury Interactive Corp.Missing: completion price<|control11|><|separator|>
  48. [48]
    [PDF] HP Annual Report 2007 - AnnualReports.com
    Dec 15, 2006 · Mercury Interactive Corporation, Bristol Technologies, Inc., SPI Dynamics, Inc. ... HP recognized a special termination benefit expense of $307 ...
  49. [49]
    HP closes Mercury deal - CNET
    Nov 7, 2006 · The deal will provide HP with Mercury's technology for managing applications development, while bolstering the company's OpenView management ...Missing: rationale division
  50. [50]
    LoadRunner - Introduction - What is LoadRuner | Advantage |
    Aug 10, 2023 · ... Mercury Interactive in November 2006 and named HP LoadRunner. Later on, HP launched LoadRunner's SaaS version called 'HP Performance Center'.Missing: early WinRunner
  51. [51]
    HP-owned Mercury Interactive settles stock options lawsuit for ...
    HP-owned Mercury Interactive settles stock options lawsuit for $117.5M · SAN JOSE, Calif. · The settlement in U.S. District Court in San Jose is Mercury's latest ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  52. [52]
    HP to Separate Into Two New Industry-Leading Public Companies
    Oct 6, 2014 · ... 2015, HP shareholders will own shares of both Hewlett-Packard Enterprise and HP Inc. The transaction is intended to be tax-free to HP's ...
  53. [53]
    Why Did Hewlett-Packard Split Its Business? - Yahoo Finance
    Nov 3, 2015 · On November 2, 2015, Hewlett-Packard split into HP Inc. (HPQ) and Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE). Shares of the two independent entities started trading.
  54. [54]
    How HPE plans to spin out its software assets - CIO
    Apr 4, 2017 · The first step was to separate HPI and HPE, which we did in November 2015. I led the separation and then Meg [Meg Whitman, CEO of HP] asked me ...
  55. [55]
    HP Enterprise strikes $8.8 billion deal with Micro Focus for software ...
    Sep 8, 2016 · HPE, which is working with Goldman Sachs on the deal, said it would pay $700 million in one-time costs related to the separation of the assets.Missing: split Mercury Interactive
  56. [56]
    Micro Focus And HPE Software Complete $8.8 Billion Spin-Off ...
    Sep 1, 2017 · Under terms of the spin-off/merger deal, announced on Sept. 7, 2016 and valued at $8.8 billion for HPE and its shareholders, HPE retains 50.1 ...
  57. [57]
    Micro Focus Completes Merger with HPE Software Business ...
    Sep 1, 2017 · Micro Focus (LSE: MCRO.L, NYSE: MFGP) today announced the completion of its merger with Hewlett Packard Enterprise's (HPE) software business.Missing: Mercury | Show results with:Mercury
  58. [58]
    Open Text Corporation - OpenText Buys Micro Focus
    Jan 31, 2023 · OpenText (NASDAQ: OTEX), (TSX: OTEX) announced today that it has closed the previously announced acquisition (the "Acquisition") of Micro Focus International ...
  59. [59]
    OpenText to Acquire Micro Focus International plc - Investors
    Aug 25, 2022 · Total purchase price of $6.0 billion, inclusive of Micro Focus' cash and debt; Total purchase price is 2.2x Micro Focus' pro forma TTM revenues( ...
  60. [60]
    OpenText to Acquire Micro Focus International plc - PR Newswire
    Aug 25, 2022 · Total purchase price of $6.0 billion, inclusive of Micro Focus' cash and debt · Total purchase price is 2.2x Micro Focus' pro forma TTM revenues ...
  61. [61]
    OpenText™︎ Core Performance Engineering CE 25.3: powered by ...
    Jul 29, 2025 · OpenText CE 25.3 introduces AI-powered Aviator for scripting, faster analysis, natural language interaction, and enhanced onboarding.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  62. [62]
    [PDF] ALM/Quality Center | OpenText
    Cloud Support. We now support installing and running ALM/. Quality Center in any cloud environment that meets the system requirements. OpenText has tested and ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  63. [63]
    What's new in OpenText ALM/Quality Center
    Jan 11, 2024 · ALM/QC is a test management and application lifecycle management tool to govern software quality and implement rigorous, auditable processes.Empower Qa Teams With A... · Web Client · Enhance Cloud ExperienceMissing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  64. [64]
    Migrate to SaaS - ADM Help Centers
    Aug 4, 2025 · This section provides you with important information on how to migrate OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering or OpenText Application ...Missing: Mercury tools industry standards
  65. [65]
    Migrate to SaaS - ADM Help Centers
    SaaS migration involves setting up a new environment, data extract, uploading data, dry-run validation, and product upgrade. Customer and OpenText have action ...
  66. [66]
    Mercury Interactive dominates world load testing market | ITWeb
    Mercury Interactive is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California with offices in more than 20 countries. Further information is available at www ...<|separator|>
  67. [67]
    Mercury becomes acquisition target - Globes English - גלובס
    Jun 6, 2005 · Mercury's four main competitors in this market are BMC Software's (NYSE: BMC) Patrol product, HP's Openview, CA's Unicenter, and the systems ...
  68. [68]
    Mercury Faces Off With CA, Niku In Project Management Arena | CRN
    Jan 27, 2005 · Both the Niku and Mercury solutions are high-end enterprise products. The cost of an average deployment begins at about $200,000 for Niku, ...Missing: Interactive | Show results with:Interactive
  69. [69]
    https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-921425
  70. [70]
    IBM Readies Rational Revamp - eWeek
    Analysts say IBM has three main motives for revamping its Rational tools. The company has lost ground in the testing market to Mercury Interactive, and ...
  71. [71]
    Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM) vs OpenText ...
    Compare Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM) vs OpenText SiteScope. 150 verified user reviews and ratings.Missing: competitors BMC
  72. [72]
    Quest Software Seems Cheap - Forbes
    Sep 8, 2006 · Competitors include IBM, Oracle, Symantic, Mercury Interactive and BMC Software. “Existing OS and database platform vendors, such as ...
  73. [73]
    Mercury needs cash for a Quest - כללי - TheMarker
    Mar 12, 2003 · Quest and Mercury operate in similar markets, and in a bid to up its market share, Mercury has focused on what is known as Business Technology ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  74. [74]
    Project portfolio management techniques - PMI
    Jan 30, 2007 · The Leaders quadrant is occupied by CA Clarity (originally Niku), Primavera, PlanView, IBM Rational Portfolio Manager (originally Systemcorp) ...
  75. [75]
    Negative Impact of Mercury Interactive on performance testing
    Oct 20, 2015 · We need to take a history lesson to understand how this happened. Mercury Interactive was founded in Israel in 1989. For most developers ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  76. [76]
    [PDF] B. TECH -SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CURRICULUM & SYLLABUS ...
    Study of various tools Study various tools such as WinRunner, LoadRunner,. TestDirector, Rational Rose Suite etc. 2. Perform various types of testing: a ...
  77. [77]
    [PDF] Black Box Software Testing Instructor's Manual
    there, mostly playing with LoadRunner lately, though it's a big pain to get it working with ... university course experiences. Q21. did you feel as though the ...
  78. [78]
    [PDF] Achieving Success in End-to-End Performance Engineering Report
    That is saving us about $30,000. And LoadRunner costs 50 percent of what it used to cost us to run the same test. We don't need a Windows Server license ...
  79. [79]
    [PDF] The Total Economic Impact™ Of Micro Focus Continuous Quality ...
    Avoiding downtime can result in cost savings of on average $500,000 per hour. Unquantified benefits. The interviewed organizations experienced the following ...
  80. [80]
    AI-Powered Test Automation and QA Innovations - Cota Capital
    Oct 9, 2025 · Companies like Mercury Interactive and Segue provided script-based automation, but adoption was limited. ... CI/CD pipelines. This pushed ...
  81. [81]
    The Evolution of Test Tools: Passing the Baton - Calleo Software
    Jul 16, 2024 · In 1991, Mercury Interactive launched WinRunner, a powerful automated testing tool that marked a significant leap forward. Even though early ...