Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Neolithic Europe

Neolithic Europe refers to the archaeological period spanning approximately 6500 BCE to 2500 BCE, characterized by the gradual adoption of agriculture, sedentism, and innovative material cultures across the continent, transforming societies from mobile hunter-gatherers to settled farming communities originating from migrations out of Anatolia.^[1] This era began with the arrival of Neolithic practices in southeastern Europe around 6500 BCE via maritime and overland routes from the Near East, where domesticated crops like emmer wheat and einkorn barley, along with animals such as sheep, goats, cattle, and pigs, were introduced, enabling denser populations and long-term villages built from timber and wattle-and-daub.^[2] By 5500 BCE, farming had expanded northwestward along the Danube River and Mediterranean coast, reaching central Europe and the Iberian Peninsula, with the process advancing at an average rate of about 1 kilometer per year through primarily demic diffusion—population movements rather than mere idea transmission.^[3] Key early cultures exemplify this spread, including the Starčevo culture in the Balkans (circa 6100–5100 BCE), known for pit-houses and early pottery, and the Linearbandkeramik (LBK) culture in central Europe (circa 5600–4900 BCE), famous for its linear-incised ceramics, rectangular longhouses up to 40 meters long, and reliance on loess soils for arable farming, which supported communities from Hungary to the Rhineland.^[2] Further north, the Funnel Beaker culture (circa 3900–2800 BCE) emerged in southern Scandinavia and the North European Plain, blending farming with foraging traditions and featuring distinctive funnel-necked pottery vessels, while in the west, maritime adaptations allowed Neolithic practices to reach Britain and Ireland by 4000 BCE.^[1] These groups developed specialized economies, with evidence of dairy production from cattle—such as cheese-making residues in LBK pottery sieves—highlighting the integral role of livestock not just for meat but for secondary products like milk and wool.^[2] A hallmark of later Neolithic Europe, particularly from 4500 BCE, was the erection of megalithic monuments, including passage tombs, dolmens, and stone circles, concentrated along the Atlantic facade from Portugal to Sweden, such as the passage tombs at Carrowmore in Ireland and the ring of Brodgar in Orkney.^[4] These structures, often used for collective burials over generations, suggest emerging social complexity, including patrilineal kindred groups and possible hierarchies, with genetic evidence indicating continuity among local farmer populations admixed with minor Western Hunter-Gatherer ancestry (less than 3% in many cases).^[4]^[3] Copper metallurgy first appeared in southeastern Europe around 5000–4500 BCE, with innovations like polished stone axes for forest clearance becoming widespread; by the late Neolithic (circa 3500–2500 BCE), increased mobility and interregional networks further fostered these developments, setting the stage for the Bronze Age transition amid growing population pressures and environmental adaptations.^[1]

Overview and Chronology

Definition and Time Frame

The Neolithic period in Europe represents a transformative era characterized by the adoption of agriculture, animal domestication, sedentism, and the use of polished stone tools, marking a shift from mobile hunter-gatherer lifestyles to more permanent settlements and food production economies.^[5] This period is distinguished from the preceding Mesolithic, which featured semi-mobile hunter-fisher-gatherer groups reliant on wild resources without widespread farming or fixed villages, by the introduction of these innovative subsistence and technological practices.^[5] In contrast to the subsequent Chalcolithic or Copper Age, the Neolithic lacked systematic metallurgy, with its end often aligned to the emergence of metal tools and weapons that signaled the Bronze Age transition.^[5] Temporally, the Neolithic began in southeastern Europe around 7000 BCE, with the earliest evidence of farming communities appearing in regions like Greece and the Balkans between circa 7000 and 6500 BCE, as agricultural practices spread from the Near East.^[6] By approximately 6250 BCE, these innovations had reached the central Balkans, initiating a gradual expansion across the continent.^[7] The period's conclusion varied regionally due to differing rates of technological and cultural adoption, generally spanning from about 3500 BCE in the southeast—where the Chalcolithic phase with early copper metallurgy began around 4500–3500 BCE—to as late as 2500 BCE in Britain and 1700 BCE in Scandinavia, where the persistence of stone-based economies delayed the full onset of metalworking.^[6]^[8]^[9] In Britain, for instance, Neolithic practices endured until around 2500 BCE before transitioning to the Bronze Age.^[9] Central to the Neolithic in Europe was the "Neolithic package," a suite of interrelated elements including domesticated plants (such as wheat and barley), animals (like cattle, sheep, goats, and pigs), ceramic vessels for storage and cooking, and ground (polished) stone tools for woodworking and agriculture, which facilitated settled village life and surplus production.^[10] This package often incorporated architectural features like longhouses in certain regions, reflecting communal living and social organization, though its components varied in adoption and completeness across Europe, adapting to local environments and interactions with indigenous populations.^[10] These innovations not only supported population growth and monument construction but also laid the foundation for subsequent cultural developments.^[5]

Regional Phases and Variations

The Neolithic period in Europe is broadly divided into Early, Middle, and Late phases, with chronologies varying by region due to differences in the adoption and adaptation of farming practices. The Early Neolithic, spanning approximately 7000–5500 BCE, marked the initial introduction of agriculture in southeastern Europe, where warmer climates and suitable terrains facilitated rapid settlement by pioneer farmers.^[11] In the Balkans, this phase is exemplified by the Impressed Ware culture, dating to around 6000–5500 BCE, characterized by coastal and riverine sites that reflect early maritime and overland diffusion routes. Post-Ice Age warming, beginning around 14,000 years ago, played a key role by creating fertile loess soils and milder conditions that enabled the northward expansion of these early farming communities from Near Eastern origins.^[2] The Middle Neolithic, from about 5500–4500 BCE, saw the expansion of farming into central and western Europe, with regional adaptations to diverse landscapes.^[1] In contrast to the quicker adoption in the Mediterranean basin, where favorable climates supported continuous growth, northern and Atlantic regions experienced delays due to cooler temperatures, rugged terrain, and persistent Mesolithic hunter-gatherer traditions, leading to overlaps between foraging and farming lifestyles in marginal areas.^[12] This phase involved cultural diversification, such as the Linearbandkeramik in the Danube corridor, but maintained a focus on gradual integration rather than uniform progression across the continent.^[11] During the Late Neolithic (c. 4500–1700 BCE), agricultural intensification occurred alongside social and technological developments that foreshadowed the Bronze Age, with pronounced regional variations.^[13] In northern Europe, the Funnelbeaker culture emerged around 4100–2800 BCE, representing a later adoption influenced by ongoing climatic fluctuations and the need for adapted subsistence strategies in forested and coastal environments.^[14] Environmental factors, including periodic cooling after initial post-glacial warming, further shaped these variations by limiting farming viability in the north while promoting denser settlements in the south.^[15] Overall, these phases highlight a mosaic of temporal and spatial developments, driven by both human agency and ecological constraints.

Origins and Diffusion

Near Eastern Origins

The Neolithic Revolution, marking the transition to agriculture, originated in the Fertile Crescent of the Near East around 10,000 BCE, where early farming communities domesticated key staple crops such as emmer wheat, einkorn wheat, and barley, alongside pulses like lentils and peas.^[16] Concurrently, animal husbandry emerged with the domestication of sheep and goats, providing reliable sources of meat, milk, and wool; these caprines were initially managed in the region's uplands, with genetic evidence indicating initial domestication events circa 10,500 years before present (approximately 8,500 BCE).^[17] This "Neolithic package" of domesticated plants and animals formed the basis of sedentary village life, exemplified by early settlements like those in the Levant, where systematic cultivation and herding replaced reliance on wild resources.^[18] From the Fertile Crescent, these innovations spread westward via Anatolia, reaching the Aegean region between approximately 8,500 and 7,000 BCE, as evidenced by archaeological sites showing the adoption of farming practices.^[19] In Greece, the Franchthi Cave in the Peloponnese provides one of the earliest records of this transmission, with domesticated sheep and goats, along with cultivated cereals, appearing around 7,000 BCE, indicating the arrival of farming communities.^[20] The debate over whether this spread involved cultural diffusion—through idea exchange among local hunter-gatherers—or demic diffusion via population migration has been resolved in favor of the latter, supported by genetic studies showing continuity between Near Eastern farmers and early European populations, suggesting migrant farmers carried the Neolithic package across regions. Recent paleogenomic analyses as of 2025 further confirm predominant demic processes with varying admixture levels.^[3]^[21] Early European Neolithic sites exhibit parallels to Anatolian settlements like Çatalhöyük (occupied circa 7,400–6,200 BCE), including mud-brick architecture and symbolic art, but more directly through shared elements of the Neolithic toolkit, such as grinding stones for processing cereals, which appear consistently from the Levant through Anatolia to the Aegean.^[19] This transmission continued into the Balkans after 7,000 BCE, facilitating the broader adoption of agriculture in Europe, though detailed routes of intra-European expansion lie beyond the initial Near Eastern impetus.

Spread Across Europe

The Neolithic package, originating from the Near East and including domesticated cereals, legumes, and livestock, disseminated across Europe primarily through two major routes beginning around the seventh millennium BCE. The overland route followed the Danube River corridor northward from the Balkans into Central Europe, where the Linearbandkeramik (LBK) culture emerged around 5600 BCE on the Hungarian Plain and rapidly expanded westward along fertile loess soils and river valleys.^[2] Concurrently, a maritime route carried the Neolithic along the northern Mediterranean coast, with the Cardial Ware culture appearing around 6000 BCE in the Adriatic and progressing westward to the Iberian Peninsula by no later than 5500 BCE, evidenced by coastal site distributions and pottery styles impressed with cockle shells.^[22] These pathways facilitated the introduction of farming practices into diverse European landscapes, from riverine lowlands to coastal zones.^[23] The mechanisms of this dissemination involved a combination of demic diffusion—through the migration and colonization by farming communities—and cultural diffusion, where local populations adopted Neolithic technologies. Radiocarbon dating of early sites supports this hybrid process: for instance, dates from LBK settlements in the Danube basin cluster around 5500–5400 BCE, indicating structured pioneer colonization rather than random dispersal.^[6] In the Mediterranean, Cardial Ware sites yield calibrated radiocarbon ages of 5470–5220 BCE, aligning with a maritime vanguard expansion that likely involved boat-based movement of farmers from Balkan origins.^[22] Local adoption is inferred from the gradual incorporation of Near Eastern domesticates into pre-existing foraging economies, with evidence of both direct farmer influx and technology transfer at transition zones.^[2] The pace of expansion varied by geography, progressing rapidly along accessible river valleys and coastlines but slowing in forested or mountainous interiors. The LBK front advanced approximately 500 kilometers from the Hungarian Plain to the Rhineland in about 200 years, achieving rates of roughly 2.5 kilometers per year, as calibrated by radiocarbon sequences from over 900 early Neolithic sites.^[6] In contrast, diffusion in the Alps and northern forests proceeded at less than 0.66 kilometers per year, constrained by environmental barriers and lower population densities.^[6] Mediterranean maritime spread maintained a steady coastal rate of 7.5–10.6 kilometers per year, enabling quicker establishment in favorable littoral environments.^[24] Interactions between incoming Neolithic farmers and indigenous Mesolithic foragers often resulted in assimilation and the development of hybrid subsistence strategies during initial phases. In the Danube corridor, Mesolithic groups were largely displaced or absorbed into LBK communities, with archaeological evidence showing variable integration of wild resources alongside domesticates at early settlements like Lepenski Vir.^[2] Genetic traces of hunter-gatherer ancestry in Cardial and LBK populations indicate admixture, supporting models where cultural diffusion predominated in peripheral regions, leading to mixed economies that blended hunting, gathering, and nascent agriculture before full Neolithic adoption.^[22]^[6]

Regional Developments

Southeastern and Eastern Europe

The Southeastern and Eastern European region, encompassing the Balkans and the Black Sea area, represents the cradle of Neolithic development in Europe, where farming communities first established permanent settlements following diffusion from the Near East via the Aegean around 6200 BCE.^[25] The fertile alluvial plains of the Danube and its tributaries provided ideal conditions for agriculture, supporting higher population densities compared to other European regions, with estimates suggesting around 1-2 individuals per square kilometer in early farming sites by 6000 BCE.^[26] These environmental advantages facilitated the growth of pioneer communities that blended incoming agricultural practices with local foraging traditions.^[27] The Starčevo–Körös–Criş cultural complex, dating from approximately 6200 to 5200 BCE, marks the initial Neolithic phase in this area, characterized by small, dispersed villages of rectangular timber-framed houses built on light foundations.^[28] These settlements often developed into tell mounds—multi-layered accumulations of domestic debris reaching heights of 5-10 meters—reflecting long-term occupation and continuous rebuilding, as seen at sites like Starčevo in Serbia and Körös in Hungary.^[29] Pottery from these cultures featured impressed and incised decorations, including cardial shell impressions, used for storage and cooking, alongside early evidence of domesticated crops such as einkorn wheat (Triticum monococcum) and legumes like peas (Pisum sativum) and lentils (Lens culinaris).^[2] Animal husbandry focused on sheep, goats, cattle, and pigs, but hunting persisted as a supplementary activity, contributing 20-30% of faunal remains in many assemblages.^[30] Interregional trade networks linked these communities to the Near East, evidenced by obsidian tools sourced from Anatolian deposits like Cappadocia, transported over 800 kilometers and comprising up to 5% of lithic inventories at sites such as Vrsac in the Banat region.^[31] This exchange not only supplied raw materials for blades and projectiles but also indicates cultural contacts that influenced technological and symbolic practices.^[32] Succeeding the Starčevo–Körös–Criş complex, the Vinča culture (c. 5700–4500 BCE) expanded across the central Balkans, featuring larger settlements like Vinča-Belo Brdo near Belgrade, which spanned over 30 hectares and supported populations of several hundred.^[33] Distinctive for its finely painted pottery with spiral and meander motifs, Vinča material culture included clay figurines and a repertoire of incised symbols on vessels and tablets—over 200 distinct signs—often interpreted as proto-writing or a system of ideographic notation, though their linguistic function remains debated.^[34] Hunting continued to play a significant role, with red deer and wild boar accounting for 15-25% of meat consumption, complementing intensified agriculture on the region's loess soils.^[35] These developments underscore the adaptive resilience of Southeastern and Eastern European Neolithic societies in a landscape of rich biodiversity and connectivity.^[36]

Central and Western Europe

The Neolithic expansion into Central and Western Europe involved the Danubian and Mediterranean routes, introducing farming communities that adapted to diverse landscapes from river valleys to coastal areas. Building on southeastern precursors such as the Starčevo culture, these groups established the Linearbandkeramik (LBK) tradition along the Danube and its tributaries, marking the first widespread farming horizon in the continental interior around 5500–4900 BCE.^[37] Parallel to this, the Cardial Ware culture emerged along the Mediterranean coasts of France and Spain circa 6000–5500 BCE, characterized by maritime dispersal and shell-impressed pottery that facilitated pioneer settlements.^[38] These traditions represented distinct yet interconnected phases of Neolithization, with LBK focusing on inland loess soils and Cardial emphasizing coastal niches. The LBK culture featured dispersed village clusters of 5–20 longhouses, each a rectangular timber structure up to 40 meters long and oriented north-south, housing extended families and livestock in a mixed subsistence economy.^[39] These settlements, such as Cuiry-lès-Chaudardes in France, integrated forest farming systems with slash-and-burn techniques, cultivating emmer wheat and barley on small, shifting fields while herding cattle and pigs.^[40] Pottery consisted of linear-band decorated vessels, reflecting standardized production across regions from Hungary to the Rhine. Recent research highlights extensive trade networks, including the exchange of flint from Polish sources and Carpathian obsidian over hundreds of kilometers, indicating inter-community alliances during the culture's expansion.^[41] In contrast, Cardial Ware communities in western Mediterranean sites like Cova de la Sarsa in Valencia, Spain, and coastal caves in Languedoc, France, produced globular pots decorated with cockle shell impressions, often coiled and fired at low temperatures for domestic use.^[42] These groups maintained smaller, semi-sedentary settlements with evidence of olive and grape cultivation alongside cereals, supported by marine resources. The LBK culture concluded around 4900 BCE without evidence of local metallurgy. Later, in the final Neolithic and emerging Chalcolithic periods (c. 3500 BCE), metallurgical innovations appeared in northern Italy with the Remedello culture, where copper axes and daggers sourced from Tuscan ores marked early experimentation with smelting, signaling technological diffusion from southeastern influences.^[43] Social organization in these regions showed emerging complexity, with LBK villages exhibiting household hierarchies based on house size and resource access, yet punctuated by conflict as evidenced by mass graves like Schöneck-Kilianstädten in Germany, where 26 individuals bore projectile wounds from organized raids circa 5000 BCE.^[44] Recent 2020s analyses of skeletal trauma across western LBK sites confirm recurrent interpersonal violence, possibly tied to resource competition during climatic shifts, contrasting with the more egalitarian early phases.^[45] Such evidence underscores a transition from cooperative expansion to localized tensions in Central and Western Europe's Neolithic heartlands.

Northern and Atlantic Europe

The Neolithic in Northern and Atlantic Europe was characterized by a delayed adoption of farming practices compared to continental regions, with innovations arriving primarily through maritime and Baltic routes from the southeast around 4000 BCE.^[46] This lag reflected the region's peripheral position and environmental constraints, leading to hybrid adaptations that blended incoming agricultural elements with persistent foraging traditions.^[47] The Funnelbeaker culture (TRB), dating from approximately 4000 to 2700 BCE, marked the initial phase in southern Scandinavia, where communities established mixed economies incorporating early cereal cultivation, animal husbandry, and intensive marine resource exploitation.^[48] Following this, the Pitted Ware culture emerged around 3400 BCE in east-central Sweden and expanded westward, representing a predominantly hunter-gatherer society that maintained maritime foraging while occasionally incorporating farmed goods through contacts with TRB groups.^[49] These cultures exemplified a gradual integration of Neolithic traits via Baltic Sea networks, rather than wholesale replacement of Mesolithic lifeways.^[46] In the Atlantic facade, including Britain and Ireland, Neolithic developments featured prominent megalithic constructions such as passage graves, which appeared around 4000 BCE and served as communal burial and ritual sites.^[50] These monuments, like those at Newgrange in Ireland, indicate early adoption of western diffusion from Central Europe, with mixed subsistence strategies that combined limited farming of emmer wheat and barley with foraging in forested and coastal environments.^[51] Across the region, economies remained diverse, with communities relying heavily on fishing, hunting seals, and gathering wild plants alongside domesticated animals and crops, adapting to the cooler, wetter northern climate that limited arable yields.^[52] This resilience is evident in southern Norway, where populations expanded despite post-2250 BCE cooling trends, by diversifying into upland pastures and marine resources.^[12] Unique cultural practices in Northern Europe included bog offerings, where items such as pottery, tools, and even human remains were ritually deposited in wetlands from the Early Neolithic onward, possibly as sacrifices to ensure fertility or appease deities in a landscape dominated by mires and lakes.^[53] Hints of early metallurgy also appear, with a Neolithic crucible fragment from Lønt, Denmark, dated to around 3500 BCE, suggesting experimental copper processing at least 1500 years before widespread adoption in the region.^[54] These elements underscore the innovative responses to climatic challenges, including shorter growing seasons and acidic soils, which favored forest clearance for grazing over intensive field agriculture.^[55] Recent excavations from 2023 to 2025 have pushed back timelines for Neolithic activity in Scotland, revealing a large timber hall at Carnoustie dated to circa 4000 BCE—over 1000 years earlier than Stonehenge—indicating communal gatherings and ritual feasting among early farmers in the northeast.^[56] This site, along with ongoing digs at the Ness of Brodgar in Orkney, highlights denser settlement and earlier adoption of monumental architecture in the Atlantic north than previously thought.^[57]

Economy and Subsistence

Agriculture and Plant Domestication

The adoption of agriculture in Neolithic Europe centered on a package of domesticated plants originating from the Near East, primarily emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccum), einkorn wheat (Triticum monococcum), barley (Hordeum vulgare), and lentils (Lens culinaris), which formed the core of early farming economies across the continent.^[58] These crops were well-suited to the Mediterranean and temperate climates but required adaptation to local conditions, with emmer and einkorn providing staple grains for bread and porridge, while barley supported brewing and animal fodder, and lentils offered protein-rich legumes.^[59] In northern Europe, where soils were often poorer and climates cooler, local wild plants like oats (Avena spp.) were incorporated into cultivation systems, initially as weeds in cereal fields but increasingly harvested and possibly selected for over time.^[60] Farming techniques in early Neolithic Europe emphasized labor-intensive methods to maximize yields on newly cleared lands, with slash-and-burn (swidden) cultivation being widespread, involving the felling and burning of forests to create nutrient-rich ash beds for short-term cropping cycles of 2–5 years before fields were abandoned to regenerate.^[61] Archaeological experiments and soil analyses confirm this practice enhanced fertility temporarily but led to rapid exhaustion in temperate woodlands, prompting frequent relocation of plots.^[62] By the mid-Neolithic, evidence of the ard plough—a simple wooden scratching tool drawn by oxen—emerges from furrow marks preserved in subsoils at the Anciens Arsenaux site in Switzerland, dated to 5100–4700 BCE, and later in Britain around 3500 BCE, indicating a shift toward deeper soil disturbance and integration with animal traction for larger-scale tillage.^[63] Pollen records from central European lake sediments further reveal patterns consistent with field rotation or fallowing, where ratios of cereal-type pollen to pastoral indicators (e.g., Plantago spp.) suggest alternating cultivation with grazing or rest periods to restore soil nutrients, particularly from the Linearbandkeramik culture onward around 5500 BCE.^[64] Over the Neolithic period, agricultural systems evolved from small, intensive garden plots—often under 1 hectare per household, yielding high returns through meticulous weeding and manuring—to more extensive field systems by the late Neolithic (ca. 3500–2500 BCE), as population growth and technological refinements like the ard enabled cultivation of broader areas up to several hectares.^[65] This transition is evident in increasing archaeobotanical densities and pollen signatures of expanded arable landscapes in regions like the Rhine Valley, though it heightened vulnerability to environmental stresses.^[66] In marginal northern and Atlantic zones, such as Scandinavia and the British Isles, crop failures posed significant risks due to shorter growing seasons, acidic soils, and erratic rainfall, leading to periodic reliance on mixed subsistence strategies and contributing to localized population declines around 3000 BCE.^[67] Despite these insights, significant gaps persist in understanding the impacts of climatic variability on Neolithic yields, particularly precursors to major events like the 4.2 kiloyear aridification episode (ca. 2200 BCE), which may have amplified drought risks in southern and central Europe but remain underexplored through integrated modeling of pollen, isotopes, and crop residues.^[68]

Animal Husbandry and Hunting

In Neolithic Europe, animal husbandry emerged as a core component of subsistence following the introduction of domesticated livestock from the Near East, where sheep (Ovis aries), goats (Capra hircus), cattle (Bos taurus), and pigs (Sus domesticus) were first domesticated during the early Neolithic around the Fertile Crescent.^[69] These species were introduced to southeastern Europe as part of the Neolithic package around 6500 BCE via migration from the Near East, spreading to central areas with the Linearbandkeramik (LBK) culture circa 5500 BCE, where all four were present.^[70]^[71] Evidence from zooarchaeological assemblages indicates that these animals were managed for multiple purposes, including meat, hides, and labor, with pigs often kept in forested areas for opportunistic foraging and ruminants like sheep and goats herded in open landscapes.^[72] Selective breeding practices are evident in the transition from wild progenitors to domestic forms, particularly for cattle derived from the European aurochs (Bos primigenius), where genomic analysis reveals episodes of hybridization between introduced domestic herds and local wild populations during the early Neolithic, enhancing genetic diversity and adaptability.^[73]^[74] Herding strategies varied regionally; in the Alps, isotopic analysis of tooth enamel from sites like Arene Candide in northern Italy demonstrates early transhumance, with cattle and sheep moved seasonally to high-altitude pastures as early as the sixth millennium BCE, optimizing resource use in mountainous terrains.^[75] Dairy exploitation was widespread, as lipid residue analysis of pottery from central and northern European sites, including LBK settlements in Germany and Poland, confirms the processing of milk from cattle, sheep, and goats into products like cheese starting around 5400 BCE, with residues indicating mixed-species dairying.^[76]^[77] In northern margins, such as Scandinavia and the Baltic region, dairy farming persisted despite challenging climates, supported by pottery residues dated to 5200 BCE.^[78] Hunting retained significance alongside husbandry, particularly in northern and western Europe, where wild game supplemented domestic resources; red deer (Cervus elaphus) remained a key target, as shown by faunal remains from Early Neolithic sites like Rottenburg-Fröbelweg in southern Germany and wetlands in the Netherlands, where hunting strategies from the Mesolithic continued into farming communities.^[79]^[80] Stable isotope analysis of human and animal bones from LBK sites in central Germany and open-air settlements in the Balkans reveals dietary balances varying by region: in southern Europe, domestic animals contributed 60-80% of protein intake, reflecting intensive herding, while northern assemblages show lower proportions (around 40-60%) due to greater reliance on wild species like deer and fish, with δ¹³C and δ¹⁵N values indicating mixed terrestrial and aquatic inputs.^[81]^[82] Bone strontium isotopes further highlight livestock mobility, supporting herding practices that integrated wild foraging.^[72] Dog domestication provided continuity from the Mesolithic, with ancient DNA from European sites showing that dogs (Canis familiaris), already present among hunter-gatherers by 9000 BCE, accompanied Neolithic farmers into new territories, derived from Near Eastern Neolithic lineages that replaced earlier Mesolithic dog populations in Europe, retaining roles in hunting and guarding herds.^[83]^[84] This integration of domestic and wild elements in animal management complemented plant-based agriculture, forming a resilient subsistence system across diverse European landscapes.^[85]

Settlements and Society

Village Structures and Patterns

Neolithic villages in Europe featured a variety of housing types adapted to regional environments and cultural traditions. In Central Europe, the Linearbandkeramik (LBK) culture, dating from approximately 5500 to 4900 BCE, is renowned for its timber-framed longhouses, which typically measured 30–40 meters in length and 5–7 meters in width, constructed with wooden posts supporting wattle-and-daub walls and thatched roofs.^[86] These elongated rectangular structures often housed extended families and served multiple functions, including living quarters, storage, and animal pens, with archaeological evidence from over 10,000 excavated examples revealing regional variations in size and layout.^[86] In contrast, southeastern Europe, particularly the Balkans, saw the use of round or oval huts during the Early Neolithic (around 6200–5500 BCE), built from wattle-and-daub with sunken floors and conical roofs, as evidenced by sites like those in the Starčevo-Krčmar culture.^[10] Settlement patterns across Neolithic Europe emphasized nucleated villages clustered in fertile loess plains and river valleys to support agriculture and animal husbandry. These villages typically comprised 10–20 longhouses or huts, accommodating 10–100 inhabitants per site, with population densities around 0.5–1 individual per square kilometer in optimal areas like the Danube basin.^[87] Dispersed seasonal camps also occurred, especially in marginal zones, where smaller groups exploited wild resources alongside early farming.^[88] Defensive features, such as ditched enclosures, appeared in some regions, with V-shaped ditches surrounding settlements possibly serving protective roles against threats, as interpreted from sites in the Iberian Peninsula and Central Europe.^[89] Over time, Neolithic settlement structures evolved from loosely dispersed clusters in the Early Neolithic to more fortified configurations by the Late Neolithic (around 4500–3500 BCE), reflecting population growth, resource competition, and social changes. This shift is marked by the appearance of walled enclosures and hilltop settlements in areas like the Hungarian Plain, where larger nucleated sites incorporated palisades and ditches for security.^[88] Recent LiDAR surveys in the 2020s have uncovered previously hidden settlements in forested regions, such as fortified enclosures in Romania's Neamț County dating to 5000 years ago, revealing denser networks of villages than previously estimated and highlighting the role of remote sensing in filling archaeological gaps.^[90] Early Neolithic societies in Europe, particularly those of the Linearbandkeramik (LBK) culture in Central Europe around 5500–4500 BCE, were organized around kin-based villages where extended families occupied longhouses that served as the primary social and economic units.^[91] These settlements emphasized communal labor for agricultural fields and the construction of enclosures, fostering cooperation among households to manage subsistence and shared resources.^[39] Gender roles showed a division of labor, with evidence from grave goods and tool assemblages indicating that women were primarily involved in pottery production and domestic processing, while men focused on hunting and heavier agricultural tasks.^[92] Social organization in these communities was largely egalitarian, with minimal variation in house sizes across LBK sites—typically ranging from 20 to 40 meters in length—suggesting comparable household wealth and status without marked disparities.^[93] Communal efforts extended to monumental constructions, such as the roughly 50,000 dolmens across Western and Northern Europe, which required coordinated labor from multiple kin groups, reinforcing social bonds rather than individual authority.^[94] By the late Neolithic and Chalcolithic periods (ca. 4500–3500 BCE), signs of increasing social inequality emerged, particularly in Southeastern Europe, as evidenced by disparities in grave goods at sites like the Varna Necropolis in Bulgaria, where elite burials contained unprecedented gold, copper, and stone artifacts, indicating the rise of specialized leaders or elites.^[95] Feasting activities, inferred from large accumulations of animal bones and pottery at settlements like Makriyalos in Greece, provided further evidence of emerging hierarchies, where hosts could display wealth to gain influence through redistribution.^[96] These shifts are reflected in varying house sizes at later sites, where some structures exceeded 50 meters, potentially signaling greater household resources or status differentiation compared to earlier uniformity.^[97] However, inequality remained limited and heterarchical, with multiple overlapping roles (e.g., ritual versus economic leadership) preventing entrenched dominance, as leaders relied on communal support and redistribution to maintain position.^[98] Debates persist on the nature of this emerging hierarchy, with some scholars interpreting it as "Big Man" societies—achieved leadership through personal charisma and feasting, without hereditary power—while others propose early chiefdoms with more institutionalized authority, particularly in monument-building contexts like rondel enclosures in Central Europe.^[99] Evidence from labor-intensive projects, such as the construction of megalithic tombs, supports the Big Man model, as they likely involved temporary alliances rather than centralized command.^[100] Overall, Neolithic social structures prioritized collective action, with inequality appearing as a fragile development rather than a dominant feature.^[101]

Material Culture and Technology

Pottery and Ceramics

Pottery emerged as a key innovation in Neolithic Europe around 6200 BCE, marking the transition to sedentary lifestyles and agricultural economies, with ceramics serving as vessels for daily and ceremonial needs. Early forms were typically hand-built and decorated with simple impressions or incisions, reflecting regional cultural identities across southeastern, central, and northern areas. These vessels not only facilitated food storage and preparation but also symbolized social connections through shared stylistic motifs. Distinct styles characterized pottery across Europe, often tied to specific cultural groups. In the western Mediterranean, Cardial ware featured impressed decorations using cockle shells (Cardium edule), creating motifs of parallel lines or arcs on the vessel exteriors, a hallmark of the Impressed Ware complex dating to 6000–5000 BCE.^[38] In central Europe, the Linearbandkeramik (LBK) culture produced pottery with linear bands of incised or painted lines, often in zigzag or spiral patterns on bowls and amphorae, flourishing from 5500–4500 BCE.^[39] Further north, the Funnel Beaker (TRB) culture developed funnel-shaped vessels with collared necks and zonal ornamentation, including comb-stamped or whipped-cord impressions, prominent between 4000–3500 BCE in Scandinavia and the Baltic region.^[102] Production techniques were labor-intensive and standardized within communities, relying on local clays processed through coiling methods. Potters formed vessels by rolling clay into sausage-like coils, stacking them spirally, and smoothing the seams to create thin-walled forms, a technique evident in early Neolithic assemblages from the Balkans to the Atlantic coast.^[103] Clays were tempered with organic materials like grass or shell fragments, or later with grog (crushed fired pottery) to reduce cracking during drying; shell tempering was particularly common in coastal Cardial wares for added durability.^[104] Firing occurred in open bonfires or simple updraft kilns at temperatures of 600–800°C, producing porous, low-fired ceramics that were functional yet brittle, with oxidizing atmospheres yielding reddish hues.^[105] Ceramics fulfilled diverse functions, from practical to symbolic, as revealed by organic residue analyses. Vessels were used for storage of grains and liquids, cooking over hearths, and processing animal products; lipid residues in LBK and TRB pottery frequently indicate dairy fats from cattle, sheep, and goats, suggesting cheesemaking or milk boiling.^[77] Some containers held fermented beverages, with starch and chemical traces in central European pottery pointing to early beer production from emmer wheat or barley, likely for communal rituals around 4000 BCE.^[106] Ritual uses are inferred from elaborately decorated pieces deposited in graves or settlements, underscoring pottery's role in social and ideological practices.^[107] Over time, pottery evolved from coarse, utilitarian wares to finer, more elaborate forms, particularly in southeastern Europe. Initial coarse vessels with thick walls and simple impressions gave way to thinner, polished ceramics by the mid-Neolithic, as seen in the Vinča culture (5400–4500 BCE), where painted motifs using graphite or red ochre adorned bowls and figurines, indicating advanced control over firing atmospheres and decorative techniques.^[108] This progression reflected technological refinement and cultural elaboration, with painted styles spreading as markers of identity before the Chalcolithic transition.^[109]

Stone Tools and Implements

In Neolithic Europe, stone tools represented a pivotal advancement in lithic technology, shifting from the primarily flaked implements of the Mesolithic to more refined forms that supported agricultural expansion and settled communities. Polished axes and adzes, crafted from hard stones like flint, basalt, or jadeite, were essential for clearing forests and tilling soil, enabling the deforestation needed for farming. These tools were hafted into wooden handles, providing greater efficiency in woodworking tasks compared to earlier handheld flakes.^[110]^[111]^[112] Flint blades, often segmented and inserted into wooden or bone hafts to form sickles, were specialized for harvesting cereals like emmer wheat and barley, reflecting the intensification of plant domestication. Grinding querns, typically saddle-shaped or rotary mills made from coarse sandstones, were used to process grains into flour, a staple in early Neolithic diets across central and western Europe. These querns, found in domestic contexts from sites like those in the Linearbandkeramik culture, underscore the daily labor of food preparation in farming villages.^[113]^[114]^[115] Lithic production combined chipping—through knapping to shape rough forms—with grinding and polishing techniques to create durable, sharp edges, marking a key technological distinction from Mesolithic flaking methods that prioritized portability for hunter-gatherers. Axes were often initially chipped to outline the blade, then ground against abrasive stones and polished with finer materials like sand or leather for a smooth finish, enhancing their cutting efficiency and longevity. This labor-intensive process symbolized the Neolithic emphasis on permanence and productivity, contrasting with the Mesolithic's focus on expedient, unpolished tools.^[116]^[117]^[118] Extensive trade networks distributed high-quality materials, such as the honey-colored flint from Grand-Pressigny in France, which was mined, knapped into blades and daggers, and exchanged across western and central Europe from around 3000 BCE, facilitating specialized tool production far from sources. Similarly, jadeite axes sourced from Alpine outcrops, particularly in northern Italy, were polished and traded over 1000 kilometers to regions like Britain and Ireland, often serving as prestige items in social exchanges. These networks highlight the interconnected economy of Neolithic societies, where raw materials and finished tools circulated via river routes and overland paths.^[119]^[120]^[121] Innovations in the late Neolithic included transverse arrowheads, trapezoidal flint points hafted with the sharp edge perpendicular to the arrow shaft, which appeared around 3300–2350 BCE in Britain and Scandinavia for improved hunting accuracy and penetration. These microlithic points, produced by snapping blades and retouching, adapted bow-and-arrow technology to target smaller game amid forest clearance, building on earlier Mesolithic designs but with greater standardization. The adoption of such specialized projectiles reflects evolving subsistence strategies, blending hunting with agriculture.^[122]^[123]^[124] Overall, these stone tools and implements epitomized the Neolithic transition, embodying technological sophistication that supported economic transformation and cultural complexity, far surpassing the Mesolithic's reliance on basic flaked lithics for mobile foraging lifestyles. Their production and distribution fostered social differentiation, as access to rare materials like jadeite conferred status, while everyday tools like querns anchored communal food processing. This era's lithic legacy underscores the ingenuity of early European farmers in harnessing stone for a new way of life.^[125]^[126]^[127]

Monumental Architecture

Monumental architecture in Neolithic Europe represents a hallmark of communal endeavor, characterized by the erection of large-scale structures using earth, timber, and massive stones, beginning around 4500 BCE. These megalithic constructions, often spanning hundreds of meters and requiring coordinated labor from farming communities, mark a shift toward enduring, visible expressions of social organization across the continent. Primarily concentrated in western and northern regions, they reflect technological ingenuity and shared cultural practices among early agricultural societies.^[128] Key types include dolmens, simple chambered tombs formed by large upright stones supporting a capstone, which served as basic burial enclosures; passage tombs, more elaborate mounds with narrow corridors leading to inner chambers, exemplified by Newgrange in Ireland's Boyne Valley, a 85-meter-wide structure built around 3200 BCE with precisely engineered quartz facades; and stone circles, emerging in the late Neolithic phase (c. 3000–2500 BCE), consisting of arranged standing stones in circular formations, such as those at Callanish in Scotland.^[128]^[129]^[130] Construction techniques evolved from early earthwork tombs, such as long barrows—elongated mounds up to 100 meters long enclosed by ditches and palisades—dating to the mid-fifth millennium BCE in western France and the Iberian Peninsula, where communities piled earth over timber frameworks without extensive stone use. By contrast, megalithic tombs involved quarrying and transporting massive stones, some weighing over 100 tons, across distances of up to 40 kilometers, frequently via coastal sea routes to sites along river valleys or elevated landscapes; this process likely employed wooden rollers, sledges, and levers crafted from stone tools.^[131]^[132] These monuments exhibit a dominant distribution along the Atlantic facade, stretching from Portugal and Spain northward through France, the British Isles, and into Scandinavia up to Sweden, with over 35,000 known examples reflecting maritime diffusion by mobile groups. They functioned primarily as cemeteries for collective burials of kin-related individuals, often accommodating dozens of remains over generations, while late-phase stone circles incorporated alignments oriented toward solar or lunar events, suggesting roles in communal gatherings.^[128]^[133]^[134] Recent geophysical surveys, including magnetometry and LiDAR in 2024, have uncovered previously hidden Neolithic funerary monuments, such as 61 long barrows in Bohemia's Ohře and Elbe River basins, revealing earthen and ditched structures from 3900–3300 BCE associated with the Funnel Beaker Culture; these findings highlight undercoverage of inland distributions and local variations in form, expanding the known territorial extent beyond coastal zones.^[135]

Key Sites and Cultures

Major Archaeological Sites

Lepenski Vir, located in the Danube Gorges of Serbia, represents a hybrid Mesolithic-Neolithic settlement active from approximately 9500 to 5500 BCE, bridging foraging and farming lifestyles.^[136] Discoveries include trapezoidal houses built on pebble foundations with central hearths and limestone sculptures depicting human-like figures, often placed in front of dwellings or associated with burials.^[136] Over 200 such boulders and artifacts, including polished stone tools and pottery in later phases, were uncovered, alongside intramural burials showing diverse practices like neonate interments under house floors.^[137] High-resolution AMS radiocarbon dating of architecture, artworks, and human remains has refined the chronology, demonstrating gradual adoption of Neolithic elements like ceramics and domesticated species around 6200 BCE.^[136] This site's significance lies in illustrating regional adaptations during the Neolithic expansion in the Balkans. In northern Europe, Skara Brae on Orkney, Scotland, exemplifies a well-preserved Neolithic village from circa 3180–2500 BCE, occupied for about 650 years.^[138] The site features eight clustered stone-built houses connected by passages, each with stone furniture including box beds, dressers, and hearths, constructed using local flagstones and midden material for insulation.^[139] Artifacts recovered include grooved ware pottery, bone tools, and maceheads, providing insights into daily life and craft production.^[138] Radiocarbon sequences from organic remains, calibrated to 3340–2140 cal BCE, confirm its Late Neolithic date and continuity with nearby sites like the Ness of Brodgar.^[139] Skara Brae's exceptional preservation due to overlying sand dunes makes it a type-site for understanding domestic architecture in Britain's Neolithic. The precursor phases of Stonehenge in Wiltshire, England, date to the Early Neolithic around 3100–3000 BCE, marking the site's initial monumental development.^[140] Archaeological evidence includes a circular ditch and bank henge enclosure, about 110 meters in diameter, enclosing cremation burials and grooved ware pottery, with postholes indicating timber structures or circles.^[140] Antler picks used for digging were found within the fills, and radiocarbon dating of associated organic materials supports this early phase before the arrival of bluestones around 2500 BCE.^[140] These features signify Stonehenge's role as a ceremonial center from its inception, influencing later Bronze Age expansions. Sesklo in Thessaly, Greece, serves as the type-site for Early Neolithic culture in southeastern Europe, occupied from approximately 6800–5300 BCE.^[141] Excavations uncovered a multi-phase tell with rectangular houses on stone foundations, storage pits, and a central megaron-like structure, alongside painted pottery, obsidian tools, and evidence of agriculture including emmer wheat and sheep herding.^[141] The site's significance stems from its demonstration of early sedentary communities and trade networks, as seen in imported materials, with radiocarbon dates establishing it as one of the earliest farming settlements in the region.^[141]

Distinct Cultural Groups

The Neolithic period in Europe featured several distinct cultural groups that emerged from the spread of farming practices originating in the Near East, each adapting to local environments and interacting through migration and exchange. The Linearbandkeramik (LBK) culture, flourishing in Central Europe from approximately 5500 to 4900 BC, represented the earliest widespread farming society in the region, characterized by longhouses, linear-incised pottery, and settled villages on loess soils from the Rhine to the Ukraine.^[1] In the Balkans, the Starčevo culture (circa 6100–5100 BCE) preceded later developments, known for its pit-houses, early pottery, and initial farming settlements along the Danube, influencing subsequent groups like the Vinča.^[2] The Vinča culture developed around 5700–4500 BC, known for its tell settlements, finely painted pottery with geometric designs, and early use of copper, spanning from modern Serbia to Hungary and reflecting a more urbanized lifestyle compared to the LBK.^[142] To the west, Megalithic cultures arose circa 4500–2500 BC along the Atlantic facade, including Iberia, France, Britain, and Scandinavia, distinguished by collective burial monuments such as passage tombs and dolmens, often built by patrilineal kin groups with significant hunter-gatherer genetic admixture.^[4] In northern Europe, the Funnel Beaker culture (circa 3900–2800 BCE) blended farming with foraging on the North European Plain and southern Scandinavia, featuring funnel-necked pottery and megalithic tombs.^[1] Later, the Corded Ware culture, dating to 2900–2350 BC across Central, Northern, and Eastern Europe, marked a shift toward mobile pastoralism, featuring cord-impressed pottery, single graves under mounds, and battle axes, with strong steppe genetic influences.^[143] These groups shared certain motifs and material practices that indicate cultural diffusion, such as geometric incised designs on pottery, including spirals and meanders, which appear in Vinča ceramics and Megalithic rock art, symbolizing possible cosmological or cyclical concepts.^[144] Trade networks facilitated interconnections, with Baltic amber exchanged southward through LBK and Megalithic territories as far as Iberia by the mid-Neolithic, and flint from specialized mines in Poland and Hungary distributed across Central Europe to support tool-making in Vinča and LBK communities.^[145] The LBK transitioned into successor cultures like the Rössen (4600–4300 BC) in the western and southern parts of its range, where pottery styles evolved from linear bands to more elaborate stamped decorations, reflecting gradual social intensification and regional adaptations without abrupt replacement.^[146] Overlaps are evident in border zones, such as southwest Hungary, where Vinča and LBK elements coexisted in mixed settlements, suggesting fluid identities and intermarriage.^[142] Recent archaeogenetic and linguistic research has updated understandings of Indo-European language links, moving away from outdated Anatolian farmer origins toward a steppe hypothesis where Corded Ware populations, admixed with Yamnaya herders from the Pontic-Caspian region around 3000 BC, likely introduced proto-Indo-European elements into Northern and Central Europe through migration and cultural replacement.^[147] This contrasts with earlier Neolithic groups like LBK and Vinča, which show primarily Anatolian farmer ancestry without strong Indo-European linguistic ties, highlighting a later transformative influx rather than continuity from the initial farming dispersal.^[1]

Ideology and Symbolism

Burial Practices

Burial practices in Neolithic Europe varied regionally and chronologically, reflecting diverse cultural responses to death. In the Early Neolithic Linearbandkeramik (LBK) culture of Central Europe, around 5500–4900 BCE, the predominant rite was single inhumation in shallow pit graves, often arranged in extramural cemeteries with bodies in flexed positions on the left side.^[148] In contrast, western and northern regions from approximately 4500 BCE featured collective burials in megalithic tombs, such as passage graves and gallery graves, where multiple individuals were interred over generations, sometimes with evidence of repeated access for secondary rites.^[4] Cremation was rare throughout the period, appearing sporadically in LBK contexts but overshadowed by inhumation as the primary method.^[148] Grave goods accompanied the deceased to signify personal identity, status, or ritual needs, commonly including red ochre for symbolic purification, stone tools for practical or ceremonial use, and jewelry such as beads or pendants made from shells, bone, or amber.^[149] In LBK burials, ochre was frequently sprinkled over the body, while tools like adzes and jewelry showed patterns linked to gender and age: adult males often received grinding tools or flint axes, females bone awls or pottery vessels, and children smaller ornaments.^[150] Recent analyses, however, indicate less rigid gender distinctions in some northern sites, with women and children buried with comparable numbers of stone tools, suggesting shared ritual roles rather than strict divisions of labor.^[151] Variations in burial forms included segmentary tomb structures in megalithic traditions, where chambers or compartments housed remains of related kin groups, allowing for lineage-specific memorials over centuries.^[152] Evidence for excarnation—exposure of bodies to deflesh before burial—appears in disarticulated skeletal assemblages from British and Irish long barrows, implying a multi-stage funerary process involving natural decomposition or animal scavenging.^[153] These practices often integrated with monumental architecture, such as chambered cairns, to create enduring communal spaces for the dead. As of December 2024, analysis of over 250 Neolithic burial sites across Europe has revealed patterns in grave goods and monument use, further supporting interpretations of structured beliefs in an afterlife where provisions ensured continuity.^[154] Such customs indicate a widespread belief in an afterlife, where provisions like ochre and tools ensured the deceased's continuity in a spiritual realm, as seen in the elaborate preparation of bodies and monuments across regions.^[155] Variations in grave goods and tomb access also reveal social hierarchies, with richer assemblages for adults or kin leaders suggesting status differentiation within communities, though egalitarian elements persisted in collective rites.^[156]

Art and Ritual Expressions

Neolithic art in Europe primarily manifested through portable clay figurines, which were widespread in the Balkans and Central Europe during the 6th to 4th millennia BCE. These small, fired-clay objects, often anthropomorphic, featured stylized human forms with exaggerated hips, thin necks, and minimal facial details, such as incised eyes or painted patterns like triangles and lines. In the Vinča culture (c. 5700–4500 BCE), figurines from sites like Opovo and Poduri-Dealul Ghindaru depicted seated or standing figures, sometimes accompanied by miniature chairs, suggesting they were part of domestic or communal assemblages rather than strictly religious icons.^[157] Interpretations as representations of a "mother goddess" or fertility symbols, popularized by Marija Gimbutas, have been critiqued for lacking contextual evidence, with recent analyses favoring views of them as markers of social identity or everyday symbolism.^[158] Rock art, in contrast, was rarer in Neolithic Europe compared to earlier Paleolithic traditions, but notable examples appear in northern Italy's Valcamonica valley, a UNESCO World Heritage site with over 300,000 engravings spanning millennia. Neolithic petroglyphs there (c. 4th millennium BCE) include spirals, necklaces, and topographic motifs hammered or scratched into sandstone, often near water sources, possibly denoting ritualized land division or ceremonial boundaries.^[159] These abstract and semi-anthropomorphic designs contrast with the more figurative clay works, highlighting regional variations in artistic expression from representational human forms to symbolic patterns that may have encoded cosmological ideas.^[160] Ritual expressions beyond art included feasting pits and votive deposits, which served as structured depositions of food remains, artifacts, and organic materials in deliberately dug features across Central and Southeastern Europe. In the Balkans, such as at Tiszaigar in Hungary (c. 5300–5070 BCE), pits contained carbonized seeds, animal bones, and unusual object combinations like clay tablets, indicating communal feasting events tied to symbolic offerings rather than mundane waste disposal.^[161] As of August 2025, excavations in Saxony-Anhalt, Germany, uncovered 5,000-year-old Neolithic sacrificial pits filled with house remnants, ceramics, and animal bones, suggesting ritual feasting and offerings linked to community ceremonies.^[162] Votive practices extended to wetlands, where repeated depositions of tools and ceramics over centuries reflect sustained cultural continuity in ritual acts, potentially linked to seasonal or agricultural cycles.^[163] Solar alignments in certain monuments, such as the Almendres cromlech in Portugal (c. 6th–4th millennia BCE), oriented toward equinoxes, suggest rituals centered on celestial observations, possibly invoking solar deities or fertility rites during communal gatherings.^[164] Anthropomorphic elements in these artifacts, like hybrid human-animal figures in figurines and rock art, have prompted hypotheses of shamanistic practices, where individuals entered trance states to mediate between human and spirit worlds. Evidence includes vulture-headed motifs at sites like Çatalhöyük (though Anatolian, influencing European traditions) and horned anthropomorphs in Valcamonica engravings, interpreted as shamanic transformations facilitated by music and dance.^[165] Abstract motifs, such as spirals, may represent visionary experiences or primordial forces, blending with figurative art to convey supernatural narratives. Recent 2020s research on isotope analysis has begun exploring mobility patterns in ritual contexts, such as pilgrimages to sacred sites, but coverage remains limited, with studies primarily focusing on dietary rather than specialized ceremonial movements.^[166]

Transition and Legacy

Shift to Chalcolithic

The transition to the Chalcolithic period in Neolithic Europe, also known as the Eneolithic or Copper Age, marked the introduction of copper metallurgy as a key technological innovation, beginning in the southeastern regions around 5000 BCE and gradually spreading westward by approximately 3000 BCE. This shift involved the extraction and smelting of native copper ores, primarily from local sources in the Carpatho-Balkan metallurgical province, leading to the production of tools such as flat axes and adzes that supplemented stone implements without fully replacing them.^[167] Early evidence includes copper axes manufactured from Balkan raw materials during the late Neolithic phase (5000–4500 BCE), exemplifying the initial experimentation with pyrotechnology for melting and casting.^[168] A prominent marker of this emerging metallurgical tradition is the Varna necropolis in Bulgaria, dated to circa 4600 BCE, where over 3,000 gold artifacts—totaling more than 6 kg—were interred, representing the world's oldest known worked gold and indicating specialized craftsmanship through techniques like hammering, casting, and alloying with copper.^[169] These hoards, found in elite burials of the Kodžadermen-Gumelnița-Karanovo VI complex, underscore social differentiation and trade networks that facilitated the circulation of precious metals, though gold remained primarily symbolic rather than utilitarian.^[170] By 4500 BCE, copper axes appeared in similar contexts, such as at Varna, signaling the integration of metal into ritual and status displays across southeastern Europe.^[167] In central Europe, the Baden culture (circa 3500–2800 BCE) exemplified the consolidation of Chalcolithic traditions, with fortified hilltop settlements like those at Parndorf and Vršac reflecting defensive architecture amid resource competition and population growth.^[171] These enclosures, often surrounded by ditches and palisades, housed communities engaged in early copper working, bridging Neolithic farming practices with emerging metal-based economies.^[172] Precursors to the later Bell Beaker phenomenon, such as Baden-influenced groups in the Danube region, introduced maritime-style pottery and archery equipment alongside basic metallurgy, setting the stage for wider diffusion without the widespread tin-bronze alloying that defined the subsequent Bronze Age.^[171] Innovations remained focused on arsenical copper and native metal processing, enabling limited tool production but not large-scale industrialization, as evidenced by the scarcity of smelting slag before 4000 BCE.

Environmental and Cultural Factors

The decline of Neolithic societies in Europe around 2500–2000 BCE was influenced by a combination of environmental stressors and internal cultural dynamics, marking the transition toward more complex social structures.^[173] Environmentally, the 4.2 kiloyear aridification event, a global episode of abrupt cooling and drought lasting several centuries, disrupted agricultural productivity across northwest Europe by reducing precipitation and altering seasonal patterns, leading to crop failures and settlement abandonments. This event, dated to approximately 2200 BCE, coincided with a sharp drop in population densities and the contraction of farming communities, as evidenced by radiocarbon-dated site distributions showing reduced occupation in previously fertile river valleys. Compounding this, prolonged slash-and-burn farming practices exhausted soil nutrients, particularly in marginal landscapes of northwest Europe, where early farmers shifted to less fertile podzols, resulting in diminished cereal yields and a population crash in regions like the Paris Basin and Lower Rhine area around 3400–3000 BCE.^[67] Recent genetic evidence from 2024 indicates that outbreaks of plague (Yersinia pestis) also contributed to this decline in northern Europe between approximately 3300 and 2900 BCE.^[174] Culturally, rapid population growth from agricultural surpluses strained resources, fostering overpopulation in core settlement zones and exacerbating competition for arable land, as indicated by sum frequency analyses of radiocarbon dates showing peaks in human activity followed by abrupt declines.^[13] This pressure manifested in escalated conflicts, notably during the late Linearbandkeramik (LBK) phase around 5000 BCE, where massacres at sites like Talheim, Schletz, and Schöneck-Kilianstädten involved the violent deaths of entire communities—up to 34 individuals at Talheim alone—with trauma patterns from adzes and arrows suggesting organized intergroup raids over territory.^[5] Such violence, affecting 10–50% of individuals in affected groups, reflected growing territoriality and social tensions in sedentary farming villages.^[5] Trade networks, reliant on obsidian, flint, and prestige goods, also faced disruptions as environmental instability fragmented exchange routes, reducing access to exotic materials and undermining economic resilience in peripheral regions.^[12] These factors laid foundational patterns for Bronze Age inequalities, as Neolithic kinship structures—characterized by patrilocal core families integrating lower-status outsiders—evolved into more rigid hierarchies, with high-status lineages controlling resources and burials showing graded wealth disparities persisting over 700 years.^[175] However, interpretations of these declines remain challenged by outdated climate models that underemphasize regional variability; recent 2024 paleoclimate reconstructions, integrating high-resolution pollen and isotope data, reveal more nuanced multicentennial cycles of aridity synced with demographic fluctuations, suggesting adaptive responses rather than uniform collapse.^[176]

Genetics and Population History

Genetic Ancestry of Neolithic Populations

The genetic ancestry of Neolithic populations in Europe is primarily characterized by a substantial contribution from Anatolian Neolithic farmers (ANF), who migrated from the Near East starting around 7000 BCE, bringing agricultural practices. Ancient DNA (aDNA) analyses from early Neolithic sites, such as those associated with the Linearbandkeramik (LBK) culture in Central Europe, reveal that these early farmers derived approximately 75–90% of their ancestry from ANF sources, with 10–25% admixture from local Western Hunter-Gatherer (WHG) groups.^[177] Recent analyses of LBK genomes indicate low kinship and high mobility, supporting genetic homogeneity consistent with egalitarian social structures in early farming communities.^[178] This admixture pattern reflects limited intermixing with indigenous foragers during the initial spread of farming, as evidenced by genome-wide data from LBK burials in Germany and Hungary, where WHG-related ancestry was minimal in the earliest phases but increased slightly over time.^[179] Paternal lineages in these populations were dominated by Y-chromosome haplogroup G2a, particularly subclades like G2a3, which are rare in modern Europeans but prevalent in ancient Near Eastern samples, underscoring the ANF origin.^[179] For instance, aDNA from LBK male individuals at the Derenburg site in Germany showed G2a3 in at least one case, aligning with broader patterns across early farmer genomes from Anatolia to Central Europe. Maternal lineages, inferred from mitochondrial DNA, included haplogroups common in ANF, such as H, J, and T, further supporting migration-driven ancestry.^[180] Notable adaptations in Neolithic genomes included low frequencies of lactase persistence alleles, with the -13,910*T variant absent in early samples from Central and Southeastern Europe dated 5800–5000 BCE, indicating that these populations were largely intolerant to lactose after weaning.^[181] Regarding pigmentation, Neolithic farmers carried derived alleles for lighter skin (e.g., in SLC24A5 and SLC45A2) at higher frequencies than contemporaneous WHG, likely an adaptation from their Near Eastern origins to facilitate vitamin D synthesis in northern latitudes, though eye and hair pigmentation remained predominantly dark. Recent aDNA studies from 2023 have confirmed these baseline ancestries while highlighting multiple migration waves into Europe, with some eastern and frontier LBK groups showing slightly elevated WHG admixture (averaging ~12–15%, up to ~20% in certain individuals) compared to core western counterparts, suggesting regionally variable gene flow during the Neolithic expansion.^[182] These findings, drawn from over 100 genomes across Central and Eastern Europe, reinforce the ANF-dominated profile but emphasize dynamic interactions with local foragers.

Migration and Admixture Patterns

The Neolithic period in Europe was characterized by multiple pulses of migration originating from Anatolian farmers, who carried a genetic profile distinct from local Western Hunter-Gatherers (WHG), leading to a gradual admixture across the continent starting around 7000 BCE.^[183] These migrations followed two primary routes: a southeastern path through the Balkans and a Mediterranean coastal route, resulting in the establishment of Early European Farmer (EEF) populations with predominant Anatolian Neolithic ancestry, often comprising 70-90% of their genetic makeup in early settlements.^[184] Regional variations emerged as EEF groups intermingled with WHG populations, with admixture levels increasing over time; for instance, in central Europe, WHG contribution rose from less than 10% in the Early Neolithic to around 20-30% by the Middle Neolithic, reflecting localized gene flow facilitated by interactions at the frontiers of farmer expansion.^[185] Autosomal DNA analyses reveal clinal gradients in ancestry, with higher EEF proportions in southern and southeastern Europe decreasing northward and westward, underscoring the demic diffusion model of farming spread through population movements rather than solely cultural adoption.^[3] Evidence of sex-biased admixture is limited during the initial Neolithic phases, showing no strong male or female bias in the farmer-WHG mixing, unlike later periods.^[186] However, local increases in WHG admixture occurred progressively along the expansion routes, as demonstrated by high-coverage genomic data from sites spanning 6500-2500 BCE, indicating ongoing interbreeding that enriched Neolithic genomes with adaptive hunter-gatherer alleles, such as those related to pigmentation and immunity.^[21] Late Neolithic populations show initial signs of increased mobility that foreshadowed later Bronze Age admixtures from steppe sources.^[187] Recent ancient DNA studies from northern European sites, including 2024-2025 analyses of high-coverage genomes from Scandinavia and the Baltic, highlight gaps in our understanding of admixture timing and extent, revealing higher-than-expected WHG retention in some Late Neolithic groups and uneven Steppe penetration, with admixture levels varying from 10-40% across locales.^[188] These findings underscore the need for further sampling to resolve regional heterogeneities, particularly in understudied northern peripheries where farmer expansions were slower and more punctuated.^[3]

Language and Communication

Hypotheses on Spoken Languages

One prominent hypothesis posits that the Anatolian branch of the Indo-European (IE) language family originated in Anatolia and spread to Europe with Neolithic farmers around 7000–6000 BCE, correlating with the demic diffusion of agriculture from the Near East.^[189] This Anatolian hypothesis, initially proposed by Colin Renfrew, suggests that early IE speakers were these migrating farmers, introducing terms related to farming and domestication into European linguistic substrates.^[189] However, as of 2025, genetic studies indicate a stronger link to the Steppe hypothesis, with Proto-Indo-European (PIE) originating approximately 6500 years ago (~4500 BCE) in the Caucasus-Lower Volga region of southern Russia, from which it spread westward via Yamnaya pastoralist migrations around 6000 years ago (~4000 BCE), post-dating the initial Neolithic farming dispersals.^[190] These findings suggest that while the Anatolian branch may have earlier ties to farmer movements, the core PIE expansions occurred later through steppe herders, reconciling elements of both hypotheses but favoring a later timeline for widespread IE dispersal in Europe.^[191] In contrast, the Basque language (Euskara) is hypothesized to represent a linguistic isolate with continuity from pre-Indo-European languages potentially spoken by Neolithic or earlier populations in western Europe, serving as a cultural barrier that preserved its distinctiveness amid later IE influxes.^[192] Genetic evidence indicates Basque populations exhibit continuity from Iron Age onward, with significant ancestry from Neolithic farmers who admixed with local hunter-gatherers, supporting the idea that Euskara descends from non-IE substrates rather than emerging post-Neolithic.^[192] This continuity is inferred from the language's isolation and lack of IE cognates, though direct links to specific Neolithic dialects remain speculative. Supporting evidence for these hypotheses includes non-IE substrate words embedded in later IE languages, particularly agricultural terms such as those for pea (*arwīt- in Proto-Germanic), bean, and turnip, which likely entered via cultural exchanges between Neolithic farmers and incoming IE speakers in regions like southern Scandinavia around 2800–2600 BCE.^[193] Additionally, numerous European toponyms—place names with non-IE roots, such as those ending in -briga or hydronyms like the Danube—suggest widespread Paleo-European substrates from Neolithic multilingual contexts, reflecting linguistic diversity before IE dominance.^[191] Debates center on whether IE languages arose monogenetically from a single PIE source tied to farming migrations or emerged in a multilingual Neolithic landscape with multiple families, including potential Uralic precursors and other isolates; however, the absence of written records precludes direct proof, leaving hypotheses reliant on indirect correlations.^[189] Earlier models have been critiqued as outdated, but recent linguistic-genetic studies, such as Bayesian analyses integrating ancient DNA with language phylogenies, strengthen ties between later pastoralist migrations and early IE dispersal while highlighting gaps in understanding non-IE substrates.^[191]

Absence of Writing Systems

Neolithic Europe, spanning approximately 7000 to 2000 BCE, lacked any form of true writing system capable of representing spoken language through phonetic or logographic scripts. Archaeological evidence indicates that while various symbolic markings appear on artifacts, none constitute a systematic script for recording information, narratives, or administrative purposes across the continent. This pre-literate condition persisted throughout the period, with knowledge and cultural continuity relying instead on non-written means of preservation and dissemination.^[194] The most prominent example of potential proto-writing in Neolithic Europe comes from the Vinča culture in Southeastern Europe (ca. 5300–4500 BCE), where over 200 distinct symbols—often incised on pottery, figurines, and tablets—have been identified. These Vinča symbols, sometimes referred to as the "Danube script," exhibit repetition and combinatorial patterns suggestive of intentional notation, but their status remains highly debated among scholars. Proponents like Harald Haarmann argue they represent an early script rooted in local Mesolithic traditions, used possibly for ritual or economic purposes, predating Sumerian cuneiform by millennia. However, others, including Marija Gimbutas and Conrad M. Cullen, classify them as non-linguistic proto-writing or mere tally marks and potter's marks, lacking evidence of phonetic value or syntactic structure to qualify as true writing. No decipherment has been achieved, and their use appears sporadic and regionally confined, not indicative of widespread literacy.^[194]^[195] In the absence of writing, Neolithic European societies transmitted knowledge primarily through oral traditions, supplemented by material culture as mnemonic aids. Archaeological interpretations suggest that spoken narratives, songs, and rituals passed down generational expertise in agriculture, craftsmanship, and social norms, a process termed "primary orality" in prehistoric contexts. Symbolic artifacts, such as clay figurines and decorated pottery, likely served as visual cues or memory prompts during communal storytelling, embedding cultural memory in tangible objects rather than abstract records. For instance, the recurrence of motifs on Vinča figurines may have reinforced oral histories tied to fertility rites or cosmology, though direct evidence is inferred from artifact distributions and ethnographic analogies.^[196] This illiteracy had profound implications for historical reconstruction, forcing modern archaeologists to depend almost entirely on material remains—such as settlement patterns, tool assemblages, and burial goods—for insights into Neolithic life, without the benefit of written corroboration. In stark contrast to the Near East, where proto-cuneiform emerged around 3200 BCE in Mesopotamia for accounting and administrative needs amid urbanizing societies, Neolithic Europe's decentralized, agrarian communities showed no comparable impetus for script development. The lack of writing likely fostered a more fluid, community-based knowledge system, less prone to centralized control but vulnerable to loss over time.^[197] Neolithic Europe's pre-literate framework parallels other non-literate prehistoric societies worldwide, such as the Jōmon culture in Japan (ca. 14,000–300 BCE) or early Mesoamerican groups, where oral and symbolic transmission sustained complex social structures without scripts. These comparisons highlight how illiteracy did not preclude sophisticated cultural expression but shaped distinct pathways for innovation and continuity.^[196]

References

[1]
Mobility and Social Change: Understanding the European Neolithic ...
Jan 4, 2021 · This paper discusses and synthesizes the consequences of the archaeogenetic revolution to our understanding of mobility and social change during the Neolithic ...
[2]
[PDF] The Spread of Early Farming in Europe - Peter Bogucki
the Linear Pottery Culture suggests that domesticated cattle were v cultural economy of Neolithic Europeans. The bones of cattle alm remains of sheep, goats ...
[3]
Modeling the European Neolithic expansion suggests predominant ...
Aug 25, 2025 · The Neolithic Revolution initiated a pivotal change in human society, marking the shift from foraging to farming.
[4]
Megalithic tombs in western and northern Neolithic Europe were ...
Apr 15, 2019 · Around 4000 BCE, Neolithic farming communities reached the northwestern fringes of Europe, including the British Isles (14, 15) and Scandinavia ...Missing: agriculture | Show results with:agriculture
[5]
Conflict, violence, and warfare among early farmers in Northwestern ...
Jan 17, 2023 · The Neolithic is defined here as the period between the mobile or semi-mobile hunter-fisher-gatherer groups of the Mesolithic, and the ...
[6]
Demic and cultural diffusion propagated the Neolithic transition ...
About 9000 years ago, the Neolithic transition began to spread from the Near East into Europe, until it reached Northern Europe about 5500 years ago. There are ...
[7]
The Neolithic Demographic Transition in the Central Balkans
Nov 30, 2020 · The Early Neolithic communities from the Aegean reached the Central Balkans by approximately 6250 BC according to the new radiocarbon dates ...
[8]
Subsistence and population development from the Middle Neolithic ...
Oct 28, 2024 · The transition from the Middle Neolithic B (MNB, 2850–2350 BCE) to the Late Neolithic (LN, 2350–1700 BCE) in Southern Scandinavia is recognised ...
[9]
Neolithic Britain: The Transformation of Social Worlds. Keith Ray ...
Unlike the continental Neolithic, established across the Channel by 5000 bc, the British Neolithic is packed into only about 1500 years, from 4000 to 2500 bc.
[10]
Archaeological Evidence on the Westward Expansion of Farming ...
Defining “Neolithic Packages” and Trajectories. For a long time the concept of the “Neolithic package” was limited to cultivated plants, domesticated animals, ...<|separator|>
[11]
The chronology of culture: a comparative assessment of European ...
Jan 19, 2015 · The resulting analysis gives a new and more accurate description of the duration and intensity of European Neolithic cultures. Keywords.
[12]
Understanding climate resilience in Scandinavia during the ...
Dec 15, 2023 · Neolithic communities permanently settled in S Scandinavia ∼3800–3700 BCE. The spread of farming in S Norway coincided with cooling periods after 2250 BCE.<|separator|>
[13]
European Neolithic societies showed early warning signals ... - PNAS
Aug 29, 2016 · The publicly available dataset includes more than 13,658 archaeological radiocarbon dates comprising 2,759 sites for Mesolithic and Neolithic ...
[14]
Chronology of the Neolithic in northern Europe. Abbreviations: LN =...
Early evidence of domesticates and crop cultivation indicate a transition to farming in this area during the late 5th millennium cal BC. However, there is ...
[15]
(PDF) Climate shaped how Neolithic farmers and European hunter ...
Jul 8, 2020 · The Neolithic transition in Europe was driven by the rapid dispersal of Near Eastern farmers who, over a period of 3,500 years, brought food ...
[16]
How did the domestication of Fertile Crescent grain crops increase ...
The origins of agriculture, 10 000 years ago, led to profound changes in the biology of plants exploited as grain crops, through the process of domestication.
[17]
Convergent genomic signatures of domestication in sheep and goats
Mar 6, 2018 · Before becoming established worldwide, sheep and goats were domesticated in the fertile crescent 10,500 years before present (YBP) where their ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
[18]
The Origins of Agriculture in the Near East | Current Anthropology
Agriculture in the Near East arose in the context of broad-based systematic human efforts at modifying local environments and biotic communities.
[19]
Out-of-Anatolia: Cultural and genetic interactions during ... - Science
Jun 26, 2025 · Neolithic farming cultures first developed in the Fertile Crescent around 10,000 years ago and later spread into Europe through the Aegean. How ...
[20]
A zooarchaeological history of the Neolithic occupations at Franchthi ...
The Neolithic settlement at Franchthi Cave was founded ca. 8650–8450 cal BP. It was one of the first Neolithic settlements in mainland Greece and was ...
[21]
Genetic evidence for the spread of agriculture in Europe by demic ...
Genetic evidence for the spread of agriculture in Europe by demic diffusion ... By contrast, Ammerman and Cavalli-Sforza proposed that the spread of ...
[22]
A Common Genetic Origin for Early Farmers from Mediterranean ...
The spread of farming out of the Balkans and into the rest of Europe followed two distinct routes: An initial expansion represented by the Impressa and ...Missing: Linear | Show results with:Linear
[23]
Westward Ho! : The Spread of Agriculture from Central Europe to the ...
In most places, full sedentary agriculture was introduced very rapidly at the start of the Neolithic. “Transitional” economies are virtually absent.
[24]
Neolithic Spread: Mediterranean Coast Dispersal & Culture
Jul 22, 2022 · We estimate a spread rate of 7.5–10.6 km/year for the Neolithic expansion along the northern shore of the western Mediterranean.<|separator|>
[25]
The rapid spread of early farming from the Aegean into the Balkans ...
Aug 6, 2025 · These earliest Neolithic settlements are all concentrated in a region that Pavle Cikovac calls the Sub-Mediterranean-Aegean (SMA) biogeographic region.
[26]
The Neolithic Demographic Transition in the Central Balkans
Nov 30, 2020 · The population in the Central Balkans increased rapidly after the Neolithic introduction, then decreased, recovered, and decreased again, with ...
[27]
(PDF) The Spread of the Neolithic in the South East European Plain
Oct 31, 2025 · Our model successfully accounts for the regional variations in the spread of the Neolithic, consistent with the radiocarbon data, and reproduces ...Missing: fertile scholarly
[28]
Demography of the Early Neolithic Population in Central Balkans
Aug 10, 2016 · The appearance of the first Neolithic in Central Balkans is related to the Starčevo culture, which is a part of the wider Early Neolithic ...
[29]
Neolithic Settlements in the Central Balkans between 6200 and ...
Nov 24, 2020 · Neolithic Settlements in the Central Balkans between 6200 and 5300 calBC: Issues of Duration and Continuity of Occupation ; of the Aşağı Pınar is ...
[30]
Of herds and societies—Seasonal aspects of Vinča culture herding ...
Oct 7, 2021 · Natural environment and resources, and the long life of the Neolithic settlement at Vinča, southeast Europe. Archaeological and ...
[31]
Modelling obsidian trade routes during late Neolithic in the south ...
Aug 7, 2025 · The aim of this paper is to reconstruct the possible trajectory of the movement of the obsidian that was brought to the region of present ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
[32]
[PDF] Obsidian exchange and societies in the Balkans and the Aegean ...
This thesis uses obsidian to examine interactions of Neolithic communities in the Balkans and Aegean, focusing on the directionality and intensity of exchange. ...
[33]
Observations on the origin and demography of the Vinča culture
Sep 20, 2020 · The Vinča culture represents one the most important archaeological phenomena of the Neolithic and Eneolithic world in Southeastern Europe.Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
[34]
(PDF) Celestial symbols from Vinča civilization - ResearchGate
Jan 24, 2022 · The Vinča culture (5400-4400 BC) is distinguished for its advanced societal structure and its possible origination of proto-writing. Evidence ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
[35]
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380723768_Where_are_the_wild_things_Wild_animal_exploitation_during_the_Neolithic_of_the_central_Balkans
[36]
The Neolithic of Southeast Europe: Recent Trends - Annual Reviews
Jul 13, 2020 · Regions with major settlement but devoid of local salt sources include Thessaly, Thrace, Ukraine, and much of Hungary, confirming that salt was ...
[37]
Interactions between earliest Linearbandkeramik farmers and ...
The Linearbandkeramik or Linear Pottery culture (LBK) played a key role in the Neolithization of central Europe. Culturally, economically, and genetically, the ...
[38]
Pottery forming of the Cardial and Epicardial Neolithic wares
This paper focuses on the reconstruction of the forming technologies that were used for manufacturing the Early Neolithic vessels from Cova del Frare
[39]
A new model for the Linear Pottery Culture in west-central Europe
This paper proposes a novel interpretation of Neolithic Linear Pottery (LBK) settlement organisation, based on comparative analysis of data on subsistence.
[40]
(PDF) Revisiting and modelling the forest farming system of the ...
Aug 9, 2025 · This article presents the conception and the conceptual results of a modelling representation of the farming systems of the Linearbandkeramik ...
[41]
FROM THE WEST TO THE EAST. ON THE TRANSCARPATHIAN ...
The article is devoted to the issue of far-reaching, Transcarpathian distribution and exchange of various flint raw materials and obsidian during the ...Missing: trade 2020s
[42]
Rediscovering Cova de la Sarsa (València, Spain) - MDPI
Cova de la Sarsa (València, Spain) is one of the most important Neolithic impressed ware culture archaeological sites in the Western Mediterranean.2. Pottery Study · 4. Cn Isotopic Analyses · 5. Discussion
[43]
Lead isotopes of prehistoric copper tools define metallurgical ...
Feb 21, 2024 · Here we show that the diffusion of copper in Northern Italy (approximately 4500–2200 BC) includes three major periods of metal use and/or production.
[44]
(PDF) The massacre mass grave of Schöneck-Kilianstädten reveals ...
Aug 6, 2025 · The massacre mass grave of Schöneck-Kilianstädten reveals new insights into collective violence in Early Neolithic Central Europe. August 2015 ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[45]
Large-scale violence in Late Neolithic Western Europe based on ...
Nov 2, 2023 · The extent of violence. Trauma has proven to be elusive in skeletal remains. Violent attacks often lead to soft tissue injuries and only a ...
[46]
The genetic prehistory of the Baltic Sea region - PMC
Jan 30, 2018 · Our analysis provides genetic evidence that hunter-gatherers settled Scandinavia via two routes. ... Five individuals from Lithuania and Estonia ...Missing: Delayed | Show results with:Delayed
[47]
Last hunter-gatherers and first farmers of Europe - ScienceDirect.com
The Neolithisation of Europe has seen the transformation of hunting-gathering societies into farming communities.Review/revue · 6. Evolution And Adaptation... · Conflict Of Interest...
[48]
Funnel-Beaker Culture Research Papers - Academia.edu
The Funnel-Beaker Culture (TRB) is a prehistoric European culture, primarily associated with the Neolithic period (circa 4200-2900 BCE)
[49]
Pitted ware culture: Isotopic evidence for contact between Sweden ...
The Pitted Ware Culture emerged during the Neolithic around 3400 BCE in east-central Sweden and quickly spread south and west to various parts of southern ...
[50]
The Irish Origins of the European Megalithic Culture - Newgrange
The earliest dates of construction for western European megaliths are found to be in the west of Ireland. These early dates were first put forth in the late ...
[51]
New Grange - Ancient Megalithic Passage Tomb Mound - Knowth
New Grange in Ireland is one of the finest monuments of European pre-history. Dating to circa 3200 B.C., it was built during the New Stone Age.<|separator|>
[52]
Neolithic dairy farming at the extreme of agriculture in northern Europe
Sep 22, 2014 · Since the end of the last Ice Age, some 12 000 years ago, the high northern latitudes of the globe became permanently settled by humans of ...
[53]
New insights from forgotten bog bodies - ScienceDirect.com
Our radiocarbon results show that two of the ten bog skeletons (two adult females) date to the Nordic Neolithic Age, one 8-year old child dates to the Nordic ...
[54]
An Early Neolithic Crucible and a Possible Tuyère from Lønt, Denmark
May 11, 2020 · In this article we present the fragments of a crucible and a possible tuyère that provide evidence of early copper metallurgy in Scandinavia at least 1500 ...
[55]
How early farmers in Scandinavia overcame climate change
Dec 8, 2023 · Neolithic communities in Southern Norway, despite facing cooling trends, demonstrated resilience by continuing to grow and settling in the ...
[56]
Large neolithic farmers' hall unearthed in Carnoustie - BBC
Jul 7, 2025 · Archaeologists have discovered the remains of a large and complex hall where some of Scotland's first farmers gathered for festivities.
[57]
The Ness of Brodgar Project – Investigating a prehistoric complex in ...
20 years of excavation on the Ness of Brodgar revealed a huge complex of monumental Neolithic buildings from the centuries around 3000BC.
[58]
The Origin and Early Spread of Agriculture in the Old World
The principal 'founder crops' discovered in the early Neolithic Near Eastern farming villages are: emmer wheat, einkorn wheat, barley, lentil, pea, bitter ...
[59]
On the 'lost' crops of the neolithic Near East - PMC - PubMed Central
Feb 23, 2013 · The claim that the 'classic' eight 'founder crop' package (einkorn wheat, emmer wheat, barley, lentil, pea, chickpea, bitter vetch, and flax) ...
[60]
[PDF] Neolithic farming in north-western Europe - Queen's University Belfast
Oct 8, 2012 · This study uses archaeobotanical evidence from Ireland to examine Neolithic farming, where farming arrived around 6000 years ago, and new data ...
[61]
Forest clearance and land use by early farmers in Europe
Dec 10, 2018 · Conversely, the Forchtenberg experiments have effectively tested only the slash-and-burn regime under soil pH conditions hostile to successful ...
[62]
Slash-and-Burn Experiments to Reconstruct Late Neolithic Shifting ...
Apr 6, 2021 · The Neolithic agricultural revolution used fire to shift the natural vegetation from perennialdominated to annual dominated landscapes. ...
[63]
Europe's Oldest Plough Marks Discovered in Switzerland, Dated to ...
Mar 9, 2024 · Compelling evidence has emerged suggesting that Neolithic farmers employed animal traction to operate ploughs between 5,100 and 4,700 years ago ...
[64]
Intensification of agriculture in southwestern Germany between the ...
Jan 6, 2021 · Pollen datasets can provide Cerealia to Plantago index values as a proxy for the changing relationship of cultivated land to fallow land ...Materials And Methods · On-Site Macrofossil Evidence · Off-Site Pollen Evidence<|control11|><|separator|>
[65]
[PDF] New insights into early farming practices in North-west Europe
Were crops grown intensively in small plots or extensively over larger areas? Do the crop remains represent single or multiple harvests? Were different ...
[66]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440325002183
[67]
Neolithic population crash in northwest Europe associated with ...
Aug 23, 2019 · We show that the period of population decline is coincidental with a decrease in cereal production linked to a shift towards less fertile soils.
[68]
Collapse and continuity: A multi-proxy reconstruction of settlement ...
One of the most discussed of these is the 4.2kya event, a period of increased aridity and cooling posited as the cause of societal changes across the globe, ...
[69]
https://oxfordre.com/environmentalscience/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.001.0001/acrefore-9780199389414-e-548
[70]
On the origin of European sheep as revealed by the diversity of the ...
May 14, 2020 · In the Neolithic, domestic sheep migrated into Europe and subsequently spread in westerly and northwesterly directions.
[71]
Neolithic Explanations Revisited: Modelling the Arrival and Spread ...
This paper considers the logistics of introducing domestic cattle from continental Europe. Cattle were the most extensively utilised domestic animal at the ...
[72]
Zooarchaeological evidence for livestock management in (earlier ...
Feb 20, 2024 · It is proposed here that most domestic ruminants in Neolithic Europe were managed for non-specialised exploitation of a mixture of carcass and secondary ...
[73]
Incorporation of aurochs into a cattle herd in Neolithic Europe - Nature
Jul 23, 2014 · It implies that early farmers took the opportunity to restock their cattle herds with wild aurochs. Such events appear to have been rare, as ...
[74]
Cattle domestication in the Near East was followed by hybridization ...
Domesticated cattle were one of the cornerstones of European Neolithisation and are thought to have been introduced to Europe from areas of aurochs ...
[75]
Transhumance in the Early Neolithic? Carbon and oxygen isotope ...
This study explores the evidence for transhumant pastoralism at Arene Candide, Northern Italy during the Neolithic. We examine the carbon (δ13C) and oxygen (δ18 ...
[76]
Dating the emergence of dairying by the first farmers of Central ...
Oct 17, 2022 · The overall low lipid concentration of dairy residues found in LBK pottery, particularly at the Hungarian sites, may also reflect the intensity ...
[77]
Detection of dairy products from multiple taxa in Late Neolithic ...
Mar 15, 2023 · The presence of dairy lipids in pottery from Hungary and Poland dating to the sixth millennium BCE supports the idea that dairying was part of ...Abstract · Introduction · Methods · Results and discussion
[78]
Neolithic dairy farming at the extreme of agriculture in northern Europe
Here, we examine food residues in pottery, testing a hypothesis that Neolithic farming was practiced beyond the 60th parallel north.
[79]
(PDF) Red Deer Hunting and Exploitation in the Early Neolithic ...
Jul 5, 2019 · The early Neolithic in northern Central Europe ought to be the theatre in which incoming farmersmeet local hunter-gatherers, with greater or ...Missing: persistence | Show results with:persistence
[80]
37 The Persistence of Hunting and Gathering Amongst Farmers in ...
This article discusses a case study on the persistence of hunting and gathering amongst farmers in the wetlands of north-west Europe (the Netherlands). It is ...
[81]
Early Neolithic diet and animal husbandry: Stable isotope evidence ...
Aug 10, 2025 · Here we present the largest study undertaken to date on LBK material using stable isotope analysis of carbon and nitrogen to reconstruct human ...
[82]
Isotopic evidence of strong reliance on animal foods and dietary ...
Jul 3, 2019 · This study provides the first isotopic insights into the diet and subsistence economy of Early and Middle Neolithic populations from open-air sites in interior ...
[83]
Dogs accompanied humans during the Neolithic expansion into ...
Oct 17, 2018 · Dogs were the only domestic species present in both Europe and the Near East prior to the Neolithic. Here, we assessed whether early Near ...
[84]
Domestication and uses of the dog in western Europe from the ...
Jul 1, 2014 · The dog was the first animal to be domesticated by the Upper Paleolithichunter-gatherers, but their domestication process remains difficult to understand.
[85]
Food and Farming Systems in the Neolithic – an Impossible Vista?
Jan 10, 2022 · As with other contributors, she highlights the importance of unpacking the Neolithic 'package' and examining the timings of each novel strand or ...
[86]
Narrating the house. The transformation of longhouses in early ...
The paper explores the transformation of longhouses in early Neolithic Europe, focusing on spatial organization and architectural developments.<|separator|>
[87]
(PDF) Neolithic Settlement Structures in Central Europe: Case Study ...
density of 0.06settlements/km2. The second settlement area is the Morava River Ba-. sin, which is mainly located in Moravia, in the north-. ern part of Lower ...
[88]
[PDF] structure and evolution of economic networks in neolithic
May 18, 2017 · The area-density index provides a view of local population size averaged across the span of an archaeological period, so that a group of 10 ...
[89]
(PDF) Neolithic ditched enclosures: A comparative history of their ...
Traditional models have viewed Prehistoric Iberian ditched enclosures as ›fortified settlements‹: permanently inhabited centres with robust defensive systems ...
[90]
LiDAR study reveals 5,000-year-old fortified settlements
Mar 11, 2025 · Archaeologists using LiDAR have discovered 5,000-year-old fortified settlements in Romania's Neamț County. Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), ...Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025
[91]
Community differentiation and kinship among Europe's first farmers
Here, we present evidence concerning forms of social organization and differentiation at the population scale from across the LBK distribution. The evidence ...
[92]
Sexual division of labour in early agriculture: grave goods, tools
Apr 14, 2021 · Previous analysis of the grave good assemblage variation by osteological sex and age has led many researchers to argue that women and children ...Missing: communal | Show results with:communal
[93]
Size matters? Exploring exceptional buildings in the central ...
Within Linearbandkeramik (LBK) studies, several models of social structure and organisation have been debated since the 1960s, influenced by several major ...
[94]
The Social Archaeology of Megalithic Monuments - Academia.edu
There are approximately 50,000 dolmens in Europe, indicating significant communal labor investment. Monuments served as tombs and may have symbolized ...
[95]
The social context of the emergence, development and ...
Jan 25, 2017 · In this article we outline some of the key characteristics of the social structure of the Climax Copper Age in the eastern Balkans and the ...
[96]
Evidence for large-scale feasting at Late Neolithic Makriyalos, North ...
In Neolithic settlements it is the household that is the focus of social behaviour, hosting the infra-communal politics and managing the ties between the ...
[97]
Lech Czerniak. Is length significant? LBK longhouses and the social ...
Nine ELHs ranged from 36 to 58.5 meters, indicating variation in architectural significance. Central positioning of ELHs often correlates with larger household ...
[98]
(PDF) Achieving Equality: Why There Was Not as Much Inequality in ...
First, a broad review of evidence suggests that social inequality was not a major organizing principle of most prehistoric societies. Instead, throughout ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[99]
Jaroslav Řídký, Petr Květina, Petr Limburský, Markéta Končelová ...
Aug 12, 2019 · The chapter includes a list of archaeologically detectable attributes of Big Man and chiefdom societies. The application of these criteria is ...Missing: debate | Show results with:debate
[100]
The construction of monumental landscapes in low-density societies
The question of investment of labor and material in the construction of Neolithic monuments has been discussed previously (Renfrew, 1979, Andersen, 1988, Earle, ...
[101]
Achieving Equality: Why There Was Not as Much Inequality in ...
Aug 20, 2025 · First, a broad review of evidence suggests that social inequality was not a major organizing principle of most prehistoric societies. Instead, ...
[102]
Technology and provenience of the oldest pottery in the northern ...
Aug 20, 2024 · The spread of ceramic technology among European communities occurred in two distinct diffusion zones during the 7th and 6th millennium cal BC.
[103]
From Macro to Micro: Integrated analysis of Funnel Beaker Culture ...
This paper focuses on the multifaced analysis of the Funnel Beaker Culture (FBC) ceramic assemblage from Kiełczewo (Kościan community).
[104]
Production technique of Early Neolithic pottery. 1 -vessel base; 2...
Production technique of Early Neolithic pottery. 1 -vessel base; 2 -separated courses of coiling on a body sherd from a bowl; 3 -scheme of construction, ...
[105]
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-69208-7
[106]
The Oldest Traces of Alcoholic Beverages in the Border Zone of the ...
Aug 12, 2025 · “Exploring the Significance of Beaker Pottery Through Residue Analyses.” Oxford Journal of Archaeology 25: 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1111 ...
[107]
Pottery residue research explores culinary traditions in Germany ...
May 17, 2024 · For their study, scientists analyzed the pottery-based food storing and culinary practices of Central Germany by examining lipid residues ...
[108]
(PDF) Pottery technology at the dawn of metallurgy in the Vinča culture
PDF | This chapter summarises the macroscopic and microscopic analyses of pottery sherds from the sites of Belovode and Pločnik, presented in Chapters.
[109]
Pottery use at the transition to agriculture in the western Mediterranean
In fact, it has been suggested that impressed and cardial decorative motifs identified Impressed/Cardial Ware communities, and were a symbol of their ...<|separator|>
[110]
(Re)Learning to Use Early Neolithic Stone Adzes - EXARC
May 15, 2015 · At the same time we see the development of polished flint axes in Northern Europe with the emergence of the Funnel Beaker Culture.
[111]
Lithic Production | Milwaukee Public Museum
Ground stone axes appear in the Neolithic period. They are made in the ... The blade of the adze was polished in similar fashion to the ground stone axe.Neolothic Period · Chip-Stone Axe · Ground Stone Axe
[112]
Recycling Neolithic Axes: An Experiment Re-using Polished Axes as ...
Apr 27, 2023 · Polished flint axes are ubiquitous in the European Middle (4200–2900 BC) to Late Neolithic (2900–2000 BC). Not only do we find complete ...
[113]
The Neolithic reaping knives from Egolzwil 3 - ScienceDirect.com
Jan 12, 2017 · The multiple flint elements were inserted in these sickles on an oblique axis to the shaft, and thus the cereal stems were cut with a composite ...
[114]
Multiproxy study of 7500-year-old wooden sickles from the ... - Nature
Sep 2, 2022 · This article presents interdisciplinary research on three of the most complete and well-preserved sickles recovered from the site, yet unpublished.
[115]
Functional exploration of grinding and polishing stones from the ...
The results indicate that grinding and polishing stones were used to process a wide range of cereals and other plant resources, and more importantly, grinding ...
[116]
Knapping before and after polishing: Technological evidence in the ...
The authors present the evidence gathered during the interdisciplinary study of several polished stone tools from some Neolithic sites in Hungary.
[117]
[PDF] Use-wear analysis of grinding tools and the exploration of ... - HAL
Dec 15, 2022 · Functional analysis of stone grinding and polishing tools from the earliest Neolithic of north-western Europe, Journal of Archaeological Science ...
[118]
29. Tool Types and Techniques of Neolithic Culture
Chipping, retouching, grinding and polishing were techniques developed in the Neolithic to make very fine, sharp and simply beautiful stone tools. In the Later ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[119]
Archaeological collections - Le Grand-Pressigny Prehistory Museum
It houses a significant collection of carved flint, proof of Le Grand-Pressigny's prolific flint production in 3000BC. (Final Neolithic). At the time, large ...
[120]
Flint sickle diversity during late Neolithic between Grand-Pressigny ...
The aim of this study is the diversity of flint tools used to harvest cereals during the late Neolithic (2900-2450 BC) in an area between Grand-Pressigny ...
[121]
Stone Axe - Museum of Stone Tools
Large green jadeite axes circulated across Western Europe during the Neolithic period, from about 7000 to 5000 BP. These axes derived primarily from high- ...
[122]
Neolithic transverse arrowheads: a great misunderstanding
Nov 1, 2018 · This article offers a critical review of research so far into transverse arrowheads in Southern Scandinavia. It does so by proposing a new typo- ...
[123]
Neolithic transverse arrowheads – a great misunderstanding
Aug 8, 2025 · This article offers a critical review of research so far into transverse arrowheads in Southern Scandinavia. It does so by proposing a new typo- ...
[124]
Record ID: DOR-9DB8FD - NEOLITHIC transverse arrowhead
A late Neolithic flint chisel arrowhead dating to 3300 BC - 2350 BC. Transverse type (bladed, not pointed; edge formed by a tranchet blow) Made from a broad ...
[125]
5.2.2 Axeheads (plus adze heads and chisels)
Around 4000 ground stone axeheads, mostly Neolithic, have been found in Scotland, with some from preferred sources like Great Langdale. Research focuses on ...
[126]
A critical approach towards jade axes in southern Scandinavia
The main problem with all the jade axes is that visually it is difficult to distinguish between Neolithic axes of alpine jadeite and imported ethnographic axes ...
[127]
What distinguishes the mesolithic period from neolithic and ...
Mar 22, 2016 · The Paleolithic had utilized Modes I-IV and the Neolithic mainly abandoned the chipped microliths in favor of polished, not chipped, stone tools ...
[128]
Megalithic tombs in western and northern Neolithic Europe were ...
Apr 15, 2019 · A new phenomenon of constructing distinctive funerary monuments, collectively known as megalithic tombs, emerged around 4500 BCE along the Atlantic façade.Missing: communal | Show results with:communal<|separator|>
[129]
The 'king' of Newgrange? A critical analysis of a Neolithic petrous ...
Jun 24, 2025 · Neolithic Ireland is widely recognised for the extent and scale of its megalithic monuments, in particular passage tombs with their eponymous, ...
[130]
Megalithic transport and territorial markers: evidence from the ...
Jan 2, 2015 · Evidence from the Channel Islands supports the view that long-distance transport of megaliths in the European Neolithic cannot be substantiated.
[131]
The emergence of monumental architecture in Atlantic Europe
Feb 21, 2023 · The authors focus on west-central France, one of the earliest centres of megalithic building in Atlantic Europe, commencing in the mid fifth millennium BC.
[132]
Seafaring megaliths: A geoarchaeological approach to the ...
Seafaring transportation of megalithic stones over distances of up to 40 km have also been suggested for some of the Neolithic monuments of the Locmariaquer ...
[133]
Europe's Megalithic Monuments Originated in France and Spread by ...
Feb 11, 2019 · Soon after their initial appearance, the stone structures spread in France and to parts of the Iberian Peninsula and Mediterranean. During the ...
[134]
Newgrange — Science or Symbolizm | Cambridge Core
Feb 18, 2014 · A new analysis of the tomb's structure reveals that it was based on a simple geometric shape measurable by a 13.1 m unit of length. The ...
[135]
New Evidence of Neolithic Funerary Monuments from the Eastern ...
Feb 27, 2024 · A new type of long barrow has been identified in Bohemia using remote sensing and current excavation data.
[136]
Pathways to plant domestication in Southeast Anatolia based on ...
Jan 22, 2021 · Southeast Anatolia is home to some of the earliest Neolithic sites associated with the transition from foraging to farming in the Old World.<|separator|>
[137]
Architectural planning and measuring in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic ...
We examined the architectural remains of the public structure known as the “Terrazzo building” in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic site of Çayönü, in order to ...
[138]
Food and social complexity at Çayönü Tepesi, southeastern Anatolia
We show that when the inhabitants of Çayönü Tepesi changed their architecture and operated different burial practices in conjunction, this coincided with other ...
[139]
High-Resolution AMS Dating of Architecture, Boulder Artworks and ...
Sep 21, 2018 · The archaeological site of Lepenski Vir is widely known after its remarkable stone art sculptures that represent a unique and unprecedented case of Holocene ...
[140]
Unveiling the narrative behind the neonate burials at Lepenski Vir in ...
Lepenski Vir, in the Danube Gorges area, was a Mesolithic and Neolithic settlement, famous for artistic sandstone boulders often associated with the remains ...
[141]
[PDF] Neolithic Scotland: ScARF Panel Report
Neolithic 'village' site of Skara Brae (Childe,. 1931; Clarke 1976, 2003) is well known, but to this must be added an impressive list of other settlement ...
[142]
[PDF] Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland
A recent series of radiocarbon dates from the 1972–3 and 1977 excavations place the occupation of Skara Brae between 4480 ± 35 BP and 3775 ± 35 BP (3340– 2140 ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
[143]
History of Stonehenge | English Heritage
A history of Stonehenge, explaining how the prehistoric monument developed from an early henge into its final form, as well as its later history.Research · Description of Stonehenge · History and Stories · SignificanceMissing: precursor | Show results with:precursor
[144]
https://www.academia.edu/68962374/The_Spiral_in_British_and_Irish_Neolithic_Rock_Art
[145]
Prehistoric Wetland Settlements of the Bulgarian Black Sea Coast
Nov 16, 2024 · In recent years, evidence of Late Neolithic coastal sites from the late 6th millennium BC has been discovered (Leshtakov 2010; Leshtakov et al.
[146]
Between the Vinča and Linearbandkeramik Worlds - PubMed Central
Here two longhouses were found, with an arguably general resemblance to LBK-type buildings. ... Neolithic in central Europe (LBK), 5700–4900 BC. Brno: Masarykova ...
[147]
The introduction of Corded Ware Culture at a local level
The introduction of the Corded Ware Culture (3000–2500 BCE) is considered a formative event in Europe's past. Ancient DNA analyses demonstrate that ...
[148]
(PDF) The Spiral in British and Irish Neolithic Rock Art - Academia.edu
Summary This paper provides an up-dated account of all spiral-sites in Neolithic British and Irish rock art. The focus is on spirals executed on open-air ...
[149]
The earliest Baltic amber in Western Europe - PMC - PubMed Central
The occurrence of Baltic amber through Europe has traditionally been associated to the spread of the Bell Beaker culture during the 3rd millennium BC.
[150]
In the region of southeast low countries, northeast France, northern ...
Rössen culture has been identified in 11 of 16 German states. The region of southeast Low Countries, northeast France, northern Switzerland and a small part ...
[151]
Landmark studies track source of Indo-European languages spoken ...
Feb 11, 2025 · A pair of landmark studies, published Wednesday in the journal Nature, has finally identified the originators of the Indo-European family of 400-plus languages.
[152]
Early Neolithic executions indicated by clustered cranial trauma in ...
Jun 25, 2018 · Usually, LBK burials are found as individual inhumations or cremations in dedicated cemeteries13. Overall, there is a large variety but left- ...
[153]
(PDF) Tracing Neolithic Funerary Practices from Finnish Ochre Graves
Feb 4, 2016 · The deceased were buried together with stone tools, jewelry, fragments of dishes, funeral and memorial food. The burial things were prepared ...
[154]
Grave goods show gendered roles for Neolithic farmers
Apr 14, 2021 · Grave goods, such as stone tools, have revealed that Neolithic farmers had different work-related activities for men and women.Missing: ochre patterns
[155]
Stone Age women were buried with as many tools as men
Sep 11, 2025 · The woman in burial 211 alone was laid to rest with a staggering 45 different stone objects. Zvejnieki cemetery's long history. Nestled along ...Missing: patterns | Show results with:patterns
[156]
Megalith tombs were family graves in European Stone Age - Phys.org
Apr 15, 2019 · The kin relations can be traced for more than 10 generations and suggest that megaliths were graves for kindred groups in Stone Age northwestern Europe.
[157]
Pattern and diversity in the Early Neolithic mortuary practices of ...
This article presents the first synthesis of the evidence for a diverse range of mortuary practices across the British Isles, and an interpretation of what they ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[158]
[PDF] How did Neolithic people view death and burial?
Sep 30, 2022 · As with the other Irish megalithic tombs, wedge tombs were used for communal burial, with multiple cremations and inhumations within a single ...
[159]
(PDF) The significance of Early Neolithic settlement burials: A case ...
Early Neolithic Settlement burials in Central Europe have long been treated as an irregularity and thus sparked discussions about perceptions of social ...
[160]
[PDF] The Figurines of Old Europe Douglass W. Bailey
The figurines are small human shapes and chairs, some with painted decorations, possibly part of a cult complex, and found in pottery vessels.
[161]
The Goddess Diffracted - jstor
Small ceramic figurines representing predominantly human fe- males are characteristic artifacts of many of the world's earliest settled villages.
[162]
[PDF] The rock art tradition of Valcamonica-Valtellina, Northern Italy
These rocks, sandstone, schist or limestone are very polished and molded. In these areas one finds mainly engravings, as only 7 paintings have been discovered ...
[163]
Symbols and Abstract Motifs in Neolithic Art: More than just Fanciful ...
May 4, 2018 · The assignment of anthropomorphic, zoomorphic or ; composite forms to invisible primordial ancestors and ; supernatural forces would have made ...
[164]
Pit-digging and Structured Deposition in the Neolithic and Copper Age
Aug 6, 2025 · Findings in feasting pits, such as carbonized seeds and animal bones, indicate a strong link between ritual and food.
[165]
Wetland and Ritual Deposits during the Neolitic. A Local Study in a ...
Finds show that votive depositions in wetlands were made over centuries, reflecting deep cultural continuity. The text analyzes the interplay of landscape and ...
[166]
Almendres Stone Rows/Alignments, Portugal – Neolithic Studies
Some commentators speculate that the site's religion was a solar cult while others see resemblances to worship of the Mediterranean Great Mother Goddess. The ...
[167]
[PDF] The Evidence of Shamanism Rituals in Early Prehistoric Periods of ...
This shamanic hypothesis is based on a fusion of direct evidence from the caves of Palaeolithic, rock art of Mesolithic, stone pillars of Pre-Pottery Neolithic ...
[168]
Regional long-term analysis of dietary isotopes in Neolithic ...
In this work we present the first regional analysis for Neolithic southeastern Italy as a whole, including both substantial original data and a review of the ...
[169]
Early Balkan Metallurgy: Origins, Evolution and Society, 6200-3700 ...
Metallurgy in the Balkans emerged independently around 5000 BC, driven by local mineral resources. The region produced copper, gold, tin bronze, lead, and ...Missing: onset | Show results with:onset
[170]
New data on the provenance of copper finds from the Early-Middle ...
Jun 15, 2019 · During the Late Neolithic (5000–4500 cal BC), copper axes were manufactured from local raw materials in the Balkans (Kalicz's Horizon 1b ...
[171]
Chalcolithic Gold from Varna - Provenance, circulation, processing ...
Trace element analyses revealed distinctive signatures in the Varna gold artefacts, suggesting a combination of local placer gold sources and previously unknown ...
[172]
[PDF] ARTICLE - David Reich Lab
Feb 21, 2018 · The Varna necro- polis has some of the earliest evidence for extreme inequality in wealth; one individual there (grave 43), from whom we ...
[173]
(PDF) The Baden Complex and the Outside World - Academia.edu
The Baden Complex serves as a critical link in understanding the Late Neolithic era in Eastern Central Europe, indicative of significant cultural transitions.
[174]
Late Prehistoric Fortifications in Europe: Defensive, Symbolic and ...
In large parts of Europe, walls, fences, berms or ditches around settlements or ritual places became increasingly significant from the Chalcolithic to the Iron ...
[175]
Late Neolithic and Chalcolithic maritime resilience? The 4.2ka BP ...
This paper deals with prehistoric communities at the end of the 3rd millennium BC in Northwest Europe in relation to the 4.2 ka BP climatic event.Missing: kiloyear | Show results with:kiloyear
[176]
Kinship-based social inequality in Bronze Age Europe - Science
Oct 10, 2019 · Here, we show a different kind of social inequality in prehistory: complex households that consisted of (i) a higher-status core family, passing ...
[177]
Multicentennial cycles in continental demography synchronous with ...
Nov 26, 2024 · Our reconstruction reveals multicentennial growth cycles on all six inhabited continents, which exhibited matching dominant frequencies and phase relations.
[178]
The effects of climate and population on human land use patterns in ...
Nov 15, 2024 · We find that changes in climate correlate strongly with the size and extent of the projected potential human niche space.
[179]
Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans - Nature
### Summary of Genetic Ancestry of Neolithic Europeans
[180]
Ancient DNA from European Early Neolithic Farmers Reveals Their ...
The results reveal that the LBK population shared an affinity with the modern-day Near East and Anatolia, supporting a major genetic input from this area.
[181]
Interactions between earliest Linearbandkeramik farmers ... - Nature
Dec 20, 2019 · Ancient mitochondrial DNA from the northern fringe of the Neolithic farming expansion in Europe sheds light on the dispersion process.Missing: Pace | Show results with:Pace
[182]
Absence of the lactase-persistence-associated allele in early ...
However, the absence of the 13.910*T allele in our Neolithic samples indicates that the early farmers in Europe were not yet adapted to the consumption of ...
[183]
Genetic continuity, isolation, and gene flow in Stone Age Central ...
Aug 9, 2023 · We found that Mesolithic European populations formed a geographically widespread isolation-by-distance zone ranging from Central Europe to Siberia.
[184]
A genomic Neolithic time transect of hunter-farmer admixture in ...
Oct 5, 2018 · Here we analyse genome-wide data of 17 individuals spanning from the Middle Neolithic to the Early Bronze Age (4300-1900 BCE) in order to assess the Neolithic ...
[185]
The genomic origins of the world's first farmers - ScienceDirect.com
May 26, 2022 · The precise genetic origins of the first Neolithic farming populations in Europe and Southwest Asia, as well as the processes and the timing ...
[186]
Hunter-gatherer admixture facilitated natural selection in Neolithic ...
Davy et al. study natural selection after admixture between hunter-gatherer and Neolithic farmer-associated individuals in ancient Europe.Missing: hybrid | Show results with:hybrid
[187]
Ancient X chromosomes reveal contrasting sex bias in Neolithic and ...
Mar 7, 2017 · We find no evidence of sex-biased admixture during the migration that spread farming across Europe during the early Neolithic.
[188]
Local increases in admixture with hunter-gatherers followed the ...
Aug 20, 2025 · In this study, we modeled the expansion of Neolithic farmers into central Europe along the continental route of dispersal. We used spatially ...
[189]
Massive migration from the steppe was a source for Indo-European ...
Origins and genetic legacy of Neolithic farmers and hunter-gatherers in Europe. ... Haak W, et al. Ancient DNA from European early Neolithic farmers ...
[190]
Dynamic changes in genomic and social structures in third ... - Science
Aug 25, 2021 · Major migrations preceded the arrival of “steppe” ancestry, and at ~2800 BCE, three genetically and culturally differentiated groups coexisted.
[191]
The genetic and cultural impact of the Steppe migration into Europe
Aug 29, 2021 · This paper aims to evaluate the influence of the Steppe migration on European Bronze Age populations by calculating both male and female genetic contributions.
[192]
Admixture as a source for HLA variation in Neolithic European ...
Feb 28, 2025 · We observe significant shifts in HLA allele frequencies from early farmers to late farmers, likely due to admixture with western hunter-gatherers.Missing: hybrid | Show results with:hybrid
[193]
Indo-European languages: new study reconciles two dominant ...
Oct 25, 2023 · There are two main, though apparently contradictory, established hypotheses. On one side we have the Anatolian Hypothesis, which traces the ...
[194]
Language trees with sampled ancestors support a hybrid ... - Science
Jul 28, 2023 · Their results suggest an emergence of Indo-European languages around 8000 years before present. This is a deeper root date than previously thought.<|control11|><|separator|>
[195]
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338467369_A_Neolithic_Sign_System_in_Southeastern_Europe
[196]
Scandinavia's earliest farmers exchanged terminology with Indo ...
Sep 29, 2017 · Neolithic farmers made lasting contributions to Indo-European vocabulary before their own language went extinct, new research shows.
[197]
[PDF] The Danube Script and Other Ancient Writing Systems
According to my own provisional assessment, there were at least three gravitations of writing: the Vinča culture in ... features of cultural symbolism and signs ...
[198]
A Neolithic Sign System in Southeastern Europe - ResearchGate
We are honoured to present this pivotal paper by a senior Danish scholar (born in 1922) that promises to revise many views of Late Neolithic and Bronze Age ...
[199]
Primary orality in the archaeological context (Chapter One)
The emphasis in the book is primarily on oral tradition as history, but makes the move towards a broader context which this book addresses. This chapter will ...
[200]
The Origins of Writing as a Problem of Historical Epistemology
A spate of scholarly work on the origins of writing has been pursued in the last decades at different places and in different disciplines and with varying ...