Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Next Generation Combat Vehicle

The Next Generation Combat Vehicle (NGCV) is a program to develop and acquire a family of advanced armored platforms, including optionally manned fighting vehicles, robotic combat vehicles, and systems, aimed at replacing legacy systems like the M2 Bradley and enhancing capabilities for multi-domain operations on future battlefields. Launched as a top modernization priority in 2017 through the establishment of the NGCV , the initiative emphasizes integration of , superior lethality, protection, and mobility to counter near-peer adversaries in complex environments such as megacities and contested terrains. Key components include the , selected in 2023 for prototyping to succeed the with advanced survivability features for modern threats, and the Robotic Combat Vehicle (RCV) program, which consolidated variants into a single chassis approach by 2025 to enable autonomous operations alongside manned units. The (MPF) variant entered low-rate initial production in 2022, with initial fielding planned for fiscal year 2025 to provide light armored divisions with support absent in current . Ongoing soldier touchpoints and testing, such as at , validate prototypes for operational effectiveness, reflecting the Army's shift toward digitally engineered designs and to accelerate delivery. While the program has advanced through prototype contracts and deliveries—such as eight RCV units for evaluation—it faces challenges in balancing innovation with fiscal constraints, as noted in emphasizing prioritization amid broader modernization efforts. The NGCV's focus on empirical testing and feedback underscores a pragmatic approach to causal warfighting requirements, prioritizing platforms that integrate with forces for decisive overmatch rather than incremental upgrades.

Background and Strategic Rationale

Historical Context of U.S. Army Armored Vehicles

The U.S. Army's involvement with armored vehicles originated during , when it adopted French light tanks for training and limited combat, forming the initial Tank Corps under Major and Captain in 1918. The first American-designed tank, the Mark VIII Liberty, was prototyped in 1918 but never saw service due to the war's end and production delays. Post-war demobilization curtailed development until the 1930s, when light tanks like the and emerged, emphasizing infantry support over independent armored operations. World War II marked the maturation of U.S. armored doctrine and production, with the M4 Sherman medium tank entering service in 1942 as the primary battle tank, featuring a 75mm gun, sloped armor, and mass-producibility that yielded over 49,000 units by 1945. Light tanks such as the and M5 Stuart provided reconnaissance and infantry support, while the heavy tank, introduced in late 1944 with a 90mm gun, addressed deficiencies against German Panthers and Tigers but arrived too late for decisive impact. Armored personnel carriers were rudimentary, relying on half-tracks like the M3, which transported troops under fire but offered limited protection. These vehicles enabled combined-arms tactics in and , though high losses highlighted vulnerabilities to anti-tank weapons and the need for better firepower and armor. In the Cold War era, the Army upgraded its fleet with the (1949), an interim modification of the Pershing with improved engine and transmission, followed by the M47 (1951), M48 (1952), and (1960) series, which incorporated diesel engines, stabilized guns, and infrared night sights for nuclear battlefield scenarios. The introduction of the in 1960 revolutionized infantry mobility, with its aluminum armor, low silhouette, and capacity for 11 troops plus crew, leading to over 80,000 produced and widespread use in for rapid deployment despite vulnerability to mines. The mechanized infantry fighting vehicle concept evolved into the , selected in 1977 and fielded in 1981, armed with a 25mm and TOW missiles to provide support, marking a shift from mere transport to combat enablers. The main battle tank lineage culminated in the , prototyped in the 1970s after cancellation of the joint project with due to cost overruns, entering production in 1980 with a 120mm gun, composite armor, and gas-turbine engine for superior mobility and lethality. variants proved dominant in the 1991 , destroying over 1,700 Iraqi tanks with minimal losses, validating U.S. emphasis on thermal sights and active protection. However, by the 2000s, legacy systems like the (over 40 years old) and faced escalating maintenance costs—exceeding $1 billion annually for alone—and exposure to improvised explosive devices in and , prompting upgrades like reactive armor but underscoring the need for lighter, more survivable designs against peer adversaries.

Drivers for Replacement Amid Peer Competitor Threats

The U.S. Army's legacy armored vehicles, including the first fielded in 1981 and the introduced in 1980, were engineered to counter massed Soviet armored formations during the but exhibit persistent capability gaps against contemporary peer threats from and . These platforms, despite iterative upgrades, lack sufficient protection, lethality, and to reliably defeat advanced anti-tank guided missiles (ATGMs), munitions, and drone-delivered submunitions, as evidenced by high attrition rates of similar systems in Russia's 2022 of . Peer adversaries have narrowed technological disparities through investments in kinetic-energy penetrators, cyber-electromagnetic warfare, and integrated reconnaissance-strike complexes, enabling them to target U.S. vehicles at extended ranges with precision fires that exploit vulnerabilities in top-attack defenses and legacy sensors. A 2023 Army Science Board study, drawing on lessons from conflicts including Ukraine, forecasts that the M1 Abrams will cease to dominate by 2040 in scenarios against China's People's Liberation Army, due to escalating threats like armed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), anti-tank mines, and pervasive battlefield transparency from enhanced intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR). Factors compounding this obsolescence include the Abrams' excessive weight (over 70 tons in upgraded variants), high fuel consumption limiting operational tempo, and low fleet readiness rates, which hinder rapid deployment to Indo-Pacific theaters where China's anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) networks—featuring hypersonic missiles, integrated air defenses, and long-range artillery—would impose severe logistical strains on heavy formations. Even recent enhancements like the M1A2 SEP v3 and v4 configurations fail to fully mitigate these risks, as adversaries proliferate low-cost counters that overwhelm traditional armor schemes. Russia's demonstrated use of cheap, attritable drones and man-portable ATGMs in has further illuminated systemic deficiencies in U.S. vehicles, such as inadequate active protection against swarming threats and limited integration with unmanned systems for distributed lethality. Chinese military modernization, including advanced sensors and platforms, amplifies these gaps by enabling layered defenses that contest maneuver across domains, rendering legacy vehicles susceptible to disintegration before closing for decisive engagement. The NGCV program's emphasis on optionally manned designs, AI-driven , and modular upgrades stems from this causal imperative: without replacement, U.S. armored brigades forfeit in large-scale combat operations against peers who prioritize systems warfare over symmetric tank duels. To restore decisive advantages, next-generation platforms must incorporate lighter architectures (e.g., 35-60 tons), propulsion for reduced signatures, and robotic wingmen to disperse risk while amplifying through 130mm-class guns and networked effects. This evolution addresses not merely hardware shortcomings but doctrinal necessities for multi-domain convergence, where armored forces operate amid contested communications and extreme lethality rivaling scales, as projected in U.S. Army training and doctrine analyses. Prioritization of these drivers elevated NGCV as the Army's second-highest modernization imperative in 2017, targeting fielding timelines like 2028 for successors to ensure survivable maneuver into positions of relative advantage.

Program Initiation and Evolution

Early Planning and NGCV Framework (2017-2019)

In October 2017, the U.S. Army Gen. established cross-functional teams (CFTs) to accelerate modernization efforts, identifying six key priorities known as the "," with the Next Generation Combat Vehicle (NGCV) designated as the second priority to deliver combat overmatch against peer adversaries like and through advanced armored platforms. This initiative responded to assessments that legacy systems such as the lacked sufficient lethality, protection, and mobility for high-intensity conflicts, prompting early conceptual planning for a family of optionally manned, networked vehicles integrated with and long-range fires. The NGCV framework emphasized modular designs, reduced logistical footprints, and with unmanned systems, drawing from ongoing studies like the Army's strategic portfolio reviews to prioritize investments over sustaining obsolete platforms. By June 2018, the Army formalized the NGCV program under the CFT structure, explicitly aiming to replace the with an Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle (OMFV) capable of , enhanced , and active protection systems, while allocating initial funding for capability development documents and prototyping contracts. Brig. Gen. Ross Coffman was appointed to lead the NGCV CFT, which integrated requirements from Training and Doctrine Command, Army Futures Command precursors, and combat developers to define performance thresholds, including speeds exceeding 60 mph, reduced crew sizes, and hybrid-electric propulsion for silent watch capabilities. This period saw accelerated prototyping timelines in the fiscal budget justification, with $372 million requested for NGCV efforts to mature technologies like directed energy weapons and autonomous subsystems ahead of fielding in the 2030s. Through 2019, the NGCV framework evolved to encompass a broader portfolio beyond the OMFV, incorporating light armored , robotic combat vehicles, and multi-purpose support platforms, informed by soldier feedback from early experiments and that highlighted needs for urban survivability and all-domain operations. The 's approach prioritized risk reduction via middle-tier acquisition authorities, enabling contracts awarded to industry teams for subsystem demonstrations, while the CFT coordinated with the newly established Army Futures Command in July 2019 to align NGCV with overall force design updates. Congressional oversight emphasized cost controls and technology maturity, leading to directives for independent assessments of trade-offs in armor, firepower, and sustainment to avoid pitfalls of prior programs like the cancellation in 2014.

Revisions, Setbacks, and Program Restructuring (2020-2023)

In January 2020, the U.S. Army canceled the initial solicitation for the Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle (OMFV), a core element of the Next Generation Combat Vehicle (NGCV) portfolio intended to replace the , after receiving insufficient competitive prototypes under the rapid middle-tier acquisition approach. This setback stemmed from overly ambitious requirements and tight timelines that deterred industry participation, prompting a program reset to refine specifications and extend the development phase. A Government Accountability Office (GAO) review in August 2020 highlighted systemic risks in the NGCV portfolio, including the OMFV, Robotic Combat Vehicle (RCV), and Mobile Protected Firepower (MPF) programs, noting that the Army's emphasis on rapid prototyping prioritized speed over comprehensive analysis. Cost estimates for OMFV and MPF relied on single-point projections rather than probabilistic ranges, potentially understating uncertainties and exposing the programs to overruns similar to prior failed vehicle efforts that wasted approximately $23 billion. Additionally, delays in systems engineering technical reviews for OMFV increased the likelihood of downstream design flaws and integration issues, as the Army deferred full evaluations until after prototype awards. GAO recommended updating cost estimates to include uncertainty ranges and conducting timely engineering reviews, though implementation timelines extended into 2022 for MPF and later for OMFV. Budget constraints amid fiscal years 2021-2023 further pressured NGCV development, with the reallocating funds from legacy systems to modernization priorities while facing flat or modest increases in tracked RDT&E appropriations—rising from $3.6 billion in FY2021 to $3.8 billion requested for FY2022. The exacerbated delays in prototyping and testing across defense programs, though specific NGCV impacts were compounded by disruptions and workforce limitations rather than outright halts. To address early shortfalls, the restructured the OMFV program in March 2022 by issuing a revised draft request for proposals that relaxed key constraints, such as eliminating hard limits on vehicle weight (previously capped at 50 tons short), troop capacity, and engine power, while emphasizing trade-space flexibility to broaden bidder interest. This adjustment reflected lessons from the 2020 cancellation and GAO critiques, shifting from rigid performance mandates to a capabilities-based approach that incorporated feedback on feasibility. By June 2023, the revised solicitation enabled downselection to two competitors—American Rheinmetall Vehicles and —for OMFV (later redesignated XM30) prototype contracts, marking a toward iterative development with digital engineering tools to mitigate prior risks. Overall, these changes extended timelines but aimed to enhance long-term viability against peer threats, though GAO assessments persisted in cautioning about persistent cost and engineering vulnerabilities.

Core Vehicle Development Programs

Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle (AMPV)

The (AMPV) is a tracked armored family developed by for the U.S. to replace the M113 family of vehicles, which originated in the era and number over 80,000 legacy units requiring modernization within Armored Teams (ABCTs). The program emphasizes improvements in survivability, , , power generation, and cooling over the M113, while enabling integration of advanced networking and lethality upgrades. The AMPV shares a common derived from elements of the but is lighter and more versatile for multi-role support functions. The AMPV family comprises five variants: General Purpose (for troop transport and utility roles), (equipped with a 120 mm mortar system accommodating two crew and two mortar operators with 69 rounds of ammunition), (for tactical operations centers), Medical Treatment (for forward medical care), and (for casualty transport). These variants support ABCT sustainment and command functions, with the hull designed for modular upgrades including potential unmanned turreted mortars or autonomous operations. BAE Systems received the initial engineering and manufacturing development contract in December 2014, followed by the first prototype rollout in December 2016. Low-rate initial production (LRIP) began with a contract in 2018, though deliveries were delayed until 2020. Full-rate production was approved in August 2023 with a $797 million contract, enabling deliveries starting in March 2023. Subsequent modifications include a $754 million award in March 2024 for the second production phase (March 2026 to February 2027), a $184 million order in October 2024 for 48 additional vehicles, and a $139.6 million extension in August 2025. The Army plans to procure approximately 2,000 to 3,000 AMPVs to equip ABCTs, with initial fielding to the 1st Armored Division in 2023 and the second brigade (Spartan Brigade) receiving and training on vehicles by September 2024. Recent efforts include a September 2025 collaboration with Forterra to prototype an autonomous AMPV variant, leveraging the chassis for rapid integration of unmanned capabilities. The program has met key performance parameters for protection, mobility, and interoperability, supporting the Army's transition to next-generation combat vehicle architectures.

XM30 Mechanized Infantry Combat Vehicle

The is a program aimed at developing an advanced to replace the , which entered service in 1981 and has undergone multiple upgrades but faces obsolescence against peer adversaries. Formerly designated the Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle (OMFV), the XM30 emphasizes optional manning to enable remote or autonomous operations, allowing a two-person crew—/ and —to control the vehicle while supported by advanced technologies for reduced manpower demands. The platform is intended to transport to positional advantage for while delivering enhanced lethality, survivability, and mobility in contested environments, including against swarms and top-attack munitions. Development of the XM30 traces back to the broader Next Generation Combat Vehicle framework, with the Army issuing requests for proposals in 2021 after an initial OMFV competition faltered due to unmet requirements and cost concerns. In June 2023, the Army downselected two industry teams—American Rheinmetall Vehicles (partnered with Raytheon for subsystems) and General Dynamics Land Systems—to proceed into detailed design and prototype fabrication phases, awarding contracts valued at up to $1.6 billion collectively for this stage. These teams are tasked with producing 11 prototypes each by the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2026, followed by government-led testing and soldier evaluations to inform a downselect for low-rate initial production. General Dynamics confirmed in October 2025 that it remains on schedule for initial prototype delivery in 2026, amid Army efforts to accelerate the program as highlighted in a June 2025 secretary memo prioritizing XM30 alongside other modernization initiatives. Key requirements for the XM30 include a capacity for at least six dismounted alongside the crew, integration of a 50mm XM913 for superior firepower over the Bradley's 25mm system, and modular for rapid upgrades. Protection features mandate advanced active protection systems () for intercepting incoming threats, modular passive armor kits, and underbody blast mitigation to counter improvised explosive devices and anti-tank guided missiles. Mobility enhancements focus on tracked design with improved powertrain for speeds exceeding 40 mph and operations in diverse terrains, while networking capabilities enable integration with for real-time data sharing. In May 2025, the Army incorporated soldier feedback via virtual simulations and models to refine human-machine interfaces, and testing of surrogate components has occurred at to validate ruggedness. However, the program missed its Milestone B decision for engineering and manufacturing development transition on April 1, 2025, due to ongoing refinements, pushing full-rate production decisions potentially into the late 2020s. The XM30's estimated program cost exceeds $45 billion for acquiring over 2,000 vehicles across armored brigades, reflecting the Army's commitment to a "transformational" capability leap rather than incremental upgrades, though budgetary pressures and technical integration risks persist. Recent partnerships, such as Integris Composites providing composite armor solutions in October 2025, underscore emphasis on , high-strength materials to balance protection and mobility without excessive weight penalties. As of October 2025, the program remains in the prototyping preparatory phase, with physical "bending metal" underway and evaluations set to assess trade-offs in optionally manned operations against fully manned baselines for operational realism.

Mobile Protected Firepower (M10 Booker)

The Mobile Protected Firepower (MPF) program sought to deliver a lightweight, transportable combat vehicle to provide U.S. Army Infantry Brigade Combat Teams (IBCTs) with mobile, protected direct-fire capabilities for engaging armored threats, fortifications, and personnel at extended ranges. The selected design, based on General Dynamics Land Systems' (GDLS) Griffin II platform, was designated the XM10 in development and officially renamed the M10 Booker in June 2023 to honor two U.S. Army captains killed in action 60 years apart. Intended for rapid deployment via C-130 aircraft, the M10 featured a 105mm low-recoil main gun capable of firing kinetic and multi-purpose rounds, enhanced sensor integration for networked operations, and modular armor for balancing protection against mobility. Development accelerated under the NGCV framework, with GDLS receiving prototype contracts in December 2018 following competitive evaluation. The Army awarded a $1.14 billion low-rate initial production (LRIP) contract to GDLS on June 28, 2022, for up to 96 vehicles, including training and support systems, with initial fielding targeted for 2025. The first was delivered to the Army on April 18, 2024, at GDLS facilities in , marking the transition from prototyping to production validation testing. New equipment training for soldiers commenced in July 2024 at (formerly ), , focusing on operation and maintenance ahead of operational testing. However, the program encountered challenges in meeting performance thresholds, including full-load C-130 transportability and integration with IBCT formations under peer threats. In May 2025, as part of broader transformation efforts to prioritize long-range precision fires and unmanned systems, senior leaders decided to terminate M10 procurement during LRIP. The formally announced the cessation on June 11, 2025, citing shifts in strategic priorities amid fiscal constraints and evolving battlefield requirements observed in conflicts like , where light armored vehicles proved vulnerable to drones and . Approximately 80 vehicles had entered production by cancellation, with existing units slated for or rather than full operational deployment across four planned battalions. This outcome highlighted acquisition risks in balancing designs with modern multi-domain operations, prompting reviews of requirements validation processes.

Robotic Combat Vehicle (RCV)

The Robotic Combat Vehicle (RCV) program seeks to develop unmanned ground vehicles capable of scouting, escorting manned platforms, and engaging threats to mitigate risks to soldiers in high-threat environments. Initiated as part of the U.S. Army's Next Generation Combat Vehicle efforts around 2019, the RCV emphasizes modularity, remote operation, and integration with manned systems like the . Early concepts envisioned three variants—light (under 10 short tons, air-transportable for ), medium (10-20 short tons, for durable ), and heavy (over 20 short tons, for lethal direct )—but the program shifted by 2023 to prioritize a single, common-chassis approach focused on the light variant to accelerate prototyping and reduce complexity. This evolution reflects budgetary constraints and operational needs for affordable, scalable unmanned systems deployable at levels. In January 2020, the Army awarded other transaction agreements to QinetiQ North America for four RCV-light prototypes and Textron Systems for four RCV-medium prototypes, with vehicles designed for speeds up to 40 mph and hybrid propulsion in the QinetiQ design weighing just over 10 short tons. These early prototypes underwent initial evaluations, but the program restructured, deferring medium and heavy variants in favor of light-focused development. By September 2023, the Army selected four industry teams—including Textron with its Ripsaw platform—for a new prototyping phase under the "24 in 23" modernization initiative, aiming for semi-autonomous capabilities in complex terrain and GPS-denied settings. Prototypes from this phase began delivery in late summer 2024, with three of four contractors providing systems by October 2024 for a year-long of , lethality, and software . The plans a decision in 2027, targeting initial fielding to units by 2030, though 2025 budget documents indicate ongoing deferral of medium variants. In 2025, the service issued a for a low-cost ground robot variant under $650,000 per unit, capable of carrying over 2,200 pounds payload to support armored brigades, signaling further emphasis on expendable, brigade-scale unmanned assets. Complementary efforts include partnerships for autonomous software with eight firms announced in April 2024, focusing on in diverse conditions.

Technological and Capability Focus Areas

Enhancements in Lethality and Protection

The Next Generation Combat Vehicle programs emphasize superior lethality through advanced armament systems designed to overpower peer adversaries. The incorporates a 50mm XM913 capable of firing programmable airburst munitions, alongside anti-tank guided missiles and a remote weapon station, providing overmatch against legacy 25mm systems on the . Similarly, the Combat Vehicle equips Infantry Brigade Combat Teams with a 105mm main gun for against armored threats, enabling sustained long-range engagement beyond the capabilities of existing light forces. Robotic Combat Vehicles (RCVs) in heavy variants mount anti-tank missiles or 30mm cannons, extending standoff lethality while minimizing human exposure. Protection enhancements prioritize layered defenses against kinetic, explosive, and electronic threats. XM30 prototypes feature modular composite armor, underbelly blast mitigation, and integrated active protection systems () to intercept incoming projectiles, surpassing the Bradley's vulnerabilities in and high-threat environments. The M10 Booker includes , reactive panels, automatic fire suppression, and blow-out panels to enhance crew survivability against improvised explosive devices and anti-tank weapons. RCVs leverage unmanned designs for expendable light and medium variants, allowing aggressive positioning in contested areas, while heavy RCVs aim for survivability comparable to manned platforms through reinforced hulls and . The (AMPV) bolsters sustainment operations with upgraded ballistic and mine-resistant hulls derived from chassis improvements, ensuring protected mobility for rear-echelon functions. These advancements integrate and virtual reality-aided turret designs to balance safety with firing precision, as demonstrated in U.S. armament prototyping that reduces exposure during engagements. Overall, NGCV lethality and protection focus on scalable, hybrid-electric platforms that maintain without excessive weight penalties, addressing limitations in fleets like the Bradley's saturated capacity.

Advances in Mobility, Networking, and Optionally Manned Operations

The Next Generation Combat Vehicle (NGCV) portfolio prioritizes mobility enhancements through diesel-electric propulsion systems and advanced electrification, enabling superior power generation, reduced fuel consumption, and increased electrical output for auxiliary systems. These powertrains, as prototyped for the , deliver up to 30% improved sprint capability, extended range, and approximately 30 times more electrical power compared to platforms, supporting high-energy demands for sensors and effectors while minimizing logistical burdens. Such advancements address terrain challenges in contested environments, with systems facilitating quieter operations and rapid acceleration to evade threats. Networking capabilities in NGCV vehicles leverage a Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) to standardize hardware, software, and data interfaces, enabling secure, real-time information sharing across manned and unmanned assets. This architecture supports integration with broader command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C4ISR) networks, allowing vehicles like the XM30 to exchange tactical data with Robotic Combat Vehicles (RCVs) and external platforms for enhanced situational awareness. Field tests have validated radio performance improvements for RCV communications, ensuring reliable links in denied environments to coordinate fires and maneuvers. The digital backbone in XM30 prototypes further unifies subsystems for networked lethality, with provisions for up to four unmanned remote combat vehicles per optionally manned platform. Optionally manned operations represent a core NGCV innovation, permitting vehicles to function with onboard crews, remotely, or autonomously based on mission profiles to mitigate human exposure in high-risk scenarios. The XM30, derived from the Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle , accommodates a two-person crew plus six dismounts in manned mode but incorporates remote features, including digital for modular autonomy upgrades. This flexibility aligns with requirements for against peer threats, where vehicles can transition to unmanned states for or suppression tasks, supported by for maneuver and decision-making. Initial prototypes, slated for delivery in 2026, emphasize through such modes, though full autonomous capabilities remain developmental pending software maturation.

Integration with Unmanned and Autonomous Systems

The Next Generation Combat Vehicle (NGCV) program incorporates unmanned and autonomous systems to enable (MUM-T), allowing manned platforms like the to operate alongside robotic combat vehicles (RCVs) for enhanced , reduced risk to personnel, and distributed lethality. This integration relies on advanced networking to support low-latency , anti-jamming , and scalable throughput over operational ranges, as assessed in experiments. NGCV prototypes, planned for delivery by fiscal year 2020, included two manned vehicles and four RCVs to prototype these teaming capabilities. RCVs form a core unmanned component, categorized into light, medium, and heavy variants designed for , suppression, and roles in conjunction with manned systems such as the XM30 and (MPF). In demonstrations like Project Convergence 21, AI-enabled RCVs exhibited synergy with optionally manned fighting vehicles, performing agile maneuvers and coordinated engagements to validate autonomous behaviors in contested environments. Software from contractors like supports RCV autonomy, including and mission execution, with field tests in 2021 focusing on radio performance improvements for reliable communication during operations. Autonomous enhancements extend to existing platforms, such as the (AMPV), where and Forterra are developing an unmanned prototype for testing by 2026, leveraging Forterra's experience in RCV and autonomous transport initiatives. XM30 designs incorporate manned-unmanned features, including a 50mm suite compatible with RCV teaming for layered fires. Overall, NGCV emphasizes modular, software-defined architectures to adapt to evolving threats, though progress has faced scrutiny over acquisition delays and autonomy maturation.

Challenges, Criticisms, and Controversies

Acquisition and Budgetary Hurdles

The Next Generation Combat Vehicle (NGCV) portfolio has encountered persistent acquisition delays and budgetary constraints, exacerbated by fiscal pressures and shifting strategic priorities within the U.S. Army. Programs under the NGCV umbrella, aimed at replacing legacy systems like the M113 and , have faced scrutiny from the (GAO) for incomplete planning and rapid acquisition risks that could lead to cost overruns. These challenges stem from competing demands for funding in areas such as unmanned systems and network modernization, resulting in reallocations that prioritize near-term capabilities over long-term vehicle development. The (MPF) program, culminating in the , exemplifies budgetary hurdles leading to outright cancellation. Initiated to provide mobile artillery support for , the program exceeded its target weight of 38 tons, reaching 42 tons, which undermined its air-transportability and strategic utility. By June 2025, the Army ceased procurement after investing over $1 billion and accepting 26 low-rate initial production vehicles at approximately $12.9 million each, reallocating remaining FY2025 funds to accelerate other priorities like precision fires. This decision reflected broader fiscal realism, as the vehicle's evolving requirements inflated costs without delivering proportional operational value. The , formerly Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle (OMFV), has experienced repeated delays tied to technical and budgetary integration issues. A planned B decision was postponed due to non-Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA)-compliant software from competing vendors, hindering the transition to major capability acquisition. reviews slipped by weeks in April 2025, though approval followed in June, with first fielding targeted for FY2029 amid ongoing budget strains that have historically doomed predecessors like the due to overruns. Robotic Combat Vehicle (RCV) development has similarly stalled under budgetary scrutiny, with the Army canceling a planned prototype award in May 2025 to address developmental and autonomy challenges. Originally envisioning light, medium, and heavy variants, the program consolidated to a single chassis but acknowledged integration hurdles, prompting a pivot to a lower-cost competition under $650,000 per unit by August 2025. FY2025 budget documents highlighted these issues, reflecting congressional concerns over escalating costs in unmanned ground systems. In contrast, the (AMPV) has navigated acquisition more steadily, achieving full-rate production approval in July 2023 and securing a $139.6 million modification in August 2025 for continued output. However, potential reductions in planned quantities to 2,897 units could elevate per-vehicle costs, underscoring persistent budgetary trade-offs across the NGCV family. Overall, these hurdles illustrate causal pressures from finite resources, where empirical assessments of cost-effectiveness have driven cancellations and restructurings to align with evolving warfighting needs.

Technical Failures and Operational Shortcomings

The Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle (OMFV) program, now designated XM30, has encountered technical risks stemming from inadequate validation of core concepts, as highlighted in a 2023 () assessment, which found the Army lacked sufficient evidence for the vehicle's validity and reliability prior to incentivizing industry competition. This deficiency echoes historical NGCV predecessor programs, such as the initiative canceled in 2013 after expending resources on oversized designs (64-84 tons) that struggled to balance protection, mobility, and operational demands across diverse conflict environments. Similarly, the program, terminated in 2009 at a cost of approximately $23 billion, failed due to immature technologies and overambitious integration of networked systems that proved unreliable in testing. The (MPF) program, rebranded as the , exemplified operational shortcomings through progressive weight creep that exceeded airlift requirements, rendering it unsuitable for rapid deployment with units as originally intended. By 2025, the vehicle's mass had ballooned beyond specifications, complicating transport via C-130 and straining logistical infrastructure, while escalating costs and mismatched capabilities—such as limited effectiveness against peer adversaries—prompted the Department of Defense to cancel further production after an investment exceeding $1 billion. These issues arose from flawed initial requirements that prioritized firepower over deployability, resulting in a platform that, despite successful prototyping, could not fulfill missions without imposing undue sustainment burdens. The Robotic Combat Vehicle (RCV) program has faced persistent technical hurdles in achieving reliable autonomy and survivability, with prototypes vulnerable to low-cost drone threats that undermine their scouting and escort roles in contested environments. Industry critiques have centered on the Army's fragmented acquisition strategy for autonomy software, which relies on internal development rather than mature commercial solutions, leading to delays and inconsistent performance in field tests as of 2024. By mid-2025, these shortcomings contributed to the program's second restructuring, halting variant-specific development and shifting to a single, cost-constrained design amid GAO-noted oversight gaps in cost and schedule metrics. Although prototypes demonstrated basic teleoperation and communications resilience, operational integration with manned units remains unproven, exposing risks in networked operations against electronically jammed or kinetically saturated battlefields. Across NGCV efforts, evaluations from 2020 onward have criticized incomplete acquisition planning and inconsistent adherence to best practices, elevating technical risks through rushed prototyping without robust , as evidenced by wide variances in program schedules and underdeveloped cost baselines. For instance, the (AMPV) experienced early powertrain deficiencies in initial low-rate production units, requiring remediation by contractor in 2019, though subsequent adjustments enabled full-rate approval by 2025. These recurring issues underscore a where ambitious and goals outpace technological maturity, often resulting in platforms that fail to achieve mission-capable rates, with five of six ground combat vehicles missing readiness targets in fiscal years reviewed through 2025.

Debates on Relevance in Modern Warfare

The ongoing Russia-Ukraine war has intensified debates over the relevance of heavy armored vehicles in , with empirical evidence from the conflict highlighting vulnerabilities to low-cost threats like FPV drones and anti-tank guided missiles (ATGMs). Russian tank losses exceeded 3,000 by mid-2025, often to inexpensive drones costing under $1,000, prompting analysts to question the survivability of manned platforms without comprehensive countermeasures. This has led critics, including some U.S. observers, to argue that investments in programs like the Next Generation Combat Vehicle (NGCV) risk obsolescence in asymmetric or drone-saturated environments, where precision munitions enable defenders to inflict asymmetric attrition on advancing armor. Proponents counter that such vulnerabilities stem from doctrinal failures rather than inherent flaws in , emphasizing that s and infantry fighting vehicles (IFVs) remain essential for enabling offensive maneuvers and protecting in peer-level conflicts against adversaries like or . In , while drones have proliferated, Russian forces have adapted by reducing exposure and integrating (EW) to jam drone signals, underscoring that unmanned systems are potent but counterable, not revolutionary for land operations. Active protection systems () and explosive reactive armor () upgrades, as pursued in NGCV designs like the XM30, aim to mitigate top-attack threats, allowing vehicles to function as mobile fortresses in urban or contested terrain where requires shielded firepower support. The U.S. Army's cancellation of the (MPF) program—renamed —in May 2025 exemplifies these tensions, with the decision attributed to escalating costs, excessive weight exceeding air-transportability goals, and doubts about light tanks' utility against fortified defenses in high-intensity wars. Critics of manned NGCV elements argue for reallocating funds to robotic combat vehicles (RCVs) and swarms, which reduce human risk and scale more affordably against massed threats, as evidenced by Ukraine's rapid iteration of unmanned systems outpacing traditional procurement. However, Army leadership maintains that optionally manned platforms like the XM30 integrate unmanned capabilities for dominance, providing the protected mobility drones alone cannot achieve in breakthrough operations or sustained engagements. These debates reflect broader causal realities: while excel in reconnaissance and attrition, armored vehicles offer kinetic mass and endurance under fire, with demonstrating that neither obviates the other but requires doctrinal evolution for mutual reinforcement. Think tanks like note that early-war tank skepticism overlooked their role in later mechanized advances, suggesting NGCV's focus on networking and could restore relevance if paired with robust and air defense. Yet, persistent U.S. doctrinal lags in small integration raise questions about whether NGCV adequately prioritizes hybrid threats over legacy heavy formations.

Recent Developments and Future Trajectory

Key Milestones and Cancellations (2024-2025)

In August 2024, the U.S. received the first prototypes for its Robotic Combat Vehicle (RCV) program from competing vendors, including Oshkosh Defense on August 19, on October 2, and Systems on October 3, marking a key step in evaluating unmanned ground vehicles for enhanced lethality and . These deliveries supported initial mobility testing and feedback, with the planning to select a single vendor for further development in spring 2025. The program, successor to the , experienced a brief delay in its Milestone B approval, originally targeted for April 1, 2025, but achieved on June 12, 2025, transitioning it into the engineering and manufacturing development phase. This approval followed critical design reviews for competitors and , enabling prototype construction slated for delivery in 2026 without altering the overall fielding timeline. ![M10 Booker Mobile Protected Firepower vehicle][float-right] The (MPF) program reached a milestone with delivery of the first vehicle on April 18, 2024, intended as a for brigades. However, on May 1, 2025, Dan Driscoll announced cancellation of the M10 program, citing excessive costs, weight overruns exceeding initial specifications, and inadequate repair rights negotiation, as part of broader transformation priorities under the Army Transformation Initiative. Official cessation of procurement followed on June 11, 2025, redirecting resources to other capabilities amid fiscal constraints.

Implications for U.S. Army Force Structure and Deterrence

The NGCV portfolio, encompassing programs such as the Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle (OMFV) and Robotic Combat Vehicle (RCV), aims to equip combat teams with platforms offering enhanced , protection, and networked mobility to counter peer adversaries. This modernization supports the U.S. Army's Armored Brigade Combat Teams (ABCTs) by replacing aging systems like the , enabling sustained operations in high-intensity conflicts without necessitating wholesale increases in unit numbers. By prioritizing open architectures and modular upgrades, NGCV facilitates force structure adaptations that emphasize quality over quantity, allowing the Army to maintain 11 ABCTs while integrating unmanned elements to augment manned formations. These capabilities influence broader force design by promoting hybrid manned-unmanned units, as seen in RCV prototypes designed for and lethality support, which reduce personnel exposure and enable smaller, more agile armored elements within Infantry and Brigade Combat Teams. In the context of the Army's 2024 force structure transformation, which reduces certain legacy formations to fund multi-domain enablers, NGCV offsets potential capability gaps by delivering in , ensuring ABCTs remain viable for theater-level maneuver despite a projected end strength of around 445,000 active soldiers by FY2025. For deterrence, NGCV restores technological edges eroded by legacy vehicle vulnerabilities, such as limited protection against modern anti-tank threats, thereby bolstering the Army's contribution to integrated deterrence against and through credible ground dominance in operations. Programs like the (MPF), fielded to airborne and units since 2023, exemplify this by providing direct fire support to expeditionary forces, enhancing forward-deployed deterrence in regions like the without relying on heavier, less deployable assets. Underfunding risks, as highlighted in analyses, could undermine this posture by delaying fielding, potentially signaling weakness to adversaries; however, successful prototyping and middle-tier acquisitions since 2020 mitigate such delays, projecting initial operational capability for OMFV variants by the late .

References

  1. [1]
    Army re-envisions land warfare with Next Generation Combat Vehicles
    May 6, 2022 · OMFVs, which are presently in a digitally engineered blueprint phase but are set to progress into a prototyping phase in 2023, will not simply ...
  2. [2]
    Next Generation Combat Vehicles: As Army Prioritizes Rapid ...
    Aug 6, 2020 · The Army is developing a portfolio of Next Generation Combat Vehicles to provide more firepower, protection, and mobility.
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Army Modernization in Next-Generation Vehicles Will Change the ...
    Therefore the Next-Generation Combat Vehicle (NGCV) cross-functional team (CFT) is the Army's No. 2 modernization priority. Established in 2017 by then ...
  4. [4]
    Next Generation Combat Vehicle must be effective in megacities ...
    Next Generation Combat Vehicle must be effective in megacities, FORSCOM commander says. By David Vergun, Army News ServiceDecember 1, 2017.
  5. [5]
    New Mechanized Infantry Combat Vehicle prototype contract ...
    Jun 26, 2023 · The Next Generation Combat Vehicle program aims at updating several vehicles and weapons platforms used in the Army today. Part of advancing ...
  6. [6]
    https://www.armyrecognition.com/focus-analysis-conflicts/army/defence-security-industry-technology/future-u-s-army-infantry-fighting-vehicle-xm30-designed-to-survive-modern-battlefields
  7. [7]
    The Army's Robotic Combat Vehicle (RCV) Program - Congress.gov
    May 20, 2025 · The Robotic Combat Vehicle (RCV) has transitioned from a family of light, medium, and heavy variants to a single vehicle approach with a common chassis.
  8. [8]
    AMPV transitions, NGCV continues future focus | Article - Army.mil
    Jun 1, 2023 · The Next Generation Combat Vehicles Cross-Functional Team (NGCV CFT) continues to build momentum to design and deliver future vehicles the Army will field in ...Missing: program | Show results with:program
  9. [9]
    Next Generation Combat Vehicles Cross-Functional Team (NGCV ...
    The U.S. Army has taken delivery of eight Robotic Combat Vehicle (RCV) prototypes that will be used in a series of Soldier Touchpoints to further... Army ...
  10. [10]
    Combat vehicle testing at Yuma Proving Ground essential to Army ...
    Jul 24, 2025 · ... Next Generation Combat Vehicle Cross Functional Team Integrator. This extends to platforms such as the XM30 Mechanized Infantry Combat ...
  11. [11]
    Preparing for future battlefields: The Next Generation Combat Vehicle
    Sep 17, 2018 · The ongoing efforts of the Next Generation Combat Vehicle Cross-Functional Team will be the focus of a Warrior's Corner presentation on Tuesday, ...
  12. [12]
    Next generation ground combat vehicle key to multi-domain battle ...
    Sep 11, 2019 · Coffman directs the Next Generation Combat Vehicle Cross Functional Team, which leads the Army's effort to modernize its combat vehicles. He ...
  13. [13]
    The Birth of Armored Forces | Article | The United States Army
    The first two companies (200 men) reached the school on February 22, 1918. Because no American-made tanks had reached France, Patton had to rely on twenty-five ...
  14. [14]
    The Evolution of the American Tank - Popular Mechanics
    Feb 12, 2018 · From the trenches of France to the desert of Afghanistan, tanks have been the U.S. Army's armored spearhead for a century.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] US Army History and Role of Armor - DTIC
    US Army Armor School, in 1958, developed combat vehicle design and ... development of the primary armored vehicles the M46, with a new power plant ...<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    Armoured vehicle | History, Types & Uses - Britannica
    In 1960 the U.S. Army fielded the M113, which had a lower silhouette and was considerably lighter. The M113 was the first aluminum-armoured vehicle to be put ...
  17. [17]
    How Bradley Fighting Vehicles Work - Science | HowStuffWorks
    The Bradley Fighting Vehicle entered production in 1981 and became a replacement for the M113. The Bradley is considered to be a more powerful and faster ...
  18. [18]
    Industry readies for key US Army Bradley replacement decision
    Dec 22, 2022 · The service is set to move into the detailed design and prototyping phases of its competition to replace the 40-year-old Bradley infantry fighting vehicle.
  19. [19]
    Why Bradley Fighting Vehicle Remains a Battlefield Favorite Despite ...
    Aug 27, 2025 · Drones and loitering munitions have emerged as significant threats, capable of targeting vulnerable points on armored vehicles. Additionally, ...
  20. [20]
    M1 Abrams Ineffective By 2040 In Fight Against China: Army Study
    Oct 4, 2023 · The Army Science Board highlights how the scale and scope of potential threats to tanks and other armored vehicles only continue to grow. This ...<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    [PDF] TRADOC Pamphlet 525-3-8
    Dec 21, 2018 · In the future environment, characterized by intensive peer and near-peer competition and possible conflict, the U.S. Army must evolve and.
  22. [22]
    Army Wants Armed Ground Robot Prototype by 2019
    Mar 15, 2018 · Army Chief of Staff Mark Milley created the Cross Functional Teams last fall to advance his Big Six modernization priorities. What's called Next ...
  23. [23]
    The Army's Big Six Modernization Priorities - RealClearDefense
    Dec 8, 2017 · The goal: to better resource the Big Six modernization priorities he and Chief of Staff Mark Milley announced in October. “I personally led ...Missing: NGCV | Show results with:NGCV<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    Next-Generation Combat Vehicle Could Replace Aging Bradleys
    which would be called the next-generation combat vehicle — wouldn't be fielded until the late 2020s or 2030s, said Todd Thomas, ...Missing: early | Show results with:early
  25. [25]
    [PDF] GAO-20-579, Next Generation Combat Vehicles: As Army Prioritizes ...
    Aug 6, 2020 · This report examines (1) the acquisition approaches and contracting strategies the Army is considering for the NGCV portfolio, (2) the extent ...
  26. [26]
    US Army's next-gen combat vehicle prototyping to be accelerated
    Feb 15, 2018 · The US Army's prototyping effort to inform a Next-Generation Combat Vehicle will be accelerated, according to fiscal 2019 service budget documents released ...
  27. [27]
    New Next-Gen Combat Vehicle outfit takes on light tank and ...
    Oct 7, 2018 · The Army's new Next-Generation Combat Vehicle's modernization arm is expanding its scope from prototyping next-generation vehicles and ...
  28. [28]
    Army decides to cancel current OMFV solicitation
    Jan 16, 2020 · The US Army canceled today the solicitation for the Section 804 Middle Tier Acquisition (MTA) Rapid Prototyping phase of the Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle ...
  29. [29]
    Next-Generation Combat Vehicles “all about the soldier”: US General
    Jan 30, 2020 · The RCV programme aims to deliver robotic vehicles to the US Army in three different weight categories; light, which is around five to seven ...
  30. [30]
    https://www.gao.gov/assets/710/708369.pdf
  31. [31]
    https://www.gao.gov/recommendations/gao-20-579/recommendation-1
  32. [32]
    US Army's FY22 budget backs modernization, cuts 'down into bone ...
    May 28, 2021 · Weapons and tracked combat vehicle funding is boosted slightly in FY22: The request asks for $3.8 billion over the $3.6 billion approved in FY21 ...
  33. [33]
    Upgrading the U.S. Army Arsenal: New Generation of Combat ...
    Oct 18, 2023 · The Army announced in June that American Rheinmetall Vehicles and General Dynamics Land Systems will build prototypes of the XM30. A winner ...
  34. [34]
    Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle (AMPV) - BAE Systems
    The AMPV FOV consists of five, multi-mission variants including the General Purpose, Mortar Carrier, Mission Command, Medical Treatment and Medical ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  35. [35]
    Army awards full rate production contract for AMPV
    Aug 31, 2023 · The AMPV addresses the M113's shortcomings in survivability and force protection; mobility and power; and features the ability to incorporate ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  36. [36]
    AMPV: Bringing flexible, multi-mission capabilities to the U.S. Army
    Apr 3, 2018 · BAE Systems' five variant AMPV is a fully modern, highly flexible vehicle designed to replace the Vietnam War-era M113 family of vehicles. It is ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle (AMPV)
    The proposed action is the execution of the Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle (AMPV) program which includes production, testing, training, fielding and operation, ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] The Army's Armored Multi Purpose Vehicle (AMPV) - DTIC
    Jan 25, 2021 · The Mortar Carrier variant accommodates two crew members, two mortar crew members, one mounted 120 mm mortar, 69 rounds of 120 mm ammunition, ...Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
  39. [39]
    BAE Systems delivers new prototype Armored Multi-Purpose ...
    Mar 6, 2024 · By using a fielded and fully-qualified asset like the AMPV chassis, it gives the Army options to field combat capabilities—such as the Patria ...
  40. [40]
    BAE Systems rolls out first AMPV to U.S. Army under EMD contract
    Dec 15, 2016 · ... schedule. "We have the best Army in the world, bar none," said ... June 26, 2023Army announces contract awards for OMFV · June 8, 2023 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  41. [41]
    U.S. Army awards BAE Systems $797 million contract to begin full ...
    Sep 1, 2023 · The Army first awarded BAE Systems the AMPV contract in 2014 and signed a low-rate initial production (LRIP) contract in 2018. The first LRIP ...
  42. [42]
    Army delivers newest combat vehicle | Article | The United States Army
    Mar 14, 2023 · ... Next Generation Combat Vehicle Cross Functional Team, both headquartered in Warren, Michigan. VARIANTS. The M1283 General Purpose (GP) ...
  43. [43]
    U.S. Army awards BAE Systems $754 million for second phase of ...
    Mar 28, 2024 · This contract begins the second phase of full-rate production of AMPVs between March 2026 and February 2027.
  44. [44]
    BAE Systems receives order to produce additional Armored Multi ...
    Oct 9, 2024 · AE Systems has received a $184 million contract modification to produce an additional 48 Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicles (AMPV) for the U.S. Army
  45. [45]
    U.S. Army buys more AMPV tracked vehicles - Defence Blog
    Aug 2, 2025 · Modified date: Aug 2, 2025. File photo by Sgt. Bernabe Lopez. The U.S. Army has awarded BAE Systems a $139.6 million contract modification for ...
  46. [46]
    Spartan Brigade becomes second brigade to receive and train on ...
    Sep 10, 2024 · The AMPV is the U.S. Army's program to replace the legacy fleet of Vietnam War-era M113 Armored Personnel Carriers, and integrate them into ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  47. [47]
    BAE Systems and Forterra join forces to develop autonomous ...
    Sep 30, 2025 · BAE Systems and Forterra are collaborating to rapidly prototype an autonomous Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle (AMPV).Missing: program | Show results with:program
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle (AMPV)
    Option Year 1 of the STS/STSS/PPTS contract was awarded in July 2022. For overall program system performance, the PM meets all APB KPP threshold requirements.Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline<|separator|>
  49. [49]
    XM30 enters prototyping phase: Bradley successor taking shape
    Oct 10, 2025 · The prototypes will undergo an intensive Army testing and evaluation process through mid-2027, including a Limited User Test (LUT) late in the ...Missing: NGCV | Show results with:NGCV
  50. [50]
    The Army's XM-30 Mechanized Infantry Combat Vehicle (Formerly ...
    Jun 16, 2025 · Reportedly, the Army missed its Milestone B decision to transition the XM-30 to a Major Defense Acquisition Program (MDAP) on April 1, 2025 ...Missing: NGCV | Show results with:NGCV
  51. [51]
    XM30 Bradley IFV Replacement Detailed - Defense Security Monitor
    Jul 3, 2023 · The XM30 will have a crew of two: A commander/gunner and the driver, supported by advanced autonomy technologies. It will be able to carry six ...
  52. [52]
    Two industry teams to begin bending metal for Bradley replacement
    Jun 12, 2025 · The XM30 was recently called out in a memo issued by the Army secretary as a program the service is keen on accelerating, along with a ...
  53. [53]
    US Army to receive first XM30 infantry vehicle prototype from ...
    Oct 12, 2025 · General Dynamics will begin delivering XM30 Infantry Combat Vehicle prototypes to the U.S. Army in July 2026, replacing the M2 Bradley under ...
  54. [54]
    The XM913 Bushmaster® Chain Gun® Developed for the U.S. ...
    The XM30 Mechanized Infantry Combat Vehicle (ICV) program is replacing the M2 Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle (IFV) and is designed to increase soldiers' ...
  55. [55]
    XM30 Combat Vehicle | Raytheon - RTX
    The XM30 Combat Vehicle is a next-generation, tracked, armored fighting vehicle designed to address the critical challenges of the future battlefield.
  56. [56]
    Integris Composites Joins US XM30 Combat Vehicle Program
    Oct 14, 2025 · In May 2025, the US Army used virtual simulations to integrate real-time soldier feedback into digital twin models of the XM30. The aim was to ...
  57. [57]
    Integris Composites Named Armor Partner for U.S. Army XM30
    Oct 14, 2025 · Integris Composites joins American Rheinmetall as an armor partner for the U.S. Army's $45B XM30 Combat Vehicle program, showcasing innovation ...
  58. [58]
    Army takes delivery of first M10 Booker Combat Vehicle | Article
    Apr 18, 2024 · The M10 Booker will provide IBCTs with mobile, protected direct-fire capability to apply lethal and sustained long-range fires to light armored vehicles.
  59. [59]
    Army renames Mobile Protected Firepower 'M10 Booker combat ...
    Jun 10, 2023 · The Mobile Protected Firepower (MPF) “light tank” has been rebranded the M10 Booker combat vehicle, named after two fallen soldiers who died 60 years apart.Missing: developments | Show results with:developments
  60. [60]
    M10 Booker: Get Ready for the U.S. Army's New 'Light Tank'
    The M10 Booker is fitted with a 105mm M35 main gun, which is notably more powerful than the service's existing M2/3 Bradley infantry fighting vehicle, which ...Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
  61. [61]
    M10 Booker Ground Combat Vehicle, US - Army Technology
    Jul 19, 2024 · The vehicle was purpose-built for the US Army's IBCTs to provide them with decisive lethality, mobility, and survivability.
  62. [62]
    The Army's M-10 Booker (Formerly Known as Mobile Protected ...
    Jul 8, 2025 · On June 28, 2022, the Army announced the award of a $1.14 billion contract to GDLS for the production and fielding of up to 96 M-10 systems ( ...Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
  63. [63]
    The Army made a tank it doesn't need and can't use. Now it's figuring ...
    Apr 27, 2025 · The M10 Booker busted its requirements from the beginning. It's a case study in how Army procurement wants to change.
  64. [64]
    Canceled M10 Booker Holds Lessons for Transformation - AUSA
    Aug 28, 2025 · The Booker met the same fate. Marketed as a mobile, C-130 transportable direct fire capability for infantry brigade combat teams, the system ...Missing: MPF details<|separator|>
  65. [65]
    Army to cease procurement of M10 Booker Combat Vehicles
    Jun 11, 2025 · Formerly known as the Mobile Protected Firepower, the M10 Booker low-rate initial production contract was awarded in June 2022 to General ...Missing: tank | Show results with:tank
  66. [66]
    Dead on arrival: Army pulls plug on M10 Booker light tank
    Jun 12, 2025 · The service noted its plans to cancel the M10 Booker procurement in a memo issued at the start of last month and on June 11 officially announced ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] The Army's Robotic Combat Vehicle (RCV) Program - Congress.gov
    Jan 16, 2025 · The Robotic Combat Vehicle (RCV) has transitioned from a family of light, medium, and heavy variants to a single vehicle approach with a common ...
  68. [68]
    GVSC, NGCV CFT announces RCV Light and Medium award ...
    Jan 10, 2020 · ... Functional Team intends to award an Other Transaction Agreement to QinetiQ North America to build four Light and Textron to build four Medium
  69. [69]
    Army moving out with cheaper Robotic Combat Vehicle competition ...
    Aug 18, 2025 · This time around, service officials are eyeing a ground robot with a price tag below $650,000 that can carry a payload of more than 2,200 pounds ...Missing: 2024 | Show results with:2024
  70. [70]
    US Army picks winners to build light and medium robotic combat ...
    Jan 9, 2020 · ... QinetiQ North America to build four RCV-light prototypes and another contract to Textron to build four RCV-medium prototypes, the release stated ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] The Army's Robotic Combat Vehicle (RCV) Program - Congress.gov
    Jan 16, 2025 · The Robotic Combat Vehicle (RCV) has transitioned from a family of light, medium, and heavy variants to a single vehicle approach with a common ...
  72. [72]
    Army selects four companies for Robotic Combat Vehicle prototypes
    Sep 20, 2023 · The RCV program is part of the Army's “24 in 23” Modernization Signature systems to be in the hands of Soldiers in fiscal year 2023. The ...
  73. [73]
    Textron Systems' Ripsaw 3 Ground Robot Wins US Army's Robotic ...
    Mar 11, 2025 · On January 10, 2020, the Army awarded OTAs to QinetiQ North America (Virginia) and Textron (Rhode Island) to build prototype vehicles for ...
  74. [74]
    RCV programme participants deliver prototypes to US Army
    Oct 7, 2024 · The Army intend to develop three RCV variants: Light, Medium, and Heavy. After the first prototype phase, the Army then plans to initiate a ...
  75. [75]
    Army Receives New Robot Combat Vehicle Prototypes
    Oct 11, 2024 · A full-on production decision is expected to occur in 2027, followed by the first RCV unit fielding that is anticipated to occur by fiscal year ...
  76. [76]
    US Army Seeks Ground Drone Prototype for Brigade-Level Support
    Aug 21, 2025 · The service originally planned to adopt light, medium, and heavy RCV variants capable of air transport and weighing from 10 to 30 tons (9,072 to ...
  77. [77]
    US Taps Consortium for Army's Robotic Combat Vehicle Software ...
    Apr 4, 2024 · The US has teamed with eight industry partners to prototype autonomous software and processes for the army's Robotic Combat Vehicle (RCV) program.
  78. [78]
    Army's new M10 Booker combat vehicle could receive AI upgrades ...
    Jun 10, 2023 · The design includes armor, smoke grenade launchers, blowoff panels, and automatic fire suppression intended to enhance survivability against ...
  79. [79]
    The Latest on U.S. Robotic Combat Vehicle Capabilities - IDGA
    Mar 4, 2024 · This article will analyze where the Army currently is in its efforts to create a next-generation RCV and the expected timeline for a new RCV to be used in the ...
  80. [80]
    Next Generation Combat Vehicles to replace Bradley starting fiscal ...
    Nov 3, 2018 · The Bradley Fighting Vehicle no longer has decisive overmatch in lethality and protection and has reached the limits of its growth capacity, he ...Missing: enhancements | Show results with:enhancements
  81. [81]
    [PDF] GVSC Planned Combat Vehicle Electrification and Mobility ... - DTIC
    May 30, 2019 · System will improve sprint 30% = 60% fewer hits and ~30x more electrical power for emerging capabilities, 40% increased range.
  82. [82]
    [PDF] Combat Vehicle Developments to - Fort Benning
    The next generation of combat vehicles is being developed with a partnership that stretches across the Army and beyond: • The Maneuver Center of Excellence is ...
  83. [83]
    [PDF] NEXT GENERATION COMBAT VEHICLES As Army Prioritizes ...
    Aug 6, 2020 · This report examines (1) the acquisition approaches and contracting strategies the Army is considering for the NGCV portfolio, (2) the extent to ...
  84. [84]
    Army engineers field-test robotic combat vehicle communications
    May 18, 2021 · Army engineers evaluated methods to improve the radio performance of Robotic Combat Vehicles (RCVs) during a field-based experiment here.
  85. [85]
    U.S. Army taps Persistent Systems to develop secure comms for ...
    Feb 11, 2020 · The Army envisions a next-generation Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle (OMFV) that can be networked with up to four unmanned Remote Combat ...<|separator|>
  86. [86]
    Report to Congress on Army Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle ...
    Apr 20, 2021 · In June 2018, in part due to congressional concerns, the Army announced a new modernization strategy and designated the Next Generation Combat ...
  87. [87]
    Bradley out, XM-30 in: US Army's biggest combat vehicle buy ever
    Jan 30, 2025 · The XM-30 is positioned as a next-generation military platform capable of operating with either a full crew or autonomously, depending on mission requirements.
  88. [88]
    Artificial Intelligence of Maneuver and Mobility (AIMM)
    AIMM drives ground autonomy, supports Next Generation Combat Vehicles, and aims for autonomous systems to adapt for reconnaissance missions by 2025.
  89. [89]
    Initial prototypes for Next-Gen Combat Vehicle to focus on manned ...
    Mar 26, 2018 · As the Army drives toward a Next-Generation Combat Vehicle capability, leaders have outlined plans to test key features that could one day ...
  90. [90]
    Army assesses network needs for manned-unmanned teaming | Article
    Coffman, director of the Next Generation Combat Vehicle, or NGCV, CFT. Ten ... combat with autonomous systems while remaining safely outside of enemy range.
  91. [91]
    AI-enabled ground combat vehicles demonstrate agility and synergy ...
    Nov 1, 2021 · The new vehicles undergoing testing include the Army's Robotic Combat Vehicle, Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle and Next Generation Tank.
  92. [92]
    Anduril to supply robotic combat vehicle software to US Army
    Apr 3, 2024 · Anduril to supply robotic combat vehicle software to US Army ... A Robotic Combat Vehicle Light prototype is seen at the National Training Center ...
  93. [93]
    Army engineers field-test robotic combat vehicle communications
    May 18, 2021 · Army engineers evaluated methods to improve the radio performance of Robotic Combat Vehicles (RCVs) during a field-based experiment here.<|control11|><|separator|>
  94. [94]
    BAE Systems, Forterra join forces for autonomous AMPV prototype
    Sep 30, 2025 · RELATED: Frustrations mount over Army's Robotic Combat Vehicle autonomy, acquisition approach. In regards to Forterra's responsibility of ...
  95. [95]
    US Army to test first autonomous AMPV prototype by 2026
    Oct 1, 2025 · It has been used in Department of Defense initiatives such as the Robotic Combat Vehicle, Autonomous Transport Vehicle System (also known as ...
  96. [96]
    Building better land systems: Software-defined, hardware-enabled
    Oct 9, 2023 · ... XM30 Mechanized Infantry Combat Vehicle and Robotic Combat Vehicle, which will help the Army maintain close combat overmatch against ...<|separator|>
  97. [97]
    Strained Army Budget Leaves Experts Wary of Modernization Projects
    Aug 15, 2024 · ... budgetary constraints have played a role in many recent Army modernization program cancellations. ... XM30 Mechanized Infantry Combat Vehicle.
  98. [98]
    Canceled Army Assault Vehicle M10 Booker Outgrew Its Worth
    Jul 8, 2025 · The M10 Booker armored vehicle is among the programs the Army has put on the chopping block as part of its new transformation initiative.
  99. [99]
    'We Got It Wrong': M10 Booker Light Tank 'Axed' By US Army
    Jun 16, 2025 · The United States Army spent well over a billion dollars on a light tank, but the Army is now terminating the program just as it was slated to ...
  100. [100]
    XM30 delay caused by non-MOSA-compliant software, GAO says
    Jun 13, 2025 · The Army's delay in pivoting the XM30 to a major capability acquisition pathway was caused by software and hardware from competing vendors.
  101. [101]
    Milestone B delay for Bradley replacement competition will not ...
    Apr 24, 2025 · The US Army slightly delayed the critical design reviews for two companies vying to win its M2 Bradley Fighting Vehicle replacement program.
  102. [102]
    After slight delay, Army approves XM30 Milestone B
    Jun 12, 2025 · After slight delay, Army approves XM30 Milestone B. The decision comes after critical design reviews of both the American Rheinmetall and ...Missing: restructuring 2020-2023
  103. [103]
    Army to cancel planned Robotic Combat Vehicle award, pause ...
    May 2, 2025 · An Army two-star general has told staff that the service expects to halt work on its embattled Robotic Combat Vehicle (RCV) program and pause a new howitzer ...
  104. [104]
    Frustrations mount over Army's Robotic Combat Vehicle autonomy ...
    Jul 22, 2024 · Despite the challenges, Norman expressed cautious optimism about the RCV program. Four other service leaders agreed, while all citing an ...
  105. [105]
    [PDF] Modernized Selected Acquisition Report (MSAR) Armored Multi ...
    Dec 31, 2023 · Finally, Option Year. 2 was awarded to the FRP contract on March 13, 2024. To date, 394 AMPVs are on the FRP contract. There was one mark ...
  106. [106]
    [PDF] The Army's Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle (AMPV) - Congress.gov
    Mar 15, 2024 · If approved AMPV acquisition quantities remain at 2,897 vehicles, there could be cost implications resulting from higher per-vehicle costs ...
  107. [107]
    GAO: next gen fighting vehicle programme lacks validity and reliability
    Jun 28, 2023 · US Army incentivises competition for the OMFV programme – despite its lack of evidence for the concept's validity and reliability.
  108. [108]
    [PDF] Technical Challenges of the U.S. Army's Ground Combat Vehicle ...
    The GCV program faces technical challenges due to its large size (64-84 tons), the need for protection, and the ability to operate across various conflict ...
  109. [109]
    The Army cancels the M10 Booker, a 'light tank' that was too heavy
    May 2, 2025 · The Army has officially killed further delivers of the M10 Booker, canceling not just a billion-dollar program to build a heavily-armed vehicle for fast-moving ...<|separator|>
  110. [110]
    The U.S. Army's M10 Booker 'Light Tank' Mistake Still Stings
    Sep 5, 2025 · Officials cited weight creep that made the vehicle too heavy for its intended airlift role, as well as infrastructure problems and rising costs ...
  111. [111]
    Drones are forcing the Army to rethink its robotic combat vehicles ...
    May 27, 2025 · The RCV concept is "incredibly invaluable" but vulnerable to cheap drone attacks, officials say. Four prototypes were developed as part of the ...Missing: failures | Show results with:failures
  112. [112]
    [PDF] GAO-20-439, DEFENSE ACQUISITIONS ANNUAL ASSESSMENT
    Jun 3, 2020 · However, the Navy's cost analysis showed that CVN 80 and 81 have a high likelihood of experiencing cost overruns, and it is uncertain whether.
  113. [113]
    Army engineers field-test robotic combat vehicle communications
    May 18, 2021 · The experiment focused on protected communications for tele-operating robotic combat vehicles under the Next Generation Combat Vehicles Cross-Functional Team's ...Missing: failures | Show results with:failures
  114. [114]
    Army official: BAE fixing issues with AMPV power train in first vehicles
    Feb 28, 2019 · An Army official says Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle maker BAE Systems is mitigating "a handful of items" identified as issues with the ...
  115. [115]
    Various Challenges Affect Ground Vehicles' Availability for Missions
    Sep 25, 2025 · Five of six selected Army ground combat vehicles did not meet mission capable goals in any fiscal year (FY) during the time frame of GAO's ...Missing: NGCV criticisms
  116. [116]
    Tank Warfare and the Changing Face of Combat
    Aug 8, 2025 · The case of the Russia-Ukraine war illustrates both the deployment of tanks in modern warfare and, as a system, its exposed vulnerabilities ...
  117. [117]
    Are Tanks Still Relevant in Modern Warfare? Lessons from Ukraine
    Jul 1, 2025 · Are Tanks Still Relevant in Modern Warfare? Explore how tanks are evolving to stay relevant amid drones, missiles, and urban combat threats.
  118. [118]
    [PDF] The Implications of the Fighting in Ukraine for Future U.S.-Involved ...
    May 22, 2025 · initial phases of the war prompted significant debate over the continued relevance of tanks, with some analysts suggesting that heavy ...
  119. [119]
    Drones Are Game-Changing, But They Are Not the Answer to the ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · Drones and drone warfare, however, are not revolutionizing warfare, at least in land wars, in a strategic way. That is, drones and drone warfare ...
  120. [120]
    UNMANNED SYSTEMS ARE NOT REVOLUTIONARY (BUT COULD ...
    May 8, 2025 · Drone swarms will be revolutionary in that opponents who lack the same capabilities will be overwhelmed by speed and numbers. Only states that ...
  121. [121]
    Tanks take a sharp turn to remain relevant
    May 13, 2024 · Tanks equipped with APS become veritable assets in urban warfare, acting as fortresses that can protect nearby vehicles.
  122. [122]
    APS and ERA developments - Euro-sd
    Jan 21, 2025 · AFVs are now threatened from all directions, including from above through top-attack munitions. The modern battlefield for armoured vehicles is ...<|separator|>
  123. [123]
    With the official cancellation of production contracts, the U.S. Army ...
    Jun 13, 2025 · The United States Army, in a decision that continues to cause surprise and controversy, announced the cancellation of its Combat Vehicle Program, or light tank ...Missing: debates warfare
  124. [124]
    Technological Evolution on the Battlefield - CSIS
    Sep 16, 2025 · As AI-enabled drones have gotten good at locating tanks and armored vehicles, the Russian military has switched to donkeys and horses for moving ...
  125. [125]
    The Army's Race to Catch Up in a World of Deadly Drones
    Oct 9, 2025 · Some former Army officials criticized General George's plans, in interviews with The New York Times, as too reliant on unproven technology.
  126. [126]
    How Did the World's Most Sophisticated Military Fall So Far Behind ...
    Aug 27, 2025 · “The incident highlighted what many experts see as a dangerous, 'pre-drone age mindset' within the U.S. military,” wrote David Hambling in a ...
  127. [127]
    OSHKOSH DEFENSE SUBMITS PHASE II PROPOSAL FOR RCV ...
    Sep 12, 2024 · On Monday, August 19, 2024, Oshkosh delivered two RCV Platform Prototypes as part of the Phase I Ground Vehicle Systems (GVS) Other Transaction ...
  128. [128]
    General Dynamics Land Systems Delivers TRX Prototypes for U.S. ...
    Oct 2, 2024 · General Dynamics Land Systems Delivers TRX Prototypes for U.S. Army's Robotic Combat Vehicle Competition. October 2, 2024. Contact: Robin Porter ...
  129. [129]
    RIPSAW® M3 prototypes sent for RCV Program - Textron Systems
    Oct 3, 2024 · Textron Systems, Howe & Howe and Teledyne Flir Defense Deliver Ripsaw® M3 Prototypes For U.S. Army Robotic Combat Vehicle (RCV) Program.
  130. [130]
    US Army aims to pick a robotic combat vehicle vendor next spring
    Oct 16, 2024 · The Army plans to choose next spring one winner out of four vendors competing to build the base platform for its Robotic Combat Vehicle, or RCV.Missing: milestones | Show results with:milestones
  131. [131]
    Department of Defense (DOD) FY 2025 Program ... - Congress.gov
    Reportedly, the Army missed its Milestone B decision to transition the XM-30 to a Major Defense Acquisition Program (MDAP) on April 1, 2025, and now intends to ...
  132. [132]
    An Army Modernization Update | AUSA
    Nov 18, 2024 · These are the six modernization priorities that we discussed previously. ... [4] “Army Makes United Network a Top Priority,” National Defense ...Missing: NGCV | Show results with:NGCV
  133. [133]
    Underfunding the Army Has Risky Implications - AUSA
    Jan 11, 2023 · NGCV programs will allow the Army to deliver increased firepower from more survivable platforms. From OMFV to RCV, they include substantial ...