Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Cognitive radio

Cognitive radio is a paradigm in wireless communications wherein transceivers intelligently sense the radio-frequency environment to identify unused spectrum bands, known as white spaces, and dynamically adapt transmission parameters to exploit these opportunities without causing interference to primary users.^[1]^[2] The concept was first articulated by Joseph Mitola III in his 2000 doctoral dissertation, building on software-defined radio foundations to enable context-aware, learning-based reconfiguration.^[3]^[4] At its core, cognitive radio facilitates dynamic spectrum access (DSA), allowing secondary users—such as unlicensed devices—to opportunistically transmit in licensed bands when primary licensees are inactive, thereby addressing empirical evidence of spectrum underutilization documented in regulatory studies.^[5]^[6] Key mechanisms include spectrum sensing techniques (e.g., energy detection or cooperative sensing) to reliably identify idle channels and reconfigurability to adjust modulation, power, and frequency in real time, often leveraging machine learning for enhanced decision-making.^[7] This approach contrasts with static spectrum allocation, which causal analysis shows leads to inefficient usage due to fixed licensing despite variable demand patterns.^[8] Notable achievements include enabling higher throughput in cognitive radio networks through DSA, with peer-reviewed simulations demonstrating capacity gains of up to several fold in underutilized bands, and practical deployments in applications like wireless regional area networks (IEEE 802.22 standard) and integration with IoT for energy-efficient spectrum sharing.^[9] Regulatory endorsements, such as FCC permissions for TV white space devices, underscore its role in causal spectrum efficiency improvements, though implementation challenges persist in achieving robust interference avoidance amid imperfect sensing.^[6]^[10]

Definition and Principles

Core Definition

Cognitive radio (CR) is an adaptive wireless communication system built on software-defined radio (SDR) platforms, enabling transceivers to intelligently detect available spectrum bands, adjust transmission and reception parameters dynamically, and operate in underutilized frequency allocations while minimizing interference with licensed primary users.^[11] This capability addresses spectrum scarcity by facilitating opportunistic access to "white spaces"—unused portions of the licensed spectrum—through environmental awareness and decision-making processes that mimic human cognition, such as sensing, analysis, and adaptation.^[11] The concept integrates model-based reasoning to optimize radio resource management, allowing the system to learn from interactions and improve performance over time without fixed hardware reconfiguration.^[4] The term "cognitive radio" was introduced by Joseph Mitola III in his 2000 doctoral dissertation, where he envisioned it as an evolution of SDR incorporating artificial intelligence elements for autonomous operation in complex electromagnetic environments.^[12] Unlike traditional radios with static allocations, CR systems exhibit key attributes: awareness of surrounding radio conditions via spectrum sensing, understanding of internal capabilities and user objectives, and the ability to reason about actions to meet goals like quality of service or energy efficiency.^[13] Formal definitions emphasize its role in dynamic spectrum access (DSA), where secondary users opportunistically transmit only when primary signals are absent, as quantified by detection thresholds in sensing algorithms that achieve probabilities of detection above 0.9 and false alarms below 0.1 in practical implementations.^[14] At its core, CR operates through a cycle of observation (e.g., measuring signal energy or features), orientation (modeling the spectrum state), decision (selecting channels or modulation schemes), and action (reconfiguring parameters), enabling reconfiguration at rates up to milliseconds for real-time adaptation.^[15] This framework, rooted in first principles of signal processing and machine learning, has been validated in standards like IEEE 802.22, which specifies CR for TV white space usage with transmit powers up to 100 mW in rural deployments since its 2011 ratification.^[16] Empirical studies confirm CR's potential to increase spectrum utilization from under 5-10% in fixed allocations to over 50% in dynamic scenarios, though challenges like hidden node problems necessitate robust interference mitigation.^[17]

Fundamental Principles

The fundamental principles of cognitive radio revolve around enabling intelligent, adaptive use of radio spectrum to address inefficiencies in traditional fixed allocation schemes, where much spectrum remains underutilized despite growing demand for wireless services. Proposed by Joseph Mitola III in his 1999 keynote at the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, cognitive radio introduces a paradigm of dynamic spectrum access (DSA) that allows unlicensed secondary users to opportunistically exploit temporarily idle licensed bands without causing harmful interference to primary users.^[18] This is achieved through a cognitive cycle comprising observation of the radio environment, orientation via analysis, planning and decision-making, and action via reconfiguration, mimicking aspects of human cognition to optimize resource use.^[7] Central to these principles is spectrum sensing, which detects the presence or absence of primary user signals to identify spectrum "white spaces" or idle channels. Common techniques include energy detection, which compares received signal energy against a noise threshold to identify activity—simple and computationally efficient but susceptible to hidden node problems and low signal-to-noise ratios—and cyclostationary feature detection, which exploits periodicities in primary signals for robustness in noisy environments, though it requires prior knowledge of signal characteristics.^[19] Matched filtering, another method, correlates received signals with known primary replicas for optimal detection under Gaussian noise but demands high computational resources and exact signal models.^[19] These sensing mechanisms ensure secondary users vacate channels promptly upon primary reactivation, typically within milliseconds, adhering to regulatory constraints like those in IEEE 802.22 standards for TV white space usage.^[7] Decision-making and adaptation form the reasoning core, where sensed data informs machine learning algorithms or rule-based policies to select optimal transmission parameters such as carrier frequency, bandwidth, modulation scheme, and transmit power. DSA paradigms include interweave (opportunistic access to sensed idle bands), overlay (simultaneous operation with controlled interference mitigation via coding or beamforming), and underlay (low-power underlay transmission treating primary signals as noise).^[19] Adaptation ensures compliance with interference limits, often modeled as maintaining aggregate interference below a threshold (e.g., -114 dBm/Hz in some FCC guidelines for unlicensed devices), while learning from historical data refines future decisions to enhance throughput and reliability.^[7] This closed-loop process prioritizes causal awareness of environmental dynamics over static configurations, enabling spectrum efficiency gains reported up to 3-5 times in simulations of urban deployments.^[19]

Historical Development

Origins in Software-Defined Radio

Software-defined radio (SDR) emerged in the late 1980s and early 1990s as a paradigm shift from hardware-centric radios to systems where signal processing components traditionally implemented in analog or digital hardware—such as modulation, demodulation, and filtering—are performed by software on programmable processors or digital signal processors. This transition, initially driven by military research including U.S. Air Force Rome Laboratories' funding of programmable modems around 1987, enabled greater flexibility in radio reconfiguration, multi-standard operation, and reduced hardware specificity, laying the groundwork for intelligent spectrum management.^[20] By the mid-1990s, SDR architectures demonstrated practical implementations, such as the SPEAKeasy program by the U.S. military, which validated software-based waveform portability across platforms.^[21] Cognitive radio originated as a direct extension of SDR, incorporating autonomous sensing, reasoning, and adaptation to address inefficiencies in spectrum utilization, where licensed bands often remain underused while unlicensed ones face congestion. Joseph Mitola III formalized this concept in his 1999 paper "Cognitive Radio: Making Software Radios More Personal," co-authored with Gerald Q. Maguire Jr. and published in IEEE Personal Communications, defining cognitive radio as an SDR enhanced with model-based reasoning and agent architectures to perceive user needs, environmental conditions, and policy constraints, thereby enabling proactive reconfiguration.^[22] Mitola envisioned cognitive radios as "personal" devices that learn from interactions, drawing on artificial intelligence techniques to optimize parameters like frequency, power, and modulation without human intervention, fundamentally building on SDR's software reconfigurability to introduce environmental awareness.^[23] This evolution was further elaborated in Mitola's 2000 doctoral dissertation at KTH Royal Institute of Technology, titled "Cognitive Radio: An Integrated Agent Architecture for Software Defined Radio," which proposed a unified framework integrating SDR hardware with cognitive engines for tasks like spectrum sensing via receiver reconfiguration and decision-making through inference engines.^[4] Unlike basic SDR, which requires external commands for changes, cognitive radio introduces closed-loop autonomy, where the system observes the radio-frequency environment (e.g., detecting primary user signals), orients via knowledge bases, plans optimal responses, and acts by altering its waveform—all executed in software to minimize interference and maximize efficiency.^[24] Early prototypes in the early 2000s, such as those explored by Mitre Corporation, demonstrated this integration, highlighting SDR's role as the essential enabler for cognitive functions without which hardware limitations would preclude dynamic adaptation.^[22]

Key Milestones and Standardization Efforts

The concept of cognitive radio was formally introduced by Joseph Mitola III in August 1999 through his paper "Cognitive Radio: Making Software Radios More Personal," published in IEEE Personal Communications Magazine, which outlined a framework for radios to autonomously adapt to user needs and environmental conditions using knowledge representation and machine learning elements integrated with software-defined radio architectures.^[25] This built on Mitola's earlier licentiate thesis from September 1999 at KTH Royal Institute of Technology, emphasizing model-based competence for adaptive radio systems.^[23] Regulatory recognition advanced in November 2003 when the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted Notice of Inquiry ET Docket No. 03-322, soliciting comments on employing cognitive radio technologies to enable flexible, efficient spectrum use by secondary users without interfering with primary licensees, including proposals for interference temperature metrics and smart radio systems.^[26] This followed an FCC Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in May 2004 (ET Docket No. 04-186) on unlicensed operations in TV broadcast bands, laying groundwork for dynamic spectrum access demonstrations. Military research, including DARPA's early 2000s efforts in adaptive communications, paralleled these developments, though specific program timelines like the neXt Generation projects emphasized software-defined precursors rather than fully cognitive implementations until later iterations. Standardization efforts gained momentum with the formation of the IEEE 802.22 working group in 2004, culminating in the publication of IEEE Std 802.22-2011 on July 1, 2011, which defined the first worldwide standard for cognitive radio-based wireless regional area networks (WRANs) operating in TV white spaces, incorporating spectrum sensing, geolocation databases, and interference avoidance to enable secondary broadband access in the 54-862 MHz bands. In Europe, the ETSI Technical Committee on Reconfigurable Radio Systems (TC RRS), established around 2008, developed specifications for cognitive pilot channels and functional architectures to support reconfigurable and cognitive operations, with key outputs including ETSI TR 102 802 on cognitive radio system functional architecture published in 2009.^[27] The ITU Radiocommunication Sector (ITU-R) initiated studies on cognitive radio systems (CRS) in the early 2010s through working parties like WP5A, focusing on coexistence frameworks and reporting systems, with recommendations such as ITU-R SM.2152 on CRS definitions issued in 2010 to guide international harmonization.^[28] These efforts prioritized empirical validation of sensing reliability and regulatory compliance over speculative applications, addressing challenges like hidden node problems through hybrid database-assisted and sensing-based approaches.

Technical Foundations

System Architecture

The architecture of a cognitive radio system is modular, integrating reconfigurable hardware with intelligent software components to enable dynamic spectrum access and adaptation to environmental changes. At its core, it relies on a software-defined radio (SDR) platform for the physical layer, which allows flexible reconfiguration of transmission parameters such as frequency, modulation, and power through software control rather than fixed hardware.^[29] This foundation supports the system's ability to operate across multiple bands and modes, addressing spectrum scarcity by opportunistically utilizing underused frequencies.^[22] Key subsystems include the spectrum sensing module, which monitors the radio environment to detect primary users and assess spectrum availability using techniques like energy detection or feature analysis, providing real-time data on occupancy and interference levels.^[29] The cognitive engine, often implemented as an optimization algorithm or machine learning-based decision maker, processes this sensory input alongside internal state information (e.g., battery levels, traffic demands) and environmental models to select optimal operating parameters, such as channel allocation or waveform adaptation.^[22] A policy engine complements the cognitive engine by enforcing regulatory constraints, validating decisions against predefined rules to prevent interference with licensed users.^[29] These components interact in a feedback loop: spectrum sensing feeds data to the cognitive engine for analysis and decision-making, which is then checked by the policy engine before reconfiguration commands are sent to the SDR hardware.^[29] In network contexts, the architecture extends to include inter-node coordination for spectrum sharing and mobility, where secondary users maintain connectivity by handing off to available channels upon detecting primary user activity.^[30] This layered design—spanning physical reconfiguration, cognitive processing, and policy oversight—enables autonomous operation while prioritizing interference avoidance, as demonstrated in prototype frameworks using ontologies for knowledge representation and rule-based reasoning.^[22]

Spectrum Sensing Techniques

Spectrum sensing constitutes a fundamental process in cognitive radio systems, wherein secondary users ascertain the occupancy status of spectrum bands licensed to primary users, enabling opportunistic access to underutilized frequencies while minimizing interference. This detection relies on analyzing received signals to distinguish primary transmissions from noise and secondary activity, typically formulated as a binary hypothesis test: absence (white space) or presence of primary signals. Performance metrics include probability of detection (Pd, correct identification of primary presence) and probability of false alarm (Pfa, erroneous detection of presence), with Pd targeted above 0.9 and Pfa below 0.1 under varying signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs).^[31]^[32] Primary non-cooperative techniques dominate due to their autonomy, categorized into energy detection (ED), matched filter (MF), and cyclostationary feature detection (CFD). ED aggregates signal energy over a bandwidth W and time T, yielding test statistic Y = \sum_{n=1}^{N} |r(n)|^2 compared against threshold \lambda, where N = TW samples. Optimal under unknown signals, ED demands low complexity (order O(N)) and no a priori primary knowledge, but degrades at low SNRs (e.g., Pd drops below 0.5 at -15 dB without enhancements) due to noise uncertainty and inability to discriminate modulated signals from interference.^[33]^[34]^[35] MF maximizes SNR by correlating received samples r(t) with known primary template s(t), as Y = \int r(t) s^*(t) dt, attaining theoretical bounds like Neyman-Pearson optimality for white Gaussian noise at high SNRs (e.g., requiring only $10 \log_{10}(1/\text{Pd}) / \text{SNR} samples for target Pd). Its drawbacks encompass demands for precise signal priors (structure, phase, timing), vulnerability to synchronization errors, and elevated complexity (order O(N) per symbol but iterative for unknowns), rendering it impractical for diverse primary waveforms.^[36]^[37] CFD leverages the cyclostationarity of primary signals—manifesting as non-zero cyclic autocorrelation R_x^\alpha(\tau) = E[x(t+\tau/2) x^*(t-\tau/2) e^{-j2\pi \alpha t}] at cyclic frequencies \alpha (e.g., multiples of baud rate)—to filter stationary noise, yielding robust Pd (e.g., >0.9 at -10 dB SNR) even under colored noise or hidden terminals. Computationally intensive (order O(N \log N) via FFT for spectral correlation function), it necessitates cyclic spectrum knowledge, prolonging sensing time (milliseconds to seconds) and limiting real-time viability without approximations.^[38]^[39]^[40] Cooperative sensing mitigates individual limitations like shadowing via data fusion (e.g., AND, OR, majority rules) from multiple nodes, enhancing Pd by 20-30% in multipath fading per simulations, though it incurs communication overhead and centralization risks. Hybrid approaches, combining ED with CFD for initial coarse then fine detection, balance trade-offs, achieving Pd >0.95 at -12 dB SNR in IEEE 802.22 trials. Challenges persist in low-SNR regimes and mobility, spurring machine learning integrations for adaptive thresholds.^[41]^[42]^[43]

Cognitive Functions and Decision-Making

Cognitive functions in cognitive radio systems enable adaptive behavior by processing environmental observations to optimize spectrum utilization. These functions typically encompass spectrum sensing to detect primary user activity, environmental modeling for situational awareness, and iterative decision-making to select transmission parameters such as frequency, power, and modulation scheme.^[44] The core process follows a cognitive cycle, often simplified by Haykin as observe-decide-act-learn, where observation involves radio frequency (RF) stimuli collection, decision evaluates options against goals like interference minimization, action implements reconfiguration, and learning refines models from outcomes.^[45] Decision-making in cognitive radio integrates multi-attribute analysis to balance factors including spectrum availability, signal quality, and energy efficiency. Algorithms such as fuzzy logic, game-theoretic models, and reinforcement learning are employed; for instance, Tsukamoto's fuzzy method aggregates attributes like channel idle time and interference levels to rank spectrum options probabilistically.^[46] Multiple-attribute dynamic spectrum decision-making frameworks evaluate alternatives using utility functions, prioritizing channels with high throughput potential while adhering to interference thresholds, as demonstrated in simulations achieving up to 20% improvement in spectrum efficiency over static allocation.^[47] Belief-based approaches enhance robustness by incorporating uncertainty in sensing data, updating probabilistic models via Bayesian inference to inform reconfiguration decisions in dynamic environments.^[48] Learning mechanisms within the cognitive cycle enable long-term adaptation, such as through machine learning paradigms that predict primary user patterns from historical sensing data. Reinforcement learning agents, for example, maximize cumulative rewards by trial-and-error adjustment of actions, with Q-learning variants shown to converge on optimal policies in under 1000 episodes for Markov decision processes modeling spectrum handoffs.^[49] Challenges in decision-making include computational complexity and hidden terminal problems, where imperfect sensing leads to false decisions; cooperative sensing mitigates this by fusing reports from multiple nodes, reducing error probabilities by factors of 10-50 dB in aggregate detection thresholds.^[33] These functions collectively aim for causal efficiency in spectrum access, grounded in empirical RF measurements rather than predefined rules.

Applications and Implementations

Civilian and Commercial Deployments

Cognitive radio technology has found civilian and commercial applications primarily through dynamic spectrum access in underutilized bands, such as television white spaces (TVWS) and the Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS) band, enabling efficient wireless connectivity in telecom, IoT, and rural broadband scenarios.^[50]^[51] In TVWS, secondary users employ spectrum sensing and geolocation databases to opportunistically access unused UHF/VHF frequencies previously allocated for analog TV broadcasting, providing long-range, non-line-of-sight propagation suitable for sparse or obstructed environments.^[52] This approach has been deployed for fixed and mobile broadband, particularly in rural and developing regions where traditional infrastructure is cost-prohibitive.^[53] Commercial TVWS networks emerged in the 2010s, with Microsoft's Airband Initiative leading deployments to bridge digital divides. In Ghana, Microsoft partnered with SpectraLink Wireless to launch a commercial TVWS network at Koforidua Polytechnic in 2016, serving 8,500 students, faculty, and staff with campus-wide connectivity using TVWS-enabled radios.^[52] Additional projects in Ghana expanded in 2020 to connect university campuses and off-campus hostels via TVWS combined with other wireless technologies.^[54] In the United States, Sacred Wind Communications deployed TVWS in rural New Mexico communities including Grants, Milan, San Rafael, and Yatahey starting in 2019, leveraging Microsoft's technology for fixed wireless broadband in areas lacking fiber or cellular coverage.^[55] Post-hurricane recovery efforts in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands utilized TVWS in 2017 to restore communications in disaster-affected zones.^[56] These implementations demonstrate TVWS's efficacy for low-cost, high-penetration networks, with propagation advantages over Wi-Fi in ISM bands enabling coverage up to several kilometers.^[57] In IoT applications, TVWS supports low-power wide-area networks (LPWAN) for massive device connectivity. The SNOW framework, implemented with commercial off-the-shelf devices, enables LPWAN over TVWS for sensor networks, offering extended range and interference resilience compared to sub-GHz ISM alternatives.^[58] Similarly, the Whisper system deploys narrowband IoT in TVWS, exploiting its propagation for urban and rural monitoring.^[59] For telecom infrastructure, TVWS has been tested in 5G augmentation and LTE optimization, where cognitive access dynamically allocates spectrum to reduce energy consumption and enhance coverage in white space-enabled base stations.^[60] CBRS, operating in the 3.55–3.7 GHz band, incorporates cognitive radio principles via a three-tier priority system managed by Spectrum Access Systems (SAS), allowing commercial entities to share spectrum with incumbents like naval radar.^[51] Deployments include private LTE/5G networks for enterprises and campuses; for instance, a 2024 study analyzed a real-world CBRS network, measuring co-channel interference and coexistence performance across 150 MHz of shared bandwidth.^[61] CBRS has facilitated rapid private network rollouts in industrial and educational settings, with over 100,000 certified devices by 2023 enabling dynamic access for applications like smart factories and venue connectivity.^[62] These systems rely on environmental sensing capabilities and SAS-mediated decisions to avoid interference, marking a scalable commercial evolution of cognitive techniques beyond TVWS.^[63] While adoption has grown, challenges like SAS reliability and hidden node issues persist in dense deployments.^[64]

Military and Tactical Uses

Cognitive radio technology has been pursued by military organizations primarily for its capacity to enable dynamic spectrum access and adaptability in contested electromagnetic environments, where traditional fixed-frequency systems are vulnerable to jamming and interference. The U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) initiated the neXt Generation (XG) program in the early 2000s to integrate cognitive radio principles into legacy military waveforms, allowing radios to opportunistically access underutilized spectrum while avoiding primary users and mitigating interference.^[65] This approach supports tactical communications by enabling radios to sense the local radio frequency (RF) environment, identify vacant channels, and autonomously adjust transmission parameters without hardware modifications.^[66] In tactical scenarios, cognitive radios facilitate resilient networks for dismounted soldiers and mobile units, such as through mobile ad-hoc networks (MANETs) that dynamically route data around disruptions. For instance, the Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS), a U.S. military program, incorporated cognitive radio capabilities by 2012 to optimize high-bandwidth waveforms, ensuring efficient spectrum utilization and interoperability across platforms like ground vehicles and aircraft.^[67] These systems enhance situational awareness by autonomously establishing links during combat operations, adapting to neighboring units' signals, and switching frequency bands in response to detected threats.^[68] Research into cognitive radio networks for tactical wireless communications emphasizes interference mitigation and flexible spectrum sharing, critical for operations in urban or electronically dense battlefields.^[69] Military applications extend to unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and electronic warfare (EW), where cognitive radios support adaptive routing and spectrum dominance against adversaries. In UAV networks, cognitive techniques enable contested-environment operations by detecting and exploiting spectrum opportunities, as demonstrated in evaluations using software-defined radios like Ettus and Silvus platforms with dynamic spectrum access features.^[70] For EW, cognitive systems process RF signals with machine learning to alter transmissions beyond baseline parameters, countering intelligent jamming and enabling proactive denial of adversary spectrum use.^[71] Ongoing developments, including multi-agent reinforcement learning testbeds, test cognitive radios for military jamming resistance and network enhancement, underscoring their role in future assured access architectures like cognitive radio cloud networks.^[72]^[73]

Regulatory and Policy Landscape

FCC Regulations and Unlicensed Spectrum Access

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has played a pivotal role in regulating cognitive radio technologies to enable unlicensed secondary access to underutilized spectrum, primarily through opportunistic use of licensed bands while protecting incumbent primary users. In a 2004 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ET Docket No. 04-186), the FCC proposed allowing unlicensed devices employing cognitive radio to access vacant channels in the TV broadcast bands (470-698 MHz), contingent on mechanisms to detect and avoid primary signals, such as spectrum sensing or geo-location databases.^[74] This initiative aimed to harness cognitive capabilities for dynamic spectrum sharing, addressing spectrum scarcity without reallocating licensed holdings.^[74] On November 14, 2008, the FCC adopted final rules in a Report and Order (FCC 08-260), authorizing unlicensed fixed and personal/portable devices in television white spaces (TVWS) under Part 15 Subpart H of its rules. These devices must incorporate cognitive radio functions, including either database-driven channel selection via FCC-approved databases or spectrum sensing to identify unused channels, with fixed devices required to query databases for location-specific availability and portable devices relying on sensing or hybrid methods. Power limits were set at up to 100 mW for fixed devices and 40 mW for portable ones, with mandatory interference avoidance protocols like adjacent channel detection thresholds of -116 dBm. The rules also mandated device certification testing to verify cognitive performance, reflecting FCC's emphasis on empirical protection of primary TV broadcasters and wireless microphones. Despite broadcaster opposition citing potential interference risks, FCC testing and field trials supported the feasibility of cognitive techniques. Complementing TVWS, the FCC in 2008 and 2009 established rules for the 3650-3700 MHz band (ET Docket No. 04-163), permitting higher-power unlicensed cognitive radio operations up to 1 watt EIRP for access points, with client devices up to 250 mW. These rules, finalized in FCC 09-57 on June 23, 2009, require dynamic frequency selection via sensing or databases to evade incumbents like fixed satellite services, including a "channel availability check" and in-service monitoring every 60 seconds. Security measures, such as encrypted database queries and anti-spoofing, were imposed to prevent unauthorized access or jamming, underscoring causal concerns over deliberate interference in shared spectrum. These regulations exemplify the FCC's framework for unlicensed access, prioritizing verifiable non-interference through cognitive decision-making over blanket prohibitions, though deployment has been constrained by database approval delays and sensing accuracy debates. In 2010, the FCC refined TVWS implementation by approving databases and affirming sensing standards, enabling initial commercial trials.^[75] Broader Part 15 updates in 2005 (effective 2007) incorporated cognitive radio definitions, allowing adaptive transmissions in unlicensed bands like ISM, provided they comply with emission limits and avoid harmful interference.^[76] Overall, FCC policies treat cognitive radio as a tool for efficient spectrum use, backed by engineering data rather than unsubstantiated scarcity narratives, though critics note persistent underutilization due to regulatory stringency.^[77]

International Standards and Policy Debates

The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) has played a central role in defining cognitive radio systems (CRS) globally, with Recommendation ITU-R SM.2152 establishing the foundational definition in 2009 as "a radio system employing technology that allows the system to obtain knowledge of its operational and geographical environment, established policies and its internal state; to dynamically and autonomously adjust its operational parameters and protocols according to its radio environment and network, and defined objectives; and to learn from the results obtained."^[78] This framework supports studies under Resolution ITU-R 58 (revised in 2019), which directs ITU-R to examine CRS implementation for efficient spectrum use while preventing harmful interference, particularly in radiocommunication services.^[79] ITU-R reports, such as M.2330 (2014), further explore CRS applications in land mobile services, emphasizing coexistence with primary users through sensing and dynamic access techniques.^[80] The IEEE has developed key standards enabling cognitive radio deployment, including IEEE 1900.1 (2008, updated 2019), which defines terms like "cognitive radio" and outlines dynamic spectrum access networks for opportunistic use of underutilized bands.^[81] IEEE 802.22 (published 2011) specifies wireless regional area networks (WRANs) using cognitive radio to access TV white spaces in the VHF/UHF bands (54-862 MHz), requiring robust spectrum sensing to avoid interfering with incumbents.^[28] Additionally, IEEE SCC41 coordinates standards for dynamic spectrum access, liaising with ITU and ETSI to ensure interoperability.^[82] ETSI's Technical Committee on Reconfigurable Radio Systems (TC RRS), established to standardize software-defined and cognitive radios, produced Technical Report TR 102 802 (2010) outlining a cognitive radio vision focused on reconfigurability for spectrum efficiency.^[83] Key outputs include TR 102 683 (2010) on the Cognitive Pilot Channel (CPC), a control mechanism to signal available spectrum opportunities across networks, and functional architectures for management and control of reconfigurable systems.^[84] ETSI maintains liaisons with ITU, IEEE, and 3GPP to integrate cognitive principles into broader reconfigurable radio standards.^[85] Policy debates surrounding cognitive radio internationally center on reconciling dynamic spectrum sharing with traditional exclusive licensing to protect primary users from interference, as highlighted in ITU-R studies urging regulatory measures under agenda item 1.19 of the 2012 Radiocommunication Assembly.^[86] Proponents argue that CRS enables efficient spectrum utilization in underused bands, potentially increasing capacity by factors of 3-10 through opportunistic access, but critics, including some national regulators, contend that imperfect sensing and cross-border propagation risks could disrupt incumbent services like broadcasting and aviation.^[87] In developing regions, debates focus on equitable access, with ITU emphasizing harmonized global policies to avoid digital divides, though implementation varies due to differing national priorities—e.g., Europe's push for CPC via ETSI contrasts with more cautious ITU approaches to IMT integration.^[88] These tensions persist in World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC) discussions, where proposals for CRS in mobile services balance innovation against interference safeguards, without yet mandating widespread adoption.^[89]

Challenges, Criticisms, and Limitations

Technical and Performance Issues

One primary technical challenge in cognitive radio systems is the imperfection of spectrum sensing, which can lead to false alarms or missed detections due to factors such as noise uncertainty, fading, shadowing, and the hidden terminal problem, where secondary users fail to detect distant primary transmissions.^[90] These issues degrade detection probability and increase interference risks to licensed users, with hardware limitations like limited dynamic range exacerbating inaccuracies in wideband sensing scenarios.^[90] Cooperative spectrum sensing mitigates some local sensing constraints by leveraging spatial diversity, yet it introduces additional overhead from coordination and reporting delays.^[91] Hardware implementation poses significant constraints, including the need for broadband amplification and suppression of mixing spurs in RF front-ends, which demand high linearity and power efficiency not easily achieved in reconfigurable architectures.^[92] Cognitive radios require agile, wideband transceivers capable of operating across multiple standards, but current analog-to-digital converters and filters struggle with the required resolution and speed, leading to quantization noise and aliasing that impair signal fidelity.^[93] These physical layer bottlenecks limit adaptability in dynamic environments, particularly for mobile nodes where Doppler effects and multipath further complicate precise channel estimation. Performance degradation arises from the computational complexity of real-time decision-making, including spectrum analysis and reconfiguration, which incurs latency and reduces throughput as sensing periods consume a substantial fraction of available transmission time—often 10-20% in practical setups.^[94] Energy efficiency remains a critical issue, as continuous sensing and adaptation drain battery life in resource-constrained devices, with studies showing that inefficient sensing schemes can increase overall power consumption by up to 30% compared to fixed-spectrum alternatives.^[95] Trade-offs between sensing accuracy, energy use, and quality-of-service persist, as aggressive power-saving modes compromise detection reliability, hindering deployment in low-power IoT or ad-hoc networks.^[96]

Security Vulnerabilities and Interference Risks

Cognitive radio networks (CRNs) face significant security vulnerabilities stemming from their dependence on distributed spectrum sensing and opportunistic access, which expose them to exploitation by adversaries with access to radio frequency signals. A prominent threat is the primary user emulation attack (PUEA), in which a malicious secondary user or external attacker transmits forged signals imitating a licensed primary user, prompting legitimate secondary users to erroneously relinquish spectrum bands and enabling the attacker to monopolize access.^[97] ^[98] This attack exploits the CR's inability to distinguish signal origins without additional authentication, potentially reducing network throughput by up to 50% in simulated scenarios depending on attacker proximity and power levels.^[99] Jamming attacks represent another critical vulnerability, where adversaries deliberately transmit noise or disruptive signals to overwhelm CR control channels, sensing processes, or data links, thereby denying service to secondary users.^[100] Unlike traditional jamming, CR-specific variants leverage knowledge of sensing algorithms to target idle channels post-detection, forcing frequent channel switches that degrade performance and increase latency.^[101] In cooperative CRNs, spectrum sensing data falsification (SSDF) attacks further compound risks, as colluding malicious nodes report false occupancy data to manipulate fusion center decisions, leading to incorrect spectrum handovers or persistent underutilization.^[102] ^[103] Interference risks in CRNs arise both unintentionally from technical limitations and intentionally from security breaches, potentially violating coexistence requirements with primary systems. Imperfect spectrum sensing, affected by factors such as hidden node problems or low signal-to-noise ratios, can result in secondary transmissions overlapping with primary users, causing harmful interference levels exceeding regulatory thresholds like those set by the FCC for unlicensed operations.^[104] Malicious interference, including PUEA-induced evictions or targeted jamming, amplifies these risks by creating artificial spectrum scarcity or forcing secondary users into suboptimal bands, where collision probabilities rise due to increased density.^[105] In dense deployments, such as urban environments, stochastic models indicate that unmitigated interference from sensing errors alone can degrade primary user signal-to-interference ratios by 10-20 dB under high secondary user loads.^[106] These vulnerabilities underscore the need for robust authentication and anti-jamming protocols, though implementation challenges persist in resource-constrained CR devices.^[107]

Economic and Policy Critiques

Cognitive radio's deployment has been critiqued for imposing uncompensated economic externalities on primary spectrum holders, who must invest in additional technologies—such as interference signaling or detection systems—to mitigate risks from secondary users, without deriving direct benefits from the arrangement.^[108] For instance, licensed broadcasters or radar operators face heightened monitoring costs to prevent opportunistic encroachments, potentially devaluing their exclusive spectrum allocations and discouraging investment in primary infrastructure.^[108] Economic models suggest that while cognitive radio promises spectrum efficiency gains, the transaction costs of negotiating non-interfering access—amid asymmetric information and hold-up problems—often exceed realized revenues from secondary leasing, limiting scalability in oligopolistic markets.^[87] Critics argue that cognitive radio exacerbates inefficiencies in unlicensed bands by enabling high-power secondary devices to disrupt low-power incumbents like WiFi networks, leading to degraded performance and retrofitting expenses for existing users.^[108] In TV white spaces, economic viability falters in rural areas where abundant idle spectrum yields lower secondary throughput due to extended transmission ranges and aggregation losses from multiple devices, contrasting with denser urban deployments but highlighting uneven returns on hardware investments.^[109] Overall, the technology's reliance on real-time auctions or cooperative sensing introduces overhead costs for infrastructure and software limits, potentially inflating device prices without proportional efficiency improvements.^[87] On policy grounds, cognitive radio challenges spectrum governance by complicating interference enforcement, as software-defined capabilities allow "hit-and-run" transmissions that evade detection, fostering potential cheating and undermining trust in secondary access regimes.^[108] Regulatory frameworks, such as FCC rules for TV white spaces, inadequately account for cumulative interference from multiple secondary transmitters, which can shrink protected zones for primaries (e.g., reducing effective radii by up to 10 km in modeled scenarios) and necessitate database-driven power controls that add administrative burdens.^[109] Moreover, by enabling opportunistic use, cognitive radio erodes the value of property-like rights in licensed spectrum, as seen in historical disputes like the $2.8 billion Nextel-iDEN interference resolution, prompting calls for clearer easement definitions or market-based reforms over command-and-control overlays.^[109]^[108] These issues risk a "tragedy of the commons" in shared bands, where non-cooperative behaviors prioritize short-term gains, demanding stringent hardware limiters and policy innovations that may stifle innovation.^[87]

Recent Developments and Future Prospects

Advances in AI Integration (2020s)

In the 2020s, artificial intelligence, particularly deep learning techniques, has significantly enhanced cognitive radio functionalities such as spectrum sensing, prediction, and decision-making, enabling more adaptive and efficient spectrum utilization in dynamic environments. These advances leverage neural networks to process complex radio frequency data, surpassing traditional statistical methods in handling noise, temporal dependencies, and low signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). For instance, deep learning frameworks have been applied to spectrum sharing, resource allocation, and security in cognitive radio networks, supporting the evolution toward beyond-5G (B5G) and 6G systems by improving reliability and adaptability.^[110] A key development in spectrum sensing involves convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which extract features automatically from raw signals without manual preprocessing. A 2024 study demonstrated a 1D CNN model trained on datasets with multiple modulation types and SNRs ranging from -20 to +30 dB, achieving 100% accuracy in noise-free conditions and 97.5% under additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) after optimization, with detection probabilities exceeding 0.5 at -2 dB SNR for signals like on-off keying (OOK) and quadrature phase-shift keying (QPSK). This outperforms conventional methods such as eigenvalue-based detection, particularly in low-SNR scenarios relevant to real-world deployments.^[111] For spectrum prediction and decision-making, generative adversarial networks (GANs) combined with bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) have emerged as effective tools. These models generate synthetic spectrum data from historical patterns, optimized via algorithms like red panda optimization, to predict availability with higher accuracy than traditional statistical approaches, which struggle with temporal correlations in heterogeneous networks. Such AI-driven decisions facilitate proactive channel selection and resource optimization, reducing interference risks and enhancing overall network throughput in cognitive radio systems.^[112]

Role in 6G and Beyond

Cognitive radio (CR) is positioned as a foundational technology for 6G networks, enabling dynamic spectrum access and intelligent resource allocation to support terahertz frequencies, ultra-high data rates exceeding 1 Tbps, and connectivity for trillions of devices. By sensing environmental conditions such as interference levels and primary user activity, CR allows secondary networks to opportunistically utilize idle spectrum, mitigating the limitations of static allocation in dense, heterogeneous environments. This capability addresses 6G's projected spectrum demand, which could require up to 1000 times more bandwidth than 5G, through techniques like cooperative sensing and non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) integration.^[113]^[114] In 6G architectures, CR enhances energy efficiency by minimizing unnecessary transmissions and optimizing power allocation based on real-time channel conditions, potentially reducing consumption by adapting to variable traffic loads in integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) scenarios. Research indicates that CR-driven spectrum sharing can improve network throughput by 20-50% in cognitive radio networks (CRNs) tailored for 6G, particularly in satellite-terrestrial hybrids where it prevents interference via probabilistic interference models. Furthermore, CR's adaptability supports advanced applications like holographic communications and digital twins, where low-latency spectrum decisions are critical.^[115]^[116]^[117] Looking beyond 6G toward 7G or fully autonomous systems, CR evolves into cognitive networks that autonomously observe, reason, and act using AI-driven decision engines, enabling self-optimizing infrastructures resilient to failures and evolving demands. Ericsson's vision outlines CR as central to such architectures, incorporating machine learning for predictive spectrum management and blockchain for secure sharing, fostering sustainable connectivity with global coverage and enhanced security against jamming. Challenges persist, including precise sensing in high-mobility scenarios, but ongoing advancements in quantum-secured CR frameworks promise robust performance for beyond-6G IoT ecosystems.^[118]^[119]^[120]

References

[1]
What Is Cognitive Radio (CR) and How Does It Work? - TechTarget
Jun 18, 2021 · Cognitive radio (CR) is a form of wireless communication in which a transceiver can intelligently detect which communication channels are in use and which ones ...
[2]
Cognitive Radio - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Cognitive radio (CR) is defined as an intelligent communication system that is aware of its environment and makes decisions accordingly, utilizing spectrum ...
[3]
[PDF] Cognitive Radio 8 May, 2000 - DiVA portal
May 8, 2000 · This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the degree of Doctor of Technology. 8 May, 2000. Page 2. Copyright © 2000 Joseph Mitola ...
[4]
[PDF] Cognitive Radio An Integrated Agent Architecture for Software ...
This article briefly reviews the basic concepts about cognitive radio CR, and the need for software-defined radios is underlined and the most important ...
[5]
[PDF] Cognitive Radio for Dynamic Spectrum Access
Introduces flexibility in allocation and spectrum usage. Dynamic. Spectrum. Access. Exclusive. Use Model. Open. Sharing Model. Hierarchical.
[6]
[DOC] and Reliable Spectrum Use Employing Cognitive Radio ...
Among these advances are cognitive radio technologies that can make possible more intensive and efficient spectrum use by licensees within their own networks, ...
[7]
An Overview of Cognitive Radio Technology and Its Applications in ...
Jul 3, 2023 · Cognitive radio operates on a typical duty cycle that involves detecting spectrum idle space, selecting optimal frequency bands, coordinating ...
[8]
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4509796
[9]
[PDF] Dynamic Spectrum Access:Current State of the Art and Future ...
The FCC ruling permitting the use of TV white space has led to the IEEE 802.22 standard for Cognitive Radio based Wireless Regional Area Networks (WRAN) [11].
[10]
Cognitive Radio Networks: Technologies, Challenges and ...
Feb 8, 2025 · Cognitive Radio Networks (CRNs) have emerged as a transformative solution to address the growing demand for wireless spectrum resources.
[11]
Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications
Feb 28, 2005 · The cognitive radio, built on a software-defined radio, is defined as an intelligent wireless communication system that is aware of its environment.
[12]
[PDF] E2L005 - DSpace@MIT
First defined in his doctoral dissertation, Joseph Mitola defines "cognitive radio" broadly as combining model-based reasoning with software-defined radio. In ...
[13]
Fundamental Operations of Cognitive Radio: A Survey - IEEE Xplore
Cognitive Radio (CR) has evolved as a smart technology in bridging the disparity between the availability and allocation of the radio frequency spectrum ...
[14]
Cognitive radio technology: Principles and practice - IEEE Xplore
This position paper first briefly reviews the basic concepts about cognitive radio (CR) technology, and then discusses the differentiating features of CR ...Missing: core | Show results with:core
[15]
[PDF] Cognitive Radio Definitions and Nomenclature
Sep 10, 2008 · This has resulted in explosive growth in interest in cognitive radios. The term cognitive radio was first used by Joe Mitola [1]. The.
[16]
Software Defined Radio architecture for cognitive radio - IEEE Xplore
In this study, software defined radio architecture considered as the fundamental base of cognitive radio is discussed and an architecture is proposed.
[17]
Breaking Spectrum Gridlock With Cognitive Radios - IEEE Xplore
Apr 24, 2009 · These paradigms are unified by the definition of a cognitive radio as an intelligent wireless communication device that exploits side ...
[18]
Fourteen Years of Cognitive Radio Development - IEEE Xplore
Feb 10, 2014 · Cognitive Radio principles were first described at a Keynote Speech by Dr. Joseph Mitola at the IEEE ICASSP Conference in Phoenix in 1999.
[19]
[PDF] Cognitive Radio Principles and Spectrum Sensing
Aug 30, 2019 · Abstract: Cognitive Radio is an all intelligent radio network that is advancement over the conventional radio. The difference.Missing: core | Show results with:core
[20]
Software Defined Radio - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The concept of Cognitive Radio was first introduced by Joseph Mitola and Maguire in 1999 with the aim of exploiting unused portions of the radio spectrum.Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
[21]
[PDF] Cognitive Radio Applications in Software Defined Radio
Cognitive Radios may sense the local spectrum utilization either through a dedicated sensor or using a configured SDR receiver channel. Using this information ...
[22]
[PDF] Toward a Cognitive Radio Architecture - MITRE Corporation
The ultimate vision of CR technology—denoted by Mitola as the “ideal cognitive radio (iCR)”—encompasses many facets of intelligent be- havior such as context ...<|separator|>
[23]
[PDF] Cognitive Radio for Flexible Mobile Multimedia Communications
[4] J. Mitola, Cognitive radio – model-based competence for software radios, Licentiate Thesis, KTH, Stockholm (September 1999). [5] ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[24]
[PDF] Cognitive Radio - Wireless Innovation Forum
Cognitive radio represents a logical extension for the SDR Forum. By its very definition, software defined radio is the ability to reconfigure a radio's ...
[25]
Cognitive radio: making software radios more personal - IEEE Xplore
Cognitive radio enhances the flexibility of personal services through a radio knowledge representation language.
[26]
Facilitating Opportunities for Flexible, Efficient, and Reliable ...
Proposed and seeks comment on the use and applications for cognitive "smart" radio systems. Order. DA/FCC #: FCC-03-322. Docket No:.Missing: inquiry | Show results with:inquiry
[27]
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5560591
[28]
ITU-R standardization activities on Cognitive Radio Systems
A lot of CRS usage scenarios and business cases are possible. This has triggered a lot of standardization activity at all levels, including ITU, IEEE, ETSI, and ...
[29]
Cognitive Radio Network Architecture Concept | WInnForum
Learn about a cognitive radio, its subsystems, and the basics of cognitive radio architecture in this educational article from the Wireless Innovation Forum ...
[30]
Cognitive radio network architecture: Part I - General structure
This chapter will brief the various architectures of cognitive radio networks, terminal capabilities of cognitive radio as nodes of CRN highlighting the ...
[31]
[PDF] Spectrum Sensing Techniques For Cognitive Radio Networks - arXiv
Abstract: In this chapter, we present the state of the art of the spectrum sensing techniques for cognitive radio networks as well and their comparisons.
[32]
(PDF) A Comprehensive Survey on Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive ...
Apr 21, 2025 · PDF | Cognitive radio technology has the potential to address the shortage of available radio spectrum by enabling dynamic spectrum access.
[33]
[PDF] A Survey of Spectrum Sensing Algorithms for Cognitive Radio ...
In this section, some of the most common spectrum sensing techniques in the cognitive radio literature are explained. A. Energy Detector Based Sensing.
[34]
[PDF] Performance analysis of Energy detection, Matched filter detection ...
This is a review paper that compares the performance of three main spectrum s e n s i n g techniques. Keywords- Cognitive Radio (CR), Energy Detection (ED), ...
[35]
[PDF] A Comprehensive Analysis of Spectrum Sensing Methods in ... - IJFMR
However there are some major disadvantages of Energy detection. The performance is poor at low. SNRs due to the unpredictable nature of noise.It is not capable ...
[36]
Performance comparison of energy, matched-filter and ... - IEEE Xplore
This paper presents a comprehensive performance comparison of energy detection, matched-filter detection, and cyclostationarity-based detection.
[37]
https://www.ijettjournal.org/assets/volume-9/number-1/IJETT-V9P204.pdf
[38]
[PDF] Cyclostationary Detection Based Spectrum Sensing for Cognitive ...
Feb 3, 2015 · The existing spectrum sensing techniques are usually divided into energy detection, matched filter and cyclostationary detection [4]. Among them ...
[39]
Comparison of cyclostationary and energy detection in cognitive ...
In this paper we only consider cyclostationary detection and energy detection of their simplicity compared to matched filter detection.
[40]
A review of spectrum sensing in modern cognitive radio networks
Nov 24, 2023 · One advantage of cyclostationary-based detection over energy detection is that it performs better than energy detectors even under severe fading ...
[41]
[PDF] SPECTRUM SENSING TECHNIQUES IN COGNITIVE RADIO ...
In this paper, survey of spectrum sensing techniques is presented. The challenges and issues involved in implementation of spectrum sensing techniques are ...
[42]
Survey on spectrum sensing techniques in cognitive radio networks
Abstract: Recent advancements in wireless communication technologies have lead to challenges in effective utilization of Radio frequency (RF) spectrum.<|separator|>
[43]
[PDF] spectrum-sensing-methods-for-cognitive-radio-a-survey.pdf
Spectrum sensing is a key function of cognitive radio to prevent the harmful interference with licensed users and identify the available spectrum for improving ...
[44]
Decision Making Approaches in Cognitive Radio-Status, Challenges ...
The cognitive radio cycle consists of several steps, and one of the most important steps is the step of analysis and decision-making. There are many algorithms ...
[45]
Decision making for cognitive radio equipment: analysis of the first ...
Jan 25, 2012 · As illustrated in Figure 1, a full cognitive cycleb demands at every iteration five steps: observe, orient, plan, decide, and act. The observe ...
[46]
Decision-making approach in Cognitive Radio using Tsukamoto and ...
The decision-making process in selecting the available spectral frequencies by cognitive radio secondary users is an important and sensitive process at the ...
[47]
Multiple attribute dynamic spectrum decision making for cognitive ...
Multiple attribute dynamic spectrum decision making for cognitive radio networks. Abstract: Spectrum Sensing and Spectrum Decision making are the main ...
[48]
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6843160/
[49]
Decision Making Method ETOP for Handoff in Cognitive Radio ...
Dec 28, 2020 · Decision Making Method ETOP for Handoff in Cognitive Radio Network ... Abstract: Cognitive Radio (CR) is a mode of wireless communication, where a ...<|separator|>
[50]
Dynamic Spectrum and TV White Spaces - Microsoft Research
The project is the first deployment of TV white space technology in Africa targeted at communities without access to broadband or electricity and is a ...
[51]
A Survey on Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS) - MDPI
Technologically, cognitive radio networks can be a promising solution to leverage the existing spectrum for boosting the capacity of wireless networks as their ...
[52]
[PDF] Connecting Africa Using the TV White Spaces: From Research to ...
Ghana: Microsoft and SpectraLink Wireless launched a commercial TVWS network at Koforidua Polytechnic, a uni- versity with 8,500 students, faculty and staff on ...
[53]
[PDF] Worldwide Commercial Deployments, Pilots, and Trials
The TV White Space networks enable greater internet penetration, providing more bandwidth for less money, and this allows students to take university courses ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
[54]
Microsoft announces new TV white space projects for Ghana
May 19, 2020 · The networks will use TV white space-enabled radios and other wireless technologies to connect campus buildings, as well as off-campus hostels ...
[55]
Sacred Wind Communications and Microsoft to Deploy TV White ...
Jul 2, 2019 · Sacred Wind Communications will first deploy TVWS technology in the communities of Grants, Milan, San Rafael, Yatahey and areas located in the ...
[56]
Microsoft Utilizes TV White Space in Puerto Rico and the Virgin ...
Nov 21, 2017 · Microsoft is aiming to use its particular variant of TV “white spaces” to allow greater communication capabilities during a time of widespread ...
[57]
(PDF) TV White Space Networks Deployment: A Case Study of ...
Aug 7, 2025 · In this work we analyze the benefits that can be obtained by application of TV White Space network, i.e. the network that operates in vacated TV ...<|separator|>
[58]
[PDF] LPWAN in the TV White Spaces: A Practical Implementation and ...
In this paper, we implement SNOW using low-cost, low form-factor, low-power, and widely available commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) devices to enable its ...
[59]
[PDF] Whisper: IoT in the TV White Space Spectrum - Deepak Vasisht
Apr 6, 2022 · There are several advantages of utilizing TVWS spectrum for a NB IoT deployment over ISM bands.Missing: telecom | Show results with:telecom
[60]
[PDF] TV White Space and LTE Network Optimization towards Energy ...
TVWS technologies dynamically allocate the required spectrum. The spectrum allocation is performed by means of cognitive radios with local spectrum sensing ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[61]
A Comprehensive Analysis of Secondary Coexistence in a Real ...
May 7, 2025 · This paper presents a first-of-its-kind extensive measurement campaign of a commercial CBRS network that quantifies both co-channel interference ...
[62]
[PDF] A Survey on Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS) - IRIS
Dec 1, 2022 · CBRS is a spectrum opened by the FCC for commercial use, with a three-tier architecture for licensed and unlicensed access, providing 150 MHz ...
[63]
Cognitive Radio vs CBRS - A Comprehensive Analysis
CBRS employs dynamic spectrum access principles to allow multiple users to dynamically access and share the same frequencies. Spectrum sharing tiers. CBRS is ...
[64]
Wireless Spectrum in Rural Farmlands: Status, Challenges ... - arXiv
Jul 5, 2024 · Spectrum sensing with limited number of stand-alone cognitive radios faces challenges such as the hidden node problem, which affects the ...
[65]
Application of Cognitive Radio Technology to Legacy Military ...
Abstract: There is a significant development of cognitive radio (CR) technology taking place under the DARPA next generation (XG) communication program ...
[66]
On making the current military radios cognitive without hardware or ...
Cognitive Radio (CR) using Dynamic Spectrum Access (DSA) provides the military radios, an ability to operate in un-predictable interference environments.
[67]
JTRS advances 'Cognitive Radio' concept | Article - Army.mil
May 4, 2012 · Cognitive Radio allows Joint Tactical Radio Systems, known as JTRS, radios to more efficiently draw upon high-bandwidth waveforms, ensure maximum ...
[68]
Cognitive radio technologies: Envisioning the realization of network ...
Imagine a radio that can autonomously sense neighboring units and establish communications during combat; radios that automatically change frequency bands as ...
[69]
Cognitive Radio Networks for Tactical Wireless Communications
Cognitive Radio CR is widely considered as a promising technology for providing the mechanisms to mitigate interference, and allow more flexible and dynamic ...
[70]
MANET, Adaptive Routing and Cognitive Radio for UAV Networks in ...
Oct 18, 2021 · Ettus and Silvus radios, for example, employ out-of-the-box DSA capabilities that can be deployed in body-worn, UGV, or UAV solutions [9, 15].<|control11|><|separator|>
[71]
Cognitive Electronic Warfare: Radio Frequency Spectrum Meets ...
The program will lay the groundwork for a new generation of RF systems that are goal-driven and can learn from data, according to DARPA.
[72]
A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Testbed for Cognitive Radio ...
Applications of RFRL range from military communications jamming to enhancing WiFi networks. Before deploying algorithms for these purposes, they must be ...<|separator|>
[73]
[PDF] Cognitive Radio Cloud Networks: Assured Access in the Future
Nov 14, 2018 · The DOD should continue to use the presidential guidance to invest heavily in cognitive radios and cloud computing pairing. Conclusion. CRCNs ...
[74]
[PDF] Federal Communications Commission FCC 04-100
While our central proposal is for the use of unlicensed devices with cognitive radio ... mechanisms to facilitate access by opportunistic devices with cognitive ...
[75]
White Space | Federal Communications Commission
In 2010, the Commission adopted final rules to allow unlicensed radio transmitters to operate in the white spaces.Missing: cognitive | Show results with:cognitive
[76]
Cognitive Radio Technologies and Software Defined Radios
May 4, 2005 · This document modifies the Commission's rules to reflect ongoing technical developments in cognitive radio technologies.
[77]
[PDF] Spectrum Regulations for Ad Hoc Wireless Cognitive Radios
Unlicensed spectrum is ideal for cognitive radio. Note however that the unlicensed bands are subject to congestion and laissez-faire operation.
[78]
[PDF] Cognitive Radio Systems (CRS) - ITU
“A radio system employing technology that allows the system to obtain knowledge of its operational and geographical environment, established policies and ...
[79]
Studies on the implementation and use of cognitive radio systems
Res.58-2 (2019), Studies on the implementation and use of cognitive radio systems, In force (Main) ; Previous versions ; Number, Title, Status ; Res.58-1 (2015)
[80]
[PDF] Cognitive radio systems in the land mobile service - ITU
19.1, “System Design Document”, IEEE 802.19-10/0055r3, March 2010. [27]. ETSI TR 102 907, Reconfigurable Radio Systems (RRS); Use Cases for Operation in White.
[81]
[PDF] A Roadmap to International Standards Development for Cognitive ...
Mar 16, 2012 · The IEEE 1900.1 Standard TM defines “cognitive radio” (CR) and “cognitive radio network” but does not define “cognitive radio system” which is ...
[82]
IEEE 802.16: Liaisons and External Organizations
IEEE L802.16-11/0025 [Draft] Wireless telecommunication standards under development by IEEE 802 containing cognitive radio capabilities for operation in the ...
[83]
[PDF] TR 102 802 - V1.1.1 - Reconfigurable Radio Systems (RRS) - ETSI
Apr 5, 2010 · ITU-R studies on Cognitive radio systems ... A.2.1 Activities to define Cognitive Radio Systems. A.2.1.1 IEEE draft standard P802.22.
[84]
[PDF] TR 102 682 - V1.1.1 - Reconfigurable Radio Systems (RRS) - ETSI
Multi-standard and cognitive radio terminals can be reconfigurable. Moreover, different types of Base Stations (BS) provide wireless access to terminals in this ...
[85]
Our committee Reconfigurable Radio Systems (RRS) - ETSI
We are responsible for the standardization of Reconfigurable Radio Systems (RRS), including reconfigurable equipment architecture and Cognitive Radio.
[86]
[PDF] ITU-R Standardization Activities on Cognitive Radio Systems - EUDL
Currently a lot of standardization activity related to. Cognitive Radio Systems is performed on all levels, including. ITU, IEEE, and ETSI, where each of this ...
[87]
[PDF] Sharing Spectrum through Spectrum Policy Reform and Cognitive ...
Traditionally, interference protection is guaranteed through a policy of spectrum licensing, whereby wireless systems get exclusive access to spectrum.
[88]
[PDF] Cognitive radio systems specific for International Mobile ... - ITU
It is important to note that any IMT system using a CRS must operate in accordance with the Radio Regulations, local and regional administration rules governing ...
[89]
Introduction to cognitive radio systems in the land mobile service - ITU
Introduction to cognitive radio systems in the land mobile service ... ITU-T Recommendations · Service Publications · Handbooks · Proceedings; Test charts ...
[90]
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5444402
[91]
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4392252
[92]
[PDF] Challenges in the Design of Cognitive Radios1
This paper describes architecture and circuit design issues facing cognitive radio realizations. The challenges include broadband amplification, mixing spurs ...
[93]
Cognitive Radio RF: Overview and Challenges - ResearchGate
Aug 7, 2025 · We point out some key research challenges, especially implementation challenges of cognitive radio (CR). A particular focus is on RF front-end, ...
[94]
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6208752
[95]
Energy efficiency in cognitive radio network using cooperative ...
This study provides a second priority user transmission system using cooperative spectrum sensing to sense available channels.
[96]
Energy-efficient and intelligent cooperative spectrum sensing ...
Sep 19, 2022 · In cognitive radio networks, spectrum sensing itself consumes a lot of energy, and ineffective spectrum sensing increases energy consumption.
[97]
Primary User Emulation attack and their mitigation strategies: A survey
Cognitive Radio emerged as a solution to solve the spectrum scarcity by allowing unlicensed user to exist with the licensed users of the network whenever t.
[98]
[PDF] Modeling Primary User Emulation Attacks and Defenses in ...
Abstract—Primary user emulation attacks are a potential security threat to cognitive radio networks. In this work, we attempt to characterize an advanced ...
[99]
Detection Of Primary User Emulation Attack (PUEA) In Cognitive ...
Jun 21, 2021 · A Primary User Emulation Attack (PUEA) mimics a primary user's signal to deceive secondary users, potentially to grab vacant bands or disrupt ...
[100]
The Ability to Initiate and Detect Jamming Attacks in Cognitive Radio ...
These attacks can be easily achieved by signals from radio frequency signals that do not obey the basic MAC protocol. Unreliable attacks can seriously delay the ...
[101]
Cognitive Radio Jamming Mitigation using Markov Decision Process ...
In this paper, we explain how a cognitive radio can exploit its ability of dynamic spectrum access and its learning capabilities to avoid jammed channels.
[102]
A survey on security issues in cognitive radio based cooperative ...
Feb 25, 2021 · This paper performs a state-of-the-art comprehensive survey of the researches on defending SSDF and PUEAs.
[103]
Comprehensive survey on security challenges and solutions in ...
This paper examines key vulnerabilities in cognitive radio networks (CRNs), including spectrum sensing data falsification, primary user emulation attacks, and ...
[104]
[PDF] Interference Modeling in Cognitive Radio Networks: A Survey - arXiv
In the case of cognitive radio (CR) networks, the problem of interference is tremendously crucial. In other words, CR keeps the important promise of not.
[105]
(PDF) Cognitive Radio and Interference Management - ResearchGate
Sensing beacon transmitted from different cognitive terminals creates significant interference to the primary users if proper precautions have not been taken ...
[106]
Stochastic geometry approach towards interference management ...
Jan 15, 2021 · This paper hence presents a comprehensive survey related to the use of SG to effect interference management and control in CRN.
[107]
A comprehensive survey of security threats, detection ...
Sep 23, 2023 · The many vulnerabilities, assaults, and defenses aimed at the various Cognitive radio Network tiers are covered in-depth in this article.
[108]
[PDF] Deploying Cognitive Radio - International Journal of Communication
Aug 24, 2008 · Unfortunately, life is not that simple, for two reasons: 1) the deployment of cognitive radio is likely to impose costs on others, particularly ...Missing: drawbacks | Show results with:drawbacks
[109]
[PDF] Cognitive radios in the TV whitespaces: challenges and opportunities
Dec 16, 2011 · Whitespace devices can instead query a database in real-time via the. Internet in order to determine the set of allowed channels. Advantages to ...
[110]
Deep Learning Frameworks for Cognitive Radio Networks: Review and Open Research Challenges
### Summary of Deep Learning Frameworks for Cognitive Radio Networks
[111]
Deep Learning-Based Spectrum Sensing for Cognitive Radio ...
Dec 11, 2024 · In order for cognitive radios to identify and take advantage of unused frequency bands, spectrum sensing is essential.
[112]
Enhancing spectrum prediction in cognitive radio networks using an ...
This work proposes a novel approach for spectrum prediction in Cognitive Radio Networks (CRN) using a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) model.
[113]
The Convergence of Cognitive Radio and 6G - IEEE Xplore
In order to use the features of the 6G networks, cognitive radio (CR) technology, which has the capacity to dynamically access the spectrum and adjust to ...
[114]
Sixth Generation (6G) Cognitive Radio Network (CRN) Application ...
Oct 13, 2021 · 6G CR networks are anticipated to familiarize innovative use cases and performance metrics, such as to offer worldwide coverage, cost efficiency, enhanced ...Introduction · Cognitive Radio and Wireless... · Security Issues of CR Network...
[115]
How cognitive radio is driving dynamic spectrum sharing in 6G
Jul 14, 2025 · Moreover, cognitive radio enables better energy efficiency in 6G networks. By intelligently managing spectrum use, networks can minimize energy ...
[116]
Efficient resource allocation for 5G/6G cognitive radio networks ...
A cognitive network can sense the environment and gather information such as power, frequency, and interference level. With this sensing ability, secondary ...
[117]
Spectrum Sharing for 6G Integrated Satellite-Terrestrial ...
Aug 20, 2021 · Spectrum Sharing for 6G Integrated Satellite-Terrestrial ... cognitive radio (CR) in the spectrum access of the ISTCN. Through ...
[118]
Cognitive networks – towards a 6G architecture - Ericsson
Jan 12, 2022 · A cognitive network will work in a similar way, using the capability to observe, reason and then act accordingly. It will operate autonomously.
[119]
Blockchain-Based Dynamic Spectrum Management for 6G Networks ...
Apr 24, 2024 · This paper introduces a novel radio spectrum management model in 6G networks, named as BSM-6G, which integrates blockchain technology with CR.
[120]
AI-Enhanced Quantum-Secured IoT Communication Framework for ...
Oct 14, 2024 · This paper introduces a Quantum-Secured IoT Communication Framework designed for 6G Cognitive Radio Networks (CRNs) in order to cater to the ...