Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Plesiochronous digital hierarchy

The Plesiochronous Digital Hierarchy (PDH) is a telecommunications transmission technology designed for multiplexing and transporting large volumes of digital data, such as voice and data signals, over networks using media like copper cabling, microwave links, or fiber optics, where signals at various hierarchy levels operate at nominally identical bit rates but permit controlled timing variations between them. The term "plesiochronous," as defined by the , describes a timing mode in which the significant instants of signals or time scales occur at essentially the same nominal rate, with any deviations constrained within predefined limits to ensure compatibility without full . Developed in the 1960s and formalized through ITU-T recommendations such as G.702 in 1988, PDH provided an early framework for digital by enabling the aggregation of basic (PCM) channels—typically 64 kbps voice streams—into higher-capacity trunks, revolutionizing long-distance communication before the advent of fully synchronous systems. At its core, PDH employs time-division multiplexing (TDM) to combine lower-bit-rate signals into progressively higher levels, using techniques like bit stuffing or justification to compensate for slight clock discrepancies and maintain frame alignment across the hierarchy. The structure varies by region: the European (E-series) hierarchy includes four levels at bit rates of 2.048 Mbps (E1, aggregating 30 voice channels plus signaling), 8.448 Mbps (E2), 34.368 Mbps (E3), and 139.264 Mbps (E4), while the North American/Japanese (T-series) features 1.544 Mbps (T1, for 24 voice channels), 6.312 Mbps (T2), 44.736 Mbps (T3), and 274.176 Mbps (T4), all derived from a common primary rate as specified in ITU-T G.702. PDH networks typically form point-to-point or tree-like topologies with shared reference frequencies, supporting reliable data transport but requiring specialized equipment for demultiplexing due to the plesiochronous nature, which complicates cross-connections and limits to around 565 Mbps . While PDH enabled efficient utilization and widespread adoption in legacy infrastructures, its drawbacks—including inflexible allocation, manufacturer-specific implementations, and poor support for —prompted its supersession by more advanced (SDH) and (SONET) standards in the for modern high-capacity, ring-based optical networks.

Fundamentals

Definition and Terminology

The plesiochronous digital hierarchy (PDH) is a technology employed in networks to aggregate and transport large volumes of digitized , , and other signals over digital transport equipment, such as cables and early fiber optic systems. Developed as a standardized framework for building hierarchical signal structures, PDH enables the efficient combination of lower-rate channels into higher-capacity streams, forming the backbone of early telephony infrastructure. The term "plesiochronous," derived from roots meaning "near" and "time," describes an operational mode in which interconnected clocks or signals maintain nominally identical rates but allow for minor deviations, typically constrained to ±50 parts per million () relative to a reference. This near-synchronous behavior accommodates practical limitations in across network elements, where absolute is neither feasible nor required, distinguishing PDH from fully synchronous systems. Key terminology in PDH includes basic rate interfaces, which serve as the entry-level units, such as the 1.544 Mbit/s T1 in North systems and the 2.048 Mbit/s E1 in and variants, each supporting multiple 64 kbit/s channels for or . Higher-order multiplexing levels then aggregate these basic rates—typically in multiples of four—into intermediate and aggregate streams, such as 6.312 Mbit/s () or 8.448 Mbit/s (E2), up to capacities like 44.736 Mbit/s (T3) or 139.264 Mbit/s (). PDH played a pivotal role in the evolution of digital hierarchies, providing scalable transport solutions for circuit-switched networks prior to the widespread adoption of synchronous optical technologies like SDH.

Plesiochronous vs. Synchronous Operation

In plesiochronous digital hierarchy (PDH) systems, each network element operates with its own independent clock source, allowing nominal bit rates to vary slightly within defined tolerances, typically ±50 parts per million (ppm) for primary rates such as 2048 kbit/s, to accommodate minor drifts between nodes. This contrasts with fully synchronous systems, such as the synchronous digital hierarchy (SDH), where all clocks derive from a single master reference clock—often traceable to a primary reference clock (PRC) with accuracy better than ±1 × 10^{-11}—ensuring exact long-term alignment across the entire network without the need for rate adjustments at interfaces. In PDH, this near-synchrony, or "plesiochrony," enables flexible of lower-order signals into higher-order streams but introduces challenges in maintaining bit-level over cascaded links. The primary effects of plesiochronous operation stem from the gradual accumulation of phase differences due to clock drifts, which can lead to buffer overflows or underflows at multiplexers, resulting in controlled slips—typically limited to one slip every 70 days in well-designed networks—and potential bit errors if phase variations exceed equipment tolerances. These slips manifest as repeated or deleted bits or frames, disrupting , particularly in long-haul transmissions where errors compound across multiple , necessitating robust frame alignment signals to re-establish timing at each receiver. In contrast, synchronous systems avoid such slips by enforcing uniform clocking, minimizing error accumulation and simplifying signal transport, though they require more stringent network-wide infrastructure. Conceptually, the clock tolerance in PDH can be visualized as a band around the nominal rate: for a 2048 kbit/s signal, the allowed deviation of ±50 translates to a maximum of approximately ±0.1024 kbit/s, depicted as bounding the ideal clock , with drifts causing periodic crossings that trigger alignment mechanisms. This plesiochrony arises fundamentally from the physics of quartz crystal oscillators used in slave clocks, which exhibit inherent variations—on the order of 10^{-6} to 10^{-5} due to fluctuations, aging, and environmental factors—preventing perfect long-term without a common reference.

Historical Background

Origins in Digital Telephony

The transition from analog to digital transmission in telephony during the mid-20th century marked a pivotal shift, driven by the need to overcome inherent limitations of analog (FDM) systems, such as susceptibility to and noise accumulation over long distances. (PCM), developed in the at Bell Laboratories, provided the foundational technology for this evolution by digitizing analog voice signals through sampling, quantization, and encoding, typically at 64 kbps per channel using 8 kHz sampling and 8-bit to achieve high-fidelity transmission while exploiting speech redundancies like sample-to-sample correlation. Building on these PCM experiments, early digital hierarchies emerged to enable efficient of multiple voice channels for long-haul networks, laying the groundwork for plesiochronous operation where clocks are nearly synchronous but independently derived. A key milestone came in 1962 with Bell Laboratories' introduction of the T1 carrier system, which multiplexed 24 PCM voice channels into a single 1.544 Mbps digital stream transmitted over twisted copper pairs using (TDM). This innovation addressed the inefficiencies of analog FDM by reducing bandwidth requirements and improving signal integrity, while facilitating hierarchical structures for aggregating lower-rate channels into higher-capacity trunks. The T1 system's design, incorporating bipolar signaling and framing bits for synchronization, represented a practical application of PCM principles to create scalable digital transport for networks. AT&T began deploying T1 carriers in the for inter-office trunks spanning 10-50 miles, initially using D1 channel banks with 7-bit PCM plus signaling, and later upgrading to D2 banks for 8-bit encoding in toll networks. These deployments rapidly expanded, with over 100,000 channels in service by the mid-, driven by motivations to lower per-channel transport costs through TDM —potentially halving expenses compared to analog systems—and to prepare the infrastructure for future digital switching technologies like the No. 1 introduced in 1965. By mitigating noise and issues prevalent in analog FDM, T1 enabled more reliable voice transport and set the stage for broader digital hierarchy adoption in .

Standardization Efforts

In 1972, the Comité Consultatif International Télégraphique et Téléphonique (CCITT), the predecessor to the , initiated proposals for a plesiochronous digital hierarchy framework to standardize digital transmission rates for . These efforts culminated in the approval of Recommendation G.702, which defined the bit rates for the primary and higher-order multiplex levels in the PDH, accommodating both North American and European variants. The recommendation established a flexible structure allowing regional adaptations while promoting interoperability at international gateways. Regional standardization efforts in the 1970s reflected the need to integrate PDH into existing national infrastructures. In , the formalized specifications during this decade, building on earlier T1 deployments to define hierarchical rates up to DS3 (44.736 Mbit/s), emphasizing compatibility with the 24-channel PCM format derived from analog voice systems. In , the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT) developed the system concurrently, standardizing 30-channel primary multiplexes at 2.048 Mbit/s to align with continental analog practices, with higher orders up to (139.264 Mbit/s). Japan adapted the PDH through its J-carrier system, adopting a 24-channel primary rate similar to but tailored to domestic needs, achieving initial deployment in the mid-1970s. Key ITU-T recommendations further solidified PDH interfaces by the early 1980s. Recommendation G.703, first approved in 1972 and revised through the decade, specified the physical and electrical characteristics of hierarchical digital interfaces, including unbalanced and balanced pair connections for rates from 64 kbit/s to 44.736 Mbit/s. Complementing this, G.704—initially developed in the late and formally approved in —outlined synchronous structures for primary and secondary levels, ensuring consistent and signaling alignment across PDH equipment. These standards facilitated equipment within regions while supporting limited cross-regional connectivity. Harmonization efforts faced significant challenges due to entrenched regional differences in basic channel capacities, stemming from legacy analog designs. North American and systems used 24 voice channels per primary multiplex to accommodate signaling overhead in a 1.544 Mbit/s frame, whereas Europe's 30-channel E1 at 2.048 Mbit/s prioritized higher density, reflecting variations in national analog hierarchies that predated digital adoption. These discrepancies complicated interconnections, requiring gateway adaptations and contributing to the eventual push for more unified synchronous hierarchies in the 1980s.

Hierarchy Specifications

North American T-carrier System

The North American system forms the foundational hierarchy of the plesiochronous digital hierarchy (PDH) in the United States and , designed primarily for multiplexing voice channels over digital transmission lines. Developed by Bell Laboratories in the 1960s, it uses to aggregate multiple lower-rate digital signals into higher-rate carriers, with each level supporting a specific number of 64 kbit/s DS0 channels derived from of analog voice. At the base level, the T1 (or DS1) carrier operates at a line rate of 1.544 Mbit/s, accommodating 24 DS0 channels. Each DS0 channel carries 64 kbit/s (8 bits sampled at 8,000 Hz), yielding a of 1.536 Mbit/s (24 × 64 kbit/s), with the remaining 8 kbit/s dedicated to framing overhead. The T1 consists of 193 bits: 192 payload bits (24 channels × 8 bits) plus 1 framing bit, transmitted at 8,000 frames per second to match the voice sampling rate. Higher levels in the hierarchy multiplex multiple lower-level signals. The (DS2) carrier runs at 6.312 Mbit/s, combining four T1 signals for 96 DS0 channels. The T3 (DS3) operates at 44.736 Mbit/s, multiplexing seven signals to support 672 DS0 channels. Further levels include T4 (DS4) at 274.176 Mbit/s for 4,032 DS0 channels and at 400.352 Mbit/s for 5,760 DS0 channels, though T4 and T5 saw limited deployment due to the rise of fiber-optic alternatives. An intermediate T1C (DS1C) level exists at 3.152 Mbit/s for 48 DS0 channels. These rates incorporate overhead for and in the plesiochronous multiplexing process. T1 framing is organized into superframes for and signaling. The original Superframe (SF), also known as D4 framing, groups 12 frames, using the framing bits to form alternating patterns (F_T for terminal framing and F_S for signaling framing) that enable alignment and robbed-bit signaling. Robbed-bit signaling embeds control information, such as on-hook/off-hook status, by overwriting the least significant bit of channel 8 and 16 in every sixth frame, reducing voice slightly during signaling but avoiding dedicated overhead. The Extended Superframe (ESF) extends this to 24 frames, allocating framing bits more efficiently: 2 kbit/s for a framing pattern sequence, 2 kbit/s for (CRC) error detection, and 4 kbit/s for a facility to carry messages, improving diagnostics without increasing the overall rate.

European E-carrier System

The system forms the plesiochronous digital hierarchy standardized for telecommunications networks in and aligned regions, providing a structured scheme for voice and data transmission. Defined by the (ITU-T), it begins with the primary rate E1 and builds upward through successive multiplexing levels, each aggregating four lower-rate signals with added overhead for alignment and synchronization. This hierarchy supports efficient carriage of multiple 64 kbit/s channels, optimized for the A-law used in European telephony. The basic rate, E1, operates at 2.048 Mbit/s and accommodates 30 DS0 channels, each at 64 kbit/s for such as digitized voice, plus two additional time slots for overhead: one for alignment and one for signaling. This configuration yields 32 time slots per frame, enabling a total capacity of 1920 kbit/s for user data after deducting 128 kbit/s for framing and signaling. The E1 rate is derived from a frame repetition of 8000 Hz, matching the standard sampling rate, with bit rate accuracy maintained at ±50 ppm. Higher levels in the hierarchy multiplex four signals from the previous level, incorporating justification bits to handle plesiochronous clock differences. E2 aggregates four E1 signals to achieve 8.448 , supporting 120 DS0 channels. E3 combines four E2 signals for 34.368 , equivalent to 480 DS0 channels. E4 multiplexes four E3 signals to reach 139.264 , carrying 1920 DS0 channels. The highest defined level, E5, multiplexes four E4 signals at 565.148 , accommodating 7680 DS0 channels. These rates follow a consistent quaternary multiplication factor, with progressively tighter bit rate accuracies (±30 for E2, ±20 for E3, ±15 for E4) to ensure stable aggregation. Framing in the system adheres to synchronous structures that facilitate bit and while supporting both channel-associated signaling () and common signaling () modes. Each E1 consists of 256 bits (32 time slots of 8 bits each), repeating at 125 μs intervals; time slot 0 (TS0) is dedicated to the signal (FAS: 001011 in specific bits) and cyclic redundancy check-4 (CRC-4) for detection, while TS16 handles signaling. In mode, TS16 carries per-channel signaling bits (a, b, c, d at 500 bit/s each) within a 16- multiframe, where 0 includes a multiframe signal (MFAS: 0000) for . mode repurposes TS16 as a full 64 kbit/s for common signaling protocols, such as those in ISDN. Higher levels (E2–E5) employ similar multiframe structures with additional overhead for bits and remote alarms, ensuring compatibility across the hierarchy.
LevelBit Rate (Mbit/s)DS0 ChannelsMultiplexing FactorPrimary Code
E12.04830-HDB3
E28.4481204 × E1HDB3
E334.3684804 × E2HDB3
E4139.26419204 × E3CMI
E5565.14876804 × E4CMI
Unlike the North American T-carrier's T1 rate with 24 DS0 channels, the E1's 30-channel design allows for greater density in European networks.

Operational Mechanisms

Clocking and Synchronization

In plesiochronous digital hierarchy (PDH) systems, clock sources consist of precision oscillators embedded in each or element, enabling autonomous operation while permitting minor frequency discrepancies across the . These clocks preclude end-to-end , as each device maintains its own timing reference derived from local sources rather than a unified clock. Local synchronization is achieved through master-slave , where subordinate clocks in lower-tier elements reference superior clocks in higher-tier nodes to ensure relative within regional segments of the network, though absolute across the entire remains unattainable due to the plesiochronous design. methods primarily rely on timing, in which the clock recovered from an incoming signal regenerates the outgoing transmit clock to maintain with the received data stream. For enhanced , external timing references—such as primary reference clocks traceable to national standards—are incorporated to minimize long-term drift in critical nodes. Clocks at each PDH hierarchy level operate independently, nominally aligned to lower-level tributaries but allowed a frequency tolerance of ±20 to 100 parts per million (ppm) relative to the nominal rate, to accommodate inherent plesiochronous variations without requiring precise locking. For instance, the 2048 kbit/s primary rate exhibits a tolerance of ±50 ppm. PDH signals undergo regeneration at typically spaced 2 to 6 km apart, depending on the and rate, where the incoming waveform is sampled, timing is extracted via circuits, and a clean retimed signal is retransmitted using the local oscillator. If clock drifts occur between regenerations, incoming is filtered to some extent by the repeater's low-pass characteristics, but cumulative phase errors can build up across successive stages, potentially degrading over extended links.

Rate Adaptation and Justification

In plesiochronous digital hierarchy (PDH) systems, rate adaptation is essential to compensate for slight clock frequency differences between tributary signals and the multiplexer output frame rate, ensuring reliable data transport without loss. Bit justification techniques are employed at the bit level during multiplexing, where positive justification involves inserting extra "stuffing" bits into the frame when the tributary rate is lower than the output rate, effectively padding the data stream to match the higher frame rate. Conversely, negative justification skips or removes bits from the tributary when its rate exceeds the output rate, preventing buffer overflow. These methods use dedicated justification bits (J-bits) to signal the presence of stuffed or skipped bits to the receiver, which then removes or inserts them accordingly to reconstruct the original signal. For example, in the European E-carrier system, multiplexing four E1 tributaries (2.048 Mbit/s each) into an E2 frame (8.448 Mbit/s) employs bit interleaving with positive and negative justification opportunities distributed across the frame structure. In higher-order multiplexing, such as E2 to E3 or to T3, adaptation often involves grouping bits into larger units for efficiency, resembling byte justification while remaining bit-oriented. Control bits within the indicate and justification actions for each ; for instance, in E2 formation from E1 inputs, a 4-bit justification field per E1 allows for precise using one or more control bits to denote or . This is managed through elastic buffers that temporarily store incoming data, with the clock reading out at a nominally higher , inserting or omitting bits as needed based on buffer fill levels. In the North American system, T1 to multiplexing (1.544 Mbit/s to 6.312 Mbit/s) similarly uses in a bit-interleaved , where justification overhead accounts for variances up to ±130 . The effective adjustment can be expressed as the input plus the average justification overhead, divided by the multiplexing factor; for T1 to , this yields an adjusted of approximately 1.578 Mbit/s per slot (with total overhead of 0.136 Mbit/s for the T2 ), ensuring the aggregate matches the T2 . Frame slips, which occur due to accumulated clock drifts causing underflow or , are detected using patterns embedded in the structure, such as the alignment signal () in E1 frames or multiframe signals in higher orders. Upon detection, the system employs slip buffering to absorb these drifts, typically handling variations up to 125 μs without by controlled or deletion of entire frames, while maintaining synchronization through phase-locked loops. In the E1 structure, for example, a single control bit per in the overhead facilitates initial and slip recovery by indicating frame boundaries and justification states. This mechanism limits introduced by justification to within tolerances, such as ±30 (unit intervals) at the second-order level.

Limitations and Evolution

Challenges of PDH

One of the primary challenges in the Plesiochronous Digital Hierarchy (PDH) is the complexity associated with demultiplexing signals to access individual channels. In PDH systems, signals are multiplexed bit-by-bit across hierarchical levels, requiring the complete demultiplexing of all higher-order tributaries to extract a single lower-rate channel, such as retrieving a 2 Mbit/s signal from a 140 Mbit/s stream. This process, often involving "tributary unit" extraction, demands specialized hardware and increases operational costs due to the lack of direct access mechanisms, making efficient add/drop operations cumbersome. Jitter and wander accumulation further exacerbate PDH limitations, as each network element operates with its own nominally independent clock, leading to gradual timing drifts between plesiochronous signals. These phase variations accumulate across cascaded equipment, necessitating periodic resynchronization to prevent bit errors; network limits are specified in terms of and wander tolerances per G.823 for hierarchies like the 2048 kbit/s system. Rate adaptation through justification methods, such as , helps mitigate immediate slips but contributes to ongoing wander buildup, constraining the overall reliability and extent of PDH networks. Scalability issues in PDH become pronounced at higher , rendering the system inefficient for capacities exceeding 140 Mbit/s, where the struggles to accommodate growing traffic demands without excessive complexity. The justification process introduces significant overhead—typically 10-20% of the total due to added and control bits—to align differing rates, reducing effective capacity and complicating at upper levels like or T4. This overhead, combined with fixed hierarchical structures, limits PDH's adaptability for modern, high-bandwidth applications. Management of PDH networks is hindered by the absence of standardized overhead bytes dedicated to and maintenance, forcing reliance on solutions for add/drop multiplexers and fault detection. Without international agreements on performance channels, integrating equipment from different vendors becomes challenging, often resulting in incompatible signaling and limited visibility into network health, such as error rates or alarm propagation.

Transition to SDH and SONET

In the , the limitations of PDH, such as complex requiring full disassembly for signal extraction and challenges in across plesiochronous networks, prompted the development of synchronous alternatives. The - Telecommunication Standardization Sector () issued initial Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH) recommendations, including G.707 (Network node interface for the synchronous digital hierarchy), G.708 (Network node interface for the synchronous digital hierarchy - definition of the ), and G.709 (Synchronous multiplex equipment operating at 155 520 kbit/s and above), in 1988 to standardize a fully synchronous transport system capable of efficiently carrying PDH signals and other payloads. Concurrently, in the United States, the (ANSI) adopted the Synchronous (SONET) standard in 1988 (T1.105 series), originally proposed by Bellcore in 1985, to meet similar needs for transport in North American telecommunications networks. These standards aimed to simplify , enable add-drop without full demultiplexing, and support higher bit rates for emerging data services. The transition timeline began with Bellcore's SONET proposal in 1985, followed by ANSI ratification in 1988 and 's initial SDH approvals in the same year. Further refinements occurred, with updating the recommendations in the 1993 edition, incorporating feedback from early implementations. Commercial deployments commenced in the early 1990s, with the first systems installed around 1991-1993 by carriers like and international operators adopting SDH for backbone networks. By the mid-1990s, SDH/ had gained widespread adoption, gradually supplanting PDH in and networks due to improved and . A key aspect of the transition involved mapping PDH signals into SDH/ frames using virtual containers to maintain compatibility. For instance, a E1 signal (2.048 Mbit/s) is embedded into a VC-12 virtual container, which includes and path overhead for and , before being multiplexed into tributary units and higher-level structures like the frame. This asynchronous mapping technique, defined in G.707, allows plesiochronous PDH tributaries to be adapted to the synchronous SDH/ bit rate through justification bits, preserving without requiring immediate network-wide . To facilitate a smooth shift, systems emerged using PDH-SDH multiplexers that bridged legacy PDH equipment with new SDH/ infrastructure, enabling gradual migration without disrupting existing services. These adapters handled rate adaptation and partial demultiplexing, allowing operators to overlay synchronous layers on plesiochronous backbones during the 1990s rollout.

References

  1. [1]
    Plesiochronous Digital Hierarchy - Analog Devices
    Definition. The time-division multiplexed network used by telecommunications companies to transport phone calls and data over copper cabling. The entire network ...
  2. [2]
    Plesiochronous digital hierarchy
    Definition: Is a technology used in telecommunications networks to transport large quantities of data over digital transport equipment such as fibre optic and ...
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
    PDH (Plesiochronous Digital Hierarchy): Overview and Functionality
    Rating 4.9 (39) Nov 4, 2024 · PDH is “plesiochronous,” meaning it operates with “almost” synchronized timing between data streams, but allows for slight timing differences.
  5. [5]
    G.702 : Digital hierarchy bit rates
    ### Summary of ITU-T G.702 Digital Hierarchy Bit Rates
  6. [6]
    Difference between PDH and SDH - GeeksforGeeks
    Jul 23, 2025 · PDH stands for Plesiochronous Digital Hierarchy. It is a telecommunications network transmission technology designed for the transport of large data volumes.
  7. [7]
    PDH vs SDH: Understanding the Differences and Similarities - FCTEL
    Jan 11, 2023 · Plesiochronous Digital Hierarchy (PDH) is a telecommunication technology used for several decades. It is based on a plesiochronous timing system ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Plesiochronous Digital Hierarchy (PDH) information model for ... - ETSI
    1. Scope. The present document defines the information model to be used at the interface between Network Elements (NEs) and management systems, for the ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Primer > SDH Telecommunications Standard - Tektronix
    Plesiochronous Digital Hierarchy (PDH) . ... Although these clocks are extremely accurate, there's a small frequency difference between one clock and the other.
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Jitter & Wander measurements - ALBEDO Telecom
    These limits are represented in masks or amplitude-frequency graphs in recommendations G.823 (for PDH) and G.825 (for SDH). The frequencies at which tolerance ...<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Digital Telephony
    Bellamy, John, l94l*. Digital telephony / John Bellamy.*3rd ed. p.cm,- (Wiley series in t'elecornmunications and signal processing). "A Wiley-Lrterscience ...
  13. [13]
    Pulse Code Modulation - Engineering and Technology History Wiki
    In 1937, Alec Reeves came up with the idea of Pulse Code Modulation (PCM). At the time, few, if any, took notice of Reeve's development.
  14. [14]
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Fifth Plenary Assembly of the C.C.I.T.T. (Geneva, 1972)
    Draft Recommendation G.702 Vocabulary of pulse code modulation and digital terms ... suggestions and proposals concerning the organization and methods of work of ...Missing: PDH | Show results with:PDH
  16. [16]
    1951-1970:The Birth of T-carrier - T1: A Survival Guide [Book]
    Timing, Clocking,and Synchronization in the T-carrier System. A Timing ... The transistor, invented in 1947 at Bell Labs, made it possible to construct ...
  17. [17]
    E-Carrier System: Brief Overview and History - DPS Telecom
    The E-carrier system, standardized by CEPT, is for digital voice and data transmission, enabling rapid data over wireline networks.Missing: 1970s | Show results with:1970s
  18. [18]
    An Introduction to Plesiochronous Digital Hierarchy
    Dec 22, 2014 · Innovation in the telecom industry has led to a new kind of multiplexing and de-multiplexing technique called plesiochronous digital hierarchy (PDH).Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  19. [19]
    G.704 : Synchronous frame structures used at 1544, 6312 ... - ITU
    Dec 24, 2019 · In force components. Number, Title, Status. G.704 (10/98), Synchronous frame structures used at 1544, 6312, 2048, 8448 and 44 736 kbit/s ...Missing: first date PDH
  20. [20]
    [PDF] PDH and T-Carrier: The Plesiochronous Hierarchies
    Based on the E1 signal, the ITU-T defined a hierarchy of plesiochronous signals that enables signals to be transported at rates of up to 140 Mbps (see Figure ...
  21. [21]
    Communication Technologies - The Plesiochronous Digital Hierarchy
    Jan 28, 2009 · The T1 and E1 carriers are the first level of multiplexing in the Plesiochronous Digital Hierarchy (PDH). Four first level carriers are multiplexed together.
  22. [22]
    T-carrier - ATIS Telecom Glossary
    T-carrier ; First level, 1.544 Mb/s (DS1) (24 user channels), 1.544Mb/s (24 user channels), 2.048 Mb/s (30 user channels).Missing: T1 T3 T4 T5 specifications<|control11|><|separator|>
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Tektronix: Primer > T1 Network Technology
    This results in a total data rate of : 193 bits/frame * 8,000 frames/sec = 1.544 Mbps. This data rate signal is also known as a ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] T1 E1 Overview - GL Communications
    • Framing bit creates a channel of 8kbit/s and is used for messages, synchronization, and alarms. • A frame is the basic building block for the SF and the ESF ...Missing: T- | Show results with:T-<|control11|><|separator|>
  25. [25]
  26. [26]
    [PDF] A review of Plesiochronous Digital Hierarchy (PDH) and ... - arXiv
    Plesiochronous Digital Hierarchy (PDH) on the other hand has been used before the introduction of the SDH standard and it also provides a means to transport ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] EN 300 462-2-1 V1.1.1 (1998-05) - ETSI
    A clock accuracy of ±20 ppm is required to send an Alarm Indication Signal (AIS) (applicable for regenerators and any other SDH equipment where loss of all.
  28. [28]
    [PDF] ETS 300 462-2 - Edition 01 - Transmission and Multiplexing (TM)
    Sep 9, 1996 · Master-slave synchronization uses a hierarchy of clocks in which each level of the hierarchy is synchronized with reference to a higher ...
  29. [29]
  30. [30]
    [PDF] EN 300 417-5-1 V1.1.2 (1998-11) - ETSI
    Hierarchy (SDH) elements) at the ITU-T Recommendation G.702 hierarchical rates of 2 048 ... signal (a bit rate in range 2048 kbit/s ± 50 ppm) - within 250 ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] ITU-T Rec. G.823 (03/93) The control of jitter and wander within ...
    ITU-T Recommendation G.823 concerns the control of jitter and wander within digital networks based on the 2048 kbit/s hierarchy.
  32. [32]
    G.742 : Second order digital multiplex equipment operating at ... - ITU
    In force components ; Number, Title, Status ; G.742 (11/88), Second order digital multiplex equipment operating at 8448 kbit/s and using positive justification ...Missing: bit negative stuffing PDH
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Course 10-11. Multiplexing of plesiochronous signals. The PDH ...
    ▫ if the clock signal does not present any jitter, then the regeneration process by sampling at the middle of the signal elements might ensure a jitter ...Missing: repeaters | Show results with:repeaters
  34. [34]
    G.707 : Network node interface for the synchronous digital ... - ITU
    Mar 13, 2023 · G.Imp707/Y.1322 (06/10), Implementers' Guide for Recommendation ITU-T G.707/Y.1322 (07/2007) - Definitions and terms found in Recommendation ITU ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Fundamentals of SONET/SDH
    Sep 18, 2001 · ANSI work commenced in 1985 with the CCITT. (now ITU) initiating a standardization effort in 1986. From the very beginning there was conflict.
  36. [36]
    G.707 - ITU-T Recommendation database
    Approval date: 1996-03-20 ; Provisional name: G.ons ; Approval process: TAP ; Status: Superseded ; Observation: Replaces 1993 versions of ITU-T G.707, G.708, G.709.
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Network Synchronization - ALBEDO Telecom
    Aug 3, 2012 · ... transmission and multiplexing and PCM terms, March 1993. • ITU-T Rec. G.702, Digital Hierarchy bit rates, Nov. 1988. • ITU-T Rec. G.703 ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Application Note 125 - EXFO
    Oct 10, 2023 · Their answer was the definition and ratification of three key technologies that form the basis of next-generation SONET/SDH: generic framing.