Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Radiofrequency ablation

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive that applies high-frequency alternating electrical currents through electrodes to generate localized heat, thereby destroying targeted abnormal tissues such as tumors, pain-conducting nerves, or irregular cardiac pathways. Developed in the , has become a versatile treatment across multiple medical specialties due to its precision and reduced recovery time compared to traditional surgery. In , it is commonly used to treat chronic conditions like facet joint-mediated back and , , and by creating thermal lesions that interrupt nociceptive signals, often providing relief for 6 to 12 months or longer. In , RFA targets solid tumors in organs including the liver, , , , and , particularly for patients unsuitable for , by heating cancer cells to lethal temperatures above 60°C, leading to . It can also palliate pain from metastatic disease or treat precancerous lesions like . Cardiac applications focus on treating arrhythmias such as , where RFA ablates faulty electrical pathways in the heart to restore normal rhythm, often performed via under imaging guidance. In , RFA addresses and by delivering radiofrequency energy through a to heat and collapse superficial veins, promoting their permanent closure. The procedure is typically outpatient, lasting 10 to depending on the site, and uses with sedation; imaging like , , or ensures accurate placement, with temperatures controlled to 60–80°C for effective while minimizing surrounding damage. While offers benefits such as decreased reliance, high success rates (up to 80% for relief in select cases), and low complication rates, potential risks include infection, bleeding, transient , organ injury, or post-procedure syndrome with flu-like symptoms. An interprofessional team, including interventional radiologists, specialists, or surgeons, optimizes outcomes through careful selection and .

Principles and Mechanism

Definition and Basic Principles

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive therapeutic that employs high-frequency alternating electrical , typically in the range of 300–500 kHz, to generate localized heat within targeted biological tissues through ionic agitation. This non-ionizing radiofrequency energy is delivered via an , inducing frictional heating at the molecular level without causing neuromuscular stimulation due to the frequency being above the that triggers nerve or muscle . The core principle of RFA relies on resistive heating, known as the Joule effect, where the alternating current flows through the tissue's electrical resistance, producing temperatures of 60–100°C that lead to irreversible coagulation necrosis of cells in the targeted zone. This thermal damage disrupts cellular proteins and membranes, resulting in tissue destruction confined to the area of elevated current density around the electrode tip. Unlike cryoablation, which freezes tissues to induce ice crystal formation and vascular stasis, or microwave ablation, which uses higher frequencies (900–2450 MHz) for dielectric heating over larger volumes, RFA specifically leverages low-frequency ionic friction for precise, controllable thermal lesions. Key biophysical aspects include , where the radiofrequency generator automatically adjusts output to optimize energy transfer despite varying impedance (typically 80–150 Ω), ensuring efficient heating without excessive power draw. In monopolar RFA systems, which are most common, a grounding pad (dispersive ) on the patient's skin completes the electrical , distributing return to prevent localized overheating at the pad . Energy delivery can occur in continuous mode for steady heating or pulsed mode, which intermittently applies to modulate rise, reduce adjacent charring, and potentially minimize pain during application. These principles underpin RFA's use in fields such as for tumor destruction and for treatment.

Thermal Effects and Tissue Destruction

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) induces tissue destruction primarily through localized , where alternating current generates frictional heat via ionic agitation, elevating tissue temperatures to 50–100°C near the . This thermal energy causes immediate coagulation at temperatures exceeding 60°C, resulting from protein denaturation, , and disruption of cellular membranes and bilayers. In the surrounding transitional areas, where temperatures range from 42–50°C, delayed occurs through mitochondrial damage, cellular stress pathways, and ischemia-induced autophagy. These mechanisms ensure targeted cell death while minimizing damage to adjacent structures, as seen in applications like destroying cardiac foci or pain-transmitting nerves. A significant limitation in RFA efficacy is the heat sink effect, whereby blood flow in nearby vessels dissipates heat, cooling the ablation zone and reducing the predictability and completeness of tissue destruction, particularly in vascularized organs like the liver. This convective cooling can lead to incomplete ablation margins, increasing recurrence risk in settings. The ablation zone exhibits a characteristic zonal architecture based on temperature gradients: a central necrotic reaching up to 100°C with irreversible ; an intermediate hyperemic rim at 50–60°C featuring active and partial ; and an outer zone at 40–50°C where sublethal heat induces and potential . Histologically, these zones show distinct changes, including shrinkage and denaturation in the , vascular disrupting blood supply, and activation of immune responses in peripheral areas that release tumor antigens in oncologic applications. Several factors influence the efficacy and extent of thermal destruction in RFA, including electrical , which affects distribution; design, such as single-needle versus multi-array probes that expand the volume; and power settings ranging from 20–200 W to control energy delivery and size. Optimal combinations of these elements are critical for achieving uniform while mitigating variability from local or heterogeneity.

Procedure and Technique

Preoperative Evaluation and Preparation

Preoperative evaluation for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) begins with careful patient selection to ensure suitability across various applications, such as , , and . Ideal candidates include those with localized lesions or targeted neural structures who are not surgical candidates due to comorbidities, with tumors typically limited to 3-5 cm in diameter for optimal outcomes in hepatic applications. Contraindications vary by site but generally encompass absolute barriers like patient refusal, active local or systemic , uncorrectable , and bacteremia, while relative contraindications include proximity of the target to critical structures (e.g., central ducts or major vessels in liver tumors, risking biliary or vascular injury) and presence of pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in cardiac procedures due to electromagnetic interference risks. In , additional absolute contraindications involve known left atrial , mobile , and mechanical prosthetic heart valves to avoid embolic or procedural complications. Diagnostic imaging is essential for procedural planning to precisely map the target anatomy and assess feasibility. Cross-sectional modalities such as , , or are routinely employed to delineate lesion size, location, vascular involvement, and adjacent structures, with multiphasic or preferred for liver tumors to evaluate enhancement patterns and resectability alternatives. In cardiac applications, transthoracic is standard to exclude structural abnormalities or thrombi, supplemented by cardiac or for complex mapping. For RFA, or guides neural targeting, ensuring accurate electrode placement. Laboratory assessments focus on mitigating procedural risks, particularly bleeding and contrast-related issues. A coagulation profile, including , international normalized ratio, and platelet count, is mandatory to identify , with anticoagulation management following American Society of Regional guidelines (e.g., holding 5 days pre-procedure). Renal function tests, such as and estimated , are required when is anticipated for imaging, to prevent . and electrolytes are also evaluated, especially in cardiac cases, to address or imbalances that could exacerbate arrhythmias. Anesthesia selection depends on the application site and patient factors to balance comfort, safety, and procedural precision. with mild is common for peripheral or RFA, allowing real-time patient feedback while minimizing systemic effects. In contrast, cardiac RFA often employs conscious using intravenous benzodiazepines and opioids, though general is preferred for pediatric patients or complex cases involving transseptal access. For high-risk hepatic procedures, monitored anesthesia care with infusion provides hemodynamic stability without full general . Informed consent is a critical step, involving a thorough discussion of procedure-specific risks, benefits, , and alternatives to empower patient decision-making. Providers outline potential complications like bleeding (1-3%), infection (<1%), or site-specific issues such as cardiac perforation (0.5-1%), alongside benefits including reduced pain or tumor control. is highlighted contextually, such as 90-98% complete ablation rates for small hepatocellular carcinomas (<3 cm), comparable to surgical resection in select cases, with alternatives like surgery, chemotherapy, or watchful waiting presented based on tumor stage and patient health. Documentation confirms patient understanding, particularly emphasizing the minimally invasive nature and potential for repeat sessions if incomplete.

Ablation Process and Imaging Guidance

The ablation process in radiofrequency ablation (RFA) varies by application. For extra-cardiac targets such as tumors or nerves, it typically begins with the percutaneous insertion of an electrode needle into the target tissue under local anesthesia. This approach involves using 14- to 18-gauge needles, which are advanced through the skin to reach the lesion, minimizing invasiveness while ensuring precise placement. Local anesthesia, such as , is administered to the insertion site to manage discomfort during the procedure. In cardiac applications, an endovascular catheter is inserted via vascular access (e.g., femoral vein) and navigated to the heart under imaging guidance. Modern variations include high-power short-duration protocols and 3D electroanatomic mapping systems to enhance precision and reduce procedure time, as of 2025. Once positioned, radiofrequency energy is delivered through the electrode to generate heat in the surrounding tissue. Power output is incrementally increased while monitoring tissue impedance to adjust delivery and prevent excessive heating, with the electrode tip temperature typically targeted between 80°C and 100°C to achieve effective coagulation without boiling. The duration of energy application per lesion generally ranges from 5 to 20 minutes, depending on the lesion size and system used, allowing for controlled thermal destruction of the target area. Real-time imaging guidance is essential for accurate electrode placement and monitoring during RFA. Ultrasound provides dynamic visualization for procedures in the liver and thyroid, enabling operators to adjust the needle trajectory and assess the ablation zone in real time. Fluoroscopy offers continuous imaging for cardiac applications, facilitating catheter navigation within the heart. For lung tumors, computed tomography (CT), often with fluoroscopy integration, ensures precise targeting in aerated tissues where ultrasound may be limited. The procedure's endpoint is determined by specific physiological indicators to confirm adequate tissue ablation. The roll-off technique is commonly employed, where energy delivery ceases upon an abrupt impedance rise of more than 20 ohms above baseline, signaling desiccation and coagulation. Alternatively, temperature thresholds, such as reaching 100°C at the tip, may guide termination to avoid over-ablation. RFA systems vary in configuration to optimize performance and lesion size. Monopolar systems direct current from the electrode tip through the body to a grounding pad, suitable for focal ablations, while bipolar systems use two electrodes to contain the current flow between them, potentially reducing unintended heating. Cooled-tip electrodes, which circulate fluid internally, prevent charring at the tissue-electrode interface by dissipating heat, enabling higher power delivery and larger ablation zones without impedance spikes.

Postoperative Monitoring and Recovery

Following radiofrequency ablation (RFA), patients are typically transferred to a recovery area for immediate postoperative monitoring, where vital signs including blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, and temperature are continuously assessed to detect any acute complications such as bleeding or infection. Pain management is initiated promptly with analgesics, and patients are observed for 4 to 24 hours depending on the treatment site and individual risk factors, allowing for stabilization before discharge or extended hospital stay. Hydration is encouraged, and the puncture site is inspected for signs of hematoma or inflammation to ensure early intervention if needed. Imaging confirmation via contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is performed shortly after the procedure to evaluate the ablation zone, which typically measures 3 to 5 cm in diameter for small tumors, encompassing the target lesion plus a 0.5- to 1.0-cm ablative margin to confirm complete coverage and technical success. Nonenhancement within this zone on imaging indicates successful thermal destruction without viable tumor tissue. During the initial recovery phase, patients are advised to adhere to activity restrictions, including 24 hours of bed rest followed by avoidance of strenuous activities or heavy lifting for 1 to 2 weeks to minimize discomfort and promote healing at the access site. Mild soreness or bruising may persist for up to 2 weeks, managed with ice packs and over-the-counter pain relief, while light activities can resume after the first day. Follow-up protocols generally include clinical evaluations at 1 week and 1 month post-procedure to assess symptom resolution and any immediate concerns, followed by visits at 3 to 6 months incorporating repeat imaging to monitor for sustained efficacy. Success is gauged by significant symptom relief, such as greater than 50% reduction in pain scores on validated scales like the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), alongside persistent nonenhancement of the ablated lesion on follow-up CT or MRI.

Oncology Applications

Liver Tumors

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) serves as a key minimally invasive treatment for primary and metastatic liver tumors, particularly when surgical resection is not feasible due to tumor location, patient comorbidities, or multifocal disease. It is indicated for early-stage lesions smaller than 3 cm, often as a first-line option for solitary or limited nodules in patients meeting the , which encompass a single tumor up to 5 cm or up to three nodules each no larger than 3 cm without vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread. For metastatic lesions, such as those from , RFA is recommended for unresectable tumors up to 3 cm in diameter, typically limited to three or fewer lesions, providing local control in patients ineligible for surgery. Clinical efficacy of RFA in small HCC is well-established, with 5-year overall survival rates ranging from 40% to 60% for lesions under 3 cm, comparable to surgical outcomes in select early-stage cases. Local tumor control exceeds 90% for HCC nodules smaller than 2 cm, attributed to complete necrosis achieved through precise energy delivery, with low rates of local progression (around 2-5% at 3 years in optimized protocols). In colorectal liver metastases, RFA yields complete response rates over 90% for small lesions, contributing to prolonged progression-free survival when integrated into multimodal care. For larger tumors exceeding 3 cm, RFA techniques are adapted using multiple overlapping ablations to ensure comprehensive coverage of the lesion and a 0.5-1 cm margin, often requiring 4-6 sequential applications per session to achieve uniform thermal destruction. Approaches include percutaneous insertion under ultrasound or CT guidance for accessible tumors, or laparoscopic methods for subcapsular or posteriorly located lesions to enhance precision and reduce complications. These adaptations extend RFA's utility to tumors up to 5 cm in select patients, though efficacy diminishes beyond this size without adjuncts. Combining RFA with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) enhances outcomes for intermediate-stage HCC or larger lesions by first reducing tumor vascularity and size via embolization, followed by ablation for residual disease, resulting in superior 5-year survival rates (up to 50-60%) compared to either modality alone. This sequential approach improves local control and delays intrahepatic recurrence, particularly for tumors 3-5 cm or in high-risk locations near vessels. As of 2025, advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) are integrating into RFA workflows for liver tumors, with models using pre- and post-procedural imaging to predict ablation zone coverage and identify incomplete treatments, achieving accuracies around 70-85% in estimating tumor necrosis extent. These AI tools, often based on machine learning analysis of CT or MRI slices, help refine electrode placement and energy parameters, potentially reducing recurrence rates below 10% by minimizing marginal failures in small HCC cases.

Kidney and Lung Tumors

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) serves as a minimally invasive alternative to surgery for treating small , particularly T1a stage tumors measuring less than 4 cm in diameter, in patients who are poor candidates for surgical intervention due to comorbidities or other risks. This approach is nephron-sparing, helping to preserve renal function by avoiding the need for partial or radical nephrectomy, which is especially beneficial in patients with solitary kidneys or preexisting renal impairment. Procedural nuances include the use of hydrodissection, where fluid (such as 5% dextrose solution) is injected to displace adjacent structures like the bowel or ureter, thereby protecting them from thermal injury during ablation. Efficacy data indicate high oncologic outcomes, with 5-year cancer-specific survival rates ranging from 92% to 95% in selected cohorts of small renal tumors. For lung malignancies, RFA is indicated for primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or pulmonary metastases smaller than 3 cm, often in patients unsuitable for resection or stereotactic body radiotherapy, with a focus on peripheral lesions amenable to percutaneous access. Stereotactic CT guidance enhances precision for these peripheral targets, allowing for targeted electrode placement while minimizing damage to surrounding lung parenchyma. To address respiratory motion artifacts during the procedure, breath-hold techniques under general anesthesia or conscious sedation are employed, stabilizing the tumor position relative to imaging and the ablation probe. Local control rates for lung tumors treated with RFA typically range from 80% to 90% at 2 years, with a pneumothorax complication rate of approximately 30%, though risks are lower (around 10-20%) for smaller, peripheral lesions managed with careful technique. In vascular-rich organs like the kidney, strategies such as pulsed ablation protocols help mitigate heat sink effects from nearby blood flow. Recent advancements as of 2025 include hybrid approaches combining microwave ablation with RFA principles, enabling faster energy delivery and larger ablation zones in lung tissue, which reduces procedure time compared to traditional RFA alone and improves outcomes for multifocal or challenging lesions.

Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) serves as a minimally invasive option for treating bone and soft tissue tumors, particularly when surgical resection is not feasible due to tumor location, patient comorbidities, or lesion size. It is indicated for benign lesions such as osteoid osteoma, which causes severe nocturnal pain unresponsive to conservative therapies like nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and for malignant bone metastases that induce intractable pain despite analgesics or prior radiation. For unresectable soft tissue sarcomas, including recurrent cases in non-surgical candidates, RFA provides local tumor control and palliation, targeting lesions that are otherwise challenging to manage. The procedure typically employs CT guidance to precisely place electrodes into the tumor nidus or lesion, delivering thermal energy to induce coagulative necrosis through temperatures of 80–100°C for 5–10 minutes. In spinal bone metastases, RFA is often followed by cement augmentation via vertebroplasty, where polymethylmethacrylate is injected to fill voids and restore vertebral stability, thereby preventing pathological fractures and reducing pain from mechanical instability. This combined approach enhances structural integrity in weight-bearing areas, with the ablation step first devitalizing tumor tissue to minimize cement leakage risks. Efficacy in bone tumors is high, with pain relief achieved in approximately 80% of patients with after a single session and sustained success rates exceeding 95% at long-term follow-up. For bone metastases, rapid pain reduction occurs in 75–80% of cases within 24 hours to one week, with mean pain scores decreasing by over 70% at eight weeks and reduced reliance on opioids. In unresectable soft tissue sarcomas, RFA yields local control rates above 80%, with local recurrence below 20% for lesions under 3 cm, supporting its role in palliating symptoms and delaying progression. RFA is frequently integrated into multimodal strategies for bone metastases, such as sequential or concurrent use with radiotherapy, which amplifies pain response rates to over 90% at three months and improves local tumor control compared to radiation alone. Recent data from 2023 post-market studies indicate that RFA reduces opioid requirements by 50–70% in the months following treatment, with ongoing trials in 2025 exploring further synergies with radiation to enhance palliation and quality of life. Unique challenges in RFA for these tumors include the risk of periosteal overheating, which can lead to burns or nerve damage in superficial bone lesions, necessitating careful electrode positioning and temperature monitoring below 90°C near the cortex. Soft tissue charring, caused by desiccation and impedance rise during ablation, is mitigated through perfusion techniques using saline-infused electrodes to maintain conductivity and uniform heating, preventing incomplete treatment margins. These measures ensure safety, with overall complication rates under 5% in experienced centers.

Pancreatic Tumors

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is emerging as a palliative option for pancreatic tumors, particularly unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors, in patients unsuitable for surgery due to advanced disease or comorbidities. It is often performed endoscopically under ultrasound (EUS) guidance to target lesions in the pancreas while minimizing damage to adjacent structures like the duodenum or bile duct. Efficacy includes local tumor control and pain palliation, with studies reporting symptom relief in 70-90% of cases and potential extension of survival when combined with , though overall survival remains limited (median 6-12 months in advanced cases). As of 2025, advancements focus on probes for precise delivery, reducing complications like (10-20% risk) and improving integration with systemic therapies for better outcomes in locally advanced disease.

Cardiology Applications

Cardiac Arrhythmias

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) serves as a cornerstone therapy for managing cardiac arrhythmias, including supraventricular tachycardias, ventricular tachycardias, and particularly , where it offers a potentially curative approach by targeting abnormal electrical circuits in the heart. The technique delivers controlled thermal energy through a catheter to create precise lesions that interrupt arrhythmogenic foci, thereby restoring normal rhythm without the need for open-heart surgery. Historically, catheter-based ablation originated with direct current shocks for atrioventricular (AV) node modification in 1982 to treat refractory , marking the first successful intervention of its kind. Radiofrequency energy was introduced in 1987 as a safer alternative for AV junction ablation, reducing risks associated with earlier direct current methods, and rapidly expanded to accessory pathway ablation in conditions like . By the late 1990s, RFA evolved to address through , a breakthrough that shifted focus from palliative AV node ablation to targeting AF triggers at their source. The primary application of RFA in cardiac arrhythmias is PVI for paroxysmal AF, where ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins initiate episodes; this procedure electrically isolates the veins from the left atrium to prevent propagation. Advanced 3D electroanatomic mapping systems, such as , are integral to the process, enabling real-time visualization of cardiac anatomy and electrical activation to precisely identify arrhythmogenic foci and guide the creation of contiguous circumferential lesions around the pulmonary vein ostia. RFA techniques vary between point-by-point ablation, which uses a steerable catheter to apply sequential lesions for durable isolation, and single-shot balloon-based approaches that deploy energy circumferentially in one application to streamline the procedure. Emerging non-thermal alternatives, such as , use electrical pulses to selectively ablate myocardial tissue while sparing surrounding structures, showing comparable efficacy to RFA in paroxysmal AF with potentially lower risks. As of 2025, RFA remains a dominant technology for AF ablation, though is rapidly gaining adoption and is projected to surpass RFA in procedure volume in many markets due to its safety profile. Clinical outcomes for RFA in paroxysmal AF demonstrate freedom from arrhythmia recurrence in 70-80% of patients at one year post-PVI, positioning it as a reliable curative option for drug-refractory cases. Successful ablation achieves a greater than 90% reduction in AF burden, significantly improving quality of life and reducing reliance on antiarrhythmic drugs or anticoagulation. Complications remain low, with pulmonary vein stenosis occurring in less than 1% of cases, attributable to refined mapping and energy delivery protocols that minimize excessive tissue heating.

Renal Sympathetic Denervation

Renal sympathetic denervation using (RFA) is a catheter-based procedure designed to treat resistant hypertension by targeting overactive sympathetic nerves surrounding the renal arteries. It is indicated for patients with office systolic blood pressure greater than 160 mmHg despite adherence to at least three antihypertensive medications at optimal doses, including a diuretic. The procedure is performed via femoral artery access, similar to vascular approaches in cardiac , allowing for percutaneous delivery of the ablation catheter to the renal arteries bilaterally. The technique involves advancing a multi-electrode catheter, such as the Symplicity Spyral system, through the femoral access to the renal arteries under fluoroscopic guidance. Radiofrequency energy is then delivered from the catheter's electrodes to the inner walls of the renal arteries, creating controlled thermal lesions that ablate the surrounding sympathetic nerves; typically, 4-6 applications are performed per artery, with each lasting about 60 seconds to minimize procedural time and patient discomfort. This approach disrupts both afferent and efferent sympathetic nerve fibers embedded in the adventitia of the renal arteries, thereby reducing sympathetic outflow to the kidneys and central nervous system without causing significant endothelial or vessel wall damage, as confirmed by intravascular imaging in clinical trials. Clinical efficacy has been demonstrated in randomized trials, with RFA-based renal denervation achieving systolic blood pressure reductions of 10-20 mmHg at 12 months compared to sham controls, alongside improvements in 24-hour ambulatory monitoring. Meta-analyses from 2025 further support the durability of these effects, showing sustained blood pressure lowering beyond 3 years in patients with resistant hypertension, with no increase in major adverse events. In November 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the Symplicity Spyral radiofrequency renal denervation system for hypertension treatment, based on positive outcomes from the SPYRAL HTN trials demonstrating safety and blood pressure reduction in medicated patients.

Pain Management Applications

Axial Skeleton Pain

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a targeted neuromodulatory intervention used to manage chronic pain originating from the axial skeleton, particularly the spine, by interrupting pain signals from or intervertebral discs. This procedure is indicated for facet-mediated low back pain, which accounts for 15-45% of chronic low back pain cases, and cervical or thoracic pain from similar zygapophyseal joint sources. Diagnosis typically requires confirmatory diagnostic medial branch blocks, where concordant pain relief exceeding 80% establishes candidacy for RFA. The primary targets of RFA in axial skeleton pain are the medial branch nerves innervating the facet joints, with lumbar and sacral segments most commonly addressed due to their prevalence in degenerative conditions. These nerves are coagulated at temperatures of 80-90°C for 60-90 seconds per nerve to achieve thermal neurolysis, selectively denervating the sensory afferents while sparing motor function. The technique employs fluoroscopy-guided needle placement in a prone patient position, allowing precise electrode positioning adjacent to the target nerves; multilevel ablations are frequently performed to cover multiple segments affected by spondylosis or arthritis. Clinical efficacy of conventional RFA for axial skeleton pain demonstrates 60-70% reduction in pain scores at 6-12 months post-procedure, with functional improvements in activities of daily living and reduced opioid reliance. Repeat ablation rates remain low at under 20% within the first year, reflecting durable sensory interruption via thermal coagulation of nociceptive fibers. As of 2025, advancements in cooled RFA have expanded applications to larger lesion volumes by utilizing internal water circulation to dissipate heat, enabling broader denervation fields and potentially providing pain relief durations of 9-12 months on average, with up to 24 months in some refractory cases. This variant maintains similar safety profiles to conventional methods but offers superior outcomes for patients with extensive facet involvement.

Peripheral Joint and Nerve Pain

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for peripheral joint and nerve pain targets sensory nerves innervating joints and extremities to alleviate chronic pain, particularly in conditions like osteoarthritis where conservative treatments have failed. This approach is analogous to axial nerve targeting but adapted for peripheral anatomy, using imaging guidance to access nerves around joints such as the knee or hip. Primary applications include knee osteoarthritis (OA) with moderate to severe pain, typically indicated when visual analog scale (VAS) scores exceed 5 despite multimodal therapy, and confirmed by at least 50% temporary relief from diagnostic genicular nerve blocks. The procedure focuses on the genicular nerves—superior medial, superior lateral, and inferior medial branches of the femoral and tibial nerves—which transmit pain signals from the knee joint capsule. The technique involves percutaneous needle placement under ultrasound or fluoroscopic guidance to position electrodes adjacent to the target nerves, followed by application of radiofrequency energy to create thermal lesions that disrupt pain transmission without damaging motor function. Standard thermal heats the tissue to 80–85°C for 90 seconds per site, while cooled uses internal probe cooling to maintain electrode temperature at 60°C, allowing larger lesions (up to 80°C in surrounding tissue) for more comprehensive denervation. Pulsed variants apply short bursts of energy (e.g., 20 ms pulses at 42°C) to modulate nerve activity without significant thermal damage, reducing risks like sensory loss. Post-procedure, patients experience mild soreness for 1–2 weeks, with effects onset within 2–4 weeks. Efficacy studies demonstrate 50–70% of patients achieve at least 50% pain reduction at 6 months, with mean VAS score improvements of 3–5 points from baselines of 7–8. Cooled RFA shows higher success rates (up to 74% at 6 months) compared to conventional methods, sustaining benefits in 40–65% of cases at 12 months. Additionally, approximately 60% of patients report reduced opioid consumption, with some achieving complete cessation. For hip pain, RFA targets articular branches of the femoral and obturator nerves, providing 50–80% pain relief lasting 6–12 months in OA patients refractory to intra-articular injections. In trigeminal neuralgia, percutaneous RFA of the trigeminal ganglion or peripheral branches yields 70–90% initial pain relief, with 50–70% maintaining benefits beyond 1 year. Recent advancements as of 2025 include pulsed RFA protocols for and joint pain, which preserve sensory function while achieving comparable analgesia to thermal methods, with studies reporting 60–80% improvement in refractory cases and minimal complications. Innovations like V-shaped active-tip electrodes enhance precision in genicular targeting, extending relief to 12–24 months in select knee cohorts.

Other Clinical Applications

Thyroid Nodules

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) serves as a minimally invasive, thyroid-preserving alternative to surgery for treating symptomatic benign thyroid nodules. Indications typically include nodules greater than 2 cm in diameter that cause compressive symptoms such as dysphagia, neck discomfort, or cosmetic concerns, with benign cytology confirmed by at least two fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) or core needle biopsies. This approach is particularly suitable for patients who are poor surgical candidates or prefer to avoid thyroidectomy, preserving normal thyroid function while addressing nodule-related issues. The procedure is performed percutaneously under ultrasound guidance, utilizing a moving-shot technique to ensure uniform thermal ablation across the nodule volume and minimize damage to surrounding structures like the recurrent laryngeal nerve. An 18-gauge electrode is inserted transisthmically, delivering radiofrequency energy at 80-120°C to induce coagulation necrosis, typically in an outpatient setting under local anesthesia. Compared to ethanol ablation, which is more effective for predominantly cystic nodules due to its diffusive mechanism, RFA is preferred for solid or hypervascular nodules as it provides more predictable and complete tissue destruction without reliance on fluid dynamics. Nodule volumes typically reduce by 50-80% at 6 months post-procedure, reflecting the progressive resorption of necrotic tissue. Efficacy is evidenced by sustained nodule shrinkage of 70-90% at 1 year, with over 80% of patients experiencing significant symptom relief, including improved cosmetic scores and reduced compressive effects. In the United States, received FDA clearance in 2018 for benign compressive thyroid nodules, leading to gradual adoption; by 2025, it has become a widely accepted option in specialized centers, supported by growing clinical evidence and professional guidelines. Complications are infrequent and mostly transient, with the overall major complication rate around 1-3%. Transient hoarseness occurs in less than 5% of cases due to temporary nerve irritation, while permanent vocal cord palsy is rare at under 1%, often avoidable with precise ultrasound monitoring. Other minor effects include pain or swelling, resolving without intervention in most patients.

Varicose Veins

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive endovascular procedure used to treat chronic venous insufficiency by closing incompetent saphenous veins, thereby alleviating symptoms of varicose veins such as pain, swelling, and skin changes. The technique delivers controlled radiofrequency energy to the vein wall, causing thermal damage that induces collagen contraction and fibrosis, resulting in vein occlusion and redirection of blood flow to healthier veins. Indications for RFA primarily include symptomatic superficial venous reflux in the great saphenous (GSV) or small saphenous (SSV), confirmed by duplex ultrasound showing duration exceeding 0.5 seconds (typically >500 ms reversed flow) and diameters greater than 3 mm. It is recommended for patients with CEAP clinical classes C2 () through C6 (active venous ulcers), particularly when conservative measures like compression therapy fail. incompetence with diameters over 3.5 mm and similar may also warrant RFA in the context of healed or active ulcers. These criteria align with strong recommendations (Grade 1, Evidence B) from vascular society guidelines for axial . The procedure is performed under ultrasound guidance in an outpatient setting, beginning with percutaneous access using a 16- or 18-gauge needle at the knee or ankle level. A specialized RFA catheter is advanced to within 2 cm of the saphenofemoral or saphenopopliteal junction, followed by infiltration of tumescent anesthesia (a dilute lidocaine ) around the vein to provide analgesia, compress the vein, and insulate perivenous tissues from . Radiofrequency , reaching temperatures up to 120°C, is then applied in segmental bursts of 20 seconds per position as the catheter is slowly withdrawn, typically at rates of 1-3 cm per second depending on the device, to ensure uniform heating and vein wall denaturation. Post-procedure, patients wear for 1-2 weeks to promote and reduce complications. This method achieves acute vein occlusion in over 95% of cases. Efficacy of RFA is well-established, with anatomical success rates exceeding 90% at 1 year and clinical recurrence rates below 10% at 5 years, significantly lower than the 20-30% seen with traditional surgery. Compared to stripping, RFA offers faster recovery, with most patients resuming normal activities within 1-2 days versus weeks for open surgery, and lower rates of complications such as or . Long-term studies confirm sustained closure in 85-90% of treated segments at 5 years, with reoperation rates around 10.7%. As of 2025, current standards emphasize segmental application for tributary veins alongside ablation, often combined with adjunctive or ambulatory phlebectomy for residual varicosities to optimize cosmetic and functional outcomes (Grade 1, Evidence B/C). This approach addresses multifocal more comprehensively than isolated . Clinical outcomes demonstrate substantial improvements in , with the Chronic Venous Insufficiency (CIVIQ-20) scores decreasing by 15-20 points on average (indicating reduced symptom burden), corresponding to 70-80% relative improvement in patient-reported measures of pain, daily activities, and social functioning. Venous clinical severity scores (VCSS) also decline significantly, from baseline medians of 4-5 to 1 at 12 months post-procedure. Patient satisfaction exceeds 90%, underscoring RFA's role in enhancing mobility and reducing venous disease progression.

Barrett's Esophagus

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an endoscopic thermal therapy used to treat dysplastic (BE), a premalignant condition characterized by the replacement of normal squamous epithelium with , increasing the risk of esophageal . It is particularly indicated for patients with confirmed low-grade (LGD) or high-grade (HGD) who are not candidates for esophagectomy, offering a minimally invasive alternative to . According to the 2024 American Gastroenterological (AGA) guidelines, endoscopic eradication therapy (EET), including RFA, is strongly recommended for HGD over surveillance alone (moderate evidence quality, strong recommendation), conditionally suggested for LGD (low evidence quality, conditional recommendation), and not routinely recommended for nondysplastic BE due to uncertain benefits. The procedure involves the delivery of radiofrequency energy to ablate the abnormal mucosa while sparing deeper esophageal layers. It is typically performed via upper using specialized catheters, such as the HALO360 for circumferential of longer BE segments or the HALO90 for focal of residual or nodular areas. Energy is applied at a of 12 J/cm², often in multiple sessions spaced 8-12 weeks apart, following initial endoscopic mucosal resection () of any visible lesions to confirm and remove nodules. RFA is the preferred ablative modality for the remaining BE segment after lesion resection, as it achieves uniform mucosal destruction with low risk (very low evidence quality, conditional recommendation per ). Clinical trials demonstrate high efficacy, with complete eradication of achieved in 80-90% of patients after 2-3 sessions and regression exceeding 95%. In a landmark sham-controlled trial of patients with dysplastic BE, led to complete eradication of HGD in 90.5% and in 77.4% at one year, compared to 22.7% and 39.0% with , respectively. A 2018 meta-analysis reported 88.2% eradication of and 96.7% of LGD after . Recent 2024-2025 evidence from systematic reviews confirms these rates, with significantly outperforming in preventing progression to HGD or cancer in LGD cases. Post-treatment is essential to monitor for recurrence, with and biopsies recommended at 3, 6, and 12 months for HGD patients, followed by annual intervals if complete eradication of is achieved; for LGD, surveillance occurs at 1 and 3 years post-eradication, then per nondysplastic BE protocols. Recurrence rates of neoplasia are 4-8%, and 5.6-9.7%, often managed with repeat ablation. Per 2024 AGA guidelines and supporting evidence, reduces the risk of esophageal by approximately 80-90% in dysplastic BE, with a of 90% for progression from HGD and 75% from LGD compared to surveillance.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is utilized for base-of-tongue reduction in patients with moderate to severe (OSA), targeting airway collapse caused by tongue base obstruction. This applies radiofrequency energy to induce controlled , leading to tissue volume reduction via without damaging the overlying mucosa. It is particularly indicated for individuals with an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) greater than 15 events per hour and evidence of tongue base obstruction on imaging or , typically in those with a (BMI) less than 35 kg/m² to optimize outcomes and minimize risks. The technique involves either a transoral approach, where a probe is inserted through the mouth under local or general , or a method using external needle insertion for deeper tissue targeting. Multiple ablation sites are created along the tongue base musculature in a multi-level fashion, often sparing the mucosa to preserve function and reduce surface complications, with sessions spaced weeks apart to allow healing. This stepwise application ensures gradual volume reduction while integrating with other airway surgeries if needed. Clinical efficacy is demonstrated by reductions in AHI of approximately 40-60%, particularly when combined with other procedures, reflecting decreased frequency of apneic events, alongside improvements in (ESS) scores exceeding 40%, indicating enhanced daytime alertness and quality of life. By 2025, advancements include combined approaches with (UPPP) to address multi-level obstructions more comprehensively, alongside emerging robotic-assisted surgical techniques for tongue base reduction. As of 2025, major guidelines (e.g., AASM) position tongue base RFA as a potential adjunct in multi-level surgery for OSA, though stimulation is increasingly favored for moderate-to-severe cases intolerant to CPAP. Specific risks associated with for tongue base reduction include transient , occurring in 20-30% of patients, which typically resolves within weeks but may require supportive care such as dietary modifications. Other potential adverse effects are minimal due to the procedure's targeted nature, though monitoring for or is essential post-treatment.

Dermatological and Aesthetic Uses

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has emerged as a versatile tool in dermatology for treating benign skin conditions and enhancing aesthetic outcomes through targeted thermal energy delivery to superficial tissues. In dermatological applications, RFA addresses various benign skin tumors, while in aesthetics, it promotes skin rejuvenation by stimulating dermal remodeling without significant disruption to the epidermis. This non-invasive to minimally invasive approach allows for precise control over energy application, minimizing damage to surrounding healthy tissue. Common indications for RFA in include benign tumors such as and . For , RFA effectively vaporizes viral-infected tissue, achieving clearance rates around 90% with minimal scarring. In keloid management, RFA reduces scar volume by up to 95% when combined with intralesional therapies, offering a faster response compared to injections alone. Aesthetically, RFA targets rhytides (wrinkles) and striae (), where it improves texture and elasticity by inducing controlled dermal injury. The technique employs superficial electrodes or microneedle arrays to deliver radiofrequency energy directly into the at lower temperatures of 40-60°C, promoting and protein denaturation without ablating the . Microneedle-based systems, such as fractional RF needling, create microchannels that enhance energy penetration while sparing the surface, allowing for adjustable depths typically 1-2 mm. This controlled superficial heating facilitates precise treatment of lesions or aesthetic concerns in outpatient settings under . Efficacy in lesion clearance for benign tumors reaches 80-95%, with studies showing sustained improvement in resolution and flattening post-treatment. For aesthetic uses, induces remodeling through stimulation and neocollagenesis, leading to reduction and striae improvement that lasts 1-2 years with optimal protocols. These outcomes are supported by clinical evaluations demonstrating enhanced skin firmness and reduced rhytides without epidermal damage. As of 2025, trends in fractional with RF needling emphasize non-ablative skin tightening, integrating microneedling for deeper stimulation and broader adoption in cosmetic practices. This evolution highlights devices like Virtue RF for combined resurfacing and tightening, reflecting market growth driven by demand for minimally invasive rejuvenation. Key advantages include its outpatient nature, with procedures completable in under an hour, and minimal downtime—typically 1-3 days of mild —compared to lasers, which may require longer recovery due to greater thermal spread. RFA's non-chromophore-dependent energy delivery also suits diverse types, reducing pigmentation risks associated with therapies.

Risks and Complications

Common Adverse Effects

Common adverse effects of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are typically mild, transient, and occur in a significant proportion of patients across various applications. These side effects often resolve without long-term consequences and can be managed conservatively. and swelling at the treatment site represent one of the most frequent complaints, affecting 20-50% of patients, and usually subside within 1-3 days through application of ice packs and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Skin burns at the grounding pad site occur in less than 5% of cases, primarily manifesting as first- or second-degree burns due to improper pad placement or excessive energy delivery. These burns are superficial and heal with standard care, though they underscore the importance of monitoring pad contact during the procedure. In oncology applications, such as tumor ablation, transient fever or known as post-ablation affects approximately 30-35% of patients, characterized by flu-like symptoms including low-grade fever, , and that typically resolve within 1-2 weeks. Minor bleeding or formation is reported in fewer than 10% of procedures, particularly at access sites, and is usually self-limited without requiring intervention. associated with occurs in 5-15% of cases during endoscopic or cardiac RFA procedures, often linked to anesthetic agents like , and can be mitigated with antiemetics. Proper , including optimal grounding pad positioning and energy titration, helps minimize these effects across RFA applications.

Serious and Long-Term Risks

Serious complications from radiofrequency ablation (RFA), though infrequent, can have significant clinical consequences, particularly in organ-specific applications. In procedures targeting , esophageal perforation occurs in less than 1% of cases, often requiring urgent intervention such as endoscopic repair or surgical management. Similarly, in cardiac RFA for , the risk of stroke ranges from 0.5% to 1%, primarily due to during or shortly after the procedure, with higher rates in patients with preexisting vascular risk factors. Infections and abscess formation represent another critical risk, especially in ablative treatments of the liver and . For liver tumors, the incidence of post-RFA abscesses is approximately 1-2%, frequently necessitating and prolonged , with risk elevated in patients with prior biliary interventions. Comparable rates of 1-2% are observed in renal RFA, where abscesses may arise from bacterial seeding along the ablation tract, often managed similarly with to prevent . Long-term risks include nerve regeneration, which can lead to recurrence in 20-30% of patients within 2 years following for syndromes, as partial axonal regrowth restores sensory transmission despite initial . In oncologic applications, tumor seeding along the needle tract occurs in fewer than 0.5% of cases, a rare but potentially aggressive complication that may manifest as metastatic deposits requiring additional therapy. Systemic complications, such as allergic reactions to used in procedural imaging, can range from mild urticaria to , occurring in up to 3% of exposed patients, with recommended for those with prior histories. Additionally, contrast-induced renal impairment affects about 5% of at-risk individuals undergoing , particularly those with baseline , leading to transient or persistent declines in . Recent advancements as of 2025 incorporate for real-time monitoring during to mitigate overheating risks, using predictive algorithms to adjust energy delivery and prevent unintended thermal damage to adjacent tissues.

History and Advancements

Early Development and Pioneers

The origins of radiofrequency ablation () trace back to early 20th-century neurosurgical applications, where it was initially employed for creating precise lesions in neural tissue. In 1931, German surgeon Martin Kirschner performed the first electrode-based lesioning of the gasserian ganglion to treat , marking a foundational use of radiofrequency energy for targeted tissue destruction without open surgery. This technique built on earlier electrocautery methods from the late 1920s, but Kirschner's approach emphasized delivery, laying groundwork for minimally invasive ablation. Early commercial radiofrequency generators, developed in the 1950s by Sidney Aronow and Bernard Cosman, facilitated broader neurosurgical adoption by enabling controlled lesion formation. By the 1970s, RFA gained traction in pain management, particularly for spinal conditions. In 1971, C. Norman Shealy introduced percutaneous radiofrequency rhizotomy for facet joint denervation, targeting the medial branches of dorsal rami to alleviate chronic low back pain; this innovation shifted from chemical or surgical rhizotomy to thermal coagulation, offering outpatient feasibility and reduced complications. Concurrently, catheter-based ablation techniques emerged in cardiology, with Melvin Scheinman performing the first human atrioventricular node ablation in 1981 using high-energy direct current shocks, though radiofrequency energy was not yet standard. The 1980s saw a pivotal revival of RFA for cardiac arrhythmias, led by Shoei K. Stephen Huang, who demonstrated radiofrequency catheter ablation's safety and efficacy in preclinical models and early clinical cases starting in 1985, replacing riskier direct current methods with controllable thermal lesions. The first successful clinical radiofrequency ablation of an accessory pathway occurred in 1987 in Germany by Martin Borggrefe and colleagues, coinciding with the introduction of commercial generators tailored for cardiac use, such as those from Osypka Medical. In the 1990s, RFA expanded into , with initial trials focusing on percutaneous treatment of liver tumors. Pioneers like Italian radiologist Stefano Livraghi reported the first series of ultrasound-guided RFA for in 1995, achieving complete necrosis in small lesions and establishing its role as a bridge to resection or for unresectable cases. Similarly, S. Rossi and colleagues in performed the inaugural percutaneous RFA for hepatic metastases in 1993, demonstrating feasibility and local control rates exceeding 80% in early cohorts. European centers, particularly in and , drove rapid adoption for tumor pre-2000, with multicenter studies by 1997 showing RFA's superiority over injection for small tumors due to larger ablation zones. A key technological milestone came in 1996 when the U.S. cleared the first RFA systems for generic soft tissue , including liver applications, accelerating global clinical trials. These developments solidified RFA's transition from experimental to a versatile interventional tool.

Modern Innovations and Regulatory Milestones

In the early , innovations in () technology focused on overcoming limitations in size and heat dissipation, leading to the development of cooled systems. These systems circulate saline through the to cool the tip, allowing higher power delivery and creation of larger zones without charring surrounding tissue. A seminal example is the Cool-tip RF System, which enabled more effective treatment of larger tumors by expanding the volume up to 3-5 cm in . This advancement was particularly impactful for hepatic applications, where precise control over thermal spread is critical to spare healthy liver . Subsequent innovations integrated real-time imaging and sensing technologies to enhance procedural accuracy and safety. Multi-tined expandable electrodes, such as those in the RITA system, allowed for simultaneous across multiple points, reducing procedure time for irregular or multifocal lesions. In , contact force-sensing emerged to measure tip-to-tissue pressure, minimizing complications like ; the TactiFlex , with its flexible laser-cut tip, improves conformability to cardiac anatomy during treatment. Temperature-controlled irrigated systems, like the DiamondTemp System, use diamond-embedded tips for uniform heat distribution, achieving durable isolation with lower recurrence rates in paroxysmal . For , cooled RFA targets peripheral nerves with precision, providing relief lasting up to 12 months in conditions like knee osteoarthritis. These developments prioritize through automated power modulation and integration with or guidance. Regulatory milestones reflect the maturation of from experimental to standard therapy across applications. The U.S. (FDA) first cleared for varicose vein treatment in 1999 via the VNUS Closure system, marking its entry as a minimally invasive alternative to . In 2004, the Cool-tip system received 510(k) clearance for general , followed by specific approval in 2006 for nonresectable liver tumors. The FDA issued a alert in 2007 cautioning against for lung tumors due to reported complications like . Later approvals expanded indications: the Acessa system for uterine fibroids in 2012, cooled for knee in 2017, and the DiamondTemp system via premarket approval () in 2021 for . Recent clearances include the TactiFlex in 2023 and the Affera and in 2024, both enhancing electrophysiological procedures with advanced RF delivery, as well as the OptaBlate BVN system in May 2025 for basivertebral in vertebrogenic chronic . These milestones underscore the FDA's evolving oversight, shifting from 510(k) pathways for substantial equivalence to for higher-risk cardiac uses, ensuring robust clinical of and .

References

  1. [1]
    Radiofrequency Ablation - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    Technique or Treatment ... The basic technique involves catheter-guided radiofrequency currents through an electrode placed nearby a nociceptive pathway to ...
  2. [2]
    Radiofrequency ablation for cancer - Mayo Clinic
    Mar 27, 2025 · Radiofrequency ablation for cancer is a treatment that uses electrical energy to heat up cancer cells, causing those cells to die.
  3. [3]
    Ablation | Cardiac Surgery | SUNY Upstate Medical University
    Definition. Radiofrequency ablation uses energy to heat and destroy an area of tissue. Reasons for Procedure. This procedure is used to destroy abnormal ...Reasons For Procedure · What To Expect · Problems To Look Out For
  4. [4]
    Radiofrequency ablation for chronic pain - MedlinePlus
    Jan 16, 2025 · Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a procedure that uses radio waves to heat up and kill tissue. When used to treat pain, RFA is used to ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  5. [5]
    Bad back? Target pain with radiofrequency neurotomy. - Mayo Clinic
    Apr 6, 2024 · The treatment turns off the nerves' ability to send pain signals for a short time. The procedure also is known as radiofrequency ablation.Overview · Why It's Done · What You Can Expect<|control11|><|separator|>
  6. [6]
    Definition of radiofrequency ablation - NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms
    A procedure that uses radio waves to heat and destroy abnormal cells. The radio waves travel through electrodes (small devices that carry electricity).Missing: medical | Show results with:medical
  7. [7]
    Varicose Vein Treatment: Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy - NCBI
    Radiofrequency ablation is a minimally invasive technique for treating superficial venous insufficiency, which causes varicose veins and chronic venous disease.Continuing Education Activity · Anatomy and Physiology · Technique or Treatment
  8. [8]
    Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) for Back and Neck Pain - HSS
    Dec 10, 2023 · Radiofrequency ablation is a minimally invasive procedure that uses radiofrequency waves to reduce chronic neck or back pain arising from ...What is radiofrequency ablation? · How does it work? · How is it performed?
  9. [9]
    A review of the general aspects of radiofrequency ablation
    Mar 23, 2005 · The mechanisms of tissue heating in RFA are based on the adequate conversion of electrical energy into thermal energy. Most current RFA devices ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  10. [10]
    A review on radiofrequency, laser, and microwave ablations and ...
    First, ionic agitation, and thus tissue heating, is greatest in the areas of the highest current density, i.e., closest to the active electrode tip, so that ...
  11. [11]
    1 Radiofrequency Ablation: Mechanism of Action and Devices
    Jul 12, 2020 · RF ablation results in coagulative necrosis of tissue at high temperatures. The dipole molecules (mostly water) adjacent to the tip of the RF ...
  12. [12]
    Radiofrequency Ablation, Cryoablation, and Microwave ... - MDPI
    Jan 20, 2023 · This creates ionic agitation, which results in frictional heat ... A further benefit of CA over heat-based ablation is that it is less ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  13. [13]
    Radiofrequency Ablation: Mechanism of Action and Devices
    An understanding of RF ablation equipment, mechanism of action and its interactions with tissue is critical to avoid complications and improve patient outcomes.
  14. [14]
    Sequential activation of multiple grounding pads reduces skin ...
    Sequential activation of multiple grounding pads reduces skin heating during radiofrequency tumor ablation ... The impedance between the RF electrode and ground ...Missing: monopolar matching
  15. [15]
    Comparison between pulsed and continuous radiofrequency delivery
    Dec 13, 2006 · Results: More homogeneous lesions were produced in significantly less time with pulsed rather than with continuous energy delivery. There were ...
  16. [16]
    Radiofrequency ablation: mechanisms and clinical applications - PMC
    Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), a form of thermal ablation, employs localized heat to induce protein denaturation in tissue cells, resulting in cell death.
  17. [17]
    Radiofrequency Ablation of Cancer - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
    At 50–52°C, cells undergo coagulation necrosis in 4–6 minutes; for temperatures greater than 60° C, coagulation necrosis is instantaneous.
  18. [18]
    Heat Sink Effect on Tumor Ablation Characteristics as... - Medicine
    Thermal ablation of liver tumors near large blood vessels is affected by the cooling effect of blood flow, leading to incomplete ablation.
  19. [19]
    Radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors (I): biological background
    The aim of this article is to review available biological data on tissue destruction mechanisms. Experimental evidence shows that tissue injury following ...
  20. [20]
    Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Tumors - NCBI - NIH
    May 22, 2023 · This activity reviews the percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors and highlights the role of the interprofessional team in managing patients.
  21. [21]
    Radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors: Actual limitations and ...
    Jan 27, 2011 · In general, a tumor location within 10 mm of a central bile duct is frequently considered a contraindication to RFA[43,45,46]. It has been ...
  22. [22]
    Catheter Ablation: Overview, Indications and Contraindications ...
    Jul 18, 2022 · Similarly, mobile left ventricular thrombus would be a contraindication to left ventricular ablation. Mechanical prosthetic heart valves are ...Missing: preoperative | Show results with:preoperative
  23. [23]
    Radiofrequency Ablation of the Liver Current Status | AJR
    Contraindications to hepatic resection include too many tumors, tumors in unresectable locations, insufficient hepatic reserve to tolerate resection, and other ...
  24. [24]
    Anesthesia for Percutaneous Radiofrequency Tumor Ablation (PRFA)
    Dec 4, 2019 · Overview and Preoperative Evaluation for PRFA Procedures. PRFA in many cases is performed under ultrasound guidance but also can be performed ...
  25. [25]
    Treatment efficacy of radiofrequency ablation of 338 patients ... - NIH
    Sufficient data confirmed that RFA could successfully ablate the small liver tumors. The ablation success rate of the initial RFA in this study was 94.8% (723/ ...
  26. [26]
    Radiofrequency Ablation: A Nursing Perspective - PMC
    Radiofrequency Ablation Procedure. RFA usually is performed on an outpatient basis under conscious sedation, although general anesthesia is preferred by many ...Nursing Considerations · Intraprocedure · PostprocedureMissing: definition | Show results with:definition
  27. [27]
    Radiofrequency Ablation and Percutaneous Ethanol Injection ...
    Local anesthesia was achieved with 1.5% buffered lidocaine, and 0.2 to 2.0 mL of pure dehydrated ethanol was injected through a 22- or 25-gauge needle into each ...
  28. [28]
    Clinical efficacy analysis of percutaneous “tripod” combined ... - NIH
    The radiofrequency ablation temperature is set in the range of 80–100 °C, continuous ablation for 5 min, the radiofrequency ablation equipment adopts ...Place The Tripod · Needle Biopsy · Fig. 4
  29. [29]
    Thermal Ablation of Renal Tumors: Indications, Techniques ... - NIH
    RFA, radiofrequency ablation; RF, radiofrequency. With RFA, the ablation process of 5–20 min duration is considered to be successfully completed once the ...Missing: per | Show results with:per
  30. [30]
    Imaging Guidelines during Percutaneous Liver Ablation to Optimize ...
    Aug 19, 2024 · B-mode ultrasound is commonly used to target the lesion and monitor the ablation zone. The benefits of ultrasound guidance for ablation include ...
  31. [31]
    Ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of benign ... - NIH
    The treatment involves insertion of an RFA electrode needle into the nodule under direct ultrasound guidance. The needle used has an active tip which heats due ...
  32. [32]
    How to Achieve Near Zero Fluoroscopy During Radiofrequency ...
    CONCLUSION. There is enough evidence that RF ablation of AF can be performed with minimal use or complete elimination of fluoroscopy. A stepwise approach to ...
  33. [33]
    Lung Ablation: Indications and Techniques - PMC - PubMed Central
    While most pulmonary ablation procedures are performed under CT or CT fluoroscopy guidance, ultrasound (in conjunction with CT) has also been used for ...
  34. [34]
    Radiofrequency Ablation Beyond the Liver - PMC - PubMed Central
    This will automatically turn the current down to near-zero when the impedance increases to more than 20 ohms above baseline and let the tissue cool before ...
  35. [35]
    Percutaneous hepatic radiofrequency for hepatocellular carcinoma
    May 19, 2015 · Principles of RFA​​ On the other side, the temperature must not rise above 100°C because of the increase of electric resistance by tissue ...
  36. [36]
    Tumour ablation: technical aspects - PMC - PubMed Central
    Ex vivo bipolar mode showed a more rapid increase and higher temperature between two electrodes compared with monopolar modes,,. In vivo multiple-electrode ...
  37. [37]
    Current oncologic applications of radiofrequency ablation therapies
    Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) uses high frequency alternating current to heat a volume of tissue around a needle electrode to induce focal coagulative necrosis ...Technical Features Of Rfa · Solid Tumor Ablative... · Liver
  38. [38]
    RF tumor ablation with internally cooled electrodes and saline infusion
    (A) Internally cooled electrode: water is circulated during ablation to cool tissue next to the applicator and prevent tissue charring. (B) Perfusion electrode: ...
  39. [39]
    Imaging After Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatic ...
    An essential component of RFA is post-treatment imaging. Postablation ... ablation zone decreases in size and as associated inflammation resolves (Figs.
  40. [40]
    Interpretation of CT and MRI After Radiofrequency Ablation of ...
    Subsequent follow-up should be performed every 3 months for 1 year, and every 6 months thereafter. In equivocal cases, follow-up may be more frequently ...Missing: criteria | Show results with:criteria
  41. [41]
    Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA): What It Is & Procedure
    The pain may last for a week or two after the procedure. Applying an ice pack at the site, 20 minutes off and on, may help relieve the pain. You may feel some ...
  42. [42]
    Quality Improvement Guidelines for Radiofrequency Ablation of ...
    These guidelines were written to be used in quality-improvement programs to assess RFA of HCC and liver metastases.Missing: lung | Show results with:lung
  43. [43]
    Abstract No. 55 Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation in Pain Relief ...
    RFA significantly reduced pain, with mean VAS scores decreasing from 8.2 (SD ±1.2) at baseline to 4.1 (SD ±2.3) at one-month post-RFA (p < 0.005), sustained at ...
  44. [44]
    Radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
    In general, RFA should be the first choice for patients with a central single nodule HCC that has a diameter of less than 3 cm because surgical resection will ...
  45. [45]
    Long-term outcome and eligibility of radiofrequency ablation for ...
    Sep 28, 2023 · Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is effective for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with a diameter ≤ 3.0 cm.Patients And Methods · Rfa Procedure · Long-Term Outcome
  46. [46]
    Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer
    RFA is recommended for liver metastases with a maximum diameter of 3 cm in patients with not more than three tumors who are contraindicated for surgery, ...<|separator|>
  47. [47]
    Local ablative treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma - NIH
    Among ablative therapies, radiofrequency ablation has gained a pivotal role due to its efficacy, with a reported 5-year survival rate of 40%-70%, and safety.
  48. [48]
    Full article: Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for small ...
    The 1-,3-, and 5-year local tumor progression-free survival rates were all 98.0%. The 1-,3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 68.1%, 39.9 ...
  49. [49]
    Safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiofrequency ablation for very ...
    Jan 31, 2020 · Since RFA results in complete cure for small HCCs (<3 cm) and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) in greater than 90% of cases, it has been ...
  50. [50]
    Laparoscopic Microwave Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma at ...
    For tumors of 3 to 5 cm, multiple overlapping ablations under laparoscopy or LUS were harnessed. The electrode was inserted until the distal margin of the ...
  51. [51]
    Combination of Chemoembolization plus Radiofrequency Ablation ...
    Sep 27, 2019 · Key result: The 10-year overall survival rates of combination therapy were significantly better than those of either treatment modality alone ( ...
  52. [52]
    Combination of radiofrequency ablation with transarterial ... - PubMed
    Conclusions: The combination of TACE with RFA can improve the overall survival rate and provides better prognosis for patients with HCC, but more randomized ...Missing: cancer | Show results with:cancer
  53. [53]
    Estimation of tumor coverage after RF ablation of hepatocellular ...
    Jun 7, 2025 · The average ablation volume was 49.3 ± 29.8 cm3, corresponding to a zone size of 4.5 ± 3.8 cm assuming a spherical ablation zone. The ...Abstract · Linear Regression Analysis · DiscussionMissing: typical | Show results with:typical<|control11|><|separator|>
  54. [54]
    Artificial intelligence in predicting recurrence after first-line treatment ...
    Oct 7, 2024 · This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates the comprehensive application value of AI in predicting recurrence after a single first-line treatment of ...
  55. [55]
    Radiofrequency Ablation of Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Radiofrequency Ablation of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Part 1, Indications ... 30 Nov 2013 | Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, Vol. 14, No. 11.
  56. [56]
    Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
    'Roll off' equates to clinical endpoint where complete tissue coagulation is reached when the impedance reaches a clinically relevant level and there is ...
  57. [57]
    Tips and tricks for a safe and effective image-guided percutaneous ...
    May 12, 2017 · In particular, when a radiofrequency ablation with hydrodissection is planned, saline solution should be avoided because of its high ...Ablative Techniques · Hydrodissection · Gas Insufflation
  58. [58]
    Effectiveness of Thermal Ablation for Renal Cell Carcinoma after ...
    Journal List · User Guide. PERMALINK. Copy. As a library, NLM ... The 5-yr survival rates were 93.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86.7–99.9%) for OS, 94.4% (95 ...2. Patients And Methods · 3.1. Ablation Procedures · 3.4. Oncologic And Survival...
  59. [59]
    Lung radiofrequency and microwave ablation: a review of ...
    Journal List · User Guide. PERMALINK. Copy. As a library, NLM ... Does tumour type affect local control by radiofrequency ablation in the lungs? Eur J Radiol ...Pulmonary Metastases · Ablation Technique · Unexpected Findings
  60. [60]
    Advancements in microwave ablation for tumor treatment and future ...
    Apr 18, 2025 · 18 April 2025, 112175. Journal home page for iScience. Review. Advancements in microwave ablation for tumor treatment and future directions.
  61. [61]
    Radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma - PMC - PubMed Central
    Percutaneous ablation is reported to be a safe and cost-effective treatment, with a superior long-term efficacy and a significant reduction in hospitalization ...
  62. [62]
    Radiofrequency ablation of osseous metastases for the palliation of ...
    CT-guided RF ablation appears to be effective for treatment of painful bone metastases. Keywords: Radiofrequency ablation, Osseous metastases, Minimally ...
  63. [63]
    Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Recurrent Bone and ...
    Conclusions: RFA is a safe and useful therapeutic option for treatment of recurrent bone and soft-tissue sarcomas. Prognostic factors found in this study will ...
  64. [64]
    Combination radiofrequency ablation and vertebral cement ...
    Radiofrequency ablation is a minimally invasive technique that uses high-frequency electrical current to generate heat and cause coagulative necrosis of ...
  65. [65]
    (PDF) Radiofrequency thermoablation (RFA) and radiotherapy (RT ...
    Conclusions: The RFA-RT combined strategy appears to be promising in terms of efficiency and safety with adequate pain control and quality of life improvement.
  66. [66]
    Final Results from the OsteoCool Tumor Ablation Post-Market Study
    Apr 3, 2023 · Small prospective studies on percutaneous RFA have demonstrated pain relief [7,8,9,10] and decreased opioid use [9]. These studies had few ...
  67. [67]
    Varian Sponsors Clinical Trial of Radiation and Ablation Therapy for ...
    Jan 31, 2025 · A ground-breaking trial designed to evaluate whether combining palliative radiation therapy and percutaneous ablation is an effective treatment option for pain ...Missing: RFA reduced
  68. [68]
    Percutaneous image-guided ablation of bone and soft tissue tumours
    May 17, 2014 · Thermal damage can cause normal bone osteonecrosis in the lesion's periphery, surrounding muscular atrophy and scarring, and skin burns.Ablation Techniques · Benign Tumours · Malignant Tumours<|separator|>
  69. [69]
    The Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation for Bone Tumors ...
    May 18, 2021 · As per our study findings, RFA was effective in reducing pain and improving functional ability of patients with bone tumors that were difficult to radically ...
  70. [70]
    Radiofrequency Ablation to Prevent Sudden Cardiac Death - PMC
    In 1982, direct current (DC) catheter ablation was first described to perform atrioventricular junction ablation on patients with atrial fibrillation.2 Although ...<|separator|>
  71. [71]
    Radiofrequency ablation of cardiac arrhythmias: past, present and ...
    Nov 12, 2011 · This review article will discuss the emergence of radiofrequency ablation in the management of cardiac arrhythmias, summarize the technical ...
  72. [72]
    Catheter Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Using a 3D ...
    The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that a nonfluoroscopic electroanatomic mapping system might assist in the creation and verification of ...
  73. [73]
    Pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: Does ablation ...
    These techniques can be broadly divided into two categories: 'point by point' (PBP) ablation, wherein single ablation lesions are applied using a single-tip ...
  74. [74]
    PFA to surpass radiofrequency ablation in 2025: Citi survey
    Dec 16, 2024 · A group of 72 physicians surveyed by Citi on average expect 49% of their AFib procedures will use PFA devices in 2025, up from 39% this year.
  75. [75]
    Pulsed field ablation was not superior to radiofrequency ablation in ...
    Aug 31, 2025 · The primary endpoint, single-procedure success at 12 months, was high and similar between the procedure types: 77.2% in the PFA group and 77.6% ...
  76. [76]
    Pulsed Field vs Conventional Thermal Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial ...
    Jun 24, 2024 · Compared with thermal ablation, PFA more often resulted in an AA burden less than the clinically significant threshold of 0.1% burden.
  77. [77]
    Pulmonary Vein Stenosis After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation | Circulation
    In summary, PVS is a rare but dreaded complication after catheter ablation of AF. The incidence in the current era is low (<1%), and there is no robust data to ...
  78. [78]
    Renal Denervation for the Treatment of Hypertension
    Aug 5, 2024 · Although further research is clearly needed, renal denervation presents a novel treatment strategy for patients with uncontrolled blood pressure.
  79. [79]
    Symplicity Spyral™ Renal Denervation System - Medtronic
    The Symplicity Spyral™ renal denervation (RDN) system is used during the Symplicity™ blood pressure procedure for the treatment of hypertension.
  80. [80]
    Safety and efficacy of a multi-electrode renal sympathetic ...
    Jun 19, 2013 · Renal sympathetic denervation, using the EnligHTN™ multi-electrode catheter results in a rapid and significant office blood pressure reduction ...
  81. [81]
    Differential role of afferent and efferent renal nerves in the ...
    The current study is an important step in elucidating the differential role of afferent and efferent renal nerves in the antihypertensive effect of RDNX. Renal ...
  82. [82]
    Safety and Efficacy of Renal Denervation in Patients Taking ... - JACC
    The composite rate of MAE at 1 month among the first 253 patients treated with RDN in the SPYRAL HTN-OFF and -ON MED trials was 0% (1 of 253) compared with a ...
  83. [83]
    Efficacy and Safety of Catheter‐Based Renal Denervation for ...
    Jun 6, 2025 · ABSTRACT. This meta‐analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of renal denervation (RDN) for patients with hypertension.
  84. [84]
    Medtronic launches new frontier to treat high blood pressure
    Nov 17, 2023 · The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today approved the Medtronic Symplicity Spyral™ renal denervation system for use in the United ...
  85. [85]
    Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for Painful Knee Arthritis
    Mar 13, 2019 · Specifically, 1 mL of lidocaine is injected using a 20-gauge, 3.5-in (8.9-cm) spinal needle around the superior lateral, superior medial, and ...
  86. [86]
    Cooled radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves for knee ...
    Both RFA and CRFA effectively reduced NRS pain scores in most patients. RFA was associated with a higher probability of treatment success and a greater degree ...
  87. [87]
    Genicular Nerve Ablation Review Using Cooled-Radiofrequency ...
    Cooled radiofrequency ablation (C-RFA) is an effective treatment modality that can alleviate the pain associated with moderate to severe OA.
  88. [88]
    Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation practice patterns: A survey ...
    Most providers applied lesions using a generator temperature setting between 80 and 85oC (66.0 %; n = 99) for a minimum duration of 90 s per ablation (67.3 %; n ...
  89. [89]
    [PDF] 7.01.154 Ablation of Peripheral Nerves to Treat Pain
    Jul 22, 2024 · Pulsed RFA. Non-ablative - provides 20 ms pulses every 30 seconds. 42° C. Limits tissue damage but results in shorter duration of pain relief.
  90. [90]
    Effectiveness of genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation in ...
    GnRFA is effective in reducing knee pain in the majority of patients with osteoarthritis when large lesion techniques are used with moderate-certainty evidence, ...
  91. [91]
    Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Clinical Trial ... - NIH
    The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of subjects whose knee pain was reduced by 50% or greater from baseline at 6 months after treatment. Secondary ...Missing: sparing | Show results with:sparing
  92. [92]
    Genicular Nerve Blocks and Ablation for Chronic Knee Pain
    At 6 months, 74.1% of cooled radiofrequency ablation participants reported reduced index knee pain by at least 50% compared to 16.2% in participants treated ...
  93. [93]
    Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Hip Pain - Oxford Academic
    Jul 23, 2021 · Radiofrequency ablation of the articular sensory branches of the FN and ON at the hip joint appears to offer a potential option for pain ...Introduction · Search Methodology · Radiofrequency Ablation... · Outcomes
  94. [94]
    The Role of Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Trigeminal ...
    Mar 15, 2023 · RFA is a minimally invasive procedure that uses heat energy to destroy the small portion of the trigeminal nerve responsible for the pain. The ...
  95. [95]
    Treatment of Peripheral Nerves With Pulsed Radiofrequency - NIH
    Mar 1, 2025 · Using PRF on peripheral nerves provided promising clinical results in terms of pain and impact of change in therapy-refractory cases.
  96. [96]
    Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Knee Joint ...
    Mar 1, 2025 · GNRFA using a V-shaped active tip needle is a promising intervention for chronic knee pain, offering significant and sustained pain relief and functional ...Missing: indications | Show results with:indications
  97. [97]
    Radiofrequency ablation of benign thyroid nodules - NIH
    Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a thermal ablation technique widely used for the management of benign thyroid nodules.
  98. [98]
    Radiofrequency Tumor Ablation - Medical Clinical Policy Bulletins
    Radiofrequency ablation devices have been cleared by the FDA for the general indication of soft tissue cutting, coagulation, and ablation by thermal coagulation ...Breast Cancer · Spinal Metastases · Benign Thyroid Nodules
  99. [99]
    Radiofrequency Ablation for Thyroid Nodules: A Minimally-Invasive ...
    Jun 29, 2022 · In 2018, the FDA approved RFA for use on benign compressive thyroid nodules. Indications have since expanded to include malignancies under 1 ...Missing: clearance | Show results with:clearance
  100. [100]
    The 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum ...
    For patients with symptomatic varicose veins and axial reflux in the SSV, who are candidates for intervention, we recommend treatment with endovenous ablation ...
  101. [101]
    Clinical Results 5 Years after Radiofrequency Ablation of ... - NIH
    The reoperation rate up to 5 years after RFA was 10.7% (GSV: 9.7, SSV: 15.6%). In the reoperation cases after the RFA of GSV, the sites of reflux were 14 ...Missing: CIVIQ | Show results with:CIVIQ
  102. [102]
    A retrospective comparative study of cyanoacrylate embolization and...
    Jun 27, 2025 · However, the greater improvement in CIVIQ-20 scores observed in the RFA group (−19.5 ± 4.5) compared to the CA group (−15.5 ± 3.5; P = .
  103. [103]
  104. [104]
    Balloon-based, circumferential, endoscopic radiofrequency ablation ...
    The effectiveness phase used 10 J/cm2 (delivered twice [x2]) for all patients, followed by EGD with biopsies at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. A second ablation ...Missing: cm² | Show results with:cm²
  105. [105]
    [PDF] Endoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation or Cryoablation for Barrett ...
    Feb 1, 2024 · Radiofrequency ablation affects only the most superficial layer of the esophagus (i.e., the mucosa), leaving the underlying tissues unharmed.
  106. [106]
    Radiofrequency Ablation in Barrett's Esophagus with Dysplasia
    May 28, 2009 · Radiofrequency ablation was associated with a high rate of complete eradication of both dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia and a reduced risk of disease ...
  107. [107]
  108. [108]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  109. [109]
    Advancing Obstructive Sleep Apnea Management: Recent Trends ...
    Tongue base reduction is indicated in cases where airway obstruction is caused by an enlarged or posteriorly displaced tongue base. The intervention decreases ...
  110. [110]
    Coblation Versus Radiofrequency for Tongue Base Reduction ... - NIH
    Jan 19, 2025 · Both interventions decreased sleep‐related outcomes in adult patients with OSA. Coblation appears to exhibit superiority over radiofrequency with a similar ...
  111. [111]
    RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION IN DERMATOLOGY
    Radiofreqeuency ablation is a versatile dermatosurgical procedure used for surgical management of skin lesions by using various forms of alternating current ...Introduction · Radiofrequency Equipment And... · Dermatological Indications...
  112. [112]
    THE USAGE OF RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION FOR ... - PubMed
    Conclusions: Scars volume reduction was faster after five sessions of RFA than following local 5-FU injections. Combination of RFA with scars infiltration with ...
  113. [113]
    A Review of Current Keloid Management: Mainstay Monotherapies ...
    Jul 23, 2020 · [49] Further evaluation of combination therapy with RF ablation and steroid injection was found to decrease keloid volume (95.4% reduction), ...
  114. [114]
    Radiofrequency in Facial Rejuvenation - MedNexus
    Jul 18, 2022 · There are several advantages of RF devices in treating facial skin laxity, wrinkles, and striae. RF treatment has long-lasting effects, few ...
  115. [115]
    Sylfirm X RF Micro-needling | Smooth, Soft & Glowing skin
    RF energy is then delivered to the skin through the micro needles, at a generated heat of 40-60°C. This causes coagulation and protein denaturation, leading ...
  116. [116]
    Stretch Marks Removal Using RF Microneedling - IMAGO Aesthetic
    These Microneedle delivers Radio Frequency (RF) energy. They produce heat in the skin at 40-60°C resulting in clotting, skin contraction and collagen production ...
  117. [117]
    Radiofrequency in Cosmetic Dermatology | Request PDF
    Aug 9, 2025 · When RF is transmitted to skin tissue, molecules in the skin create friction and generate heat at 40-60 • C, causing structural change and the ...<|separator|>
  118. [118]
    Genius RF Microneedling for Skin Tightening - Sophia Rahman MD
    The collagen production stimulated by Genius RF Microneedling continues for months after the treatment, with results lasting up to 1-2 years. With periodic ...
  119. [119]
    RF Microneedling: Comprehensive Guide | Top Rated
    While results can last up to 2 years, the duration depends on factors such as treatment intensity, age, skin type, and the treated area. To maintain the effects ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  120. [120]
    RF Microneedling Market Share and Opportunities 2025-2032
    Global RF microneedling market is estimated to be valued at USD 0.43 Bn in 2025 and is expected to reach USD 0.75 Bn by 2032, exhibiting a compound annual ...Market Concentration And... · Regional Insights · Market Report ScopeMissing: RFA ablative
  121. [121]
    Aesthetic Trends in 2025: Injectables, Lasers, and Body Contouring
    Jan 4, 2025 · For those looking to tighten loose skin, Virtue RF combines radiofrequency energy with microneedling to stimulate collagen and elastin ...Missing: ablative | Show results with:ablative<|separator|>
  122. [122]
    Radiofrequency vs. Laser Treatments: The Pros & Cons of Each
    Apr 21, 2021 · These treatments are safe and effective and, in many cases, require little to no downtime post-procedure. From uneven skin tone and problematic ...
  123. [123]
    Radiofrequency in Clinical Dermatology - Medical Lasers
    RF treatment has been used in the field of cosmetic dermatology to improve skin laxities, wrinkles, acne scars, cellulite, and striae distensae since early ...
  124. [124]
    Choosing Between Laser and RF: Pros and Cons - latrenta.com
    Aug 26, 2025 · One of the main advantages of RF technology is its safety across a wide range of skin tones. Unlike some laser treatments that target pigment ...
  125. [125]
    Radiofrequency Ablation Complicated by Skin Burn - PMC - NIH
    The incidence of skin burns in recent studies ranges from 0.1–3.2% for ... RF ablation grounding pad-related skin burns. Treatment of grounding pad ...
  126. [126]
    Image-guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation and ...
    Dec 1, 2005 · Complete post–RF ablation syndrome occurs in approximately one-third of patients but is self-limiting within 10 days after the procedure.
  127. [127]
    Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatic Tumors
    Postablation symptoms occurred in 14 of 39 (36%) patients after 17 of 50 (34%) ablation sessions. Symptoms consisted of fever (16/17), malaise (12/17), chills ( ...
  128. [128]
    Incidence of nausea/vomiting following propofol sedation with ... - NIH
    Feb 27, 2024 · The incidence of PONV was 5.5% (15/272). Nausea occurred in nine patients after an average of 4.6 ± 3.5 h (range: 2–12 h) postablation, and ...
  129. [129]
    A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness... - LWW
    Aug 6, 2025 · Esophageal stricture prevalence was 5.84% (95% CI: [4.07, 18.31]), bleeding 1.79% (95% CI: [0.01, 5.63]), perforation 0.79%, and abdominal pain: ...
  130. [130]
    Left Atrial Catheter Ablation and Ischemic Stroke
    Dec 8, 2011 · The periprocedural stroke risk amounts to 0.1% to 0.8% (Table 1), and there is a similar risk for transient ischemic attacks (0.1%–0.7%).Introduction · Laca-Associated Stroke · Periprocedural And...<|separator|>
  131. [131]
    Incidence and Risk Factors for Liver Abscess After Thermal Ablation ...
    The total incidence of liver abscesses was 1.7%, while the rates in the RFA group (1.8%) and MWA groups (1.6%) were similar (P > 0.05). The rates of liver ...
  132. [132]
    Infectious Complications after Percutaneous Radiofrequency ...
    Percutaneous RF ablation of small RCC is now an established treatment with a low incidence of major complications (1, 2). As expertise develops, we are now ...
  133. [133]
    Trigeminal neuralgia: approaches and interventions | JPR
    Nov 3, 2021 · Pain recurrence was encountered in 11.1% during the first year; by 2 years, 25% of the patients had recurrent pain. Kanpolat et al described ...
  134. [134]
    The use of radiofrequency in cancer - Nature
    May 3, 2005 · ... 0.5% in one multicentre study ... risk of tumor seeding after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for single hepatocellular carcinoma.
  135. [135]
    Intravenous Radiocontrast Media: A Review of Allergic Reactions
    May 22, 2012 · Allergy reactions to IV dye are common, can range from mild to moderate, and can sometimes be life-threatening.Missing: radiofrequency impairment
  136. [136]
    Use of Intravenous Iodinated Contrast Media in Patients with Kidney ...
    Jan 21, 2020 · The risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) developing in patients with reduced kidney function following exposure to intravenous iodinated contrast ...
  137. [137]
    Global Research Progress on Radiofrequency Ablation in Cardiology
    Jan 31, 2025 · AI and ML have the potential to enhance various aspects of RFA, from pre-procedural planning to real-time decision-making during ablation. For ...
  138. [138]
    History of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) - Anesthesia Key
    Aug 6, 2023 · The first use of RF lesioning for pain management occurred in 1965, when Rosomoff performed a percutaneous lateral cordotomy for unilateral pain ...
  139. [139]
    History, Principles, and Techniques of Radiofrequency Ablation
    Therapeutic application of radiofrequency (RF) energy as electrocautery has been used in surgery since the late 1920s.1 RF energy has also historically been ...
  140. [140]
    Radiofrequency Ablation: Pioneers of Therapeutic Innovations
    Nov 1, 2024 · RF energy, a type of electromagnetic energy, is composed of radio waves with frequencies ranging from 300 kHz to 1 MHz. These frequencies ...
  141. [141]
    A History of the Development of Radiofrequency Neurotomy - PMC
    Dec 24, 2021 · Cooled radiofrequency ablation was first developed in the late 1990s for use in the cardiac field for arrhythmia management,, and then found ...
  142. [142]
    History of AF Ablation | UCSF Cardiology
    The first catheter ablation in humans was performed by Dr. Melvin Scheinman in 1981, using high energy DC shocks. Dr Scheinman remains today as an active ...
  143. [143]
    Radio-frequency catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias
    S.K. Huang et al. Closed-chest catheter desiccation of atrioventricular junction using radiofrequency energy—a new method of catheter ablation ...
  144. [144]
    History in medicine: the road to clinical electrophysiology
    Dec 15, 2021 · The first successful radiofrequency (RF) ablation of an accessory pathway was carried out in Munster, Germany in 1987 by Martin Borggrefe et al ...
  145. [145]
    Radiofrequency Ablation of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma in ...
    The application of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to the treatment of human liver tumors was pioneered in the early 1990s both in Europe and the USA.
  146. [146]
    Radiofrequence ablation of liver cancers
    Jun 15, 2002 · More recently, Rossi and McGahan separately pioneered the application of RFA to primary and metastatic lesions in the liver[45,46]. The so- ...<|separator|>
  147. [147]
    Radiofrequency Ablation: The Future Is Now | AJR
    It was in the late 1980s that the concept of percutaneous treatment for cancer was first put forward by the modern-day pioneers of interventional radiology.
  148. [148]
    [PDF] The Role Of Image-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation In Primary And ...
    [1-4]. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for generic tissue ablation in 1996 and for ablation of unresectable.
  149. [149]
    Navigating the Clinical Translation of Medical Devices - NIH
    The first RFA device submitted to the FDA, the Cool‐tip RF Ablation System, was cleared in 2004.Missing: milestones | Show results with:milestones
  150. [150]
    FDA Clears RF Ablation System for Use in Nonresectable Liver ...
    Jun 1, 2006 · FDA Clears RF Ablation System for Use in Nonresectable Liver Tumors. Valleylab recently announced that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ...Missing: percutaneous 1996<|separator|>
  151. [151]
    Advances in radiofrequency ablation: mechanism of action and ...
    Mechanism of action. The goal of RFA for the treatment of chronic pain is to create a thermal lesion to inactivate nociceptive pain pathways. RF describes the ...
  152. [152]
    Abbott Receives FDA Approval for TactiFlex™ Ablation Catheter for ...
    May 19, 2023 · The world's first ablation catheter with a flexible tip and contact force technology. Used to perform an ablation procedure to treat atrial fibrillation (AFib).
  153. [153]
    Radiofrequency ablation - Wikipedia
    Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a medical procedure in which heat generated from medium frequency alternating current (in the range of 350–500 kHz) is used to ...
  154. [154]
    Medical Trends: Evolution of RFA Technology - RGS Healthcare
    Modern RF ablation devices incorporate AI-powered diagnostics to optimize treatment parameters, analyze patient data, and predict outcomes. These smart ...Missing: overheating | Show results with:overheating
  155. [155]
    [PDF] summary of safety and effectiveness data (ssed) - accessdata.fda.gov
    The AtriCure Synergy Ablation system is indicated to treat persistent or longstanding persistent AF using radiofrequency ablation in patients undergoing a ...
  156. [156]
  157. [157]
    Radiofrequency Ablation, Where It Stands in Interventional ... - NIH
    In the field of obstetrics/gynecology, RFA has historically been used for endometrial ablation. In 2012, the FDA approved the Acessa RFA device for uterine ...Missing: approvals | Show results with:approvals
  158. [158]
    Medtronic receives FDA approval of Affera™ Mapping and Ablation ...
    Oct 24, 2024 · The Affera Mapping and Ablation System and Sphere-9 catheter also received CE Mark in March 2023 and was approved in Australia in September 2024 ...