Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Continuous passive motion

Continuous passive motion (CPM) is a postoperative rehabilitation therapy that employs a motorized device to passively move a patient's joint—such as the knee, hip, shoulder, or elbow—through a controlled range of motion without requiring active muscle contraction from the patient. Introduced in the early 1970s by Canadian orthopedic surgeon Robert B. Salter, who originated the concept based on research demonstrating the benefits of early, controlled motion for joint healing, the first practical CPM device was developed in 1978 through collaboration with engineer John Saringer. The primary goals of CPM therapy include reducing postoperative swelling, preventing intra-articular adhesions and stiffness (), improving circulation for nutrient delivery to , and facilitating earlier recovery of function. It is most commonly prescribed immediately after surgeries like total knee arthroplasty, , or rotator cuff repair, with sessions typically lasting several hours daily during the initial recovery phase. Clinical evidence supporting CPM remains mixed, with systematic reviews indicating short-term improvements in and reduced medication use, but limited long-term benefits compared to standard alone, particularly after total knee arthroplasty. Despite this, CPM continues to be widely utilized in hospital and home settings for its non-invasive nature and potential to enhance patient compliance in early mobilization protocols.

Overview and History

Definition and Purpose

Continuous passive motion (CPM) is a therapeutic technique that employs a motorized device to gently and continuously flex and extend a through a controlled , without requiring any voluntary or active effort from the patient. This method was pioneered by Canadian orthopedic surgeon Robert B. Salter in the as an alternative to traditional following or . In CPM, the device applies smooth, repetitive cycles of movement to the affected , typically starting soon after the procedure to facilitate early . The primary purpose of CPM is to mitigate complications associated with postoperative recovery, such as joint stiffness known as , by promoting the maintenance and restoration of joint mobility. It also seeks to alleviate pain and through enhanced circulation of within the , which nourishes articular and removes inflammatory byproducts. Additionally, CPM accelerates the overall recovery of (ROM) after or surgical intervention, enabling patients to progress more rapidly to active phases. At its core, CPM distinguishes itself from active motion therapies by being entirely passive, meaning the joint is moved externally by the machine while the patient remains relaxed, avoiding or compensatory strain that could occur with voluntary efforts. Clinicians customize the by adjusting key parameters, including the ROM limits to match the patient's tolerance and surgical constraints, the speed of motion cycles (often 1 cycle every 20–60 seconds), and the duration of sessions (ranging from hours per day to continuous use over several days). These settings ensure safe, progressive application tailored to individual needs, prioritizing gentle mobilization over aggressive stretching.

Historical Development

The roots of continuous passive motion (CPM) therapy trace back to early 20th-century medical observations that emphasized the benefits of early passive movement following joint injuries or surgeries over prolonged immobilization, as evidence from animal and human studies showed that limited passive motion reduced adhesions and stiffness while promoting tissue healing. The modern concept of CPM was originated in 1970 by Canadian orthopedic surgeon Robert B. Salter, who drew from animal experiments demonstrating that continuous, controlled motion after immobilization enhanced articular cartilage repair in rabbit models compared to rest alone. Salter, collaborating with biomedical engineer John Saringer, developed the first prototype CPM device in 1978 specifically for the knee joint, marking the transition from theoretical research to practical application. Initial clinical trials, beginning in 1975, focused on post-surgical knee rehabilitation, where CPM was applied immediately after procedures to prevent joint stiffness. Key milestones in the 1980s included U.S. clearance of early devices through the 510(k) process, which facilitated wider availability. By the 1990s, expanded beyond the to other such as the , , and ankle, supported by growing clinical evidence for its role in reducing postoperative complications across orthopedic procedures. Into the early 2000s, became integrated into standard protocols for total replacements and recovery, reflecting its acceptance as a foundational element in regimens. A seminal publication establishing the foundational evidence was Salter's 1980 study in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, which detailed experimental results from rabbit models showing superior regeneration with versus immobilization, influencing subsequent clinical adoption.

Mechanism and Technology

Principles of Operation

() operates on the biomechanical principle of applying low-load, prolonged stretch to joint tissues through passive flexion and extension cycles, which mimics natural joint motion without requiring active . This motion generates sinusoidal intra-articular changes that function as a , facilitating the clearance of harmful substances such as hemarthrosis and inflammatory debris via trans-synovial flow, thereby preventing intra-articular adhesions and stiffness. The low-load aspect ensures that the stress applied to periarticular tissues remains below the threshold for injury, promoting gradual elongation of fibers and reducing the risk of formation. Physiologically, CPM enhances the production and distribution of , which nourishes avascular by improving nutrient diffusion and waste removal within the joint space. It reduces by limiting accumulation and suppressing pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and enzymes such as COX-2, which in turn minimizes erosive damage to articular surfaces. Through mechanotransduction, the mechanical stimuli from CPM trigger cellular responses in chondrocytes and fibroblasts, including increased synthesis of proteoglycans, , and lubricin (PRG4), fostering tissue repair and remodeling without active muscle involvement. Much of the mechanistic understanding derives from model , with ongoing studies confirming applicability in humans. Typical operational parameters for CPM include cycles of flexion-extension at a rate of 0.5 to 2 cycles per minute, with session durations ranging from 2 to 8 hours daily, depending on the and recovery phase. (ROM) adjustments are progressive, starting at limited arcs such as 0° to 40° flexion immediately post-intervention and gradually increasing to full ROM over days to weeks, ensuring tolerance and avoiding overload. These parameters are tailored to sustain continuous, non-fatiguing motion that supports physiological recovery. The underlying biology of CPM draws from principles like , which posits that osseous tissues adapt to imposed mechanical loads by remodeling in response to controlled stress; analogous mechanobiological principles apply to soft tissues in the joint. This mechanobiological adaptation promotes regeneration and prevents degenerative changes by stimulating anabolic pathways in response to the sustained, low-intensity loading. Seminal work by Salter et al. established these concepts, demonstrating that early passive motion enhances articular repair through such adaptive mechanisms.

Device Design and Variations

Continuous passive motion (CPM) devices consist of a motorized unit that drives controlled joint movement, equipped with programmable controls allowing clinicians to set parameters such as range of motion (ROM), speed, and pause duration to tailor therapy to individual patient needs. These units are paired with adjustable splints or braces designed for secure limb fixation, often featuring anatomically aligned supports like four-point systems to ensure proper positioning and minimize skin pressure during operation. Most models are portable, with weights typically ranging from 10 to 20 kg, facilitating easy transport between clinical settings or home use. Key design features enhance usability and safety, including remote controls—such as handheld interfaces or tablet-based systems—for patient-independent adjustments to and speed without disrupting therapy. Safety mechanisms are integral, with many devices incorporating detection systems, often via or pressure sensors, that automatically halt motion upon encountering excessive force to prevent injury. Some advanced models offer battery-powered operation for greater mobility in home environments, though most rely on for sustained sessions. CPM devices vary by targeted joint, with knee-specific models being the most common, particularly for post-arthroplasty , offering up to 120° flexion and -10° extension. Upper extremity variants address and recovery, providing multi-plane motion like and for shoulders or flexion-extension for elbows. Full-limb devices for extend coverage to larger joints, accommodating and up to 120°. Emerging post-2020 developments include robotic versions integrating for adaptive motion profiles that adjust in real-time based on patient feedback, enhancing in . These devices adhere to medical standards, with many manufacturers ensuring compliance with for quality management in design and production to guarantee reliability and safety. Typical purchase costs range from $2,000 to $5,000 per unit, varying by model complexity and joint specificity.

Clinical Applications

Post-Surgical Joint Rehabilitation

Continuous passive motion (CPM) plays a central role in the immediate postoperative phase of orthopedic surgeries involving major joints, facilitating controlled joint mobilization to prevent stiffness and promote early recovery of (ROM). It is typically initiated within 24-48 hours following procedures such as total knee arthroplasty (TKA), (ACL) reconstruction, or rotator cuff repair, allowing passive joint movement without active patient effort to minimize pain and swelling while initiating rehabilitation. This approach contrasts with traditional immobilization, aiming to restore functional mobility sooner through device-assisted flexion and extension cycles. In recovery, protocols commonly begin with a starting of 0-60 degrees of flexion on the first postoperative day, gradually progressing to 0-120 degrees over approximately two weeks as tolerated by the patient. Sessions are prescribed for 2-4 hours per day initially, often combined with such as packs to manage and enhance comfort during use. For reconstruction, similar early initiation targets controlled knee flexion to 90 degrees within the first few days, adjusting speed and cycle duration based on graft stability and surgeon preferences. repair protocols emphasize gentle passive shoulder motion starting at low angles to protect the surgical site while preventing adhesions. Joint-specific adaptations ensure safety and efficacy across different anatomies. For shoulder surgeries like repair, CPM devices limit motion to 0-90 degrees of and flexion, typically applied for 1-2 hours per session in the early postoperative period to avoid on repaired tendons. In hip arthroplasty, specialized CPM units restrict flexion to 90 degrees and to 30 degrees to prevent posterior , with usage starting and progressing to seated positions as stability improves. These parameters are customized by orthopedic surgeons, often incorporating patient-specific factors like age and comorbidities. CPM is integrated into broader regimens, serving as an adjunct to active exercises and once subsides. Devices are used in both inpatient settings for the initial 3-5 days and transitioned to home use via rental programs lasting 2-6 weeks, enabling consistent application during outpatient recovery. Rental durations align with protocol timelines, with on setup and to ensure proper alignment and .

Neurological and Other Conditions

Continuous passive motion (CPM) has been applied in to address upper and lower limb and improve motor control. In a involving patients shortly after unilateral , daily CPM sessions targeting the enhanced joint stability compared to self-directed range-of-motion exercises, with a trend toward reduced (p=0.06). For paretic ankles, a 30-minute CPM combined with reduced spasticity as measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale and increased passive in dorsiflexion and plantarflexion, while also eliciting in sensorimotor areas via fMRI. In chronic patients, brain-computer interface-controlled CPM for wrist extension over 20 sessions improved active by approximately 24 degrees, supporting its role in enhancing voluntary control. Protocols typically involve 1-2 hours per day at low speeds to minimize discomfort and promote without exacerbating fatigue. In other neurological conditions such as cerebral palsy, CPM targets spasticity and joint mobility maintenance. A controlled trial in children with cerebral palsy demonstrated that 20-minute knee CPM sessions at 15 degrees per second reduced hypertonia on the Modified Ashworth Scale, increased active knee range of motion, and improved functional mobility as assessed by the Timed Up-and-Go test and 6-Minute Walk Test. For ankle involvement, a four-week program of 1-hour daily bilateral CPM decreased soleus hypertonia (p=0.006), lowered H/M ratios indicative of reduced excitability (p=0.001), and expanded passive ankle range of motion (p=0.049) in individuals with spastic cerebral palsy. In multiple sclerosis, robot-assisted ankle CPM over 18 sessions reduced spinal cord excitability via H-reflex measures (up to 96.5% decrease on affected sides) and modestly improved walking performance in five of eight participants on the 10-meter Walk Test. These applications emphasize CPM's utility in chronic spasticity management, with evidence from 2020s studies highlighting sustained reductions in muscle tone and better ambulatory outcomes. Emerging uses of CPM extend to non-traumatic settings, including ankle contracture prevention in (ICU) patients. In mechanically ventilated adults, unilateral ankle CPM preserved dorsiflexion (increasing from 9.90° to 12.99°, p=0.004) compared to contralateral controls, suggesting its potential as an early intervention to avert immobility-related complications. For post-fracture rehabilitation in the elderly, evidence remains limited as of 2025, with preliminary applications focusing on gentle motion to restore mobility without overloading healing tissues, though high-quality trials are lacking. In pediatric congenital conditions like , postoperative CPM in infants yielded superior short-term improvements in Dimeglio scores (3.11 vs. 4.17 at 12 months) relative to cast , but long-term benefits at 48 months were comparable (4.47 vs. 3.89). Neurological adaptations of CPM often involve slower speeds (0.2-1 cycle per minute) to enhance patient tolerance and avoid , as seen in robot-driven protocols for limbs. Integration with has shown promise in combined therapies for , where CPM augments muscle activation during passive cycles to facilitate motor relearning, though direct neurological studies are emerging. Device variations suitable for non-surgical use, such as portable ankle or wrist models, support these outpatient protocols.

Evidence and Benefits

Key Clinical Outcomes

Continuous passive motion (CPM) therapy has been associated with modest improvements in (ROM) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), particularly when compared to traditional protocols. A 2004 indicated an average gain of approximately 4 degrees in active knee flexion at 2 weeks postoperatively, facilitating faster achievement of functional flexion milestones such as 90 degrees, which occurs approximately 4.7 days earlier with CPM. CPM also contributes to swelling reduction in the immediate postoperative period. Patients using CPM experience reduced knee swelling by an average of 1.79 units compared to controls. This is attributed to enhanced lymphatic drainage and decreased . The same meta-analysis found reduced analgesic requirements (mean 4.18 mg less at 2 weeks), though no significant pain reduction on VAS scores. In terms of functional recovery, CPM supports shorter stays, typically by 0.69 days (95% -1.35 to -0.03), and enables earlier ambulation in TKA patients by promoting quicker mobilization and reducing dependency on extended inpatient care. Long-term effects include a lower incidence of manipulation under (risk ratio 0.12, 95% CI 0.03–0.53) relative to non-CPM groups, as well as improved health in animal models, where CPM enhances viability and articular tissue repair compared to .

Research Findings and Comparisons

A 2014 Cochrane of 24 randomized controlled trials involving over 1,400 participants undergoing total found that continuous passive motion (CPM) provided small short-term improvements in active flexion (ROM), approximately 2 degrees greater than standard care at early follow-up, alongside modest gains in , though these effects were not deemed clinically significant and did not persist beyond the immediate postoperative period. A 2024 meta-analysis published in the Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, synthesizing data from 6 studies with 557 patients, confirmed no significant differences in pain as measured by visual analog scale scores compared to alone, but demonstrated no long-term superiority in ROM, function, or patient satisfaction at 6 months or beyond, with CPM also associated with longer hospital stays. Recent evidence from 2020 to 2025 highlights expanding applications beyond orthopedics. A 2025 scoping review in Spinal Cord Series and Cases () examined passive movement interventions, including , for management in across 13 studies; it reported heterogeneous outcomes, with some trials showing reductions in spasticity scores via mechanisms like altered spinal reflex excitability, but emphasized limitations due to variable protocols and small sample sizes, calling for standardized RCTs. Regarding delivery settings, a 2025 retrospective cohort study published in () compared home-based to clinic-based in 40 patients (20 per group) after arthroscopic release for degenerative stiffness, finding superior ROM gains at 3 months (126.75° vs. 112.50°) and early pain control in the home group, attributed to flexible scheduling and reduced travel burden. Comparisons to alternative therapies underscore CPM's niche role. Versus physical therapy alone, CPM yields similar outcomes in ROM, function, and pain, per the 2024 meta-analysis. Against immobilization or no motion, CPM reduces joint stiffness and adhesions, as evidenced by lower incidence of manipulation under anesthesia in meta-analyses, though at increased cost without proportional long-term gains. For stroke rehabilitation, a 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis of 4 trials reported significant but low-certainty improvements in motor function (SMD 0.70, 95% CI 0.20–1.20) and disability scores (SMD 0.81, 95% CI 0.35–1.27) with passive movement including CPM, due to methodological flaws and small sample sizes. Professional guidelines, such as the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Choosing Wisely recommendation (as of 2020), advise against routine use of CPM following total knee arthroplasty due to insufficient evidence of clinically meaningful long-term benefits. Ongoing research gaps include the paucity of randomized controlled trials for non-knee applications, such as or ankle rehabilitation, where evidence is largely anecdotal or from small cohorts. Cost-effectiveness analyses indicate CPM adds $500-1,000 per patient in device rental and monitoring expenses for a typical 2-week course, often without offsetting savings in days or readmissions, prompting calls for targeted implementation in high-risk cases only.

Risks and Considerations

Potential Complications

While continuous passive motion (CPM) is generally considered safe for post-surgical rehabilitation, particularly after total knee arthroplasty, it is associated with certain adverse effects, primarily related to mechanical stress on tissues and device fit. Common complications include irritation, localized bruising, and transient swelling, often resulting from overly aggressive settings or prolonged sessions. These issues may manifest as pain at the site or increased need for analgesia, with overall adverse events affecting approximately 15% of patients using CPM compared to similar rates (16.3%) in standard groups. Skin breakdown, blistering, or irritation can also occur due to from straps or poor device alignment, particularly in areas like the inner or around surgical incisions. Rare but serious risks encompass device malfunctions that could lead to unintended hyperextension or excessive force, potentially exacerbating damage, though such incidents are minimized by modern safety features like limit switches. Other infrequent complications include deep vein , especially if patients remain immobile during extended sessions, and wound infections in the presence of open surgical sites. The incidence of serious adverse events is low, though specific rates are not well-quantified in recent reviews. Management of these complications involves close monitoring of pain thresholds during sessions, with immediate adjustment or discontinuation if discomfort exceeds tolerable levels or if plateaus or regresses. Proper device fitting with adequate padding and frequent skin inspections (at least daily) help prevent and breakdown, while elevating the limb and combining CPM with active exercises can mitigate swelling. In cases of suspected or , prompt medical evaluation is essential to avoid progression.

Absolute Contraindications

Continuous passive motion (CPM) therapy is contraindicated in cases of active at or near the , including septic or diffuse , as it may exacerbate the condition or spread . Unstable fractures, instability, or incomplete also represent absolute contraindications due to the risk of further or injury during passive movement. Severe open wounds, deep lacerations surrounding the , or uncontrolled similarly preclude use to avoid worsening or hemorrhage.

Relative Contraindications

Relative contraindications for CPM include acute or diffuse swelling, which could be aggravated by motion, and skin ulcers or lesions over the area that might lead to sores from device contact. intolerance to passive motion, manifested as severe during initial trials, warrants caution or temporary suspension to prevent psychological distress or guarding responses. In neurological conditions involving or , CPM requires careful evaluation, as uncontrolled muscle activity may interfere with the device's function or cause injury, though it may still be applicable under close supervision. s with or non-compliance may require additional supervision to ensure safe use and monitoring for complications.

Usage Guidelines

The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) advises against the routine use of CPM following uncomplicated total knee arthroplasty (), citing insufficient evidence for improved long-term , pain reduction, or function compared to standard . When indicated, CPM should commence within 48 hours postoperatively for stable joints to maximize potential benefits in preventing stiffness, with treatment typically limited to 7-21 days under multidisciplinary oversight involving surgeons, therapists, and nurses. should be progressively titrated based on patient tolerance, starting at comfortable levels and advancing only as pain allows, while ensuring the device does not impede wound care or nursing needs. Patient selection prioritizes motivated individuals with limited postoperative mobility after joint replacement surgery, such as or anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, but CPM is not recommended as standard care for all patients or other neurological conditions due to variable evidence of efficacy.

References

  1. [1]
    What Does a Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) Machine Do?
    Jan 15, 2021 · CPM machines were historically used after knee, hip, shoulder, and elbow surgery to help minimize stiffness and increase range of motion.
  2. [2]
    What Is a Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) Machine?
    A continuous passive motion machine is a device that bends a joint to increase mobility. It's often used for rehabilitation after knee replacement surgery.Before Therapy · During Therapy · After TherapyMissing: history | Show results with:history
  3. [3]
    Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) Machines - Aetna
    Published studies suggest that continuous passive motion (CPM) can improve range of motion (ROM) in those patients undergoing surgical release of arthrofibrosis ...
  4. [4]
    Clinical application of basic research on continuous passive motion ...
    Since 1970, when the concept of continuous passive motion (CPM) was originated by one of the authors (R.B.S.), he and a succession of his research fellows ...Missing: invention | Show results with:invention
  5. [5]
    The Biologic Concept of Continuous Passive Motion of Synovial Joints
    The Biologic Concept of Continuous Passive Motion of Synovial Joints. The First 18 Years of Basic Research and Its Clinical Application. SALTER, ROBERT B. O.C., ...Missing: invention | Show results with:invention
  6. [6]
    History | Kinetec USA
    Kinetec started in France in the 1970s, invented the first CPM device in 1978, was acquired by Richards in 1986, and established a US office in 2014.
  7. [7]
    Effectiveness of prolonged use of continuous passive motion (CPM ...
    The expected effect of CPM treatment was a quicker restoration of RoM, resulting in improved ADL function during the first three months after surgery. Knee ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  8. [8]
    Understanding CPM Machines - the medcom group
    Its main aim is to help reduce swelling, inhibit scar tissue formation, maintain joint flexibility, and enhance blood circulation around the surgical site, ...
  9. [9]
    Why Use CPM Therapy? | Kinetec UK
    Oct 3, 2017 · – Enhanced nutrition and metabolic activity; – Accelerated healing of articular tissues; – Regeneration of cartilage. The benefits of CPM for ...
  10. [10]
    Efficacy and safety of continuous passive motion and physical ... - NIH
    Jan 13, 2024 · Efficacy and safety of continuous passive motion and physical therapy in recovery from knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
  11. [11]
    Effect of continuous passive motion on the early recovery outcomes ...
    Oct 21, 2021 · Continuous passive motion (CPM) is a frequently used method in the early post-operative rehabilitation of patients after knee surgery.
  12. [12]
    Continuous Passive Motion, Early Weight Bearing, and Active ... - NIH
    The purpose of this article is to review the literature addressing the use of CPM, active range of motion (AROM), and early weight bearing following knee ...
  13. [13]
    The Basic Science of Continuous Passive Motion in Promoting Knee ...
    To determine whether the basic science evidence supports the use of continuous passive motion (CPM) after articular cartilage injury in the knee.
  14. [14]
    Continuous Passive Motion Following Total Knee Arthroplasty ... - NIH
    Based on evidence from 24 randomized trials (pooled n = 1445), the authors concluded that there is very little advantage of using CPM after TKA.
  15. [15]
    The Utility of Continuous Passive Motion After Anterior Cruciate ...
    While our systematic review identified a number of studies that suggest CPM use may be associated with lower usage of pain medication in hospitalized patients, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  16. [16]
    CG-DME-52 Continuous Passive Motion Devices in the Home Setting
    Nov 14, 2024 · Continuous passive motion refers to the use of a motorized device that is applied to an individual's extremity to move the individual's joint ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  17. [17]
    Clinical evaluation of usefulness and effectiveness of sitting-type ...
    Dec 19, 2024 · Continuous passive motion (CPM) involves an externally powered device that provides passive movement of a joint throughout a pre-set arc of ...
  18. [18]
    Giants In Orthopaedic Surgery: Robert Bruce Salter CC, MD, FRCSC
    Salter's concept of continuous passive motion (CPM) has become somewhat controversial. The concept challenged the long-held notion of treating diseased and ...
  19. [19]
    Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) machines - Medicare
    See coverage policy for CPM machines under Medicare. Learn potential costs for continuous passive motion equipment for knee rehab at Medicare.gov.
  20. [20]
    History of Rest and Motion and the Scientific Basis for ... - PubMed
    The history of rest, early motion, and CPM is described. The success of CPM stems from two main factors: basic research has validated the concept, ...
  21. [21]
    Robert Bruce Salter | The Canadian Encyclopedia
    Dec 13, 2007 · In the late 1970s he originated the revolutionary concept of continuous passive motion (CPM) of joints to stimulate the regeneration of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  22. [22]
    510(k) Premarket Notification - FDA
    510(k) Premarket Notification ; K841674 · CONTINUOUS PASSIVE MOTION · CHATTANOOGA GROUP, INC. 803 N. Front St. Suite 3. McHenry, IL 60050 · CHATTANOOGA GROUP, INC.
  23. [23]
    The Clinical Use of Continuous Passive Motion in Physical Therapy
    Continuous passive motion (CPM) is used in physical therapy for rehabilitation after knee manipulations, fracture fixation, and soft tissue procedures, and has ...
  24. [24]
    The biological effect of continuous passive motion on the healing of ...
    The biological effect of continuous passive motion on the healing of full-thickness defects in articular cartilage. An experimental investigation in the rabbit.Missing: paper | Show results with:paper
  25. [25]
    Continuous Passive Motion Applied to Whole Joints Stimulates ...
    Rehabilitative joint motion, applied in the form of CPM, stimulates chondrocyte PRG4 metabolism. The stimulation of PRG4 synthesis is one mechanism by which CPM ...
  26. [26]
    Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) - Physiopedia
    CPM is most commonly used after joint surgery to promote the recovery of normal joint range of motion (ROM) and thus, to prevent joint stiffness complications.
  27. [27]
    CPM - Kinex Medical Company
    CPM (Continuous Passive Motion) devices perform passive range of motion to a knee, shoulder, or other joint following orthopedic surgery.Missing: features variations ISO 13485
  28. [28]
    Amazon.com: New CPM Machine Knee Exercise Leg Exercise Unit ...
    Maximum Load Capacity: 200 kg (440 lbs) Package Weight: 20 kg (44 lbs) Dimensions: 92 x 36 x 37 cm (36.2 in x 14.2 in x 14.6 in) ✫Package includes: 1 ...
  29. [29]
  30. [30]
    Continuous passive motion device - All medical device manufacturers
    The device is easy to move and handle, suitable for home use. It consists of a base fitted on four swivel casters with brake and is height adjustable.Missing: components safety variations
  31. [31]
    CPM Continuous Passive Motion Device - Electric Wrist Therapy ...
    Occupational therapy for improved hand mobility. Technical Specifications: Power Supply: AC 110-240V Material: High-quality durable plastic & soft ...Missing: variations | Show results with:variations
  32. [32]
    Learn how AI and the latest CPM technologies optimize patient ...
    Feb 21, 2024 · CPM therapy works by supporting and moving limbs on behalf of a passive patient within a range of motion prescribed by the therapy.Missing: variations | Show results with:variations
  33. [33]
    Advanced Shoulder and Elbow CPM Machine - Skrilix Private Limited
    Rating 5.0 (9) · Free deliveryCertified under ISO 13485:2016, specifically designed for medical devices, this product meets all regulatory requirements for the design, production, and ...
  34. [34]
    CPM Machine Sales & Rental | Simple Medical Supply Vista, CA ...
    Purchasing a CPM machine can range from $2,000 to $5,000, depending on the model and features, while rental prices are customizable to fit short-term recovery ...
  35. [35]
    Buy Top-Quality CPM Machines | Knee Rehab Equipment
    1–2 day deliveryKinetec Spectra Essential Knee CPM. Now: $2,395.00. $5,629.25. Was: ; Chattanooga OptiFlex K1 knee CPM. Now: $3,455.00. Was: ; Chattanooga OptiFlex S Shoulder CPM.
  36. [36]
    Continuous passive motion improves shoulder joint ... - PubMed - NIH
    Device-delivered continuous passive range of motion may offer an enhanced benefit for some adverse symptom reduction in the hemiplegic arm after stroke.
  37. [37]
    The Effect of Passive Movement for Paretic Ankle-Foot and Brain ...
    Aug 31, 2016 · This study aims at investigating the short-term efficacy of the continuous passive motion (CPM) device developed for the therapy of ankle-foot paresis.
  38. [38]
    Motor imagery based brain-computer interface control of continuous ...
    Jan 23, 2020 · Motor imagery based brain-computer interface control of continuous passive motion for wrist extension recovery in chronic stroke patients.
  39. [39]
    Managing spastic hypertonia in children with cerebral palsy via ...
    The aim of this study was to explore the effects of continuous passive motion on children with cerebral palsy, regarding their lower extremity spastic ...
  40. [40]
    Effects of ankle continuous passive motion on soleus hypertonia in ...
    The purpose of this research was to evaluate the effects of a four-week program of continuous passive motion of the ankle joint on the changes in soleus ...
  41. [41]
    Robot controlled, continuous passive movement of the ankle ...
    Oct 10, 2019 · Robot-driven continuous passive movement (CPM) is a strategy for lower limb spasticity management but effects on spasticity, walking ability and ...
  42. [42]
    Continuous passive motion for prevention of ankle contracture and ...
    Oct 1, 2025 · Sessions lasted 30 min, twice daily on weekdays, for up to 7 days or until ICU discharge.
  43. [43]
    Continuous passive motion versus immobilisation in a cast after ...
    Continuous passive motion has been shown to be effective in the conservative treatment of idiopathic club foot. We wished to determine whether its use after ...Missing: pediatric | Show results with:pediatric
  44. [44]
    Robot controlled, continuous passive movement of the ankle ...
    Oct 10, 2019 · Robot-driven devices which provide both slow continuous passive motion (CPM) and passive muscle stretch of the ankle may be a beneficial ...
  45. [45]
    Early Stroke Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb Assisted ... - Frontiers
    Sep 3, 2017 · Continuous passive motion improves shoulder joint integrity following stroke. ... Functional electrical stimulation in neurological disorders. Eur ...
  46. [46]
    Efficacy of Continuous Passive Motion Following Total Knee ...
    CPM combined with conventional PT may be utilized to produce small increases in active knee flexion ROM, to decrease length of hospital stay, and to reduce the ...
  47. [47]
    Continuous passive motion following total knee arthroplasty in ...
    Feb 6, 2014 · It is believed that CPM increases recovery of knee ROM and has other therapeutic benefits. However, it is not clear whether CPM is effective.Missing: post | Show results with:post
  48. [48]
    Efficacy and safety of continuous passive motion and physical ...
    Jan 13, 2024 · Efficacy and safety of continuous passive motion and physical therapy in recovery from knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
  49. [49]
    Passive movement interventions and spasticity outcomes in ... - Nature
    Nov 5, 2025 · ... continuous passive motion (n = 4), and manual passive range of ... multiple sclerosis included no PM interventions [46]. Likewise, a ...
  50. [50]
    Effectiveness of home based continuous passive motion compared ...
    Aug 20, 2025 · Preclinical studies suggest that CPM may be more effective than immobilization or intermittent motion, as it promotes fluid clearance from the ...
  51. [51]
    Effects of Passive Movement on Motor Function and Disability in ...
    Mar 31, 2025 · Conclusions: Evidence for the effects of passive movement on recovery outcomes in patients with stroke seems to be low. Therefore, the clinical ...
  52. [52]
    CPM Machine Rent - AAA Medical Supply
    A CPM machine rental can cost between $250 and $500 per week. It's always a good idea to shop around and compare prices from different rental companies to get ...
  53. [53]
    Postoperative Continuous Passive Motion Does Not Improve the ...
    This study found no advantage in the routine use of CPM post-MUA for stiff total knee replacement patients, suggesting it may not provide sustained ROM ...
  54. [54]
    Continuous passive motion following total knee arthroplasty in ...
    The review showed that CPM following knee replacement surgery probably improves the ability to bend the knee slightly and the person's quality of life but may ...
  55. [55]
    Continuous Passive Motion - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Continuous passive motion (CPM) refers to a mechanical device that supports a joint and is designed to move slowly through a designated range of motion ...Missing: slower | Show results with:slower