The Salar de Atacama is a large endorheic salt flat in the Antofagasta Region of northern Chile, within the hyper-arid Atacama Desert, covering approximately 3,000 square kilometers at an average elevation of 2,300 meters above sea level.[1][2] It constitutes the largest salt flat in Chile and features a thick crust of evaporite minerals formed over millennia from the evaporation of ancient lake waters in a closed basin surrounded by Andean cordilleras.[1][3]
The salar's subsurface brines hold exceptionally high lithium concentrations, averaging 0.14% lithium chloride, supporting the extraction of vast quantities of lithium carbonate and hydroxide that account for a substantial share of global battery-grade lithium supply through solarevaporation processes operated by major firms like Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile (SQM).[4][5] These reserves, concentrated in the Lithium Triangle spanning Chile, Argentina, and Bolivia, have positioned Chile as the second-largest lithium producer worldwide, with all domestic output derived from this site as of recent years.[6]
Amid the extreme dryness receiving less than 10 millimeters of annual precipitation, the salar sustains pockets of hypersaline lagoons that harbor unique microbial life and serve as critical habitats for high-altitude waterbirds, notably breeding colonies of the vulnerable Andean flamingo (Phoenicoparrus andinus), alongside Chilean and James's flamingos dependent on algae and brine shrimp for sustenance.[7][8] Intensive lithium pumping has been empirically associated with localized aquifer drawdown and subsidence rates of 1-2 centimeters per year, contributing—alongside reduced surface water from climatic shifts—to fluctuating and declining flamingo abundances in monitored wetlands, underscoring tensions between resource extraction and ecological persistence in this fragile system.[9][10]
Geography and Location
Physical Characteristics
The Salar de Atacama is a vast salt flat spanning approximately 3,000 square kilometers in northern Chile's Atacama Desert, making it the third-largest saline pan in the world.[1][11] It lies at an average elevation of 2,300 meters above sea level within an endorheic basin that reaches a maximum depth of 1,700 meters below the surface.[12][13] The salar's surface features a predominantly flat topography interrupted by a central bumpy region formed by polygonal salt crusts, with the active halite nucleus covering about 2,200 square kilometers, extending roughly 85 kilometers north-south and 50 kilometers west-east.[14]The surface is capped by a thick evaporite crust, primarily composed of halite (sodium chloride), with thicknesses varying from tens of meters in peripheral zones to several hundred meters in the core, as evidenced by drilling records.[15][16] This crust overlies brine-saturated sediments and aquifers, maintained by the region's hyperarid climate, where annual precipitation averages less than 2 millimeters in the driest sectors, preventing significant dissolution or fluvial erosion.[17] The salar's margins are bounded by volcanic cordilleras and alluvial fans, contributing to its isolation as a closed depositional basin.[11]
Regional Context
The Salar de Atacama is situated in the Antofagasta Region of northern Chile, within the hyper-arid Atacama Desert, which spans approximately 128,000 km² of barren terrain including salt lakes, stony landscapes, and lava fields along the western slopes of the Andes.[18] This endorheic basin lies at an elevation of about 2,300 meters above sea level, enclosed by the Cordillera de Domeyko to the west—rising to an average of 3,000 meters—and the Andean cordillera to the east, creating a topographic depression that traps evaporative brines.[19][12]The region's extreme aridity, with some areas receiving less than 1 mm of annual precipitation, results from the rain shadow of the towering Andes blocking moist easterly winds and the cooling effect of the Humboldt Current along the Pacific coast, rendering the Atacama the driest non-polar desert on Earth.[18] Nearby indigenous Atacameño communities, including Toconao, Talabre, Camar, and Peine, are located along the basin's eastern and southern borders, sustaining traditional livelihoods amid the harsh environment.[20] The town of San Pedro de Atacama serves as a key access point to the north, supporting tourism and research activities in this remote plateau.[21]
Geological Formation
Evolutionary History
The Salar de Atacama basin originated in the Permian as part of a regional rift system along the western margin of Gondwana, accumulating approximately 2 kilometers of Permo-Triassic continental detrital and volcanic sediments prior to the onset of Andean subduction-related tectonics.[22] This early extensional phase transitioned into Mesozoic sag basin development, with over 2 kilometers of Jurassic mixed carbonate and clastic sequences overlying the rift fill, followed by more than 4 kilometers of continental detritus in the Cretaceous to Eocene Purilactis Group, which unconformably underlies later Cenozoic strata.[22] The basin has persisted as northern Chile's largest and deepest nonmarine depocenter since roughly 90 million years ago, recording progressive infilling under varying tectonic regimes driven by Nazca-South American plate convergence.[23]From the Late Cretaceous through the Paleogene, the basin evolved as a continental backarc depocenter characterized by episodic extension, with nonmarine sedimentation dominated by fluvial and lacustrine deposits amid thin-skinned thrusting along its margins.[24]Oligocene extension and trans-tension further deepened the basin, leading to accumulation of the 2-kilometer-thick Paciencia Group of continental sediments, while the depositional axis shifted eastward over time.[22] This extensional phase inverted during the Neogene, as the basin transitioned to a forearc setting under intensified compression, with thick- and thin-skinned thrusting deforming strata along structures like the Cordillera de la Sal and elevating surrounding ranges.[25]Late Miocene to Pliocene deformation, including reverse faulting and folding, finalized the basin's endorheic configuration, isolating internal drainage and promoting evaporite formation.[26]The modern Salar de Atacama salt flat emerged within this tectonically bounded depression during the late Cenozoic, as hyperarid conditions in the Andean forearc inhibited outflow, concentrating brines through repeated evaporation cycles and precipitation of halite and other salts in a closed hydrologic system.[25] This process, ongoing since at least the Pliocene, reflects the basin's long-term subsidence accommodating over 3 kilometers of Cenozoic fill, punctuated by pulses of Andean uplift that enhanced topographic isolation and climatic desiccation.[23] The salar's evolutionary trajectory underscores causal links between plate-scale compression, localized extension-inversion cycles, and paleoclimate shifts, yielding one of the world's premier lithium-rich evaporite systems.[27]
Mineralogical Composition
The Salar de Atacama features a thick evaporite sequence dominated by halite (NaCl), which constitutes the primary mineral phase in its central nucleus, exceeding 900 meters in thickness over an area of approximately 3,000 km². This halite accumulation, totaling more than 1,800 km³, results from prolonged evaporation in a closed basin under hyperarid conditions, trapping interstitial brines rich in dissolved salts.[28][29]Gypsum (CaSO₄·2H₂O) occurs prominently in marginal facies and associated sediments, forming layers that reflect early stages of sulfate precipitation before halite dominance.[30]Associated evaporite minerals include minor sulfates and chlorides, with the overall assemblage shaped by cyclic wetting and extreme aridity over Quaternary timescales. While brines within the halite pores contain elevated concentrations of lithium (>1,000 mg/L), potassium, magnesium, and boron, these elements remain largely in solution rather than forming distinct solid phases in the core deposits; advanced evaporation models suggest potential for potash minerals like carnallite (KMgCl₃·6H₂O) in evolved sequences, though natural precipitation favors halite persistence.[31][32][33] Sedimentary interbeds may incorporate carbonates such as calcite and dolomite, alongside clays and quartz, derived from influxes of volcanic and alluvial materials.[34] This composition underscores the salar's role as a non-marine evaporite system, distinct from marine sequences by its chloride-sulfate profile influenced by continental weathering and limited marine input.[19]
Hydrology and Brines
Aquifer Dynamics
The regional groundwater system of the Salar de Atacama features peripheral aquifers in alluvial and volcanic formations that feed laterally into the central halite nucleus hosting lithium-rich brines. These aquifers exhibit radial inward flow toward the salar center, driven by hydraulic gradients from surrounding highlands, with the primary recharge originating from subsurface inflows in northern and southeastern sub-basins contributing over 90% of the total input.[35] Direct precipitation recharge is minimal due to the arid climate, averaging less than 1 mm/year over the basin, though episodic high-intensity events enable rapid infiltration into the southern margin's halite-hosted brineaquifer, documented via oxygen-18 and deuteriumisotope tracing.[36][37]Flow dynamics reveal a dominance of ancient groundwater, with tritium analyses indicating that discharge to the salar comprises predominantly pre-1950s water (>60 years old at the time of sampling), sourced from interbasin transfers and high-elevation paleorecharge rather than modern precipitation.[38][39] Stable isotope systematics (δ¹⁸O and δ²H) confirm recharge elevations exceeding 4,000 meters in the Andean cordillera, where fresher, cooler waters infiltrate fractured volcanics before descending and migrating basinward over timescales of millennia.[39] In the upper halite nucleus, shallow brine flow shows isotopic variability linked to mixing zones between fresher peripheral inflows and evaporated central brines, with hydraulic conductivities estimated at 10⁻⁵ to 10⁻³ m/s in porous halite.[40]Discharge occurs mainly through evaporation from the salar surface and evapotranspiration in peripheral wetlands, balancing natural inflows in a steady-state pre-extraction model where annual recharge approximates 200-300 million cubic meters, concentrated by factors of 100-1,000 in brines via free-water evaporation rates of 1-2 meters per year.[41] Numerical models of hydrodynamics highlight density stratification, with denser brines (specific gravity >1.2) overlying less saline underflows in some sectors, though lateral advection dominates overall basin-scale transport. These dynamics sustain the salar's endorheic hydrology but are sensitive to perturbations, as evidenced by coupled natural-anthropogenic simulations showing drawdown propagation from extraction points.
Chemical Properties of Brines
The brines in Salar de Atacama consist primarily of sodium-magnesium-chloride-sulfate waters, with significant potassium, lithium, boron, and sulfate contents, resulting from prolonged evaporation of paleolake waters and influx from surrounding volcanic and alluvial sources. Total dissolved solids (TDS) range from 0.18 to 66.54 g/L, reflecting hypersaline conditions in the central halite nucleus where evaporation concentrates solutes, while marginal zones show dilution from freshwater inflows.[32]Lithium concentrations average 1,400 mg/L across the salar, with minima of 900 mg/L in peripheral areas and maxima exceeding 7,000 mg/L in isolated southern sectors near the halite body, attributed to minimal mixing and enhanced evaporation.[42][32]Major cation and anion compositions vary spatially but follow consistent patterns: sodium (Na) up to 31,800 mg/L, potassium (K) up to 4,551 mg/L, magnesium (Mg) up to 2,400 mg/L, calcium (Ca) up to 1,843 mg/L, chloride (Cl) up to 58,710 mg/L, sulfate (SO₄) up to 5,898 mg/L, and boron (B) up to 81.9 mg/L.[32] These brines exhibit a low Mg/Li molar ratio (typically 6–10), which facilitates lithium extraction compared to other salars with higher ratios, as less lime is required for magnesium precipitation during processing.[42]pH values span 6.56 to 9.86, generally neutral to alkaline, influenced by carbonate buffering and minor CO₂ degassing in geothermal-influenced zones.[32]
Component
Typical Range (mg/L)
Notes
Li
900–7,000 (avg. 1,400)
Highest in halite nucleus; volcanic leaching contributes.[42][32]
Brine density correlates with salinity, often reaching 1.20–1.30 g/cm³ in production zones, enabling solar evaporation without significant phase separation until advanced concentration stages.[31] Elevated boron and sulfate stem from evaporative enrichment and influx from Andean volcanic rocks, while lithium enrichment traces to hydrothermal alteration of surrounding ignimbrites, yielding Li/Cl ratios higher than in typical seawater-derived brines.[32] Spatial heterogeneity arises from aquifer compartmentalization, with fresher brines (Li <500 mg/L) in margins transitioning to Li-enriched (>1,000 mg/L) central pools via density-driven stratification and limited vertical mixing.[43]
Ecology and Biodiversity
Endemic Species
The Salar de Atacama, characterized by its hypersaline conditions and extreme aridity, supports limited macroscopic biodiversity, with endemic species primarily adapted to marginal habitats around lagoons and vegetated fringes. These taxa exhibit specialized physiological traits for tolerating high salinity, alkalinity, and low water availability, reflecting long-term isolation in this endorheic basin. Notable endemics include reptiles and halophytic plants, though overall species richness remains low compared to more mesic Andean ecosystems.[44]Among vertebrates, Liolaemus fabiani, known as Fabian's lizard, represents a key endemic reptile confined to the salt flat and adjacent areas at elevations reaching 3,000 meters. This iguanid lizard, first described in 1982, thrives in hot desert environments, foraging on insects and exhibiting agonistic behaviors suited to the sparse terrain. Its distribution is restricted to the Salar de Atacama, making it vulnerable to habitat alterations from mining and climate shifts.[45]Flora includes Nitrophila atacamensis, an endangered halophyte plant uniquely occurring in the Salar de Atacama's saline soils. This species, adapted to hyperarid rhizosphere conditions, hosts specialized bacterial microbiomes that aid nutrient uptake in nutrient-poor, high-salinity substrates. Its persistence underscores the salar's role as a refugium for salt-tolerant endemics, though populations face pressures from groundwater extraction.[44]
Habitat Fragility
The habitats of the Salar de Atacama, particularly its hypersaline lagoons and surrounding high Andean wetlands, exhibit high fragility due to the region's extreme aridity and dependence on limited groundwater inflows and episodic surface water from the Andes. These ecosystems maintain narrow tolerances for salinity, water levels, and temperature, with even minor perturbations capable of disrupting microbial mats, brine shrimp populations, and associated food webs that support higher trophic levels. Endorheic hydrology confines recharge to precipitation and upstream rivers, rendering the system vulnerable to over-extraction, as evidenced by observed subsidence rates of 1-2 centimeters per year in mining-affected areas, linked to brine pumping that depletes subsurface aquifers.[9]Water extraction for lithium production, accounting for a significant portion of regional groundwater use, has correlated with declines in surface water availability critical for wetland persistence. Studies indicate that lagoons adjacent to extraction sites have experienced reduced water levels, leading to increased salinity and habitat contraction, which threatens specialized species reliant on stable brine conditions. For instance, Andean flamingo (Phoenicoparrus andinus) abundances fluctuate regionally with surface water variations, with populations in the Salar de Atacama showing declines amid intensified mining since the 2010s, including a 10-12% drop in one key lagoon over 11 years proximal to operations.[10][46][47]Avifauna serve as sentinel indicators of habitat stress, with three endemic flamingo species—Andean, Chilean, and Puna—exhibiting population reductions tied to diminished wetland area and quality. Approximately 80% of the salar's animal species are native, including 17 endangered vertebrates among 53 total, underscoring the ecosystem's low resilience to anthropogenic pressures like aquifer drawdown, which can propagate through trophic cascades. While broader systemic effects remain uncertain pending long-term monitoring, localized evidence from satellite imagery and field surveys confirms drying of peripheral wetlands and river diversions, exacerbating fragility in an already water-stressed basin.[48][49]Climate variability compounds mining-induced stresses, as reduced Andean snowmelt further limits recharge, potentially amplifying habitat loss; however, disentangling climatic from extractive drivers requires causal modeling beyond correlative data. Conservation frameworks emphasize integrated management to preserve hypersaline refugia, but ongoing expansion risks tipping thresholds toward irreversible degradation, as seen in analogous saline systems globally.[7][50]
Human History
Indigenous Occupation
The Lickanantay, also known as Atacameños, are the indigenous people whose ancestral occupation of the Salar de Atacama basin dates back at least 11,000 years, with archaeological evidence indicating human presence in the broader Atacama region from as early as 12,500 calibrated years before present (cal BP).[51][52] Early Holocene sites, such as Tambillo-1 on the eastern margin of the salar, preserve remains of base camps occupied around 10,000 years ago, reflecting hunter-gatherer adaptations to the arid environment through exploitation of local resources like lithic materials and fauna.[53] These communities transitioned from mobile foraging patterns between approximately 10,800 and 8,500 cal BP to more sedentary lifestyles, incorporating the salar's brines and surrounding oases into sustainable practices that sustained populations without evident ecological degradation.[54]The Lickanantay integrated the salar into their cultural and cosmological framework, viewing it as a central life-sustaining element intertwined with volcanological knowledge and territorial identity, as evidenced by oral traditions and place-based understandings of geological processes like volcanic activity shaping the basin.[51] Descended from cultures such as the extinct San Pedro phase, they practiced agriculture in adjacent fertile zones, relying on minimal water use from aquifers and surface flows to cultivate crops like quinoa and potatoes, while harvesting salt from the salar for preservation and trade within Andean networks.[55] This occupation persisted through interactions with neighboring groups, including Aymara influences, until Spanish colonial incursions in the 16th century disrupted traditional land use, though communities maintained continuity in the altiplano and desert fringes.[56]Pre-colonial Lickanantay settlement patterns emphasized resilience in the hyper-arid conditions, with evidence from radiocarbon-dated skeletal remains and artifacts showing continuous human adaptation across oases near the salar from the Pleistocene-Holocene boundary onward, predating intensive resource extraction by millennia. Their territorial claims, rooted in millennia of stewardship, form the basis for contemporary indigenous assertions over the salar's resources, highlighting a historical harmony with the ecosystem's hydrological limits.[51]
Modern Exploration and Settlement
Following Chile's annexation of the Atacama region after the War of the Pacific concluded in 1884, systematic geological exploration of the Salar de Atacama intensified as part of efforts to assess mineral and groundwater resources in the newly acquired territory.[57] Early 20th-century surveys documented the basin's salt deposits and aquifers, with U.S. Geological Survey reports in the mid-1960s detailing the northern sector's hydrology and potential extractable resources, including brines suitable for industrial use.[19] These efforts laid groundwork for identifying economically viable minerals, though the harsh arid conditions limited initial permanent outposts to peripheral indigenous villages.The discovery of lithium in the salar's brines during the 1960s marked a pivotal advancement in modern resource exploration, with concentrations confirmed through geochemical sampling that positioned the site as one of the world's richest deposits.[58][49] Pilot extraction tests followed, evolving into industrial operations by 1984 under state-linked entities, which spurred infrastructure development such as evaporation ponds and processing facilities without establishing dedicated company towns in the salar itself.[59] Operations relied on commuting workers from nearby settlements, minimizing direct habitation on the flat due to environmental extremes.Settlement patterns remained centered on longstanding indigenous communities, including San Pedro de Atacama and Toconao, which predate modern mining but experienced demographic shifts from associated economic activity. San Pedro de Atacama's population roughly doubled between 1992 and 2002, driven primarily by tourism influx alongside indirect mining employment, reaching approximately 5,000 residents by the early 21st century while hosting transient workers. These communities, predominantly Lickanantay, negotiated benefit-sharing agreements with lithium firms amid tensions over resource access, reflecting ambivalent integration of extractive economies into traditional lifeways without large-scale urbanization of the salar core.[60]
Resource Extraction
Lithium Mining Techniques
The primary technique for lithium extraction in the Salar de Atacama involves pumping lithium-rich brines from subsurface aquifers followed by solar evaporation to concentrate the resource.[3][5] This method leverages the region's hyper-arid climate and high solar irradiance, which accelerate evaporation rates exceeding 3,000 mm annually in equivalent water loss.[61]Extraction begins with drilling wells to depths greater than 40 meters into the brine-saturated halite layers, yielding fluid with lithium concentrations around 1,800 mg/L (0.2% by weight).[5] The brine is pumped to surface-level evaporation ponds lined with geotextiles, PVC, and a 30 cm halite base for impermeability.[5] In sequential pond arrays, solar evaporation over 12–18 months reduces volume by up to 95%, progressively precipitating impurities: gypsum and early salts in initial low-salinity ponds, followed by halite, sylvinite, and potassium carnallite in intermediate stages, yielding a lithium-enriched eluate at 6% concentration.[61][5]Post-evaporation, the concentrated brine is transported to nearby processing plants, such as those in La Negra, for purification.[61]Boron is removed via solvent extraction to below 30 ppm, while magnesium and calcium are precipitated using slaked lime and soda ash.[5]Lithium is then recovered by adding sodium carbonate to form lithium carbonate (Li₂CO₃) precipitate, which is filtered, washed, dried, and calcined to achieve battery-grade purity over 99.5%.[5] For lithium hydroxide (LiOH), the carbonate or chloride intermediate undergoes causticization or electrolytic conversion.[5]Operators like Albemarle and Sociedad Química y Minera (SQM) integrate this process with potassium chloride co-production, utilizing fractional crystallization of sylvinite and carnallite byproducts from the evaporation sequence.[61][5] The Salar de Atacama's brines benefit from a favorable lithium-to-magnesium ratio (above 7:1), minimizing impurity removal costs compared to other salars.[5]Emerging direct lithium extraction (DLE) pilots, such as Albemarle's adsorption-based systems at La Negra, aim to selectively recover lithium ions from raw brine without bulk evaporation, reinjecting spent fluid to reduce water loss, though these remain non-commercial as of 2025.[62]
Other Mineral Exploitation
The brines underlying the Salar de Atacama contain elevated concentrations of potassium (up to 5-6% as KCl equivalent), boron (approximately 0.85 g/L as B), and magnesium, in addition to lithium, supporting the industrialproduction of multiple mineral compounds through solarevaporation and chemical processing. Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile (SQM), operating under concession agreements with the Chilean government, maintains dedicated production lines for these non-lithium minerals, pumping brines into shallow evaporation ponds where solar concentration precipitates salts sequentially based on solubility differences.[5][63]Potassium chloride (KCl, or muriate of potash) crystallizes first after initial evaporation, followed by processing to yield potassium sulfate (K₂SO₄) via reaction with sulfuric acid derived from nearby sulfur deposits; these products serve as fertilizers in global agriculture.[64][14]SQM's annual harvest from these ponds reaches about 14 million cubic meters of salts, equivalent to 35,000-40,000 cubic meters daily, with potassium output forming a substantial portion alongside lithium.[5] In 2024, SQM achieved sales of 695,000 metric tons of potash (primarily KCl from Salar brines), reflecting a 28% increase from 543,000 metric tons in 2023, though projections indicate a potential halving to around 350,000 metric tons in 2025 due to market adjustments and production reallocations toward lithium.[65]Boron extraction yields boric acid (H₃BO₃) after selective precipitation or solvent processes to remove it from lithium-rich brines, contributing to SQM's portfolio of specialty chemicals used in glass manufacturing and agriculture; magnesium chloride (MgCl₂) emerges as a residual liquor byproduct, often repurposed in industrial applications.[63][11]Albemarle Corporation, the other major brine operator in the Salar, prioritizes lithium carbonate production but benefits from the same multi-mineral brine composition, with residual potassium and boron streams managed through evaporationtailings rather than dedicated commercial lines.[5] These operations, initiated in the 1990s under environmental permits capping brine extraction (e.g., SQM's limit of 1,700 liters per second for potassium and iodine-related activities per 2006 regulatory approval), underscore the Salar's role as a polymetallic resource basin, though potassium and boron yields remain secondary to lithium in economic volume.[66][67]
Economic Role
Production Statistics
The Salar de Atacama serves as the exclusive site for Chile's lithium production, extracted via solar evaporation of lithium-rich brines by operators Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile (SQM) and Albemarle Corporation. In 2023, national output totaled an estimated 234,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE), accounting for approximately 24% of global LCE supply from brine sources.[68][69] SQM contributed 170,000 metric tons LCE that year, with Albemarle's operations supporting the remainder through its expanded capacity at the adjacent La Negra processing facility, which reached 85,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate annually post-upgrades.[70][71]Production volumes have expanded rapidly amid rising demand for battery-grade lithium, with SQM targeting 200,000 metric tons LCE in 2024 and achieving an installed capacity of 210,000 metric tons at its Salar facilities.[70][67] Historical growth reflects this trend: Chile's LCE output tripled to around 240,000 metric tons by 2022 from earlier baselines, driven by brine concentrations averaging 0.14% lithium—among the highest globally.[72][5] Secondary products include potassium chloride, but lithium dominates economic output, with SQM's 2023 sales emphasizing hydroxide and carbonate forms for downstream applications.[73]
National and Global Impacts
Lithium extraction from the Salar de Atacama constitutes the primary source of Chile's lithium output, with operations by companies such as SQM and Albemarle driving national economic contributions through exports and employment. In 2024, lithium accounted for 9.3% of Chile's mining exports, generating $5.1 billion in revenue, with projections estimating a rise to 15% by 2030 amid expanding production capacities.[74] The sector directly employs approximately 8,200 workers, bolstering regional development in the Antofagasta region while the broader mining industry, including lithium, represents about 58% of total export revenues.[74][75] Production costs in the salar remain competitive at $3,000 to $5,000 per ton of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE), lower than many global alternatives, supporting fiscal stability despite copper's dominance.[76]Globally, the Salar de Atacama supplies over 25% of the world's lithium, positioning Chile as the second-largest producer with roughly 30% of annual global demand met from its brine operations.[77][78] This output is critical for lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles (EVs) and renewable energy storage, with partnerships like Codelco-SQM enhancing supply chain reliability for the energy transition.[79]Chile's reserves, estimated at 9.3 million tons, underscore its strategic role, though production growth—projected to increase in 2024-2025—faces scrutiny over long-term sustainability amid rising international demand.[80][81]
Environmental Effects
Water Depletion Data
The primary water depletion in the Salar de Atacama stems from the extraction of lithium-rich brine for evaporation-based processing by operators SQM and Albemarle, which collectively pump over 63 billion liters (63 million cubic meters) of brine annually from subsurface aquifers.[82][83] This volume equates to approximately 2,000 liters per second, drawn primarily from the halite body and underlying aquifers in an endorheic basin where precipitation averages less than 15 millimeters per year and evaporation rates exceed recharge.[83][84]Brine processing involves pumping to solar evaporation ponds, where roughly 90% of the water content evaporates, concentrating lithium chloride for further refinement; this process removes groundwater without replenishment in the short term, leading to net aquifer drawdown.[85]Subsidence measurements using SAOCOM-1 satelliteinterferometry from 2020 to 2023 indicate the salt flat is sinking at 1 to 2 centimeters per year over an area spanning about 8 kilometers north-south and 5 kilometers east-west in the southwest sector, a direct consequence of pore space collapse following brinewithdrawal.[85]
Metric
Value
Period/Source
Annual brine extraction
>63 billion liters
Recent years (SQM + Albemarle)[82]
Subsidence rate
1–2 cm/year
2020–2023 (University of Chile study via satellite data)[85]
Evaporation loss fraction
~90% of extracted water
General process (brine to ponds)[85]
Freshwater supplementation for operational needs, such as reagent preparation and dust control, totals around 3.4 million cubic meters annually across operations, sourced from salar wells and contributing further to local drawdown, though it represents a smaller fraction than brine volumes.[31]Water footprint analyses for 2022 production quantify scarcity-adjusted impacts at 442 cubic meters world equivalents per metric ton of battery-grade lithium under the AWARE methodology, highlighting the basin's extreme water stress (local scarcity factor >1,000).[86] These metrics underscore extraction exceeding natural inflows, with no peer-reviewed consensus on long-term aquifersustainability amid rising production demands.[86][85]
Subsidence and Ecosystem Shifts
Lithium brine extraction from the Salar de Atacama has caused measurable subsidence of the salt flat, with rates of 1 to 2 centimeters per year observed in extraction zones.[85] This sinking results from the removal of subsurface fluids supporting the porous halite structure, leading to compaction as pore spaces collapse under overburden pressure.[85] Rates accelerated during the lithium production boom from 2015 onward, peaking between 2020 and 2022.[82]Accompanying groundwater depletion has driven ecosystem shifts, including the drying of peripheral wetlands that rely on aquifer recharge. Near mining operations, vegetated wetland areas have decreased by up to 90%, as hypersaline lagoons and phreatophytic vegetation lose hydraulic connectivity to underlying brines.[87] These changes disrupt habitats for endemic species, with brine pumping reducing surface water availability and altering salinity gradients in lagoons like Laguna Cejar.[48]Biodiversity impacts include potential declines in populations of brine-dependent avifauna, such as Andean and Chilean flamingos, though regional buffering from adjacent salars may mitigate local losses.[10] Approximately 80% of the salt flat's animal species are endemic, heightening vulnerability to habitat fragmentation from sustained extraction, which has drawn approximately 200 million liters of brine daily from operators like SQM and Albemarle.[49][48] While mining companies report monitoring, independent assessments highlight causal links between pumping volumes and these shifts, underscoring the need for hydrogeological models to quantify long-term risks.[49]
Controversies
Indigenous and Community Perspectives
The Lickan Antay (also known as Atacameño) indigenous communities have inhabited the Salar de Atacama region for over 10,000 years, maintaining traditional practices centered on the scarce water resources of the hyper-arid basin, including agriculture, livestock herding, and sacred rituals tied to lagoons and aquifers.[88]Lithium extraction, primarily through brine pumping and evaporation, is perceived by these communities as a direct threat to groundwater levels, with mining operations consuming approximately 65% of the basin's water, exacerbating depletion rates estimated at 30% in surface and subsurface sources since industrial-scale operations began in the 1990s.[89][90]Community leaders, such as those from the Council of Atacameño Peoples, have framed lithium mining as a form of "ecological exhaustion" that disrupts the interconnected hydrological system, leading to drying wetlands, reduced flamingo populations, and diminished availability for human use, which they link to broader cultural erosion and potential extinction risks for their way of life.[82][91] In October 2024, the Council filed a formal complaint against operators like SQM and Albemarle, alleging violations of indigenous consultation rights under ILO Convention 169 and demanding halts to unauthorized expansions that bypass community veto power.[82] Protests, including sustained roadblocks to mining sites, have persisted since at least 2020, highlighting grievances over uncompensated environmental damage and insufficient reinvestment of mining royalties into local water restoration.[92][93]While some communities have negotiated benefit-sharing agreements with miners—providing jobs and infrastructure—these are often criticized internally as inadequate and coercive, altering traditional governance structures without addressing root causes of waterinjustice, such as the failure to replenish extracted brine volumes.[94][95]Indigenous epistemologies emphasize the Salar as a living entity rather than a resource, viewing state-backed extraction as colonial continuity that prioritizes global battery supply chains over local sustainability, prompting calls for indigenous co-management or extraction moratoriums.[96][60]
Scientific Debates on Impacts
Scientific debates center on the hydrological and ecological consequences of brineextraction for lithium production in the Salar de Atacama, where evaporation pond methods remove vast quantities of lithium-rich brine, equivalent to significant water volumes in an arid environment receiving less than 10 mm of annual precipitation.[97] Critics, including independent modelers, argue that pumping disrupts aquifer recharge rates, leading to groundwater depletion and reduced surface water in adjacent wetlands, with studies estimating a total water storage decline of 1.16 mm annually from 2010 to 2017.[98] In contrast, mining operators reference hydrological models asserting sustainable extraction levels below natural recharge, though these are often company-commissioned and contested for lacking transparency in assumptions about porosity and evaporation losses.[49]A key contention involves classifying brine extraction: Chilean law treats lithium as a mineral, not water, prompting debates over whether volumetric accounting should include evaporated water (up to 95% loss in ponds) as depletion or merely industrial processing.[99] Peer-reviewed analyses highlight altered hydrodynamics, with brine withdrawal compressing pore spaces and potentially contaminating freshwater lenses via saltwater intrusion, yet empirical data gaps persist due to limited long-term monitoring by independent bodies.[97] Some researchers advocate direct lithium extraction (DLE) technologies as lower-impact alternatives, claiming reduced evaporation and faster processing, but pilot-scale tests reveal higher freshwater demands and unproven scalability in hypersaline brines.[97]Subsidence emerges as a focal point of recent geophysical evidence, with interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) data from 2015–2022 revealing ground sinking rates of 1–2 cm per year over a 48 km² area directly above extraction wells, attributed to accelerated dewatering outpacing geological rebound.[85] This phenomenon risks fracturing brine aquifers and infrastructure, though debates question attribution solely to lithium versus cumulative effects from regional mining, including copper operations, amid sparse pre-extraction baselines.[49]Ecological impacts spark disputes over biodiversity thresholds, with observations of declining Andean flamingo populations and wetland shrinkage (e.g., halving of lagoon surfaces in winter from 1985–2020) linked to hydrological shifts, potentially stressing endemic microbial communities foundational to the salt flat's food web.[97][72] Proponents of minimal harm cite stable overall flamingo counts in monitored sectors and adaptive management, but skeptics note selective data and underrepresentation of subsurface effects, underscoring systemic uncertainties from industry-dominated research agendas.[49] These debates underscore calls for state-led, transparent hydrogeological modeling to resolve causal chains beyond stakeholder narratives.[49]
Policy and Mitigation Efforts
Chile's National Lithium Strategy, launched in April 2023, emphasizes sustainable extraction through public-private partnerships, state oversight via entities like Codelco, and environmental safeguards, including a goal to protect 30% of salt flats by 2030.[100][101] The strategy mandates reduced water usage in operations and biodiversity preservation, requiring legislative reforms to enforce limits on brine pumping, though implementation faces delays due to the need for congressional approval.[102] In December 2024, the government opened processes to assign exploration licenses for six new lithium deposits, prioritizing areas outside high-impact zones like Salar de Atacama while integrating mitigation protocols.[103]Major operators SQM and Albemarle have adopted voluntary sustainability measures, including a 2016 joint agreement to monitor and limit environmental impacts in Salar de Atacama, such as brine extraction rates and ecosystem restoration.[104] SQM's 2024 sustainability initiatives target carbon neutrality by 2040 and water intensity reductions through technologies like direct lithiumextraction pilots, alongside habitat rehabilitation in the Salar Futuro project.[105][106] Albemarle achieved an Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA) performance score of 50 in 2023 for its Salar de Atacama operations, incorporating independent audits on water management and subsidence monitoring, though scores indicate room for improvement in stakeholder engagement.[107]Regulatory frameworks under Chile's Mining Code classify lithium reserves as strategic state assets, prohibiting private concessions and requiring environmental impact assessments for expansions, with fines for non-compliance.[6] Recent contracts, such as the October 2025 SQM-Codelco and Enami-Rio Tinto agreements, incorporate clauses for technology transfers aimed at minimizing subsidence—measured at 1-2 cm annually—and aquifer recharge, but critics argue these lack enforceable baselines given ongoing depletion evidenced by 30% water level drops since intensified extraction.[108][85][90] Despite these efforts, independent analyses highlight insufficient mitigation for cumulative effects, with calls for basin-wide hydrological modeling to inform adaptive policies.[49]