Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Sandbagging

Sandbagging is a deceptive in which an individual or entity intentionally underperforms, conceals capabilities, or lowers expectations to achieve a subsequent , such as in competitions, negotiations, or performance evaluations. This practice is commonly observed in and , where participants hide their true level to secure easier opponents, lower handicaps, or better ratings, as seen in activities like chess, , and . In and contexts, sandbagging involves underreporting potential achievements or forecasts to later surpass targets, thereby enhancing perceived success or avoiding heightened scrutiny. The term derives from the 19th-century use of a —a cloth sack filled with sand employed as a concealed bludgeon for surprise attacks—symbolizing an unexpected and overpowering strike after feigned weakness. Beyond its figurative applications, sandbagging literally refers to the of barriers using sandbags to mitigate flooding, a that redirects flow and protects structures by leveraging the bags' weight and malleability when partially filled. In this context, sandbags are stacked in overlapping layers to form temporary levees or walls, a technique recommended by authorities for its simplicity and effectiveness during like hurricanes or river overflows. While effective for short-term defense, modern alternatives such as inflatable dams or portable flood barriers are increasingly preferred for and ease of deployment. The ethical implications of sandbagging in competitive and professional settings are significant, often leading to penalties or bans in regulated environments to promote fairness. For instance, in neuropsychological testing for sports-related concussions, deliberate underperformance—known as sandbagging—can invalidate results and compromise assessments. Despite its prevalence, sandbagging undermines trust and , prompting organizations to implement measures like performance audits or anti-sandbagging clauses in contracts.

Physical Applications

Flood Control and Civil Engineering

In flood control and civil engineering, sandbagging serves as a fundamental technique for erecting temporary barriers to mitigate ingress during emergencies. The process entails filling durable bags—typically constructed from burlap, , or synthetic fabrics—with , , or to form modular, stackable units that create walls or dikes typically 4 to 6 inches high per layer. is the preferred fill material due to its ease of handling and shaping, though or clay can enhance sealing properties when compacted. These barriers are particularly valued for their simplicity and adaptability in resource-constrained scenarios, allowing rapid assembly without specialized equipment. Effective deployment relies on precise techniques to maximize structural integrity. Standard bags measure approximately 14 by 26 inches and are filled to one-half to two-thirds , yielding a weight of 35 to 50 pounds for optimal maneuverability and stability. Stacking occurs in configurations for heights exceeding three layers—using a base three bags wide tapering to one—or in , staggered patterns to distribute and prevent . Placement along vulnerable riverbanks, levees, or building perimeters diverts or slows floodwaters, with plastic sheeting often layered beneath to reduce seepage. These methods transform loose fill into cohesive barriers capable of withstanding moderate hydrodynamic forces. Sandbag structures demonstrate effectiveness in absorbing impacts up to 2 feet of depth when properly built, as the granular fill conforms to surfaces and filters over time, reducing permeability. However, limitations include vulnerability to overtopping beyond heights and gradual degradation; burlap bags rot within 6 to 12 months when wet, while variants endure 8 to 12 months under exposure but require UV protection for longevity. In contrast, modern systems like HESCO barriers provide reusable, wire-mesh alternatives that assemble faster and resist higher pressures. Historical applications underscore sandbagging's role in large-scale flood fights. During the 1993 Great Flood of the , the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers distributed over 31 million sandbags to reinforce levees across multiple states, aiding in the protection of communities despite record crests. In (2005), New Orleans saw widespread sandbagging to bolster canals and levees, but overtopping by storm surges overwhelmed these efforts, contributing to extensive inundation as floodwalls failed. Contemporary practices emphasize coordinated logistics for swift implementation. Volunteers often handle manual filling and stacking, with teams producing 20 to 50 bags per hour manually, though machinery like front-end loaders accelerates bulk operations for major deployments. In recent events, such as the 2024 Hurricane Helene floods, sandbags continued to be deployed alongside modern tools like automated fillers for faster production. Environmental concerns arise post-use, as floodwaters can contaminate bags with sediments, , pathogens, or chemicals, necessitating testing and proper disposal to avoid or . Guidelines recommend separating clean sand for reuse while treating contaminated materials as .

Military and Defensive Uses

In military operations, sandbags serve as a fundamental component for constructing expedient fortifications, providing rapid protection against fire, , and blast effects in dynamic environments. These structures, including walls, bunkers, and revetments for machine gun nests, are built by stacking filled bags in interlocking layers to form stable barriers that absorb from incoming projectiles. Typically, walls are erected in a configuration for , with the base three times wider than the height and subsequent layers staggered to prevent collapse, with material requirements varying by configuration, typically 1-2 bags per linear foot per course in a pyramid setup. Reinforcement with materials such as wire , timber poles, or is often incorporated to enhance structural , particularly in revetments where sandbags line excavated positions to prevent cave-ins. Sandbags are filled with locally available or , allowing for quick adaptation to terrain conditions without reliance on specialized supplies, though post-World War II developments introduced more durable synthetic materials like and bags to replace traditional burlap, improving resistance to rot and environmental degradation. In strategic applications, they have been extensively used for trench protection, such as on the Western Front during , where millions of bags were deployed to form parapets and parados shielding soldiers from enfilading fire. During the (2003-2011), sandbag blast walls were erected around forward operating bases and checkpoints to mitigate improvised explosive devices, often serving as initial barriers before more permanent options. They have also been employed as road barriers and temporary revetments to channel enemy movement or protect supply routes. The effectiveness of sandbag fortifications lies in their ability to stop shrapnel and low-velocity projectiles, such as small-caliber rounds and nearby blasts, due to the dense, energy-absorbing fill material, though they remain vulnerable to high-explosive or direct impacts that can penetrate or destabilize the structure. Assembly is notably rapid; a of soldiers can construct a 6-foot-high wall segment in a matter of hours under optimal conditions, enabling on-the-fly defensive adjustments. Notable examples include the widespread use of sandbag-lined foxholes in base camps for overhead cover against mortar fire, and in the Pacific theater during , where they reinforced island bunkers and beach defenses against amphibious assaults.

Idiomatic Uses in Competition and Performance

In Sports and Martial Arts

In and , sandbagging refers to the deliberate underperformance or manipulation of one's skill level to gain unfair advantages, such as lowering a , rating, or to secure easier matchups, preserve energy for later rounds, or avoid tougher . This practice is distinct from legitimate tactical choices, like pacing oneself in events, as it involves intentional that undermines the integrity of . In golf, sandbagging commonly involves inflating a player's handicap index by selectively posting higher scores or avoiding low ones, which grants more strokes in net-score tournaments and increases chances of winning prizes or side bets. The United States Golf Association (USGA) addresses this through its Handicap System, imposing penalties such as suspension of handicap privileges or retroactive disqualification for verified manipulation, with detection aided by peer review and score consistency checks. For example, in motorsports like NASCAR, teams have been accused of sandbagging during qualifying laps by running slower times to start from mid-pack positions, potentially avoiding early wrecks while conserving fuel and tires; however, NASCAR officials ruled a notable 2016 Talladega strategy by Joe Gibbs Racing legal, as it complied with the "100 percent rule" requiring full effort in competition. In chess, players may intentionally lose games to depress their ELO rating, allowing entry into lower-division tournaments against novices for easier titles or prizes; the International Chess Federation (FIDE) enforces bans for this, as evidenced by the 2025 six-month suspension of Chinese player Li Haoyu for systematic underperformance. In , particularly (BJJ) and competitions, sandbagging manifests as experienced athletes competing in lower levels or weight classes despite superior proficiency, often dominating less skilled opponents and skewing bracket fairness. The (IBJJF) combats this with strict certification requirements and tournament rules allowing for disqualifications or bans upon verification of misrepresentation, emphasizing that promotions should reflect genuine progression. Consequences across these domains include formal penalties like bans, of rankings, and lasting reputational harm, with detection typically stemming from abrupt spikes or video analysis of inconsistencies. Historical cases in during the 2010s, such as the 2010 World Amateur Handicap in Myrtle Beach where organizers used statistical modeling to expose and disqualify 30 sandbaggers, highlighted the issue's prevalence in amateur formats. In (MMA), UFC undercard mismatches have drawn scrutiny for potential sandbagging, though the promotion relies more on regulatory oversight than outright bans.

In Gaming and Esports

In and , sandbagging refers to the deliberate underperformance or concealment of a player's true level to manipulate algorithms, secure easier victories, accumulate rewards in lower tiers, or evade the pressures of high-level competition. This practice often involves intentionally losing matches—known as "throwing"—to lower one's rank, using suboptimal characters or strategies, or feigning incompetence during casual play. Unlike smurfing, where skilled players create new accounts to dominate lower ranks, sandbagging typically occurs on established accounts to exploit progression systems without starting over. Common mechanisms vary by genre. In multiplayer online battle arena (MOBA) games like League of Legends, players may engage in "intentional feeding," repeatedly dying to enemies on purpose to derank and remain in less challenging lobbies, facilitating wins against weaker opponents or allowing queuing with lower-ranked friends. In fighting games such as Super Smash Bros., sandbagging manifests as selecting non-main characters or intentionally missing combos during casual sessions to build an opponent's confidence, test experimental techniques, or avoid revealing optimal strategies in bracketed tournaments. For massively multiplayer online (MMO) titles, it includes underleveling alternate characters (alts) to join low-level groups for exclusive rewards or to gain unfair advantages in cooperative content like raids. These tactics exploit algorithmic matchmaking, which pairs players based on visible skill metrics like rank or win rates. In professional , sandbagging undermines competitive integrity and invites severe penalties, including suspensions or permanent bans from leagues and ranked play. For instance, in the , has imposed escalating punishments for matches or boosting—related practices where players intentionally underperform to alter skill ratings—with repeat offenders facing permanent competitive bans to deter manipulation of match outcomes. Community-driven detection often relies on statistical analysis, such as anomalous death streaks or performance inconsistencies across games, leading to player reports and investigations by developers. High-profile cases highlight enforcement challenges, as subtle sandbagging can evade automated systems until aggregated data reveals patterns. Psychologically, sandbagging serves as a self-presentational to lower external expectations, reducing anxiety from high-stakes evaluation and creating a where subsequent strong performances appear more impressive. It fosters a false sense of security in opponents while allowing players to experiment with metas or builds risk-free, though it can stem from avoidance or in anonymous online environments. This behavior proliferated in the with the rise of persistent online ranking systems, such as those in StarCraft II's ladders, where players historically threw games to farm easier matchups or reset divisions amid early matchmaking flaws. Notable examples illustrate its prevalence. In the 2020s, saw widespread deranking among players, including professionals, who intentionally lost matches to align ranks with teammates, prompting to enhance anti-manipulation tools despite ongoing issues in competitive queues; as of March 2025, access to competitive mode requires account level 20, with ongoing smurf detection algorithms. Historically, in , ladder sandbagging involved pros throwing casual games to maintain low-division access for scouting or practice, contributing to Blizzard's 2016 ladder overhaul for fairer progression. In Super Smash Bros. esports, players like sandbagged at Apex 2010 by using underpowered characters like , finishing outside top placements to experiment without bracket disruption.

Idiomatic Uses in Business and Professional Contexts

In Sales and Corporate Forecasting

In and corporate , sandbagging refers to the intentional underreporting or lowballing of projections, pipelines, deal closures, or overall performance metrics to create the appearance of exceeding expectations later, thereby securing bonuses, additional resources, or positive investor reactions. This tactic is prevalent among teams, who may delay reporting potential deals or hold back details to make quarterly quotas appear more achievable, and among executives, who understate guidance to surpass estimates—a practice often linked to broader management . The primary motivations for sandbagging stem from incentive alignment in commission-based structures, where salespeople or managers aim to ensure predictable payouts by building in buffers against uncertainties, or to avoid raising performance bars too high for future periods. However, it carries significant risks, including distorted company-wide planning and budgeting due to inaccurate forecasts, erosion of trust between teams and leadership, and ethical concerns over transparency. Excessive sandbagging can also attract regulatory scrutiny from bodies like the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) if it veers into misleading disclosures or manipulative practices. Notable examples include the tech sector during the early economic slowdowns, where companies issued conservative guidance amid and layoffs, sometimes drawing criticism for understating potential to manage expectations. To counteract sandbagging, organizations employ internal audits and regular deal reviews to verify reported , alongside transparent () tools that enforce real-time visibility and reduce opportunities for withholding information. These measures, often combined with bottoms-up processes involving input from reps, promote and more accurate projections without stifling . In legal and contractual settings, particularly within (M&A), sandbagging refers to the practice where a buyer discovers a of the seller's representations or warranties during but proceeds to close the transaction anyway, only to later assert an indemnification claim for that known post-closing. This approach contrasts with anti-sandbagging clauses, which explicitly prohibit such claims if the buyer had prior knowledge of the issue. Sandbagging plays a central role in M&A agreements by allowing buyers to preserve remedies for inaccuracies in seller disclosures without implying waiver through continued performance. In jurisdictions like , courts generally adopt a pro-sandbagging default rule, permitting claims unless the includes an express anti-sandbagging provision, as this aligns with the principle that representations and warranties serve as standalone assurances of fact. This stance influences indemnification claims, enabling buyers to seek damages or escrowed funds for breaches that impact the target's value, even if uncovered pre-closing. Jurisdictional variations exist; for instance, some states like may require proof of reliance on the representation, potentially limiting sandbagging absent explicit contractual support. A notable example of sandbagging's application arose in the 2025 case In re Dura Medic Holdings, Inc. Consolidated Litigation, where a buyer sought post-closing indemnification for breaches related to undisclosed healthcare compliance issues discovered during ; the court upheld the buyer's claim under Delaware's pro-sandbagging framework, confirming that knowledge of breaches does not preclude recovery absent an anti-sandbagging clause. Similar post-closing disputes in acquisitions, including those in the technology sector, have reinforced this, with buyers successfully invoking sandbagging to recover for undisclosed risks or financial misstatements revealed during integration. The practice gained prominence alongside the surge in complex M&A transactions during the 1980s leveraged buyout era, when heightened deal volumes and intricate warranty structures necessitated robust post-closing protections amid limited due diligence timelines. In modern deals, representation and warranty (R&W) insurance has emerged as a key mitigation tool, shifting risk from sellers to insurers and often incorporating anti-sandbagging-like exclusions to prevent claims on known breaches, thereby facilitating smoother negotiations. Debates surrounding sandbagging center on its perceived unfairness to sellers, who argue it incentivizes opportunistic behavior by buyers who "lie in wait" without disclosing issues pre-closing, versus its value in protecting buyers from overpaying for misrepresented assets in asymmetric information environments. To address these tensions, contracts commonly include pro-sandbagging language such as "no by knowledge," explicitly stating that a buyer's of a does not forfeit indemnification , while anti-sandbagging clauses provide sellers with certainty by barring claims based on pre-closing discoveries.

Etymology and Historical Development

Origins from Literal Sandbag Use

The modern , consisting of a sturdy bag filled with sand, originated in the primarily for fortifications to provide rapid barriers against enemy fire. During the , British loyalists employed sandbags alongside logs to construct defensive works, as seen in the 1781 Siege of Ninety-Six, where they helped reinforce positions under siege. These early applications highlighted sandbags' versatility as lightweight, easily transportable materials that could be filled on-site using shovels, marking a shift from earlier improvised earthworks. Beyond fortifications, sandbags served as improvised weapons in the , often fashioned from a or cloth filled with to deliver blunt-force blows capable of stunning or incapacitating without immediate lethality. This use exploited the object's weight and flexibility for ambushes, allowing assailants to bludgeon victims unexpectedly while minimizing traces of . Historical accounts describe such tools in urban and settings, where they enabled by rendering targets unconscious for looting. The "to " entered in the mid-19th century, with its earliest recorded sense around 1860 denoting the act of striking someone with a to or stun, often in the context of . The traces the verb's initial appearance to 1838, but the weapon-related meaning solidified in the 1860s amid reports of hoodlums using filled bags for surprise attacks. By the 1880s, entries, including those in the OED, explicitly documented "" as a for such a weapon and the verb for its assaultive use, underscoring its violent origins before broader adoption. In parallel, the term began transitioning in and contexts during the late , where were practically applied to secure equipment or stabilize structures, diverting from purely aggressive implications. By the early 1900s, non-violent uses dominated, with "sandbagging" referring to reinforcing structures against or , as manual filling evolved into standardized and structural defenses.

Evolution into Figurative Meanings

The figurative use of "sandbagging" emerged in the late from its literal association with using a as a concealed for a , symbolizing an unexpected blow or . By the , this evolved into for deceiving or undermining someone covertly, as seen in contexts where "sandbagging" denoted hitting or stunning unexpectedly to gain an advantage. The metaphor drew from the sandbag's unassuming appearance hiding its potential for harm, transitioning from physical to strategic misrepresentation. In the early , the term shifted toward competitive , particularly in poker by the , where it described slow-playing a strong hand—refraining from aggressive betting to lure opponents into overcommitting, thereby trapping them later. This gaming application extended to various in the 20th century, referring to concealing skill to mislead competitors and secure an edge. Post-World War II, the concept expanded into professional domains; by the mid-20th century, adopted it for underpromising on or metrics to surpass lowered expectations, a tactic noted in corporate practices. In legal contexts, particularly , "sandbagging" describes buyers proceeding with transactions despite known seller breaches, then seeking post-closing remedies—a practice analyzed in acquisition agreements. Cultural influences accelerated the term's spread, with media depictions in 1940s films portraying "sandbag jobs" as sneaky betrayals or ambushes, embedding the in popular narratives of . The online boom further popularized it, as multiplayer platforms enabled players to underperform intentionally for advantages, a trend persisting into . Linguistically, the evolved from the "hidden blow" of a physical to "hidden potential," emphasizing restraint and for gain rather than outright aggression. In the 21st century, "sandbagging" remains prevalent in , where it raises ethical concerns over and , and in corporate discussions on , with no observed decline in usage as of 2025.

References

  1. [1]
    Understanding Sandbagging in Business: Definition and Key ...
    Sandbagging is a strategy of lowering the expectations of the strengths and core competencies of a company or an individual in order to produce greater-than- ...What Is Sandbagging? · Applications Beyond Business · An Illustrative Example
  2. [2]
    SANDBAG Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
    1. to bank, stop up, or weight with sandbags 2. a : to hit or stun with or as if with a sandbag b : to treat unfairly or harshly c : to coerce by crude means.
  3. [3]
    Sandbagging - Intentionally Lowering Expectations to Beat Them
    Sandbagging occurs when a person or company intentionally lowers its estimation for success with the goal of producing greater-than-expected results.What is Sandbagging? · Sandbagging in a Startup · Sandbagging in Asset...
  4. [4]
    Sandbagging for Flood Protection | NDSU Agriculture
    Build a sandbag dike by filling sandbags slightly over half full, placing them lengthwise, lapping them, and sealing with plastic. Training is important.
  5. [5]
    How to Use Sandbags to Prevent Flooding - Lowe's
    Sandbags create a barrier that, when properly filled and strategically stacked, redirect floodwater and debris away from homes and other structures. For a more ...Tools And Materials · Sandbags Help Prevent... · What Do Sandbags Do In A...<|control11|><|separator|>
  6. [6]
    ESPORTS CODE OF CONDUCT - Lake Area Technical College
    2.8.2 Sandbagging. Intentionally playing below one's competitive abilities, also known as sandbagging, is expressly forbidden. 2.8.3 Collusion. Collusion is ...
  7. [7]
    Pediatric Issues in Sports Concussions - PMC - NIH
    ... sandbagging” (purposely performing poorly on the test), preexisting neurocognitive problems, poor motivation/boredom, fatigue/exhaustion, dehydration ...
  8. [8]
    How Does Sandbagging Work in M&A Deals? | Insights - MLT Aikins
    Oct 7, 2021 · Sandbagging and anti-sandbagging provisions are risk allocation tools primarily used in mergers and acquisitions transactions.
  9. [9]
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
    Why we still use sandbags to stop floods.
    Mar 30, 2009 · There are some viable alternatives. One example is the HESCO Bastion barrier, which has supplemented sandbags in Iowa City. Consisting of a mesh ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] The Great Flood of 1993 Post-Flood Report. Upper Mississippi River ...
    The Corps was very active in the flood fight, distributing more than 31 million sandbags and miles of plasfic sheeting to help local communities protect ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Sandbagging Techniques
    The use of sandbags is a centuries old, tried and true method for flood fighting. See procedures and safety tips inside on efficient bagging operations. Page 2 ...
  14. [14]
    Sandbag Disposal: Environmental and Practical Considerations ...
    Mar 13, 2025 · Sandbags are typically made from synthetic materials such as polypropylene or burlap, which can degrade over time, especially after ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Guidelines for managing mud and used sandbags after a flood
    As both flood-mud and used sandbags may contain bacteria and contaminants, care should be taken to wear appropriate protective gloves, eye protection, and ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Guide To Fighting Positions, Obstacles, And Revetments - DTIC
    Nov 1, 2000 · The use of berms and sandbag revetments is one of the most commonly used techniques for expedient protection. The proper placement of a berm ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] AFH 10-222, VOLUME 14 Civil Engineer Guide to Fighting Positions ...
    Aug 1, 2008 · ... layers of sandbags for protection against quick-fused 82 mm and. 120 mm mortars. Cover bunkers with approximately 48 inches of sandbags or.
  18. [18]
    [PDF] SANDBAG WALL CONSTRUCTION | Rothesay
    A single stack of sandbags isn't very strong. The recommended approach is to plan a sand bag wall 3 times wider than the height (or 2 times wider at bare ...Missing: military ballistic<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    The Nylon Sandbags to Be issued Late Vietnam War.
    Dec 22, 2014 · I was interested now and again when the "Nylon" sandbags first came out. It seems starting sometime in 1971. From the February 1971 issue of ...Missing: evolution | Show results with:evolution
  20. [20]
    This is the year of the sandbag – saviour of soldiers and fitted carpets
    Feb 15, 2014 · Indian factories sent about 1.3bn sandbags to the Allied armies, mainly for use on the western front, almost doubling the value of India's jute ...
  21. [21]
    'Cement Sentinels' stand silent guard | Article | The United States Army
    Jun 19, 2011 · Sandbags, the initial form of protection, are canvas sacks filled with sand which are then piled as high as needed for protection. HESCO ...Missing: 2003-2011 | Show results with:2003-2011
  22. [22]
    An Iraqi man walks past a wall of sandba - Getty Images
    Jul 7, 2003 · An Iraqi man walks past a wall of sandbags set up along the main road by US troops from where they have been shot at in Fallujah, ...
  23. [23]
    American military base during the Vietnam war, with fox holes...
    Sep 8, 2017 · American military base during the Vietnam war, with fox holes surrounded by sandbags, 1968. (Photo by Stuart Lutz/Gado/Getty Images).
  24. [24]
    What is a Sandbagger? | Chess.com Help Center
    Sandbagging is when a player intentionally lowers their rating by losing on purpose. Learn more about it and how to spot sandbaggers here!
  25. [25]
    NASCAR says Gibbs' sandbagging strategy was legal at Talladega
    Oct 24, 2016 · By pursuing strategy of running in the rear to ensure playoff advancement, the cars were within the bounds of the rulebook.Missing: qualifiers | Show results with:qualifiers
  26. [26]
    Sandbagging In Chess Explained: What Li Haoyu's FIDE Ban Tells ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · Sandbagging in chess specifically refers to the intentional act of losing games or underperforming to lower one's Elo rating, enabling a player ...
  27. [27]
    BUSTED! One tournament does a great job of chatching sandbaggers
    BUSTED! One tournament does a great job of chatching sandbaggers. The DIGEST UP AND IN. IN AUGUST, NEARLY 3,100 GOLFERS � FORMER All-Star pitcher Roger ...
  28. [28]
    Sandbagging - SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
    Jun 1, 2025 · Originating from Billiards slang, referring to the concealment of one's ability to play, sandbagging in the Super Smash Bros. series generally ...<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    What Is a Sandbagging? - Computer Hope
    Jul 9, 2025 · Sandbagging is doing badly to reduce expectations, then doing well to exceed them. It is considered cheating in games and competitions.
  30. [30]
    Feeding | Esports Legal News
    Feb 22, 2025 · Kou says, “intentional feeding is a major type of blatant sabotaging, meaning to intentionally get killed by the opponent team. Intentionally ...
  31. [31]
    Boosters and throwers are about to get increased punishments
    Jun 14, 2017 · Doing anything to manipulate your internal MMR or Skill Rating (i.e. Boosting or Throwing) is not fine. Penalties for boosting and throwing are ...<|separator|>
  32. [32]
    Sandbagging as a Self-Presentational Strategy: Claiming to be Less ...
    Aug 10, 2025 · Sandbagging is a self-presentational strategy involving the false prediction or feigned demonstration of inability.
  33. [33]
    Patch 3.4: The StarCraft II Ladder Revamp - Blizzard News
    Jun 28, 2016 · There are two primary goals behind the revamping of the StarCraft II ladder system: increased accuracy and increased transparency.
  34. [34]
    VALORANT Competitive is in dire state despite Riot's efforts
    Jul 31, 2023 · Some players purposefully disconnect to 'derank' because they are unable to queue with a friend due to rank disparity. Such accounts should be ...
  35. [35]
    Sandbagging - Intentionally Lowering Expectations to Beat Them
    Dec 26, 2024 · The sandbag technique has become ordinary in the world of forwarding guidance regarding the declaration of expected revenues and earnings.What Is Sandbagging? · Why People Sandbag · Sandbagging Strategy...
  36. [36]
    Sandbagging in Sales: What It Is & Why You Shouldn't Do It
    Dec 9, 2024 · Sandbagging sales is a practice where a salesperson slightly holds back their deals to undermine their forecast and lower management's expectations.
  37. [37]
    Sandbagging in Sales: Why It Happens and How Effective Comp ...
    Nov 3, 2023 · Sandbagging in sales refers to withholding information about potential deals or deliberately delaying deal closures to manipulate quotas.<|control11|><|separator|>
  38. [38]
    What Is Sandbagging in Sales? Definition and the Pros and Cons
    May 23, 2023 · As you might expect, the more egregious and obvious forms of sandbagging can open a company up to potential scrutiny from government regulators.
  39. [39]
    Atlanta-Based Pest Control Company, Former CFO Charged with ...
    Apr 18, 2022 · Rollins Inc. agreed to pay $8 million to settle charges that it engaged in improper accounting practices in order to boost its publicly-reported quarterly ...
  40. [40]
    Financial Crisis Was Avoidable, Inquiry Finds - The New York Times
    Jan 25, 2011 · A Congressional inquiry said bankers and regulators could have seen the 2008 crisis coming and stopped it.Missing: understated sandbagging
  41. [41]
    Sandbagging in Sales - Definition and Should You Do It?
    Apr 11, 2023 · Sandbagging is a deceptive practice where someone tries to mislead someone else or intentionally doctors reports to look one way when something else is ...
  42. [42]
    Sandbagging in Sales – is it a Relationship Problem? | Altify
    Sandbagging in sales happens when salespeople underestimate or downplay their sales forecast or pipeline due to a lack of confidence or uncertainty regarding ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  43. [43]
    “Sandbagging” in M&A transactions - Dentons
    Jun 12, 2019 · The term “sandbagging” is believed to have originated with 19th century street gangs who would fill socks with sand (hence, the term “sandbags”) ...Missing: etymology | Show results with:etymology<|control11|><|separator|>
  44. [44]
    What are Sandbagging and Anti-Sandbagging Clauses?
    A sandbagging clause allows a buyer to sue the seller after closing for a breach of a seller representation and warranty that the buyer knew about prior to ...
  45. [45]
    Chancery Court Clarifies Delaware's Position on Sandbagging and ...
    Mar 13, 2025 · The Delaware Chancery Court has issued a notable opinion that confirms Delaware's position as a pro-sandbagging jurisdiction and clarifies when damages may be ...
  46. [46]
    Sandbagging: Default Rules and Acquisition Agreements
    In the M&A world, a buyer "sandbags" a seller when, knowing the seller has materially breached a warranty, it closes the deal and then asserts a post-closing ...
  47. [47]
    Akorn v. Fresenius: Important Practical Lessons from… - Fenwick
    Oct 24, 2018 · Delaware Remains “Pro-Sandbagging”. Akorn attempted to argue that Fresenius had assumed the risk of Akorn's regulatory non-compliance because ...
  48. [48]
    Sandbagging in M&A Deals: Is Silence Golden For Buyers? - Stout
    When a claim involves sandbagging, whether or not the claim is successful often turns on whether reliance is a component of the claim in the particular ...
  49. [49]
    Sandbagging: What About Deals With RWI Policies?
    Jan 17, 2023 · It is increasingly common for the parties to an acquisition to obtain representation and warranty insurance. These policies typically have their ...
  50. [50]
    Does Sandbagging Hurt? – The Importance and Enforceability of ...
    Aug 31, 2022 · A sandbagging clause provides post-closing recourse to a buyer if the seller breaches a representation even if the buyer had knowledge of the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Sandbagging Clauses in Acquisition Agreements - Stikeman Elliott
    Oct 29, 2012 · “Sandbagging” means to conceal or understate the strength of one's position so as to gain an advantage over a competitor.
  52. [52]
    The History and Uses of Sandbags: Managing Flooding - Easypave
    The Origins of Sandbags​​ The modern sandbag as we know it, consisting of a sturdy bag filled with sand, was first introduced during the 18th century.
  53. [53]
  54. [54]
    How Sandbags Work - Science | HowStuffWorks
    Not a bad quality if you're talking about a material that's used to help control flooding. In a sandbag, the sand itself doesn't hold back the water; there are ...
  55. [55]
    Sandbag - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    The meaning "person's area of interest or expertise" is by 1964, from African-American vernacular, from jazz sense of "category," probably via notion of putting ...
  56. [56]
    sandbag, v. meanings, etymology and more
    The earliest known use of the verb sandbag is in the 1830s. OED's earliest evidence for sandbag is from 1838, in Lit. & Pict. Repository.Missing: 19th century
  57. [57]
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Prospecting and Mining Activity in the Rampart, Manley Hot Springs ...
    Richmond was charged with sandbagging and robbing a man in Circle City. At the time, it was a somewhat common practice to knock someone unconscious with a ...
  59. [59]
  60. [60]
    Competition Manipulation in Esports and Video Gaming
    Dec 3, 2024 · This article will present some of the key issues in esports related to competition manipulation and considerations for stakeholders.