Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Smart thermostat

A smart thermostat is a Wi-Fi-connected device that regulates a building's (HVAC) systems by automatically adjusting temperatures based on user schedules, detection, and external factors such as weather data, while enabling through mobile applications and integration with broader smart home ecosystems. Introduced commercially in 2011 by Nest Labs, founded by former Apple executives including , these devices marked a shift from manual or basic programmable thermostats by incorporating algorithms to predict and adapt to occupant preferences without manual programming. Key features include geofencing for automatic adjustments upon detecting user arrival or departure, voice control compatibility with assistants like or , and real-time energy usage reporting to promote efficiency. Manufacturers assert energy savings of 10-20% through optimized operation, with some controlled studies supporting reductions up to 10% in residential heating costs without comfort loss, though large-scale field experiments reveal minimal net impacts due to behavioral rebound effects where users override automations or maintain higher temperatures. Market adoption has surged, with the U.S. smart thermostat sector valued at approximately USD 2.36 billion in 2024 and projected to grow at a 17.5% compound annual rate through 2030, driven by incentives for and compatibility with . Despite benefits, notable controversies involve data privacy risks, as these devices collect detailed behavioral patterns that can infer and habits, with surveys indicating over half of users unaware of how their data is shared or utilized by manufacturers and third parties, prompting calls for enhanced local control options and transparency.

Types of Thermostats

Manual Thermostats

Manual thermostats function as non-automated controllers that maintain a single, user-selected setpoint by directly activating heating, ventilation, or (HVAC) systems until the desired level is achieved. Users must physically adjust the dial or lever to change settings, providing immediate but unchanging control without timers or sensors for occupancy or schedules. These devices rely on mechanical or electromechanical principles for operation. A coiled , formed by bonding two metals with differing coefficients of , responds to ambient temperature fluctuations by bending and tilting a containing mercury or actuating electrical contacts. This motion closes or opens the low-voltage to the HVAC equipment precisely at the fixed setpoint, ensuring on-off cycling without digital processing. Mercury switches, common in older models, use the liquid metal's to bridge contacts when tilted, though environmental concerns have prompted phase-outs in favor of snap-action discs in modern variants. Their design emphasizes simplicity, incorporating minimal components without batteries, wiring for power beyond HVAC signaling, or connectivity requirements, which enhances reliability and durability over decades of use. This passive operation persists during power interruptions that disable electronic alternatives, as the thermostat itself demands no to sense or switch. Acquisition costs remain low, with basic units priced between $15 and $35, making them accessible for basic installations. Limitations arise from the absence of automated adjustments, fostering energy inefficiency through sustained HVAC operation at the constant setpoint regardless of varying or daily routines. Without scheduling, systems or cool unoccupied spaces continuously, relying on inconsistent manual overrides that often fail to optimize usage.

Programmable Thermostats

Programmable thermostats enable users to establish predefined schedules that automatically adjust heating or cooling based on time of day or week, representing an early form of automated climate control without remote or adaptive capabilities. These devices typically feature button-based or interfaces for setting multiple daily presets, such as raising temperatures to 70°F (21°C) upon waking, lowering to a setback of 62°F (17°C) during work hours, and restoring comfort levels in the evening. Weekly programming allows customization for varying routines, like weekends, with setbacks of 7–10°F (4–6°C) for 8 hours daily potentially yielding up to 10% annual savings on heating and cooling costs. Despite these efficiencies, programmable thermostats often suffer from rigid scheduling that ignores unforeseen variations, such as early returns home or shifts, necessitating frequent overrides via hold functions. adoption remains low due to interface complexity; a 2011 study of over 7,000 U.S. households found that approximately 40% of owners never programmed schedules, while 33% routinely overrode them, undermining intended energy reductions. This underuse, ranging 20–50% across surveys, stems from programming difficulties and preference for constant adjustments, highlighting limitations in absent in later models. Introduced in the , programmable thermostats marked a transitional advancement from analog manual controls, incorporating displays and circuits for precise time-based operation while relying on user input without sensors or . pioneered widespread adoption with early models featuring for easier setpoint retention and setback programming, though overrides were essential for deviations from fixed cycles. These units bridged pre- mechanical thermostats and modern , emphasizing scheduled efficiency over dynamic response.

Smart Thermostats

Smart thermostats are Wi-Fi-enabled devices designed for automated control of (HVAC) systems through integration with mobile applications, cloud processing, and connectivity. These devices enable remote monitoring and adjustments, allowing users to manage home temperatures via apps regardless of location, provided an connection is available. Distinguishing them from programmable thermostats, which operate on fixed, user-defined schedules without network access, smart thermostats incorporate adaptive capabilities that respond to for dynamic HVAC adjustments beyond static programming. Key differentiators include geofencing, which leverages GPS to detect occupant departure or arrival and automatically shift to energy-saving modes or restore preferred settings. detection further enables the device to identify when spaces are vacant, pausing or scaling back operations accordingly. Additionally, integration with other (IoT) devices facilitates ecosystem-wide automation, such as coordinating with smart lights or locks for comprehensive home management. App-based provides users with real-time visibility into system status and the ability to override settings , enhancing convenience for those with variable schedules. However, reliance on stable means that advanced remote and automated functions may be unavailable during outages, at which point the thermostat defaults to local manual or basic scheduled operation.

Historical Development

Pre-Digital Innovations

The origins of thermostat technology trace to the late 19th century, when mechanical devices emerged to automate temperature regulation in response to the limitations of manual control in expanding industrial and institutional heating systems. In 1883, American inventor Warren S. Johnson patented the first electric thermostat, termed the "electric tele-thermoscope," which employed a bimetallic strip—a laminated element of two metals with differing thermal expansion rates—to sense temperature deviations and electrically activate heating mechanisms. This innovation, initially deployed in educational facilities like the State Normal School in Whitewater, Wisconsin, enabled remote monitoring and control, reducing reliance on human oversight for maintaining consistent indoor climates in large buildings. By the early , adaptations for residential use gained traction, with mechanical designs prioritizing simplicity and precision through bimetallic coils or mercury-filled glass tubes that expanded or contracted to complete or break electrical circuits. In 1906, engineer Mark Honeywell acquired patents from Albert Butz for a furnace regulator and developed early commercial models for home heating, incorporating these mechanical sensors to cycle systems on and off at set thresholds. Such devices focused on operational reliability in everyday environments, leveraging durable materials like steel and glass to withstand vibrations, dust, and temperature extremes without electronic vulnerabilities. From the 1920s through the 1950s, manufacturers like refined bimetallic spiral mechanisms, as seen in models emphasizing consistent snap-action switching for minimal — the lag between sensed and actual temperature changes. These pre-digital thermostats demonstrated long-term empirical durability, with many units functioning reliably for 20 to 50 years under normal residential loads, attributable to their paucity of failure-prone components compared to later integrated circuits and networks. This era's innovations laid the groundwork for automated climate control by establishing causal principles of thermal feedback loops, where physical expansion directly drove corrective actions in heating or cooling apparatus.

Launch of Commercial Smart Models

The launch of commercial smart thermostats gained momentum in the early 2010s, spearheaded by Nest Labs' introduction of the Nest Learning Thermostat on October 25, 2011. Developed by and Matt Rogers, former Apple engineers, the device pioneered algorithms that analyzed user behavior to automatically optimize heating and cooling schedules, alongside Wi-Fi connectivity for via mobile apps and self-diagnostic features to promote . This innovation addressed longstanding limitations in traditional programmable thermostats by adapting dynamically without manual programming, driven by consumer needs for convenience and reduced energy waste. Nest Labs, established in 2010, raised $80 million in venture funding across three rounds, including investments from Ventures, which supported scaling production and marketing efforts amid growing demand for connected home devices. Competition intensified with , founded in 2007, which had debuted the first -enabled smart thermostat that year, emphasizing remote scheduling and integration with HVAC systems; by 2013, its ecobee3 model added room sensors for improved accuracy. , a legacy player in thermostats, countered with programmable models like the T6 series in the early , incorporating interfaces and app-based controls to capture market share fueled by utility rebates and smart home adoption. A landmark development occurred on January 13, 2014, when acquired Nest Labs for $3.2 billion in cash, injecting substantial resources to enhance algorithmic capabilities and ecosystem compatibility while expanding global reach. This deal accelerated commercialization but drew early concerns over potential data monopolization, though it underscored the sector's rapid evolution from niche innovation to mainstream .

Post-2020 Advancements

In August 2024, released the Nest Learning Thermostat (4th generation), featuring an upgraded motion sensor for enhanced occupancy detection, a larger display, and AI-driven optimizations for energy savings, including adaptive eco modes and smart ventilation that adjust based on detected activity and weather data. This iteration builds on prior models by incorporating dual-band and sensors for ambient light, , and , enabling more precise control without relying solely on user schedules. Ecobee's Smart Thermostat Premium, introduced in 2022 and refined through 2025 updates, integrates a built-in air quality monitor that detects pollutants like VOCs and , alerting users and suggesting improvements such as changes. It also embeds voice assistants like and for hands-free operation, alongside radar-based sensing to prioritize comfort in occupied rooms while minimizing use in vacant ones. These features address post-2020 demands for health-focused monitoring amid heightened awareness of following the . In response to lingering supply chain disruptions in the HVAC sector, which persisted into 2025 due to chip shortages and logistics delays, manufacturers like Sinopé Technologies launched Wi-Fi-enabled thermostats optimized for central HVAC systems, such as the TH6500WF model supporting multi-stage heating and cooling with automatic configuration for up to 25% energy reduction. These devices emphasize geofencing and real-time usage reports to enhance efficiency without proprietary hardware dependencies. Adoption of the Matter protocol accelerated in 2024-2025, enabling thermostats from and others to interoperate across ecosystems like Apple Home, Google Home, and , reducing through standardized IP-based communication. This shift, formalized in 1.4 updates, prioritizes local control and security, allowing seamless integration without cloud reliance for basic functions.

Core Technologies

Sensing Capabilities

Smart thermostats integrate multiple sensor types to detect environmental variables and , directly influencing HVAC responsiveness by providing for precise setpoint maintenance and load adjustments. sensors, often thermistors or integrated circuits like the NTC type, measure ambient air with accuracies typically within ±0.5°F in calibrated conditions, enabling fine-tuned control loops that minimize overshoot or undershoot in heating and cooling cycles. Relative sensors, such as capacitive or resistive models, quantify moisture levels to prevent issues like or dryness, with resolutions around 1-2% RH, supporting dehumidification or decisions based on psychrometric thresholds. Occupancy sensing primarily uses passive infrared (PIR) detectors, which identify human presence by monitoring fluctuations in from , typically within a 90-120° and up to 30-foot range. These enable automatic setbacks, such as reducing heating by 2-4°F during detected absences to curb energy waste from unoccupied spaces, with causal efficacy tied to sensor resolution—accurate detection correlates with up to 10-15% reductions in runtime in simulated vacancy scenarios. Advanced models employ millimeter-wave radar for volumetric motion tracking, offering superior penetration through obstacles and lower susceptibility to environmental interference compared to PIR. Complementing onboard hardware, geofencing leverages smartphone GPS triangulation to approximate user proximity, triggering preemptive mode shifts like preconditioning upon approach, though reliant on app permissions and signal strength. Field and lab evaluations indicate PIR-based occupancy accuracy of 83.8% overall, with false positive rates at 12.8% and false negative rates at 47.4%, improving to 91.5-99.8% when fused with multiple sensors or algorithmic filtering in controlled tests. Such underpins causal performance gains, as erroneous presence signals prolong unnecessary operation, while verified absences optimize differential pressures and fan speeds for efficiency. PIR limitations include false activations from pets exceeding 40 pounds or rapid heat sources like vents, which mimic human signatures and induce inefficient cycling by overriding eco-modes. Placement errors, such as mounting below 6-7 feet or near windows, exacerbate blind spots or temperature-induced noise, reducing effective coverage and leading to undetected occupancy that sustains higher baselines. Radar mitigates some issues but incurs higher power draw, highlighting trade-offs in selection for reliability.

Network Connectivity

Smart thermostats primarily rely on connectivity operating on 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands to enable cloud-based synchronization and remote access, with devices like the Thermostat supporting both frequencies for broader router compatibility. This wireless standard facilitates real-time data transmission to manufacturer servers, allowing seamless integration with home networks without dedicated wiring. To mitigate latency associated with cloud dependency and enhance local reliability, some systems incorporate low-power mesh protocols such as or through compatible hubs or ecosystems, enabling device-to-device communication that bypasses internet reliance for basic operations. For instance, integration with platforms like Samsung SmartThings permits /Z-Wave sensors to interface indirectly with thermostats, reducing response times during . Remote control is achieved via dedicated mobile applications for and , permitting users to adjust settings from afar, though this introduces vulnerabilities such as complete loss of remote functionality during internet outages, rendering the thermostat dependent on pre-set schedules. Bandwidth requirements remain low, typically 15-20 MB per month for models like the Smart Thermostat Enhanced, well under 1 Mbps, supporting efficient operation even on constrained connections. Security protocols, including WPA2/WPA3 encryption for links and end-to-end data protection, are essential to safeguard against unauthorized access and exploits, as demonstrated by vulnerabilities in unpatched devices. Manufacturers emphasize firmware updates to address these risks, underscoring the between connectivity convenience and potential exposure in always-on systems.

Control Algorithms

Smart thermostat control algorithms integrate data from internal sensors, user interactions, and external variables like forecasts to compute HVAC setpoints and timings, aiming to minimize energy use while maintaining occupant comfort. These algorithms typically employ either deterministic rule-based logic or probabilistic methods to map inputs—such as current , predicted , and historical usage—to outputs like setpoint adjustments or on/off states. Rule-based approaches rely on hardcoded if-then rules, such as activating heating when indoor falls below a during scheduled periods, providing transparent and low-compute operation suitable for basic models but struggling with unmodeled variability like irregular routines or thermal inertia. Machine learning models surpass rule-based systems by learning patterns from data, often using supervised techniques for prediction—e.g., time-series via recurrent neural networks trained on anonymized historical patterns of user adjustments and geolocation signals—and for iterative optimization of comfort-efficiency trade-offs, where actions are rewarded based on metrics like deviation from preferred temperatures weighted against energy costs. Nest thermostats, for example, deploy neural network-based learning to infer and auto-generate schedules from observed behaviors, predicting away periods to preemptively shift to eco modes, with models refined via aggregated fleet data for improved accuracy over static programming. Ecobee systems incorporate similar predictive elements, leveraging datasets from over 200,000 households to train models that setpoints and adapt to household-specific dynamics. Advanced implementations may use for in thermal modeling, estimating parameters like building from sparse data to avoid over-cooling during uncertain , or frameworks to dynamically balance multi-objective rewards in real-time control loops. These probabilistic methods enable auto-scheduling by probabilistically inferring user preferences from adjustment histories, such as raising setpoints during frequent evening arrivals, while penalizing inefficient cycles through simulated environment training. Over-the-air updates allow iterative enhancements; ecobee's 2025 releases, including version 4.10.7 for models, have integrated field-derived refinements to boost predictive fidelity using insights from their Donate Your Data initiative, reducing setpoint errors in variable climates. Such updates exemplify causal , where outputs evolve based on empirical performance feedback rather than fixed rules.

Operational Features

Adaptive Learning

Adaptive learning in smart thermostats refers to the use of algorithms that analyze user behavior, occupancy patterns, and environmental data to automatically refine heating and cooling schedules over time, typically spanning weeks of observation. These systems extend basic control algorithms by incorporating historical data on preferred temperatures, daily routines, and external factors such as seasonal variations in , enabling predictive adjustments without manual reprogramming. For instance, algorithms may detect recurring absences or preferred comfort levels during specific hours and optimize setpoints accordingly, while incorporating user feedback mechanisms like app-based temperature ratings to iteratively improve accuracy. Prominent examples include Google's Nest Learning Thermostat, which employs sensors and smartphone geolocation to power its Home/Away Assist feature, learning household routines by monitoring motion and arrival/departure patterns to switch between home and eco modes seamlessly. Over time, it builds a personalized schedule based on observed preferences, such as adjusting for early morning wake times or evening returns, and refines these through direct overrides that influence future predictions. Similarly, ecobee's smart thermostats utilize eco+ algorithms, including schedule assistants that learn from user-set holds and occupancy data derived from integrated sensors, adapting to patterns like remote work shifts or guest visits while accounting for time-of-use energy pricing. Honeywell's T9 and T10 series incorporate Adaptive Intelligent Recovery, which learns the specific cycle times of a home's HVAC system through repeated operations, preemptively ramping up heating or cooling to reach target temperatures by scheduled times while adapting to variables like or outdoor . These features often integrate seasonal recalibration, such as preemptively lowering heating thresholds in winter based on prior data trends, to maintain without user intervention. To mitigate risks of opaque "" decision-making, manufacturers emphasize user override capabilities—temporary manual adjustments via apps or devices that the algorithms then factor into subsequent learning cycles, ensuring adaptability to atypical events like vacations or renovations.

Ecosystem Integration

Smart thermostats achieve ecosystem integration primarily through APIs and protocols compatible with dominant platforms such as , , and , allowing users to control devices via voice commands and apps from these providers. For instance, the Premium thermostat connects to , , and , enabling seamless management within those ecosystems. Similarly, the Learning Thermostat (4th generation, released 2024) supports integration with , , and its native Google Home platform. These connections facilitate basic functions like remote temperature adjustments and scheduling without requiring device-specific apps. The Matter standard, launched in October 2022 by the Connectivity Standards Alliance, addresses interoperability challenges by enabling cross-brand control across ecosystems, reducing reliance on proprietary APIs. Matter-certified thermostats, such as emerging models supporting Thread networking, allow unified control from Alexa, Google Home, or HomeKit hubs, with over 1,400 certified products by mid-2024 demonstrating gradual adoption. This standard supports device types including thermostats and enhances multi-vendor setups, though full implementation remains uneven due to hardware certification requirements. Integration enables advanced routines, such as linking thermostat adjustments to detection from smart lights or motion sensors, where presence confirmation triggers HVAC optimization to avoid unnecessary heating or cooling. For example, routines can combine geofencing with light states to verify home before altering setpoints, promoting through holistic system control. However, ecosystems create silos; Google's 2014 acquisition of Nest has led to criticisms of diminished third-party support and feature discontinuations, potentially locking users into Google-dependent workflows despite partial cross-platform compatibility. Such dependencies highlight interoperability's practical limits, where standards like mitigate but do not eliminate vendor-specific constraints.

Zoned Control Systems

Zoned control systems extend smart thermostat functionality to multi-area environments by enabling independent for distinct zones within a , often through networks of multiple thermostats, sensors, or motorized dampers that modulate in ducted HVAC setups. This approach addresses inefficiencies in single-zone systems, where a central conditions the entire uniformly, regardless of occupancy or varying thermal loads across rooms. In larger residences, such systems scale by dividing the into 2 to 12 or more zones, each with customizable setpoints, to maintain comfort while minimizing energy waste from over-conditioning unused areas. Exemplary implementations include the evohome, which uses a central hub to orchestrate up to 12 zones via radiator valves, actuators, and hot water controls, integrating with boilers through wired or protocols for precise demand signaling. Other platforms, such as or in compatible configurations, support multi-zone operation by linking multiple thermostats to a shared HVAC unit or zone dampers, allowing app-based scheduling and remote adjustments per area. These systems rely on proprietary zone boards or controllers to interpret signals from distributed thermostats, opening or closing dampers to direct conditioned air selectively. Balancing algorithms aggregate data from zone sensors—such as , , and —to prioritize simultaneous demands, HVAC equipment like furnaces or compressors to avoid short-cycling while optimizing distribution across . For instance, if one calls for heating while another remains satisfied, the restricts to the active , reducing overall load through predictive load shedding and shared limits enforced by the central controller. This coordination prevents system overload and enhances efficiency by aligning supply with localized needs rather than global averages. Field evaluations demonstrate that zoned smart thermostat systems can yield savings of around 20% relative to single-zone counterparts, primarily by curtailing in low-occupancy during monitored periods. One retrofit analysis of centralized HVAC with room-level reported 20.5% savings over 20 days, attributing gains to reduced in peripheral areas. Broader assessments, including U.S. Department of Energy analyses, suggest potential reductions up to 30% in suitable climates, though actual outcomes depend on zone sizing, , and usage patterns. Deployment of these systems typically demands HVAC modifications, including installation in ductwork, panel integration, and wiring for communication, elevating complexity beyond plug-and-play single-unit setups. Professional involvement is often essential for evohome-like systems to ensure compatibility with existing boilers and to calibrate timing via or 24VAC protocols, with retrofit challenges amplifying in older homes lacking zoned ducting. Resulting expenses for materials and labor exceed those of standalone smart s, frequently necessitating custom to maintain and avoid issues like .

Performance Evaluation

Energy Savings Claims

Manufacturers of smart thermostats frequently promote energy savings ranging from 10% to 26% on (HVAC) costs. , for instance, asserts average reductions of 10-12% on heating bills and 15% on cooling bills, derived from aggregated data across millions of devices assuming user learning and away-mode activation. similarly claims up to 26% savings on combined heating and cooling energy costs, based on internal modeling of occupancy patterns and setpoint optimizations. These projections stem from controlled demonstrations and vendor-conducted pilots that presuppose ideal conditions, including consistent user override avoidance and integration with efficient HVAC systems. Such claims amplify apparent benefits in scenarios with high baseline inefficiency, particularly older homes featuring outdated or leaky envelopes, where unoptimized temperature swings create opportunities for algorithmic corrections to capture low-hanging waste. In these contexts, the relative delta from inefficient defaults can yield the touted percentages, as even modest setpoint adjustments yield proportionally larger reductions against wasteful priors. Conversely, modern constructions with superior thermal barriers and high-efficiency equipment exhibit , since inherent low waste limits the causal leverage of thermostat interventions alone. Vendor metrics often selectively emphasize programmed efficiencies while sidelining rebound dynamics, wherein intuitive interfaces and remote incentivize users to prioritize comfort over , such as frequent overrides or elevated baselines that erode net gains. This behavioral —driven by eased to adjustments—undermines assumptions of sustained optimal use, as empirical patterns show initial enthusiasm yielding to habitual comfort elevation absent manual discipline.

Independent Studies and Data

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, through its program, estimates average savings from smart thermostats at approximately 8% of heating and cooling bills, or about $50 annually per household, based on aggregated from controlled evaluations and user patterns. This figure derives from analyses incorporating factors like and equipment efficiency but relies partly on voluntary adoption rather than universal . A 2022 National Bureau of Economic Research working paper, drawing from randomized field experiments across thousands of households, reported negligible statistically or economically significant reductions attributable to smart thermostats when scaled beyond pilot phases. The study contrasted lab-simulated or small-cohort results—often showing 10-15% savings—with real-world deployments, where overrides and inconsistent engagement eroded projected gains, yielding effects indistinguishable from zero in rigorous controls. Randomized controlled trials, considered the gold standard for isolating causal impacts, consistently reveal savings of 5-10% in heating and cooling under strict protocols, lower than manufacturer claims of 10-15% derived from self-selected user cohorts or proprietary logs. These trials highlight methodological gaps in non-randomized studies, such as self-reported behaviors or pre-post comparisons prone to , which inflate estimates by overlooking baseline inefficiencies or usage. No randomized supports statistically significant shaving from smart thermostats alone, as algorithmic adjustments fail to override manual interventions in diverse settings.

Variability and User Factors

User overrides represent a of variability in smart thermostat performance, as frequent manual adjustments disrupt automated optimization algorithms and can reduce projected savings by altering setpoint schedules. Evaluations indicate that approximately 80% of participants manually override their devices at least once per month, often prioritizing immediate comfort over long-term efficiency. Such behaviors stem from discrepancies between learned patterns and real-time preferences, leading to inconsistent HVAC operation that deviates from baseline efficiency models. Household occupancy patterns exacerbate this variance, with consistent routines—such as those in dual-income households enabling predictable away modes—yielding more reliable savings through alignment with algorithmic assumptions, whereas irregular presence, including extended or variable family schedules, prompts more frequent interventions and diminished returns. Tech-savvy demographics, which dominate adoption, may initially amplify engagement but do not inherently mitigate override tendencies without sustained discipline. External causal elements, including weather deviations from historical norms and suboptimal installation—such as misaligned sensors or inadequate HVAC integration—further introduce discrepancies by invalidating data-driven predictions or amplifying system inefficiencies. Non-thermostat behaviors, like supplemental heating or unaccounted structural factors, compound these effects independently of device functionality. Over time, initial novelty-driven adherence often wanes, as users revert to habitual manual controls, underscoring the role of behavioral inertia in long-term outcomes.

Criticisms and Challenges

Technical Reliability Issues

Smart thermostats have encountered hardware reliability challenges, particularly with temperature sensors prone to calibration drift over time, resulting in inaccuracies of approximately 0.1 to 0.2 degrees Fahrenheit annually due to material fatigue and environmental factors like humidity. Dust accumulation on sensors can further exacerbate readings by insulating components, leading to discrepancies between displayed and actual temperatures. In budget models, such as basic digital variants without advanced self-calibration, error margins can reach up to ±1°F as specified by manufacturers like Ecobee, potentially compounding with power fluctuations to cause inefficient HVAC cycling. Firmware bugs represent another persistent issue, with notable failures including a 2016 software in Nest Learning Thermostats that drained batteries and halted heating operations, leaving users without climate control during winter months. This defect affected multiple units, requiring manual restarts or recharges, and highlighted vulnerabilities in over-the-air updates that can introduce stuck modes or unresponsive states without user intervention. Heavy reliance on cloud services amplifies downtime risks, as connectivity outages disable remote adjustments and advanced features, with devices like rendering thermostats uncontrollable during events such as the October 20, 2025, AWS disruption. Offline modes exist but are limited, often reverting to basic schedules without or diagnostics, as evidenced by user reports of network failures causing prolonged inoperability until service restoration. Such dependencies have led to empirical observations of HVAC systems running inefficiently or not at all during internet blackouts, underscoring the fragility of cloud-integrated controls in residential settings.

Practical and Economic Drawbacks

Smart thermostats typically cost between $80 and $300 for the device itself, with professional adding $200 to $500, resulting in total upfront expenses of $350 or more for many households. These costs exceed those of basic programmable thermostats, which range from $30 to $100 without advanced . Independent analyses indicate realistic energy savings of 8% on heating and 10% on cooling, far below manufacturer claims of 20% or more, leading to payback periods often exceeding five years even under optimal conditions. For instance, with average U.S. residential heating and cooling expenditures around $1,000 annually, net savings might total $80 to $100 per year after for baseline inefficiencies, extending recovery time for the full investment. Practical usability challenges arise particularly for non-technical users, who may struggle with apps, Wi-Fi setup, and interface navigation required for full functionality. Usability studies highlight that while smart thermostats outperform basic programmables in controlled tests, real-world deployment involves frequent app interactions for adjustments, which can deter elderly or less digitally adept individuals from realizing benefits. Compatibility issues further compound these drawbacks, as older HVAC systems—common in homes built before 2000—often lack the necessary wiring (e.g., C-wire for power) or control protocols, necessitating costly adapters or professional rewiring that can add hundreds to installation fees. Beyond direct expenses, costs include the time invested in and tweaking features via apps, contrasting with the simplicity of programmable thermostats that require minimal ongoing input once scheduled. This overhead yields negligible advantages for users with predictable routines, as empirical shows comparable savings from manual programming without dependencies. Resale value remains low, typically under $50 in home sales, due to system-specific integration and buyer preferences for standard replacements over proprietary models.

Overhyped Expectations

Promotional campaigns for smart thermostats frequently emphasize automatic learning capabilities that purportedly deliver effortless energy reductions of 10-20% without ongoing user input, portraying devices as self-optimizing solutions superior to traditional controls. However, such claims overlook the causal mechanism of savings, which primarily stems from programmed setbacks rather than inherent ; the U.S. Department of Energy notes that manual setbacks of 7-10°F for eight hours can yield 5-15% reductions in heating costs, comparable to smart thermostat outcomes when users actively configure similar schedules. Real-world data tempers these expectations, with estimating average savings at only 8% of heating and cooling bills, or about $50 annually, contingent on , equipment , and user behavior rather than passive deployment. Independent analyses indicate even modest results, as savings diminish without deliberate engagement like overriding auto-modes or integrating occupancy data, contradicting advertisements that downplay the need for manual oversight akin to programmable thermostats. highlights that while app interfaces improve usability over older models, benefits accrue mainly from consistent feature utilization, not set-it-and-forget-it automation, with non-adoption leading to negligible gains. Media coverage often amplifies manufacturer narratives while underreporting variability, such as studies showing smart thermostats save roughly 7% more on gas than programmable ones only when programmed, but manual diligent adjustments achieve equivalent efficiency without connectivity dependencies or added costs. This reliance on user-driven setbacks underscores that overhyped "smart" features introduce complexity and potential inefficiencies— like frequent overrides in dynamic households—without guaranteeing superior results over simpler, low-tech alternatives that avoid technological risks.

Security Considerations

Hacking and Vulnerability Risks

Smart thermostats face hacking risks primarily from their internet connectivity and reliance on that can harbor exploitable flaws. In the 2016 Mirai botnet attack, which compromised millions of devices using default or weak credentials, smart thermostats were not major vectors but exemplified how unsecured connected appliances could be remotely commandeered for distributed denial-of-service assaults, potentially enabling broader network pivots to manipulate home controls. Documented firmware vulnerabilities have allowed unauthorized access in specific models. A 2024 flaw in connected thermostats, designated CVE-2023-49722, permitted local network attackers to send commands, replace , and alter device settings without authentication, which patched via over-the-air updates after disclosure by researchers. Similarly, a 2014 analysis of the Nest Learning Thermostat revealed hardware-level exploits enabling attackers with physical access to reprogram the boot process and install malicious , granting persistent control over temperature regulation and network traffic. has since addressed multiple Nest issues through security bulletins, including patches for elevation-of-privilege and denial-of-service vulnerabilities in 2022-2023 models. Reactive patching remains common, as seen in independent penetration tests uncovering unknown flaws in devices like Meross and Shelly smart thermostats, including command injection risks exploitable for remote execution. User reports of intrusions describe remote overrides setting temperatures to hazardous extremes, such as 90°F (32°C), underscoring causal pathways from unpatched connectivity to physical disruptions. The U.S. (CISA) has cataloged hardware vulnerabilities in thermostats from and Network Thermostat, often tied to components, amplifying risks of embedded flaws from overseas manufacturing hubs like .

Privacy and Data Handling

Smart thermostats routinely log data via integrated motion or sensors, infer routines from patterns in temperature setpoint changes and HVAC activation times, and incorporate geolocation details from paired devices to automate /away adjustments. This granular tracking can reconstruct detailed profiles of daily activities, such as schedules or work-from- patterns, often without users recognizing the extent of passive enabled by the devices' core learning algorithms. Manufacturers transmit this information to remote servers for processing, with policies permitting sharing to third parties for purposes including analytics, partnerships, or aggregated datasets, raising risks of unauthorized or commercial exploitation of inferred personal habits. Data breaches in such systems could expose these logs, potentially revealing absence periods that facilitate targeting or other invasions tied to predictable behaviors. Consumer awareness of these data practices is limited; according to a January 2025 Copeland study of smart thermostat owners, only 14 percent reviewed manufacturer policies before purchase, while over half lacked understanding of collection methods, heightening vulnerability to unintended disclosures. Efforts to limit flows face structural barriers, as mechanisms rarely support comprehensive local-only operation; available alternatives typically disable cloud-dependent features like predictive adjustments or remote monitoring, rendering the devices less "smart" and underscoring reliance on centralized handling.

Defensive Measures

Users can enhance smart thermostat security by promptly applying firmware updates, which patch known vulnerabilities and incorporate new security features, thereby reducing exploitation risks. Manufacturers typically release these updates via app notifications or automatic mechanisms, but manual verification ensures completeness. Disabling unnecessary features, such as built-in microphones on models like certain Nest variants, further minimizes the attack surface by eliminating potential eavesdropping vectors. Network segmentation represents a core defensive strategy, isolating smart thermostats on separate or dedicated subnets from primary devices like computers and phones. This confines potential breaches to the segment, preventing lateral movement to sensitive systems, as demonstrated in analyses where segmentation halted threat propagation across virtual networks. Compatible routers, such as those supporting VLAN tagging, enable this without vendor-specific tools, empowering users to enforce rules that restrict outbound for thermostats except for essential functions. Adopting WPA3 encryption for networks strengthens authentication and data protection for connected thermostats, resisting offline dictionary attacks more effectively than WPA2 through individualized data encryption. Transitioning to WPA3-compatible hardware, while ensuring device compatibility, aligns with standards introduced in 2018. Complementing this, local control hubs like allow thermostats to operate without constant cloud connectivity, processing commands on-premises and thereby avoiding remote risks associated with vendor servers. Zero-trust models extend these measures by assuming no inherent device trustworthiness, requiring continuous verification of communications and least-privilege access for thermostats. Users implement this via router-level policies that block unsolicited inbound traffic and monitor anomalous activity, reducing overall exposure in home ecosystems. Such practices collectively diminish likelihood by limiting vectors and enforcing , prioritizing user-managed controls over manufacturer assurances.

Market and Adoption

Major Manufacturers

Google Nest, acquired by Alphabet Inc. (Google's parent) in 2014 for $3.2 billion, remains a dominant force in the smart thermostat sector, frequently ranked among the top brands in the U.S. market due to its integration of machine learning algorithms for adaptive temperature scheduling and energy optimization. Nest's innovations, driven by private R&D, include patented systems for user behavior learning and predictive adjustments, which have faced legal challenges but underscore its focus on algorithmic efficiency over hardware subsidies. Ecobee, Inc., a key competitor, differentiates through privacy-centric features like local processing to minimize cloud dependency and multi-sensor remote capabilities for room-specific control, positioning it as a strong alternative in North American markets where concerns influence consumer choice. Honeywell International Inc. (via its Resideo for home products) leverages decades of HVAC expertise to offer thermostats emphasizing industrial-grade reliability and compatibility with legacy systems, maintaining a top-tier market presence through robust build quality rather than flashy AI features. Emerson Electric Co.'s Sensi line targets budget-conscious users with Wi-Fi-enabled models featuring geofencing and app-based scheduling, prioritizing data privacy compliance and easy installation without requiring C-wire adapters in many setups. Emerging players like Sinopé Technologies are gaining traction in 2025 with specialized offerings for electric baseboard and low-voltage HVAC systems, including new controls compatible with regional utilities, driven by targeted innovations in zonal heating efficiency. The smart thermostat market is projected to generate revenue of $1.9 billion in 2025. This segment is expected to expand at a (CAGR) of 17.1% through 2030, driven primarily by consumer demand for cost-saving in residential . Globally, shipments of smart thermostats are forecasted to reach 67.2 million units by 2030, reflecting broader integration into affordable ecosystems. Key economic drivers include declining device prices, with basic models now available below $100, making them accessible to price-sensitive households seeking utility bill reductions through programmable scheduling and remote control. Bundling with expanding smart home platforms—such as voice assistants and hub systems—further incentivizes adoption by enabling seamless interoperability and aggregated energy monitoring, which appeals to users prioritizing convenience and long-term savings over standalone devices. Adoption projections indicate that up to 45% of households in and could incorporate smart thermostats by 2030, concentrated in and suburban areas with reliable . However, barriers persist in rural regions, where limited access hinders connectivity-dependent features like app-based adjustments and over-the-air updates, exacerbating a in penetration. An emerging trend is the transition to Matter-compatible thermostats, which standardize communication protocols across ecosystems to mitigate fragmentation and reduce consumer lock-in to platforms, potentially accelerating market and uptake in multi-device homes.

Sustainability Assessment

Actual Environmental Effects

Empirical field studies indicate that smart thermostats achieve average HVAC energy savings of approximately 8%, though results vary widely based on user behavior and setbacks, with some analyses finding little to no significant net reduction in overall consumption due to behavioral overrides. Since (HVAC) systems account for about 45% of total residential use in the United States, these savings translate to roughly 3-4% of a home's overall under controlled conditions. However, real-world deployments often yield lower figures, as users frequently adjust settings for greater comfort, diminishing the marginal impact to 1-2% or less of total household . Lifecycle assessments reveal that manufacturing a smart thermostat generates embodied primarily from electronics production, including sensors and circuit boards, estimated in the range of several kilograms of CO2 equivalent per unit, though exact figures depend on materials sourcing and assembly. Optimistic models suggest an environmental of 1-2 years for CO2 offsets, assuming consistent savings and a device lifespan of 9-10 years, but these calculations typically overlook full rebound effects and do not account for frequent replacements driven by software or upgrades. In practice, the net carbon benefit remains marginal, as production emissions—potentially involving energy-intensive processes for components like rare-earth-dependent displays and modules—are not substantially offset by the device's operational savings in average households. Rebound effects further erode potential environmental gains, with studies documenting increased baseline HVAC usage from enhanced comfort and remote accessibility, offsetting up to half of projected efficiencies through user overrides and extended runtime preferences. No robust evidence supports claims that widespread adoption accelerates grid-scale decarbonization, as reduced demand does not inherently shift utility generation toward renewables without corresponding policy or infrastructure changes; instead, savings primarily manifest as individual cost reductions rather than systemic CO2 mitigation. Thus, the actual environmental effects of smart thermostats are limited, with net impacts often neutral or modestly positive only under ideal usage scenarios that prioritize efficiency over convenience.

Incentive Programs and Policies

Various utility rebate programs in the United States, often aligned with certification, offer $50 to $100 incentives for installing qualifying smart thermostats to promote . For example, Electric Utilities provides $50 rebates for self-installed -certified models and $100 for contractor-installed units, while Columbia Gas of Virginia offers $50 rebates specifically for such devices. The Focus on Energy program in similarly reimburses $50 for eligible smart thermostats purchased from retailers, with applications processed post-installation. These incentives, supported by federal funding mechanisms including those enabled by the of 2022, lower upfront costs and have demonstrably boosted adoption rates beyond what market prices alone might achieve. However, such taxpayer-funded subsidies can distort market dynamics by favoring programmable smart devices over unsubsidized alternatives like enhanced building insulation, which may offer comparable or superior energy savings without reliance on ongoing connectivity or behavioral adjustments. Studies show that targeted subsidies increase adoption of eligible technologies, including smart thermostats, irrespective of uniform or discriminatory application, potentially leading to inefficient resource allocation as consumers respond to artificial price signals rather than total lifecycle costs or opportunity expenses. While direct tax credits under the Inflation Reduction Act's Section 25C do not explicitly cover smart thermostats, the legislation facilitates utility rebates and state-level programs that indirectly subsidize them, amplifying this effect without rigorous comparative evaluation against non-technological efficiency measures. Internationally, policies under the recast Energy Efficiency Directive mandate progressive reductions in building energy use, with targets of 11.7% savings by 2030 relative to 2020 projections, encouraging smart thermostat deployment as part of broader "energy efficiency first" strategies tied to objectives. Member states implement these through national incentives, such as subsidies for smart building technologies, but often without mandating assessments of trade-offs like device privacy risks or the marginal efficacy of automated controls versus passive design improvements. Joint U.S.-EU statements have highlighted smart thermostats in demand-response efforts, yet empirical critiques note that policy emphasis on such gadgets may overlook causal factors like structural inefficiencies, prioritizing subsidized tech rollouts over holistic, unsubsidized optimizations.

References

  1. [1]
    Everything You Need To Know About Smart Thermostats
    Aug 25, 2024 · A smart thermostat is a Wi-Fi-enabled device that automatically adjusts your home's heating and cooling temperature settings.
  2. [2]
    What Is a Smart Thermostat? - Trane®
    A smart thermostat, or Wi-Fi thermostat, is a thermostat that can be controlled by a phone, tablet, smart speaker, or another internet-connected device.
  3. [3]
    Original Nest Thermostat and the Smart Home Revolution | SafeWise
    Jul 19, 2022 · The original Nest Thermostat was a hit with reviewers on release in November of 2011—it sold out on the first day ...
  4. [4]
    How Nest's Control Freaks Reinvented the Thermostat
    Feb 15, 2013 · Two men who created the iPod and iPhone founded Nest and injected new technology into the humble thermostat. Now they have their sights on the rest of your ...
  5. [5]
    What Are the Main Features of a Smart Thermostat? - HVAC.com
    Mar 2, 2024 · Smart thermostats offer a variety of useful features, such as Wi-Fi connectivity, maintenance alerts, and data on energy use.
  6. [6]
    What Is a Smart Thermostat and How Does It Save Energy?
    The smart thermostat is an improvement upon the programmable thermostat, which allows users to program heating and cooling schedules so that there's less energy ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] findings from - Fraunhofer ISI
    Dec 13, 2020 · Smart thermostats may provide up to 10% savings in residential thermal energy use without loss of comfort, yet.
  8. [8]
    [PDF] The Human Perils of Scaling Smart Technologies: Evidence from ...
    Field experiments show little impact of smart thermostats on energy use, with user behavior dampening savings. The scale-up problem is also discussed.
  9. [9]
    U.S. Smart Thermostat Market Size | Industry Report, 2030
    The U.S. smart thermostat market size was estimated at USD 2.36 billion in 2024 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 17.5% from 2025 to 2030.
  10. [10]
    How Data Privacy Should Factor Into Your Smart Thermostat Decision
    Aug 30, 2023 · In fact, only 13% of smart thermostat owners researched their manufacturers' data privacy policy before purchase.
  11. [11]
    Copeland Study Reveals Increasing Concerns Around Data Privacy ...
    Jan 13, 2025 · “But what's most concerning is that more than half of homeowners don't understand how data from their smart thermostat is collected and used – ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  12. [12]
    Comparing Thermostats: Manual, Programmable, and Smart
    Sep 9, 2024 · Manual thermostats are the simplest type of thermostat. They require you to adjust the temperature settings manually whenever you want to change ...
  13. [13]
    How do thermostats work? - Explain that Stuff
    Aug 1, 2023 · In a thermostat, the switch is tilted by the expanding and contracting bimetallic strip. Here's a typical older-style room thermostat with a ...
  14. [14]
    The Mercury Switch Thermostat | HVAC Control
    The bi-metal strip is wound in a loop or spiral, and when it gets hot and cold, it expands and contracts according to the temperature. That causes the mercury ...
  15. [15]
    How Thermostats Control Temperature - AND Services
    Thermostats use mercury switches and bimetallic strips. Temperature changes tilt the mercury, and the coil expands/contracts, turning on/off the heater/fan.
  16. [16]
    Understanding Your Thermostat: Manual vs. Smart
    Jul 9, 2025 · Manual thermostats are valued for their simplicity and reliability. With fewer electronic components, they tend to have a long lifespan and are ...
  17. [17]
    Smart vs. Traditional Thermostats in HVAC Design - Innodez
    Pros and Cons. Pros: Simplicity, affordability, reliability, and no Wi-Fi dependency. Cons: Limited features, energy efficiency, and remote control. Choosing ...
  18. [18]
    How Much Does Thermostat Replacement Cost in 2025?
    Oct 7, 2025 · Type, Average Cost (Thermostat Only) ; Manual, $15 – $35 ; Non-Programmable, $20 – $50 ; Programmable, $30 – $150 ; WiFi, $85 – $275.
  19. [19]
    How Thermostats Impact Your Energy Bills
    Feb 19, 2025 · Manual thermostats require frequent adjustments, which can lead to inefficient heating or cooling. Programmable models allow you to set ...
  20. [20]
    Residential thermostat usability: Comparing manual, programmable ...
    While manual thermostats offer a high degree of simplicity, they require diligent adjustment from occupants to achieve energy-saving schedules.
  21. [21]
    Programmable Thermostats | Department of Energy
    You can save as much as 10% a year on heating and cooling by simply turning your thermostat back 7°-10°F for 8 hours a day from its normal setting. The ...
  22. [22]
    Setback Thermostat: Energy-Saving Solution - Trane®
    According to the DOE, you can save 10% a year on heating and cooling costs by setting your thermostat back 7-10 degrees for 8 hours a day while you're at work, ...
  23. [23]
    Energy efficiency and the misuse of programmable thermostats
    Twenty years later, the EPA concluded that consumers were not using programmable thermostats effectively due to programming difficulties and lack of ...Missing: inefficiency | Show results with:inefficiency
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Energy efficiency and the misuse of programmable thermostats
    The ability to automatically setback the temperature at certain times is the main reason why properly programmed thermostats save energy over manual thermostats ...
  25. [25]
    Illustrated History of the Thermostat | Endesa
    Dec 20, 2017 · The 1980's featured the emergence of the first thermostats with digital displays, electronic circuits and many functions such as programming in ...How Do Thermostats Work? · Type Of Thermostat · Stable Temperature And...
  26. [26]
    The Evolution of the Trusty Thermostat
    By the 1980s, programmable thermostats using solid state electronics came out, making them much easier to program and better able to hold a nice, even ...
  27. [27]
    The History of Thermostats and Their Evolution to Smart
    May 29, 2020 · The very first thermostat we know of is a 1620 invention by Dutch inventor, Cornelis Drebbel. While you'd expect the first thermostat created to ...<|separator|>
  28. [28]
    Smart Thermostats | ENERGY STAR
    A smart thermostat is a Wi-Fi enabled device that automatically adjusts heating and cooling temperature settings in your home for optimal performance.
  29. [29]
    Smart vs. Programmable Thermostats: Which Is Better? | Scott-Lee
    Feb 8, 2025 · Programmable thermostats allow users to set heating and cooling schedules based on weekly routines. Unlike smart thermostats, they don't require Wi-Fi, ...
  30. [30]
  31. [31]
    How do smart thermostats work? Features and benefits
    Jan 29, 2025 · A smart thermostat is an advanced climate control device that goes beyond basic temperature regulation. Unlike traditional or even digital ...
  32. [32]
    Are Smart Thermostats Worth It? - Consumer Reports
    May 5, 2023 · If a thermostat can connect to WiFi (or Z-Wave, a smart-home-specific wireless standard), we consider it “smart.” Consumer Reports has tested ...
  33. [33]
    How Warren Johnson invented the world's first room thermostat
    Jun 26, 2025 · Patented in 1883 as the “electric tele-thermoscope”, it brought order, automation and comfort to a previously chaotic system. By 1885, Johnson ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  34. [34]
    Warren Johnson, Father of Thermostats and Room Temperature ...
    Jul 16, 2018 · This July 24th marks the 135th anniversary of a patent issued to Johnson in 1883 covering his thermostat technology. U.S. Patent No. 281884, ...
  35. [35]
    Keeping temps just right: the Minneapolis-developed thermostat
    Dec 13, 2012 · The Round was first developed in 1941 but was shelved during World War II. After the war, the Chronotherm – a clunky, coffin-shaped regulator ...
  36. [36]
    The origin of Honeywell's round thermostat - MinnPost
    Jan 13, 2025 · The Round, designed by engineer Carl Kronmiller and designer Henry Dreyfuss for Honeywell, was introduced in 1953.
  37. [37]
    A Brief History of Thermostats - Bounds Heating & Air
    Invention: 1830. Back when people had to rely on their senses, regulating temperature was troublesome. Many had to rely on fireplaces and furnaces to warm ...<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    The Nest Learning Thermostat - Core77
    Oct 25, 2011 · Today marks the launch of Silicon Valley startup Nest Labs' Learning Thermostat ... Tony Fadell and Matt Rogers—who spearheaded the design and...<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    The Nest timeline: 7 years of ramping up Google's smart home - CNET
    Mar 14, 2018 · 2011 -- Nest introduced its first product, the Learning Thermostat. · 2012 -- The startup debuted its second-gen Learning Thermostat -- same ...
  40. [40]
    Nest - 2025 Company Profile, Team, Funding & Competitors - Tracxn
    Sep 6, 2025 · Nest has raised a total funding of $80M over 3 rounds. Its first funding round was on Sep 2010. Its latest funding round was a Series C round on ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  41. [41]
  42. [42]
    WiFi Smart Color Thermostat RTH9585WF1004 - Honeywell Home
    In stock 30-day returnsWith 7-day programming, this ENERGY STAR® certified WiFi Smart Color Thermostat, allows you to create custom temperature schedules for each day of the week.
  43. [43]
    Google gains entry to home and prized team with $3.2 billion Nest ...
    Jan 14, 2014 · Google Inc took its biggest step to go deeper into consumers' homes, announcing a $3.2 billion deal to buy smart thermostat and smoke ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  44. [44]
    Google Acquires Smart Thermostat Maker Nest For $3.2 Billion
    Jan 13, 2014 · Three years after redefining what thermostats are capable of, Palo Alto-based Nest is being bought by Google for $3.2 billion.Missing: details | Show results with:details
  45. [45]
    The Nest Learning Thermostat is smarter and sleeker than ever
    Aug 6, 2024 · The new Nest Learning Thermostat (4th gen) is here, featuring a larger display, improved AI for energy savings, and a redesigned Nest ...
  46. [46]
    Google Nest Learning Thermostat 4th Gen Review - CNET
    In stock Rating 4.0 Sep 25, 2024 · The 4th Gen Nest Smart Thermostat lets you set a schedule (maybe 76 degrees from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. and 72 degrees overnight), and it can adjust ...
  47. [47]
    Google Nest Learning Thermostat (4th Gen) - Review 2024
    Rating 4.0 Sep 19, 2024 · It is equipped with ambient light, humidity, motion, and temperature sensors and has a dual-band Wi-Fi radio. While robust, the Nest's feature ...
  48. [48]
  49. [49]
    ecobee Smart Thermostat Premium with Smart Sensor and Air ...
    Built-in air quality monitor alerts you to poor air quality, provides tips on how to improve it, and reminds you when it's time to change your furnace's air ...
  50. [50]
    Indoor Air Quality Sensor FAQs - ecobee Support
    Smart Thermostat Premium includes a built-in air quality sensor. Learn more about how it works and what it monitors, answers to other frequently asked ...
  51. [51]
  52. [52]
    HVAC Manufacturers Look Ahead to a Post-COVID World
    Jun 8, 2021 · “The HVAC industry has had to deal with supply chain disruptions, followed by logistics issues and then COVID restrictions,” he said. “We have ...
  53. [53]
    Sinopé Technologies launches new range of smart thermostats for ...
    Sinopé Technologies, Canada's largest manufacturer of smart devices, introduces its line of Wi-Fi thermostats for HVAC systems designed to optimize comfort ...
  54. [54]
    Best smart thermostats in 2025 - Android Police
    Best smart thermostats in 2025 · Google Nest Thermostat. For the Matter protocol. $90 at Amazon · Amazon Smart Thermostat Source: Amazon. Amazon Smart Thermostat.
  55. [55]
    Here's What the 'Matter' Smart Home Standard Is All About - WIRED
    May 26, 2025 · This open source protocol ensures your devices play nicely. Matter 1.4.1 makes setup easier with QR codes or NFC.
  56. [56]
    Build With Matter | Smart Home Device Solution - CSA-IOT
    Matter is a unifying, IP-based connectivity protocol built on proven technologies, helping you connect to and build reliable, secure IoT ecosystems.Missing: thermostats 2024-2025
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Residential Smart Thermostat Test Lab - Phase One - | ETCC
    Dec 26, 2014 · The objective of this test was to document the accuracy and precision of the device temperature sensors, in comparison to calibrated sensors in ...Missing: detection | Show results with:detection
  58. [58]
    Analyzing smart thermostat data to uncover trends in remote work ...
    Mar 1, 2025 · Occupancy detection accuracy increased from 91.5 % to 99.8 % when using one PIR sensor ... motion detector built into the thermostat. Hence, to ...
  59. [59]
  60. [60]
    (PDF) The smart thermostat - ResearchGate
    Jun 22, 2025 · We demonstrate that our approach will achieve a 28% energy saving on average, at a cost of approximately $25 in sensors. In comparison, a ...
  61. [61]
    Types of Motion Sensors: Features & Applications Explained
    Apr 19, 2025 · Motion sensors are essential for security and automation. Learn about different types of motion sensors, including PIR, microwave, ...
  62. [62]
    Best Smart Thermostats of 2025: Find Out What's Hot - CNET
    Oct 6, 2025 · We've tested several smart thermostats from the biggest brands to help you find the best thermostat for your needs.Missing: 2020 2021-2025
  63. [63]
    Long-Term field testing of the accuracy and HVAC energy savings ...
    Feb 1, 2025 · Sensor performance showed an overall accuracy of 83.8%, a False Positive Rate (FPR) of 12.8%, and a False Negative Rate (FNR) of 47.4%. A key ...
  64. [64]
    challenges on smart thermostat systems in intelligent buildings
    Oct 30, 2019 · ... PIR sensors can be falsely triggered by pets. Producers should include more sensitive. sensors that discriminate occupants from pets. Pets ...Missing: placement | Show results with:placement
  65. [65]
    How To Prevent Pets From Setting Off Security Motion Alarm
    Motion sensors with pet-immunity tend to disregard animal movement below 40 lbs. but factors that affect this include model of sensor and placement of sensor.
  66. [66]
    PIR Sensor Disadvantages: What You Need to Know for Pet ...
    Limited field of view and blind spots: Most units have a detection angle of 90‑120°, leaving corners uncovered unless you add more sensors. Improper placement ...
  67. [67]
    The Ultimate Guide to Motion Sensors for Your Home Security System
    Nov 26, 2024 · Avoid placing sensors near HVAC vents, windows, or other areas prone to temperature fluctuations or direct sunlight to mitigate these issues.Passive Infrared Sensors... · Microwave Sensors · Maintenance, Testing, And...<|control11|><|separator|>
  68. [68]
    Wi-Fi networks that are incompatible or aren't recommended
    Some Nest products, like the 2nd generation Nest Thermostat and Nest Protect, only support 2.4GHz Wi-Fi networks. Nest products that work with 2.4 or 5GHz Wi-Fi ...
  69. [69]
  70. [70]
  71. [71]
    Can a Smart Thermostat Work Without Wi-Fi Connection?
    If the internet is down or there is no Wi-Fi connection, you will lose the remote-control functionality. Typically, this will only affect the mobile app utility ...
  72. [72]
    Security features for Google Nest Wifi and Google Wifi
    Google Nest Wifi and Google Wifi secure your Wi-Fi network with either WPA2 protocol or the newer WPA3 protocol. Using WPA3 protocol makes your Wi-Fi network ...
  73. [73]
    Smart Home Technology Comparison - Silicon Labs
    Oct 3, 2024 · Bluetooth mesh networks use the same 2.4 GHz frequency band as other wireless technologies such as Wi-Fi, Zigbee, and Z-Wave. This can cause ...
  74. [74]
    Smart Thermostat based on Machine Learning and Rule Engine
    In this paper, we propose a smart thermostat temperature set-point control method based on machine learning and rule engine.
  75. [75]
    Efficacy of temporal and spatial abstraction for training accurate ...
    Oct 1, 2023 · To maximize energy savings, many of these thermostats use machine learning (ML) for more accurate prediction and optimal control. These ML ...
  76. [76]
    A critical review of use cases and insights from a large dataset of ...
    Using building energy and smart thermostat data to evaluate indoor ultrafine particle source and loss processes in a net-zero energy house. ACS EST Eng, 1 ...
  77. [77]
    Evaluating the Feasibility of Reusing Pre-trained Thermal Models in ...
    In this paper we train a Bayesian neural network to establish the RC model for a home equipped with a smart thermostat, and investigate how to reuse this model ...
  78. [78]
    What are the latest ecobee device firmware versions?
    Auto-upgrade firmware versions as of September 22nd, 2025. Thermostats. Smart Thermostat Premium. 4.10.7.44. Smart Thermostat Enhanced. 4.10.7.46. Smart ...Missing: predictive accuracy
  79. [79]
    How Smart Thermostats Are a Game Changer For Energy Efficiency
    Feb 15, 2024 · 4. Learning Algorithms. Smart thermostats use adaptive learning algorithms to study the way people use the HVAC system and spot trends in things ...
  80. [80]
    How Machine Learning can Optimize Thermostat Settings
    Oct 21, 2024 · Smart thermostats equipped with advanced learning algorithms optimize thermostat settings to significantly reduce energy consumption.
  81. [81]
  82. [82]
    ADT Smart Home Security- Google Nest Learning Thermostat
    It learns what temperature you like and builds a schedule around yours. It can use sensors and your phone's location to check if you have left, then sets itself ...<|separator|>
  83. [83]
  84. [84]
    [PDF] 33-00478-01 - T9 Smart thermostat with wireless sensor
    Adaptive Intelligent Recovery: The T9 Smart thermostat learns your heating and cooling cycle times to make sure the system delivers the temperature you want, ...<|separator|>
  85. [85]
    Lyric Thermostat Adaptive Recovery - Honeywell Home
    Sep 2, 2025 · Learn about adaptive recovery and what it means for your Lyric Thermostat device in this Honeywell Home Support article.Missing: algorithms | Show results with:algorithms
  86. [86]
  87. [87]
    Google Nest Learning Thermostat (4th Gen, 2024 ... - Amazon.com
    30-day returnsGoogle Nest Learning Thermostat (4th Gen, 2024) with Nest Temperature Sensor - Energy Saving Smart Thermostat - Compatible with Alexa, Apple HomeKit and Google ...
  88. [88]
    The 4 Best Smart Thermostats of 2025 | Reviews by Wirecutter
    Aug 11, 2025 · After a new round of testing, we've added the Ecobee Smart Thermostat Essential as runner-up and updated this guide throughout. August 2025.Missing: advancements 2020
  89. [89]
    What's the matter with Matter? After 2 years, this promising smart ...
    Jul 13, 2024 · Matter's adoption has been slow but steady since its official launch in late 2022. At this time, there are over 1,400 new Matter-certified ...
  90. [90]
    Matter 1.4 Enables More Capable Smart Homes - CSA-IOT
    Nov 7, 2024 · Matter 1.4 expands its energy management capabilities by adding support for new device types like solar panels, batteries, heat pumps, and water ...
  91. [91]
  92. [92]
    9 Routine Ideas You Can Automate In Your Home And How To Set ...
    Nov 6, 2024 · Smart Lights: Use smart lights to indicate when cleaning is in progress. For example, set a rule to turn on a specific light when the robot ...
  93. [93]
    Google's Nest acquisition: Strategically important with caveats
    Jan 14, 2014 · Google's $3.2 billion acquisition of Nest may look like a steal if Tony Fadell sticks around, the company learns better hardware design, ...Missing: risks | Show results with:risks
  94. [94]
    Google Kills off Nest Security Ecosystem - TidBITS Talk
    Jan 2, 2024 · Google has informed us that, come April 8, it will somehow remotely “brick” all our Nest Security Systems.
  95. [95]
    Why We Should Be Careful About Google's Promises in the Fitbit Deal
    Aug 21, 2020 · Google claims its acquisition of Fitbit is not about data, but hardware. This is simply not credible. Data plays a crucial role in the Fitbit deal.
  96. [96]
    Zone Control Systems: How They Work & Save You Money
    Jun 10, 2024 · Thermostat Settings: Each zone's thermostat is set to the desired temperature. For example, an office area might be set to 72°F, while a ...How Do Zone Control Systems... · Examples Of Zoning Setups · Implementation And...
  97. [97]
    [PDF] Complexity made simple - Honeywell Home HCC100 ... - Resideo
    Nov 24, 2022 · evohome is a smart zone control system that supports up to 12 zones in the home, all from one place. Customers can easily control individual ...
  98. [98]
    Zoned system compatibility with Nest thermostats - Google Help
    Thermostats in zoned systems can control the same heating and cooling system or each thermostat can control its own system. dampers. When multiple thermostats ...
  99. [99]
    Multi-Zone HVAC Systems: Design and Installation Guide
    Sep 4, 2025 · Multi-zone HVAC systems control airflow to different areas. Key design involves the 35% rule, proper bypass sizing, individual load ...
  100. [100]
  101. [101]
    Feasibility of retrofitting centralized HVAC systems for room-level ...
    Initial analysis indicates that this method has a 20.5% energy savings over the existing single-zoned thermostat during a 20 day evaluation.
  102. [102]
  103. [103]
    HVAC Zoning Controls: Damper and Thermostat Integration
    Sep 4, 2025 · Fix HVAC zoning controls problems fast. Learn 24VAC wiring, smart thermostat integration, RS-485 protocols, and damper timing for reliable ...
  104. [104]
  105. [105]
    Honeywell Evohome review: The best smart thermostat you can buy
    Rating 5.0 DIY installation is possible, but professional installation is better and will cost around £100, depending on the complexity of installation and the number of ...
  106. [106]
    Save Energy and Live Comfortably with Nest Thermostat Savings
    Nest thermostats can help save an average of 12% on heating bills and 15% on cooling bills. —. Nest thermostat ...
  107. [107]
    DATA SHOWS HOW SMART THERMOSTATS CAN SAVE ON ...
    Oct 17, 2024 · Users of the ecobee smart thermostat in North America can save up to an estimated 26% on their heating- and cooling-related energy costs, ...
  108. [108]
    [PDF] Framework for Comparing Thermostat Energy Performance
    Jul 8, 2014 · The applicability and energy-savings potential of both types of strategies depends on factors such as climate region, building characteristics, ...
  109. [109]
    How Does Smart Thermostat Technology Affect Energy ...
    Feb 14, 2025 · For example, in regions with extremely hot or cold climates, the potential for energy savings might be greater, but the rebound effect could ...
  110. [110]
    How Can Smart Homes Integrate Thermostats? → Question
    Mar 26, 2025 · Energy Efficiency and Rebound Effects. One of the primary arguments for smart thermostats is their potential to improve energy efficiency.
  111. [111]
    ENERGY STAR Smart Thermostats FAQs for EEPS
    On average, savings are approximately 8% of heating and cooling bills or $50 per year. Savings may be greater depending on climate, personal comfort preferences ...
  112. [112]
    [PDF] Energy Impacts of Smart Home Technologies - ACEEE
    Apr 19, 2018 · Smart thermostats have proved to reduce HVAC energy consumption; average savings of 8% in heating costs and. 10% in cooling costs can be ...
  113. [113]
    The Human Perils of Scaling Smart Technologies: Evidence from ...
    Sep 15, 2022 · We find little evidence that smart thermostats have a statistically or economically significant effect on energy use.
  114. [114]
    [PDF] EVIDENCE FROM FIELD EXPERIMENTS Alec Brandon Christoph
    The study found little evidence that smart thermostats significantly affect energy use, and that user behavior dampens energy savings.
  115. [115]
    [DOC] U.S. Department of Energy: Smart Thermostats
    3.1.2.1 Randomized Field Experiments. Randomized field experiments are the gold standard in energy efficiency program evaluation and are the most reliable ...
  116. [116]
    [PDF] Final Report 2022-2023 Impact and Process Evaluation - | WA.gov
    Feb 15, 2024 · Percent of smart thermostats ... four in five participants reported that they manually override their smart thermostat at least once per month.<|separator|>
  117. [117]
    [PDF] SMART THERMOSTATS - National Consumer Law Center
    Smart thermostat evaluations consistently point to the fact that customer behavior can sharply limit energy savings. For example, customers who alter thermostat ...
  118. [118]
    Exploring smart thermostat users' schedule override behaviors and ...
    Programmable thermostats with frequent schedule overrides (i.e., “holds”) are widely assumed to be detrimental to potential energy savings.Missing: compliance underuse
  119. [119]
    Why Your Home's Thermostat Provides Inaccurate Readings
    Aug 5, 2025 · These devices can experience material fatigue over time, with an average annual drift of about 0.1 to 0.2 degrees. This can cause the ...
  120. [120]
    Why Is My Thermostat Showing the Wrong Temperature?
    Sep 8, 2025 · Dust and debris can coat the internal sensor, insulating it and causing an inaccurate thermostat reading. A quick, gentle cleaning with canned ...Missing: smart | Show results with:smart<|separator|>
  121. [121]
    Allow sensor temperature correction - beestat community
    May 23, 2020 · The sensor accuracy specification from ecobee's web site is +/- 1F - Which should mean that all of my sensors should be within 1.1C of each other.
  122. [122]
    Nest thermostat bug leaves users cold - BBC News
    Jan 14, 2016 · A software bug that caused Nest's smart thermostat to stop working has left many users both cold and angry.Missing: recall | Show results with:recall
  123. [123]
    Nest Thermostat Glitch Leaves Users in the Cold
    Jan 13, 2016 · My once-beloved “smart” thermostat suffered from a mysterious software bug that drained its battery and sent our home into a chill in the middle of the night.
  124. [124]
    Bug in Nest Thermostat turns off heating for some - The Guardian
    Jan 15, 2016 · The solution is to “recharge and restart your thermostat” according to the company. Central heating controlled by Nest Thermostat systems in the ...
  125. [125]
  126. [126]
    [PDF] When Smart Devices Are Stupid: Negative Experiences Using Home ...
    Oct 4, 2021 · Users reported issues with power outages, network failures, misattributing events to hacking, false alarms, complex schedules, and fears of ...
  127. [127]
  128. [128]
    How Much Does a Smart Thermostat Cost? - HVAC.com
    Oct 29, 2024 · So, how much does a smart thermostat cost? The average price for a new smart thermostat is $80 to $300, depending on its features.
  129. [129]
    How Much Does Smart Thermostat Installation Cost in 2025?
    Dec 21, 2024 · Smart thermostat installation costs around $350 on average. You should expect to pay $200 to $500 for most professional installations.<|separator|>
  130. [130]
    How to Know If Your HVAC is Compatible with a Smart Thermostat?
    Mar 8, 2024 · System Age: Older HVAC systems may not be compatible with newer smart thermostats. Consult an HVAC professional to explore your options ...
  131. [131]
    How to Know If Your Thermostat and HVAC System Are Compatible
    Sep 13, 2024 · Compatibility With Older Systems: If you have an older HVAC unit, not all smart thermostats may work. It's a good idea to double-check if your ...
  132. [132]
    Smart vs Programmable Thermostats - Energy Savings Comparison
    May 21, 2024 · Smart thermostats have auto-scheduling, remote access, and high energy efficiency, while programmable ones require manual scheduling and have ...
  133. [133]
    Programmable vs. Smart Thermostat: Which One is Best for You?
    The purchase price of programmable thermostats generally stay under $100, while smart thermostats can run upwards of $200.
  134. [134]
    Are Smart Thermostats Worth the Money? - The New York Times
    Jan 13, 2025 · Smart thermostats can save households about 8 percent on bills, or about $50 a year. A few independent studies say the savings are probably even lower.
  135. [135]
    [PDF] Energy efficiency effectiveness of smart thermostat based BEMS
    The results showed that by using Nest thermostats, the participants could save about. 7% more on gas compared to the programmable thermostats and could save ...
  136. [136]
    What is the Mirai Botnet? - Cloudflare
    Learn how Mirai malware turns IoT devices running on the ARC processor and the Linux OS, into botnets. Mirai is commonly used to launch DDoS attacks, ...Missing: thermostats | Show results with:thermostats
  137. [137]
    Did your smart thermostat contribute to last week's big cyberattack?
    Oct 26, 2016 · Could our smart thermostats go rogue and help take out the internet? It doesn't look like internet-connected energy-saving devices were affected ...Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  138. [138]
    Vulnerability affecting smart thermostats patched by Bosch
    Jan 12, 2024 · The vulnerability in a popular connected thermostat could allow a hacker to connect to the device's network.
  139. [139]
    Vulnerability Puts Bosch Smart Thermostats at Risk of Compromise
    Jan 12, 2024 · Bitdefender researchers revealed the vulnerability allows an attacker to send commands to the thermostat and replace its firmware.Missing: Nest | Show results with:Nest
  140. [140]
    [PDF] Smart Nest Thermostat: A Smart Spy in Your Home - Black Hat
    We will demonstrate that attackers who understand the hardware can change the boot process of the device in order to upload malicious firmware, effectively ...
  141. [141]
    Nest Security Bulletin—September 2023 - Google Help
    Sep 5, 2023 · This Nest Security Bulletin contains details of security vulnerabilities that previously affected Google Nest's connected home devices.
  142. [142]
    [PDF] Penetration testing of current smart thermostats - DiVA portal
    Dec 4, 2023 · Findings reveal four unknown vulnerabilities in the Meross Smart. Thermostat and two in the Shelly TRV. These vulnerabilities consist of.<|separator|>
  143. [143]
    [DOC] SmartThermostatSecurityBlurb05...
    Several users have reported that their systems were remotely hacked, resulting in smart thermostats that were turned up to dangerously high levels , home ...
  144. [144]
    CISA flags hardware vulnerabilities in Honeywell, Medtronic ...
    CISA flags hardware vulnerabilities in Honeywell, Medtronic, Mitsubishi, LG, Network Thermostat devices. July 25, 2025. CISA Advisory Medtronic.<|control11|><|separator|>
  145. [145]
    Ecobee Smart Thermostat Premium | Privacy & security guide
    Manages vulnerabilities​​ Ecobee runs a bug bounty program, which means that anyone who finds a security issue and discloses it responsibly may get paid.
  146. [146]
    Smart Thermostats and Your Privacy: Here's What Data They're ...
    Aug 5, 2025 · Ecobee does have a fairly strong privacy background, notably for refusing Amazon requests to collect and send constant customer data via its ...
  147. [147]
    The Privacy Risks of Your Smart Thermostat - VPNOverview.com
    One of the biggest risks of smart devices, such as your thermostat, is the use of weak passwords, re-using compromised passwords, or using the default username ...Your Smart Thermostat Knows... · The Best Smart Thermostats...
  148. [148]
    Privacy Statement for Nest Products and Services
    Any Nest data that you choose to share with a third party is governed by that third party's privacy policy while in that party's possession. Any data that Nest ...
  149. [149]
  150. [150]
  151. [151]
    Is there such a thing as a smart thermostat that is private? : r/privacy
    Jul 10, 2021 · The problem boils down to finding a thermostat that you can control over your local network, even when it is blocked from accessing the ...Smart Thermostats and Privacy : r/homeautomation - RedditA utility company locked thousands of customers out of their smart ...More results from www.reddit.comMissing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  152. [152]
    Homeowners are clueless about how smart devices collect their data
    Jan 17, 2025 · Homeowners are increasingly concerned about data privacy in smart home products but remain generally comfortable using new technology.
  153. [153]
    Keeping devices and software up to date - NCSC.GOV.UK
    Patches matter because they fix known flaws in products that attackers can use to compromise your devices. New security features make it harder for attackers ...Missing: smart | Show results with:smart
  154. [154]
    How Regular IoT Firmware Updates Can Prevent Security Breaches
    Jul 31, 2024 · Improved intrusion detection capabilities, multi-factor authentication, and secure boot protocols are some of the modern security features that ...
  155. [155]
    8 Ways to Protect Your Smart Home From Hackers - PCMag
    Oct 25, 2024 · 1. Consider What You Actually Need · 2. Secure Your Wi-Fi Network · 3. Update Firmware · 4. Replace Outdated Routers · 5. Manage Your Account ...
  156. [156]
    Five Tips to Protect Your Smart Home - NETGEAR Blog
    1. Change Default Credentials during setupThe first step is to change any default usernames and passwords. · 2. Regularly update device · 3. Secure your Wi-Fi · 4.
  157. [157]
    Securing Your Smart Home: Step-by-Step Network Segmentation
    Mar 28, 2025 · Restrict security device VLANs from communicating with any other network. Note that these rules can and should change and adapt to each use ...
  158. [158]
    Network Segmentation Security with the Implementation of Threats
    Jul 11, 2025 · Network segmentation proves to be an effective method for enhancing security by preventing the detection and spreading of threats across virtual ...
  159. [159]
    Strategies For Securing Internet Of Things (IoT) Devices - Brandefense
    Jul 10, 2024 · Use network segmentation and virtual local area networks (VLANs) to isolate IoT devices and minimize risk. Implementing network segmentation ...
  160. [160]
    WPA3 explained: what it is and how it improves Wi-Fi security
    Developed by the Wi-Fi Alliance, WPA3 improves encryption and protects against password-cracking attacks. It has also been designed to improve security on both ...
  161. [161]
    What is WPA3 vs. WPA2? - Portnox
    WPA3 uses stronger encryption and individualized data encryption, while WPA2 uses PSK and shared keys. WPA3 also has better public network security.
  162. [162]
    What is WPA3? Explore WPA3 Devices | TP-Link Chile
    WPA3 is a security standard for closed Wi-Fi networks, introduced in 2018, that improves cybersecurity with more secure encryption and protection against brute ...
  163. [163]
    What Is Home Assistant? And Why Isn't Everyone Using It?
    Jun 5, 2024 · Managing everything locally reduces the risk of data breaches (like if a cloud provider gets hacked), and protects you from unauthorized access ...
  164. [164]
    Secure Your Home Network With Zero Trust Security Best Practices
    Mar 6, 2025 · This article explores how the Zero Trust security model—long a staple of corporate cybersecurity—can be applied to protect personal IoT networks ...
  165. [165]
    Zero Trust Security for Building Automation: What You Need to Know
    Mar 14, 2023 · What is Zero Trust Security? Zero trust security is a security model that assumes all network traffic is untrusted, regardless of whether it ...Missing: thermostats | Show results with:thermostats
  166. [166]
    7 Tips to Keep Your Smart Home Safer and More Private, From a ...
    Apr 2, 2025 · You can take simple steps to make your smart home safer, such as never reusing your password and setting up two-factor authentication.
  167. [167]
    Top smart thermostat brands in US Market include Google Nest ...
    Aug 13, 2025 · Parks Associates' latest market assessment, Smart Thermostat Market Assessment 2025, forecasts that smart thermostat sales will grow over ...
  168. [168]
  169. [169]
    NEST LABS, INC. Inventions, Patents and Patent Applications
    Abstract: A thermostat is described that includes a rechargeable battery, a graphical user interface and a wireless network communication capabilities. During ...Missing: ML | Show results with:ML
  170. [170]
    Google persuades US appeals court to overturn $20 mln Nest patent ...
    May 22, 2025 · Google (GOOGL.O) on Wednesday convinced a US appeals court to overturn its $20 million trial loss to energy-management company EcoFactor in a patent lawsuit.
  171. [171]
    Top 10 Smart Thermostat Companies in the United States
    Top 10 Smart Thermostat Companies in the United States ; 1. Nest (Google) ; 2. Ecobee ; 3. Honeywell Home (Resideo) ; 4. Emerson Sensi ; 5. Lennox iComfort ...<|separator|>
  172. [172]
  173. [173]
    Sensi™ Brand | Emerson US
    Our expanded line of Sensi™ smart thermostats feature easy installation, a top-rated mobile app and unmatched data privacy, empowering you to take control of ...
  174. [174]
    Sinopé Technologies launches new range of smart thermostats for ...
    As soon as their compatibility is officially announced in 2025, Sinopé HVAC thermostats connected to Hydro-Québec's Hilo app will entitle users ...
  175. [175]
  176. [176]
  177. [177]
    Smart Thermostat Market Size, Share, Trends and Growth Analysis ...
    The global smart thermostat market was valued at USD 5.2 billion in 2025 and is estimated to reach USD 11.5 billion by 2040, registering a CAGR of 17.1% ...Market Dynamics · Driver: Escalated Demand For... · Opportunity Rising Demand...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  178. [178]
    The Smart Thermostat Sector Heats Up With 67.2 Million Devices ...
    Jul 2, 2024 · The Smart Thermostat Sector Heats Up With 67.2 Million Devices Shipped by 2030 ... global technology intelligence firm ABI Research, smart ...
  179. [179]
    Smart & Connected Thermostats in the US - The Freedonia Group
    Smart thermostats will retain a more than 70% share of the market over lower-tech connected types in 2022 based on their: declining prices; superior performance ...Missing: falling | Show results with:falling
  180. [180]
    U.S. Connected Thermostat Market | Industry Report, 2033
    The U.S. connected thermostat market size was estimated at USD 647.3 million in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 2,186.5 million by 2033, growing at a CAGR ...
  181. [181]
    TOP 20 SMART THERMOSTAT MARKETING STATISTICS 2025
    Sep 27, 2025 · In 2024, the smart thermostat market stood at USD 5.04 billion and is projected to hit USD 27.61 billion by 2034. This projection indicates a ...
  182. [182]
    Multiple Barriers Can Hinder Rural Broadband Deployment
    Research indicates that people living in rural areas struggle to obtain broadband connections mainly because of the low density of housing.
  183. [183]
    Simplifying Smart Homes: Learn How Matter, Thread and Wi-Fi are ...
    May 21, 2025 · Matter addresses this fragmentation challenge in smart homes with its industry-standard framework, promoting seamless interconnectivity, reliability and ...
  184. [184]
    [PDF] Thermostat Control for Load Shedding in Large Offices - Publications
    ENERGY STAR® smart thermostats save 8% of heating and cooling bills on average, accounting for both energy usage costs and demand charges [22], [23]. And ...
  185. [185]
    Residential Buildings Factsheet | Center for Sustainable Systems
    In 2024, the residential sector used 18.4 quads of energy, 19.6% of U.S. primary energy consumption. Heating and cooling account for 45% of the total energy ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  186. [186]
    Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions of a traditional and ...
    Apr 1, 2024 · Life cycle energy and GHG emissions of traditional and smart HVAC control systems are quantified. •. Energy for the production and operation the ...
  187. [187]
    Sustainability impact assessment of an intelligent control system for ...
    This assumes the payback period equals the expected lifetime of 9.5 years. Even though from an environmental perspective the use of smart thermostats will ...Missing: CO2 | Show results with:CO2
  188. [188]
    Conditions for a cost-effective application of smart thermostat ...
    Mar 15, 2020 · By exploring the sensitivity of CO2 mitigation costs and payback times with respect to specific heating energy consumption, the scope of the ...
  189. [189]
    Understanding patterns of thermostat overrides after demand ...
    Sep 15, 2022 · In this paper, we analysed patterns of thermostat settings before, during and after demand-response events (DREs), with a particular focus on the behaviour of ...
  190. [190]
    Influence of Rebound Effect on Energy Saving in Smart Homes
    The rebound effect refers to the increase in energy use resulting from reduced energy costs and improved energy efficiency. This study proves that the ...
  191. [191]
    ENERGY STAR® Certified Smart Thermostats - PPL Electric Utilities
    Rebate Eligibility · Must be ENERGY STAR certified. · Self or contractor installed - $50 rebate. · PPL Trade Ally installed - $100 rebate.
  192. [192]
    ENERGY STAR® Smart Thermostat Rebates
    $$50 smart thermostat rebates help you save · Why choose an ENERGY STAR® certified smart thermostat? · Apply for your rebate today.
  193. [193]
    Smart Thermostats | Focus on Energy
    Qualified smart thermostats can be purchased from any retailer and are eligible for a $50 rebate. Use either of the applications below to apply for your rebate.
  194. [194]
    Home Upgrades | Department of Energy
    Amount: This tax credit is valued at 30% of the cost paid by the consumer, up to $600. May be eligible for a Home Efficiency Rebate, which provides up to $8,000 ...
  195. [195]
    Discriminatory subsidies for energy-efficient technologies and the ...
    Our results show that eligible households are more likely to adopt a smart thermostat, regardless of whether the subsidy is uniform or discriminatory. By ...
  196. [196]
    Coordinating DOE Home Energy Rebates with Energy-Efficient ...
    Jul 19, 2024 · [13] The smart thermostat is not eligible for a 25C tax credit. [14] States and territories are responsible for determining the best way to ...
  197. [197]
    Energy Efficiency Directive
    Under the amending directive, EU countries were set a target of achieving new final energy consumption savings of 0.8% each year for the 2021-2030 period, ...Missing: thermostats | Show results with:thermostats
  198. [198]
    Joint Statement between the United States and the European ...
    Mar 25, 2022 · Partnering on technologies and energy efficiency solutions such as ramping up demand response devices (such as smart thermostats) and heat pump ...
  199. [199]
    Towards effective implementation of the energy efficiency first principle
    The energy efficiency first (EE1st) principle, embedded in the European Union's (EU) recast Energy Efficiency Directive, aims to prioritise cost-effective ...