Standard works
The Standard Works of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are the four volumes of scripture officially canonized as the church's foundational texts: the Holy Bible (King James Version), the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants, and the Pearl of Great Price.[1][2] These works collectively serve as the ultimate standard for doctrinal authority within the church, superseding individual prophetic statements unless they align with their teachings.[3] The Holy Bible provides the ancient Judeo-Christian foundation, accepted with the caveat that it is accurate "as far as it is translated correctly."[4] The Book of Mormon, purportedly translated by founder Joseph Smith from golden plates containing records of ancient American prophets, is presented as "another testament of Jesus Christ" detailing migrations from Jerusalem around 600 BCE and subsequent civilizations.[5] The Doctrine and Covenants compiles revelations received primarily by Smith and later leaders, outlining church organization and practices. The Pearl of Great Price includes extracts from the Book of Moses (visions revealed to Smith), the Book of Abraham (translated from Egyptian papyri Smith acquired), and historical writings like the Joseph Smith—History.[6] A defining characteristic of the Standard Works is their status as an open canon, allowing for potential future additions via revelation, though none have been canonized since 1880.[3] However, the uniquely Latter-day Saint portions—the Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants revelations, and Book of Abraham—rest on claims of divine translation and revelation that lack empirical corroboration from archaeology, linguistics, genetics, or historical records. For instance, no archaeological evidence supports the Book of Mormon's descriptions of advanced Nephite and Lamanite societies with metallurgy, wheeled chariots, and millions in battle, nor do genetic studies link pre-Columbian American populations to ancient Israelites.[7] Similarly, Egyptological analysis of the surviving Abraham papyri identifies them as conventional Greco-Roman era funerary documents unrelated to Abraham, with Smith's published translations and facsimile interpretations diverging entirely from the hieroglyphic content as deciphered by non-LDS scholars.[8] These discrepancies have fueled ongoing controversies, prompting the church to invoke theories of lost originals or revelatory processes independent of source texts, while mainstream scholarship views them as 19th-century productions.[9]Overview and Role
Definition and Canonical Status
The Standard Works of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints comprise four volumes of scripture officially accepted as authoritative: the Holy Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants, and the Pearl of Great Price.[1] These texts form the foundational canon for doctrine, teaching, and governance within the Church, serving as the measure against which all other revelations and teachings are evaluated.[10] Church members regard them as the word of God, revealed through prophets, with the Bible providing ancient scripture and the other three constituting modern revelations primarily received via Joseph Smith during the early 19th century.[2] Canonization in the Church occurs through a process of divine revelation followed by ratification by common consent of the membership, typically at general conferences.[11] For instance, the Book of Mormon was presented to the Church in 1830 and sustained as scripture, while sections of the Doctrine and Covenants were added progressively through 1844 and beyond, with the Pearl of Great Price canonized in 1880.[12] Unlike closed canons in many Christian traditions, the LDS canon remains open, allowing for potential future additions if sustained by the Church president and members as further revelation from God.[10] This status underscores the Church's belief in continuing prophetic guidance, though no additions have occurred since the 19th century.[13]Theological Significance in the Restoration
In Latter-day Saint theology, the standard works underpin the Restoration by providing scriptural authentication of Joseph Smith's prophetic role and the reinstitution of apostolic authority and doctrines following a claimed apostasy. The Book of Mormon, translated by Smith from gold plates delivered by the angel Moroni between 1827 and April 1829, and published on March 26, 1830, functions as empirical evidence of divine intervention in the Restoration process, containing prophecies, Christ's American ministry, and teachings on covenants that purportedly restore "plain and precious" truths absent from the Bible. Smith declared it "the keystone of our religion," meaning its authenticity validates his seership and the church's foundational claims: a true book confirms a true prophet and a true Restoration, while falsity undermines them.[14][15][5] The Doctrine and Covenants, a compilation of 138 revelations primarily to Smith from 1823 to 1844 and later presidents, codifies the Restoration's causal mechanisms, including priesthood keys: the Aaronic Priesthood conferred on May 15, 1829, by John the Baptist, and the Melchizedek Priesthood shortly thereafter by Peter, James, and John. These texts outline church governance, temple ordinances, and eschatological fulfillments of Old Testament prophecies like Malachi 4:5–6 (Elijah's return on April 3, 1836), emphasizing ongoing revelation as essential to counter doctrinal corruption and enable salvation's ordinances.[16] The Pearl of Great Price, accepted as canon in 1880, supplements through Smith's 1830 visions and translations, such as the Book of Moses, which elaborates Genesis with restored accounts of creation, the Fall, and premortal councils, addressing perceived biblical lacunae. Collectively, the standard works—harmonized with the King James Bible as "the word of God... as far as it is translated correctly"—theologically signify the Restoration's completeness, restoring the "fulness of the gospel" via cumulative witnesses that prioritize empirical prophetic fruits over isolated traditions.[6][16]Historical Development
Origins During Joseph Smith's Ministry
The foundational text of the Latter-day Saint standard works emerged with the Book of Mormon, which Joseph Smith reported translating from ancient gold plates obtained from the angel Moroni between 1827 and 1829. The translation process involved Smith dictating text to scribes using seer stones, with significant work occurring in 1829 after the loss of an initial 116 pages in 1828. The first edition, comprising 592 pages, was printed by Egbert B. Grandin in Palmyra, New York, and made available in March 1830, coinciding with the formal organization of the Church of Christ on April 6, 1830.[17][18] Parallel to this, Smith received and recorded revelations starting in the late 1820s, but the bulk during the early 1830s addressed church organization, doctrine, and governance. These were initially shared orally or in letters before systematic recording in revelation books. A conference in late 1831 authorized their compilation and publication to counter misrepresentations and provide doctrinal guidance, leading to the Book of Commandments in 1833. This volume included 65 chapters of selected revelations, primarily from 1830 onward, compiled by Smith, Oliver Cowdery, Sidney Rigdon, Frederick G. Williams, and William W. Phelps, though printing was disrupted by a mob attack in July 1833, resulting in only about 100 copies completed.[19][20][21] The Bible, specifically the King James Version, was accepted as scripture from the church's inception in 1830, with Smith emphasizing its value while noting potential errors from transmission. In June 1830, shortly after the Book of Mormon's publication, Smith began revising it, producing the Joseph Smith Translation through study and revelation. This effort yielded expansions like the book of Moses (Genesis 1–6) and clarifications elsewhere, with initial work on Genesis continuing into 1831 before pauses for other duties; the bulk was completed by July 1833. These revisions, though not fully published during Smith's lifetime, originated key textual expansions integrated into later standard works.[22][23] Early writings, including accounts of visions and histories, also laid groundwork for the Pearl of Great Price. For instance, Smith's 1832 history and 1838 expansion of his First Vision narrative were recorded during his ministry, though canonized posthumously. Revelations and translations during this period—spanning Smith's leadership until his death in 1844—formed the core of the standard works, distinguishing the movement by adding modern scriptures to the Bible.[24]Process of Addition, Alteration, and Canonization
The standard works of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints initially emerged through revelations received by Joseph Smith, beginning with the Book of Mormon published in March 1830 as a companion to the Bible.[25] Revelations were recorded in manuscript books and compiled into the Book of Commandments in 1833, containing 65 sections, though this edition faced destruction during mob violence in Missouri.[26] By 1835, an expanded Doctrine and Covenants replaced it, incorporating 102 sections plus seven "Lectures on Faith," with additions including new revelations and modifications for clarity, such as expansions in wording to resolve ambiguities from oral transcription.[27] These changes, numbering in the hundreds between editions, addressed scribal errors, grammatical issues, and contextual expansions without altering core doctrines, according to church historians.[28] The Pearl of Great Price originated from selections of Joseph Smith's writings, including extracts from his Bible translation, the Book of Abraham from Egyptian papyri acquired in 1835, and Articles of Faith drafted in 1842.[29] Franklin D. Richards compiled and published an initial version in 1851 in Liverpool, England, drawing from Times and Seasons excerpts and other sources; it gained wider use among missionaries but was not immediately formalized.[30] Alterations occurred in subsequent printings, such as the 1878 edition under Orson Pratt, which standardized formatting and added Joseph Smith—History from his 1838-1856 manuscript history.[31] Formal canonization of all four standard works—the Bible (King James Version), Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and Pearl of Great Price—occurred on October 10, 1880, during the church's semiannual general conference in Salt Lake City.[10] Orson Pratt proposed the motion, endorsed by church president John Taylor and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles unanimously, followed by sustaining vote via common consent of the membership present, marking the transition from functional to official canon.[13] This process required prophetic presentation, apostolic unanimity, and congregational affirmation, as outlined in Doctrine and Covenants sections 26 and 28.[32] Post-canonization alterations remained limited; for instance, the Book of Mormon saw about 4,000 changes across editions from 1830 to 1981, primarily orthographic and punctuation fixes, with doctrinal shifts like "white and delightsome" to "pure and delightsome" in 2 Nephi 30:6 justified as restoring intended meaning from Smith's original dictation.[33] The Lectures on Faith were removed from Doctrine and Covenants in 1921 for lacking direct revelatory origin, reflecting ongoing editorial refinement without new canonical additions since 1880.[26]The Bible
Preference for King James Version and Literalism
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints designates the King James Version (KJV) as its official English-language Bible, a policy established due to its prevalence during Joseph Smith's ministry in the early 19th century.[4] Joseph Smith, who received revelations forming the basis of Latter-day Saint doctrine between 1820 and 1844, relied on the KJV for scriptural study, citation in revelations, and his inspired revision known as the Joseph Smith Translation (JST), completed primarily between 1830 and 1833.[34] This version's Elizabethan English also permeates phrasing in the Book of Mormon, translated by Smith in 1829, reflecting its cultural dominance in American Protestantism at the time, where it accounted for over 80% of English Bibles in circulation by 1800.[35] The preference persists for reasons of historical continuity, liturgical familiarity, and perceived fidelity to original texts, despite the KJV's reliance on the Textus Receptus for the New Testament and Masoretic Text for the Old, which include later manuscript variants unknown in Smith's era.[36] Church leaders, including the First Presidency, have endorsed the KJV in official editions since 1879, incorporating cross-references to other standard works and JST excerpts in footnotes rather than supplanting the base text, as the JST remains non-canonical for public use per a 1867 revelation to Brigham Young.[37] While members may consult modern translations privately, public worship, seminary curricula, and temple recommend interviews reference the KJV exclusively in English, ensuring doctrinal uniformity across the church's 17 million members as of 2023.[4] Complementing this textual choice is an emphasis on literal interpretation of the Bible, treating its narratives as historical events corroborated by latter-day revelation rather than mere allegory.[38] Core doctrines, such as the literal creation of Adam and Eve as the first humans around 4000 BCE, the global Noachian flood circa 2348 BCE, and Christ's physical resurrection in approximately 33 CE, are affirmed as factual in official teachings, with Ninth Article of Faith stating belief in the Bible "as far as it is translated correctly" to resolve apparent contradictions via empirical and revelatory lenses.[39] This approach contrasts with higher-critical methods in academia, which often date Genesis to post-exilic periods (circa 500 BCE) and view miracles as mythological; Latter-day Saints prioritize first-hand prophetic accounts and archaeological alignments, such as Nahom inscriptions potentially corroborating Book of Mormon geography, over secular timelines that assume uniformitarian geology without catastrophic interventions.[40] Literalism extends to soteriological claims, interpreting passages like John 3:5 on baptismal regeneration and Hebrews 6:1 on foundational ordinances as prescribing actual ordinances rather than symbolic rites, integrated with Doctrine and Covenants revelations received by Smith between 1830 and 1844.[38] However, where translation errors or plainness obscure meaning—as in Isaiah's dual prophecies fulfilled in both ancient Israel and latter-day restoration—supplementary scriptures clarify without allegorizing away historicity, maintaining causal chains from divine acts to observable outcomes like the church's organizational structure outlined in biblical epistles.[41] This hermeneutic, articulated in Joseph Smith's 1842 Wentworth Letter, rejects uninspired creeds that spiritualize physical promises, such as literal gathering of Israel evidenced by the church's missionary efforts yielding over 300,000 converts annually by 2020.[36]Status of the Apocrypha
The Apocrypha refers to a collection of ancient Jewish writings, including books such as Tobit, Judith, Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach, Baruch, and 1 and 2 Maccabees, positioned between the Old and New Testaments in some Bible editions like the original 1611 King James Version.[42] In the canon of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, these books hold no authoritative status as scripture and are excluded from the Standard Works, which comprise the King James Version of the Bible (without the Apocrypha), the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants, and the Pearl of Great Price.[12] During Joseph Smith's Bible translation project in 1833, he inquired about the Apocrypha's value, prompting a revelation recorded as Doctrine and Covenants 91 on March 9, 1833. The revelation states that the Apocrypha is "mostly translated correctly" but includes "many interpolations by the hands of men that are not true," advising against a full translation since its truths align with known scriptures.[43][44] Church doctrine permits study of the Apocrypha for potential benefit, but only for those "enlightened by the influence of the Holy Spirit," who may discern its valid elements from errors.[43] This approach underscores a principle of verifying extra-canonical texts against modern revelation and the Spirit, rather than granting them independent doctrinal weight. Official editions of the LDS Bible, such as those used in the quadruple combination, omit the Apocrypha entirely.[45]Joseph Smith Translation and Its Limited Use
The Joseph Smith Translation (JST) refers to the revisions and expansions Joseph Smith made to the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible, beginning in June 1830 shortly after the Book of Mormon's publication, prompted by interpretive disagreements between Smith and Oliver Cowdery on biblical passages during their scriptural study.[46] Smith described the effort as divinely directed to restore plain and precious truths lost through transmission errors or intentional alterations since the original writings.[47] Unlike conventional translations relying on Hebrew, Greek, or Aramaic manuscripts and lexicons, Smith's process involved direct revelation, with him dictating changes to scribes such as Sidney Rigdon and later Oliver Cowdery, focusing on clarification rather than a complete re-translation from ancient languages.[45] Intensive work occurred primarily from June 1830 to July 1833 in Kirtland, Ohio, covering the Old Testament up to part of Genesis and the New Testament, with sporadic additions until Smith's death in June 1844; the project encompassed alterations to approximately 3,400 verses, including insertions of new material totaling over 400 verses.[46][48] In the theology of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the JST holds inspired status as a tool for doctrinal elucidation and harmonization with latter-day revelations, yet it lacks canonical equivalence to the KJV, which remains the church's official English Bible as affirmed in its Articles of Faith.[47] Smith himself indicated the revisions were for his personal and instructional benefit, not immediate public supplantation of the KJV, and he never authorized its full publication as a standalone Bible during his lifetime.[45] Posthumously, church leaders, including Brigham Young, viewed it as valuable but incomplete, with Young reportedly stating in 1867 that it should not displace the KJV due to its unfinished state and Smith's directive against it.[49] The JST's limited use manifests in its non-primary role during worship services, where the KJV is read aloud in sermons, sacraments, and ordinances, reflecting a preference for textual stability and familiarity among members.[50] Selected excerpts appear as footnotes or appendices in the church's 1979 edition of the KJV to provide interpretive aids, such as expansions in Genesis or Matthew, but these constitute only about 1% of the biblical text and are not treated as authoritative over the KJV baseline.[49] Portions like Joseph Smith—Matthew (an expanded version of Matthew 24) and revisions in Genesis used for the Book of Moses have been canonized separately in the Pearl of Great Price since 1880, integrating JST insights into standard works without elevating the full manuscript.[51] This restrained incorporation stems from pragmatic considerations, including the JST's reliance on the KJV's archaic language (which Smith retained for continuity), evidentiary critiques questioning its alignment with ancient manuscripts, and church policy prioritizing the KJV's widespread acceptance and Article of Faith 8's endorsement of it "as far as it is translated correctly." Full JST texts are available for scholarly study via church publications or the Community of Christ (formerly RLDS), which treats it more prominently as scripture, but LDS usage remains supplementary to avoid doctrinal fragmentation.[52]The Book of Mormon
Translation Process and Initial Publication
Joseph Smith began translating the Book of Mormon in 1828 with Martin Harris as scribe, covering the first portion known as the Book of Lehi, but the work halted after Harris lost the 116-page manuscript entrusted to him.[53] Resuming in April 1829, Smith primarily used Oliver Cowdery as his scribe, dictating the text over approximately 60 to 65 working days between April 7 and late June 1829, producing around 269,000 words without apparent reference to manuscripts or books during the process.[54] [55] Smith described receiving the translation by divine means, initially employing "spectacles" called the Urim and Thummim attached to the plates, but later relying on a seer stone placed in a hat to block ambient light, through which he claimed to view the English words to dictate verbatim to the scribe.[25] Eyewitness accounts from associates, including Cowdery, Emma Smith, and David Whitmer, corroborate that Smith dictated fluently with his face in the hat, often without the plates uncovered or present, and corrected scribal errors only after the scribe read back the text.[56] Other scribes involved included Emma Smith, Christian Whitmer, Jacob Whitmer, Peter Whitmer Jr., John Whitmer, and Hiram Page, with at least a dozen individuals observing portions of the dictation.[57] These accounts, drawn from contemporary and near-contemporary affidavits by participants, emphasize the oral nature of the process but derive largely from Smith's associates, whose testimonies align with religious convictions rather than independent verification.[56] The completed original manuscript served as the basis for a printer's copy, which was hand-copied by Oliver Cowdery and others to protect the original during printing.[58] In June 1829, Smith contracted with printer Egbert B. Grandin in Palmyra, New York, who published the title page in the Wayne Sentinel newspaper on June 26, 1829, to gauge interest and secure funding via Martin Harris's mortgage on his farm.[59] Printing commenced in August 1829 using type set by hand from the printer's manuscript, facing delays from local opposition and financial strains, with the 592-page first edition—bound in brown calfskin—completed and available for sale by March 26, 1830, in an initial print run of 5,000 copies.[18] [60] This timing preceded the formal organization of the Church of Christ on April 6, 1830, by days.[60]Core Content and Narrative Claims
The Book of Mormon presents itself as an abridged compilation of sacred records kept by ancient inhabitants of the Americas, primarily drawn from the "large plates of Nephi" (covering history, wars, and kings) and the "small plates of Nephi" (focusing on prophecies and ministry), with Mormon as the principal abridger circa 385 AD and his son Moroni adding final elements before burying the plates around 421 AD.[61] The text spans roughly 600 BC to 421 AD for its main narrative, framed as a testament of Jesus Christ parallel to the Bible, claiming to contain "the fulness of the gospel of Jesus Christ" and prophecies of its own restoration in modern times. It consists of 15 books, including doctrinal sermons, lengthy excerpts from Isaiah, and accounts of migrations, covenants, and cycles of righteousness and apostasy among Israelite-derived peoples.[62] The narrative opens with the Book of Ether, an abridgment of Jaredite records, claiming that during the confusion of languages at the Tower of Babel (circa 2200 BC), the prophet Jared and his brother led a group—preserved from linguistic division through prayer—to the Americas via divinely provided barges across the ocean. This Jaredite civilization flourished with righteous kings like Orihah but repeatedly collapsed into secret combinations, idolatry, and civil wars due to moral decay, culminating in mutual annihilation by 600 BC, with only the prophet Ether surviving as witness; the text attributes their downfall to rejecting prophets and covenants, emphasizing that "inasmuch as ye will not keep my commandments ye shall be cut off from my presence." The core storyline shifts to the Lehite migration in First Nephi, where the prophet Lehi, warned by God of Jerusalem's impending destruction in 600 BC, flees with his family—including sons Laman, Lemuel, Sam, and Nephi—obtaining brass plates containing Jewish scriptures and genealogy from Laban, then sailing to the Americas after Nephi's divinely guided shipbuilding. Upon arrival in the "promised land," familial divisions emerge: the rebellious Laman and Lemuel spawn the Lamanites, cursed with darkened skin for covenant-breaking, while faithful Nephi leads the Nephites, establishing a society with laws, temples, and records. Subsequent books detail cycles of Nephite prosperity under prophets like Jacob and Enos, followed by kings such as Benjamin and Mosiah, who institute reforms like the reign of judges around 92 BC to curb monarchy's corruptions. Central conflicts involve repeated Lamanite wars against Nephites, defended by figures like Captain Moroni, who authors the Title of Liberty rallying covenant-keeping in 72 BC, and Helaman's 2,000 stripling warriors, who prevail through faith despite improbable odds. Internal threats include Gadianton robbers, secret societies promoting plunder and assassination, which infiltrate governments and precipitate societal collapse, as warned by prophets like Nephi (son of Helaman) who foresee Christ's birth, ministry, and death. A pivotal claim occurs in Third Nephi, where massive destructions at Christ's crucifixion in 33 AD—earthquakes, fires, and city burials—decimate both groups, leaving survivors whom the resurrected Jesus visits, organizing his church, quoting Sermon on the Mount elements, and instituting sacraments like baptism and the Lord's Supper. The narrative concludes with Nephite-Lamanite amalgamation into a brief era of unity and miracles post-Christ's visit, but renewed wickedness leads to the Nephites' extermination in the final battle at Cumorah in 385 AD, where Mormon abridges the records amid defeat; Moroni, sole survivor, adds exhortations on faith, repentance, and baptism, sealing the book with a promise that its truthfulness can be spiritually confirmed and prophesying Joseph Smith's role in its 1830 emergence as a sign of the Restoration. Throughout, the text claims these peoples as literal descendants of Abraham, bearing Israelite lineage verified by genealogy, with doctrines underscoring free agency, atonement through Christ's sacrifice, and judgment based on works and grace.Evidentiary Support, Archaeological Critiques, and Defenses
Eleven men testified to witnessing the golden plates from which Joseph Smith claimed to translate the Book of Mormon, divided into the Three Witnesses—who reported a visionary experience mediated by an angel showing the plates, the Urim and Thummim, and other artifacts—and the Eight Witnesses—who stated they physically handled the plates in Joseph Smith's presence near Manchester, New York, in June 1829.[63] Several witnesses later distanced themselves from the Latter-day Saint movement or expressed doubts about Smith's prophethood, yet none publicly recanted their plate testimonies, with figures like Martin Harris and David Whitmer reaffirming them until death despite personal conflicts.[64] Critics contend these accounts rely on subjective spiritual experiences for the Three Witnesses and lack independent corroboration, as the plates were not available for public examination and descriptions varied slightly in weight and appearance.[65] Linguistic analyses by Latter-day Saint scholars identify Hebraic structures like chiasmus and complex place-name etymologies in the text, argued to reflect ancient Near Eastern authorship unlikely for an uneducated 19th-century American like Smith.[66] A potential Old World correlation involves "Nahom," cited in 1 Nephi 16:34 as a burial site for Ishmael during Lehi's journey circa 600 BCE, aligning with altars inscribed "NHM" (a tribal name in South Arabian script) discovered in Yemen's Nihm region, near an ancient frankincense trade route's eastward turn toward the seashore, matching the narrative's southward-then-eastward path.[67] Mainstream archaeologists view this as a phonetic coincidence, noting "NHM" derives from a root unrelated to Hebrew "Nahom" (meaning "to mourn") and predates Lehi by centuries without direct ties to the text's events.[68] Archaeological critiques highlight the absence of corroborating artifacts, inscriptions, or sites for the Book of Mormon's claimed civilizations spanning 600 BCE to 421 CE in the Americas, including no evidence of reformed Egyptian script, a language central to the record's production.[69] Specific anachronisms include references to horses, chariots, steel swords, wheat, silk, and elephants—none archaeologically attested in pre-Columbian Americas during the stated periods, with horse extinction around 10,000 BCE and reintroduction by Europeans in 1493 CE.[66] Massive battles purporting millions of deaths (e.g., Ether 15:2) left no skeletal remains, metallurgical traces, or demographic disruptions matching Mesoamerican or Heartland models, despite extensive excavations yielding sophisticated but unrelated cultures like Maya and Olmec.[70] Genetic studies show Native American mitochondrial DNA traces primarily to Siberian/Asian migrations via Beringia 15,000–20,000 years ago, with negligible pre-Columbian Middle Eastern haplogroups, contradicting claims of Israelite migrants as "principal ancestors" (Introduction, 1981 edition; revised 2007 to "among the ancestors").[71] The Smithsonian Institution and National Geographic Society have stated no Book of Mormon-supporting evidence exists in their records.[72] Defenses from Latter-day Saint researchers propose a limited Mesoamerican geography, arguing Lehite populations were small and intermarried with indigenous groups, diluting detectable DNA signatures per founder effect and genetic drift models.[73] Apologists cite pre-Columbian barley and cement use in Andean sites as resolving some anachronisms, while reinterpreting "horses" as tapirs or deer via loan-shifting and "chariots" as non-wheeled litters.[74] Internal consistencies, such as consistent directional geography and covenantal language patterns, are advanced as evidence of ancient origins, with Nahom and metal-plate precedents in the Near East bolstering plausibility.[75] However, these rely on speculative correlations without peer-reviewed consensus outside faith-affirming circles, and academic anthropology maintains the Book of Mormon's historicity lacks empirical validation akin to the Bible's partial corroborations.[76]The Doctrine and Covenants
Compilation of Revelations to Smith and Successors
The Doctrine and Covenants compiles revelations dictated primarily to Joseph Smith between 1823 and 1844, addressing church organization, doctrine, and practical guidance, with one additional revelation given through his successor Brigham Young in 1846.[77][78] These texts originated as oral dictations in response to specific events, such as organizational needs or doctrinal inquiries, transcribed by scribes like Oliver Cowdery or Sidney Rigdon, and preserved in manuscript revelation books.[79][80] The compilation process involved selecting from these manuscripts, with Joseph Smith personally reviewing and editing texts for publication to ensure clarity and doctrinal consistency.[81] The first published collection appeared as the Book of Commandments in 1833, containing 65 chapters from revelations dated up to September 1831, printed in Independence, Missouri, though a mob destroyed the press after only about 160 copies were bound.[82] In 1834–1835, Smith, Oliver Cowdery, and a committee expanded this effort, incorporating revelations through 1834, reorganizing sections, and adding appendices on church governance; the resulting Doctrine and Covenants (1835 edition) featured 102 numbered sections plus Lectures on Faith.[28] Textual adjustments during this compilation included grammatical standardization, spelling corrections, and expansions for doctrinal precision—such as altering phrasing in Section 5 from emphasizing a single seer to broader prophetic access—totaling thousands of variants across sections, though manuscript comparisons confirm the substantive content derived from original dictations.[81][83] Posthumous editions continued the compilation under Smith's successors. The 1844 Nauvoo edition added sections up to Smith's final revelations, while the 1876 edition, supervised by Brigham Young, incorporated visions like Section 137 (1836) and removed the Lectures on Faith in 1921 for lacking direct revelatory status.[28][82] Revelations to successors were limited; Brigham Young received guidance in 1846 for the westward exodus, canonized as Section 136 in 1879, addressing pioneer organization and covenant-keeping amid the Mormon Battalion's formation and Winter Quarters hardships.[84][85] No further prophetic revelations from Young's era or immediate successors were added to the sectional core, reflecting a practice of restraint until Official Declaration 1 (1890), a manifesto by Wilford Woodruff ending plural marriage, and Official Declaration 2 (1978) extending priesthood to all worthy males, appended as authoritative but not sequentially numbered.[77] The modern 2013 edition retains 138 sections, prioritizing fidelity to earliest obtainable texts via projects like the Joseph Smith Papers.[78]Key Sections on Church Organization and Doctrine
Section 20, received through Joseph Smith in April 1830 at Fayette, New York, establishes the foundational articles and covenants governing the Church's organization and operations. It delineates the duties of officers, including elders who baptize, confirm, ordain, and exhort; priests who preach, teach, baptize, administer the sacrament, and visit members; teachers who watch over the flock and assist the bishop; and deacons who assist teachers and warn members.[86] The section mandates a church meeting every first Sunday of the month for the sacrament and specifies doctrinal requirements such as baptism by immersion for those accountable and at least eight years old, emphasizing faith, repentance, and confirmation by the laying on of hands.[86] It also requires tithing and outlines procedures for excommunication by majority vote of the congregation or council.[86] Section 21, dated April 6, 1830, designates Joseph Smith as the seer, translator, prophet, apostle of Jesus Christ, and elder of the Church, instructing members to heed his words as if from God's own mouth, with the promise of divine confirmation through the Holy Ghost. This revelation establishes the principle of continuing revelation through designated prophets, central to the Church's doctrinal framework for leadership and decision-making. Section 84, received September 22–23, 1832, at Kirtland, Ohio, expounds the oath and covenant of the priesthood, describing the Melchizedek Priesthood as holding the power of the Son of God, including keys to ordinances from Enoch to Moses and the apostles.[87] It traces priesthood lineage from Adam through patriarchal figures and emphasizes that priesthood holders receive the Father's fulness upon magnifying their calling, with covenants binding heirs to eternal promises.[87] Doctrinally, it warns of condemnation for treating lightly the children's obligation to receive the law of Moses and underscores the priesthood's role in building the New Jerusalem and administering temple ordinances.[87] Section 107, given in March or April 1835 at Kirtland, Ohio, details the two priesthoods—Melchizedek and Aaronic (including Levitical)—and their quorums' organization for governance.[88] The Melchizedek Priesthood includes the First Presidency presiding over the Twelve Apostles, Seventy, and high priests, with decisions by majority or unanimous vote; the Aaronic Priesthood comprises bishops, priests, teachers, and deacons, with bishops holding keys for temporal matters.[88] It mandates quorums to act in unity, with the Twelve as traveling high council and the Seventy for missionary work under apostolic direction, reinforcing doctrinal principles of priesthood keys, accountability, and collective presidency.[88] These sections collectively provide the scriptural blueprint for the Church's hierarchical structure, priesthood authority, and core doctrines such as revelation, ordinances, and covenantal obligations, evolving from initial 1830 formations to refined 1835 specifications amid practical church growth.[89]Textual Adjustments and Recent Editorial Changes
The revelations comprising the Doctrine and Covenants underwent textual adjustments primarily during the 1830s and 1840s under Joseph Smith's direction, aimed at refining phrasing for clarity, correcting scribal errors from initial recordings, and expanding certain sections to articulate doctrine more precisely. For instance, the 1835 edition incorporated revisions to multiple revelations, such as expansions in what became Section 20 to detail church organization and ordinances beyond the briefer version in the 1833 Book of Commandments.[82][27] These changes, documented in manuscript records, preserved core revelatory content while addressing limitations in early transcription and publication processes.[26] Subsequent editions introduced format-related modifications rather than substantive textual alterations to the revelations themselves. The 1876 edition, edited by Orson Pratt, divided the text into verses for reference and added Section 132 (on eternal marriage), which had been recorded in 1843 but withheld from earlier printings due to persecution risks.[28] The 1921 edition removed the Lectures on Faith as a non-revelatory preface, deeming them theological essays rather than direct divine communication, while adding historical prefaces.[26] Grammatical and punctuation updates continued in later printings to standardize language, but official church analyses maintain these did not alter doctrinal intent, supported by comparisons to original manuscripts in the Joseph Smith Papers.[90][91] Recent editorial changes have focused on ancillary materials like section introductions and footnotes, informed by ongoing historical scholarship. In 2013, updates clarified revelation circumstances and added cross-references, reflecting manuscript evidence without modifying the revelatory text.[90] On October 23, 2025, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints announced adjustments to 25 Doctrine and Covenants section introductions: 15 for factual corrections (e.g., precise dating or recipient details) and 10 for enhanced context, drawn from the Joseph Smith Papers project findings on revelation origins and transmission.[92][93] These revisions, such as amending ambiguous phrasing in Section 42's heading from "as early as 1831" to "earlier" to account for potential prior principles, prioritize empirical alignment with primary documents over prior assumptions.[94]The Pearl of Great Price
Origins from Joseph Smith's Translations and Writings
The contents of the Pearl of Great Price derive primarily from Joseph Smith's claimed translations of biblical texts and Egyptian papyri, as well as excerpts from his personal history and doctrinal summaries, produced between 1830 and 1844. Smith initiated his revision of the King James Bible in June 1830, shortly after organizing the Church of Christ, dictating expansions and insertions through revelation to scribes including Oliver Cowdery; this work yielded material later extracted for the Books of Moses and Joseph Smith–Matthew, though none was published in Smith's lifetime.[95][96] In July 1835, Smith purchased four mummies and accompanying Egyptian papyri rolls from traveling exhibitor Michael Chandler for $2,400, asserting they contained writings of Abraham and Joseph; he produced a translation of portions, including explanations of three facsimiles, which appeared serially in the Times and Seasons from March 1 to May 16, 1842.[97][98] These elements, preserved in manuscripts and periodicals, formed the core of the compilation Franklin D. Richards assembled in 1851 as a missionary aid for British converts, drawing directly from Smith's unpublished and published outputs without alteration at that stage.[29][99] The Book of Moses specifically encompasses Smith's revelatory additions to Genesis 1:1–6:13, completed by early 1831, including visions of pre-mortal existence, Enoch's city of Zion, and Noah's preaching; these were transcribed into the Old Testament Manuscript 1 and later Manuscript 2, reflecting Smith's process of "translating" via inspiration rather than linguistic expertise.[100][101] Joseph Smith–Matthew, meanwhile, revises Matthew 24 with prophecies of the last days, tribulation, and Christ's return, stemming from the same 1830–1833 Bible project and emphasizing signs like wars and earthquakes.[29] Smith's History extract (Joseph Smith–History 1:1–26) originates from his 1838 autobiographical account of the First Vision in 1820 and the angel Moroni's visits starting in 1823, which he drafted amid persecution and completed portions by 1840; an abridged version appeared in the Times and Seasons in 1842 before Richards selected it for the 1851 pamphlet.[29] The Articles of Faith comprise thirteen creedal statements Smith appended to his March 1, 1842, letter to Chicago Democrat editor John Wentworth, outlining beliefs on God, scripture, ordinances, organization, and obedience to law, derived from his synthesized teachings rather than a new revelation.[102] These origins reflect Smith's broader pattern of producing scripture through dictation, seer stones for ancient records, or direct revelation, with no evidence of formal scholarly training in Hebrew, Egyptian, or ancient Near Eastern languages; contemporaries like William W. Phelps assisted in grammar and publication but not core content generation.[98] Manuscripts from the era, such as those in the Joseph Smith Papers project, confirm the texts' attribution to Smith, though their assembly into the Pearl awaited post-martyrdom efforts to standardize church literature amid denominational fragmentation.[29]Specific Books: Moses, Abraham, and Related Texts
The Book of Moses consists of eight chapters extracted from Joseph Smith's "translation" of Genesis 1–6, produced between June 1830 and early 1831 as part of his broader revision of the King James Bible.[95] This text expands biblical narratives with additional material, including Moses' direct vision of God in which he beholds the earth and its inhabitants as part of God's creations across multiple worlds, followed by a confrontation with Satan who claims dominion over the earth but is rebuked.[103] Chapters 2–4 recount the creation of the world and humanity, the placement of Adam and Eve in Eden, their partaking of the forbidden fruit, and expulsion, emphasizing agency, opposition, and the necessity of the Fall for progression.[104] Chapters 5–8 detail the posterity of Adam, the introduction of gospel principles such as faith, repentance, and baptism through prophets like Adam and Enoch, Enoch's ministry including the establishment of Zion—a translated city taken to heaven—and prophecies of Noah's flood amid widespread wickedness.[105] The book introduces concepts like the pre-mortal council and the plan of salvation not explicit in Genesis, presented as restored lost content, though no ancient manuscripts or external corroboration support these expansions beyond Smith's revelations.[106] The Book of Abraham contains five chapters, which Joseph Smith described as his 1835 translation of characters from Egyptian papyri purchased from a traveling exhibitor, with the text first published in installments in the Times and Seasons in 1842.[9] Chapters 1–2 narrate Abraham's life in Ur of the Chaldees, his opposition to idolatrous priests who attempt his sacrifice on an altar, divine deliverance, receipt of priesthood blessings from heavenly messengers, and covenants promising posterity and land, paralleling but expanding Genesis 11–12. Chapter 3 describes Abraham's astronomical vision of Kolob—a star nearest God's throne—and the governing "intelligences" or spirits organized by time reckonings, leading into a pre-mortal council where noble spirits including Jesus are chosen amid a war in heaven against Lucifer.[107] Chapters 4–5 provide a creation account by "the Gods" (plural council) organizing rather than ex nihilo creating, with detailed sequences of earth's formation and life's placement, differing in phrasing and emphasis from Moses' parallel account. These doctrines underpin LDS teachings on pre-existence, priesthood lineage, and cosmology, but the papyri's surviving fragments—identified by Egyptologists as the late hypocephalus and portions of the Book of Breathings, a 2nd-century BCE funerary document for a priest named Hor—bear no relation to Abraham's era (circa 2000 BCE) or the translated content, with hieroglyphic translations yielding ritual spells for the afterlife rather than Abrahamic narrative. Related texts within the Pearl of Great Price, such as the extracts from Smith's Bible revision in Moses, connect thematically to Abraham through shared motifs of ancient patriarchs receiving divine knowledge of creation and premortal origins, though these remain internal to Smith's productions without independent historical or archaeological validation.[106] Scholarly examinations, including textual criticism, indicate the Book of Moses aligns more with 19th-century theological expansions than verifiable ancient restorations, while Abraham's claims face direct refutation from papyrological evidence, prompting LDS interpretations of non-literal "translation" via divine inspiration rather than linguistic decoding.[108][109]Facsimiles and Egyptological Controversies
The Book of Abraham includes three woodcut facsimiles derived from vignettes on the Egyptian papyri obtained by Joseph Smith in 1835, each accompanied by Smith's interpretive explanations purporting to restore corrupted or symbolic elements. Facsimile 1 depicts a figure on a lion-headed couch with bird and human-headed figures attending; Smith described it as Abraham bound on an altar by an idolatrous priest, with the bird representing the angel of the Lord and other elements symbolizing divine intervention. Facsimile 2, a hypocephalus or circular emblem, features Egyptian deities and cosmological motifs; Smith interpreted it as representing Kolob, the planet nearest God's throne, and celestial governances. Facsimile 3 shows an enthroned figure with attendants; Smith identified the central figure as Abraham teaching astronomy to Pharaoh and others, with standing figures as princes of Egypt and a waiting servant. Portions of the papyri were destroyed in the 1871 Great Chicago Fire but fragments were rediscovered in 1967 among Metropolitan Museum of Art holdings and returned to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Non-Latter-day Saint and Latter-day Saint Egyptologists, including Robert K. Ritner of the University of Chicago, have translated the surviving fragments as excerpts from the Book of the Dead and Book of Breathings, standard Late Period (c. 664–332 BC) or Ptolemaic-era (c. 300–100 BC) funerary texts for individuals named Hor and Ta-shenset-neferhotep, focused on afterlife rituals and resurrection, not historical narratives of Abraham from c. 2000 BC.[110][8][111] Specific discrepancies abound: Facsimile 1 originates from the "Breathing Permit of Hôr," illustrating Anubis resurrecting the deceased Hor (depicted as Osiris) on a lion-couch, with Isis and a ba-bird symbolizing the soul, contradicting Smith's altar-sacrifice scene; restorations by Smith, such as adding a priest's elongated arm, deviate from the damaged original without Egyptological warrant. Facsimile 2's hypocephalus invokes Egyptian gods like Ra and Osiris for the owner's eternal life, with no Abrahamic or planetary references matching Smith's cosmology. Facsimile 3 portrays Osiris-Hor enthroned with Anubis and Isis, a common judgment or offering scene, not an astronomical lecture by Abraham. These interpretations align with 19th-century speculative Egyptology but conflict with hieroglyphic and iconographic analyses established since the 19th century, including peer-reviewed editions confirming funerary contexts.[8][111][112] Egyptological consensus holds that the papyri postdate Abraham by over a millennium, contain no direct references to him or his narrative, and bear grammatical, orthographic, and thematic hallmarks of demotic Egyptian ritual texts unrelated to Semitic patriarchs. While Latter-day Saint scholars acknowledge the mismatch between vignettes and Abraham text, defenses invoke a "missing papyrus" hypothesis—positing the Abraham translation derived from lost portions—or a "catalyst" model, where the papyri prompted divine revelation rather than literal translation, akin to Smith's seer stones. Critics, including Ritner, argue these are unsubstantiated ad hoc rationales, as Smith's grammar and alphabet manuscripts link specific characters to Abrahamic content from the extant rolls, and early publications tied the text explicitly to the papyri. Egyptology's empirical methods, grounded in comparative philology and archaeology, yield consistent results across institutions, whereas apologetic theories prioritize theological consistency over direct textual correspondence.[9][8][111]Denominational Variations
Canonicity in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
In The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the scriptural canon comprises the four standard works: the Holy Bible (King James Version), the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants, and the Pearl of Great Price. These texts are officially recognized as the revealed word of God and serve as the primary measure of doctrine and truth within the church.[1][12] Members are instructed to regard the standard works as authoritative, with teachings from church leaders evaluated against them for consistency.[3] Canonization occurs through a process of prophetic revelation followed by ratification via common consent of the church membership, as directed in Doctrine and Covenants 26:2, which states that "the church shall give heed unto all commandments" presented by the presiding authority. The Book of Mormon was published on March 26, 1830, and accepted as scripture shortly thereafter by early church members.[113] The Doctrine and Covenants originated from compilations of revelations, with its first full edition published in 1835 and sustained by vote on August 17, 1835, during a general assembly in Kirtland, Ohio.[113] The Pearl of Great Price, compiled from Joseph Smith's writings and translations, was canonized on October 10, 1880, at the church's October general conference.[114] The Bible, while inherited from broader Christian tradition, is affirmed as scripture "as far as it is translated correctly," with Joseph Smith's inspired revisions noted in footnotes of modern editions.[1] The church maintains an open canon, allowing for potential additions through new revelation sustained by the body of members, a principle rooted in the belief in continuing prophetic guidance.[115] No substantive additions to the standard works have occurred since 1880, though visions and declarations—such as Official Declaration 2 extending priesthood ordination to all worthy males on September 30, 1978—have been appended to the Doctrine and Covenants.[3] This framework emphasizes the standard works as the unchanging foundation, while permitting authoritative interpretation by living prophets, provided alignment with these texts.[10] Church members sustain the canon annually during general conferences and affirm adherence in temple recommend interviews.[1]Differences in Community of Christ and Other Groups
The Community of Christ designates the Bible, Book of Mormon, and Doctrine and Covenants as its scriptural canon, excluding the Pearl of Great Price, which it has never published or canonized.[116][117] Its edition of the Doctrine and Covenants comprises 163 sections, incorporating revelations received by prophet-presidents from Joseph Smith through the 20th century, including Section 163 adopted in 1990, reflecting an open canon amenable to ongoing prophetic guidance.[118][119] This contrasts with the LDS Church's closed set of 138 sections plus two official declarations, which halt after revelations to Joseph Smith and early successors, omitting later Community of Christ additions while including unique content such as visions in Sections 137 and 138.[116] The Community of Christ's Book of Mormon adheres closely to the 1830 printing with minimal textual emendations, differing from the LDS version's thousands of corrections for grammar, clarity, and doctrinal alignment accumulated over editions since 1837.[120] In smaller Latter Day Saint denominations, scriptural canons diverge further from both the LDS Church and Community of Christ models. Fundamentalist groups, such as the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (FLDS), retain the four LDS standard works but emphasize sections endorsing plural marriage (e.g., Doctrine and Covenants 132) and incorporate unpublished revelations from their leaders as supplementary authority, rejecting post-1890 LDS disavowals of polygamy.[120] Conversely, primitivist sects like the Church of Christ (Temple Lot) limit canon to the Bible and Book of Mormon, dismissing the Doctrine and Covenants and Pearl of Great Price as non-binding due to disputes over succession after Joseph Smith.[121] The Church of Jesus Christ (Bickertonite), with origins in Sidney Rigdon's faction, accepts the Bible and Book of Mormon alongside an abbreviated Doctrine and Covenants confined to Joseph Smith's lifetime revelations, excluding successor additions.[122] These variations stem from schisms over leadership legitimacy and doctrinal priorities, with many smaller groups prioritizing a restricted canon to preserve early Restorationist purity.[123]Table of Comparative Canonicity Across Sects
| Scripture | The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints | Community of Christ | The Church of Jesus Christ (Bickertonites) | Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (Strangites) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bible | Canonical (King James Version preferred, with Joseph Smith Translation footnotes in some editions)[124] | Canonical (includes Inspired Version/Joseph Smith Translation as approved excerpts) | Canonical (King James Version)[125] | Canonical (as far as translated correctly) |
| Book of Mormon | Canonical | Canonical[126] | Canonical[125] | Canonical |
| Doctrine and Covenants | Canonical (includes revelations to Joseph Smith and successors up to 1981)[127] | Canonical (primarily sections 1–111; later sections viewed as historical or inspirational rather than binding doctrine)[126] | Accepts early revelations from Joseph Smith but not as a formal canonical compilation; emphasizes original Book of Commandments[128] | Accepts early sections but supplements with Strang's revelations; not fully canonical in LDS form |
| Pearl of Great Price | Canonical (includes Book of Moses, Book of Abraham, Joseph Smith—Matthew, Joseph Smith—History, and Articles of Faith)[129] | Not canonical; viewed as non-scriptural writings of Joseph Smith | Not canonical | Not canonical |
| Other Works | Open canon allows for future additions via revelation | Ongoing revelation; includes inspired documents and Section 163 (1990) as doctrinal[126] | No additional canonical works beyond Bible and Book of Mormon; rejects later LDS additions | Book of the Law of the Lord (Strang's revelations and Voree Plates translation) canonical[130] |