Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Supercritical fluid extraction

Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) is a separation technique that employs , primarily (CO₂), as solvents to isolate target compounds from complex matrices such as materials, foods, or environmental samples. It operates by pressurizing and heating the beyond its critical point—31.1°C and 73.8 bar for CO₂—transforming it into a state with gas-like and liquid-like , enabling efficient penetration and selective of solutes. This process typically involves pumping the supercritical through a sample chamber, where it extracts the desired components, followed by decompression in a to recover the extract while the . Developed in the mid-20th century with early commercial applications emerging in the for processes like , SFE gained prominence in the as a green extraction method due to its ability to replace hazardous . The technique's principles rely on tunable properties: increasing enhances and solvating power, while temperature affects diffusivity and volatility, often optimized with co-solvents like for polar compounds. Key advantages include environmental sustainability—using non-toxic, recyclable CO₂ leaves no residues—high selectivity for bioactive molecules such as essential oils, , and pharmaceuticals, and preservation of heat-sensitive compounds through mild operating conditions (typically 40–100°C). SFE finds widespread applications across industries, including for extracting flavors and removing contaminants like or , pharmaceuticals for isolating alkaloids and antioxidants, for natural pigments, and environmental for pollutant remediation from soils. Despite its benefits, challenges such as high initial equipment costs and the need for precise parameter control have limited broader adoption, though ongoing advancements in process intensification continue to enhance its efficiency and scalability.

Introduction and background

Definition and principles

Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) is a separation technique that employs a as a to selectively extract target compounds from a solid or liquid matrix under elevated and conditions. In this process, the supercritical fluid penetrates the matrix, dissolves the solutes based on their in the fluid, and carries them away, after which the extract is recovered by altering the fluid's conditions. The foundational thermodynamic principle of SFE relies on the unique properties of substances in the supercritical state, which occurs when a fluid is maintained above its critical (T_c) and critical (P_c), eliminating the distinction between and gas phases. In this regime, the fluid exhibits liquid-like densities for efficient solvating power while possessing gas-like diffusivities and low viscosities that facilitate rapid and penetration into the sample matrix. These hybrid characteristics enable tunable by adjusting and , allowing precise control over the extraction selectivity without phase transitions. In a typical , the supercritical region is depicted beyond the critical point, where the curve terminates, and the fluid's varies continuously with and rather than abruptly across boundaries. For (CO_2), a commonly used in SFE due to its mild critical parameters, the critical point is at T_c = 31.1^\circ \text{C} and P_c = 73.8 \text{ bar} (7.38 \text{ MPa}). Operating above these values—typically at 40–100^\circ \text{C} and 100–400 —ensures CO_2 remains supercritical while optimizing extraction efficiency. SFE aligns with principles by enabling solvent-free recovery of the extract through simple depressurization, which causes the to revert to its gaseous state and evaporate, leaving no residual in the product. This depressurization step, often combined with mild heating, facilitates quantitative solvent removal and , minimizing environmental impact compared to conventional organic solvent-based extractions.

Historical overview

The concept of supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) originated in the late with the pioneering experiments of James B. Hannay and J. Hogarth, who in 1879 demonstrated the of solid inorganic salts, such as calcium, , and sodium chlorides, in supercritical under high pressure and temperature conditions exceeding the fluid's critical point. Their work, published in the of , marked the first observation of enhanced solvent properties in supercritical fluids, though practical applications remained unexplored for decades due to technological limitations. Advancements accelerated in the mid-20th century, particularly in the 1960s, when Kurt Zosel at the Max Planck Institute for Coal Research investigated supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO₂) for extracting organic compounds from coal, revealing its potential as a selective solvent for non-polar substances. Zosel's initial patent in 1963 described the general process of SFE using scCO₂, laying the groundwork for industrial applications. By the early 1970s, Zosel extended this to food processing, patenting a method for caffeine decaffeination from coffee beans using moist scCO₂, which selectively removed caffeine while preserving flavor compounds; this process received U.S. Patent 3,806,619 in 1974. Commercialization gained momentum in the , as scCO₂ was recognized as generally regarded as safe (GRAS) by the FDA for contact, enabling its approval for extracting food-grade products without residual solvents. The first industrial-scale SFE plant for hops extraction, aimed at isolating bitter acids and essential oils for , became operational in the early , with significant expansion by 1988 through facilities like those operated by Hopunion in the U.S. During the 1990s and 2000s, SFE expanded into pharmaceuticals and natural products extraction, driven by its tunability for isolating bioactive compounds like essential oils, , and from botanicals, with over 100 industrial plants worldwide by the early 2000s focusing on high-value extracts. Recent milestones through 2025 include the integration of computational tools such as (DFT) to predict solute-solvent interactions and optimize extraction yields for bioactives; for instance, 2024-2025 studies on extracts combined SFE with DFT analyses to enhance antioxidant profiling and sustainability.

Scientific principles

Properties of supercritical fluids

Supercritical fluids exhibit unique physical properties that bridge the characteristics of liquids and gases, making them particularly suitable as solvents in processes. Their can be tuned over a wide range, typically from 0.1 to 0.8 g/cm³, approaching liquid-like values while remaining highly responsive to changes in and . This tunability arises from the absence of a distinct liquid-gas boundary above the critical point, allowing continuous adjustment without phase transitions. In contrast, the of supercritical fluids is significantly lower, ranging from 0.005 to 0.01 ·s, which is approximately 10 times lower than that of typical s (0.05–0.1 ·s). Meanwhile, their is intermediate but notably higher than liquids, on the order of 10⁻⁷ m²/s, representing 10–100 times greater mobility compared to liquid solvents (∼10⁻⁹ m²/s). These attributes—liquid-like solvating capacity combined with gas-like transport properties—enhance efficiency during extractions. The solvating power of supercritical fluids is highly tunable through variations in pressure and temperature, which directly influence density and thus solubility. Density (ρ) as a function of pressure (P) and temperature (T) can be modeled using equations of state such as the Peng-Robinson equation, which provides a thermodynamic framework for predicting phase behavior and solubility in the supercritical regime: P = \frac{RT}{V_m - b} - \frac{a \alpha}{(V_m + b)^2 - b(V_m - b)} where V_m is the molar volume, R is the gas constant, and parameters a, b, and \alpha are substance-specific, enabling computation of ρ from P and T. This adjustability allows precise control over solvent strength, often increasing solubility by orders of magnitude with modest pressure changes near the critical point. Common supercritical fluids include (CO₂), which is favored for its non-toxicity, low critical temperature (Tc), and moderate critical pressure (Pc), as well as , , and nitrous oxide (N₂O). These fluids are selected based on their critical parameters, which determine the conditions required to achieve the supercritical state. The table below summarizes key critical parameters for these substances:
FluidTc (°C)Pc (atm)Critical Density (g/cm³)
CO₂31.372.90.47
96.842.40.22
374.2218.30.34
N₂O36.572.50.45
CO₂, in particular, operates under mild conditions ( ≈ 31°C, ≈ 73 ), facilitating energy-efficient processes. Supercritical fluids also demonstrate high near the critical point, enabling rapid adjustments to strength through variations without inducing changes. Their thermal conductivity, typically intermediate between gases (∼0.01–0.1 W/m·) and liquids (∼0.1–1 W/m·), supports efficient in processing equipment, though it varies with density. This is particularly pronounced, often exceeding that of liquids by factors of 10–100 near criticality, further enhancing their versatility as tunable media.

Extraction mechanisms

Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) primarily relies on the of target s in the supercritical fluid, which is governed by the fluid's and its compatibility with the solute. The is driven by the fluid's tunable , which can be adjusted via and to mimic the solvating power of solvents while maintaining gas-like . For non-polar supercritical fluids like CO₂, the (δ) provides a quantitative measure of , where optimal occurs when the δ of the fluid closely matches that of the ; for supercritical CO₂ at typical conditions (e.g., 40°C and 200 ), δ ranges from 3 to 6 (/cm³)^(1/2), enabling efficient solubilization of lipophilic compounds such as essential oils or pesticides. Mass transfer in SFE is facilitated by the enhanced diffusion rates of supercritical fluids compared to liquids, allowing rapid penetration into the sample matrix and solute transport. This process follows Fick's first law of , expressed as the diffusive J = -D \nabla C, where D is the diffusion coefficient (typically 10^{-4} to 10^{-3} cm²/s in supercritical CO₂, orders of magnitude higher than in organic solvents) and \nabla C is the concentration gradient of the . The elevated arises from the low and cluster-free nature of supercritical fluids, promoting faster equilibration and reducing extraction times for embedded analytes in porous matrices like plant materials. Partitioning of the between the solid and the involves desorption from binding sites and subsequent transfer into the bulk fluid phase, often enhanced by matrix swelling that increases . Swelling occurs as the acts as a , disrupting intermolecular forces in the (e.g., lignocellulosic structures in ), which facilitates release; for instance, in samples can amplify this effect by promoting and pore expansion. Additionally, elevated temperatures increase volatility, aiding desorption by lowering energies for release from the , though this must be balanced against potential density reductions in the fluid. To extend SFE to polar analytes, small amounts of polar modifiers (e.g., 5-10% or ) are added to the , increasing its and hydrogen-bonding capacity to improve partitioning and of compounds like or pharmaceuticals.

Advantages

Selectivity and tunability

One of the key advantages of supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) lies in its tunability, achieved by varying and to adjust the and solvating power of the , primarily (CO₂). At supercritical conditions, CO₂ behaves as a non-polar that preferentially dissolves lipophilic compounds, such as oils and , while showing limited affinity for hydrophilic substances like unless modified with co-solvents such as . Increasing , for instance from 100 to 300 bar, significantly enhances fluid , thereby improving the solubility of these lipophilic analytes; a study on demonstrated a 53% yield increase for essential oils under elevated conditions. adjustments further fine-tune this selectivity, as higher values boost but can reduce , allowing operators to target specific compound classes based on their and . This tunability enables fractionated extraction, particularly for essential oils, where pressure variations allow sequential isolation of components with differing molecular weights. In lavender essential oil extraction, low pressures around 90 bar at 40°C favor the recovery of volatile like and , yielding a light fraction rich in these aromatics, while higher pressures up to 300 bar shift selectivity toward heavier waxes and sesquiterpenes. Such stepwise control minimizes the co-extraction of undesired heavier residues, producing purer fractions compared to conventional methods. In comparison to traditional organic solvents like , SFE with CO₂ offers superior selectivity by reducing the co-extraction of impurities, such as polar contaminants or ; for example, it achieves high recovery of from with minimal interference, unlike solvent-based methods that often dissolve a broader range of components. Quantitatively, selectivity in SFE can be assessed using the S = \frac{C_{\text{[fluid](/page/Fluid)}}}{C_{\text{[matrix](/page/Matrix)}}}, representing the between the and the solid , which highlights the 's ability to concentrate analytes while leaving impurities behind. A practical illustration is the of green beans, where supercritical CO₂ selectively targets —a moderately polar —over flavor compounds like chlorogenic acids, achieving up to 90% purity in extracts with only 18-63% overall to preserve taste profiles.

Efficiency and sustainability

Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) demonstrates notable in terms of operational speed, largely attributable to the high of supercritical fluids, which facilitates rapid and penetration into sample matrices. Compared to traditional Soxhlet extraction, which often requires 6 to 48 hours, SFE typically completes in 15 to 60 minutes, achieving rates 10 to 25 times faster. This acceleration stems from the fluid-like and gas-like of supercritical CO₂, enabling shorter cycle times without compromising yield in applications such as isolation. A key aspect of SFE's efficiency lies in its solvent recovery capabilities, particularly with CO₂, which can be recycled at rates of 95% to 99% through depressurization in closed-loop systems, eliminating liquid waste generation. This recyclability contrasts sharply with conventional organic solvent methods that produce substantial requiring disposal or treatment, thereby enhancing overall process throughput and reducing operational downtime. From a sustainability perspective, SFE's closed-loop configurations minimize and carbon emissions relative to traditional extractions involving solvent evaporation and . These systems lower the (E-factor), a of per unit product, to values often below 1 kg per kg product, far superior to the 5 to 50 or higher in solvent-based techniques. Such reductions align SFE with core principles, including prevention (principle 1), safer solvents and auxiliaries (principle 5), (principle 6), catalysis where integrated (principle 9), and inherent product degradability without residues (principle 10).

Limitations

Technical challenges

Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) involves operating under extreme conditions that present significant hurdles, primarily due to the need to maintain fluids like (CO₂) in their supercritical state, where the critical is 31.1°C and critical is 73.8 . These conditions demand robust system design to prevent operational failures, but challenges arise from the fluid's unique properties, such as low viscosity and zero , which complicate containment and flow dynamics. High-pressure requirements, typically ranging from 100 to 400 for effective , pose risks of leaks and failures due to the fluid's ability to infiltrate and the cyclic of materials under repeated pressurization cycles. For instance, supercritical CO₂'s low can lead to sealing issues, potentially causing if fail, while material in high-strength alloys becomes a concern over prolonged operations at pressures up to 550 . These issues are exacerbated by the Joule-Thomson cooling during depressurization, which can embrittle components like , increasing the likelihood of brittle fractures. Temperature control is critical to sustain the supercritical state while avoiding analyte degradation, with CO₂ extractions often conducted at 40–80°C to balance solvent density and diffusivity. However, precise regulation is challenging, as fluctuations can cause phase transitions that disrupt flow or lead to incomplete extraction; for thermally labile compounds, temperatures above 60°C risk degradation, limiting applicability to heat-sensitive biomolecules like antioxidants or pharmaceuticals. Matrix interactions frequently result in , particularly with waxy or polar sample matrices, where extracted or resins precipitate in extraction lines or restrictors due to rapid depressurization. plays a key role in extraction yield, as finer particles enhance by increasing surface area but can promote channeling or blockages in packed beds; for example, in extraction of roselle, particles less than 0.4 mm with fines below 10% were optimal. Polar matrices often exhibit low in non-polar CO₂, necessitating modifiers that can further complicate flow and increase clogging risks. Safety concerns are paramount, with CO₂ posing an asphyxiation hazard as it displaces oxygen and accumulates in low-lying areas due to its higher (1.98 /m³ at ambient conditions). Concentrations as low as 5% by volume can impair breathing, escalating to unconsciousness at 10% within 30 minutes or at 20% in under one minute. Additionally, risks arise from ruptures or the use of flammable supercritical fluids like or modifiers such as , compounded by cooling effects that may embrittle equipment and initiate failures.

Economic and practical constraints

One of the primary barriers to widespread adoption of supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) is the high investment required for pressure-rated capable of operating at elevated pressures (typically 10-40 MPa). For to pilot-scale systems (e.g., 50-100 L capacity), costs typically range from $50,000 to $150,000, while scaling to larger pilot or semi-industrial units (e.g., 500 L) can reach $300,000 to $1,000,000, making initial setup prohibitive for many operations compared to conventional solvent extraction systems, which are significantly less expensive. Operating expenses further compound these challenges, with energy demands typically 1-10 kWh per kg of extract, depending on solvent-to-feed ratios and . This arises from the need to compress and recycle large volumes of CO₂ (often 50-200 times the feed ), where energy alone can account for 0.2-0.5 kWh per kg of CO₂, amplified by low extract yields (1-10 wt%). Additional costs include (initial CO₂ at $0.5-1/kg) and recovery systems, though recycling rates exceed 95%, minimizing losses; overall manufacturing costs for extracts range from $5-125/kg, far higher than the $1-10/kg for traditional methods like . Scalability remains limited by the predominance of batch processes in most SFE setups, which suit low-volume, high-value products but struggle with continuous needed for bulk commodities. While pilot-scale batch systems achieve viable throughputs (e.g., 20,000 oil/year from dual 15 extractors), transitioning to continuous flow requires complex multi-vessel designs, increasing costs without proportional yield gains for low-extract matrices. Thus, SFE is economically justified primarily for niche applications like pharmaceuticals and essential oils, where product values ($50-500/) offset expenses, but not for large-scale food oils. Reflecting its niche status, the SFE was valued at USD 3.1 billion in 2025 amid a broader solvent extraction exceeding $10 billion annually. typically exceeds 2-3 years (e.g., 2.5 years payback), driven by high upfront and operational s that deter adoption outside high-margin sectors; in contrast, solvent extraction often yields paybacks under 1 year due to lower and needs ($0.5-2/kg product ).

Equipment and procedure

System components

A supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) comprises specialized hardware engineered to operate under elevated pressures and temperatures, ensuring the safe delivery, containment, and manipulation of supercritical fluids like (CO₂). Core elements include high-pressure pumps for fluid propulsion, extraction vessels for sample processing, devices for pressure regulation, heating mechanisms for thermal control, separation units for product recovery, and the fluid supply source. These components are typically constructed from corrosion-resistant materials such as to endure operational stresses up to 700 and temperatures exceeding 100°C. Pumps serve as the primary means for delivering the supercritical fluid into the system with precise control over pressure and flow. Syringe pumps and reciprocating pumps are commonly employed, with syringe types offering pulseless delivery ideal for analytical scales and reciprocating models suited for higher throughput. These pumps can achieve pressures up to 700 (approximately 10,000 ) and flow rates typically ranging from 1 to 100 mL/min, enabling efficient fluid circulation while minimizing pulsations that could disrupt extraction uniformity. A dedicated modifier pump is often integrated to introduce co-solvents, such as or , at rates of 0.5–2.7 mL/min to enhance of polar analytes. Extraction vessels, also known as pressure cells or reactors, house the sample material and facilitate direct contact with the . Constructed from or Hastelloy for chemical inertness and structural integrity, these vessels typically range in volume from 50 to 500 mL for applications, scaling to several liters in pilot systems. They feature via external jackets or internal heating elements to maintain conditions above the fluid's critical point (e.g., 31.1°C and 73.8 for CO₂), often up to 80–100°C, and include filters or packing to prevent clogging by . Pressure maintenance components, such as back-pressure regulators (BPRs) and flow restrictors, are critical for sustaining supercritical conditions and preventing uncontrolled expansion that could lead to or equipment damage. BPRs, often micrometering valves, regulate downstream pressure up to 550 by adjusting orifice size, while restrictors like capillary tubes or nozzles control fluid exit flow to ensure gradual depressurization. These devices address inherent challenges of high-pressure operations by providing stable, automated control. Additional supporting elements enhance system functionality and safety. Ovens or circulation heaters maintain uniform temperatures across the fluid path, typically 30–80°C, using or coiled preheaters to precondition the fluid before entry into the vessel. Separators, often multi-stage chambers, collect extracts by rapidly depressurizing the to gaseous CO₂, allowing solutes to precipitate; cold separators at reduced pressures (e.g., 50 ) minimize issues like formation. The CO₂ supply originates from standard high-pressure cylinders containing , which is preconditioned via chilling or pumping to achieve the desired supercritical (e.g., 0.7–0.95 g/mL).

Operational steps

The operational procedure for supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) typically begins with preparation of the sample matrix and the extraction system. The raw material, such as plant , is dried and ground to an optimal , often 0.6–0.9 mm, to maximize surface area and enhance penetration. The prepared matrix is then loaded into the extractor vessel, which is packed with filters or to prevent clogging. The system is purged with (CO₂) to remove air and impurities, ensuring a clean environment for the supercritical process. Following preparation, the system undergoes pressurization and the phase. Liquid CO₂, cooled to below 5°C and initially pumped at around 50 , is introduced and heated to supercritical conditions, typically above 31°C and 74 , with common targets of 100–400 and 35–70°C depending on the target compounds. proceeds in static and dynamic modes: an initial static phase allows equilibration (e.g., 15–35 minutes), followed by dynamic flow of supercritical CO₂ at rates of 0.175–33.33 g/min for 30–60 minutes, during which the fluid dissolves and carries target analytes from the matrix. Co-solvents like (0–20% v/v) may be added to improve for polar compounds. Depressurization and collection follow to recover the extract. Pressure is gradually reduced through a backpressure to a separator vessel at ambient conditions, causing the CO₂ to drop and the extract to precipitate. The collected extract is weighed, and yield is calculated as the of mass extracted relative to the initial (e.g., 5–15% for oils). Any residual CO₂ evaporates naturally, leaving a solvent-free product. Cleanup involves flushing the system lines and components with fresh CO₂ or to remove residues, followed by analysis of the extract using techniques such as gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) to verify composition and purity. The extractor and separators are then disassembled for maintenance if needed. protocols are integral throughout, including pressure testing of vessels to withstand up to 550 , proper to handle CO₂ , and use of non-flammable, non-toxic CO₂ to minimize hazards. Automated controls monitor temperature and pressure to prevent blockages or over-pressurization.

Modeling and theory

Basic models

Basic models for supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) provide foundational frameworks to predict extraction yields and dynamics using empirical correlations and simplified balances, often relying on experimental data to correlate operating parameters like , , and . These approaches are particularly useful for initial and scaling, where detailed are not yet required. They typically focus on correlations and overall material balances rather than microscopic mechanisms. One of the seminal semi-empirical models is the Chrastil equation, which correlates the of a solute in the to the fluid and . The model expresses y (in mass fraction) as y = k \rho^a \exp\left(\frac{c}{T}\right), where \rho is the , T is the absolute , and k, a, and c are empirical constants fitted from experimental data; typically, a (around 1–5) reflects , while c relates to solute-solvent interactions via of . This equation has been widely applied to predict yields in CO₂-based extractions of natural products, such as essential oils, by linking to extraction conditions without needing molecular details. A straightforward mass balance approach estimates the total extracted mass m from the flow rate Q, extraction time t, and average solute concentration C_\text{avg} in the effluent: m = Q \cdot t \cdot C_\text{avg}. Here, C_\text{avg} is often approximated as the average of initial and equilibrium concentrations, assuming rapid equilibration or constant during the process. This model is commonly used for batch or semi-continuous SFE systems to forecast overall recovery, particularly when data from models like Chrastil are available to inform C_\text{avg}. For instance, in extractions of bio-oils, it simplifies predictions by integrating flow and without accounting for intraparticle effects. Breakthrough curve models describe the dynamic profile of solute concentration in the over time, identifying the period until () is reached. In simple forms, the assumes an initial rapid rise to near- concentration followed by a plateau, with the breakthrough time t_b estimated as the total extractable mass divided by the product of and : t_b \approx m_\text{total} / (Q \cdot y_\text{eq}), where y_\text{eq} is the . This approach is applied to fixed-bed extractions to determine optimal times, as seen in desorption studies of volatiles from solid matrices. These basic models operate under key assumptions, including ideal in the extractor (neglecting axial for uniform velocity profiles) and constant (treating solute as steady without variation in effective coefficients). Such simplifications enable quick correlations but limit accuracy for complex matrices where radial gradients or variable properties dominate. concepts underpin these models, linking fluid properties to extraction efficiency as described in extraction mechanisms.

Mass transfer fundamentals

Mass transfer in supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) is governed by diffusion within the solid matrix and convection in the bulk fluid phase, which collectively determine the extraction kinetics. These phenomena are influenced by the unique properties of supercritical fluids, such as low and high , enabling efficient solute transport from the matrix to the fluid. Diffusivity values in supercritical fluids, typically ranging from 10^{-8} to 10^{-7} m²/s, are higher than in liquids but lower than in gases, facilitating rapid compared to traditional solvent extraction methods. Intraparticle diffusion, the primary resistance within the solid matrix, is described by Fick's second law for unsteady-state . This law models the concentration change over time as solute diffuses out of the particle pores or matrix: \frac{\partial C}{\partial t} = D \frac{\partial^2 C}{\partial x^2} where C is the solute concentration, t is time, D is the diffusion coefficient, and x is the position coordinate. This equation assumes isotropic and is applicable to porous matrices where solute transport occurs via through the pore network. For heterogeneous matrices like materials, the shrinking core model extends this framework by treating the particle as having an unextracted core surrounded by a depleted shell, with the core radius decreasing as extraction proceeds. The model accounts for through the extracted layer and at the core , providing a more accurate representation of kinetics in fixed-bed extractors. Convective mass transfer in the supercritical fluid phase enhances overall extraction rates by transporting dissolved solute away from the particle surface. The mass transfer coefficient k is related to flow conditions via the Sherwood number, defined as: Sh = \frac{k d}{D} where d is the particle diameter. The Sherwood number correlates with dimensionless groups like Reynolds (Re) and Schmidt (Sc) numbers, such as Sh = 2 + 1.1 Re^{0.6} Sc^{1/3} for packed beds, linking fluid velocity and viscosity to enhanced transfer. In SFE, natural convection can also contribute under low flow rates, modifying the Sherwood correlation to include Grashof number effects. At the fluid-matrix interface, mass transfer resistance arises from stagnant films on both sides, as described by the two-film theory. This theory posits that solute must diffuse through a (coefficient k_f) and a matrix (coefficient k_m), leading to an overall K given by: \frac{1}{K} = \frac{1}{k_f} + \frac{1}{k_m} In SFE applications, the fluid-side resistance often dominates due to high matrix , but both terms are critical for modeling interface-limited extractions, such as from additives or aqueous solutions. For complex geometries in industrial SFE, such as irregular particle beds or non-spherical matrices, analytical solutions to these equations are inadequate, necessitating numerical methods like finite element analysis (FEA). FEA discretizes the domain into elements to solve coupled diffusion-convection equations, accommodating non-ideal shapes and variable fluid properties.

Optimization strategies

Parameter tuning

Parameter tuning in (SFE) involves adjusting key operational variables to optimize , , and selectivity while balancing trade-offs in solvent properties and dynamics. , , , , and content of the sample matrix are primary parameters that influence the solvating power of the , typically (CO2), and the rate of solute from the matrix. Increasing pressure enhances the of supercritical CO2, which in turn improves the of target compounds by strengthening solute-solvent interactions, leading to higher yields up to a certain plateau where further increases yield due to reduced . For CO2-based SFE, optimal pressures typically range from 200 to 350 , where reaches levels sufficient for effective of non-polar to moderately polar solutes without excessive energy costs or equipment . Beyond this range, such as above 400 , potential compaction of the sample bed can hinder , offsetting gains. Temperature tuning presents a : higher temperatures increase the volatility of target analytes, facilitating their release from , but simultaneously decrease CO2 density, reducing solvating capacity and overall yield. Optimal temperatures for most applications fall between 35°C and 60°C to preserve compounds while achieving a balance; joint optimization of and is often achieved using (RSM), which models yield as a function of these variables to identify synergistic effects. For instance, RSM has been applied to maximize extraction of volatile compounds by evaluating quadratic interactions, revealing peaks in yield at moderate temperatures under elevated pressures. Flow rate control distinguishes between dynamic and static extraction modes: in static mode, the fluid equilibrates with the sample in a to promote initial solubilization, while dynamic mode continuously refreshes the fluid to drive , often following a static pre-equilibration period. Optimal s of 0.5–2 mL/min balance enhanced rates against risks like channeling—preferential fluid paths through the bed that reduce contact efficiency—ensuring uniform without excessive solvent use. Higher rates beyond this can shorten , limiting and yield. Sample preparation parameters, such as and moisture content, critically affect intraparticle and bed permeability. Grinding the matrix to 0.5–1 mm increases surface area and shortens paths, significantly boosting rates for embedded solutes, though excessively fine particles (<0.3 mm) may promote channeling or clogging. Reducing moisture to below 10% minimizes competitive water and improves fluid penetration, as excess moisture (>14%) can form aqueous barriers that impede solute and lower yields. the matrix prior to thus enhances overall efficiency by facilitating better fluid-matrix contact.

Use of modifiers

Modifiers are essential additives in supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) to enhance the solvating power of nonpolar fluids like (CO₂) for extracting polar or ionic analytes that would otherwise exhibit low . By introducing a polar component, modifiers improve matching, enabling better dissolution through mechanisms such as hydrogen bonding and interactions. For instance, incorporating 5-10% as a can significantly boost the of water-soluble compounds, such as the , in supercritical CO₂, facilitating their extraction from natural matrices. Common modifiers include alcohols like and , as well as and acetone, which are selected based on the analyte's , often quantified by its value to ensure compatibility with the target's polarity. and are particularly favored for their GRAS () status and ability to target moderately polar compounds, while is used sparingly for highly hydrophilic , and acetone for intermediate polarities. The choice optimizes extraction selectivity and efficiency without disrupting the supercritical phase. The primary effect of modifiers is a substantial increase in extraction yields, often by 2-5 times for , due to enhanced solute-solvent interactions. For example, adding 10% to CO₂ has been shown to elevate total phenolic content and overall yield in plant extracts, such as from , by up to nearly double compared to pure CO₂. This enhancement can be conceptually modeled using a simplified equation for modified : y_{\mod} = y_{\sc} \times (1 + \alpha [\mod]) where y_{\mod} is the modified solubility, y_{\sc} is the solubility in pure , \alpha is the empirical enhancement factor (typically 0.1-1 depending on the system), and [\mod] is the modifier concentration (e.g., mole fraction). This linear approximation captures the proportional solubility boost observed in polar systems. Despite these benefits, modifiers introduce drawbacks such as greater process complexity from additional pumping and mixing requirements, and the risk of residual modifier contamination in the final extract, which may necessitate further purification steps. Recent advances as of 2025 focus on greener alternatives like ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents as tunable co-solvents, offering improved and reduced environmental impact while maintaining high selectivity for polar analytes.

Applications

Established industrial uses

Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), particularly using (CO₂), has been a in the since the late 1970s for decaffeinating and , enabling the removal of 97-99% of while preserving flavor compounds due to the solvent's selectivity. This process gained commercial traction in the 1980s, with early adoption by companies like in and subsequent implementation by Corporation, which established a dedicated supercritical CO₂ decaffeination plant in Houston, , in 1988 to process green beans on an industrial scale. The U.S. (FDA) recognizes supercritical CO₂ as (GRAS) for food extraction, facilitating its widespread use in producing decaffeinated products that meet regulatory standards for safety and quality. In brewing, SFE with CO₂ extracts hop oils and resins from hop pellets (Humulus lupulus), providing essential bittering and aromatic compounds for beer production without residual solvents, as demonstrated by commercial operations from suppliers like Yakima Chief Hops. These extracts, containing alpha acids, beta acids, and oils, achieve yields up to 7% under optimized conditions (e.g., 200 bar and 55°C), supporting efficient large-scale flavoring in the global beer industry. In , SFE extracts natural pigments such as from plant materials, providing solvent-free ingredients for skincare and colorant formulations. In pharmaceuticals, SFE extracts high-purity antioxidants such as from like , achieving extracts with astaxanthin concentrations up to around 18%, suitable for applications in nutraceuticals and supplements after further refinement if needed. This method leverages CO₂'s tunability to isolate astaxanthin while minimizing degradation, as validated in that yield lipid-rich extracts from algal containing 2-4% astaxanthin. For nutraceuticals, SFE isolates essential oils and bioactive compounds from spices, including from ginger ( officinale), enhancing product potency for and formulations. Optimized SFE conditions (e.g., 50°C, 250 bar) recover oleoresins rich in -gingerol, supporting the growing demand in health supplements where such extracts contribute to markets valued in the hundreds of millions annually. The GRAS status of CO₂ ensures these extracts are suitable for oral consumption, aligning with FDA guidelines for safety.

Emerging developments

Recent advancements in supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) have focused on hybrid systems that integrate or assistance to enhance efficiency. These hybrids disrupt cell walls and improve , leading to higher of bioactives compared to conventional SFE. For instance, -assisted SFE has demonstrated yield increases of up to 50% for total antioxidants from flowers, with yields rising by 14.9% under optimized conditions of 29 MPa, 57 °C, and 0.21 W/mL ultrasonic . Similarly, -assisted hybrids accelerate intracellular access, boosting overall rates, though specific yield gains vary by matrix. By-product valorization through SFE has gained traction for recovering bioactives from food waste, promoting principles. This approach targets non-polar and polar compounds like oils and phenolics from residues. A 2025 study on supercritical CO₂ extraction from s reported oil yields ranging from 18% in to 48.81% in muskmelon, rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids (>60% ) and phenolics such as (9.6 mg/100 g in oil). These extractions enable sustainable recovery from wastes like and , yielding tocopherols and with potential. Analytical integrations are advancing SFE through computational tools for predictive design and optimization. Coupling SFE with (DFT) and , , , , and (ADMET) analyses allows evaluation of extracted compounds' molecular properties and . In a 2025 investigation of Rosmarinus officinalis extracts, DFT assessed dipole moments (e.g., 4.29 for ) and stability, while ADMET profiling predicted for phenethylamine derivatives, guiding drug-like compound selection. models further optimize SFE parameters, such as estimation in supercritical CO₂, with adaptive inference systems achieving 99% accuracy (R² = 0.991) across 1816 datasets for solid drugs. These tools reduce experimental trials and enhance process scalability. Future trends in SFE emphasize sustainable expansions, including as a for polar extracts. , despite higher operational demands (critical point: 374 °C, 22.1 MPa), enables of hydrophilic bioactives like phenolics from , complementing CO₂ for non-polar targets. Scale-up to continuous flow systems is progressing, with solvent flow rates and chamber geometry (e.g., bed height-to-diameter ratios) optimized to maintain yields during industrial transitions. Environmental impact assessments via analysis (LCA) highlight reductions, with SFE cutting by up to 90% over traditional methods through recyclable CO₂ and lower use in optimized setups. A 2025 LCA review of 70 studies confirms SCF processes often lower (0.2–5 kg CO₂eq/kg input for ), though hotspots require renewable for further gains.

References

  1. [1]
    Recent Advances in Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Natural ...
    This work aims to discuss the recent advances in supercritical fluid extraction techniques, especially supercritical carbon dioxide, along with the fundamental ...
  2. [2]
    Supercritical Fluid Extraction - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) is defined as a process of separating components from a matrix using supercritical fluids, primarily carbon dioxide, ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] SUPERCRITICAL FLUID EXTRACTION - TSI Journals
    Supercritical Fluid Extraction (SFE) is the process of separating one component. (the extractant) from another (the matrix) using supercritical fluids that is ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] A review of supercritical fluid extraction - GovInfo
    investigation of supercritical fluid extraction principles and applications. This study was one portion of a project funded by the U.S. Department of Energy ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] A Short Review on Supercritical Fluid Extraction
    Jul 6, 2025 · Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) is a modern method of extraction that is more versatile and eco-friendlier than traditional methods, as it ...
  6. [6]
    Carbon dioxide - the NIST WebBook
    , The vapour pressures and critical temperatures of acetylene and carbon dioxide, Trans. ... Triple point pressure. Tc, Critical temperature. Ttriple, Triple ...Missing: source:
  7. [7]
    Coffee decaffeination processes - Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
    Aug 13, 2014 · A successful researchers: As early as the 1960s, Kurt Zosel from the Max Planck Institute for Coal Research began to use supercritical gases to ...
  8. [8]
    50th Anniversary: Supercritical Fluid Extraction - ChemistryViews
    Mar 15, 2013 · This year marks the 50th anniversary of the first patent describing the use of supercritical fluid extraction by Kurt Zosel, Max Planck ...Missing: CO2 | Show results with:CO2
  9. [9]
    US3806619A - Process for recovering caffeine - Google Patents
    A process for obtaining caffein from green coffee by withdrawing the caffein by means of recirculating moist carbon dioxide in supercritical state, ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Food Products Manufacture: Source Reduction of Chlorinated ...
    SuDercritical Fluid Extraction (SFE). Supercritical fluid extraction using carbon dioxide. (C02) is under consideration by the food industry as a potential ...
  11. [11]
    Advances in Supercritical Fluid Extraction, DFT, and ADMET Analyses
    Sep 23, 2025 · The combination of DFT analysis and ADMET prediction further supports the potential of these extracts as valuable sources of antioxidants ...
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
    Supercritical Fluids: Introduction | Chemical Reviews
    Properties of SCFs are different from those of ordinary liquids and gases and are tunable simply by changing the pressure and temperature.
  14. [14]
    [PDF] SUPERCRITICAL CARBON DIOXIDE AS A CHROMATOGRAPHIC ...
    Table 1.1 lists the critical parameters of selected supercritical fluids. Supercritical fluids have properties that are intermediate between gases and liquids ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] A Review on Dielectric Properties of Supercritical Fluids - NSF-PAR
    SCFs are widely studied and applied in chemistry, due to favorable properties in diffusivity, solubility, and density. Traditionally, chemical applications of ...
  16. [16]
    The Great Versatility of Supercritical Fluids in Industrial Processes
    3.2.1. Density Is a Key Factor in Solubilization Processes. A useful solubility indicator was introduced in 1936 by Joel Hildebrand for subcritical liquids and ...
  17. [17]
    Solubility Parameter of Carbon Dioxide—An Enigma - PMC - NIH
    Hence, its Hildebrand solubility parameter, δH, may be used to predict its dissolution in liquids.Missing: mechanisms | Show results with:mechanisms
  18. [18]
    (PDF) Diffusion in supercritical fluids - ResearchGate
    Aug 10, 2025 · Further, the strong dependence of the Fick diffusion coefficient on the molecular mass of the solute as well as the breakdown of the Stokes ...Abstract · References (60) · Recommended Publications
  19. [19]
    Mass transfer and kinetic modelling of supercritical CO 2 extraction ...
    Diffusion and Langmuir models for extraction. The Fick's 2nd law model has been employed forseveral decades for understanding the mass transfer process during ...
  20. [20]
    Supercritical fluid extraction as a useful method - Analusis
    Presence of water in the sample may aid the extraction process by swelling the matrix (and enabling better diffusion of the supercritical fluid into the matrix) ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Supercritical fluids in analytical chemistry - TUE Research portal
    Jan 1, 1997 · analytes from the sample matrix into the extraction fluid and/or to the slow desorption of the components from the sample matrix. By the ...<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Supercritical Fluid Extraction (SFE) of Polar Compounds from ...
    Jul 18, 2023 · However, the addition of ethanol and water as modifiers increased the polarity of the extraction phase and, consequently, its affinity for polar ...
  23. [23]
    Effect of the polar modifiers on supercritical extraction efficiency for ...
    The addition of a small amount of a polar modifier could significantly increase the solvating power of supercritical CO2 to targeted organic chemicals.Missing: additives | Show results with:additives
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
  26. [26]
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
    Comparison of supercritical fluid extraction and Soxhlet extraction ...
    SFE has several advantages over Soxhlet for PCB determinations including reduced sample clean-up, reduced extraction time (50 min compared to 18 h to 24 h), and ...
  29. [29]
    Supercritical Fluid Extraction (SFE) Systems - JASCO Inc
    Selectivity – CO2 polarity varies greatly depending on the pressure it is exposed to. This makes CO2 a tunable solvent which allows the user to find the precise ...
  30. [30]
    Looking at the Past to Understand the Future: Soxhlet Extraction
    Aug 1, 2019 · A Soxhlet extraction can easily take 6–48 h, and the technique is manual, though the procedure runs unattended. Even more important are the ...<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    How Long Does Supercritical Fluid CO2 Extraction Take?
    Batch Extraction Cycles (30min-4hours typical) · Continuous System Throughput (24/7 operation capabilities) · Multi-Kettle Configurations for Efficiency.
  32. [32]
    Techno-economic and safety assessment of supercritical CO2 ...
    In this case, ethanol is utilized as a co-solvent, and approximately 96% of CO2 and 94% of co-solvent are recovered. The extraction yield is 1.1 wt% of the ...
  33. [33]
    Supercritical Fluid
    Green Solvent with CO2 recovery rate over 95%; No solvent residue in the extract. This means lower operating costs for clean-up and the reduction in post ...
  34. [34]
    Continuous-Flow Supercritical CO2 Platform for In-Situ Synthesis ...
    Feb 3, 2023 · E-factor analysis of a pilot plant for end-to-end integrated ... Fundamentals of supercritical fluid extraction. 2025, 187-199. https ...
  35. [35]
    Supercritical CO2 technology for biomass extraction: Review
    Moreover, the CO2 used in these processes is often recycled within closed loop systems. This helps minimize waste generation and lower greenhouse gas emissions, ...
  36. [36]
    Supercritical Fluid Extraction: A Green and Sustainable Approach for ...
    Supercritical Fluid Extraction (SFE) has emerged as a green and sustainable technique for isolating high-value bioactive compounds from natural sources.
  37. [37]
    Supercritical Fluid Extraction—A Sustainable and Selective ... - MDPI
    This article compares research on conventional versus supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), which is recognized as an eco-friendly and efficient technique.
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Comprehensive Review of Applicable Supercritical Fluid Extraction ...
    Supercritical fluid extraction ... This section can be artificially divided into analysis of plant or animal tissues, although the technical challenges presented ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] IChemE - HAZARDS FROM HIGH PRESSURE CARBON DIOXIDE ...
    Hazards include dispersion modeling issues, strong cooling, erosive flows, asphyxiation, toxic contamination, corrosion, and low temperatures from CO2 releases.
  40. [40]
    (PDF) Influence of particle size in supercritical carbon dioxide ...
    ... supercritical CO2 extraction of rose essential oil: Evaluation of phenolic, flavonoid, and antioxidant profiles. Article. Full-text available. Dec 2024; CAN J ...
  41. [41]
    (PDF) Supercritical Fluid Technology-A Review - ResearchGate
    Oct 19, 2025 · In this review, we briefly describe the operating principles and parameters influencing each one of SCF processes along with their merits and perspectives.
  42. [42]
    Techno-economic evaluation of supercritical fluid extraction of flaxseed oil
    ### Summary of Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Flaxseed Oil at Pilot Scale
  43. [43]
  44. [44]
  45. [45]
    Solvent Supercritical Fluid Technologies to Extract Bioactive ... - NIH
    Another advantage of CO2 SFE methods is the low critical temperature, meaning some of the thermal labile compounds can be retained without damage and extracted.
  46. [46]
    Development and Optimization of Supercritical Fluid Extraction ...
    This study describes the design and development of setup for the extraction of cannabis strain 1 (Cannabidiol dominant) using supercritical carbon dioxide.
  47. [47]
    SFT-120XW- Supercritical Fluid Extraction
    It may be operated at pressures up to 10,000 psi (68.9 MPa) and at temperatures ranging from ambient to 200°C. The wide range of vessel volumes available makes ...Missing: maximum | Show results with:maximum
  48. [48]
    Extraction of natural products using supercritical fluids and ...
    This work presents a comprehensive review and current insights into the use of high-pressure systems, specifically supercritical fluid extraction and ...
  49. [49]
    A Comprehensive Review on Advanced Extraction Techniques for ...
    Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) is a technique that utilizes supercritical fluids, such as carbon dioxide, to extract bioactive components. SFE offers ...
  50. [50]
  51. [51]
  52. [52]
    Theoretical models for supercritical fluid extraction - ScienceDirect
    This paper has summarized representative developments of theoretical models for supercritical fluid extraction of solutes from various solid matrices. These ...
  53. [53]
    Solubility of solids and liquids in supercritical gases
    New Approach to Modeling Supercritical CO2 Extraction of Cuticular Waxes: Interplay between Solubility and Kinetics. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry ...Missing: original | Show results with:original
  54. [54]
    Diffusion and mass transfer in supercritical fluids - Princeton University
    Binary diffusion coefficients of nonvolatile solutes in supercritical fluids were measured with a technique that involved laminar flow and diffusion in a ...
  55. [55]
    Kinetic models for extraction with supercritical carbon dioxide from ...
    Aug 15, 2023 · The model based on Fick's law presents a good fit to the experimental data because this model considers that the main mass transfer mechanism is ...
  56. [56]
    Bidisperse Shrinking Core Model for Supercritical Fluid Extraction
    Jun 2, 2015 · The bidisperse representation of particle ensembles allows accurate description of OECs on the basis of the modified shrinking core model.
  57. [57]
    On the mass transfer of supercritical fluids, specifically super critical ...
    Aug 1, 2024 · An extraction process is a separation technique whereby compounds are transferred from a solid or liquid into a different solvent. Conventional ...Missing: analyte | Show results with:analyte
  58. [58]
    Mathematical modeling of mass transfer in supercritical fluid ...
    Huang et al. Theoretical models for supercritical fluid extraction. J. Chromatogr. A. (2012). J. Ivanovic et al. Supercritical CO2 extraction of Helichrysum ...
  59. [59]
    KINETICS OF SUPERCRITICAL FLUID EXTRACTION OF ETHANOL ...
    Jan 25, 2007 · A mathematical model based on the two-film theory was derived for estimating the over all mass transfer coefficient. The effects of ...
  60. [60]
    Investigation of parameters affecting the supercritical fluid extraction ...
    Investigation of parameters affecting the supercritical fluid extraction of polymer additives from polyethylene ... The two-film theory, which considers mass ...
  61. [61]
    A step-by-step finite element method for solving the external mass ...
    Jun 1, 2020 · Solving a mathematical model for supercritical fluid extraction using finite element method. •. Comparing finite element method with finite ...Missing: ideal geometries
  62. [62]
    [PDF] The Effect of Fluid Flow Rate and Extraction Time in Supercritical ...
    Nov 17, 2019 · Temperature higher than 65°C will degrade the thermolabile compound in the extract. While, high pressure than 30 MPa will damage the equipment.
  63. [63]
    Application of response surface methodology to optimise ... - PubMed
    Response surface methodology was successfully applied for supercritical fluid CO₂ extraction optimisation of the volatile compounds from C. sativus.Missing: density trade- off
  64. [64]
    Optimization of supercritical CO2 extraction by response surface ...
    Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to optimize the extraction process and the yield of bamboo green wax under pressure of 20–30 MPa, temperature of 318 ...
  65. [65]
    Solubility of the Natural Antioxidant Gallic Acid in Supercritical CO2 ...
    Aug 10, 2025 · To increase the solubility, 5-10% of ethanol is added as co-solvent (Barth et al. 1995). Another example is the enhancement of gallic acid ...
  66. [66]
    Effect of supercritical CO 2 modified with ethanol on the extraction ...
    Nov 1, 2024 · Limited antibacterial activity was observed in all obtained extracts with ethanol-modified supercritical CO2 against Staphylococcus aureus, with ...
  67. [67]
    The Application of Supercritical Fluid Extraction in Phenolic ... - NIH
    The separation of phenolic compounds by supercritical fluid extraction has been widely studied throughout the last two decades.
  68. [68]
    [PDF] Supercritical Fluid Extraction: A Green and Sustainable Approach for ...
    May 19, 2025 · The principle of SFE is to optimize the solubility of materials and improving fractionation [3]. SFE is a nontoxic, inexpensive, non-flammable, ...
  69. [69]
    Decaffeination plant for coffee - Natex Prozesstechnologie GesmbH
    Effective Caffeine Removal: It efficiently removes 97-99% of the caffeine from the coffee beans without damaging the form of the bean and without removing other ...
  70. [70]
    Weird Fluids, Big Business - Bloomberg.com
    Sep 10, 1995 · By the late 1970s, German coffee company HAG mastered the use of supercritical carbon dioxide to decaffeinate coffee. General Foods Corp. bought ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Carbon Dioxide - Handling/Processing - Agricultural Marketing Service
    Aug 11, 2006 · Extraction is performed by pumping supercritical carbon dioxide ... Carbon dioxide is included on the FDA's list of affirmed GRAS substances (21 ...Missing: 1980s | Show results with:1980s<|control11|><|separator|>
  72. [72]
    Advancements in conventional and supercritical CO2 extraction of ...
    The most common solvent used in the SFE methodology is carbon dioxide (CO2), which is Generally Recognised as Safe (GRAS) by the Food and Drug Administration ( ...
  73. [73]
    Commercial Co2 Extract - Yakima Chief Hops
    CO 2 Hop Extract is the pure resin extract of hops containing alpha acids, beta acids, and hop oils. It is produced using a supercritical CO 2 process.
  74. [74]
    Watch this deep dive video on Yakima Chief's CO2 hop extract
    Jul 11, 2022 · Supercritical CO2 extraction is a process whereby the essential bittering and aromatic compounds of hops (alpha acids, beta acids and oils) ...
  75. [75]
    Mathematical modeling of supercritical CO2 extraction of hops ...
    The supercritical CO2 extraction of hop pellet (Humulus lupulus L.) was performed under different conditions of temperature and pressure.
  76. [76]
    Extraction of Astaxanthin and Lutein from Microalga Haematococcus ...
    Nov 3, 2018 · The highest astaxanthin purity and the highest lutein purity were found at 80 °C and 400 bar, and at 65 °C and 550 bar, respectively. Keywords:.
  77. [77]
    Natural Product Extraction | Supercritical Fluids - Phasex Corporation
    Microalgae, such as Haematococcus pluviales, contains between 2% to 4% (w/w) astaxanthin and an average 30% to 50% total extract of lipids, plus astaxanthin.
  78. [78]
    Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction of Astaxanthin, Lutein ... - NIH
    Sep 13, 2018 · Supercritical fluid extraction using CO2 as an extraction fluid in supercritical condition (SFE-CO2) represents a valid alternative to ...
  79. [79]
    Characterization of gingerol analogues in supercritical carbon ...
    Column chromatographic fractionation of ginger extract. Super critical fluid carbon dioxide extract (400 mg) was fractionated on silica gel column to obtain ...Missing: nutraceuticals | Show results with:nutraceuticals
  80. [80]
    Optimization of supercritical CO2 green extraction of Zingiber ...
    The SFE not only provides high yield but also improves the phytochemical richness which offers a sustainable alternative for high value essential oil recovery ...
  81. [81]
    Supercritical CO2 Extraction of Oleoresin from Peruvian Ginger ...
    In this study, we performed supercritical CO2 extraction of oleoresin from Peruvian ginger, focusing on the extraction yield, total polyphenol content, ...2. Results · 3. Materials And Methods · 3.3. 3. Extract...
  82. [82]
    Ultrasound-assisted supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of lutein ...
    Oct 30, 2025 · Compared with conventional supercritical CO2 extraction, this hybrid technology increased the lutein yield by 14.9 %, with a 16.7 % shorter ...
  83. [83]
    Supercritical CO2 extraction of oil from fruit seed by-product
    Jul 3, 2025 · Typically, pressures ranging from 15 to 51.6 MPa are used in SFE-CO2 to extract fruit seed oils ( Table 2 ). In the study by Louaer et al. ( ...
  84. [84]
    Supercritical Fluid Extraction Techniques for Bioactive Recovery ...
    Jun 19, 2025 · Among various methods, supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) has been a remarkable technique that offers a greener and efficient approach to ...
  85. [85]
    Advances in Supercritical Fluid Extraction, DFT, and ADMET Analyses
    Oct 22, 2025 · ... Supercritical Fluid Extraction, DFT, and ADMET Analyses. September 2025; Results in Engineering 28:107422. DOI:10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107422.
  86. [86]
    Application of machine learning approach to estimate the solubility ...
    Feb 12, 2025 · Experimental optimization and mathematical modeling of the supercritical fluid extraction of essential oil from Eryngium billardieri: ...
  87. [87]
    Applications of machine learning in supercritical fluids research
    Application of an artificial neural network model for the supercritical fluid extraction of seed oil from Argemone mexicana (L.) seeds. Industrial Crops and ...
  88. [88]
    Environmental impacts of supercritical fluids processes: A critical ...
    The average electricity requirement is 0.02 kWh.kginput−1, while heating energy needs average 4 MJ.kginput−1. This lower energy demand is due to alcohols ...