Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Environmental factor

An environmental factor encompasses any external agent, condition, or stimulus—distinct from an organism's genetic composition—that influences its physiological processes, phenotypic expression, behavioral patterns, or developmental trajectory.^[1]^[2] These factors operate through direct causal mechanisms, such as chemical exposures modulating cellular functions or physical stressors altering metabolic rates, and their effects are often amplified or mitigated via interactions with genetic predispositions, as evidenced in gene-environment interplay models.^[3]^[4] In biological and ecological contexts, environmental factors range from abiotic elements like temperature, light intensity, and nutrient availability, which dictate organismal growth and survival thresholds, to biotic interactions including predation, symbiosis, and pathogen exposure.^[5] For plants and microbes, such factors can induce adaptive morphological changes or population shifts, while in animals, they shape neural development and reproductive success.^[6] Human applications highlight their role in disease etiology, where pollutants, dietary patterns, and urban infrastructure correlate with elevated risks for conditions like inflammatory bowel disease and dementia, though causal attribution requires disentangling from confounding genetic variances.^[7]^[8] Heritability analyses across twin and cohort studies consistently reveal that for traits such as cognitive ability and educational attainment, genetic influences account for 40-80% of variance, underscoring that environmental contributions, while nontrivial, frequently manifest as modulators rather than primary drivers.^[9]^[10]^[11] Notable controversies arise in interpreting environmental impacts, particularly in fields prone to overemphasizing modifiable externalities amid institutional tendencies toward alarmist projections; for instance, while air pollution links to chronic disease incidence in epidemiological data, effect sizes diminish when controlling for socioeconomic and genetic confounders, challenging narratives of ubiquitous environmental determinism.^[12]^[13] The exposome framework, quantifying lifetime environmental exposures, offers a rigorous tool for causal inference but remains limited by measurement challenges and reliance on observational data susceptible to reverse causation.^[14] Defining characteristics include dose-response relationships and context-specificity, where low-level exposures may confer resilience via hormesis, contrasting with high-dose toxicities that precipitate acute harm.^[15]

Definition and Scope

Core Definition

An environmental factor refers to any external condition, agent, or influence—physical, chemical, biological, or social—that modulates the growth, development, physiology, behavior, reproduction, or survival of living organisms, operating independently of their intrinsic genetic instructions.^[1] These factors encompass abiotic elements such as temperature, light intensity, humidity, soil composition, and atmospheric gases, as well as biotic interactions including predation, competition, symbiosis, and pathogen exposure.^[16] In empirical contexts, such influences are quantified through tolerance ranges, where deviations beyond an organism's optimal limits constrain its fitness; for instance, plants exhibit reduced growth when water availability falls below adaptive thresholds.^[17] In biology and medicine, environmental factors are distinguished by their exogenous nature, contrasting with endogenous genetic determinants, and often interact dynamically with genomes to shape phenotypes—a phenomenon evidenced in twin studies where identical genotypes yield divergent outcomes due to differing exposures.^[2] For human health, these include airborne particulates elevating risks of cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, with meta-analyses attributing approximately 20-30% of global disease burden to modifiable environmental exposures like pollution and occupational hazards.^[7] Chemical agents, such as endocrine disruptors in plastics, demonstrate causal links to developmental disorders through longitudinal cohort data, underscoring dose-response relationships central to toxicological assessments.^[18] The scope extends to cumulative lifetime exposures, conceptualized in frameworks like the exposome, which aggregates non-genetic influences from prenatal stages onward to elucidate disease etiology beyond isolated events.^[19] Rigorous measurement challenges persist, as factors like social stressors or microplastics require integrated epidemiological and omics approaches for verification, with biases in self-reported data necessitating objective biomarkers for causal inference.^[20]

Scope in Biology and Medicine

In biology, environmental factors comprise all non-genetic external influences that shape organismal phenotypes, ranging from molecular interactions to ecological dynamics. These include abiotic elements such as temperature, which modulates enzyme kinetics and metabolic rates—optimal ranges for human enzymes typically fall between 35–40°C, beyond which denaturation occurs—and chemical stressors like pH variations that affect protein folding and cellular homeostasis in microbes and multicellular organisms.^[21] Biotic factors, including predator-prey interactions and symbiotic relationships, further influence survival, reproduction, and evolutionary adaptation, as evidenced by population models where resource availability dictates carrying capacity.^[22] Empirical observations confirm that these factors operate hierarchically: at the cellular level, they alter gene expression without changing DNA sequences, while at organismal scales, they drive phenotypic plasticity, such as seasonal coat color changes in Arctic foxes in response to photoperiod.^[1] In medicine, the scope of environmental factors emphasizes their causal role in disease etiology through chronic exposures that interact with physiological systems. The exposome paradigm, encompassing the lifetime aggregate of such exposures—from prenatal toxins to adult lifestyle elements like diet and pollutants—complements genomic studies by quantifying non-heritable variance in health outcomes.^[23] For example, airborne particulates and chemical contaminants contribute to respiratory and cardiovascular pathologies via oxidative stress and inflammation, with epidemiological data linking fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure to increased ischemic heart disease risk, where each 10 μg/m³ increment correlates with a 6–13% rise in mortality.^[3] Twin studies underscore this dominance: analyses of Nordic registries reveal that genetic factors account for only 15–30% of variance in most common cancers, attributing the majority to environmental influences like tobacco smoke and occupational hazards, which exhibit dose-response relationships in cohort data.^[24] This scope extends to preventive paradigms, where modifiable environmental inputs—such as reducing lead exposure, which impairs neurodevelopment with blood levels above 5 μg/dL associated with IQ decrements of 2–4 points—offer leverage points for public health interventions over immutable genetic risks. Overall, while genetics set susceptibility thresholds, environmental factors determine realization probabilities, as demonstrated by discordance rates in monozygotic twins for environmentally mediated conditions like schizophrenia (50% concordance) versus near-100% for monogenic disorders.^[25]

Distinction from Genetic and Behavioral Factors

Environmental factors differ from genetic factors in that they originate external to the organism's DNA and are not heritable across generations via germline transmission. Genetic factors encompass inherited variations in DNA sequence or structure that establish inherent susceptibilities to traits or diseases, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with increased risk for conditions like type 2 diabetes.^[26] In contrast, environmental factors include non-volitional exposures like air pollutants, ionizing radiation, microbial pathogens, and climatic conditions that modulate gene expression or physiological processes without altering the underlying DNA code.^[2]^[1] This distinction is evident in twin studies, where identical twins—sharing nearly 100% genetic material—exhibit differing disease outcomes due to disparate environmental exposures, underscoring the causal role of external inputs.^[27] Behavioral factors, often termed lifestyle factors, are separated from environmental factors by their dependence on individual agency and decision-making, involving modifiable habits such as tobacco use, dietary patterns, and physical inactivity.^[28] While environmental contexts can influence behaviors—for instance, access to healthy foods or tobacco availability—these factors are classified distinctly in epidemiological frameworks because they represent proximate, volitional contributors to health outcomes rather than passive ambient exposures.^[29] Genetic predispositions may also predispose individuals to certain behaviors, yet the behavioral category emphasizes interventions targeting personal choices, as opposed to environmental regulations addressing uncontrollable externalities.^[30] In disease etiology, this tripartite classification—genetic, environmental, and behavioral—facilitates precise attribution of risk and tailored prevention strategies. For example, cardiovascular disease risk models integrate genetic variants (e.g., familial hypercholesterolemia mutations) with environmental toxins (e.g., lead exposure) and behavioral risks (e.g., sedentary lifestyle), revealing that modifiable non-genetic factors often account for the majority of variance in population-level incidence.^[31]^[32] Empirical data from large cohort studies indicate that environmental and behavioral influences explain up to 75% of health variations, compared to 25% from biological and genetic determinants combined.^[33] Overlaps exist through gene-environment interactions, where genetic vulnerabilities amplify responses to specific exposures or behaviors, but the core distinctions persist for causal analysis and policy design.^[34]^[35]

Types of Environmental Factors

Abiotic Factors

Abiotic factors encompass the non-living physical and chemical components of the environment that shape the survival, distribution, and physiological responses of organisms, including humans. These include temperature, light, water availability, soil composition, atmospheric gases, salinity, pH levels, and pollutants, which interact with biotic elements to determine ecosystem dynamics and organismal health.^[36]^[37] In biological systems, abiotic factors impose selective pressures; for example, temperature gradients dictate species ranges, with eurythermal organisms tolerating wider fluctuations than stenothermal ones, influencing metabolic rates and reproductive success.^[38] In medical and human health contexts, abiotic factors contribute to disease etiology and population-level outcomes. Temperature extremes, for instance, elevate risks of heat-related illnesses and cardiovascular strain, with global data indicating over 489,000 heat-related deaths annually between 2000 and 2019, predominantly in Asia and Europe.^[39] Humidity and precipitation patterns modulate vector-borne diseases; higher humidity correlates with increased mosquito activity and malaria transmission in endemic regions.^[40] Chemical abiotic stressors, such as heavy metals and persistent pollutants in water and soil, disrupt endocrine functions and immune responses, as evidenced by studies linking lead exposure to neurodevelopmental deficits in children at blood levels above 5 μg/dL.^[41]^[42] Radiation, including ultraviolet (UV) exposure from sunlight, represents another critical abiotic influence, driving vitamin D synthesis while excess levels contribute to skin cancers; epidemiological data show UV radiation accounting for approximately 90% of non-melanoma skin cancers worldwide.^[43] Atmospheric composition, particularly ozone and particulate matter, impairs respiratory health, with fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations exceeding 10 μg/m³ associated with a 6-8% increase in cardiovascular mortality per 10 μg/m³ rise, based on cohort studies across multiple continents.^[44] These factors often compound in urban environments, where anthropogenic alterations amplify abiotic stresses, underscoring their role in gene-environment interactions and chronic disease burdens.^[45]

Biotic Factors

Biotic factors comprise the living elements of an ecosystem, including organisms such as plants, animals, fungi, bacteria, and protists, that directly influence the physiology, behavior, distribution, and population dynamics of other species through interactions like predation, competition, symbiosis, and parasitism.^[46]^[47] These factors operate via density-dependent mechanisms, where their effects intensify with increasing organism density, contrasting with abiotic influences that are often density-independent.^[48] Biotic factors are classified into three primary functional groups: producers (autotrophs like algae and vascular plants that generate biomass via photosynthesis), consumers (heterotrophs including herbivores, carnivores, and omnivores that derive energy from consuming other organisms), and decomposers (saprotrophs such as bacteria and fungi that recycle nutrients by breaking down organic detritus).^[48] Producers form the base of food webs, supporting higher trophic levels; for instance, phytoplankton in aquatic systems sustain fish populations through primary production rates exceeding 50 grams of carbon per square meter annually in productive coastal waters.^[47] Consumers exert top-down control, as evidenced by keystone predators like sea otters regulating kelp forest ecosystems by curbing herbivorous sea urchin densities, preventing overgrazing.^[49] Symbiotic relationships exemplify biotic influences, ranging from mutualism—where both parties benefit, such as nitrogen-fixing bacteria in legume root nodules enhancing plant growth by converting atmospheric N₂ at rates up to 200 kg per hectare per year—to commensalism and parasitism, where one organism benefits at the host's expense, as in tapeworms reducing host nutrient absorption by 20-30% in infected mammals.^[47] Competition for limited resources, such as light or mates, can limit species coexistence; Darwin's finches on the Galápagos Islands demonstrate resource partitioning, with beak morphology adapting to seed sizes, reducing interspecies overlap and stabilizing populations.^[50] In human health contexts, biotic factors include microbial exposures shaping the exposome, such as gut microbiota influencing immune development and metabolic disorders—diverse microbiomes correlate with reduced allergy risk, with early-life antibiotic use disrupting bacterial diversity and elevating asthma incidence by 1.5-2 fold in cohort studies—or airborne biotics like pollen and fungal spores triggering respiratory conditions.^[51] Pathogenic biotic interactions, including viral and bacterial infections, drive evolutionary pressures; for example, Plasmodium falciparum malaria has selected for sickle-cell trait heterozygotes in African populations, conferring 10-20% survival advantage against severe infection.^[48] These factors underscore causal roles in disease etiology and adaptation, with disruptions like biodiversity loss amplifying zoonotic spillover risks, as seen in the 2019 SARS-CoV-2 emergence from wildlife reservoirs.^[49]

Anthropogenic and Lifestyle Factors

Anthropogenic factors refer to environmental alterations resulting from human activities, including industrial emissions, agricultural practices, and urbanization, which introduce pollutants such as particulate matter, volatile organic compounds, and heavy metals into air, water, and soil.^[52] These factors contribute significantly to global disease burden, with ambient air pollution alone linked to 7.9 million deaths in 2023, primarily from cardiovascular diseases, respiratory illnesses, and lung cancer.^[53] Fossil fuel combustion accounts for an estimated 5.13 million excess deaths annually due to associated fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure.^[54] Agricultural chemicals, particularly pesticides, represent another major anthropogenic exposure pathway, with systematic reviews indicating increased risks of neurodevelopmental disorders, cancers, and metabolic syndrome from chronic low-level exposure.^[55] ^[56] For instance, occupational and dietary pesticide residues have been associated with elevated odds of depression and cognitive impairment in meta-analyses of exposed populations.^[57] ^[58] Water and soil contamination from industrial runoff further exacerbates these risks, leading to bioaccumulation of toxins like lead and mercury, which impair neurological and renal function.^[59] Lifestyle factors modulate individual exposure to these anthropogenic elements through daily choices and living conditions, such as residential proximity to pollution sources or indoor habits.^[32] Tobacco smoking, a prevalent lifestyle-induced indoor air pollutant, generates secondhand smoke containing over 7,000 chemicals, including carcinogens, contributing to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma exacerbations, and approximately 1.2 million annual deaths from household air pollution globally when combined with other sources.^[60] ^[61] Dietary patterns influence ingestion of environmental contaminants, with higher consumption of processed or pesticide-laden foods correlating with elevated non-communicable disease risks.^[55] Urban lifestyles, characterized by increased traffic-related emissions and reduced green space access, amplify exposure to noise and ultrafine particles, heightening cardiovascular strain.^[62] Empirical evidence from cohort studies underscores that lifestyle-environment interactions often outweigh genetic predispositions for conditions like lung and heart diseases, emphasizing modifiable behaviors in mitigation strategies.^[32] For example, reducing indoor smoking has demonstrably lowered COPD incidence in controlled populations, while avoiding high-pesticide produce mitigates endocrine disruption.^[63] ^[64] These factors collectively drive a substantial portion of preventable morbidity, with integrated exposure assessments revealing synergistic effects between outdoor pollution and personal habits.^[7]

Mechanisms of Influence

Direct Physiological Effects

Direct physiological effects of environmental factors refer to immediate biochemical and cellular responses triggered by external agents interacting with bodily tissues, altering organ function and systemic homeostasis without involving genetic or epigenetic modifications. These effects arise from physical, chemical, or thermal mechanisms, such as pollutant-induced inflammation, toxin-mediated enzyme inhibition, or temperature-driven shifts in metabolic rates.^[65]^[7] In the respiratory system, inhalation of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) from air pollution generates reactive oxygen species, causing oxidative damage to lung epithelial cells and endothelial dysfunction, which can elevate blood pressure and promote thrombosis within hours of exposure.^[66]^[67] Ozone exposure similarly provokes acute bronchoconstriction and airway hyperresponsiveness by activating sensory nerves and releasing pro-inflammatory mediators.^[7] Cardiovascular responses to environmental stressors include direct impacts from carbon monoxide, which binds hemoglobin more avidly than oxygen, reducing tissue oxygenation and straining myocardial function, as observed in urban traffic-related exposures.^[67] Heavy metals like lead disrupt neuronal signaling by inhibiting calcium channels and enzymes such as delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase, leading to immediate neurophysiological impairments including slowed nerve conduction.^[68] Thermal extremes exert direct effects on thermoregulation; acute heat exposure elevates core body temperature, impairing protein stability and enzyme kinetics, which manifests as reduced muscle performance and cognitive deficits during exertion.^[7] Conversely, ultraviolet radiation from solar exposure penetrates skin to stimulate melanogenesis and erythema via direct DNA photoproducts in keratinocytes, while also promoting cholecalciferol synthesis in the epidermis.^[69] Neurological direct effects encompass disruptions from volatile organic compounds, which cross the blood-brain barrier to alter neurotransmitter balance, inducing symptoms like dizziness and headaches through GABA receptor modulation.^[68] These responses highlight causal pathways where environmental agents perturb homeostasis via receptor agonism, membrane perturbation, or osmotic shifts, often quantifiable through biomarkers like C-reactive protein for inflammation or cortisol for stress.^[65]^[67]

Epigenetic and Molecular Modifications

Environmental factors exert influence on gene expression through epigenetic mechanisms, which involve heritable changes in chromatin structure and regulatory RNAs without altering the underlying DNA sequence. These modifications include DNA methylation—typically the addition of methyl groups to cytosine bases in CpG dinucleotides—histone post-translational modifications such as acetylation and methylation, and alterations in non-coding RNAs like microRNAs (miRNAs). Exposures to air pollutants, dietary components, and psychosocial stress can disrupt these processes by interfering with enzymatic activities, such as those of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) or histone deacetylases (HDACs). For instance, prenatal and early-life environmental stressors have been associated with persistent DNA methylation changes that extend beyond infancy, potentially contributing to long-term physiological adaptations or vulnerabilities.^[70]^[71] Air pollution represents a prominent abiotic factor inducing epigenetic shifts, with particulate matter (PM) exposure linked to rapid global DNA hypomethylation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. A 2008 study of non-smoking adults exposed to traffic-related particles demonstrated measurable decreases in LINE-1 repetitive element methylation within two hours of exposure, correlating with oxidative stress pathways implicated in cardiovascular risk. Similarly, chronic exposure to fine PM2.5 has been tied to site-specific methylation alterations in genes related to inflammation and metabolism, as evidenced in meta-analyses of human cohorts. These changes may mediate pollution's role in metabolic syndrome, where DNA methylation in blood acts as an intermediary between exposure and outcomes like insulin resistance.^[72]^[73]^[74] Dietary and nutritional factors influence epigenetic landscapes via one-carbon metabolism and nutrient availability. Folate and methionine deficiencies impair S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) production, the primary methyl donor for DNA methylation, leading to hypomethylation in experimental models and human studies. For example, maternal undernutrition during critical developmental windows has been shown to alter methylation patterns in offspring, affecting genes involved in growth and metabolism. Conversely, excessive intake of certain bioactive compounds, such as genistein from soy, can hypermethylate tumor suppressor genes in rodent models, highlighting dose-dependent effects. Psychosocial stress, including chronic maternal stress, induces glucocorticoid-mediated histone modifications and miRNA dysregulation, with human epidemiological data linking early-life adversity to reduced methylation of stress-response genes like NR3C1.^[71]^[75]^[70] Beyond epigenetics, environmental exposures prompt broader molecular modifications, including oxidative damage to proteins and lipids, RNA editing, and post-translational changes in signaling molecules. Toxicants like benzene and heavy metals disrupt histone acetylation by inhibiting HDACs, while endocrine disruptors alter miRNA processing pathways. Recent evidence suggests these can propagate transgenerationally through germline epigenetic reprogramming, as seen in animal models where paternal exposure to pollutants induces offspring DNA methylation defects. However, human transgenerational effects remain inferential, relying on associative cohort data rather than direct causation, with confounders like shared environments complicating interpretation.^[76]^[77]^[78]

Gene-Environment Interactions

Gene-environment interactions (GxE) describe scenarios in which the effect of genetic variants on a trait, behavior, or disease outcome varies depending on environmental exposures, or vice versa, leading to non-additive influences on phenotypes. These interactions challenge simplistic models of genetic determinism by illustrating how genotypes can confer differential susceptibility to environmental influences, with some individuals more resilient or vulnerable based on their genetic makeup. Empirical evidence from twin and adoption studies supports this, showing that heritability of complex traits like cognitive ability increases in resource-rich environments; for example, IQ heritability rises from approximately 0.26 in low socioeconomic status (SES) settings to 0.72 in high-SES contexts, as genetic differences manifest more fully when environmental constraints are minimized.^[79] Similarly, polygenic risk scores for traits such as neuroticism interact with life stressors, where higher genetic risk amplifies environmental impacts on symptom severity.^[80]^[81] In human disease etiology, GxE exemplifies causal realism by highlighting how environmental triggers can precipitate outcomes only in genetically predisposed individuals. A replicated example involves the COMT Val158Met polymorphism and cannabis exposure in psychosis risk: Val/Val homozygotes exhibit a significantly elevated odds ratio (up to 10-fold) for psychotic symptoms following adolescent cannabis use, compared to Met carriers, due to altered dopamine regulation in prefrontal cortex pathways affected by both factors.^[82]^[83] In schizophrenia, urban upbringing and childhood trauma interact with genetic liability, with epidemiological data from large cohorts indicating that these environmental adversities double disease risk in high-polygenic risk groups, underscoring moderation effects beyond main genetic or environmental associations.^[83]^[84] Recent genome-wide approaches have quantified GxE contributions to neuropsychiatric variance, estimating that interactions account for 10-20% of trait heritability in conditions like depression and ADHD, often through context-dependent fitness landscapes.^[85]^[86] Methodological advances, including variance components models and Mendelian randomization-inspired screens, have improved detection of GxE while addressing prior replication failures in candidate gene studies, which suffered from low power and publication bias.^[87]^[88] These interactions imply that environmental interventions may yield genotype-specific benefits, as seen in moderated treatment responses for anxiety disorders where serotonin transporter variants predict differential efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy versus pharmacology.^[89] Overall, GxE underscores the need for integrated models in biology and medicine, where empirical longitudinal data reveal environment as a modulator rather than mere backdrop to genetic effects.^[90]

Biological and Health Impacts

Positive and Adaptive Effects

Environmental factors can elicit adaptive physiological responses that enhance organismal resilience and health, often through mechanisms that precondition biological systems against future stressors. Hormesis exemplifies this, wherein low-level exposures to environmental agents—such as toxins, radiation, or oxidative stressors—induce biphasic dose-response curves, stimulating repair pathways, antioxidant production, and cellular maintenance that surpass baseline functionality.^[91] This adaptive phenomenon has been observed across species, where moderate challenges improve metabolic efficiency, longevity, and resistance to disease, as low doses activate signaling cascades like Nrf2 for detoxification and proteostasis.^[92] For example, controlled low-dose ionizing radiation exposure has been linked to reduced DNA damage and potential cancer risk mitigation in some epidemiological data from radiation workers, though results remain debated due to confounding variables.^[93] Biotic environmental factors, particularly microbial diversity in natural settings, foster immune system development via the hygiene hypothesis, which posits that early postnatal exposure to commensal bacteria, parasites, and environmental antigens calibrates Th1/Th2 balance, suppressing aberrant hypersensitivities.^[94] Longitudinal studies indicate that children raised in farm environments with high microbial loads from livestock, soil, and unpasteurized milk exhibit 30-50% lower incidences of asthma, eczema, and allergies compared to urban cohorts, attributable to enhanced regulatory T-cell function and microbial diversity shaping the gut and respiratory microbiomes.^[95] Vegetation and pollen exposure further bolsters innate immunity by upregulating anti-inflammatory cytokines and natural killer cell activity, as evidenced in interventions like forest bathing, which correlate with reduced cortisol levels and improved cardiovascular markers after acute sessions.^[7] Abiotic factors contribute adaptively by driving acclimatization processes; for instance, intermittent moderate heat exposure triggers heat shock protein expression, enhancing protein folding, autophagy, and vascular function to mitigate heat-related illnesses in acclimated individuals.^[96] Similarly, chronic mild hypoxia from high-altitude residency stimulates erythropoietin release, elevating red blood cell counts and oxygen delivery efficiency, which confers endurance advantages and cardioprotective effects in adapted populations, as seen in Andean and Tibetan highlanders with genetic and physiological optimizations persisting across generations. These responses underscore causal pathways where environmental pressures select for and induce heritable or phenotypic improvements in homeostasis, distinct from pathological overloads.^[97]

Negative Health Outcomes

Exposure to air pollutants such as particulate matter (PM2.5), ozone, and nitrogen dioxide has been linked to increased risks of respiratory diseases, including chronic asthma and pulmonary insufficiency, as well as cardiovascular conditions like ischemic heart disease.^[98] Long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution correlates with higher all-cause mortality, circulatory disease deaths, lung cancer, and childhood asthma onset in epidemiological studies.^[99] Decades of research confirm that fine particulate matter and ozone exacerbate lung and heart diseases, with vulnerable populations experiencing heightened severity.^[100] Water contamination from pollutants including heavy metals, pathogens, and industrial chemicals contributes to acute infections such as cholera, diarrhea, dysentery, and hepatitis A, particularly in areas with inadequate sanitation.^[101] Chronic exposure to contaminants like arsenic and lead in drinking water leads to organ damage, developmental disorders, reproductive issues, and elevated cancer risks, with studies documenting liver, kidney, and intestinal toxicity.^[102] In older populations, water pollution associates with physical ailments including skin diseases, malnutrition, and malignancies.^[103] Chemical exposures to endocrine-disrupting compounds, found in plastics, pesticides, and consumer products, interfere with hormonal systems, resulting in adverse outcomes such as reproductive disorders, neurodevelopmental impairments, and cardiometabolic diseases.^[104] These substances are implicated in increased cancer incidence, with analyses showing associations between exposure and carcinogenic effects across multiple human studies.^[105] Even low-dose exposures can precipitate health problems without a identifiable safe threshold, affecting fetal development and adult endocrine function.^[106] Climate-driven environmental changes, including warming temperatures and altered precipitation, expand the range of vectors like mosquitoes, facilitating the spread of diseases such as dengue, Zika, and malaria into previously unaffected regions.^[107] Short-term extreme weather and multiyear warming correlate with worsened mental health outcomes, including increased distress and psychiatric admissions.^[108] In high-latitude areas, rising temperatures have enabled novel vector establishments, such as mosquitoes in Iceland, amplifying transmission potential.^[109]

Empirical Evidence from Longitudinal Studies

Longitudinal studies, which track cohorts over extended periods, provide robust evidence for the temporal precedence of environmental exposures in health outcomes, mitigating some reverse causation concerns inherent in cross-sectional designs. These investigations often adjust for confounders such as socioeconomic status, genetics, and lifestyle, revealing dose-response relationships and cumulative effects. For instance, the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Air pollution ancillary study, a prospective cohort initiated in 2000 with over 6,000 participants across six U.S. sites, demonstrated that long-term exposure to fine particulate matter (PM_2.5) and nitrogen oxides accelerated subclinical atherosclerosis progression, as measured by carotid intima-media thickness and coronary artery calcium scores over up to 10 years of follow-up.^[110] Similarly, the Framingham Heart Study, ongoing since 1948 with multiple generations, has linked environmental tobacco smoke exposure—a key anthropogenic factor—to increased cardiovascular disease incidence, with secondhand smoke conferring a 25-30% elevated risk of coronary heart disease independent of personal smoking status in offspring cohort analyses spanning decades.^[111] In cognitive development, the Port Pirie Cohort Study in Australia, following children from prenatal lead exposure in a mining region through adolescence (initiated in 1979), found that elevated blood lead levels above 10 μg/dL in early childhood correlated with IQ deficits of 4-7 points per 10 μg/dL increment, persisting into adulthood with effect sizes undiminished after adjustments for maternal IQ and home environment.^[112] A U.S.-based analysis of the Cincinnati Lead Study, a longitudinal birth cohort from 1979-1984 tracked to age 30+, showed prenatal and early postnatal lead exposure (mean peak blood lead 20.7 μg/dL) associated with reduced gray matter volume in prefrontal regions and lower performance on executive function tasks, supporting neurotoxic mechanisms via disrupted synaptogenesis.^[113] These findings underscore lead's role as a persistent environmental neurotoxin, with no safe threshold identified in dose-response models. Air pollution's cardiovascular impacts are further evidenced by the Women's Health Initiative cohort (1993-ongoing, n=93,000+ postmenopausal women), where 10-year average PM_2.5 exposure above 10 μg/m³ linked to a 24% higher hazard ratio for incident acute myocardial infarction and ischemic heart disease mortality, with stronger effects in diabetic subgroups.^[114] For respiratory outcomes, the Children's Health Study in Southern California (1993-2012, tracking 3,600+ children) revealed that residence within 500 meters of major roadways during childhood increased adult asthma prevalence by 1.5-fold and reduced lung function growth (FEV₁), effects mediated by traffic-related pollutants like black carbon.^[115] Late-life exposures also matter; the ASPREE-XT study extension (Australian/U.S. cohort, 2010-2022) indicated that PM_2.5 increments of 5 μg/m³ raised dementia risk by 10-15%, particularly among APOE-ε4 carriers, highlighting gene-environment interactions in neurodegeneration.^[116] Fewer longitudinal data exist for positive environmental effects, but the British Birth Cohort (1958, n=17,000+) has associated greater childhood green space exposure with 10-20% reduced adult mental health disorder risks, potentially via stress reduction and physical activity promotion, though residual confounding from urbanicity persists.^[117] Overall, these studies affirm environmental factors' causal contributions to health trajectories, with effect sizes varying by exposure window—prenatal/infancy periods showing heightened vulnerability—while emphasizing the need for exposure biomarkers to refine causal inference beyond modeled estimates.^[118]

The Exposome Framework

Historical Development

The concept of the exposome originated in the post-genomic era, when sequencing the human genome revealed that genetic factors alone accounted for only a fraction of disease risk, prompting renewed emphasis on environmental influences. In August 2005, British epidemiologist Christopher Wild, then director of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), formally proposed the term "exposome" in a commentary published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. He defined it as "the cumulative effect on an individual's health of environmental exposures from conception onwards," explicitly drawing a parallel to the genome to advocate for systematic characterization of non-genetic factors in disease etiology, particularly cancer. This introduction highlighted the need for exposure assessment to match the precision of genomic tools, critiquing the fragmented nature of prior environmental epidemiology that often focused on single agents rather than lifetime totality.^[119] Early elaboration of the framework occurred amid technological stagnation in exposure measurement, as traditional methods like questionnaires and biomarkers struggled with comprehensiveness and recall bias. In 2012, Wild further refined the exposome in International Journal of Epidemiology, delineating its scope into external exposures (e.g., air pollution, diet) and internal processes (e.g., inflammation, oxidative stress), while outlining three tiers: specific (targeted chemicals), general (lifestyle factors), and background (e.g., psychosocial stressors).^[119] This period marked a shift from conceptualization to utility, spurred by advances in personal sensors and high-throughput biology, though Wild noted persistent challenges in data integration and causality inference.^[120] By the mid-2010s, the paradigm gained traction through funding initiatives; for instance, the European Union's Horizon 2020 program supported projects like EXPOSOMICS (2012–2017), which applied untargeted metabolomics and GPS tracking to map exposures in over 500 participants across Italy, the UK, and Norway, yielding early evidence linking traffic-related air pollution to cardiovascular biomarkers. Subsequent milestones reflected maturation toward interdisciplinary integration. The Human Early-Life Exposome (HELIX) consortium, launched in 2013 with €8.7 million from the EU, biobanked data from 30,000 mother-child pairs to assess prenatal and childhood exposures' role in neurodevelopment and obesity, demonstrating, for example, associations between bisphenol A exposure and behavioral issues in longitudinal cohorts. By 2020, exposome research expanded via omics synergies, with studies like those from the U.S. National Institutes of Health's Exposure Biology program validating wearable devices for real-time pollutant tracking, reducing reliance on proxies.^[121] In a 2025 retrospective, Wild reflected on two decades of progress, crediting sensor miniaturization and AI-driven analytics for bridging the "exposure gap," though underscoring that full exposome mapping remains elusive due to ethical and logistical barriers in capturing dynamic, individual-level data.^[120] These developments have positioned the exposome as a cornerstone for precision environmental health, influencing policy in areas like urban planning and chemical regulation.

Components and Lifespan Coverage

The exposome framework categorizes exposures into three overlapping domains: general external, specific external, and internal. The general external domain includes macro-level factors such as sociodemographic conditions, urban or rural residence, climate, and seasonal variations that influence populations broadly but are challenging to measure at the individual level.^[119] Specific external exposures involve targeted, quantifiable agents like air and water pollutants, pesticides, occupational hazards, diet, physical activity, tobacco smoke, and infectious agents, which can be assessed through personal monitoring or questionnaires.^[119] ^[122] The internal domain captures endogenous biological responses, including the metabolome, microbiome composition, oxidative stress markers, inflammation levels, and hormonal fluctuations, reflecting how the body processes external inputs.^[119] ^[123] These domains are interconnected; for instance, external pollutants may trigger internal inflammatory cascades, while general socioeconomic factors can modulate access to specific exposures like healthy diets.^[122] This tripartite structure, proposed by Christopher Wild in 2012, emphasizes the need for comprehensive measurement across domains to capture the full spectrum of environmental influences on health.^[119] The exposome encompasses exposures across the entire lifespan, from preconception through fetal development, childhood, adulthood, and into old age, recognizing that cumulative effects and critical windows of vulnerability amplify impacts.^[119] Prenatal and early-life periods are particularly sensitive, as evidenced by associations between in utero exposures to famine or toxins and lifelong risks of metabolic disorders or neurodevelopmental issues in cohort studies.^[124] Adulthood exposures, such as chronic occupational chemicals, contribute to progressive disease burdens like cancer, while aging-related internal shifts (e.g., declining metabolic efficiency) interact with ongoing external factors to exacerbate vulnerabilities.^[120] This lifelong perspective, integral to the framework since its inception, underscores the exposome's role in elucidating dynamic gene-environment interactions over time rather than isolated events.^[119]^[122]

Integration with Omics Data

The integration of exposome data with omics datasets—encompassing genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics—enables the identification of molecular mechanisms underlying environmental exposures and health outcomes. This approach reveals how external factors modulate biological pathways, complementing genome-wide association studies (GWAS) by incorporating dynamic environmental variables through exposome-wide association studies (EWAS). For instance, EWAS correlate exposure profiles with omics alterations, analogous to GWAS for genetic variants, facilitating the detection of exposure-specific molecular signatures.^[125]^[126] Methodological frameworks for this integration include network-based analyses that map connections between exposures and multi-omics features, such as partial least squares or Bayesian networks, to disentangle gene-environment interactions. In the HELIX project, involving 1,301 mother-child pairs across six European cohorts, multi-omics data (e.g., DNA methylation, gene expression) were integrated with exposome metrics like air pollution and diet, yielding exposure-associated molecular clusters linked to cardiometabolic and respiratory traits. Similarly, longitudinal studies employing wearable sensors and biospecimens have demonstrated dynamic exposome-omics interplay, where personal exposure timelines predict metabolomic shifts over time.^[127]^[128]^[126] Challenges persist due to data heterogeneity, high dimensionality, and missing values across omics layers, necessitating advanced imputation techniques like block-wise algorithms or machine learning models tailored for sparse exposome datasets. Confounding from unmeasured variables and temporal misalignment between exposures and omics sampling further complicates causal inference, often requiring physiology-based kinetic modeling to simulate exposure trajectories. Despite these hurdles, initiatives like precision environmental health monitoring underscore the potential for integrated models to advance personalized medicine by forecasting disease risk from combined exposome-omics profiles.^[129]^[130]^[131]

Measurement and Assessment

Traditional and Emerging Methods

Traditional methods for assessing environmental exposures have primarily relied on self-reported questionnaires and surveys to capture lifestyle, occupational, and residential histories, such as smoking habits, diet, or proximity to pollution sources; however, these approaches are prone to recall bias, subjectivity, and limited precision in quantifying cumulative or dynamic exposures.^[132]^[133] Static environmental monitoring stations measure ambient levels of pollutants like particulate matter (PM2.5) or volatile organic compounds at fixed locations, providing population-level data but failing to account for individual mobility or indoor exposures, which constitute up to 90% of daily time spent indoors.^[132] Geographic information systems (GIS) integrate spatial data, such as traffic density or land use, to model exposures retrospectively, as employed in projects like the Human Early Life Exposome (HELIX) cohort linking residential histories to air pollution estimates.^[134] These methods, while cost-effective and scalable, often overlook temporal variability and mixtures of exposures, hindering detection of gene-environment interactions (GxE) due to measurement error that can attenuate effect estimates by 20-50% in epidemiological models.^[133] Emerging methods leverage sensor technologies for real-time, personalized monitoring, including wearable devices like silicone wristbands that passively absorb semi-volatile compounds (e.g., phthalates, flame retardants) and smartphones equipped with GPS, accelerometers, and built-in sensors to track movement, noise, and UV radiation with temporal resolutions down to minutes.^[132]^[133] Remote sensing via satellites, such as MODIS instruments providing 10-km resolution PM2.5 data since 2000, enables global-scale assessment of atmospheric pollutants, supplemented by machine learning models to downscale to finer grids.^[132] High-throughput analytical techniques, including liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), facilitate untargeted profiling of thousands of chemicals in biospecimens, as demonstrated in high-resolution metabolomics studies identifying exposure biomarkers with detection limits below 1 ng/mL.^[135] These approaches, integrated in initiatives like the EXPOsOMICS project (launched 2014), support longitudinal personal exposure monitoring (PEM) for air and water contaminants, enhancing GxE analyses by reducing misclassification and capturing non-linear interactions, though challenges persist in data harmonization and validation against gold-standard dosimetry.^[136]^[135]

Technological Advances

Technological advances in exposome measurement have primarily focused on portable and wearable sensors for real-time external exposure assessment, enabling high-resolution personal monitoring that surpasses traditional stationary methods. Wearable devices, such as wristbands and flexible electronics integrated with AI, capture dynamic exposures to air pollutants, noise, temperature, and chemicals by combining sensors for particulate matter (PM2.5), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and other stressors.^[137] ^[138] For example, the AirPen, a compact wearable monitor developed in 2023, quantifies personal PM2.5 and VOC exposures with low noise and portability, offering advantages in spatial-temporal resolution over fixed-site samplers.^[138] Similarly, neighborhood-scale sensors have been deployed for air quality and heat mapping, as in studies from 2022 providing granular data for urban exposome profiles.^[135] Geographic information systems (GIS) and remote sensing technologies have enhanced spatial modeling of exposures, integrating satellite data with ground-level inputs for broader coverage. GIS tools like NISMap, introduced in 2013, model radiofrequency exposures from cellular infrastructure, while aerosol optical depth (AOD) derived from MODIS satellites estimates PM concentrations at 10-km resolution using data from 2001–2010.^[139] Global positioning systems (GPS) paired with accelerometers track individual mobility and activity patterns, refining exposure estimates in longitudinal studies, such as those examining children's physical activity in 2012.^[139] These methods allow retrospective reconstruction of lifetime exposures by layering historical datasets, though they require validation against direct measurements to account for interpolation uncertainties. For internal exposome assessment via biomarkers, high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) has emerged as a cornerstone, enabling untargeted detection of thousands of chemicals in biofluids and tissues. Advances in HRMS workflows, surveyed in 2024, support comprehensive chemical exposome profiling through improved mass analyzers and informatic pipelines for handling complex datasets.^[140] High-resolution metabolomics (HRM) techniques monitor over 1,000 small molecules, facilitating qualitative and quantitative analysis at reduced costs compared to earlier targeted assays.^[135] Single-cell exposomics via MS, advanced by 2023 innovations in sample preparation and ionization, reveals heterogeneous cellular responses to stressors, bridging external exposures to molecular impacts.^[141] Integration with machine learning enhances data interpretation, as in exposome-wide association studies identifying risk patterns.^[135] These tools collectively address the exposome's complexity but demand standardized protocols to mitigate variability in detection limits and false positives.

Validation and Reliability Challenges

One major challenge in exposome assessment is the paucity of validated biomarkers for most environmental exposures, necessitating reliance on surrogate measures such as questionnaires, geographic information systems (GIS), or remote sensing, which are prone to measurement error and misclassification. For example, self-reported data on lifestyle factors like diet or physical activity exhibit low reproducibility, with test-retest reliability coefficients often below 0.5 in longitudinal cohorts.^[132] ^[142] External exposure models, such as those for air pollutants, frequently fail to capture intra-individual variability due to unmodeled factors like time-activity patterns, resulting in exposure estimates that correlate poorly (r < 0.3) with personal monitoring devices in validation studies.^[132] Reliability is further compromised by the transition from targeted to untargeted analytical approaches, particularly in high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) for chemical exposomics, where non-standardized protocols lead to inconsistent detection limits and false positives across laboratories. Inter-laboratory comparisons have shown variability in chemical identification exceeding 50% for low-concentration analytes, undermining data comparability.^[143] Validation against gold-standard personal sensors or dosimetry is limited to a subset of exposures (e.g., particulate matter), leaving the majority—such as endocrine disruptors or psychosocial stressors—without robust ground-truth metrics.^[144] Reproducibility in exposome-wide association studies (EWAS) faces statistical hurdles from high-dimensionality, with thousands of correlated exposures inflating multiple-testing burdens and reducing power to detect true signals below effect sizes of 10-20% after correction. Empirical replication rates for initial EWAS findings hover around 20-30%, akin to early genomics challenges, due to cohort heterogeneity and unaddressed confounding from collinear exposures.^[145] Longitudinal validation remains scarce; for instance, only a fraction of studies incorporate repeated measures over years, revealing time-dependent decay in reliability for volatile exposures like volatile organic compounds (VOCs).^[146] Semantic and data integration issues exacerbate these problems, as external exposome ontologies are underdeveloped, hindering harmonization of diverse datasets from sensors, wearables, and administrative records. Efforts like the EXPOsOMICS project have demonstrated improved internal validity through multi-method triangulation (e.g., combining biomarkers with GIS), yet scalability is constrained by costs exceeding $100 per sample for comprehensive profiling.^[147] ^[148] Addressing these requires standardized reference materials and prospective cohorts for cross-validation, though institutional biases toward hypothesis-driven over agnostic approaches may slow progress.^[149]

Research Initiatives and Findings

Major Projects and Collaborations

The Human Early-Life Exposome (HELIX) project, funded by the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme from 2013 to 2018 with a budget exceeding €8 million, integrated data from six European birth cohorts involving over 30,000 mother-child pairs to characterize early-life exposures such as air pollution, water contaminants, and lifestyle factors, linking them to child health outcomes including respiratory, cardiometabolic, and neurodevelopmental effects. This collaborative effort, coordinated by the Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), employed advanced exposure modeling and biomarkers to advance exposome assessment methods, revealing patterns like higher prenatal exposure to fine particulate matter correlating with adverse birth outcomes across cohorts in Spain, France, Greece, the UK, the Netherlands, and Norway.^[150] The EXPOsOMICS project, supported by the EU's Horizon 2020 program from 2012 to 2017 with approximately €9 million, focused on internal and external exposome characterization for priority pollutants like air toxics and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, using omics profiling from over 500 adult volunteers and retrospective data from European cohorts to predict disease risks such as cardiovascular and respiratory conditions.^[151] Led by Imperial College London in partnership with institutions across Italy, Greece, and the UK, it pioneered personal exposure monitoring via wearables and untargeted metabolomics, demonstrating that internal dose markers from blood and urine better predict health effects than external estimates alone, though challenges in causal inference persisted due to confounding variables. The European Human Exposome Network (EHEN), launched in 2020 under Horizon 2020 with €50 million across nine interconnected projects, represents the largest coordinated exposome initiative, pooling data from over 500,000 participants in 30+ European cohorts to map lifelong exposures and integrate them with health registries for diseases including cancer and neurodegeneration.^[152] Collaborations involve 150+ partners from universities, research institutes, and public health agencies, emphasizing data harmonization platforms and geospatial analytics, with findings indicating that cumulative urban exposures contribute up to 70% more variance in cardiometabolic risk than genetics alone in preliminary analyses.^[153] In the United States, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) established the first NIH-wide Exposome Coordinating Center in 2024, building on prior investments exceeding $100 million since 2010, to standardize exposomics analyses across grantees and foster cross-agency collaborations for integrating exposure data with electronic health records.^[154] This initiative collaborates with academic centers like Johns Hopkins' Exposome Collaborative, which applies high-resolution mass spectrometry to assess chemical mixtures in ongoing cohort studies, highlighting persistent organic pollutants' role in immune dysregulation.^[155] The UK Medical Research Council (MRC) funded a £50 million Centre of Research Excellence in Exposome Immunology in 2025, spanning 14 years and uniting teams from Oxford, Manchester, and Edinburgh to dissect how lifetime exposures drive chronic inflammation, using longitudinal biobanks to quantify microbial and chemical interactions with immune pathways.^[156] These projects underscore international reliance on public funding for large-scale data integration, though critiques note potential overemphasis on modifiable exposures at the expense of unmeasured confounders like socioeconomic variability.

Recent Developments (2015–Present)

Since 2015, exposome research has expanded through large-scale consortia and infrastructure investments, emphasizing integration with multi-omics data and high-throughput measurement technologies. The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) launched the Children's Health Exposure Analysis Resource (CHEAR) in 2015, providing centralized laboratory capabilities for analyzing environmental exposures in pediatric studies, which facilitated over 50 funded projects by enabling cost-effective biomarker assessments for chemicals, metals, and mixtures.^[121] In Europe, the EXPOsOMICS project (concluding in 2017) advanced personal exposure assessment for air pollution and traffic using wearable sensors and GPS data linked to biomarkers in over 900 participants, demonstrating correlations between black carbon exposure and oxidative stress markers.^[157] Subsequent initiatives like the HELIX project (ending 2017) integrated pregnancy and childhood exposures across six cohorts, identifying critical windows for air pollution effects on birth weight and lung function.^[158] The establishment of the European Human Exposome Network (EHEN) in 2020 coordinated over 30 projects, harmonizing data from 40+ cohorts to model lifetime exposures and their health impacts, with findings linking combined physical, chemical, and lifestyle factors to cardiometabolic outcomes.^[159] EXPANSE, part of EHEN, developed urban exposome tools using satellite data and citizen science for real-time air and noise monitoring, revealing dose-response relationships between green space access and reduced cardiovascular risk in adults.^[159] In the U.S. and EU, clinical translation efforts emerged, such as IndiPHARM and HYPERMARKER projects by 2025, incorporating exposome profiling into pharmacogenomics for personalized dosing, with preliminary data showing exposure-adjusted predictions improving drug response accuracy by 15-20% in oncology trials.^[160] Empirical discoveries highlighted exposome-health links in neurodegeneration and early development. A 2022 multi-omics study of over 1,000 mother-child pairs associated prenatal and childhood exposures (e.g., phthalates, pesticides, and urban noise) with DNA methylation changes and immune profiles predictive of neurodevelopmental delays.^[127] For neurodegenerative diseases, 2024 analyses defined the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) exposome, quantifying lifetime cumulative risks from pesticides, heavy metals, and electromagnetic fields, with models estimating 10-20% variance in progression attributable to modifiable exposures.^[161]^[162] A 2024 European cohort study of external exposome factors (air pollution, noise, temperature) in over 300,000 adults found hazard ratios of 1.05-1.15 for all-cause mortality per interquartile range increase in composite scores, underscoring cumulative effects over single pollutants.^[163] These advancements, while promising, rely on self-reported and modeled data, prompting ongoing validation against internal dosimetry.^[135] Technological integration accelerated, with AI-driven analyses parsing high-dimensional exposome data; for instance, machine learning clusters of societal, built, and behavioral exposures predicted schizophrenia functional outcomes in first-episode cohorts with 70% accuracy.^[164]^[165] By 2025, exposomics informed precision public health, estimating that environmental improvements drove 60-70% of U.S. mortality gains from 1990-2015, shifting focus to post-2015 urban and chemical mixtures.^[166] Despite progress, challenges persist in causal inference, as observational designs limit separation of exposures from confounders like socioeconomic status.^[167]

Key Empirical Discoveries

In a comprehensive analysis of UK Biobank data from 492,567 participants, environmental exposures accounted for 17% of the variation in all-cause mortality, substantially exceeding the less than 2% explained by polygenic risk scores across 22 major diseases.^[168] Of 164 examined exposures, 110 showed significant associations with mortality, with 25 independent factors—such as smoking (hazard ratio >1.4) and higher household income (hazard ratio <0.8)—remaining robust after multivariable adjustment, highlighting the dominance of modifiable environmental determinants over genetic factors in predicting lifespan outcomes.^[168] Integrating exposome and genetic models increased explained variance in mortality by 16-19 percentage points from environmental components alone, compared to 2-3 percentage points from genetics, with combined models surpassing 50% for most age-related endpoints.^[168] Exposome research has quantified the outsized role of early-life and cumulative exposures in biological aging and disease incidence, with 25 key exposures linked to accelerated proteomic aging clocks and, on average, 22 of 25 aging biomarkers per exposure.^[168] For instance, these exposures correlated with 15 of 25 common age-related diseases on average, including cardiovascular conditions and cancers, underscoring causal pathways from environmental insults to multimorbidity independent of genetic heritability.^[168] While polygenic scores explained higher variance (10.3-26.2%) in incidences of dementias and certain cancers like breast and prostate, exposome effects prevailed in broader mortality and aging metrics, revealing environment's leverage in preventive interventions.^[168]^[169] Population-level exposome-wide association studies have identified pervasive links between specific exposures and health, such as prenatal and childhood chemical burdens (e.g., PCBs) with neurodevelopmental and respiratory outcomes, yielding 127 probable causal factor-outcome pairs in pediatric cohorts.^[170] Social and lifestyle dimensions of the exposome, including deprivation and physical inactivity, independently predict vascular aging and psychopathology, with a derived general exposome factor associating with elevated obesity odds (OR=1.4) and symptom severity (β=0.28).^[171]^[172] These findings affirm that environmental factors contribute to over 80% of chronic disease etiology globally, far beyond genetics' 10-30% heritability ceiling, emphasizing empirical shifts toward exposure mitigation for causal disease reduction.^[173]^[174]

Controversies and Debates

Nature Versus Nurture Dichotomy

The nature versus nurture dichotomy, originating in the 19th century through Francis Galton's coinage, frames the relative contributions of genetic inheritance (nature) and experiential factors (nurture) to phenotypic outcomes, but empirical research has largely superseded this binary framing with evidence of bidirectional interactions. Twin studies, comparing monozygotic and dizygotic pairs reared apart or together, consistently estimate heritability—the proportion of trait variance attributable to genetic differences—at 40-80% for behavioral and cognitive traits in high-resource environments, underscoring that genetic factors explain the majority of individual differences once basic needs are met.^[175]^[176] For intelligence, heritability rises from about 20-40% in early childhood, when environmental disparities like nutrition exert stronger effects, to 70-80% in adulthood as opportunities equalize, indicating that nurture's influence diminishes over time while genetic potentials stabilize.^[177] Gene-environment interactions (GxE) further erode the dichotomy, demonstrating that environmental factors do not act independently but interact with genetic variants to produce outcomes; for example, individuals with certain serotonin transporter gene alleles exhibit heightened depression risk under chronic stress, while others show resilience, with environmental exposures modulating epigenetic expression rather than overriding genetics.^[178] Adoption studies reinforce this, revealing that while shared family environments account for minimal variance (often <10%) in personality or psychopathology after adolescence, non-shared experiences—unique to each individual—interact with polygenic scores to shape trajectories, as evidenced by longitudinal data from cohorts like the Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart.^[179] In environmental health contexts, factors like toxin exposure (e.g., lead) demonstrably lower IQ by 4-7 points on average, yet population-level effects are constrained by genetic baselines, with heritability remaining robust even in polluted settings.^[180] Debates persist due to interpretive biases, particularly in academia and policy-oriented fields, where environmental determinism—positing outcomes as primarily malleable through interventions—prevails despite contradictory data, often to align with egalitarian ideologies that downplay innate differences. Quantitative behavioral genetics, drawing from genome-wide association studies (GWAS), attributes 20-50% of variance in educational attainment or psychopathology to measurable genetic factors, yet narratives emphasizing socioeconomic or cultural nurture dominate, as critiqued in reviews highlighting how heritability estimates are dismissed or requantified to fit non-genetic models.^[181] This skew reflects systemic pressures against "genetic determinism," though causal realism demands acknowledging that environments select for and amplify genetic variances rather than supplant them; for instance, assortative mating and meritocratic systems increasingly align outcomes with heritable traits, reducing nurture's explanatory power. Empirical synthesis thus favors an interactionist model where environmental factors, while causally potent in deprivation scenarios, operate within genetic architectures that set upper bounds on plasticity.^[182]

Overreliance on Environmental Determinism

Overreliance on environmental determinism refers to the tendency in certain scholarly and policy domains to attribute variations in human traits, behaviors, and outcomes predominantly or exclusively to environmental influences, while systematically underweighting genetic contributions. This approach echoes the "blank slate" doctrine, which posits that individuals are born without significant innate predispositions, with differences arising chiefly from external factors like upbringing and socioeconomic conditions. Empirical evidence from behavioral genetics, however, contradicts such monocausal explanations, revealing that genetic factors account for substantial portions of variance in key traits. Twin studies, for instance, estimate the heritability of general cognitive ability (g) at 41% in childhood, rising linearly to 55% in adolescence and 66% in early adulthood, with shared environmental influences diminishing over time.^[183] Adoption studies further underscore the limits of environmental determinism by demonstrating that adopted children's IQs correlate more strongly with biological parents than adoptive ones, indicating genetic transmission independent of rearing environment. In a analysis of adoptive and biological families, IQ heritability was estimated at 0.42 (95% CI: 0.21–0.64), with minimal lasting impact from adoptive family socioeconomic status on cognitive outcomes. Similarly, for personality traits, twin studies yield heritability estimates averaging 40%, ranging from 15% to 55% across dimensions like extraversion and neuroticism, where non-shared environmental effects dominate over shared ones. These findings highlight that while environments modulate expression, they do not erase underlying genetic architectures, as evidenced by genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identifying polygenic scores predicting up to 20% of IQ variance.^[184]^[185] This overreliance persists partly due to ideological preferences in academia and media for egalitarian narratives that prioritize malleability, often dismissing genetic evidence as deterministic or politically inconvenient—a pattern critiqued as resistance to behavioral genetics rooted in misconceptions of free will and heritability. Meta-analyses of over 17,000 traits from twin data confirm broad genetic influences, yet social sciences frequently favor nurture-centric models, leading to flawed causal inferences. For example, policies assuming equal environmental inputs yield equal outcomes ignore heritability, as seen in educational interventions where genetic variance explains persistent achievement gaps beyond socioeconomic controls. Such approaches risk inefficacy, as interventions targeting shared environment yield diminishing returns in adulthood when genetic effects predominate.^[186]^[187]

Socioeconomic Explanations Versus Individual Agency

Socioeconomic explanations for disparities in outcomes such as educational attainment, income, and health often emphasize external factors like poverty, neighborhood quality, and access to resources as primary causal drivers, positing that improving these conditions would substantially equalize results across populations.^[188]^[189] These views draw on correlations between low socioeconomic status (SES) and adverse outcomes, including higher rates of cardiovascular disease and poorer quality of life, with longitudinal data indicating that sustained low SES predicts persistent health deficits.^[190]^[191] However, such interpretations frequently overlook confounding individual-level variables, as evidenced by randomized interventions like the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) experiment (1994–1998), which relocated families from high-poverty to low-poverty neighborhoods but yielded mixed results: modest gains in mental health and obesity reduction for adults, yet limited or null effects on employment, earnings, and education—particularly for males—suggesting that environmental shifts alone do not override entrenched behavioral patterns.^[192]^[193]^[194] In contrast, evidence from behavioral genetics underscores the role of individual agency, proxied through heritable traits like cognitive ability, perseverance, and personality, which independently predict life outcomes beyond SES. Twin and adoption studies estimate heritability of educational attainment at 40–70%, rising in contexts of greater social mobility where family-shared environments matter less, implying that genetic endowments enabling personal initiative—such as intelligence and conscientiousness—drive variance in achievement more than shared socioeconomic circumstances.^[10]^[195] For income, polygenic scores associated with common genetic variants explain up to 10–15% of variance, with heritability modulated by but not subsumed under environmental factors, challenging deterministic models that attribute inequality primarily to structural barriers.^[196] Among low-SES students, factors like perceived competence, academic buoyancy, and low conduct problems—markers of agency—correlate with resilience and success, independent of background.^[197] Critiques of socioeconomic determinism highlight its tendency to underemphasize causal agency, fostering policies that prioritize systemic fixes over personal accountability and ignoring how heritable traits mediate environmental effects.^[198]^[199] This perspective aligns with findings that cognitive and psychological resources, rather than SES alone, account for much of the stratification in success, as multiple abilities (e.g., non-cognitive skills) interact with opportunities but originate substantially from individual biology.^[200] Empirical patterns, such as stagnant mobility despite anti-poverty programs, further suggest that overattributing outcomes to SES conflates correlation with causation, potentially biasing research toward environmental interventions while sidelining genetic resilience and choice.^[201] In high-mobility societies, heritability's prominence reinforces that individual agency, enabled by innate capacities, often trumps deterministic environmental narratives.^[202]

Criticisms and Limitations

Methodological and Causal Inference Issues

Studies attributing outcomes such as intelligence or behavior to environmental factors often struggle with causal inference due to the predominance of observational data, where randomization is infeasible, leading to challenges in distinguishing correlation from causation.^[203] Confounding variables, including genetic factors that influence both environmental exposures and traits, frequently bias estimates; for instance, parental socioeconomic status correlates with child IQ not only through enriched environments but also via heritable cognitive abilities passed to offspring.^[204]^[205] A specific example arises in research on toxins like lead and IQ, where apparent negative effects are often overstated because confounders such as maternal IQ, home environment quality (e.g., HOME score), and parental education account for variances exceeding or equaling the exposure's estimated impact, particularly at low exposure levels below 10 μg/dL.^[206]^[207] Quantitative analyses adjusting for these factors demonstrate that unadjusted models inflate environmental causality, with confounder adjustments reducing effect sizes by up to 50% or more in meta-analyses of cohort studies.^[208] Gene-environment interactions (G×E) and dependencies further complicate inference, as genotypes can evoke or select environments (e.g., passive, evocative, or active rGE), inducing collider bias when conditioning on outcomes or intermediaries in regression models.^[209] This bias arises because genetic propensities shape exposures—such as intelligent parents providing stimulating homes—creating spurious associations if not modeled causally, as evidenced in simulations where ignoring rGE leads to overestimation of environmental main effects by 20-30%.^[203] Quasi-experimental designs like twin or adoption studies mitigate some issues by comparing monozygotic and dizygotic pairs to partition variance, yet they remain susceptible to unmeasured shared environments or assortative mating, which inflate heritability estimates and deflate pure environmental ones.^[210]^[211] Omitted variables, including unmeasured genetic or cultural confounders, pose ongoing threats, as social scientists' reliance on cross-sectional or longitudinal surveys without instrumental variables or Mendelian randomization often fails to isolate exogenous environmental shocks.^[212] For behavioral traits with high heritability (e.g., 50-80% for IQ), detecting modest environmental effects requires large samples and rigorous controls, but many studies underpower for interactions, leading to false negatives or positives; recent calls advocate integrating causal graphs and family-based designs to strengthen claims.^[213]^[214] Overall, these methodological hurdles underscore that while environments matter, inferring their causal potency demands skepticism toward unadjusted associations and prioritization of designs approximating counterfactuals.^[204]

Potential Biases in Research Funding and Interpretation

Research funding for environmental factors in human development and behavior often prioritizes studies emphasizing modifiable social and experiential influences, reflecting the ideological composition of grant-awarding bodies and academic reviewers, which surveys indicate are overwhelmingly left-leaning. In social sciences and psychology, where environmental determinism aligns with policy preferences for interventionist approaches to inequality, federal agencies like the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Science Foundation (NSF) allocate disproportionate resources to research on socioeconomic and cultural determinants over genetic heritability, despite twin studies demonstrating heritability estimates exceeding 50% for traits such as intelligence and political ideology in adulthood.^[215] This disparity is exacerbated by competitive grant processes that favor proposals avoiding controversial genetic implications, leading to underfunding of behavioral genetics; for example, political scientists report no dedicated funding streams for heritability research, unlike ample support for environmental policy studies.^[215]^[216] Interpretation of findings exhibits similar biases, with researchers in ideologically homogeneous fields prone to downplaying genetic variance in favor of environmental explanations, even when data suggest substantial heritability. A 2017 survey of academics revealed that scholars in humanities and social sciences disproportionately endorsed strong environmental determinism for complex traits, underestimating genetic influences relative to empirical evidence from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and adoption designs, which attribute 40-80% of variance in educational attainment and cognitive ability to heritable factors.^[217]^[218] This interpretive skew, documented in models of political bias, manifests as selective emphasis on gene-environment interactions interpreted primarily as environmental moderation, potentially overlooking additive genetic effects due to confirmation biases reinforced by peer review norms in left-leaning disciplines.^[216]^[219] Such patterns contribute to a feedback loop where funded studies amplify environmental narratives, marginalizing dissenting genetic perspectives despite their empirical robustness.

Underemphasis on Genetic Resilience

Research on environmental factors, such as those encompassed by the exposome concept, frequently prioritizes the average adverse effects of exposures across populations, thereby underemphasizing the role of genetic variation in conferring resilience to such influences.^[220] Gene-environment interactions (GxE) demonstrate that certain genetic variants can buffer or mitigate the impact of environmental stressors, yet these moderating effects are often sidelined in favor of deterministic models that assume uniform vulnerability.^[221] For instance, twin studies have quantified genetic contributions to psychological resilience, with heritability estimates indicating that genetic factors explain a substantial portion of variance in adaptive responses to adversity, independent of shared environmental influences.^[222] ^[223] This underemphasis stems partly from methodological challenges in detecting GxE effects, which require large sample sizes and sophisticated statistical modeling to distinguish from main effects, leading to underpowered studies and a relative scarcity of robust findings.^[221] In fields like environmental epidemiology, the focus on modifiable exposures for policy interventions may incentivize research that highlights environmental risks over innate genetic protections, potentially overlooking how polymorphisms in genes involved in detoxification or stress response—such as those in the glutathione S-transferase family—reduce susceptibility to pollutants like air particulates or heavy metals.^[224] Systematic reviews of genetic variants linked to resilience highlight mechanisms like enhanced neural plasticity or inflammatory regulation that counteract environmental insults, but these are infrequently integrated into exposome frameworks.^[224] Critics argue that this imbalance perpetuates an overreliance on environmental determinism, ignoring evidence from behavioral genetics where genetic factors not only predispose to vulnerability but also promote resilience through differential sensitivity to contexts.^[225] ^[226] For example, in studies of severe mental illness, GxE research reveals understudied protective interactions, such as specific alleles that attenuate the link between childhood adversity and later psychopathology.^[225] Similarly, exposome analyses that emphasize non-genetic properties of exposures can inadvertently dismiss how genetics shape phenotypic plasticity in response to lifelong cumulative burdens.^[220] Addressing this gap calls for expanded genomic integration in environmental studies to accurately model causal pathways, as heritability of resilience traits—estimated at 30-50% in meta-analyses—suggests genetics play a non-trivial role in why not all exposed individuals manifest harm.^[227] ^[224] The systemic preference for nurture-over-nature explanations in academia, evidenced by historical resistance to high heritability findings in behavioral traits, may further contribute to this underemphasis, as funding and publication biases favor actionable environmental narratives over complex genetic moderators.^[228] Despite growing recognition, resilient outcomes remain understudied relative to pathology, limiting a full causal understanding of how genetics enable adaptation to environmental pressures.^[226]

References

[1]
What is an Environmental Factor? - Learn Genetics Utah
Environmental factors include everything outside of DNA that affects your traits. They are very broad and can influence you in many ways.
[2]
Environmental Factors - National Human Genome Research Institute
Environmental factors, as related to genetics, refers to exposures to substances (such as pesticides or industrial waste) where we live or work.
[3]
Gene and Environment Interaction
Factors in your environment can range from chemicals in air or water pollution, mold, pesticides, diet choices, or grooming products.
[4]
Gene Environment Interaction
Gene environment interaction is an influence on the expression of a trait that results from the interplay between genes and the environment.
[5]
Environmental factors affecting plant growth | OSU Extension Service
Environmental factors that affect plant growth include light, temperature, water, humidity and nutrition. It's important to understand how these factors affect ...
[6]
Environmental Change | Department of Ecology and Evolutionary ...
A marked change in the environment favors some characteristics of plants, animals and microbes over others. These character differences are often genetically ...
[7]
The Effects of Environmental Factors on General Human Health
Each link in the chord diagrams shows a positive value association between the disease and the environmental factor as identified by reviewed articles. Also ...
[8]
Environmental risk factors of inflammatory bowel disease
Mar 11, 2025 · 4. Roadmap to translating environmental factor modification in preventing IBD. 4.1 Predicting individuals at risk of IBD. Understanding the ...
[9]
Differences in genetic and environmental influences on the human ...
Studies of heritability of cognition have found that there is a gene × environment interaction such that shared environmental factors become more prominent ...
[10]
Genetic and environmental variation in educational attainment
Jul 29, 2020 · We investigated the heritability of educational attainment and how it differed between birth cohorts and cultural–geographic regions.
[11]
What is heritability?: MedlinePlus Genetics
Sep 16, 2021 · Heritability can give initial clues as to the relative influences of “nature” (genetics) and “nurture” (environment) on complex traits, and it ...
[12]
[PDF] The Role of Environmental Factors in the Development of Chronic ...
Air pollution emerged as a significant environmental factor associated with the development of chronic diseases. Several studies reported a positive association ...
[13]
Physical and Social Environmental Factors - U.S. Health in ... - NCBI
Residential segregation (and its many social and physical correlates) may be another environmental factor that affects multiple, seemingly unrelated health ...
[14]
Environmental risk factors for all-cause dementia, Alzheimer's ...
Apr 1, 2025 · ... environmental factor that is often modified through local planning and bylaws (Brown et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2019). Modification of ...
[15]
How environmental perception influence depression and anxiety
Mar 31, 2025 · ... environmental factor. Conclusion and limitation. In conclusion, individuals with poorer perceptions of their environment are more prone to ...
[16]
Environmental Factor - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Environmental Factor. In subject area: Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Environmental factors refer to elements such as sun, rain, wind, humidity, and ...
[17]
Environment | McGraw Hill's AccessScience
For each environmental factor, an organism has a tolerance range in which it is able to survive. The intercept of these ranges constitutes the ecological niche ...
[18]
https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/environmental-influences-on-gene-expression-536
[19]
Defining the Human Envirome | Circulation Research
Apr 27, 2018 · ... environmental factor, which by definition is external to an individual. Moreover, social determinants of health do not include the natural ...Human Envirome · Natural Environment · Social Environment
[20]
Gene-environment interactions within a precision environmental ...
Jul 10, 2024 · We review the state of GEI research, including challenges in measuring environmental factors and advantages of GEI analysis in understanding disease mechanisms.
[21]
10: Environmental Factors - Biology LibreTexts
Jan 3, 2021 · Temperature, oxygen, pH, water activity, pressure, radiation, lack of nutrients…these are the primary ones. We will cover more about metabolism ...
[22]
Environment - Definition and Examples - Biology Online Dictionary
May 29, 2023 · The environment is the total of all living and nonliving things in nature that affect an individual's survival and development.Environment Definition · Types of Environments · External Environment...
[23]
Epigenetics and the exposome: A new era of disease prevention
By analyzing these epigenetic marks, scientists can assess the exposome more robustly and better study how environmental factors can shape long-term health ...
[24]
Environmental and Heritable Factors in the Causation of Cancer
Jul 13, 2000 · We used data from the Swedish, Danish, and Finnish twin registries to estimate the effects of genetic and environmental factors on the most common cancers.<|control11|><|separator|>
[25]
Worldwide Well-Being: Simulated Twins Reveal Genetic and ... - NIH
Jun 29, 2023 · We find a worldwide heritability of 31% to 32% for SWB. Individual environmental factors explain 46% to 52% of the variance (including measurement error).
[26]
Genetics and Health - Genes, Behavior, and the Social Environment
Any single genetic or environmental factor is expected to explain only a very small fraction of disease risk in a population. Moreover, these factors are ...
[27]
GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES ON HUMAN ...
Mar 1, 1998 · Human behavioral genetic research aimed at characterizing the existence and nature of genetic and environmental influences on individual differences.
[28]
Genetic, Environmental, and Personality Determinants of Health ...
Risk behaviors such as tobacco use, unhealthy eating behaviors, and physical inactivity play an important role in models of genetic and environmental ...
[29]
Risk factors in health and disease - EUPATI Toolbox
Types of risk factors · Behavioural risk factors · Physiological risk factors · Demographic risk factors · Environmental risk factors · Genetic risk factors.
[30]
Genes, environment, and behavior (article) | Khan Academy
This combination of your genetics and experiences ultimately forms your identity and influences your behavior.
[31]
Noncommunicable diseases - World Health Organization (WHO)
Sep 25, 2025 · ... genetic, physiological, environmental and behavioural factors. The main types of NCDs are cardiovascular diseases (such as heart attacks and ...
[32]
Lifestyle and environmental factors affect health and ageing more ...
Feb 20, 2025 · environmental exposures had a greater effect on diseases of the lung, heart and liver, while genetic risk dominated for dementias and breast ...
[33]
Biological and Physical Determinants of Health - Kyruus Health
Jun 8, 2022 · Biological and genetic factors combined with health behaviors affect health up to 25 percent, while social and physical ones account for 75 ...
[34]
Gene–environment interactions and their impact on human health
Dec 30, 2022 · We next detail well-established G × E interactions that impact human health involving environmental toxicants, pollution, viruses, and sex chromosome ...
[35]
Environmental Exposures and Gene Regulation in Disease Etiology
The reviewed studies indicate that genetic predisposition for disease is best predicted in the context of environmental exposures.
[36]
Abiotic factor - Definition and Examples - Biology Online Dictionary
Sep 26, 2023 · An abiotic factor is a non-living element of the environment that influences the way organisms and ecosystems function.
[37]
Abiotic factors - (General Biology I) - Vocab, Definition, Explanations
Definition. Abiotic factors are the non-living chemical and physical components of the environment that influence ecosystems and living organisms.
[38]
Major abiotic factors (article) | Khan Academy
abiotic factors, non-living, physical or chemical components that influence an organism's habitat ; eurythermal organism, organism that can tolerate a wide range ...
[39]
Impacts of environmental and climatic changes on future infectious ...
Jan 24, 2023 · Environmental and climatic changes in infectious diseases. Environmental factors such as temperature, rainfall, and humidity consequential of ...Missing: peer | Show results with:peer
[40]
Abiotic and biotic factors jointly influence the contact and ...
Aug 16, 2024 · Abiotic factors such as temperature can directly influence pathogen persistence in the environment and will also affect biotic factors, such as ...
[41]
Abiotic and biotic factors affecting the immune system of aquatic ...
Abiotic environmental factors, including temperature, salinity, pH, hypoxia, and pollutants, significantly influence immune functions in aquatic animals.
[42]
Effect of abiotic factors and environmental concentrations on the ...
Dec 10, 2021 · Many aquatic ecosystems are under persistent stress due to influxes of anthropogenic chemical pollutants. High concentrations can harm ...<|separator|>
[43]
Abiotic Factors - National Geographic Education
Oct 19, 2023 · In a terrestrial ecosystem, examples might include temperature, light, and water. In a marine ecosystem, abiotic factors would include salinity ...
[44]
Biotic and abiotic factors | Research Starters - EBSCO
Conversely, abiotic factors encompass all nonliving elements that influence ecosystems, such as landforms, water, air, sunlight, and climate. These components ...
[45]
Biotic and Abiotic Effects of Human Settlements in the Wildland ...
Apr 3, 2014 · For example, exotic plant species richness decreases significantly with the distance from settlement edge in a small forest surrounded by WUI ...
[46]
Biotic Factors - National Geographic Education
A biotic factor is a living organism that shapes its environment. In a freshwater ecosystem, examples might include aquatic plants, fish, amphibians, and algae.
[47]
Biotic factor - Definition and Examples - Biology Online Dictionary
Sep 26, 2023 · Biotic factors are the living components, such as bacteria, birds, and any other living things present in an ecosystem.Biotic Factor Definition · Types of Biotic Factors · Consumer biotic factor...
[48]
Biotic Factors: Types, Examples & Key Influences - Microbe Notes
May 26, 2025 · Biotic factor or components means the living things of an eco-system. It is also responsible for the different outbreaks of diseases. Both ...Producers · Decomposers · Example of biotic factors · Factors Affecting
[49]
What Are Biotic and Abiotic Factors in an Ecosystem? - Treehugger
Biotic factors include interactions between organisms, like disease, predation, parasitism, and competition among species or within a single species. In ...Biotic Factors · Abiotic Factors · Yellowstone Biotic And...
[50]
Biotic factors - Interdependency between animal and plant species
factors are interactions associated with living organisms. Examples of biotic factors are: food availability; competition for environmental resources; grazing ...
[51]
Dynamic Human Environmental Exposome Revealed by ...
Sep 20, 2018 · Information about environmental exposures, both biotics (e.g., fungi, pollen, and microbes) and abiotics (e.g., chemicals), can be important for ...Missing: factors | Show results with:factors
[52]
Environmental and Health Impacts of Air Pollution: A Review
Anthropogenic air pollution is one of the biggest public health hazards worldwide, given that it accounts for about 9 million deaths per year (1). Without a ...
[53]
Health Impacts of Air Pollution | State of Global Air
Air pollution accounts for more than 1 in 8 deaths globally. · Air pollution contributed to 7.9 million deaths in 2023. · Air pollution is the 2nd leading risk ...
[54]
Air pollution deaths attributable to fossil fuels - The BMJ
Nov 29, 2023 · An estimated 5.13 million (3.63 to 6.32) excess deaths per year globally are attributable to ambient air pollution from fossil fuel use.<|separator|>
[55]
Dietary pesticide exposure and non-communicable diseases and ...
Oct 31, 2023 · This seems consistent with a recent systematic review on pesticides and risk of cancer [11].
[56]
Exposure to Pesticides, Herbicides, & Insecticides: Human Health ...
A 2022 systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that pesticide exposure is a major risk factor for metabolic syndrome.4 The analysis included 12 studies for ...
[57]
Full article: Pesticide Exposure or Pesticide Poisoning and the Risk ...
Nov 10, 2023 · The present meta-analysis suggested clearly a significant positive association between pesticide poisoning and depression.
[58]
Pesticides impacts on human health and the environment with their ...
Apr 15, 2024 · Evidence suggests that exposure to pesticides for a long period of time can cause brain damage and lead to the progression of AD. In a meta- ...
[59]
Environmental Risk Factors and Health: An Umbrella Review ... - NIH
The environmental factors found in this review were air pollution, environmental tobacco smoke, heavy metals, chemicals, ambient temperature, noise, radiation, ...Missing: anthropogenic | Show results with:anthropogenic
[60]
Household air pollution - World Health Organization (WHO)
Oct 16, 2024 · Household air pollution is a risk for acute lower respiratory infections in adults and contributes to 22% of all adult deaths due to pneumonia;
[61]
Tobacco smoke particles and indoor air quality (ToPIQ)
Dec 21, 2011 · In addition, exposure to PM and especially to PM2.5 has been linked to the development of cancer [30]. However, the exact mechanism of cancer ...
[62]
Health losses attributed to anthropogenic climate change - Nature
Sep 17, 2025 · Over the last decade, attribution science has shown that climate change is responsible for substantial death, disability and illness.
[63]
Indoor Air, Passive Smoking, and COPD - ATS Journals
Obstructive lung disease appears to predispose to a higher risk of adverse health effects from indoor particulate pollutants, especially SHS. Further research ...
[64]
A systematic review of pesticide exposure, associated risks, and ...
This systematic review synthesizes the available evidence regarding the health risks and long-term effects of pesticide exposure
[65]
Determining environmental causes of biological effects: the need for ...
Physiology provides the mechanistic link between environmental change and ecological patterns. Physiological research, therefore, should be integrated into ...
[66]
The Physiological Effects of Air Pollution: Particulate Matter ...
Research has shown human exposure to PM to be associated with multiple respiratory diseases including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, ...
[67]
Environmental pollutants and their effects on human health - PMC
Possible mechanisms of the harmful effects of ultrafine particles include increased blood viscosity and coagulation, which affect endothelial and vascular ...
[68]
Environmental Toxins and Brain: Life on Earth is in Danger - PMC
Sep 5, 2022 · The exposure of humans to neurotoxins in our environment leads to various neurological clinical manifestations; for example, encephalopathies, ...
[69]
Molecular mechanisms of environmental exposures and human ...
Here, we discuss emerging research on interactions of environmental exposures with the human genome and review evidence of the environmental impact on ...
[70]
Epigenetic alterations induced by environmental stress associated ...
Epigenetic modifications of the genome (ie, “epigenome”) are more vulnerable to environmental stress, such as malnutrition, environmental chemicals, and mental ...
[71]
Epigenetics: A Molecular Link Between Environmental Factors ... - NIH
Environmental exposures to nutrients may change gene expression and alter disease susceptibility through epigenetic modifications. Similar mechanisms are ...<|separator|>
[72]
Rapid DNA Methylation Changes after Exposure to Traffic Particles
Jul 15, 2008 · Lower blood DNA methylation content is found in processes related to cardiovascular outcomes, such as oxidative stress, aging, and ...
[73]
Air pollution and DNA methylation: effects of exposure in humans
Sep 3, 2019 · Emerging data indicate that air pollution exposure modulates the epigenetic mark, DNA methylation (DNAm), and that these changes might in turn influence ...
[74]
DNA methylation: a potential mediator between air pollution and ...
Jun 30, 2022 · This paper comprehensively reviews the evidence for the hypothesis that the effect of air pollution on the MetS is mediated by DNA methylation in blood.
[75]
Environmental Epigenetics and Its Implication on Disease Risk and ...
This review focuses on how environmental factors through epigenetics modify disease risk and health outcomes.
[76]
Epigenetics and environmental chemicals - PMC - NIH
Environmental chemicals may modify multiple biological processes that affect epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation, histone codes, and miRNA ...
[77]
Exploring the evidence for epigenetic regulation of environmental ...
Jun 22, 2021 · It is also hypothesized that environmental exposure effects can be transmitted across generations via epigenetic modifications of germline DNA.
[78]
Environmental exposures influence multigenerational epigenetic ...
Oct 17, 2024 · Epigenetics are also modified by a multitude of environmental exposures, including diet and pollutants, allowing an individual's environment to influence gene ...
[79]
Genotype by Environment Interactions in Cognitive Ability - NIH
Researchers have tried to identify modifiers that influence the heritability of cognitive ability, indicating a genotype by environment interaction (GxE).
[80]
Genome-wide gene-environment interactions in neuroticism
From a biological perspective, GxE can be seen as the process by which environmental influences are moderated by genetic factors (or vice versa). GxE has been ...
[81]
Gene-environment interaction using polygenic scores - NIH
In relation to developmental psychopathology, GxE can be thought of as genetic moderation of the association between environmental factors, such as parenting, ...
[82]
Measured Gene-Environment Interactions in Psychopathology
Likewise, cannabis use was a good environmental candidate for our G × E study of COMT and psychosis because cannabis affects the same neuroanatomical sites, ...
[83]
Gene-Environment Interactions in Schizophrenia: A Literature Review
Nov 23, 2021 · Schizophrenia is a devastating mental illness with a strong genetic component that is the subject of extensive research.
[84]
Genes, environment and schizophrenia | The British Journal of ...
Jan 2, 2018 · This model postulates that patients with schizophrenia express psychosis when the frontal cortex comes 'on-line' in a deficient fashion, as a ...
[85]
Gene-environment interactions explain a substantial portion of ...
Sep 20, 2022 · Limitations of the study. Our study finds substantial gene-environment interactions in common neuropsychiatric diseases through elegant methods.
[86]
Measured Gene by Environment Interaction in Relation to Attention ...
In all, higher heritability coefficients are suggestive of more, rather than less, GxE. Accordingly, GxE may be especially appropriate for understanding ADHD.<|control11|><|separator|>
[87]
An approach to identify gene-environment interactions and reveal ...
Apr 22, 2024 · We present a powerful new approach to screen for interactions across the genome, an approach that shares substantial similarity to the Mendelian randomization ...
[88]
Commentary: Fundamental problems with candidate gene-by ...
... moderation, in which the overall heritability of a trait changes across the levels of an environmental moderator. Neither approach is free from limitations ...
[89]
Gene-Environment Interaction in Psychological Traits and Disorders
In this article, I review different methodologies to study gene-environment interaction, providing an overview of methods from animal and human studies.
[90]
Lessons Learned From Past Gene-Environment Interaction Successes
Oct 1, 2017 · Genetic and environmental factors are both known to contribute to susceptibility to complex diseases. Therefore, the study of gene-environment ...
[91]
How does hormesis impact biology, toxicology, and medicine?
Sep 15, 2017 · Hormesis refers to adaptive responses of biological systems to moderate environmental or self-imposed challenges through which the system improves its ...
[92]
The Importance of Hormesis to Public Health
With hormesis, any exposure limit below the ZEP would protect the general public against the risk of disease in excess of background—including the hypothetical ...
[93]
Possible positive effects of ionising radiation - hormesis
Hormesis is also used to justify the radiotherapy of inflammatory conditions, stimulative irradiation as well as the treatment of rheumatism in radon (health) ...
[94]
The hygiene hypothesis: current perspectives and future therapies
Strachan proposed that this increased microbial exposure in early life could protect children from developing immune hypersensitivities later in life. Strachan ...Missing: benefits | Show results with:benefits
[95]
Time to abandon the hygiene hypothesis: new perspectives on ... - NIH
Numerous studies now show that exposure to farm environments during the first 2–3 years of life protects against allergic disorders and correlates with ...
[96]
Are you feeling comfortable? – Measuring clinical hormesis
Instead, hormesis suggests that some stressors, within a certain range of exposure, can stimulate adaptive responses that enhance resilience and promote health.
[97]
Health and environment from adaptation to adaptivity: a situated ...
In public health, adaptation is being used in relation to climate change and the effects of ecological issues/disasters on health and well-being. Several ...
[98]
Environmental and Health Impacts of Air Pollution: A Review - PMC
Feb 20, 2020 · The long-term effects associated with air pollution are chronic asthma, pulmonary insufficiency, cardiovascular diseases, and cardiovascular ...
[99]
Long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution and selected ...
Long-term exposure to TRAP and the adverse health outcomes all-cause, circulatory, ischemic heart disease and lung cancer mortality, asthma onset in children ...Short Communication · 5. Main Findings Of The... · 5.2. Respiratory Outcomes
[100]
Research on Health Effects from Air Pollution | US EPA
Jun 11, 2025 · Decades of research have shown that air pollutants such as ozone and particulate matter (PM) increase the amount and seriousness of lung and heart disease and ...
[101]
Drinking-water - World Health Organization (WHO)
Sep 13, 2023 · Contaminated water and poor sanitation are linked to transmission of diseases such as cholera, diarrhoea, dysentery, hepatitis A, typhoid and ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
[102]
Potential Well Water Contaminants and Their Impacts | US EPA
Jul 21, 2025 · People that consume high levels of heavy metals risk acute and chronic toxicity, liver, kidney, and intestinal damage, anemia, and cancer.
[103]
The impact of water pollution on the health of older people - PubMed
Mar 30, 2024 · Water pollution is also associated with physical ailments, such as diarrhea, skin diseases, malnutrition, and cancer. Exposure to specific ...
[104]
Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: implications for human health
... exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and a deepened understanding of their effects on human health. In this Series paper, we have reviewed su …
[105]
Carcinogenic health outcomes associated with endocrine disrupting ...
Sep 5, 2024 · Carcinogenic health outcomes associated with endocrine disrupting chemicals exposure in humans: A wide-scope analysis · Highlights · Abstract.
[106]
Latest Science Shows Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals in Plastics ...
Feb 26, 2024 · “For example, we know that even very low doses of endocrine disrupting chemicals can cause health problems and there may be no safe dose for ...
[107]
Climate Change and Vectorborne Diseases
Nov 23, 2022 · Warming temperatures and changes in precipitation associated with climate change are affecting the occurrence of vectorborne diseases.
[108]
Empirical evidence of mental health risks posed by climate change
Oct 8, 2018 · We show that short-term exposure to more extreme weather, multiyear warming, and tropical cyclone exposure each associate with worsened mental health.
[109]
https://abcnews.go.com/International/mosquitoes-found-iceland-1st-time-temperatures-region-rise/story?id=126716295
[110]
Air Pollution, Built Environment, and Early Cardiovascular Disease
Jun 8, 2023 · Key Studies of How Air Pollution Exposure Before Adulthood ... Study of Atherosclerosis and Air Pollution): a longitudinal cohort study.
[111]
Framingham Heart Study (FHS) - NHLBI - NIH
The NHLBI is using FHS data in the TOPMed Program to better understand the genetic and environmental factors contributing to cardiovascular disease. Study ...
[112]
Longitudinal analyses of prenatal and postnatal lead exposure and ...
High prenatal lead exposure was linked to lower cognitive scores in infants, with a 4.8 point difference from low exposure. Postnatal lead levels showed no ...
[113]
Childhood lead exposure is associated with lower cognitive ...
Nov 9, 2022 · While lead in drinking water has been shown to negatively affect cognition among children, much less is known about its long-term consequences ...
[114]
Association of Long-term Exposure to Particulate Air Pollution With ...
Feb 24, 2023 · In this study, long-term PM 2.5 exposure at moderate concentrations was associated with increased risks of incident AMI, IHD mortality, and CVD mortality.
[115]
Associations between early-life exposure to PM2.5 and reductions in ...
Dec 14, 2022 · Longitudinal studies are needed to identify the early-life exposures ... Environmental factors and developmental outcomes in the lung.
[116]
Midlife and late-life environmental exposures on dementia risk in the ...
Nov 22, 2024 · Late-life air pollution exposure is associated with an increased risk for dementia, with this effect exacerbated among apolipoprotein E-4 (ApoE-4) carriers.
[117]
Adverse early-life environmental exposures and their repercussions ...
Dec 16, 2021 · In this review, the authors will address how exposure to environmental hazards early in life can have an impact on adult respiratory health. The ...
[118]
Longitudinal Analysis of Long-Term Air Pollution Levels and Blood ...
Longitudinal study designs are useful for ensuring that past air pollution exposures can be investigated in relation to future blood pressure levels.
[119]
The exposome: from concept to utility - Oxford Academic
Jan 31, 2012 · The concept of the exposome was developed to draw attention to the critical need for more complete environmental exposure assessment in epidemiological studies.
[120]
The exposome at twenty: a personal account - Oxford Academic
Apr 21, 2025 · This article provides a personal history of the exposome, which serves to highlight the reasons why an exposome was needed to complement the genome.
[121]
Exposure Biology and the Exposome
Measuring the totality of exposures a person experiences from conception to death along with the associated biological response is referred to as the exposome, ...
[122]
Use of the “Exposome” in the Practice of Epidemiology - NIH
The exposome has been defined as the totality of exposure individuals experience over their lives and how those exposures affect health.
[123]
Exposome - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The exposome is composed of the following 3 overlapping domains of exposures: (1) a general external exposome that includes factors, such as climate factors ...Missing: components | Show results with:components<|separator|>
[124]
The Prenatal and Early Life Exposome: Shaping Health ... - JACC
Jan 8, 2024 · The exposome framework takes a panoramic, all-encompassing view of the environmental influences shaping health over a lifespan.Missing: coverage | Show results with:coverage
[125]
bridging genome, exposome and personalized medicine - PMC
Apr 30, 2025 · We highlight cutting-edge methodologies, including multi-omics technologies, exposome-wide association studies (EWAS), physiology-based ...
[126]
Decoding the exposome: data science methodologies and ...
The HELIX project is a resource of multi-omics and exposome data for 1301 mother-child pairs from six European cohorts. The ExWAS (Exposome-wide association ...
[127]
Multi-omics signatures of the human early life exposome
Nov 21, 2022 · Network integration of multi-omics signatures of the exposome. To visualize whether a molecular feature was connected to several exposures ...
[128]
Precision environmental health monitoring by longitudinal ... - NIH
This data-driven longitudinal monitoring study shows the potential dynamic interactions between the personal exposome and internal multi-omics.
[129]
Small-Sample Learning for Next-Generation Human Health Risk ...
Jan 2, 2025 · Compounding this challenge, multiomics data obtained through different measurement techniques often exhibit distinct characteristics and ...
[130]
A Two-Step Algorithm for Handling Block-Wise Missing Data in Multi ...
However, integrating multi-omics data is fraught with challenges [3], such as data heterogeneity, the inherent noise in biological datasets, high ...2. Methods · 4. Results · 4.2. Exposome Data<|control11|><|separator|>
[131]
Merging the exposome into an integrated framework for “omics ...
We propose a reattribution of “exposome” to exclusively represent the totality of contact with external factors that a biological entity experiences.
[132]
Assessing the Exposome with External Measures - PubMed Central
This article reviews (a) categories of exposures that can be assessed externally, (b) the current state of the science in external exposure assessment,
[133]
Gene-environment interactions within a precision environmental ...
We review the state of GEI research, including challenges in measuring environmental factors and advantages of GEI analysis in understanding disease mechanisms.
[134]
Use of the “Exposome” in the Practice of Epidemiology: A Primer on
Aug 14, 2016 · Traditional methods are being used for exposure assessment, as well as biomarker and -omic measures to assess the exposome. The HELIX ...
[135]
Exposomics: a review of methodologies, applications, and future ...
Jan 27, 2025 · The exposome leaves footprints on these various “omics” layers and plays an essential role in disease etiology (Wu et al, 2023). For example, ...
[136]
The exposome in practice: Design of the EXPOsOMICS project
We have measured the external exposome component for air and water contaminants by performing extensive, repeated Personal Exposure Monitoring (PEM). Fresh ...
[137]
https://the-innovation.org/article/id/648ae0ffcf340000a10028d8
[138]
AirPen: A Wearable Monitor for Characterizing Exposures to ...
Jul 14, 2023 · We developed a small, quiet, wearable monitor, called the AirPen, to quantify personal exposures to fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) and volatile organic ...
[139]
Assessing the Exposome with External Measures - Annual Reviews
Mar 20, 2017 · We describe major scientific and technological advances that inform external assessment of the exposome, including geographic information ...
[140]
High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry for Human Exposomics
Jul 10, 2024 · In this article, we survey the literature on state-of-the-art HRMS-based technologies, review current analytical workflows and informatic pipelines,Figure 1 · 3.5. Mass Analyzer: Mass... · 3.6. Mass Spectral Data...
[141]
Exploring Single-Cell Exposomics by Mass Spectrometry
Aug 10, 2023 · Substantial advancements in MS technology have set the stage for single-cell exposome analysis. Developments in sample preparation ...1. Introduction · 2. Spatial And... · 6. Future Perspective
[142]
Opportunities and Challenges for Environmental Exposure ...
The internal exposome consists of internally measured exposure and phenotypic factors, such as indicators of metabolism, microflora, and inflammatory markers.
[143]
Analytical challenges in human exposome analysis with focus on ...
Mar 1, 2021 · The analytical challenges in the field of exposome research are reviewed, with specific emphasis on the sampling, sample preparation, and analysis.
[144]
Defining the Scope of Exposome Studies and Research Needs from ...
The concept of the exposome was introduced over 15 years ago to reflect the important role that the environment exerts on health and disease.
[145]
data science methodologies and implications in exposome-wide ...
Jan 17, 2024 · The paper aims to guide future health researchers in understanding and evaluating exposomic studies. Our discussion extends to emerging topics, ...
[146]
Unravelling the chemical exposome in cohort studies
Feb 11, 2021 · Association of exposome and health outcomes. One of the biggest challenges of the exposome approach lies in establishing robust relationships ...
[147]
The exposome in practice: Design of the EXPOsOMICS project - PMC
EXPOsOMICS is a European Union funded project that aims to develop a novel approach to the assessment of exposure to high priority environmental pollutants.
[148]
Semantic standards of external exposome data - PMC - NIH
We conducted a review of existing ontology for the external exposome and found only four relevant ontologies. Further, the four existing ontologies are limited.
[149]
TOWARD GREATER IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EXPOSOME ...
Investigators have encountered three primary challenges to incorporating the exposome paradigm into epidemiologic research on a larger scale: (a) the lack of ...
[150]
HELIX - ISGLOBAL
The HELIX 'early-life exposome' approach involves combining all environmental hazards that mothers and children are exposed to, and linking this to the health, ...
[151]
The exposome in practice: Design of the EXPOsOMICS project
EXPOsOMICS is a European Union funded project that aims to develop a novel approach to the assessment of exposure to high priority environmental pollutants.
[152]
Home - The European Human Exposome Network (EHEN)
The European Human Exposome Network (January 2020-June 2025) received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme.
[153]
Global coordination of exposome research | Horizon-europe.gouv.fr
The European Human Exposome Network (EHEN), a cluster of 9 projects funded since 2020 for five years from Horizon 2020, is currently the world's largest network ...<|separator|>
[154]
First NIH-wide exposome research coordinating center launched
The center builds on NIEHS investments over the past decade and will work with the exposome research community to develop a framework for exposomics analysis.
[155]
Exposome Projects | Johns Hopkins
The Exposome Collaborative at Johns Hopkins will provide a comprehensive exposome assessment for participants of an ongoing Childhood Asthma study.
[156]
New £50m MRC Centre to study how environmental exposures ...
Jul 16, 2025 · The MRC CoRE in Exposome Immunology will receive up to £50 million over 14 years, leveraging the combined strength of teams at The University of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[157]
The exposome concept: a challenge and a potential driver for ...
Accurately assessing the exposome currently requires numerous measurements, which rely on different technologies; resulting in an expensive set of protocols. In ...Missing: emerging | Show results with:emerging
[158]
Putting the exposome into practice: An analysis of the promises ...
HELIX (2013–2017), EXPOsOMICS (2012–2017) and Lifepath (2015–2019) together constitute a first generation of projects that established the exposome as a novel ...
[159]
International Exposome Research Projects
Exposome powered tools for healthy living in urban settings – Prof Roel Vermeulen, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, The NetherlandsMissing: major | Show results with:major
[160]
[PDF] Human exposome research - European Parliament
Mar 13, 2025 · Efforts to align exposome research globally have already begun. A key milestone has been the collaboration between U.S. and European ...
[161]
[PDF] The amyotrophic lateral sclerosis exposome - CDC Stacks
Oct 1, 2024 · The ALS exposome is the lifetime accumulation of environmental exposures that raise disease risk and affect progression, and can be applied at ...
[162]
Role of the Exposome in Neurodegenerative Disease: Recent ...
Feb 27, 2024 · This review provides an overview of recent advances toward defining neurodegenerative disease exposomes, focusing on Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral ...
[163]
External exposome and all-cause mortality in European cohorts
May 27, 2024 · We aimed to evaluate the association between external exposome and all-cause mortality in large administrative and traditional adult cohorts in Europe.<|separator|>
[164]
Identification of exposome clusters based on societal, social, built ...
Association between exposome score for schizophrenia and functioning in first-episode psychosis: results from the Athens first-episode psychosis research study.
[165]
The Use of Artificial Intelligence to Analyze the Exposome in ... - MDPI
... Exposome Monitoring: Design, Development, Calibration, and Long-Term Validation. ... Pattern recognition, reliability evaluation, bioinformatics, survival ...
[166]
How exposomic tools complement and enrich genomic research
Aug 13, 2025 · During the 1990–2015 period, public health improvements driven by the human exposome accounted for the largest part of mortality improvement ...
[167]
Advancing translational exposomics: bridging ... - Human Genomics
Apr 30, 2025 · The study found that environmental factors accounted for 17% of the variation in risk for premature mortality, whereas genetic predisposition ...Design Of Exposome Studies · Examples Of Exposome Studies · Translating Exposome...
[168]
Integrating the environmental and genetic architectures of aging and ...
Feb 19, 2025 · Here we aimed to quantify the relative contributions of environment (referred to as the exposome) and genetics to aging and premature mortality.
[169]
Integrating the environmental and genetic architectures of aging and ...
Polygenic risk explained a greater proportion of variation (10.3–26.2%) compared with the exposome for incidence of dementias and breast, prostate and ...
[170]
Children's Health: Assessing the impacts of the exposome
May 19, 2025 · The exposome includes environmental exposures from conception. Studies found 127 likely/very likely factor-outcome pairs, such as PCB exposure ...
[171]
Measuring the Adverse Social Exposome Over the Life Course
May 27, 2025 · Results of this study suggest that the social exposome, characterized over the life course, is an important risk factor in age-related vascular ...
[172]
The Exposome and its Associations with Broad Mental and Physical ...
Dec 10, 2021 · The general exposome factor was associated with psychopathology (β=0.28, 95%CI 0.26-0.3) and key health-related outcomes: obesity (OR=1.4, 95%CI ...<|separator|>
[173]
Do environmental exposures contribute to human diseases?
Aug 13, 2022 · Research shows environmental factors are associated with more than 80% of human diseases and nearly 1 in 6 deaths worldwide.<|separator|>
[174]
The human exposome unraveling the impact of environment on health
There is evidence that genetic variants explain a limited fraction – 10% to 30% – of the variability of risk of chronic diseases , , which indicates the ...
[175]
Beyond Heritability: Twin Studies in Behavioral Research - PMC - NIH
The heritability of human behavioral traits is now well established, due in large measure to classical twin studies.
[176]
Nature, nurture, and expertise - ScienceDirect.com
Heritability, which is an effect size index of the proportion of phenotypic variance that is accounted for by genetic variance, is typically between 30 and 60% ...
[177]
Nature vs. Nurture Debate In Psychology
Jul 16, 2024 · Behavioral genetics has enabled psychology to quantify the relative contribution of nature and nurture concerning specific psychological traits.<|separator|>
[178]
Rethinking Nature and Nurture - From Neurons to Neighborhoods
Gene-environment interaction indicates that genetic susceptibility may increase an individual's sensitivity to specific environmental influences. Such an ...
[179]
Twin Studies: A Unique Epidemiological Tool - PMC - NIH
Twin studies are a special type of epidemiological studies designed to measure the contribution of genetics as opposed to the environment, to a given trait.
[180]
Conventional twin studies overestimate the environmental ... - Nature
Jul 17, 2023 · In this study, twin-specific shared environments refers to environmental influences held in common by twins which are experienced as nonshared ...
[181]
The Nature-Nurture Debate is Over, and Both Sides Lost ... - NIH
The nature-nurture debate is inadequate; outcomes are from both biological and environmental influences, not either-or. Genetic factors explain 20-30% of ...
[182]
Genes, environment, and psychological well-being - Oxford Academic
According to quantitative behavioral genetics studies, psychological well-being has a significant heritable genetic component.
[183]
The heritability of general cognitive ability increases linearly from ...
The heritability of general cognitive ability increases significantly and linearly from 41% in childhood (9 years) to 55% in adolescence (12 years) and to 66% ...
[184]
Genetic and environmental contributions to IQ in adoptive and ...
The heritability was estimated to be .42 [95% CI .21, .64]. Together, these findings provide further evidence for the predominance of genetic influences on ...
[185]
Where Does Our Personality Come From? | Psychology Today
Aug 2, 2020 · Twin studies of the heritability on personality have found that between 15 and 55 percent of the overall variance in our personality is due to genetic ...
[186]
Behavioral Genetics and Human Agency - PubMed
Jun 3, 2025 · This article argues that a pervasive but confused theory of free will is driving unwarranted resistance to behavioral genetic research and undermining the ...
[187]
Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years ...
May 18, 2015 · We report a meta-analysis of twin correlations and reported variance components for 17,804 traits from 2,748 publications including 14,558,903 ...
[188]
Socioeconomic Status and Quality of Life: An Assessment of ... - NIH
Mar 3, 2023 · The results showed that socioeconomic status was a strong predictor of social capital and quality of life. In addition to this, there was a ...
[189]
Evaluating the evidence for models of life course socioeconomic ...
Jan 20, 2005 · A relatively consistent body of research supports an inverse graded relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and cardiovascular disease (CVD).
[190]
A Review of the Relationship between Socioeconomic Status ... - NIH
Jun 29, 2023 · A large proportion of studies found that an SES change impacts health. Evidence suggests that those with consistently high SES have the best health outcomes.
[191]
Life course socioeconomic conditions and adult psychosocial ...
Conclusions Childhood socioeconomic position was associated with adult psychosocial functioning, but these effects were specific to some aspects of adult ...
[192]
[PDF] Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Program
... Results ... experiment, carefully designed and rigorously implemented to test the effects of this approach on participating families. Between 1994 and 1998 ...
[193]
Evidence of Neighborhood Effects from Moving to Opportunity
Oct 1, 2020 · This paper estimates neighborhood effects on adult labor market outcomes using the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) housing mobility experiment.
[194]
Evaluating the Impact of Moving to Opportunity in the United States
For adults, moving with a Low-Poverty voucher reduced the likelihood of diabetes by half and the rate of extreme obesity by about 40 percent. Mental health also ...Missing: agency | Show results with:agency
[195]
Heritability of education rises with intergenerational mobility - PNAS
Dec 2, 2019 · We combine this research with behavior genetics to show that societal variation in mobility is rooted in family advantages that siblings share ...
[196]
Associations between common genetic variants and income provide ...
Jan 28, 2025 · The heritability of income and its genetic associations may vary across different social environments or different groups within an environment.
[197]
Personal agency among students from low socio-economic ...
Dec 20, 2023 · This study examined five factors of personal academic agency (perceived competence, school belonging, perseverance, academic buoyancy, and conduct problems)<|separator|>
[198]
The downsides and dangers of economic determinism - Social Europe
Sep 23, 2019 · Workers and many members of the middle class find themselves in precarious economic positions and resentful of growing social and economic ...
[199]
Major Criticisms of Marxism - Simply Psychology
Sep 30, 2025 · Criticisms of Economic Determinism. Many sociologists argue this model is too rigid, presenting people as products of capitalism with little ...
[200]
The Economics and Psychology of Inequality and Human ...
This section reviews evidence on the importance of multiple abilities in determining socioeconomic success, the relationship between psychological ...
[201]
[PDF] The Social Stratification of Environmental and Genetic Influences on ...
Feb 20, 2019 · To explain the relative importance of social compared to genetic influences on education, we combine sociological theories with behavioral ...<|separator|>
[202]
Heritability of class and status: Implications for sociological theory ...
The results suggest that the variability in class and status attainment is influenced by genetics to a non-negligible degree, while shared environmental factors ...Heritability Of Class And... · 3. Bringing In Genetics: The... · 6. Results
[203]
The Challenge of Causal Inference in Gene–Environment ...
In this essay, we suggest a way forward in G×E research in humans, which is for social scientists to utilize their training in methods of causal inference ...
[204]
Causal complexity in human research: On the shared challenges of ...
Sep 11, 2023 · We advocate for the idea that behavior genetics shares many of the same pitfalls and promises as environmentally oriented research, medical genetics, and other ...
[205]
Genetic and environmental contributions to IQ in adoptive and ...
We estimated genetic and environmental effects on adulthood IQ in a unique sample of 486 biological and adoptive families.
[206]
The effect of confounding variables in studies of lead exposure and IQ
Dec 10, 2020 · Confounding variables, like maternal IQ, HOME score, and maternal education, can obscure the effects of lead exposure on IQ, especially at low ...
[207]
The effect of confounding variables in studies of lead exposure and IQ
This analysis determined that confounders influence IQ estimates in a quantifiable way that may exceed or at least obscure previously-reported effects of blood ...
[208]
[PDF] The effect of confounding variables in studies of lead exposure and IQ
Dec 10, 2020 · A confounder is a variable that correlates both with the outcome and the major exposure variable. Accurate treatment of confounding is crucial ...
[209]
Gene-environment dependencies lead to collider bias in models ...
May 4, 2021 · We offer potential solutions, highlighting the importance of causal inference. We also urge further caution when fitting and interpreting models ...
[210]
Twins and Causal Inference: Leveraging Nature's Experiment - PMC
In this review, we discuss how samples comprising monozygotic and dizygotic twin pairs can be used for the purpose of strengthening causal inference.
[211]
Stepping towards causation in studies of neighborhood and ...
Stepping towards causation in studies of neighborhood and environmental effects: How twin research can overcome problems of selection and reverse causation.
[212]
Description, prediction and causation: Methodological challenges of ...
Furthermore, a widely recognized threat for causal inference are omitted variables, or confounders; such a common cause of two observed variables can lead to a ...
[213]
A Family Affair: Rigorous Causal Inference Comes to Statistical ...
Feb 13, 2024 · This post by Daniel Adkins delves into recent debates surrounding causal inference in human complex trait genetics.
[214]
Critical Need for Family-Based, Quasi-Experimental Designs in ...
Sep 10, 2013 · Can increase the statistical power of the estimate of environmental factors that make siblings unique (consistent with a causal inference).
[215]
Genetic Influences on Political Ideologies: Twin Analyses of 19 ...
This is a particularly daunting scenario for researchers who focus on political attitudes and ideologies; unlike health related conditions, there are no funding ...
[216]
[PDF] A Model of Political Bias in Social Science Research - Sites@Rutgers
Mar 9, 2020 · Specifically, we present a heuristic model of political bias that identifies ways they manifest, and we review evidence that bears on it.Missing: funding | Show results with:funding
[217]
Beliefs About Genetic & Environmental Determinism By Discipline
Jul 12, 2017 · A survey of academics, sorted by discipline, regarding their views about genetic and environmental determinism and the explanatory power of science.<|separator|>
[218]
Ethical, Legal, Social, and Policy Implications of Behavioral Genetics
The ever-widening scope of behavioral genetics raises ethical, legal, social, and policy issues in the potential new applications to criminal justice, education ...
[219]
Psychological Barriers to Evolutionary Psychology: Ideological Bias ...
Nov 15, 2018 · SCIENTIFIC In this paper, we argue that four interlocking barriers beset psychologists seeking to develop a proper science of social psychology.
[220]
an exposome-wide association study and twin modeling - Nature
Sep 25, 2023 · Moreover, some studies have emphasized exposures' non-genetic properties, which ignores how the environment interacts with genetics through ...
[221]
Gene-Environment Interactions in Psychiatry: Recent Evidence and ...
A majority of the studies found evidence for gene-by-environment interactions, particularly in relation to stressful life events, trauma exposure, and ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[222]
Genetic and environmental contributions to psychological resilience ...
Feb 15, 2018 · Twin studies indicate that genetic and environmental factors contribute to both psychological resilience and coping style.
[223]
Genetic and Environmental Causes of Variation in Trait Resilience ...
The aim of this multi-informant twin study was to determine the relative role of genetic and environmental factors in explaining variation in trait resilience ...
[224]
Genetic Variants Associated With Resilience in Human and Animal ...
We conducted a systematic review of genetic variants associated with resilience to enable the identification of general resilience mechanisms.
[225]
Gene–Environment Interactions in Severe Mental Illness - Frontiers
Compared to both major depressive disorder and schizophrenia, gene–environment interactions in bipolar disorder have been understudied. Only a single ...
[226]
Genetics of Resilience: Gene-by-Environment Interaction Studies as ...
However, resilient individuals are understudied in most cohorts and even when studied, resilience is typically defined as an absence of psychopathology.
[227]
A meta-analysis of genome-wide studies of resilience in the German ...
Aug 8, 2024 · Resilience is the capacity to adapt to stressful life events. As such, this trait is associated with physical and mental functions and ...<|separator|>
[228]
Resilience and measured gene-environment interactions - PubMed
In this article, we argue that one step toward advancing the field of developmental psychopathology would be for G × E research to consider resilience.Missing: understudied | Show results with:understudied