Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Swim cap


A swim cap is a form-fitting covering worn on the head by swimmers during activities to reduce hydrodynamic , contain , and protect it from exposure.
Originally developed in the early from rubberized fabrics, swim caps evolved to models by the , which provided a tighter seal but were prone to tearing. Modern variants primarily use for durability and comfort or for minimal in competitive settings, with caps being thicker and less likely to wrinkle while offers a thinner profile at lower cost. Lycra or fabric caps serve more for protection in recreational use but provide less reduction. In competitive , swim caps are mandatory in many to standardize conditions and minimize resistance, potentially shaving seconds off times through smoother water flow over the head. A notable controversy arose in 2021 when FINA, the international federation, initially prohibited oversized caps designed for voluminous hair textures in competitions, arguing they deviated from the standard head-conforming form essential for equitable hydrodynamics; the was reviewed and reversed for future elite amid over equipment uniformity.

Design and Materials

Materials and Their Properties

swim caps, derived from or synthetic alternatives, exhibit high elasticity and thin construction, enabling a tight fit that reduces hydrodynamic drag by conforming closely to the head. This material's flexibility allows for easy application but results in lower durability, with caps prone to tearing after 10-20 uses or exposure to sharp objects like hairpins. also provides minimal due to its thin profile, making it suitable for warm-water competitive where breathability aids comfort. Silicone swim caps, formed from synthetic polymers, are thicker—typically 0.5-1 mm versus latex's 0.2-0.4 mm—and demonstrate superior tear resistance and longevity, often enduring 50-100 sessions with proper care. Their moderate elasticity ensures a snug yet less constrictive fit, minimizing pulling and wrinkles that could increase passive by up to 4% as shown in controlled hydrodynamic tests. Silicone's smooth surface enhances flow efficiency, though it offers slightly more warmth than , which may benefit swimmers in cooler pools. However, the material's reduced stretch compared to can complicate fitting over longer . Textile-based caps, commonly using Lycra or spandex-nylon blends, prioritize comfort through breathability and softness, absorbing less than rubber alternatives and providing better against cold via trapped air layers. These materials exhibit high stretch but lower , leading to greater from fabric and potential water permeation, rendering them suboptimal for speed-focused applications. Empirical comparisons confirm rubber caps outperform textiles in drag reduction, with passive drag coefficients dropping 2-5% under fitted or versus fabric. All materials are inherently waterproof to prevent damage from chemicals, but latex poses risks for approximately 1-6% of users sensitive to rubber proteins, prompting as a substitute. Durability differences stem from molecular structure: latex's chains degrade faster under UV and chemical exposure, while 's cross-linked bonds resist such breakdown.

Construction and Fit Characteristics

Swim caps are primarily constructed using molding techniques for rubber-based variants or textile assembly for fabric types, with the influencing , seamlessness, and overall . swim caps, derived from , are formed through a multi-layer dipping process on head-shaped molds, where is applied repeatedly and allowed to cure, yielding a thin, highly prone to tearing under stress but offering initial snugness. Silicone caps, favored for longevity, employ : raw silicone is placed into heated molds under high pressure (often exceeding 100 tons), followed by to polymers, producing thicker, seamless structures resistant to punctures and chemical degradation. Fabric or lycra caps, conversely, involve synthetic yarns into stretchable webs or pre-cut panels, sometimes with hems, to create breathable yet less hydrodynamic enclosures suitable for casual use. Fit characteristics prioritize elasticity and conformity to the cranium to reduce and encapsulate , with most models adopting a universal "one-size-fits-most" design accommodating head circumferences of 51-60 cm via material stretch rather than rigid sizing. Latex variants excel in flexibility, conforming tightly to irregular shapes like voluminous but risking slippage or discomfort from excessive tension, as their thinner profile (typically 0.2-0.5 mm) amplifies points. caps, thicker at 0.5-1 mm, provide a more secure, compressive grip with moderate stretch, minimizing water ingress while distributing force evenly across the , though they may feel restrictive initially until broken in. Specialty or hybrid caps introduce graduated sizing—e.g., small/medium for 54-56 cm head lengths of 35-37 cm, and large/extra-large for 57-59 cm—to enhance thermal retention in open water, where uniform fit prevents chafing during prolonged exposure. Optimal fit demands a taut seal without inducing headaches, verified by metrics like ear-to-ear distance (31-35 cm for adults), ensuring hydrodynamic efficiency without vascular constriction.

Functions and Empirical Benefits

Hydrodynamic and Performance Effects

Swim caps primarily reduce hydrodynamic drag by encasing the hair and providing a smoother contour to the swimmer's head, minimizing turbulence and frictional resistance compared to exposed hair. Computational fluid dynamics analyses have demonstrated that wearing a swim cap can decrease passive drag by approximately 15% during gliding phases relative to no cap, as hair introduces irregular protrusions that amplify form and wave drag. Smoother cap materials, such as silicone or latex, further optimize this effect by reducing surface roughness, yielding passive drag reductions of 4-5.2% across various speeds when the head is aligned or lowered in streamline position. Differences among cap models significantly influence profiles; for instance, high-smoothness caps exhibit 5-6.5% lower passive than cloth caps at speeds from 1.6 to 2.4 m/s, attributable to variances in and fit that alter over the head. These reductions stem from first-principles , where force scales with the square of velocity and is proportional to the and ; caps lower the latter by streamlining the head's effective shape without altering propulsion. Empirical towing tests confirm higher forces without caps, as bare hair increases separation and . In terms of performance, mitigation translates to potential gains, with streamlined configurations including caps enabling faster travel times over short distances, such as 5.6 in push-off glides, compared to no-cap conditions. However, in prolonged efforts under tropical conditions, caps have been observed to impair 800-meter times in pre-adolescent swimmers by 2-3 seconds, likely due to retention elevating core temperature without altering or perceived exertion, highlighting context-dependent trade-offs between hydrodynamics and . Overall, for competitive sprint and mid-distance pool events emphasizing minimization, caps confer a net hydrodynamic advantage, though empirical speed improvements remain modest and swimmer-specific.

Protective and Practical Roles

Swim caps limit the exposure of to chlorinated , reducing of chemicals that cause dryness, , and breakage. While caps do not render entirely dry—water often seeps in around edges—they create a partial barrier that minimizes compared to uncovered , thereby preserving integrity during repeated swims. This protective effect is particularly beneficial for color-treated or chemically processed , where accelerates and structural damage. In environments, swim caps enhance by containing loose strands, preventing them from dispersing into the water and contributing to . This containment reduces the accumulation of in systems, easing burdens and lowering operational costs for facilities; for instance, public pools mandate caps partly to avoid filter clogs from shed . Caps also act as a measure, minimizing the spread of products or natural oils that could affect water quality for other users. For open-water or cold-water applications, specialized caps made from insulating materials like provide thermal retention by covering the head—a site of significant loss—and restricting convective cooling from surrounding . Empirical observations in cold-water scenarios indicate that such caps help stabilize core temperature, mitigating risks of and during prolonged exposure, though benefits vary with cap thickness and water temperature below 20°C.

Historical Development

Early Origins and Pre-Modern Forms

Prior to the commercialization of rubber swim caps in 1883, head coverings for swimming were rudimentary fabric constructs aimed at containing hair and affording limited protection from water immersion. These early forms, prevalent in the 19th century Victorian era, typically consisted of hairnets or gathered bonnets made from wool, cotton, or flannel, integrated into full-body bathing costumes that emphasized modesty and hygiene over hydrodynamic efficiency. Women, whose societal norms dictated long hair, donned these caps to prevent tangling and excessive wetting, as saturated hair was viewed as unhygienic and damaging to elaborate coiffures; the caps offered minimal waterproofing, relying on tight fitting rather than material impermeability. Bathing caps of this period resembled domestic mob caps, with drawstrings or elastic-free gathers to secure them, and were often paired with oilskin-treated fabrics for slight repellency in seaside or river dips promoted for health benefits. Archaeological and textual evidence for even earlier origins, such as ancient or swimmers using net-like hair restraints, remains speculative and lacks material artifacts confirming purpose-built designs; practical needs in pre-industrial favored simplicity, with any coverings serving dual roles in daily grooming and water activities. By the mid-19th century, as public bathing facilities expanded in and , these pre-modern caps became standardized accessories in recreational contexts, though their was constrained by absorbent materials that absorbed water weight, increasing drag.

20th-Century Advancements and Material Shifts

In the early 1900s, swim caps evolved from fabric predecessors to rubber-based designs, which provided a waterproof barrier to keep hair dry and minimize hydrodynamic drag during strokes. These rubber caps, enabled by vulcanized rubber processes dating to , were often textured or reinforced for better grip and durability, though they could cause discomfort from tightness and elasticity loss over time. Initial models frequently incorporated chin straps to secure fit against water pressure, reducing slippage in pool or open-water environments. The 1920s marked a pivotal material advancement with the introduction of , a more elastic derivative that allowed for thinner, more pliable caps conforming closely to the head shape. improved upon pure rubber by offering enhanced stretch without cracking, facilitating tighter seals that further reduced water resistance—estimated to shave seconds off race times through streamlined profiles. However, 's drawbacks, including frequent tears after 10-20 uses and potential for skin irritation in sensitive individuals, prompted ongoing refinements. By the 1950s and 1960s, supplanted as the dominant , prized for its superior tear resistance, longevity (often lasting 50+ sessions), and qualities that minimized allergic responses affecting up to 10% of users with . caps, thicker yet more flexible, enabled standardized sizing for varied head shapes and reduced the need for double-capping techniques previously used to compensate for weaknesses. This shift correlated with rising competitive demands, as 's smoother surface enhanced glide properties, contributing to marginal gains in events where milliseconds mattered.

Usage in Swimming Contexts

Competitive Pool Swimming Practices

In competitive pool swimming, swim caps are standard employed to minimize hydrodynamic and streamline the swimmer's profile through the water. Empirical testing demonstrates that caps can reduce passive by 5-15% relative to bareheaded conditions, with models outperforming due to their smoother surface and tighter fit, which eliminates protrusions and air traps during and glide phases. This mitigation translates to measurable performance gains in sprints and distance events, as even marginal reductions in resistance—quantified via towing dynamometry—allow for higher velocities at equivalent energy expenditure. World Aquatics governs cap usage under its swimwear rules (formerly FINA GR 5), defining swimwear to encompass suits, caps, and , all of which must exhibit "good moral taste" and suit the discipline without excessive ornamentation or attachments creating a hood-like effect. Caps are not compulsory but are universally adopted in and age-group competitions for their practical roles in containing to prevent visual obstruction and goggle , while also signaling team or national affiliation via colors and logos, subject to limits (e.g., no more than 80% surface coverage by non-team markings). Dual caps are permitted, often with an inner layer for added compression and an outer for identification, provided both comply with and permeability standards to avoid altering stroke mechanics. Swimmers apply caps immediately prior to races or sets, stretching them evenly from to to achieve a seamless, low-profile seal that withstands velocities exceeding 2 m/s without slippage. In training regimens, consistent wear—typically for daily sessions—fosters , simulates conditions, and curbs shedding into , aligning with protocols in facilities hosting sanctioned meets. are positioned over the cap edges for secure retention against water pressure, a practice refined through biomechanical feedback to optimize and reduce mid-race adjustments. While tropical conditions may introduce minor thermal drawbacks for certain cap materials, pool environments (typically 25-28°C) emphasize the net hydrodynamic advantages, with no verified instances of disqualification for cap omission but widespread among coaches that bareheaded forfeits competitive edge.

Open Water and Channel Swimming Rules

In competitive open water swimming events regulated by , participants must wear an approved swim cap at the start of all competitions, typically constructed from or to ensure and with standards. Up to two caps are permitted, with the outer cap displaying any required event numbering or national identifiers while adhering to restrictions that limit branding to specified areas. For masters competitions, highly visible colored caps are mandatory to enhance swimmer identification amid waves and variable conditions, reducing collision risks. These requirements prioritize hydrodynamic neutrality and observability, as non-standard materials like are generally disallowed unless explicitly approved for thermal regulation in colder events. Channel swims, such as crossings ratified by the or Channel Swimming & Piloting Federation (CS&PF), restrict swimmers to a single standard cap made from , , or similar non-insulating , explicitly prohibiting or materials providing heat retention or to maintain the challenge's integrity against environmental aids. The cap must be pre-approved by an independent observer, who verifies it offers no thermal protection, with non-compliance resulting in disqualification of the swim record. Multiple caps or those with chin straps are forbidden, as are any modifications enhancing grip or insulation, ensuring feeds and pilot observations occur without gear advantages. Analogous protocols govern other marathon channel swims, including the Catalina Channel under the Catalina Channel Swimming Federation, where one porous cap is allowed alongside goggles and body grease but must not retain body heat or provide flotation. The Santa Barbara Channel Swimming Association similarly mandates latex or silicone caps in standard styles, banning neoprene, multiples, or straps to uphold unassisted crossing standards. Organizations like the World Open Water Swimming Association (WOWSA) endorse these principles in ratified events, emphasizing single-cap use for safety signaling—often in bright colors—while rejecting thermal variants to preserve empirical benchmarks of endurance against cold water immersion. Violations, such as undetected neoprene use, have historically invalidated records, underscoring enforcement via pilot logs and post-swim audits.

Controversies and Regulatory Debates

Soul Cap and Oversized Design Challenges

In 2021, FINA (now ), the international governing body for , rejected the Soul Cap—a swim cap designed for swimmers with thick, curly, or afro-textured —for use in competitions, including the , on the grounds that it "exceeds the natural form of the head." The Soul Cap, developed by British swimmer Tokunbo Ajasa-Ahmed and approved for sale in 2019, is intentionally larger than standard caps to accommodate voluminous without compression or breakage, addressing a practical barrier for swimmers where traditional caps, sized for shorter or straighter , often fail to fit securely. FINA's rule, outlined in its swimming cap approval criteria, requires caps to conform to the head's natural contours to maintain uniformity and prevent alterations to hydrodynamics or that could confer competitive edges, though officials stated the Soul Cap provided no such advantage based on their assessment. The decision drew immediate criticism from athletes, advocacy groups, and media outlets, which argued it perpetuated exclusion in a with historically low participation rates—citing U.S. showing Black children drown at rates 5.5 times higher than white children, partly due to hair-related barriers to comfortable gear. Soul Cap's founders countered that the cap's shape mirrors standard designs but scales up proportionally for fit, rejecting claims of deviation from head form as pretextual. FINA responded by initiating a review in July 2021, emphasizing its commitment to inclusivity while adhering to technical standards developed over decades to ensure , amid broader regulatory challenges with oversized designs that risk increased or flotation violating equipment parity rules. Following over a year of consultations, including swimmer and testing, FINA approved the Soul Cap on September 1, 2022, adding it to its list of certified equipment for all levels of competition, a move hailed as advancing without compromising . This resolution highlighted ongoing tensions in swimwear regulations, where oversized or non-standard caps—such as those for or —must balance ergonomic needs against empirical concerns like resistance; studies on cap hydrodynamics indicate that deviations beyond 10-15% in volume can marginally increase drag coefficients by 1-2%, though no peer-reviewed data specifically validated advantages for the Soul Cap. continues to enforce caps under 25 cm in length and conforming to cranial profiles, with exceptions now calibrated for diverse hair types to mitigate prior exclusions.

Material and Practice Restrictions

Swim caps used in competitive swimming are regulated by under Competition Regulations Part One, Rule 7, which governs swimwear and wearables including caps to ensure fairness, safety, and non-interference with hydrodynamics. Common materials include for its tight, low-drag fit during races; for greater durability and reduced hair pulling; and fabrics like Lycra for practice sessions, though and predominate in elite events due to their sleek profiles and elasticity. No outright bans exist on these core materials, but caps must consist of non-buoyant, non-propulsive substances that do not consolidate or alter body position unnaturally, aligning with broader post-2009 rules prohibiting technology-driven performance enhancements seen in earlier suits. Design restrictions emphasize conformity to the head's natural shape, prohibiting extensions that form hoods, masks, or attachments to swimsuits or , as these could create unfair drag reduction or continuity effects mimicking integrated gear. Oversized caps, such as the initial Soul Cap model designed for voluminous natural hair, were rejected in 2021 for exceeding head contours and posing detachment risks during races, though approved a compliant version by September 2022 after review confirmed no hydrodynamic advantage. All models require pre-approval via submission to , involving a 750 EUR fee per design and material testing to verify compliance. In practice, swimmers may wear up to two caps simultaneously in events, provided both adhere to limits and rules, such as manufacturer logos not exceeding specified sizes. For open water competitions, caps must be brightly colored for visibility and may include race numbers on hands or the cap itself when wetsuits are worn, with no extensions beyond standard head coverage. Personal names on caps are capped at 20 cm² in to prevent excessive branding. These rules prioritize empirical equity, as oversized or modified designs risk providing marginal or streamlining benefits unsubstantiated by neutral testing, while allowing practical dual-layering for hair protection without performance distortion.

References

  1. [1]
    Essential Swim Gear Guide: What Is a Swim Cap? | Vanguard
    Jul 4, 2024 · A swim cap is a fitted, typically silicone, latex, or lycra cap worn by swimmers to protect their hair from chlorine, reduce drag in the water, and improve ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition<|separator|>
  2. [2]
    Differences In Swim Cap Materials Lycra Latex Silicone
    Dec 4, 2009 · A swim cap is any of a number of rubberized or otherwise elastic devices worn on the head during participation in aquatic activities.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  3. [3]
    Swim Cap - Scarborough Museums and Galleries
    Swim caps were made of rubberised fabric during the early 20th century, moving onto latex by the 1920s. Early styles were known as aviator caps, as they ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  4. [4]
    The swim cap's history
    Sep 4, 2020 · The first swim caps were developed in the 20s and were made out of rubber. They had a small chin leash to attach the swim cap, to make sure that ...Missing: definition materials
  5. [5]
  6. [6]
    FINA Releases Statement Saying it is 'Reviewing' Ban on Soul Cap
    Jul 2, 2021 · FINA on Friday released a media statement saying that it is reviewing its ban on the Soul Cap for competition in response to a global uproar ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  7. [7]
    Soul Cap Gets Approved for Competitions After Olympics Ban
    Sep 6, 2022 · Swim caps approved by FINA had been made for people with shorter or thinner hair, making them an impediment for swimmers with “thick, curly or ...
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    Effect of Swim Cap Surface Roughness on Passive Drag - PubMed
    The aim of this study was to compare the effects on passive drag (Dp) of 3 swim cap models: a smooth silicon helmet cap (usually used during swimming ...Missing: properties | Show results with:properties
  10. [10]
    Effect of swim cap model on passive drag - PubMed
    Hydrodynamics plays an important role in swimming because even small decreases in a swimmer's drag can lead to performance improvements.Missing: properties | Show results with:properties
  11. [11]
    Guide To Swim Caps: Choose The Right Swim Cap For You
    Swim caps come in fabric, silicone, and latex. Fabric is softer, silicone is durable, and latex is less durable but sits tight. Fabric can be used under latex ...
  12. [12]
    Production Process of Silicone Swimming Cap
    - Compression Molding: Compression molding is the most commonly used technique. The mold is heated and pressure is applied to ensure that the silicone takes the ...Missing: construction | Show results with:construction
  13. [13]
    The Manufacturing Process of Silicone Swim Caps - UKONG
    The manufacturing process of silicone swim caps involves several steps, from design and mold making to printing and packaging. Each step is critical in ensuring ...Missing: construction | Show results with:construction
  14. [14]
    Swim Caps Size Chart
    Swim Cap Size Chart, Adult (Unisex) ; S · 20-21.9 inches, 51-55.9 cm. Ear lob to ear lob: 12.25 - 13.75 inches, 31 - 34.9 cm ; M · 22 - 23.5 inches, 56 - 59.9 cmMissing: characteristics | Show results with:characteristics
  15. [15]
    Size Guide - Neoprene Swim Cap - 2XU
    SIZE, Head Circumference, Head Length. S/M, Cm, 54 - 56, 35-37. S/M, Inches, 21-22, 14-14.5. L/XL, Cm, 57-59, 37.5-39. L/XL, Inches, 22.5 - 23, 14.75- 15.25 ...Missing: fit characteristics
  16. [16]
    [PDF] the effect of wearing a cap on the swimmer passive drag
    In conclusion, one can state that wearing a swim cap may positively influence swimmer's hydrodynamics. KEY WORDS: CFD, swimming, model, sports equipment.Missing: materials properties
  17. [17]
    The effect of swim-cap surface roughness on passive drag
    Aug 10, 2025 · Gatta et al. (2013) and Gatta et al. (2015) have published initial scientific studies on the infiuence of the cap model and surface roughness.
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Conditions that Affect the Passive Drag on a Swimmer in Streamline ...
    The average time it took the swimmer to travel 5.6 meters with a regular suit and no cap was significantly slower than it took the swimmer to travel that ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  19. [19]
    The Effect of a Silicone Swim Cap on Swimming Performance ... - NIH
    We conclude that a silicone swim cap worn in tropical environment significantly decreased 800-m crawl performance without affecting HR or RPE.
  20. [20]
    Tips for Protecting Color-Treated Hair from Chlorine
    Oct 3, 2023 · A swim cap, however, creates a physical barrier between your hair and the pool water, reducing the exposure to chlorine. It'll also make you ...
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
    How Swim Caps Help Maintain Hygiene in Pools - SwimInk
    Sep 15, 2023 · By encouraging swimmers to wear swim caps, pool operators can streamline cleaning processes to make them more efficient. Cleaner pool water ...
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    Are Swim Caps Worth It? Benefits, Fit Guide & Material Comparison
    May 19, 2019 · Silicone caps reign supreme for their durability and snug fit, making them the best swim caps for regular pool-goers. Latex caps offer a tighter ...
  26. [26]
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Influences of Swimming Caps on Thermal Responses and ...
    At first, blocking the skin from water forcedly prevents heat removal and suppresses the decrease of skin temperature. Secondly, cold stimulation suppresses ...
  28. [28]
    Swimming Caps History - Natural Swimmer
    Before 1883: Swim caps were not rubber or latex during this time period, but rather simple hair nets that one could use to keep their hair up during both ...
  29. [29]
    Victorians at the Beach - Recollections Blog
    Apr 3, 2024 · A small bathing cap, usually gathered up similar to a mob cap, completed the ensemble. In the Edwardian era, swimwear was still made of wool.
  30. [30]
    Swimwear in the Early Days | Fashion-Era
    Aug 2, 2023 · In the early Victorian era women had worn serge or dark flannel bathing dresses, but by the 1860s two-piece belted costumes replaced the earlier styles.<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    Vintage Swim Caps - Their History and Some Clever Uses
    Jul 21, 2016 · The caps were basically just hairnets used to hold hair up and out of the water. Later, taffeta fabric was waxed and then used as swim caps.
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
    History of Swim Caps | Epic Sports
    Swim caps today are used mainly by swim athletes to reduce drag and protect their hair from harsh chemicals in the pool. Growing interest in competitive ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  34. [34]
    Bathing Cap - Swimming Cap - Vintage Fashion Guild
    Modern bathing (or swimming) caps have been around since rubber was invented in 1883. The invention of latex in the 1920s helped make the caps more pliable.Missing: historical | Show results with:historical<|separator|>
  35. [35]
    Beyond the Podium: Technology & Fashion in Swimming
    Aug 15, 2024 · Bathing caps have been used for centuries to protect the wearer's hair, but in the 1920s, the invention of latex allowed for the creation of ...
  36. [36]
    Making Waves: The Evolution of Swim Caps: From Function to Fashion
    We'll explore the origins of swim caps, tracing their roots back to the early days of competitive swimming in the late 19th century. From simple rubber caps ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  37. [37]
    The Evolution Of Competitive Swimwear - SwimSwam
    Aug 12, 2023 · In the early 20th century ... The biggest swim news in the 1970s was the massive use of swim caps, which became a necessary accessory.
  38. [38]
    The effect of wearing a cap on the swimmer passive drag.
    Oct 11, 2025 · Moreover, Marinho et al. (5) have shown that a reduction of Dp of up to 15% can be obtained by wearing a swim cap (compared with the " ...Missing: benefits | Show results with:benefits
  39. [39]
    [PDF] FINA GENERAL RULES - World Aquatics
    Aug 17, 2021 · GR 5.1 The swimwear (swimsuit, cap and goggles) of all competitors shall be in good moral taste and suitable for the individual sports ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] amendments to advertising identification - World Aquatics
    Oct 18, 2023 · Printing the competitors' name isn't compulsory. It is permissible to wear two (2) caps. Both caps must comply with the advertising rules. 8.6 ...
  41. [41]
    Approved Swimwear - World Aquatics
    All the technical and approval implementing rules can be found in the Competitions Regulations, Part One Rule 7 Swimwear and Wearables. DELIVERY OF SAMPLES: One ...
  42. [42]
    How Do I Put and Keep My Swim Cap On? | U.S. Masters Swimming
    Dec 20, 2019 · Swimmers rely on swim caps for their contribution to hydrodynamics, the protection they provide from chlorine and other pool chemicals, and the ...<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    Swim Cap Rules – Essential Guidelines for Coaches - SwimInk
    Dec 26, 2023 · Consistent use of swim caps adds a degree of professionalism to training sessions and prepares swimmers for the physical sensation and subtle ...
  44. [44]
    Why Wear a Swimming Cap – Benefits for Kids and Adults
    Swim caps are essential for competitive swimmers as they help reduce drag and increase swimming speed. The smooth surface of a swim cap minimizes water ...Missing: empirical data<|separator|>
  45. [45]
    [PDF] OPEN WATER SWIMMING MANUAL - World Aquatics
    Jan 29, 2024 · 4.1. All Open Water competitions shall start with all competitors wearing an approved swim cap and standing on a fixed platform or in water ...
  46. [46]
    Masters rule changes approved by World Aquatics
    Oct 19, 2023 · 4.6 It shall be compulsory for all swimmers to wear highly visible coloured swim caps and approved World Aquatics Swimwear. 4.3 (NEW) Masters ...
  47. [47]
    CS&PF Rules - Channel Swimming & Piloting Federation
    The swimmer must be sure that their costume and cap are of an approved type before the swim starts as the swim will not be recognised if they are later found ...
  48. [48]
    Swim Regulations - Rules relating to your Swim
    The hat shall not offer thermal protection or buoyancy. The Observer will have to approve the costume and cap. The Swimmer must make sure their costume and cap ...
  49. [49]
    Rules — Santa Barbara Channel Swimming Association
    Swim caps must be standard-style and constructed from latex or silicone. Neoprene caps,multiple caps, and caps with chin straps are prohibited. e. Full-body ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] CCSF Rules - Catalina Channel Swimming Federation
    Swimmers are permitted to grease the body before a swim, use goggles, wear one cap, wear one porous suit, neither of which may be designed either to retain body ...
  51. [51]
    WOWSA Rules & Regulations
    Aug 11, 2024 · These guidelines outline the standard rules, regulations, and protocols that govern open water racing events, marathon solo swims, and relays.
  52. [52]
    Soul Cap, Designed For Minority Swimmers, Rejected by FINA For ...
    Jul 1, 2021 · The Soul Cap is a cap designed for swimmers with long, voluminous and Afro hair and was designed to help encourage more black women to begin swimming.Missing: regulations oversized challenges
  53. [53]
    A swimming cap made for Black hair gets final approval after ... - NPR
    Sep 2, 2022 · FINA, the governing body for international swim competitions, had rejected the design of Soul Cap's head covering ahead of last year's Olympics ...
  54. [54]
    Swimming caps designed for natural black hair finally permitted by ...
    Sep 2, 2022 · The international Swimming federation's decision in June last year to bar the Soul Cap from use at the Tokyo Games – a decision based in part on ...Missing: Aquatics | Show results with:Aquatics
  55. [55]
    It's Official: SOUL CAP Is Now Approved by FINA!
    Sep 1, 2022 · As of today, SOUL CAP is now officially approved by FINA, bringing our inclusive swim caps into competitive swimming at every level.Missing: Aquatics ruling
  56. [56]
    One Year After Rejection, Soul Cap Earns FINA Approval for ...
    Sep 4, 2022 · Soul Cap, a covering designed to protect natural Black hair, has earned FINA's approval for competition use after initially being rejected ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] COMPETITION REGULATIONS | World Aquatics
    Apr 5, 2023 · Note: Caps for Open Water Swimming are defined under Rule I.8.6.. Current World Aquatics Swimming Cap Rules. For World Aquatics competition ...
  58. [58]
    Swimming 101: Equipment, swimsuits, Olympic pool dimensions
    Feb 28, 2024 · World Aquatics decided to ban high-tech suits effective Jan. 1, 2010. The new rules call for textile-only fabric. Men's suits can only extend ...
  59. [59]
    Swimming Fast Under FINA Rules
    Mar 15, 2014 · Independent item: the cap shall not be attached to the swimsuit or goggles nor be in continuity therewith (i.e.no “hood” or “mask” effect).
  60. [60]
    [PDF] World AquAtics - Olympics.com
    The cap may display the swimmer's national flag or the swim- mer's name to a maximum size of 20cm2. Homologation Marks. Additional IF Specifications. Section ...