Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Universal law

Universal laws are empirically derived principles in the natural sciences, particularly physics, that describe invariant regularities in the behavior of matter, energy, and forces, presumed to hold uniformly across all regions of space and time without exception.^[1] These laws distinguish themselves from mere accidental uniformities by their broad explanatory power and predictive success, as evidenced in phenomena from subatomic interactions to cosmic expansion.^[1] Central examples include the force laws—such as gravitation, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak nuclear forces—which quantify interactions proportional to specific properties like mass or charge, alongside the phenomenological laws of thermodynamics governing energy conservation and entropy increase.^[2] Formulated through inductive generalization from repeated observations and experiments, these laws enable deterministic calculations within their domains, though they require initial conditions for complete specification of outcomes.^[2] The assumption of universality has been tested empirically through astronomical spectroscopy and cosmological models, revealing no detectable variations in fundamental constants over billions of light-years or billions of years, supporting causal consistency essential for scientific inference.^[3] While philosophical debates persist on whether laws reflect necessary truths or contingent descriptions, their empirical robustness—underpinning technologies from GPS to particle accelerators—affirms their status as cornerstones of causal realism in understanding the cosmos.^[1]

Definition and Conceptual Foundations

Core Definition

Universal law refers to normative principles of justice and morality that derive from the inherent structure of nature or human reason, binding all rational beings uniformly regardless of time, place, culture, or enacted statutes. These principles possess an objective validity independent of subjective opinion or contingent agreement, forming the basis for distinguishing inherently right actions from arbitrary conventions.^[4] In ancient philosophy, Aristotle identified natural justice as a universal standard "which everywhere has the same force and does not exist by people's thinking this or that," contrasting it with legal justice that varies by polity or custom. Cicero further defined it in De Legibus as "true law [being] right reason in agreement with nature," characterized by universal application, unchangeability, and eternity, summoning obedience through commands and deterring vice through prohibitions. This rational foundation implies that universal law reflects a cosmic or divine order accessible via reason, serving as the measure for human legislation.^[5]^[6] The concept presupposes that certain causal relations in human nature—such as the pursuit of eudaimonia through virtue or the reciprocity inherent in social cooperation—generate obligatory rules not reducible to empirical variation or power dynamics. Deviations in positive law from these universals render them defective, as evidenced in historical critiques where tyrannical edicts contradict natural equity.^[7]

Distinctions from Particular or Local Laws

Universal laws are defined by their invariance and applicability across all times, places, and rational agents, deriving from fundamental principles of reason, nature, or necessity rather than human contingency.^[1] In philosophical terms, such laws express properties or relations that hold universally, binding all instances without exception, as opposed to particulars, which are individual objects or events instantiating those properties in limited contexts.^[8] Particular laws, by extension, address specific cases or subclasses, often as applications or derivations of broader universals, while local laws are jurisdictionally confined enactments by human authorities, varying by society, era, or region due to their dependence on legislative will.^[9] A core distinction in jurisprudence lies between natural law—viewed as universal, discoverable through reason, and rooted in inherent human goods or moral order—and positive law, which consists of explicit human commands valid only within the enacting polity and subject to amendment or conflict across borders.^[10] Natural law theorists, such as Thomas Aquinas, argued that positive laws gain legitimacy only insofar as they align with these eternal principles; unjust positive laws, though locally enforceable, lack true moral authority.^[11] For instance, prohibitions on arbitrary killing emerge as universal from rational reflection on human flourishing, whereas statutes on property inheritance differ markedly between ancient Roman civil law and modern Scandinavian systems, reflecting cultural and temporal contingencies.^[12] In moral philosophy, universal laws demand actions consistent with maxims that could hold as objective necessities for all rational beings, as in Kant's categorical imperative, which tests principles by their potential universality rather than situational expediency.^[13] Contingent local norms, conversely, arise from cultural conventions or pragmatic needs, such as tribal customs on vendettas that vary widely and lack transcontextual binding force.^[14] This renders universal laws non-derogable by majority will or circumstance, whereas local laws permit exceptions, overrides, or outright contradictions, as seen in divergent national approaches to contractual enforcement under common law versus civil law traditions.^[15] Scientific formulations reinforce the divide: laws of nature, like Newton's law of universal gravitation (formulated in 1687), describe invariant causal regularities observable empirically across the cosmos, falsifiable only by comprehensive counterevidence rather than isolated anomalies.^[1] Particular or local "laws" in applied sciences, however, often denote approximations tailored to specific domains, such as regional engineering codes adapting universal fluid dynamics to seismic zones, which evolve with new data or policy but do not claim cosmic scope.^[16] Thus, universality entails metaphysical necessity or broad empirical generalization, while locality admits variability and human mediation.^[17]

Preconditions for Universality

A principle qualifies as a universal law only if it applies unconditionally to all rational agents, independent of empirical contingencies, desires, or particular circumstances. In Kantian ethics, this requires the subjective maxim of action—formulated as an intention to act in a given context for a specific end—to be tested for universalizability by imagining it as an objective law of nature. The maxim fails if its universalization leads to a contradiction in conception, where the action becomes logically impossible (e.g., a universal permission to lie undermining the concept of communication), or a contradiction in will, where rational volition conflicts with the law's implications (e.g., willing universal non-assistance while needing help oneself).^[14] These tests ensure the principle's necessity, as moral laws must command a priori through reason alone, binding all finite rational beings without reliance on hypothetical imperatives conditioned by inclinations.^[14] In natural law traditions, universality presupposes precepts grounded in the intelligible structure of human nature and reality, accessible via practical reason to beings endowed with intellect and free will. Such laws, as eternal ordinances of reason, bind inherently because they reflect teleological ends essential to human flourishing, such as self-preservation and pursuit of truth, rather than deriving from divine command or social convention alone.^[18] For instance, Thomas Aquinas identifies the first precept—do good and avoid evil—as self-evident and directive for all derivative norms, applicable universally since human nature shares common rational capacities across individuals and societies.^[18] This objectivity demands invariance across cultures and epochs, rejecting relativism where moral validity hinges on local acceptance or utility. Further preconditions include generality in formulation, prohibiting ad hoc exceptions tied to specific persons, times, or places, and causal realism in grounding, where the law aligns with observable human ends and avoids self-undermining abstractions. Legal positivists challenge this by attributing validity to social facts like sovereign command, but natural law theorists counter that true universality requires moral conformity, as unjust enactments (lex iniusta) lack binding force qua law.^[19] Empirical deviations, such as culturally variable practices, do not negate universality if the principle traces to invariant rational or natural necessities, though source biases in modern academia—often favoring relativist interpretations—may underemphasize these objective anchors.^[18] Thus, universality demands both logical coherence and alignment with the causal order of human action.

Historical Development

Ancient Origins

In ancient Greek philosophy, precursors to the concept of universal law emerged in pre-Socratic thought, where figures like Heraclitus (c. 535–475 BCE) identified law (nomos) with reason (logos), portraying it as an eternal, divine principle governing both mortals and immortals, superior to human conventions.^[20] Similarly, Pythagoras (c. 570–495 BCE) linked justice to cosmic harmony, envisioning it as a universal requital embodied in numerical equality, influencing later ideas of equitable order.^[20] Aristotle (384–322 BCE) advanced this by distinguishing natural justice—universal, unchanging, and rooted in human nature—from conventional laws varying by place and time, as articulated in Nicomachean Ethics (Book V, 1134b–1135a).^[20] For Aristotle, law embodied collective reason, impartial and free from passion, serving as a universal standard of conduct applicable across contexts to promote virtue and proportionality in distribution and correction.^[21]^[22] He emphasized equity as a corrective to rigid laws, adapting universal principles to particular cases without undermining their generality.^[22] The Stoics, beginning with Zeno of Citium (c. 334–262 BCE), synthesized these ideas into a cosmic natural law, equating it with the rational active principle (logos) pervading the universe, identical to Zeus and "right reason in agreement with nature."^[23] Chrysippus (c. 279–206 BCE) described law as "king of all things human and divine," a singular, corporeal force unifying ethical norms through comprehensive knowledge of the world's rational order, rejecting relativistic nomos-phusis debates in favor of this immutable framework.^[23] This Stoic view positioned universal law as both descriptive of natural causation and prescriptive for human conduct, extending equality to all rational beings in a cosmopolitan ethos.^[20]^[23]

Medieval and Natural Law Traditions

In the early medieval period, Isidore of Seville (c. 560–636) laid foundational distinctions in his Etymologies (completed c. 620–636), categorizing laws into divine, natural, human, and customary types, with natural law defined as the universal dictate of right reason discerned by the intelligent mind, binding all nations through shared rationality rather than convention.^[24] Isidore emphasized natural law's origin in divine reason imprinted on creation, distinguishing it from ius gentium (law of nations), which he viewed as human agreements arising from necessity, such as captivity or property division, thus preserving natural law's universality as antecedent to positive enactments.^[25] By the 12th century, Gratian's Decretum (c. 1140) integrated natural law into canon law, defining it as precepts from scripture and gospel mandating reciprocal justice—"do to others what you wish done to yourself"—and asserting the equality of all souls before God, which implied universal human dignity independent of ecclesiastical or civil authority.^[26]^[27] Gratian's framework elevated natural law above positive canon and civil laws, positioning it as an immutable standard for evaluating their justice, thereby establishing a hierarchical jurisprudence where universal equity constrained particular rules.^[28] The synthesis culminated in Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274), who in Summa Theologica (1265–1274) formulated natural law as humanity's rational participation in God's eternal law, the divine reason governing the universe, with its primary precept that "good is to be done and pursued, and evil avoided," from which secondary precepts—such as prohibitions against murder, theft, and adultery—derive universally through synderesis, an innate intellectual habit.^[29]^[30] Aquinas argued these precepts are self-evident to practical reason, applicable to all rational beings irrespective of revelation, though divine positive law perfects them; variability in application arises from contingent circumstances, not the precepts' core universality.^[31] This Thomistic view, reconciling Aristotelian teleology with Christian theology, posited natural law as causally rooted in human nature's orientation toward the good, verifiable by reason's observation of ends like self-preservation and sociality, countering relativistic customs with objective moral universality.^[32] Later scholastics, such as Francisco Suárez, reinforced this by insisting natural law commands via God's reasonable will, though medieval emphasis remained on its rational accessibility over voluntarism.^[33]

Enlightenment Formulations

During the Enlightenment, formulations of universal law emphasized rational discovery of moral precepts applicable to all humanity, shifting from scholastic reliance on divine revelation toward human reason as the accessible arbiter, though often retaining a theistic underpinning. John Locke, in his Second Treatise of Government (1689), defined the law of nature as a universal obligation discerned by reason, commanding the preservation of mankind and prohibiting harm to others' life, health, liberty, or possessions, with all individuals equally bound in the state of nature.^[34]^[35] Locke grounded this law in God's workmanship over humans, making it a divine decree knowable through natural light, thereby establishing self-preservation and mutual non-aggression as enforceable universals prior to civil authority.^[36] This framework influenced later rights theories by positing consent-based governance as derivative from these rational, impartial principles.^[37] Montesquieu advanced Enlightenment thought in The Spirit of the Laws (1748), conceiving laws as necessary relations deriving from the intrinsic nature of entities, including universal moral relations binding human societies irrespective of particular customs or climates.^[38] While acknowledging environmental influences on positive laws, he upheld natural equity—impartial justice aligned with reason—as a transcendent standard against arbitrary rule, insisting that legitimate governance must conform to these relations to avoid tyranny.^[39] Montesquieu's analysis, informed by comparative study of global legal systems, rejected absolutism by deriving universal constraints from rational observation of human faculties and societal ends, such as moderation in power to prevent corruption.^[40] Voltaire echoed these rationalist universals by critiquing religious persecution as contrary to the law of nature, equating intolerance with barbarism exceeding even animal instincts, and advocating tolerance as a dictate of reason applicable across creeds and nations.^[41] Drawing from Lockean premises, he promoted empirical scrutiny and scientific method to uncover natural laws governing human conduct, viewing universal rights to liberty and security as evident from reason rather than ecclesiastical dogma.^[42] These formulations collectively prioritized causal reasoning from human equality and self-interest, fostering secular critiques of tradition while cautioning against unchecked relativism, as evidenced in their role shaping 18th-century constitutional experiments like the U.S. Declaration of Independence (1776).^[43]

Philosophical Formulations

Kantian Categorical Imperative

The Categorical Imperative represents Immanuel Kant's foundational principle for deriving universal moral laws through pure practical reason, independent of empirical desires or contingent ends. Presented in his 1785 Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, it functions as an a priori command binding all rational agents, contrasting with hypothetical imperatives that prescribe actions only as means to achieve subjective goals. Kant derives it from the concept of a good will, which acts from duty under the moral law, asserting that rationality itself necessitates universalizable principles to avoid self-contradiction in willing.^[44] The primary formulation, the Formula of Universal Law, instructs: "Act only in accordance with that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it become a universal law." This criterion tests moral maxims by assessing whether their generalization into a law of nature would be coherent; contradictions in conception (e.g., false promising) or will (e.g., refusing aid in absolute self-interest) reveal impermissibility. Kant illustrates this with examples like suicide, which undermines self-preservation as a universal rule, or neglecting talents, which contradicts rational development. By requiring consistency across all rational beings, the formula establishes moral universality as a logical necessity of autonomy, where the will legislates laws it subjects itself to.^[44] A complementary formulation, the Formula of Humanity as End in Itself, demands: "Act so that you use humanity, whether in your own person or in that of another, at all times as an end and never merely as a means." This emphasizes the intrinsic worth of rational nature, prohibiting instrumentalization that violates persons' capacity for self-legislation. Kant equates this with treating individuals as ends-in-themselves, akin to sovereigns in a realm governed by self-imposed laws, thereby extending universality to interpersonal relations. The third formulation envisions a "kingdom of ends," where rational agents act as co-legislators under maxims compatible with collective freedom, synthesizing the prior formulas into a systematic ideal of moral community.^[44] In his 1788 Critique of Practical Reason, Kant reaffirms the Categorical Imperative as the "fact of reason," an immediate awareness of moral obligation that presupposes human freedom against mechanistic determinism. This synthetic a priori judgment integrates theoretical reason's limits with practical demands, postulating duties as objectively necessary while allowing for incentives from sensible inclinations only subordinately. Empirical verification is impossible, as universality stems from reason's form rather than content, yet violations manifest in rational inconsistency rather than observable outcomes. Kant's system thus posits the Imperative as the sole ground for moral legislation, immune to cultural relativism or consequentialist calculations.^[45]

Aristotelian and Rationalist Approaches

Aristotle distinguished between natural and conventional justice in his ethical and rhetorical works, positing natural justice as a universal principle inherent in human nature and applicable without variation across societies. In the Nicomachean Ethics (Book V, Chapter 7), he describes natural right as that which "everywhere has the same force and does not exist by law nor by people's thinking this or that," contrasting it with legal justice that depends on enacted laws and may differ by polity. This universal aspect aligns with Aristotle's teleological view of human flourishing (eudaimonia), where virtues, including justice, fulfill the rational and social purpose (telos) of humankind, observable through empirical reflection on nature rather than pure deduction.^[18] In the Rhetoric (Book I, Chapter 13), Aristotle further references an unwritten "universal law" of nature, binding all and evoking a sense of common equity, as in the Antigone example where divine or natural norms supersede particular statutes. Such Aristotelian universals emphasize causality rooted in human essence—rational animals seeking the good—rather than abstract imperatives, influencing later natural law traditions by grounding moral universality in observable human ends rather than divine command alone.^[46] Critics note Aristotle's framework accommodates contextual application, as universal principles manifest differently in varied regimes, prioritizing the common good over rigid absolutism.^[47] Rationalist approaches to universal law, emerging prominently in the early modern period, derive binding principles deductively from reason's innate apprehension of right, independent of empirical variability or theological premises. Hugo Grotius (1583–1645), often regarded as a foundational rationalist in this domain, defined natural law in De Jure Belli ac Pacis (1625) as "the dictate of right reason which points out that a given act, secundum quae cum natura, is conformable to rational nature, and teaches that it is necessarily commanded or forbidden by God, the author of nature."^[48] He argued this holds etiamsi daremus non esse Deum (even if we should concede there is no God), underscoring its rational self-evidence over faith-based derivation, thus establishing universal norms for war, property, and sociability applicable to all rational agents.^[49] This rationalist method, echoed in successors like Samuel Pufendorf (1632–1694), treats universal law as a priori obligations discerned through logical analysis of human rationality and self-preservation, forming the basis for ius gentium (law of nations) transcending positive laws.^[50] Unlike Aristotelian teleology, which integrates empirical observation of ends, rationalism prioritizes deductive certainty, positing moral laws as necessary truths akin to mathematics, though vulnerable to critiques of overlooking cultural contingencies. Spinoza's geometric Ethics (1677) extends this by framing ethical "laws" as eternal necessities of nature's substance, where human bondage to passions yields to rational understanding of universal conatus (striving), yielding prescriptive freedom rather than heteronomous commands.

Criticisms from Relativism and Empiricism

Relativists challenge the notion of universal laws by emphasizing observed moral diversity across societies, arguing that ethical norms are shaped by cultural contexts rather than transcending them. Anthropological studies, such as those documenting varying practices on kinship, property, and retribution, suggest that what constitutes justice or virtue differs fundamentally between groups, rendering claims of invariant principles ethnocentric impositions.^[51] For example, cultural relativists maintain that universalist frameworks fail to account for how societies like the Inuit historically practiced female infanticide as adaptive without violating an objective moral order, implying no cross-cultural constants exist beyond descriptive anthropology.^[52] This view posits that moral truths, if any, are relative to societal conventions, undermining natural law theories that derive universals from human nature independent of empirical variation.^[53] Such relativism critiques rationalist foundations of universal law, like those in Aristotelian or Kantian traditions, as abstract deductions disconnected from lived diversity, potentially justifying tolerance for conflicting norms without hierarchical adjudication. Proponents argue this avoids the imperialism of imposing, say, Western prohibitions on honor killings prevalent in certain Middle Eastern or South Asian contexts.^[54] Yet, relativist positions often encounter logical tensions, such as self-undermining when asserting relativism itself as universally true, though advocates counter that their claim describes meta-ethical contingency rather than prescribing behavior. Empirical cross-cultural surveys, while revealing variances, occasionally uncover near-universal prohibitions like those against unprovoked murder, which relativists attribute to convergent evolutionary pressures rather than normative absolutes.^[55] Empiricists, drawing from David Hume's framework in A Treatise of Human Nature (1739), object to universal laws derived a priori, insisting that knowledge originates solely from sensory experience and cannot yield necessary, exceptionless principles. Hume's distinction between "is" and "ought" asserts that descriptive observations of human behavior provide no logical basis for prescriptive universals, as moral approbation stems from sentiment and utility rather than rational deduction. Thus, purported universal moral laws, like prohibitions on lying, lack justification beyond habitual associations formed inductively, which remain probabilistic and revisable under new evidence, rejecting innate or transcendental grounds.^[56] This empiricist skepticism extends to causal realism in ethics, where universal claims falter against the problem of induction: past consistencies do not guarantee future universality, as seen in Hume's analysis of causation itself, extrapolated to moral regularities.^[57] Critics of rationalist universals argue that without empirical verification, such laws resemble dogmatic metaphysics, vulnerable to counterexamples from historical shifts, like evolving views on slavery across eras. Academic empiricists prioritize observable consequences over abstract imperatives, viewing universal law as an overreach beyond verifiable data, though this invites challenges from synthetic a priori defenses in Kantian responses.^[58]

Scientific Laws of Nature

Newtonian Paradigm

Newton's Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, published on July 5, 1687, established the foundational laws of motion and gravitation that defined the Newtonian paradigm for universal physical laws.^[59] ^[60] These principles posited a deterministic universe where mechanical causes produce predictable effects, applicable invariantly to all matter, from falling apples to orbiting planets, under the assumptions of absolute space and absolute time.^[61] Absolute space provided an unchanging reference frame for motion, while absolute time flowed uniformly, independent of observers or events, enabling laws to hold universally without reference to local conditions.^[61] The three laws of motion formed the core: the first law describes inertia, stating that a body persists in its state of rest or uniform rectilinear motion unless compelled to change by external forces impressed upon it; the second law relates force to the rate of change of momentum, approximately F = ma for constant mass; and the third law declares that actions and reactions are equal and opposite.^[60] Complementing these, the law of universal gravitation asserts that any two bodies attract each other with a force directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their centers, quantified as F = G m_1 m_2 / r^2, where G is the gravitational constant later measured as approximately 6.67 × 10^{-11} N·m²/kg².^[62] This force acts instantaneously across vacuum, unifying terrestrial gravity with celestial mechanics and implying a clockwork cosmos governed by mathematical regularity.^[63] Empirical validation reinforced the paradigm's universality; Newton's framework derived Johannes Kepler's three laws of planetary motion—elliptical orbits with the sun at one focus, equal areas swept in equal times, and T² ∝ a³ for periods T and semi-major axes a—from Tycho Brahe's observational data, transforming descriptive empiricism into causal explanation.^[64] ^[65] Predictions of comet paths, lunar perturbations, and tidal variations matched observations, such as Edmund Halley's comet return in 1758, confirming the laws' predictive scope across scales without ad hoc adjustments.^[65] Within this paradigm, deviations from predictions indicated unknown forces rather than flaws in universality, prioritizing causal mechanisms over mere correlations.^[66]

Relativistic and Quantum Extensions

Einstein's special theory of relativity, formulated in 1905, extends Newtonian mechanics by positing that the laws of physics are invariant under Lorentz transformations rather than Galilean ones, with the speed of light in vacuum constant at approximately 299,792,458 m/s for all inertial observers.^[67] This framework reconciles electromagnetism's Maxwell equations with mechanics, yielding relativistic energy-momentum relations such as E = \gamma m c^2 and p = \gamma m v, where \gamma = 1/\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}, which reduce to Newtonian forms E \approx m c^2 + \frac{1}{2} m v^2 and p \approx m v at velocities v \ll c.^[68] Conservation of energy and momentum persists but manifests relativistically, as derived from spacetime symmetries via Noether's theorem applied to the Poincaré group. General relativity, published by Einstein in 1915, further generalizes this by incorporating gravity through the equivalence principle, equating inertial and gravitational mass, and describing it as curvature of a four-dimensional pseudo-Riemannian manifold governed by the Einstein field equations G_{\mu\nu} + \Lambda g_{\mu\nu} = \frac{8\pi G}{c^4} T_{\mu\nu}.^[69] Newtonian gravity emerges as the weak-field, slow-motion limit, with the Schwarzschild metric solution predicting phenomena like the 1919 solar eclipse deflection of starlight by 1.75 arcseconds, verified observationally.^[70] Universality is preserved via diffeomorphism invariance, ensuring laws hold locally in any coordinate system, though global structure depends on topology; empirical tests, including GPS time dilation corrections of up to 38 microseconds daily, confirm predictions to parts in $10^{14}.^[69] Quantum mechanics, crystallized in 1925–1926 through Heisenberg's matrix formulation and Schrödinger's wave equation i \hbar \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} = \hat{H} \psi, supplants deterministic trajectories with probabilistic amplitudes over Hilbert space, universal in applying to all microscopic systems via unitary evolution under the Hamiltonian \hat{H}.^[71] Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, \Delta x \Delta p \geq \hbar/2 (1927), arises from non-commuting operators [\hat{x}, \hat{p}] = i \hbar, limiting simultaneous precision but not violating conservation laws, which hold via continuous symmetries—e.g., time-translation invariance implies energy conservation in isolated systems.^[72] Wave-particle duality and superposition, as in the 1927 double-slit experiment with electrons, underscore universality, with Born's 1926 rule P = |\psi|^2 yielding statistical predictions matching data, such as atomic spectra to 10 decimal places. Relativistic quantum field theory (QFT), emerging in the 1940s, unifies these by quantizing fields on Minkowski spacetime, as in quantum electrodynamics (QED) where Dirac's 1928 equation \left(i \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu - m\right) \psi = 0 predicts antimatter and fine-structure constant anomalies verified to 12 digits.^[73] Conservation laws extend via the full Poincaré group plus internal symmetries like gauge invariance, underpinning the Standard Model's particle interactions; however, at Planck scales ($10^{-35} m), unresolved quantum gravity tensions challenge strict universality, as general relativity's continuous spacetime conflicts with quantum discreteness, evidenced by black hole information paradoxes since Hawking's 1974 calculations.^[74] Despite this, both frameworks maintain empirical universality across cosmological scales, from CMB anisotropies to LHC collisions at 13 TeV.^[73]

Empirical Verification and Falsifiability

Empirical verification of scientific laws requires rigorous testing of their predictive power against observational and experimental data, often involving repeated trials under controlled or natural conditions to confirm consistency across scales and contexts. For instance, laws must withstand challenges like varying gravitational strengths or velocities to claim universality.^[75] This process, however, faces the problem of induction identified by David Hume in the 18th century: no amount of confirmatory evidence can logically guarantee a law's future applicability, as it relies on assuming the uniformity of nature without deductive proof.^[76] Karl Popper reformulated scientific methodology in the 20th century to emphasize falsifiability over verification, arguing that theories gain credibility by surviving potential refutations rather than accumulating confirmations, which cannot resolve induction's logical gap.^[77] A universal law qualifies as scientific if it prohibits specific empirical outcomes—such as certain particle trajectories or spectral lines—and empirical tests could decisively contradict it, enabling theory replacement. Popper's criterion demarcates science from pseudoscience, insisting that ad hoc adjustments to evade falsification undermine a theory's empirical content.^[78] In physics, Newtonian gravitation was verified through centuries of data, including planetary orbits calculated to high precision, yet falsified by the anomalous 43 arcseconds per century advance in Mercury's perihelion, unresolvable by Newtonian perturbations from other planets.^[79] Einstein's general relativity (1915) predicted this exact excess, integrating it into spacetime curvature.^[77] Verification of relativity came swiftly via the 1919 solar eclipse expeditions organized by Arthur Eddington and Frank Dyson, where photographic plates measured starlight deflection by the Sun at 1.75 arcseconds—matching Einstein's prediction and doubling the Newtonian value—across sites in Sobral, Brazil, and Príncipe, West Africa, despite cloudy conditions.^[80] Subsequent tests, including radar ranging to Venus in 1964 confirming Shapiro delay, have further corroborated relativity while highlighting limits, such as incompatibilities with quantum field theory at singularities.^[81] Falsifiability drives iterative refinement: quantum mechanics falsified classical determinism by demonstrating probabilistic outcomes in experiments like the double-slit interference (1927), where electron patterns defy particle trajectories without wave function collapse.^[77] Yet, no theory achieves absolute universality; ongoing null results from gravitational wave detections (e.g., LIGO's 2015 black hole mergers aligning with relativity) provisionally support laws but invite future disconfirmation, underscoring science's tentative, anti-dogmatic nature.^[82]

Juridical and Ethical Applications

Natural Law in Jurisprudence

Natural law in jurisprudence refers to the theory that certain legal principles derive from inherent human nature and reason, independent of positive law enacted by human authorities. This tradition holds that valid law must conform to moral truths discernible through rational inquiry, serving as a standard to evaluate and potentially invalidate unjust statutes. Thomas Aquinas, in his Summa Theologica (1265–1274), articulated natural law as human participation in eternal divine law, with primary precepts such as "good is to be done and pursued, and evil avoided," from which secondary principles like prohibitions on murder and theft emerge.^[83]^[84] In English jurisprudence, natural law influenced common law development from the 13th century, as seen in Henry de Bracton's On the Laws and Customs of England (c. 1250), which integrated natural equity with customary rules, and later in Sir William Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765–1769), where he described municipal law as declaratory of preexisting natural rights to life, liberty, and property.^[85]^[86] John Locke, in Two Treatises of Government (1689), grounded political authority in natural rights to life, liberty, and estate, asserting that governments exist to protect these against infringement, a view that shaped constitutional limits on sovereign power.^[87]^[88] In American jurisprudence, natural law underpinned the Declaration of Independence (1776), invoking "the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God" as justifying rebellion against tyrannical rule. Early Supreme Court justices, such as James Wilson in Chisholm v. Georgia (1793), explicitly referenced natural law to affirm unalienable rights transcending written constitutions. However, by the late 19th century, legal realism and positivism, championed by Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. in "The Path of the Law" (1897), marginalized natural law, prioritizing observable social facts over abstract moral principles.^[89]^[90]^[91] Contemporary natural law jurisprudence, revived by John Finnis in Natural Law and Natural Rights (1980), emphasizes practical reason's basic goods—life, knowledge, play, aesthetic experience, sociability, practical reasonableness, and religion—as objective foundations for legal validity, influencing debates on human rights and bioethics. Critics from legal positivism, such as H.L.A. Hart in The Concept of Law (1961), argue that law's existence depends solely on social recognition by officials, decoupling it from morality to avoid subjective indeterminacy, though this separation has been faulted for enabling enforcement of immoral regimes, as in the post-World War II Nuremberg Trials (1945–1946), where natural law principles justified prosecuting acts legal under Nazi positive law.^[92]^[93]^[94] Recent scholarship notes a "natural law moment" in U.S. constitutional theory, with originalist judges invoking it to interpret unenumerated rights, as in Justice Clarence Thomas's opinions emphasizing natural rights predating the Constitution. Despite positivist dominance in academia, natural law persists in international human rights instruments like the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), which presupposes inherent dignity and rights derivable from reason rather than state grant.^[95]^[96]

Universal Jurisdiction in International Law

Universal jurisdiction enables any state to assert criminal jurisdiction over perpetrators of certain egregious international crimes, regardless of the crime's location, the nationalities involved, or any other connection to the prosecuting state.^[97] This principle applies to offenses such as piracy, genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and torture, predicated on their status as delicta juris gentium—crimes against the law of nations that concern all states collectively, thereby justifying prosecution anywhere to avert safe havens for offenders.^[98]^[99] Historically rooted in customary international law for piracy as early as the 16th century, universal jurisdiction expanded significantly after World War II amid efforts to address atrocities. The 1949 Geneva Conventions explicitly mandate states parties to search for, prosecute, or extradite individuals responsible for grave breaches, incorporating universal elements by requiring jurisdiction over such acts irrespective of nationality or territory.^[100]^[101] The 1948 Genocide Convention, while primarily emphasizing territorial and national jurisdiction in Article VI, has been interpreted alongside customary norms to support broader application. Further reinforcement came via the 1984 United Nations Convention Against Torture, which obliges states to establish jurisdiction over torture when the offender is found on their territory, effectively endorsing aut dedere aut judicare (extradite or prosecute).^[102] These instruments, combined with customary law, form the dual basis for the doctrine, though its scope remains subject to state practice and interpretation.^[103] Notable exercises include the 1998 arrest of Augusto Pinochet, former Chilean head of state from 1973 to 1990, in London under a Spanish warrant for alleged torture and disappearances during his regime; the UK House of Lords ruled that former heads of state lack immunity for international crimes under universal jurisdiction, though Pinochet was released in 2000 on health grounds.^[104] In 2021, a German court applied the principle to convict Eyad al-Gharib, a former Syrian official, of aiding and abetting crimes against humanity for his role in 2011-2012 detentions and abuses during the Syrian conflict, marking one of the first such prosecutions for Syrian atrocities.^[105] These cases demonstrate practical invocation, often by states like Spain, Belgium, and Germany with expansive domestic laws enabling investigations without victim-perpetrator links. Critics contend that universal jurisdiction risks politicization, enabling prosecutions driven by geopolitical motives rather than impartial justice, which can strain diplomatic relations and infringe on sovereignty.^[106] For instance, Belgium curtailed its broad 1993-1999 universal jurisdiction statute in 2003 after NATO allies, including the United States, threatened sanctions over cases implicating Israeli and American officials.^[99] Such retrenchments highlight inconsistencies, with application often selective—favoring pursuits against adversaries while sparing allies—and dependent on domestic political will, potentially undermining the principle's universality.^[107] Despite these challenges, proponents argue it remains essential for closing impunity gaps where territorial states fail to act, supported by evolving customary practice evidenced in over 100 states incorporating elements into national codes.^[108]

Moral Realism vs. Constructivism

Moral realism holds that moral facts exist objectively and independently of human attitudes, beliefs, or rational procedures, rendering certain moral judgments true or false based on their correspondence to these facts.^[109]^[110] In the domain of universal law, this view treats moral principles as akin to scientific laws—discovered rather than invented—with binding force derived from their stance-independent reality, explaining phenomena like persistent cross-cultural condemnation of acts such as torture or betrayal as tracking genuine moral truths rather than contingent agreements.^[109]^[111] Proponents argue that alternatives fail to account for the phenomenology of moral experience, where obligations feel inescapably authoritative, not merely hypothetical or preference-based.^[109] Moral constructivism, by contrast, denies the existence of such independent facts, asserting instead that moral truths emerge from a constructive process governed by the constitutive norms of rational agency.^[112]^[113] Christine Korsgaard, a leading advocate, contends that normativity originates in the reflective endorsement of one's humanity as an end in itself, which rational agents must universalize to justify their actions, yielding principles like the categorical imperative without invoking metaphysically "queer" entities.^[114] This approach renders universal laws procedural outcomes of practical reason: binding insofar as they survive scrutiny under conditions of impartiality and consistency, but lacking ontological depth beyond agency itself.^[114]^[113] The debate hinges on normativity's source and universality's robustness. Realists, such as Russ Shafer-Landau, defend objective facts as explanatorily superior, citing moral disagreement's resolution through evidence (e.g., historical shifts against slavery as convergence on truth, not re-construction) and rejecting constructivism's reliance on unargued privileges for agency.^[109] Constructivists respond by highlighting realism's epistemological burdens—how non-empirical facts could motivate or justify without reducing to natural properties—and emphasize constructivism's avoidance of such commitments while preserving universality via shared rationality.^[114]^[112] A pivotal critique of constructivism is David Enoch's "shmagency" objection: even if norms are constitutive of genuine agency, a non-agent ("shmagent") indifferent to those norms faces no rational deficit, severing the link between construction and categorical authority.^[115] This undermines constructivism's claim to ground universal laws in reason alone, as it permits opting out without irrationality, whereas realism attributes inescapability to the facts themselves.^[115]^[109] Empirical patterns, including near-universal aversion to gratuitous harm documented in cross-cultural studies since the 1930s (e.g., Westermarck's observations on innate taboos), align more readily with realism's objective constraints than with variable constructions, though constructivists interpret such data as reflective equilibrium outputs.^[111] Despite academia's historical tilt toward anti-realist views amid secular skepticism of metaphysics, recent defenses emphasize realism's coherence with causal explanations of moral motivation and progress.^[109]

Debates and Controversies

Universality vs. Cultural Relativism

The debate between universality and cultural relativism in the context of universal laws centers on whether certain moral, ethical, or legal principles hold across all human societies independent of cultural context, or if such principles are entirely constructed by specific cultural norms. Proponents of universality argue that empirical cross-cultural studies reveal consistent prohibitions and values, such as bans on murder and incest, suggesting innate or evolutionarily derived foundations rather than arbitrary cultural inventions.^[116] Cultural relativism, conversely, posits that moral laws vary fundamentally between societies, with no objective basis for preferring one over another, a view advanced by anthropologists like Franz Boas to counter ethnocentrism but criticized for implying that practices like honor killings or slavery lack universal condemnation.^[117] Empirical evidence supports universality through systematic analyses of global societies. Anthropologist Donald E. Brown compiled a list of over 300 human universals from ethnographic data, including prohibitions against murder within the ingroup, incest taboos covering parent-child and sibling relations, and norms of reciprocity and property respect, observed without known exceptions across documented cultures.^[116] Similarly, a 2019 study by Oxford researchers analyzed 60 societies spanning seven major cultural areas and identified seven cooperative moral rules—kinship loyalty, group loyalty, reciprocity, bravery, deference to authority, fairness in resource division, and property respect—as universally present, aligning with evolutionary theories of cooperation rather than cultural idiosyncrasy.^[118] Jonathan Haidt's Moral Foundations Theory further posits six innate psychological systems (care/harm, fairness/cheating, loyalty/betrayal, authority/subversion, sanctity/degradation, liberty/oppression) that underpin moral reasoning worldwide, with cultural differences arising from varying emphases rather than absence of foundations.^[119] Criticisms of cultural relativism highlight its logical inconsistencies and practical dangers. Relativism's claim that all morals are culturally determined is self-undermining, as it asserts a universal truth about the relativity of truths, and it precludes cross-cultural moral progress or condemnation of atrocities like genocide, which occurred in 20th-century cases such as the Holocaust (1941-1945) or Rwandan genocide (1994), where relativist inaction would equate victim and perpetrator.^[117] While relativists cite practices like historical infanticide in Inuit societies or ritual sacrifice in Aztec culture (circa 1400-1521 CE) as evidence of variance, these exceptions often violate broader universals like ingroup harm avoidance when scrutinized, and modern anthropological consensus, informed by genetic and psychological data, increasingly favors hybrid models acknowledging universal cores modulated by culture.^[120] This empirical tilt toward universality underscores causal mechanisms rooted in human biology and cooperation needs, challenging purely constructivist views prevalent in some academic circles despite their empirical weaknesses.^[121]

Descriptive vs. Prescriptive Laws

Descriptive laws articulate empirical regularities observed in the natural world, stating what occurs under specified conditions without implying obligation or normativity. For instance, the law of universal gravitation describes how masses attract proportionally to their product and inversely to the square of their distance, holding invariantly across tested scales as verified by experiments like Cavendish's 1797-1798 torsion balance measurement yielding a gravitational constant of approximately 6.74 × 10^{-11} m³ kg^{-1} s^{-2}. Such laws are falsifiable generalizations derived from inductive evidence, applicable universally insofar as they withstand empirical scrutiny without cultural or subjective variance.^[19] Prescriptive laws, by contrast, impose normative directives on conduct, specifying what agents ought to do to achieve ends such as justice, flourishing, or social order. In ethical contexts, these include imperatives like "do not murder," posited in traditions such as Thomistic natural law, where they derive from rational deduction about human telos—purposeful ends inherent in nature, such as self-preservation and reproduction.^[18] Legal systems exemplify prescription through enacted statutes, as in the U.S. Constitution's Eighth Amendment prohibiting "cruel and unusual punishments," which binds legislators and enforcers irrespective of empirical outcomes.^[19] Universality here claims applicability to all rational beings, but lacks the predictive testability of descriptive laws, relying instead on a priori reasoning or revealed authority. The core debate centers on whether descriptive universals can ground prescriptive ones, epitomized by David Hume's 1739-1740 is-ought distinction in A Treatise of Human Nature, which contends no logical entailment exists from factual premises ("is") to normative conclusions ("ought") without unstated evaluative assumptions.^[122] Natural law theorists counter that human nature's descriptive features—evident in cross-cultural universals like aversion to pain or kin altruism, corroborated by anthropological data from sources such as Henry Murray's 1938 Thematic Apperception Test studies—imply prescriptions for actions aligning with survival and reason, as Aquinas argued in Summa Theologica (1265-1274) that eternal law's rational order manifests descriptively in creatures.^[18] Critics, including legal positivists like H.L.A. Hart in The Concept of Law (1961), maintain this conflates description with prescription, as natural vulnerabilities (e.g., mortality) necessitate minimal rules for survival but do not dictate specific moral content, leaving prescriptions vulnerable to arbitrary imposition.^[123] Empirical challenges amplify the divide: descriptive laws endure rigorous falsification, with quantum mechanics refining Newtonian predictions to 10 decimal places in electron g-factor measurements by 2020, yet prescriptive universals falter under cultural variance, as evidenced by divergent homicide prohibitions in ancient codes like Hammurabi's (c. 1750 BCE) versus modern secular variants. Attempts to bridge via evolutionary ethics, positing moral intuitions as adaptive traits selected over millennia, face Humean scrutiny, as describing gene propagation (e.g., kin selection models by Hamilton in 1964) does not entail oughts for altruism beyond genetic interest.^[122] Thus, while descriptive laws achieve universality through causal invariance, prescriptive claims demand additional metaphysical commitments—such as teleology or divine ordinance—to assert binding force, rendering their universality philosophically contested rather than empirically settled.^[124]

Challenges from Modern Physics

Quantum mechanics undermines the classical ideal of deterministic universal laws by introducing inherent probabilism. In contrast to Newtonian mechanics, where initial conditions and laws uniquely predict outcomes, quantum theory posits that physical states are described by wave functions yielding only probabilistic predictions for measurement results, as per the Born rule established in 1926. This is evidenced by experiments confirming the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, which imposes fundamental limits on simultaneously measuring conjugate variables like position and momentum, precluding complete determinism even in principle. Radioactive decay processes further illustrate this, as the precise timing of an atom's decay remains unpredictable, governed solely by statistical half-lives rather than causal chains.^[125]^[126] General relativity challenges absolute universality by rendering physical laws covariant under arbitrary coordinate transformations, dependent on local spacetime curvature rather than a fixed Euclidean backdrop. Formulated by Einstein in 1915, the theory equates gravitation with geometry via the Einstein field equations, implying that "universal" laws apply locally in freely falling frames but manifest differently in strong gravitational fields, such as near black holes where singularities render predictions incomplete due to event horizons and information paradoxes observed in theoretical models since the 1970s. This frame-dependence erodes the notion of invariant, observer-independent laws, as simultaneity and causality become relative, contradicting classical absolute time.^[127]^[125] The profound incompatibility between quantum mechanics and general relativity exacerbates these issues, as attempts to quantize gravity lead to infinities in perturbation theory, rendering standard quantum field approaches non-renormalizable, as recognized since the 1930s Wheeler-DeWitt attempts and persisting in loop quantum gravity and string theory efforts. This discord, highlighted in the "problem of time" where quantum evolution conflicts with relativistic static spacetime, suggests current laws are approximations rather than truly universal, potentially requiring emergent or observer-dependent principles in a complete theory. Bell's theorem experiments since 1982 further challenge local realism, demonstrating non-local correlations in entangled particles that violate classical intuitions of separable, universal causation.^[128]^[125]^[126]

Modern Developments and Implications

Quantum Entanglement Universals

Quantum entanglement refers to a quantum mechanical phenomenon in which the quantum states of two or more particles become correlated such that the state of one particle cannot be described independently of the others, even when separated by large distances.^[129] This correlation persists instantaneously upon measurement, as demonstrated in experiments violating Bell's inequalities, which test local hidden variable theories against quantum predictions.^[130] The first conclusive experimental verification occurred in 1982 by Alain Aspect's team, confirming non-local correlations predicted by quantum theory.^[129] These non-local effects challenge classical notions of locality and separability, implying that quantum systems exhibit holistic properties governed by universal principles inherent to the theory's formalism.^[131] Empirical tests, including those using photons separated by over 1,400 kilometers in 2017 by Chinese researchers, have upheld entanglement's predictions without signaling faster-than-light communication, preserving causality while rejecting local realism.^[129] In 2022, the Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to John Clauser, Alain Aspect, and Anton Zeilinger for their foundational work establishing entanglement as a robust feature of nature. Recent theoretical advances have uncovered universal laws structuring entanglement across all spatial dimensions. In August 2025, researchers at RIKEN's iTHEMS and Kavli IPMU applied thermal effective field theory to random quantum systems, revealing that entanglement entropy and measures between subsystems follow dimension-independent scaling laws, providing new constraints on quantum many-body states.^[132] These universals manifest as fixed ratios in entanglement contributions from different subsystems, akin to critical exponents in phase transitions, suggesting emergent patterns rooted in quantum statistics rather than specific Hamiltonians.^[133] Such findings extend to higher dimensions, where entanglement obeys analogous rules, bolstering the view of quantum mechanics as encoding invariant principles applicable universe-wide.^[134] Philosophically, these universals support a realist interpretation wherein entanglement reflects objective, non-separable relations in physical reality, countering instrumentalist dismissals of quantum formalism as mere calculation tool.^[131] While interpretations like Many-Worlds or Bohmian mechanics differ on underlying ontology, the empirical universality of entanglement—observed in diverse systems from electrons to superconducting circuits—affirms quantum laws as fundamental constraints transcending local causality.^[130] This non-locality does not imply acausal influences but underscores a deeper interconnected fabric, with implications for quantum information protocols like error-corrected computing, where universal entanglement scaling enhances scalability.^[133] Ongoing experiments, including those probing entanglement in gravitational contexts via ER=EPR conjectures, continue to test these principles' breadth.^[129]

Applications in Complex Systems

In complex systems, universality refers to the phenomenon where diverse systems exhibit identical macroscopic behaviors and scaling relations near critical points or under self-organizing conditions, despite differing microscopic interactions; this allows classification into universality classes described by shared critical exponents and power laws.^[135]^[136] Such principles, derived from renormalization group theory, simplify analysis by focusing on dimensionality, symmetry, and long-range correlations rather than system-specific details.^[137] For example, phase transitions in ferromagnets, fluid vaporization, and certain lattice models fall into the same universality class, with critical exponents like the magnetization scaling β ≈ 1/8 in three dimensions, enabling predictive models for material properties under extreme conditions.^[135] Biological and ecological applications leverage these universals for scaling laws governing energy flows and population dynamics. Kleiber's law, positing basal metabolic rate scales as body mass to the power of 3/4, holds across taxa from unicellular organisms to mammals, reflecting fractal-like vascular networks and resource distribution efficiencies; this informs ecosystem productivity estimates and biodiversity conservation by predicting energy budgets in food webs.^[138]^[139] In ecology, power-law distributions describe species abundance (e.g., lognormal or Zipf-like tails) and fluctuation spectra in populations, aiding forecasts of invasion risks and resilience to perturbations, as seen in analyses of temporal variability where exponent values around -2 indicate self-organized criticality.^[140] Socio-economic and network systems apply universality through power-law tails in distributions and scale-invariant structures, enhancing risk modeling and infrastructure design. In economics, firm sizes, wealth, and city populations follow Pareto-like power laws with exponents ≈1-2, capturing fat-tailed events like market crashes and enabling stress tests for financial stability.^[141] Scale-free networks, prevalent in the internet (degree exponent γ ≈2.5), social connections, and metabolic pathways, exhibit robustness to random failures but vulnerability to targeted attacks on hubs, informing epidemic containment strategies (e.g., via percolation thresholds) and supply chain optimizations.^[142] Recent extensions to urban systems confirm Kleiber-like scaling for carbon emissions and infrastructure, where metabolic rates per capita decrease with city size, guiding sustainable planning.^[143]

Implications for Policy and Ethics

Universal laws in moral philosophy, particularly Kant's formula of universal law, require that ethical maxims be willed as applicable to all rational beings without logical contradiction, providing a test for deontological morality independent of empirical outcomes.^[14] This formulation, outlined in Immanuel Kant's Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (1785), implies that policies endorsing deception or self-serving exceptions fail ethical scrutiny if they cannot be universalized, influencing debates on truthfulness in governance and contractual obligations.^[144] In practice, this has ramifications for ethical policy design, such as prohibiting discriminatory laws that treat individuals as means rather than ends, as these violate the universality requirement.^[145] Natural law theory extends these implications to public policy by asserting that valid laws must align with objective principles derived from human nature, such as the pursuit of the common good through protection of life, liberty, and rational association.^[146] Proponents argue this justifies limited government intervention, as policies infringing on inherent rights—evident in historical documents like the U.S. Declaration of Independence (1776), which references "Laws of Nature"—undermine social order and individual flourishing.^[147] Empirical support for universal moral foundations, including care, fairness, and loyalty, drawn from cross-cultural psychological studies, bolsters claims against pure cultural relativism, suggesting policies ignoring these invite instability, as seen in failed multicultural experiments without shared ethical anchors.^[148]^[149] In ethics, universal laws challenge constructivist views by grounding obligations in causal realities of human teleology, where deviations from natural ends—like procreation in reproductive policies—yield measurable harms, such as demographic declines in low-fertility societies (e.g., Japan's fertility rate of 1.26 in 2023).^[150] Policy-wise, this informs bioethics, advocating restrictions on practices contradicting universal human goods, as critiqued in natural law analyses of assisted suicide laws in jurisdictions like Canada (legalized 2016), where expansions correlated with a 35% increase in cases by 2021, raising concerns over slippery slopes absent universal prohibitions.^[151] Conversely, relativist influences in academia, often amplifying subjective identities over empirical norms, have led to policies like expansive affirmative action, which natural law critiques as preferential treatment violating equality under universal reason.^[50] These tensions highlight the need for policies rooted in verifiable human universals to sustain ethical coherence and societal resilience.

References

[1]
Laws of Nature - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Apr 29, 2003 · According to Lewis (1973, 73), the laws of nature belong to all the true deductive systems with a best combination of simplicity and strength.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[2]
[PDF] 2 THE UNIVERSAL LAWS OF PHYSICS
The universal laws of physics include the force laws of physics and the two phenomenological laws of thermodynamics: conservation of energy and increase of ...
[3]
Evidence for large-scale uniformity of physical laws
Consequently, empirical tests for global variations of terrestrial physical laws are of particular significance. The comparison of physical constants at ...
[4]
[PDF] Aristotle on Natural Law - NDLScholarship
' Also, at times it might be safer to approach the whole problem of natural law in terms of whether a certain conduct accords with natural justice. However ...
[5]
Treatise on the Laws - Online Library of Liberty
Granting the justice of these remarks, we cannot help lamenting that the science of jurisprudence or universal law, properly so called, should be so little ...
[6]
Justice in the Nicomachean Ethics
Natural justice on the other hand is justice no matter what community one enters into, even if that community does not recognize that fact. 4.17 Aristotle ...
[7]
Aristotle and Natural Law - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews
Jun 2, 2012 · The middle layer includes the principles of natural justice, principles that follow deductively from the supreme principle of equity (Burns does ...
[8]
What is the difference between universal and particular in philosophy?
Apr 18, 2020 · A particular is an individual object. A universal is a property shared by two or more particulars. This distinction leaves a number of ...
[9]
The Nature of Law - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
May 27, 2001 · Lawyers are typically interested in the question: What is the law on a particular issue? This is always a local question and answers to it ...
[10]
[PDF] Natural Law and Positive Law - NDLScholarship
NATURAL LAW AND POSITIVE LAW*. N American jurisprudence, natural law is both a founda- tion and a stumbling block. It is a foundation, because it.
[11]
Natural Law in Ethics - Investopedia
Put simply, natural laws are inherent in us as human beings, while positive laws are created by people in the context of society. Positive law may or may not ...What Is Natural Law? · Key Principles · Natural vs. Positive Law
[12]
Differences between Natural Law and Positive Law - UOLLB
Jul 5, 2024 · While natural law emphasises the connection between law and morality, positive law emphasises the authority of human institutions and formal sources of law.Trusted By Law Students And... · Uollb Sqe Turbocharge · Join Students And Legal...
[13]
Immanuel Kant - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Kant argued that the moral law is a truth of reason, and hence that all rational creatures are bound by the same moral law.Metaphysics and Epistemology · Moral Theory · Political Theory and Theory of...
[14]
Kant's Moral Philosophy
Feb 23, 2004 · Only a universal law could be the content of a requirement that has the reason-giving force of morality. This brings Kant to a preliminary ...
[15]
Philosophy of law | Definition, Examples, History, & Facts - Britannica
A law (e.g., a statute) is by nature universal in form: it is a standard of conduct that applies generally, in respect of both the classes of persons and the ...
[16]
'The Laws of Nature' | Issue 144 - Philosophy Now
It is, after all, in relation to the fulfilment of our intentions that we experience universal laws as both local constraints and enablers. Thus understood, ...
[17]
Laws of Nature: Necessary and Contingent - Oxford Academic
Nov 30, 2021 · Some philosophers think that laws of nature are contingent, others think that laws are metaphysically necessary.<|control11|><|separator|>
[18]
The Natural Law Tradition in Ethics
Sep 23, 2002 · The precepts of the natural law are binding by nature: no beings could share our human nature yet fail to be bound by the precepts of the ...
[19]
The Nature of Law - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Apr 29, 2025 · A society may follow all kinds of norms that prescribe or prohibit forms of behavior, such as the norms of etiquette, morality, or tradition.
[20]
None
### Summary of Natural Law in Ancient Greece
[21]
Aristotle's Justice and Rule of Law: Proportional Equality and Fairness
Feb 4, 2024 · Universal lawfulness refers to the idea that justice encompasses all virtues and is synonymous with lawful behavior. For Aristotle, the law ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[22]
The History and Development of Legal Philosophy (Part One) - Verdict
Feb 21, 2022 · To Aristotle the law is universal, it is general and a standard of conduct that can be applied anywhere. Aristotle maintained that, should ...
[23]
[PDF] The Stoic Conception of Law | Katja Maria Vogt
The Stoics identify the law with the active principle, which is corporeal, pervades the universe, individuates each part of the world, and causes all its ...
[24]
Laws and times (De legibus et temporibus) (Book V)
The Etymologies of Isidore of Seville - June 2006. ... Joshua Ralston; Journal: Law and the Rule of God: A Christian Engagement with Shari'a.
[25]
St. Isidore of Seville: A Natural Law Encyclopedist - Lex Christianorum
May 15, 2010 · Isidore's definition of the law of nations, or ius gentium, also departed from the traditional definition found, say, in the Institutes of ...
[26]
Gratian and the Natural Law: Concordance and Discordance in the ...
May 16, 2010 · Natural law is what is contained in the Law and Gospel. By it, each person is commanded to do to others what he wants done to himself and ...
[27]
Tracing the Origin of Natural Law & Equal Rights in Western Thought
Nov 1, 2020 · Gratian called this idea “natural law”, summarized by the statement, “all souls are equal in the sight of God”.
[28]
Gratian and His Book: How a Medieval Teacher Changed European ...
May 7, 2021 · What Gratian was doing with natural law, was to take a concept that existed in Roman law and in ancient philosophy and give it a new spin, by ...
[29]
Thomas Aquinas on Law
The natural law is promulgated by God: "God has instilled it into human minds so as to be known by them naturally." Divine and human laws can be promulgated by ...
[30]
St. Thomas Aquinas, Natural Law, and the Common Good
The master principle of natural law, wrote Aquinas, was that “good is to be done and pursued and evil avoided.” Aquinas stated that reason reveals particular ...
[31]
Thomas Aquinas - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Dec 7, 2022 · The theory of natural law gives us Aquinas's moral theory: it ... Angier, Tom, 2021, Natural Law Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[32]
Thomas Aquinas: Moral Philosophy
Knowledge and Faith in Thomas Aquinas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Liska, Anthony. 1996. Aquinas' Theory of Natural Law: An Analytic Reconstruction.
[33]
Medieval Theories of Natural Law
Against these views Suarez insists, with Thomas Aquinas, that natural law is commanded by God's reasonable will. ... Primary sources: Alexander of Hales ...
[34]
Locke's Political Philosophy
Nov 9, 2005 · In the Two Treatises, Locke frequently states that the fundamental law of nature is that as much as possible mankind is to be preserved. Simmons ...Natural Law and Natural Rights · State of Nature · Property · Locke and Punishment
[35]
Locke's Ethics | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Because all human beings possess, by nature, the faculty of reason, all human beings, at least in principle, can discover the natural law. Locke offers five ...Introduction · The Good · The Law of Nature · Power, Freedom, and...
[36]
[PDF] The Basis of the Natural Law in Locke's Philosophy
Thus, in the early essays Locke described the law of nature "as being the decree of the divine will discernible by the light of nature and indicating what is ...
[37]
John Locke, Second Treatise on Government (1689) - House Divided
The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one: and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind, who will but consult it ...Missing: universal | Show results with:universal
[38]
Complete Works, vol. 1 The Spirit of Laws | Online Library of Liberty
The Spirit of Laws is Montesquieu's best known work in which he reflects on the influence of climate on society, the separation of political powers.Missing: universal | Show results with:universal
[39]
The Rule of Law in Montesquieu (Chapter 7)
For him, the rule of law means the rule of legitimate laws, or laws that answer to natural law and the standard of natural equity. Still, these universal norms ...
[40]
[PDF] The Spirit of Laws
The following work may with the strictest justice be said to have done honour to human nature as well as to the great abilities of the author.
[41]
Voltaire argued that religious intolerance was against the law of ...
Voltaire argued that religious intolerance was against the law of nature and was worse than the “right of the tiger” (1763). Found in: Toleration and Other ...Missing: Enlightenment | Show results with:Enlightenment
[42]
Natural law - Enlightenment, Modernity, Philosophy | Britannica
Sep 27, 2025 · A law of nature (lex naturalis) as “a precept or general rule found out by reason, by which a man is forbidden to do that which is destructive of his life.”
[43]
Enlightenment - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Aug 20, 2010 · The law of nature “teaches all mankind … that, being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or ...
[44]
[PDF] Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals - Early Modern Texts
In arriving at moral judgments one does better ·to go by just one of the three formulations, specifically· to follow the strict method and base one's thinking ...
[45]
The Critique of Practical Reason, by Immanuel Kant
If now it is found that this rule is practically right, then it is a law, because it is a categorical imperative. Thus, practical laws refer to the will ...
[46]
(PDF) Aristotle and natural law - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · However, Aristotle's natural law theory is unconventional in certain respects. ... universal principles which have 'everywhere the same. force'.
[47]
Natural Justice and Natural Law (Chapter 6) - Aristotle and Law
Nov 28, 2019 · Aristotle's analogy between natural justice and right-handedness assumes as a premise that the right hand is by nature stronger or superior ( ...<|separator|>
[48]
Grotius, Hugo | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Hugo Grotius was a Dutch humanist and jurist whose philosophy of natural law had a major impact on the development of seventeenth century political thought.
[49]
The Law of Nature in the Thought of Hugo Grotius - jstor
Thus far there seems to be every justification for calling Grotius a rationalist and a secularist on natural law, especially when one's attention is ...
[50]
Natural Law Theories - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Feb 5, 2007 · Natural law theory accepts that law can be considered and spoken of both as a sheer social fact of power and practice, and as a set of reasons ...Can general theories of law be... · Other elements of natural law...
[51]
[PDF] The Incoherence of Moral Relativism - CUNY Academic Works
Some of the typical criticisms of moral relativism are the following: moral relativism is erroneously committed to the principle of tolerance, which is a ...
[52]
[PDF] The moral universalism-relativism debate
Moral relativism, in contrast, means that there are moral principles that do not apply to everyone or everywhere. There are two lines of argument in favor of ...
[53]
[PDF] Moral Relativism or Moral Universalism? - DiVA portal
Jan 17, 2020 · According to James Rachels (2002:19), moral relativism is the view that 'there is no measure of right and wrong other than the standards of one ...
[54]
[PDF] A Critical Review of Moral Relativism, Universalism, and the ... - HAL
Dec 7, 2022 · This means that there are no universal moral standards to judge the behaviors of people as to whether they are good or bad, right, or wrong.
[55]
[PDF] It DOES Matter What You Believe: A Critique of Moral Relativism
Relativists do not want anyone's morality imposed on them, yet they push for legislation to enforce personal autonomy and tolerance. The assumption here is that ...
[56]
David Hume: Causation - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Hume challenges us to consider what experience allows us to know about cause and effect. Hume shows that experience does not tell us much.
[57]
Empiricism | History of Modern Philosophy Class Notes - Fiveable
Hume questions the justification for inferring universal laws from particular instances, arguing that inductive reasoning cannot be logically justified · He ...
[58]
Hume and the 'metaphysical argument a priori' - Oxford Academic
Nov 17, 2022 · Focuses on the a priori causal argument for God's existence put forward by Demea in Part IX of the Dialogues concerning Natural Religion.11 Hume And The... · Demea's Exposition · Cleanthes' Objections<|separator|>
[59]
July 5, 1687: Newton's Principia is published - Astronomy Magazine
Jul 5, 2025 · Isaac Newton's monumental book, Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, was published July 5, 1687. Newton had developed the ...
[60]
Newton's Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica
Dec 20, 2007 · The third edition appeared in 1726, thirty nine years after the first. Most changes in it involved either refinements or new data. The most ...
[61]
Newton's Views on Space, Time, and Motion
Aug 12, 2004 · Newton defined the true motion of a body to be its motion through absolute space. Those who, before or shortly after Newton, rejected the ...Missing: universality | Show results with:universality
[62]
13.1 Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation - OpenStax
Sep 19, 2016 · The constant G is called the universal gravitational constant and Cavendish determined it to be G = 6.67 × 10 −11 N · m 2 /kg 2 G = 6.67 × 10 − ...
[63]
Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation - The Physics Classroom
Newton's revolutionary idea was that gravity is universal - ALL objects attract in proportion to the product of their masses. Gravity is universal. Of course, ...
[64]
[PDF] Kepler's Laws, perturbations and orbital resonances
Sep 26, 2024 · All these empirical facts can be derived from Newton's laws. That is, Newton's theories are validated by Tycho's observations, as Newton ...<|separator|>
[65]
Isaac Newton's Scientific Method: Turning Data into Evidence about ...
Sep 8, 2013 · It also follows in Book I that for circular orbits Kepler's period law is satisfied if and only if the centripetal force is an inverse square ...
[66]
Satellites and Kepler's Laws: An Argument for Simplicity
Kepler's laws describe planetary motion, but Newton's gravitational theory explains them. This marked a shift in science—from description to causation through ...
[67]
Special relativity explained — Einstein's mind-bending theory of ...
no gravity involved. General relativity extends these ideas to ...
[68]
[PDF] Comparing Newtonian Mechanics, Special Relativity and General ...
Jun 7, 2023 · Special relativity also offers a relativistic relationship between mass, momentum, and energy.
[69]
7.2 Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation and Einstein's Theory of ...
Einstein's theory of general relativity explained some interesting properties of gravity not covered by Newton's theory. Einstein based his theory on the ...
[70]
[PDF] Relativity: The Special and General Theory - Marxists Internet Archive
The present book is intended, as far as possible, to give an exact insight into the theory of. Relativity to those readers who, from a general scientific ...
[71]
Bohr, Heisenberg, Schrödinger, and the Principles of Quantum ...
The conceptual core of this chapter is Heisenberg's discovery of quantum mechanics, considered as arising from certain fundamental principles of quantum ...
[72]
The Uncertainty Principle (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Oct 8, 2001 · The uncertainty principle (for position and momentum) states that one cannot assign exact simultaneous values to the position and momentum of a physical system.
[73]
On conservation laws in quantum mechanics - PMC - PubMed Central
Conservation laws, such as those for energy, momentum, and angular momentum, are among the most fundamental laws of nature. As such, they have been intensively ...
[74]
[PDF] Conservation Laws and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
Oct 2, 2023 · Conservation laws are some of the most important laws of physics. ... from classical mechanics, to relativistic and quantum physics. There ...
[75]
Empirical evidence: A definition | Live Science
Feb 8, 2022 · Empirical laws are scientific laws that can be proven or disproved using observations or experiments, according to the Merriam-Webster ...
[76]
The Problem of Induction - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Mar 21, 2018 · Thus, Popper claimed that science was not based on the extrapolative inferences considered by Hume. The consequence then is that it is not ...
[77]
Karl Popper - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Nov 13, 1997 · These factors combined to make Popper take falsifiability as his criterion for demarcating science from non-science: if a theory is ...Backdrop to Popper's Thought · Basic Statements, Falsifiability... · Critical Evaluation
[78]
Karl Popper: Philosophy of Science
In particular, Popper argues that a scientific theory can be legitimately saved from falsification by the introduction of an auxiliary hypothesis that allows ...Background · Falsification and the Criterion... · Criticisms of Falsificationism
[79]
Perihelion precession of Mercury
The perihelion precession rate of the planet Mercury is found to be $5.32$ arc seconds per year. However, the observed precession rate is $5.75$ arc seconds ...Missing: falsification | Show results with:falsification
[80]
The significance of the 1919 total solar eclipse | Physics Today
Sep 1, 2019 · Kennefick delves into details of the 1919 solar eclipse expeditions, the people involved, the data analyses that followed, and much more.
[81]
General Relativity and the 1919 Solar Eclipse
The sky began to clear just before totality at 14:13 and was briefly completely clear. Stars appeared on 7 of the plates and the remainder showed good images of ...
[82]
https://www.symmetrymagazine.org/article/falsifiability-and-physics
[83]
Introduction to Natural Law Jurisprudence (part 2) - The Josias
Nov 8, 2019 · Aquinas, relying on Aristotle, argues that classical jurisprudence understood the principles of natural law to be general rules not made by ...
[84]
Aquinas and Natural Law Jurisprudence (Chapter 2)
The identification of these substantive first principles is Aquinas's greatest single contribution to the renovation and development of classical natural law ...
[85]
[PDF] Natural Law and Human Rights in English Law: From Bracton to ...
The first deals with the place of natural law in the works of English common lawyers between Bracton and Blackstone-roughly speaking, from the mid-thirteenth ...
[86]
[PDF] Blackstone, Quasi-Jurisprudent - SMU Scholar
Burlamaqui is much more the con- ventional natural law jurisprudent than Blackstone, whose views may be said to be a pastiche of natural law and his own ...
[87]
https://iracmethod.com/post/natural-law
[88]
[PDF] The Role of Christian Natural Law in American Jurisprudence Past ...
Jan 1, 2006 · Thinkers from Plato and Aristotle to Aquinas and Locke have elucidated different principles of what is loosely cal1ed the natural law position.
[89]
What Happened to Natural Law in American Jurisprudence?
Dec 13, 2021 · A review of the decline of natural law: how American lawyers once used natural law and why they stopped, by Stuart Banner (Oxford University Press)
[90]
The U.S. Supreme Court and Natural Law
In the broadest sense, “natural-law jurisprudence” involves a judge's resort to a “higher law,” one anterior and superior to the written constitution. The ...
[91]
[PDF] Natural Law, the Constitution, and the Theory and Practice of ...
INTRODUCTION. The concept of "natural law" is central to the western tradition of thought about morality, politics, and law. Although the western.
[92]
[PDF] FINNIS-CALVIN NATURAL LAW: HOW RELIGION INFORMS THE ...
Finnis's seminal work in 1980 synthesized Aquinas's original theory with modern legal jurisprudence, thrusting the idea of natural law back into the ...<|separator|>
[93]
[PDF] Legal positivism and natural law theory revisited
Nov 10, 2017 · Contemporary legal philosophy is predominantly anti-naturalistic. his is true of natu- ral law theory, but also, more surprisingly, of legal ...
[94]
[PDF] Legal Positivism and the Natural Law: The Controversy Between ...
Professor Hart defends legal positivism and Professor Fuller sets out his view of the natural law. Perhaps it would be more accurate.
[95]
'We are living through a natural law moment in constitutional theory ...
Apr 16, 2024 · American constitutional law is having a “natural law moment,” declared Joel Alicea '13, a professor at The Catholic University of America ...
[96]
[PDF] NATURAL LAW AND JUSTICE THOMAS - Regent University
An appeal to the natural law will gain no lawyer his case in court-unless he is a spellbinder arguing before a jury uncorrupted by legal positivism and higher ...
[97]
[PDF] What is Universal Jurisdiction? - OHCHR Seoul
Universal jurisdiction. Universal jurisdiction is a specific form of extraterritorial jurisdiction. It is based on the idea that some crimes.
[98]
Universal Jurisdiction - Oxford Public International Law
Universal jurisdiction can be defined as the competence of a State to prosecute and punish the alleged perpetrators of certain offences.
[99]
Basic Facts on Universal Jurisdiction | Human Rights Watch
Oct 19, 2009 · Universal jurisdiction is the ability of the domestic judicial systems of a state to investigate and prosecute certain crimes.
[100]
Universal Jurisdiction - TRIAL International
Universal jurisdiction has become an important principle of international law since World War II. It has been recognized in the Geneva Conventions (1949) ...
[101]
[PDF] Universal jurisdiction over war crimes - ICRC
The basis for the assertion of universal jurisdiction over war crimes is found in both treaty law and in customary international law. Treaty law. The treaty ...
[102]
[PDF] Chapter Nine Torture: The legal basis for universal jurisdiction
6. Both treaties lay out detailed obligations for states parties to prevent and punish torture and to exercise jurisdiction over suspects in their territory ...
[103]
[PDF] 2005_kra_03_en.pdf - Institut de Droit International
Universal jurisdiction is primarily based on customary international law. It can also be established under a multilateral treaty in the relations between ...
[104]
General Pinochet arrest: 20 years on, here's how it changed global ...
Oct 15, 2018 · Two decades ago, Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet was arrested in London, putting human rights abuses in the limelight.
[105]
Criminal Justice is Local: Why States Disregard Universal ...
On February 24, 2021, a German court convicted a former Syrian official, Eyad al-Gharib, for perpetrating torture and other abuses-described as "crimes against ...
[106]
[PDF] Advancing Global Accountability: The Role of Universal Jurisdiction ...
Political Challenges. The controversy that resonates most strongly among critics of universal jurisdiction is the abuse of political power. In this context ...
[107]
Universal Jurisdiction In International Law: Principles, Challenges ...
Jan 14, 2025 · Further, critics hold the view that States abuse the principle of universal jurisdiction for political reasons and apply it in a highly ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[108]
Without Clear Definition, Universal Jurisdiction Principle Risks ...
Oct 10, 2018 · Furthermore, universal jurisdiction is a principle of customary international law and should not be confused with the exercise of jurisdiction ...
[109]
Moral Realism - Russ Shafer-Landau - Oxford University Press
Free delivery 25-day returnsRuss Shafer-Landau argues that there are moral principles that are true independently of what anyone, anywhere, happens to think of them.
[110]
[PDF] Is morality real, and is it relative? - University of Notre Dame
Let's return to moral realism, the view that there are objective facts about what is right and wrong which are not relative to a culture or group. One reason ...
[111]
[PDF] The Conditions of Moral Realism
... moral realism is true. ... For a realist, either there are or there are not exactly three objects in the box in virtue of objective facts about their existence ...
[112]
Is constructivism an alternative to moral realism? (Chapter Five)
Meta-ethical constructivism is sometimes viewed as an anti-realist alternative to moral realism. It is thought to avoid some of the difficulties of realism.
[113]
https://www.pdcnet.org/scholarpdf/show?id=jpr_2003_0028Supplement_0099_0122
[114]
[PDF] Summary: Korsgaard's The Sources of Normativity
The result purports to be an objective and universal theory of meta-ethics. Korsgaard's goal is to show that we do have moral obligations irrespective of our.
[115]
Why Normativity Won't Come from What Is Constitutive of Action
Apr 1, 2006 · David Enoch; Agency, Shmagency: Why Normativity Won't Come from What Is Constitutive of Action. The Philosophical Review 1 April 2006; 115 ...
[116]
[PDF] Donald E. Brown's List of Human Universals - Joel Velasco
THIS LIST, COMPILED in 1989 and published in 1991, consists primarily of "surface" universals of behavior and overt language noted by ethnographers. It does ...
[117]
The Challenge of Cultural Relativism
Different cultures have different moral codes. Therefore, there is no objective "truth" in morality. Right and wrong are only matters of opinion, and opinions ...
[118]
Seven moral rules found all around the world | University of Oxford
Feb 11, 2019 · As predicted, these seven moral rules appear to be universal across cultures. Everyone everywhere shares a common moral code. All agree that ...
[119]
Moral Foundations Theory | moralfoundations.org
Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) was developed by a team of social and cultural psychologists, primarily Jonathan Haidt and Jesse Graham.Publications · Questionnaires · Other Materials · Videos and Press
[120]
Universality and Cultural Diversity in Moral Reasoning and Judgment
Dec 13, 2021 · This review discusses the current formulation of moral theories that attempt to explain cultural factors affecting moral judgment and reasoning.
[121]
Seven Moral Rules Found All Around the World
May 17, 2018 · Morality is always and everywhere a cooperative phenomenon. And, as predicted by the theory, these seven moral rules appear to be universal across cultures.
[122]
Hume's Moral Philosophy
Oct 29, 2004 · Hume maintains that the duty to obey one's government has an independent origin that parallels that of promissory obligation: both are invented ...Issues from Hume's... · Is and Ought · Honesty with Respect to Property<|separator|>
[123]
H.L.A. Hart's Minimum Content Theory of Natural Law - jstor
of nature involves a confusion of descriptive and prescriptive laws. Whereas descriptive laws reflect the regularities of nature, prescriptive laws require ...
[124]
Hume on Is and Ought | Issue 83 | Philosophy Now
Hume's idea seems to be that you cannot deduce moral conclusions, featuring moral words such as 'ought', from non-moral premises, that is premises from which ...
[125]
Causality, determinism, and physics - AIP Publishing
Nov 1, 2022 · This paper discusses how, over time, different physical theories have either reinforced or challenged these prejudices.
[126]
Was physics ever deterministic? The historical basis of determinism ...
Apr 1, 2021 · Determinism is generally regarded as one of the main characteristics of classical physics, that is, the physics of the eighteenth and nineteenth century.
[127]
Relativity versus quantum mechanics: the battle for the universe
Nov 4, 2015 · Relativity and quantum mechanics are fundamentally different theories that have different formulations. It is not just a matter of scientific terminology.
[128]
Unifying quantum mechanics with Einstein's general relativity
Dec 19, 2019 · To explain how both theories can be correct at the same time, physicists needed a way to unify both classical electrodynamics and quantum ...
[129]
Quantum entanglement's long journey from 'spooky' to law of nature
Jul 18, 2023 · Quantum theory predicts that particles, even those very far apart from each other, can be entangled with one another.
[130]
Philosophical Issues in Quantum Theory
Jul 25, 2016 · This article is an overview of the philosophical issues raised by quantum theory, intended as a pointer to the more in-depth treatments of other entries in the ...
[131]
[PDF] Quantum entanglement and a metaphysics of relations
Abstract. This paper argues for a metaphysics of relations based on a characterization of quantum entanglement in terms of non-separability, ...
[132]
Discovery of Universal Laws of Quantum Entanglement Across ...
Aug 7, 2025 · Unraveling the structure of quantum entanglement is a central challenge in both theoretical physics and quantum information science.
[133]
Researchers discover universal rules of quantum entanglement ...
Aug 6, 2025 · A team of theoretical researchers used thermal effective theory to demonstrate that quantum entanglement follows universal rules across all ...
[134]
Physicists Discover Universal Laws Governing Quantum ...
Aug 28, 2025 · Scientists uncovered universal laws of entanglement in any dimension. The results strengthen links between particle physics, quantum theory, and ...
[135]
1.4 Universality - New England Complex Systems Institute
Mar 10, 2016 · The study of universality enables us to identify classes of systems whose behaviors can be described the same way by a common mathematical model ...
[136]
A plunge into universality - Department of Physics | ETH Zurich
Jun 18, 2024 · Universality is so appealing to physicists because it simplifies the study of complex systems by implying that detailed knowledge of ...
[137]
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-48537-1
[138]
Kleiber's Law: How the Fire of Life ignited debate, fueled theory, and ...
According to Kleiber's Law, metabolism equals mass raised to the 3-quarter power. The so-called “mouse-to-cattle-curve” depicts the relationship between basal ...
[139]
On the thermodynamic origin of metabolic scaling | Scientific Reports
Jan 23, 2018 · The universality of Kleiber's law ultimately stems from the universality of cell's energy source. Consequently, the predicted values for f ...<|separator|>
[140]
Scaling and power-laws in ecological systems
May 1, 2005 · In this review we analyze scaling relationships related to energy acquisition and transformation and power-laws related to fluctuations in numbers.Why bother with scaling and... · Scaling in ecology · Some ecological power-laws...
[141]
[PDF] Power Laws in Economics and Finance - NYU Stern
May 1, 2025 · Abstract. A power law (PL) is the form taken by a large number of surprising empirical regularities in economics and finance. This review.
[142]
Scale-free networks are rare | Nature Communications
Mar 4, 2019 · However, the universality of scale-free networks remains controversial. Here, we organize different definitions of scale-free networks and ...
[143]
Cities obey the same laws of living systems - News - EPFL
Aug 21, 2025 · An EPFL study has found that urban areas follow the same universal rules observed in the natural world. From population size to carbon ...
[144]
Kant's Formula of Universal Law as a Test of Causality
Jul 1, 2023 · Kant's formula of universal law (FUL) is standardly understood as a test of the moral permissibility of an agent's maxim.
[145]
Kantian Deontology – Introduction to Philosophy: Ethics - Rebus Press
The underlying idea behind the first formulation of the categorical imperative is that moral rules are supposed to be universal laws. If we think of comparable ...
[146]
Natural Law, the Common Good, and Limited Government
Aug 10, 2022 · These principles have many implications for politics. Most fundamentally, they explain the underlying nature and purpose of political community.
[147]
Natural Law | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
The natural law is comprised of those precepts of the eternal law that govern the behavior of beings possessing reason and free will. The first precept of the ...
[148]
How Universal Is Our Morality? | Psychology Today
May 24, 2022 · Utilitarianism argues that the most important factor to consider when judging the morality of an action is the consequences of that action.
[149]
Are universal ethics necessary? And possible? A systematic theory ...
May 6, 2022 · The violation of these principles and commandments is subject to social rejection and punishment under equal rules and laws for everyone.
[150]
There Is No Escaping Natural Law - Ethics & Public Policy Center
May 23, 2022 · But the natural law is first and foremost a reality before it is theorized. There is a truth about human nature and the goods that perfect it, ...
[151]
[PDF] Natural Law, Homosexual Conduct, and the Public Policy Exception
This paper will explore the classic natural law theory of Saint. Thomas Aquinas and the reasons why that theory condemns homosex- ual conduct as being contrary ...